Customs and Border Protection Report On Border Walls Crossing Washes and Streams

001027
SBI-TI May 2009

Project: IPT
PF 225 and VF 300
Border Fence Projects
Technical IPT
Final Report
California, Arizona,
New Mexico and Texas
Submitted to:
SBI
And
DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
Fort Worth District Corps of Engineers
Prepared by
Fort Worth, Texas
Michael Baker Jr., Inc.

Phoenix, Arizona
Not for Construction

001028
Executive Summary
On the afternoon of July 12, 2008, a severe monsoon resulted in significant flooding in
the area around Lukeville, Arizona. Shortly after the storm, the Associated Press
published an article titled “Border Fence Design Gets a Second Look.” That article
described the flooding in Lukeville and attributed it to the pedestrian fence (PF) recently
built in the area (specifically the PF 225 segment D-2). On August 8, the National Park
Service (NPS) issued a memorandum that also attributed the flooding of July 12 to the
pedestrian fence, and, in particular, to poor drainage designs.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), with the collaboration of Michael Baker
Corp (Baker), produced an After Action Review (AAR) report that described the flood
event, why it happened, and recommended solutions (see Appendix A for a copy of the
AAR). On October 22, 2008, a “drainage summit” was held at the Border Patrol station in
Douglas, Arizona, to discuss the AAR and develop a plan for addressing the drainage
issues as well as the resulting erosion and damage to the fencing. The summit also
developed a preliminary approach to locating and correcting all other areas in which the
PF 225 or VF (vehicle fence) 300 fence has the potential of creating similar incidents or
having a high risk of flooding.
As a result of the drainage summit, an Integrated Project Team (IPT) was created to
prepare a plan to identify all the areas subject to flooding because of PF 225 fencing and
recommend solutions for mitigating. (Appendix A also includes a copy of the IPT’s
charter.). This plan does not, and was never intended to, cover the legacy fences.
The IPT found that one of the factors contributing to the flooding was the collection of
debris at fence sections built within wash areas. The debris builds-up on the fence
obstructed storm water from flowing freely across the fence, causing the water to rise and
divert from its natural flow pattern. In addition to the flooding, the debris build-up, which
sometimes reached a height of 6 feet, caused a water-fall effect on the other side of the
fence resulting in major scour and erosion problems, and increasing the likelihood that
the fence could be damaged or collapse.
The IPT further found that VF 300 fences resulted in no major drainage concerns because
of obstructions. However, it expressed concern about the scour, erosion, stability, and
longevity of the vehicle fence, and whether it could withstand high-water pressure
without being washed out. As a result, the IPT concluded that VF 300 also required
mitigation (Legacy vehicle fences are not included in the analysis and mitigation)
The IPT collected data on all the washes where the PF 225 or VF 300 fence had been
constructed (Legacy fences not included), and grouped them into three risk categories
(high, medium, and low) using hydrologic and hydraulic criteria, such as flow rates,
velocities, channel slopes, and water depth. (Appendices B and C present the list of the
i
001029
washes and their relative data; while Appendix D shows the locations of the PF 225 and
VF 300 washes) The risk categories are defined as follows:
 Category 1, Low Risk: There is little or no risk of debris collecting at the fence, or
causing any flooding, scour or erosion problems, or danger to the fence stability.
No action by IPT is anticipated.
 Category 2, Medium Risk: There may be a risk of fence failing because of

flooding hazards or debris collecting at the fence and causing floods, or scour or
erosion problems. Further analysis is required to decide whether a retrofit to the
fence is needed or if regular maintenance will suffice.
 Category 3, High Risk: There is a high risk of failure because of water pressure,
flooding, and scour or erosion problems. Removing or retrofitting the fence and
installing scour protection are required. This category also includes all of the VF
300 crossings located in a FEMA Zone A floodplain.
The IPT team validated the data, visited all the Category 2 and 3 washes (Appendix E
shows photos and site visit forms), and identified the VF washes that needed to be
permanently anchored to the ground, the PF washes that required fence retrofits, the
washes that only required scour protection, and the washes in which regular debris
removal would suffice. These washes are as follows:
 PF 225 crossings needing retrofit:
 Segment A2K – Washes J1&2 (47+09), J5 (70+50)
 Segment A2L – Washes J6 (23+48), J9 (59+24)
 Segment D2 – Washes E16, W13, E8, W17
 Segment D5A – Wash 2 (Mariposa)
 Segment D5B – Washes 10 (Las Cuevitas), 44
 Segment E2A – Wash 5 (Montezuma)
 Segment E2B – Washes M5 (BC Wash), M8 (Gringo wash), M14 (wash
33), M16 (first horseshoe), M21 (second horseshoe)
 Segment E3 – Wash M1 (Christiansen)
 Wash east of Nogales Port of Entry (POE)
 PF 225 crossings needing low water crossings (LWCs) and Rip Rap:
 Segment A2A – Wash 2
 Segment A2D – Wash 52+13, 60+57
 Segment A2F – Wash 5+44
 Segment A2J – Wash 51+75
 Segment A2N – Wash 3
 Segment D2 – Washes E19, E20, E31, E33, W1
 Segment D5A – Washes 1, 4
 Segment D5B – Washes 1, 28, 8, 9 (Barranca Honda), 26, 27
001030
 Segment E2A – Washes 7, 3, 6

 Segment E3 – Washes M3, M4, US2, US4, US5
 Segment I1A – Washes 3, 4
 Segment L1 – Washes 1, 4, 6
 VF 300 crossings needing permanent anchoring system and scour protection
(length of vehicle fence to be permanently anchored shown in brackets):
 Segment CV2A – Wash Y6 (180’)
 Segment DV4B – Washes 14 (150’), A (240’), 6 (270’), 8 (70’)
 Segment EV1A – Washes 6 (100’), 42 (200’), 52 (50’), 53 (100’), 55
(50’), 61 (70’)
 Segment EV1B – Wash F02 (200’)
 Segment EV2B – Wash 102 (240’)
 Segment FV1B – Washes C13 (Black draw - 450’+200’), C14 (hay
Hollow - 40’+50’+100’), C6 (Silver Creek - 300’+200’).
 Segment HV3 – Wash DA6 (50’)
 VF 300 crossings needing LWC and Rip Rap:
 Segment BV1 – Wash 100 (Pinto)
 Segment CV2 – Washes 7, 16
 Segment DV1 – Washes 6, 12, 14, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23
 Segment DV3A – Washes 1(San Simon Wash), 4 (Chukut Kuk)
 Segment DV4A – Washes 1, 11 (LWC only), 17, 20, 35 (LWC only), 37,
41, 42 (LWC only), 43, 44, 45, 46 (LWC only), 5, 6 (LWC only), 9 (LWC
only)
 Segment DV4B – Washes 17, 21, 9, 12
 Segment DV4C – Wash 52
 Segment DV7 – Washes 17, 35
 Segment EV1A – Washes 35, 38, 40, 45, 56, 58, 59, 60, 63, 66
 Segment EV1B – Wash F01
 Segment FV1B – Washes C17 (Cantina), C24, C4 (LWC only), C45
(LWC only), C50, C52 (LWC only), C10, C21, C5.
 Segment HV2 – Washes 4, 8
 Segment HV3 – Washes DA1, DA4
 Segment IV4 – Wash 1
 Segment JV3 – Wash 1
 All other crossings requiring future more frequent debris removal:
 Segment A2C – Washes 1+37, 16+03, 25+22, 6+95
 Segment A2D – Washes 36+35, 38+28, 39+02, 48+63
 Segment A2F – Wash 100
 Segment A2g – Washes 2, 8, 9
 Segment A2I – Washes 1+56, 16+29, 41+93, 44+41, 52+67, 7+67
001031
 Segment A2J – Washes E29, E30, E6, W2, W22, 3, 29, 31, 32, 40, 43,
43.5, 46, 55, 57, 58, 59, 20a, 25c, 471, 47b, 48a
 Segment D6 – Washes 1, 3, 4
 Segment E2A – Washes 1, 2, 4
 Segment E3 – Wash M2B
 Segment DV1 – Washes 7, 15
 Segment DV2 – Wash F06
 Segment DV3A – Washes 9, 12
 Segment DV4A – Washes 14, 15, 19, 29, 32, 33, 49
 Segment FV1B – Washes C20, C28
 Segment HV2 – Washes 6, 7, 9, 22
 Segment HV4 – Washes 3, 9
 Segment IV2 – Washes F02, F03, F04, F06
 Segment JV2 – Wash F01
 Segment JV1A – Wash 1
 Segment JV1B – Washes 10, 13, 16, 18.
The IPT also developed conceptual designs for pedestrian fence retrofits. These concepts
are provided in Figures F-1, F-2, and F-8 in Appendix F, with Figure F-8 showing the
recommended retrofit. Appendix F also includes concepts for anchoring vehicle fences as
alternative solutions to removing the fence (see Figures F-5, F-6, and F-7, with Figure F-
7 showing the recommended solution).
Each of the recommended concepts needs to be further developed before it can be applied
to specific wash sites. For planning purposes, the IPT proposed the following rough order
of magnitude cost estimates for construction of the recommended solutions:
1. Retrofitting PF 225 fences: $9.5 million to $12.1 million
2. Anchoring VF 300 fences: $1.8 million to 2.6 million
3. Building LWC and Riprap for PF 225: $1.2 million to $2.2 million
4. Building LWC and Riprap for VF 300: $2.2 million to $4.3 million.
001032
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i

Section 1. Introduction ..............................................................................................................1
Section 2. Categorizing Washes ................................................................................................1
Section 3. Site Visits ...................................................................................................................3
Section 4. Considerations ..........................................................................................................5
PF 225 Proposed Solutions ......................................................................................................... 6
Installation of Gates at Wash Crossings that can be Opened During Monsoon Season or
Prior to Major Storms ............................................................................................................. 6
Retrofit Existing Fence at Wash Crossings with Removable Bollards................................... 6
VF 300 Solutions ........................................................................................................................ 7
Remove Existing Fence and Replace with Concrete Boulders or Tetra Pods ........................ 7
Anchor Normandy Fences to Ground ..................................................................................... 7
Remove Existing Fence and Replace with Widely Spaced Bollards ...................................... 8
Remove Existing Fence Before Major Flood Events ............................................................. 8
Rebuild Post and Rail Fences with Deeper Foundations ........................................................ 8
Section 5. Recommendations.....................................................................................................8
PF 225 Recommendations for High-Risk Washes...................................................................... 8
VF 300 Recommendations for High-Risk Washes ..................................................................... 9
Recommendations for PF 225 Medium-Risk Wash Crossings................................................. 10
Recommendations for Other VF 300 Medium-Risk Wash Crossings ...................................... 11
Prioritizing Criteria ................................................................................................................... 13
Section 6. ROM Cost Estimates ..............................................................................................14
Retrofitting PF 225 Fences ....................................................................................................... 14
Anchoring VF 300 Fences ........................................................................................................ 15
Building Scour Protection for 32 PF 225 Crossings ................................................................. 15
Building Scour Protection for Approximately 62 VF 300 Crossings ....................................... 15
Appendix A IPT Charter and After Action Review

Appendix B Wash Ranking Tables for PF 225
Appendix C Wash Ranking Tables for VF 300
Appendix D Summary
Appendix E Site Photos and Forms
Appendix F Concepts
Appendix G Rough Order of Magnitude Calculations
Appendix H Hec-Ras Models for Boulders in a Wash

Page A

001033
IPT Report
Project PF 225 AND VF 300
Department of the Army
Fort Worth, Corps of Engineers
Forth Worth, Texas
MAY 2009
Section 1. Introduction
Pedestrian fence (PF) 225 D-2 near Lukeville, Arizona, was one of the first fence
segments constructed as part of the PF 225 Program. It was constructed using the design-
build approach. Shortly after its completion, a large monsoon storm hit the area on July
12, 2008, resulting in major flooding and damages along the border. This incident was
reported in an Associated Press article that indicated “the barrier acted like a dam during
flash flood.” In addition, the National Park Service (NPS), which manages the Organ
Pipe Memorial Park that is located adjacent to the D-2 segment, raised concerns to the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
that the fence caused the flooding. At CBP’s request, USACE conducted a study to
determine whether the fence caused or contributed to the flooding. The results of that
study, including recommended solutions, were presented in an After Action Review
(AAR) report produced by the USACE. (Appendix A presents a copy of this report.)
Shortly after the AAR was completed, a drainage summit was held at the Border Patrol
station in Douglas, Arizona on October 22, 2008. That summit discussed the AAR and
developed a plan for addressing the drainage issues as well as the resulting erosion and
damage to the fencing. It also created a preliminary approach to locate and correct any
other washes in which PF 225 or vehicle fence (VF) 300 was built with a likelihood of
potentially creating similar issues.
The drainage summit further established an Integrated Project Team (IPT) to develop a
plan for identifying all of the washes most likely be subject to flooding and severe
erosion because of PF 225 and VF 300 fencing, and recommend solutions for mitigating
those situations (Appendix A also shows the IPT’s charter). This plan does not, and was
never intended to, cover the situations caused by the legacy fences.
This report describes the steps and methods that the IPT used to identify and categorize
the drainage crossings, identifies potential solutions, and proposes rough order of
magnitude (ROM) cost estimates to implement the solutions.
Section 2. Categorizing Washes

The first step in identifying the washes most susceptible to flooding and erosion was to
collect and analyze the hydrologic and hydraulic information for the washes in which PF
225 and VF 300 fence segments crossed, and group them into the following three
categories:
1
001034
 Category 1, Low Risk: There is little or no risk of debris collecting at the fence, or
causing any flooding, scour or erosion problems, or danger to the fence stability.
No action is anticipated.
 Category 2, Medium Risk: There may be a risk of the fence failing because of
flooding hazards, or because of debris collecting at the fence and causing floods
and scour or erosion problems. Further analysis is required to decide whether a
retrofit to the fence is needed or if regular maintenance will suffice.
 Category 3, High Risk: There is a high risk of failure because of water pressure,
flooding, or scour and erosion problems. Removing or retrofitting the fence and
installing scour protection are required. This category also includes all of the VF
300 crossings located in a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
Zone A floodplain.
When available, the drainage designs and studies prepared for the PF 225 and VF 300
projects were thoroughly reviewed for key data pertaining to the hydrology and
hydraulics of the washes. This review covered a 100-year storm event and focused on the
following factors:
 Flow rate
 Flow velocity
 Water surface elevation
 Flow direction
 Channel slopes
 Fence type (only for VF-300)
 FEMA rating (or zone).

When this information was not available, the IPT conducted a separate hydraulic and
hydrologic (H&H) analysis for the 100-year storm event.
In order to assign the drainage crossings to one of the three categories, the IPT used a
preliminary set of “desk-top” criteria. The criteria were selected after analyzing multiple
scenarios and consisted of the following factors:
 Flow rate: Directly proportional to the risk of flooding (because water will back
up) and its capacity to contain sediments and debris. Four thresholds were
selected: 100 cfs, 500 cfs, 1000 cfs, and 3000 cfs.
2
001035
 Velocity: Directly proportional to scour and erosion and to the size of sediments
and debris the flow may contain. Three thresholds were selected: 3 fps, 5 fps, and
10 fps.
 Flow depth: Directly proportional to the amount of debris and sediments the flow
can contain and to the damages that can be caused when flooding. Three
thresholds were selected: 1 ft, 3 ft, and 5 ft.
 Channel slope: Directly proportional to the turbulence the flow can have, which
leads to more erosion, scour, debris, and sediment transport. Three thresholds
were selected: 0.2 percent, 0.5 percent, and 1 percent.
The closer the factors for each wash were to the higher thresholds, the higher the category
of the wash. Tables B-2 and C-6 (in Table 1) show how these factors are linked to the
categorization of the wash. All analysis used the 100-year storm event.
The desk-top analysis resulted in a preliminary grouping of the washes into one of the
three categories. Table 1 summarizes the various tables generated as a result of the desk-
top analysis.
Table 1. Results of Desk-Top Analysis
Table Title Location
B-1 PF 225 Washes and Data Appendix B

B-2 Criteria Table Used to Categorize Washes Appendix B
B-3 PF 225: List of Category 2 Washes Appendix B
B-4 PF 225: List of Category 3 Washes Appendix B
C-5 VF 300 Washes and Data Appendix C
C-6 Criteria Table Used to Categorize Washes Appendix C
C-7 VF 300: List of Category 2 Washes Appendix C
C-8 VF 300: List of Category 3 Washes Appendix C
D-9 Summary of Total Washes per Category and Appendix D
Location
D-10 Longitude and Latitude of Washes Appendix D
Because the desk-top analysis and subsequent categorization were based primarily on
hydraulic considerations, the IPT conducted site visits to confirm that the washes were
properly categorized and determine if the recommended retrofits and upgrades were
warranted.
Section 3. Site Visits

The desk-top analysis yielded 106 Category 2 PF 225 fence/wash crossings and 21
Category 3 PF 225 fence/wash crossings with more than 66 percent located in Arizona.
3
001036
(Appendixes B and C summarize the PF 225 and VF 300 Category 2 and 3 wash
crossings.)
All Category 2 and 3 fence/wash crossings were validated through on-site visits for the
following purposes:
 Obtain a better idea of the watershed makeup upstream of the wash crossing
 Collect basic data concerning the “as-built” conditions of the fence and grates
 Collect bed load data
 Determine the likely long-term maintenance requirements following a major

storm event and or at the end of the monsoon season
 Asses the validity of the proposed concept recommendations.

The IPT did not visit the following washes:
 All those in Category 1
 All crossings associated with segment A-1 because this segment was still under
design
 All Category 2 PF 225 crossings with flow rates below 100 cfs or velocity below
2 fps; these crossing were assumed to have no major flooding anticipated.
The site visits were conducted in the following order:
1. The washes in New Mexico and Texas (specifically PF 225 Segments I-1A and L-
1) were visited in the early stages of the fence design phase and prior to
construction; no additional site visits were warranted.
2. Naco to Douglas, Arizona, corridor (PF 225 “E” and “F” segments); these visits
were conducted on January 23, 2009; all the crossings within that corridor were
observed.
3. Lukeville to Nogales, Arizona, corridor (PF 225 “D” segments); these visits were
conducted on January 30, 2009; all crossings within that corridor were observed.
4. San Diego, California, A-2 segments; these segments were observed on February
12, 2009; all crossings of concern were visited and evaluated.
5. All vehicle fences that the IPT initially recommended be removed due to
regulatory concerns were visited in 2008 and re-visited recently, as needed.
4
001037
To facilitate the field observations, a standard data collection form was prepared for each
crossing and pre-populated with existing information, and then supplemented in the field
with additional information obtained during the site visit (such as specific grate designs
and fence type). The IPT also took photographs of each crossing visited. (Appendix E
provides copies of the data collection forms and photographs.)
Section 4. Considerations
PF 225 fencing obstructs drainage flow every time a wash is crossed. With additional
debris build-up, the International Boundary Water Commission’s (IBWC’s) criteria for
rise in water surface elevations (set at 6” in rural areas and 3” in urban areas) can quickly
be exceeded. Proposed solutions for PF 225 fence projects focus on reducing the
destructive effects of debris at fence drainage crossings. The proposed solutions would
enable drainage flow to cross the fence while minimizing the risk of flooding, scouring,
and structural failure. Those solutions also need to meet IBWC criteria. In California,
Arizona, and New Mexico, PF 225 were built outside FEMA’s floodplains, so FEMA
criteria did not apply. Some PF 225 segments in Texas, however, were planned to be
constructed in the tributary crossings of the Rio Grande and will be in FEMA floodplains.
The collection of debris in those wash crossings and their impacts on the Rio Grande
FEMA floodplains are addressed in other drainage documents and beyond the scope of
this report.
Given that the rise in water surface elevation (WSE) after the placement of VF 300
fencing typically meets IBWC’s criteria (described above), VF 300 fencing was allowed
to be constructed in FEMA floodplains. During high-flood events (monsoon season),
however, the VF 300 fence in FEMA floodplains were to be removed and relocated to an
off-site staging area. Given the low rise in WSE, VF-300 fences were allowed to remain
in place at all wash crossings permanently without violating IBWC criteria. That policy
of leaving the VF 300 fence in floodplains was not considered during the original design
phase of the fence project because of the time required to comply with FEMA’s
requirements. The IPT was further tasked to assess the flood risks associated with leaving
the VF 300 fence in FEMA floodplains during flood events. Most of the VF 300 fence
placed in drainage crossings was “Normandy style” fencing (VF-2), which is set on the
ground without a foundation. Few VF 300 segments with “rail on post” fencing (VF-1),
with 6-foot deep post foundations were constructed in the floodplains. Both style fences
typically present minimal impacts and pose a very low flood risk. Giving the lack of
schedule constraints, FEMA compliance may be achieved while keeping the VF 300
fence in the floodplains and will be addressed under a separate cover. The primary
concern with the VF 300 drainage crossings is the stability and longevity of the VF-2
fence and its ability to withstand flooding. Proposed solutions for VF-2 fencing will
address maintaining the current fencing against high pressures from the water flowing at
5
001038
high velocities. For the remaining VF 300 fencing with foundations, the IPT considered
solutions similar to those for the PF 225.
During weekly meetings, the IPT discussed multiple potential solutions to mitigate debris
build-up along PF 225 and VF 300 fence projects. The goal of those solutions was to
alleviate debris build-up at the fence and the potential for scour and erosion during major
storm events. The solutions are briefly discussed in the following subsections.
PF 225 Proposed Solutions
Installation of Gates at Wash Crossings that can be Opened During

Monsoon Season or Prior to Major Storms
Multiple gate options were considered including swing, sluice, slide, and
retractable. The IPT compared the various types of gates using the following
factors: drainage efficiency, ease of gate operation, visual deterrence, long-term
maintenance requirements, construction and life-cycle costs, and location (see
Table F-11 in Appendix F). It concluded that retrofitting the existing fence at
wash crossings with a sluice gate (sliding vertically) was the best solution. This
concept would require the removal of existing grating or fencing, and retrofitting
with one or more vertical gates similar to the concept design depicted in Figure F-
8 in Appendix F.
The required height of the gate openings was estimated to be 4 to 9 feet, and
would be a function of the flood water elevation and wash geometry of the
applicable wash. The required width and number of gates would also be a
function of each crossing’s characteristics. When the required number of gate
openings was known, a customized vertical gate system would be fabricated and
installed at each crossing. The gates would be opened prior to monsoon or storm
events, thus providing a clear opening for the storm water and debris to flow
through the fence with minimal obstruction. Following the monsoon or storm
events, the gates would be closed. For low-to-moderate storm events, the gates
could remain in the closed position.
Retrofit Existing Fence at Wash Crossings with Removable Bollards
This concept would require retrofitting the existing fence to allow only a portion
of the fence bollards to be removable. By minimizing the height of the bollards to
be removable, operation and maintenance costs would be reduced and heavy
equipment would not be required during installation. The required height of the
removable bollards (estimated at 4 to 9 feet) would be a function of the flood
water elevation and wash geometry. Prior to installing the removable bollards, all
6
001039
existing grates would be removed. If the fence has no grate, then another retrofit
would be required to replace the bollard fence with a frame similar to a fence with
grates so that there would be clear openings behind the removable bollards. The
bollards would be removed before monsoon or storm events, thus providing a
clear opening for the storm water and debris to flow through the fence with
minimal obstruction. Following the monsoon or storm event, the bollards would
be reinstalled. For low-to-moderate storm events, the removable bollards would
remain in the closed position. The bollards would not need to be removed for
every storm event, only those with the potential for major precipitation. The
concept design is presented in Figures F-1 and F-2 in Appendix F. This option
was not as promising as the previous gate option because of the need to find a
place to store after removal and to haul the bollards.
VF 300 Solutions
Remove Existing Fence and Replace with Concrete Boulders or Tetra

Pods
These structures would be large concrete blocks strategically placed in the bed of
the main wash to stop vehicles from crossing. The IPT performed preliminary
calculations to estimate the size of a concrete cubes required to resist hydrostatic
sliding forces. Those calculations showed that each of these structures would need
to be between 8 to 12 feet, depending on the velocity of the flow. (Appendix F
shows typical images of similar structures and the IPT’s calculations.)
To determine the order of magnitude impact that the concrete blocks or boulders
would have on a water surface elevation, the IPT created a Hec-Ras Model for
two typical washes: the Cantina Wash (Segment FV-1B Wash C17) and Hay
Hollow Wash (Segment FV-1B wash C14). An analysis showed that installing
such an obstruction would cause the water surface elevation to rise to a level
higher than the limit set by IBWC (see Appendix H). In addition, the obstructions
would need to meet FEMA’s requirements and regulations for building in a
floodplain. For the above reason, the IPT does not recommend this solution.
Anchor Normandy Fences to Ground
This solution calls for installing deep concrete drilled shafts or deep embedded
metal columns connected to the existing Normandy fence. This approach would
anchor the fence in place even when it is subjected to the high pressures of storm
flows. Details of the Normandy fence and the anchoring system are shown in
Figures F-6 and F-7 in Appendix F. The IPT recommends this solution.
7
(
b 001040
)
(
5
)
Remove Existing Fence and Replace with Widely Spaced Bollards
The bollards would need to be clearly separated from each other, but not more
than 4 feet in order to stop vehicles from crossing. The bollards would also need
to be embedded into the ground to sustain the forces of the flow and the scour
depth. The footings for these bollards would likely be concrete drilled shafts to
estimated depths of 25 to 30 feet. Figure F-5 in Appendix F shows the details of
such a fence. For hydraulic and scour reasons this solution is not recommended
for high-flow Category 3 washes, but may be considered for lower Category 3
washes. This option is not operationally desirable because of the open space
between bollards.
Remove Existing Fence Before Major Flood Events
In this solution, the Normandy fence would be modified to facilitate easy and
quick removal with heavy machinery. The VF would be removed from the main
channel of the wash prior to the monsoon season or a major storm event. This
option is not operationally desirable because of the need to find a place to store
the fence after removal and the need to haul the fence, both actions are labor and
cost prohibitive.
Rebuild Post and Rail Fences with Deeper Foundations
This solution is less tamper proof then the recommended option, so it is not
operationally desirable.
Section 5. Recommendations
PF 225 Recommendations for High-Risk Washes
The IPT recommends that the existing drainage grates be removed and retrofitted
with vertical slides gate, concrete apron, and rip rap similar to the concept design
depicted in Figure F-8 in Appendix F. Table 2 summarizes the recommended
actions by order of priority.
Table 2. Recommendations: PF 225 High-Risk Washes
Flow
Fence ID Wash IDs Category Fence type direction
8
001041
Flow
Fence ID Wash IDs Category Fence type direction
Approx 500 feet
Nogales
East of Nogales
POE
POE 3 Bollards N
E-16 3 Mesh with grates S

D-2 W13 3 Mesh with grates S
E8 2 Mesh with grates S
W17 2 Mesh with grates S
E3 M1 (Christiansen) 3 Bollards with grates N
10 (Las Cuevita) 3 Bollards N
D-5B
44 3 Bollards N
D-5A 2 (Mariposa) 3 Bollards N
E2A 5 (Montezuma) 3 Bollards with grates S
M5 (BC Wash) 2 Staggered bollards N
M8 (gringo Wash) 3 Staggered bollards S
E2B M14 (Wash 33) 2 Staggered bollards N
st
M16 (1 Horseshoe) 3 Staggered bollards N
nd
M21 (2 horseshoe) 2 Staggered bollards N
A2L J6 3 Bollards with grates N

