Você está na página 1de 78

L&T-INFRASTRUCTURE

ENGINEERING LIMITED
Client: WELSPUN ENTERPRISES LIMITED
Project: Project No.:
Four Laning of Chikhali–Tarsod
(Pkg IIA) Section of NH 6 from km C1172708
360.000 to 422.700 in the state of
Maharashtra
Title: Document No.: Rev.:
Design of Abutment for ROB at
CH:396825 (A1) DN 090 E1
File path:
This document is the property of L&T-Infrastructure Engineering Limited and
y:\roads\2017\c1172701 – dd chikhali-tarsod-
must not be passed on to any person or body not authorised by us to receive it
maharastra\working\calculations\3.0 structural design\001.rob\002-
nor be copied or otherwise made use of either in full or in part by such person or
substructure\396+885\dn 090-e1-krh-detailed design of substructure and
body without our prior permission in writing.
foundation for abutment (a1).docx

Notes:

Revision Details:

E1 19/06/2019 For Approval KJS NRY PML

Init. Sign. Init. Sign. Init. Sign.


Rev. Date Details
Prepared Checked Approved
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING DOCUMENT NO. DATE
ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

Index
page
1.0 General Arrangement drawing 1
1.1 Salient Reduced levels's (RL) 1
1.2 Dimension of substructure and foundation 1
1.3 Material properties 2
1.4 Load from Super structure 2
1.5 Seismic load 3
1.6 Computation of volumnes of subsoil components 3
2 SIDL loads 5
3 Carriageway live load reactions and moments 5
3.1 Maximum logitudinal Moment case. 6
3.2 CWLL transvere Eccentricities 6
4 Calculation of Horizontal force 8
4.1 Horizontal Force due to POT/PTFE 9
4.2 Centrifugal Force 10
10
4.3 Summary of Horzontl Foce due to fixed POT/PTFE bearing
4.4 Summary of vertical effect due to bracking forces 11
5 Forces and moments due to wind Force 12
5.1 Wind force on exposed area of the super structure 12
5.2 Wind force on Live load 12
6 Force and Moment due to Seismic 14
6.1 Seismic coefficient in service stage 15
6.2 Seismic coefficient in span dislodge stage 16
6.3 Longitudinal seismic force 17
6.4 Transverse seismic force 18
7 Combination for verifiction of ultimate limit state 20
7.1 Summary of loads and moments at the base of pier shaft 22
7.2 Analysis of Rectangular setion under axial load and bi-axial bending 23
8 Combination for verifiction of serviceability limit state 24
8.1 Summary of loads and moments (for SLS) 36
8.2 Analysis of Rectangular setion under axial load and bi-axial bending 37
8.3 Summary of Base pressure 38
8.4 Design of Toe footing 39
8.5 Design of Heel footing 41
9 Combination for calculation of base pressure 43
9.1 Summary of base pressure 49
9.2 Crack width calculation 50
10 Combination for calculation of Base pressure for design of foundation 51
10.1 Summary of base pressure for foundation design 52
10.2 Design of Toe footing 55
10.3 Design of Heel footing 61
11 Design of Piercap in Transverse Direction 66
12 Design of Dirt wall 75
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING DOCUMENT NO. DATE
ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

Design of abutment and abutment foundation

Note : The design note presents the design of Pier type abutment for 2 Lane ROB. The span arrangement is 1 spans of 59.20m. POTPTFE
bearings are proposed over abutment. RE wall is proposed on backside of pier type abutment and in the approaches also.

1.0 General Arrangement


Span Arrangement = 1 x 59.20 + 0 x 0.00
Total Length of Bridge = 59.2 m + 0 x 0.00

Left Span Right Span


C/C distance between Exp. Jt. = 0.000 59.200 m
Dist. between C/L's of Brg. & Exp. Jt. = 0.000 0.741 m
Dist. between C/L's of Brg. & C/4L's of Shaft = 0.000 0.741 m
C/C distance between Bearing = 0.000 57.718 m
Expansion Gap = 0.04 m

Deck Width = 28.500 12.000 m


Carriageway Width = 27.500 9.000 m

Type of Superstructure = PSC girder Steel truss


No of Girders = 8 2
C/C dist of bearing in trans direction = 3.600 13.000 m

Angle of Skew q = 23.50 Degrees Cos q Sin q Tan q


0.917 0.399 0.435
1.1 Salient Reduced Levels's (RL's)
Left Span Right Span
FRL (At Median inner edge) = 221.458 221.458 m
Camber = 2.500 2.500 %
RL at Outer Girder/Bearing Location = 221.139 221.158 m
Thickness of Wearing Course = 0.065 0.065 m
Depth of Superstructure = 2.000 1.655 m
Soffit Level at Outer Girder/Bearing = 219.074 219.438 m
Depth of Pedestal (Min) 0.200 0.200
Depth of Brg.+Ped at above location = 0.350 0.350 m
Pier Cap Top Level = 218.724 219.088 m
Pier Cap Bottom Level (Rect. Portion) = 218.488 m
Pier Cap Bottom Level (Trap. Portion) = 217.488 m
HFL (Affluxed) = 209.772 m
Mean velocity of flow = 0.000 m/s
LBL = 209.872 m
Pucca floor level = 209.872 m
Footing Top Level = 207.250 m
Depth of Footing : At Root = 1.500 m At tip = 0.900 m
Depth Effective = 1.500 m (Refer clause 707.2.4 of IRC:78)
Actual Foundation Level = 205.750 m
Foundation Level taken for design = 205.750 m

1.2 Dimensions of Substructure & Foundation

1.2.1 Bearings & Pedestals

No of Bearings & Pedestals 8 2


Type of Bearing = Free PTFE Fixed POT

L-L Dir. T-T Dir. Avg. Thick


Size of Bearing of LHS Span = 700 700 150
Size of Bearing of RHS Span 700 700 150

Size of pedestals of LHS Span = 1.000 1.000 0.290


Size of pedestals of RHS Span = 1.000 1.000 0.525

Page # 2
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING DOCUMENT NO. DATE
ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY
1.2.2 Abutment Cap

Proj.of pier cap from cL of brg. in L-L dir = 0.600 m


Proj.of pier cap from cL of brg. in T-T dir = 0.600 m

L-L Dir. T-T Dir. Thickness


Uniform portion Top = 2.13 16.03 0.60
Trapezoidal portion Top = 2.13 16.03
1.00
Bottom = 1.20 8.00
Projection at top of pier = 0.00 0.00
Thick. of rectangular haunch at top of pier = 0.00 0.00
Thickness of dirt wall = 0.40 m
Height of dirt wall = 2.37 m
RE wall from the face of Abutment = 1.90 m
1.2.4 Abutment

Type of Pier = R Rectangular


Height of pier shaft including pier cap = 11.84 m

L-L Dir. T-T Dir.


Size of Pier at bottom = 1.200 8.000 m
Thickness of pier (for hollow pier) = 0.000 0.000 m
Ht. of pedestal below RL 207.250 = 0.00 0.00 m
Proj. of pedestal at RL 207.250 = 0.10 0.10 m

Dia. of cutwater portion = 0.000 m

1.2.4 Footing With reference to c/l of shaft


L-L Dir. T-T Dir. offset heel side toe side
Size of Footing = 5.10 9.00 m 0 2.55 2.55

Design speed of the vehicle = 100 kmph Radius of Curvature = 1E+10 m


Superelevation = 2.5 %

1.3 Material Properties


Abutment Cap Abutment Footing Pile
Grade of Concrete = M 35 M 35 M 35 M 35
Permi. Bending Stress s cbc = 11.67 11.67 11.67 11.67 Mpa
Permi. Direct Stress s co = 8.75 8.75 8.75 8.75 Mpa
Basic tensile stress in concrete = 0.670 0.670 0.670 0.670 Mpa

Grade of Steel = S 500


Permi. Bending Stress s st = 240 Mpa (Normal Case)
= 360 Mpa (Seismic Case)
= 319.2 Mpa (Wind Case)

SBC in Normal Case = 700.00 kN/m^2


SBC in Seismic Case = 875.00 kN/m^2
SBC in Wind Case = 875.00 kN/m^2
This design caters for following load cases
Normal Case Longitudinal Seismic Case Transverse Seismic Case Wind Case
Case 1 : Max Reaction Case Case 5 : Max Reaction Case Case 9 : Max Reaction Case Case 13 : Max Reaction Case
Case 2 : Max Trans. Moment Cond'n Case 6 : Max Trans. Moment Cond'n Case 10 : Max Trans. Moment Cond'n Case 14 : Max Trans. Moment Cond'n
Case 3 : Max Long. Moment Cond'n Case 7 : Max Long. Moment Cond'n Case 11 : Max Long. Moment Cond'n Case 15 : Max Long. Moment Cond'n
Case 4 : One Span Dislodged Cond'n Case 8 : One Span Dislodged Cond'n Case 12 : One Span Dislodged Cond'nCase 16 : One Span Dislodged Cond'n

1.4 Loads From Superstructure


Reactions (KN) Eccentricities (m)
Left Span Right Span Left Span Right Span
DL Reaction = 0.00 4500.00 0.000 0.000 Refer Section 2.0 of design sheets
SIDL Reaction = 0.00 1341.00 0.000 0.000
FPLL Reaction = 0.00 143.56 0.000 -4.250
Wt of Platform at pier cap 0.00 0.000

CWLL Reaction = 1351.53 KN (Max CWLL Reaction Case)


CWLL Reaction = 1225.57 KN (Max Transverse Moment Case)
CWLL Reaction = 1351.53 KN (Max Longitudinal Moment Case)

Page # 3
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING DOCUMENT NO. DATE
ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

1.5 Seismic Load

Seismic Zone = III (II / III / IV / V)


Type of Foundation soil strata = HS (Rocky or Hard Soil (HS) / Medium Soil (MS) / Soft Soil (SS))
Importance Factor = IB (Important Bridges (IB) / Others (OT))

Service Condition Span Dislodged Condition


L-L Dir. T-T Dir. L-L Dir. T-T Dir.
Horizontal seismic coefficient = 0.039 0.096 0.053 0.096
Vertical seismic coefficient = 0.026 0.064 0.036 0.064

1.6 Computation of volumes of Subsoil Components

1.6.1 Pedestal on either side of C/L of pier

Volume of pedestals on LHS side = 1.000 x 1.000 x 0.290 x 8 = 2.320 m^3


Volume of pedestals on RHS side = 1.000 x 1.000 x 0.525 x 2 = 1.050 m^3

1.6.2 Abutment Cap

Volume of Rectangular portion of cap = 16.03 x 2.13 x 0.60 x = 20.49 x m^3

Area of cap at RL 218.488 = 16.03 x 2.13 x = 34.14 x m^2


Area of cap at RL 217.488 = 8.00 x 1.20 x = 9.60 x m^2
Volume of Trapezoidal portion of cap = (34.1428014091591 + 9.6 + (34.1428014091591 x 9.6)=^0.5 )) 20.62
x 1 / 3x m^3

Total Volume of pier cap = 20.49 x + 20.62 x = 41.10 x m^3

1.6.3 Abutment Shaft

Height of pier shaft = 10.24 m

Height above LBL = 7.616 m ; Height below LBL = 2.622 m


Height above PFL = 7.616 m ; Height below PFL = 2.622 m

Area of pier shaft = pi() x (1.2 ^2 - 1.2 ^2) / 4 = 9.600 m^2

1.6.3.1 Abutment' shaft in LWL Case

Volume of pier shaft above LWL = = 73.114 m^3


Volume of pier shaft below LWL = = 25.171 m^3

1.6.4 Pedestal at bottom of pier

Length of pedestal along L-L Dir = 1.200 + 0.20 = 1.40 m


Length of pedestal along T-T Dir = 8.000 + 0.20 = 8.20 m
Volume of Pedestal = 1.400 x 8.200 x 0.00 = 0.00 m^3

Page # 4
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING DOCUMENT NO. DATE
ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY
1.6.5 Abutment Footing

Length of footing along L-L at top = 1.200 + 0.20 = 1.40 m


Length of footing along T-T at top = 8.000 + 0.20 = 8.20 m

Area of footing at RL 207.250 = 1.400 x 8.200 = 11.48 m^2


Area of footing RL 206.650 = 5.100 x 9.000 = 45.90 m^2
Volume of Trap. portion of footing = (11.48 + 45.9 + (11.48 x 45.9) ^0.5 ) )x 0.6 / 3 = 16.067 m^3

Volume of Rect. portion of footing = 5.100 x 9.000 x 0.900 = 41.310 m^3

Total Volume of footing = 41.310 + 16.067 = 57.38 m^3

1.6.6 Volume of Overburden Earth over footing

1.6.6.1 In LWL Case

Total Volume of earth above footing = 5.100 x 9.000 x 4.122 = 189.200 m^3
Net Volume of earth above footing = 189.200 -57.377 0.000 -25.171 = 106.652 m^3
Volume of earth on back side of retaining wall
= 0.050 x 9.000 x 11.586 = 5.214 m^3
Eccentricity from the centre of pier = 0.050 + 2.500 = 2.525 m
2

Page # 5
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING DOCUMENT NO. DATE
ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

2.0 SIDL Loads:

Effective Span (LHS) = 0.00 m ; Effective Span (RHS) = 57.72 m


Unit weight of RCC = 25.00 KN/m^3 ; Unit weight of PCC = 24.00 KNm^3

2.1.1 Weight of RCC Kerb + Railing:

Width of Kerb = = 0.500 m


Height of Kerb = = 0.250 m

Weight of Kerb = 0.5 x 0.25 x 25 = 3.130 KN/m


Wt of RCC Railing / m = (0.175 * 0.2 * 2 * 2)+(0.25 * 0.275 * 0.86)) / 2 * 24 = 2.500 KN/m

Weight of Kerb + Railing = 3.13 + 2.5 = 5.700 KN/m

2.1.1 Weight of RCC Crash barrier on Footpath side

Volume of C/Barrier = = 0.350 m^3


Weight of RCC Crash barrier = 0.35 x 25 = 8.750 KN/m

Weight of RCC Crash barrier+Pipe = 8.75 + 0 = 8.80 KN/m

2.1.2 Weight of RCC Crash barrier on Median side

Volume of C/Barrier = = 0.350 m^3


Weight of RCC Crash barrier = 0.35 x 25 = 8.750 KN/m

Weight of RCC Crash barrier+Pipe = 8.75 + 0.036 = 8.80 KN/m

2.1.3 Footpath Live Load:

As per IRC: 6-2000, Clause 209.4


Intensity of FPLL P = P1 (for effective span <= 7.5m)
P' - (40 x L - 300) / 9 (for effective span > 7.5m and < 30.0m)
= (P' - 260 + 4800 / L) x (16.5 - W) / 15 (for effective span > 30m)
P' = = 500.00 kg/m^2

Intensity of FPLL for RHS Span = = 323.20 kg/m^2


Footpath Live Load = 3.232 x 1.5 = 4.850 KN/m

2.2 Transverse Eccentricity of SIDL


Description of Load Load Length Total Ecc. wrt to Total Trans Total Net Ecc of
Recation centre Moment Recation on Reaction
(KN/m) (m) (KN) (m) (KNm) Pier (KN) (m)
C/Barrier Load on Outer side 8.80 29.60 260.48 5.75 1497.76
C/Barrier Load on Outer side 8.80 29.60 260.48 -2.75 -716.32
Kerb+Railing Load on Footpath side 5.70 29.60 168.72 -5.75 -970.14 1341.00 -0.141
Wearing Coat Load on outer half side 11.00 29.60 325.60 6.88 2238.50
Wearing Coat Load on Footpath half side 11.00 29.60 325.60 -6.88 -2238.50

Page # 6
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

3.0 Carriageway Live Load Reactions and Moments:

Right Side Span (C/C of Exp. Gap) = 59.20 m


Right Side Dist. Between centre of abutmentshaft & Bearing = 0.00 m
Right Side Span (C/C of Bearing) = 57.72 m

The train of loads are placed in such a way that CG of the load system is at the center line of pier to get the max reaction.

3.1 Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case

To find the maximum longitudinal moment, the train of loads are placed in such a way that the starting load is placed at the
center line of the pier.

3.1.1 Class 70R Wheeled Vehicle:

1000.00

5.124 52.594

R1 R2 R4

57.718

0.000 0.000

R2 = 1000 x 52.594 / 57.718 = 911.23 KN


R4 = 1000 - 911.23 = 88.77 KN

Total Reaction on pier = = 911.23 KN

Longitudinal Moment = 911.23 * 0 0.00 KNm

Braking Force for RHS = 0.2 * 1000 = 200.00 KN

3.1.2 1 Lane Class A:


500.00

5.714 52.004

R1 R2 R4

57.718

0.000 0.000

R2 = 500 x 52.004 / 57.718 = 450.51 KN


R4 = 500 - 450.51 = 49.49 KN

Total Reaction on pier = = 450.51 KN

Page # 7
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

Longitudinal Moment = 450.51 * 0 0.00 KNm

Braking Force for RHS = 0.2 * 500 = 100.00 KN

3.1.3 2 Lane Class A:

For Class A 2 Lane the loads & the moments shall get multiplied by 2 times that of Class A 1 Lane.

