FN Clarivate Analytics Web of Science

VR 1.0
PT J
AU Hinojosa, VH
Gutierrez-Alcaraz, G
AF Hinojosa, Victor H.
Gutierrez-Alcaraz, Guillermo
TI A computational comparison of 2 mathematical formulations to handle
transmission network constraints in the unit commitment problem
SO INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE DC formulation; power transfer distribution factors; transmission
losses; transmission network constraints; unit commitment
ID THERMAL UNIT; MODEL; ALGORITHM; MARKET
AB Until recently, transmission network constraints have been incorporated into the
unit commitment (UC) problem (security-constrained UC [SCUC]) using the classical
direct current (DC)-based equation. This paper proposes a new formulation to model
network constraints in the UC problem by using the power transfer distribution
factor (PTDF). The classical formulation uses the binary commitment status, the
power generation, and the voltage-phase angles as decision variables. For the
proposed formulation, the nodal balance equality constraints are modeled using one
equality constraint, and the transmission network constraints have been modeled
using the PTDF and the active power generation (decision variables). The main
advantage of this formulation is the reduction of decision variables in the
operation problem in comparison with the classical DC formulation. Transmission
losses, using a piecewise linear approximation, are included in the SCUC problem as
well. Both formulations are validated and tested on the Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 14-bus, the IEEE 30-bus, the IEEE 57-bus, and the IEEE
118-bus. The IEEE 14-bus and IEEE 57-bus systems are used to compare the loss and
the lossless models. The results show that the PTDF-based formulation, which
requires fewer continuous variables and equality constraints than the classical DC
formulation, reduces the simulation time without sacrificing optimality. The
results also demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed formulation to address the
SCUC problem and its potential applicability to medium-scale and large-scale power
systems.
C1 [Hinojosa, Victor H.] Univ Tecn Federico Santa Maria, Dept Elect Engn,
Valparaiso, Chile.
[Gutierrez-Alcaraz, Guillermo] Inst Tecnol Morelia, Dept Elect Engn, Morelia,
Michoacan, Mexico.
RP Hinojosa, VH (reprint author), Univ Tecn Federico Santa Maria, Dept Elect Engn,
Valparaiso, Chile.
EM victor.hinojosa@usm.cl
RI researchers, ac3e/N-2008-2016; Hinojosa, Victor/E-6989-2015;
publicaciones, AC3E/S-4625-2017
OI Hinojosa, Victor/0000-0001-7586-0572;
FU Mexican National Council for Science and Technology (CONACyT);
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria [USM 116.22.2]; Chilean
National Commission for Scientific and Technological Research (CONICYT)
[FB0008]; Fondecyt [1130793]
FX Mexican National Council for Science and Technology (CONACyT),
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria, Grant/Award Number: USM
116.22.2. Chilean National Commission for Scientific and Technological
Research (CONICYT), Grant/Award Number: Project FB0008, Fondecyt
1130793.
CR Arroyo JM, 2000, IEEE T POWER SYST, V15, P1098, DOI 10.1109/59.871739
Bai X, 2009, IET GENER TRANSM DIS, V3, P182, DOI 10.1049/iet-gtd:20070516
Carrion M, 2006, IEEE T POWER SYST, V21, P1371, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2006.876672
Christie RD, 2000, P IEEE, V88, P170, DOI 10.1109/5.823997
 Derakhshandeh SY, 2015, INT T ELECTR ENERGY, V25, P1349, DOI 10.1002/etep.1913
Dimitroulas DK, 2011, APPL ENERG, V88, P4687, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.06.009
dos Santos TN, 2011, IEEE T POWER SYST, V26, P508, DOI
10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2057263
Dvorkin Y, 2015, IEEE T POWER APPARAT, V30, P612
Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, 1999, ELECTR POW SYST RES, V50, P35, DOI 10.1016/S0378-
7796(98)00129-1
Fu Y, 2005, IEEE T POWER SYST, V20, P1538, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2005.854375
Helseth A, 2013, INT T ELECTR ENERGY, V23, P1396, DOI 10.1002/etep.1667
Hinojosa VH, 2016, ELECTR POW SYST RES, V140, P391, DOI
10.1016/j.epsr.2016.06.002
Hu BQ, 2014, IEEE T POWER SYST, V29, P2952, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2308637
Kumar VS, 2010, INT J ELEC POWER, V32, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2009.06.019
LEE FN, 1994, IEEE T POWER SYST, V9, P279, DOI 10.1109/59.317600
Lei X, 2002, ELECTR POW SYST RES, V60, P193, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7796(01)00177-8
Lotfjou A, 2010, IEEE T POWER SYST, V25, P531, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2036486
Ma HL, 1998, INT J ELEC POWER, V20, P287, DOI 10.1016/S0142-0615(97)00058-6
Ostrowski J, 2012, COMPUT IND ENG, V63, P702, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2012.02.013
Padhy NP, 2004, IEEE T POWER SYST, V19, P1196, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2003.821611
Pandzic H., 2013, 2013 IEEE POW EN SOC
Pinto H, 2006, 2006 IEEE/PES POWER SYSTEMS CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION. VOLS 1-5,
P1759, DOI 10.1109/PSCE.2006.296179
SHEBLE GB, 1994, IEEE T POWER SYST, V9, P128, DOI 10.1109/59.317549
Tseng CL, 1999, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V24, P297, DOI 10.1016/S0167-9236(98)00072-4
Wang FY, 2015, IEEE T POWER SYST, V30, P612, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2328605
Wei W, 2014, INT T ELECTR ENERGY, V24, P1726, DOI 10.1002/etep.1812
Wood A. J., 1996, POWER GENERATION OPE
Zhang H, 2012, IEEE T POWER APPARAT, V27
Zimmerman RD, 2011, IEEE T POWER SYST, V26, P12, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2051168
1999, IEEE T POWER APPARAT, V14, P1010
NR 30
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 1
U2 9
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 2050-7038
J9 INT T ELECTR ENERGY
JI Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst.
PD AUG
PY 2017
VL 27
IS 8
AR e2332
DI 10.1002/etep.2332
PG 15
WC Engineering, Electrical & Electronic
SC Engineering
GA FD7ZM
UT WOS:000407744800001
DA 2019-01-15
ER

PT J
AU An, K
Liu, HJ
Zhu, H
 Dong, ZY
Hur, K
AF An, Kyungsung
Liu, Hao Jan
Zhu, Hao
Dong, Zhao Yang
Hur, Kyeon
TI Evaluation of Conservation Voltage Reduction with Analytic Hierarchy
Process: A Decision Support Framework in Grid Operations Planning
SO ENERGIES
LA English
DT Article
DE analytic hierarchy process (AHP); conservation voltage reduction (CVR);
CVR factor; integer programming; power transfer distribution factor
(PTDF); voltage sensitivity factor (VSF)
ID POWER-SYSTEM; ENERGY; LOAD; IMPLEMENTATION; DEMAND; CVR; NETWORKS;
IMPACT
AB This paper presents a systematic framework to evaluate the performance of
conservation voltage reduction (CVR) by determining suitable substations for CVR in
operations planning. Existing CVR planning practice generally only focuses on the
energy saving aspect without taking other underlying attributes into account, i.e.,
network topology and reduced voltage effects on other substations. To secure the
desired operating reserve and avoid any adverse impacts, these attributes should be
considered for implementing CVR more effectively. This research develops a
practical decision-making framework based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
to quantify several of the aforementioned attributes. Candidate substations for CVR
deployment are prioritized such that performances are compared in terms of power
transfer distribution factor (PTDF), voltage sensitivity factor (VSF), and CVR
factor. In addition, to meet a specified reserve requirement, an integer
programming approach is adopted to select potential substations for CVR
implementations. Case studies for a Korean electric power system under diverse
operating conditions are performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed
method.
C1 [An, Kyungsung; Hur, Kyeon] Yonsei Univ, Sch Elect & Elect Engn, Seoul 120149,
South Korea.
[Liu, Hao Jan; Zhu, Hao] Univ Illinois, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, 1308 West Main
St, Urbana, IL 61801 USA.
[Dong, Zhao Yang] Univ Sydney, Sch Elect & Informat Engn, Sydney, NSW 2006,
Australia.
RP Hur, K (reprint author), Yonsei Univ, Sch Elect & Elect Engn, Seoul 120149,
South Korea.
EM anks8609@gmail.com; haoliu6@illinois.edu; haozhu@illinois.edu;
joe.dong@sydney.edu.au; khur@yonsei.ac.kr
OI Hur, Kyeon/0000-0003-3726-7545
FU Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation
of Korea(NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology
[2016R1D1A1B03930582]; Yonsei University [2016-12-0046]
FX This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through
the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) funded by the Ministry of
Education, Science and Technology (No. 2016R1D1A1B03930582). This work
was supported by the Yonsei University Research Fund Joint International
Project Development Fund (JIPDF) Supporting Program of 2016 (project
No.: 2016-12-0046).
CR Cheng X, 2005, IEEE T POWER SYST, V20, P1868, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2005.857013
Diaz-Aguilo M, 2013, IEEE T POWER DELIVER, V28, P2428, DOI
10.1109/TPWRD.2013.2271095
Dodgson J., 2000, TECHNICAL REPORT
DWYER A, 1995, IEEE T POWER SYST, V10, P709, DOI 10.1109/59.387907
ERICKSON JC, 1982, IEEE T POWER AP SYST, V101, P2014, DOI
10.1109/TPAS.1982.317449
Kabir MN, 2014, IEEE T IND INFORM, V10, P967, DOI 10.1109/TII.2014.2299336
Kim DM, 2012, IEEE T SMART GRID, V3, P635, DOI 10.1109/TSG.2012.2188653
KIRSHNER D, 1990, IEEE T POWER SYST, V5, P1178, DOI 10.1109/59.99368
Kumar A., 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review, V22, P42, DOI
10.1109/MPER.2002.1016847
LAURIA DM, 1987, IEEE T POWER DELIVER, V2, P1186, DOI 10.1109/TPWRD.1987.4308241
Le B, 2015, IEEE T SMART GRID, V6, P1865, DOI 10.1109/TSG.2015.2394362
Lefebvre S., 2008, POW EN SOC GEN M CON, P1
Liu HJ, 2014, INT CONF SMART GRID, P529, DOI 10.1109/SmartGridComm.2014.7007701
Nam SR, 2013, ENERGIES, V6, P6322, DOI 10.3390/en6126322
Nam SR, 2013, ENERGIES, V6, P3692, DOI 10.3390/en6083692
Pinney D., 2014, DEOE0000222 NRECA
PJM, 2015, PJM MAN 13 EM OP
PREISS RF, 1978, IEEE T POWER AP SYST, V97, P1665, DOI 10.1109/TPAS.1978.354658
Saaty T., 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE
Sandraz JPA, 2014, IEEE T POWER DELIVER, V29, P1692, DOI
10.1109/TPWRD.2014.2304501
SCALLEY BR, 1981, IEEE T EDUC, V24, P210, DOI 10.1109/TE.1981.4321493
Schneider K. P., 2010, TECHNICAL REPORT
Shin J, 2015, J ELECTR ENG TECHNOL, V10, P719, DOI 10.5370/JEET.2015.10.3.719
Short T. A., 2012, P 2012 IEEE PES TRAN, P1
Steese J. D., 1987, TECHNICAL REPORT
Wang ZY, 2014, IEEE T POWER SYST, V29, P2321, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2304641
Wang ZY, 2014, IEEE T POWER SYST, V29, P1306, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2288518
Wang ZY, 2014, IEEE T SMART GRID, V5, P431, DOI 10.1109/TSG.2013.2279836
WARNOCK VJ, 1986, IEEE T POWER SYST, V1, P92, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.1986.4334910
Wood AJ, 1984, POWER GENERATION OPE
Zhu J, 2009, OPTIMIZATION POWER S
NR 31
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 0
U2 6
PU MDPI AG
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
SN 1996-1073
J9 ENERGIES
JI Energies
PD DEC
PY 2016
VL 9
IS 12
AR 1074
DI 10.3390/en9121074
PG 15
WC Energy & Fuels
SC Energy & Fuels
GA EI3PD
UT WOS:000392402700075
OA DOAJ Gold
DA 2019-01-15
ER