J9 3 Bollards with grates N
A2K J-1&2 (47+09) 3 Bollards with grates S

J-5 (70+50) 3 Bollards with grates N
VF 300 Recommendations for High-Risk Washes
For the very few washes with rail-on-post fence that are in high risk washes, the
IPT recommends removing the existing post foundation, post, and rail and replace
them with deep concrete shaft foundations, new posts with removable rails,
concrete aprons, and rip rap.
For the washes with Normandy fence, the IPT further recommends that the fence
be anchored as shown in Figure F-7 in Appendix F, adding concrete aprons and
RipRap. Table 3 lists the washes to be retrofitted in order of priority.
Table 3. Recommendations: VF 300 High-Risk Washes
Approximate
FEMA
Segment Crossing Category fence length to be
crossing
anchored (ft)
FV-1B C6 – Silver Creek 3 300+200 Zone A
9
001042
Approximate
FEMA
Segment Crossing Category fence length to be
crossing
anchored (ft)
C13 – Black Draw 3 450+200 Zone A
C14 – Hay Hollow 3 40+50+100 Zone A
EV2B 102 3 240 Zone A
6 3 100 Zone D
42 3 200 Zone D
52 2 50 Zone D
EV1A
53 3 100 Zone D
55 2 50 Zone D
61 3 70 Zone D
14 3 150 Zone D
A 3 240 Zone D
DV4B
6 3 270 Zone D
8 2 70 Zone D
EV1B F02 3 200 Zone B
HV-3 DA6 2 50 Zone X
CV2A Y6 2 180 Zone D
Note: Short definitions of FEMA zones: Zone A = area with 1 percent annual
chance floodplain; Zone C = areas outside the 1 percent annual chance floodplain; Zone D = areas
where flood hazards are possible, but undetermined; Zone X = areas outside the 1 percent annual
chance floodplain.
Recommendations for PF 225 Medium-Risk Wash Crossings
For PF 225 fence wash crossings that do not warrant retrofitting with the sluice
bollard gate concept design but are subjected to scour and erosion problems, the
IPT recommends the installation of Low Water Crossings (LWC) and rip rap.
Figure F-3 and F-4 in Appendix F provide details of the LWC and Rip Rap for
each flow direction.
The PF 225 fence segments and their associated wash crossings that should have
LWC and rip rap installed are summarized by order of priority in Table 4.
Table 4. Recommendations: PF 225 Medium-Risk Washes
Flow
Fence ID Wash IDs Fence type direction
A2A 2 Bollards S
A2D 52+13 Bollards with grates S
E2A 3 Bollards with grates S
A2J 51+75 Bollards with grates N
A2E 5+44 Bollards with grates S
A2D 60+57 Bollards with grates S
D5B 27 Bollards N
10
001043
Flow
Fence ID Wash IDs Fence type direction
D5A 4 Bollards N
D5B 28 Bollards with grates S
D2 E31 Mesh with grates S
D2 W1 Mesh with grates S
D5B 9 (Barranca Honda) Bollards N
D5A 1 Bollards N
A2N 3 Bollards with grates N
E3 US4 Bollards with grates S
E3 US2 Bollards S
E3 M4 Bollards with grates N
D5B 8 Bollards with grates N
E3 US5 Bollards S
L1 4 Bollards S
L1 1 Bollards S
D5B 1 Bollards N
D5B 26 Bollards N
L1 6 Bollards S
E3 M3 Bollards with grates N
I1A Subbasin 3 Bollards S
I1A Subbasin 4 Bollards S
Recommendations for Other VF 300 Medium-Risk Wash Crossings
The remaining vehicle fence segments and their associated wash crossings that
should have LWC and rip rap installed are summarized in Table 5 by order of
priority.
Table 5. Recommendations: VF 300 Medium-Risk Washes
Required Flow FEMA

Segment Crossing Fence type
installation direction crossing
BV-1 100 (Pinto) LWC & RipRap Normandy N Zone A

JV3 1 LWC & RipRap Normandy S Zone X
DV-3A 1 (San Simon) LWC & RipRap Rail on post S Zone D
DV-3A 4 (Chukut kuk) LWC & RipRap Rail on post S Zone D
HV-2 8 LWC & RipRap Normandy N Zone X
11
001044
Required Flow FEMA

DV-7 35 LWC & RipRap Rail and post S Zone D

FV-1B C5 LWC & RipRap Rail and post S Zone X
EV-1A 63 LWC & RipRap Normandy S Zone D
DV-4B 12 LWC & RipRap Rail and post S Zone D
DV-7 17 LWC & RipRap Rail and post S Zone D
DV-4A Basin 11 LWC Only Normandy S Zone D
FV-1B C21 LWC & RipRap Rail and post S Zone X
HV-3 DA1 LWC & RipRap Normandy N Zone X
FV-1B C17 (Cantina) LWC & RipRap Normandy S Zone X
FV-1B C50 LWC & RipRap Normandy S Zone X
HV-2 4 LWC & RipRap Normandy N Zone X
FV-1B C4 LWC Only Normandy N Zone D
EV-1B EV-1B_F-01 LWC & RipRap Normandy S Zone D
DV-4A Basin 1 LWC & RipRap Normandy S Zone D
FV-1B C24 LWC & RipRap Normandy N Zone X
DV-1 18 LWC & RipRap Normandy S Zone D
HV-3 DA4 LWC & RipRap Normandy S Zone X
FV-1B C52 LWC Only Normandy S Zone X
CV-2 16 LWC & RipRap Normandy S Zone D
CV-2 7 LWC & RipRap Rail on post S Zone D
12
001045
Required Flow FEMA


FV-1B C45 LWC Only Normandy S Zone X
DV-4C Basin 52 LWC & RipRap Normandy S Zone D
FV-1B C10 LWC & RipRap Normandy S Zone X
IV4 1 LWC & RipRap Rail on post S Zone X
Note: Zones A, C, D, and Z are as defined in Table 3.
Prioritizing Criteria
The risks facing the PF 225 and VF 300 fences have the following order of
priority:
1. Obstruction to the flow
2. Risking the structural integrity of VFs
3. Scour and erosion.
To mitigate these risks, the IPT recommends implementing the following four
projects listed in their order of priorities:
1. Retrofit PF with a sluice bollard gate and add scour protection
2. Anchor the VF and add scour protection
3. Add low-water crossings to washes with PFs
4. Add low-water crossings to washes with VFs.
13
001046
Each of these projects has several segments, which are listed below in priority
order:
 Highest priority: Washes falling in FEMA Zone A
 Higher priority: Washes with high velocity and high-flow depth
 High priority: Washes with lower velocity.
Section 6. ROM Cost Estimates

The IPT calculated unit costs to install a sluice Bollard gate, anchor a vehicle
fence, and scour protection. Appendix G shows the details of the costs presented
in this section.
Retrofitting PF 225 Fences
 Retrofitting approximately 160 gates into a fence with no grates:
Min: (b) (5)

Max:
 Retrofitting approximately 359 gates into a fence with grates:
Min: (b) (5)

Max:
 Scour protection for approximately 3,800 to 4,000 feet:
Min: (b) (5)

Max:
 Mobilization/demobilization and contingency:
Min: 3% + 15% = 18%

Max: 5% + 20% = 25%
Total approximate PF 225 retrofit cost:
Min:(b) (5)
Max
14
001047
Anchoring VF 300 Fences
 Anchoring approximately 3,310 feet of Normandy fence:
Number of anchors = 3310/16 = 207

Min: (b) (5)
Max:
 Scour protection for approximately 5,500 to 6,000 feet:
Min: (b) (5)

Max:
Min: 3% + 15% = 18%

Max: 5% + 20% = 25%
Total approximate VF 300 retrofit cost:
Min: (b) (5)

Max:
Building Scour Protection for 32 PF 225 Crossings
 Low-water crossings length:
Min length: 32 x 150’ = 4,800’

Max length: 32 x 250 = 8,000’
Min: 3% + 15% = 18%

Max: 5% + 20% = 25%
Total approximate PF 225 crossings scour protection cost:
Min: (b) (5)

Max:
Building Scour Protection for Approximately 62 VF 300 Crossings
 Low -water crossings length:

15
001048
Min length: 62 x 150’ = 9,300’

Max length: 62 x 250 = 15,500’
Min: 3% + 15% = 18%

Max: 5% + 20% = 25%
Total approximate VF 300 crossings scour protection cost:
Min: (b) (5)

Max:
Table 6 summarizes the costs for these recommendations.

Table 6. Summary of Costs
Min Max
(b) (5)
Retrofit PF 225 fence
Anchor VF 300 fence
Scour protection for PF 225 crossings
Scour protection for VF 300 crossings
Total
16
001049

IPT Report
APPENDIX A
IPT Charter & After Action Review

001050
Project Name
SBI-TI
PF-225 and VF-300 Border Fence projects
Technical IPT
Understanding of the Need
The major factor impacting the drainage across the fence is the debris. At wash crossings, the debris starts to
build up, clogging the fence openings and changing the hydraulics of the flow. This has a direct impact to
higher scour and erosion problems, as well as increase in water surface elevation due to the backwater effect.
Controlling the Debris during and after the storm event is needed in order to keep the flooding under control.
Another factor include the high pressure of the flow carrying heavy debris (i.e. waterbed rocks) and causing
the removal of the bollards from the ground and transported with the flow downstream, causing high safety
issues. The bollard fence need to have a special structural and foundation design or it must be removed from
the wash during monsoon seasons.
Deliverables/Objectives
To address the long term and short term solutions that will mitigate the drainage issues described above,
and coming up with a maintenance program to sustain the fence and the different alternatives.
Deliverables include design details of the different solutions, locations where these solutions need to be
implemented and when, requirements for a maintenance program.
Preliminary Statement of Work
The following steps describe the method used to reach a solution. Additional steps may be added pending
meeting outcomes.
Step 1: Collect all the crossings and group them into three flooding risk categories: Low, Intermediate and
High. This step include coming up with criteria and thresholds that will be used to group these crossings.
Step 2: Divide the intermediate risk crossings into two categories: High priority (currently under construction)
and Low priority (Constructed or Soon to be under construction). This step Assumes that the Low risk
crossings don’t require any action, and at high risk crossings will use a temporary fence that will be removed
during the monsoon season
Step 3: Provide a short term solution for the high priority crossings. Find a strategy or a way to implement this
solution, with its impact on the budget and construction schedule.
Step 4: Provide a long term solution for the high and low priority crossing. Find a strategy or a way to
implement this solution, with its impact on the budget and schedule of the incoming construction.
Step 5: Provide maintenance requirements for all three flooding risk categories
In Scope
- Review of hydrologic and hydraulic analysis produced for each report

- Produce criteria (non scientific) and have it approved by the IPT team. These criteria will set the
thresholds.
- Produce a typical detail for each solution.
- Include the pros and cons for each detail
- Preliminary cost estimate
- Produce meeting minutes
Known Risks
- Fences soon to be constructed may not include the proposed solutions in order to meet the deadlines
- The proposed solutions may have to be implemented after the fence is constructed (alteration to the
fence already installed)
001051
After Action Review (AAR)

The Monsoon Flooding Event on 12 July 2008 in
Lukeville, Arizona
And
The Effects of the International Boundary Fence
23 September 2008
US Army Corps of Engineers
(b) (6)
001052
After Action Review (AAR)

The Monsoon Flooding Event on 12 July 2008 in Lukeville, Arizona
And
The Effects of the International Boundary Fence
23 September 2008
Purpose
The purpose of this After Action Review is to determine the cause of the flooding in
Lukeville, Arizona on July 12, 2008 and to determine the implications of the D-2
Lukeville border fence on drainage and environmental conditions.
Introduction
On the afternoon of July 12, 2008, a severe monsoon event created flooding in the
Lukeville, Arizona area. During this event, the Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument
(OPCNM) recorded 1.99 inches of rainfall over a ninety (90) minute period. This event
was the first significant rainfall of the summer. Of the area along the fence involved in
the flooding, three noted locations of concern are the Lukeville Port of Entry (POE), the
Gringo Pass Store and the Sonoyta, Sonora, Mexican Port of Entry.
List of Documentation and References

1. Request For Proposal, D-2:AJO 3.1 Miles East to 2.1 Miles West of Lukeville, AZ
POE
2. Letter: Gringo Pass, Inc. July 14, 2008 to Lee Baiza, Superintendent: Organ Pipe
Cactus National Monument
3. U.S. Border Patrol: Monsoon Storm Flooding in Lukeville, Arizona Area
4. National Park Service, Effects if the International Boundary Pedestrian Fence in the
Vicinity of Lukeville, Arizona, on Drainage Systems and Infrastructure, Organ Pipe
Cactus National Monument August 2008
5. Kiewit/HNTB. Project D-2 AJO 3.1 Miles East to 2.1 Miles West of Lukeville, AZ
Poe Design Complete package: Drainage Report February 2008.
6. U.S. Border Patrol, Tucson Sector. Final Environmental Assessment for the proposed
installation, operation, and maintenance of primary pedestrian fence near Lukeville,
Arizona February 2008
7. National Weather Service Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service Precipitation
Analysis
Review of Documentation
The following sections are summaries of the documentation reviewed for this report.
The Request for Proposal (RFP) for D-2, Section 1.9.4. Drainage Report and its
accompanying technical appendix (Ref. 1) detailed the requirements for the contractor,
Kiewit Western Co., under Contract W912BV-07-D-2022, CQ02. The RFP had a
preliminary drainage report and a list of minimum requirements for the contractor to
perform which included 1) review of existing drainage and field verify existing wash
locations, 2) provide delineation maps, 3) determine local drainage runoff and sheet flow
conditions as they cross the fence location, 4) provide final hydraulics calculations by
001053
Figure 1: Watershed Delineation by Contractor (Ref. 5)

(b) (5)
001054

(b) (5)
001055

(b) (5)
001056
determining velocities associated with select fence type and rise in water surface
elevation, 5) provide final calculations on scour and/or long term degradation, 6) provide
details for fence wash crossing which satisfies rise in water surface elevation, 7) provide
details for protection against scour and long-term degradation, 8) show that cut fill
operation do not adversely affect the natural drainage patterns, 9) provide hydraulic
design and details for any other site drainage improvements, 10) provide final drainage
report and 11) coordinate with all applicable reviewing agencies. The included
preliminary report by Michael Baker Inc. shows a preliminary hydrologic analysis but no
analysis regarding hydraulics or scour.
A letter supplied by (b) (6) of Gringo Pass Inc to Lee Baiza, Superintendent of the
Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument (Ref. 2) stated that the July 12 storm flooded the
entire Gringo Pass Store. A flood occurred last year which flooded the back of the store.
It was stated that Border Patrol vehicles were getting stuck in mud and debris.
A report by the Office of Border Patrol (OBP) on Monsoon Storm Flooding in Lukeville,
Az. (Ref. 3) details three flooding issues: 1) the Lukeville POE, 2) the Gringo Pass store
and 3) the Mexican POE. The Lukeville POE contains an atrium in the center of the
building with a dry well system that drains into a 2.5 inch dry well that takes water out of
the building proper. Contributing factors of flooding stated in the report are the building
foundation at equal grade as the atrium and the end of the drain having been covered with
earth. It was stated that the Gringo Pass store flooding was due to a combination of
construction on low elevation, obstruction of flow from vegetation on the fence gate,
concrete rubble south of the fence in the wash, the amount of rain and its intensity, and
the vegetative ground cover spread (mulch) within the drainage location. The mulch
material was removed vegetation from the placement of the border fence that was given
to the OPCNM to grind into mulch and place in the watershed. Flooding at the Mexican
Port of Entry is attributed to the structure, which is 1 ft below the existing grade, being
built in the flood plain. The contractor, the Corps of Engineers (USACE) and OBP
personnel met on site to discuss possible causes. Elevation surveys of the areas were
performed to determine the Gringo Pass store and the Mexican POE were in the
floodplain. Also, it was reasoned that the first flood of the season would produce most of
the debris. The recommendations made were 1) placement of a pressure release system
in the fence on the west side of the wash, 2) insure that the washes are channeled properly
and that debris does not build up against the fence and 3) retrofit sections of the existing
fence with a hybrid 4” bollard design to facilitate maximum water flow.
A report from the Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument (OPCNM) of the Nation Park
Service (NPS) (Ref. 4) documents the July 12th event and the performance of the fence
during a flash food and the effects on the floodplains and channel morphology. The July
12 event recorded 1.99 inches of within 90 minutes based on a climate station for the
National Atmospheric Deposition Program operated by the Nation Park Service. The
location of this measurement was at the OPCNM headquarters. Another rain gage
located 1.5 miles west-northwest of the Lukeville measured 1.25 inches in 105 minutes.
The radar rainfall estimate for that day from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
001057
Administration (NOAA) shows the thunderstorm centered north of Lukeville, in the

vicinity of the OPCNM headquarters, with a very small region receiving rain in excess of
2.5 inches. The NPS states that the July 12th storm occurs regularly within OPCNM,
placing the reoccurrence between once every 3-5 years. NPS states that the drainage
areas delineated by the Contractor are for W13 or “Victoria Wash” and E31 or “Estes
wash” are undersized because OPCNM delineations are more accurate. United States
Geographic Survey (USGS) equations used were not applicable in areas under 1730 ft in
elevation. Mainstream flood flows were contained in flow reaching the fence however
a combination of debris flow blockage and “subsurface sediment flow” impeded by the
foundation of the fence contributed to the flooding. Documentation of water levels was
up to 7 ft above the foundation wall at W13. Blockages caused lateral flows at the fence
will a) cause scour and b) cause flow to enter different washes. The blockages at
Headquarters Wash (W1) were the cause of the Gringo Store and Lukeville POE
flooding. Ponding of water was not noticed at the fence for the July 12th storm, however
it was noticed upstream of the fence where patrol road elevations are above natural
surface elevations; in turn, vegetation change is expected in locations where water pools.
The conclusion that a) the accelerated scour will comprise the integrity of the fence b)
lateral flows will erode the patrol road and the pedestrian fence. c) Vegetation will
change which will change rainfall retention, d) riparian vegetation will change due to the
increase of sedimentation, and e) channel morphology will change over time where
channelized water will gully.
The design of the pedestrian fence was accomplishment by Kiewit with the drainage
report by HNTB (Ref. 5). The report requirements were as detailed in the RFP. Also,
design criteria included the United States International Boundary and Water Commission
(USIBWC) limit of the water surface elevation rise due to the fence for a 100-year
frequency event to 6 inches in rural areas. Security criteria includes a maximum 6” gap
between vertical members used if there are no horizontal members are used and a
maximum clear opening that would prevent someone from being able to create a 2’ by 2’
gap in the fence within a 15- minute timeframe if both vertical and horizontal members
are used for the fence. The contractor’s precipitation calculations were based on NOAA
Atlas 14 Point Precipitation Frequency Estimates at the approximate location of the
Lukeville POE. Wash crossings were determined from available topography, mapping,
and detailed site visits. Drainage area calculations were based on USGS topology,
although it was not specific on what topology was used. The 100-year peak discharge for
the washes were determined in 2 ways: 1) for sub area greater than 10 square miles,
USGS Regression equations for Arizona Region 13 were used, 2) for regions under 10
square miles, the National Resources Conservation Service NRCS method was used. The
hydraulics were performed in two parts, 1) HEC-RAS and Bentley’s FlowMaster
program was used to determine the water surface elevation of the wash prior to the gate
and 2) The head loss equation used was the USACE equation for vertical racks to
determine the increase in the water surface elevation when the flow reaches the gate. The
water surface elevation results were added to the head loss to achieve a final water
surface elevation. Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) contour mapping, aerial
photography and field surveys were used to determine wash characteristics and to model
the wash crossings. The two boundary conditions used were the 100-year peak flow rate
001058
determined in the hydrology analysis and normal depth. It was assumed that the gates
would be cleared prior to a flood event and no debris would be capture on the fence
which would create blockage. High Performance Turf Reinforce Mats (HPTRM) was
set downstream of the border fence to prevent scour on locations where the modeled
velocity was greater than 4 fps. The HPTRM is expected to hold up to velocities of 10
fps.
The Final Environmental Assessment (EA) for the proposed installation, operation, and
maintenance of primary pedestrian fence near Lukeville, Arizona February 2008 (Ref. 6)
states that “Furthermore, in most washes or arroyos, the primary pedestrian fence would
be designed and constructed to ensure proper conveyance of floodwaters and to eliminate
the potential to cause backwater flooding on either side of the U.S.-Mexico border. CBP
(U.S. Customs and Border Protection) will remove debris from the fence within
washes/arroyos immediately after rain events to ensure that no backwater flooding
occurs.”
Site Visit
A site visit of the D-2 border fence occurred on September 3, 2008. The site visit
reviewed the fence 1 mile West and 3.1 miles East from the Lukeville Port of Entry.
There had been a storm on August 26th, and the fence had not been maintained since the
storm. It was reported that there was no flooding in the Lukeville POE or Gringo Pass
Store during the August 26th storms. Three days of radar satellite imagery from NOAA
are shown in Figures 4-6. The W1 border fence location showed large debris captured at
the grate (Fig. 7), sedimentation on the approach to the fence (Fig. 8) and the HPTRM
downstream of the fence was wrapped around the post-and-rail (Fig. 9). Sedimentation
was shown just upstream of the fence (Fig. 10). Standing water was seen just
downstream on the Mexican side of the wash. Large obstructions exist just downstream
on the Mexican side (Fig. 11) W4 had a small amount of debris build up (Fig.12). The
W5 fence crossing had a pool of water at the fence (Fig 13). The fence crossings at W7,
W9 and W10 were free of debris. The fence crossing at W11 had a standing pool of
water (Fig 14). The fence crossing at W13 had debris, sedimentation and erosion
downstream of the fence with HPTRM wrapped around the downstream post-and-rail
(Fig 15-17).
Due to the reported flooded at the Lukeville POE, the AAR team investigated the
building’s office atrium. The atrium drains the roof and all of the water captured within
the atrium into three floor drains located within the atrium (Fig 18). The water drains to a
location near fence crossing E1. The end of the drain was reportedly covered at the time
of the July 12th flood but was daylighted before the site visit. The E1 fence crossing was
clean of debris during the site visit. Crossings E2-E7 were either clean of debris or had a
relatively small amount of debris. The E8 crossing, which has a tributary drainage area of
14.7 sq. mi., collected significant debris and sediment at the crossing (Fig. 19-21). The
soil was eroded around the downstream post-and-rail foundation (Fig. 22). Erosion was
seen east of the E8 fence crossing, along the upstream toe of the fence (Fig. 23). Debris
was shown at the fence crossing at E9 (Fig 24, 25). The fence crossing at E13, which has
001059
Figure 4. NOAA Radar Satellite for Aug 26

001060
Figure 7. W1 crossing.
001061
Figure 8. Sedimentation in the approach wash for W1
Figure 9. HPTRM wrapped around the downstream post and rail

001062
Figure 10: W1. Sedimentation just upstream of the fence.
Figure 11. Site W1: Pool downstream of the fence

001063
Figure 12. Debris at W4
Figure 13. Ponding at the W5 crossing

001064
Figure 14. W11 fence crossing, upstream side
Figure 15. W13 crossing, upstream side

001065
Figure 16. W13 crossing
Figure 17 HPTRM rapped around the fence post-and-rail downstream of fence W13
001066
Figure 18. Center drain at Lukeville POE building atrium
Figure 19. Debris build up at E8

001067
Figure 20. A closer look at the debris build up at E8
Figure 21. Sedimentation at E8

001068
Figure 22. Erosion at downstream side of the E8 fence crossing
Figure 23. Erosion at upstream side of the of E8/E9 crossing

001069
Figure 24.Sediment at E9
Figure 25. Debris at E9

001070
a tributary drainage area of 0.6 sq. mi., did not have any debris build up (Fig 26). E16,
which has a tributary drainage of 14.7 sq. mi., had significant debris and scour
downstream of the fence (Fig. 27-29). Gabbions and K-Rail, presumably used to support
the post and rail, were exposed by the 3-4 foot downstream scour hole. Sedimentation
was evident on the patrol road. Wash crossing E29, which has a drainage of 0.6 sq mi,
had debris build up of tree branches, vegetative material and sedimentation (Fig. 30). The
fence crossing the E30 wash shows significant erosion on its west side on the upstream
side of the fence likely due to lateral flow along the fence (Fig. 31). Debris clogging is
also evident. E31 captured debris at the wash crossing and west along the wire mesh of
the fence (Fig. 32,33)
Analysis
As stated, the July 12th storm accumulated 1.99 in of rain within 90 minutes. This
amount of rain for that short of duration according to NOAA 14 point precipitation
frequency estimates for the Organ Pipe National Monument classifies it between 10-year
and a 25-year storm. The highest volume of recent rainfall for a day is approximately the
2.5 inches which occurred from 0500 26 August to 0500 27 August, Mountain Standard
Time (MST). This amount can be substantiated by the gage recording at the Organ Pipe
Cactus Nation Monument rain gage, which preliminary records show 2.62 inches 24 hour
period ending 27 August 2008. NOAA 1- Day Precipitation for 12 July 2008 0500 MST
to 13 July 2008 500 MST are shown in Figure 34. The design for the pedestrian fence is
based on a 100-year, 24-hour frequency storm. The contractor used an adequate data
source to determine 100-year 24-hour storm.
Under the conditions of these two storms, the border fence is shown ineffective to allow
large debris material to pass. Even after the clearing of “first flush debris” of the
watershed on July 12th, there was still significant amount of debris found on the wash
crossings with large tributary drainage areas from the storm on August 26th. With the
large debris in the fence, sediments and vegetation are less likely to pass through, and in
turn, can accumulate with large debris and clog the lower portion of the fence (see figure
19). The obstruction can cause backwater effects, lateral flows along the fence,
flows flowing over the crest of the debris which may cause significant vortex forces at
the downstream footing of fence, which would lead to scour, endangering the structural
integrity of the fence. The backwater can cause sediment and vegetation to settle out of
the flow before the fence. Lateral flows can cause scour along the upstream side of the
fence, and allow flow to pass the fence at another wash location.
The contractor, in the design of the fence, considers the obstruction of the fence in the
wash contributing to head loss of a 100-year storm, however, does not include debris
collected during the storm in their calculation of the rise of the water surface elevation
due to the fence. The design addresses this on page 10 of the Design Complete package
Drainage Report: Kiewit HNTB:
“The fence design permits the passage of flows with minimal effects upstream of the
International Boundary resulting from flows backing up behind the fence. This is true
with the assumption that and debris caught on the fence during a storm event will be
001071
Figure 26. E13 Wash Crossing
Figure 27. Downstream scour at E16 crossing.

