0 Votos favoráveis0 Votos desfavoráveis

0 visualizações22 páginasSensor-Less Predictive Drying Control

Jun 04, 2019

© © All Rights Reserved

PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd

Sensor-Less Predictive Drying Control

© All Rights Reserved

0 visualizações

Sensor-Less Predictive Drying Control

© All Rights Reserved

- Neuromancer
- The E-Myth Revisited: Why Most Small Businesses Don't Work and
- How Not to Be Wrong: The Power of Mathematical Thinking
- Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us
- Chaos: Making a New Science
- The Joy of x: A Guided Tour of Math, from One to Infinity
- How to Read a Person Like a Book
- Moonwalking with Einstein: The Art and Science of Remembering Everything
- The Wright Brothers
- The Other Einstein: A Novel
- The 6th Extinction
- The Housekeeper and the Professor: A Novel
- The Power of Discipline: 7 Ways it Can Change Your Life
- The 10X Rule: The Only Difference Between Success and Failure
- A Short History of Nearly Everything
- The Kiss Quotient: A Novel
- The End of Average: How We Succeed in a World That Values Sameness
- Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die
- Algorithms to Live By: The Computer Science of Human Decisions
- The Universe in a Nutshell

Você está na página 1de 22

Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2675625

Pneumatic Conveying Batch Dryers

BIPLAB SATPATI1 , CHIRANJIB KOLEY2 , (Member, IEEE), and SUBHASHIS DATTA3

1 Department of Electrical Engineering, University Institute of Technology, The University of Burdwan 713104, India

2 Department of Electrical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur 713209, India

3 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ghani Khan Choudhury Institute of Engineering and Technology, Malda 732102, India

Corresponding author: B. Satpati (biplabsatpati@yahoo.co.in)

This work was supported by the Department of Science and Technology, Government of West Bengal under

Grant 321(Sanc.)/ST/P/S&T/6G1/2010).

ABSTRACT This paper presents predictive drying control design for a lab-scaled industrial pneumatic

conveying dryer (PDC) involves with continuous/ batch processing of powder materials. The model pre-

dictive control (MPC) is an established method for drying control in various drying applications, such

as fluidized bed dryers, rotary dryer, infrared dryer, timber dryers, baker’s yeast dryers and so on. But

the predictive control of PDCs have not been studied in the literature, however, these dryers are widely

used in food, agriculture, and chemical industries, particularly suitable for batch processing of fine grained

materials. The unavailability of any suitable control oriented first principle’s model of these dryers make

the predictive control design and implementation issues more challenging. Existing control methods for

similar drying applications use outlet material moisture as a main control variable, online measurement, of

which is difficult, costly, and unreliable due to the involvement of materials in granular/powder form. In

the present contribution, an innovative control oriented model of the dryer is derived from first principle’s

encompassing a soft sensor-based online powder-moisture measurement procedure replacing the physical

moisture sensors. The proposed physical sensor-less powder moisture control strategy stands on the tradi-

tional two-layer predictive control paradigm involving detection of an economically best operating point

for batch dryer operation by optimizing the various process economic objectives followed by employing a

suitable state space MPC (SSMPC) law for steering the process to operate at economically best operating

point. The developed control strategy has been implemented and tested under practical settings and shown its

effectiveness in improving the drying performance and product quality compared with an inbuilt auto-tuned

proportional integral plus derivative controller of Honeywell make HC900 programmable logic controller.

INDEX TERMS Pneumatic conveying and drying process, first principle’s model, heating and flow control

process, parameterized gray-box nonlinear state-space model, state space model predictive control (SSMPC).

The pneumatic conveying and drying technology has been initial moisture content, material throughput, relative humid-

extensively used in food processing and agricultural, chem- ity and velocity of the drying agent have a significant effect

ical, polymer and ceramic, pharmaceutical, pulp and paper, on the drying kinetics and product quality. Many flash dryers

and wood processing industries for removing the surface used in food, chemical, agricultural and pellet industries are

moisture of granular or fine grained (powder) materials with a still lean towards the manual (fixed gain PID’s) control proce-

particulate size of 10-500µm [1]–[4]. The pneumatic convey- dure for monitoring the drying conditions [1], [6], [7]. But this

ing continuous/batch dryers are highly preferred in aforemen- practice yields a poor energy efficiency, increased production

tioned industrial processes because of various environmental, costs and sometimes may degrade the product quality [5], [7].

operational and economic benefits compared to the other Therefore, to achieve a satisfactory drying performance and

dryers [1], [3], [4]. processing the products as per desired quality, the inlet air

The main motivation for employing advanced control temperature of the pneumatic conveying dryers require to be

strategies in industrial drying is to produce products at a controlled dynamically according to the material throughputs

desired quality at maximum throughput, but at minimum and initial moisture content of wet materials. On the other

2169-3536

2017 IEEE. Translations and content mining are permitted for academic research only.

VOLUME 5, 2017 Personal use is also permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. 3547

See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.

B. Satpati et al.: Sensor-Less Predictive Drying Control of Pneumatic Conveying Batch Dryers

hand, flow rate needs to be governed in such a way so that Over the past one decade the focus of drying control

the drying materials can attain a sustained conveyance and at research has shifted from conventional PID control to model

the same time it ensures to provide an adequate drying time so predictive control (MPC) approaches [6], [21]–[24]. There

that the material grains can get dried properly while conveyed has been a notable number of research work on MPC design

through the vertical duct. and implementation in the diverse application area of drying

Moreover in pneumatic conveying dryers, the mass flow such as corn drying [25], timber drying [26], grain dry-

rate of the input raw materials, their initial moisture content, ing [27], [28], paper drying [29], [30], rotary dryer [24],

and their grain size often vary during operation, therefore the [31], infrared drying process [21], [22], [32], drying in olive

desired set points of the temperature and airflow controller oil mill [31], [33], pasta drying [34], baker’s yeast dry-

needs to be dynamically altered according to the drying ing [15], [19] etc. In order to employ predictive control in

conditions. Unlike the relatively faster airflow control of the aforementioned drying processes, the prevalent practice is to

process, dryer inlet air-temperature control is more critical, choose the material moisture as the main control variable.

because of the large time constants of the heating system But the works contributed to this area have emphasized very

employed and the dependency of the inlet air temperature on less about the costs, difficulties and inaccuracies involved

the airflow rate. Further, the different time constants at differ- with the online measurement of solid moisture [3]. One of

ent operating region and involvement of various uncertainties the most widely used sensors for online measurement of

and process nonlinearities make the existing PID control solid moisture is infrared moisture meter [35]. These sensors

incompetent in providing a good disturbance rejection and are accurate for local measurement, but infrared radiation

an energy efficient operation particularly in the dynamically fails to deeply penetrate the processing material; thus the

varying load situation [2], [4]. Thus to obtain a satisfactory measurement is superficial only [35]. Moreover, these sen-

drying performance, the drying controller has to be synthe- sors are highly expensive. Capacitive measurement is the

sized using model based control techniques [2]. There has relatively less expensive method for online measurement of

been a significant number of research works on mathematical product moisture but the measurement is inaccurate due to

model of pneumatic conveying/flash dryer [8]–[13] based high noise variance during measurement. Related to online

on first principle’s, published in last two decades. These product moisture sensing, air humidity measurement in real

works highlight the formulation of complex transport equa- time is also difficult, because this sensors are either inaccurate

tions based on partial differential equations (PDEs) aimed or have a short life span due to the harsh conditions present in

to either facilitate dryer design or obtain experimental and a dryer [15], [31]. The difficulty of measuring solids moisture

numerical solutions of some typical drying applications. But and air humidity in real time leads to an uncontrollable and

these models are not control-oriented and focused more on unobservable drying process model, which makes control

enhancing the design and qualitative aspects rather than designing issues more challenging [3], [31], [35].

the improving drying control mechanism. Apart from math- As an alternate to the physical sensors, many empirical

ematical models, many knowledge-based models such as rule, knowledge and model based estimation frameworks

fuzzy-neuro rule based predictive models [14]–[17] genetic are available in the area of soft sensing [35]. Among the

algorithm based models [4], [18], [19] and data driven black various approaches, the observer based soft sensor is the most

box models [20], [21] etc. of various dryers are also available prevalent, particularly in feedback control applications [36].

in the literature. These models can offer detailed predic- The observer based soft sensor provides an estimate of the

tions of the fluid flow, heat & mass transfer and product unmeasured process variable from the measurement of input

quality. Moreover, in many drying applications, these mod- and output on the basis of a known dynamic model of the

els have been found suitable to employ the model based process. But to deal with the present application, finding an

advanced control strategies for improving the drying per- explicit dynamic model becomes challenging, because the

formance [15], [19], [21]. Nevertheless, the control strate- values of many parameters of the first principle’s model are

gies stand on knowledge-based model suffers from certain difficult to determine from the physical dimensions, thermal

disadvantages, such as performance of the control design and hydrodynamic properties and operational characteristics

using these models to a large extent depends upon ini- of the dryer and the processing material due to the high inter-

tial data-set and operating conditions, outside the data-set dependencies among various parameters and the complex and

performance is unknown and physical significance of the distributed nature of the plant. Considering these complex-

model parameters are very difficult to discern. Therefore ities of observer based estimation an alternative framework

to emulate the physical phenomena of drying system into has been employed in this contribution on the basis of a

the design, the knowledge–based data driven digital models well-known temperature drop model [7], [37], [38] of the

should be supported by a suitable first principle’s model. dryer and heat exchanger. The operating set point (dryer inlet

This is a most common practice in control engineering and air temperature and flow) for each batch of production are

successfully adopted in many applications. But the develop- estimated by a soft sensor driven online set point estimator,

ment of suitable control-oriented first principle’s model of which incorporates an estimator and an economic optimizer.

pneumatic conveying dryers is still under the scope of the At first the estimator computes a set of possible set points for

research. a known drying condition of the processing material then an

B. Satpati et al.: Sensor-Less Predictive Drying Control of Pneumatic Conveying Batch Dryers

optimal set point is obtained by optimizing the cost function process operations [39]. In contrast with the tradi-

including the indices such as operating cost, product quality tional MPC, the EMPC method incorporates the process

loss etc. Thereafter the estimated optimal set point is used by economics and process control objectives in a single cost

the MPC control law to generate a set of manipulated inputs, function and which is optimized to operate the process in a

which steers the process to operate at economically best possible time varying fashion.

operating point. Here the economic optimization is executed In contrast with the traditional MPC, the EMPC method

batch wise at a rate of hours/day (e.g. 4-6 hours interval for incorporates the process economics and process control

rice powder), but control action is taken in minutes/seconds objectives in a single cost function and which is optimized

(e.g. every 20 seconds for rice powder). A schematic block to operate the process in a possible time varying fashion.

diagram of the proposed predictive control frame work is Though the present work deals with the traditional MPC

shown in Figure 1. The employed control strategy is most framework, but it insights an important foundation work

widely known as two-layer paradigm in process control litera- which can be extended for possible employment of EMPC

ture. The paradigm has witnessed a numerous number of suc- in pneumatic conveying dryer.

cessful implementation, considering steady state economic The remainder of the paper is organized as follows:

operation of chemical processes [39]–[41]. Section II describes about the experimental dryer setup,

However in very recent years, dynamic or time varying while in Section III, the background and theoretical frame-

economic operation of chemical processes has attracted work of the present study related to the development of

the attention of research community as well as indus- powder moisture soft sensor, first principle’s model, closed-

tries. A new paradigm, Economic MPC (EMPC) is becom- loop model identification in the structured form and state

ing very popular and effective in the context of chemical space MPC method are discussed. Section IV exemplifies the

B. Satpati et al.: Sensor-Less Predictive Drying Control of Pneumatic Conveying Batch Dryers

processing of rice powder material, sought to carry out system

identification and control design. Section V presents both

results in simulation and in a real time application. The paper

ends summarizing the contribution of the work in Section VI.

