Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Name: Mark Concepcion
Age / Sex: 21 / M
Date of Birth: 19-Sep-1997
Occupation: Student
Diagnosis: ⓇFDP, FDS tendon rupture; Median & Ulnar nerve transection
Rehab Doctor-in-charge: Gaerlan Inciong M.D. FPARM
Date of Initial Evaluation: 27-Feb-2019
Precautions: Flexor Tendon Injury Repair
Medications: -
Source: Patient (90%), Medical Chart (10%)
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. Overview of the Case
This is the case of M.C., a 21 y/o M diagnosed with Flexor Digitorum Profundus, Flexor Digitorum Superficialis tendon rupture, median
and ulnar nerve transection. He was referred for Occupational Therapy by his doctor last February 27, 2019.
B. Outline of Presentation
I. Medical-Surgical Background
Definition of Condition
Epidemiology
Etiology
Types and classifications
Signs and Symptoms (Clinical and Classical Picture)
Medical/Surgical/Rehabilitation Interventions
Prognosis and Functional Outcomes
Risk factors
II. OT Evaluation
Subjective Information
Objective Information
OT Impression
Prioritized Problem List
III. OT Intervention
LTGs, STGs, and Plan of Action for each problem
Frames of Reference Used
Conduct of Therapy
Recommendations
Conclusion
MEDICAL-SURGICAL BACKGROUND
A. Definition of the Condition
I. Flexor Tendon Rupture
Tendons are tissues that serve as the connection between muscle and bone. Muscle contraction causes tendons to pull on body parts
resulting in movement. Flexor tendons are tissues that help control movement of the hand through thumb and finger flexion and
opposition. Flexor tendon rupture is the term used to describe a condition or injury that occurs on the volar side of the fingers, hand,
wrist or forearm due to direct trauma, eccentric loading and/or advanced age wherein the tendons in the area snap. It includes severe
pain, marked weakness, immediate bruising, deformity and inability to move and use the affected structures. The origin, insertion,
action, and nerve supply of the flexor muscles used in thumb and finger flexion and opposition are summarized in Table 1.
Figure 2. Cutaneous Sensory Innervation Areas of the Figure 3. Ape/Simian Hand Deformity with thenar
Hand wasting
Upon examination, a hollowing between the metacarpal bones is seen, which is due to atrophy of the dorsal interossei. Loss of
sympathetic control also occurs, which causes arteriolar dilatation and absence of sweating resulting in warm and drier than
normal hands.
Muscle Origin Insertion Nerve Supply Action
Abductor Digiti Minimi Pisiform bone Base of proximal Abducts little finger
phalanx of little
Flexor Digiti Minimi Flexes little finger
finger Deep branch of
Flexor retinaculum ulnar nerve Pulls 5th metacarpal
Medial border fifth
Opponens Digiti Minimi forward as in cupping
metacarpal bone
the palm
Flex
Median nerve
metacarpophalangeal
Tendons of flexor Extensor expansion (lateral two);
joints and extend
Lumbricals digitorum of medial four Deep branch of
interphalangeal joints
profundus fingers ulnar nerve
of fingers except
(medial two)
thumb
Dorsal interossei
Proximal phalanges abduct
of index, fingers from center
Contiguous sides
middle, and of third finger; both
Dorsal of shafts of
ring fingers and palmar and dorsal flex
metacarpal bones
dorsal extensor metacarpophalangeal
expansion joints and extend
Deep branch of
Interossei interphalangeal joints
ulnar nerve
First arises from base Proximal phalanges
of 1st metacarpal; of thumb and
Palmar interossei
remaining three index, ring, and
adduct
Palmar from anterior little fingers and
fingers toward center
surface of shafts dorsal extensor
of third finger
of 2nd, 4th, and 5th expansion of each
metacarpals finger
Flexes
Flexor Pollicis Brevis Base of proximal
Flexor retinaculum Median nerve metacarpophalangeal
(deep head) phalanx of thumb
joint of thumb
Oblique head; 2nd
and 3rd metacarpal
Base of proximal Deep branch of
Adductor Pollicis bones; transverse Adduction of thumb
phalanx of thumb ulnar nerve
head; 3rd
metacarpal bone
Flexes distal phalanx
of fingers and assists
Flexor Digitorum Anteromedial surface Distal phalanx of Ulnar nerve
in flexing the
Profundus of shaft of ulna medial four fingers (medial half);
proximal and middle
phalanges and hand
Humeral Medial epicondyle of
head Humerus
Flexor Pisiform bone, hook of
Medial aspect of Flexes and adducts
Carpi the hamate, base at Ulnar nerve
Ulnar olecranon process hand at wrist joint
Ulnaris fifth metacarpal bone
Head and posterior border
of ulna
Table 3. OINA of Muscles Affected in an Ulnar Nerve Injury
OT EVALUATION
A. Subjective Information
I. Chief Complaint
According to client, “Hirap mag-type at magsulat para sa school.”
