Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Conformity bias.
Choices of mass populations influence how we
think, even if against independent personal
judgements. This can result in poor decision
making and lead to groupthink which is Strategic misrepresentation. Bandwagon bias.
particularly detrimental to creativity as outside Knowingly understating the costs and Favouring ideas already adopted by others.
opinions can become suppressed leading to overstating the benefits. When developing This is especially influential when linked to Ambiguity bias.
self- censorship and loss of independent innovation concepts, ballpark figures and authority bias. Bandwagon effect is a common Favouring options where the outcome is more
thought. When you spot group think within a business model prototypes, teams are prone to occurrence we see in workshops. The rate and knowable over those which it is not. This bias
team, try to gain everyone’s personal understating the true costs and overstating the speed at which ideas are adopted by others has dire impacts innovation outcomes because
perspective separately first (either through a likely benefits in order to get a project (through discussion, ...) can significantly the process is fundamentally risky and
silent, written brainstorm or through one on approved (which happens all the time in large influence the likelihood of those ideas and unknown process. If team members
one conversations) before discussing the topic governmental contracting). Over-optimism is concepts being selected by the group and subconsciously favour known known’s, you will
in a team setting. then spotted and challenged by managers taken forward. Do you like a teams idea just most likely follow know knowns and previously
assessing how truly innovative team outcomes because you’ve seen it done before? Are you trodden paths. When disliking an idea or way
are. Challenge your teams: are they showing favouring ideas just because other banks do of working: think for a second. Is it based on
the full image of costs? What about FTE’s and them too? merit or just because it’s new and unknown?
other time investments?
Pro-innovation bias.
New innovations should be adopted by all
members society (regardless of the wider Status-quo bias.
needs) and are pushed-out and accepted Favouring the current situation or status quo Feature positive effect.
regardless. Novelty and ‘newness’ are seen as Anchoring bias. and maintaining it due to loss aversion (or fear (close links with optimism bias): due to limited
inherently good, regardless of potential Being influenced by information that is already of losing it) and do nothing as a result. This is a time or resources, people tend to focus on the
negative impacts (inequality, elitism, known or that is first shown. This causes pre- subtle bias on an emotional level that makes us ‘good’ benefits whilst ignoring negative effects
environmental damage etc.) resulting in new loaded and determined tunnel vision and reduce risk and prefer what is familiar or “the even when the negative effects are significant.
ideas and concepts generated being judged influences final decision making. We way we do things round here” as it is known. It This is influential when deep-diving into
through somewhat rose tinted spectacles. deliberately manipulate team members’ minds has severe consequences when seeking out specific new feature sets for new concepts
Question the idea: are we judging it too much by ‘pre-loading’ them one of our warm-up new ways to creatively solve needs and (especially when coupled with loss aversion
on its level of novelty or “sexyness”? Without exercises to demonstrate this bias at play. The problems. When you dislike an idea, ask bias), because it means that teams will
falling into status quo bias, are we taking all impact is highly-significant on creative thinking yourself: “Is this just me sticking to what I overlook missing information especially when
possible (also negative) impacts into account? and outcomes. know?” it is outside expertise resulting in taking ideas
forward with critical flaws.
3 steps how to de-bias you and your teams Know & conquer your enemy. Reflect and challenge biases asking questions like: What if x, y, z bias did not exist at this
Spot the biases. Identify the 16 innovation specific biases identified by openly discussing impacts on current decision moment? What if the opposite of this bias were true at this
affecting you or your team at key moments by listing them making at key decision making points. Overcome point? Would you individually (or as a group) make the printsize: A2
individually. Innovation Biases. Flip, reverse, remove biases identified by same decision in light of new awareness? boardofinnovation.com/tools