The process under investigation is a negative pressure closed-

type lab-scaled pneumatic conveying system, which is partic-

ularly suitable for drying, conveying and separation of fine

grained materials [2], [3]. The drying operation in these units

is characterized by a coherent flow of a preheated gas–grain

mix, where grains being de-hydrated or dried by the preheated

air during transportation through the air duct, thereafter grains

are separated according to size by some cyclone systems [2].

The schematic process flow and instrumentation diagram

of the experimental set-up is illustrated in Figure 2, which

consists of an air pre-heating furnace comprising a 1m inner

diameter G.I. air duct fitted with six electrical heaters of

58 kW total heating capacity, a horizontal section consisting

of a rotary feeder and mixing and grinding unit, a vertical

pneumatic conveying duct (114.3 mm internal diameter and FIGURE 2. Process flow and instrument diagram.

(Maximum discharge 2548.5 m3 /h).

The heaters placed inside the preheating furnace are used measured by a RTD sensor placed prior to the rotary feeder

to heat the drying air at desired temperature. The material to and regulated by controlling the current through the heaters.

be processed is fed into the hopper and the feeding rate is In order to control the heater current, a 3-ph solid state

being regulated by a rotary feeder. The vertical duct work is relay (SSR) (model 25A, NIPONIX) is operated at high fre-

the main component of the dryer, which is used to convey the quency in time proportional output (TPO) mode. The outlet

preheated air–grain mix in the upward direction caused due air temperature and relative humidity of air are measured by

to the creation of a negative pressure zone inside the duct by relative humidity temperature meter (AMPROBE THDW-3)

means of a blower-motor drive, placed at end of the conveying placed just prior to exit. The suspended powder material

line. Resistance Temperature Detectors (RTDs) are mounted temperature in the cyclone systems are measured by infrared

on the duct in various locations to measure the air or air- thermometer (emissivity 0.98). The airflow rate and pressure

grain mixture temperature. The dryer inlet air temperature is inside the duct are measured by v-cone (Mc-crometer) and

B. Satpati et al.: Sensor-Less Predictive Drying Control of Pneumatic Conveying Batch Dryers

pressure transmitter (Honeywell, ST 3000) respectively, and parallel to each other, therefore the vertical pneumatic

is controlled by controlling the blower motor (3-ph induc- conveying duct can be considered as 1-1 co-current heat

tion type) through a variable frequency drive (VFD) (model exchanger. Considering the thermodynamic properties of

IG5ASV015IG5A-4, LG). co-current heat exchanger, the temperature drop between

Since the various control elements are distributed through- dryer inlet and outlet (1T) can be derived in terms of log-

out the system, a Honeywell make HC 900 controller is used mean temperature difference [37], [38], given by

for monitoring and controlling the entire process. The outlet

Ta − Tpin − Ta0 − Tpout

air temperature, airflow rate, and duct pressure are acquired 1T = (2)

T −Tpin

by Analog Input (AI) channels of the HC 900 controller, ln Ta0a−Tpout

and then sent to the respective PID controller, the output of

the temperature PID controller is then sent to Digital Out- The particle temperature at cyclone system or collec-

put (DO) port of the HC 900 controller through a TPO block, tor (Tpout ) of pneumatic conveying dryer is obtained from the

which then drive the SSR. The output of the airflow PID energy balance between drying agent and drying materials

controller goes to the Analog Output (AO) port of the HC 900 in dilute phase with the consideration of loss-less heat trans-

controller, and then converted into 4-20 mA current output, fer [37], yields

which finally goes to the Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) ṁa ca

for control of the blower speed. Initial and final moisture Tpout = Tpin + Ta − Ta0 (3)

ṁp cp

contents are measured using 10 g samples by an air-oven

drying method (135 degree C for 24 h). From the theoretical point of view of any adiabatic dryer,

in order to operate the dryer near its maximum thermal

III. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND AND DEVELOPMENT efficiency (ηT _max ), the dryer outlet air temperature (Ta0 )

This section discusses the background and theoretical frame- should be as close as possible to either the wet bulb tem-

work of the present study related to the development of perature (TBW ) or the negligibly lower adiabatic saturation

material moisture soft sensor, control oriented first princi- temperature (TAS ) [1]. On the other hand the drying materials

ple’s model and structured model parameter identification are usually fed to the hopper at ambient temperature (Tamb ).

technique from closed-loop experimental data. The section Therefore without loss of any generality, it may be

also gives a brief overview of the conventional state space assumed:

model predictive control (SSMPC) design method, but the

Ta0 = TBW = TAS = Ta − ηT _max [Ta − Tamb ] (4)

method has been modified as per the requirement of the

control problem. The production rate (S) of batch dryer proportionally varies

with the material throughput or flow rate (ṁp ).

A. DEVELOPMENT OF SOLID MOISTURE SOFT SENSOR Thus, using equations (2-4), the equation (1) is reshaped as

USING TEMPERATURE DROP MODEL follows:

The solid moisture soft sensor developed in this section is k4

a modification of the soft sensor model originally reported M = M0 + k3 [Ta − Tamb ]γ + η , (5)

ṁp

in [3]. In contrast to the earlier work, the temperature drop cal-

culation steps of the presented model [3] have been reformed

where k3 = ηT _max 1 + ca . .

φcp

to a great extent by utilizing the concept of log-mean tem- ln 1 1 − ηT _max (1+

perature difference of 1-1 co-current heat exchanger. The

ca

φcp and k4 is the modified proportionality constant.

aforementioned modifications are incorporated in order to

justify the model from theoretical standpoint. Now for a given dryer dimensions, inlet conveying line

In pneumatic conveying dryer the material moisture (M) pressure (P1 ), dryer mean temperature (T Dm ) and conveying

at any appropriate point along the vertical duct during batch conditions, the minimum conveying air flow velocity (vamin ),

processing before the product leaves the dryer or collected by corresponding to the conveying limit can be determined by

the cyclone system can be estimated from the measurements using the following equation [3], [4]

of product initial moisture (M0 ), temperature drop between ṁp TDm

dryer inlet and outlet (1T ) and production rate or dryer vamin = 0.1018 (6)

Dpipe2 P1 φ

speed (S) [7], [42]. The model is based on the empirical rule,

As addressed in the various literature of pneumatic con-

k2

M = M0 + k1 [1T ]γ + , (1) veying and drying [1], [3], [4] for dilute phase conveying

(S)η the minimum conveying air flow velocity, vamin , will almost

where k1 , k2 , γ and η are the empirical model constants certainly be above 10 m/s to ensure that the material does not

depending upon the type, size and shape of the materials used drop out of suspension and block the pipeline. The value of

for processing. vamin depends mainly upon mean particle size, particle shape

In the process under investigation the coherent flow of and particle size distribution. This is typically in the region

preheated gas–grain mix moves in the upward direction of 10–12 m/s for a very fine powder, to 14–16 m/s for a fine

B. Satpati et al.: Sensor-Less Predictive Drying Control of Pneumatic Conveying Batch Dryers

granular material, and beyond for larger particles and higher 2) The throughputs ṁp and initial moisture content (M0 )

density materials. of material feeds can be varied or adjusted by the

Design would generally be based on a conveying line operator during a batch of production.

inlet air velocity, va , 20 per cent greater than the minimum 3) The solid loading ratio (φ) is kept constant for the entire

conveying air velocity [4]: batch of processing

4) Drag and heat transfer coefficients can vary with the

ṁp TDm

va = 1.2vamin = 0.122 (7) shape and size of drying particles. Since uniform parti-

D2 P1 φ cles are fed in batch, therefore these coefficients can be

Therefore to get a sustained conveyance and meet the drying assumed constant.

requirements, the constraints imposed on air flow velocity is 5) Sensor (temperature and flow) dynamics are ignored in

given by the model, however sensor gains are considered.

6) Static air pressure drops in the conveying line are

ṁp TDm 1M

0.122 < va < (8) assumed to be equal at blower and dryer exits.

D P1 φ

2 τ [H − Hea ] Based on the above assumptions the process can be repre-

Now, Substituting ṁp from (7) in (5), the desired material sented by the following set of equations (see Table I), which

moisture (Mf ) is estimated at the cyclone system before the have been written in a suitable form for developing nonlinear

product leaves the dryer, given by state space model of pneumatic conveying dryer.

a (9)

particle properties, inlet conveying line pressure, dryer mean

temperature and solid loading ratio.

CONVEYING DRYER

The formulation of first principle’s model is based upon

FIGURE 3. Schematic diagram of conveying line with motor blower drive.

momentum, energy and mass differential balances between

drying agent and drying material with the considera-

tion of one dimensional heat transport phenomena and Motor-Blower Dynamics: The process under investigation

dilute phase conveying for food particles as presented by consists of a negative pressure conveying line, where the

Fyhr and Rasmuson [8], Tanaka et al. [11] and Plegrina and motor-blower drive is placed prior conveying line is shown in

Crapiste [10]. In contrast with the existing models, the present Figure 3. Here the static pressure of air has been considered

contribution includes some necessary modifications to obtain in four different location of the conveying line i.e. P1 at dryer

control oriented mathematical model of pneumatic conveying inlet, P2 at blower inlet, and P3 at blower outlet and P4

dryer, taking into account the negative pressure conveying at dryer exit respectively ( see the ‘static pressure profile’

and complexities of online material moisture and air humidity presented by dashed-dot red line).

measurement. Through the conveying line, the air flow accelerates from

In order to develop controllable and observable state space position 1 to position 2 because of the static pressure drop

model of pneumatic conveying dryer the unmeasured (mea- generated at the entrance of the blower, and the static pressure

sured offline) variables such as material moisture and air drop at position 2 is equal to the dynamic pressure gain at that

humidity were replaced in terms of measured process vari- location.

ables (dryer inlet air temperature and air flow rate) using 1

i.e. P1 = P2 + ρa v2avg (19)

temperature drop model. To facilitate control design pressure 2

drop model of blower-motor drive has been incorporated The static pressure change across the blower is given by:

and momentum balance differential equations were reshaped 1Pblower,static = P3 − P2 (20)

accordingly.

The first principl’s model developed in this contribution Based on the assumptions vi (P3 = P4 ), the total static

primarily stands on some relevant assumptions as made by pressure drop created by the motor –blower drive in the

Fyhr and Rasmuson [8] and Plegrina and Crapiste [10], conveying line can be determined as follows:

in addition with some application specific assumptions were 1

also taken up such as: 1Pblower,drop = P2 − P4 = P1 − ρa v2avg − P4

2

1) The model is developed by considering batch operation 1

= −(P4 − P1 ) − ρa v2avg

of pneumatic conveying dryer. Therefore, the particles 2

having uniform shape (non-spherical) and size are fed 1

= −1Pstatic − ρfan v2avg (21)

during a batch of processing. 2

3552 VOLUME 5, 2017

B. Satpati et al.: Sensor-Less Predictive Drying Control of Pneumatic Conveying Batch Dryers

Considering the axial flow and blower properties, the pressure Substituting (23) in (24), results in

drop calculated in (21) can be rewritten in the following

form [46]: 2

1 2 N

2 1Pblower,drop = − ρa (πDtip ) ψ

2 60

1 1 V̇

1Pblower,drop = − ρa vtip ψ − ρa

2

, (22) 2

2 2 Ablower 1 va

− k8 ρa (26)

where the blower tip velocity 2 Ablower

N

vtip = πDtip (23)

60 Drying air humidity (H) and volume fraction 1−ε ε cal-

and Vavg is the volumetric air flow rate (V̇ ) per unit annular culations using Temperature Drop Model

swept area of the blower (Ablower ). In the preceding section the particle moisture (M) at any

Now for a uniform cross-sectional circular conveying duct appropriate point along or inside the batch dryer has been

volumetric air flow rate (V̇ ) is proportionally varies with estimated using temperature drop model and given by (5).

the air flow velocity (va ). Therefore, (22) can be revised as Now using (5) and (14), the air humidity can be obtained as

follows: follows:

2

1 1 va

1Pblower,drop = − ρa vtip ψ − k8 ρ a

2

, (24)

" #

2 2 Ablower k4

γ

H = −φ M0 + k3 [Ta − Tamb ] + η + ℵ, (27)

where k8 is a system constant and its value depends upon ˙

(mp )

dryer geometry.

