Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
net/publication/316826050
CITATIONS READS
0 603
1 author:
Salim Nabhan
Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
4 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Salim Nabhan on 10 May 2017.
Salim Nabhan
University of PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
Grand Semanggi Residence C-21 Surabaya, Indonesia
Email: salimnabhan@yahoo.com
Abstract
Reflective learning has been supporting the teaching and learning process. Literature suggests
several methods to encorage student’s reflection. The aim of the research is to investigate the
use of journal writing to know students’ perception and comprehension about teaching and
learning process in English as Foreign Language Classroom towards student’s self awareness
and critical thinking. A qualitative research was conducted. The students’ learning experinces
through portfolio in the form of journal were analysed for data of the research. The subject of
the research was the first year students of English Education Department, University of PGRI
Adi Buana Surabaya, Indonesia. The Students attended one semester (16 meetings) program of
Intensive English Course as one of the subjects in the English Education Department. The
information obtained from the students was based on researcher’s experience in utilizing the
journal as a reflective medium in the classroom. The result indicated that the journal helped
students to recognize their feeling and create deeper insight of English teaching and learning
towards self-awarness and critical thinking development.
Keywords: Reflective learning, student journal, students’ perception, critical thinking
1. INTRODUCTION
Reflection has been widely performed by individuals to recall the events or experiences. In the
context of English language teaching and learning, reflection can be used either by the teachers
or the students themselves. The reflective learning engages the students to reflect the students‟
classroom activities. The teachers need to know and understand well what the students feel or
assume towards their teaching practice, moreover when they face the students with different
learning style. Hillier (2005: 63) has identified individual learning style. Students have not only
different level of knowledge but also different way of learning and preferences. If we notice our
teaching activities, some learners may enjoy the activities and some learners may not. It may
happen when the teaching activities do not meet the learners‟ preferences in learning style. This
indicates that teachers need information from the students regarding what the students prefer.
Kolb (1984 as citec by Hiller, 2005: 65) divides four types of preferences. They are an
accomodator who learns best by doing and feeling, a diverger who likes to undergo experience
and reflect, a converger who prefers thinking and doing, an assimilator who prefers watching and
thinking. If teachers have those students with different types of learning style, they must ensure
that the learners learn well. Techers need to identify the learners‟ need in terms of their feeling
and expectation, the material of the lessons, and other requirments.
The reseacher is aware of the importance of reflective learning and considers using journal as the
medium in teaching Intensive Course Subject to the first year students in English Education
Department. Therefore, the of aim of the research is to investigate the use of journal writing to
know students‟ perception and comprehension in English as Foreign Language Classroom
towards students‟ self awareness and critical thinking.
449
Proceeding of the 7th International Conference on Educational Technology of Adi Buana (ICETA-7), 13 March 2016
ISBN: 978-979-3870-50-2
450
Proceeding of the 7th International Conference on Educational Technology of Adi Buana (ICETA-7), 13 March 2016
ISBN: 978-979-3870-50-2
Ryan, & Ryan (2015: 19-25) underline the importance of teaching reflective learning in higher
education level in which the assessment is commonly embedded in the course objectives,
learning outcomes, or professional standards. Two models of pedagofical fields of reflection in
in higher education are proposed, the category-based on dimension which deals with the level of
thinking or higher order thinking skill and the development-based dimension which deals with
the progression of program or course accross time. It is called Teaching and Assessing Reflective
Learning Model (TARL Model). Therefore, reflection is implemented as consistent
developmental process.
451
Proceeding of the 7th International Conference on Educational Technology of Adi Buana (ICETA-7), 13 March 2016
ISBN: 978-979-3870-50-2
overcome the numerous hindrances to rational thinking.”. Facione (1998:12) asserts that critical
thinking is “the process of purposeful, self-regulatory judgment. This process reasoned
consideration to evidence, contenxt, conceptualizations, methods, and criteria.” There are 6 main
skills of critical thinking, as describred by Facione (1998), including self- regulation,
interpretation, analysis, enference, explanantion, and evaluation.
Figure 2. Core Critical Thinking Skills (Facione, P.A.: 1998)
Previous research concerning reflective learning from different field has shown the the benefits
of using journal writing. The reseach by Letch (2012) found that reflective journal is potential in
teaching BPM (Business Process Management). In the field of English as Foreign Language
Classroom, according to Ragawanti (2009), Students‟ journal is applicable to look at students‟
belief in teaching and learning English.