PT J
AU Rahmani, M
Kargarian, A
Hug, G
AF Rahmani, Mohsen
Kargarian, Amin
Hug, Gabriela
TI Comprehensive power transfer distribution factor model for large-scale
transmission expansion planning
SO IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION
LA English
DT Article
DE power transmission lines; power system measurement; power transmission
planning; power factor; optimisation; comprehensive power transfer
distribution factor based model; large-scale transmission expansion
planning; TEP; decision-making process; large-scale power systems; size
reduction; computational cost reduction; system topology; scalable
optimisation problem; PTDF-based TEP model; angle-based TEP models;
transmission lines
ID BOUND ALGORITHM; MULTISTAGE; SYSTEMS; SOLVE
AB Transmission expansion planning (TEP) is an important and computationally
expensive decision-making process in power systems. Expression of the power flows
using power transfer distribution factors (PTDFs) could potentially reduce the size
and computational cost of the TEP. However, this formulation does not lend itself
easily for this problem as the system topology changes in the course of the
optimisation procedure. This study presents a PTDF-based TEP model devoid of
voltage angles and nodal power balances, while producing the same solution as
angle-based TEP models. The proposed model is capable of monitoring a limited
number of transmission lines that have significant impact on the system's reliable
and optimal operation. It thus considerably reduces the number of constraints and
results in a scalable optimisation problem. The proposed model is highly
advantageous especially for the TEP of large-scale power systems. The numerical
results provide an indication for the effectiveness of the proposed model.
C1 [Rahmani, Mohsen] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Engn & Publ Policy, Pittsburgh, PA
15213 USA.
[Kargarian, Amin] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Baton Rouge, LA
70803 USA.
[Hug, Gabriela] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Informat Technol & Elect Engn Dept,
Zurich, Switzerland.
[Rahmani, Mohsen] Ascend Analyt, Dev Div, Boulder, CO 80302 USA.
RP Kargarian, A (reprint author), Louisiana State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn,
Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA.
EM kargarian@lsu.edu
CR Alguacil N, 2003, IEEE T POWER SYST, V18, P1070, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2003.814891
Binato S, 2001, IEEE T POWER SYST, V16, P235, DOI 10.1109/59.918292
Escobar AH, 2004, IEEE T POWER SYST, V19, P735, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2004.825920
Fourer R, 2002, AMPL MODELING LANGUA
Fu Y., 2014, SCI WORLD J, V2014, P1, DOI DOI 10.1001/JAMANEUR0L.2014.1065
Granville S., 1985, ANAL LINEARIZED POWE
Guo JC, 2009, IEEE T POWER SYST, V24, P1633, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2023273
Haffner S, 2000, IEE P-GENER TRANSM D, V147, P149, DOI 10.1049/ip-gtd:20000337
Hashimoto SHM, 2003, IEE P-GENER TRANSM D, V150, P536, DOI 10.1049/ip-
gtd:20030656
Jabr RA, 2013, IEEE T POWER SYST, V28, P2779, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2228507
Karll E., 2012, RTO UNIT COMMITMENT
da Silva AML, 2011, IET GENER TRANSM DIS, V5, P360, DOI 10.1049/iet-
gtd.2010.0497
Olsen D, 2012, IEEE T SUSTAIN ENERG, V3, P837, DOI 10.1109/TSTE.2012.2200111
Rahmani M, 2010, ELECTR POW SYST RES, V80, P1056, DOI 10.1016/j.epsr.2010.01.012
Rahmani M, 2013, IEEE T POWER SYST, V28, P3795, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2266346
Rahmani M, 2013, IEEE T POWER SYST, V28, P2164, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2223241
Rider MJ, 2008, IET GENER TRANSM DIS, V2, P90, DOI 10.1049/iet-gtd:20070090
Rider MJ, 2007, IET GENER TRANSM DIS, V1, P731, DOI 10.1049/iet-gtd:20060465
 Romero R, 2002, IEE P-GENER TRANSM D, V149, P27, DOI 10.1049/ip-gtd:20020026
Taylor JA, 2011, IEEE T POWER SYST, V26, P2533, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2011.2145395
Tohidi Y, 2014, IEEE T POWER SYST, V29, P2662, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2312021
Wood A. J, 2013, POWER GENERATION OPE
NR 22
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 0
U2 1
PU INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
PI HERTFORD
PA MICHAEL FARADAY HOUSE SIX HILLS WAY STEVENAGE, HERTFORD SG1 2AY, ENGLAND
SN 1751-8687
EI 1751-8695
J9 IET GENER TRANSM DIS
JI IET Gener. Transm. Distrib.
PD SEP 2
PY 2016
VL 10
IS 12
BP 2981
EP 2989
DI 10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.1573
PG 9
WC Engineering, Electrical & Electronic
SC Engineering
GA DW1AG
UT WOS:000383374400017
DA 2019-01-15
ER

PT J
AU Van den Bergh, K
Delarue, E
AF Van den Bergh, Kenneth
Delarue, Erik
TI An improved method to calculate injection shift keys
SO ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE Network reduction; Injection shift key (ISK); Generation shift key
(GSK); Demand shift key (DSK); Power transfer distribution factor (PTDF)
ID NETWORK REDUCTION; POWER-SYSTEMS; FLOW; AGGREGATION; EQUIVALENTS
AB Transmission network constraints become increasingly relevant in generation
scheduling models, given the ongoing integration of market zones and the deployment
of renewables in remote areas. However, a full nodal network representation in
generation models is often not possible due to computational limitations.
Therefore, reduced zonal network models are needed. A crucial step in the nodal-
zonal network reduction is the calculation of injection shift keys (ISKs).
Injection shift keys denote the nodal contribution to the zonal generation balance
and are needed to compile different nodes into one equivalent node. This paper
discusses injection shift keys in detail and proposes an improved method to
calculate them. According to the improved method, the generation and load portfolio
is split up in different categories, and injection shift keys are determined
separately for each category. A case study of the central European electricity
system indicates that the improved method is able to approximate the nodal network
without a considerable increase in computational cost. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All
rights reserved.
C1 [Van den Bergh, Kenneth; Delarue, Erik] Univ Leuven, KU Leuven, Energy Inst,
Celestijnenlaan 300 Box 2421, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.
RP Delarue, E (reprint author), Univ Leuven, KU Leuven, Energy Inst,
Celestijnenlaan 300 Box 2421, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.
EM erik.delarue@mech.kuleuven.be
RI Delarue, Erik/G-9722-2012
OI Delarue, Erik/0000-0003-1798-1274
CR [Anonymous], 2014, DOC CWE FB MC SOL BA
Baldick R, 2003, IEEE T POWER SYST, V18, P1316, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2003.818723
Barton John, 2005, PERSPECTIVES SONG SO, V346, P1
Biskas PN, 2011, ELECTR POW SYST RES, V81, P1973, DOI 10.1016/j.epsr.2011.06.008
Cheng X, 2005, IEEE T POWER SYST, V20, P1868, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2005.857013
DECKMAN S, 1980, IEEE T POWER AP SYST, V99, P2301, DOI 10.1109/TPAS.1980.319798
Deckmann S., 1980, IEEE T POWER APPAR S, V6, P2292
Doquet M, 2015, IEEE T POWER SYST, V30, P503, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2320414
Duthoit C. J., 2008, P 1 INT C FOR APPL T, P1
Ehrenmann A., 2005, Utilities Policy, V13, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.jup.2004.12.007
ENNS MK, 1991, IEEE T POWER SYST, V6, P613, DOI 10.1109/59.76704
ENTSO-e, 2013, DAT PORT STAT DAT
European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO-E),
2013, STUD MOD 2020 CONT E
Guler T, 2007, IEEE T POWER SYST, V22, P879, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2006.888950
Housos E., 1980, IEEE T POWER APPAR S, V6, P2113
Kang CQ, 2013, INT J ELEC POWER, V51, P321, DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.02.033
Kardakos EG, 2014, ELECTR POW SYST RES, V109, P141, DOI
10.1016/j.epsr.2013.12.014
Klos M., 2014, C IEEE IND EL SOC, P1
Kumar A, 2004, ELECTR POW SYST RES, V72, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.epsr.2004.03.011
Oh H, 2012, IEEE T POWER SYST, V27, P705, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2011.2176758
Oh H, 2010, IEEE T POWER SYST, V25, P677, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2036183
Papadogiannis A., 2011, P IEEE POW EN SOC GE, P1
Purchala K, 2005, IEEE POWER ENG SOC, P454
Purchala K., 2005, PROC INT SYMP CIGRE, P362
Shayesteh E, 2015, IEEE T POWER SYST, V30, P429, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2326615
Stott B, 2009, IEEE T POWER SYST, V24, P1290, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2021235
TINNEY WF, 1987, IEEE T POWER SYST, V2, P351, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.1987.4335132
Vukasovic M., 2007, IEEE INT C POW ENG E, P791
Ward J. B., 1949, ELECTRON ENG, V68, P794
NR 29
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 0
U2 4
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA PO BOX 564, 1001 LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND
SN 0378-7796
EI 1873-2046
J9 ELECTR POW SYST RES
JI Electr. Power Syst. Res.
PD MAY
PY 2016
VL 134
BP 197
EP 204
DI 10.1016/j.epsr.2016.01.020
PG 8
WC Engineering, Electrical & Electronic
SC Engineering
GA DH4MN
UT WOS:000372760200022
DA 2019-01-15
ER