001072
Figure 28. Debris captured at E16
Figure 29. Debris captured at E16

001073
Figure 30. Debris at Wash E29 Crossing
Figure 31. Erosion east of E30 wash crossing

001074
Figure 32. Debris at E31
Figure 33. Debris remaining west of E31 crossing

001075
Figure 34. NOAA observed precipitation on July 12th rainstorm
cleared by the Border Portal or designated maintenance personnel within a reasonable

timeframe. Debris left in place causing significant blockage of flow area could cause an
eventual backwater rise beyond those calculated in this report.” The RFP drainage
report does not explicitly state that debris calculations will be performed or considered
when determining the rise in elevation due to the placement of the fence.
It does not appear that the vegetative material collected at the fence was mulch. There is
no confirmation on the report by the Office of Border Patrol stating the vegetative
material from the construction of the border fence was turned into mulch and deposited
within the watershed.
The HPTRM showed to be ineffective at the fence crossing W1 and W13. Both are large
washes where respective tributary drainage areas are greater than 1 sq. mi. The HPTRM
was caught in the downstream post-and-rail fence and likely add to the obstruction of
flow and backwater effects. It is unknown whether the failure was due to poor installation
or unanticipated flow conditions. There is scour on the downstream side of W13, E8, and
E16.
Scour at the footing on the upstream side of the fence can be seen through inspection at
E8 and E30. Scour at those sites likely incurred due to significant lateral flows. Lateral
flows traveled beyond the grate design area and into areas which only contained mesh
wire, as shown at fence crossing E30 and E31, which indicates the design did not account
for flows within that area (Fig 30, 32).
The OPCNM Report has stated that the flows on July 12th at fence crossing at W13
reached up to 7 feet from the toe of the fence. According to Contractor’s report, the 100-
year storm at W13 will reach 4.59 feet above the toe.
001076
There were some instances of pooling of water in some site west of Lukeville (W1, W5,
W11). The pooling of water can be attributed to a difference in grade between the
downstream Mexican and border fence. It is unknown where this difference existed in
the past and pooling was common in these areas. Requirements by the RFP state that the
contractor will provide details for preventing ponding of water at the fence.
The memo prepared by (b) (6) for Gringo Pass Inc. stated that this years flooding in
the store was worst than last year. It is presumed that the post-and-rail fence was the only
erected obstruction last year. No information is available on the volume and duration of
last year’s storm. The Gringo Store is close to the fence crossing wash W1, and the
pedestrian fence was likely responsible for capturing more debris at the crossing than in
years past. The comparable storm on August 26th did not cause the same flooding in the
in the region. One important change was 120 feet of the east side W1 berm was raised 3
feet to protect the store from flooding. The store did not incur flooding on August 26th. It
is unknown if a 25-year storm alone would have flooded the area in the same manner; the
Gringo Pass Store does lie in the 100-year flood plain, but it is unknown if it lies in a 25-
year or 10-year floodplain.
The Lukeville POE flooding on July 12th could have been caused in part by the W1
backwater effects. The blockage of the atrium drain was responsible for the building’s
internal flooding. The subsequent storm on August 26th did not cause flooding in the
area. It is assumed that the berm as well as the clearance of the drain prevented flooding.
The language in the Final EA states “Furthermore, in most washes or arroyos, the
primary pedestrian fence would be designed ad constructed to ensure proper conveyance
of floodwaters and to eliminate the potential to cause backwater flooding on either side of
the U.S.-Mexico border. CBP will remove debris from the fence within washes/arroyos
immediately after rain events to ensure that no backwater flooding occurs.” Most of the
major washes here, according to the contractor’s HEC-RAS simulation, are subcritical
flows, therefore, an increase in height at the fence is propagated upstream. Under the
USIBWC, the fence can increase the water surface elevation at the fence at 3 inches in
urban area and 6 inches for rural areas. Conceivably, these 3 and 6 inch criteria may not
cause backwater effects if it does not cause the flow to enter the floodplain. If the flow is
out of the floodplain, then the 3 and 6 inches increase at the fence may increase the
flooding. Therefore, under certain conditions, the 3-6 inch allowable criteria are contrary
to the EA criterion of no backwater flooding.
Conclusion
It is unknown whether the fence was a major factor impacting the flooding at the Gringo
Pass Store and the Lukeville POE. Under the conditions of the August 26th storm the
Gringo Pass Store did not flood. The three foot rise of the berm on the east side of W1
likely helped prevent the flooding from occurring. The Lukeville POE, with the berm
being raised and the end of the atrium drain being cleared helped the building from being
flooded.
001077
The larger washes, where the tributary drainage area at the fence crossing is greater than
1 sq. mi., showed many instances of debris, sediment and vegetation being captured in
the border fence. The debris at W13 is likely causing an increase in the water surface
elevation at the fence which is greater than the 100-year elevation. Therefore, the rise in
the water surface elevation is possibly greater than the 6 inches permitted by the
USIBWC design criteria. Another possibility of the unexpected rise of the water surface
elevation at the fence could be in the discrepancy in the tributary drainage area between
the results from the Contractor and the NPS report. The Contractor estimate of 2,839
acres is 774 acres less than NPS estimate of 3,613 acres. There is not enough data at the
other sites which experienced significant debris blockage to determine if those sites did
not meet the USIBWC criteria.
The contractor did not consider blockage of the debris in calculations of the rise in water
surface elevation from existing to proposed conditions, which, depending on the severity,
can increase the water surface elevation at the location of the fence. Instead the contractor
assumed that any debris would be cleared before the next storm and no debris would
build during the storm. There was no explicit guidance or requirement in the RFP to
consider debris, however, the contractor should have assumed that debris would have
built up against the fence and blocked the small openings available for flow to pass.
The blockage of the fence due to debris is likely adding to downstream scour due to water
flowing over the crest of the blockage and causing significant vortices at the downstream
footing of the fence, dislodging HPTRM and creating scour at the downstream side of the
fence. There are instances on the upstream portion of the fence where lateral flows are
causing scour. Erosion is seen in locations where the pedestrian fence does not have the
grate portion, but simply the wire mesh, hence the floodplain cast by the storm is greater
than the expected design 100-year floodplain. The requirements of the RFP states that the
contractor will provide details for protection of scour and/or long term degradation along
with preventing ponding of water at the fence location, however, the scour and ponding
still occurred, therefore, the contractor seemingly did not meet the design and RFP
requirements.
Given the criteria for both the USIBWC and RFP requirements, it would appear the fence
is not performing as originally intended. Debris will accumulate on the fence given the
tolerances required to keep people out. In addition, continuous maintenance after every
flood event is required to clear debris from the openings.
Recommendations
(b) (5)
001078
(b) (5)
001079

IPT Report
APPENDIX B
Wash Ranking Tables for PF 225

001080
Project: SBI - TI , Technical IPT

Title: Table B-1: PF 225 washes and data
Date: 4/23/09
Normal Flow Estimated

Q V Bed Slope FEMA
Segment Crossing Depth Direction (N Notes Construction RANK
(cfs) (ft/s) Load (%) Crossing
(ft) / S) Start Date
Final dranage report not received.

Preliminary Analysis done for two major
A-1 1 7554 34.530 6.61 18.000 wash Zone D 2009 3
Final dranage report not received.
Preliminary Analysis done for two major
A-1 2 7028 35.800 7.86 16.000 wash Zone D 2009 3
A-2A 2 2124 2.870 11.49 S 5.300 Proposed Conditon HEC-RAS Data Zone X 8-Nov-08 2
A-2B 100 0.000 Crossing was not identified Zone X 15-Nov-08 1
A-2C 1+37 13 7.880 0.38 S 13.000 Flow Master Data Zone X 1-Dec-08 2
A-2D 36+35 9 6.770 0.28 S 16.000 Flow Master Data Zone X 16-Dec-08 2
A-2E 5+87 7 4.380 0.38 S 4.000 Flow Master Data Zone X 18-Dec-08 1
A-2E 5+44 95 20.440 0.84 S 37.000 Flow Master Data Zone X 18-Dec-08 2
A-2F 100 7 8.730 1.38 S 50.000 Culvert Data Zone X 8-Nov-08 2
A-2G 8 206 1.930 5.41 S 5.000 Proposed Conditon HEC-RAS Data Zone X 10-Dec-08 2
A-2G 2 8 7.850 1.49 N 50.000 Culvert Data Zone X 10-Dec-08 2
A-2G 9 5.40 6.900 1.19 N 50.000 Culvert Data Zone X 10-Dec-08 2
A-2I 0+79 0.78 4.240 0.49 S 9.300 Flow Master Data Zone D 2-Nov-08 1
A-2J 52+67 15.53 8.16 0.58 S 8.040 Flow Master Data Zone D 2-Nov-08 2
A-2J 51+75 174.00 13.17 3.67 N 5.124 Flow Master Data Zone D 2-Nov-08 2
A-2I 40+00 1.52 6.000 0.60 N 15.700 Flow Master Data Zone D 2-Nov-08 2
A-2K J-1 (48+50) 1 1.000 1.00 S 0.700 Drainage Report Zone D 17-Dec-08 1
A-2K J-1&J-2 (47+09) 6300 7.000 6.00 S 1.100 Drainage Report Zone D 17-Dec-08 3
A-2K J-5 (70+50) 6400 8.00 5.50 N 2.600 Drainage Report Zone D 17-Dec-08 3
A-2L J-6 (23+48) 17234 4.000 6.00 N 2.500 Drainage Report Zone D 17-Dec-08 3
A-2N 3 334 7.650 1.35 N 5.100 HEC-RAS Data Zone D 1-Nov-08 2
A-2N 4 96 2.610 0.67 N 10.000 HEC-RAS Data Zone D 1-Nov-08 1
B2 1 50 0.000 Final Drainage Report not Available Zone X not awarded 1
H&H was not done in the final drainage
B4 1 0 0.000 report Zone X 1
B4 4 1515 0.000 report Zone A 1
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\IPT meetings- debris\IPT report revised May 2009\Appendix B\Table 1- PF225 washes and data.xls
001081

Date: 4/23/09

Q V Bed Slope FEMA

B5A 1 220 0.000 Drainage Report Missing Zone D 1
B5B 1 11 0.000 report (San Dune Area) Zone D 1
C-1 22 21 1.990 0.49 0.500 HEC-RAS Data, All other wash are small Zone X 1
D2 W22 18 9.300 0.83 S 22.000 Flow Master Data Zone X Completed 2
D2 W14 810 5.250 2.72 S 1.100 HEC-RAS Data Zone X Completed 2
D2 W1 2796 4.960 5.94 S 0.980 HEC-RAS Data Zone A Completed 2
D2 E1 55 2.330 0.78 S 1.000 HEC-RAS Data Zone X Completed 1
D2 E2 12 1.640 0.46 S 2.670 Flow Master Data Zone X Completed 1
D2 E19 45 2.530 3.01 S 1.010 HEC-RAS Zone X Completed 2
D2 E20 2335 2.530 3.01 S 1.010 HEC-RAS Zone X Completed 2
001082

Date: 4/23/09

Q V Bed Slope FEMA
Flow Master Data (using 2' contour and

M1
D-5 244 19.45 1.56 N 19.500 PDR) Zone D not awarded 2
M2
M3
M4
M5
M6
US1
D-5 24 7.57 0.26 S 21.100 PDR) Zone D not awarded 2
US2
US3
US4
US5
US6
US7
US8
US9
Flow Master Data (using 2'
2 contour and
US10
US11
D-5A 1 950 7.250 1.44 N 3.450 PDR) Zone D Completed 2
D-5B 1 439 3.110 5.50 N 1.000 HEC-RAS results Zone C 2009 2
D-5B 02a 5 0.860 0.55 N 29.000 HEC-RAS results Zone C 2009 1
D-5B 5b 16 1.870 1.81 N 31.000 HEC-RAS results Zone C 2009 1
D-5B 20a 104 0.980 2.01 S 5.500 HEC-RAS results Zone C 2009 2
D-5B 25c 123 0.88 3.95 N 2.500 HEC-RAS results Zone C 2009 2
D-5B 28 1325 7.61 6.33 S 0.780 HEC-RAS results Zone C 2009 3
D-5B 43.50 50 1.68 3.94 S 8.000 HEC-RAS results Zone C 2009 2
D-5B 43.70 5 0.83 0.85 S 21.000 HEC-RAS results Zone C 2009 1
001083

Date: 4/23/09

Q V Bed Slope FEMA
D-5B 44 7791 7.50 9.6 N 3.300 HEC-RAS results Zone A 2009 3

D-5B 44.50 23 0.76 1.13 N 6.500 HEC-RAS results Zone C 2009 1
D-5B 47c 16 0.65 0.65 N 20.000 HEC-RAS results Zone C 2009 1
D-5B 61 & 62 9 4.30 0.33 N 11.000 HEC-RAS results Zone C 2009 1
D-6 1 32 4.32 1.15 S 3.000 HEC-RAS results Zone C 17-Nov-08 2
D-6 3 8.00 5.69 0.66 S 11.000 HEC-RAS results Zone C 17-Nov-08 2
D-6 5 8 S 15.000 Small Wash, Analysis not done Zone C 17-Nov-08 1
D-6 7 4 S 11.000 Small Wash, Analysis not done Zone C 17-Nov-08 1
D-6 8 S 0.000 Small Wash, Analysis not done Zone C 17-Nov-08 1
D6
D-6 9 14 3.00 0.30 S 5.300 HEC RAS results
HEC-RAS Zone C 17 Nov 08
17-Nov-08 1
D-6 12 48 S 3.300 Analysis not done Zone C 17-Nov-08 1
D-6 17 26 1.86 0.22 N 4.400 HEC-RAS results Zone C 17-Nov-08 1
D-6 18 8 2.28 0.42 N 3.200 HEC-RAS results Zone C 17-Nov-08 1
D-6 19A 51 1.80 0.96 N 1.600 HEC-RAS results Zone C 15-Dec-08 1
D-6 19B 8 3.24 0.29 N 8.300 HEC-RAS results Zone C 15-Dec-08 1
D-6 20A 2 3.32 0.30 N 11.000 HEC-RAS results Zone C 15-Dec-08 1
D-6 20B 40 2.21 0.52 N 1.800 HEC-RAS results Zone C 15-Dec-08 1
D-6 21 20 3.82 0.70 N 4.000 HEC-RAS results Zone C 15-Dec-08 1
E-2A 1 1-Dec-08 1
Covered in Wash 1 and 2, Segment EV-2A, VF 300 Ranking Tables
E-2A 2 1-Dec-08 1
E-2A 3 194 14.040 1.74 S 5.650 Proposed Condition flow is more Zone X 1-Dec-08 2
E-2A 5 2825 12.400 3.10 S 5.520 Montezuma Wash Zone X 1-Dec-08 3
E-2A 7 738 7.500 3.13 S 1.910 Zone X 1-Dec-08 3
E-2A 8 26 3.380 0.36 S 2.860 Zone X 1-Dec-08 1
E-2B M1 170 3.690 1.04 N 1.400 Zone X 2
E-2B M2 60 3.58 0.61 N 2.000 Zone X 1
E-2B M3 40 2.57 0.35 N 2.900 Zone X 1
E-2B M4 110 3.01 0.55 N 2.000 Zone X 2
E-2B M5 390 4.01 0.88 N 1.750 BC Wash Zone X 2
E-2B M6 30 2.35 0.23 N 4.000 Zone X 1
E-2B M7 210 4.43 1.03 N 1.880 Zone X 2
E-2B M8 3640 7.81 3 N 1.250 Gringo Wash Zone X 3
E-2B M9 20 1.27 0.16 N 1.250 Zone X 1
E-2B M10 30 1.8 0.33 N 1.500 Zone X 1
E-2B M11 110 5.07 0.33 N 1.285 Zone X 2
E-2B M12 50 2.32 0.63 N 1.200 Zone X 1
E-2B M13 550 5.93 2.46 N 1.500 Zone X 2
E-2B M14 2390 5.52 1.76 N 1.330 wash 33 Zone X 2
E-2B M15 130 5.54 0.9 N 2.500 Zone X 2
E-2B M16 3010 6.88 3.77 N 1.560 1st Horshoe Zone X 3
E-2B M17 50 2.18 0.25 N 1.900 Zone X 1
E-2B M18 80 2.94 0.37 N 2.000 Zone X 1
E-2B M19 510 3.4 1.31 N 0.800 Zone X 2
E-2B M20 20 1.61 0.2 N 2.000 Zone X 1
E-2B M21 860 4.6 1.93 N 0.750 2nd Horshoe Zone X 2
001084

Date: 4/23/09

Q V Bed Slope FEMA
E-3 M1 12840 7.410 9.14 N 0.300 Christiansen Wash Zone X Completed 3

E-3 M2 61 3.810 0.39 N 2.000 HEC-RAS Data Zone X Completed 1
E-3 M2B 58 5.380 0.93 N 1.900 HEC-RAS Data Zone X Completed 2
E-3 US2 3500 4.260 2.27 S 1.200 HEC-RAS Data Zone A Completed 2
E-3 US3 160 2.240 0.64 S 0.760 HEC-RAS Data Zone X Completed 1
E-3 US4 2590 4.490 10.65 S 0.650 HEC-RAS Data Zone A Completed 2
E-3 US5 540 4.390 1.71 S 0.870 HEC-RAS Data Zone X Completed 2
F-1 Basin 1-4 (213+00 3201 6.610 2.02 S 1.000 Data from irregular channel worksheet Zone X 17-Nov-08 3
F-1 Basin 5 (198+00) 555 7.230 0.84 S 0.560 Data from irregular channel worksheet Zone X 17-Nov-08 2
H-1 100 1
H2-A 100 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.000 Not awarded yet 1
H-3 100 1
H-4 100 1
I-1A Subbasin 1 427.0 0.95 1.00 S 0.350 From Tetra Tech Drainage Report Zone X 1
I1-B 100 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.000 Not Awarded Zone X 1
From Tetra Tech Drainage Report for
J-1 1 221.0 0.98 1.00 2.000 Santa Teresa POE Zone X 1
J-2 1a 299.4 0.00 1.00 0.340 From Psomas Drainage Report Zone X 1
J-2 2a 49.2 0.00 1.00 0.900 From Psomas Drainage Report Zone X 1
K-1 B 2810 10.01 1 S 5.14 TOE OF LEVEE Zone X 1
K-1A 100 S TOE OF LEVEE 1
K-1B 100 S TOE OF LEVEE 1
K-1C 100 S ON LEVEE 1
K-2A 100 S TOE OF LEVEE 1
K-2B 100 S TOE OF LEVEE 1
K-2C 100 S TOE OF LEVEE 1
K-2D 100 S TOE OF LEVEE 1
K-3 100 S TOE OF LEVEE 1
L-1 1 3635 1.63 3.48 S 0.03 ON LEVEE Zone A 2
L-1 2 1371 1.87 2.17 S 0.03 Zone A 1
L-1 3 2147 1.87 4.37 S 0.03 Zone A 1
L-1 4 3437 2.64 6.63 S 0.03 Zone A 2
L-1 5 2900 1.97 4.95 S 0.03 Zone A 1
L-1 6 760 1.97 5.17 S 0.03 Zone A 2
L-1A 100 S ON LEVEE 1
L-1B 100 S ON LEVEE 1
Values from Table 3 and Table 4 from
M-1 8+00 96 2.59 1.92 S 0.0117 Final Drainage Report Zone X 1
M-1 68+50 6.5 1.92 0.62 S 0.0137 Final Drainage Report Zone X 1
M-1 72+50 108 1.34 2 S 0.007 Final Drainage Report Zone X 1
001085

Date: 4/23/09

Q V Bed Slope FEMA

M-2A Rio Grande 233077 S NO ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1
ASSUMPTIONS MADE BASED OFF OF
M-2B 203+50 20 1 1 S 0.1 REPORT TEXT Zone A 1
FENCE DOES NOT ACTUALLY CROSS
M-2B 228+20 6750 7.91 11 S 0.0018 WASH - App A Zone A 1
M 2B
M-2B 237+20 19 7
19.7 1 1 S 01
0.1 REPORT TEXT Zone A 1
M-2B 249+20 19.1 1 1 S 0.1 REPORT TEXT Zone A 1
O-4A 100 S ON LEVEE 1
O-4B 100 S ON LEVEE 1
O-5 100 S ON LEVEE 1
O-6B/C 100 S ON LEVEE 1
O-9B 100 S ON LEVEE 1
O-11 STA 38+25 54.84 2.22 1.99 S 0.2 Tables in Appendix C 2-Dec-08 1
O-12 STA 00+65 79.95 1.97 1.87 S 1.67 Table 1B: Ditch Backwater Computations 1-Dec-08 1
O-13 STA 38+30 22361 2.13 1.81 S 0.5 Tables in Appendix C Zone C 1-Dec-08 1
O-14 100 S ON LEVEE 1-Dec-08 1
O-15 STA 101+90 22.61 2 1.56 S 0.2 Tables in Appendix C 1-Dec-08 1
O-16 STA 86+65 22.61 1.41 0.88 S 1 Tables in Appendix C 1-Dec-08 1
O-17 4+00 415 0.91 2.39 S 0.2 Tables in Appendix C Zone C 1-Dec-08 1
O-18 100 S no report - ON LEVEE 1-Dec-08 1
O-19 100 S ON LEVEE 1-Dec-08 1
O-20 STA 6+65 20.35 2.83 1.13 S Tables in Appendix C 1-Dec-08 1
001086

Date: 4/23/09

Q V Bed Slope FEMA

O 21
O-21 STA 640 65
640+65 23.39 1.7 1.55 S Tables in Appendix C 1 Dec 08
1-Dec-08 1
001087
Title: Table B-2: Criteria Table used to categorize washes

Date: 5/15/09
MAX MAX Q (CFS)= 100 500 1000 3000 >3000

Velocity MAX FLOW DEPTH (FT)= 1 3 5 >5 1 3 5 >5 1 3 5 >5 1 3 5 >5 1 3 5 >5
(fps) MAX SLOPE %
02
0.2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2
0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
3
1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
>1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3
0.2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
0.5 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
5
1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3
>1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 3
0.2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3
0.5 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
10
1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 3
>1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3
0.2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 3
0.5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 3 3
>10
1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
>1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\IPT meetings- debris\IPT report revised May 2009\Appendix B\Table 2- PF225 Criteria Table used to categorize washes.xls
001088
Table B-3
PF225: List of Category 2 washes
Flow Normal
Q V
Segment Crossing Direction Depth
(cfs) (ft/s)
(N / S) (ft)
A-2A 2 S 2124.0 2.9 11.5
1+37 S 12.5 7.9 0.4
16+03 S 2.5 5.6 0.3
25+22 S 36.3 6.1 0.7
A-2C 6+95 S 32.5 7.9 0.5
36+35 S 9.0 6.8 0.3
38+28 S 87.5 11.7 0.8
39+02 S 3.0 5.2 0.3
48+63 S 13.8 6.2 0.5
A-2D 60+57 S 70.0 16.1 0.8
A-2E 5+44 S 95.0 20.4 0.8
A-2F 100 S 7.0 8.7 1.4
2 N 8.0 7.9 1.5
8 S 206.0 1.9 5.4
A-2G 9 N 5.4 6.9 1.2
A-2N 3 N 334.0 7.7 1.4
E6 S 195.0 1.3 4.0
W1 S 2796.0 5.0 5.9
W2 S 4.0 6.0 0.4
W22 S 18.0 9.3 0.8
W17 S 13.0 5.3 2.7
W16 S 14.0 5.3 2.7
W15 S 3.0 5.3 2.7
W14 S 810.0 5.3 2.7
E8 S 5875.0 2.7 6.6
E9 S 94.0 2.7 6.6
E17 S 33.0 4.5 8.4
E19 S 45.0 2.5 3.0
E20 S 2335.0 2.5 3.0
E29 S 371.0 1.4 3.9
E31 S 1591.0 7.1 2.5
E32 S 3.0 7.1 2.5
D2 E33 S 16.0 7.1 2.5
M1 N 244.0 19.5 1.6
M2 N 158.0 11.7 0.6
M3 N 505.0 15.4 2.3
M4 N 458.0 14.7 2.7
US1 S 24.0 7.6 0.3
US10 S 24.0 5.2 0.3
US11 S 13.0 6.5 0.3
US3 S 99.0 10.8 1.0
US4 S 16.0 9.0 0.3
US5 S 44.0 13.6 0.9
US6 S 37.0 9.7 0.5
US8 S 17.0 6.3 0.2
D-5 US9 S 11.0 7.3 0.3
1 N 950.0 7.3 1.4
3 N 50.0 8.9 0.9
D-5A 4 N 20.0 12.0 0.9
001089
Table B-3
PF225: List of Category 2 washes
1 N 439.0 3.1 5.5
8 N 225.0 5.2 1.0
9 N 545.0 7.7 2.5
26 N 248.0 3.8 2.8
27 N 459.0 10.9 2.7
29 S 107.0 6.8 2.3
31 S 47.0 5.5 0.6
32 S 98.0 1.6 3.6
40 S 276.0 1.3 5.2
43 S 65.0 1.2 3.9
43.5 S 50.0 1.7 3.9
46 N 40.0 1.8 3.2
55 N 14.0 9.5 0.6
57 N 16.0 7.8 0.8
58 N 14.0 6.0 0.9
59 N 5.0 6.8 0.4
20a S 104.0 1.0 2.0
25c N 123.0 0.9 4.0
47a N 77.0 1.6 3.5
47b N 84.0 2.0 4.4
D-5B 48a N 61.0 1.2 4.2
1 S 32.0 4.3 1.2
3 S 8.0 5.7 0.7
D-6 4 S 20.0 5.2 0.9
3 S 194.0 14.0 1.7
4 S 88.0 8.3 1.2
E-2A 6 S 139.0 4.4 1.5
M1 N 170.0 3.7 1.0
M4 N 110.0 3.0 0.6
M5 (BC Wash) N 390.0 4.0 0.9
M7 N 210.0 4.4 1.0
M11 N 110.0 5.1 0.3
M13 N 550.0 5.9 2.5
M14 (Wash 33) N 2390.0 5.5 1.8
M15 N 130.0 5.5 0.9
M19 N 510.0 3.4 1.3
E-2B M21 (2nd horseshoe) N 860.0 4.6 1.9
M2B N 58.0 5.4 0.9
M3 N 330.0 3.6 1.6
M4 N 1370.0 3.2 3.7
US2 S 3500.0 4.3 2.3
US4 S 2590.0 4.5 10.7
E-3 US5 S 540.0 4.4 1.7
F-1 198+00 S 555.0 7.2 0.8
Subbasin 3 S 1146.0 1.9 1.0
I-1A Subbasin 4 S 2572.0 1.9 1.0
1 S 3635.0 1.6 3.5
4 S 3437.0 2.6 6.6
L-1 6 S 760.0 2.0 5.2
A-2L J-9 (66+39) N 1163.8 5.3 1.6
1+56 S 2.7 5.7 0.9
16+29 N 4.7 6.2 0.6
44+41 S 3.5 6.5 0.9
7+67 N 2.8 7.8 0.7
A-2I 40+00 N 1.5 6.0 0.6
51+75 N 174.0 13.2 3.7
A-2J 52+67 S 15.5 8.2 0.6
Zone A Area with 1-percent annual chance floodplain

Zone C Areas outside the 1-percent annual chance floodplain
Zone D Areas where there are possible but undetermined flood hazards
Zone X Areas outside the 1-percent annual chance floodplain
001090
Table B-4
PF225: List of Category 3 Washes
Flow
Direction FEMA
Segment Crossing (N / S) Crossing
1 (blank) Zone D
A-1 2 (blank) Zone D
A-2D 52+13 S Zone X
W13 S Zone X
D2 E16 S Zone X
M5 N Zone D
M6 N Zone D
D-5 US7 S Zone D
D-5A 2 N Zone D
10 N Zone C
28 S Zone C
D-5B 44 N Zone A
5 (Montezuma) S Zone X
E-2A 7 S Zone X
M8 (Gringo Wash) N Zone X
E-2B M16 (1st horseshoe) N Zone X
E-3 M1 (Christiansen) N Zone X
F-1 Basin 1-4 (213+00) S Zone X
J-1&J-2 (47+09) S Zone D
A-2K J-5 (70+50) N Zone D
A-2L J-6 (23+48) N Zone D

001091

IPT Report
APPENDIX C
Wash Ranking Tables for VF 300

001092
Title: Table C-5: VF300 Washes and Data

Date: 5/15/09

Q V Slope
Segment Crossing Depth Direction fence Type Notes FEMA Crossing Construction RANK
(cfs) (ft/s) (%)
(ft) (N/S) Start Date
BV-1 100 33000 6.00 10.00 N 1.00 Zone A 3

rail-on-post &
CV-2 1 301 1.560 1.50 N Normandy style 5.70 LWC Design Data Zone D 1
rail-on-post &
rail-on-post &
rail-on-post &
rail-on-post &
rail-on-post &
rail-on-post &
CV-2 7 4667 5.250 8.18 S Normandy style 0.70 LWC Design Data Zone D 3
rail-on-post &
rail-on-post &
rail-on-post &
rail-on-post &
rail-on-post &
rail-on-post &
rail-on-post &
CV-2
C 13
3 915
9 5 8.270
8 0 0.94
09 S Normandy
o a dy sty
style
e 5.00
5 00 LWC Design
g Data Zone D 1
rail-on-post &
rail-on-post &
rail-on-post &
rail-on-post &
CV-2 16.1 14 0.680 0.02 S Normandy style 4.70 LWC Design Data Zone D 1
rail-on-post &
CV-2 18 127 3.090 0.02 S rail-on-post & 9.70 LWC Design Data Zone D 1
rail-on-post &
rail-on-post &
rail-on-post &
rail-on-post &
rail-on-post &
CV-2A O3 467.0 2.91 1.78 N Normandy Style 19.80 Zone D 1
CV-2A M3 248.0 2.65 1.39 N Normandy Style 5.20 Zone D 1
CV-2A K3 329.0 2.56 1.43 N Normandy Style 5.80 Zone D 1
CV-2A I3 172.0 1.65 0.77 N Normandy Style 6.20 Zone D 1
CV-2A G3 128.0 2.08 1.10 N Normandy Style 7.20 Zone D 1
CV-2A B3 139.0 1.34 0.76 N Normandy Style 12.80 Zone D 1
CV-2A C3 242.0 2.25 1.11 N Normandy Style 7.80 Zone D 1
CV-2A Y6 2152.0 3.82 2.98 N Normandy Style 6.70 Zone D 2
DV-1 1 976.0 2.11 0.72 S Normandy Style 0.80 Preliminaru H&H Zone D 1
DV-1 7 1480 3.080 2.42 S Normandy Style 1.00 Preliminaru H&H Zone D 2
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\IPT meetings- debris\IPT report revised May 2009\Appendix C\Table 5- VF300 washes and Data.xls
001093

