Design low-rise reinforced concrete building (Restaurant in Siklós)

Table 9. Categories of use for imposed loads

Category Specific Use Example

A Areas for domestic and Rooms in residential buildings and houses;

residential activities bedrooms and wards in hospitals; bedrooms in
hotels and hostels kitchens and toilets.
B Office areas
C Areas where people may C1: Areas with tables, etc.
congregate (with the e.g. areas in schools, cafes, restaurants, dining
exception of areas defined halls, reading rooms, receptions.
under category A, B, and C2: Areas with fixed seats, e.g. areas in
D1}) churches, theatres or cinemas, conference
rooms, lecture halls, assembly halls, waiting
rooms, railway waiting rooms.
C3: Areas without obstacles for moving
people, e.g. areas in museums, exhibition
rooms, etc. and access areas in public and
administration buildings, hotels, hospitals,
railway station forecourts.
C4: Areas with possible physical activities, e.g.
dance halls, gymnastic rooms, stages.
C5: Areas susceptible to large crowds, e.g. in
D Shopping areas D1: Areas in general retail shops
D2: Areas in department stores

Values of actions

The categories of loaded areas, as specified in Table 6.1, shall be designed by using
characteristic values qk (uniformly distributed load) and Qk (concentrated load) [32].

46
 Design low-rise reinforced concrete building (Restaurant in Siklós)

Values for qk and Qk are given in Table 6.2 below. Where a range is given in this table, the
value may be set by the National annex.
The recommended values, intended for separate application, are underlined. qk is intended for
determination of general effects and Qk for local effects.

The National annex may define different conditions of use of this Table [33]

Table 10. Imposed loads on floors, balconies and stairs in buildings

Categories of loaded areas qk Qk
[kN/m2] [kN]
Category A
- Floors 1.5 to 2.0 2.0 to 3.0
- Stairs 2.0 to 4.0 2.0 to 4.0
- Balconies 2.5 to 4.0 2.0 to 3.0
Category B 2.0 to 3.0 1.5 to 4.5
Category C
- C1 2.0 to 3.0 3.0 to 4.0
- C2 3.0 to 4.0 2.5 to 7.0
(4.0)
- C3 3.0 to 5.0 4.0 to 7.0
- C4 4.5 to 5.0 3.5 to 7.0
- C5 5.0 to 7.5 3.5 to 4.5
Category D
- D1 4.0 to 5.0 3.5 to 7.0
(4.0)
- D2 4.0 to 5.0 3.5 to 7.0

The model is a restaurant building which is category ‘C1’ and the recommended value for qk
the uniformly distributed load is assumed to be equal to 3 kN/m2

47
 Design low-rise reinforced concrete building (Restaurant in Siklós)

4.2 HAND CALCULATION DESIGN (R.C COLUMN)

Reinforced Concrete Column design

Column dimensions:
b  350mm h  350mm l  4.2m
Material strength:

5 2 N
Ac  b h  1.225  10 mm fck  25 ϕ .ef : creep ratio
2
mm  ef  2.95
N
Es  200000 N
2 fyk  500
mm 2 nb  3
mm
fyk N fck N nh  3
fyd   434.783 fcd   16.667
1.15 2 1.5 2 n  nb  nh
mm mm

  10mm  s  6mm Cc  20mm  l  18mm

Effective length:

F  .7
3
l0  F l  2.94  10 mm
l
d2  b  Cc   s     305 mm
2
l
d  h  Cc   s     305 mm
2

Detailed analysis direction Y:

Slenderness analysis:

Column Slenderness:

l0
  3.46   29.064
h

75
 Design low-rise reinforced concrete building (Restaurant in Siklós)

M01
rm   0.493 C  1.7  rm  1.207
M02
20 A BC
 lim   26.868
n

   lim

columny  " slender column " if    lim  " slender column "

" short-column " otherwise 2nd order effect calculations are needed

Buckling analysis:
0.45 d
r0   63.135 m
Method based on nominal curvature:  fyd 
 
Design moment in slender columns:  Es 
25 
c  10 Kr  0.71   0.35    0.281
200 150