The axial flow coefficients ψ can be obtained experimen- where ℵ is a system constant.

tally and given by [46]: In order to replace particle moisture (M) and drying

air

1Pstatic humidity (H) in the expression of volume fraction 1−εε ,

ψ= 1 (25)

2 ρfan (π Dtip ) [2f (1 − s) /p]

2 M and H obtained using (5) and (27) are substituted in (17)

B. Satpati et al.: Sensor-Less Predictive Drying Control of Pneumatic Conveying Batch Dryers

and finally volume fraction is obtained as follows: Linearization of State Space Model: The nonlinear model

of pneumatic conveying and drying process is linearized

γ

ρa va 1+M0 +k3 [Ta −Tamb ] + ˙ η k4

about a selected operating point, chosen on the basis of a suit-

1−ε (mp )

=φ able drying condition (Mf , M0 , 1M) considering the thermal

ε

ρp vp 1−φ M0 +k3 [Ta −Tamb ]γ + ˙k4 η +ℵ and hydrodynamic properties of dryer and physical properties

(mp )

of the processing powder material, to ease the control design

(28) and implementation issues.

Nonlinear State Space Model: The pneumatic conveying To linearize the model (31), the Taylor series method

dryer is initially modeled with the four ordinary differential is used. In developing this linearization, it is assumed that

equations based on momentum and energy balances of par- all process variables have their respective values in the

ticle and air as presented in (10)-(13). Then the dependent vicinity of a selected drying condition (operating point),

variables in the right hand side expression of (10)-(13) which is denoted in the following by the index ‘‘o’’; i.e.

such

x = xo + 1x, y = yo + 1y, u = uo + 1u, d = d0 + 1d.

as blower pressure drop (1Pdrop ), volume fraction 1−ε ,

ε In order to approximate the nonlinear state equations only

˙ latent heat of vaporization (L Tp , M ), parti-

drying rate (w), the first-order derivative elements in the Taylor series are

cle moisture (M) and drying air humidity (H) are substituted taken into account. Applying Taylor series in (31) and in

using (26), (28), (18), (16), (5) and (27) respectively, as accordance with the assumptions above, the linearized state

applicable. Finally the first order vector matrix equations of space model of the process is obtained as follows:

the nonlinear process model are obtained (see Appendix-I)

and the system is represented in the following form: 1x

˙ = A1x + Bu 1u + Bd 1d

1y = C1x, (32)

ẋ = f (x, u, d) y = h (x) (29)

∂f (x,u,d) ∂f (x,u,d)

where A = ∂x |xo ,uo ,d0 , Bu/d = ∂u/d |xo ,uo ,d0 and

where x ∈ X ⊆ Rnx is the state vector, u ∈ U ⊂ Rnu ,

and d ∈ D ⊂ Rnd are the control and disturbance input C = ∂h(x)

∂x |xo

vector respectively, f (x, u, d) is the input and state dependent

C. CONTROL RELEVANT IDENTIFICATION

function vector of the state equation, h(x) is the output func-

tion vector. The control inputs to the pneumatic conveying The state space model of pneumatic conveying dryer derived

system are N the rotational speed of blower and q̇ the heat from first principle’s model contains many physical param-

input rate to the heaters. Along with the input variables, three eters and system constants. The state space model to be

disturbance inputs are also considered such as material inlet identified through system identification in accordance with

temperature (Tamb ), material throughputs or flow rate ṁp the structures as derived in (32), which can be rewritten in

and initial moisture content of material (M0 ). These variable the discrete state spaceform by discretizing the system at a

strongly effects system operation and performance. The air sampling rate of T as follows:

flow velocity (va ) and air temperature (Ta ) are considered 1x (k + 1) = Aθ 1x (k) + Buθ 1u (k) + Bdθ 1d(k) (33)

as output variables. The state variables of the process are

1y (k) = Cθ 1x (k) , (34)

chosen as air flow velocity (va ), particle velocity (vp ), air

temperature (Ta ) and particle temperature (Tp ), i.e. Where 1x (k) is (4 × 1) state vector, 1u (k) is (2 × 1)

control input vector, 1y(k) is (2 × 1) system output vector

va = x1 , vp = x2 , Ta = x3 , Tp = x4 ,

and 1d(k) is (3 × 1) measured plant input disturbance vec-

N = u1 , q̇ = u2 , Tamb = d1 , tor, Aθ , Buθ , Bdθ and Cθ are system input-coupled matrices

corresponds to control input vector and measured plant input

ṁp = d2 , M0 = d3 , va = y1 and Ta = y2 , where

disturbance vector and output-coupled matrices respectively

x = [x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 ]T , U = [u1 , u2 , d1 , d2 , d3 ]T and of appropriate sizes parameterized by a set of parameters θ.

Everywhere θ := [θ1 , θ2 , θ3 , . . . . . . ., θ24 ]T , transformed

y = [y1 , y2 ]T . (30)

parametric space 0 : θ : θ ∈ R24 } ,

By rearranging the first order vector matrix equations in the

θ1 θ2 θ3

0

structure as presented in (29) with the consideration of (30), θ4 θ5 0 0 ,

the following state space model is obtained: Aθ = θ6 θ7 θ8 θ9

State equation : 0 0 θ10 θ11

f1 (x1 , x2 , x3 , u1 , d1 , d2 , d3 ) θ12 θ13 θ14 θ15

0

f2 (x1 , x2 )

0 0 0 0 0

ẋ = f (x, u, d) =

Bθ = Buθ Bdθ =

f3 (x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 , u2 , d1 , d2 , d3 ) θ16 θ17 θ18 θ19

0

f4 (x3 , x4 , d1 , d2 , d3 ) θ20 θ21 θ22

0 0

h1 (x1 ) = ζ1 x1 θ23 0

0 0

Output equation : y = h (x) = (31) Cθ = (35)

h1 (x3 ) = ζ2 x3 0 0 θ24 0

B. Satpati et al.: Sensor-Less Predictive Drying Control of Pneumatic Conveying Batch Dryers

In order to estimate parameters of the model presented identification [48], [55] or stochastic based search algo-

in (33-35), the structured parameterization of state space rithm [56], [57] have been found very effective for closed-

matrices Aθ , Buθ and Cθ is our primary concern, as because loop identifications. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) [58]

the structure of the linear time invariant (LTI) state-space is one of the most widely used intelligent computational

model has been deduced from physical considerations and methods based on stochastic searchfor identifying the pro-

the operating conditions. Thus, the system identification tech- cess model. In many applications, PSO based stochastic

nique to be employed should have the ability to handle gray- search algorithms were found to be very accurate for struc-

box LTI structured parameter identification problem. tured model estimation in gray-box form [59]–[61]. Though,

Among the various system identification techniques, sub- most of the researches conducted in this area were used

space based approaches are most common for identifying for open loop identification data. Therefore the applicability

the parameters of black-box (fully parameterized) LTI state and closed-loop identification problem formulation of PSO

space model. These methods are non-iterative, highly compu- based stochastic search algorithms are still under the scope

tationally intensive and well suited for both open and closed- of research.

loop identifications [47], [48]. But the appropriateness of The present paper uses a refined PSO based stochastic

the subspace based identification methods drops radically search framework to develop a closed-loop structured model

when gray-box state space models are considered [49], [50]. parameter estimation method. The estimation algorithm is

Predictions or output error based frameworks are the good being improved greatly by considering some adaptive modi-

substitute of subspace based approaches, often used in black- fications in the penalty functions (adaptive penalty function)

box LTI state space model identifications. But if these meth- [62] involved with the least squared constraint optimization

ods are adopted for gray-box state space model identification, problem.

success of the estimation to a large extent depends upon the Closed-Loop Refined-PSO Based Stochastic Search

selection of optimizer and initial parameter vector, wrong Framework for Structured Model Parameters Identification:

initialization of parameter vector may lead to the rise of local Consider the perturbed system represented by set of equa-

minima issues [50]. As an alternative to the conventional tions (33-35). The system has an existing set of proportional

frameworks, many researchers have been employed a two- controllers (temperature and flow PIDs, both operating in

or three-steps iterative framework [49], [51] for identifying proportionalmode) placed in the forward path with a gain

the parameters of gray-box state space model. First, an initial G11 0

matrix G = .

fully parameterized black-box model is estimated in state 0 G22

space from using subspace methods, then the initial black- In contrast to the experiments performed for the purpose

box model has been transformed into gray-box form, either of identification, an additional excitation/noise input 1v(k) is

by enforcing some parameters to zero or replacing by known injected to the control input, and the total input to the closed-

values as per the desired structure. The initial model obtained loop system become

in structured form is further used as an initial model of a pre- 1u (k) = G [1r (k) − 1y (k)] + 1v(k), (36)

diction error based recursive estimation algorithm to identify

1u1 (k) 1r 1 (k)

the parameters as per the desired structures. Nevertheless, the where 1u (k) = , 1r (k) = , 1y (k) =

success of the estimation through iterative algorithm is sub- 1u 2 (k) 1r2 (k)

1y1 (k) 1v1 (k)

jected to accuracy of initial parameter values and efficiency and 1v (k) = , which yields the

of the designer [49]. In order to avoid the iterative algorithm 1y2 (k) 1v2 (k)

and address initial model issues, polynomial optimization following closed-loop system (perturbed) of the form

or numerically reliable approach has been employed by few 1x (k + 1) = Abθ 1x (k) + B

duθ 1r (k) + B

ddθ 1w (k) (37)

researchers. Still the applicability of these methods is limited 1y (k) = C

cθ 1x (k) , (38)

to small size models.

Apart from the model structure, the collection of where Abθ , denotes the closed-loop system matrix, Abθ = Aθ −

identification data is another important concern. It is estab- Buθ GC (θ), B duθ , designates the closed-loop input-coupled

lished for model based control design; closed-loop identifi- matrix corresponds to reference signal 1r (k) , Bd uθ = Buθ G,

cation gives better performance [52]. However, closed-loop B

ddθ signifies the closed-loop input-coupled matrix corre-

sponds to dither signal 1w (k) , B

identification presents some additional complications for sys- d dθ = Buθ ; Bdθ and

tem identification. The fundamental problem is the con- 1w (k) = [1d (k) ; 1v(k)],

troller induced correlation between the output noise and cθ denotes the closed-loop output coupled matrix,

C

the plant input through the feedback. Because of this cor- cθ = Cθ .

C

relation, many conventional identification methods such as The objective of the problem is to obtain a state space

least squares estimate method, maximum likelihood method, model of the open-loop system, denoted by the set Aθ ,

Bθ = Buθ Bdθ , Cθ from the known closed-loop data set

empirical transfer function estimation, instrumental variable

methods etc. may yield a large estimation bias, and even [1r (k) , 1w (k) , 1y (k)] and controller G.

lead to unidentified model [53], [54]. Nevertheless, a sig- The identification problem is formulated in terms of an

nificant number of methods generally based on subspace optimization problem in which the error between an actual

B. Satpati et al.: Sensor-Less Predictive Drying Control of Pneumatic Conveying Batch Dryers

physical measured response of the system and the simulated iterations as follows [2], [62]:

response of a parameterized model is minimized. 1

The objective function defined as the weighted mean β (t) if all the best particle in the

01 1 or 2

squared errors between measured and simulated responses β1 or 2 (t +1) = last j iterations are feasible

02 β1 or 2 (t)

for a number N of given samples is considered as fitness of

if they are not feasible

estimated model parameters: β1 or 2 (t) otherwise

1 XN

(43)

Jobj = β1 (yi1m −b yi1sim )2 + β2 (yi2m −b yi2sim )2

N i=1 It indicates, if all best particles of last j iterations are feasi-

1 h ble, penalty term β1 or 2 (t + 1) for iteration (t + 1) decreases.

