Você está na página 1de 4

5/10/2019 How the hard-man mask can affect a prisoner's sense of self | Aeon Ideas

How the hard-man mask can affect a


prisoner’s sense of self
Kirstine Szifris

On my first day teaching philosophy in a maximum-security prison, I stood at my


classroom door, nervously waiting for my participants to arrive. As I watched the flow
of men into the education department, I was immediately struck by the swagger on
display. ey marched down the corridor with over-developed muscles, projecting
authority and machismo, hollering to their friends and acquaintances, displaying a
front of the ‘hard man’ as they headed to their classrooms. However, when they
entered, their demeanours changed dramatically. eir swagger would disappear as
they took their seats, and looked at me with apprehension, uncertain of what was
about to happen. In those early days of teaching, I discovered that prison involves
survival through developing a front, or a mask to live behind. But, in reality, these men

https://aeon.co/ideas/how-the-hard-man-mask-can-affect-a-prisoners-sense-of-self?utm_source=Aeon+Newsletter&utm_campaign=d6714ec395-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_
5/10/2019 How the hard-man mask can affect a prisoner's sense of self | Aeon Ideas

had fragile egos and complex vulnerabilities. Prison is not a place where it pays to be
vulnerable.

No thinker has better encapsulated the complexities of self-presentation in a context


where there is almost no place to hide than Erving Goffman. In 1957, the Canadian-
American sociologist called such contexts ‘total institutions’; having done participant
observation in a psychiatric hospital by feigning insanity, he knew firsthand what he
was writing about, and the special pressures that come from forcible imprisonment.

In what became a classic text


<https://monoskop.org/images/1/19/Goffman_Erving_ e_Presentation_of_Self_in
_Everyday_Life.pdf> , e Presentation of the Self in Everyday Life (1956), Goffman
takes seriously William Shakespeare’s line that ‘All the world’s a stage,’ examining the
ways in which we manage our appearance for different audiences. He explores how
our identities shape, and are shaped by, the circumstances in which we find ourselves.
Goffman describes identity using the metaphors of a ‘front’ and a ‘backstage’ self,
which we now refer to as the ‘dramaturgical’ self. Goffman extends this metaphor by
discussing how we play out various roles for the benefit of others. ese roles shape
how we act, and how we think about ourselves.

For those of us attempting to understand prisons and the prisoner society, Goffman’s
metaphor is particularly powerful. is way of thinking about human interactions
characterises the ways in which men within the prison system act towards each other,
and helps to illustrate the long-term harm that can come from this. In my own
research
<https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/271849/Szifris-2018-
PhD.pdf?sequence=1> working with men in prison, Goffman’s dramaturgical self
provided the foundation for articulating a distinction between ‘survival’ and ‘growth’
in this context. Specifically, it provided a vocabulary to describe how the closed
institution of the prison, and the culture that develops there, affects the individual. I
was interested in exploring how prison culture affects the individual’s sense of self.
Goffman helped me understand the macho swagger on display in the corridor, and
the change in demeanour as the classroom door closed. What I found was that prison
encourages a hypermasculine ‘survival’ front that is not conducive to growth and
personal development. And, without growth and personal development, our
fundamental sense of self is challenged.

https://aeon.co/ideas/how-the-hard-man-mask-can-affect-a-prisoners-sense-of-self?utm_source=Aeon+Newsletter&utm_campaign=d6714ec395-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_
5/10/2019 How the hard-man mask can affect a prisoner's sense of self | Aeon Ideas

’m far from the first prison researcher to reach back to Goffman’s dramaturgical

I
metaphor of the self. For more than 50 years, prison scholars have used his theories
to describe <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1525/si.1991.14.4.415> the
conscious effort prisoners make to project a front in order to successfully navigate
prisoner society. Given prisoners’ preoccupation with personal safety and the need to
negotiate the complex and unwelcoming environment of the prison, thinking of
identity in this way is helpful. However, Goffman’s theory that the ‘backstage’ self
represents the individual’s ‘true’ self is, arguably, oversimplified. An individual has a
range of ‘selves’ that present in different circumstances, which are not necessarily
dissonant, nor are they necessarily a departure from the true self – a notion that
Goffman would have questioned. Rather, they reflect different aspects of a person’s
identity, with different versions of the self being allowed to come to the fore according
to what is appropriate in a given social setting.

But what really happens to a person’s identity when the ‘stage’ for his performance is
a prison and he must play the ‘role’ of prisoner? In prison, the ‘performance’ is one
that is necessary for survival – survival of the self physically and psychologically.
Prisons can be dangerous places, with a climate
<https://www.prc.crim.cam.ac.uk/publications/whitemoor-report> of distrust and
threatening overtones, underpinned by a divided atmosphere. For men in prison, the
survival ‘front’ typically involves developing a hypermasculine sense of self that shows
no fear, emotion or distress in the face of the prison community; a kind of Stoicism
that takes violence, bullying and deprivation in one’s stride, relying on no-one but
oneself to get through the prison day. e prisoner role, if not performed well, carries
great risk to the individual. e mask mustn’t be allowed to slip.

Importantly, Goffman discusses place and space; not only is there a front- and
backstage self, there are front- and backstage areas. Frontstage areas are the places
where the individual must ‘don the mask’ and ‘play the role’ assigned. Importantly,
Goffman describes the backstage areas as places where the performers can relax,
where they can conduct themselves more casually and engage in open conversation.
Backstage areas can provide opportunity for people to create bonds, and group status
can be emphasised or consolidated. ese are private places, where outsiders come
with caution, respectfully announcing their presence, and requesting a level of
permission before entering.

https://aeon.co/ideas/how-the-hard-man-mask-can-affect-a-prisoners-sense-of-self?utm_source=Aeon+Newsletter&utm_campaign=d6714ec395-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_
5/10/2019 How the hard-man mask can affect a prisoner's sense of self | Aeon Ideas

In prisons, there is no private place. Prisoners can’t relax, don’t know whom to trust,
they feel watched and monitored at every turn, even when they aren’t. And even
where the prisoner has the luxury of being alone in a cell, prison officers enter without
permission, listen to private phone calls, and note whom they socialise with.
Furthermore, the ever-present possibility of exploitation and intimidation within the
prisoner community reduces the possibility of friendship or trust.

So, what happens in such places? Prisoners employ strategies to blend into the
background or develop a persona (or ‘front’) as a means of achieving personal and
psychological survival. ese ‘fronts’ mean that true identities are suppressed,
prisoners can’t be seen to being having fun or making friends within the
environment, which stifles individuality or any form of self-expression. Goffman’s
account gives a useful way of understanding how imprisoning people in a total
institution can lead to the transformation of self, but in a way that is completely at
odds with the hoped-for outcome of imprisonment: the prisoner has to maintain a
‘hard man’ mask as a matter of survival, but then he actually becomes a hard man,
and leaves the prison psychologically damaged by the experience, likely to continue
playing the hard-man role after release. e fear, expressed by my research
participants, is that the cultivated ‘macho’ identity gradually becomes who they are,
no longer a front for survival, but an expression of the fundamental self. e mask
becomes the personality.

Kirstine Szifris is a research associate at the Policy Evaluation and Research Unit at
Manchester Metropolitan University. She is interested in the role of prison education in
personal development and desistance. She lives in Sheffield.

aeon.co01 May, 2019

https://aeon.co/ideas/how-the-hard-man-mask-can-affect-a-prisoners-sense-of-self?utm_source=Aeon+Newsletter&utm_campaign=d6714ec395-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_

Você também pode gostar