II. Rehabilitation Goals
According to client, “Gamitin ang dalawang kamay para sa school at para makapag-basketball.”
III. History of Present Illness
~2 mos. PTIE, on December 8, 2018, client was @ his aunt’s birthday party where he drank alcohol & became intoxicated. Pt. fell
over, broke some glass, & cut himself on the Ⓡ FA. Pt. was rushed by his mother & aunt to JRRMMC. He was given unrecalled
medications via IV & had an x-ray. Pt. received the dx. of FDP, FDS rupture & underwent a ~10 hr. tendon repair surgery. Post-op,
pt. was confined, given antibiotics & painkillers, & received PT services. P̅ discharge, pt. became unable to do or was D with
occupations using UE.
~1 mo. PTIE, pt. was referred to OT & PT. PT program: e-stim, US, and grip ax. OT program: ther ex, ADL/IADL training, SI. Pt.
receiving tx 3x/wk. Pt. now I in occupations thru use of ⓁUE.
IV. Past Medical History
No prior hospitalizations, medications, and/or relevant medical history.
B. Objective Information
I. Standardized Tests
Goniometry
Goniometry is performed to measure the available range of motion (ROM) in a joint. A goniometer is used to measures the
available in the joint. Standard measurement positioning and procedures are discussed by Levange (2011). The results gathered
from this standardized test is then compared to an established set of norms. It is worth noting, however, that the norms
established by the American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) and used in this test have not yet been culturally
adapted for the Philippines.
Manual Muscle Testing
Manual Muscle Testing is a standardized assessment used to measure muscle strength. Hislop (2007) discussed the
standardized positioning and procedures for testing specific muscles or muscle groups. Manual Muscle Testing is a criterion-
referenced assessment that yields a numerical grade with equivalent word ratings e.g. 1 = Trace.
Edema
Testing for edema requires the use of either tape measure or volumeter. With the use of a tape measure for edema testing,
circumferential measurement or figure of eight measurement can be done. Circumferential measurement places the tape
measure around the extremity and measures the edema. It is significant that the limb should not be resting on the table as this
may alter the shape of the limb. In figure of eight measurement, the patient's hand is positioned in pronation with the hand over
the edge of the table. The wrist should be in neutral and the fingers abducted. The zero on the tape measure is placed on the
Case Presentation – M.C. | pg. 10
ulnar aspect of the wrist. The tape measure is then passed across the volar aspect of the forearm just distal to the radial styloid
process. It is then taken diagonally across the dorsum of the hand to the 5th MCP joint. It should be then passed across the
volar aspect of the palm to the 2nd MCP joint. After which, it goes diagonally back to the starting point. With the use of a
volumeter, patient is asked to insert hand on the volumeter filled with water. There is a mark on the bottom part to which 2nd
webspace of the hand is placed. The therapist takes note of the amount of water displaced.
Hand Dexterity
Jebsen Test of Hand Function
This standardized assessment tool is a norm-based performance test which assesses gross and fine motor functions of
an individual. It determines the speed and quality of performance as well as a patient’s potential ability to use one’s
non-dominant side. The assessment tool consists of 7 subtests which include writing a short sentence, simulated page-
turning, lifting small common objects, simulated feeding, stacking checkers, lifting large light objects, and lifting large
heavy objects. The tool requires performing the subtests utilizing both hands in which the patient’s non-dominant hand
is tested first. One of the protocols of the tool is ensuring that the individual would not cross the midline when
performing the subtests. Time in completing each subtest will be recorded. To record the standard score for each
subtest, subtract mean time from actual time and divide by standard deviation. The accepted standard deviation is -2 to
+2.