R2 = 2 x 450.51 = 901.02 KN
R4 = 2 x 49.49 = 98.98 KN

Total Reaction on pier = = 901.02 KN

Longitudinal Moment = 901.02 * 0 0.00 KNm

Braking Force for RHS = 0.2 * 2 * 500 = 200.00 KN

3.1.4 3 Lane Class A:

For 3 lane loading the loads & the moments shall be multiplied by 3 times that of 1L Class A.
(As per clause 205 of IRC:6, for 3 lane loading the longitudinal effects shall be reduced by 10%)

R2 = 3 x 450.51 = 1351.53 KN
R4 = 3 x 49.49 = 148.47 KN

Total Reaction on pier = = 1351.53 KN

Longitudinal Moment = 1351.53 * 0 0.00 KNm

Braking Force for RHS = (0.2 * 2 * 500 + 0.05 * 500) * 0.9 = 202.50 KN

3.1.5 70RW + 1 LCA

For 3 lane loading the loads & the moments shall be multiplied by 0.9 times that of (70RW + 1L Class A)
(As per clause 205 of IRC:6, for 3 lane loading the longitudinal effects shall be reduced by 10%)

R2 = (911.23 + 450.51 ) = 1225.57 KN


R4 = (88.77 + 49.49 ) = 124.43 KN

Total Reaction on pier = = 1225.57 KN

Longitudinal Moment = 1225.566 * 0 0.00 KNm

Braking Force for RHS = (0.2 * 1000 + 0.05 * 500) * 0.9 = 202.50 KN

3.1.7 Summary of Loads for maximum longitudinal moment case:

Longitud
Vertical Reaction Vertical Load on spans Braking Force Reaction
Details of .
(KN) Reaction (KN) (KN) at free
Load Cases Moment
LHS Span RHS Span (KN) LHS Span RHS Span LHS Span RHS Span end (KN)
KNm
70 RW 0.00 911.23 911.23 0.00 1000.00 200.00 88.77
1 LCA 0.00 450.51 450.51 0.00 500.00 100.00 49.49
2 LCA 0.00 901.02 901.02 0.00 1000.00 200.00 98.98
3 LCA 0.00 1351.53 1351.53 0.00 1500.00 202.50 148.47
70RW+1 LCA 0.00 1225.57 1225.57 0.00 1350.00 202.50 124.43

Page # 8
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY
3.1.7 Summary of Loads for minimum live load case:

Longitud
Vertical Reaction Vertical Load on spans Braking Force Reaction
Details of .
(KN) Reaction (KN) (KN) at free
Load Cases Moment
LHS Span RHS Span (KN) LHS Span RHS Span LHS Span RHS Span end (KN)
(KNm)
70 RW 0.00 88.77 88.77 0.00 1000.00 200.00 911.23
1 LCA 0.00 49.49 49.49 0.00 500.00 100.00 450.51
2 LCA 0.00 98.98 98.98 0.00 1000.00 100.00 901.02
3 LCA 0.00 148.47 148.47 0.00 1500.00 202.50 1351.53
70RW+1 LCA 0.00 124.43 124.43 0.00 1350.00 202.50 1225.57

3.2 CWLL Transverse Eccentricities

2.500 0.500
CL of Bridge
Crash Barrier 5.500 Crash
with Safety Kerb

12.000

Carriageway configuration of bridge

3.2.1 Class 70R Wheeled Vehicle:

2.500 0.500
CL of Bridge CG of 70RW
2.905 2.595

12.000

3.2.2 1Lane Class A Vehicle:

2.500 0.500
CL of Bridge CG of 1 LCA
4.200 1.300

12.000

3.2.3 2Lane Class A Vehicle:

2.500 0.500
CL of Bridge CG of 2 LCA
2.450 3.050

12.000

Page # 9
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY
3.2.4 3Lane Class A Vehicle:

2.500 0.500
CG of 3 LCA
0.700 4.800

CL of Bridge

12.000

3.2.5 70R Wheeled vehicle+1 LCA Vehicle:


cg of 70RW
2.500 4.895 0.500
CL of Bridge CG of 1 LCA
0.605 4.200 1.3

12.000

3.2.6 Summary of Transverse Eccentricities:

Eccentricity from c/l


S. No. Class of Loading
of superstructure
1 Class 70 RW 2.905
2 1 LCA 4.200
3 2 LCA 2.450
4 3 LCA 0.700 0.700 0.000
5 70RW + 1 LCA 1.803 4.200 0.605

Page # 10
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19

TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET


DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

4.0 Calculation of Horizontal force:

Left Side Span (C/C of Bearing) = 0.00 m Right Side Span (C/C of Bearing) = 57.72 m

LHS Span RHS Span


DL Reaction at free end (Max) = (Increased by 5%) = 0.00 4725.00 KN
DL Reaction at free end (Min) = (Decreased by 5%) = 0.00 4275.00 KN
SIDL Reaction at free end = = 0.00 1341.00 KN

4.1 Horizontal Force due to POT/PTFE:

H.F at Fixed bearing for POT/PTFE bearing = Fh - m (Rg + Rq) or Fh / 2 + m (Rg + Rq)

where Fh = Braking Force in t


Rg = DL + SIDL reaction at free end in t
Rq = CWLL reaction at free end in t
m = Coefficient of friction of movable bearing = 0.05
Coefficient of friction of movable bearing = 0.03
Horizontal Force for Elastomeric bearing = Fh / 2 + Vrtc

where Fh = Braking Force in t


Vrtc = Force due to elastomeric bearing property

Page # 11
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19

TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET


DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY
4.2 Centrifuga Force (CF):

Centrifugal force = W x v^2 / (127 x R)


where W = Weight of moving vehicle in t ; v = Speed of vehicle in kmph
R = Radius of curvature of superstructure in m

Speed of the vehicle v = (127 x R x (e + 0.15))^0.5


where e = Superelevation

Speed of the vehicle = (127 x R x (e + 0.15))^0.5 = 1834529.9 Kmph


Design speed for the project = = 100.00 Kmph

Centrifugal force = W x v^2 / (127 x R) = 0.000 W

4.3 Summary of Horizontal Forces due to Fixed POT/PTFE Bearing

Vertical
Longitudin Load on spans Braking Force Reaction Centrifug Trasverse Trasverse Horizontal Force(KN)
Reactio
Details of Load Cases al Moment (KN) (KN) at free al Force Ecc. Moment Span
n Service Seismic
(KNm) LHS-Span RHS-Span LHS-Span RHS-Span end (KN) (KN) (KN) (KNm) Dislodged
(KN)
Min Reaction Case
Case 1 : 70 RW 88.77 0.00 0.00 1000.00 0.00 200.00 911.23 0.00 2.905 257.88 407.74 314.19 0.00
Case 2 : 1 LCA 49.49 0.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 100.00 450.51 0.00 4.200 207.86 355.78 308.80 0.00
Case 3 : 2 LCA 98.98 0.00 0.00 1000.00 0.00 100.00 901.02 0.00 2.450 242.50 358.25 309.29 0.00
Case 4 : 3 LCA 148.47 0.00 0.00 1500.00 0.00 202.50 1351.53 0.00 0.700 103.93 411.98 0.00 0.00
Case 5 : 70RW + 1 LCA 124.43 0.00 0.00 1350.00 0.00 202.50 1225.57 0.00 1.803 224.40 410.78 0.00 0.00
Max Longitudinal Moment Case
Case 1 : 70 RW 911.23 0.00 0.00 1000.00 0.00 200.00 88.77 0.00 2.905 2647.12 448.87 322.42 0.00
Case 2 : 1 LCA 450.51 0.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 100.00 49.49 0.00 4.200 1892.14 375.83 312.81 0.00
Case 3 : 2 LCA 901.02 0.00 0.00 1000.00 0.00 200.00 98.98 0.00 2.450 2207.50 448.36 322.32 0.00
Case 4 : 3 LCA 1351.53 0.00 0.00 1500.00 0.00 202.50 148.47 0.00 0.700 946.07 472.13 0.00 0.00
Case 5 : 70RW + 1 LCA 1225.57 0.00 0.00 1350.00 0.00 202.50 124.43 0.00 1.803 2210.10 465.83 0.00 0.00

Page # 12
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19

TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET


DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

Page # 13
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19

TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET


DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY
4.4 Summary of vertical effect due to bracking force

Braking Force Vertical Force(KN)


Appilcation
of load (m)

span (m)
effective
(KN) Service
Details of Load Cases

Span

Span
RHS
LHS
Normal Seismic

Min Reaction case


Case 1 : 70 RW 2.92 57.72 0.00 200.00 10.12 5.06
Case 2 : 1 LCA 2.92 57.72 0.00 100.00 5.06 2.53
Case 3 : 2 LCA 2.92 57.72 0.00 100.00 5.06 2.53
Case 4 : 4 LCA 2.92 57.72 0.00 202.50 10.24 5.12
Case 5 : 70RW + 2 LCA 2.92 57.72 0.00 202.50 10.24 5.12
Max Longitudinal Moment Case
Case 1 : 70 RW 2.92 57.72 0.00 200.00 10.12 5.06
Case 2 : 1 LCA 2.92 57.72 0.00 100.00 5.06 2.53
Case 3 : 2 LCA 2.92 57.72 0.00 200.00 10.12 5.06
Case 4 : 4 LCA 2.92 57.72 0.00 202.50 10.24 5.12
Case 5 : 70RW + 2 LCA 2.92 57.72 0.00 202.50 10.24 5.12

Page # 14
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

5.0 Forces and Moments due to Wind Force

Left Span Right Span


C/C distance between Exp. Jt. = 0.000 59.200 m
Dist. between C/L's of Brg. & Exp. Jt. = 0.000 0.741 m
C/C distance between Bearing = 0.000 57.718 m

FRL (At Median inner edge) = 221.458 221.458 m


Camber = 2.500 2.500 %
RL at Outer Girder/Bearing Location = 221.139 221.158 m
Thickness of Wearing Course = 0.065 0.065 m
Depth of Superstructure = 2.000 1.655 m
Soffit Level at Outer Girder/Bearing = 219.074 219.438 m
HFL = 209.772 m
LBL = 209.872 m
Depth of Footing = 1.500 m
Founding Level = 205.750 m

Angle of Skew q = 23.50 Degrees Cos q Sin q Tan q


0.917 0.399 0.435

Height of Crash barrier = 0.90 m

Wind velocities & Pressures (Refer Table 4: of IRC:6)

Basic speed Height Velocity Pressure DL LL


Pz x G x CD
(m/s) H (m) V (m/s) Pz (N/m2) G= 2 2
33 10.00 27.80 463.70 1808.43 CD = 1.95 1.2

39.00 10.00 32.85 647.65 2525.82

Wind Loads on super structure


LHS RHS
width of the deck = 28.50 12.00
Lift co-effiecent (CL) = 0.75 0.75

5.1 Wind Force on exposed area of the superstructure (Normal to the wind dir) (Refer clause 212.2 & 212.3)

Exposed area of superstructure = ( Area of Deck with C/Barrier for Left Span + Area of Deck with C/Barrier for Right Span)
= ((0 x (2 + 0.065 + 0.9) + 59.2 x (1.655 + 0.065 + 0.9))/2) = 77.55 m^2

Wind Force for the above area = = 195883 N


= 195.88 KN

Depth of Superstructure + C/Barrier = = 2.62 m


Acting at @ from Founding Level = = 15.00 m

Wind force perpendicular to pier axis = 195.882 x sin 23.5 = 78.11 KN


Wind force parallel to the pier axis = 195.882 x cos 23.5 = 179.64 KN

Wind load Longitudinal WL = 195.882 x 0.25 = 44.909 KN


Wind load Transverse WL = 195.882 x 0.25 = 19.52701 KN

Plan area for the vertical load = (59.2X12+59.2X12)/2 = 710.4 m^2


Wind vertical load = = 690133 N/m^2
= = 690.13 KN
5.2 Wind Force on the Live Load (normal to the wind direction)

Wind load on live load = No Live Load is considered (Refer clause 209.3.7 of IRC:6- 2010)
= 0 x 3 x 647.647 x 1.95 x 1.2/1000 = 0.000 KN

Page # 15
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY
Acting at @ from Founding Level = = 17.21 m

Wind force perpendicular to pier axis = 0 x sin 23.5 = 0.00 KN


Wind force parallel to the pier axis = 0 x cos 23.5 = 0.00 KN

Wind load Longitudinal WL = = 0.00 KN


Wind load Transverse WL = = 0.000 KN

5.2.1 Span Dislodged Condition

5.2.1.1 Wind Force on exposed area of the superstructure (Normal to the wind dir)

Exposed area of superstructure = = 77.55 m^2


Wind Force for the above area = = 195883 N
= 195.88 KN
Wind force perpendicular to pier axis = 195.882 x sin 23.5 = 78.11 KN
Wind force parallel to the pier axis = 195.882 x cos 23.5 = 179.64 KN

Wind load Longitudinal WL = 195.882 x 0.25 = 44.909 KN


Wind load Longitudinal WL = 195.882 x 0.25 = 19.52701 KN

Plan area for the vertical load = (59.2X12)/2 = 355.2 m^2


Wind vertical load = = 345066.4 N/m^2
= = 345.07 KN
5.2.2 Wind Loads on sub structure
For piercap For Pier
Shape = Rectangular Rectangular
Width (b) = 1.2 1.2
Depth (t) = 16.029484 8
t/b = 13.358 6.6666667
Height = 1.6 10.238
H/b = 1.333 8.532
CD = 0.8 1.027
Gust factor (G) = 2 2

5.2.3 Service Condition

5.2.3.1 Wind force on the sub structure

Exposed area of Piercap = 1.92


Wind load on piercap = 994.79 N
= 0.995 KN
Acting at @ from Founding Level = 12.538 m

Wind force perpendicular to pier axis = 0.994 x sin 23.5 = 0.39667 KN


Wind force parallel to the pier axis = 0.994 x cos 23.5 = 0.912 KN

Wind load Longitudinal WL = = 0.23 KN


Wind load Transverse WL = = 0.099 KN

Exposed area of Pier = 21570.95 N


= 21.571 KN

Acting at @ from Founding Level = 7.930 m

Wind force perpendicular to pier axis = 21.571 x sin 23.5 = 8.601 KN


Wind force parallel to the pier axis = 21.57 x cos 23.5 = 19.782 KN

Wind load Longitudinal WL = = 4.95 KN


Wind load Transverse WL = = 2.150 KN

Page # 16
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

6.0 Forces and Moments due to Seismic Case

As per IRC: 6-2010 ammendments, no calculation of seismic force is required for structures up to 10m and for structures in Zone -II &
Zone -III, if the two conditions stated below are satisfied simultaneously.

i) The span is less than 15 meter.


ii) The total length of the bridge is less than 60 meter.

All other bridges shall be designed for seismic forces.

Zone = III
Span Length = 59.20 > 15
Total Length = 59.20 < 60

Hence the bridge is to be designed for Seismic Forces.

As per clause 222.3, Since the bridge is not in the Zone-IV or Zone -V, no vertical component of the seismic force is
required to be considered in the design. (Refer clause 222.3 of IRC:6)
AV = 0 x Ah

Horizontal seismic force Feq = Ah x (D.L + b x L.L)

Where Feq = Seismic Force to be resisted


D.L = DL from the superstructure & substructure upto the scour level
L.L = Live Load
b = The multiplying factor for the Live Load as per Table 1 of IRC :6
= 0.2 (when the seismic force is acting perpendicular to traffic)
= 0 (when the seismic force is acting parallel to traffic)

Tables as per IRC:6, for Zone Factor, Importance Factor and Foundation Strata:

Zone Zone Type Importance Foundation Notation


Number Factor of Bridge Factor Strata
II 0.10 Important 1.20 Rock/Hard Soil HS
III 0.16 Others 1.00 Medium Soil MS
IV 0.24 Soft Soil SS
V 0.36
F

Fxe

F x e / (E x I)
F x (e + l) / (E x I)

where F = Force applied at centre of mass of superstructure to produce 1mm deflection


e = Distance between the centre of mass of superstructure to top of bearing =

Ah = Horizontal Seismic Coeff. = (z/2) x (Sa/g) / (R/I)

where Z = Zone Factor = III = 0.16


I = Importance Factor = IB = 1.20
R = Reduction Factor = = 3.00
Foundation strata Reduction Factor = HS = 1.00

Type of Pier = Rectangular = R


=
Dist. of top of pier cap where 1mm deflection is req. = L = 11.338 m

Page # 17
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

Grade of Concrete = = M 35
Youngs Modulus E = 5700 x (35) ^ 0.5 / 1000 = 3.250E+07 KN/m^2

Min DL & LL has been considered for calculating fundamental time period on conservative side as the same coefficient is used for all max
load, min load and max longitudinal moment cases.