PT J
AU Shi, D
Tylavsky, DJ
AF Shi, Di
Tylavsky, Daniel J.
TI A Novel Bus-Aggregation-Based Structure-Preserving Power System
Equivalent
SO IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE Bus clustering; computational efficiency; dc power flow; power-system
equivalent; power transfer distribution factor (PTDF); system planning
ID DYNAMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT; SECURITY ANALYSIS; NETWORK; FLOW
AB The challenges power systems engineers are facing today require the development
of new system planning tools for analyzing generation and environmental policy
options in the transmission-constrained electricity market. The requirements of a
power-system equivalent to be used with such tools are very different from those
assumed in the traditional network reduction process. To solve this issue, a novel
structure-preserving network equivalent is proposed in this paper for modeling
large power systems in the context of analyzing policy options and emissions. In
the proposed method, a power system is first clustered into zones based on the
similarity of the power transfer distribution factors (PTDFs); network reduction is
achieved by aggregating buses (generators/loads) on a zonal basis and modeling
inter-zonal transactions (power flows) using equivalent transmission lines. The
proposed equivalent is superior to existing bus-aggregation-based equivalents in
its accuracy under both the base case and change-case operating conditions. In
addition, the method is more computationally efficient than other bus aggregation
methods proposed heretofore. This paper also examined several classic clustering
techniques and identified their performance and computational efficiencies when
applied to very large power systems. The proposed network equivalencing approach is
tested on an illustrative six-bus system as well as the 62,000-bus and 80,000-
branch Eastern Interconnection (EI).
C1 [Shi, Di] NEC Labs Amer Inc, Cupertino, CA 95014 USA.
[Tylavsky, Daniel J.] Arizona State Univ, Sch Elect Comp & Energy Engn, Tempe,
AZ 85287 USA.
RP Shi, D (reprint author), NEC Labs Amer Inc, Cupertino, CA 95014 USA.
EM dshi@nec-labs.com; tylavsky@asu.edu
FU CERTS; PSERC
FX This work was supported in part by CERTS and PSERC. Paper no.
TPWRS-00340-2014.
CR Aggarwal C. C., 1999, P 5 ACM SIGKDD INT C
Allen E., 2008, IEEE T POWER SYSTEMS, V3, P896
Alsafih H.A., 2010, POW EN SOC GEN M 201, P1
Arthur D., 2007, P 18 ANN ACMSIAM S D, V8, P1027, DOI DOI
10.1145/1283383.1283494
Cheng X, 2005, IEEE T POWER SYST, V20, P1868, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2005.857013
DAVIS TA, UMFPACK UNSYMMETRIC
DECKMAN S, 1980, IEEE T POWER AP SYST, V99, P2301, DOI 10.1109/TPAS.1980.319798
Department of Energy, 2009, NAT EL TRANSM CONG S
Dept. Energy, 2006, NAT EL TRANSM CONG S
Dimo P., 1975, NODAL ANAL POWER SYS
DING H, 1994, ELECTR POW SYST RES, V30, P209, DOI 10.1016/0378-7796(94)00857-4
DOPAZO JF, 1979, IEEE T POWER AP SYST, V98, P2153
DURAN H, 1972, IEEE T POWER AP SYST, VPA91, P670, DOI 10.1109/TPAS.1972.293253
Energy Visuals Inc, E INT DAT TRANSM ATL
 Ezhilarasi G., 2011, INT J MACHINE LEARNI, V1, P93
Haque M. H., 1991, P I EL ENG GEN TRANS, V138, P546
HOUSOS EC, 1980, IEEE T POWER AP SYST, V99, P2113, DOI 10.1109/TPAS.1980.319789
IPCC-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, CLIMATE CHANGE 2007
IRVING MR, 1990, IEE PROC-C, V137, P69, DOI 10.1049/ip-c.1990.0010
Kamwa I, 2007, IEEE T POWER SYST, V22, P1974, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2007.907383
Kamwa I, 2009, IEEE T POWER SYST, V24, P1356, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2021225
Li N., 2012, P 8 INT C WIR COMM N, P1, DOI DOI 10.1145/2406367.2406382
MONTICELLI A, 1979, IEEE T POWER AP SYST, V98, P498, DOI
10.1109/TPAS.1979.319387
MULLER N, 1992, IEEE T POWER SYST, V7, P520, DOI 10.1109/59.141754
Oh H, 2010, IEEE T POWER SYST, V25, P677, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2036183
Qi Y., 2012, N AM POWER S NAPS, P16
Ramezani M, 2009, IEEE T POWER SYST, V24, P849, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2016543
Shawhan DL, 2014, RESOUR ENERGY ECON, V36, P191, DOI
10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.11.015
SHI D, 2012, P IEEE PES GEN M SAN, P1
Shi D., 2012, THESIS ARIZONA STATE
TINNEY WF, 1987, IEEE T POWER SYST, V2, P351, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.1987.4335132
UNDRILL JM, 1971, IEEE T POWER AP SYST, VPA90, P46, DOI 10.1109/TPAS.1971.292897
VALE MHM, 1992, 1992 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOLS
1-6, P2761, DOI 10.1109/ISCAS.1992.230626
Wadie M. E., 1997, P I EL ENG GEN TRANS, P279
Wang HY, 2007, IEEE T POWER SYST, V22, P1185, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2007.901301
WANG MH, 1994, IEEE T POWER SYST, V9, P2056, DOI 10.1109/59.331469
Ward J. B., 1949, AIEE T, V68, P373, DOI DOI 10.1109/T-AIEE.1949.5059947
Zimmerman Ray D., SUPEROPF RES ROADMAP
NR 38
TC 16
Z9 16
U1 0
U2 6
PU IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
PI PISCATAWAY
PA 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, NJ 08855-4141 USA
SN 0885-8950
EI 1558-0679
J9 IEEE T POWER SYST
JI IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
PD JUL
PY 2015
VL 30
IS 4
BP 1977
EP 1986
DI 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2359447
PG 10
WC Engineering, Electrical & Electronic
SC Engineering
GA CK9AK
UT WOS:000356531600031
DA 2019-01-15
ER