Moberg Pick-Up Test
This standardized assessment tool is norm-referenced. The tool involves picking up, holding, manipulating and
identifying small objects. To administer the tool, the patient is shown 10 objects on a table and is asked to place these
objects in a box. Uninjured hand is tested first, then injured hand. It is done with vision included first, after which with
vision occluded. This is done for three times. Each trial is timed and average will be calculated. The test will be
discontinued if it takes longer than 3 minutes. The test also involves patient’s ability to perceive constant touch,
precision grip, cutaneous feedback and peripheral receptors and cognitive function.
Grip and Pinch Strength
Testing for grip and pinch strength requires the use of a dynamometer and pinch gauge. The patient is asked to hold the
dynamometer in his hand to be tested, with the arm and elbow at 90-degree angle. The patient squeezes the dynamometer with
maximum isometric effort, which is maintained for about 5 seconds. No other body movement is allowed. The subject should
be strongly encouraged to give a maximum effort. This is done three times. The mean score for each hand is then computed.
The results are then compared to established norms. It is worth noting, however, that the norms used in this test have not yet
been culturally adapted for the Philippines.
II. Summary of Standardized Test Results
Goniometry
All joints of BUE and/or BLE are WNL/WFL upon PROM/AROM except for the following:
Norms Difference
Joint PROM AROM Cause of LOM
(AAOS) (N-PROM)
Ⓡ Thumb IP 0 - 70 ˚ 0 - 45 ˚ 0 - 80 ˚ 10 ˚ Flexor tendon adhesion Commented [an1]: Add CMC flexion
MCP 0 - 60 ˚ 0 - 45 ˚ 0 - 90 ˚ 30 ˚ Flexor tendon adhesion
Ⓡ2nd Digit PIP 0 - 50 ˚ 0 - 50 ˚ 0 - 100 ˚ 50 ˚ Flexor tendon adhesion
DIP 0-5˚ 0˚ 0 - 90 ˚ 85 ˚ Flexor tendon adhesion
MCP 0 - 45 ˚ 0 - 40 ˚ 0 - 90 ˚ 45 ˚ Flexor tendon adhesion
FLEXION
Edema
Visual observation showed no edema and thus volumetry was not performed. However, further assessment may be needed.
Hand Dexterity
Muscle Tone
All major muscle groups on both Ⓛ and Ⓡ side are considered normotonic.
Muscle Bulk
No noticeable muscle bulk asymmetry.
Functional Sensory Evaluation
Superficial Sensations
Grade Sensation Stimulus Response
A cotton swab is used to The client was able to feel
lightly touch (light touch) or the stimuli and point within
press hard enough to cause the allowed margin of error
skin blanching (pressure). on the areas innervated by
Pt. is asked to say whether the radial nerve. (10 mm for
he felt the stimuli. If yes, he digit tips, 11 mm for
was asked to point to the proximal phalanx, and 20
location using the other mm for palm)
hand. 3 positive stimuli and However, the client was not
a non-representational able to recognize and
Light Touch stimulus were introduced localize the stimuli or
& Pressure per sub-area in a random identified the non-
manner while visually representational stimulus as
occluded. a positive stimulus for all
other areas of the right
hand.
Client has intact (+) light touch
and pressure sensation on the
areas innervated by the radial
nerve while all the other areas
have absent light touch and
pressure sensation.
A paper clip with the Client has correct response
straightened edge (sharp to sharp (+S) and dull (+D)
pain) & the curved end (dull stimulus given by the
pain) was used to lightly therapist on the areas
poke the client. Pt. is asked innervated by the radial
to say whether he felt the nerve while client reports to
stimuli and to describe it either have an incorrect
was “sharp” or “dull”. 3 response or no response at
positive stimuli and a non- all to a dull and sharp
representational stimulus stimulus given by the
Superficial were introduced per sub- therapist on all the other
Pain area in a random manner areas of right hand
while visually occluded. innervated by the median
and ulnar nerve.