= (y1m −b y1s )T Ō

˛ 1 (y1m −b yi1s ) If they are unfeasible, the penalty term is increased. Other-

N

wise if the best individuals in the last j iterations consist of

i

+ (y2m −b y2s )T Ō

˛ 2 (y2m −by2s ) , (39)

feasible and unfeasible solutions, the penalty term does not

where y1m , y2m and b y1s , b

y2s are measured and simulated change. 01 and 02 are the scaling factors and 01 , 02 > 1,

outputs, β1 , β2 are the death penalty values (β1 , β2 > 0) 01 > 02 and 01 6 = 02 .

and Ō˛ 1 and Ō

˛ 2 are the scalar weighting matrices given by Identification Algorithm: The identification algorithm

β1 eye (N , N ) and β2 eye (N , N ) respectively. integrates the considerations for closed-loop estimation,

In defining the objective function (Jobj ) for stochastic based particle swarm optimization and adaptive penalty function

search algorithm many researchers used death or static penal- method. The identification algorithm involves the following

ties [63], [64]. But the death penalty function sometimes leads steps:

to infeasible solutions if the weights are too small or very Step 1: Load the closed-loop experimental data set

poor quality solutions if the weights are too high. Therefore to r (k) , w (k) , y (k)], also specify the data size N and controller

minimize the possibility of finding infeasible and poor quality gain G.

solutions in the search space, death penalty values β1 and β2 Step 2: Determine the parameters to identify, define the

are modified by adopting adaptive penalty functions [62]. model structure and matrices Aθ , Buθ , Bdθ and Cθ as pre-

Particle Position, Velocity and Weight Update Equations sented in (35).

in PSO Algorithm: PSO is a nature inspired algorithm based Step3: Initialize a population of g particles with random

optimization tool, which was developed by Kennedy [58] positions within the lower and upper bound of the problem

motivated by the social behavior of bird flocking and fish space. Similarly initialize randomly g velocities associated

schooling. Kennedy demonstrated that the velocity and posi- with the particles. The dimension of the search space must

tion of the particles can be updated as follows: be same as the number of parameters to be identified. Also

Velocity Update: specify the maximum number of iteration. T

Step 4: Initialize the state vector as x (0) = 0 0 0 0 and

T

Vit+1 = WVit + κ1 rand 1 XPbest − Xit

ysim = 0 0

+ κ2 rand 2 Xgbest − Xit Step 5: Initialize the initial weight of the penalties β1 and β2

(40)

and scaling factor 01 , 02 such that, 02 > 1, 01 > 02 and

Position Update: 01 6 = 02 .

Step 6: Compute the closed-loop model matrices Abθ , B duθ , B

ddθ

Xit+1 = Xit + γ Vit+1 (41) and C cθ for the initial population.

Step 7: Calculate ysim (i) and x(i + 1) using (38) and (37) for

Where κ1 and κ2 are two positive constants, rand 1 and rand 2 the entire experimental data set i.e., i = 1: N − 1.

are random numbers in the range of [0, 1], W is the inertia Step 10: Evaluate the optimization fitness functions Jobj for

weight, Xit represents current position of ith particle, Vit rep- the initial population using (39).

resents current velocity, XPbest and Xgbest represents local and Step 11: Find the minimum fitness value for fitness functions

global best position of the particles receptively. The position Jobj in Step 10 and call it JPbest and let the particle associated

of the particles are updated using equation (41), where Xit+1 with it be Xi .

is the new position of the particle in the search space. Step 12: Initially set Jgbest equal to JPbest .

Weight Update: The weight W is updated as follows: Step 13: Update the particle weight W using (42).

Wmax − Wmin

Step 14: Update the velocity of each particle using (40).

W = Wmax − iter, (42) Check V for the range [Vmax, Vmin]. If not, set it to the

iter max

limiting values.

where iter is the iteration count. Step 15: Update the position of each particle using (41),

Adaptive Penalty Modifications: In adaptive penalty which gives the new population.

method, the weights β1 and β2 are updated for every j iter- Step 16: Compute the closed-loop model matrices Abθ ,

ations according to information collected from population. B

d uθ , B

ddθ and Ccθ for the new population

The penalty functions β1 and β2 are updated for every j Step 17: Repeat Step 7 for the new population.

B. Satpati et al.: Sensor-Less Predictive Drying Control of Pneumatic Conveying Batch Dryers

Step 18: Evaluate the optimization fitness functions Jobj for was performed by adding pure water to the rice flour and

the new population using (39). keeping the wet sample inside a freezer within plastic bags

Step 19: Obtain new JPbest for fitness functions Jobj for new for 24 hours. As per the requirement of identification, two

population. different moisture conditioned samples were prepared. After

Step 20: Compare the JPbest obtained in step 19 with Jgbest . the moisture conditioning the samples were kept at the room

If JPbest is better than Jgbest then set Jgbest to JPbest . temperature approximately for two hours so that the materials

Step 21: Check the iteration count. If iteration count =j check could attain ambient temperature before placed in the hopper.

the fitness values of JPbest for the last j iterations, else go The moisture content of samples were measured by an air-

to Step 13. oven drying method. Before performing the tests the exper-

Step 22: Updatepenalties β1 and β2 using (43). imental setup was used to run for one hour under no-load

Step 23: Modify the objective function Jobj using (39) and go to eliminate the startup effects. The test was repeated for

to Step 13. three times in order to acquire more accurate data to perform

Step 24: Check the convergence criteria (maximum num- the system identification and validation. Among the three

ber of iteration, fitness value). If met exit the iteratio; sets of data, one randomly chosen set has been kept entirely

otherwise return to Step 13 and update iteration count separate for final validation purpose. The remaining two data

by one. sets have been used for model estimation and testing using a

2-fold cross-validation (cv) test, which is discussed in detail

D. CONTROL DESIGN by Satpati et al. (2014) [2].

The anticipative temperature and flow control law employed To formulate the data-driven model of the pneumatic con-

in the present contribution uses the conventional constrained veying and drying process in closed-loop the following mea-

state space model predictive control approach (SSMPC), sures were taken during the experiments:

which has been attracted an increasing attention of a sig- â The temperature and flow PID controllers were kept in

nificant number of researchers over the last few decades, AUTO mode with P, I and D setting of PB=100%, Td=0

in order to handle some complex industrial control prob- and Ti=infinite.

lems [65]–[68]. In the process under investigation, the main â Set point of temperature PID was varied in pseudo-

concerns of performing control design are reducing energy random manner within 50-120◦ C.

consumption and improving product quality, which can be â Set point of flow PID was varied in pseudo-random

obtained by maintaining a desired temperature and flow pro- manner within 133.33 -328.35 m3 /h.

file of drying agent over the length of the dryer. To achieve â Inlet material temperature was considered to be varied

the control objectives, the control strategy is transformed in accordance with the ambient temperature.

into Quadratic Programming (QP) problem where a quadratic â Material was fed into the rotary feeder at a constant

objective function subject to linear inequality constraints is feeding rate of 20 kg/s/m2 (per cross sectional area of

minimized online. In formulating the Constrained SSMPC the vertical duct) for a considerable duration thereafter

problem for the present study, the future trajectory predictions feeding rate has been changed to 25 kg/s/m2 for next

were generated using the innovation bias approach, which is duration.

equivalent to carrying out predictions using the observer aug- â During the experiments, two different moisture condi-

mented with an artificially introduced integrated white noise tioned (27.27% and 29.7%) rice powder samples were

model. The observer has been developed using a Kalman pre- used, the samples were fed into the rotary feeder one

dictor [66]. The state estimation, prediction and optimization after another, i.e. 27.27% moisture conditioned sample

methods employed in control design has been discussed in approximately for first three hours and second sample

details by Wang [65], Li et al. [66], and Mustapha et al. [68]. for next couple of hours duration.

â Loop rate of the DCS was set to 1 Hz.

IV. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND DATA COLLECTIONS â The heat energy supplied to the heater coil (Q) was

The choice of the excitation signal is a very important issue of computed by transforming the measured current data.

concern before finding the suitable model of the multivariable The heater current was estimated from the TPO-duty

process under observation. The system should be excited in cycle of PLC, which generates a PWM signal to operate

such a way that all interesting areas of the input space and the SSR connected with the heating coil. Thus the error

all relevant frequencies are covered. That is why amplitude involved in the measurement of current was significantly

modulated pseudo random binary signal (APRBS) [69] has low.

been considered in designing the closed-loop experiments â The mixing motor was used to rotate at constant speed

for system identification.Rice powder was used as a model during all the experiments.

drying material to carry out the experiments for system

identificatio and hence the control design. Here the fine V. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

grained rice flour sample (mean diameter (dp0 ) 95 µm) of The obtained results, grouped in two categories are presented

Indian basmati (Basmati 370) [70] has been considered for in the following subsections. These are the model estimation

experimental study. The moisture conditioning of rice powder and validation and control design.

B. Satpati et al.: Sensor-Less Predictive Drying Control of Pneumatic Conveying Batch Dryers

and PSO.

The computational intensiveness and accuracy in param-

eter estimation are the main concern of any stochastic

search based system identification algorithm. The conver-

gence speed (number of iterations) is the measure of com-

putational intensiveness and the accuracy in estimation is

ascertained by the final fitness value of objective function.

In order to verify the proficiency of proposed method over

the conventional PSO based approaches, a comparative study

has been carried out and depicted in Figure 4. The figure

demonstrates, the conventional

PSO approach undergoes 1,053 performance evaluations

to reach its best fitness value (0.01289), while the proposed

method finds the much improved global optimum value

(0.002787) in only 458 runs for the estimation data-set.The

adaptive modifications in the penalty functions involved

with the weighted least squared constraint optimization has

reduced the computational time by approximately 57% com-

pared to the conventional PSO based search method. The

study also affirmed the benefits of blending adaptive penalty

function method with the conventional PSO algorithm to cre-

ate a more sophisticated and improved algorithm, particularly

suitable for structured identification.