Date: 5/15/09

Q V Slope
(cfs) (ft/s) (%)
rail-on-post &
DV-2 DV-2_F_06 1817 5.280 3.66 N Normandy style 0.60 25 year data Zone X 20-Oct-08 2
rail-on-post &
DV-3A 1 36200 5.000 5.00 S Normandy style 0.20 San Simon Wash Zone D 15-Dec-08 3
rail-on-post &
DV-3A 2 780 5.000 5.00 S Normandy style 0.20 Zone D 15-Dec-08 1
rail-on-post &
DV-3A 4 20040 5.000 5.00 S Normandy style 0.20 Zone D 15-Dec-08 3
DV-3A 11 and 12 8010 4.020 5.28 S rail-on-post 0.50 Zone D 15-Dec-08 2
DV-3A 9 4690 4.050 2.01 S rail-on-post 0.50 Zone D 15-Dec-08 2
DV-4A Basin 1 1650 9.020 3.53 S rail-on-post 1.50 HEC-RAS Data Zone D 28-Aug-08 2
DV-4A Basin 8 120 0.000 0.00 S rail-on-post
p 0.00 Sheet Flows Zone D 28-Aug-08
g 1
DV-4A Basin 21 5340 0.000 0.00 S rail-on-post 0.00 Sheet Flows Zone D 28-Aug-08 1
Qbasin = 5800 cfs. Only 400 cfs is
DV-4A Basin 25 400 4.240 2.31 S rail-on-post 0.00 contained in channel Zone D 28-Aug-08 1
DV-4A Basin 34 410 0.000 0.00 S rail-on-post 0.00 Sheet Flows Zone D 39688 1
Qbasin = 9050 cfs. Only 1100 cfs is
DV-4A Basin 35 1100.0 8.00 3.34 S rail-on-post 7.83 contained in channel Zone D 39688 2
DV-4A Basin 36 500.0 0.00 0.00 S rail-on-post 0.00 Sheet Flows Zone D 39688 1
DV-4A Basin 37 2030.0 3.39 2.07 S rail-on-post 1.10 HEC-RAS Data Zone D 39688 2
DV-4A Basin 51 390 7.170 1.40 S rail-on-post 3.76 HEC-RAS Data Zone D 1
001094

Date: 5/15/09

Q V Slope
(cfs) (ft/s) (%)
DV-4B 14 7420 15.77 2.550 S Normandy Style 1.7 TON 6 Mile West Drainage Report Zone D 3
DV-4B 17 1187 11.38 1.410 S Normandy Style 1.3 TON 6 Mile West Drainage Report Zone D 2
DV-4B 21 597 8.53 1.230 N Normandy Style 1.0 TON 6 Mile West Drainage Report Zone D 2
DV-4B A 4514 10.85 1.71 N Normandy Style 0.7 TON 6 Mile West Drainage Report Zone D 3
DV-4B 6 18659 9.69 6.850 S Normandy Style 0.5 Vamori Wash Drainage Analysis Zone D 3
DV-4B 6a 629 4.30 1.96 N Normandy Style 0.5 TON Phase III Drainage Report Zone D 1
DV-4B 7 680 3.90 1.650 N Normandy Style 1.6 TON Phase III Drainage Report Zone D 1
DV-4B 10A 76 1.89 0.400 N Normandy Style 1.2 TON Phase III Drainage Report Zone D 1
DV-4B 10B 76 1.89 0.40 N Normandy Style 1.2 TON Phase III Drainage Report 1
DV-4B 10C 76 1.89 0.400 N Normandy Style 1.2 TON Phase III Drainage Report 1
DV-4B 16D 50 9.51 0.370 N Normandy Style 4.7 TON Phase III Drainage Report 1
DV-4B 17D 264 13.43 0.610 N Normandyy Style
y 5.5 TON Phase III Drainage Report 1
DV-4B 17E 264 14.68 0.69 N Normandy Style 5.5 TON Phase III Drainage Report 1
DV-4C Basin 52 750 7.11 1.700 S Normandy Style 5.0 HEC-RAS Data Zone D 28-Aug-08 2
DV-6 C1 19 3.85 0.50 S rail-on-post 0.5 LWC Design Data Zone X 1
DV-6 C4 34 14.610 0.94 S rail-on-post 9.40 Culvert Design Data Zone X 1
DV-6 C9 330 15.440 1.80 S rail-on-post 4.20 HEC-RAS Data (Existing Condition) Zone X 1
DV-6 C13 212 6.580 0.94 N rail-on-post 0.50 LWC Design Data Zone X 1
DV-6 C23 18 9.310 1.18 N rail-on-post 5.00 Culvert Design Data Zone X 1
DV-7 1 400 10.340 1.78 N rail-on-post 4.20 Flow Master Data Zone D not awarded 1
DV-7 2 18 6.210 0.36 S rail-on-post 11.80 Flow Master Data Zone D not awarded 1
DV-7 18 207.0 10.02 2.59 S rail-on-post 3.50 Flow Master Data Zone D not awarded 1
001095

Date: 5/15/09

Q V Slope
(cfs) (ft/s) (%)
DV-7 28 7.0 9.94 0.34 N rail-on-post 45.00 Flow Master Data Zone D not awarded 1
Steel piles (filled -
DV-8 M1 7.0 6.51 0.36 N Grouted) 17.82 Flow Master Data Zone D not awarded 1
DV-8 US1 104.0 5.61 0.64 S Grouted)) 4.26 Flow Master Data Zone D not awarded 1
DV-8 US2 55.0 4.34 1.08 S Grouted) 1.40 Flow Master Data Zone D not awarded 1
DV-8 US3 1087.0 8.07 2.67 S Grouted) 2.11 HEC-RAS Data Zone D not awarded 2
DV-8 US4 48.0 6.29 0.49 S Grouted) 11.02 Flow Master Data Zone D not awarded 1
DV-8 US5 239.0 5.70 1.43 S Grouted) 3.89 HEC-RAS Data Zone D not awarded 1
DV-8 US6 28 6.240 0.53 S Grouted) 11.02 Flow Master Data Zone D not awarded 1
EV-1A 6 9490 28.290 3.81 S Normandy Style 6.00 Sonoita 25 Mile Drainage Report Zone D 3
EV-1A 35 550.0 5.54 2.06 S Normandy Style 1.60 Sonoita 25 Mile Drainage Report Zone D 2
EV-1A 47, 48, 49 760 8.390 0.99 S Normandy Style 5.00 Sonoita 25 Mile Drainage Report Zone D 1
EV-1B EV-1B_F-01 1083 8.540 5.16 S Normandy Style 4.24 Zone D 2-Jan-09 2
EV-1B EV-1B_F_02 3941 7.020 4.51 S Normandy Style 2.20 Zone B 2-Jan-09 3
EV-1B EV-1B-F_03 1184 9.170 4.10 S Normandy Style 4.30 Zone D 2-Jan-09 2
EV-2A 1 44 10.200 0.88 S 24.00 Zone X 1
EV-2A 2 36 10.430 1.03 S 16.62 Zone X 1
001096

Date: 5/15/09

Q V Slope
(cfs) (ft/s) (%)
EV-2B 102 22300 2.50 5.00 Normandy style 0.00 Final Drainage Report Not Available Zone A 2
FV-1B C1 17 5.79 1.05 S Normandy style 6.15 Flow Master Data Zone D 5-Dec-08 1
FV-1B C4 1185 10.180 1.69 N Normandy style 7.70 Flow Master Data Zone D 5-Dec-08 2
FV-1B C5 2222 16.320 2.76 S rail-on-post 7.80 Flow Master Data Zone X 5-Dec-08 2
FV-1B C6 15061 9.330 11.18 S Normandy style 1.70 HEC-RAS Data Zone A 5-Dec-08 3
FV-1B C7 412 2.060 2.27 S Normandy style 0.40 Flow Master Data Zone X 5-Dec-08 1
FV-1B C22 21.6 4.50 0.56 N Normandy style 6.68 Flow Master Data Zone X 5-Dec-08 1
FV-1B C24 621.3 9.01 3.78 N rail-on-post 3.50 Flow Master Data Zone X 5-Dec-08 2
FV-1B C28 632.0 5.19 1.34 S Normandy y style
y 1.70 Flow Master Data Zone X 5-Dec-08 2
FV-1B C29 119.9 6.57 1.23 S Normandy style 0.350 Flow Master Data Zone X 5-Dec-08 1
FV-1B C45 978.4 7.15 2.67 S rail-on-post 2.900 Flow Master Data Zone X 5-Dec-08 2
Flow Master Data - Fence Does Not
FV-1B C53 428.9 12.01 2.88 S Normandy style 6.170 Cross Wash Zone X 5-Dec-08 1
Flow Master Data - Fence Does Not
FV-1B C54 9600.4 18.14 7.38 S NO FENCE 3.000 Cross Wash Zone X 5-Dec-08 3
HV-1 F_01 189.0 2.42 1.09 S Normandy style 0.400 Appendix B, HV-1 Final Drainage Report Zone X 17-Nov-08 1
HV-1 F_02 825.0 2.88 1.58 S Normandy style 0.400 Appendix B, HV-1 Final Drainage Report Zone X 17-Nov-08 1
HV-1 F_03 1477.0 2.28 0.86 N Normandy style 0.400 Appendix B, HV-1 Final Drainage Report Zone X 17-Nov-08 1
001097

Date: 5/15/09

Q V Slope
(cfs) (ft/s) (%)
HV-2 1 195.0 12.35 0.85 N Normandy style 2.400 App B and App C HV-2 Drainage Report Zone X 17-Nov-08 1
HV-3 DA1 845.0 11.93 3.25 N Normandy style 3.100 HEC-RAS HV-3 Drng Rpt Zone X 10-Dec-08 2
HV-3 DA2 300.0 3.79 1.83 N Normandy style 0.470 HEC-RAS HV-3 Drng Rpt Zone X 10-Dec-08 1
sheet flow not analyzed as per HV-3 Drng
HV-3 DA3 322.0 1.00 1.00 N Normandy style 4.000 Rpt Zone X 10-Dec-08 1
HV-3 DA4 824.0 8.03 3.29 S Normandy style 0.880 HEC-RAS HV-3 Drng Rpt Zone X 10-Dec-08 2
HV-4 1 80.2 3.20 0.67 S Normandy style 1.200 Table B1 and C2, NRCS Zone X 20-Oct-08 1
HV-4
HV 4 2 957.3 8.88 0.91 S Normandy style 6.500 Table B1 and C2, NRCS Zone X 20-Oct-08
20 Oct 08 1
HV-4 8 202.1 3.52 1.18 N Normandy style 0.800 Table B1 and C2, NRCS Zone X 20-Oct-08 1
HV-4 9 5040.0 5.22 2.73 N Normandy style 0.800 Table B1 and C2, NRCS Zone X 20-Oct-08 2
HV-4 14 866.6 1.37 2.01 N Normandy style 0.050 Table B1 and HECRAS Zone X 20-Oct-08 1
IV-2 F_01 137.0 4.59 1.18 S Normandy Style 4.200 HEC-RAS Analysis does not show fence Zone X 13-Sep-08 1
IV-2 F_02 9513.0 3.32 5.23 S Normandy Style 0.850 HEC-RAS Analysis does not show fence Zone A 13-Sep-08 3
East Playas Area - massive ponding,
IV-4 1 56922.0 1.00 4.00 S Post on Rail 0.100 stagnant flow Zone A 18-Oct-08 3
JV-1A 1 3868.0 2.43 3.85 S Normandy Style 1.000 Zone X 2
JV-1A 12 2 3.14 0.57 S Normandy Style 1 Zone X 1
JV-1A 16 403 2.67 2.47 N Normandy Style 1 Zone X 1
001098

Date: 5/15/09

Q V Slope
(cfs) (ft/s) (%)
Table 8 supplimented w/ flowmaster JV-1B

JV-1B 1 467 0.81 3.17 S Normandy Style 2.53 Drainage Reports Zone X 39734 1
JV-1B 3 73 1 1 S Normandy Style 1 minimal flows, values assumed = 1 Zone X 39734 1
JV-1B 10 1467 5.04 3.65 S Normandy Style 0.56 HEC-RAS 114134 JV-1B Drainage Report Zone X 39734 2
JV 1B
JV-1B 19 775 1.29
1 29 5.17
5 17 S N
Normandy
d St
Style
l 0 66
0.66 Drainage
D i Reports
R t Zone
Z X 39734 1
JV-1B 20 2915 3.07 5.27 S Normandy Style 0.1 HEC-RAS 114134 JV-1B Drainage Report Zone X 39734 1
JV-2 F_01 6253 2.69 1.99 S Normandy Style 0.24 HEC-RAS from JV-2_Final DrngRptTOT Zone A 39734 3
JV-2 F_02 795 3.48 2.46 S Normandy Style 0.19 HEC-RAS from JV-2_Final DrngRptTOT Zone X 39734 1
Normandy Style -
Post on rail last 4
JV-3 1 19620 3.15 8.5 S miles 0.03 HEC-RAS from JV-3 07-30-08.pdf Zone X 39735 2
001099
Title: Table C-6: Criteria Table used to categorise washes

Date: 5/15/09
MAX MAX Q (CFS)= 100 500 1000 3000 >3000

Velocity MAX FLOW DEPTH (FT)= 1 3 5 >5 1 3 5 >5 1 3 5 >5 1 3 5 >5 1 3 5 >5
(fps) MAX SLOPE %
0.2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2
0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2
3
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2
>1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
0.2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
5
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
>1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
0.2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3
0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3
10
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
>1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3
0.2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3
0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
>10
1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 3
>1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\IPT meetings- debris\IPT report revised May 2009\Appendix C\Table 6-VF300 Criteria Table Used to categorize washes.xls
001100
Table C-7
VF300: List of Category 2 Washes
Normal Flow
FEMA Q V
Segment Crossing Depth fence Type Direction
Crossing (cfs) (ft/s)
(ft) (N/S)
CV-2 16 Zone D 1137 8.7 1.2 rail-on-post & Normandy style S
CV-2A Y6 Zone D 2152 3.8 3.0 Normandy Style N
6 Zone D 5216 4.7 1.9 Normandy Style S
DV-1 17 Zone D 684 6.9 1.7 Normandy Style S
DV-2 DV-2_F_06 Zone X 1817 5.3 3.7 rail-on-post & Normandy style N
11 and 12 Zone D 8010 4.0 5.3 rail-on-post S
DV-3A
9 Zone D 4690 4.1 2.0 rail-on-post S
Basin 1 Zone D 1650 9.0 3.5 rail-on-post S
DV-4A
8 Zone D 1321 9.6 1.8 Normandy Style N
DV-4B
DV-4C Basin 52 Zone D 750 7.1 1.7 Normandy Style S
26 Zone D 2487 7.7 3.0 rail-on-post S
DV-7
39 Zone D 1251 9.1 2.6 rail-on-post N
DV-8 US3 Zone D 1087 8.1 2.7 Steel piles (filled - Grouted) S
001101
Table C-7
VF300: List of Category 2 Washes
Normal Flow
FEMA Q V
Segment Crossing Depth fence Type Direction
Crossing (cfs) (ft/s)
(ft) (N/S)
EV-1A
EV-1B_F-01 Zone D 1083 8.54 5.16 Normandy Style S
EV-1B
EV-1B-F_03 Zone D 1184 9.17 4.1 Normandy Style S
EV-2B 102 Zone A 22300 2.5 5 Normandy Style (blank)
C17 Zone X 500.2 11.98 2.56 rail-on-post S
C20 Zone X 987 5.55 4.1 rail-on-post S
C24 Zone X 621.3 9.01 3.78 rail-on-post N
C28 Zone X 632 5.19 1.34 Normandy Style S
C4 Zone D 1184.5 10.18 1.69 Normandy Style N
FV-1B
C45 Zone X 978.4 7.15 2.67 rail-on-post S
C5 Zone X 2222 16.32 2.76 rail-on-post S
C50 Zone X 739.6 10.87 1.69 Normandy Style S
C52 Zone X 753.2 9.1 1.02 Normandy Style S
C10 Zone X 1126 5.42 1.28 Normandy Style S
4 Zone X 1484 10.8 0.98 Normandy Style N
HV-2
DA1 Zone X 845 11.93 3.25 Normandy Style N
HV-3 DA4 Zone X 824 8.03 3.29 Normandy Style S
DA6 Zone X 683 20.18 3.61 Normandy Style S
3 Zone X 954.3074 6.177627 1.428605 Normandy Style S
HV-4
F_03 Zone X 2662 3.1 4.2 Normandy Style S
IV-2 F_04 Zone X 1284 3.08 2.72 Normandy Style S
F_06 Zone X 523 6.6 3.25 Normandy Style S
JV-3 1 Zone X 19620 3.15 8.5 mandy Style - Post on rail last 4 S
JV-1A 1 Zone X 3868 2.43 3.85 Normandy Style S
10 Zone X 1467 5.04 3.65 Normandy Style S
JV-1B

001102
Table C-8
VF300: List of category 3 Washes
Segment Crossing fence Type FEMA Crossing
BV-1 100 (blank) Zone A
CV-2 7 -on-post & Normandy st Zone D
1 -on-post & Normandy st Zone D
DV-3A
4 -on-post & Normandy st Zone D
6 Normandy Style Zone D
DV-4B 14 Normandy Style Zone D
A Normandy Style Zone D
17 rail-on-post Zone D
DV-7
35 rail-on-post Zone D
EV-1A
EV-1B EV-1B_F_02 Normandy Style Zone B
C13 Normandy Style Zone A
FV-1B C21 rail-on-post Zone X
C54 NO FENCE Zone X
HV-2 8 Normandy Style Zone X
IV-2 F_02 Normandy Style Zone A
IV-4 1 Post on Rail Zone A
JV-2 F_01 Normandy Style Zone A

001103

IPT Report
APPENDIX D
Summary
001104
Wash Location Mapset Location Map
Legend
San Diego Imperial
h Category 3 Wash Crossing
h Category 2 Wash Crossing Figure 1

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
International Border (for reference only, not surveyed)
1
Se gment A-1 2
h h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001105
Wash Location Mapset
V
U 94
Location Map
Legend
San Diego Imperial

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
2
Se gment A-2A
h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001106
Legend
San Diego Imperial
V
U
94

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
Se gment A-2D
48+63 52+13
25+22
36+35 38+28 39+02
h h h 60+57
1+37 6+95
Segment A-2C
h h hh
Se gment A-2B h h h 16+03
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001107
Legend Imperial
San Diego

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
V
U
94
U
V
94
V
U
94
Se gment A-2F
h 100
Se gment A-2E
h 5+44
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001108
Legend
San Diego Imperial

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
Se gment A-2H
Segment A-2G
2 8
hh h9
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001109
Legend
Imperial
San Diego

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
Se gment A-2J
Se gment A-2I 7+67 16+29

h
40+00
h 51+75
1+56
h h
h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001110
Legend
Imperial
San Diego

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
J5 (70+50)
J2 (47+09) Se gment A-2K h

h
J1 (38+30)
h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001111
Legend

8
San Diego
Imperial

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
Se gment A-2N
h 3
Segment A-2L
J9 (66+39)
J6 (23+48) h
h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001112
Legend
Imperial
San Diego

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
Se gment BV-1
100
h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001113 Imperial
Maricopa
Legend
Yuma

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence Pima
Seg
m ent
CV-2
h7
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Seg
Üm ent C
V-2
001114 Imperial
Maricopa
Legend
Yuma

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence Pima
Seg
m ent C
V-2
13
h
Se g
m ent C
V-2
16
h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001115
Wash Location Mapset Location Map Maricopa
Legend
Yuma
h Category 2 Wash Crossing Figure 12 Pima
PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
Se g
m ent C
V-2A
Y6
h
Se g
m ent
CV-
2A
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Se g
m ent
CV-3
Ü
001116
Maricopa
Legend Yuma
PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
6
h Se g
m ent
DV-
1
h7
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001117 Maricopa
Legend Yuma
h Category 3 Wash Crossing Pima

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
12
h
Se g
m ent
DV-
1
14
h
15
Ü
h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

001118 Maricopa
Legend Yuma

Pima
PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
17
h 18
h Se g
m ent
DV-
1
19
h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001119 Maricopa Pinal
Legend Yuma

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
21
h Se g
m ent D
V-1
22
h
23
h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001120
Legend Yuma

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
V
U
85
W22
h
W14-W17
h W13
h Seg
m ent D
-2
W2 W1
hh
Ü
E6
h E8
h h E9
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles
001121
Legend Yuma
PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
E8
h h E9
E16
h h E17
E19
E20 Segme
hh nt D
-2
E29 E30
hh E31 E32 E33
h hh
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001122
Wash Location Mapset Yuma
Location Map
Legend

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
Se g
m ent D
V-2
DV-2_F_06
Ü
h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

001123
Wash Location Mapset Yuma
Location Map
Legend
Pima

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
1
h
Se g
m ent
DV-3
A
2
h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Seg
m ent
DV-3 Ü
001124
Legend
Pima

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
Santa Cruz
9
h
Se g
m ent D
V-3
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

h
11and12
Ü
001125
Legend
Pima

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence Santa Cruz
1
h
Se g
m ent D
V-4A
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

h
5
h
6
Ü
001126
Legend
Pima

PF225 Fence
9
h
Seg
m ent D
V-4A
h 11
14
h
15
h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

h
17
Ü
001127
Legend
Pima

PF225 Fence
Santa Cruz
VF300 Fence
20
h
29
h
Se g
m ent D
V-4A
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001128
Legend
Pima

PF225 Fence
Se g
m ent
DV-4
A
32
h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001129
Legend
Pima

PF225 Fence
Santa Cruz
VF300 Fence
33
h
Se g
m ent
DV-
4A
35
h
37
h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

h
41
Ü
001130
Legend
Pima

PF225 Fence
Ü
42
h Se g
m ent D
V-4A
h 43
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

001131
Legend
Pima

PF225 Fence
Santa Cruz
VF300 Fence
44
h
45
h Se g
m ent D
V-4A
46
h
Ü
49
h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

001132
Legend
Pima

PF225 Fence Santa Cruz
VF300 Fence
Segm
e nt D
V-4A
52 Segm e
nt D
h V-4C
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Seg
m ent
DV-
4B Ü
001133
Legend
Pima

PF225 Fence Santa Cruz
VF300 Fence
Se g
m ent D
V-4B
14
h
12
h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001134
Legend Pima

Santa Cruz
PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
9
h 8
h
Se g
m ent
DV-
4B
Ü
6
h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

001135
Legend
Pima

Santa Cruz
PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
2
h
Se g
m ent
D V-4B
h 21
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001136
Legend Pima

Santa Cruz
PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
17
h
Se g
m ent D
V-4B
Ü
14
h Se g
m ent D
V-4B
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

001137
Legend
Pima
h Category 3 Wash Crossing Cochise
h Category 2 Wash Crossing Figure 34 Santa Cruz
PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
17
h
Se g
m ent
DV-
7
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001138
Legend
Pima
Cochise
h Category 3 Wash Crossing Santa Cruz

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
M1 Segment D-5
M2 M3 M4 US1
h h h h h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001139
Legend Pima
Cochise

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
Segment D-5 Segment D-5A

US8 US9 US10 US11 1
US4 US5 US6 M5 US7
hh h h h h M6 h h hh h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001140
Legend Pima
Cochise

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
U
V
189
Segment D-5A
2 3 4
hh h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001141
Legend Pima
Cochise

U
V
82
Figure 38
PF225
89 Fence
t
u
VF300 Fence
Segment D-5B 25c 26 27 28 29 31 32

8 9 10 20a
h
1
h hh h h hh h h h h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001142
Legend Pima
Cochise

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
Segment D-5B
Segment D-5B 46 47a 47b 48a 58 59
40 43 43.5
h h h h 44 h hh h h hhh
55 57
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001143
Legend Pima
PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
1 3 4 Segment D-6 Segment DV-8
h h h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001144
Legend Pima
Cochise

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
Segment DV-8 US3 Segment DV-8
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001145
Legend Pima
Cochise

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
Segment EV-1B Segment EV-1A

EV-1B_F_02
h EV-1B_F_01
h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001146
Wash Location Mapset Pima
Location Map
Legend
Cochise

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
Segment EV-1A 28
35
h h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001147
Wash Location Mapset Pima Location Map
Legend
Cochise

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
Segment EV-1A
40 42 45
h h h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001148
Legend
Cochise

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
Segment EV-1A
52 53
h h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001149
Legend
Cochise

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
55 Segment EV-1A 58 59 60 61
56
h h h h h h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001150
Legend
PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
EV-1B
63
Segment EV-1A 66 EV-1B_F_03 Segment
h h h h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001151
Location Map
Legend
Cochise

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
Segment EV-2A 2 Segment E-2A 4 5

3
h 1
h h h h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001152
Legend
Cochise

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
Segment E-2A
6
h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001153
Legend
Cochise

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
Segment E-2A Segment EV-2B 102 Segment E-2B M1

7
h h h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001154
Location Map
Legend
Cochise

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
M4 M5 M7 M8 Segment E-2B M11 M13 M14

h h h h h h h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001155
Location Map
Legend
Cochise

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
M15 Segment E-2B M16 M19 M21
h h h h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001156
Legend
Cochise Hidalgo

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
US2 Segment E-3 US4 US5

h h h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001157
Legend
Cochise Hidalgo

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
M1 M2B Segment E-3 M4

h h h M3
h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001158
Wash Location Mapset Pima V
U
Location Map
80
Legend
Cochise Hidalgo

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
1-4 5 Segment F-1
h h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001159 Grant
Legend
Cochise Hidalgo

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
Segment FV-1A Segment FV-1B 4

h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001160 Grant
Legend
Cochise Hidalgo

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
5 Segment FV-1B
h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001161 Grant
Legend
Cochise Hidalgo

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
Segment FV-1B
10
h 6
h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001162 Grant
Legend
Cochise Hidalgo

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
13 14 Segment FV-1B
h h h 17
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001163 Grant
Legend
Cochise
h Category 3 Wash Crossing Hidalgo

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
Segment FV-1B 21 Segment FV-1B

24
h 20
h h h
28
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001164 Grant Luna
Legend
Cochise Hidalgo

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
45 Segment FV-1B
50 52
h h h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001165 Grant
Luna
Legend
Cochise Hidalgo

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
B
-1
tFV
en
gm
Se
54
h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001166 Grant Luna
Legend
Cochise Hidalgo

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
4 Segment HV-2 6
h h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001167 Grant
Luna
Legend
h Category 3 Wash Crossing Cochise Hidalgo

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
7 Segment HV-2 9
h h 8
h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001168 Grant
Luna
Location Map
Legend
Cochise Hidalgo
Category 3 Wash Crossing
Figure 65
k
k Category 2 Wash Crossing
PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
Segment HV-3 DA4

DA1
k k
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001169 Grant
Luna
Legend
Cochise Hidalgo

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
Segment HV-3 DA6

h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001170 Grant
Luna
Legend
Cochise Hidalgo

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
Segment HV-4
h3
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001171 Grant Luna
Legend
Cochise Hidalgo

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
9 Segment HV-4
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001172
Legend Grant
Luna Dona Ana

Hidalgo
PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
F_02 Segment IV-2 F_03

h h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001173
Legend
Grant Luna Dona Ana

Hidalgo
PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
F_04 Segment IV-2 F_06
h h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001174
Legend
Grant
Luna Dona Ana
h Category 3 Wash Crossing El Paso
h Category 2 Wash Crossing Figure 71 El Paso
PF225 Fence
Hidalgo
VF300 Fence
3 Segment I-1A 4
h h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001175
Legend
Grant Dona Ana
Luna
h Category 2 Wash Crossing Figure 72 V

U
9
El Paso
PF225 Fence
Hidalgo
VF300 Fence
Segment I-1B Segment IV-4B Segment JV-1A

h1
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001176
Legend Otero
Grant Luna Dona Ana

h Category 3 Wash Crossing V
U
9
PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence Hidalgo
Segment JV-1A Segment JV-1B
h1
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001177
Legend Otero
Luna Dona Ana
PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
V
U
9
10 13 Segment JV-1B 16
h h h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001178
Legend Otero
h Category 3 Wash Crossing Luna Dona Ana
PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
V
U
9
18 Segment JV-1B
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001179
Legend Otero
h Category 3 Wash Crossing Luna Dona Ana

El Paso
PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
Segment JV-2 F-01

h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001180
Legend Otero

V
U
9
Luna Dona Ana
El Paso
PF225 Fence Hudspeth
VF300 Fence
Segment JV-2 1 Segment JV-3 3
h h 2
h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001181
V
U
9
Legend Otero
Luna Dona Ana

El Paso
PF225 Fence
Hudspeth
VF300 Fence
7 Segment JV-3 8
4 5 6
h h h h h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001182
Legend Otero
Luna Dona Ana

El Paso
PF225 Fence
Hudspeth
VF300 Fence
9 10 Segment JV-3 11 12
h h h h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001183
Location Map
Legend Otero
Luna Dona Ana
Category 3 Wash Crossing
Figure 80
k
El Paso
PF225 Fence
Hudspeth
VF300 Fence
13 Segment JV-3 1 16 17
14
k k k k k
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001184
Legend Otero
Luna Dona Ana