Client has (+) protective sensation
(+S, +D) on the areas innervated
by the radial nerve while (-
)protective sensation (-S, -D) on
all the other areas of right hand
innervated by the median and
ulnar nerve.
Case Presentation – M.C. | pg. 12
Subtest 1 Client was able to correctly
2 identical test tubes with identify the temperature of
hot water & cold water were both hot and cold water
touched against the client’s when placed on the areas
skin. Pt. is asked to say innervated by the radial
whether “hot or cold”. 3 nerve. However, client was
positive stimuli and a non- unable to correctly identify
representational stimulus if the water is cold or hot on
were introduced per sub- all other areas of right hand
area in a random manner innervated by the median
while visually occluded. and ulnar nerve.
Thermal
Subtest 2
Needs further assessment
Client has intact (+) thermal for radial nerve innervation.
sensation on the areas innervated
by the radial nerve while all the
other areas of right hand
innervated by median and ulnar
nerve have absent thermal
sensation.
Deep Sensations
Grade Sensation Stimulus Response
Client was asked to identify whether Client was able to identify position
the joints were in a position which is correctly in 3/3 instances.
“nakasara” or “nakabukas”. The
wrist and MCP joints were used. 3
+ Proprioception
positive stimuli and a non-
representational stimulus were
introduced per joint in a random
manner while visually occluded.
Client was asked to identify whether Client was able to identify motion
the joints were in a motion which is correctly in 3/3 instances.
“pasara” or “pabukas”. The wrist
and MCP joints were used. 3
+ Kinesthesia
positive stimuli and a non-
representational stimulus were
introduced per joint in a random
manner while visually occluded.
A tuning fork was used. Client was Client was not able to identify vibrating
- Vibration asked to identify whether the stimuli stimuli in 3/3 instances.
in the bony prominences were
Case Presentation – M.C. | pg. 13
“vibrating” or not. The PIP bony
prominence, MCP bony prominence,
and radial styloid process were used.
3 positive stimuli and a non-
representational stimulus were
introduced per joint in a random
manner while visually occluded.
Table 9. Results of Deep Sensation Tests
Combined Sensations
Grade Sensation Stimulus Response
3 common objects (key, Client was unable to Commented [BAD3]: Client was unable to
paper clip, coin) were recognize any objects manipulate object. Client did not manipulate despite
presented to the client. because client was not cue and promts
He was then asked to able to manipulate.
identify the object he is Inability to manipulate
currently holding. because of difficulty in
Initially, objects were flexing fingers.
0 Stereognosis given to the patient and
he was allowed to
manipulate and feel the
objects with no
occlusion. After which
test was done while
client was visually
occluded.
Static Client was able to
A reshaped paper clip identify whether the
was used. Client was stimuli were presented
asked to identify whether was “one” or “two”
the stimuli presented was having a distance of 6
“one” or “two”. 10 mm in the areas
positive stimuli and a innervated by the radial
non-representational nerve. For all the
stimulus were introduced remaining areas, client
per area in a random was not able to
2-Point
manner. Initially, a few distinguish any points.
Discrimination
trials were given to the
patient with no
occlusion. After which,
Areas innervated by radial nerve are test was done while
normal while all other areas are client was visually
anesthetic on right hand. occluded.
Dynamic
Was not assessed due to
time constraints.
Table 10. Results of Combined Sensation Tests
Handedness
The client reports and was observed to be right-handed.
RGCR Patterns
Pattern Left Right Functional Justification
Reach G G Able to reach for items placed on table. Commented [BAD4]: Refer to emilia’s paper
Grasp G G Able to assume grasp on objects presented.
Carry G P Difficulty maintaining grasp to carry object from table to bag.
Release G P Difficulty releasing grasp on objects back to the bag.
Table 11. Results of RGCR Assessment
Prehension Patterns
13
GPP L R Response
Cylindrical G F Client was able to use L hand to stabilize the jar while R hand was opening the
lid. With the R Hand, client was able to hold the jar but with slight difficulty.
2 nd and 3rd digits of the R hand were pressed more against the jar than the 4 th
and 5th digits.
Spherical G F Client was able to hold and take the stress ball out of the paper bag and return it
back inside. Client had slight difficulty maintaining grasp in R hand when
placing ball back inside bag.