6.1.1 Seismic Coefficient in Longitudinal Direction in Service Condition:

Size of Rectangular Pier = 1.20 x 8.00 m


Moment of Inertia I = 8 x 1.2 ^ 3 / 12 = 1.15 m^4
Moment of Inertia of Pier I = = 1.15 m^4
Dist. from c.g of mass of superstructure to top of brg = = 1.118 m

F req. to produce 1mm deflection at F = F x l² x (3 x e + 2 x l) / (6 x E x I) = 67137.48 KN/m


top of pier F = = 67.14 KN/mm

Fundamental time period T = 2 x (D / (1000 x F)) ^0.5


where D = D1 + D 2
D1 = DL + SIDL from the superstructure = 11232.00 KN
D2 = Live Load = 0.00 KN

T = = 0.8180 sec

Average Response Acceleration Coefficient for 5% damping


Rock or Hard Soil Sa/g = 2.50 (0.00 <= T <= 0.40)
= 1.00 / T (0.40 <= T <= 4.00)
=
Taking Sa / g = = 1.223

Horizontal Seismic Coefficient Ah = (0.16/ 2 ) x 1.223 / (3 / 1.2) = 0.039

Vertical Seismic Coefficient Av = Ah*2/3 or 0 = 0.026

6.1.2 Seismic Coefficient in Transverse Direction in Service Condition:

Size of Rectangular Pier = 1.20 x 8.00 m


Moment of Inertia I = 1.2 x 8 ^ 3 / 12 = 51.20 m^4

Moment of Inertia of Pier I = = 51.20 m^4


Dist. from c.g of mass of superstructure to top of brg = = 1.118 m

F req. to produce 1mm 'd' at top of pier F = F x l² x (3 x e + 2 x l) / (6 x E x I) = 2983888.06 KN/m


F = = 2983.89 KN/mm

Fundamental time period T = 2 x (D / (1000 x F)) ^0.5


where D = D1 + D 2
D1 = DL + SIDL from the superstructure = 5616.00 KN
D2 = Live Load = 612.78 KN
T = = 0.091 sec
As per ammendment for Resposereduction 1, we need to consider Sa/g=1
Average Response Acceleration Coefficient for 5% damping
Rock or Hard Soil Sa/g = 2.50 (0.00 <= T <= 0.40)
= 1.00 / T (0.40 <= T <= 4.00)
Taking Sa / g = = 1.000

Horizontal Seismic Coefficient Ah = (0.16/ 2 ) x 1 / (1 / 1.2) = 0.096

Vertical Seismic Coefficient Av = Ah*2/3 or 0 = 0.064

Page # 18
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

6.2.1 Seismic Coefficient in Longitudinal Direction in Span Dislodged Condition:

Size of Rectangular Pier = 1.20 x 8.00 m


Moment of Inertia I = 8 x 1.2 ^ 3 / 12 = 1.15 m^4

Moment of Inertia of Pier I = = 1.15 m^4


Dist. from c.g of mass of superstructure to top of brg = = 1.118 m

F req. to produce 1mm deflection at F = F x l² x (3 x e + 2 x l) / (6 x E x I) = 67137.48 KN/m


top of pier F = = 67.14 KN/mm

Fundamental time period T = 2 x (D / (1000 x F)) ^0.5


where D = D1 + D 2
D1 = DL + SIDL from the superstructure = 6066.00 KN
D2 = Live Load = 0.00 KN

T = = 0.6012 sec

Average Response Acceleration Coefficient for 5% damping


Rock or Hard Soil Sa/g = 2.50 (0.00 <= T <= 0.40)
= 1.00 / T (0.40 <= T <= 4.00)
=
Taking Sa / g = = 1.664

Horizontal Seismic Coefficient Ah = (0.16/ 2 ) x 1.664 / (3 / 1.2) = 0.053

Vertical Seismic Coefficient Av = Ah*2/3 or 0 = 0.035

6.2.2 Seismic Coefficient in Transverse Direction in Span Dislodge Condition:

Size of Rectangular Pier = 1.20 x 8.00 m


Moment of Inertia I = 1.2 x 8 ^ 3 / 12 = 51.20 m^4

Moment of Inertia of Pier I = = 51.20 m^4


Dist. from c.g of mass of superstructure to top of brg = = 1.118 m

F req. to produce 1mm 'd' at top of pier F = F x l² x (3 x e + 2 x l) / (6 x E x I) = 2983888.06 KN/m


F = = 2983.89 KN/mm

Fundamental time period T = 2 x (D / (1000 x F)) ^0.5


where D = D1 + D 2
D1 = DL + SIDL from the superstructure = 6066.00 KN
D2 = Live Load = 0.00 KN

T = = 0.090 sec

Average Response Acceleration Coefficient for 5% damping


Rock or Hard Soil Sa/g = 2.50 (0.00 <= T <= 0.40)
= 1.00 / T (0.40 <= T <= 4.00)
As per ammendment for Resposereduction 1, we need to consider Sa/g=1
Taking Sa / g = = 1.000

Horizontal Seismic Coefficient Ah = (0.16/ 2 ) x 1 / (1 / 1.2) = 0.096

Vertical Seismic Coefficient Av = Ah*2/3 or 0 = 0.064

Page # 19
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

6.3.1 Longitudinal Seismic Case with Maximum Live Load

Horizontal Seismic Coefficient = 0.0392


Vertically Seismic Coefficient = 0.0261

Item Volume Unit Dead Fh Fv CG of eL at c.g. ML @ ML @ ML @


Weight Load Force of Footing CG of 205.75 m 207.25 m
(m3) (kN/m3) (KN) (KN) (KN) RL in (m) (m) Footing (KNm) (KNm)
DL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 219.438 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
DL Reaction : Right span 4725.00 370.44 123.32 219.438 0.000 0.00 5070.58 4514.92
SIDL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 219.438 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
SIDL Reaction : Right span 1341.00 105.13 35.00 219.438 0.000 0.00 1439.08 1281.38
FPLL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 219.438 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
FPLL Reaction : Right span 143.56 0.00 3.75 219.438 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
CWLL Rection : Left Span 20% of LL 270.31 0.00 7.05 219.438 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
CWLL Rection : Right Span 20% of LL 0.00 0.00 0.00 219.438 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
Weight of Pedestal : Left Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 2.27 1.51 219.233 0.000 0.00 30.65 27.24
Weight of Pedestal : Right Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 2.27 1.51 219.233 0.000 0.00 30.65 27.24
Pier Cap (Uniform portion) 20.486 25.00 512.14 20.08 13.37 218.788 0.000 0.00 261.75 231.64
Pier Cap (Trapezoidal portion) 20.616 25.00 515.40 20.20 13.45 218.035 0.000 0.00 248.19 217.89
Pier Shaft upto Scour Level 73.114 25.00 1827.84 71.65 47.71 213.680 0.000 0.00 568.20 460.72
Total Loads & Moments in LWL Case 592.05 246.68 0.00 7649.11 6761.03

6.3.2 Longitudinal Seismic Case with Minimum Live Load

Horizontal Seismic Coefficient = 0.0392


Vertically Seismic Coefficient = 0.0261

Item Volume Unit Dead Fh Fv CG of eL at c.g. ML @ ML @ ML @


Weight Load Force of Footing CG of 205.75 m 207.25 m
3
(m ) (kN/m3) (KN) (KN) (KN) RL in (m) (m) Footing (KNm) (KNm)
DL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 219.438 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
DL Reaction : Right span 4725.00 370.44 123.32 219.438 0.000 0.00 5070.58 4514.92
SIDL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 219.438 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
SIDL Reaction : Right span 1341.00 105.13 35.00 219.438 0.000 0.00 1439.08 1281.38
FPLL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 219.438 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
FPLL Reaction : Right span 143.56 0.00 3.75 219.438 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
CWLL Rection : Left Span 20% of LL 0.00 0.00 0.00 219.438 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
CWLL Rection : Right Span 20% of LL 1351.53 0.00 35.27 219.438 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
Weight of Pedestal : Left Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 2.27 1.51 219.233 0.000 0.00 30.65 27.24
Weight of Pedestal : Right Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 2.27 1.51 219.233 0.000 0.00 30.65 27.24
Pier Cap (Uniform portion) 20.486 25.00 512.14 20.08 13.37 218.788 0.000 0.00 261.75 231.64
Pier Cap (Trapezoidal portion) 20.616 25.00 515.40 20.20 13.45 218.035 0.000 0.00 248.19 217.89
Pier Shaft upto Scour Level 73.114 25.00 1827.84 71.65 47.71 213.680 0.000 0.00 568.20 460.72
Total 592.05 274.90 0.00 7649.11 6761.03

Page # 20
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

6.3.3 Longitudinal Seismic Case with Span Dislodged Condition:

Horizontal Seismic Coefficient = 0.0533


Vertically Seismic Coefficient = 0.0355

Item Volume Unit Dead Fh Fv CG of eL at c.g. ML @ ML @ ML @


Weight Load Force of Footing CG of 205.75 m 207.25 m
(m3) (kN/m3) (KN) (KN) (KN) RL in (m) (m) Footing (KNm) (KNm)
DL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 219.438 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
DL Reaction : Right span 0.00 0.00 0.00 219.438 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
SIDL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 219.438 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
SIDL Reaction : Right span 0.00 0.00 0.00 219.438 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
FPLL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 219.438 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
FPLL Reaction : Right span 0.00 0.00 0.00 219.438 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
CWLL Rection : Left Span 0.00 0.00 0.00 219.438 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
CWLL Rection : Right Span 0.00 0.00 0.00 219.438 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
Weight of Pedestal : Left Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 3.09 2.06 219.233 0.000 0.00 41.68 37.04
Weight of Pedestal : Right Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 3.09 2.06 219.233 0.000 0.00 41.68 37.04
Pier Cap (Uniform portion) 20.486 25.00 512.14 27.30 18.18 218.788 0.000 0.00 355.90 314.95
Pier Cap (Trapezoidal portion) 20.616 25.00 515.40 27.47 18.30 218.035 0.000 0.00 337.47 296.26
Pier Shaft upto Scour Level 73.114 25.00 1827.84 97.42 64.89 213.680 0.000 0.00 772.57 626.44
Total 158.37 105.48 0.00 1549.30 1311.74

6.4.1 Transverse Seismicl Case with Maximum Live Load

Horizontal Seismic Coefficient = 0.0960


Vertically Seismic Coefficient = 0.0640

Item Volume Unit Dead Fh Fv CG of eL at c.g. ML @ MT @ MT @


Weight Load Force of Footing CG of 205.75 m 207.25 m
3
(m ) (kN/m3) (KN) (KN) (KN) RL in (m) (m) Footing (KNm) (KNm)
DL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 220.679 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
DL Reaction : Right span 4725.00 453.60 302.40 220.679 0.000 0.00 6771.91 6091.51
SIDL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 221.708 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
SIDL Reaction : Right span 1341.00 128.74 85.82 221.708 0.000 0.00 2054.37 1861.27

FPLL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 221.708 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
FPLL Reaction : Right span 143.56 13.78 9.19 221.708 0.000 0.00 219.93 199.26
CWLL Rection : Left Span 20% of LL 270.31 25.95 17.30 222.658 0.000 0.00 438.75 399.83
CWLL Rection : Right Span 20% of LL 0.00 0.00 0.00 222.658 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
Weight of Pedestal : Left Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 5.57 3.71 219.233 0.000 0.00 75.07 66.72
Weight of Pedestal : Right Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 5.57 3.71 219.233 0.000 0.00 75.07 66.72
Pier Cap (Uniform portion) 20.486 25.00 512.14 49.17 32.78 218.788 0.000 0.00 641.02 567.27
Pier Cap (Trapezoidal portion) 20.616 25.00 515.40 49.48 32.99 218.035 0.000 0.00 607.82 533.60
Pier Shaft 73.114 25.00 1827.84 175.47 116.98 213.680 0.000 0.00 1391.50 1128.29
Total 907.32 604.88 0.00 12275.44 10914.46

Page # 21
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

6.4.2 Transverse Seismicl Case with Minimum Load

Horizontal Seismic Coefficient = 0.0960


Vertically Seismic Coefficient = 0.0640

Item Volume Unit Dead Fh Fv CG of eL at c.g. ML @ MT @ MT @


Weight Load Force of Footing CG of 205.75 m 207.25 m
(m3) (kN/m3) (KN) (KN) (KN) RL in (m) (m) Footing (KNm) (KNm)
DL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 220.679 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
DL Reaction : Right span 4725.00 453.60 302.40 220.679 0.000 0.00 6771.91 6091.51
SIDL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 221.708 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
SIDL Reaction : Right span 1341.00 128.74 85.82 221.708 0.000 0.00 2054.37 1861.27

FPLL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 221.708 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
FPLL Reaction : Right span 143.56 13.78 9.19 221.708 0.000 0.00 219.93 199.26
CWLL Rection : Left Span 20% of LL 0.00 0.00 0.00 222.658 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
CWLL Rection : Right Span 20% of LL 1351.53 129.75 86.50 222.658 0.000 0.00 2193.76 1999.14
Weight of Pedestal : Left Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 5.57 3.71 219.233 0.000 0.00 75.07 66.72
Weight of Pedestal : Right Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 5.57 3.71 219.233 0.000 0.00 75.07 66.72
Pier Cap (Uniform portion) 20.486 25.00 512.14 49.17 32.78 218.788 0.000 0.00 641.02 567.27
Pier Cap (Trapezoidal portion) 20.616 25.00 515.40 49.48 32.99 218.035 0.000 0.00 607.82 533.60
Pier Shaft 73.114 25.00 1827.84 175.47 116.98 213.680 0.000 0.00 1391.50 1128.29
Total 0.00 1011.12 674.08 0.00 14030.45 12513.78

6.4.3 Transverse Seismic Case with Span Dislodged Condition:

Horizontal Seismic Coefficient = 0.0960


Vertically Seismic Coefficient = 0.0640

Item Volume Unit Dead Fh Fv CG of eL at c.g. ML @ Mt @ MT @


Weight Load Force of Footing CG of 205.75 m 207.25 m
(m3) (kN/m3) (KN) (KN) (KN) RL in (m) (m) Footing (KNm) (KNm)
DL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 220.679 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
DL Reaction : Right span 0.00 0.00 0.00 220.679 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
SIDL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 221.708 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
SIDL Reaction : Right span 0.00 0.00 0.00 221.708 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00

FPLL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 221.708 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
FPLL Reaction : Right span 0.00 0.00 0.00 221.708 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
CWLL Rection : Left Span 0.00 0.00 0.00 222.658 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
CWLL Rection : Right Span 0.00 0.00 0.00 222.658 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
Weight of Pedestal : Left Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 5.57 3.71 219.233 0.000 0.00 75.07 66.72
Weight of Pedestal : Right Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 5.57 3.71 219.233 0.000 0.00 75.07 66.72
Pier Cap (Uniform portion) 20.486 25.00 512.14 49.17 32.78 218.788 0.000 0.00 641.02 567.27
Pier Cap (Trapezoidal portion) 20.616 25.00 515.40 49.48 32.99 218.035 0.000 0.00 607.82 533.60
Pier Shaft 73.114 25.00 1827.84 175.47 116.98 213.680 0.000 0.00 1391.50 1128.29
Total 285.25 190.17 0.00 2790.49 2362.61

Page # 22
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY DOCUMENT NO. DATE
STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

