Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
2017-18
CHAPTER-2
[REVIEW OF LITRATURE]
Two main goals are achieved in this review of the empirical literature on factors
affecting conflict resolution in watershed partnerships. The first is an
assessment of two public policy theories relevant to partnership structure and
function. The second is a set of practical suggestions for designing successful
partnerships. The 37 available studies collectively identified 210 “lessons
learned,” which were grouped into 28 thematic categories. The most frequently
recurring themes are the necessity of adequate funding (62% of the studies),
effective leadership and management (59%), interpersonal trust (43%), and
committed participants (43%). Exploratory factor analysis was used to search
for patterns in the lessons. Four factors were identified, which together explain
95% of the variance in the 28 themes. The first two factors emphasize the
importance of (1) balancing the partnership's resources with its scope of
activities; and (2) employing a flexible and informal partnership structure. The
third and fourth factors offer modest support for two theoretical perspectives on
collaborative resource management—the alternate dispute resolution framework
and the institutional analysis and development framework.
WILLIAM BLOMQUIST
Authors
Eun-Sung ChungEmail author Won-Pyo Hong Kil Seong Lee Steven J. Burian
2.12 Prioritizing the best sites for treated wastewater instream use in
an urban watershed using fuzzy TOPSIS
This study developed a new framework that prioritized the best sites for treated
wastewater (TWW) instream use using fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference
by Similarity to Ideal Solution (fuzzy TOPSIS), a fuzzy-based multi-criteria
decision-making (MCDM) technique. We identified key criteria for TWW use
based on the Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework that
considered technical, social, economic and environmental aspects. We also
introduced triangular fuzzy numbers and conducted individual interviews to
consider the uncertainty of weighting values and input data. This procedure was
applied at ten sites in a South Korean urban watershed, where hydrologic
modeling exercises were performed. Our simulation results for water quantity
(i.e., drought flow, low flow and the days to satisfy instream flow) and water
quality (i.e., BOD concentration and the days to satisfy target water quality)
showed significant inter-annual variability that could be better represented with
fuzzy numbers. Furthermore, the use of fuzzy TOPSIS gave different rankings
of the best sites for TWW use compared to those obtained from a weighting
sum method, a traditional MCDM technique. Such varied rankings with
different MCDM techniques indicate the need for fuzzy-based techniques,
considering various uncertainties and thus being less controversial.
Highlights
► A framework to prioritize the best sites for treated wastewater use was
developed.
► Use of fuzzy TOPSIS gave markedly different rankings of the best sites.
study, the proposed procedure was applied to the Korean urban watershed,
which has suffered from streamflow depletion and water quality deterioration.
Our application shows that the framework provides a useful watershed
management tool for incorporating quantitative and qualitative information into
the evaluation of various policies with regard to water resource planning and
management.
Highlights
Authors
Gemma Car
This article proposes social criteria for siting watershed-level agricultural non-
point source (NPS) pollution abatement projects. A suite of indicators is
introduced and a methodology is described for assessing the indicators and
making a relative comparison between sites. Indicators discussed include
funding availability, project interest, problem salience, and stakeholder
collaboration and trust. The article concludes with a discussion of the challenges
associated with measuring and comparing qualitative criteria.
Authors
Authors and affiliations
Melissa WatanabeEmail author
Lúcia Rejane da Rosa Gama Madruga
Cristina Keiko Yamaguchi
Adriana Carvalho Pinto Vieira
Roseli Jenoveva-Neto
Water is an essential element to life, and must be available to meet the basic
needs of human beings. One of these needs is the production of food,
emphasizing the relevance of agribusiness agents in the management of this
natural resource. This study discusses how the management of water resources
is being conducted by Committees of Watersheds in the State Rio Grande do
Sul, focusing on decision making and in social learning. This is an exploratory
study, supported by predominantly qualitative analysis. The results showed that
the formation of the Committees of Watersheds in the State of Rio Grande do
Sul depends on local decisions that are distinct in each region of the State.
Evolution in the learning process of the members of the Committees occurs
from the existence of conflicts. The conflicts emerge from issues concerning
the use of water due to the multiple interests involved and provide discussions
and solutions that lead to learning. Decisions taken in the Basin Committees
are generally operating and relating to the quantity or quality of water. Social
learning is promoted by actions of technical and relational nature offered by the
exchange of knowledge and experience among stakeholders and other agents
involved.
[1] Key documents such as the European Water Framework Directive and the
U.S. Clean Water Act state that public and stakeholder participation in water
resource management is required. Participation aims to enhance resource
management and involve individuals and groups in a democratic way.
Evaluation of participatory programs and projects is necessary to assess whether
these objectives are being achieved and to identify how participatory programs
and projects can be improved. The different methods of evaluation can be
classified into three groups: (i) process evaluation assesses the quality of
participation process, for example, whether it is legitimate and promotes equal
power between participants, (ii) intermediary outcome evaluation assesses the
achievement of mainly nontangible outcomes, such as trust and communication,
as well as short- to medium-term tangible outcomes, such as agreements and
institutional change, and (iii) resource management outcome evaluation assesses
the achievement of changes in resource management, such as water quality
improvements. Process evaluation forms a major component of the literature but
can rarely indicate whether a participation program improves water resource
management. Resource management outcome evaluation is challenging because
resource changes often emerge beyond the typical period covered by the
evaluation and because changes cannot always be clearly related to participation
activities. Intermediary outcome evaluation has been given less attention than
process evaluation but can identify some real achievements and side benefits
that emerge through participation. This review suggests that intermediary
outcome evaluation should play a more important role in evaluating
participation in water resource management.
V. Selvi D. V. Singh
Madgyal is a small village located at distance of 25 Kms from Jath city. It lies
between North latitude 17°02’56.94” and East longitude 75° 13’8.14”. Some
measures have been adopted to recharge the ground water resources. Hence it is
planned to take such engineering and biological measures which will direct this
extra runoff to ground water storage. The most significant feature of the work is
that if such technologies are developed and adopted at larger scale in rural areas,
it will prevent thousands of villages of the country from water supply by
The present paper is based on the basic research for water conservation at
Arunavati River and at the southern footage in Shirpur thesil Dhule District.
The present project is the vision of Hon. M.L.A Mr. Amrishbhai Patel (Ex.
Youth and Sport Ministry, Maharashtra state) and Dr. Suresh Khanapurkar. The
vision of Amrishbhai Patel is come into concert form by the hardwork Dr.
Khanapurkar so this pattern is also known as Amrishbhai Patel Pattern all over
the Maharashtra. The project officerDr. Khanapurkar is renowned Ex. Geologist
of Govt. of Maharashtra. The Shirpur thesil situated in 837.39 sq. km area
among which 78.7 % is cultivated land and remaining 12.94 is covered with
forest area. Out of cultivated total area 84.61% area is under irrigation. The
distribution of rainfall in Shirpur thesil is highly erratic, so this area comes in
drought prone area of the state and due to this situation made as to work on
Shirpur Pattern
Summary:-
1] In all reviews detail study of hydrology should be mentioned.
3] In Sangli some measures have been adopted to recharge the ground water
resources. Hence it is planned to take such engineering and biological measures
which will direct this extra runoff to ground water storage.
8] Water is an essential element to life, and must be available to meet the basic
needs of human beings. One of these needs is the production of food,
emphasizing the relevance of agribusiness agents in the management of this
natural resource. This study discusses how the management of water resources