0 Votos favoráveis0 Votos desfavoráveis

0 visualizações8 páginasThe circulation of a railway vehicle on a railway track can be approached theoretically the second order differential equation of motion specialized for this system “vehicle-track”. The motion of a railway vehicle on a railway track is a forced oscillation with a forcing excitation induced by the rail running table (rail running surface) –which has the form of a “signal”–, expressed by a random, non-periodic function. Railway-track, is simulated –with the observer situated on the wheel– .

May 13, 2019

© © All Rights Reserved

PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd

The circulation of a railway vehicle on a railway track can be approached theoretically the second order differential equation of motion specialized for this system “vehicle-track”. The motion of a railway vehicle on a railway track is a forced oscillation with a forcing excitation induced by the rail running table (rail running surface) –which has the form of a “signal”–, expressed by a random, non-periodic function. Railway-track, is simulated –with the observer situated on the wheel– .

© All Rights Reserved

0 visualizações

The circulation of a railway vehicle on a railway track can be approached theoretically the second order differential equation of motion specialized for this system “vehicle-track”. The motion of a railway vehicle on a railway track is a forced oscillation with a forcing excitation induced by the rail running table (rail running surface) –which has the form of a “signal”–, expressed by a random, non-periodic function. Railway-track, is simulated –with the observer situated on the wheel– .

© All Rights Reserved

- Fundamental Frequency 2003 06
- LR Brochure Automobile Engineering
- bmw
- Vehicle System Dynamics: International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility
- Bernard Sklar Raylegh Fading Channels
- Lecture 3
- An Accurate Full Car Ride Model Using Model Reducing Techniques
- Prius
- art1
- pars-4x4-
- Scaffolding 2
- halliday_1995
- Ulsas Engineering Report
- DRZ400SM2 0705
- SP10Barbe-Wech Method Revisited
- stock price list dogeos
- Fourier transform_Notes_6b
- lexus-nx
- Active Suspension System
- WCE2009_pp1532-1537

Você está na página 1de 8

ISBN: 978-1-912532-09-4

Equation of Motion for the case of the Suspended-Masses

Konstantinos Sp. Giannakos

Civil Engineer PhD, F. ASCE, M. TRB AR050-060Com.

108 Neoreion str., Piraeus 18534, Greece

tel: +302104133258; mob: +306973304141

kongiann@otenet.gr; kyannak@gmail.com

http://giannakoskonstantinos.com/wp

the (concrete) sleeper/tie (Fig.1).

The circulation of a railway vehicle on a railway track can be

approached theoretically the second order differential equation of

motion specialized for this system “vehicle-track”. The motion of

a railway vehicle on a railway track is a forced oscillation with a

forcing excitation induced by the rail running table (rail running

surface) –which has the form of a “signal”–, expressed by a

random, non-periodic function. Railway-track, is simulated –with

the observer situated on the wheel– as an elastic means with springs

and dashpots. The railway vehicle has the Suspended-Masses (SM)

and the Non-Suspended Masses (NSM). The track defects/faults

are the random excitation for the rolling wheels of the vehicle. The

case of the Non-Suspended Masses has been analyzed in previous

scientific articles of the author. In the case of the Non-Suspended

Masses the forces resulting from the excitation, due to the track

defects of short wavelength, are large and have grate effect on the

rolling of the wheel. In the case of the Suspended-Masses of the

vehicles, the forces resulting from the excitation, due to the track

defects, when the wavelength of defects is short, are not large and

have small effect on the rolling of the wheel. The present paper

depicts that the longer the wavelength of defects is, the more

predominant the role of the Suspended-Masses is and they mainly Figure 1 (Upper-illustration) cross-section of Ballasted Track

influence the magnitude of the acting dynamic component of the as a multi-layered structure; (lower-illustration) characteristic

total Load. The differential equation is solved and been investigated Values of Static Stiffness Coefficients (spring-constants ρi) and

and these results are presented for the Suspended-Masses of the damping coefficients (ci) of each layer.

vehicle. A sensitivity is also performed and a comparison between

the theoretical results for the vertical accelerations (directly

proportional to the acting loads) due to the Suspended-Masses vs

the measured ones, in a track under operation. The magnitude of

the acting Loads is proportionally analogous to the annual

maintenance cost of a railway track according to the fourth rule of

the following Equation: m

p1 cos t − 1

=

2

p cos t −2

Where pi= average stress on ballast, m=3 or 4.

Keywords

Track, Vehicle, Suspended-Masses, Fourier Analysis, Power

Spectral Density, Spectrum of Defects.

1. GENERAL

The circulation of a railway-vehicle on a track-panel is a random

dynamic phenomenon and, depending on the different frequencies

of the loads it imposes, there is a corresponding response of the Figure 2 Model of a railway-vehicle running on one (of two) rail

track panel and vice-versa the track defects/faults are the random running table, of a track-panel: n is the ordinate of the defect

excitation for the rolling wheels of the vehicle. When a vehicle’s of the rail running table, y is the deflection of the rail.

axle passes from the location of a sleeper/support-point of the rail, The railway vehicles consist of (a) the car-body, (b) the primary

at a track with defects, the track-panel deflects, a vertical and the secondary suspension with the bogie between them and (c)

acceleration (second derivative of the deflection) is generated and the axles with the wheels. In general, the mass of the (c) case under

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17501........................................

DISP '19, Oxford, United Kingdom

ISBN: 978-1-912532-09-4

the primary suspension is the Non-Suspended Mass of the vehicle, ρsubstructure ranging (i) 20-60 kN/mm for pebbly subgrade, (ii) 80-

since all the rest are the suspended masses of the vehicle (Fig.2). 100 kN/mm in the case of well compacted subgrade, (iii) 86-171

kN/mm for NBS of the German railways and (iv) 250 kN/mm for

The masses of the railway vehicle located under the primary the case of a ballast-bed of small thickness laid on the concrete base

suspension (axles, wheels and a percentage of the electric motor of a tunnel or on a bridge’s concrete deck.

weight in the case of locomotives) are the Non-Suspended Masses

(NSM) of the Vehicle, that act directly on the railway track without ρpad is calculated through the trial-and-error method from the Load-

any damping at all. Furthermore, a section of the track mass Deflection curve of the pad of the fastening as provided by the

(mTRACK) also participates in the motion of the vehicle’s Non- producer.

