Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Instructor:
Prof. A. Noghreh-Abadi
Due Date:
January 15, 2019
Student:
S.M.A. Taleghani
- Problem Specification[1]:
1
-Requirements:
The streamlines within the chamber are to be determined using:
I. Finite difference method
II. Finite volume method
III. Ansys Fluent with structured mesh
IV. Ansys Fluent with unstructured mesh
For Parts I & II, the following methods are to be used:
(a) Jacobi
(b) Point Gauss-Seidel
And the corresponding codes shall be provided in the appendix.
It is also required to compare the convergence time and accuracy of different methods.
- Pre-analysis:
I. For the FDE method, there is no significant pre-analysis required. All boundary
conditions are Dirichlet –type and the governing FDE equation for equal sizes of
𝚫𝐱 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝚫𝐲 is:
𝛹𝑖+1,𝑗+𝛹𝑖−1,𝑗+𝛹𝑖,𝑗+1 +𝛹𝑖,𝑗−1
𝛹𝑖,𝑗 = (P5-1.6)
4
II. In the FVM method, the governing equation for the domain is the same as (P5-1.6)
III. & IV. For solving the problem in Fluent, the stream function Ψ will be treated as
temperature T. Therefore, all Ψ= constant boundary conditions will turn into isothermal
boundary conditions.
The only matter of concern is the modeling of inlet and outlet velocities:
𝒅𝚿 𝒅𝐓
𝒂𝒕 𝒊𝒏𝒍𝒆𝒕: 𝒗𝒐𝒖𝒕 = − ≡− (P5-1.7)
𝒅𝒙 𝒅𝒙
2
Since the inlet is surrounded by 𝛹= 100 on the right and 𝛹= 0 on the left:
𝒅𝚿 𝚫𝚿 𝟏𝟎𝟎−𝟎
− ≅− =− = −𝟓𝟎𝟎 (P5-1.8)
𝒅𝒙 𝚫𝒙 𝟎.𝟐
Using Fourier's law:
𝒅𝐓
𝒒𝒙 = −𝒌𝑨 (P5-1.9)
𝒅𝒙
Comparing (P5-1.8) & (P5-1.9):
𝒒𝒙 = −𝟓𝟎𝟎𝒌𝑨 (P5-1.9)
(P5-1.9) in the thermal analysis is equivalent of having an inlet velocity causing the difference of
100 in 𝛹 between the left and right side of the inlet. This equation indicated that the heat flux is
only in the x-direction, i.e. parallel to the inlet. As far as we are concerned, the heat flux normal
to the inlet will be set to zero in Fluent and the flux in x-direction will be automatically satisfied
by the Ψ= constant boundary conditions
Also, by comparing (P5-1.7) & (P5-1.8):
𝒇𝒕
𝒗𝒐𝒖𝒕 = −𝟓𝟎𝟎
𝒔
Which indicates that the inlet is actually an outlet!
A similar analysis for the outlet yields:
𝒅𝚿 𝒅𝐓
𝒂𝒕 𝒐𝒖𝒕𝒍𝒆𝒕: 𝒖𝒊𝒏 = ≡ (P5-1.10)
𝒅𝒚 𝒅𝒚
𝒅𝚿 𝚫𝚿 𝟎−𝟏𝟎𝟎
≅ = = −𝟓𝟎𝟎 (P5-1.11)
𝒅𝒚 𝚫𝒚 𝟎.𝟐
𝒅𝐓
𝒒𝒚 = −𝒌𝑨 𝒅𝒚 (P5-1.12)
𝒒𝒚 = 𝟓𝟎𝟎𝒌𝑨 (P5-1.13)
(P5-1.13) will be satisfied by insulating the outlet (allowing flux only in the y-direction).
Also by comparing (P5-1.10) & (P5-1.11):
𝒇𝒕
𝒖𝒊𝒏 = −𝟓𝟎𝟎
𝒔
Therefore, the outlet is actually an inlet! The same pitfall was present for the inlet.
3
- Results:
I & II.
(a) Jacobi method
Matlab command window output:
Numeric solution is done.
Number of iterations using Jacobi:
348
4
(b) Gauss-Seidel method
Matlab command window output:
Numeric solution is done.
Number of iterations using Gauss-Seidel:
215
III.
The geometry which is a 5-by-5 surface with split edges as shown in the figure below was created
in Ansys SpaceClaim Direct Modeler 19.1.