7.0 Combination for Verification of ultimate limit state as per Table 3.2 of IRC: 6

7.0.1 Vertical Load and their moments about C/L of Shaft

Volume Unit Wt. Vertical Horizont. Horizont. Long. Trans. Long. Trans.
Load Force Force Eccentri. Eccentri. Moment Moment
S.No Item
P HL HT eL eT ML MT
(m3) (kN/m3) (kN) (kN) (kN) (m) (m) (KN-m) (KN-m)
1 Loads from Super structure
1a DL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00
1b DL Reaction : Right span 4725.00 0.00 0.00
2a SIDL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
2b SIDL Reaction : Right span 1341.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
6066.00 0.00 0.00
2c SIDL Reaction : Left span (Surfacing)
2d SIDL Reaction : Right span (Surfacing)
0.00 0.00 0.00
3 Footpath Loads
3a FPLL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
3b FPLL Reaction : Right span 143.56 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
143.56 0.00 0.00
4 Carriageway Live Loads
Maximum Reaction case
4a CWLL Reaction : Left Span 1351.53 0.00 0.700 0.00 946.07
4b CWLL Reaction : Right Span 0.00 0.00 0.700 0.00 0.00
Maximum Longitudinal Momemt
4c CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 0.00 0.700 0.00 0.00
4d CWLL Reaction : Right Span 1351.53 0.00 0.700 0.00 946.07
Maximum transverse moment
4e CWLL Reaction : Left Span 1225.57 0.00 1.803 0.00 2210.10
4f CWLL Reaction : Right Span 0.00 0.00 1.803 0.00 0.00
One Span Dislodged Case
4g CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
4h CWLL Reaction : Right Span 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
HF at Bearing Level
4i Maximum Reaction case 5.29 432.97 12.65 12.188 12.188 5277.06 154.21
4j Maximum Longitudinal Moment case 10.24 432.97 188.26 12.188 12.188 5277.06 2294.53
4k Maximum Transverse Moment case 10.24 427.19 20.83 12.188 12.188 5206.64 253.93
4l Span Dislodged 0.00 0.00 12.188 12.188 0.00 0.00
4m Seismic case with Maximum Reaction Case 2.64 0.00 12.65 12.188 12.188 0.00 154.21
4n Maximum Longitudinal Case 5.12 0.00 188.26 12.188 12.188 0.00 2294.53
4o Maximum Transverse Case 5.12 4.80 20.83 12.188 12.188 58.46 253.93
4p One Span Dislodged Case 0.00 0.00 12.188 12.188 0.00 0.00

4Q Thermal Loads 145.80 12.188 12.188 1777.01 0.00

5 Loads from Substructure LWL Case


5a Weight of Pedestal : Left Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 0.00 0.00
5b Weight of Pedestal : Right Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 0.00 0.00
5c Pier Cap (Uniform portion) 20.486 25.00 512.14 0.00 0.00
5d Pier Cap (Trapezoidal portion) 20.616 25.00 515.40 0.00 0.00
5e Platform at Pier cap Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5f Pier Shaft upto LWL 73.114 25.00 1827.84 0.00 0.00
5g Pier Shaft below LWL 25.171 25.00 629.28 0.00 0.00
5h Pedestal below the Pier shaft 0.000 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3600.66 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 Loads from Substructure HFL Case
6a Weight of Pedestal : Left Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 0.00 0.00
6b Weight of Pedestal : Right Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 0.00 0.00
6c Pier Cap (Uniform portion) 20.486 25.00 512.14 0.00 0.00
6d Pier Cap (Trapezoidal portion) 20.616 25.00 515.40 0.00 0.00
6e Platform at Pier cap Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
6f Pier Shaft upto HFL 74.074 25.00 1851.84 0.00 0.00
6g Pier Shaft below HFL 24.211 25.00 605.28 0.00 0.00
6h Pedestal below the Pier shaft 0.000 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6i Footing 0.000 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6j Volume of earth above Footing 0.000 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3600.66 0.00 0.00 0.00
7 Wind forces
7a Wind Force On super structure 690.13 123.02 199.16 13.498 13.498 1660.48 2688.30
7b Wind force on liveload 0.00 0.00 15.708 15.708 0.00 0.00
7c Windforce on piercap 0.62 1.01 11.038 11.038 6.90 11.16
7d Windforce on pier 13.55 21.93 6.430 6.430 87.11 141.02
690.13 137.19 222.11 1754.49 2840.49

Page # 23
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY DOCUMENT NO. DATE
STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

8 Water Current Force 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

9 Buoyancy
9b For Stem 24.211 0 0.00

10 Seismic Forces
10a Long. seismic with Max. Live load 246.68 542.95 312.03 6200.27 4221.49
10b Long. seismic with Min. Live Load -274.898 542.95 347.72 6200.27 4825.04
10c Long. seismic with One Span Dislodged -105.484 145.24 49.05 1202.94 479.82
10d Trans. seismic with Max. Live load 604.880 203.61 832.07 2630.51 10009.22
10e Trans. seismic with Min. Live Load -674.078 203.61 927.26 2630.51 11475.88
10f Trans. seismic with One Span Dislodged -190.168 27.23 261.59 266.40 2166.65

11 HF at Bearing Level
11a Maximum Reaction case 2.64 2.92 1.27 12.188 12.188 35.54 15.45
11b Maximum Transverse 5.12 4.80 1.27 12.188 12.188 58.46 15.45
11c Maximum Longitudinal 5.12 0.00 0.00 12.188 12.188 0.00 0.00
11d Span Dislodged 0.00 0.00 12.188 12.188 0.00 0.00

Total Loads & Moments 31789.14 3391.40 3619.96 40330.11 48397.59

COMBINATION 1
LOAD COMBINATIONS
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Trans. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) H.F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1.5+(7*0.9)+(5*1.35) 15921.678 772.927 199.896 9494.624 4206.860
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*1.5+(7*0.9)+(8*1)+(6*1.35)-(9b*0.15) 15929.115 772.927 199.896 9494.624 7417.345
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*1.5+(7*0.9)+(8*1)+(6*1.35)-(9b*0.15) 15740.169 764.261 199.896 9389.001 6252.499

Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load


a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1.15+(7*1.5) 14085.193 205.783 333.160 2631.730 4260.740
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*1.15+(7*1.5)+(8*1)+(6*1.35)- 14085.193 205.783 333.160 2631.730 4260.740
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*1.15+(7*1.5)+(8*1)+(6*1.35)- 14085.193 205.783 333.160 2631.730 4260.740

COMBINATION 2
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Trans. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) H.F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*0.75+(7*1.5)+(5*1) 10791.944 324.729 0.000 3957.793 825.208
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*0.75+(7*)+(8*1)+(6*1)-(9b*0.15) 10795.663 324.729 0.000 3957.793 2430.451
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*0.75+(7*)+(8*1)+(6*1)-(9b*0.15) 10701.190 320.396 0.000 3904.981 1848.027

COMBINATION 3
Vertical Longi. Trans
Long. H.F Trans.
Case - (i) Longitudinal Seismic Case Load Moment moment
(Kn) H.F (Kn)
(Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4m)*0.2+(5*1)+(10a*(r1+r2*0.3+r3* 10093.456 933.592 429.219 10661.292 5352.433
0.3)*1.25*1.5)
b): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4n)*0.2+(8*1)+(6*1)- 9494.022 933.592 478.321 10661.292 6109.007
(9b*0.15)+(10b*1.25*1.5)
c): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*+(2c+2d)*+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4n)*0.2+(7*)+(8*1)+(6*)- 9799.707 934.551 478.321 10672.983 6361.813
(9b*0.15)+(10b*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*)

Case - (ii) Transverse Seismic Case


a): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4m)*0.2+(5*1)+(10d*(r1+r2*0.3+r3* 10278.234 280.078 1430.729 3198.388 17399.944
0.3)*1.25*1.5)
b): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4n)*0.2+(7*)+(8*1)+(6*1)- 8807.635 280.078 1594.404 3198.388 19921.856
(9b*0.15)+(10e*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1.5)
c): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4n)*0.2+(7*)+(8*1)+(6*1)- 9593.791 281.037 1594.404 3210.079 20174.663
(9b*0.15)+(10e*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1.5)

Page # 24
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING
PROJECT:
ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS DOCUMENT NO. DATE
450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
TITLE:
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1 KJS NRY 0

7.1 Summary of Loads and Moments at the Base of Pier Shaft:

Case No Case Description P ML MT MR


(kN) (kN-m) (kN-m) (kN-m)
Combination 1
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 15921.68 9494.62 4206.86 10384.87
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 15929.12 9494.62 7417.35 12048.44
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 15740.17 9389.00 6252.50 11280.38

Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load


a): Maximum Reaction Case 14085.19 2631.73 4260.74 5007.98
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 14085.19 2631.73 4260.74 5007.98
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 14085.19 2631.73 4260.74 5007.98

Combination 2
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 10791.94 3957.79 825.21 4042.91
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 10795.66 3957.79 2430.45 4644.48
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 10701.19 3904.98 1848.03 4320.19

Combination 3
Case - (i) Longitudinal Seismic Case
a): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case 10093.46 10661.29 5352.43 11929.45
b): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case 9494.02 10661.29 6109.01 12287.52
c): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case 9799.71 10672.98 6361.81 12425.19

Case - (ii) Transverse Seismic Case


a): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case 10278.23 3198.39 17399.94 17691.46
b): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case 8807.64 3198.39 19921.86 20176.97
c): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case 9593.79 3210.08 20174.66 20428.45

Page # 25
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Project:
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
Title: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY 0

7.2 Analysis of Rectangular Sections under Axial Load and Bi-Axial Bending moments

Length of section along Traffic direction: 1.200 m


Length of section across Traffic direction: 8.000 m

Effective Cover 0.1 m


End Spacing 0.085 m

No of bars along Traffic direction (one side) 10 Nos.


Diameter of bar 0.02 m

No of bars across Traffic direction (one side) 60 Nos.


Diameter of bar 0.02 m

Code of Practise IRC


Modular Ratio m 10

Grade of Concrete M 35

2
Area of Concrete 9.6000 m
2
Area of Steel =2×3.14/4×(0.02^2×10+0.02^2×60)×1e6 43982 mm OK
Percentage of Steel 0.46 %

Area of concrete to resist axial load only


2
= #REF! 1820470 mm
2
Area of Steel = 0.8% of above 14564 mm

2
Min. Area of steel on each face= 0.0012*Ac 11520.0 mm OK

2
Total Area of vertical reinforcement = 0.0024*Ac 23040 mm
2
= 0.04*Ac 384000 mm Steel Prov > Min reqd

Effective Length of Pier Shaft

Pier Shaft Height L = 10.238 m


Radius of gyration r = 0.346 m
Normal Case One Span Dislodged Case
Effective length leff = 1.5 x L = 15.4 2.0 x L = 20.5
Slenderness ratio leff / r = 44 < 50 59 > 50
Type of Member = Short Column Long Column
Stress reduction Coefficient b = 1.00 0.91

Page # 26
ConStructRCol:v1-2012 10-04-2019 5:28:41 PM

Limit State Design of Rectangular Biaxial Column

Execute Design
Inputdata
D 8000 mm Longer dimension Always
B = 1200 mm % Steel = 0.46 % X
Fck = 35 Mpa p/Fck = 0.013089969
Fy = 500 Mpa d'/D = 0.009 Y
Es = 200000 Mpa B
Cover = 75 mm D

0.9

0.8 Interaction curve

0.7

0.6
Pu/Fck b d

0.5 #
0
1
0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5

Mu/Fck b d^2

Interaction Diagram
Copy Right <<%%##$$~~!!~~$$##%%>>2012 ::: +91 9676708579 :::
No of load cases : 15
Load case Pu[kN] Mx[kNm] My[kNm] an Condition C to D Ratio Status
1 15921.7 9494.6 4206.9 1.0000 PASS 0.589 Designed
2 15929.1 9494.6 7417.3 1.0000 PASS 0.616 Designed
3 15740.2 9389.0 6252.5 1.0000 PASS 0.603 Designed
14085.2 2631.7 4260.7 1.0000 PASS 0.198 Designed
5 14085.2 2631.7 4260.7 1.0000 PASS 0.198 Designed
6 14085.2 2631.7 4260.7 1.0000 PASS 0.198 Designed
7 10791.9 3957.8 825.2 1.0000 PASS 0.267 Designed
10795.7 3957.8 2430.5 1.0000 PASS 0.283 Designed
9 10701.2 3905.0 1848.0 1.0000 PASS 0.274 Designed
10 10093.5 10661.3 5352.4 1.0000 PASS 0.763 Designed
11 9494.0 10661.3 6109.0 1.0000 PASS 0.782 Designed
12 9799.7 10673.0 6361.8 1.0000 PASS 0.779 Designed
13 10278.2 3198.4 17399.9 1.0000 PASS 0.385 Designed
14 8807.6 3198.4 19921.9 1.0000 PASS 0.425 Designed
15 9593.8 3210.1 20174.7 1.0000 PASS 0.420 Designed
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING ROB BETWEEN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

8.0 Combination for Verification of Serviceability Limit State as per Table B.3 of IRC 6

8.0.1 Vertical Load and their moments about C/L of Foundation Base upto Shaft:

Volume Unit Wt. Vertical Horizont. Horizont. Long. Trans. Long. Trans.
Load Force Force Eccentri. Eccentri. Moment Moment
S.No Item
P HL HT eL eT ML MT
(m3) (kN/m3) (kN) (kN) (kN) (m) (m) (KN-m) (KN-m)
1 Loads from Super structure
1a DL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00
1b DL Reaction : Right span 4725.00 0.00 0.00
2a SIDL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
2b SIDL Reaction : Right span 1341.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
6066.00 0.00 0.00
2c SIDL Reaction : Left span (Surfacing)
2d SIDL Reaction : Right span (Surfacing)
0.00 0.00 0.00
3 Footpath Loads
3a FPLL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
3b FPLL Reaction : Right span 143.56 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
143.56 0.00 0.00
4 Carriageway Live Loads
Maximum Reaction case
4a CWLL Reaction : Left Span 1351.53 0.00 0.700 0.00 946.07
4b CWLL Reaction : Right Span 0.00 0.00 0.700 0.00 0.00
Maximum Longitudinal Momemt
4c CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 0.00 0.700 0.00 0.00
4d CWLL Reaction : Right Span 1351.53 0.00 0.700 0.00 946.07
Maximum transverse moment
4e CWLL Reaction : Left Span 1225.57 0.00 1.803 0.00 2210.10
4f CWLL Reaction : Right Span 0.00 0.00 1.803 0.00 0.00

Page # 27
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING ROB BETWEEN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

One Span Dislodged Case


4g CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
4h CWLL Reaction : Right Span 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
HF at Bearing Level
4i Maximum Reaction case 5.29 29.10 12.65 13.688 13.688 398.30 173.18
4j Maximum Longitudinal Moment 10.24 432.97 188.26 13.688 13.688 5926.51 2576.92
4k Maximum Transverse Moment 10.24 47.92 20.83 13.688 13.688 655.88 285.18
4l Span Dislodged 0.00 0.00 13.688 13.688 0.00 0.00
4m Seismic case with Maximum Reaction Case 2.64 2.92 12.65 13.688 13.688 39.92 173.18
4n Maximum Longitudinal Case 5.12 0.00 188.26 13.688 13.688 0.00 2576.92
4o Maximum Transverse Case 5.12 4.80 20.83 13.688 13.688 65.65 285.18
4p One Span Dislodged Case 0.00 0.00 13.688 13.688 0.00 0.00

4Q Thermal Loads
For Normal case
From Left Span 145.80 13.688 13.688 1995.71 0.00
From Right Span -145.80 13.688 13.688 -1995.71 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00

For One span dislodged condition -145.80 1995.71 0.00


5 Loads from Substructure LWL Case
5a Weight of Pedestal : Left Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 0.00 0.00
5b Weight of Pedestal : Right Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 0.00 0.00
5c Pier Cap (Uniform portion) 20.486 25.00 512.14 0.00 0.00
5d Pier Cap (Trapezoidal portion) 20.616 25.00 515.40 0.00 0.00
5e Platform at Pier cap Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page # 28
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING ROB BETWEEN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

5f Pier Shaft upto LWL 73.114 25.00 1827.84 0.00 0.00


5g Pier Shaft below LWL 25.171 25.00 629.28 0.00 0.00
5h Pedestal below the Pier shaft 0.000 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5i Footing 57.377 25.00 1434.43 0.00 0.00
5j Volume of earth above Footing 106.65 20.00 2133.03 0.00 0.00
3600.66 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 Loads from Substructure HFL Case
6a Weight of Pedestal : Left Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 0.00 0.00
6b Weight of Pedestal : Right Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 0.00 0.00
6c Pier Cap (Uniform portion) 20.486 25.00 512.14 0.00 0.00
6d Pier Cap (Trapezoidal portion) 20.616 25.00 515.40 0.00 0.00
6e Platform at Pier cap Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
6f Pier Shaft upto HFL 74.074 25.00 1851.84 0.00 0.00
6g Pier Shaft below HFL 24.211 25.00 605.28 0.00 0.00
6h Pedestal below the Pier shaft 0.000 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6i Footing 57.377 25.00 1434.43 0.00 0.00
6j Volume of earth above Footing 106.652 20.00 2133.03 0.00 0.00
3600.66 0.00 0.00 0.00
7 Wind forces
7a Wind Force On super structure 690.13 123.02 199.16 14.998 14.998 1845.01 2987.05
7b Wind force on liveload 0.00 0.00 17.208 17.208 0.00 0.00
7c Windforce on piercap 0.62 1.01 12.538 12.538 7.83 12.68
7d Windforce on pier 13.55 21.93 7.930 7.930 107.43 173.92
690.13 137.19 222.11 1960.27 3173.65