Hook G G Client was able to assume, maintain and use hook grasp in both L and R hands
while lifting a paper bag with items inside, against gravity for approximately 5
seconds.
Disk G F Client was able to hold the jar by the lid when taking it out of the bag while
using the L hand. With the R hand, client was able to hold lid of jar with fingers
but with palm slightly touched lid.
FPP L R Response
Pad to Pad G A Upon instruction to hold card, client was able to hold it using L hand. Using R
hand, client held card using lateral pinch. Client compensated by pressing card
against 1st web space.
Tip to Tip G A Client cannot assume or maintain pinch when asked to get 3 beans out of a
container.
Lateral G A Client assumed to hold card via lateral pinch but compensated with thumb IP
flexion.
Tripod G A Client cannot assume or maintain tripod grasp to hold a pencil.
Table 13. Result of Prehension Patterns Assessment
Due to the condition of the patient, LOM is the most urgent problem that needs to be addressed since tendon repair are prone to
adhesions which can affect available PROM in the long run. The weak grip strength is prioritized next since this is a pre-requisite
for other client factors, such as prehension patterns and in-hand manipulation skills, to be addressed. Impaired sensation is
prioritized third as this would be necessary for the patient’s safety and for functional use of the hand. Lastly, impaired Ⓡ hand
function, which includes GPP/FPP, RGCR, In-Hand Manipulation skills, etc., will be addressed last as this would be easier to
address once the pre-requisite client factors of ROM, strength have been improved. Intact sensation would also allow for a more
functional hand use.
E. OT Impression
1. The client has LOM as evidenced by which potentially affects performance in ADL tasks, educational, and work
participation.
2. The client has weak grip strength which potentially affects performance in ADL tasks and educational
participation.
3. The client has impaired sensations which potentially affects ADL tasks, leisure, educational participation, and
work participation.
4. The client has impaired right hand function which potentially affects ADL tasks, leisure, educational participation,
and work participation.
F. Rehabilitation Potential
According to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), advances in medical science and flexor tendon surgery results in
good return of function and high patient satisfaction. However, despite extensive therapy, some patients still report long-term stiffness.
Adding to that, since the injury is in Zone V, direct tendon repair results in less complications but Orthobullets states that this often carri es
a worse prognosis due to the associated neurovascular injury, as is the case with the client. This means that the client has a guarded medical
prognosis. However, the client received early surgical and rehabilitation interventions. The client is also motivated and cooperative with his
home exercises. If the client maintains this positive behavior and remains compliant to the treatment, tendon adhesions and complications
can be avoided, thus the client has a guarded rehabilitation potential.
OT INTERVENTION
A. LTGs, STGs, and Plan of Action
Problem 1: Client has LOM in finger flexion which results in difficulty in performing ADL tasks, educational and work
participation.
LTG 1: Client will improve ROM of Ⓡ hand to a functional position necessary for effective occupational performance in 3 months
of OT sessions.
STG 1: Given ROMex, the client will improve the ROM of all MCP flexion to 0-71˚ in 1 month of OT sessions.
STG 2: Given ROMex, the client will improve the ROM of all PIP flexion to 0-87˚ in 1 month of OT sessions.
STG 3: Given ROMex, the client will improve the ROM of all DIP flexion to 0-64˚ in 1 month of OT sessions.
POA:
TUS:
Active Friendliness
The therapist will maintain a friendly attitude towards the client and take the initiative to initiate interactions. This
distracts the client from the pain and fatigue that may come with activities given.
Encouraging Mode
The therapist will use positive reinforcements to promote client performance and participation in the activities.
TUG:
Case Presentation – M.C. | pg. 16
Dyadic Group
A dyadic group composed of the therapist and the patient will be utilized to allow for close observation and maintenance
of the quality of the exercise being done by the client.
TUA:
First, client will be given 3 sets of 10 reps passive ROM exercises for the R hand to prepare targeted joints for
occupation-based activities and to serve as a gentle passive stretch to prevent contractures. Client will be asked to hold the flexed
position for 10 seconds. Client will then be asked to do functional activities beginning with light prehension activities suc h as
writing or typing. If there is a continuous presence of contracture, a cock-up resting splint may be advised to be worn at night and
will be educated on care for splint.
