Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
ASSESSMENT OF
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES (CLOs)
FOR CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT (CQI)
OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMS
Prof. Dr. Tanveer Hussain
Rector, National Textile University
Faisalabad.
1
12/6/2017
TEACHER/HOD
make decisions TEACHER
for changes in plans/refines
CLOs, curriculum, CLO assessment
teaching or tools & KPIs
assessment
strategies
TEACHER/HOD TEACHER
analyze collects
evidence and evidence on
generate action achievement of ASSESSMENT CYCLE:
items CLOs Every Semester
HOD/DEAN
HOD/DEAN
analyze
collect evidence
evidence and
on achievement
generate action ASSESSMENT CYCLE:
of PLOs
items Every Year
2
12/6/2017
BOS/IAB make
decisions for HOD/DEAN
changes in plan/refine PEO
PLOs, CLOs, assessment
Scheme of tools & KPIs
Studies,
Courses, etc.
HOD/DEAN
HOD/DEAN
analyze
collect evidence
evidence and
on achievement
generate action ASSESSMENT CYCLE:
of PEOs
items Every 3 Year
3
12/6/2017
4
12/6/2017
Sentence Errors in sentence structure are frequent enough to be a major Some sentences are awkwardly constructed Sentences are well-phrased and there is some Sentences are well-phrased and varied in
Structure distraction to the reader. so that the reader is occasionally distracted. variety in length and structure. Flow from sentence length and structure. They flow smoothly
to sentence is generally smooth. from one to another.
Grammar, spelling, There are so many errors the meaning is obscured. Student Paper has many distracting errors. Perhaps There are occasional errors, but they are not too Writing is free or almost free of errors.
punctuation obviously did not proof read the paper at all. some editing did occur. distracting and do not obscure the meaning of the
sentence.
Use of References Student failed to cite sources. Very few references given Although attributions are occasionally given, Professionally legitimate sources are generally Compelling evidence from legitimate sources
throughout paper, even though the content clearly did not many statements seem unsubstantiated. present and attribution is, for the most part, clear are given. Attribution is clear and fairly
originate from the student. Sources of information are unclear. and fairly represented. Student made a good effort represented.
at citing sources.
Quality of Virtually no professionally reliable sources. Random websites Most of the references are from sources Majority of the references cited are from peer- References are primarily peer-reviewed
References with no qualifications are references. The Wikipedia appeared that are not peer-reviewed. Accuracy of the reviewed sources. Accuracy of some sources may professional journals or other approved
to be the only source. material is unable to be substantiated. not be verifiable but are generally regarded as sources. Reader is confident that information
legitimate. Minimal use of Wikipedia. and ideas can be trusted.
5
12/6/2017
DIRECT ASSESSMENT of COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES (CLOs) through Assignments, projects etc.
No. of Students with Respective Level (Score)
Linked Assessment for CLO Achievement
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES
PLO Tool Excellent Good Fair Poor
(=>85%) (71-84%) (61-70%) <60%
PLO-2 CLO-1Ability to formulate a research question Assignment 1
PLO-5 CLO-2ability to design experiments Assignment 2
PLO-10 CLO-3Ability to write a research proposal Assignment 3
PLO-10 CLO-4Ability to write a short review paper Assignment 4
Ability to use MINITAB for design & analysis of
PLO-5 CLO-5 experiments Assignment 5
PLO-10 CLO-6 Ability to write a research paper Assignment 6
Average No. of Students with respective level/score for CLO achievement
TARGET KPI : Min. 60% students should get good/excellent avg. achievement of CLOs.
Program:
Course:
Student ID:
Instructions: By ticking in appropriate box, please indicate how confident are you regarding the
attainment of each course learning outcome (CLO).
Excellent Good Average Fair Poor
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES
(5.0) (4.0) (3.0) (2.0) (1.0)
CLO-1 Ability to formulate a research question
CLO-2 ability to design experiments
CLO-3 Ability to write a research proposal
CLO-4 Ability to write a short review paper
CLO-5 Ability to use MINITAB for design & analysis of experiments
CLO-6 Ability to write a research paper
6
12/6/2017
EXAMPLE Session:
Semester/Year: Total No. of Students:
DIRECT ASSESSMENT of COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES (CLOs) through Assignments, projects etc.
40
COURSE
Achievement
Linked PLO COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES Assessment Tool
Excellent Good Fair Poor
(=>85%) (71-84%) (61-70%) <60%
PLO-2 CLO-1 Ability to formulate a research question Assignment 1 15 15 5 5
PLO-5 CLO-2 ability to design experiments Assignment 2 10 10 10 10
ASSESSMENT
PLO-10 CLO-3 Ability to write a research proposal Assignment 3 15 15 5 5
PLO-10 CLO-4 Ability to write a short review paper Assignment 4 10 10 10 10
PLO-5 CLO-5 Ability to use MINITAB for design & analysis of experiments Assignment 5 15 15 5 5
PLO-10 CLO-6 Ability to write a research paper Assignment 6 15 15 5 5
Average No. of Students with respective level/score for CLO achievement 13.3 13.3 7.0 7.0
REPORT TARGET KPI : Min. 60% students should get >70% avg. achievement score of CLOs.
Percentage of students meeting Target KPI:
INDIRECT ASSESSMENT of COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES (CLOs) through students' feedback
67%
FOR CQI
Linked PLO COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES
Excellent Good Average Fair Poor
(5.0) (4.0) (3.0) (2.0) (1.0)
PLO-2 CLO-1 Ability to formulate a research question 15 15 5 5 0
PLO-5 CLO-2 ability to design experiments 10 10 10 10 0
PLO-10 CLO-3 Ability to write a research proposal 15 15 5 5 0
PLO-10 CLO-4 Ability to write a short review paper 10 10 10 10 0
PLO-5 CLO-5 Ability to use MINITAB for design & analysis of experiments 15 15 5 5 0
PLO-10 CLO-6 Ability to write a research paper 15 15 5 5 0
Avrg. No. of Students with resp. level/score of confidence 13.3 13.3 6.7 6.7 0.0
TARGET KPI : Min. 60% students should have good or excellent avg. confidence in achievement of CLOs.
Percentage of students meeting Target KPI: 67%
AGGREGATE MARKS OF THE STUDENTS
Aggregate Marks %: =>85% 71-84% 61-70% 50-60% <50%
No. of Students: 10 10 10 10 10
Target KPI: Min. 60% student should get >60% aggregate
%age of Students meeting Target KPI: 75%
TEACHER'S REMARKS FOR CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT (CQI)
A. Remarks about level of CLO achievement and distribution of grades, and action plan for any change in curriculum, delivery or assessment methods.
TEACHER
DATE:
SIGNATURE
HOD'S REMARKS FOR CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT (CQI)
A. Remarks about level of CLO achievement and distribution of grades, and action plan for any change in curriculum, delivery or assessment methods.
HOD
DATE:
SIGNATURE
7
12/6/2017
EXAMPLE
GRADUATING
STUDENTS
SURVEY
FORM
8
12/6/2017
Attitude of being a lifelong learner in the practical >60% employers and alumni rate PEO Employer Survey;
PEO-5
life. achievement 3 or higher on 1-5 scale. Alumni Surey
SOFT SKILLS
0% 10% 30% 30% 30%