8 Water Current Force 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

9 Buoyancy
9a For Footing 188.240 0 0.00
9b For Stem 24.211 0 0.00

Page # 29
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING ROB BETWEEN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

10 Seismic Forces
10a Long. seismic with Max. Live load 246.68 542.95 312.03 7014.69 4221.49
10b Long. seismic with Min. Live Load -274.898 542.95 347.72 7014.69 4825.04
10c Long. seismic with One Span Dislodged -105.484 145.24 49.05 1420.80 479.82
10d Trans. seismic with Max. Live load 604.880 203.61 832.07 2630.51 11257.32
10e Trans. seismic with Min. Live Load -674.078 203.61 927.26 2630.51 12866.77
10f Trans. seismic with One Span Dislodged -190.168 27.23 261.59 266.40 2559.04

11 HF at Bearing Level
11a Maximum Reaction case 2.64 2.92 1.27 13.688 13.688 39.92 17.36
11b Maximum Transverse 5.12 4.80 1.27 13.688 13.688 65.65 17.36
11c Maximum Longitudinal 5.12 0.00 0.00 13.688 13.688 0.00 0.00
11d Span Dislodged 0.00 0.00 13.688 13.688 0.00 0.00

Total Loads & Moments 38924 2320 3620 34086 52764

COMBINATION 1
LOAD COMBINATIONS
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Trans. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) H.F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1+(7*0.6)+(4Q*0.6)+(5*1) 11581.12 111.41 133.26 1574.46 3023.45
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*1+(4Q*0.6)+(7*0.6)+(8*1)+(6*1) 11586.08 515.28 133.26 7102.68 5427.19
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*1+(4Q*0.6)+(7*0.6)+(8*1)+(5*1) 11460.11 130.23 133.26 1832.04 4399.48

Page # 30
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING ROB BETWEEN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load


a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*0.75+(4Q*0.6)+(7*1)+(5*) 10356.79 137.19 222.11 1960.27 3173.65
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*0.75+(4Q*0.6)+(7*1)+(8*1)+(6*1) 10356.79 137.19 222.11 1960.27 3173.65
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*0.75+(4Q*0.6)+(7*1)+(8*1)+
(5*1) 10356.79 137.19 222.11 1960.27 3173.65

Case - (iii) Thermal Load as Leading Load


a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*0.75+(4Q*1)+(7*0.6)+(5*) 11482.08 104.14 222.11 1474.89 4013.10
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*0.75+(4Q*1)+(7*0.6)+(8*1)+(6*1) 11485.80 407.04 222.11 5621.05 5815.90
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*0.75+(4Q*1)+(7*0.6)+(8*1)+(5*1) 11391.32 118.25 222.11 1668.07 5045.12

COMBINATION 2
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Trans. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) H.F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*0.75+(4Q*0.5)+(7*0.5)+(5*1) 11137.01 90.42 111.05 1278.86 2426.27
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*0.75+(4Q*0.5)+(7*0.5)+(8*1)+(6*1)-
(9b*0.15) 11140.73 393.32 111.05 5425.02 4229.07
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*0.75+(4Q*0.5)+(7*0.5)+(8*1)+(5*1)-
(9b*0.15) 11046.26 104.53 111.05 1472.04 3458.29

Page # 31
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING ROB BETWEEN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load


a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*0.2+(4Q*0.5)+(7*0.6)+(5*0.1 10080.74 155.21 133.26 2174.02 1904.19
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*0.2+(4Q*0.5)+(7*0.6)+(8*1)+(6*0.15)-
(9b*0.15) 10080.74 155.21 133.26 2174.02 1904.19
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*0.2+(4Q*0.5)+(7*0.6)+(8*1)+(5*0.15)-
(9b*0.15) 10080.74 155.21 133.26 2174.02 1904.19

Case - (iii) Thermal Load as Leading Load


a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*0.2+(4Q*0.6)+(7*0.5)+(5*0.1 10311.80 74.41 111.05 1059.79 1810.68
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*0.2+(4Q*0.6)+(7*0.5)+(8*1)+(6*0.15)-
(9b*0.15) 10312.80 242.67 111.05 2165.44 2291.43
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*0.2+(4Q*0.6)+(7*0.5)+(8*1)+ 10287.60 78.18 111.05 1111.31 2085.88
(5*0.15)-(9b*0.15)

COMBINATION 3 (Quasi - Permanent Combination)


Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Trans. Moment moment
Case - (i) (Kn) (Kn) H.F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Normal Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b)*1+(5*1) 9810.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page # 32
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING ROB BETWEEN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

8.0 Combination for Verification of Serviceability Limit State as per Table 3.3 of IRC 6: 2010

8.0.2 Vertical Load and their moments about C/L of Foundation Base upto Footing:

Volume Unit Wt. Vertical Horizont. Horizont. Long. Trans. Long. Trans.
Load Force Force Eccentri. Eccentri. Moment Moment
S.No Item
P HL HT eL eT ML MT
(m3) (kN/m3) (kN) (kN) (kN) (m) (m) (KN-m) (KN-m)
1 Loads from Super structure
1a DL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00
1b DL Reaction : Right span 4725.00 0.00 0.00
2a SIDL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
2b SIDL Reaction : Right span 1341.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
6066.00 0.00 0.00
2c SIDL Reaction : Left span (Surfacing)
2d SIDL Reaction : Right span (Surfacing)
0.00 0.00 0.00
3 Footpath Loads
3a FPLL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
3b FPLL Reaction : Right span 143.56 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
143.56 0.00 0.00
4 Carriageway Live Loads
Maximum Reaction case
4a CWLL Reaction : Left Span 1351.53 0.00 0.700 0.00 946.07
4b CWLL Reaction : Right Span 0.00 0.00 0.700 0.00 0.00
Maximum Longitudinal Momemt
4c CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 0.00 0.700 0.00 0.00
4d CWLL Reaction : Right Span 1351.53 0.00 0.700 0.00 946.07

Page # 33
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING ROB BETWEEN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

Maximum transverse moment


4e CWLL Reaction : Left Span 1225.57 0.00 1.803 0.00 2210.10
4f CWLL Reaction : Right Span 0.00 0.00 1.803 0.00 0.00
One Span Dislodged Case
4g CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
4h CWLL Reaction : Right Span 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
HF at Bearing Level
4i Maximum Reaction case 5.29 29.10 12.65 13.688 13.688 398.30 173.18
4j Maximum Longitudinal Moment 10.24 432.97 188.26 13.688 13.688 5926.51 2576.92
4k Maximum Transverse Moment 10.24 47.92 20.83 13.688 13.688 655.88 285.18
4l Span Dislodged 0.00 0.00 13.688 13.688 0.00 0.00
4m Seismic case with Maximum Reaction Case 2.64 2.92 12.65 13.688 13.688 39.92 173.18
4n Maximum Longitudinal Case 5.12 0.00 188.26 13.688 13.688 0.00 2576.92
4o Maximum Transverse Case 5.12 4.80 20.83 13.688 13.688 65.65 285.18
4p One Span Dislodged Case 0.00 0.00 13.688 13.688 0.00 0.00

4Q Thermal Loads
For Normal case
From Left Span 145.80 13.688 13.688 1995.71 0.00
From Right Span -145.80 13.688 13.688 -1995.71 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00

For One span dislodged condition -145.80 1995.71 0.00


5 Loads from Substructure LWL Case
5a Weight of Pedestal : Left Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 0.00 0.00
5b Weight of Pedestal : Right Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 0.00 0.00
5c Pier Cap (Uniform portion) 20.486 25.00 512.14 0.00 0.00
5d Pier Cap (Trapezoidal portion) 20.616 25.00 515.40 0.00 0.00
5e Platform at Pier cap Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5f Pier Shaft upto LWL 73.114 25.00 1827.84 0.00 0.00
5g Pier Shaft below LWL 25.171 25.00 629.28 0.00 0.00
5h Pedestal below the Pier shaft 0.000 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5i Footing 57.377 25.00 1434.43 0.00 0.00
5j Additional soil behind RE wall 5.21 20.00 104.27 -2.53 -263.29
5j Volume of earth above Footing 106.65 20.00 2133.03 -0.09 -195.37
7272.39 -2.62 -458.67 0.00

Page # 34
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING ROB BETWEEN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

6 Loads from Substructure HFL Case


6a Weight of Pedestal : Left Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 0.00 0.00
6b Weight of Pedestal : Right Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 0.00 0.00
6c Pier Cap (Uniform portion) 20.486 25.00 512.14 0.00 0.00
6d Pier Cap (Trapezoidal portion) 20.616 25.00 515.40 0.00 0.00
6e Platform at Pier cap Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
6f Pier Shaft upto HFL 74.074 25.00 1851.84 0.00 0.00
6g Pier Shaft below HFL 24.211 25.00 605.28 0.00 0.00
6h Pedestal below the Pier shaft 0.000 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6i Footing 57.377 25.00 1434.43 0.00 0.00
6j Additional soil behind RE wall 5.214 20.00 104.27 -2.53 -263.29
6j Volume of earth above Footing 106.652 20.00 2133.03 -0.09 -195.37
7272.39 -2.62 -458.67 0.00
7 Wind forces
7a Wind Force On super structure 690.13 123.02 199.16 14.998 14.998 1845.01 2987.05
7b Wind force on liveload 0.00 0.00 17.208 17.208 0.00 0.00
7c Windforce on piercap 0.62 1.01 12.538 12.538 7.83 12.68
7d Windforce on pier 13.55 21.93 7.930 7.930 107.43 173.92
690.13 137.19 222.11 1960.27 3173.65

8 Water Current Force 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

9 Buoyancy
9a For Footing 188.240 0 0.00
9b For Stem 24.211 0 0.00

10 Seismic Forces
10a Long. seismic with Max. Live load 246.68 542.95 312.03 7014.69 4221.49

Page # 35
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING ROB BETWEEN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

10b Long. seismic with Min. Live Load -274.898 542.95 347.72 7014.69 4825.04
10c Long. seismic with One Span Dislodged -105.484 145.24 49.05 1420.80 479.82
10d Trans. seismic with Max. Live load 604.880 203.61 832.07 2630.51 11257.32
10e Trans. seismic with Min. Live Load -674.078 203.61 927.26 2630.51 12866.77
10f Trans. seismic with One Span Dislodged -190.168 27.23 261.59 266.40 2559.04

11 HF at Bearing Level
11a Maximum Reaction case 2.64 2.92 1.27 13.688 13.688 39.92 17.36
11b Maximum Transverse 5.12 4.80 1.27 13.688 13.688 65.65 17.36
11c Maximum Longitudinal 5.12 0.00 0.00 13.688 13.688 0.00 0.00
11d Span Dislodged 0.00 0.00 13.688 13.688 0.00 0.00

Total Loads & Moments 46476 2320 3620 32251 52764

COMBINATION 1
LOAD COMBINATIONS
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Trans. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) H.F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1+(7*0.6)+(4Q*0.6)+(5*1) 15252.85 111.41 133.26 1115.79 3023.45
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*1+(4Q*0.6)+(7*0.6)+(8*1)+(6*1) 15257.81 515.28 133.26 6644.01 5427.19
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*1+(4Q*0.6)+(7*0.6)+(8*1)+(5*1) 15131.84 130.23 133.26 1373.38 4399.48

Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load


a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*0.75+(4Q*0.6)+(7*1)+(5*) 14028.53 137.19 222.11 1501.60 3173.65
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*0.75+(4Q*0.6)+(7*1)+(8*1)+(6*1) 14028.53 137.19 222.11 1501.60 3173.65
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*0.75+(4Q*0.6)+(7*1)+(8*1)+ 14028.53 137.19 222.11 1501.60 3173.65

Page # 36
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING ROB BETWEEN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

Case - (iii) Thermal Load as Leading Load


a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*0.75+(4Q*1)+(7*0.6)+(5*) 15153.81 104.14 222.11 1016.22 4013.10
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*0.75+(4Q*1)+(7*0.6)+(8*1)+(6*1) 15157.53 407.04 222.11 5162.38 5815.90
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*0.75+(4Q*1)+(7*0.6)+(8*1)+(5*1) 15063.05 118.25 222.11 1209.41 5045.12

COMBINATION 2
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Trans. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) H.F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*0.75+(4Q*0.5)+(7*0.5)+(5*1 14808.74 90.42 111.05 820.19 2426.27
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*0.75+(4Q*0.5)+(7*0.5)+(8*1)+(6*1)-
(9b*0.15) 14812.46 393.32 111.05 4966.36 4229.07
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*0.75+(4Q*0.5)+(7*0.5)+(8*1)+(5*1)-
(9b*0.15) 14717.99 104.53 111.05 1013.38 3458.29

Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load


a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*0.2+(4Q*0.5)+(7*0.6)+(5*0.1 13752.47 155.21 133.26 1715.35 1904.19
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*0.2+(4Q*0.5)+(7*0.6)+(8*1)+(6*0.15)-
(9b*0.15) 13752.47 155.21 133.26 1715.35 1904.19
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*0.2+(4Q*0.5)+(7*0.6)+(8*1)+(5*0.15)-
(9b*0.15) 13752.47 155.21 133.26 1715.35 1904.19

Page # 37
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING ROB BETWEEN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

Case - (iii) Thermal Load as Leading Load


a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*0.2+(4Q*0.6)+(7*0.5)+(5*0.1 13983.53 74.41 111.05 601.13 1810.68
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*0.2+(4Q*0.6)+(7*0.5)+(8*1)+(6*0.15)-
(9b*0.15) 13984.53 242.67 111.05 1706.77 2291.43
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*0.2+(4Q*0.6)+(7*0.5)+(8*1) 13959.33 78.18 111.05 652.64 2085.88
+(5*0.15)-(9b*0.15)

COMBINATION 3 (Quasi - Permanent Combination)


Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Trans. Moment moment
Case - (i) (Kn) (Kn) H.F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Normal Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b)*1+(5*1) 13481.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page # 38
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

8.1 Summary of Loads and Moments : (For SLS Condition)

Case No Case Description P ML MT MR


Shaft Footing Shaft Footing Shaft Footing Shaft Footing
Combination 1 - Rare Combination (kN) (kN-m) (kN-m) (kN-m)
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 11581.12 15252.85 1574.46 1115.79 3023.45 3023.45 3408.84 3222.77
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 11586.08 15257.81 7102.68 6644.01 5427.19 5427.19 8938.81 8578.88
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 11460.11 15131.84 1832.04 1373.38 4399.48 4399.48 4765.69 4608.86

Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load


a): Maximum Reaction Case 10356.79 14028.53 1960.27 1501.60 3173.65 3173.65 3730.25 3510.97
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 10356.79 14028.53 1960.27 1501.60 3173.65 3173.65 3730.25 3510.97
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 10356.79 14028.53 1960.27 1501.60 3173.65 3173.65 3730.25 3510.97

Case - (ii) Thermal Load as Leading Load


a): Maximum Reaction Case 11482.08 15153.81 1474.89 1016.22 4013.10 4013.10 4275.54 4139.76
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 11485.80 15157.53 5621.05 5162.38 5815.90 5815.90 8088.32 7776.56
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 11391.32 15063.05 1668.07 1209.41 5045.12 5045.12 5313.73 5188.05

Combination 2 - Frequent Combination


Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 11137.01 14808.74 1278.86 820.19 2426.27 2426.27 2742.67 2561.15
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 11140.73 14812.46 5425.02 4966.36 4229.07 4229.07 6878.66 6523.02
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 11046.26 14717.99 1472.04 1013.38 3458.29 3458.29 3758.55 3603.71

Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load


a): Maximum Reaction Case 10080.74 13752.47 2174.02 1715.35 1904.19 1904.19 2890.03 2562.88
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 10080.74 13752.47 2174.02 1715.35 1904.19 1904.19 2890.03 2562.88
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 10080.74 13752.47 2174.02 1715.35 1904.19 1904.19 2890.03 2562.88

Case - (ii) Thermal Load as Leading Load


a): Maximum Reaction Case 10311.80 13983.53 1059.79 601.13 1810.68 1810.68 2098.03 1907.85
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 10312.80 13984.53 2165.44 1706.77 2291.43 2291.43 3152.74 2857.22
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 10287.60 13959.33 1111.31 652.64 2085.88 2085.88 2363.46 2185.60

Combination 3 - Quasi - Permanent Combination


Case - (i)
a): Normal Case 9810.22 13481.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page # 39
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Project: EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
Title: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY 0

8.2 Analysis of Rectangular Sections under Axial Load and Bi-Axial Bending moments

ML

end spacing
T LT x Longitudinal
y Transverse
MT

LL
L

Length of section along Traffic direction: 1.200 m


Length of section across Traffic direction: 8.000 m

Effective Cover 0.1 m


End Spacing 0.085 m

No of bars along Traffic direction (one side) 10 Nos.