Suspended Masses, which also highly aggravates the stressing on

the railway track (and on the vehicle too). The reaction due to the total dynamic component of the load is

given according to the probability of occurrence (99.7% in

The remaining vehicle masses are called Suspended Masses (SM) railways) from:

or Sprung Masses: the car-body, the secondary suspension, the

R = Adynamic 3 2 ( QNSM ) + 2 ( QSM ) (1e)

frame of the bogie, a part of the electric motor’s weight and the dynamic

primary suspension.

1

3

ρ dynamic

The case for the Non-Suspended Masses (NSM) has been presented A dynamic = 4 (1f)

in (Giannakos 2016a). The present paper presents the analysis for 2 2 EJ

the Suspended Masses (SM) of the vehicle: the car-body, the

secondary suspension, the frame of the bogie, a part of the electric ρtotal-(static)

total −dynamic = hTRACK = 2 2 4 E J (1g)

motor’s weight and the primary suspension.

2. ACTIONS/REACTIONS ON TRACK The influence of the track defects on the standard deviation

On each support point of the rail (sleeper/tie) a reaction/action is σ2(ΔQSM) of the SM will be investigated in the following

applied due to the distribution of the acting load to the adjacent paragraphs based on the second order differential equation of

sleepers (support-points of the rail) which results from the total motion.

elasticity/total static stiffness coefficient of the track. The sum of

the static, semi-static and dynamic components of the acting load 3. THE 2ND ORDER DIFFERENTIAL

is given from the Eqns (1), as derived from the differential equation EQUATION OF MOTION

of motion (cf. Giannakos 2016a; 2016b): A forced oscillation of the Non-Suspended and the Suspended

Qwheel 4 3 total Rstat 1 4 3 total (1a) Masses of the vehicle is caused by the irregularities of the rail

Rstat = = A = Astat =

2 2 EJ Qwheel 2 2 EJ running table (like an input random signal) -as a system’s

excitation- which creates forces influencing the wheel’s trajectory.

2 hCG Qa

Q = Qwheel Rsemi − stat = = Astat (1b) In the case of the very short wavelength track defects, the Non-

e2 Qwheel Suspended Masses’ response is predominant since the response of

( Qdynamic ) = 2 ( QNSM ) + 2 ( QSM ) (1c) the Suspended Masses is negligible (Giannakos 2016a: for the

modelling of the motion of the Non-Suspended Masses of a railway

Where: Qwheel=the static load of the wheel, E is the modulus of vehicle). On the contrary in the case of long wavelength defects, a

elasticity of the rail (steel), J is the moment of inertia of the rail, forced oscillation is caused where the Non-Suspended Masses’

Rstatic is the reaction/action on each support point of the rail response is negligible since the response of the Suspended Masses

(sleeper); Āstatic is the static reaction coefficient of the sleeper/ is predominant as it will be depicted below.

support point of the rail, α is the cant deficiency; hCG is the height

If the random excitation (track irregularities) is given, it is difficult

of the center of gravity of the railway vehicle from the rail head; e

to derive the response, unless the system is linear and invariable. In

is the track gauge, σ(ΔQNSM) and σ(ΔQSM) the standard deviation

this case the input signal can be defined by its spectral density and

of the dynamic components of the load due to the NSM and the SM,

from this we can calculate the spectral density of the response. The

ℓ the distance among sleepers.

theoretical results confirm and explain the experimental

The total static stiffness coefficient of the track ρtotal is a quasi- verifications performed in the former British railway network.

coefficient of elasticity (spring constant) of the track, given by:

The motion of a railway vehicle on the rail running table/surface or

1 1 1 1 1 1 1

= = + + + + (1d) the motion of a road vehicle on the road, the response of the

total i =1 i rail pad sleeper ballast substructure structures to earthquakes, etc., is a forced oscillation with a forcing

excitation (force), and damping expressed by a random, non-

where i are the layers that constitute the multilayered structure periodic function. The motion is described by equations and, in

“Track”, and ρtotal the total static stiffness coefficient of track, railway engineering, it is illustrated through the simplified form of

which must be calculated for each case, for rail, pad, sleeper, ballast a spring-mass-damper system as depicted in Fig.3-Upper, with a

and substructure. The values used in the analyses, have been railway vehicle running on a track with longitudinal defects and the

derived from measurements of the former German Railways/DB forces exerted on the vehicle’s “car-body”. In this simplified model,

(Alias 1984; Prud’homme 1969): with the wheel rolling over a surface with defects, but undeflected

itself, the acting forces are:

ρrail ranging 50.000-100.000 kN/mm.

a. the weight of the vehicle m∙g;

ρsleeper ranging 12.000-15.000 kN/mm for concrete sleepers.

b. the dynamic component of the Load P dyn;

ρballast 380-500 kN/mm for ballast older than 2 years old ("fouled").

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17501........................................

DISP '19, Oxford, United Kingdom

ISBN: 978-1-912532-09-4

c. the motive force P(t) which is equal to the difference between the This equation describes only the dynamic part of the load. The

tractive force of the locomotive minus the friction and it is positive phenomena of the wheel-rail contact and of the wheel hunting,

in the case of increase of speed (accelerated motion) or negative in particularly the equivalent conicity of the wheel and the forces of

the case of braking (decrease of speed) since it is equal to zero if pseudo-glide, are non-linear. In any case the use of the linear

the motive force is equal to friction; system’s approach is valid for speeds lower than the V critical≈500

km/h. The integration for the non-linear model (wheel-rail contact,

d.the reaction R1 provided by the system “vehicle-track” equal to a wheel-hunting and pseudoglide forces) is performed through the

spring constant or coefficient of elasticity ρi (given in kN/mm) Runge Kutta method (for bibliographic references see Giannakos

multiplied by the subsidence u(x) of the center of gravity of the 2016a). Consequently, for all operational speeds in High Speed