PT J
AU Verma, T
Ellens, W
Kooij, RE
AF Verma, Trivik
 Ellens, Wendy
Kooij, Robert E.
TI Context-independent centrality measures underestimate the vulnerability
of power grids
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURES
LA English
DT Article
DE power grids; complex networks; cascading failures; centrality; flow
redistribution; tolerance parameter; vulnerability
ID COMPLEX NETWORKS; STRUCTURAL VULNERABILITY; FLOW
AB Power grids vulnerability is a key issue in society. A component failure may
trigger cascades of failures across the grid and lead to a large blackout. Within
complex network analysis, structural vulnerabilities of power grids have been
studied mostly using purely topological approaches, which assumes that flow of
power is dictated by shortest paths. However, this fails to capture the real flow
characteristics of power grids. We have proposed a flow redistribution mechanism
that closely mimics the flow in power grids using the power transfer distribution
factor (PTDF). We apply the model to the European high-voltage grid to carry out a
comparative study for a number of centrality measures. 'Centrality' gives an
indication of the criticality of network components. We also show a brief
comparison of the end results with other power grid systems to generalise the
result.
C1 [Verma, Trivik; Kooij, Robert E.] Delft Univ Technol, EEMCS, Mekelweg 4, NL-2628
CD Delft, Netherlands.
[Verma, Trivik; Ellens, Wendy; Kooij, Robert E.] TNO, Performance Networks &
Syst, NL-2612 CT Delft, Netherlands.
[Verma, Trivik] ETH, Inst Baustoffe IfB, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
RP Verma, T (reprint author), Delft Univ Technol, EEMCS, Mekelweg 4, NL-2628 CD
Delft, Netherlands.
EM trivik@ethz.ch; wendy.ellens@tno.nl; robert.kooij@tno.nl
CR Albert R, 2004, PHYS REV E, V69, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.025103
Albert R, 2000, NATURE, V406, P378, DOI 10.1038/35019019
Arianos S, 2009, CHAOS, V19, DOI 10.1063/1.3077229
Asztalos A., 2012, EUROPEAN PHYS J B, V85, P1
Boccaletti S, 2006, PHYS REP, V424, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009
Bompard E, 2010, IET GENER TRANSM DIS, V4, P716, DOI 10.1049/iet-gtd.2009.0452
Bompard E., 2007, APPROACHES SECURITY
Bompard E, 2009, INT J CRIT INFR PROT, V2, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.ijcip.2009.02.002
Bompard E, 2010, 2010 COMPLEXITY IN ENGINEERING: COMPENG 2010, PROCEEDINGS, P52,
DOI 10.1109/COMPENG.2010.10
Bompard E, 2009, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5508, P144
Borgatti SP, 2005, SOC NETWORKS, V27, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.008
Callaway DS, 2000, PHYS REV LETT, V85, P5468, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5468
Cohen R, 2000, PHYS REV LETT, V85, P4626, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4626
Crucitti P, 2004, PHYS REV E, V69, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.045104
Dobson I., 2001, ELECT POWER TRANSFER, P01
Kinney R, 2005, EUR PHYS J B, V46, P101, DOI 10.1140/epjb/e2005-00237-9
Koc Y., 2013, P 10 IEEE INT C NETW
McLinn J., 2009, MAJOR POWER OUTAGES
Mitchell M, 2009, COMPLEXITY GUIDED TO
Motter AE, 2002, PHYS REV E, V66, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.065102
Nasir A. N. B. M. D, 2011, P IEEE ICC, P01, DOI DOI 10.1109/IST.2011.5962188
Newman M., 2010, NETWORKS INTRO
Pahwa S, 2010, ANN IEEE SYST CONF, P272, DOI 10.1109/SYSTEMS.2010.5482329
Purchala K., 2005, P IEEE PES GEN M, P2457
Rosas-Casals M, 2007, INT J BIFURCAT CHAOS, V17, P2465, DOI
10.1142/S0218127407018531
Simonsen I, 2008, PHYS REV LETT, V100, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.218701
Tutzauer F, 2007, SOC NETWORKS, V29, P249, DOI 10.1016/j.socnet.2006.10.001
 van Eeten M, 2011, PUBLIC ADMIN, V89, P381, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01926.x
Youssef M., 2011, P 2011 INT WORKSH MO, P45
Zimmerman R., MATPOWER SIMULATION
NR 30
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 0
U2 5
PU INDERSCIENCE ENTERPRISES LTD
PI GENEVA
PA WORLD TRADE CENTER BLDG, 29 ROUTE DE PRE-BOIS, CASE POSTALE 856, CH-1215
GENEVA, SWITZERLAND
SN 1475-3219
EI 1741-8038
J9 INT J CRIT INFRASTRU
JI Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct.
PY 2015
VL 11
IS 1
SI SI
BP 62
EP 81
DI 10.1504/IJCIS.2015.067398
PG 20
WC Engineering, Multidisciplinary
SC Engineering
GA DH2DK
UT WOS:000372594200006
DA 2019-01-15
ER

PT J
AU Cvijic, S
Ilic, MD
AF Cvijic, Sanja
Ilic, Marija D.
TI Part I: A New Framework for Modeling and Tracing of Bilateral
Transactions and the Corresponding Loop Flows in Multi-Control Area
Power Networks
SO IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE Bilateral distribution factor (BDF) matrix; bilateral transaction;
diakoptics; loop flow; loop flow tracing; mesh-to-tree transformation;
parallel flow; power transfer distribution factor (PTDF) matrix
ID OPEN ACCESS; ELECTRICITY; SYSTEMS
AB This paper introduces a novel multi-control area framework for explicit
modeling, managing, and accounting of simultaneous bilateral transactions with
specified contract paths. Our framework provides a modular and multi-layered
electrical network representation with zooming-in and zooming-out capabilities. The
zoomed-out representation concerns interconnections and inter-area transactions,
while the zoomed-in representation concerns a single area and its internal
transactions. The framework allows explicit modeling of bilateral transactions with
contract paths through a transformation of a meshed electrical network into a
spanning tree. Loop flows are introduced to represent a deviation between the
contract paths of bilateral transactions and physical line flows. The effects of
both intra-area and inter-area bilateral transactions and loop flows can be
graphically traced in the framework. Moreover, these tracing methods allocate
bilateral transactions to line flows and loop flows, essential for accounting and
flow control. Our tracing methods differ from the distribution factor based method
because the distribution factor matrix handles nodal injections only and it cannot
account for contract paths of bilateral transactions and the resulting loop flows.
The multi-layered network transformations and tracing methods are illustrated on
the IEEE 14-bus system.
C1 [Cvijic, Sanja; Ilic, Marija D.] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn,
Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA.
RP Cvijic, S (reprint author), Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn,
Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA.
EM sanja.cvijic@gmail.com; milic@ece.cmu.edu
CR Achayuthakan C, 2010, IEEE T POWER SYST, V25, P1078, DOI
10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2037506
Bialek J, 1996, IEE P-GENER TRANSM D, V143, P313, DOI 10.1049/ip-gtd:19960461
Bompard E, 2008, IEEE T POWER SYST, V23, P1590, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2008.2004738
Cvijic S., 2012, P IEEE PES GEN M
Cvijic S., 2011, P 43 N AM POW S BOST
Cvijic S., 2011, P ISGT EUR MANCH UK
David AK, 2001, IEE P-GENER TRANSM D, V148, P448, DOI 10.1049/ip-gtd:20010431
DECKMAN S, 1980, IEEE T POWER AP SYST, V99, P2301, DOI 10.1109/TPAS.1980.319798
Duran H., 1970, P IEEE WINT POW M NE
Galiana FD, 1998, IEEE T POWER SYST, V13, P681, DOI 10.1109/59.667400
Happ H. H., 1980, PIECEWISE METHODS AP
Hunt S., 2002, MAKING COMPETITION W
Ilic M.D., 2000, DYNAMICS CONTROL LAR
ILICSPONG M, 1985, IEEE T CIRCUITS SYST, V32, P170, DOI 10.1109/TCS.1985.1085682
Kron G., 1963, DIAKOPTICS PIECEWISE
Lai Loi Lei, 2001, POWER SYSTEM RESTRUC
POTTS RB, 1972, FLOWS TRANSPORTATION
Song HL, 2002, IEEE T POWER SYST, V17, P73, DOI 10.1109/59.982195
Suryanarayanan S., 2004, THESIS ARIZONA STATE
Suryanarayanan S, 2008, IEEE T POWER SYST, V23, P809, DOI
10.1109/TPWRS.2008.920703
Wei P, 2002, INT J ELEC POWER, V24, P807, DOI 10.1016/S0142-0615(02)00008-X
Wei P., 2000, P INT C EL UT DER RE
Weyant J., 1999, ENERGY ENV POLICY MO
Wu FF, 2000, IEEE T POWER SYST, V15, P923, DOI 10.1109/59.871714
Yu C. W., 1996, P 4 INT C POW SYST C
Zobian A, 1997, IEEE T POWER SYST, V12, P549, DOI 10.1109/59.589601
NR 26
TC 13
Z9 14
U1 0
U2 15
PU IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
PI PISCATAWAY
PA 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, NJ 08855-4141 USA
SN 0885-8950
EI 1558-0679
J9 IEEE T POWER SYST
JI IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
PD NOV
PY 2014
VL 29
IS 6
BP 2706
EP 2714
DI 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2312376
PG 9
WC Engineering, Electrical & Electronic
SC Engineering
GA AS6YR
UT WOS:000344405600014
DA 2019-01-15
ER