Problem 2: Client has weak grip strength which results in difficulty in performing ADL tasks and educational participation.
LTG 2: Client will improve grip strength of Ⓡ necessary for independent performance of occupations in 3 months of OT sessions.
STG 1: Given active assistive exercises, client will improve MMT grade of thumb flexors from 2+ to 3 necessary for
gripping objects, in 1 week of OT sessions
STG 2: Given active assistive exercises, client will improve MMT grade of thumb flexors from 3 to 4 necessary for
gripping objects, in 1 week of OT sessions
STG 3: Given active assistive exercises, client will improve MMT grade of thumb flexors from 4 to 5 necessary for
gripping objects, in 1 week of OT sessions
STG 4: Given active resistive exercises, client will be able to hold and lift a glass filled with water independently
using the Ⓡ hand for 15 seconds in 1 week of OT sessions.
STG 5: Given active resistive exercises, client will be able to hold and lift a dipper filled with water independently
using the Ⓡ hand for 15 seconds in 1 week of OT sessions.
STG 6: Given active resistive exercises, client will be able to grip a brush to groom his hair using his Ⓡ hand
independently in 1 week of OT sessions.
STG 7: Given active resistive exercises, client will be able to grip utensils for feeding using his Ⓡ hand
independently in 1 week of OT sessions. Commented [BAD6]: power web
POA:
TUS:
Active Friendliness
The therapist will maintain a friendly attitude towards the client and take the initiative to initiate interactions. This distracts the
client from the pain and fatigue that may come with activities given.
Encouraging Mode
The therapist will use positive reinforcements to promote client performance and participation in the activities.
TUG:
Dyadic Group
A dyadic group composed of the therapist and the patient will be utilized to allow for close observation and maintenance of the
quality of the exercise being done by the client.
TUA:
To prepare the muscles of the R hand for functional activities, client will be given low-intensity active resistive exercises such as
grasping, raking, and pinching theraputty 10 times each. Client will then be tasked to do occupation-based activities using the R
hand such as lifting a glass of water to drink, bathing using a dipper, brushing hair and feeding with utensils using the right hand.
The client will begin with an empty glass of water and the amount of water will be increased as client’s strength improves. A
gardening task may also be given which will include lifting bags of soil, shoveling, pushing a wheelbarrow and watering the plants.
Problem 3: Client has impaired sensation which results in difficulty performing ADL tasks, leisure, educational and work
participation.
LTG 3: Client will improve protopathic sensation necessary for safe occupational participation in 6 months of OT sessions.
STG 1: Client will be able to recognize and localize light tough and pressure 5/5 instances given sensory re-education in
2 months of OT sessions.
STG 2: Client will be able to perceive and describe pain 5/5 instances given sensory re-education in 2 months of OT
sessions.
STG 3: Client will be able to perceive and describe temperature 5/5 instances given sensory re-education in 2 months of
OT sessions.
POA:
TUS:
Active Friendliness
The therapist will maintain a friendly attitude towards the client and take the initiative to initiate interactions. This distracts the
client from the pain and fatigue that may come with activities given.
Encouraging Mode
The therapist will use positive reinforcements to promote client performance and participation in the activities.
TUG:
Dyadic Group
A dyadic group composed of the therapist and the patient will be utilized to allow for close observation and maintenance of the
quality of the exercise being done by the client.
Case Presentation – M.C. | pg. 17
TUA:
To expose the client to different sensations, the client would be given sensory re-education. Objects or materials to be presented will
be following gross to fine discrimination. This will allow the client to clearly delineate the difference of one object to another.
Client will then be asked to do occupation-based activities that relates to the client’s work. An example of this would be searching
objects placed inside a bag with varying objects with varying textures. Commented [de7]: not sure if tama itoo or pano
isingit ung sa temperature
not sure if tama itoo or pano isingit ung sa temperature
Problem 4: Client has impaired Ⓡhand function results in difficulty during ADL tasks, leisure, educational and work participation. Commented [BD8]: problem statement
LTG 4: Client will improve hand functions necessary for functional performance from P to G in 6 months of OT sessions.