Diameter of bar 0.02 m

No of bars across Traffic direction (one side) 60 Nos.


Diameter of bar 0.02 m

Code of Practise IRC


Modular Ratio m 10

Grade of Concrete M 35
2
Permissible Stresses in Concrete for Axial Compression 8.75 N/mm
2
Permissible Stresses in Concrete for bending Compression 16.80 N/mm
2
Permissible Stresses in Steel for Compression 205 N/mm
2
Permissible Stresses in Steel for Tension 240 N/mm

2
Area of Concrete 9.6000 m
2
Area of Steel =2×3.14/4×(0.02^2×10+0.02^2×60)×1e6 43982 mm
Percentage of Steel 0.46 %

Area of concrete to resist axial load only


2
= 1158.6 / 8.75 1324123 mm
2
Area of Steel = 0.8% of above 10593 mm

2
Min. Area of steel on each face= 0.0012*Ac 11520.0 mm OK

2
Total Area of vertical reinforcement = 0.0024*Ac 23040 mm
2
= 0.04*Ac 384000 mm Steel Prov > Min reqd

Combi - 1 Load P ML MT ex ey s CONCRETE s ST COMP s ST TENSION Remark


Rare Case No t t t m m N/mm2 N/mm2 N/mm2
Case (i) - a) 101 1158 157 302 0.136 0.261 2.14 20.11 0.00 100%
b) 102 1159 710 543 0.613 0.468 7.86 63.28 -106.59 100%
c) 103 1146 183 440 0.160 0.384 2.36 22.03 0.00 100%

Case (ii) - a) 105 1036 196 317 0.189 0.306 2.22 20.57 0.00 133%
b) 106 1036 196 317 0.189 0.306 2.22 20.57 0.00 133%
c) 107 1036 196 317 0.189 0.306 2.22 20.57 0.00 150%

Case (iii) - a) 109 1148 147 401 0.128 0.350 2.16 20.33 0.00 150%
b) 110 1149 562 582 0.489 0.506 5.96 50.42 -56.10 150%
c) 111 1139 167 505 0.146 0.443 2.32 21.77 0.00 150%

Page # 40
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

8.3 Summary of Base Pressure


L-L Dir. T-T Dir.
Area of Footing A = 5.100 x 9.000 = 45.90 m^2
Section Modulus along L-L Axis ZL = 9.000 x 5.100 ^2/6 = 39.02 m^3
Section Modulus along T-T Axis ZT = 5.100 x 9.000 ^2/6 = 68.85 m^3

Base Pressure = P/A ± ML / Z L ± MT / Z T


Load Load Case Description Vertical Long. Transverse P/A ML / ZL MT / ZT Pressure Pressure Pressure
Case Load Moment Moment at A at B at C at D
No P ML MT PA PB PC PD
(KN) (KNm) (KNm) (KN/m^2) (KN/m^2) (KN/m^2) (KN/m^2) (KN/m^2) (KN/m^2) (KN/m^2)
Combination 1 - Rare Combination
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 15252.85 1115.79 3023.45 332.31 28.60 43.92 404.83 316.99 347.63 259.79
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 15257.81 6644.01 5427.19 332.42 170.30 78.83 581.55 423.89 240.95 83.29
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 15131.84 1373.38 4399.48 329.67 35.21 63.90 428.78 300.98 358.36 230.56

Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load


a): Maximum Reaction Case 14028.53 1501.60 3173.65 305.64 38.49 46.10 390.23 298.03 313.25 221.05
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 14028.53 1501.60 3173.65 305.64 38.49 46.10 390.23 298.03 313.25 221.05
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 14028.53 1501.60 3173.65 305.64 38.49 46.10 390.23 298.03 313.25 221.05

Case - (ii) Thermal Load as Leading Load


a): Maximum Reaction Case 15153.81 1016.22 4013.10 330.15 26.05 58.29 414.49 297.91 362.39 245.81
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 15157.53 5162.38 5815.90 330.23 132.32 84.48 547.03 378.07 282.39 113.43
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 15063.05 1209.41 5045.12 328.18 31.00 73.28 432.46 285.90 370.46 223.90

Combination 2 - Frequent Combination


Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 14808.74 820.19 2426.27 322.64 21.03 35.24 378.91 308.43 336.85 266.37
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 14812.46 4966.36 4229.07 322.72 127.30 61.43 511.45 388.59 256.85 133.99
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 14717.99 1013.38 3458.29 320.66 25.98 50.23 396.87 296.41 344.91 244.45

Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load


a): Maximum Reaction Case 13752.47 1715.35 1904.19 299.62 43.97 27.66 371.25 315.93 283.31 227.99
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 13752.47 1715.35 1904.19 299.62 43.97 27.66 371.25 315.93 283.31 227.99
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 13752.47 1715.35 1904.19 299.62 43.97 27.66 371.25 315.93 283.31 227.99

Case - (ii) Thermal Load as Leading Load


a): Maximum Reaction Case 13983.53 601.13 1810.68 304.66 15.41 26.30 346.37 293.77 315.55 262.95
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 13984.53 1706.77 2291.43 304.68 43.75 33.29 381.72 315.14 294.22 227.64
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 13959.33 652.64 2085.88 304.13 16.73 30.30 351.16 290.56 317.70 257.10

Combination 3 - Quasi - Permanent Combination


Case - (i)
a): Normal Case 13481.95 0.00 0.00 293.73 0.00 0.00 293.73 293.73 293.73 293.73

Page # 41
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY
8.4 Design of Toe Footing
L-L Dir. T-T Dir.
Size of Pier = 1.20 x 8.00 m
Size of Section for flexure / Sec 1-1 = 1.20 x 8.00 m
Size of Footing 5.10 x 9.00 m
Clear Cover to reinforcement = 75 mm
Depth of Footing (D) = 1500 mm
Width of the meber (b) = 5100.00 mm
8.4.1 Design of Toe fooring for the servicebility limit state

8.4.1.1 Crack width calculations in L-L Direction


Comb-2 -
Combination1 - Rare
Quasi
Case 1 : Live Load as Leading Load
Case 2 : Wind Load as Leading Load
Case 3 : Thermal Load as Leading
Normal
Load
Description of Item Calculations for Case 1 Unit Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 9 Case 10 Case 11 Case 13
Size of Footing along L-L Axis 5.100 m 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100
Size of Footing along T-T Axis 9.000 m 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000
Size of Section for flexure along L-L Axis 1.200 m 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200
Size of Section for flexure along T-T Axis 8.000 m 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000
Projection of footing along L-L axis (5.1 - 1.2) / 2 0 m 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950
Projection of footing along T-T axis (9 - 8) / 2 m 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500
Max Pressure at A 404.83 KN/m^2 404.83 581.55 428.78 390.23 390.23 390.23 414.49 547.03 432.46 293.73
Pressure at B 316.99 KN/m^2 316.99 423.89 300.98 298.03 298.03 298.03 297.91 467.79 285.90 293.73
Pressure at C 347.63 KN/m^2 347.63 240.95 358.36 313.25 313.25 313.25 362.39 222.75 370.46 293.73
Min Pressure at D 259.79 KN/m^2 259.79 83.29 230.56 221.05 221.05 221.05 245.81 15.95 223.90 293.73
Pressure at the H 404.83 + (347.63 - 404.83) x 1.95 / 5.1 KN/m^2 382.96 451.33 401.86 360.80 360.80 360.80 394.57 423.05 408.76 293.73
Pressure at the G 316.99 + (259.79 - 316.99) x 1.95 / 5.1 KN/m^2 295.12 293.67 274.06 268.60 268.60 268.60 277.99 295.03 262.20 293.73
Average pressure along GH (382.96 + 295.12) / 2 KN/m^2 339.04 372.50 337.96 314.70 314.70 314.70 336.28 359.04 335.48 293.73
Average pressure along AB (404.83 + 316.99) / 2 KN/m^2 360.91 502.72 364.88 344.13 344.13 344.13 356.20 507.41 359.18 293.73
Depth of Footing at face of Pier 1.500 m 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500
Unit weight of Concrete 25.00 KN/m^2 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
Depth of Soil at face of Pier 209.872 - 205.75 - 1.5 m 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622
Unit weight of Soil 20.00 KN/m^2 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
Downward Force at root due to weight of footing & overburden earth KN/m^2 121.43 121.42 121.42 121.42 121.42 121.42 121.42 121.42 121.42 121.42
Depth of Footing at tip of footing 0.900 m 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900
Unit weight of Concrete 25.00 KN/m^2 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
Depth of Soil at tip of footing 209.872 - 205.75 - 0.9 m 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222
Unit weight of Soil 20.00 KN/m^2 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
Downward Force at tip due to weight of footing & overburden earth KN/m^2 117.38 117.37 117.37 117.37 117.37 117.37 117.37 117.37 117.37 117.37
Net Avg. pressure along AB 360.91 - 117.3825 KN/m^2 243.53 385.36 247.52 226.77 226.77 226.77 238.84 390.05 241.82 176.37
Net Avg. pressure along GH 339.04 - 121.4325 KN/m^2 217.61 251.09 216.55 193.29 193.29 193.29 214.87 237.63 214.07 172.32
Net Upward Force (217.61 + 243.53) / 2 x 1.95 x 9 KN 4046.51 5584.85 4072.21 3686.03 3686.03 3686.03 3981.31 5507.89 4000.43 3059.75
C.G. of the Force from GH (2 x 243.53 + 217.61)/(243.53+217.61)x1.95 / 3 m 0.994 1.044 0.997 1.001 1.001 1.001 0.992 1.054 0.995 0.979
BM at the critical section/mwidth 4046.51 x 0.994/8.125 KNm 495.05 717.32 499.54 454.08 454.08 454.08 486.18 714.45 489.80 368.60
Effective Width of footing 8 + (9 - 8) / 8 { b + (B - b) / 8} m 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125
Effective depth required (6327.11 x 10^6 / (4.68 x 8125) 114.14 137.40 114.66 109.32 109.32 109.32 113.11 137.12 113.53 98.49
Effective Depth provided 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
Factor Fav 12.51 12.51 12.51 12.51 12.51 12.51 12.51 12.51 12.51 12.51
Factor β = (λ/2) 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40
k av = M/Fav*b*d2 0.020 0.029 0.020 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.019 0.029 0.020 0.015
Neutral Axis Depth, X= (mm) d*(1-sqrt(1-4*b*kav))/(2*b) mm 28.20 41.01 28.46 25.85 25.85 25.85 27.69 40.84 27.90 20.95
Pρ eff= As/Ac eff 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118
Diameter of Bar provided at Bottom 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
Spacing of main steel to be provided at bottom 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125
Area of main steel provided at bottom (mm^2) mm2 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514
Max. crack spacing, Sr Max mm 542 542 542 542 542 542 542 542 542 542
Moment of inertia of cracked section 3.02E+10 2.97E+10 3.02E+10 3.03E+10 3.03E+10 3.03E+10 3.02E+10 2.97E+10 3.02E+10 3.05E+10
Stress in Steel(Mpa) 22.71 33.20 22.92 20.80 20.80 20.80 22.30 33.06 22.47 16.83 OK
Stress in concrete(Mpa) 0.462 0.991 0.470 0.387 0.387 0.387 0.445 0.983 0.452 0.253 OK
(ϵsm-ϵcm) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
Crack width Wk Sr max(esm-ecm) (mm) 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.03

Page # 42
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY
8.4 Design of Toe Footing

8.4.1.2 Check for Flexure in T-T direction Combination1 - Rare Comb-2 - Quasi
Case 1 : Live Load as Leading Load
Case 2 : Wind Load as Leading Load
Case 3 : Thermal Load as Leading
Normal
Load
Description of Item Calculations for Case 1 Unit Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 9 Case 10 Case 11 Case 13
Size of Footing along L-L Axis 5.100 m 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100
Size of Footing along T-T Axis 9.000 m 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000
Size of Pier along L-L Axis 1.200 m 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200
Size of Pier along T-T Axis 8.000 m 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000
Projection of footing along L-L axis (5.1 - 1.2) / 2 0 m 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950
Projection of footing along T-T axis (9 - 8) / 2 m 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500
Max Pressure at A 404.83 KN/m^2 404.83 581.55 428.78 390.23 390.23 390.23 414.49 547.03 432.46 293.73
Pressure at B 316.99 KN/m^2 316.99 423.89 300.98 298.03 298.03 298.03 297.91 467.79 285.90 293.73
Min Pressure at C 347.63 KN/m^2 347.63 240.95 358.36 313.25 313.25 313.25 362.39 222.75 370.46 293.73
Pressure at D 259.79 KN/m^2 259.79 83.29 230.56 221.05 221.05 221.05 245.81 15.95 223.90 293.73
Pressure at the M 347.63 + (259.79 - 347.63) x 0.5 / 9 KN/m^2 342.75 232.20 351.26 308.13 308.13 308.13 355.92 211.27 362.32 293.73
Pressure at the N 404.83 + (316.99 - 404.83) x 0.5 / 9 KN/m^2 399.95 572.80 421.68 385.11 385.11 385.11 408.02 542.63 424.32 293.73
Average pressure along AC (404.83 + 347.63) / 2 KN/m^2 376.23 411.25 393.57 351.74 351.74 351.74 388.44 384.89 401.46 293.73
Average pressure along MN (342.75 + 399.95) / 2 KN/m^2 371.35 402.50 386.47 346.62 346.62 346.62 381.97 376.95 393.32 293.73
Depth of Footing at root 1.500 m 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500
Unit weight of Concrete 25.00 KN/m^2 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
Depth of Soil at face of Pier 2.62 m 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622
Unit weight of Soil 20.00 KN/m^2 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
Downward Force at root due to weight of footing & overburden earth KN/m^2 121.43 121.42 121.42 121.42 121.42 121.42 121.42 121.42 121.42 121.42
Depth of Footing at tip 0.900 m 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900
Unit weight of Concrete 25.00 KN/m^2 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
Depth of Soil at face of Pier 209.872 - 205.75 - 0.9 m 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222
Unit weight of Soil 20.00 KN/m^2 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
Downward Force at tip due to weight of footing & overburden earth KN/m^2 117.38 117.37 117.37 117.37 117.37 117.37 117.37 117.37 117.37 117.37
Net average pressure along AC 376.23 - 117.3825 KN/m^2 258.85 293.89 276.21 234.38 234.38 234.38 271.08 267.53 284.10 176.37
Net average pressure along MN 371.35 - 121.4325 KN/m^2 249.92 281.09 265.06 225.21 225.21 225.21 260.56 255.54 271.91 172.32
Net Upward Force (249.92 + 258.85) / 2 x 0.5 x 5.1 KN 648.68 733.10 690.12 585.98 585.98 585.98 677.84 666.91 708.91 444.58
C.G. of the Force from MN m 0.981 0.982 0.982 0.981 0.981 0.981 0.981 0.982 0.982 0.979
BM at the face of pier shaft/Pedestal KNm 376.99 426.72 401.48 340.82 340.82 340.82 394.23 388.28 412.59 257.87
Effective Width of footing 8 + (9 - 8) / 8 { b + (B - b) / 8} m 1.688 1.688 1.688 1.688 1.688 1.688 1.688 1.688 1.688 1.688
Effective depth required (6327.11 x 10^6 / (4.68 x 8125) 218.559 232.528 225.547 207.810 207.810 207.810 223.501 221.808 228.646 180.761
Effective Depth provided 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
Factor Fav 12.51 12.51 12.51 12.51 12.51 12.51 12.51 12.51 12.51 12.51
Factor β = (λ/2) 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40
k av = M/Fav*b*d2 0.015 0.017 0.016 0.014 0.014 0.014 0.016 0.016 0.016 0.010
Neutral Axis Depth, X= (mm) d*(1-sqrt(1-4*b*kav))/(2*b) mm 21.43 24.28 22.83 19.36 19.36 19.36 22.42 22.08 23.47 14.63
Pρ eff= As/Ac eff 0.0099 0.0099 0.0099 0.0099 0.0099 0.0099 0.0099 0.0099 0.0099 0.0099
Diameter of Bar provided at Bottom 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
Spacing of main steel to be provided at bottom 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
Area of main steel provided at bottom (mm^2) mm2 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095
Max. crack spacing, Sr Max mm 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600
Moment of inertia of cracked section mm4 2.54E+10 2.53E+10 2.54E+10 2.55E+10 2.55E+10 2.55E+10 2.54E+10 2.54E+10 2.54E+10 2.57E+10
Stress in Steel(Mpa) N/mm2 20.66 23.43 22.02 18.65 18.65 18.65 21.62 21.29 22.64 14.06 OK
Stress in concrete(Mpa) N/mm2 0.318 0.409 0.361 0.259 0.259 0.259 0.348 0.337 0.382 0.147 OK
(ϵsm-ϵcm) 0.00006 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
Crack width Wk Sr max(esm-ecm) (mm) 0.04 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.04