El Paso
PF225 Fence
Hudspeth
VF300 Fence
18 19 20 21 Segment JV-3 22 Segment J-1

23
h h hh h h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001185
Legend Otero
Luna Dona Ana

El Paso
PF225 Fence
Hudspeth
VF300 Fence Se
g me
tK n
International Border (for -1reference
A only, not surveyed)
U
V
20
B
h
Se gm e
nt K-1B
t
u
85

10
Ü
Se
g me
nt
K-
1C
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

V
U
375
001186
Wash Location Mapset El Paso
Location Map
Legend
h Category 3 Wash Crossing Hudspeth
Culberson

PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
Jeff Davis
Presidio
Se g
m ent
L -1
4
1
h
h
6
h
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001187
Legend Pima
Location Map
Cochise
Santa Cruz 82
U
V
PF225 Fence
VF300 Fence
189
U
V
89
£
¤
§
¦
¨
19
89
£
¤
Nogales Wash
1
k k
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles

Ü
001188
TABLE D-9:
Summary of Total Washes per Category and Location
PF 225 VF-300
Category 2 Category 3 Category 2 Category 3
TOTAL Washes 106 21 92 22
TOTAL Washes in CA 24 6 0 1
TOTAL Washes in AZ 77 15 74 17
TOTAL Washes in NM 2 0 18 4
TOTAL Washes in TX 3 0 0 0
TOTAL washes in San Diego Sector 24 6 0 0
TOTAL washes in El Centro Sector 0 0 0 1
TOTAL washes in Yuma 0 0 2 1
TOTAL washes in Tuscon 77 15 72 16
TOTAL washes in El Paso 2 0 18 4
TOTAL washes in Marfa 3 0 0 0
001189
TABLE D-10:
Longitude and Lattitude of Washes
Fence_Type Wash_ID Category Segment Latitude Longitude
PF225 1 3 A‐1 32.56163476300 ‐116.82917508700
PF225 2 3 A‐1 32.56156584200 ‐116.80583198400
VF300 100 3 BV‐1 32.63468346630 ‐115.89682575900
VF300 7 3 CV‐2 32.21887452250 ‐113.90889914300
VF300 1 3 DV‐3A 31.75762643880 ‐112.41853496100
VF300 2 3 DV‐3A 31.75251806090 ‐112.40095747600
VF300 EV‐1B_F_02 3 EV‐1B 31.33318886780 ‐110.66600287300
VF300 102 3 EV‐2B 31.33418719230 ‐110.14813371700
VF300 6 3 FV‐1B 31.33398147560 ‐109.30211030600
VF300 13 3 FV‐1B 31.33385788670 ‐109.25991564100
VF300 14 3 FV‐1B 31.33389741260 ‐109.25281190800
VF300 21 3 FV‐1B 31.33356856620 ‐109.20832281800
VF300 54 3 FV‐1B 31.33274491510 ‐109.08956773100
PF225 W13 3 D‐2 31.88435432220 ‐112.83148286600
PF225 M5 3 D‐5 31.33238187430 ‐111.04304135000
PF225 M6 3 D‐5 31.33244822210 ‐111.03183209000
PF225 US7 3 D‐5 31.33238280050 ‐111.03600991200
PF225 2 3 D‐5A 31.33257721310 ‐110.99920894900
PF225 10 3 D‐5B 31.33302358910 ‐110.91327978800
PF225 28 3 D‐5B 31.33323932180 ‐110.88968909600
PF225 44 3 D‐5B 31.33350628990 ‐110.86842160000
PF225 5 3 E‐2A 31.33376253340 ‐110.22795108500
PF225 7 3 E‐2A 31.33399761270 ‐110.15902205600
PF225 M1 3 E‐3 31.33409433720 ‐109.79076712100
PF225 1‐4 3 F‐1 31.33405616040 ‐109.62951545600
VF300 8 3 HV‐2 31.33230894110 ‐108.80529265200
VF300 F_02 3 IV‐2 31.78379525820 ‐108.07782828900
VF300 1 3 IV‐4 31.78400399670 ‐107.43319247200
VF300 F‐01 3 JV‐2 31.78390554940 ‐107.06197823800
PF225 J6 (23+48) 3 A‐2L 32.61296600980 ‐116.17581198800
PF225 52+13 3 A‐2D 32.58076484520 ‐116.57443482200
VF300 13 3 CV‐2 32.20863789920 ‐113.87594089300
PF225 M8 3 E‐2B 31.33394643710 ‐110.10132644700
PF225 M16 3 E‐2B 31.33387759660 ‐110.05769467700
VF300 42 3 EV‐1A 31.33301840200 ‐110.42394963800
VF300 53 3 EV‐1A 31.33314538640 ‐110.38349240100
VF300 61 3 EV‐1A 31.33342475210 ‐110.33234307500
VF300 14 3 DV‐4B 31.52139724450 ‐111.66544230400
VF300 6 3 DV‐4B 31.55840644630 ‐111.78260626000
PF225 1 3 A‐1 32.56163476300 ‐116.82917508700
PF225 2 3 A‐1 32.56156584200 ‐116.80583198400
VF300 100 3 BV‐1 32.63468346630 ‐115.89682575900
VF300 7 3 CV‐2 32.21887452250 ‐113.90889914300
001190
TABLE D-10:
VF300 1 3 DV‐3A 31.75762643880 ‐112.41853496100
VF300 2 3 DV‐3A 31.75251806090 ‐112.40095747600
VF300 EV‐1B_F_02 3 EV‐1B 31.33318886780 ‐110.66600287300
VF300 102 3 EV‐2B 31.33418719230 ‐110.14813371700
VF300 6 3 FV‐1B 31.33398147560 ‐109.30211030600
VF300 13 3 FV‐1B 31.33385788670 ‐109.25991564100
VF300 14 3 FV‐1B 31.33389741260 ‐109.25281190800
VF300 21 3 FV‐1B 31.33356856620 ‐109.20832281800
VF300 54 3 FV‐1B 31.33274491510 ‐109.08956773100
PF225 W13 3 D‐2 31.88435432220 ‐112.83148286600
PF225 M5 3 D‐5 31.33238187430 ‐111.04304135000
PF225 M6 3 D‐5 31.33244822210 ‐111.03183209000
PF225 US7 3 D‐5 31.33238280050 ‐111.03600991200
PF225 2 3 D‐5A 31.33257721310 ‐110.99920894900
PF225 10 3 D‐5B 31.33302358910 ‐110.91327978800
PF225 28 3 D‐5B 31.33323932180 ‐110.88968909600
PF225 44 3 D‐5B 31.33350628990 ‐110.86842160000
PF225 5 3 E‐2A 31.33376253340 ‐110.22795108500
PF225 7 3 E‐2A 31.33399761270 ‐110.15902205600
PF225 M1 3 E‐3 31.33409433720 ‐109.79076712100
PF225 1‐4 3 F‐1 31.33405616040 ‐109.62951545600
VF300 8 3 HV‐2 31.33230894110 ‐108.80529265200
VF300 F_02 3 IV‐2 31.78379525820 ‐108.07782828900
VF300 1 3 IV‐4 31.78400399670 ‐107.43319247200
VF300 F‐01 3 JV‐2 31.78390554940 ‐107.06197823800
PF225 J6 (23+48) 3 A‐2L 32.61296600980 ‐116.17581198800
PF225 52+13 3 A‐2D 32.58076484520 ‐116.57443482200
VF300 13 3 CV‐2 32.20863789920 ‐113.87594089300
PF225 M8 3 E‐2B 31.33394643710 ‐110.10132644700
PF225 M16 3 E‐2B 31.33387759660 ‐110.05769467700
VF300 42 3 EV‐1A 31.33301840200 ‐110.42394963800
VF300 53 3 EV‐1A 31.33314538640 ‐110.38349240100
VF300 61 3 EV‐1A 31.33342475210 ‐110.33234307500
VF300 14 3 DV‐4B 31.52139724450 ‐111.66544230400
VF300 6 3 DV‐4B 31.55840644630 ‐111.78260626000
PF225 2 2 A‐2A 32.57315840390 ‐116.66616749700
PF225 1+37 2 A‐2C 32.57942533480 ‐116.59075689300
PF225 6+95 2 A‐2C 32.57954736410 ‐116.58899875200
PF225 16+03 2 A‐2C 32.57980869100 ‐116.58618363700
PF225 25+22 2 A‐2C 32.58005507070 ‐116.58341296000
PF225 36+35 2 A‐2D 32.58036492670 ‐116.57949734400
PF225 38+28 2 A‐2D 32.58043222730 ‐116.57868374100
PF225 39+02 2 A‐2D 32.58043148770 ‐116.57846319200
001191
TABLE D-10:
PF225 48+63 2 A‐2D 32.58063428350 ‐116.57629806300
PF225 60+57 2 A‐2D 32.58103821280 ‐116.57151289200
PF225 5+44 2 A‐2E 32.58240954320 ‐116.55587962700
PF225 100 2 A‐2F 32.58444431680 ‐116.53056964400
PF225 2 2 A‐2G 32.59249582040 ‐116.43582111800
PF225 8 2 A‐2G 32.59253222800 ‐116.43532529100
PF225 9 2 A‐2G 32.59250216930 ‐116.43323204900
PF225 51+75 2 A‐2J 32.60516205870 ‐116.27369367400
PF225 40+00 2 A‐2I 32.60474246180 ‐116.27970722300
PF225 7+67 2 A‐2I 32.60430254050 ‐116.28508392200
PF225 1+56 2 A‐2I 32.60382212250 ‐116.29137316400
PF225 16+29 2 A‐2I 32.60447517220 ‐116.28303578100
PF225 J1 (38+30) 2 A‐2K 32.60965823850 ‐116.21732187500
PF225 J2 (47+09) 2 A‐2K 32.61008574230 ‐116.21213788200
PF225 J5 (70+50) 2 A‐2K 32.61093895440 ‐116.20158864100
PF225 J9 (66+39) 2 A‐2L 32.61365754100 ‐116.16696770800
PF225 3 2 A‐2N 32.61603446680 ‐116.13754667000
VF300 16 2 CV‐2 32.20340322940 ‐113.85857531500
VF300 DV‐2_F_06 2 DV‐2 31.78377866160 ‐112.50371991100
VF300 9 2 DV‐3B 31.73676281800 ‐112.35172534500
VF300 11and12 2 DV‐3B 31.72597066400 ‐112.31626438700
VF300 1 2 DV‐4A 31.68986732320 ‐112.19996300000
VF300 5 2 DV‐4A 31.68182085660 ‐112.17441544800
VF300 6 2 DV‐4A 31.68125073260 ‐112.17257301600
VF300 9 2 DV‐4A 31.67680914180 ‐112.15836640100
VF300 11 2 DV‐4A 31.67381869870 ‐112.14867149600
VF300 14 2 DV‐4A 31.67183907250 ‐112.14241064600
VF300 15 2 DV‐4A 31.67052481300 ‐112.13838479800
VF300 17 2 DV‐4A 31.66677893900 ‐112.12676559600
VF300 20 2 DV‐4A 31.66275150440 ‐112.11357136200
VF300 29 2 DV‐4A 31.66078757210 ‐112.10724112400
VF300 32 2 DV‐4A 31.64361574460 ‐112.05313749600
VF300 33 2 DV‐4A 31.63568298030 ‐112.02768024200
VF300 35 2 DV‐4A 31.63266280130 ‐112.01777024000
VF300 37 2 DV‐4A 31.62996251070 ‐112.00891615300
VF300 41 2 DV‐4A 31.62546653150 ‐111.99498398000
VF300 42 2 DV‐4A 31.61446635200 ‐111.95982067300
VF300 43 2 DV‐4A 31.61359960350 ‐111.95707067700
VF300 44 2 DV‐4A 31.60918913040 ‐111.94341890800
VF300 45 2 DV‐4A 31.60701068910 ‐111.93677853400
VF300 46 2 DV‐4A 31.60319994390 ‐111.92438093600
VF300 49 2 DV‐4A 31.60015000670 ‐111.91462606200
VF300 52 2 DV‐4C 31.59151798180 ‐111.88776280900
001192
TABLE D-10:
VF300 17 2 DV‐7 31.43109867130 ‐111.38207617700
VF300 US3 2 DV‐8 31.33364905850 ‐110.77910485400
VF300 EV‐1B_F_01 2 EV‐1B 31.33328124210 ‐110.68280767300
VF300 EV‐1B_F_03 2 EV‐1B 31.33358471790 ‐110.29507487700
VF300 4 2 FV‐1B 31.33404944840 ‐109.37455807000
VF300 5 2 FV‐1B 31.33409648310 ‐109.34114691500
VF300 10 2 FV‐1B 31.33386112340 ‐109.27399294100
VF300 17 2 FV‐1B 31.33364253580 ‐109.22324815900
VF300 20 2 FV‐1B 31.33360840050 ‐109.21185994400
VF300 24 2 FV‐1B 31.33342281030 ‐109.20161326800
VF300 28 2 FV‐1B 31.33319314070 ‐109.18059552100
VF300 50 2 FV‐1B 31.33297998230 ‐109.13387520100
VF300 45 2 FV‐1B 31.33302499950 ‐109.15340812200
VF300 52 2 FV‐1B 31.33287302280 ‐109.13153896400
PF225 W22 2 D‐2 31.89021448230 ‐112.85083994000
PF225 W14‐W17 2 D‐2 31.88546213890 ‐112.83499919000
PF225 W2 2 D2 31.88052099910 ‐112.81895532000
PF225 W1 2 D2 31.88032156140 ‐112.81829766600
PF225 E6 2 D2 31.87845266810 ‐112.81193783100
PF225 E8 2 D‐2 31.87723533010 ‐112.80809030800
PF225 E9 2 D‐2 31.87674114090 ‐112.80640444000
PF225 E16 2 D‐2 31.87342669460 ‐112.79558310200
PF225 E17 2 D‐2 31.87314375970 ‐112.79467423100
PF225 E19 2 D‐2 31.87166090330 ‐112.78977096400
PF225 E20 2 D‐2 31.87143729940 ‐112.78895818300
PF225 E29 2 D‐2 31.86795652930 ‐112.77745503300
PF225 E30 2 D‐2 31.86782758930 ‐112.77714152400
PF225 E31 2 D‐2 31.86742876840 ‐112.77584049200
PF225 E32 2 D‐2 31.86704269130 ‐112.77456666400
PF225 E33 2 D‐2 31.86695062860 ‐112.77429313700
PF225 M1 2 D‐5 31.33269368270 ‐111.07609293300
PF225 M2 2 D‐5 31.33231598430 ‐111.07403371400
PF225 M3 2 D‐5 31.33235513880 ‐111.06675918200
PF225 M4 2 D‐5 31.33234824900 ‐111.05985301800
PF225 US1 2 D‐5 31.33233186140 ‐111.05242297400
PF225 US4 2 D‐5 31.33234064360 ‐111.04701400800
PF225 US5 2 D‐5 31.33231826110 ‐111.04628990500
PF225 US6 2 D‐5 31.33232537890 ‐111.04498352600
PF225 US8 2 D‐5 31.33251158870 ‐111.02419205400
PF225 US9 2 D‐5 31.33252097560 ‐111.02248487500
PF225 US10 2 D‐5 31.33252389220 ‐111.02050357200
PF225 US11 2 D‐5 31.33252498100 ‐111.01970957200
PF225 1 2 D‐5A 31.33262408520 ‐111.01069465000
001193
TABLE D-10:
PF225 3 2 D‐5A 31.33256551680 ‐110.99826189400
PF225 4 2 D‐5A 31.33253437020 ‐110.99602028100
PF225 1 2 D‐5B 31.33292971210 ‐110.92461461800
PF225 8 2 D‐5B 31.33301748400 ‐110.91512038600
PF225 9 2 D‐5B 31.33302129300 ‐110.91407527800
PF225 20a 2 D‐5B 31.33308467730 ‐110.90627113400
PF225 25c 2 D‐5B 31.33322288140 ‐110.89420222400
PF225 26 2 D‐5B 31.33324741380 ‐110.89172627500
PF225 27 2 D‐5B 31.33322559600 ‐110.89089597300
PF225 29 2 D‐5B 31.33326083720 ‐110.88752524400
PF225 31 2 D‐5B 31.33330813370 ‐110.88627460500
PF225 32 2 D‐5B 31.33333058210 ‐110.88413148900
PF225 40 2 D‐5B 31.33337694050 ‐110.87764114300
PF225 43 2 D‐5B 31.33342639010 ‐110.87308433700
PF225 43.5 2 D‐5B 31.33346025920 ‐110.87006720800
PF225 46 2 D‐5B 31.33353795000 ‐110.86498877200
PF225 47a 2 D‐5B 31.33355193970 ‐110.86267697200
PF225 47b 2 D‐5B 31.33355012330 ‐110.86237478700
PF225 48a 2 D‐5B 31.33359365600 ‐110.85904743600
PF225 55 2 D‐5B 31.33368857330 ‐110.84262720700
PF225 57 2 D‐5B 31.33368205210 ‐110.84138010600
PF225 58 2 D‐5B 31.33367070860 ‐110.84040361900
PF225 59 2 D‐5B 31.33367914570 ‐110.83946742400
PF225 1 2 D‐6 31.33365785720 ‐110.83281272000
PF225 3 2 D‐6 31.33364384210 ‐110.82884601900
PF225 4 2 D‐6 31.33360739240 ‐110.82698859100
PF225 1 2 E‐2A 31.33374713690 ‐110.25133961300
PF225 2 2 E‐2A 31.33378919100 ‐110.24860337700
PF225 3 2 E‐2A 31.33372835280 ‐110.24140202000
PF225 4 2 E‐2A 31.33375599180 ‐110.23285883400
PF225 6 2 E‐2A 31.33372023890 ‐110.20285695000
PF225 M14 2 E‐2B 31.33393516230 ‐110.07450899400
PF225 US2 2 E‐3 31.33411682970 ‐109.85306110100
PF225 US5 2 E‐3 31.33411606280 ‐109.83149698800
PF225 M2B 2 E‐3 31.33399500530 ‐109.77946884900
PF225 M3 2 E‐3 31.33399748650 ‐109.77181108700
PF225 M4 2 E‐3 31.33402600550 ‐109.76898246500
PF225 5 2 F‐1 31.33403530930 ‐109.62489298000
PF225 3 2 I‐1A 31.78379883460 ‐107.60200831500
PF225 4 2 I‐1A 31.78369507950 ‐107.59239847300
PF225 1 2 L‐1 30.98538327580 ‐105.54328751400
PF225 4 2 L‐1 30.98593762000 ‐105.53386364700
PF225 6 2 L‐1 30.98070889380 ‐105.52853421700
001194
TABLE D-10:
PF225 B 2 K‐1 31.76761222780 ‐106.51124152800
VF300 4 2 HV‐2 31.33240424640 ‐108.86616732300
VF300 6 2 HV‐2 31.33235922730 ‐108.83247983300
VF300 7 2 HV‐2 31.33234593740 ‐108.82220336800
VF300 9 2 HV‐2 31.33233357050 ‐108.79363455000
VF300 DA1 2 HV‐3 31.33314049910 ‐108.70697567800
VF300 DA4 2 HV‐3 31.33336534990 ‐108.66838371700
VF300 DA6 2 HV‐3 31.33340335530 ‐108.62004709600
VF300 3 2 HV‐4 31.33355224500 ‐108.56063376300
VF300 9 2 HV‐4 31.33341087510 ‐108.50738317800
VF300 F_03 2 IV‐2 31.78379638800 ‐108.05117952900
VF300 F_04 2 IV‐2 31.78367610240 ‐107.98759134800
VF300 F_06 2 IV‐2 31.78384633880 ‐107.96357875600
VF300 10 2 JV‐1B 31.78374842260 ‐107.20477927000
VF300 13 2 JV‐1B 31.78371344720 ‐107.20148755100
VF300 16 2 JV‐1B 31.78372615930 ‐107.18391074000
VF300 18 2 JV‐1B` 31.78371394440 ‐107.14907895400
VF300 1 2 JV‐1A 31.78379148900 ‐107.27741859300
VF300 1 2 JV‐3 31.78383603390 ‐106.89966798900
VF300 2 2 JV‐3 31.78384224280 ‐106.89163246500
VF300 3 2 JV‐3 31.78387695820 ‐106.88801109200
VF300 4 2 JV‐3 31.78386298300 ‐106.86718728000
VF300 5 2 JV‐3 31.78381985130 ‐106.85694903100
VF300 6 2 JV‐3 31.78382539780 ‐106.84288641800
VF300 7 2 JV‐3 31.78400739330 ‐106.83506053300
VF300 8 2 JV‐3 31.78399370820 ‐106.82763711800
VF300 9 2 JV‐3 31.78405275530 ‐106.81830192800
VF300 10 2 JV‐3 31.78398485710 ‐106.80238248300
VF300 11 2 JV‐3 31.78396725170 ‐106.78650731700
VF300 12 2 JV‐3 31.78395175130 ‐106.78110252200
VF300 13 2 JV‐3 31.78392461300 ‐106.76274272300
VF300 14 2 JV‐3 31.78386215400 ‐106.75277464100
VF300 1 2 JV‐3 31.78387836150 ‐106.73899075200
VF300 16 2 JV‐3 31.78387491270 ‐106.73575505100
VF300 17 2 JV‐3 31.78387727060 ‐106.73099586300
VF300 18 2 JV‐3 31.78391052360 ‐106.72661777000
VF300 19 2 JV‐3 31.78392539930 ‐106.72440798900
VF300 20 2 JV‐3 31.78393388480 ‐106.72132330000
VF300 21 2 JV‐3 31.78393060650 ‐106.72048611000
VF300 22 2 JV‐3 31.78388968210 ‐106.71162026300
VF300 23 2 JV‐3 31.78382418640 ‐106.70047310200
PF 225 M1 2 E‐2B 31.33413333300 ‐110.13438333300
PF 225 US4 2 E‐3 31.33405090820 ‐109.83413570100
001195
TABLE D-10:
PF225 M4 2 E‐2B 31.33396610580 ‐110.11755313800
PF225 M5 2 E‐2B 31.33394643710 ‐110.11281297800
PF225 M7 2 E‐2B 31.33394643710 ‐110.10319497500
PF225 M11 2 E‐2B 31.33390382150 ‐110.09278366800
PF225 M13 2 E‐2B 31.33390382150 ‐110.07828126700
PF225 M15 2 E‐2B 31.33387759660 ‐110.06364774200
PF225 M19 2 E‐2B 31.33387759660 ‐110.04156633000
PF225 M21 2 E‐2B 31.33393004650 ‐110.03097144700
PF225 35 2 EV‐1A 31.33287275860 ‐110.47376347200
PF225 28 2 EV‐1A 31.33295464360 ‐110.44973021800
PF225 40 2 EV‐1A 31.33307747110 ‐110.43875762600
PF225 45 2 EV‐1A 31.33303652860 ‐110.41357798200
PF225 52 2 EV‐1A 31.33315935620 ‐110.38684252300
PF225 55 2 EV‐1A 31.33332312620 ‐110.35781428300
PF225 56 2 EV‐1A 31.33328218370 ‐110.35363814700
PF225 58 2 EV‐1A 31.33332312620 ‐110.34508116300
PF225 59 2 EV‐1A 31.33332312620 ‐110.34164199200
PF225 60 2 EV‐1A 31.33340501120 ‐110.33464082200
PF225 63 2 EV‐1A 31.33344595370 ‐110.31965586400
PF225 66 2 EV‐1A 31.33348689620 ‐110.30598106500
PF225 6 2 DV‐1 32.02298822690 ‐113.28183068900
PF225 7 2 DV‐1 32.02097711640 ‐113.27577308000
PF225 12 2 DV‐1 32.00604253080 ‐113.22788565300
PF225 14 2 DV‐1 32.00244575390 ‐113.21709532200
PF225 15 2 DV‐1 31.99956833240 ‐113.20745596000
PF225 17 2 DV‐1 31.99183739440 ‐113.18226146100
PF225 18 2 DV‐1 31.99091843930 ‐113.17938972600
PF225 19 2 DV‐1 31.98862105130 ‐113.17157860700
PF225 21 2 DV‐1 31.98046532410 ‐113.14642220900
PF225 22 2 DV‐1 31.97759358910 ‐113.13723265700
PF225 23 2 DV‐1 31.97426237660 ‐113.12666467300
VF300 21 2 DV‐4B 31.54203576670 ‐111.73071269200
VF300 17 2 DV‐4B 31.53192883610 ‐111.69865079100
VF300 2 2 DV‐4B 31.54498716030 ‐111.73997030100
VF300 8 2 DV‐4B 31.56702706360 ‐111.80999689200
VF300 9 2 DV‐4B 31.56830104650 ‐111.81394623900
VF300 12 2 DV‐4B 31.57445863020 ‐111.83322584600
VF300 14 2 DV‐4B 31.57760112130 ‐111.84329031000
VF300 Y6 2 CV‐2A 32.14580696000 ‐113.67451266500
001196

IPT Report
APPENDIX E
Site Photos and Forms

001197
001198
001199
001200
001201
001202
001203
001204
001205
001206
001207
001208
001209
001210
001211
001212
001213
001214
001215
001216
001217
001218
001219
001220
001221
001222
001223
001224
001225
001226
001227
001228
001229
001230
001231
001232
001233
001234
001235
001236
001237
001238
001239
001240
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2N , Wash (4), Looking South, Photo1
001241
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2N , Wash (4), Looking North, Photo2
001242
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2N , Wash (3), Looking East, Photo 3
001243
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2N , Wash (4), Looking West, Photo 4
001244
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2N , Wash (3), Looking South, Photo 5
001245
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2N , Wash (3), Looking SW , Photo 6

001246
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2N , Wash (3), Looking West, Photo 7
001247
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2N , Wash (3), Looking East, Photo 8
001248
SAN DIEGO SECTOR:Segment A-2N , Wash (9), Looking South, Photo 9

001249
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2N , Wash (3), Looking South, Photo 10
001250
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2N , Wash (3), Looking North, Photo 11
001251
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2N , Wash (3), Looking to the watershed , Photo 12
001252
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment A-2N , Wash (3), Looking to the watershed, Photo 13
001253
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment A-2N , Wash (3), Looking to the watershed, Photo 14
001254
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2L , Wash J8(59+24), Looking South, Photo 15
001255
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment A-2L , Wash J8 & J9 (59+24), Looking East, Photo 16
001256
Segment A-2L , Wash J8 & J9 (59+24), Looking West, Photo 17 17

001257
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2L , Wash J8 7 J9 (59+24), Looking North, Photo 18
001258
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment A-2L , Wash J8 & J9 (59+24), Looking North, Photo 19
001259
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment A-2L , Wash J8 & J9 (59+24), Looking South, Photo 20
001260
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2L , Wash J8 & J9 (59+24), Looking West, Photo 21
001261
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2L , Wash J6(23+48), Looking South, Photo 22
001262
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2L , Wash J6(23+48), Looking North, Photo 23
001263
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2L , Wash J6 (23+48), Looking south, Photo 24
001264
SAN DIEGO SECTOR : Segment A-2L , Wash J6(23+48), Looking East, Photo 25
001265
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2L , Wash J6 (23+48), Looking West, Photo 26
001266
SAN DIEGO :Segment A-2K, Wash (70+50), Looking NW, Photo 27

001267
SAN SIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2K, Wash (70+50), Looking South , Photo 28
001268
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2K, Wash (70+50), Looking South, Photo 29
001269
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2K, Wash (70+50), Looking East, Photo 30
001270
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2K, Wash (70+50), Looking West , Photo 31
001271
SAN DIEGO SECTOR Segment A-2K , Wash J1&J2 (47+09), Looking NW looking to the watershed, Photo 32
001272
SAN DIEGO SECTORSegment A-2K , Wash J1&J2 (47+09), Looking South East, Photo 33
001273
SAN DIEGO SECTOR ;Segment A-2K , Wash J1&J2 (47+09), Looking SE, Photo 34
001274
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2K , Wash J1&J2 (47+09), Looking East, Photo 35
001275
SAN DIEGO SECTOR: Segment A-2K , Wash J1&J2 (47+09), Looking W, Photo 36
001276
SNA DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2K , Wash J1&J2 (47+09), Looking N, Photo 37
001277
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2K , Wash J1&J2 (47+09), Looking NW, Photo 38
001278
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2J, Wash (51+75), Looking East, Photo 39
001279
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment 2J, Wash (51+75), Looking North, Photo 40
001280
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2J, Wash (51+75), Looking West, Photo 41
001281
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment 2J, Wash (51+75), Looking East, Photo 42
001282
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment 2J, Wash (51+75), Looking North to the
001283
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2J, Wash (51+75), Looking South Photo 44
001284
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2I, Wash (40), Looking W , photo 45