3. METHOD
The subject of the research is the First Semester of English Education Department, University of
PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya, Indonesia. The students were class B consisted of 39 students. The
students attended one semester (16 meetings) program of Intensive English Course as one of the
subjects in the English Education Department. The objective of the course is to prepare and
develop students‟ ability of general English. The course covers four English Language Skills
(listening, speaking, reading, and writing) and English Language Components (Grammar,
Vocabulary Building, and Pronunciation). The course were taught by two lecturers. The
researcher was one of the lecturers of the course. Writing students‟ journal was one of the tasks
given to the students and submitted in the end of each topic (every two meetings) as a reflective
medium. The researcher conducted qualitative research by analysing the portfolio of the
students‟ journal writing as the data of the research.
This writing journal activity was given to the students to let them share what they had experinced
during teaching and learning process. Besides, the activity was also intended as writing practice.
Lecturer corrected the grammar and vocabulary based on the writing assessment rubric. The
journal consisted of the information about what they felt, what they learnt, and what they
suggested. The questions were as follows:
1. Write a Topic/General Sentence about the Intensive Course Meeting
2. Write what happened (description of event).
3. Write what you felt or feel about it.
4. Write what you have learned from the meeting.
5. Write what you hope and/or plan for the future.
6. End your writing. Write a final remark of the meeting or your feelings.
452
Proceeding of the 7th International Conference on Educational Technology of Adi Buana (ICETA-7), 13 March 2016
ISBN: 978-979-3870-50-2
Based on those content of the journal, researcher then grouped them into the catagory of
students‟ perception about the learning and teaching procesee, students‟ comprehension about
the learning outcomes, and students‟ self-awareness and critical thinking.
From the table above, It can be seen that how the students‟ journal revealed what the students
felt towards the teaching and learning process. Student 5 (first row) felt positive to the lesson, as
the student enjoyed and could understand the lesson. Student 1 and 35 (Second and third rows)
indicated that group discussion technique used by the lecturer was proven to be effective and
succesful to give to the students. The technique was used to teach an article for speaking
practice. Student 35 got the advantages not only improving the speaking skill but also sharing the
ideas among the students.
This journal also revealed the students‟ problem in the classroom. Forth and fifth rows reflected
the students‟ feeling during classroom activities. Student 20 felt nervous when the student
presented the material in front of the students. The student did not have self confidence regarding
the speaking ability. In addition, Student 3 faced the difficulty in understanding the lessons given
by the lecturer, but the student did not mention the reason why the student did not understand. In
connection with the mentality problems of the students, Student 6 (shown in row 6) believed that
by practicing in front of the class, the student was more confident and brave. Therefore the
student gave a positive respond towards such activity.
453
Proceeding of the 7th International Conference on Educational Technology of Adi Buana (ICETA-7), 13 March 2016
ISBN: 978-979-3870-50-2
Another aspect regarding the students‟ perception found from the students‟ journal was dealing
with the topic of the materials. The student was motivated to engage in the classroom activities,
as the topic given was very interesting. It was shown in the last row telling that Student 9 was
very happy to discuss the topic because the topic was interesting.
1 I learnt about time and map in IC Class last Monday because we have to know
about it so we can apply it in our daily activity (Student 3)
2 I learnt about telling the time, how to ask and give direction, syllable, word
stress, talking about people (describing an object), and group discussion on each
article about.... (Student 39)
3 I learnt about how to make a resume well and how to use preferences in the
classroom. I could understand the explanation because the lecturers explained
very clearly and well understanding (Student 37)
4 The first I‟ve learnt about the difference between resume and CV. The resume is
more spesific than CV. The second I‟ve learnt about using prefer, would rather,
would prefer and so on. Besides that, I have learnt about how making new years‟
resolution (Student 17)
5 I got many knowledge from this presentation because every group there were
different topic in the class today (Student 1)
6 We need to excercise a lot in IC Course because for me this is very important to
improve the quality of learner‟s language (Student 19)
The journal gave the idea about how the students wrote the journal regarding the topic given and
how they organized their writing to cover sub topics given by the lecturer into the journal. The
journal was also used to measure how far they understood the lesson. From the table above, first
and second rows (Student 3 and Student 39) indicated that both students gave different idea
about the lesson. Student 39 went into detail. This might show that Student 39 followed more the
lesson than Student 3. The same thing happened to the third and forth rows. Student 17 gave
more information regarding the lesson written in the journal. This might indicate that Student 17
gave more attention to all the lessons.