STG 1: Client will be able to improve GPPs from F to G in 1 month of OT sessions. Commented [BAD9]: thumb
STG 2: Client will be able to improve RGCR from F to G in 1 month of OT sessions.
STG 3: Client will be able to improve FPPs from A to F in 1 month of OT sessions. Commented [BAD10]: per grasp
STG 4: Client will be able to improve FPPs from F to G in 1 month of OT sessions. Commented [BAD11]: per component
STG 5: Client will be able to improve in-hand manipulation skills from P to F in 1 month of OT sessions.
STG 6: Client will be able to improve in-hand manipulation skills from F to G in 1 month of OT sessions.
For RGCR:
LTG: Client will be able to improve RGCR from F to G in 1 month of OT sessions. Commented [BD12]: per component
STG: Client will be able to reach to grasp a variety of size objects using the client’s affected hand??
Client will be able to grasp an object using
Client will be able to maintain to carrying an object using
Client wil be able to voluntary release objects using chuchu Commented [de13]: hello! di ko sure itoo pero
parang ganyan alam ko if need hiwahiwalayin so
another LTG pa tayo
POA:
TUS:
Active Friendliness
The therapist will maintain a friendly attitude towards the client and take the initiative to initiate interactions. This distracts the
client from the pain and fatigue that may come with activities given.
Encouraging Mode
The therapist will use positive reinforcements to promote client performance and participation in the activities.
TUG:
Dyadic Group
A dyadic group composed of the therapist and the patient will be utilized to allow for close observation and maintenance of the
quality of the exercise being done by the client.
TUA:
Activities that require individual and precise movements of the hand structures will be utilized. The can include writing tasks,
typing, art making, etc.
The client would be given strengthening exercises and active resistive devices that would utilize the client’s movements in hand
structures.
For GPP: strengthening exercises, active resistive exercises. RGCR (ball game)
For FPP: PROMs, AROMs, Active assistive exercises, active resistive. EZ board, occupation based
office desk works (organize: coins, pencils chuchu)
For in hand manipulation: finger ROM exercises, strengthening excercises. Sorting, filing and
labeling (pencils, files, paperclips, coins). IT’s task (office works
Differential tendon gliding exercises will be given to the client to help avoid the adherence of the repaired tendons to scar tissue.
Client would have to perform 10 repetitions of position A. Straight; B. Hook; C. Fist; D. Tabletop; and E. Straight fist. two to three
times a day.
II. Compression Garments
Client will be given compression garments for scar management. The custom-made compression garment would be worn 24 hours
to be removed only when bathing or for other hygiene purposes.
III. Instructions to the Client
The client should use his affected hand for light ADL activities but should avoid heavy lifting and excessive resistance. The client
must not yet play basketball or any other sport activity with the affected hand. Since the client has impaired sensation on the hand,
he must compensate by using his other senses, special vision. He must check his hand for injury often and compensate using his
vision to maintain safe interaction with his environment.
IV. Instructions to the Caregiver
The caregiver must do the heavy lifting instead of the client.
E. Conclusion
I. Summary of Achieved Goals
With the interventions provided, the therapist was able to address the goals regarding the improvement of range of motion, grip
strength, and functional use of the hand. The use of ROM exercises is able to increase the range of motion in the different joints of
the client’s hand. Using theraputty or other similar materials also allowed the therapist to target different motions and improve the
strength of the paretic muscles, which in turn will help improve the client’s grip strength. The materials used during the preparatory
activities also allowed the patient to improve his gross prehension skills, especially spherical grasp. The therapist, however, was not
able to achieve any goals towards improving sensation. Instructions were given on how to compensate for the impaired sensation in
order to be able to safely perform tasks but it would have been better if sensation was improved.