001285
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2I, Wash (40), Looking East, Photo 46
001286
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2G, Wash (8), Looking East, Photo 47
001287
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2G, Wash (8), Looking E

001288
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2G, Wash (8), Looking South, Photo48
001289
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2G, Wash (8), Looking north to the watershed, Photo 50
001290
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2G ,Wash(8),Looking South, Photo 51

001291
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2G, Wash (8), Looking South to the watershed, Photo 52
001292
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2G, Wash (8), Looking South to the watershed, Photo 53
001293
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2G, Wash (8), Looking North, Photo 54
001294
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2G, Wash (8), Looking west, Photo 55
001295
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2E, Wash T11 (5+44), Looking East, Photo 56
001296
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2E, Wash T11 (5+44), Looking North to the watershed,
001297
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2E, Wash T11 (5+44), Looking East, Photo 58
001298
SAN DIEGO SECTOR Segment A-2E, Wash T11 (5+44), Looking South, photo 59
001299
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2E, Wash T11 (5+44), Looking W, Photo 60
001300
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2E, Wash T11 (5+44), Looking N to the watershed, Photo 61
001301
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2E, Wash T11 (5+44), Looking South, Photo 62
001302
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2D, Wash (53+36), Looking East, Photo 63
001303
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2D, Wash (53+36), Looking South East, photo 64
001304
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2D, Wash (53+36), Looking East to the Scour, Photo 65
001305
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2D, Wash (53+36), Looking W to the Scour, Photo 66
001306
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2D, Wash (53+36), Looking N, Photo 67

001307
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2D, Wash (53+36), Looking N, photo 68

001308
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2D, Wash (53+36), Looking South, photo 69
001309
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2D, Wash (53+36), Looking West, Photo 70
001310
SAN DIEGO SECTOR : Segment A 2D Wash (53+36) Looking East Photo 71

001311
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2D, Wash (53+36), Looking South, photo 72
001312
SAN DIEGO SECTORSegment A-2D,

Wash (53+36), Looking South, photo 73
001313
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2A, Wash 2, Looking Wes Photo 74

001314
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2A, Wash 2, Looking West, photo 75

001315

001316
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2A, Wash 2, Looking West, Photo 77

001317
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2A, Wash 2, Looking North, photo 78

001318
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2A, Wash 2, Looking South, photo 79

001319
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2A, Wash 2, Looking to the watershed, photo 80
001320
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2A, Wash 2, Looking East, photo 81

001321

001322
SAN DIEGO SECTOR : A-2A WASH2,

LOOKING EAST, PHOTO 83
001323
SAN DIEGO SECTOR :Segment A-2A, Wash 2, Looking to the watershed, photo 84
001324
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2 Wash E33 Looking South Photo 1

001325
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E33, Looking South, Photo 2

001326

001327
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E33, Looking South, Wash 4

001328
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E33, Looking East, Photo 5

001329
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2 Wash E33 Looking West Photo 6

001330
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E33 , Looking North, Looking 7

001331
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E33, Looking North to the watershed, Photo8
001332
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E33, Looking North, Photo 9

001333
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E33, Looking North to the tree condition , Photo 10
001334
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E33, Looking to the scour, Photo 11
001335
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E33 , Looking to the debris and ground bed material ,
Photo 12
001336

001337

001338
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2 , Wash E(32) , Looking South, Photo 15

001339

001340
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(32) , Looking South, Photo 17

001341
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E32, Looking West , Photo 18

001342
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E32 , Looking North, Photo 19

001343
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2 , Wash E32, Looking West, photo 20

001344
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E32 , Looking to the scour, Photo 21
001345
001346
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E32, Looking North, Photo 23

001347
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E32 , Looking North, Photo 24

001348
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E32, Looking South Photo 25

001349
001350
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E32 , Looking East, Photo 27

001351
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E32, Looking West, Photo 28

001352
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E32 ,Looking South to the debris, Photo 29
001353
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E32, Looking East, Photo 30

001354
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2 , General Looking North, Photo 31

001355
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2 , General Looking South, photo 32

001356
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, General Looking North to the watershed, photo 34
001357
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(30) , Looking East , photo 34

001358
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(30) , Looking North East , photo 35
001359
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(30), Looking to the scour, Photo 36
001360
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(30) ,Looking to the scour, Photo 37
001361

001362

001363
USCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(E20) , Looking South, photo 40

001364
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(E20), Looking North, Photo 41

001365
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(E20) , Looking South, photo 42

001366
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(E20), Looking to the scour, photo 43
001367
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(E20) , Looking to the Scour , Photo 44
001368
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(20) , Looking North, Photo 46

001369
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2 , Photo E(E20) , Looking North (Tree condition), Photo 47
001370
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2 , Photo E(20), Looking North, Photo 48

001371

001372
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(20), Looking East, photo 49

001373
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, wash E(E20), Looking South , Photo 50

001374
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash (E20), Looking East, Photo 51

001375
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(E20) , Looking North to the watershed, photo 52
001376
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(16-17) , Looking to the Scour, Photo 53
001377
001378
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(16-17), Looking South , Photo 55

001379
USCON SECTOR :Segment,D2, Wash E(16-17) , Looking North to the watershed, Photo 56
001380
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2 , Wash E(16-17) , Looking South, Photo 57

001381
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, photo E(16-17) , Looking North, photo 58

001382
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(16-17) , Looking to the scour, Photo 59
001383
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2 , Wash E(16-17) . Looking to the scour, Photo 60

001384
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2 E(16-17) , Looking to the Scour, Photo 61

001385
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2 E(16-17) , Looking West, Photo 62

001386
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(19-20) , Looking at the Watershed, Photo 63
001387
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(19-20) , Looking to the watershed, photo 64
001388
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2 , Wash E(16-17), Looking down to the road, photo 65
001389
001390
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(16-17), Looking to the Scour, wash 67
001391
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2 , Wash E(16-17) , Looking East, Photo 68

001392
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(19-20) , Looking North, Photo 69

001393
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(8-9), Looking South , Photo 70

001394
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(8-9), Looking North, Photo 71

001395
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(8-9),Looking North , photo 72

001396
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2 , Wash E(8-9), Looking North, Photo 73

001397
TUSCON SECTOR : Segment D2, Wash E(8-9) , Looking North, Photo 74

001398
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Was(8-9) , Looking West , Photo 75

001399
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(8-9) P80 Looking East, photo 76
001400
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(8-9) , Looking West, Photo 77

001401
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(8-9) , Looking East, Photo 78

001402
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(8-9) , Looking South, Photo 79

001403
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2 , Wash E(8-9), Looking North , Photo 80

001404
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(8-9) , Looking North, Photo 81

001405
TUSCON SECTOR :Wash D2 , Wash E(8-9) , Looking North, Photo 82

001406
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(8-9) , Looking the road condition, Photo 83
001407
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2 , Wash E(8-9) , Looking South, Photo 84

001408
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2 E(8-9), Looking to the road condition, Photo 85

001409
T USCON SECTOR :Segment D2 E(8-9) , Looking the scour, photo 86

001410
TUSCON SECTOR : Segment D2 , Wash E(8-9), Looking to the Scour, Photo 87

001411
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(8-9), Looking to the scour, Photo 88
001412
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2 E(8-9) , Looking to the scour, photo 89

001413
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E(8-9) , Looking West, photo 90

001414
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2 E(8-9), Looking to the scour, Photo 91

001415
TUSCON SECTOR : Segment D2 E(8-9), Wash Looking to the Scour, Photo 92

001416

001417

001418

001419
TUSCON SECTOR : Segment D2, Wash E6 , Looking North, Photo 96

001420
TUSCON SECTOR : Segment D2, Wash E6 , Looking East, Photo 97

001421
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2 , Wash E(6) , Looking to the scour, photo 98

001422
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash E6 , Looking South, 99

001423
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2 , Wash E6, Looking South, Photo 100

001424
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash W22 , Looking South , photo 101
001425
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash W22, LOOKING North , Photo 102
001426
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash W22, Looking East, Photo 103
001427
TUSCON SECTOR :D2 W22 P104 Looking to the ground

001428
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash W22, Photo 105

001429
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash W22 , Looking to the scour, photo 106
001430
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash W22, Looking to the scour, Photo 107
001431
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash W22, Looking South , Photo 108
001432
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash W22, Looking South , Photo 109
001433
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash W22 , Looking East, Photo 110
001434
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash W22, LOOKING North , photo 111
001435
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2 Wash W14 W17 LOOKING North Photo 112
001436
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash W14-W17, Looking East, photo 113
001437
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash W14-W17, Looking East, photo 114
001438
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash W14-W17 , LOOKING TO THE SCOUR, photo 115
001439
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2 , Wash W14-W17 , LOOKING TO THE SCOUR, Photo 116
001440
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2 , Wash W14-W17, Looking South, Photo 117

001441
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash W14-W17 , Looking South 118

001442
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash W14-W17 , Looking South to the fence, photo 119
001443
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash W17 , Looking South, photo 120
001444
TUCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash W14-W17, Looking North AT THE WATERSHEILD, ph
001445
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash W14-W17 , Looking North at the watershed , photo 122
001446
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash W14-W17, Looking West, photo 123
001447
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash W14-W17, Looking West Photo124

001448
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash W13 , Looking South , Photo 125
001449
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2 , Wash W13, Looking South, Photo 126

001450
TUSCON SECTOR :SegmentD2, Wash W13, Looking South , Photo 127

001451
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2, Wash W13 P, Looking North, Photo 128
001452
TUSCON SECTOR :SEGMENT D2 W13 LOOKING S P129

001453
TUSON SECTOR , SEGMENT D2 W13 looking N p130

001454
TUSCON SECTOR SEGMENT D2 W13 looking N p131

001455
TUSCON SECTOR, Segment D2 W13 P132

001456
TUSCON SCTOR :D2 W13 LOOKING to the road condition P133

001457
TUSCON SECTOR Segment D2 W13 looking W P134

001458
TUSCON SECTOR :SEGMENT D2 W13 LOOKING N P135

001459
TUSCON SECTOR : SEGMENT D2 W13 LOOKING to the scour P136

001460
TUSCON SECTOR :D2 W13 P137 LOOKING to the scour

001461
TUSCON SECTOR :D2 W13 LOOKING S P138

001462
TUSCON SECTOR :D2 W13 P139 LOOKING W to the debris

001463
TUSCON SECTOR : SEGMENT D2 W13 Looking E P140

001464
TUSCON SECTOR :SEGMENT D2 W2 Looking to the Scour p141

001465
TUSCON SECTOR :SEGMENT D2 W2 P142 Looking to the Scour

001466
TUSCON SECTOR :SEGMENT D2 W2 LOOKING S P143

001467
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D2 W2 Looking N P144

001468
TUSCON SECTOR : Segment D2 W2 Looking W P145

001469
TUSCON SECTOR : Segment D2 W2 P146 Looking N

001470
TUSCON SECTOR : SEGMENT D2 W2 Looking E P147

001471
TUSCON SECTOR : SEGMENT D2 W1 Looking to the S P148

001472
TUSCON SECTOR : SEGMENT D2 W1 Looking N P149

001473
TUSCON SECTOR : Segment D2 W1 Looking N P150

001474
TUSCON SECTOR : Segment D2 W1 Looking E P151

001475
TUSCON SECTOR : Segment D2 W1 Looking E P152

001476
TUSCON SECTOR : Segment D2 W1 Looking W P153

001477
TUSCON SECTOR : SEGMENT D2 W1 Looking N P 154

001478
TUSCON SECTOR : SEGMENT D2 W1 Looking S P155

001479
TUSCON SECTOR : Segment D2 W1 Looking to the Scour P156

001480
TUSCON SECTOR : SEGMENT D2 W1 Looking to the Scour P157

001481
TUSCON SECTOR : SEGMENT D2 W1 Looking S P158

001482
TUSCON SECTOR : SEGMENT D2 W1 Looking N P159

001483
TUSCON SECTOR SEGMENT EV1B WASH F_02 LOOKING SOUTH PHOTO 1

001484
TUSCON SECTOR :SEGMENT EV1B WASH F_02 LOOKING SOUTH PHOTO 2

001485
TUSCON SECTOR : SEGMENT EV1B WASH F 02 LOOKING SOUTH PHOTO 3

001486
TUSCON SECTOR : SEGMENT EV1B WASH F_02 LOOKING SOUTH PHOTO 4

001487
TUSCON SECTOR : SEGMENT EV1B WASH F_02 LOOKING NORTH PHOTO 5

001488

001489

001490
TUSCON SECTOR : SEGMENT EV1B WASH F_02 LOOKING EAST PHOTO 8

001491
TUSCON SECTOR : SEGMENT EV1B WASH F_02 LOOKING SOUTH EAST PHOTO 9
001492
TUSCON SECTOR : SEGMENT EV1B WASH F_02 LOOKING EAST PHOTO 10

001493
001494
001495
001496
001497
TUSCON SECTOR : SEGMENT EV1B WASH F_01 LOOKNG SOUTH EAST PHOTO 15
001498
TUSCON SECTOR : SEGMENT EV-1B WASH F_01 LOOKING WEST PHOTO 16

001499
TUSCON SECTOR : SEGMENT EV-1B WASH F_01 LOOKING EAST PHOTO 17

001500
TUSCON SECTOR : SEGMENT EV-1B WASH F_01 LOOKING WEST PHOTO 18

001501
TUSCON SECTOR : SEGMENT EV-1B WASH F_01 LOOKING NORTH WEST PHOTO 19
001502
TUSCON SECTOR : SEGMENT EV-1B WASH F_01 LOOKING NORTH PHOTO 20

001503
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5A, Wash 1 Looking North, Photo1

001504
TUSCON SECTOR : Segment D-5A, Wash 1, Looking South, Photo 2

001505
TUSCON SECTOR : Segment D-5A , Wash 1, Looking North, Photo 2

001506
TUSCON SECTOR : Segment D-5A , Wash 3, Looking West, Photo 4

001507
TUSCON SECTOR : Segment D-5A , Wash 3, Looking North East, Photo 5

001508
TUSCON SECTOR : Segment D-5A , Wash 3, Looking South, Photo 6

001509
TUSCON SECTOR : Segment D-5A, Wash (3), Looking South, Photo 7

001510
TUSCON SECTOR : Segment D-5A , Wash 3, Looking South, Photo 8

001511
TUSCON SECTOR : Segment D-5A , Wash 3, Looking North (There is a road 200’
north of the fence) Photo 9.
001512
TUSCON SECTOR : Segment D-5A , Wash (3 ), Looking North, Photo 10

001513
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5A, Wash (3) Looking North (There is a culvert at the
road located 200’ from the fence).
001514
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5A , Wash 3, Looking South to the Debris, Photo 12
001515
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5A , Wash 3, Looking East, Photo 13

001516
TUSCON SECTOR : Segment D-5A , Wash 3, Looking West, Photo 14

001517
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5A , Wash 3, Looking North, Photo 15

001518
TUSCON SECTORD-5A, Wash 3 Looking North, Photo 16

001519
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5A , Wash 3, Looking North Photo17

001520
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5A , Wash 3, Looking South, Photo 18

001521
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B, Wash 48B , Looking West, Photo 19

001522
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B, Wash 48b, Looking West, Photo 20

001523
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B, Wash 48B, Looking South, Photo 21

001524
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B, Wash 48B, Looking South, Photo 22

001525
TUSCON SECTOR :D-5B, Wash 48B, Looking East, Photo 23

001526
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B , Wash 48B, Looking North, Photo 24

001527
TUSCON SECTOR :SegmentD-5B, Wash 46, Looking West, Photo 25

001528
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B, Wash 46, Looking North, Photo 26

001529
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B , Wash 46, Looking South, photo 27

001530
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B, Wash 46, Looking to the road condition, photo 28
001531
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B , Wash 46, Looking North, Photo 29

001532
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B , Wash 44, Looking West, Photo 30

001533
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B, Wash 44, Looking West, Photo 31

001534
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B , Wash 44, Looking South

001535
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B, Wash 44, Looking N, Photo 33

001536
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B, Wash 44, Looking South, Photo 34, Photo 34
001537
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B, Wash (20a), Looking South, Photo 35

001538
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B, Wash (20a), Looking South, Photo 36

001539
TUSCON SECTOR : Segment D-5B, Wash(20a), Looking East, Photo 37

001540
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B, Wash (20a), Looking North, Photo 38

001541
USCON SECTOR : Segment D-5B Wash (20a), Looking West, Photo 39

001542
TUSCON SECTOR Segment D-5B, Wash (10) Looking South, Photo 40

001543
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B, Wash 10 Looking N, Photo 41

001544

001545
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B, Wash 10, Looking South, Photo 43

001546
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B, Wash 10, Looking South, photo 44

001547
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B, Wash 10, Looking West, Photo 45

001548
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B, Wash 10, Looking East, photo 46

001549
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5Bm, Wash(10), Looking to the scour, Photo 47

001550
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B, Wash (1), Looking South, photo 48

001551
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B, Wash 1, Looking S, photo 49

001552
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B, Wash 1, Looking East, Photo 50

001553
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B, Wash 1, Looking to the scour

001554
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B,Wash 1, Looking N, Photo 52

001555

001556
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B, Wash 1, Looking to the Outlet, Photo 54

001557
001558
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5A, Fence Erosion, Looking South, photo 56

001559
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5A, Fence Erosion, Looking North, Photo 57

001560
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5A, Fence Erosion, Looking South photo 58

001561

001562
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5A, Fence Erosion, Looking North, photo 60

001563

001564
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5A, Fence Erosion, Looking North, photo 62

001565

001566
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5A, Fence Erosion, Looking West, photo 64

001567
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B, Wash (28), Looking West, photo 65

001568
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B, Wash (28), Looking North

001569
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B, Wash (28), Looking North, photo 67

001570
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B, Wash (28), Looking South, photo 68

001571
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D-5B, Wash (28), Looking West, photo 69

001572
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D6, Wash 1, Looking South, Photo 70

001573
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D6, Wash 1, Looking South, photo 71

001574
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D6, Wash 1, Looking North, Photo 72

001575
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D6, Wash 4, Looking South, Photo 73

001576
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment D6, Wash 4, Looking North, Photo 74

001577
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment F-1, Wash (5), Looking South, photo 1

001578
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment F-1, Wash (5), Looking South, Photo 2

001579
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment F-1, Wash (5), Looking North, photo 3

001580
TUSCON SECTOR : Segment F-1, Wash (5), Looking East, photo 4

001581
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment F-1, Wash 5, Looking East, Photo 5

001582
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment F-1, Wash (5), Looking to the watershed, photo 6
001583
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment F-1, Wash (1-4), Looking to the watershed, photo 7
001584
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment F-1, Wash (1-4), Looking South, photo 8

001585
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment F-1, Wash (1-4), Looking South, photo 9

001586
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment F-1, Wash (1-4), Looking North, Photo 10

001587
Segment F-1, Wash (1-4), Looking East, Photo 11

001588
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment F-1, Wash (1-4), Looking West, photo 12

001589
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment F-1, Wash (1-4), Looking to the Scour, photo 13
001590
TUCON SECTOR: segment F-1, Wash (1-4),Looking to the Scour, photo 14

001591
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (M4), Looking South, photo 15

001592
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (M4), Looking East, photo 16

001593
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (M4), Looking West, photo 17

001594
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (M4), Looking North, photo 18

001595
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (M4), Looking South, Photo 19

001596
Segment E-3, Wash (M4), Looking to the scour, Photo 20

001597
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (M4), Looking to the scour, photo 21
001598
Segment E-3, Wash (M3), Looking to the Scour, photo 22

001599
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (M4), Looking to the scour, Photo 23
001600
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (M3), Looking to the Scour, photo 24
001601
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (M4), Looking to the scour, photo 25
001602

001603
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (M3), Looking East, Photo 27

001604
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (M3), Looking West, Photo 28

001605
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (M3), Looking North, Photo 29

001606

001607
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (M3), Looking to the Scour, Photo 31
001608
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (M3), Looking to the Scour, photo 32
001609
S
Segment
t E-3,
E3 W Wash
h (M4)
(M4), L
Looking
ki tto th
the d
debris,
b i PhPhoto
t 33
001610
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (M1), Looking South, Photo 34

001611
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (US4), Looking North, photo 35

001612
TUSCON SECTOR : Segment E-3, Wash (M1), Looking West, photo 6

001613
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (M1), Looking East, photo 37

001614
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (US4), Looking South, Photo 38

001615
Segment E-3, Wash (US4), Looking North, photo 39

001616
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (US4), Looking East, photo 40

001617
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (US4), Looking West, photo 41

001618
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (US4), Looking to the Scour, photo 42
001619
001620

001621
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (US5), Looking South, photo 45

001622
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (US5), Looking West, Photo 46

001623
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (US5), Looking North, photo 47

001624
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (US5), Looking to Scour, photo 48

001625

001626
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (US2), Looking North, Photo 50

001627

001628
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (US2), Looking East, photo 52

001629
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (US2), Looking to the Scour, Photo 53
001630
001631

001632
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (US2), Looking to the scour, Photo 56
001633
Segment SECTOR :E-3, Wash (US2), Looking to the scour, Photo 57

TUSCON
001634
001635
001636
001637
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-3, Wash (US2), Looking to the scour

001638
Segment E-3, Wash (US2), Looking to the scour

001639
001640
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-2B, Wash (573+10), Looking to the debris,Photo 4

001641
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-2B, Wash (573+10), Looking South, photo 65

001642
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-2B, Wash (573+10), Looking South, Photo 66

001643
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-2B, Wash (573+10), Looking West, Photo 67

001644
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-2B, Wash (573+10), Looking to the debris, Photo 68
001645
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-2B, Wash (573+10), Looking East, photo 69

001646
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-2B, Wash (573+10), Looking South, Photo 70

001647
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment 2B, Wash (573+10), Looking South, Photo 71

001648
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment 2B, Wash (573+10), Looking to the Scour, photo 72
001649
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-2A, Wash 7, Looking South, photo 73

001650
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-2A, Wash 7, Looking East, Photo 74

001651
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-2A, Wash 7, Looking West, photo 75

001652
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-2A, Wash 7, Looking North, photo 76

001653

001654
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-2B, Wash (573+10), Looking South, photo 78

001655
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-2B, Wash (573+10), Looking WEST, photo 79

001656
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-2A, Wash (7), Looking West, Photo 80

001657
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-2A, Wash (7), Looking East, Photo 81

001658
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-2A, Wash (7), Looking East, photo 82

001659
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-2A, Wash 5, Looking South, Photo 83

001660

001661
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-2A, Wash 5, Looking West, photo 85

001662
TUSCON SECTOR :Segment E-2A, Wash 5, Looking North, photo 86

001663
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT FV-1B: WASH C6 LOOKING

SOUTH PHOTO 1
001664

SOUTH PHOTO 2
001665
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT FV-1B:

FV 1B: WASH C6 LOOKING
SOUTH PHOTO 3
001666

NORTH PHOTO 4
001667
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT FV-1B: WASH C6 LOOKING EAST

PHOTO 5
001668

WEST PHOTO 6
001669
TUSCON SECTOR:SEGMENT FV-1B: WASH C6 LOOKING NORTH TO THE

WATERSHED PHOTO 7
001670

SOUTH PHOTO 8
001671

EAST PHOTO 9
001672

WEST PHOTO 10
001673

NORTH PHOTO 11
001674

SOUTH PHOTO 12
001675

SOUTH PHOTO 13
001676
SECTOR: SEGMENT FV-1B: WASH C13 LOOKING TO THE

SCOUR PHOTO 14
001677

EAST PHOTO 15
001678

NORTH PHOTO 16
001679

WEST PHOTO 17
001680

SOUTH PHOTO 18
001681
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT FV-1B: WASH C14 LOOKING AT

THE SCOUR PHOTO 19
001682

EAST PHOTO 20
001683

WEST PHOTO 21
001684

NORTH PHOTO 22
001685

SOUTH PHOTO 23
001686

EAST PHOTO 24
001687

WEST PHOTO 25
001688

NORTH PHOTO 26
001689

SOUTH PHOTO 27
001690

SOUTH PHOTO 28
001691

EAST PHOTO 29
001692

WEST PHOTO 30
001693

NORTH PHOTO 31
001694

SOUTH PHOTO 32
001695

SOUTH PHOTO 33
001696

EAST PHOTO 34
001697

NORTH PHOTO 35
001698

WEST PHOTO 36
001699

SOUTH PHOTO 37
001700

EAST PHOTO 38
001701

NORTH PHOTO 39
001702

WEST PHOTO 40
001703

SOUTH PHOTO 41
001704

EAST PHOTO 42
001705

WEST PHOTO 43
001706

NORTH PHOTO 44
001707

SOUTH PHOTO 45
001708

SOUTH PHOTO 46
001709

EAST PHOTO 47
001710

NORTH PHOTO 48
001711

WEST PHOTO 49
001712

SOUTH PHOTO 50
001713

EAST PHOTO 51
001714

NORTH PHOTO 52
001715

WEST PHOTO 53
001716

SOUTH PHOTO 54
001717

SOUTH PHOTO 55
001718

EAST PHOTO 56
001719

WEST PHOTO 57
001720

NORTH PHOTO 58
001721

SOUTH PHOTO 59
001722

NORTH PHOTO 60
001723

SOUTH PHOTO 61
001724

EAST PHOTO 62
001725

NORTH PHOTO 63
001726

WEST PHOTO 64
001727

SOUTH PHOTO 65
001728

PHOTO 66
001729

NORTH PHOTO 67
001730

WEST PHOTO 68
001731

SOUTH PHOTO 69
001732

PHOTO 70
001733

NORTH PHOTO 71
001734

WEST PHOTO 72
001735
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT EV-2B: WASH 102 LOOKING

SOUTH PHOTO 73
001736
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT EV2B: WASH 102 LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO 74
001737

EAST PHOTO 75
001738

NORTH PHOTO 76
001739

WEST PHOTO 77
001740
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT EV2B: WASH 102 LOOKING WEST PHOTO 78
001741

WEST PHOTO 79
001742

EAST PHOTO 80
001743

EAST PHOTO 81
001744
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT EV2B: WASH 102 LOOKING SOUTH PHOTO
82
001745

NORTH PHOTO 83
001746

EAST PHOTO 84
001747
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT EV-1B: LOOKING EAST PHOTO

85
001748
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT EV-1B: LOOKING SOUTH PHOTO

86
001749
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT EV-1B: PHOTO 87

001750
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT EV-1B: LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 88
001751
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT EV-1B: LOOKING WEST PHOTO

89
001752
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT EV-1B: LOOKING EAST PHOTO

90
001753
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT EV-1B: LOOKING SOUTH PHOTO

91
001754
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT EV1B: LOOKING AT ROAD CONDITION
PHOTO 92
001755
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT EV-1B: LOOKING AT NORTH

PHOTO 93
001756
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT EV-1B: LOOKING AT WEST

PHOTO 94
001757
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT EV-1B: WASH F_03 LOOKING AT

EAST PHOTO 95
001758

NORTH PHOTO 96
001759
001760

SOUTH PHOTO 97
001761

WEST PHOTO 99
001762

WATERSJED PHOTO 100
001763
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT DV-4A: WASH 49 LOOKING

SOUTH PHOTO 101
001764

EAST PHOTO 102
001765
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT DV-4A: WASH 49

LOOKING NORTH PHOTO 103
001766

LOOKING WEST PHOTO 104
001767

LOOKING SOUTH PHOTO 105
001768

LOOKING SOUTH PHOTO 106
001769

LOOKING AT THE SCOUR PHOTO 107
001770

LOOKING NORTH PHOTO 108
001771

LOOKING EAST PHOTO 109
001772

LOOKING WEST PHOTO 110
001773
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT DV4A: WASH 45 LOOKING SOUTH PHOTO
111
001774

SOUTH PHOTO 112
001775

EAST PHOTO 113
001776

NORTH PHOTO 114
001777

WEST PHOTO 115
001778

SOUTH PHOTO 116
001779

SOUTH PHOTO 117
001780

EAST PHOTO 118
001781

NORTH PHOTO 119
001782

WEST PHOTO 120
001783

SOUTH PHOTO 121
001784

NORTH/EAST PHOTO 122
001785

001786

WEST PHOTO 124
001787

NORTH PHOTO 125
001788

SOUTH PHOTO 126
001789

NORTH PHOTO 127
001790

SOUTH PHOTO 128
001791

SOUTH PHOTO 129
001792

EAST PHOTO 130
001793

NORTH PHOTO 131
001794

WEST PHOTO 132
001795

SOUTH PHOTO 133
001796

EAST PHOTO 134
001797

NORTH PHOTO 135
001798

WEST PHOTO 136
001799

SOUTH PHOTO 137
001800
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT DV4A: WASH 35 LOOKING AT SCOUR PHOTO
138
001801