Page # 43
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

8.5 Design of Heel Footing


L-L Dir. T-T Dir.
Size of Pier = 1.20 x 8.00 m
Size of Section for flexure / Sec 1-1 = 1.20 x 8.00 m
Size of Footing 5.10 x 9.00 m
Clear Cover to reinforcement = 75 mm
Depth of Footing (D) = 1500 mm
Width of the meber (b) = 5100.00 mm
8.5.1 Design of Heel fooring for the servicebility limit state

8.5.1.1 Crack width calculations in L-L Direction

Combination1 - Rare Comb-2 - Quasi


Case 1 : Live Load as Leading Load
Case 2 : Wind Load as Leading Load
Case 3 : Thermal Load as Leading Load Normal Span Dislodged
Description of Item Calculations for Case 1 Unit Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 9 Case 10 Case 11 Case 12 Case 13 Case 14
Size of Footing along L-L Axis 5.100 m 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100
Size of Footing along T-T Axis 9.000 m 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000
Size of Section for flexure along L-L Axis 1.200 m 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200
Size of Section for flexure along T-T Axis 8.000 m 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000
Projection of footing along L-L axis (5.1 - 1.2) / 2 + 0 m 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950
Projection of footing along T-T axis (9 - 8) / 2 m 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500
Max Pressure at A 404.83 KN/m^2 404.83 581.55 428.78 390.23 390.23 390.23 414.49 547.03 432.46 0.00 293.73 0.00
Pressure at B 316.99 KN/m^2 316.99 423.89 300.98 298.03 298.03 298.03 297.91 467.79 285.90 0.00 293.73 0.00
Pressure at C 347.63 KN/m^2 347.63 240.95 358.36 313.25 313.25 313.25 362.39 222.75 370.46 0.00 293.73 0.00
Min Pressure at D 259.79 KN/m^2 259.79 83.29 230.56 221.05 221.05 221.05 245.81 15.95 223.90 0.00 293.73 0.00
Pressure at the H 404.83 + (347.63 - 404.83) x 1.95 / 5.1 KN/m^2 382.96 451.33 401.86 360.80 360.80 360.80 394.57 423.05 408.76 0.00 293.73 0.00
Pressure at the G 316.99 + (259.79 - 316.99) x 1.95 / 5.1 KN/m^2 295.12 293.67 274.06 268.60 268.60 268.60 277.99 295.03 262.20 0.00 293.73 0.00
Average pressure along GH (382.96 + 295.12) / 2 KN/m^2 339.04 372.50 337.96 314.70 314.70 314.70 336.28 359.04 335.48 0.00 293.73 0.00
Average pressure along CD (347.63 + 259.79) / 2 KN/m^2 303.71 162.12 294.46 267.15 267.15 267.15 304.10 119.35 297.18 0.00 293.73 0.00
Depth of Footing at face of Pier 1.500 m 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500
Unit weight of Concrete 25.00 KN/m^2 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
Depth of Soil at face of Pier 221.458 - 205.75 - 1.5 m 14.208 14.208 14.208 14.208 14.208 14.208 14.208 14.208 14.208 14.208 14.208 14.208
Unit weight of Soil 20.00 KN/m^2 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
Downward Force at root due to weight of footing & overburden earth KN/m^2 434.24 434.24 434.24 434.24 434.24 434.24 434.24 434.24 434.24 434.24 434.24 434.24
Depth of Footing at tip of footing 0.900 m 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900
Unit weight of Concrete 25.00 KN/m^2 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
Depth of Soil at tip of footing 221.458 - 205.75 - 0.9 m 14.808 14.808 14.808 14.808 14.808 14.808 14.808 14.808 14.808 14.808 14.808 14.808
Unit weight of Soil 20.00 KN/m^2 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
Downward Force at tip due to weight of footing & overburden earth KN/m^2 430.19 430.19 430.19 430.19 430.19 430.19 430.19 430.19 430.19 430.19 430.19 430.19
Net Avg. pressure along AB 303.71 - 430.191 KN/m^2 -126.49 -268.08 -135.74 -163.05 -163.05 -163.05 -126.10 -310.85 -133.02 -430.20 -136.47 -430.20
Net Avg. pressure along GH 339.04 - 434.241 KN/m^2 -95.21 -61.75 -96.29 -119.55 -119.55 -119.55 -97.97 -75.21 -98.77 -434.25 -140.52 -434.25
Net downward force (-95.21 + -126.49) / 2 x 1.95 x 9 KN 1945.42 2894.26 2036.07 2479.82 2479.82 2479.82 1966.22 3387.68 2033.96 7585.55 2430.59 7585.55
C.G. of the Force from GH (2 x -126.49 + -95.21)/(-126.49+-95.21)x1.95 / 3 m 1.021 1.178 1.030 1.025 1.025 1.025 1.016 1.173 1.023 0.973 0.970 0.973
BM at the critical section/mwidth 1945.42 x 1.021/8.125 KNm 244.47 419.74 258.18 312.85 312.85 312.85 245.83 489.24 256.10 908.85 290.25 908.85
Effective Width of footing 8 + (9 - 8) / 8 { b + (B - b) / 8} m 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125
Effective depth required (6327.11 x 10^6 / (4.68 x 8125) 80.21 105.10 82.43 90.74 90.74 90.74 80.43 113.47 82.10 154.65 87.40 154.65
Effective Depth provided 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

Page # 44
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

8.5 Design of Heel Footing


Factor Fav 12.51 12.51 12.51 12.51 12.51 12.51 12.51 12.51 12.51 12.51 12.51 12.51
Factor β = (λ/2) 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40
2
k av = M/Fav*b*d 0.010 0.017 0.010 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.010 0.020 0.010 0.036 0.012 0.036
Neutral Axis Depth, X= (mm) d*(1-sqrt(1-4*b*kav))/(2*b) mm 13.87 23.88 14.65 17.77 17.77 17.77 13.95 27.86 14.53 52.12 16.48 52.12
Pρ eff= As/Ac eff 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118
Diameter of Bar provided at Bottom 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
Spacing of main steel to be provided at bottom 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125
Area of main steel provided at bottom (mm^2) mm2 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514
Max. crack spacing, Sr Max mm 542 542 542 542 542 542 542 542 542 542 542 542
Moment of inertia of cracked section 3.08E+10 3.04E+10 3.08E+10 3.07E+10 3.07E+10 3.07E+10 3.08E+10 3.02E+10 3.08E+10 2.92E+10 3.07E+10 2.92E+10
Stress in Steel(Mpa) 11.10 19.20 11.73 14.25 14.25 14.25 11.17 22.44 11.64 42.37 13.21 42.37 OK
Stress in concrete(Mpa) 0.110 0.330 0.123 0.181 0.181 0.181 0.111 0.451 0.121 1.621 0.156 1.621 OK
(ϵsm-ϵcm) 0.0000 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0000 0.0001 0.0000 0.0001
Crack width Wk Sr max(esm-ecm) (mm) 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.07

Page # 45
PROJECT:PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING ROB BETWEEN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

9.0 Combination for Calculation of Base pressures as per Table 3.4 of IRC : 6 -2010

9.0.1 Vertical Load and their moments about C/L of Foundation Base

Volume Unit Wt. Vertical Horizont. Horizont. Long. Trans. Long. Trans.
Load Force Force Eccentri. Eccentri. Moment Moment
S.No Item
P HL HT eL eT ML MT
(m3) (kN/m3) (kN) (kN) (kN) (m) (m) (KN-m) (KN-m)
1 Loads from Super structure
1a DL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00
1b DL Reaction : Right span 4725.00 0.00 0.00
2a SIDL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
2b SIDL Reaction : Right span 1341.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
6066.00 0.00 0.00
2c SIDL Reaction : Left span (Surfacing)
2d SIDL Reaction : Right span (Surfacing)
0.00 0.00 0.00
3 Footpath Loads
3a FPLL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
3b FPLL Reaction : Right span 143.56 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
143.56 0.00 0.00
4 Carriageway Live Loads
Maximum Reaction case
4a CWLL Reaction : Left Span 1351.53 0.00 0.700 0.00 946.07
4b CWLL Reaction : Right Span 0.00 0.00 0.700 0.00 0.00

Page # 46
PROJECT:PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING ROB BETWEEN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

Maximum Longitudinal Momemt


4c CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 0.00 0.700 0.00 0.00
4d CWLL Reaction : Right Span 1351.53 0.00 0.700 0.00 946.07
Maximum transverse moment
4e CWLL Reaction : Left Span 1225.57 0.00 1.803 0.00 2210.10
4f CWLL Reaction : Right Span 0.00 0.00 1.803 0.00 0.00
One Span Dislodged Case
4g CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
4h CWLL Reaction : Right Span 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
HF at Bearing Level
4i Maximum Reaction case 5.29 29.10 12.65 13.688 13.688 398.30 173.18
4j Maximum Longitudinal Moment 10.24 432.97 188.26 13.688 13.688 5926.51 2576.92
4k Maximum Transverse Moment 10.24 47.92 20.83 13.688 13.688 655.88 285.18
4l Span Dislodged 0.00 0.00 13.688 13.688 0.00 0.00
4m Seismic case with Maximum Reaction Case 2.64 2.92 12.65 13.688 13.688 39.92 173.18
4n Maximum Longitudinal Case 5.12 0.00 188.26 13.688 13.688 0.00 2576.92
4o Maximum Transverse Case 5.12 4.80 20.83 13.688 13.688 65.65 285.18
4p One Span Dislodged Case 0.00 0.00 13.688 13.688 0.00 0.00

4Q Thermal Loads 145.80 13.688 13.688 1995.71 0.00

5 Loads from Substructure LWL Case


5a Weight of Pedestal : Left Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 0.00 0.00
5b Weight of Pedestal : Right Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 0.00 0.00
5c Pier Cap (Uniform portion) 20.486 25.00 512.14 0.00 0.00
5d Pier Cap (Trapezoidal portion) 20.616 25.00 515.40 0.00 0.00
5e Platform at Pier cap Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5f Pier Shaft upto LWL 73.114 25.00 1827.84 0.00 0.00
5g Pier Shaft below LWL 25.171 25.00 629.28 0.00 0.00
5h Pedestal below the Pier shaft 0.000 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5i Footing 57.377 25.00 1434.43 0.00 0.00
5j Additional soil behind RE wall 5.21 20.00 104.27 -2.53 -263.29
5j Volume of earth above Footing 106.65 20.00 2133.03 -0.09 -195.37
7272.39 -2.62 -458.67 0.00

Page # 47
PROJECT:PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING ROB BETWEEN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

6 Loads from Substructure HFL Case


6a Weight of Pedestal : Left Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 0.00 0.00
6b Weight of Pedestal : Right Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 0.00 0.00
6c Pier Cap (Uniform portion) 20.486 25.00 512.14 0.00 0.00
6d Pier Cap (Trapezoidal portion) 20.616 25.00 515.40 0.00 0.00
6e Platform at Pier cap Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
6f Pier Shaft upto HFL 74.074 25.00 1851.84 0.00 0.00
6g Pier Shaft below HFL 24.211 25.00 605.28 0.00 0.00
6h Pedestal below the Pier shaft 0.000 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6i Footing 57.377 25.00 1434.43 0.00 0.00
6j Additional soil behind RE wall 5.214 20.00 104.27 -2.53 -263.29
6j Volume of earth above Footing 106.652 20.00 2133.03 -0.09 -195.37
7272.39 -2.62 -458.67 0.00
7 Wind forces
7a Wind Force On super structure 690.13 123.02 199.16 14.998 14.998 1845.01 2987.05
7b Wind force on liveload 0.00 0.00 17.208 17.208 0.00 0.00
7c Windforce on piercap 0.62 1.01 12.538 12.538 7.83 12.68
7d Windforce on pier 13.55 21.93 7.930 7.930 107.43 173.92
690.13 137.19 222.11 1960.27 3173.65

8 Water Current Force 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

9 Buoyancy
9a For Footing 188.240 0 0.00
9b For Stem 24.211 0 0.00

10 Seismic Forces
10a Long. seismic with Max. Live load 246.68 542.95 312.03 7014.69 4221.49
10b Long. seismic with Min. Live Load -274.898 542.95 347.72 7014.69 4825.04
10c Long. seismic with One Span Dislodged -105.484 145.24 49.05 1420.80 479.82
10d Trans. seismic with Max. Live load 604.880 203.61 832.07 2630.51 11257.32
10e Trans. seismic with Min. Live Load -674.078 203.61 927.26 2630.51 12866.77
10f Trans. seismic with One Span Dislodged -190.168 27.23 261.59 266.40 2559.04

11 HF at Bearing Level
11a Maximum Reaction case 2.64 2.92 1.27 13.688 13.688 39.92 17.36
11b Maximum Transverse 5.12 4.80 1.27 13.688 13.688 65.65 17.36
11c Maximum Longitudinal 5.12 0.00 0.00 13.688 13.688 0.00 0.00
11d Span Dislodged 0.00 0.00 13.688 13.688 0.00 0.00

Total Loads & Moments 46476 2611.17 3619.96 32251.03 52764.33

Page # 48
PROJECT:PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING ROB BETWEEN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

COMBINATION 1
LOAD COMBINATIONS
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Tran. H. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1+(7*0)+(5*1) 14838.769 29.098 0.000 -60.368 1119.256
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*1+(7*0)+(8*1)+(6*1)-
(9a*1) 14843.728 432.972 0.000 5467.849 3522.993
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*1+(7*0)+(8*1)+(5*1)- 14717.764 47.916 0.000 197.214 2495.289
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*1+(4Q*1)+(7a+7b+7c+7d)*0+(8*1)+(6* 13481.953 145.800 0.000 1537.044 0.000
COMBINATION 2
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Tran. H. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*0+(7*1)+(5*1) 14028.526 137.189 222.107 1501.604 3173.653
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*0+(7*1)+(8*1)+(6*1)- 14028.526 137.189 222.107 1501.604 3173.653
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*0+(7*1)+(8*1)+(5*1)- 14028.526 137.189 222.107 1501.604 3173.653

COMBINATION 3
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Tran. H. Moment moment
Case - (i) Longitudinal Seismic Case (Kn) (Kn) F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4m)*0.2+(7*0)+(5*1)+(10a*(r1 13722.771 622.978 286.146 7590.437 4060.579
+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1)
b): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4n)*0.2+(7*0)+(8*1)+(6*1)- 13323.314 622.395 318.881 7582.454 4614.064
(9a*1)+(10b*1.25*1)
c): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4n)*0.2+(7*0)+(8*1)+(6*1)- 13518.706 623.354 318.881 7595.584 4866.870
(9a*1)+(10b*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1)

Page # 49
PROJECT:PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING ROB BETWEEN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

Case - (ii) Transverse Seismic Case


a): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4m)*0.2+(7*0)+(5*1)+(10d*(r1 13845.956 187.302 953.819 1961.654 13093.762
+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1)
b): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4n)*0.2+(7*0)+(8*1)+(6*1)- 12865.723 186.718 1062.936 1953.670 14938.713
(9a*1)+(10e*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1)
c): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4n)*0.2+(7*0)+(8*1)+(6*1)- 13381.429 187.678 1062.936 1966.800 15191.520
(9a*1)+(10e*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1)

Page # 50
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

9.1 Summary of Base Pressure


L-L Dir. T-T Dir.
Area of Footing A = 5.100 x 9.000 = 45.90 m^2
Section Modulus along L-L Axis ZL = 9.000 x 5.100 ^2/6 = 39.02 m^3
Section Modulus along T-T Axis ZT = 5.100 x 9.000 ^2/6 = 68.85 m^3

Base Pressure = P/A ± ML / ZL ± MT / ZT


Load Load Case Description Vertical Long. Transverse P/A ML / ZL MT / ZT Pressure Pressure Pressure
Case Load Moment Moment at A at B at C at D
No P ML MT PA PB PC PD
(KN) (KNm) (KNm) (KN/m^2) (KN/m^2) (KN/m^2) (KN/m^2) (KN/m^2) (KN/m^2) (KN/m^2)
Combination 1
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 14838.77 -60.37 1119.26 323.29 -1.55 16.26 338.00 305.48 341.10 308.58
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 14843.73 5467.85 3522.99 323.40 140.15 51.17 514.72 412.38 234.42 132.08
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 14717.76 197.21 2495.29 320.65 5.06 36.25 361.96 289.46 351.84 279.34