The state space model matrices of linearized pneumatic

A. MODEL ESTIMATION AND VALIDATION conveying dryer [Aθ , Buθ , Bdθ and Cθ ], estimated using pro-

The nonlinear state space model of the pneumatic convey- posed PSO algorithm with the help of identification data sets

ing dryer derived from first principl’s, has been linearized (2-fold cv data set), are presented in Appendix II.

at a known drying condition i.e. initial moisture content A section of the final validation data-set, consisting of

M0 = 0.2727 kg-water/kg-dried solids and final moisture air flow and temperature set points (r1 (k) , r2 (k)), measured

content Mf = 0.1256 kg-water/kg-dried solids, then the output (y1m (k) , y2m (k)), control inputs (u1 (k) , u2 (k)) and

structured model parameters of the linearized process have measured input disturbances (d1 (k), d2 (k), d3 (k)) are shown

been identified using the proposed estimation method on the in Figure 5.

basis of identification data-sets (2-fold cv data set), collected Plots of measured output data (y1m (k) , y2m (k)) and cor-

from closed-loop experiments. The values of some of the responding simulated output response (y1sim (k) , y2sim (k))

physical parameters involve with the first principl’s model along with the set point signal is presented in Figure 5

are presented in Table 2. The control parameters of PSO panels a-b. The requisite control inputs (u1 (k) , u2 (k)) and

algorithm and initial penalty values of objective function (39), measured input disturbances (d1 (k), d2 (k), d3 (k)) for closed-

as found to be suitable through hit and trial method are loop identification are plotted in Figure 5 panels c and d

presented in Table 3. respectively. Figure 5.a shows the comparison for measured

B. Satpati et al.: Sensor-Less Predictive Drying Control of Pneumatic Conveying Batch Dryers

FIGURE 5. Plot of a) measured and simulated air flow (m3 /h) along with the flow set point b) measured and simulated air temperature (degree C) with

corresponding set point c) control inputs u1 , u2 (%) d) measured plant input disturbances d1 (◦ C), d2 (kg/s/m2 ), d3 (%).

and simulated air flow output in m3 /h and Figure 5.b shows On the other hand, air temperature (y2 ) decreases with the

the similar comparison for air temperature in ◦ C. It is evident increase of blower speed (u1 ) and increases with increase of

from Figure 5 panels −d that the responses of the estimated heater current input (u2 ). The study also indicates, the process

models are closely correlated with the respective response output responses are very much sensitive with respect to the

of the actual process when various control and disturbance variation of measured disturbance inputs such as material

inputs are applied simultaneously. inlet temperature (d1 ), material flow rate (d2 ) and initial

Further, a step response test has been carried out to investi- moisture content (d3 ). However, the effect of material inlet

gate the relevance of simulated model in reflecting the phys- temperature variation on air flow response is insignificant.

ical properties and characteristics of the real process. Figure It is evident from the figure, the output responses interacted

6.a depicts the step responses of the outputs air flow (y1 ) with various control and disturbance inputs involve with the

and air temperature (y2 )) with respect to unit step changes different time constants, which have physical meaning.

in control inputs (u1 , u2 ) and measured plant input distur- In order to determine the accuracy in estimation, the sta-

bances (d1 ) respectively. Similar kind of exercise has been tistical attribute coefficient-of-determination R2T ) has been

performed for the rest of the transmittances and presented in considered, which is defined as [Satpati et al. [2]]

Figure 6.b. It is seen from the figure, the air flow rate (y1 ) of

" #

kym − ysim k22

the dryer increases with the increase of blower speed (u1 ) and 2

RT = 1 − , (44)

remains almost invariant with change of heater current (u1 ). kym − y¯m k22

B. Satpati et al.: Sensor-Less Predictive Drying Control of Pneumatic Conveying Batch Dryers

sidering these facts, air inlet heat flow rate has been

adjusted between 47% - 90% of maximum heat inflow rate

(208, 800 KJ /h). On the other hand the hard amplitude con-

straints on outputs are taken according to the minimum and

maximum values of respective set-point signals computed by

the temperature drop model for a known drying condition.

However in design the hard constraints imposed on output

variables were soften by choosing a large slack variable (sv )

in order to avoid the violation of input constraints caused

due to the enforcement of output constraints. Based on the

practical consideration of unit operations, these constraints

are summarized as follows:

Constraint on control variables (N (u1 ), q̇(u2 )

600 rpm ≤ u1 (k) ≤ 1050rpm ∀k

27.2KJ /s ≤ u2 (k) ≤ 52.2KJ /s ∀k

−50rpm ≤ u1 (k) − u1 (k − 1) ≤ 50rpm ∀k

−4.2KJ /s ≤ u2 (k) − u2 (k − 1) ≤ 4.2KJ /s ∀k (45)

Constraint on outputs (va (y1 ) and Ta (y2 ))

133.33 m3/h ≤ y1 (k) ≤ 328.35 m3/h ∀k

FIGURE 6. Step response of the simulated model transmittances a) y1 /u1

in blue line, y1 /u2 in red line, y1 /d1 in black line, y2 /u2 in bottle green

50◦ C ≤ y2 (k) ≤ 120◦ C ∀k

line and y2 /d1 in pink line b) y2 /u1 in red line, y1 /d2 in blue line, y1 /d3

in green line, y2 /d2 in purpel line and y2 /d3 in black line.

Simulation of Controlled Process: Considering the desired

response time and computational complexity of the design

predictive controller, the control horizon (Nc ) and prediction

where ym denotes the measured output, ysim represents the horizon (Np ) are chosen as 4 and 20 samples respectively

simulated output and ym is the mean of measured output. and initially the control interval (Ts ) is taken as 5 seconds.

The statistical coefficien indicates how well the model out- The performance weight matrices of the cost function

put fit to the plant output and must be close to 1. The (see Appendix III) are chosen as R = 0.1I6×6 and

coefficient-of-determination (R2T ) were computed for the out- Rs = I10×2 [65], [68], [71].

puts (y1 (k) , y2 (k)) and found to be reasonably accurate such The control performance of the designed predictive con-

as 0.993 and 0.986 respectively. troller is analyzed in closed-loop simulation and shown

in Figure 7.

B. CONTROL DESIGN These simulations were carried out at different values of

With the available accurate digital model, the proposed air flow (r1 (k)) and air temperature (r2 (k)) set points, strate-

SSMPC based controller was applied on the simulated model, gically varied in between 133.33 m3/h -328.35 m3/h and

thereafter it has been applied to the actual experimental 50◦ C -120◦ C respectively with the model parameter values

model, with the help of PLC HC900. In this section, the as presented in Table II. Figure 7 panel (a) shows the track-

results obtained from the simulated control system are pre- ing of air flow and temperature outputs y1 (k) , y2 (k)) with

sented; thereafter experimental results are presented and com- the corresponding set point (r1 (k) , r2 (k)) variations. The

pared with conventional PID control system. The design were associated manipulated variable responses are presented in

carried out in the presence of three different types of input and Figure 7 panel (b).The figure shows clearly the comportment

output constraints such as amplitude and incremental varia- of manipulated variables over an interval of 50 minutes in

tion constraints imposed on control variables u (k) and ampli- order to maintain the output responses at their respective set

tude constraints on output variables y (k). The constrained points.

on control variable u1 (k) and the corresponding incremental The flow output (y1 (k)) is varied in accordance with the

variation 1u1 (k) are chosen in such a way so that the drying changes of control input u1 (k) and independent of alteration

materials can attain a sustained conveyance and at the same of control input u2 (k). On the other hand, the control input

time it ensures to provide an adequate drying time. Therefore u1 (k) has a substantial influence on prediction of temperature

the speed of blower motor-drive was adjusted in the range output (y2 (k)). It is seen from the Figure 7 (a), the instances

between 40% - 70% of rated speed (1500 rpm). Similarly the where the process exhibits a flow set point change, a notable

constraints on control variable u2 (k) and the corresponding variation is observed in the temperature output response. It is

incremental variation 1u2 (k) are considered according to also viewed from the Figure 7 (b), at the same instances,

the material throughputs and initial moisture content of wet the control variable u2 (k) increases or decreases accordingly

B. Satpati et al.: Sensor-Less Predictive Drying Control of Pneumatic Conveying Batch Dryers

of manipulated variable response:

(a) 1u1 (−50rpm ≤u1 k − u1 (k − 1) ≤ 50rpm (b) )1u2

(−3.5KJ/sec ≤u2 k −u2 (k − 1) ≤ 3.5kJ/sec).

FIGURE 7. Closed-loop simulation of Pneumatic Conveying and Drying

process

with SSMPC control action (a) air flow and temperature

outputs

(y1 k , y2 k ) with the corresponding set point (r1 k , r2 k variations

(b) manipulated variables: control input u1 k and u2 k .

controller at some of the set points were studied in different

control interval and the results are reported in Table 4. The

energy cost for air heating and air flow are calculated as

in order to compensate the effect of control variable u1 (k)

follows:

on temperature output (y2 (k)). The tracking of air temper-

Energy cost of air heating:

ature in the process is much slower compared to air flow Z t

as because, the limited heating capacity of the preheating XNTs

JH = u2 dt = u2 (i) (47)

furnace imposes a hard constraint on control input u2 (k) and 0 i=1

corresponding increment 1u2 which prevent the temperature

Energy cost of air flow:

output to grow faster nullifying the large time constants

involve in air heating. XNTs 1

JF = ρa y1 (i) [va (i)]2 , (48)

The rate of changes in manipulated variables 1u1 and i=1 2

1u2 are plotted in Figure 8-panels a and b respectively. It is where time t = NTs , N = number of samples and Ts is the

clearly seen from Figure 7 (b) and Figure 8, the control vari- control interval, y1 = air flow output or volumetric flow rate

ables and their variation rates are within the specified limits in m3 /h, ρa is the air density. Now to find the correlation in

as in (45). between air velocity (va ) in m/s and blower speed (u1 ) in rps,

Further to examine the performance of the controlled pro- a test has been conducted with the experimental setup under

cess at a selected drying condition (M0 = 0.2727 kg-water/ no load condition by keeping flow PID in manual mode. And

kg-dried solids and Mf = 0.1256 kg-water/kg-dried solids) finally, the correlation is obtained as

for batch drying operation of rice powder material, some

simulation studies were performed using a set of dynamic va = 0.0001428u21 + 0.1173u1 − 1.767 (49)

set points estimated by temperature drop model. On the basis

For calculating the different performance indices in each

of experimental results the best fitted empirical temperature

case, the air flow and temperature set points have been

drop model is estimated as

changed at the same time instant from the same initial values

Mf = M0 − 4.4286 [Ta − Tamb ]0.204 − 33.371v−0.8 (46) 131.33 m3 /h and 50◦ C respectively and energy cost function

a

is computed for the same duration (10 minutes).

At first the air flow set points are obtained using (8) for known It is seen from the results as obtained in Table 4, with

dryer dimension and various parameter values as given in the increase of temperature and flow set points for the same

Table 2, then the required air temperature set points are deter- control interval the total energy cost of air and rise time

mined using (46). Now, the performance of the predictive for both air flow and air temperature are increased. On the

B. Satpati et al.: Sensor-Less Predictive Drying Control of Pneumatic Conveying Batch Dryers

TABLE 4. Performance measures of controlled pneumatic conveying and drying process in different control interval.

other hand with the increase of control interval (Ts ) of the where, N= number of samples and Ts is the control inter-

predictive controller for each set point, the total energy cost of val, M (i) = final material moisture at ith time instant and

air decreases but the rise time of air flow and air temperature Mf = desired final moisture.

responses have been increased significantly. For instance, at Now the various performance indices such as disturbance

set point (119 ◦ C, 260.2 m3 /h) for the increase of control recovery time (tdr ) of air flow and temperature responses,

interval from 5 seconds to 20 seconds the rise time of air total energy cost of air (Ja ), loss of product quality (QL )

flow is increased to 22.11 times but for the variation from of controlled process were estimated

for ±25% variation

20 seconds to 40 seconds it has been increased to only of material feeding rate ṁp from its nominal operating

1.58 times. Further it can be observed that for the increase value (20 kg-wet solid/s/m2 ). All the performance measures

of control interval from 5 seconds to 20 seconds the aver- have been computed for the same duration of dryer opera-

age energy cost of air for different set point is reduced to tion (approximately 12 minutes excluding the set point alter-

74.88% but for the variation from 20 seconds to 40 seconds ation period) at different drying conditions (air temperature

the average energy cost has been reduced to only 49.5%. and flow set points) but varied from same initial values:

The study reveals that the selection of larger control inter- 131.33 m3 /h and 50◦ C respectively with control interval

val would increase the energy efficiency of the dryer to a of 20 seconds. The obtained results are presented in Table 5.

large extent, but it would make the air flow and temperature The study clearly indicates the disturbance recovery time

responses more sluggish. Thus to select the control interval for both air flow and temperature responses have a high cor-

of the predictive controller, there should be a proper tradeoff relation with the set point and material throughput alterations

between energy cost and response time of the air flow and such that the disturbance recovery time for the responses get

temperature responses. Considering these facts, the control reduced or increased in accordance with the intensification of

interval of the predictive controller for further simulation and corresponding set points while the material feeding rate has

experimental study has been chosen as 20 seconds. been altered to 15 kg-wet solid/s/m2 and 25 kg-wet solid/s/m2