vehicle; Railway Lines up to now the linear model, which we use (in this

e. the reaction R2 provided by the system “vehicle-track” equal to paper also), is quite reliable, since the maximum operational speeds

a damping constant ci multi-plied by the first derivative of the are much less (300 or 300+ km/h). As it is referred above, the

subsidence u(x) of the center of gravity of the vehicle. defects of the rail running table are categorized in short wavelength

defects and long wavelength defects. The analysis and investigation

of the Eqn (2), for consecutive short wavelength defects (e.g. the

rail surfaces corrugation, of wavelength of some centimeters), was

investigated in (Giannakos 2016a). The long wavelength defects

are difficult to be measured, since sometimes, their wavelength

overpass the measurements’ base, which is determined by the

distance between the measuring vehicle’s axles (Fig.3-lower). In

this article the long wavelength defects are modelled, analyzed and

investigated; in this analysis conclusions should be drawn about the

Suspended Masses also, and the region of wavelengths of their

influence. We hypothecate a cosine form defect on the rail running

table of the form (Giannakos 2018):

V t

= a cos t = a cos 2

(3)

where: η the ordinate of the defect along the track (abscissa x, cf.

Fig.3-lower), V the speed of the vehicle, t the time and λ the

wavelength of the defect; so in the case of a defect of wavelength

λ:

2 2 2 Vt

T= t = t t = (4)

T

If we set a new variable z, as:

mSM + mNSM dy dz d 2 y d 2 z

y=z+ g = 2 = 2 (5), where:

hTRACK dt dt dt dt

mNSM + mSM

g (6)

hTRACK

represents the subsidence due to the static loads only, and z is the

random subsidence due to the dynamic loads. Eqn (2) becomes:

Figure 3. (Upper) a spring-mass-damper-system: (left) a vehicle

d2z dz d 2n

on a railway track with longitudinal defects and (right) the mNSM 2 + + hTRACK z = − mNSM 2 (7a)

forces exerted on the “car-body”; (lower) measurement of the dt dt dt

ordinate d of a longitudinal vertical defect at the position x on

a chord of 2a length: 2a is much smaller than the defect’s d 2 z d 2n dz

mNSM 2 + 2 + + hTRACK z = 0 (7b)

wavelength 2a1, consequently the measured value d is smaller dt dt dt

than the real defect’s depth (sagitta) d1. Since, in this case, we are examining the dynamic loads only

(derived from the actions of the SM and the NSM), in order to

The equation for the dynamic interaction between the vehicle’s axle

approach their effect, we could narrow the study of equation (7b),

and the track-panel becomes finally (Giannakos 2016a; 2017):

by changing again with a new variable u:

d2y dy d 2 d 2u d 2 n d 2 z

( mNSM + mTRACK ) 2

+ + hTRACK y = −mNSM 2 + ( mNSM + mSM ) g (2) u =n+z = +

dt dt dt

where: mNSM the Non-Suspended (Unsprung) Masses of the dt 2 dt 2 dt 2

vehicle, mTRACK the mass of the track that participates in the motion Equation (7b) becomes:

(theoretical results vs measurements, in Giannakos 2010a; 2012; d 2u dz

2016c), mSM the Suspended (Sprung) Masses of the vehicle, Γ mNSM + + hTRACK z = 0 (8a)

dt 2 dt

damping coefficient of the track (for its calculation see Giannakos

d 2u d (u − n )

2010a, 2012), hTRACK=ρdynamic the total dynamic stiffness mNSM + + hTRACK ( u − n ) = 0 (8b)

coefficient of the track, η the fault ordinate of the rail running table dt 2 dt

where, u is the trajectory of the wheel over the vertical fault (of

and y the total deflection/subsidence of the track. ordinate n) in the longitudinal profile of the rail. If we apply the

Fourier transform (see Annex) to Eqn (7a):

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17501........................................

DISP '19, Oxford, United Kingdom

ISBN: 978-1-912532-09-4

( i ) hTRACK The increase of the vertical load on the track due to the NSM,

( i ) Z ( ) + Z ( ) + Z ( ) = − ( i ) N ( )

2 2

mNSM mNSM according to the principle force = mass x acceleration, is given by:

Z ( ) 2

mNSM 4 d 2u d 2 (n + Z ) (13)

H ( ) = , H ( ) = Q = mNSM = mNSM

2

N ( )

(9)

(m NSM − hTRACK ) +

2

2 2 2 2 dt dt 2

If we apply the Fourier transform to Eqn. (13):

H(ω) is a complex transfer function, called frequency response ˆ Q = mNSM p 2 U ( ) = mNSM p 2 fˆZ + n ( ) (14a)

function, that makes it possible to pass from the fault n to the

ˆ Q = mNSM C ( ) N ( ) = mNSM p B ( ) N ( )

2

subsidence Z. If we apply the Fourier transform to equation (8a):

( i ) U ( ) + ( i ) Z ( ) + hTRACK ( i ) Z ( ) = 0

2 0

ˆ Q = mNSM 2 n2 B ( ) N ( ) (14b)

U ( ) h2 + 2 2

G ( ) = , G ( )

2

= TRACK2 (10) The excitation (rail irregularities), in reality, is random and neither

Z ( ) mNSM 4 periodic nor analytically defined, like the Eqn. (3). It can be defined

G(ω) is a complex transfer function, the frequency response by its autocorrelation function in space and its spectral density (Alias

function, that makes it possible to pass from Z to Z+n. 1984, p.58; Gent and Janin, p.700; Papoulis 1977). If f(x) is a signal

If we name U the Fourier transform of u, N the Fourier transform with determined total energy and F(ν) its Fourier transform, from

of n, p=2πiν=iω the variable of frequency and Δ̂Q the Fourier Parseval’s modulus theorem (Roddier 1971), the total energy is

transform of ΔQ and apply the Fourier transform at equation (8b): (Wylie and Barrett 1995):

2 2

+ +

d 2u

f ( x) F ( )

du dn dx = d

mNSM 2 + + hTRACK u = + hTRACK n (15a)

dt dt dt − −

where, F(ν)=Α(ν)∙eiφ(ν) and power spectral density:

(m NSM p 2 + p + hTRACK ) U = ( p + hTRACK ) N

S ( ) = F ( ) = A2 ( )

2

(16)

p + hTRACK

U ( ) = N ( )

mNSM p 2 + p + hTRACK (11a) Wylie and Barrett (1995) solve Eqn (15a) as:

2

+ +

1

B ( )

f ( t ) dt = F ( ) d

2

where: (15b)

2

2 2 + hTRACK

2 − −

B ( ) =

2

(11b)

(m

2 − h ) + 2 2

The square of the modulus F(ω) is called the energy spectrum of the

2

NSM signal because F2(ω)∙Δ(ω) represents the amount of energy in any

B(ω) is a complex transfer function, the frequency response ΔΩ segment of the frequency spectrum, and the integral of F2(ω)

function, that makes it possible to pass from the fault n to the over (-∞, +∞) gives the total energy of the signal. An input signal

u=n+Z. Practically it is verified also by the following equation: -like the running rail table- creates through the vehicle an output

2

hTRACK + 2 2

B ( ) = H ( ) G ( ) = signal: the wheel trajectory. The output spectral density and the

2 2 2

[11c]

( mNSM − hTRACK ) + 2 2

2

2 input spectral density of the excitation are related through equation

(Clough and Penzien 1993; Giannakos 2004):

passing from n to Z through H(ω) and afterwards from Z to n+Z

SOUTPUT ( ) = H ( i ) S INPUT ( )

2

through G(ω). This is a formula that characterizes the transfer (16a)

function between the wheel trajectory and the fault in the

longitudinal level and enables, thereafter, the calculation of the In order to relate the temporal spectrum with the spectrum in space

transfer function between the dynamic load and the track defect we use the following equation:

(fault). 2 Vt 2

t = = V = V (16b)

The transfer function B(ω) allows us to calculate the effect of a where λ is the wavelength of the defect; the circular frequency in

spectrum of short wavelength sinusoidal faults, like the undulatory space Ω is the wave number k of the equation of oscillation, and

wear. If we replace ω/ωn=ρ, where ωn= the circular eigenfrequency (Roddier 1971):

(or natural cyclic frequency) of the oscillation, and: 1

h 2 V S ( ) d = s ( ) d f ( ax ) = fˆ

a a

n2 = TRACK , = , 2 n = , = (11d) 0 0

n 1

mNSM mNSM

S ( ) = S = S ( ) (17a)

where ζ=damping coefficient. From Eqn (11b): V V

where is the symbol for the application of the Fourier transform

1 + 4 2 2 of f and f̂ the function after the application of the Fourier transform

B ( ) = Bn ( ) =

2 2

(11e)

(1 − 2 ) + 4 2 2

2

(see Annex). This is a property of the Fourier transform.

The transfer function C(ω) of the second derivative of (Z+n) in Eqn (17a) applied in the case that the power spectrum of the vertical

relation to time: [d2(Z+n)/dt2], that is the acceleration γ, will be equal defects along the track (for the NSM) in the space domain is S(Ω)

to ω∙Β(ω): then the power spectrum of the excitation of the wheel in the time

p 2 U ( ) = p 2 B ( ) p 2 N ( ) domain will result after a replacement of Ω by the ω/V.

U ( ) = p 2 B ( ) N ( ) (12a) 1

s ( ) = S (17b)

C ( )

V V

The Variance or mean square value σ (x) of the function is given

2

2

C ( ) = 2 B ( ) = n2

B ( ) by Papoulis (1991):

n2 1

+

C ( ) = n B ( ) = 2 B ( )

2 2 (12b) 2 ( x) = S ( ) d = x 2 (18)

2 −

DISP '19, Oxford, United Kingdom

ISBN: 978-1-912532-09-4

where σ(x) the standard deviation of the function. From Eqn (18) During the research program performed by the Greek State

we derive: Railways/OSE and the French State Railways/SNCF for the

1

+

1

+ cracking of sleepers/ties, the measured values for the line “Les

2 ( n) = Sn ( ) d , ( z ) =

2

S ( ) d , Aubrais – Vierzon” in France were used; the parameters values,

z

0 0

taken into account, are: B=0.36, A=2.1∙10-6 and S(Ω) is calculated

+

1 in m3 and σ(z)=1.57 mm. The eigenfrequency of the NSM of the

2 ( Q ) = S ( ) d

Q (19) vehicles is approximately 30–40 Hz and even for speeds of 300

0

where n is the random variable of the defect (input), z the subsidence km/h there are wavelengths less than 3 m (Prud’Homme 1970).

of the wheel (output) and ΔQ the dynamic component of the Load From equations (17) and (24):

1 1 A V 3 A V 2

Sn ( ) = S ( ) =

that is added to the Static Load of the wheel due to the NSM (output = 3 3 (25)

also). V V 3

n

From these equations and the analytic form of the spectrum of the 4. LONG WAVELENGTH DEFECTS

defects/faults, we can calculate the mean square value of the An analysis of the behavior of the NSM was presented in

dynamic component of the Load due to the NSM that is added to Giannakos (2016a; 2013), where diagrams are cited for the relation

the relevant dynamic component of the SM and the total dynamic between the wavelength of the defect and the subsidence z(x) and

component of the load is added to the Static Load of the wheel. the vertical acceleration z´´(x) of the NSM (consequently, the

From the power spectral density and the variance functions and their dynamic component of the load since force=mass x acceleration).

definitions: It is valid:

Q = mNSM 2 ( Q ) = mNSM 2 ( ) ( mNSM + mTRACK ) z ( t ) 2 1

2

cos ( 2 ) − ( n ) cos ( 2n )

1

(20a) = −

2

(26)

m n Tn g 2

2 1 − ( n ) steady − state

2 ( Q )

NSM

transient − part

2 ( ) = (20b)

mNSM The result of this equation (26) is a dimensionless number given as

S Q ( ) = S n ( ) B ( ) (20c)

2

a percentage [%] of the gravitational acceleration g; where:

and using the Eqns. (20) and (11-12b): n=ωn/ω1=Τ1/Τn, Tn=2π/ωn=the period of the free oscillation of the

+

wheel circulating on the rail, T1=2π/ω1=the necessary time for the

1 1

2 ( ) = 2 ( Q ) = B ( ) S n ( ) d wheel to run over a defect of wavelength λ, ω1=λ/V, V=speed, μ=

2

mNSM m 2

NSM 0 a percentage of the wavelength λ [0, 0.1, 0.2,...., 0.8, 0.9, 1], α=the

2 + amplitude of the defects’ depth [derived from track recording-cars].

mNSM

2 ( ) = 4 n4 B ( ) Sn ( ) d

2

In the case of the SM, the forces resulting from the excitation, due

mNSM 0

2

to the short wavelength track defects, are not large and have small

+ effect on the rolling of the wheel, as it has been presented in

1 1 + 4 2 2

2 ( ) =

4

n4 S n ( ) d (21) Giannakos 2016a.