EAST PHOTO 139
001802

NORTH PHOTO 140
001803
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT DV4A: WASH 35 LOOKING WEST PHOTO 141
001804

SOUTH PHOTO 142
001805

EAST PHOTO 143
001806

NORTH PHOTO 144
001807
001808
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT DV4A: WASH 32 LOOKING SOUTH/EAST
PHOTO 146
001809

EAST PHOTO 147
001810
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT DV4A: WASH 32 LOOKING NORTH PHOTO 148
001811

WEST PHOTO 149
001812

SOUTH PHOTO 150
001813

SOUTH PHOTO 151
001814

NORTH PHOTO 152
001815

WEST PHOTO 153
001816
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT DV4A: WASH 29 LOOKING EAST PHOTO 154
001817

SOUTH PHOTO 155
001818

NORTH PHOTO 156
001819

EAST PHOTO 157
001820
001821

SOUTH PHOTO 159
001822

EAST PHOTO 160
001823

EAST PHOTO 161
001824

WEST PHOTO 162
001825

SOUTH PHOTO 163
001826

NORTH PHOTO 164
001827

EAST PHOTO 165
001828
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT DV4A: WASH 15 LOOKING WEST PHOTO
166
001829

SOUTH PHOTO 167
001830
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT DV4A: WASH 14 LOOKING EAST PHOTO 168
001831

NORTH PHOTO 169
001832

WEST PHOTO 170
001833

SOUTH PHOTO 171
001834

EAST PHOTO 172
001835

NORTH PHOTO 173
001836

WEST PHOTO 174
001837
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT DV4A: WASH 9 LOOKING SOUTH PHOTO 175
001838

SOUTH PHOTO 176
001839
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT DV4A: WASH 9 LOOKING NORTH PHOTO 177
001840
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT DV-4A: WASH 9 LOOKING EAST

PHOTO 178
001841

SOUTH PHOTO 179
001842
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT DV-4A: WASH 6 LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO 180
001843

PHOTO 181
001844

NORTH PHOTO 182
001845
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT DV-4A: WASH 6 LOOKING WEST

PHOTO 183
001846

SOUTH PHOTO 184
001847
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT DV-4A: WASH 6 GENERAL

PHOTO 185
001848

PHOTO 186
001849

NORTH PHOTO 187
001850

NORTH PHOTO 188
001851

SOUTH PHOTO 189
001852

PHOTO 190
001853

NORTH PHOTO 191
001854
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT DV-4A: WASH 1 LOOKING WEST

PHOTO 192
001855
TUSCON SECTOR: SEGMENT DV-3A: WASH 11 & 2 LOOKING

NORTH PHOTO 193
001856

EAST PHOTO 194
001857

NORTH PHOTO 195
001858

WEST PHOTO 196
001859

SOUTH PHOTO 197
001860

PHOTO 198
001861

SOUTH/WEST PHOTO 199
001862

NORTH PHOTO 200
001863

001864
NEW MEXICO : ELPASO SECTOR :Segment IV-2 Looking to the road condition PHOTO 1
001865
NEW MEXICO : ELPASO SECTOR :Segment IV-2 Looking West Photo 2

001866
NEW MEXICO : ELPASO SECTOR :Segment IV -2 Looking East Photo 3

001867
NEW MEXICO : ELPASO SECTOR : Segment IV -2 Looking West Photo 4

001868
NEW MEXICO : ELPASO SECTOR : Segment IV -2 Looking to the road crossing Photo 5
001869
NEW MEXICO : ELPASO SECTOR : Segment IV -2 Looking West condition Photo 2

001870

001871
NEW MEXICO : ELPASO SECTOR : Segment IV -2 Looking West condition Photo 8

001872
NEW MEXICO : ELPASO SECTOR : Segment IV -2 Looking South Photo 9

001873

001874
NEW MEXICO : ELPASO SECTOR : Segment IV -2 Looking to the road condition Photo 11
001875
NEW MEXICO : ELPASO SECTOR : Segment IV -2 East Photo 12

001876
NEW MEXICO : ELPASO SECTOR : Segment IV -4A Looking East Photo 13

001877
NEW MEXICO : ELPASO SECTOR : Segment IV -4A Looking West Photo 14

001878
NEW MEXICO : ELPASO SECTOR : Segment IV -4BLooking East Photo 15

001879
NEW MEXICO : ELPASO SECTOR :Looking East Photo 16

001880

IPT Report
APPENDIX F
Concepts
001881
(b) (5)
001882
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
001883
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
001884
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
001885
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E) (b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
001886
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
001887
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
001888
(b) (7)(E)
001889
Water Density
Projected Area Stream Velocity Drag Force Concrete Unit Normal Force Friction Force
Cube Size at 70°F Drag Coefficient Weight Friction Coefficient
AP V0 FD Weight FN Ff Slip? Tip?
(ft) ρ CD (1) (kip) µ
(sf) (fps) (kip) (pcf) (kip) (kip)
(slug/cf)
4 22.63 1.94 5 0.81 0.44 148 9.47 9.47 0.4 3.79 No No
4 22.63 1.94 10 0.81 1.78 148 9.47 9.47 0.4 3.79 No No
4 22.63 1.94 15 0.81 4.00 148 9.47 9.47 0.4 3.79 Yes No
4 22.63 1.94 20 0.81 7.11 148 9.47 9.47 0.4 3.79 Yes No
4 22.63 1.94 25 0.81 11.11 148 9.47 9.47 0.4 3.79 Yes Yes
4 22.63 1.94 30 0.81 16.00 148 9.47 9.47 0.4 3.79 Yes Yes
4 22.63 1.94 35 0.81 21.78 148 9.47 9.47 0.4 3.79 Yes Yes
4 22.63 1.94 40 0.81 28.45 148 9.47 9.47 0.4 3.79 Yes Yes
5 35.36 1.94 5 0.81 0.69 148 18.50 18.50 0.4 7.40 No No
5 35.36 1.94 10 0.81 2.78 148 18.50 18.50 0.4 7.40 No No
5 35.36 1.94 15 0.81 6.25 148 18.50 18.50 0.4 7.40 No No
5 35.36 1.94 20 0.81 11.11 148 18.50 18.50 0.4 7.40 Yes No
5 35.36 1.94 25 0.81 17.36 148 18.50 18.50 0.4 7.40 Yes No
5 35.36 1.94 30 0.81 25.00 148 18.50 18.50 0.4 7.40 Yes Yes
5 35.36 1.94 35 0.81 34.03 148 18.50 18.50 0.4 7.40 Yes Yes
5 35.36 1.94 40 0.81 44.45 148 18.50 18.50 0.4 7.40 Yes Yes
6 50.91 1.94 5 0.81 1.00 148 31.97 31.97 0.4 12.79 No No
6 50.91 1.94 10 0.81 4.00 148 31.97 31.97 0.4 12.79 No No
6 50.91 1.94 15 0.81 9.00 148 31.97 31.97 0.4 12.79 No No
6 50.91 1.94 20 0.81 16.00 148 31.97 31.97 0.4 12.79 Yes No
6 50.91 1.94 25 0.81 25.00 148 31.97 31.97 0.4 12.79 Yes No
6 50.91 1.94 30 0.81 36.00 148 31.97 31.97 0.4 12.79 Yes Yes
6 50.91 1.94 35 0.81 49.00 148 31.97 31.97 0.4 12.79 Yes Yes
6 50.91 1.94 40 0.81 64.00 148 31.97 31.97 0.4 12.79 Yes Yes
7 69.30 1.94 5 0.81 1.36 148 50.76 50.76 0.4 20.31 No No
7 69.30 1.94 10 0.81 5.44 148 50.76 50.76 0.4 20.31 No No
7 69.30 1.94 15 0.81 12.25 148 50.76 50.76 0.4 20.31 No No
7 69.30 1.94 20 0.81 21.78 148 50.76 50.76 0.4 20.31 Yes No
7 69.30 1.94 25 0.81 34.03 148 50.76 50.76 0.4 20.31 Yes No
7 69.30 1.94 30 0.81 49.00 148 50.76 50.76 0.4 20.31 Yes No
7 69.30 1.94 35 0.81 66.70 148 50.76 50.76 0.4 20.31 Yes Yes
7 69.30 1.94 40 0.81 87.11 148 50.76 50.76 0.4 20.31 Yes Yes
8 90.51 1.94 5 0.81 1.78 148 75.78 75.78 0.4 30.31 No No
8 90.51 1.94 10 0.81 7.11 148 75.78 75.78 0.4 30.31 No No
8 90.51 1.94 15 0.81 16.00 148 75.78 75.78 0.4 30.31 No No
8 90.51 1.94 20 0.81 28.45 148 75.78 75.78 0.4 30.31 No No
8 90.51 1.94 25 0.81 44.45 148 75.78 75.78 0.4 30.31 Yes No
8 90.51 1.94 30 0.81 64.00 148 75.78 75.78 0.4 30.31 Yes No
8 90.51 1.94 35 0.81 87.11 148 75.78 75.78 0.4 30.31 Yes Yes
8 90.51 1.94 40 0.81 113.78 148 75.78 75.78 0.4 30.31 Yes Yes
9 114.55 1.94 5 0.81 2.25 148 107.89 107.89 0.4 43.16 No No
9 114.55 1.94 10 0.81 9.00 148 107.89 107.89 0.4 43.16 No No
9 114.55 1.94 15 0.81 20.25 148 107.89 107.89 0.4 43.16 No No
9 114.55 1.94 20 0.81 36.00 148 107.89 107.89 0.4 43.16 No No
9 114.55 1.94 25 0.81 56.25 148 107.89 107.89 0.4 43.16 Yes No
Page 1 of 2 3/16/2009
001890
Water Density
Projected Area Stream Velocity Drag Force Concrete Unit Normal Force Friction Force
Cube Size at 70°F Drag Coefficient Weight Friction Coefficient
AP V0 FD Weight FN Ff Slip? Tip?
(ft) ρ CD (1) (kip) µ
(sf) (fps) (kip) (pcf) (kip) (kip)
(slug/cf)
9 114.55 1.94 30 0.81 81.00 148 107.89 107.89 0.4 43.16 Yes No
9 114.55 1.94 35 0.81 110.25 148 107.89 107.89 0.4 43.16 Yes Yes
9 114.55 1.94 40 0.81 144.00 148 107.89 107.89 0.4 43.16 Yes Yes
10 141.42 1.94 5 0.81 2.78 148 148.00 148.00 0.4 59.20 No No
10 141.42 1.94 10 0.81 11.11 148 148.00 148.00 0.4 59.20 No No
10 141.42 1.94 15 0.81 25.00 148 148.00 148.00 0.4 59.20 No No
10 141.42 1.94 20 0.81 44.45 148 148.00 148.00 0.4 59.20 No No
10 141.42 1.94 25 0.81 69.45 148 148.00 148.00 0.4 59.20 Yes No
10 141.42 1.94 30 0.81 100.00 148 148.00 148.00 0.4 59.20 Yes No
10 141.42 1.94 35 0.81 136.12 148 148.00 148.00 0.4 59.20 Yes No
10 141.42 1.94 40 0.81 177.78 148 148.00 148.00 0.4 59.20 Yes Yes
11 171.12 1.94 5 0.81 3.36 148 196.99 196.99 0.4 78.80 No No
11 171.12 1.94 10 0.81 13.44 148 196.99 196.99 0.4 78.80 No No
11 171.12 1.94 15 0.81 30.25 148 196.99 196.99 0.4 78.80 No No
11 171.12 1.94 20 0.81 53.78 148 196.99 196.99 0.4 78.80 No No
11 171.12 1.94 25 0.81 84.03 148 196.99 196.99 0.4 78.80 Yes No
11 171.12 1.94 30 0.81 121.00 148 196.99 196.99 0.4 78.80 Yes No
11 171.12 1.94 35 0.81 164.70 148 196.99 196.99 0.4 78.80 Yes No
11 171.12 1.94 40 0.81 215.12 148 196.99 196.99 0.4 78.80 Yes Yes
12 203.65 1.94 5 0.81 4.00 148 255.74 255.74 0.4 102.30 No No
12 203.65 1.94 10 0.81 16.00 148 255.74 255.74 0.4 102.30 No No
12 203.65 1.94 15 0.81 36.00 148 255.74 255.74 0.4 102.30 No No
12 203.65 1.94 20 0.81 64.00 148 255.74 255.74 0.4 102.30 No No
12 203.65 1.94 25 0.81 100.00 148 255.74 255.74 0.4 102.30 No No
12 203.65 1.94 30 0.81 144.00 148 255.74 255.74 0.4 102.30 Yes No
12 203.65 1.94 35 0.81 196.01 148 255.74 255.74 0.4 102.30 Yes No
12 203.65 1.94 40 0.81 256.01 148 255.74 255.74 0.4 102.30 Yes Yes
NOTES:
1) Cube orientation:
Flow
(Plan View)
Page 2 of 2 3/16/2009
001891
SECURED BORDER INITIATIVE – TACTICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT
Pf-225 AND VF-300 FENCE PROJECTS
IPT MEETINGS
TABLE F-11: GATES COMPARISON TABLE
Fence Drainage Operation Visual Maintenance Cost Location
Types Efficiency of Gate Deterrence*
Swing 3- 1- 2- 2- 2- 3-
Gates May cause Just need Looks similar to Minor Require Cannot be
minor to be able the fence maintenance special used for flow
additional to keep everywhere, needed to installation for going north to
blockage the door but It can be keep the the hinges and south if it will
open detected by not hinges maybe be used to
being operational electrical. access the
connected to other side of
the ground the fence.
Sluice 2- 2- 4- 3- 3- 2-
Gates (Fully Debris and Different Rails can rust Can be used
open sediments structure in the and fill with Needs lots of anywhere, but
Very will clogg fence sediments, mechanical high debris
efficient) the rails and lots of items and volume areas
mechanical maybe are not
items can electrical recommended
break. .
Slide Gates 5- 3- 4- 4- 3- 4-
May cause Debris and Different Rails can rust Needs lots of Cannot be
additional sediments structure in the and fill with mechanical used where
blockage will clogg fence sediments, items and sediments are
between the rails and lots of maybe highly
gates mechanical electrical expected
items can
break.
Retractable 4- 4- 3- 5- 5- Cannot be
gates Efficient Debris and Looks similar to Rails can rust used where it
but sediments the fence and fill with Needs lots of is expected to
doesn’t will clogg everyhwere, sediments, mechanical have high
open all the rails but It can be and lots of items and debris volume
the way and the detected from mechanical hinges
hinges the way the items and
linking the bollards are hinges can
bollards linked together break.
together
Removable 1- 5- 1- 1- 1- 1-
bollards (100% Require The fence look No additional No special Can be used
efficient.) heavy continuous like maintenance mechanical or anywhere
machinery if no gate is needed. electrical items
and lots of available needed
time to
remove
and
reinstall.
Cannot be
automated
*Visual deterrence refers to the ability of aliens to find the gate easily, knowing that gates are the
weakest structure in a fence, making the fence easier to be breached.
1 = most favorite, 5 = least favorite
5/15/2009 Page 1of 1

001892
001893
001894

IPT Report
APPENDIX G
Rough Order of Magnitude Calculations

001895
(b) (5)
001896
001897
(b) (5)
001898

IPT Report
APPENDIX H
Hec-Ras Models for Boulders in a Wash

001899
HEC-RAS Report for
VF 300 Fence Segment DV-7
Cantina Wash
A. Schematic
340
260 336.947
DV7
C
an
319.863 1990
ti
na
Was
h
309.612 1540
297.084
292.528
277.503 520
285
150
40
B. Proposed
001900 - Existing Condition Profile Output Table
HEC-RAS River: Cantina Wash Reach: DV7 Profile: Q100
Reach River Sta Profile Plan Q Total Min Ch El W.S. Elev Crit W.S. E.G. Elev E.G. Slope Vel Chnl Flow Area Top Width Froude # Chl
(cfs) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/ft) (ft/s) (sq ft) (ft)
DV7 1990 Q100 PROP 3172.00 3781.00 3785.15 3785.66 3786.98 0.011137 12.34 347.09 176.52 1.14
DV7 1990 Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3781.00 3785.15 3785.66 3786.98 0.011137 12.34 347.09 176.52 1.14
DV7 1540 Q100 PROP 3172.00 3776.76 3779.24 3779.67 3780.67 0.017721 10.46 360.01 250.75 1.30
DV7 1540 Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3776.76 3779.24 3779.67 3780.67 0.017721 10.46 360.01 250.75 1.30
DV7 520 Q100 PROP 3172.00 3765.00 3770.47 3770.47 3772.24 0.007196 10.98 315.54 95.37 0.94
DV7 520 Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3765.00 3770.47 3770.47 3772.24 0.007196 10.98 315.54 95.37 0.94
DV7 340 Q100 PROP 3172.00 3762.69 3770.10 3769.10 3771.14 0.003009 8.61 433.74 114.96 0.63
DV7 340 Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3762.69 3768.89 3769.10 3770.89 0.007580 11.67 303.72 99.14 0.96
DV7 336.947 Q100 PROP 3172.00 3762.67 3770.10 3771.12 0.002958 8.57 437.04 115.81 0.63
DV7 336.947 Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3762.67 3768.87 3769.08 3770.87 0.007534 11.67 304.42 99.48 0.96
DV7 319.863 Q100 PROP 3172.00 3762.54 3770.12 3771.05 0.002602 8.27 462.06 121.28 0.59
DV7 319.863 Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3762.54 3768.85 3768.96 3770.71 0.006637 11.29 320.00 103.35 0.91
DV7 309.612 Q100 PROP 3172.00 3762.47 3770.14 3771.01 0.002375 8.04 480.14 123.88 0.57
DV7 309.612 Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3762.47 3768.86 3768.87 3770.61 0.006077 11.02 331.67 106.77 0.88
DV7 297.084 Q100 PROP 3172.00 3762.38 3770.17 3770.96 0.002081 7.71 506.33 125.77 0.54
DV7 297.084 Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3762.38 3768.46 3768.78 3770.51 0.007471 11.87 305.51 104.41 0.97
DV7 292.528 Q100 PROP 3172.00 3762.35 3770.18 3768.73 3770.95 0.001982 7.59 516.40 126.51 0.53
DV7 292.528 Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3762.35 3768.43 3768.73 3770.46 0.007314 11.82 308.40 105.97 0.96
DV7 285 Bridge
DV7 280 Q100 PROP 3172.00 3762.25 3767.60 3768.59 3770.66 0.012925 14.31 243.54 91.49 1.25
DV7 280 Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3762.25 3768.07 3768.59 3770.36 0.008534 12.50 289.71 104.38 1.03
DV7 277.503 Border Q100 PROP 3172.00 3762.22 3767.52 3768.52 3770.62 0.013281 14.37 240.90 90.96 1.26
DV7 277.503 Border Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3762.22 3767.94 3768.52 3770.32 0.009101 12.72 282.03 102.78 1.06
DV7 260 Q100 PROP 3172.00 3762.00 3766.95 3768.13 3770.29 0.016006 14.77 225.80 87.35 1.36
DV7 260 Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3762.00 3767.19 3768.13 3770.05 0.012645 13.71 248.36 95.15 1.22
DV7 150 Q100 PROP 3172.00 3761.00 3767.47 3767.47 3769.17 0.005876 11.04 339.06 102.59 0.86
DV7 150 Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3761.00 3767.47 3767.47 3769.17 0.005876 11.04 339.06 102.59 0.86
DV7 40 Q100 PROP 3172.00 3760.00 3765.42 3766.17 3768.19 0.010738 13.97 261.45 86.42 1.15
DV7 40 Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3760.00 3765.42 3766.17 3768.19 0.010738 13.97 261.45 86.42 1.15
C. Profile
001901
DV7_CANTINA WASH Plan: 1) PROP 4/13/2009 4:41:08 PM 2) EXIS 4/13/2009 11:40:50 AM
Geom: Proposed Flow: WASH 17
Cantina Wash DV7
3795
Legend
WS Q100 - PROP
WS Q100 - EXIS
Ground
3790
3785
3780
Elevation (ft)
3775
3770
3765
3760
0 500 1000 1500 2000
Main Channel Distance (ft)
D. 001902
Cross - Sections
DV7_CANTINA WASH Plan: 1) PROP 4/13/2009 4:41:08 PM 2) EXIS 4/13/2009 11:40:50 AM DV7_CANTINA WASH Plan: 1) PROP 4/13/2009 4:41:08 PM 2) EXIS 4/13/2009 11:40:50 AM
Geom: Proposed Flow: WASH 17 Geom: Proposed Flow: WASH 17

River = Cantina Wash Reach = DV7 RS = 292.528 U/S end of second Row of Block River = Cantina Wash Reach = DV7 RS = 1990
.035 . .035 .035 . .035
3830 0 3860 0
3 Legend 3 Legend
WS Q100 - PROP WS Q100 - PROP

3820
WS Q100 - EXIS WS Q100 - EXIS
Ground 3840 Ground
3810
Bank Sta Bank Sta
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
3800
3820
3790
3780
3800
3770
3760 3780
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Station (ft) Station (ft)


River = Cantina Wash Reach = DV7 RS = 1540 River = Cantina Wash Reach = DV7 RS = 520
.035 .03 .035 .035 .03 .035
3794 3820
Legend Legend
3792 WS Q100 - PROP WS Q100 - PROP

WS Q100 - EXIS 3810 WS Q100 - EXIS
3790
Ground Ground
3788 Bank Sta 3800 Bank Sta
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
3786
3790
3784
3782 3780
3780
3770
3778
3776 3760
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700


River = Cantina Wash Reach = DV7 RS = 340 River = Cantina Wash Reach = DV7 RS = 336.947
.035 .03 .035 .035 .03 .035
3830 3830
Legend Legend

3820 3820
Ground Ground
3810 3810
Bank Sta Bank Sta
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
3800 3800
3790 3790
3780 3780
3770 3770
3760 3760
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

001903

River = Cantina Wash Reach = DV7 RS = 319.863 River = Cantina Wash Reach = DV7 RS = 309.612 U/S end of First Row of Block
.035 .03 .035 .035 . .035

3830 3830 0
Legend 3 Legend

3820 3820
Ground Ground
3810 3810
Bank Sta Bank Sta
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
3800 3800
3790 3790
3780 3780
3770 3770
3760 3760
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800


River = Cantina Wash Reach = DV7 RS = 297.084 D/S end of First Row of Block River = Cantina Wash Reach = DV7 RS = 285 BR
.035 . .035 .035 . .035
3830 0 3840 0
3 Legend 3 Legend
WS Q100 - PROP 3830 WS Q100 - PROP

3820
WS Q100 - EXIS Ground
Ground 3820 Bank Sta

3810
Bank Sta
3810
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
3800
3800
3790
3790
3780
3780
3770 3770
3760 3760
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800


River = Cantina Wash Reach = DV7 RS = 285 BR River = Cantina Wash Reach = DV7 RS = 280 D/S end of second Row of Block
.035 . .035 .035 . .035

3840 0 3830 0
3 Legend 3 Legend
3830 WS Q100 - PROP WS Q100 - EXIS

3820
Ground WS Q100 - PROP
3820 Bank Sta Ground
3810
Bank Sta
3810
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
3800
3800
3790
3790
3780
3780
3770 3770
3760 3760
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

001904

River = Cantina Wash Reach = DV7 RS = 277.503 Border Border River = Cantina Wash Reach = DV7 RS = 260
.035 . .035 .035 .03 .035
3830 0 3830
3 Legend Legend

3820 3820
Ground Ground
3810 3810
Bank Sta Bank Sta
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
3800 3800
3790 3790
3780 3780
3770 3770
3760 3760
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800


.035 . .035 .035 . .035
3840 0 3840 0
3 Legend 3 Legend
3830 WS Q100 - PROP WS Q100 - PROP

3820 Ground 3820 Ground
Bank Sta Bank Sta
3810
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
3800 3800
3790
3780 3780
3770
3760 3760
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

001905
1100
1000.000
1 900
1
828.9621
700
589.4888
499.2579
417.3875
377
325.5258
207.3878
100
001906
HEC-RAS River: 1 Reach: 1 Profile: PF 1
1 1100 PF 1 PROP 1087.00 4209.17 4212.49 4212.49 4213.29 0.007464 7.21 151.65 146.26 0.98
1 1100 PF 1 EXIS 1087.00 4209.17 4212.49 4212.49 4213.29 0.007464 7.21 151.65 146.26 0.98
1 1000.000 PF 1 PROP 1087.00 4207.00 4210.35 4210.35 4211.48 0.006570 8.60 129.84 61.77 0.97
1 1000.000 PF 1 EXIS 1087.00 4207.00 4210.35 4210.35 4211.48 0.006570 8.60 129.84 61.77 0.97
1 900 PF 1 PROP 1087.00 4206.38 4209.04 4209.04 4210.01 0.007444 7.91 137.36 71.25 1.00
1 900 PF 1 EXIS 1087.00 4206.38 4209.04 4209.04 4210.01 0.007444 7.91 137.36 71.25 1.00
1 828.9621 PF 1 PROP 1087.00 4204.00 4207.06 4207.06 4208.16 0.007263 8.41 129.30 59.68 1.01
1 828.9621 PF 1 EXIS 1087.00 4204.00 4207.06 4207.06 4208.16 0.007263 8.41 129.30 59.68 1.01
1 700 PF 1 PROP 1087.00 4201.31 4204.75 4204.75 4205.91 0.006744 8.66 127.77 57.59 0.98
1 700 PF 1 EXIS 1087.00 4201.31 4204.75 4204.75 4205.91 0.006744 8.66 127.77 57.59 0.98
1 589.4888 PF 1 PROP 1087.00 4199.00 4202.34 4202.34 4203.59 0.006884 8.99 121.15 49.65 1.00
1 589.4888 PF 1 EXIS 1087.00 4199.00 4202.34 4202.34 4203.59 0.006884 8.99 121.15 49.65 1.00
1 499.2579 PF 1 PROP 1087.00 4197.00 4200.39 4200.39 4201.62 0.006805 8.92 122.44 52.78 1.00
1 499.2579 PF 1 EXIS 1087.00 4197.00 4200.39 4200.39 4201.62 0.006814 8.93 122.39 52.77 1.00
1 417.3875 PF 1 PROP 1087.00 4195.94 4199.53 4198.61 4199.98 0.002304 5.37 202.43 78.47 0.59
1 417.3875 PF 1 EXIS 1087.00 4195.94 4198.61 4198.61 4199.62 0.007382 8.07 134.77 67.37 1.00
1 377 Bridge
1 325.5258 PF 1 PROP 1087.00 4194.00 4196.50 4196.50 4197.42 0.007668 7.68 141.61 78.67 1.01
1 325.5258 PF 1 EXIS 1087.00 4194.00 4196.50 4196.50 4197.42 0.007668 7.68 141.61 78.67 1.01
1 207.3878 PF 1 PROP 1087.00 4191.00 4194.20 4194.20 4195.06 0.006212 7.58 155.22 101.51 0.93
1 207.3878 PF 1 EXIS 1087.00 4191.00 4194.20 4194.20 4195.06 0.006212 7.58 155.22 101.51 0.93
1 100 PF 1 PROP 1087.00 4186.89 4189.80 4189.80 4190.58 0.008063 7.09 153.24 99.36 1.01
1 100 PF 1 EXIS 1087.00 4186.89 4189.80 4189.80 4190.58 0.008063 7.09 153.24 99.36 1.01
001907
DV8_Basin 3 Plan: Propsoed 4/13/2009 2:52:44 PM
Geom: Proposed Flow: 100 Year Flows
11
4215
Legend
WS PF 1
Ground
4210
4205
Elevation (ft)
4200
4195
4190
207.3878
325.5258
417.3875
499.2579
589.4888
828.9621
1000.000
1100
377
700
900
4185
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
001908
DV8_Basin 3 Plan: 1) PROP 4/13/2009 2:52:44 PM 2) EXIS 4/13/2009 2:52:50 PM DV8_Basin 3 Plan: 1) PROP 4/13/2009 2:52:44 PM 2) EXIS 4/13/2009 2:52:50 PM
Geom: Proposed Flow: 100 Year Flows Geom: Proposed Flow: 100 Year Flows
River = 1 Reach = 1 RS = 417.3875 River = 1 Reach = 1 RS = 1100
.03 .025 .03 .03 .025 .03
4280 4270
Legend Legend
4270 WS PF 1 - PROP WS PF 1 - PROP

