Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Good
Laboratory
Practice
Guidance on Archiving
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................2
SCOPE ..................................................................................................................................................................2
DEFINITION OF TERMS................................................................................................................................3
CLOSURE OF AN ARCHIVE......................................................................................................................14
DOCUMENTATION ........................................................................................................................................15
INTRODUCTION
The archiving of study materials and test facility records is an important part of
compliance with the principles of GLP. The maintenance of these materials is the only
means that can be used to reconstruct the study, enabling the information contained
in the final report to be verified.
The guidance contained in this document will assist in conforming to the requirements
of the United Kingdom Good Laboratory Practice Regulations (Statutory Instrument
1999 No. 3106) as amended by Statutory Instrument 2004 No. 994, “The Good
Laboratory Practice (Codification Amendments etc.) Regulations 2004” as they relate
to archiving. These regulations implement the requirements of European Directives
(2004/9/EC and 2004/10/EC) and are consistent with the OECD Principles of
Good Laboratory Practice (ENV/MC/CHEM(98)17).
SCOPE
This document is primarily intended for use by test facilities that are required to
operate in compliance with the principles of GLP, and for organisations that provide
contract archive services to such test facilities. Although aimed at GLP regulated
organisations, the guidance and advice contained within this document might be of
assistance to organisations that retain records and materials from other types of
regulatory work, for example Good Clinical Practice.
Individual organisations must ensure that they evaluate any applicable regulatory
requirements against their business needs. Certain aspects of archive construction
and operation may have implications for compliance with building regulations or
Health & Safety legislation. Guidance on these, and other such aspects, is outside
the scope of this document.
Material(s): A collective term given to all items which need to be retained for regulatory
purposes. This includes, but is not limited to; raw data, specimens, test items and non
study specific records. This includes records maintained in electronic form.
Metadata: Information associated with data that provides context and understanding,
i.e. data about data. Most commonly this is data that describes the structure, data
elements, inter-relationships and other characteristics of electronic records.
Migration: The transfer of data from a source format or system to a target format
or system.
Record retention schedule: A list of record types with the required storage
conditions and defined retention periods.
Retention period: The length of time for which materials should be kept
The sponsor is directly responsible for any materials that are in their custody. The
sponsor should maintain contact with the facilities that archive its materials. This is of
particular importance when study materials have been archived at more than one
location, e.g. as a result of a multi-site study.
Test facility management is responsible for ensuring that any non study specific
materials needed to support the GLP compliance status of the test facility, or of
studies conducted therein, are archived. Such records may include but are not limited
to: equipment maintenance records, personnel records, historical SOPs etc.
Study Director
The study director is responsible for ensuring that, on completion of a study, all study
specific materials are archived.
In this document, the term “Archivist” is used to identify the individual appointed by test facility
management to assume responsibility for day to day management of the archives.
Archivist
The archivist should be independent of any materials that are passed into their care, i.e.
they should not be responsible for archiving any study materials produced by them, as
there could be a potential conflict of interest. Where possible the archivist should be
independent of the line management responsible for the conduct of the studies.
The archivist is responsible for the day to day management of the archive facilities in
accordance with established company policies, standard operating procedures and
the principles of GLP.
In larger organisations where many studies are conducted, there may be a need for
several staff to effectively undertake archiving of the study materials produced. These
staff should work under the supervision of the designated archivist. Also, in certain
circumstances it may be necessary to designate other persons to undertake particular
archiving tasks on behalf of the archivist, e.g. to manage electronic data or to work at
remote locations.
Archive conditions
Storage conditions should not adversely affect the integrity of retained material.
Extremes in variation of temperature and humidity may contribute to the deterioration
of the materials being archived, so it is important to protect retained materials from
frequent fluctuations in temperature and/or humidity. The installation of systems to
control and monitor environmental conditions may be necessary.
Test facility management should define acceptable storage conditions for the different
types of retained materials. Guidance on storage conditions may be found in the
reference documents identified at the end of this document.
Archive procedures
Placement of study materials into the archive
The study director retains responsibility for the security of study materials until they
are accepted into the archives. During the conduct of some study types, a large
amount of materials will be produced before completion of the study and formal
archiving of the study specific materials. In these situations the provision of secure
storage facilities for study specific materials should be considered. Such facilities are
commonly termed “pre-archives”. The study director should identify all materials that
are to be archived from each study.
The study director should ensure that these materials are transferred to the archives
as soon as possible after issue of the final report.
Some study materials may be submitted to the archives by persons other than the
study director, e.g. data sent from a principal investigator, histopathology specimens
submitted by the pathologist. In these situations the study director should be
informed when these materials have been archived.
Archives staff should verify that the materials received correspond with the information
provided. There should be a documented acceptance of the study package by the
archives staff.