K  1    ef  1.83 r0  1 l 2
r   0
K r K  e2 
r
M2  Ned e2 c

M0e  0.6M02  0.4M01  34.411 kN m

 
MEdy  max M02 M0e  M2 M01  0.5M2  48.447 kN m

Detailed analysis direction Z:

Mz1  Mzbotton Mz2  Mztop
Slenderness analysis:

Column Slenderness: Limiting Slenderness:

l0 20 A BC
z  3.46   29.064  limz  26.868
b n

" slender column " 2nd order effect calculations are needed

77
 Design low-rise reinforced concrete building (Restaurant in Siklós)

Buckling analysis:

Method based on nominal curvature:

M01z  Mzbotton  ei Ned  46.101 kN m

M02z  Mztop  ei Ned  87.481 kN m

Design moment in slender columns:

M0ez  0.6Mz2  0.4Mz1  65.128 kN m

 
MEdz  max M02z M0ez  M2 M01z  0.5M2  87.481 kN m

Verification of the used cross section:

b  350 mm N
fcd  16.667
dc  h  d  45 mm 2
h  350 mm mm

d  305 mm dc2  b  d2  45 mm

N
fyd  434.783
d2  305 mm 2
  1.00 mm

 
 2
Ast  nb   l   763.407 mm
4
2
 2
Asc  nh   l   763.407 mm
4
2

M-N Interaction diagram (Y)

N ed  789.22 kN MEdy  48.447 kN m

Point 1 :

3
NRdy1  b h  fcd  Ast fyd  Asc fyd  2.705  10 kN
h   h
MRdy1  Asc fyd   dc   Ast fyd  d    0 kN m
2   2

Point 3 :

Xc0  0.493 d  150.365 mm

78
 Design low-rise reinforced concrete building (Restaurant in Siklós)

NRdy3  b Xc0  fcd  Asc fyd  Ast fyd  877.129 kN

 h Xc0 
  Asc fyd   dc  Ast fyd  d  
h h
MRdy3  b Xc0  fcd  
2 2  2   2
Point 4 :

( Ast  Asc) fyd

Xc   0 mm
b  fcd
N Rdy4  b Xc  fcd  Asc fyd  Ast fyd  0 kN

 h Xc 
  Asc fyd   dc  Ast fyd  d  
h h
MRdy4  b Xc  fcd  
2 2  2   2
N
M : N interaction chart EC2
6
310

6
2.710

6
2.410

6
2.110

6
1.810
NEdy
6
1.510
Ned
6
1.210

5
910

5
610

5
310

4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5
0 2.510 510 7.510 110 1.2510 1.510 1.7510 210
N*m
Medy MEdy

79
 Design low-rise reinforced concrete building (Restaurant in Siklós)

Biaxial bending verification

a a
 MEdy   MEdz  Ned
    1 s   0.292
M M N Rdy1
 Rdy   Rdz 

a  1 if s  0.1  1.16

 s  0.7 
 1.5  0.5  if s  0.7 a
 MEdy   MEdz 
a
 0.3 
     0.678 "Ok"
 s  0.1  M M
 Rdy3   Rdz3
1  0.5  otherwise
 0.6 

Reinforcement verification:
 Ned  2
Minimum areas of reinforcement Asmin  max 0.002 Ac 0.1   245 mm
fyd
 
3 2
Maximum areas of reinforcement Asmax  0.04Ac  4.9  10 mm


 2
As.prov  n   l   1.527  10 mm
4
3 2
Use 6 H18

As  "C-S is not verified" if Ac .01  As.prov  "cross section is verified"

"cross section is verified"otherwise

Asmax  As.prov  Asmin

h b
spacingh   116.667 mm spacingb   116.667 mm Ok
nh nb

Transversal reinforcement
Maximum spacing
  l
 
smax  min 0.6 h 12  l 240mm  210 mm  Stirrup  max 6mm    6 mm

 4 
Minimum spacing
smin  20mm
Links: 35 H6
 l  
nStirrup  round    0.5 0  35 @120 mm

 smax  90mm    The cross section is verified

81
 Design low-rise reinforced concrete building (Restaurant in Siklós)

4.4 HAND CALCULATION DESIGN (R.C BEAM)

SIMPLY SUPPORTED REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN ACCORDING TO EC2 :
all the values are given in N, mm and their combinations
GEOMETRY:

FREE SPAN: l'  4590

LENGTH OF SUPPORTS: a1  350 a2  350

BREADTH: b  350

HEIGHT: h  500

CONCRETE COVER: cc  20

ACCIDENTAL REBAR
  10
REPLACEMENT:

ASSUMED EFFECTIVE DEPTH: d'  d50 min( 0.9 h h  50)  450
3
 cu  0.35% Ecm  33 10  t  2.55 fbd  2.3
1.05 Ecm
Eceff.  Eceff  10500   1
1t

STRENGTH VALUES:

fck
CONCRETE C25/30
fck  25  c  1.5 fcd   16.667 fctm  2.9
c

REINFORCEMENT
fyk
f
fyk  500  s  1.15 yd   434.783 3
 Es  200 10
S5500B s

COMPATIBILITY FOR PLASTIC ANALYSIS:

560
TESNSILED BARS:  c0   0.493
700  fyd

560
COMPRESSED BARS:
' c0   2.111
700  fyd

90
 Design low-rise reinforced concrete building (Restaurant in Siklós)

DESIGN VALUE OF
6
BENDING MOMENT (ULS) MEd  58.0210
FROM AXIS VM:
DESIGN VALUE OF SHEAR: VEd.max  67.52103

FLEXURAL REINFORCEMENT DESIGN:

OPTIMAL BENDING MOMENT:

2   c0 
M0   c0 d b  fcd  1    4.391  108 M
8
 MEd  M0  3.811  10
 2 

REQUIRED COMPRESSED REINFORCEMENT:

M
A's.req  if M  0 A's.req  0
fyd ( d  d')

0 otherwise

91
 Design low-rise reinforced concrete building (Restaurant in Siklós)

REQUIRED TENSION REINFORCEMENT:

 c0 d
' s  fyd if  ' c0 0
d'
0 if A's.req 0

 cu

Es  1.25  c0 d  d' 
1.25  c0 d
otherwise

Given

 xc   22.674095599823748456
xc  MEd xc b  fcd  d    
 
 2  877.32590440017632354*


Xc  min xc xc  22.674 

 c0 d b  fcd  A's.req ' s

As.req  if M  0  304.211
fyd

Xc b  fcd
otherwise
fyd

PROVIDED REINFORCEMENENT:

 As.req 
  10 n  round 4   0.5 0   4   max( 20  )  20 k  6
  2  
 

2 As.req fyk


As.prov  n   314.159  .65  273.659
4 As.prov 1.15
4 H10
As.prov
As.req fyk
 103.27 % s   .65  273.659
As.req As.prov 1.15

92
 Design low-rise reinforced concrete building (Restaurant in Siklós)

LIMITATION OF REBAR NUMBERS IN EACH ROWS:

n1 
 
b  2 cc   k    
 10.267
 

PROVIDED NUMBER OF TENSION REBARS IN EACH ROWS :

FIRST (BOTTOM ROW): SECOND ROW:

na  trunc n1  if n1  n 4 nf   n  na  if n1  n 0

n otherwise 0 otherwise

MODIFIED GEOMETRY:

 nf
dprov  h  cc   k   (    )    459
2 n

VERIFICATION:

xc.prov 
 As.prov fyd  23.416
b  fcd

xc.prov
 0.051 PLASTIC
dprov

STANDARD REGULATIONS:

As.prov
 sl   0.196 %
b dprov

 fctm 
 sl.min max 0.13% 0.26    0.151 %
fyk
 
 sl.max  4%  sl.max   sl   sl.min OK

93
 Design low-rise reinforced concrete building (Restaurant in Siklós)

 xc.prov 

MRd  xc.prov b  fcd  d    5.987  107
 2 

MEd
PERFORMANCE:
 96.915 % Use 4 H10
MRd

SHEAR DESIGN:

5
VEd  1.77  10

SHEAR RESISTANCE OF THE BEAM (WITHOUT SHEAR REINFORCEMENT):