PT J
AU Kang, CQ
Chen, QX
Lin, WM
Hong, YR
Xia, Q
Chen, ZX
Wu, Y
Xin, JB
AF Kang, C. Q.
Chen, Q. X.
Lin, W. M.
Hong, Y. R.
Xia, Q.
Chen, Z. X.
Wu, Y.
Xin, J. B.
TI Zonal marginal pricing approach based on sequential network partition
and congestion contribution identification
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE Zonal marginal pricing mechanism; Network partition; Congestion
identification; Power transfer distribution factor; Optimization model
ID MARKET; TRANSMISSION; MANAGEMENT; DESIGN; RIGHTS
AB Pricing mechanism is a critical component in the infrastructure of electricity
market. Zonal marginal pricing (ZMP) mechanism has been implemented for its
simplicity and adaptability of managing practical electricity markets. In order to
overcome drawbacks of current ZMP mechanisms, a novel ZMP approach based on
sequential network partition and congestion contribution identification is proposed
in this paper. Network is partitioned sequentially in the presence of congestion to
eliminate intra-zonal congestions. In the approach, an optimization model is
incorporated to minimize generation procurement costs with a given number of zones.
Congestion contributions of nodes to the congested lines are identified using power
transfer distribution factors (PTDF), and ascription relations between nodes and
zones are thus decided. A numerical case based on IEEE-39 system is carried out to
demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All
rights reserved.
C1 [Kang, C. Q.; Chen, Q. X.; Lin, W. M.; Hong, Y. R.; Xia, Q.] Tsinghua Univ, Dept
Elect Engn, State Key Lab Power Syst, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China.
[Chen, Z. X.] North China Grid Co, Beijing 100053, Peoples R China.
[Wu, Y.; Xin, J. B.] Jiangxi Elect Power Res Inst, Nanchang 330006, Peoples R
China.
RP Chen, QX (reprint author), Tsinghua Univ, Dept Elect Engn, State Key Lab Power
Syst, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China.
EM cqkang@tsinghua.edu.cn; qxchen@tsinghua.edu.cn
RI Chen, Qixin/A-7831-2016; Xia, Qing/A-6497-2016; Kang,
Chongqing/A-6601-2016
OI Chen, Qixin/0000-0002-3733-8641; Xia, Qing/0000-0001-5238-9300; Kang,
Chongqing/0000-0003-2296-8250
FU National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB228206]; National
Natural Science Foundation of China [51077077, 51107059]
FX This work was supported in part by National Basic Research Program of
 China (No. 2013CB228206) and National Natural Science Foundation of
China (Nos. 51077077 and 51107059).
CR Alomoush MI, 1999, IEE P-GENER TRANSM D, V146, P471, DOI 10.1049/ip-gtd:19990441
Andrianesis P., 2009, 6 INT C EUR EN MARK
Ashwani K, 2013, INT J ELEC POWER, V44, P308
Bjorndal M, 2001, ENERGY J, V22, P51
Chen QX, 2010, ELECTR POW SYST RES, V80, P481, DOI 10.1016/j.epsr.2009.10.010
Cheng X, 2005, IEEE T POWER SYST, V20, P1868, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2005.857013
Christie R. D., 1998, IEEE Power Engineering Review, V18, P61, DOI
10.1109/39.666568
Conejo AJ, 2005, IEEE T POWER SYST, V20, P2026, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2005.857918
Ding F, 2005, IEEE T POWER SYST, V20, P875, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2005.846042
Ferreira J, 2010, IEEE PES GEN M MINN
Gianfreda A., 2009, 6 INT C EUR EN MARK
Haghifam Rahmat A., 2013, INT J ELEC POWER, V46, P4376
HOGAN WW, 1992, J REGUL ECON, V4, P211, DOI 10.1007/BF00133621
Imran M, 2007, IEEE POWER
Jang SJ, 2001, IEEE PES SUMM M COL, V3, P1670
KIM SH, 2000, IEEE PES SUMM M SEAT, V1, P38
Kristiansen T, 2011, INT J ELEC POWER, V33, P947, DOI
10.1016/j.ijepes.2011.01.003
Kumar A, 2004, IEEE T POWER SYST, V19, P554, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2003.821448
Lin SS, 2012, INT J ELEC POWER, V34, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2011.09.018
Litvinov E, 2010, IET GENER TRANSM DIS, V4, P315, DOI 10.1049/iet-gtd.2009.0046
Liu MH, 2004, IEEE T POWER SYST, V19, P802, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2004.826708
Ma XW, 2003, IEEE T POWER SYST, V18, P460, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2003.810673
Peter BL, 2006, IEEE T POWER SYST, V21, P568
Price JE, 2007, IEEE T POWER SYST, V22, P1486, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2007.907136
Saini A, 2013, INT J ELEC POWER, V46, P376, DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.10.018
Schweppe F. C., 1988, SPOT PRICING ELECT
Stoft S., 1997, ELECT J, V10, P24
Yang HM, 2005, 2005 2nd International Conference on Electrical & Electronics
Engineering (ICEEE), P282
Yu J., 2002, IEEE PES SUMM M NEW, V3, P1339
Zheng TX, 2008, IEEE T POWER SYST, V23, P277, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2008.919314
NR 30
TC 10
Z9 10
U1 0
U2 14
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0142-0615
EI 1879-3517
J9 INT J ELEC POWER
JI Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst.
PD OCT
PY 2013
VL 51
BP 321
EP 328
DI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.02.033
PG 8
WC Engineering, Electrical & Electronic
SC Engineering
GA 142ZV
UT WOS:000318837000034
DA 2019-01-15
ER

PT J
AU Sosic, D
Skokljev, I
AF Sosic, Darko
Skokljev, Ivan
TI EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHM FOR CALCULATING AVAILABLE TRANSFER CAPABILITY
SO JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING-ELEKTROTECHNICKY CASOPIS
LA English
DT Article
DE power systems; available transfer capability (ATC); genetic algorithm
(GA); power transfer distribution factor (PTDF); symbolic analysis
ID GENETIC ALGORITHM; ELECTRICITY MARKETS; ATC CALCULATIONS; ENHANCEMENT;
FLOW; LOAD
AB The paper presents an evolutionary algorithm for calculating available transfer
capability (ATC). ATC is a measure of the transfer capability remaining in the
physical transmission network for further commercial activity over and above
already committed uses. In this paper, MATLAB software is used to determine the ATC
between any bus in deregulated power systems without violating system constraints
such as thermal, voltage, and stability constraints. The algorithm is applied on
IEEE 5 bus system and on IEEE 30 bus system.
C1 [Sosic, Darko; Skokljev, Ivan] Univ Belgrade, Fac Elect Engn, Belgrade 11000,
Serbia.
RP Sosic, D (reprint author), Univ Belgrade, Fac Elect Engn, Bulevar Kralja
Aleksandra 73, Belgrade 11000, Serbia.
EM sosic@etf.rs
FU Ministry of Education and Science of Serbia [III 42009]
FX This research was partially supported by the Ministry of Education and
Science of Serbia (project III 42009).
CR Aboura S, 2012, J ELECTR ENG-SLOVAK, V63, P21, DOI 10.2478/v10187-012-0003-0
Alvorado F. L., 2000, PSERC IAB M TUT
Cheng Y, 2006, INT J ELEC POWER, V28, P408, DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2006.02.001
Christie RD, 2000, P IEEE, V88, P170, DOI 10.1109/5.823997
Dezaki HH, 2012, J ELECTR ENG-SLOVAK, V63, P47, DOI 10.2478/v10187-012-0007-9
Elmaouhab A, 2011, J ELECTR ENG-SLOVAK, V62, P163, DOI 10.2478/v10187-011-0027-x
Grijalva S, 2003, IEEE T POWER SYST, V18, P619, DOI [10.1109/TPWRS.2003.810902,
10.1109/TPWS.2003.810902]
Kumar A, 2013, INT J ELEC POWER, V44, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.07.050
Michalewicz Z., 1996, GENETIC ALGORITHMS D
Nireekshana T, 2012, INT J ELEC POWER, V43, P1276, DOI
10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.06.041
Park JB, 2000, IEEE T POWER SYST, V15, P916, DOI 10.1109/59.871713
Perumal MP, 2011, J ELECTR ENG-SLOVAK, V62, P190, DOI 10.2478/v10187-011-0031-1
Radosavjevic J, 2012, J ELECTR ENG-SLOVAK, V63, P213, DOI 10.2478/v10187-012-
0031-9
SKOKLJEV I., 2002, EUROPEAN T ELECT POW, V14, P259
Skokljev IA, 1997, ELECTR POW SYST RES, V40, P127, DOI 10.1016/S0378-
7796(96)01144-3
Sood YR, 2007, INT J ELEC POWER, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2006.03.024
Sosic D, 2013, INT J ELEC ENG EDUC, V50, P96, DOI 10.7227/IJEEE.50.1.8
Stagg G.W., 1968, COMPUTER METHODS POW
Transmission Transfer Capability Task Force, 1996, AV TRANSF CAP DEF DE
Wu YK, 2007, INT J ELEC POWER, V29, P810, DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2007.06.014
Younes M., 2006, Journal of Electrical Engineering, V57, P211
NR 21
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 0
U2 2
PU SLOVAK UNIV TECHNOLOGY
PI BRATISLAVA
PA FAC ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING & INFORMATION, ILKOVICOVA 3, BRATISLAVA, 812
19, SLOVAKIA
SN 1335-3632
J9 J ELECTR ENG-SLOVAK
JI J. Electr. Eng.
PD SEP
PY 2013
VL 64
IS 5
BP 291
EP 297
DI 10.2478/jee-2013-0042
PG 7
WC Engineering, Electrical & Electronic
SC Engineering
GA 239WI
UT WOS:000326056100004
OA Bronze
DA 2019-01-15
ER