However the relatively sluggish air flow and temperature respectively. Subsequently, the product quality loss QLn

responses obtained at the starting instant does not have any (or QLp ) estimated for any drying conditions proportionately

significant effect on drying performance and product quality, varies with the corresponding disturbance recovery time of air

as because the process under investigation is engaged with a flow and temperature responses. On the other hand, the total

continuous batch drying operation. From the point of view energy cost of air is increased for both positive and negative

of an efficient dryer operation, the measure of disturbance alteration of material throughputs with the increase of air

recovery time (tdr ) for material throughput alteration or initial temperature and flow set points.

moisture variation and the corresponding loss of product Further with the variance of set points, similar type of

quality and total energy cost for a considerable period of trends are observed for the total energy cost and product

operation would be more relevant than estimating perfor- quality loss when the process is subjected to a negative alter-

mance measures at starting instant. The loss of product qual- ation of material feeds, whereas an opposite type of tendency

ity caused by material throughput variation can be defined is perceived in the presence of positive disturbances, which

in terms of mean deviation in material moisture from its leads to an optimization problem. The optimal set point for

desired or target moisture value (within ±1% tolarences) and dryer operation can be obtained by minimizing the objective

given by function

PNTs XNOP

30 Jan + Jap + 31 QLn + 32 QLp ,

i=1 M (i) − Mf

Jopt =

QL (in%) = × 100 (50) j=1

NTs × Mf (51)

B. Satpati et al.: Sensor-Less Predictive Drying Control of Pneumatic Conveying Batch Dryers

TABLE 5. Performance measures of controlled pneumatic conveying and drying process with material throughput alteration.

obtained through temperature drop model, 30 , 31 and 32

are the death penalties associated with the cost functions

Jan +Jap , QLn and QLp respectively. As per the requirement of

the optimization problem, penalties 31 and 32 were simply

chosen as large as 1.39e5 and 1e5 respectively and a compar-

atively lower weight (1e2) has been selected for the penalty

associated with the total air energy cost function.

FIGURE 9. Optimal set point estimation through optimization. FIGURE 10. Simulated response of the controlled process with +25%

material throughput alterations: (a) air flow response (b) air temperature

Figure 9 shows the variation of the various cost indices of response.

in air flow and temperature set points. The plot clearly shows,

the possible solution of the optimal set point detection prob- setting (92 ◦ C and 205.09 m3 /h respectively) from the ini-

lem is located at the intersecting point and consequently tial values (50 ◦ C and 131.33 m3 /h respectively) at the

where the air flow and temperature set points are varied near same time instant (320 seconds) with a material feeding rate

205.09 m3 /h and 92 ◦ C respectively. Thus, to achieve an eco- of 20 kg-wet solid/s/m2.

nomic drying performance and a satisfactory product quality Then at 720 seconds, material throughput has been altered

for the rice powder materials, the optimal air temperature and to 25 kg-wet solid/s/m2 . The various tracking performance

air flow set points of dryer operation are set to be 92 ◦ C and measures for the air flow and temperature responses were

205.09 m3 /h respectively. found to be rise time: 86 seconds and 269 seconds, steady

Figure 10 shows the set point tracking and compensation state error: NIL and % peak overshoot: 0.062% and 0%

of measured disturbances (material feed alteration) of the respectively. The disturbance recovery times for both the

simulated controlled process. To obtain the responses air responses were measured as 65 seconds and 147 seconds

flow and temperature set points were varied to the optimal respectively. It is generally agreed that the air temperature

B. Satpati et al.: Sensor-Less Predictive Drying Control of Pneumatic Conveying Batch Dryers

controller implemented in LabVIEW real time environment through

PLC mod-bus interface.

slower than the gas or oil fired dryers, but a proper design and FIGURE 12. Comparison of drying performance (air temperature

implementation of predictive control with prior knowledge response) of proposed SSMPC controller and auto-tuned PID controller of

HC900 PLC. (Time axis is shown in red and green color for Auto-tuned

of process models can reduce the air temperature response PID and SSMPC respectively.

time significantly, thus reduces the total energy cost of air

and product quality loss, which certainly improves the overall

efficiency of the dryer and product quality. rise time of auto-PID controller (279 seconds) is slightly less

Experiments on Controlled Process: The main goal of than that of proposed controller (281 seconds), but auto-tuned

performing system identification and control design was to PID exhibits approximately 11.41% peak overshoot during

implement and test the SSMPC strategy on the real pneu- set point alteration compared to zero overshoot in proposed

matic conveying and drying process involves with the batch control action. The study gives an indication that the product

processing of rice powder materials for a known drying con- quality of the dryer with inbuilt PID controller may degrade

dition. To examine the dryer performance under practical set- if any set point alteration occurs during batch operation of the

ting, the developed predictive control law was implemented dryer.

in LabView 72] real time environment through a PLC mod Again, it can be seen from the figure the steady state error

bus interface. To perform the experiment,at first the experi- of the proposed control action is much less than that of auto-

mental setup was run under no-load for more than one hour tuned PID controller. In terms of disturbance rejection the

with a fixed temperature setting of 50 ◦ C and flow setting of proposed controller can perform in a better way compared to

131.33 m3 /h, then the rice powder material was fed into the the auto-tuned PID controller. The disturbance recovery time

hopper at a feeding rate of 20 kg-wet solid/s/m2 by means of for the material throughput alteration were measured from

feed control valve. As soon as the air flow and temperature the corresponding air temperature responses of auto-tuned

responses settled down, the air temperature and flow set PID and proposed controller, and found to be 298 seconds

points were changed to 92 ◦ C and 205.09 m3 /h respectively. and 186 seconds respectively. Therefore, it can be stated

Then, approximately after 33 minutes of dryer operation the that the proposed controller can provide much better dry-

rate of rice powder feed was changed to 25 kg-wet solid/s/m2 . ing performance compared to the exiting auto-tuned PID

A section of the air flow response of the experimental con- controller. Further to examine the improvement of product

trolled process is presented in Figure 11. quality in proposed control action over the inbuilt auto-tuned

From the figure, the various performance indices of the PID, the product quality loss has been computed for the same

air flow response such as rise time, peak overshoot, steady duration (approximately 48 minutes as shown in Figure 12)

state error, disturbance recovery time were measured and and found to be 6.34% and 14.83% respectively. Thus, the

found to be 89 seconds, 0.102%, 0.521% and 72 seconds implementation of proposed SSMPC controller has reduced

respectively. The study clearly demonstrates that measured the product quality loss by 57.25% and hence improved the

performance indicators are reasonably correct and closely product quality by 9.97% compared to the inbuilt auto-tuned

correlated with the indices estimated from simulation study PID controller.

(see Figure 10(a)). In order to compare the drying per- Moreover to investigate the performance and accuracy

formance of the proposed SSMPC controller against a of the soft sensor in measuring the powder material mois-

conventional controller, another set of experiments were per- ture online, a series of tests on the controlled process have

formed with similar type of set point and material throughput been conducted batch-wise using the same rice powder

alteration and operating and environmental conditions, with material (moisture conditioned at 0.2727 kg-water/kg-dried

the auto-tuned PID controller of HC900 PLC and proposed solids (27.27%)) and drying condition (set points: 92 ◦ C and

SSMPC controller respectively, and the comparative results 205.09 m3 /h, at material feeding rate o 20 kg-wet solid/s/m2 .

of air temperature response for a considerable duration is The target moisture of the rice powder has been set to

presented in Figure 12. It is observed from the figure, the 12.56% in order to acquire the properly dried material and

B. Satpati et al.: Sensor-Less Predictive Drying Control of Pneumatic Conveying Batch Dryers

FIGURE 13. Comparison between moisture measured by soft sensor and air oven drying method.

maintaining the product quality. The dried rice power materi- using refined PSO based model structured parameter iden-

als at cyclone were collected in separate plastic bags for every tification method which is being proposed and developed

10 minutes operation of the dryer. Then the final moisture in this contribution. The modeling strategies adopted in this

contents were measured using 10g samples of each plastic paper also address how control-oriented modeling of com-

bag by an air-oven drying method (131.15 ◦ C, 24h) one plex systems can benefit from integrating first principle’s

after another. The responses of the soft sensor during the and system identification methods. The work has evolved

tests were also captured and the rms values of moisture an online drying condition detection scheme by designing

measurements have been computed for every 10 minutes a solid moisture soft sensor (temperature drop model) and

interval. Figure 13(a) shows a comparative study of moisture an optimizer, which enables the determination of optimal air

measurements measured using the developed soft sensor and flow and dryer temperature working set points from the prior

air oven drying method. The correctness of the measurement knowledge of the initial and target moisture of the processing

is further investigated in Figure 13(b). It can be seen from material for each batch of production. The predictive control

Figure 13(b) that the measured moistures by soft sensor law proposed and developed on the basis of linearized multi-

(rms value) and air oven drying method were in a reasonable variable model, stringent design specifications and dynamic

agreement (within 98% confidence interval) with each other. operation conditions of the pneumatic conveying dryer, has

The study also affirms the benefits of using the soft sensor in shown its competence in tracking set point signals and sat-

measuring the powder material moisture replacing the costly isfying various quantitative and qualitative indices related to

online moisture meters. drying performance and product quality. Finally, the devel-

oped control strategy has been implemented and tested under

practical settings and affirmed its effectiveness in improv-

VI. CONCLUSIONS

ing the drying performance and product quality compared

The paper has presented the modeling, identification and to an inbuilt auto-tuned PID controller of Honeywell make

control of pneumatic conveying dryer involves with the batch HC900 PLC.

processing of powder materials by using first principle’s,

system identification techniques and a predictive control APPENDIX I

approach in a systematic manner. The alternative predictive

A0p 2 ρa ρa

drying control framework employed in this paper; invalidate fp

v˙p = Cd va − vp − 1− g− v2

the compulsion of using costly, inaccurate online solid mois- 2Vol p ρp ρp 2Dpipe p

ture measurement sensors in implementing any automated (a)

"

drying control system. The work presented in this contribu- A2blower

πDtip

2

2

tion has developed a novel control oriented first principle’s v̇a = −ψ N Ṅ − g − fa v2a

A2blower + k8 60 Dpipe

model of the pneumatic conveying and drying system in

the state space form. Then the parameters of first princi- A0p

− φ

ple’s model have been identified in the structured form by 2Volp

VOLUME 5, 2017 3565

B. Satpati et al.: Sensor-Less Predictive Drying Control of Pneumatic Conveying Batch Dryers

η

ρa va 1+M 0 +k3 [Ta −Tamb ]γ +k4 / ṁp

× η Where F and 8 are the corresponding matrices of the pre-

ρp vp 1−φ M0 +k3 [Ta −Tamb ]γ +k4 / ṁp +ℵ

dicted output combining one step to Np step ahead predictions

2 va on the basis of augmented state space model written in the

×Cd va − vp + φ

va − vp

vp compact form [65], the matrix 8T 8 has dimension 2Nc ×

2Nc , 8T F has dimension 2Nc × 6, Rs = [I ]Np ×2 r(k)2×1 , and

[k3 γ [Ta − Tamb ]γ −1 − ηk4 /(ṁp )η+1 ]

#

× 8T 8 + R is a positive definite Hessian matrix. The weight

[1 − φ[M0 + k3 [Ta − Tamb ]γ + k4 /(ṁp )η ] + ℵ]

matrix R is a block matrix with 2 blocks and has its dimension

(b) equal to the dimension of 8T 8. M is a matrix reflecting the

A0p constraints, with its number of rows equal to the number of

T˙p =

hap Ta − Tp

cp ρp Vol p constraints and the number of columns equal to the dimension

h

γ −1 − ηk / ṁ η+1

i of control effort (1U ).