The next finding showed that the students could understand beyond the matterials given. Fifth
and Sixth rows shows that Student 1 underlined the benefits of group presentation, as the student
got more knowledge from the techniques used, and Student 19 expected to have more practice
and excerice. However, students have reflected how far they have learnt and experienced during
the teaching and learning process.
454
Proceeding of the 7th International Conference on Educational Technology of Adi Buana (ICETA-7), 13 March 2016
ISBN: 978-979-3870-50-2
This section focuses on students‟ self awareness and critical thinking. The journal encourages
and stimulates the students to think deeply regarding the the course, so it can develop their self-
awareness and critical thinking. It also facilitates the students to write what they expect from the
lecturer. The students‟ expectation can be about the techniques used, activities, or topics of the
lesson. Besides, it also opens the feedback from the students. The journal is very useful medium
for lecturer to evaluate him/herself concerning their way of teaching and the materials which are
selected. Therefore, after avaluation, the lecturer can prepare the lesson plan very well in the
future.
From the above table, it can be concluded that students were motivated to join the course.
Student 38 (the first row) came to understand about the importance of studying English. It
indicated that self-awareness had developed well. Row 2-4 also gave the idea of the students‟
motivations in learning English. They expected to have skills in English very well. Student 37
wanted to be professional teacher, Student 6 wanted to be succesful person that can make the
parent proud of the students, and Student 15 wanted to get good mark. However, they have used
their mind to think critically based on their capacity. They did not only join the class, but also
brought their motivation to the class.
Another finding revealed, when Student 22 (sixth row) presented the article about using mobile
phone in the classroom, the student came to realize that that mobile phone could disturb the
student‟s focus to the lesson. The journal mediated him to have self-evaluation. Through the
journal, the student could move from a surface understanding to a deeper understanding. Self-
awareness was also developed. The student became more critical and analytical thinker.
455
Proceeding of the 7th International Conference on Educational Technology of Adi Buana (ICETA-7), 13 March 2016
ISBN: 978-979-3870-50-2
After knowing the benefits of student‟s writing journal in promoting reflective learning, it is
recommended that the further research be undertaken in the areas of reflective learning using
other media such as portfolios, surveys, inventories, and conferences. More broadly, the research
can be also conducted for other field.
REFERENCES:
Bolton, Gillie. 2010. Reflective Practice: Writing and Professional Development (3rd ed).
London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Brocbank, Anne. & McGill, Ian. 2007. Facilitating Reflective Learning in Higher Education
(2nd ed.). England: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University
Press.
Facione, P. A. 1998. Critical Thinking; What it is and Why It Counts. California: Academy
Press.
Haskin, G.R. 2006. A Practival Guide to Critical Thinking. Retrieved February 5, 2016, from
http://www.skepdic.com/essays/haskins.pdf
Hillier, Yvonne. 2005. Reflective Teaching in Further and Adult Education (2nd Ed.). London
and New York: Continum.
Lecth, Nick. 2012. Using Refelctive Journals to Engage Students in Learning Business Process
Management Process. Knowledge Management and E-Learning: an International
Journal, 4: 435-453.
Moon, Jennifer A. 2004. A Handbook of Reflective and Experiental Learning: Theory and
Practice. London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Moon, Jennifer A. 2006. Learning Journals: A Handbook for Reflective Practice and
Professional Development (2nd ed). London and New York: Routledge
Paris, Scott G. & Ayres, Linda R. 1994. Becoming Reflective Students and Teachers With
Portfolios and Authentic Assessment (1st ed). Washington DC: American Psychological
Association.
Ragwanti, Debora Tri. 2009. EFL Students’ Journal: A Reflective Medium to Look at Students’
beliefs in English Teaching and Learning. The New English Teacher: A Journal of
Language Teaching and Research, 3.1/3.2: 178-189.
Richards, Jack C. & Lockhart, Charles. 2007. Reflective Teaching in Second Language
Classroom. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ryan, Mary & Ryan, Michael. 2015. „A model for reflection for in the pedagogic field of higher
education‟. In In Mary Elizabeth Ryan (Ed), Teaching Reflective Learning in Higher
Education: A Systematic Approach Using Pedagogic Pattern s (pp. 15-27). Switzerland:
Springer International Publishing.
Zwosdiak-Myers, Paula. 2011. „Reflective practice for professional development‟. In Andrew
Green (Ed), Becoming a Reflective English Teacher (1st Ed., pp. 26-42). England: Open
University Press.
456