PT J
AU Hou, GJ
Vittal, V
AF Hou, Guanji
Vittal, Vijay
TI Determination of Transient Stability Constrained Interface Real Power
Flow Limit Using Trajectory Sensitivity Approach
SO IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE Interface transfer limit; power transfer distribution factor (PTDF);
total transfer capability (TTC); trajectory sensitivity
ID SYSTEMS
AB Fast determination of the transient stability constrained interface power
transfer limit is a critical problem in power system real time operation.
Conventional methods normally require repeated time domain simulations to
determine this interface transfer limit; therefore, they are computationally
burdensome and time consuming. This paper presents an application of the trajectory
sensitivity method to determine the transient stability constrained interface
transfer limit. For a specified contingency, the trajectory sensitivity method is
used to determine the stability constrained maximum output of the key generators
that affect the power flow of the interface. Then using the power transfer
distribution factors (PTDFs) of those key generators on the tie-lines constituting
the interface, the maximum interface transfer increment can be determined. The
advantage of this method is that it requires much less computation compared to the
conventional methods while having the same level of accuracy.
An application of the proposed method to the WECC test system is presented in
detail. The results obtained demonstrate the efficiency and accuracy of the
proposed method.
C1 [Hou, Guanji; Vittal, Vijay] Arizona State Univ, Dept Elect Comp & Energy Engn,
Tempe, AZ 85287 USA.
RP Hou, GJ (reprint author), Arizona State Univ, Dept Elect Comp & Energy Engn,
Tempe, AZ 85287 USA.
EM guanji.hou@asu.edu; vijay.vittal@asu.edu
FU National Science Foundation at the Power System Engineering Research
 Center [NSF EEC-9908690]
FX This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under the
Grant NSF EEC-9908690 at the Power System Engineering Research Center.
Paper no. TPWRS-00985-2011.
CR Berizzi A, 2007, IEEE T POWER SYST, V22, P735, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2007.895163
BETTIOL A, 1999, P IEEE BUD POW HUNG
Ejebe GC, 1998, IEEE T POWER SYST, V13, P1521, DOI 10.1109/59.736300
EJEBE GC, 1996, P 4 INT C POW SYST C, P58
Ferreira C., 2004, P 39 U POW ENG C, V2, P1091
Fouad A. A., 1991, POWER SYSTEM TRANSIE, P274
Gan DQ, 2000, IEEE T POWER SYST, V15, P535, DOI 10.1109/59.867137
Hiskens IA, 2000, IEEE T CIRCUITS-I, V47, P204, DOI 10.1109/81.828574
Hiskens IA, 2004, INT J ROBUST NONLIN, V14, P911, DOI 10.1002/rnc.907
Hiskens IA, 2006, IEEE T POWER SYST, V21, P1808, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2006.882460
Hou GJ, 2012, IEEE T POWER SYST, V27, P502, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2011.2160373
ISO NE, TTC TABL
Kim H., 2009, P 7 INT WORKSH MIDDL, P1, DOI DOI 10.1145/1657120.1657121
Laufenberg MJ, 1996, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1996 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON
CONTROL APPLICATIONS, P738, DOI 10.1109/CCA.1996.558957
Laufenberg MJ, 1998, IEEE T POWER SYST, V13, P953, DOI 10.1109/59.709082
Li W., 2007, IEEE T POWER SYST, V21, P862
Milano F, 2005, IEEE T POWER SYST, V20, P1199, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2005.851911
Minano RZ, 2010, IEEE T POWER SYST, V25, P243
*NERC, 1996, AV TRANSF CAP DEF DE
Nguyen TB, 2003, IEEE T POWER SYST, V18, P848, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2003.811002
NYISO, NYISO INT STAB LIM A
PAVELLA M, 1999, P POW ENG SOC SUMM M, V1, P273
Pizano-Martinez A, 2010, IEEE T POWER SYST, V25, P392, DOI
10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2036494
Ruiz-Vega D, 2003, IEEE T POWER SYST, V18, P1446, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2003.818708
Sapkota B, 2010, IEEE T POWER SYST, V25, P461, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2030356
Shaaban M., 2001, P POW ENG SOC SUMM M, V2, P1122
TOMOVIC R, 1963, SENSITIVITY ANAL DYN
VITTAL V, 1989, IEEE T POWER SYST, V4, P1363, DOI 10.1109/59.41686
Wang L., 2002, P IEEE PES WINT M, V2, P1184
Yamada Y, 2002, P IEEE PAS AS PAC TR, V2, P886
Zhang XM, 2004, IEEE T POWER SYST, V19, P1240, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2003.821614
Zima M., 2003, P IEEE C CONTR APPL, V1, P189
NR 32
TC 8
Z9 10
U1 0
U2 6
PU IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
PI PISCATAWAY
PA 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, NJ 08855-4141 USA
SN 0885-8950
J9 IEEE T POWER SYST
JI IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
PD AUG
PY 2013
VL 28
IS 3
BP 2156
EP 2163
DI 10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2222942
PG 8
WC Engineering, Electrical & Electronic
SC Engineering
GA 199JD
UT WOS:000322989900011
DA 2019-01-15
ER

PT J
AU Lee, KH
AF Lee, Kwang-Ho
TI Solving Mixed Strategy Nash-Cournot Equilibria under Generation and
Transmission Constraints in Electricity Market
SO JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Cournot model; Electricity market; Generation capacity; Mixed strategy;
Nash equilibrium (NE); Power transfer distribution factor (PTDF);
Transmission congestion
ID POWER-SYSTEMS; ALGORITHM; GAMES
AB Generation capacities and transmission line constraints in a competitive
electricity market make it troublesome to compute Nash Equilibrium (NE) for
analyzing participants' strategic generation quantities. The NE can cause a mixed
strategy NE rather than a pure strategy NE resulting in a more complicated
computation of NE, especially in a multiplayer game. A two-level hierarchical
optimization problem is used to model competition among multiple participants.
There are difficulties in using a mathematical programming approach to solve a
mixed strategy NE. This paper presents heuristics applied to the mathematical
programming method for dealing with the constraints on generation capacities and
transmission line flows. A new formulation based on the heuristics is provided with
a set of linear and nonlinear equations, and an algorithm is suggested for using
the heuristics and the newly-formulated equations.
C1 Dankook Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Yongin, South Korea.
RP Lee, KH (reprint author), Dankook Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Yongin, South Korea.
EM khlee@dku.edu
FU Dankook University
FX The present research was conducted by the research fund of Dankook
University in 2011.
CR Borenstein S, 2000, RAND J ECON, V31, P294, DOI 10.2307/2601042
Contreras J, 2004, IEEE T POWER SYST, V19, P195, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2003.820692
Correia PF, 2003, IEEE T POWER SYST, V18, P1417, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2003.818692
Ferrero RW, 1997, IEEE T POWER SYST, V12, P1340, DOI 10.1109/59.630479
Fudenberg D., 1991, GAME THEORY
Gardner R., 2003, GAMES BUSINESS EC
Gountis VP, 2004, IEEE T POWER SYST, V19, P1837, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2004.835663
Heusinger A., 2009, COMPUTATIONAL OPTIMI, V43, P353, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10589-007-
9145-6
Hobbs BF, 2000, IEEE T POWER SYST, V15, P638, DOI 10.1109/59.867153
Hobbs BF, 2001, IEEE T POWER SYST, V16, P194, DOI 10.1109/59.918286
KLEMPERER PD, 1989, ECONOMETRICA, V57, P1243, DOI 10.2307/1913707
Krawczyk J. B., 2006, WORKING PAPER
Lee KH, 2003, IEEE T POWER SYST, V18, P1573, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2003.818744
Lee KH, 2003, IEEE T POWER SYST, V18, P830, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2002.807067
LEMKE CE, 1964, J SOC IND APPL MATH, V12, P413, DOI 10.1137/0112033
Motto A. L., 2004, IEEE T POWER SYST, V19
Nui H., 2005, IEEE T POWER SYST, V20, P1859
Price TC, 1997, J EVOL ECON, V7, P219, DOI 10.1007/s001910050042
Richter CW, 1998, IEEE T POWER SYST, V13, P256, DOI 10.1109/59.651644
Song SH, 2012, J ELECTR ENG TECHNOL, V7, P141, DOI 10.5370/JEET.2012.7.2.141
Weber JD, 2002, IEEE T POWER SYST, V17, P590, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2002.800899
Wolak F.A., 1997, PWP047 CAL EN I
Wood A. J., 1996, POWER GENERATION OPE
 Xian W., 2004, IEEE T POWER SYST, V19, P1348
NR 24
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 0
U2 7
PU KOREAN INST ELECTR ENG
PI SEOUL
PA 901 KSTC, 635-4 YEOKSAM-DONG, GANGNAM-GU, SEOUL, 135-703, SOUTH KOREA
SN 1975-0102
J9 J ELECTR ENG TECHNOL
JI J. Electr. Eng. Technol.
PD JUL
PY 2013
VL 8
IS 4
BP 675
EP 685
DI 10.5370/JEET.2013.8.4.675
PG 11
WC Engineering, Electrical & Electronic
SC Engineering
GA 173JZ
UT WOS:000321077100002
OA Bronze
DA 2019-01-15
ER

PT J
AU Oh, H
Thomas, RJ
AF Oh, HyungSeon
Thomas, Robert J.
TI A method for identifying market power
SO DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE Dispatch sensitivity matrix; Market power; Null space; Power transfer
distribution factor (PTDF) matrix
AB An ability to exercise market power by suppliers may significantly reduce market
efficiency in restructured electricity markets. Many studies have been performed to
develop an effective tool to identify market power based on indices. Most often it
is rather difficult to use an index-based method for real-time analysis. This paper
provides a method to identify market power that can be used in real time. The
purpose is to analyze price-dispatch sensitivity to determine whether there is a
generator or a subset of generators that have the ability to increase its own price
profitably. Case studies performed on a modified IEEE 118-bus system are presented.
(C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Oh, HyungSeon] SUNY Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA.
[Thomas, Robert J.] Cornell Univ, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA.
RP Oh, H (reprint author), SUNY Buffalo, 210 Davis Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA.
EM hso1@buffalo.edu
RI Oh, HyungSeon/B-3811-2018
OI Oh, HyungSeon/0000-0002-6732-0370
CR Alvarado F.L., 1998, MARKET POWER DYNAMIC
Brickley J. A., 2008, MANAGERIAL EC ORG AR
Golub G. H., 1996, MATRIX COMPUTATION
HIRSCHMAN AO, 1964, AM ECON REV, V54, P761
Kian A.R., 2004, P 37 HICSS C SYST SC
 Kuhn H, 1951, NONLINEAR PROGRAMMIN, P481
Lerner A, 1934, REV ECON STUD, V1, P157, DOI DOI 10.2307/2967480
LESIEUTRE BC, 2006, P 39 HAW INT C SYST
LESIEUTRE BC, 2003, POW ENG SOC GEN M, P838
MURILLOSANCHEZ CE, 2001, 24 ANN INT ASS EN EC
Oh H, 2010, J ENERG ENG-ASCE, V136, P32, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000019
Qi L., 2004, POWER SYSTEMS C EXPO, V10-13, P874
SINH H, 1999, IEEE TUTORIAL GAME T, P70
U. S. Federal Energy Commission, 2002, STAND MARK DES
VISUDHIPHAN P, 2000, P IEEE POW SYST ENG
Wood A. J., 1996, POWER GENERATION OPE
NR 16
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 0
U2 9
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
PI AMSTERDAM
PA PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0167-9236
J9 DECIS SUPPORT SYST
JI Decis. Support Syst.
PD FEB
PY 2013
VL 54
IS 3
BP 1348
EP 1356
DI 10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.007
PG 9
WC Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence; Computer Science, Information
Systems; Operations Research & Management Science
SC Computer Science; Operations Research & Management Science
GA 111IW
UT WOS:000316516000012
DA 2019-01-15
ER