1 k 3 γ [T a − Tamb ] 4 p

+

cp 1 + M 0 + k3 [Ta − Tamb ]γ + k4 / ṁp η

REFERENCES

η

× k6 − k7 Tp 1 + αe−β [M0 +k3 [Ta −Tamb ] +k4 /(m˙p ) ]

γ [1] A. S. Mujumdar, Ed., Handbook of Industrial Drying. Boca Raton, FL,

h i

USA: CRC Press, 2014.

[2] B. Satpati, C. Koley, and S. Datta, ‘‘Modeling identification and control of

(c) an air preheating furnace of a pneumatic conveying and drying process,’’

A0p Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 53, no. 51, pp. 19695–19714, 2014.

Ṫa = − φ [3] B. Satpati, C. Koley, and S. Datta, ‘‘Online estimation of rice powder

ρp Ca Volp moisture in a pneumatic conveying dryer,’’ in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Circuit,

η

va 1+M 0 +k3 [Ta −Tamb ]γ +k4 / ṁp

Power Comput. Technol. (ICCPCT), 2016, pp. 1–6.

× η q̇ [4] D. Mills, Pneumatic Conveying Design Guide. London, U.K.: Butterworth,

vp 1−φ M0 +k3 [Ta −Tamb ]γ +k4 / ṁp +ℵ

2003.

δ̇ [5] H. Holmberg and P. Ahtila, ‘‘Simulation model for the model-based control

of a biofuel dryer at an industrial combined heat and power plant,’’ Drying

−φ Technol., vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1547–1557, 2006.

˙ γ

Ca ṁp 1−φ M0 +k3 Ta −Tamb +k4 /(ṁp )η + ℵ

[6] P. Dufour, ‘‘Control engineering in drying technology: Review and trends,’’

Drying Technol., vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 889–904, 2006.

Cv va

+φ Ta − Tp [7] J. W. Robinson, ‘‘Improve dryer control,’’ Chem. Eng. Prog., vol. 88,

Ca vp pp. 28–33, Dec. 1992.

h η+1 i [8] C. Fyhr and A. Rasmuson, ‘‘Mathematical model of a pneumatic conveying

k3 γ [Ta − Tamb ]γ −1 − ηk4 / ṁp dryer,’’ AIChE J., vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 2889–2902, 1997.

× η [9] R. D. Radford, ‘‘A model of particulate drying in pneumatic conveying

1 − φ M0 + k3 [Ta − Tamb ]γ + k4 / ṁp

+ℵ systems,’’ Powder Technol., vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 109–126, 1997.

(d) [10] A. H. Pelegrina and G. H. Crapiste, ‘‘Modelling the pneumatic drying of

food particles,’’ J. Food Eng., vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 301–310, 2001.

[11] F. Tanaka, T. Uchino, D. Hamanaka, and G. G. Atungulu, ‘‘Mathematical

APPENDIX II modeling of pneumatic drying of rice powder,’’ J. Food Eng., vol. 88, no. 4,

pp. 492–498, 2008.

0.3085 −0.3477 −0.0087 0 [12] C. P. Narimatsu, M. C. Ferreira, and J. T. Freire, ‘‘Drying of coarse

−0.2826 0.7486 0 0 particles in a vertical pneumatic conveyor,’’ Drying Technol., vol. 25, no. 2,

Aθ :

−0.1007 −0.0964 0.5919 −0.1443 pp. 291–302, 2007.

[13] Z. Mindziul and A. Kmieć, ‘‘Modelling gas-solid flow in a pneumatic-flash

0 0 −0.7138 0.7415

dryer,’’ Drying Technol., vol. 15, nos. 6–8, pp. 1711–1720, 1997.

0.9616 0 [14] M. Aghbashlo, S. Hosseinpour, and A. S. Mujumdar, ‘‘Application of

0 0 artificial neural networks (ANNs) in drying technology: A comprehensive

Buθ :

0

review,’’ Drying Technol., vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1397–1462, 2015.

−0.3593 [15] U. Yuzgec, Y. Becerikli, and M. Turker, ‘‘Dynamic neural-network-based

0 0 model-predictive control of an industrial baker’s yeast drying process,’’

IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1231–1242, Jul. 2008.

0.1890 −0.0860 −0.0666 [16] J. A. Hernández-Pérez, M. A. García-Alvarado, G. Trystram, and B. Heyd,

0 0 0 ‘‘Neural networks for the heat and mass transfer prediction during drying

Bdθ :

−0.3118 −0.4974 −0.1572

of cassava and mango,’’ Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol., vol. 5, no. 1,

pp. 57–64, 2004.

−0.1310 −0.4972 −0.2235 [17] N. Perrot, C. Bonazzi, and G. Trystram, ‘‘Application of fuzzy rules-based

0.3673 0 0 0 models to prediction of quality degradation of rice and maize during hot

Cθ : air drying,’’ Drying Technol., vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1533–1565, 2007.

0 0 −0.0502 0 [18] X. Liu, X. Chen, W. Wu, and G. Peng, ‘‘A neural network for predicting

moisture content of grain drying process using genetic algorithm,’’ Food

APPENDIX III Control, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 928–933, 2007.

The cost function [65] [19] U. Yuzgec, Y. Becerikli, and M. Turker, ‘‘Nonlinear predictive control of

a drying process using genetic algorithms,’’ ISA Trans., vol. 45, no. 4,

J = [Rs − FxAu (k)]T [Rs − FxAu (k)] pp. 589–602, 2006.

h i [20] H. Abukhalifeh, R. Dhib, and M. Fayed, ‘‘Model predictive control of an

+ 1U T 8T 8 + R 1U infrared-dryer,’’ in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Phys. Control, vol. 1. Aug. 2003,

pp. 340–344.

− 21U T 8T [Rs − FxAu (k)] (e) [21] H. Abukhalifeh, R. Dhib, and M. E. Fayed, ‘‘Model predictive control of an

infrared-convective dryer,’’ Drying Technol., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 497–511,

Subjected to inequality constraints M 1U ≤ γ 2005.

B. Satpati et al.: Sensor-Less Predictive Drying Control of Pneumatic Conveying Batch Dryers

[22] P. Dufour, Y. Touré, D. Blanc, and P. Laurent, ‘‘On nonlinear distributed [49] G. Mercère, O. Prot, and J. A. Ramos, ‘‘Identification of parameterized

parameter model predictive control strategy: On-line calculation time gray-box state-space systems: From a black-box linear time-invariant rep-

reduction and application to an experimental drying process,’’ Comput. resentation to a structured one,’’ IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 59,

Chem. Eng., vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 1533–1542, 2003. no. 11, pp. 2873–2885, Nov. 2014.

[23] N. Daraoui, P. Dufour, H. Hammouri, and A. Hottot, ‘‘Model predictive [50] L. Ljung, ‘‘Perspectives on system identification,’’ Annu. Rev. Control,

control during the primary drying stage of lyophilisation,’’ Control Eng. vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2010.

Pract., vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 483–494, 2010. [51] L.-L. Xie and L. Ljung, ‘‘Estimate physical parameters by black box

[24] H. Didriksen, ‘‘Model based predictive control of a rotary dryer,’’ Chem. modeling,’’ in Proc. 21st Chin. Control Conf., 2002, pp. 673–677.

Eng. J., vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 53–60, 2002. [52] H. Hjalmarsson, M. Gevers, and F. Bruyne, ‘‘For model based control

[25] I. C. Trelea, G. Trystram, and F. Courtois, ‘‘Optimal constrained non-linear design, closed loop identification gives better performance,’’ Automatica,

control of batch processes: Application to corn drying,’’ J. Food Eng., vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 1659–1673, 1996.

vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 403–421, 1997. [53] P. Van den Hof, ‘‘Closed-loop issues in system identification,’’ Annu. Rev.

[26] H. E. Musch, G. W. Barton, T. A. G. Langrish, and A. S. Brooke, ‘‘Non- Control, vol. 22, pp. 173–186, 1998.

linear model predictive control of timber drying,’’ Comput. Chem. Eng., [54] U. Forssell and L. Ljung, ‘‘Closed-loop identification revisited,’’ Automat-

vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 415–425, 1998. ica, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1215–1241, 1999.

[27] Q. Liu and F. W. Bakker-Arkema, ‘‘A model-predictive controller for grain [55] P. Van Overschee and B. De Moor, ‘‘Closed loop subspace system identi-

drying,’’ J. Food Eng., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 321–326, 2001. fication,’’ in Proc. 36th IEEE Conf. Decision Control, vol. 2. Dec. 1997,

[28] L. Zhang, H. Cui, H. Li, F. Han, Y. Zhang, and W. Wu, ‘‘Parameters online pp. 1848–1853.

detection and model predictive control during the grain drying process,’’ [56] Q. B. Jin, Z. J. Cheng, J. Dou, L. T. Cao, and K. W. Wang, ‘‘A novel closed

Math. Problems Eng., vol. 2013, May 2013, Art. no. 924698. loop identification method and its application of multivariable system,’’ J.

[29] R. A. Bartlett, L. T. Biegler, J. Backstrom, and V. Gopal, ‘‘Quadratic pro- Process Control, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 132–144, 2012.

gramming algorithms for large-scale model predictive control,’’ J. Process [57] H.-F. Wang and H.-W. Hsu, ‘‘A closed-loop logistic model with a spanning-

Control, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 775–795, 2002. tree based genetic algorithm,’’ Comput. Oper. Res., vol. 37, no. 2,

[30] C. Karthik, K. Valarmathi, and M. Rajalakshmi, ‘‘Nonlinear modeling of pp. 376–389, 2010.

moisture control of drying process in paper machine,’’ Procedia Eng., [58] J. Kennedy, ‘‘Particle swarm optimization,’’ in Encyclopedia of Machine

vol. 38, pp. 1104–1111, 2012. Learning. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2011, pp. 760–766.

[59] A. Alfi and H. Modares, ‘‘System identification and control using adap-

[31] R. Arjona, P. Ollero, and F. Vidal-Barrero, ‘‘Automation of an olive waste

tive particle swarm optimization,’’ Appl. Math. Model., vol. 35, no. 3,

industrial rotary dryer,’’ J. Food Eng., vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 239–247, 2005.

pp. 1210–1221, 2011.

[32] P. Dufour, D. Blanc, Y. Touré, and P. Laurent, ‘‘Infrared drying process

[60] D. Sendrescu, ‘‘Parameter identification of anaerobic wastewater treatment

of an experimental water painting: Model predictive control,’’ Drying

bioprocesses using particle swarm optimization,’’ Math. Problems Eng.,

Technol., vol. 22, nos. 1–2, pp. 269–284, 2004.

vol. 2013, pp. 1–8, Jun. 2013.

[33] C. Bordons and A. Núñez-Reyes, ‘‘Model based predictive control of an

[61] P. Kou, J. Zhou, C. Wang, H. Xiao, H. Zhang, and C. Li, ‘‘Parameters

olive oil mill,’’ J. Food Eng., vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2008.

identification of nonlinear state space model of synchronous generator,’’

[34] J. De Temmerman, P. Dufour, B. Nicolaï, and H. Ramon, ‘‘MPC as control Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1227–1237, 2011.

strategy for pasta drying processes,’’ Comput. Chem. Eng., vol. 33, no. 1, [62] Ö. Yeniay, ‘‘Penalty function methods for constrained optimization with

pp. 50–57, 2009. genetic algorithms,’’ Math. Comput. Appl., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 45–56, 2005.

[35] F. B. Freire, G. N. A. Vieira, J. T. Freire, and A. S. Mujumdar, ‘‘Trends [63] T. Bäck, F. Hoffmeister, and H.-P. Schwefel, ‘‘A survey of evolution

in modeling and sensing approaches for drying control,’’ Drying Technol., strategies,’’ in Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Genetic Algorithms, 1991, pp. 1–8.

vol. 32, no. 13, pp. 1524–1532, 2014. [64] A. Homaifar, C. X. Qi, and S. H. Lai, ‘‘Constrained optimization via

[36] P. Kadlec, B. Gabrys, and S. Strandt, ‘‘Data-driven soft sensors in the genetic algorithms,’’ Simulation, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 242–253, 1994.

process industry,’’ Comput. Chem. Eng., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 795–814, [65] L. Wang, Model Predictive Control System Design and Implementation

Apr. 2009. Using MATLAB. Springer, 2009.