0 (1 − ) 2 2

+ 4 2 2

From the above equations and the analytical form of the spectrum of

the longitudinal defects/faults of the track we could effectively

calculate the variance (mean square value) of the dynamic

component of the Loads on the track panel due to the NSM. All the

results of measurements on track in the French railways network

show that the spectrum of defects in the longitudinal level has the

form (SNCF 1981; Prud’Homme 1970):

A

Sn ( ) = (22),

( B + )

3

given by the following Eqn (23):

+

1

+

A A

+

1 A 1

2 ( z) = ( B + ) d = ( x) dx = − =

2 ( B + ) 0 Figure 4. Vertical acceleration of NSM vs defects’ wavelength.

3 3 2

0 0

+

A 1 A 1 1 A

=− 2 =− 0 − B 2 ( z ) = 2 B 2

2

2

(23) Fig.4 depicts that: for wavelengths inferring cyclic-frequencies

2 B + 2 B + 0 2

If we examine only the much more severe case, for the case of the higher than two times the eigenfrequency of the wheel, the vertical

NSM, of the defects of short wavelength, consequently large Ω acceleration of the NSM (consequently the correspondent dynamic

–like the undulatory wear– then we can omit the term B, and using component of the load) becomes almost negligible, compared to the

Eqn. (16b): results presented in Giannakos 2016a, for smaller values of ω n/ω1

A A A V 3 (0.5 till 2). In the cases of the long wavelength defects, which are

Sn ( ) = = = (24) of decisive importance in High-Speed Lines, the influence of the

3

1

3 3

V3 SM must be examined. If we examine the trajectory of one wheel,

The term B characterizes the defects with long wavelengths, for then the conclusion that will be derived can be used for more

which the maintenance of track is effective, and when we examine complicated cases of rolling of vehicles, motion of car-bodies etc.

this kind of defects term B should be taken into account. SM should Furthermore, we consider the simplified model of Fig.3-Upper with

be examined for long wavelength defects. one-floor mass-spring-damper system rolling on a rail’s running

surface.

DISP '19, Oxford, United Kingdom

ISBN: 978-1-912532-09-4

In order to calculate the power spectrum density of the excitation which converges for ω infinite and can be calculated in a computer.

sE(ω) from the excitation spectrum of the wheel sυ(ω), we apply the Consequently, the variance of the part of the dynamic component

Eqn. 16a with the Eqns. 17, Eqn. 22 (the parameter B is not omitted of the load due to the SM of the vehicle is given by (see Eqn. 20b):

for the case of SM) and Eqns. 10 (in order to pass from the defect

n to n+Z): 2

1 + 4 2

n2 AV 2

sE ( ) = B ( ) s ( ) = sE ( ) =

2

(27a)

( BV + )

2 3

2

2

2

1 − 2 + 4 2

n n

always the eigenfrequency of the NSM, sυ(ω) the spectrum of the

excitation of the wheel due to the track defects/faults, │B(ω)│the

modulus of the transfer function of the motion of the wheel and ζ

the damping coefficient of the track:

1

=

2 mNSM hTRACK

The sυ(ω) can be calculated from Eqn. 22. We have to take into

account Eqn. (17a) also:

1 1 A 1 A AV 2 (27b)

s ( ) = S () = = =

V V ( B + ) V

3

( BV + )

3 3

B+

V

The value of sυ(ω) derived from Eqn. 27b is used in Eqn. 27a.

From the Eqns. 11 and the Eqns. 12, 13 and 14, with the analysis Figure 5. Variance of the vertical acceleration in relation to the

cited above, we keep that, C(ω) is the transfer function of the second cyclic frequency of the defects of the rail running table (input).

derivative of (Z+n) in relation to time: [d2(Z+n)/dt2], that is the

acceleration γ and it is equal to ω∙B(ω). In the case of the SM,

│C(ω)│is the modulus of the transfer function of the accelerations QSM = mSM 2 ( QSM ) = mSM

2

2 ( ) (30)

of the car-body. Consequently, for the spectrum of the accelerations

It is obvious that the variance sγ(ω) and the standard deviation σ(γ)

of the car-body we will use Eqn. 21, 20, 15a substituting the

are functions of the inverse of the cyclic eigenfrequency ωn of the

parameters ζ and ωn of the track with the relevant parameters ζ′

track, which (Eqns. 17, 27a) is a function of the static (ρTRACK)

(damping coefficient) and ω′n (eigenfrequency) of the car-body. For

and/or dynamic (hTRACK) stiffness coefficients of the track.

the railway passenger-vehicles the eigenfrequencies ω′n of the car-

body are in the area of 1 Hz, since with the development of high-

speeds it could arrive 10 Hz. For the damping coefficient of the car- 5. MEASUREMENTS vs THEORY

body of the railway vehicles two characteristic values of ζ′ could be In real conditions, according to measurements of the French State

used with reliability: 0.15 and 0.20 (see relevantly Prud’Homme Railways (SNCF), the standard deviation σ(γ) of the vertical

1970; Alias 1984). From Eqn. 26a (Giannakos 2016b) we derive the accelerations (as a percentage of the gravitational acceleration g)

below Eqn (27c): due to the SM of the vehicles, in relation to the running speed is