PT J
AU Nourizadeh, S
Sarmadi, SAN
Karimi, MJ
Ranjbar, AM
AF Nourizadeh, S.
Sarmadi, S. A. Nezam
Karimi, M. J.
Ranjbar, A. M.
TI Power system restoration planning based on Wide Area Measurement System
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE Power system restoration; Power Transfer Distribution Factor (PTDF);
Observability; Wide Area Measurement System (WAMS); Phasor Measurement
Unit (PMU)
AB This paper presents a method for the optimal restoration planning based on Wide
Area Measurement System (WAMS). This method uses observability analysis and Power
Transfer Distribution Factor (PTDF) concept. The PTDF concept is applied to
decrease the overvoltages caused by energizing transmission lines with lightly
load. The New England 39 bus power system is used to demonstrate the proposed
algorithm and verify the results. The outcomes of the study are evaluated to show
the validity and reliability of the presented approach. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All
rights reserved.
C1 [Nourizadeh, S.; Karimi, M. J.; Ranjbar, A. M.] Sharif Univ Technol, Dept Elect
Engn, Tehran, Iran.
[Sarmadi, S. A. Nezam] Washington State Univ, Sch Elect Engn & Comp Sci,
Pullman, WA 99164 USA.
RP Nourizadeh, S (reprint author), Sharif Univ Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Tehran,
Iran.
EM nourizadeh@ee.sharif.edu
CR Adibi M. M., 1991, IEEE Computer Applications in Power, V4, P19, DOI
10.1109/67.75871
ADIBI MM, 1992, IEEE T POWER SYST, V7, P1419, DOI 10.1109/59.207363
ADIBI MM, 1994, IEEE T POWER SYST, V9, P22, DOI 10.1109/59.317561
ANCONA JJ, 1995, IEEE T POWER SYST, V10, P1480, DOI 10.1109/59.466500
[Anonymous], 2009, PSERC PUBLICATION
Balarko C., 2004, IEEE T POWER SYST, V19, P1213
Bose A, 2010, IEEE T SMART GRID, V1, P11, DOI 10.1109/TSG.2010.2044899
De La Ree J, 2010, IEEE T SMART GRID, V1, P20, DOI 10.1109/TSG.2010.2044815
Esmaili M, 2012, INT J ELEC POWER, V41, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.03.033
Hajian M, 2011, INT J ELEC POWER, V33, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2010.08.007
Heydt G. T., 1996, COMPUTER ANAL METHOD
Ju P, 2011, INT J ELEC POWER, V33, P909, DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2010.12.030
Kamwa I., 2006, IEEE POW ENG SOC GEN
Karlsson D, 2004, MODERN POWER SYSTE S, P11
LINDENMEYER D, 2001, ELECT POWER ENERGY S, V23, P219
Nezam-Sarmadi SA, 2011, EUR T ELECTR POWER, V21, P712, DOI 10.1002/etep.471
Phadke AG, 2008, IEEE POWER ENERGY M, V6, P52, DOI 10.1109/MPE.2008.927476
Phadke AG, 2008, POWER ELECTRON POWER, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-76537-2_1
Rehtanz C., 2001, BULK POWER SYSTEM DY
Roy BKS, 2012, INT J ELEC POWER, V42, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.03.011
Wood AJ, 1984, POWER GENERATION OPE
Zhang YG, 2011, INT J ELEC POWER, V33, P791, DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2011.01.018
NR 22
TC 14
Z9 15
U1 0
U2 10
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0142-0615
J9 INT J ELEC POWER
JI Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst.
PD DEC
PY 2012
VL 43
IS 1
BP 526
EP 530
DI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.06.043
PG 5
WC Engineering, Electrical & Electronic
SC Engineering
GA 038OO
UT WOS:000311184200058
DA 2019-01-15
ER
PT J
AU Oh, H
AF Oh, HyungSeon
TI Aggregation of Buses for a Network Reduction
SO IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE Bulk; congestion; demand-rich area (DRA); near boundary; optimal power
flow (OPF); power transfer distribution factor (PTDF); supply-rich area
(SRA)
ID EQUIVALENTS
AB A simple but precise model would improve the computation efficiency for planning
a large-scale power system. Recent development of a new network reduction algorithm
yields such a model with a given grouping of buses. While the flow over the reduced
network is estimated precisely, a proper value of the flow limit still remains
unresolved. In this study, a method is proposed to group buses based on the
congestion profile in the original network and to assign the flow limits of a
reduced network. The method is tested on modified IEEE 30-bus and 118-bus systems
at various load profiles, and the simulation results are compared.
C1 SUNY Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA.
RP Oh, H (reprint author), SUNY Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA.
EM hso1@buffalo.edu
RI Oh, HyungSeon/B-3811-2018
OI Oh, HyungSeon/0000-0002-6732-0370
CR Cheng X, 2005, IEEE T POWER SYST, V20, P1868, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2005.857013
DECKMAN S, 1980, IEEE T POWER AP SYST, V99, P2301, DOI 10.1109/TPAS.1980.319798
DECKMANN S, 1980, IEEE T POWER AP SYST, V99, P2292, DOI 10.1109/TPAS.1980.319797
ENNS MK, 1991, IEEE T POWER SYST, V6, P613, DOI 10.1109/59.76704
Fisher EB, 2008, IEEE T POWER SYST, V23, P1346, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2008.922256
Hedman KW, 2010, IEEE T POWER SYST, V25, P1052, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2037232
Hedman KW, 2009, IEEE T POWER SYST, V24, P1577, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2020530
ISO-NE, 2007, ISO NEW ENGL OP PROC, P7
Northeast Power Coordinating Council, 1997, GUID INT AR VOLT CON
Oh H, 2010, IEEE T POWER SYST, V25, P677, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2036183
Tinney W. F., 1991, IEEE T POWER SYST, V6, P613
Ward J. B., 1949, AIEE T, V68, P373, DOI DOI 10.1109/T-AIEE.1949.5059947
Zimmerman R., 2008, MATPOWER MATLAB POWE
NR 13
TC 15
Z9 16
U1 0
U2 3
PU IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
PI PISCATAWAY
PA 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, NJ 08855-4141 USA
SN 0885-8950
J9 IEEE T POWER SYST
JI IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
PD MAY
PY 2012
VL 27
IS 2
BP 705
EP 712
DI 10.1109/TPWRS.2011.2176758
PG 8
WC Engineering, Electrical & Electronic
SC Engineering
GA 931GX
UT WOS:000303205500014
DA 2019-01-15
ER

PT J
AU Oh, H
AF Oh, HyungSeon
TI Optimal Planning to Include Storage Devices in Power Systems
SO IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE DC power flow; optimal power flow (OPF); power transfer distribution
factor (PTDF); storage devices; variable energy resources
ID ENERGY-STORAGE; SIMULATION
AB It is difficult to forecast renewable energy resources due to their variability.
High uncertainty of the resources increases the concern about the reliable
operation of the electric power system. Storage devices have been considered a
candidate to control variable energy resources, and most studies on storage devices
are performed in the economic dispatch. Therefore, electric power adequacy may be
an issue. In this paper, a new approach in the optimal power flow framework is
proposed for deploying storage devices, and the feasibility and economic impact
analyses are discussed.
C1 Natl Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO 80401 USA.
RP Oh, H (reprint author), Natl Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO 80401 USA.
EM hyungseon.oh@nrel.gov
RI Oh, HyungSeon/B-3811-2018
OI Oh, HyungSeon/0000-0002-6732-0370
FU U.S. Department of Energy
FX This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy. Paper no.
TPWRS-00913-2009.
CR Alvarez C, 2004, IEEE T POWER SYST, V19, P1223, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2004.825878
Angarita-Marquez JL, 2007, ENERG POLICY, V35, P5051, DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2007.03.031
CHOI J, 2007, P IEEE PES GEN M JUN, P24
Denholm P, 2007, ENERG POLICY, V35, P4424, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.03.004
*DEP EN, REN EL FUT
Figueiredo F., 2006, ENERGY STUDIES REV, V14, P131
Goel L, 2007, IEEE T POWER SYST, V22, P205, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2006.887962
HILLIER F, 1995, INTRO MATH PROGRAMMI, P677
NG SKK, 2006, P NAPS POW S SEP, P17
Oh H, 2008, IEEE T POWER SYST, V23, P1050, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2008.922537
Oh H, 2010, IEEE T POWER SYST, V25, P677, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2036183
Oh H, 2009, J ENERG ENG, V135, P83, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9402(2009)135:3(83)
PETERSON J, ALTERNATIVE ENERGY S
SAVAGE H, 2008, P 43 UPED C SEP
Sioshansi R, 2008, ENERG ECON, V31, P269
Su CL, 2009, IEEE T POWER SYST, V24, P1199, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2023259
SUCCAR S, COMPRESSED AIR ENERG
Swider DJ, 2007, IEEE T ENERGY CONVER, V22, P95, DOI 10.1109/TEC.2006.889547
TORRE SDL, 2008, IEEE T POWER SYST, V23, P238
*TRUEWIND SOL AWS, 2003, OV WIND EN GEN FOR
Voropai NI, 2006, IEEE T POWER SYST, V21, P1630, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2006.873053
Zimmerman R., 2008, MATPOWER MATLAB POWE
NR 22
TC 55
Z9 55
U1 0
U2 5
PU IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
PI PISCATAWAY
PA 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, NJ 08855-4141 USA
SN 0885-8950
J9 IEEE T POWER SYST
JI IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
PD AUG
PY 2011
VL 26
IS 3
BP 1118
EP 1128
DI 10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2091515
PG 11
WC Engineering, Electrical & Electronic
SC Engineering
GA 805FK
UT WOS:000293711700016
DA 2019-01-15
ER