Retrieval
Materials that have been archived may, on occasion, need to be retrieved, e.g. for
regulatory inspection. The number of retrievals should be minimised; the archivist may
Procedures for the removal of materials should be documented, and should include:
• The reasons for which materials may be removed from the archives (often referred
to as loans).
• The timeframe within which the removed (loaned) material should be returned to the
archive.
• How the archivist identifies any materials that have not been returned within the
specified timeframe.
• Mechanisms to ensure the return of these materials by the person to whom they had
been loaned.
On return to the archive, the materials being returned should be checked to confirm
that they correspond to the materials loaned. Management should be informed of any
discrepancies. The archivist should maintain appropriate records of all material loans
and subsequent returns.
Transfers
On occasion it may be necessary to transfer archived materials from one location to
another. The archivist transferring the material should ensure that clear confirmation
of intent is received from the owner of the archived materials (usually the sponsor)
before any transfer occurs. This should include details of the materials to be
transferred, the contact details/address of the receiving facility, and the means of
transfer between locations.
The materials to be transferred should be clearly described in appropriate chain of
custody documentation prepared by the archivist. The transportation of the material,
and associated paperwork, between the two locations should be undertaken in such
a way as to minimise the risk of loss or damage of the materials.
The recipient of the transferred materials should check that they correspond with the
associated chain of custody documentation as, once accepted, they become
responsible for ensuring that the data is maintained and preserved appropriately.
Copies of the chain of custody documentation should be retained by all parties
involved in the transfer.
The controls necessary to restrict access to electronic records will usually be different
from those applied to other record types. Since many electronic storage media can
be re-used (e.g. overwritten) controls should be implemented to ensure that records
can not be altered or deleted without appropriate authorisation. If records can be
altered or deleted there must be a full audit trail of all such changes.
The retention period is usually a fixed period from the time that the record was
created, but may be a fixed period following a defined event, e.g. “after completion of
the study”; “after termination of employment”.
When determining appropriate retention periods, the following factors should be
considered:
• The possible risks to the organisation should the material not be available for
examination at any time in the future. Study data and supporting records should be
retained for as long as there is a likelihood that they will need to be referred to for
regulatory purposes.
• Supporting material (e.g. staff training records, equipment calibration records etc.)
that would be required to confirm the validity of study material should be kept for as
long as the study material that they support.
• Specimens and samples need not be retained, for regulatory purposes, for periods
of time beyond which no useful information could be derived from them, e.g.
retention of test materials that are known to have only limited stability.
• The possibility of migrating data from one medium to another could be considered,
e.g. bulky paper data could be copied onto microfilm or scanned into electronic
form etc. If data is migrated from one medium to another, the potential problems of
future readability will need to be considered.
QUALITY ASSURANCE
The quality assurance programme for the test facility should include the archive
facilities and their operation; routine QA inspections of the archive facility and its
operation must be conducted.
It is not uncommon for management of the archive function to rest with the QA
manager, and QA staff may be designated as archivists. In these situations there is a
possible conflict of interest. This can be avoided by the use of an external QA
consultant or the use of other suitably trained/experienced staff from outside of the
archives/QA department. Alternatively, procedures could be established that allow
non-archivist QA officers to perform the inspections/audits and report any findings
directly to management, thus by-passing the usual reporting lines that could give rise
to a conflict of interest.
Access arrangements
Procedures should define how, and when, stored material can be accessed by
representatives of the test facility. Any such access should be documented.
Conditions of storage
The conditions of storage within the contract archive facility should be the same as
those expected of a test facility archive which is operated in compliance with the GLP
principles. This will include the management appointment of an archivist, written and
approved SOPs describing their activities and the provision of suitable storage areas
to prevent deterioration or loss of stored materials.
Audits
Representatives of Quality Assurance from the test facility/study sponsor must
inspect the contract archive facility periodically to ensure that the conditions of the
service level agreement are being met. The systems and procedures operated by the
contract archive facility should comply with their own SOPs, the GLP principles and
any other applicable regulatory requirement.
If the test facility that is closing down is a contract research organisation, in the first
instance they should contact the sponsors of the work that they have undertaken and
ask for advice on the disposition of any retained materials. Possible scenarios are:
• The sponsor may request that study materials are returned to them. To ensure the
validity of these study data it might also be necessary for the sponsor to obtain
copies of relevant non-study specific material such as equipment calibration
records etc.
• The sponsor may request that their data be transferred to another storage
location specified by them. Again, it might be necessary for them to obtain
copies of relevant non-study specific material that would be necessary to support
the study data.
• The sponsor may instruct the test facility to destroy some, or all of their data.
In each case, the sponsor should ensure that there are complete and accurate
records of the final disposition of all data, records and specimens from GLP compliant
studies. Consideration should also be given to the fate of non study specific
supporting records.
In any circumstances, test facilities in the United Kingdom may contact the GLPMA
for advice and guidance.
SOPs will include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following:
European Commission Detailed Guidelines on the Trial Master file and Archiving
ENTR/F/2 D2002