4260
WS PF 1 - EXIS WS PF 1 - EXIS
4260
Ground Ground
4250
4250 Bank Sta Ineff
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
4240 Bank Sta
4240
4230 4230
4220
4220
4210
4210
4200
4190 4200
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 0 100 200 300 400 500

.03 .025 .03 .03 .025 .03
4270 4260
Legend Legend
WS PF 1 - PROP WS PF 1 - PROP
4260
WS PF 1 - EXIS 4250 WS PF 1 - EXIS
Ground Ground
4250
Bank Sta 4240 Bank Sta
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
4240
4230
4230
4220
4220
4210
4210
4200 4200
0 100 200 300 400 500 0 100 200 300 400 500

.03 .025 .03 .03 .025 .03
4260 4250
Legend Legend
4250 WS PF 1 - EXIS WS PF 1 - EXIS
4240
Ground Ground
4240 Bank Sta Bank Sta
4230
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
4230
4220
4220
4210
4210
4200 4200
0 100 200 300 400 500 0 100 200 300 400 500

001909
River = 1 Reach = 1 RS = 589.4888 River = 1 Reach = 1 RS = 499.2579
.03 . .03 .03 . .03
4270 0 4270 0
2 Legend 2 Legend
5 5
4260 WS PF 1 - PROP 4260 WS PF 1 - PROP
4250 Ground 4250 Ground
Bank Sta Bank Sta

4240 4240
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
4230 4230
4220 4220
4210 4210
4200 4200
4190 4190
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

River = 1 Reach = 1 RS = 377 BR River = 1 Reach = 1 RS = 377 BR
.03 .025 .03 .03 .025 .03
4300 4280
Legend Legend
4280 Ground Ground
4260
Bank Sta Bank Sta
4260
4240
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
4240
4220
4220
4200
4200
4180 4180
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 0 100 200 300 400 500 600

River = 1 Reach = 1 RS = 325.5258 River = 1 Reach = 1 RS = 207.3878
.03 .025 .03 .03 .025 .03
4270 4260
Legend Legend
4260 WS PF 1 - PROP WS PF 1 - PROP

4250
4250 Ground Ground
4240
Bank Sta Bank Sta
4240
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
4230
4230
4220
4220
4210
4210
4200 4200
4190 4190
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 0 100 200 300 400 500 600

001910
DV8_Basin 3 Plan: 1) PROP 4/13/2009 2:52:44 PM 2) EXIS 4/13/2009 2:52:50 PM
Geom: Proposed Flow: 100 Year Flows

River = 1 Reach = 1 RS = 100
.03 .025 .03
4250
Legend
WS PF 1 - PROP
4240
WS PF 1 - EXIS
Ground
4230
Bank Sta
Elevation (ft)
4220
4210
4200
4190
4180
0 100 200 300 400 500
Station (ft)
001911 HEC-RAS Report for
VF 300 Fence Segment FV-1B
Hay Hollow Wash
A. Schematic
Ha
y
H
o
ll
FV-1B
o
1224.795
wW
a sh
963.0395
600.2373
120.753
51.90444
B. Proposed
HEC-RAS River: Hay Hollow Wash Reach: FV-1B Profile: Q100
FV-1B 1224.795 Q100 PROP 9600.00 3717.05 3727.15 3724.67 3728.42 0.002850 9.15 1101.99 160.04 0.56
FV-1B 1224.795 Q100 EXIS 9600.00 3717.05 3727.16 3724.67 3728.43 0.002842 9.15 1102.82 159.92 0.56
FV-1B 963.0395 Q100 PROP 9600.00 3715.00 3724.61 3723.93 3727.17 0.007189 12.86 758.97 139.76 0.86
FV-1B 963.0395 Q100 EXIS 9600.00 3715.00 3724.53 3723.93 3727.16 0.007491 13.02 747.47 132.58 0.87
FV-1B 600.2373 Q100 PROP 9600.00 3713.00 3723.68 3721.65 3725.06 0.003479 9.79 1279.10 557.65 0.61
FV-1B 600.2373 Q100 EXIS 9600.00 3713.00 3723.95 3725.12 0.002903 9.14 1431.79 578.40 0.56
FV-1B 148.753 Q100 PROP 9600.00 3713.00 3722.57 3723.33 0.003619 9.39 1848.24 710.99 0.60
FV-1B 148.753 Q100 EXIS 9600.00 3713.00 3722.06 3723.33 0.006102 11.64 1493.18 681.31 0.77
FV-1B 138.753 Q100 PROP 9600.00 3713.00 3722.55 3723.29 0.003566 9.29 1870.02 714.68 0.60
FV-1B 138.753 Q100 EXIS 9600.00 3713.00 3722.02 3723.26 0.006134 11.60 1494.45 675.59 0.77
FV-1B 133.7534 Q100 PROP 9600.00 3713.00 3722.54 3722.22 3723.26 0.003544 9.25 1880.10 716.31 0.59
FV-1B 133.7534 Q100 EXIS 9600.00 3713.00 3721.99 3723.24 0.006229 11.65 1490.35 676.07 0.78
FV-1B 125 Bridge
FV-1B 123.753 Q100 PROP 9600.00 3713.00 3722.05 3723.12 0.005269 10.88 1575.95 667.56 0.72
FV-1B 123.753 Q100 EXIS 9600.00 3713.00 3722.05 3723.12 0.005272 10.89 1576.19 668.67 0.72
FV-1B 120.753 Q100 PROP 9600.00 3713.00 3722.05 3722.05 3723.09 0.005126 10.76 1586.90 664.55 0.71
FV-1B 120.753 Q100 EXIS 9600.00 3713.00 3722.05 3722.05 3723.09 0.005126 10.76 1586.90 664.55 0.71
FV-1B 51.90444 Q100 PROP 9600.00 3713.00 3721.07 3719.92 3721.88 0.003998 9.17 1539.71 484.32 0.63
FV-1B 51.90444 Q100 EXIS 9600.00 3713.00 3721.08 3719.92 3721.88 0.003986 9.16 1541.60 484.48 0.63
FV-1B 50 Q100 PROP 9600.00 3712.80 3720.87 3721.68 0.003998 9.17 1539.73 484.32 0.63
FV-1B 50 Q100 EXIS 9600.00 3712.80 3720.88 3721.68 0.003984 9.16 1541.98 484.52 0.63
FV-1B 45 Q100 PROP 9600.00 3712.40 3720.47 3719.38 3721.28 0.004002 9.18 1539.10 484.27 0.63
FV-1B 45 Q100 EXIS 9600.00 3712.40 3720.47 3719.38 3721.28 0.004002 9.18 1539.10 484.27 0.63
C. Profile
001913
Hay Hollow Wash Plan: 1) PROP 4/13/2009 5:07:46 PM 2) EXIS 4/13/2009 5:07:40 PM
Geom: PR_Hay Hollow Wash Flow: Hay Hollow Wash
Hay Hollow Wash FV-1B
3735
Legend
WS Q100 - PROP
WS Q100 - EXIS
Ground
3730
3725
Elevation (ft)
3720
3715
3710
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
D. Cross
001914
- Sections
Hay Hollow Wash Plan: 1) PROP 4/13/2009 5:07:46 PM 2) EXIS 4/13/2009 5:07:40 PM Hay Hollow Wash Plan: 1) PROP 4/13/2009 5:07:46 PM 2) EXIS 4/13/2009 5:07:40 PM
Geom: PR_Hay Hollow Wash Flow: Hay Hollow Wash Geom: PR_Hay Hollow Wash Flow: Hay Hollow Wash
River = Hay Hollow Wash Reach = FV-1B RS = 1224.795 River = Hay Hollow Wash Reach = FV-1B RS = 963.0395
.04 .035 .04 .04 .035 .04
3770 3770
Legend Legend
WS Q100 - EXIS WS Q100 - PROP

3760 WS Q100 - PROP 3760 WS Q100 - EXIS
Ground Ground
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
3740 3740
3730 3730
3720 3720
3710 3710
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 0 200 400 600 800 1000

River = Hay Hollow Wash Reach = FV-1B RS = 600.2373 River = Hay Hollow Wash Reach = FV-1B RS = 148.753 U/S End of First Block
.04 . .04 .04 . .04

3770 0 3770 0
3 Legend 3 Legend
5 5
3760 WS Q100 - PROP 3760 WS Q100 - EXIS
Ground Ground
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
3740 3740
3730 3730
3720 3720
3710 3710
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

River = Hay Hollow Wash Reach = FV-1B RS = 138.753 D/S End of First Block River = Hay Hollow Wash Reach = FV-1B RS = 133.7534 U/S End of Second Block
.04 . .04 .04 . .04

3770 0 3770 0
3 Legend 3 Legend
5 5
3760 WS Q100 - EXIS 3760 WS Q100 - EXIS
Ground Ground
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
3740 3740
3730 3730
3720 3720
3710 3710
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
001915
River = Hay Hollow Wash Reach = FV-1B RS = 125 BR River = Hay Hollow Wash Reach = FV-1B RS = 125 BR
.04 . .04 .04 . .04
3780 0 3780 0
3 Legend 3 Legend
5 5
3770 3770
Ground Ground
Bank Sta Bank Sta
3760 3760
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
3750 3750
3740 3740
3730 3730
3720 3720
3710 3710
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

River = Hay Hollow Wash Reach = FV-1B RS = 123.753 D/S End of Second Block River = Hay Hollow Wash Reach = FV-1B RS = 120.753 International Border
.04 . .04 .04 . .04

3770 0 3770 0
3 Legend 3 Legend
5 5
3760 WS Q100 - EXIS 3760 WS Q100 - EXIS
Ground Ground
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
3740 3740
3730 3730
3720 3720
3710 3710
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

River = Hay Hollow Wash Reach = FV-1B RS = 51.90444 River = Hay Hollow Wash Reach = FV-1B RS = 50
.04 . .04 .04 . .04
3780 0 3780 0
3 Legend 3 Legend
5 5
3770 3770
Ground Ground
3760 3760
Bank Sta Bank Sta
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
3750 3750
3740 3740
3730 3730
3720 3720
3710 3710
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

001916
Hay Hollow Wash Plan: 1) PROP 4/13/2009 5:07:46 PM 2) EXIS 4/13/2009 5:07:40 PM

River = Hay Hollow Wash Reach = FV-1B RS = 45
.04 . .04
3780 0
3 Legend
5
WS Q100 - PROP
3770
WS Q100 - EXIS
Ground
3760
Bank Sta
Elevation (ft)
3750
3740
3730
3720
3710
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Station (ft)
VF 300 Fence Segment DV-7
Cantina Wash
A. Schematic
340
260 336.947
DV7
C
an
319.863 1990
ti
na
Was
h
309.612 1540
297.084
292.528
277.503 520
280
150
40
B. Proposed
HEC-RAS River: Cantina Wash Reach: DV7 Profile: Q100
DV7 1990 Q100 PROP 3172.00 3781.00 3785.15 3785.66 3786.98 0.011137 12.34 347.09 176.52 1.14
DV7 1990 Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3781.00 3785.15 3785.66 3786.98 0.011137 12.34 347.09 176.52 1.14
DV7 1540 Q100 PROP 3172.00 3776.00 3778.62 3779.21 3780.47 0.035598 13.86 321.38 279.83 1.81
DV7 1540 Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3776.00 3778.62 3779.21 3780.47 0.035598 13.86 321.38 279.83 1.81
DV7 520 Q100 PROP 3172.00 3765.00 3775.57 3770.47 3775.77 0.000334 4.00 1004.32 164.74 0.23
DV7 520 Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3765.00 3770.47 3770.47 3772.24 0.007196 10.98 315.54 95.37 0.94
DV7 340 Q100 PROP 3172.00 3762.69 3775.57 3775.71 0.000191 3.38 1210.65 162.56 0.18
DV7 340 Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3762.69 3768.88 3769.10 3770.89 0.007591 11.68 303.55 99.11 0.97
DV7 336.947 Q100 PROP 3172.00 3762.67 3775.57 3775.71 0.000189 3.38 1214.39 162.56 0.18
DV7 336.947 Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3762.67 3768.86 3769.08 3770.87 0.007545 11.68 304.25 99.46 0.96
DV7 319.863 Q100 PROP 3172.00 3762.54 3775.57 3775.71 0.000179 3.33 1237.48 162.73 0.17
DV7 319.863 Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3762.54 3768.85 3768.96 3770.71 0.006649 11.30 319.77 103.32 0.91
DV7 309.612 Q100 PROP 3172.00 3762.47 3774.42 3775.60 0.017343 9.34 369.82 85.20 0.71
DV7 309.612 Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3762.47 3768.86 3768.87 3770.61 0.006055 11.01 332.16 106.85 0.88
DV7 297.084 Q100 PROP 3172.00 3762.38 3773.80 3775.35 0.025837 10.71 323.31 78.07 0.86
DV7 297.084 Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3762.38 3768.48 3768.78 3770.51 0.007364 11.82 307.32 104.77 0.96
DV7 292.528 Q100 PROP 3172.00 3762.35 3773.92 3772.81 3775.14 0.016596 9.56 364.89 82.09 0.73
DV7 292.528 Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3762.35 3768.45 3768.73 3770.45 0.007167 11.74 311.00 106.52 0.95
DV7 280 Q100 PROP 3172.00 3762.25 3772.73 3772.73 3774.81 0.037696 12.00 276.07 71.03 1.03
DV7 280 Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3762.25 3768.10 3768.59 3770.35 0.008352 12.41 292.37 105.08 1.02
DV7 277.503 Border Q100 PROP 3172.00 3762.22 3766.12 3768.52 3774.07 0.056922 22.66 141.10 54.06 2.44
DV7 277.503 Border Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3762.22 3767.96 3768.52 3770.31 0.008921 12.64 284.43 103.43 1.05
DV7 260 Q100 PROP 3172.00 3762.00 3765.93 3768.13 3772.59 0.047867 20.71 153.16 56.95 2.23
DV7 260 Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3762.00 3767.20 3768.13 3770.04 0.012533 13.67 249.27 95.45 1.21
DV7 150 Q100 PROP 3172.00 3761.00 3766.93 3767.47 3769.30 0.009226 12.85 284.83 98.05 1.06
DV7 150 Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3761.00 3767.47 3767.47 3769.17 0.005876 11.04 339.06 102.59 0.86
DV7 40 Q100 PROP 3172.00 3760.00 3765.44 3766.17 3768.17 0.010542 13.88 263.33 86.68 1.14
DV7 40 Q100 EXIS 3172.00 3760.00 3765.42 3766.17 3768.19 0.010738 13.97 261.45 86.42 1.15
C. Profile
001919
DV7_CANTINA WASH Plan: 1) EXIS 3/24/2009 2:55:20 PM 2) PROP 3/24/2009 2:55:14 PM
Geom: Existing Flow: WASH 17
Cantina Wash DV7
3790
Legend
WS Q100 - PROP
WS Q100 - EXIS
Ground
3785
3780
Elevation (ft)
3775
3770
3765
292.528
336.947
1540
1990
150
260
520
3760
0 500 1000 1500 2000
D. Cross
001920 - Sections
DV7_CANTINA WASH Plan: 1) PROP 3/24/2009 2:55:14 PM 2) EXIS 3/24/2009 2:55:20 PM DV7_CANTINA WASH Plan: 1) PROP 3/24/2009 2:55:14 PM 2) EXIS 3/24/2009 2:55:20 PM

.035 . .035 .035 . .035
3800 0 3800 0
3 Legend 3 Legend

3790 3790
Ground Ground
Bank Sta Bank Sta

Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
3780 3780
3770 3770
3760 3760
250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 10001050110011501200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 10001050110011501200


.035 . .035 .035 . .035
3800 0 3800 0
3 Legend 3 Legend

3790 3790
Ground Ground
Bank Sta Bank Sta
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
3780 3780
3770 3770
3760 3760
250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 10001050110011501200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 10001050110011501200


River = Cantina Wash Reach = DV7 RS = 336.947 U/S end of First Row of Block River = Cantina Wash Reach = DV7 RS = 319.863
.035 . .035 .035 . .035
3800 0 3800 0
3 Legend 3 Legend

3790 3790
Ground Ground
Bank Sta Bank Sta

Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
3780 3780
3770 3770
3760 3760
250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 10001050110011501200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 10001050110011501200

001921

River = Cantina Wash Reach = DV7 RS = 309.612 U/S end of First Row of Block River = Cantina Wash Reach = DV7 RS = 297.084 D/S end of First Row of Block
.035 . .035 .035 . .035

3800 0 3800 0
3 Legend 3 Legend

3790 3790
Ground Ground
Bank Sta Bank Sta

Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
3780 3780
3770 3770
3760 3760
250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 10001050110011501200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 10001050110011501200


River = Cantina Wash Reach = DV7 RS = 292.528 U/S end of second Row of Block River = Cantina Wash Reach = DV7 RS = 280 D/S end of second Row of Block
.035 . .035 .035 . .035

3800 0 3800 0
3 Legend 3 Legend

3790 3790
Ground Ground
Bank Sta Bank Sta
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
3780 3780
3770 3770
3760 3760
250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 10001050110011501200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 10001050110011501200


River = Cantina Wash Reach = DV7 RS = 277.503 Border Border River = Cantina Wash Reach = DV7 RS = 260
.035 . .035 .035 . .035
3800 0 3800 0
3 Legend 3 Legend

3790 3790
Ground Ground
Bank Sta Bank Sta

Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
3780 3780
3770 3770
3760 3760
250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 10001050110011501200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 10001050110011501200

001922

.035 . .035 .035 . .035
3800 0 3800 0
3 Legend 3 Legend
WS Q100 - PROP WS Q100 - EXIS

3790 3790
Ground Ground
Bank Sta Bank Sta

Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
3780 3780
3770 3770
3760 3760
250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 10001050110011501200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 10001050110011501200

VF 300 Fence Segment FV-1B
Hay Hollow Wash
A. Schematic
Ha
y
Ho
l
lo
w
FV-1B
W
1224.795
ash
963.0395
600.2373
148.753
B. Proposed
HEC-RAS River: Hay Hollow Wash Reach: FV-1B Profile: Q100
FV-1B 1224.795 Q100 PROP 9600.00 3717.05 3727.33 3724.67 3728.54 0.002643 8.94 1130.37 161.77 0.54
FV-1B 1224.795 Q100 EXIS 9600.00 3717.05 3727.16 3724.67 3728.43 0.002842 9.15 1102.82 159.92 0.56
FV-1B 963.0395 Q100 PROP 9600.00 3715.00 3726.37 3727.78 0.003082 9.78 1164.91 339.46 0.58
FV-1B 963.0395 Q100 EXIS 9600.00 3715.00 3724.53 3723.93 3727.16 0.007491 13.02 747.47 132.58 0.87
FV-1B 600.2373 Q100 PROP 9600.00 3713.00 3726.82 3727.05 0.000511 4.68 3333.06 786.02 0.25
FV-1B 600.2373 Q100 EXIS 9600.00 3713.00 3723.95 3725.12 0.002903 9.14 1431.79 578.40 0.56
FV-1B 148.753 Q100 PROP 9600.00 3713.05 3725.36 3726.38 0.011180 8.96 1190.33 296.00 0.78
FV-1B 148.753 Q100 EXIS 9600.00 3713.00 3722.06 3723.33 0.006102 11.64 1493.18 681.31 0.77
FV-1B 138.753 Q100 PROP 9600.00 3713.02 3725.14 3726.26 0.012612 9.56 1136.40 296.00 0.82
FV-1B 138.753 Q100 EXIS 9600.00 3713.00 3722.02 3723.26 0.006134 11.60 1494.45 675.59 0.77
FV-1B 133.7534 Q100 PROP 9600.00 3714.65 3725.17 3726.18 0.010176 9.07 1199.46 301.71 0.80
FV-1B 133.7534 Q100 EXIS 9600.00 3713.00 3721.99 3723.24 0.006229 11.65 1490.35 676.07 0.78
FV-1B 123.753 Q100 PROP 9600.00 3713.31 3724.26 3724.26 3725.97 0.018436 13.53 947.18 270.24 0.91
FV-1B 123.753 Q100 EXIS 9600.00 3713.00 3722.05 3723.12 0.005272 10.89 1576.19 668.67 0.72
FV-1B 120.753 Q100 PROP 9600.00 3713.00 3720.74 3722.05 3725.60 0.022826 20.05 767.77 535.89 1.45
FV-1B 120.753 Q100 EXIS 9600.00 3713.00 3722.05 3722.05 3723.09 0.005126 10.76 1586.90 664.55 0.71
FV-1B 51.90444 Q100 PROP 9600.00 3713.00 3717.83 3719.92 3723.34 0.047796 21.93 538.02 189.18 2.00
FV-1B 51.90444 Q100 EXIS 9600.00 3713.00 3721.08 3719.92 3721.88 0.003986 9.16 1541.60 484.48 0.63
FV-1B 50 Q100 PROP 9600.00 3712.80 3720.87 3719.70 3721.68 0.004000 9.17 1539.50 484.30 0.63
FV-1B 50 Q100 EXIS 9600.00 3712.80 3720.88 3721.68 0.003984 9.16 1541.98 484.52 0.63
FV-1B 45 Q100 PROP 9600.00 3712.40 3720.47 3719.38 3721.28 0.004002 9.18 1539.10 484.27 0.63
FV-1B 45 Q100 EXIS 9600.00 3712.40 3720.47 3719.38 3721.28 0.004002 9.18 1539.10 484.27 0.63
C. Profile
001925
Hay Hollow Wash Plan: 1) EXIS 3/18/2009 11:04:14 AM 2) PROP 3/18/2009 11:15:10 AM
Hay Hollow Wash FV-1B
3728
Legend
WS Q100 - EXIS
WS Q100 - PROP
3726 Ground
3724
3722
Elevation (ft)
3720
3718
3716
3714
963.0395
1224.795
51.904...
120.75...
148.75...
600.23...
50
3712
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
D. Cross
001926
- Sections
Hay Hollow Wash Plan: 1) PROP 3/24/2009 3:39:40 PM 2) EXIS 3/18/2009 11:04:14 AM Hay Hollow Wash Plan: 1) PROP 3/24/2009 3:39:40 PM 2) EXIS 3/18/2009 11:04:14 AM
River = Hay Hollow Wash Reach = FV-1B RS = 1224.795 River = Hay Hollow Wash Reach = FV-1B RS = 963.0395
. . . .04 . .04
3750 0 0 0 3750 0
4 3 4 Legend 3 Legend
5 5
3745 WS Q100 - PROP 3745 WS Q100 - PROP

3740 3740
Ground Ground
Bank Sta Bank Sta

3735 3735
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
3730 3730
3725 3725
3720 3720
3715 3715
3710 3710
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10001100120013001400150016001700180019002000 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10001100120013001400150016001700180019002000

River = Hay Hollow Wash Reach = FV-1B RS = 600.2373 River = Hay Hollow Wash Reach = FV-1B RS = 148.753 U/S End of First Block
.04 . .04 .04 . .04

3750 0 3750 0
3 Legend 3 Legend
5 5
3745 WS Q100 - PROP 3745 WS Q100 - PROP
3740 3740
Ground Ground
Bank Sta Bank Sta
3735 3735
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
3730 3730
3725 3725
3720 3720
3715 3715
3710 3710
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10001100120013001400150016001700180019002000 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10001100120013001400150016001700180019002000

River = Hay Hollow Wash Reach = FV-1B RS = 138.753 D/S End of First Block River = Hay Hollow Wash Reach = FV-1B RS = 133.7534 U/S End of Second Block
.04 . .04 .04 . .04

3750 0 3750 0
3 Legend 3 Legend
5 5
3745 WS Q100 - PROP 3745 WS Q100 - PROP
3740 3740
Ground Ground
Bank Sta Bank Sta

3735 3735
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
3730 3730
3725 3725
3720 3720
3715 3715
3710 3710
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10001100120013001400150016001700180019002000 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10001100120013001400150016001700180019002000

001927
River = Hay Hollow Wash Reach = FV-1B RS = 123.753 D/S End of Second Block River = Hay Hollow Wash Reach = FV-1B RS = 120.753 International Border
.04 . .04 .04 . .04

3750 0 3750 0
3 Legend 3 Legend
5 5
3745 WS Q100 - PROP 3745 WS Q100 - EXIS

3740 3740
Ground Ground
Bank Sta Bank Sta

3735 3735
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
3730 3730
3725 3725
3720 3720
3715 3715
3710 3710
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10001100120013001400150016001700180019002000 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10001100120013001400150016001700180019002000

River = Hay Hollow Wash Reach = FV-1B RS = 51.90444 River = Hay Hollow Wash Reach = FV-1B RS = 50
.04 . .04 .04 . .04
3750 0 3750 0
3 Legend 3 Legend
5 5
3745 WS Q100 - EXIS 3745 WS Q100 - EXIS
3740 3740
Ground Ground
Bank Sta Bank Sta
3735 3735
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
3730 3730
3725 3725
3720 3720
3715 3715
3710 3710
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10001100120013001400150016001700180019002000 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10001100120013001400150016001700180019002000

Hay Hollow Wash Plan: 1) PROP 3/24/2009 3:39:40 PM 2) EXIS 3/18/2009 11:04:14 AM

River = Hay Hollow Wash Reach = FV-1B RS = 45
.04 . .04
3750 0
3 Legend
5
3745 WS Q100 - PROP
WS Q100 - EXIS
3740
Ground
Bank Sta
3735
Elevation (ft)
3730
3725
3720
3715
3710
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10001100120013001400150016001700180019002000
Station (ft)

Customs and Border Protection Report On Border Walls Crossing Washes and Streams

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Título original

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Customs and Border Protection Report On Border Walls Crossing Washes and Streams

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

001027

SBI-TI May 2009

Michael Baker Jr., Inc.

Not for Construction

 Category 2, Medium Risk: There may be a risk of fence failing because of

 Segment E2A – Washes 7, 3, 6

Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i

Appendix A IPT Charter and After Action Review

Section 2. Categorizing Washes

 Water surface elevation

 Fence type (only for VF-300)

 FEMA rating (or zone).

B-1 PF 225 Washes and Data Appendix B

Section 3. Site Visits

 Collect bed load data

 Determine the likely long-term maintenance requirements following a major

 Asses the validity of the proposed concept recommendations.

PF 225 Proposed Solutions

Installation of Gates at Wash Crossings that can be Opened During

Retrofit Existing Fence at Wash Crossings with Removable Bollards

Remove Existing Fence and Replace with Concrete Boulders or Tetra

Anchor Normandy Fences to Ground

Remove Existing Fence Before Major Flood Events

Rebuild Post and Rail Fences with Deeper Foundations

PF 225 Recommendations for High-Risk Washes

Table 2. Recommendations: PF 225 High-Risk Washes

E-16 3 Mesh with grates S

A2L J6 3 Bollards with grates N

A2K J-1&2 (47+09) 3 Bollards with grates S

VF 300 Recommendations for High-Risk Washes

Table 3. Recommendations: VF 300 High-Risk Washes

Recommendations for PF 225 Medium-Risk Wash Crossings

Table 4. Recommendations: PF 225 Medium-Risk Washes

Recommendations for Other VF 300 Medium-Risk Wash Crossings

Table 5. Recommendations: VF 300 Medium-Risk Washes

Required Flow FEMA

BV-1 100 (Pinto) LWC & RipRap Normandy N Zone A

Required Flow FEMA

DV-7 35 LWC & RipRap Rail and post S Zone D

Required Flow FEMA

EV-1A 58 LWC & RipRap Normandy S Zone D

1. Obstruction to the flow

2. Risking the structural integrity of VFs

3. Scour and erosion.

1. Retrofit PF with a sluice bollard gate and add scour protection

2. Anchor the VF and add scour protection

3. Add low-water crossings to washes with PFs

4. Add low-water crossings to washes with VFs.

 Highest priority: Washes falling in FEMA Zone A

 Higher priority: Washes with high velocity and high-flow depth

 High priority: Washes with lower velocity.

Section 6. ROM Cost Estimates

Retrofitting PF 225 Fences

 Retrofitting approximately 160 gates into a fence with no grates:

Min: (b) (5)

Min: (b) (5)

Min: (b) (5)

Min: 3% + 15% = 18%

Anchoring VF 300 Fences

 Anchoring approximately 3,310 feet of Normandy fence:

Number of anchors = 3310/16 = 207

 Scour protection for approximately 5,500 to 6,000 feet:

Min: (b) (5)