PT J
AU Wang, C
Vittal, V
Kolluri, VS
Mandal, S
AF Wang, Chong
Vittal, Vijay
Kolluri, Venkat Sharma
Mandal, Sujit
TI PTDF-Based Automatic Restoration Path Selection
SO IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE Power transfer distribution factor; restoration performance indices;
transmission system restoration
ID DISTRIBUTION-SYSTEMS
AB After a power system blackout, system restoration is a critical task for the
dispatchers. With the stringent requirements for faster and more efficient system
restoration, an objective transmission restoration path selection procedure,
including the option to check constraints, may be more responsive in handling
unexpected system changes and in providing directed guidance to the dispatchers to
identify the optimal transmission path and to deliver power to other power plants
or to pick up load as needed. This paper presents a power transfer distribution
factor (PTDF)-based path selection approach for large-scale power systems. Two
types of restoration performance indices are utilized considering all possible
restoration paths, which are then ranked according to their expected performance
characteristics as reflected by the restoration performance index. PTDFs and
weighting factors are used to determine the ordered list of restoration paths,
which can enable the load to be picked up by lightly loaded lines or relieve stress
on heavily loaded lines. Test results which are primarily concerned with load
restoration in the outaged system are provided based on a realistic restoration
exercise for the Western region of the Entergy transmission system.
C1 [Wang, Chong; Vittal, Vijay] Arizona State Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Tempe, AZ
85287 USA.
[Kolluri, Venkat Sharma; Mandal, Sujit] Entergy Serv Inc, New Orleans, LA 70113
USA.
RP Wang, C (reprint author), Arizona State Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Tempe, AZ 85287
USA.
EM chong.wang.1@asu.edu; vijay.vittal@asu.edu; vkollur@entergy.com;
 smandal@entergy.com
FU Power System Engineering Research Center
FX Manuscript received June 02, 2009; revised October 28, 2009. First
published January 26, 2010; current version published July 21, 2010.
This work was supported by the Power System Engineering Research Center.
The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not
necessarily represent the views of Entergy Services, Inc. or any of its
affiliates. Paper no. TPWRS-00414-2009.
CR ABIDI MM, 1993, IEEE PES WINT M
Adibi M. M., 1991, IEEE Computer Applications in Power, V4, P19, DOI
10.1109/67.75871
Adibi M.M., 1987, IEEE T POWER SYSTEMS, V2, P271, DOI DOI
10.1109/TPWRS.1987.4335118
Adibi MM, 1996, IEEE T POWER SYST, V11, P1613, DOI 10.1109/59.535705
Adibi MM, 1999, IEEE T POWER SYST, V14, P751, DOI 10.1109/59.761908
ADIBI MM, 1992, IEEE T POWER SYST, V7, P43
ADIBI MM, 1994, IEEE T POWER SYST, V9, P1994
Fukuyama Y., 1996, ISAP '96. International Conference on Intelligent Systems
Applications to Power Systems Proceedings (Cat. No.96TH8152), P394, DOI
10.1109/ISAP.1996.501105
Heydt G. T., 1996, COMPUTER ANAL METHOD
IHARA S, 1981, IEEE T POWER AP SYST, V100, P4142, DOI 10.1109/TPAS.1981.316965
KAFKA RJ, 1982, IEEE T POWER APP SYS, V101, P19
KOLLURI VS, 2003, P IEEE POW ENG SOC G, P6
LIU CC, 1988, IEEE T POWER SYST, V3, P619, DOI 10.1109/59.192914
Perez-Guerrero R, 2008, IEEE T POWER DELIVER, V23, P1589, DOI
10.1109/TPWRD.2007.916112
Powertech Labs Inc, DSA TOOLS MOD MAN VE
SHULTZ RD, 1984, IEEE T POWER AP SYST, V103, P2186
Wood AJ, 1984, POWER GENERATION OPE
ZIMA M, 2005, P IEEE POW ENG SOC G, V3, P3089
NR 18
TC 11
Z9 14
U1 0
U2 4
PU IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
PI PISCATAWAY
PA 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, NJ 08855-4141 USA
SN 0885-8950
J9 IEEE T POWER SYST
JI IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
PD AUG
PY 2010
VL 25
IS 3
BP 1686
EP 1695
DI 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2037820
PG 10
WC Engineering, Electrical & Electronic
SC Engineering
GA 659CP
UT WOS:000282544900048
DA 2019-01-15
ER

PT J
AU Oh, H
 Thomas, RJ
AF Oh, HyungSeon
Thomas, Robert J.
TI Estimation of a Sensitivity-Based Metric for Detecting Market Power
SO JOURNAL OF ENERGY ENGINEERING-ASCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Dispatch sensitivity matrix; Market power; Null space; Kuhn-Tucker
optimality conditions; Power transfer distribution factor (PTDF) matrix
ID ELECTRICITY MARKETS
AB The abuse of market power is a potentially serious problem for market designers.
Few indices, if any, exist to measure the potential for market power in real time.
In this regard, Murillo-Sanchez derived an expression for a dispatch-to-price
sensitivity matrix, M. The expression requires information about network topology
and parameters, as well as the rules used to operate the market. While computing
the matrix is conceptually easy for those with all the market and system
information, such as an independent system operator, the method is probably
impractical for market participants due to the inaccessibility of much of the
information. In this paper, a method for estimating the M matrix by using
publically available data are suggested, indicating that any market participant who
does the computation will know when conditions permit them to lower or raise prices
through decreased/increased bids and/or offers.
C1 [Oh, HyungSeon] Natl Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO 80401 USA.
[Thomas, Robert J.] Cornell Univ, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA.
RP Oh, H (reprint author), Natl Renewable Energy Lab, 1617 Cole Blvd, Golden, CO
80401 USA.
EM Hyungseon.Oh@nrel.gov
RI Oh, HyungSeon/B-3811-2018
OI Oh, HyungSeon/0000-0002-6732-0370
CR BERNARD J, 1998, P 1998 BULK POW SYST
BUSHNELL J, 1993, ESTIMATING OPPORTUNI
GAN D, 2002, P IEEE PES WINT M JA, V1, P434
Gan DQ, 2002, IEEE T POWER SYST, V17, P180, DOI 10.1109/59.982211
KIAN AR, 2004, P 37 HICSS C SYST SC, P1
LESIEUTRE BC, 2003, POW ENG SOC GEN M, P838
MURILLOSANCHEZ C, 2001, P ANN 2001 INT ASS E
Rahimi AF, 2003, IEEE T POWER SYST, V18, P486, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2003.810680
SCHULZE W, 2000, P 2000 AM EC ASS ANN
*US FED EN REG COM, 2002, RM0112000 US FED EN
Wang P, 2004, IEEE T POWER SYST, V19, P1373, DOI [10.1109/TPWRS.2004.831695,
10.1099/TPWRS.2004.831695]
ZIMMERMAN RD, 1999, P 32 INT C SYST SCI, P1
NR 12
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 0
U2 2
PU ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
PI RESTON
PA 1801 ALEXANDER BELL DR, RESTON, VA 20191-4400 USA
SN 0733-9402
J9 J ENERG ENG-ASCE
JI J. Energy Eng.-ASCE
PD JUN
PY 2010
VL 136
IS 2
BP 32
EP 41
DI 10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000019
PG 10
WC Energy & Fuels; Engineering, Civil
SC Energy & Fuels; Engineering
GA 597GU
UT WOS:000277745500002
DA 2019-01-15
ER

PT J
AU Oh, H
AF Oh, HyungSeon
TI A New Network Reduction Methodology for Power System Planning Studies
SO IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE Eigenvalue; eigenvector; DC power flow; factorization; power transfer
distribution factor (PTDF); transmission network reduction; ward
reduction
ID EQUIVALENTS
AB System planning on a large-scale electric power system is computationally
challenging. Network reduction into a small system can significantly reduce the
computational expense. The Ward equivalent technique is widely used for the
reduction; however, it may not yield the same flow pattern as the original network.
In this paper, a new methodology for network reduction is proposed and the results
are compared with those from other methodologies.
C1 Natl Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO 80401 USA.
RP Oh, H (reprint author), Natl Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO 80401 USA.
EM hyungseon.oh@nrel.gov
RI Oh, HyungSeon/B-3811-2018
OI Oh, HyungSeon/0000-0002-6732-0370
FU U.S. Department of Energy
FX This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy. Paper no.
TPWRS-00413-2009.
CR Cheng X, 2005, IEEE T POWER SYST, V20, P1868, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2005.857013
CHOI J, 2007, P IEEE PES GEN M JUN, P24
COLEMAN TF, 1986, J ACM, V33, P517, DOI 10.1145/5925.5932
DECKMAN S, 1980, IEEE T POWER AP SYST, V99, P2301, DOI 10.1109/TPAS.1980.319798
DECKMANN S, 1980, IEEE T POWER AP SYST, V99, P2292, DOI 10.1109/TPAS.1980.319797
ENNS MK, 1991, IEEE T POWER SYST, V6, P613, DOI 10.1109/59.76704
NG SKK, 2006, P NAPS POW S SEP, P17
Oh H, 2009, J ENERG ENG, V135, P83, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9402(2009)135:3(83)
ROVNYAK SM, 1995, P 2 IFAC S CONTR POW, P6
Tinney W. F., 1991, IEEE T POWER SYST, V6, P613
TORRE SDL, 2008, IEEE T POWER SYST, V23, P238
Voropai NI, 2006, IEEE T POWER SYST, V21, P1630, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2006.873053
Ward J. B., 1949, AIEE T, V68, P373, DOI DOI 10.1109/T-AIEE.1949.5059947
Zimmerman R., 2008, MATPOWER MATLAB POWE
NR 14
TC 29
Z9 30
U1 0
U2 5
PU IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
PI PISCATAWAY
PA 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, NJ 08855-4141 USA
SN 0885-8950
J9 IEEE T POWER SYST
JI IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
PD MAY
PY 2010
VL 25
IS 2
BP 677
EP 684
DI 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2036183
PG 8
WC Engineering, Electrical & Electronic
SC Engineering
GA 691AH
UT WOS:000285051800010
DA 2019-01-15
ER

EF