Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Dylan Rivera
Mrs. Balka
IB HL English 1
20 February 2019
Although human minds have progressed tremendously since the dawn of humanity in
terms of their ability to process information and adapt to new circumstances, some struggles that
arise from this complex being remain. Among them are indecisiveness and the little voices inside
our heads that tell us to one thing or another, then subsequently tugging our hearts in another
Shakespeare’s play, The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. Shakespeare recognized this
feeling of indecision all too much and made it the central basis behind this world renowned play,
a realization enhanced by the use of various motifs. Shakespeare repeatedly uses the motif of
decay in order to make a case against frozen indecision, which is clearly demonstrated by the
decay as seen in nature, certain important character’s deaths, and the ultimate decay of everyone
around Hamlet.
The persistent motif of decay is first seen in Shakespeare’s repeated references to nature
and its mortal forms. For example, in Hamlet’s sullied flesh soliloquy, Hamlet cries out that life
is merely “an unweeded garden, That grows to seed; things rank and gross in nature,” (1.2.135-
136), a symbolic instance of decay. Shakespeare’s choice to use a garden as a metaphor for life
itself - the “unweeded garden” - emphasizes Hamlet’s disgust with the nature of life, how
dismayed he is with its reality, and how fleeting life appears to be. Gardens are made up of
Rivera 2
organic beings, ones that have a finite life span and eventually end up rotting in the soil after
living the entirety of their lives -- just like human beings. Hamlet’s startling epiphany here not
only lets the audience know that Hamlet has recognized the finite span of his time and thus life,
but also how every second spent is a second towards the decay of life itself into an unkempt
garden of weeds. This recognition is what propels Hamlet to assess his feelings and leave no
more time for mourning; otherwise he would descend into a silent, miserable decay as well for
not doing so. Additionally, Shakespeare brings up once again an instance of nature symbolizing
the motif of decay during Ophelia’s broken state after her father’s death when she gives flowers
to Gertrude, symbolizing several virtues and vices -- a violet for faithfulness, a columbine for
adultery, and so on. Flowers, like the plants of a garden, are mortal beings and eventually decay
in the slow process of death. Despite Ophelia’s attempts at giving an everlasting symbol of these
qualities by symbolizing them through flowers, her attempts are ironic as these flowers - and so
their values as well - will eventually die. Once the flower passes and its meaning dies with it,
there is nothing left. Death is ultimately the great equalizer of all beings, and by giving life to
contrasting characteristics such as fidelity and and adultery, their moral alignments whether good
or evil will decay with them and be equal in the depths of death. In the end, there is no difference
between what is perceived as good and evil, for everyone will die with these values.
Shakespeare’s connection of them to decaying flowers takes away the focus of the virtue or vice
itself and simply puts the spotlight on whether something was done about it in the first place,
Shakespeare’s decision to kill off critical characters also highlights the motif of decay
and the reason to make a decision in life. The death of Polonius is particularly revealing for the
audience; a tragic death of a man who was the unintended target of Hamlet’s rage. It is a perfect
Rivera 3
example of situational irony, for Hamlet had killed a father, the precise crime that inspired him to
avenge his own father. It was clearly an unnecessary and preventable death -- if Hamlet had only
controlled his rage and made a decision earlier, Polonius’s life may have been spared. But by
acting on his impulses and giving the reigns of decision-making to passionate fury, nothing had
been accomplished. Hamlet’s guilt in becoming a murderer himself defines his character now
and shows how his own personality had decayed from a once innocent boy to a man with blood
on his hands, which is what he was going against in the first place. Another notable instance of
this is through Ophelia, who Gertrude claims died by a suicidal drowning: “Till her garments,
heavy with their drink, Pulled the poor wretch from her melodious lay, To muddy death,”
(4.7.182-184). The quick decline of Ophelia from a once innocent, joyful young girl into a
distraught and suicidal girl is strikingly horrific for the audience, demonstrating how quickly
one’s life can devolve into a mess and succumb to an early death. Shakespeare makes it clear that
life, the poor life of Ophelia, is precious. This sentiment is demonstrated by the diction of these
particular lines, which make out Ophelia to be a poor victim by calling her a wretch from her
once “melodious lay” into a “muddy death”, igniting feelings of sadness and pity for the
depressing death of a once loveable character. Life is dictated by time and influences how we
approach certain obstacles in our life. In this case, Ophelia was unable to make a decision to
cope with the loss of her father and lover which made her spiral into insanity, hastening her
Finally, the last scenes of decay in its final form for most people in the play - death - that
brings the consequences of indecision to life. When Hamlet goes into the graveyard and speaks
with the gravediggers, he carries the skull of Yorick in his hand, a jester he once knew but was
confronted with the sight of his dead remains - “Where be your gibes now? your gambols? your
Rivera 4
songs? Your flashes of merriment that were wont to set the table on a roar? Not quite one now, to
mock your own grinning? Quite chapfall’n?” (5.1.200-203). To Hamlet, his once lively friend is
now dead, in his final form of decay in the grave. The syntax of these lines, designed by the
repeated use of rhetorical questions, makes Hamlet questions existence and life itself. All that
remains of him is his skull. This brings death to life for Hamlet, who now sees the common
destination of all of mankind whether good or evil -- in the ground as worm food. This somber
realization prompts Hamlet to strengthen his mind’s convictions about killing Claudius, now
knowing that death awaits him and he must quickly make a decision. Finally, the scene of
everyone dying in the palace at the end confirms Shakespeare’s warning of everyone’s decay and
the importance of making a decision. It is yet another instance of situational irony, as Fortinbras
walks in the palace and sees the dead bodies of the royal family splattered across the floor.
Hamlet’s goal to kill Claudius, and Laertes’s goal to kill Hamlet, only ended in the death of
themselves and everyone around them. Their time was up: decay had reached even the characters
with the noblest of intentions as well. It was too late to make any decision and the lack of
Hamlet’s decision to kill Claudius in the first place ended up in everyone in the castle dying.
This is Shakespeare’s reminder of death for everyone, by making death so real and vivid for
The issue of indecision has confronted humanity since its inception. Shakespeare’s
message has been able to transcend time and remain relevant to people of today. In the play The
Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, Shakespeare calls on everyone to make a decision in life
and not succumb to the devastating consequences of not acting at all. Through the motif of decay
throughout the play, this becomes apparent and immediate for the audience. In the end,
Rivera 5
Shakespeare emphasizes that the only truly “bad” decision is not making a decision in the first
place.