II. Group Insight
With the group’s experience in the clinical visits, we realized that we have many more things to learn and experience. It opened us
to the fact that we have to share our skills and knowledge that we have acquired from years of learning what and how OT can help
individuals. The group also learned the essence of time management to be able probe more if ever gathered information would not
be enough. We should be prepared at all times and should be ready with whatever changes are to happen. The group realized that
we have to know how to adapt and think quickly if ever circumstance would arise. We should be able to compose ourselves and not
panic to proceed with the OT session. Otherwise, it could be a burden to not only to each of us, but to the patient as well. We also
realized that learning and simulating treatment sessions is helpful but still very different from the real thing. Practicing treating
patients made us more self-aware of our actions and mistakes. For example, in our case we planned out our activities but we were
unable to notice without cues the effect of the improper positioning on the our treatment. Being able to communicate effectively
with the patient also plays an important part in the intervention process because through effective communication, the patient would
be knowledgeable on how he/ she could take part during the intervention process and most especially on his/ her progress. The
clinical visits, lectures, laboratory sessions, learned knowledge from the professors have prepared us well to what internship has in
store for us.
REFERENCES
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. (n.d.). Flexor Tendon Injuries. Retrieved April 18, 2019, from
https://orthoinfo.aaos.org/en/diseases--conditions/flexor-tendon-injuries/
Congress of Neurological Surgeons. (n.d.). Diagnosis and Management of Peripheral Nerve Injury and Entrapment. Retrieved April 20, 2019,
from https://www.cns.org/academic/medical-student-curriculum-neurosurgery/peripheral-nerve-disease/diagnosis-and-management
Coppard, B. M., & Lohman, H. (2008). Introduction to Splinting: A Clinical Reasoning and Problem-Solving Approach (3rd ed.). St. Louis,
MO: Mosby Elsevier.
De Jong, J. P., MD, Nguyen, J. T., MD, Sonnema, A. J., MD, Nguyen, E. C., MD, Amadio, P. C., MD, & Moran, S. L., MD. (2014). The
Incidence of Acute Traumatic Tendon Injuries in the Hand and Wrist: A 10-Year Population-based Study. Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery.
doi:10.4055/cios.2014.6.2.196
Hislop, H. J., & Montgomery, J. (2007). Daniels and Worthingham's Muscle Testing: Techniques of Manual Examination (8th ed.). St. Louis,
MO: Saunders Elsevier.
Huckhagel, T., Nüchtern, J., Regelsberger, J., & Lefering, R. (2018). Nerve injury in severe trauma with upper extremity involvement:
Evaluation of 49,382 patients from the TraumaRegister DGU® between 2002 and 2015. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation
and Emergency Medicine. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0546-6
Case Presentation – M.C. | pg. 20
Knight, J. (n.d.). Flexor Tendon Injuries. Retrieved April 19, 2019, from https://www.handandwristinstitute.com/flexor-tendon-
injuries/#What_are_the_symptoms_of_Flexor_Tendon_Injuries
Magee, D. J. (2014). Orthopedic Physical Assessment (6th ed., Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Series). St. Louis, MO.
Mayo Clinic. (n.d.). Peripheral Nerve Injuries. Retrieved April 21, 2019, from Diagnosis and Management of Peripheral Nerve Injury and
Entrapment
McHugh Pendleton, H., & Schultz-Krohn, W. (Eds.). (2013). Pedretti's Occupational Therapy Practice Skills for Physical Dysfunction (Seventh
ed.). St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby.
Menorca, R. M., BS, Fussell, T. S., BS, & Elfar, J. C., MD. (2013). Peripheral Nerve Trauma: Mechanisms of Injury and Recovery. Hand
Clinics, 29(3). doi:10.1016/j.hcl.2013.04.002
Patterson Medical. (n.d.). Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer Owner's Manual. Retrieved April 21, 2019, from
https://www.performancehealth.com/amfile/file/download/file_id/6971/product_id/27106/
Pendleton, H. M., & Schultz-Krohn, W. (2006). Pedretti's Occupational Therapy: Practice Skills for Physical Dysfunction (7th ed.). St. Louis,
MO: Mosby Elsevier.
Purves, D., Augustine, G. J., Fitzpatrick, D., Hall, W. C., LaMantia, A., McNamara, J. O., & Williams, S. (Eds.). (n.d.). Neuroscience (3rd ed.).
Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
Radomski, M., & Trombly-Latham, C. A. (Eds.). (2008). Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction (Sixth Edition ed.). Philadelphia, PA:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Snell, R. S. (2012). Clinical Anatomy by Regions (9th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.