3 1
As.prov  200  2
 l 
b dprov
k  min 2 
d
  min   2
0.035k  fck
 prov 

 1 
 0.18 3 
vRdc  max k  100  l fck   min  0.134
 c 

VRdcX  vRdc b d  21174.192

SECTION OF DESIGNED SHEAR REINFORCEMENT:

CONCRETE STRUT RESISTANCE:

1  fck 
VRd.max  b 0.9 dprov 0.6  1   fcd  6.506  105
2  250 
VRd.max  VEd
The geometry accepts the reinforcement

REQUIRED AREA OF STEEL FOR STIRRUPS:

2
 k  Asw fyd
Asw  2   56.549 sreq  0.9d   56.257
4 VEd

94
 Design low-rise reinforced concrete building (Restaurant in Siklós)

4.5 SLAB DESIGN

SIMPLY SUPPORTED REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN ACCORDING TO EC2 :

all the values are given in N, mm and their combinations

GEOMETRY:

LENGTH OF SUPPORTS: a1  350 a2  350

BREADTH: b  1000
HEIGHT: h  200
CONCRETE COVER: cc  20
ACCIDENTAL REBAR
  10
d  min( 0.9h h  50)  150

REPLACEMENT:
ASSUMED EFFECTIVE DEPTH:
d'  50
  1

STRENGTH VALUES:
fck  25
CONCRETE C25/30 fck
 c  1.5 fcd   16.667 fctm  2.9
c

fbd  2.3
fyk  500
fyk
REINFORCEMENT  s  1.15 fyd   434.783 Es  200103
s
S5500B

COMPATIBILITY FOR PLASTIC ANALYSIS:

560
TESNSILED BARS:  c0   0.493
700  fyd

COMPRESSED BARS: 560

' c0   2.111
700  fyd

 cu  0.35% Ecm  33103  t  2.55

1.05Ecm
Eceff   9760.563
1 t

98
 Design low-rise reinforced concrete building (Restaurant in Siklós)

Mid span / long direction (x) / Bottom reinforcement

DESIGN OF MEdx.bottom  18.92106

VALUE
BENDING MOMENT (ULS) M 6
Edx.top  41.1210
FROM ULS:

FLEXURAL REINFORCEMENT DESIGN:

REQUIRED TENSION REINFORCEMENT:

Given

 xc 
 292.23079835253687773
xc  MEdx.bottom xc b  fcd  d    

 2   7.7692016474631462653*
Xc b  fcd
ORIGIN  1  
Xc  min xc xc  7.769 As.req   297.819
fyd

PROVIDED REINFORCEMENENT:
  8
 As.req 
n  round 4  0.5 0  6   max( 20  )  20
2
   

99
 Design low-rise reinforced concrete building (Restaurant in Siklós)

Mid span / long direction (x) / Top reinforcement

DESIGN VALUE OF
BENDING MOMENT  6
MEdx.top 42.1210
(ULS) FROM AXIS VM:

FLEXURAL REINFORCEMENT DESIGN:

REQUIRED TENSION REINFORCEMENT:

Given
 xc  282.08179284064858108
xc  MEdx.top xcb fcd d     
 2 *
 17.918207159351442917


ORIGIN 1 Xc  minxc xc  17.918 
Xcb fcd
As.req   686.865
fyd

PROVIDED REINFORCEMENENT:   12

 As.req 
n  round 4  0.50  7   max(20 )  20
2
   
2
 
As.prov n  791.681 7 H12 m / m'
4

As.req fyk As.req fyk As.prov

 s   .65  245.192  .65  245.192  115.26%
As.prov 1.15 As.prov 1.15 As.req


MODIFIED GEOMETRY:
dprov h  cc     164
2

VERIFICATION:
xc.prov
 As.prov fyd  20.653 xc.prov
 0.126 PLASTIC
b fcd dprov
STANDARD REGULATIONS:

As.prov  fctm
 sl.max 4%  sl   0.483%  sl.min max 0.13%0.26   0.151%
bdprov  fyk 
 xc.prov
MRd  xc.provb fcd d    4.808 107  sl.max  sl   sl.min OK
 2 
MEdx.top
PERFORMANCE:  87.609%
MRd

101