[37] R. K. Shah and D. P. Sekulic, Fundamentals of Heat Exchanger Design. [66] S. Li, K. Y. Lim, and D. G. Fisher, ‘‘A state space formulation for model

Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2003. predictive control,’’ AIChE J., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 241–249, 1989.

[38] K. S. Rajan, K. Dhasandhan, S. N. Srivastava, and B. Pitchumani, ‘‘Studies [67] K. R. Muske and J. B. Rawlings, ‘‘Model predictive control with linear

on gas–solid heat transfer during pneumatic conveying,’’ Int. J. Heat Mass models,’’ AIChE J., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 262–287, 1993.

Transf., vol. 51, nos. 11–12, pp. 2801–2813, 2008. [68] M. Ramzi, H. Youlal, and M. Haloua, ‘‘State space model predictive con-

[39] M. Ellis, H. Durand, and P. D. Christofides, ‘‘A tutorial review of economic trol of an aerothermic process with actuators constraints,’’ Intell. Control

model predictive control methods,’’ J. Process Control, vol. 24, no. 8, Autom., vol. 3, pp. 50–58, 2012.

pp. 1156–1178, 2014. [69] M. Deflorian and S. Zaglauer, ‘‘Design of experiments for nonlin-

[40] T. Backx, O. Bosgra, and W. Marquardt, ‘‘Integration of model predictive ear dynamic system identification,’’ IFAC Proc. Vol., vol. 44, no. 1,

control and optimization of processes,’’ in Proc. IFAC Symp. Adv. Control pp. 13179–13184, 2011.

Chem. Process., 2000, pp. 249–260. [70] P. Bhattacharjee, R. S. Singhal, and P. R. Kulkarni, ‘‘Basmati rice: A

[41] J. J. Siirola and T. F. Edgar, ‘‘Process energy systems: Control, eco- review,’’ Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2002.

nomic, and sustainability objectives,’’ Comput. Chem. Eng., vol. 47, [71] M. Morari and N. L. Ricker, Model Predictive Control Toolbox: For Use

pp. 134–144, Dec. 2012. With MATLAB, MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA, 1998.

[42] C. Altafini and M. Furini, ‘‘Robust control of a flash dryer plant,’’ in Proc. [72] The LabVIEW User Manual, National Instrum., Austin, TX, USA, 1998.

IEEE Int. Conf. Control Appl., 1997, pp. 785–787.

[43] P. Bunyawanichakul, G. J. Walker, J. E. Sargison, and P. E. Doe, ‘‘Mod-

elling and simulation of paddy grain (rice) drying in a simple pneumatic BIPLAB SATPATI (M’08) was born in West Ben-

dryer,’’ Biosyst. Eng., vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 335–344, 2007. gal, India. He received his Bachelor degree in elec-

[44] D. B. Brooker, F. W. Bakker-Arkema, and C. W. Hall, Drying and Storage trical engineering from Bengal Engineering Col-

of Grains and Oilseeds. Springer, 1992. lege, Shibpur in 2002. He obtained his Master of

[45] C. Laithong, ‘‘Study of thermo-physical properties of rough rice,’’ Engineering with specialization in control system

M.S. thesis, Faculty Energy Mater., King Mongkut’s Inst. Technol. engineering from Jadavpur University in 2007.

Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand, 1987. Presently he holds the post of Assistant Profes-

[46] W. Zhuang, V. N. M. Roderick, and F. Borup, ‘‘Model-based analysis sor in the Department of Electrical Engineering,

and simulation of airflow control systems of ventilation units in building University Institute of Technology, The University

environments,’’ Building Environ., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 203–217, Jan. 2007.

of Burdwan, India. He is also working as a part-

[47] P. Van Overschee and B. De Moor, Subspace Identification for Linear

time research scholar in Electrical Engineering Department, National Insti-

Systems: Theory—Implementation—Applications. Springer, 2012.

tute of Technology, Durgapur. His area of interest is model based control

[48] L. Ljung and T. McKelvey, ‘‘Subspace identification from closed-loop

data,’’ Signal Process., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 209–215, 1996. design, robust and predictive control.

B. Satpati et al.: Sensor-Less Predictive Drying Control of Pneumatic Conveying Batch Dryers

CHIRANJIBKOLEY (M’02) was born in West SUBHASHIS DATTA was born in Burdwan, West

Bengal, India. He obtained his B.Tech, M.Tech, Bengal, India. He obtained his B.Tech. and Ph.D.

and Ph.D. degrees in 2000, 2002 and 2007, respec- degrees in 2000 and 2008, respectively.

tively. Presently he holds the post of Professor in the

Presently he holds the post of Associate Profes- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ghani

sor in the Department of Electrical Engineering, Khan Choudhury Institute of Engineering and

National Institute of Technology, Durgapur, India. Technology, Malda, India. His current research

He has published more than 20 research papers and includes pneumatic conveying and drying system,

developed an online course. His current research model based control design, robust and predictive

includes condition monitoring of electrical equip- control.

ment, signal processing, machine learning, instrumentation and control.

- Multivariable Feedback Control - Analysis and Design.pdfEnviado porrehan_sadiq1991
- A Practical Guide to Investigate Problems on Polishing Mixed Bed.pdfEnviado porengp1922
- 6086_TS_CURVE_R0Enviado porShubha Roy
- Turbair Vacuum SystemsEnviado porKerim Šenderović
- Theory of Robust Control (Carsten Scherer)Enviado porErsin Erol
- Adaptive MLP Network Reference Model for Controlling Flow of Split Level Coupled TankEnviado porSamer Sherif
- State Space Behaviours 1 - IntroductionEnviado porMuhammad Irfan
- 19IN000693_SummaryPDFEnEnviado porMehran Jeelani
- ANN InventoryEnviado porCamões Pessoa
- Blowerselection GuideEnviado porsahirprojects
- research paperEnviado porMiguel Sandoval
- Decentralized Control of Cooperative Robotic Vehicles.pdfEnviado porfalcon_vam
- EE250 Fall2012 Lecture-notesEnviado porAnurag Pandey
- 129666139 Centrifugal Blower Test Rig PDFEnviado porbasantvits
- IJAERpaperv3n78Enviado porHarsh Rana
- 138102Enviado porJorge Luis Erazo Quezada
- Chapter 12 Small-Signal StabilityEnviado porNguyễn Anh Tú
- 9783319588193-c1Enviado porf bhavani
- 113Enviado porGaurav Shrivastava
- Session 11 &12 Excel Optimization SoftwareEnviado porsagar
- 10.1.1.89Enviado porKudo Lê
- Multivariable Feedback Control - Analysis and DesignEnviado porFURQAN
- Mecatrônica.pdfEnviado porTadeu Felix
- atmospheric-dispersion-modelling-jun04.pdfEnviado porPedro José
- [TCF] Centrifugal Fans IOM ManualEnviado porLuis Grijalva
- Markov (1).pptxEnviado porPrincess Melanie Melendez
- BADA TutorialEnviado pormiguel12y5
- BERT_CHIN.pdfEnviado porBalaji Mariappan
- 10 Sistem Kontrol Digital PID Journal a Design Method for Modified PID Control Systems for Multiple-Input Multiple-output Plants to Attenuate Unknown DisturbancesEnviado porAgus Mutolifi
- Filters for Clean RoomEnviado porLokesh Gandhi

- 08272023.pdfEnviado pornhatvp
- Predictive Cruise Control Using High-DefinitionEnviado pornhatvp
- Distributed Model Predictive Secondary VoltageEnviado pornhatvp
- 08456489Enviado pornhatvp
- Performance Evaluation of Two-Vector-Based MPCEnviado pornhatvp
- Machine Learning Based Adaptive PredictionEnviado pornhatvp
- 08240941Enviado pornhatvp
- Research on Robust Model Predictive ControlEnviado pornhatvp
- A Fuzzy Model Predictive Control Based Upon ADAPTIVEEnviado pornhatvp
- A Scheduling Scheme of Linear Model Predictive CONTROLEnviado pornhatvp
- Load Frequency Control of an Isolated Micro GridEnviado pornhatvp
- Robust Adaptive Gain Higher Order Sliding ModeEnviado pornhatvp
- Robust Online Model Predictive ControlEnviado pornhatvp
- Robust PBPK/PD-Based Model PredictiveEnviado pornhatvp
- Gaussian Process-Based Predictive ControEnviado pornhatvp
- Building HVAC Systems for Reliable Demand ResponseEnviado pornhatvp
- 07-What does an open BAS look like.pdfEnviado pornhatvp
- [3] 10657847_853387114712059_139042780_nEnviado pornhatvp
- [1] 10741149_853387121378725_887783976_nEnviado pornhatvp
- Trends-in-Microgrid-Control.pdfEnviado pornhatvp
- Model Predictive Control of Voltages in Active Distribution Networks.pdfEnviado pornhatvp
- Model predictive control of smart microgrids.pdfEnviado pornhatvp
- Energy Efficient Microgrid Management using Model Predictive Control.pdfEnviado pornhatvp
- Distributed Control Scheme to Regulate Power FlowEnviado pornhatvp
- 02whole.pdfEnviado pornhatvp
- 30Optimal Control of Distributed Energy ReEnviado pornhatvp

- Endelig Avvikling Rapport EngelskEnviado porHenrik13
- FM Tops & Well-log CorrelationEnviado pormhdstat
- PropellerTheory.pdfEnviado porSri Harsha Challa
- lm340Enviado porJohnson John
- arc supressionEnviado porAngel Tammana
- Debt Funding for Solar ProjectsEnviado porydchou_69
- @005 Chevy Equinox Engine Cooling Factory Repair ManualEnviado porjohodada
- Example of Emergency Towing Booklet (1) 2Enviado porMarby Rohani
- Design and Analysis of Disk BrakeEnviado porA L Andriana Syarip
- Dieta bulking Masculino.xlsEnviado porMarcoBaldo
- Manual Caldero CbnEnviado porOscar Molina
- ESP VS PJFFPEnviado porSreerag Menon
- Pick Up CurrentEnviado porChanderSinghWarkade
- kupdf.com_determining-safety-distance-in-process-design.pdfEnviado porfaraj405
- UNIT 9 Hydrogen For more visit http://www.ncert.nic.in/textbooks/testing/Index.htmEnviado porArun Kumar
- OP_AMPEnviado porSARANYA
- c.) UNIT 3 BIOENERGY.pptxEnviado porNurrul Azeera
- Business Organisation and Management English.pdfEnviado porG Nagarajan
- Dodge Ram 5.9 2004 wiring diagram.pdfEnviado porPedro Paiz Cruz
- Paparan APIEnviado porari
- QSC-RMX5050[1]Enviado porYonatan Rivadeneyra
- Smart Cities System of SystemsEnviado pormus1402
- Elec and MagEnviado porkarsakk
- Report - HydrologyEnviado porEs Tacio Jay Dok
- Ibau Hamburg Central Cone Blending SiloEnviado porAnonymous PVXBGg9T
- Austenite Decompositon Into Ferrite and BainiteEnviado porfowzi81
- ROSA-GB-2007-09-10Enviado porPaulo Jorge Machado
- Variable-Speed Centrifugal Chiller Control forEnviado porDave Staelens
- Rating Report(1)Enviado porVarsha Das
- 063_agabEnviado porPiciu Corina Valeria

## Muito mais do que documentos

Descubra tudo o que o Scribd tem a oferecer, incluindo livros e audiolivros de grandes editoras.

Cancele quando quiser.