AV 2 1 + 4 2 2 1 + 4 2 2 depicted in Fig.5, as presented by Alias (1984; 1987) and

s ( ) = C ( ) s E ( ) = 4

2

( BV + ) (1 − ) + 4 (1 − 2 ) + 4 2 2 Prud’Homme (1970). The measurements were performed in tracks

3 2 2 2 2 2

There are two (2) maximums in the curve of sγ(ω) as depicted in under operation/circulation in the French network (SNCF) and

Fig.6: The first maximum corresponds –in practice– to the obviously, the measured values of σ(γ) have been influenced by the

eigenfrequency of the car-body of the vehicle. It is approximately variation of the real values of ρsubgrade and ρtrack, as it existed along

(for ω=ω′n→β′=1): the measured tracks (consequently the values of ρ were not

2

constant), since the variability of the track stiffness e.g. due to

imperfect sleeper support and inhomogeneities of the track structure

1 + 4 2 n

s ( )max −1 = n4

AV 2 1

2 + 1 n is an inherent property. Fig.5 is the final product of the

(28a)

( BV + n )

3 2 2

4

2

measurements performed along the tracks of the French network,

1 − n + 4 2 n

n n

and it is given in the publications above, as of general validity. In

Fig.5, six curves are presented for eigenfrequencies of the car-body

the second maximum corresponds –in practice– to the

1 to 6 Hz. More analytically, the coupled system car-body-bogie-

eigenfrequency of the system “vehicle-track”, that is the

axles (a two-floor system) presents an eigen-frequency, that of the

eigenfrequency of the system of the NSM and the track, which is

axle on the track, approximately 30-40 Hz, in an attenuated form,

approximately 30-40 Hz (see relevantly Prud’Homme 1970). It is

corresponding to the track defects which will become much more

approximately (for ω=ωn→β=1):

important when the speed in consideration will provoke a frequency

1 2 very close to the coupled frequency of the car-body with the axles.

s ( )max −2 = AV 2 2 + 1 4 2 n (28b)

4 n

This coupled low frequency of the car-body-bogie-axles, which

The variance of the accelerations of the car-body of the railway mainly affects the car-body and it is specifically interesting to us in

vehicles is given by (Eqns. 18, 19): this analysis, is approximately 1 Hz for the passenger wagons and

1

( ) = s ( ) d

2

(29) higher for the freight wagons (see relevantly Alias 1987, p. 47). This

0 implies that the curve for 1Hz eigenfrequency represents the

DISP '19, Oxford, United Kingdom

ISBN: 978-1-912532-09-4

passenger wagons and the higher frequencies the freight wagons, In more details, NL, the average of the brutal signal on a basis of

running at lower speeds. According to the analysis cited above approximately 300 m for the vertical and horizontal defects of the

–about the coupled system car-body-bogie-axles– it is clear that, two rails, is the convolution:

+ x − x0

finally, in this coupled motion (of 1 Hz frequency) all the parts of 1

N L ( x0 ) = l ( x )e

300

dx (31)

the vehicle participate, so we can approach the equations using the 300 −

total Qwheel instead of mSM. Consequently, an approximation could

be used for the calculation of the variance of this part of the dynamic where ηl(x) is the value of the primary signal; in practice a weighted

component of the load (Giannakos 2004; SNCF 1981): average index which “crashes” less the isolated defects than one

classic average and simulates roughly the “memory” of the vehicle

(see relevantly Janin 1982). In Fig.7 the curves of the

eigenfrequencies of the vehicles as measured by the SNCF are

depicted and, also, the Eqn (30) for four values of NL: 0.25, 0.5, 1

and 1.5. The approximation is close enough, since the dynamic

component of the load due to the SM represents a small percentage

(less than 10% usually) but a further theoretical research and

sensitivity analysis should be performed in the future.

Figure 6. Standard deviation σ(γ) of the measured vertical It should be underlined that -after measurements on track (in situ)

acceleration due to the SM of railway vehicles in relation to the and in laboratory- Eisenmann and Mattner (1984) refer: the

running speed as published [Alias (1984; 1987) and theoretical deflection of the track is the same as the measured ones

Prud’Homme (1970)]. The figure has been designed by the on track. Professor Eisenmann (1980, 1988; cf. Giannakos 2011)

author of the present paper. assures that the theoretical calculations for the dimensioning of the

track correspond to the average of the measured values on track.

These ascertainments imply that the theoretical approach is reliable

and dependent on the probability of occurrence, which in railway

engineering is 99.7%.

The analysis in the present paper leads to the conclusion that Eqn.

(31) gives results very close to the real values measured in the

system “vehicle-track”. Anyway, in the future a closer approach

should be applied for each vehicle’s eigenfrequency-curve, since

these eigenfrequencies characterize different types of railway

vehicles: 1Hz for passenger vehicles and the rest 2-6Hz for freight

vehicles. Furthermore, the measurements of long wavelength

defects -which are predominantly influential for the High-Speed

Lines- are referred to wavelengths over than 33m, that is longer

than the lengths of the measurement-bases of the track-defects’

recording cars (Fig.3-lower) and the measurements’ results depict

smaller sagitta than the real ones of the defects.

6. CONCLUSIONS

For defects of very long wavelength, of period T>2 and frequencies

1 to 3 Hz, the forced oscillations -due to these defects- of the

Suspended Masses become predominant since, at that case, the

Figure 7. Standard deviation σ(γ) of the measured vertical eigen-frequency of the SM is approached by the forced vibration.

acceleration, due to the SM of the railway vehicles, in relation

to the running speed as published [Alias (1984; 1987) and The standard deviation of the dynamic component of the load due

Prud’Homme (1970)] and Eqn. (30) for NL=0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5. to the Suspended Masses as it is calculated by the theoretical

The figure has been designed by the author. calculations (Eqn 31) approaches sufficiently the loads which are

derived by the multiplication of the measured value of the vertical

acceleration by the value of the Suspended Masses of the vehicle.