A uniform Quadrilateral 4-node mesh, 0.2 m in size was created in Ansys Meshing using the face
meshing method.
Before initiating the solver, all cells were set with an initial value of the temperature of 50 K
and the absolute convergence criteria was set to 0.01 per the problem specifications.
After solving, the solution converged with two iterations and a final residual of 4.2773e-03:
9
IV.
The unstructured mesh with element size of 0.2 m is as below:
Same setting as in part III. was used and the solution converged with a residual of 6.4942e-03.
10
Post-processing results:
11
-Discussion:
Comparing the accuracy of each method:
FDM Jacobi FDM Gauss-Seidel Fluent Structured Mesh Fluent Unstructured Mesh
This indicated that in general, the structured mesh is more accurate than an unstructured mesh in the
same circumstances.
FDM Jacobi FDM Gauss-Seidel Fluent Structured Mesh Fluent Unstructured Mesh
348 215 2 2
-References:
[1] K. A. Hoffmann and S. T. Chiang, Computational Fluid Dynamics for Engineers, 4th ed., no. v. 1.
Engineering Education System, 2000.
12
-Appendix:
Matlab Code:
clear all
close all
clc
m=25; %number of devisions in x dir
n=25; %number of devisions in y dir
L=5; %length of the chamber
W=5; %width of the chamber
x = linspace(0,L,m+1); dx = x(2)-x(1);
y = linspace(0,W,n+1); dy = y(2)-y(1);
T_jac=50*ones(n+1,m+1);%Allocating memmory for Jacobi with initial
value of 50
T_jac(1,1:6) = 0; %Left of Inlet B.C
T_jac(1,7:end) = 100; %Right of Inlet B.C
T_jac(1:16,end) = 100; %Below outlet B.C
T_jac(17:end,end) = 0; %Above outlet B.C
T_jac(end,1:end) = 0; %TOP B.C
T_jac(1:end,1) = 0; %Left B.C
T_gauss=T_jac;%Allocating memmory for gauss-seidel
%%% Jacobi
iter_jac=0;
while 1
Told = T_jac;
for j = 2:m
for i = 2:n
T_jac(j,i) = (b^2*(Told(j,i+1)+Told(j,i-
1))+Told(j+1,i)+Told(j-1,i))/(2*(b^2+1));
end
end
iter_jac=iter_jac+1;
error = max(max(abs(Told-T_jac)));
if error <eps
break
end
end
disp('Numeric solution is done.')
disp('Number of iterations using Jacobi:')
disp(iter_jac)
contour(x,y,T_jac,25),colormap(jet)
title('Psi'),xlabel('x(m)'),ylabel('y(m)'),colorbar,axis square
figure(2)
pcolor(x,y,T_jac),colormap(jet)
title('Psi'),xlabel('x(m)'),ylabel('y(m)'),colorbar,axis square
13
figure(3)
for i=0:5
plot(0:0.2:5,T_jac(:,1+i*5))
hold on
end
title('Psi along vertical
sections'),xlabel('y(m)'),ylabel('Psi'),axis square
grid
on,legend('x=0(m)','x=1(m)','x=2(m)','x=3(m)','x=4(m)','x=5(m)')
%%% Gauss-Seidel
iter_gauss=0;
while 1
Told = T_gauss;
for j = 2:m
for i = 2:n
T_gauss(j,i) = (b^2*(T_gauss(j,i+1)+T_gauss(j,i-
1))+T_gauss(j+1,i)+T_gauss(j-1,i))/(2*(b^2+1));
end
end
iter_gauss=iter_gauss+1;
error = max(max(abs(Told-T_gauss)));
if error <eps
break
end
end
disp('Numeric solution is done.')
disp('Number of iterations using Gauss-Seidel:')
disp(iter_gauss)
figure(4)
contour(x,y,T_gauss,25),colormap(jet)
title('Psi'),xlabel('x(m)'),ylabel('y(m)'),colorbar,axis square
figure(5)
pcolor(x,y,T_gauss),colormap(jet)
title('Psi'),xlabel('x(m)'),ylabel('y(m)'),colorbar,axis square
figure(6)
for i=0:5
plot(0:0.2:5,T_gauss(:,1+i*5))
hold on
end
title('Psi along vertical
sections'),xlabel('y(m)'),ylabel('Psi'),axis square
grid
on,legend('x=0(m)','x=1(m)','x=2(m)','x=3(m)','x=4(m)','x=5(m)')
14