V − 40

( QSM ) = N L Qwheel (31) The closest approach of the magnitude of the acting loads is very

1000

where: Qwheel is the static wheel load, V is the operational speed, useful, since the acting loads are proportionally analogous to the

and the coefficient NL is the mean standard deviation of the annual maintenance cost of a railway track according to the fourth

longitudinal level condition of the track, on a 300 m length rule of the following Equation (Giannakos 2011):

m

approximately, for both rails is the mean standard deviation of the p1 cos t − 1

= (32)

longitudinal level condition of the track, on a 300 m length p2 cos t − 2

fluctuating between 0.7–1.5 mm or more (see SNCF 1981; Janin where pi= average stress on ballast, m=3 or 4.

1982, p.335–336); for the Greek network NL is estimated to This implies that 10% increase of the stress on the ballast-bed of a

fluctuate –mainly– between 1 and 1,5 (Giannakos 2004). railway track will infer 1.14=1.51 times higher annual maintenance

cost. The accurate approach for the calculation of the contribution

of the SM in the total dynamic component of the load leads to more

DISP '19, Oxford, United Kingdom

ISBN: 978-1-912532-09-4

accurate estimation of their influence in the annual maintenance [17] Giannakos, K. 2018. Variance of the Vertical Accelerations

cost of the railway track (and of the vehicles: action-reaction). due to the Suspended Masses in the System ‘Railway

Vehicle-Track’: Simulation Technique, Differential

7. REFERENCES Equation, Fourier Transform and Approximants,

[1] Alias, J. 1984. La Voie Ferree, IIeme edition, Eyrolles, International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics,

Paris. vol.3, 10-16, http://www.iaras.org/iaras/journals/ijtam.

[2] Alias, J. 1987. Le Rail, Eyrolles, Paris. [18] Janin, G. 1982. La Maintenance de la Geometrie de la Voie,

[3] Clough, R.W., and Penzien, J. 1993. Dynamics of Structures, Revue Generale des Chemins de Fer (RGCF), Juin, 331–346.

second edition, McGraw-Hill Intl., Singapore. [19] Papoulis, A. 1977. Signal Analysis, McGraw-Hill Inc., USA.

[4] Eisenmann, J. 1980. Verjormungsverhalten der Schiene. [20] Papoulis, A. 1987. Reissued. The Fourier Integral and its

Auswirkungen auf die Oberbaubeanspruchung, Lagestabilitat Applications, McGraw-Hill Classic Textbook Reissue, 1962.

und Storungsfunktion, ZEV- Glasers Annalen, Berlin, 37–41. [21] Papoulis, A. 1991. Probability, Random Variables and

[5] Eisenmann, J. 1988. Schotteroberbau: Moglichkeiten und Stochastic Processes, third edition, McGraw-Hill Intl.,

Perspektiven fur die Moderne Bahn, Giesel-Verlag, Singapore.

Isernhagen, Germany. [22] Prud’homme, A. 1969. Reprint. Sollicitations Statiques et

Dynamiques de la Voie, SNCF/Direction des Installations

[6] Eisenmann, J., and Mattner, L. 1984. Auswirkung der Fixes, Paris, 1966.

Oberbaukonstruction auf die Schotter und [23] Prud’Homme, A. 1970. La Voie, Revue Generale des

Untergrundbeanspruchung, Eisenbahningenieur, Vol. 35, Chemins de Fer (RGCF), Janvier, extrait de RGCF.

No 3, 99–107. [24] Roddier, F. 1971. Distributions et Transformation de Fourier,

[7] Gent, I., and Janin, G. La Qualite de la Voie Ferree, SNCF’s Edisciense, Paris.

reprint. [25] SNCF. 1981. Mecanique de la voie, Paris.

[8] Giannakos, K. 2004. Actions on the Railway Track, Papazissis [26] Wylie, C.R., and Barrett, L.C. 1995. Advanced Engineering

publ., www.papazisi.gr, Athens. Mathematics, sixth edition, McGraw-Hill, Inc., USA.

[9] Giannakos, K. 2010a. Theoretical calculation of the track-

mass in the motion of unsprung masses in relation to track

dynamic stiffness and damping, IJPE-Special Rail Issue:

“High-Speed Railway Infrastructure: Recent Developments ANNEX – Fourier Transform

and Performance”, Vol. 11, number 4, 319-330. Since this article is mainly addressed to Civil Engineers,

specialized in Railway Engineering, some general reminders about

[10] Giannakos, K. 2011. Track Maintenance of Heavy Haul the Fourier Transform are cited in this Annex (for more details and

Railways with Resilient Versus Stiff Fastenings, Transport properties of the Fourier Transform cf. Papoulis 1987; 1977, 56-79;

Research Record (TRR), 155-162. Wylie and Barret 1995, 543-597):

[11] Giannakos, K. 2012. Influence of the Track's Damping on the The Fourier Transform F(ω) of a function f(t) is given by:

Track Mass Participating in the Motion of the Non-Suspended +

−

Comparison to Measurements, volume published in honor of Under the assumption that the above integral exists as a Cauchy

professor G. Giannopoulos, Aristotle University of principal value for every real ω. Where:

Thessaloniki.

[12] Giannakos, K. 2013. Track Defects and the Dynamic Loads

e jt = cos t + j sin t (34)

due to Non-Suspended Masses of Railway Vehicles, NAUN The Cauchy principal value of an integral from -∞ to +∞ is the

International Journal of Mechanics, Vol.7, Issue 3, 180-191. limit:

[13] Giannakos, K. 2016a. Modeling the Influence of Short + _+ A

−

A→

−A

x( t )dt (35)

Behavior of the Non-Suspended Masses, jmssp, Elsevier, 68- The inversion formula or the inverse Fourier Transform is given by:

+

83.

F( ) e

jt

f (t ) = d (36).

[14] Giannakos, K. 2016b. Deflection of a railway reinforced −

concrete slab track: Comparing the theoretical results with

experimental measurements, Engineering Structures Journal,

Elsevier, (122), 296-309.

[15] Giannakos, K. 2016c. Deflection of a Railway Reinforced

Concrete Slab Track: Comparing the Theoretical Results

with Experimental Measurements, Engineering Structures

Journal, Elsevier, 122, 296-309.

[16] Giannakos, K. 2017. Track Defects and the Dynamic Loads

due to Suspended (Sprung) Masses of Railway Vehicles, in

Loizos A, Al-Qadi I., Scarpas T., (eds), Intl. Conference

“Bearing Capacity of Roads, Rails, Airfields”, Athens,

proceedings, Taylor & Francis group, 1911-1919.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17501........................................

- Fundamental Frequency 2003 06Enviado pornphbk53
- LR Brochure Automobile EngineeringEnviado porsarvarrasheed
- bmwEnviado porMilton Poma Cabas
- Vehicle System Dynamics: International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics and MobilityEnviado porKanniti Singsanan
- Bernard Sklar Raylegh Fading ChannelsEnviado pormorro1966
- Lecture 3Enviado porMubashir Ghaffar
- An Accurate Full Car Ride Model Using Model Reducing TechniquesEnviado porVali Unu
- PriusEnviado porDaniel Boca
- art1Enviado pordamaya1701
- pars-4x4-Enviado porVictor Pileggi
- Scaffolding 2Enviado pormohamad Reza huzain
- halliday_1995Enviado porlaryvasko
- Ulsas Engineering ReportEnviado porJony M. Temnikar
- DRZ400SM2 0705Enviado portony_lee_ST
- SP10Barbe-Wech Method RevisitedEnviado porChandan Bangera
- stock price list dogeosEnviado porjohnb2b
- Fourier transform_Notes_6bEnviado porJOHN
- lexus-nxEnviado porRafly Aulia Hadi
- Active Suspension SystemEnviado porManas Bajpai
- WCE2009_pp1532-1537Enviado porSilviu Tatuc
- LECT12-2Enviado poranandbabugopathoti
- Bigm 400 LeafletEnviado porinfo4826
- h1katalogEnviado porHarly Bigbang
- Wavelet Entropy MeasureEnviado poredpogi
- Fourier TransformEnviado porJunaid Iqbal
- 2006 Comparison of SpectralEnviado porToqeer
- (Brogliato B.) Dissipative Systems Analysis and ControlEnviado porAlfredo Martínez
- mgf tfEnviado porapi-209049915
- B.e- II Mechanical 4th YearEnviado porductaiutc
- GMK6300L-Product-Guide-Imperial.pdfEnviado porAlexis Serrano Alavid

- Railway Ballast Requirements for High Speed and Heavy Haul Lines:Enviado porKonstantinos Giannakos
- GIANNAKOS_PAPER_PUBLISHED_252.pdfEnviado porKonstantinos Giannakos
- POE BOOK 2008 the Writing of a Skillful Scribe EGYPTIANEnviado porKonstantinos Giannakos
- Second Order Differential Equation of Motion in Railways: the Variance of the Dynamic Component of Actions due to the Sprung Masses of the VehicleEnviado porKonstantinos Giannakos
- Durability and long-term performance of concrete railway sleepers:Enviado porKonstantinos Giannakos
- Transition Zone between Ballastless and Ballasted Track: Influence of changing stiffness on acting forcesEnviado porKonstantinos Giannakos
- Modern Railway Infrastructure: Resilient Fastenings improve Track's Life-CycleEnviado porKonstantinos Giannakos
- Giannakos PUBLISHED FINAL 16thSOMA.pdfEnviado porKonstantinos Giannakos
- Actions on a Railway Track, due to an Isolated DefectEnviado porKonstantinos Giannakos
- c042003-094Track Defects and the Dynamic Loads due to Non-Suspended Masses of Railway VehiclesEnviado porKonstantinos Giannakos
- TRANSIENT LOADS/ ACTIONS ON RAILWAY TRACK: THE CASE OF A DEFORMED, BENT JOINT OR WELDINGEnviado porKonstantinos Giannakos
- Sensitivity Analysis of Fastenings’ Types on Track's Life-CycleEnviado porKonstantinos Giannakos
- DAMAGE OF RAILWAY SLEEPERS UNDER DYNAMIC LOADS: A CASE HISTORY FROM THE GREEK RAILWAY NETWORKEnviado porKonstantinos Giannakos
- CHADWICK - MINOS 1957 V5 -PotniaEnviado porKonstantinos Giannakos

- TongzonEnviado porlukiv
- OFP_tutorialEnviado porPaulo Pereira
- Operation Reckless (1944)Enviado porCAP History Library
- Coming of AgeEnviado porna
- Harley-Davidson litature rareEnviado pormacio853
- IRCTC Ltd,Booked Ticket PrintingEnviado porDev Raj
- j1939Enviado pormauricio olaya
- Klien GHS 2013Enviado poranggri kristika
- St Lawrence International Student GuideEnviado poreloisacoloma
- ml.remawmom.2019_31k0aa00_cb300r.pdfEnviado porakirafactor
- Prices Effective Dated December 01 2013Enviado porAyyaz Shad
- Chapter VShalbinEnviado porabby
- Generators Portable Supersilent DCA25SSI Rev 0 Final Manual DataId 19042 Version 1Enviado porMohd El-Toro Firdaus
- TD_OPTIFLUX4000_en_140218_4000525103_R06 (1)Enviado porRajanish Kumar Mishra
- RedBus TicketEnviado porDivyang Patil
- 7HA Overview_GE Gas Power Systems_August2016Enviado porshfederico-1
- Tti Classifieds 080714Enviado porDigital Media
- Tension ClampEnviado porbclee
- Diagnosis 4 AfeEnviado porDinukaDeshan
- Marine Surveyor - Sample CV 3Enviado porArnab
- Chapter IIIEnviado porMak Briz
- ScrubberEnviado porPrashant Rajput
- Major Marine Scrubber Player Expects Sales to Double in 2019 - Ship & BunkerEnviado porCharles.Z
- Doc9626_enEnviado porWeirp
- Heavy LandingEnviado porHamdan Merchant
- A LamEnviado porundercover906
- DY 20L ManualEnviado porhmbx
- What are the latest innovations for PAX & Document Handling for the airport of the future?Enviado porouldally
- RMV3 Internet form.pdfEnviado porMudit Mishra
- (Final Version) Method StatementEnviado porHo Fai Tang

## Muito mais do que documentos

Descubra tudo o que o Scribd tem a oferecer, incluindo livros e audiolivros de grandes editoras.

Cancele quando quiser.