Combination 2
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 14028.53 1501.60 3173.65 305.64 38.49 46.10 390.23 298.03 313.25 221.05
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 14028.53 1501.60 3173.65 305.64 38.49 46.10 390.23 298.03 313.25 221.05
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 14028.53 1501.60 3173.65 305.64 38.49 46.10 390.23 298.03 313.25 221.05

Combination 3
Case - (i) Longitudinal Seismic Case
a): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case 13722.77 7590.44 4060.58 298.98 194.56 58.98 552.52 434.56 163.40 45.44
b): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case 13323.31 7582.45 4614.06 290.27 194.35 67.02 551.64 417.60 162.94 28.90
c): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case 13518.71 7595.58 4866.87 294.53 194.69 70.69 559.91 418.53 170.53 29.15

Case - (ii) Transverse Seismic Case


a): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case 13845.96 1961.65 13093.76 301.66 50.28 190.18 542.12 161.76 441.56 61.20
b): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case 12865.72 1953.67 14938.71 280.30 50.08 216.98 547.36 113.40 447.20 13.24
c): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case 13381.43 1966.80 15191.52 291.54 50.42 220.65 562.61 121.31 461.77 20.47

For Normal Case: For Seismic Case:


Max Pressure = 514.72 OK Max Pressure = 562.61 OK
Min Pressure = 132.08 OK Min Pressure = 13.24 OK

Page # 51
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY
9.2 Crack width calculations

9.2.1 Crack width calculations in L-L Direction


Combination3
Normal Span Dislodged case
Description of Item Calculations for Case 1 Unit Case 1 Case 2
Size of Footing along L-L Axis 5.100 m 5.100 5.100
Size of Footing along T-T Axis 9.000 m 9.000 9.000
Size of Section for flexure along L-L Axis 1.200 m 1.200 1.200
Size of Section for flexure along T-T Axis 8.000 m 8.000 8.000
Projection of footing along L-L axis (5.1 - 1.2) / 2 m 1.950 1.950
Projection of footing along T-T axis (9 - 8) / 2 m 0.500 0.500
Base Pressure at A 293.73 KN/m^2 293.73 0.00
Base Pressure at B 293.73 KN/m^2 293.73 0.00
Base Pressure at C 293.73 KN/m^2 293.73 0.00
Base Pressure at D 293.73 KN/m^2 293.73 0.00
Pressure at the H 293.73 + (293.73 - 293.73) x 1.95 / 5.1 KN/m^2 293.73 0.00
Pressure at the G 293.73 + (293.73 - 293.73) x 1.95 / 5.1 KN/m^2 293.73 0.00
Average pressure along GH (293.73 + 293.73) / 2 KN/m^2 293.73 0.00
Average pressure along AB (293.73 + 293.73) / 2 KN/m^2 293.73 0.00
Depth of Footing at face of Pier 1.500 m 1.500 1.500
Unit weight of Concrete 25.00 KN/m^2 25.00 15.00
Depth of Soil at face of Pier 209.872 - 205.75 - 1.5 m 2.622 2.622
Unit weight of Soil 20.00 KN/m^2 20.00 10.00
Downward Force at root due to weight of footing & overburden earth KN/m^2 121.43 65.77
Depth of Footing at tip of footing 0.900 m 0.900 0.900
Unit weight of Concrete 25.00 KN/m^2 25.00 15.00
Depth of Soil at tip of footing 209.872 - 205.75 - 0.9 m 3.222 3.222
Unit weight of Soil 20.00 KN/m^2 20.00 10.00
Downward Force at tip due to weight of footing & overburden earth KN/m^2 117.38 61.72
Net Avg. pressure along AB 293.73 - 117.3825 KN/m^2 176.35 -61.73
Net Avg. pressure along GH 293.73 - 121.4325 KN/m^2 172.30 -65.78
Net Upward Force (172.3 + 176.35) / 2 x 1.95 x 9 KN 3059.41 -1118.90
C.G. of the Force from GH (2 x 176.35 + 172.3)/(176.35+172.3)x1.95 / 3 m 0.979 0.965
BM at the critical section 3059.41 x 0.979 KNm 2995.17 -1079.38
Effective Width of footing 8 + (9 - 8) / 8 { b + (B - b) / 8} m 8.125 8.125
Effective depth required (6327.11 x 10^6 / (4.68 x 8125) 408.05 487.60
Effective Depth provided 1415 1415
OK OK
Factor Fav 12.51 12.51
Factor β = (λ/2) 0.40 0.40
k av = M/Fav*b*d2 0.120 -0.043
Neutral Axis Depth, X= (mm) d*(1-sqrt(1-4*b*kav))/(2*b) mm 178.23 -59.98
Pρ eff= As/Ac eff 0.0118 0.0118
Diameter of Bar provided at Bottom 20 20
Spacing of main steel to be provided at bottom 125 125
Area of main steel provided at bottom (mm^2) mm2 2514 2514
Max. crack spacing, Sr Max mm 542 542
Moment of inertia of cracked section 2.59E+10 3.41E+10
Stress in Steel(Mpa) 142.91 -46.67
Stress in concrete(Mpa) 20.594 1.898
(ϵsm-ϵcm) 0.0004 -0.0001
Crack width Wk Sr max(esm-ecm) (mm) 0.23 -0.08

Page # 52
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY
9.2 Crack width calculations
9.2.2 Check for Flexure in T-T direction Combination3
Normal Span Dislodged case
Description of Item Calculations for Case 1 Unit Case 1 Case 2
Size of Footing along L-L Axis 5.100 m 5.100 5.100
Size of Footing along T-T Axis 9.000 m 9.000 9.000
Size of Pier along L-L Axis 1.200 m 1.200 1.200
Size of Pier along T-T Axis 8.000 m 8.000 8.000
Projection of footing along L-L axis (5.1 - 1.2) / 2 m 1.950 1.950
Projection of footing along T-T axis (9 - 8) / 2 m 0.500 0.500
Max Pressure at A 293.73 KN/m^2 293.73 0.00
Pressure at B 293.73 KN/m^2 293.73 0.00
Min Pressure at C 293.73 KN/m^2 293.73 0.00
Pressure at D 293.73 KN/m^2 293.73 0.00
Pressure at the M 293.73 + (293.73 - 293.73) x 0.5 / 9 KN/m^2 293.73 0.00
Pressure at the N 293.73 + (293.73 - 293.73) x 0.5 / 9 KN/m^2 293.73 0.00
Average pressure along AC (293.73 + 293.73) / 2 KN/m^2 293.73 0.00
Average pressure along MN (293.73 + 293.73) / 2 KN/m^2 293.73 0.00
Depth of Footing at root 1.500 m 1.500 1.500
Unit weight of Concrete 25.00 KN/m^2 25.00 15.00
Depth of Soil at face of Pier 2.62 m 2.622 2.622
Unit weight of Soil 20.00 KN/m^2 20.00 10.00
Downward Force at root due to weight of footing & overburden earth KN/m^2 121.43 65.77
Depth of Footing at tip 0.900 m 0.900 0.900
Unit weight of Concrete 25.00 KN/m^2 25.00 15.00
Depth of Soil at face of Pier 209.872 - 205.75 - 0.9 m 3.222 3.222
Unit weight of Soil 20.00 KN/m^2 20.00 10.00
Downward Force at tip due to weight of footing & overburden earth KN/m^2 117.38 61.72
Net average pressure along AC 293.73 - 117.3825 KN/m^2 176.35 -61.73
Net average pressure along MN 293.73 - 121.4325 KN/m^2 172.30 -65.78
Net Upward Force (172.3 + 176.35) / 2 x 0.5 x 5.1 KN 444.53 -162.58
C.G. of the Force from MN m 0.979 0.965
BM at the face of pier shaft/Pedestal KNm 435.10 -156.84
Effective Width of footing 8 + (9 - 8) / 8 { b + (B - b) / 8} m 1.688 1.688
Effective depth required (6327.11 x 10^6 / (4.68 x 8125) 408.054 487.599
Effective Depth provided 1415 1415
OK OK
Factor Fav 12.51 12.51
Factor β = (λ/2) 0.40 0.40
k av = M/Fav*b*d2 0.017 -0.006
Neutral Axis Depth, X= (mm) d*(1-sqrt(1-4*b*kav))/(2*b) mm 24.76 -8.84
Pρ eff= As/Ac eff 0.0099 0.0099
Diameter of Bar provided at Bottom 20 20
Spacing of main steel to be provided at bottom 150 150
Area of main steel provided at bottom (mm^2) mm2 2095 2095
Max. crack spacing, Sr Max mm 600 600
Moment of inertia of cracked section mm4 2.53E+10 2.65E+10
Stress in Steel(Mpa) N/mm2 23.90 -8.41
Stress in concrete(Mpa) N/mm2 0.426 0.052
(ϵsm-ϵcm) 0.00007 0.0000
Crack width Wk Sr max(esm-ecm) (mm) 0.04 -0.02

Page # 53
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING ROB BETWEEN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

Combination for calculation of Base pressure for Design of Foundation as per Table 3.4

10.0 Normal Case with Maximum Load (LWL Condition):

10.0.1 Vertical Load and their moments about C/L of Foundation Base

Volume Unit Wt. Vertical Horizont. Horizont. Long. Trans. Long. Trans.
Load Force Force Eccentri. Eccentri. Moment Moment
S.No Item
P HL HT eL eT ML MT
(m3) (kN/m3) (kN) (kN) (kN) (m) (m) (KN-m) (KN-m)
1 Loads from Super structure
1a DL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00
1b DL Reaction : Right span 4725.00 0.00 0.00
2a SIDL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
2b SIDL Reaction : Right span 1341.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
6066.00 0.00 0.00
2c SIDL Reaction : Left span (Surfacing)
2d SIDL Reaction : Right span (Surfacing)
0.00 0.00 0.00
3 Footpath Loads
3a FPLL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
3b FPLL Reaction : Right span 143.56 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
143.56 0.00 0.00
4 Carriageway Live Loads
Maximum Reaction case
4a CWLL Reaction : Left Span 1351.53 0.00 0.700 0.00 946.07
4b CWLL Reaction : Right Span 0.00 0.00 0.700 0.00 0.00
Maximum Longitudinal Momemt
4c CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 0.00 0.700 0.00 0.00
4d CWLL Reaction : Right Span 1351.53 0.00 0.700 0.00 946.07
Maximum transverse moment
4e CWLL Reaction : Left Span 1225.57 0.00 1.803 0.00 2210.10
4f CWLL Reaction : Right Span 0.00 0.00 1.803 0.00 0.00
One Span Dislodged Case
4g CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
4h CWLL Reaction : Right Span 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00
HF at Bearing Level
4i Maximum Reaction case 5.29 29.10 12.65 13.688 13.688 398.30 173.18
4j Maximum Longitudinal Moment 10.24 432.97 188.26 13.688 13.688 5926.51 2576.92
4k Maximum Transverse Moment 10.24 47.92 20.83 13.688 13.688 655.88 285.18
4l Span Dislodged 0.00 0.00 13.688 13.688 0.00 0.00
4m Seismic case with Maximum Reaction Case 2.64 2.92 12.65 13.688 13.688 39.92 173.18
4n Maximum Longitudinal Case 5.12 0.00 188.26 13.688 13.688 0.00 2576.92
4o Maximum Transverse Case 5.12 4.80 20.83 13.688 13.688 65.65 285.18
4p One Span Dislodged Case 0.00 0.00 13.688 13.688 0.00 0.00

4Q Thermal Loads 145.80 13.688 13.688 1995.71 0.00

5 Loads from Substructure LWL Case


5a Weight of Pedestal : Left Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 0.00 0.00
5b Weight of Pedestal : Right Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 0.00 0.00
5c Pier Cap (Uniform portion) 20.486 25.00 512.14 0.00 0.00
5d Pier Cap (Trapezoidal portion) 20.616 25.00 515.40 0.00 0.00
5e Platform at Pier cap Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5f Pier Shaft upto LWL 73.114 25.00 1827.84 0.00 0.00
5g Pier Shaft below LWL 25.171 25.00 629.28 0.00 0.00
5h Pedestal below the Pier shaft 0.000 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5i Footing 57.377 25.00 1434.43 0.00 0.00
5j Additional soil behind RE wall 5.21 20.00 104.27 -2.53 -263.29
5j Volume of earth above Footing 106.65 20.00 2133.03 -0.09 -195.37
7272.39 -2.62 -458.67 0.00
6 Loads from Substructure HFL Case
6a Weight of Pedestal : Left Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 0.00 0.00
6b Weight of Pedestal : Right Span 2.320 25.00 58.00 0.00 0.00
6c Pier Cap (Uniform portion) 20.486 25.00 512.14 0.00 0.00
6d Pier Cap (Trapezoidal portion) 20.616 25.00 515.40 0.00 0.00
6e Platform at Pier cap Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
6f Pier Shaft upto HFL 74.074 25.00 1851.84 0.00 0.00
6g Pier Shaft below HFL 24.211 25.00 605.28 0.00 0.00
6h Pedestal below the Pier shaft 0.000 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6i Footing 57.377 25.00 1434.43 0.00 0.00
5j Additional soil behind RE wall 5.21 20.00 104.27 -2.53 -263.29
6j Volume of earth above Footing 106.652 20.00 2133.03 -0.09 -195.37
7272.39 -2.62 -458.67 0.00
7 Wind forces
7a Wind Force On super structure 690.13 123.02 199.16 14.998 14.998 1845.01 2987.05
7b Wind force on liveload 0.00 0.00 17.208 17.208 0.00 0.00
7c Windforce on piercap 0.62 1.01 12.538 12.538 7.83 12.68
7d Windforce on pier 13.55 21.93 7.930 7.930 107.43 173.92
690.13 137.19 222.11 1960.27 3173.65

Page # 54
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING ROB BETWEEN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

8 Water Current Force 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

9 Buoyancy
9a For Footing 188.240 0 0.00
9b For Stem 24.211 0 0.00

10 Seismic Forces
10a Long. seismic with Max. Live load 246.68 542.95 312.03 7014.69 4221.49
10b Long. seismic with Min. Live Load -274.898 542.95 347.72 7014.69 4825.04
10c Long. seismic with One Span Dislodged -105.484 145.24 49.05 1420.80 479.82
10d Trans. seismic with Max. Live load 604.880 203.61 832.07 2630.51 11257.32
10e Trans. seismic with Min. Live Load -674.078 203.61 927.26 2630.51 12866.77
10f Trans. seismic with One Span Dislodged -190.168 27.23 261.59 266.40 2559.04

11 HF at Bearing Level
11a Maximum Reaction case 2.64 2.92 1.27 13.688 13.688 39.92 17.36
11b Maximum Transverse 5.12 4.80 1.27 13.688 13.688 65.65 17.36
11c Maximum Longitudinal 5.12 0.00 0.00 13.688 13.688 0.00 0.00
11d Span Dislodged 0.00 0.00 13.688 13.688 0.00 0.00

Total Loads & Moments ##### 2611.17 3619.96 32251.03 52764.33

COMBINATION 1
LOAD COMBINATIONS
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H. Tran. H. F Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) F (Kn) (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1.5+(7*0.9)+(5*1.35) 20878.514 167.117 199.896 1742.490 4535.172
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*1.5+(7*0.9)+(8*1)+(6*1.35)-(9a*1) 20885.952 772.927 199.896 10034.816 8140.778
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*1.5+(7*0.9)+(8*1)+(5*1.35)-(9a*1) 20697.006 195.344 199.896 2128.863 6599.221

Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load


a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1.15+(7*1.5)+(5*1) 19042.030 205.783 333.160 2321.206 4760.480
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*1.15+(7*1.5)+(8*1)+(6*1)-(9a*1) 19042.030 205.783 333.160 2321.206 4760.480
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*1.15+(7*1.5)+(8*1)+(5*1)-(9a*1) 19042.030 205.783 333.160 2321.206 4760.480

COMBINATION 2
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H. Tran. H. F Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) F (Kn) (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1.3+(7*0.8)+(5*1) 15840.988 147.579 177.69 1627.34 3993.96
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*1.3+(7*0.8)+(8*1)+(6*1)- 15847.434 672.614 177.69 8814.02 7118.81369
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*1.3+(7*0.8)+(8*1)+(5*1)- 15683.681 172.042 177.69 1962.19 5782.7979

Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load


a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1+(7*1.3)+(5*1) 14235.566 178.345 288.739 2089.685 4125.750
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*1+(7*1.3)+(8*1)+(6*1)-(9a*1) 14235.566 178.345 288.739 2089.685 4125.750
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*1+(7*1.3)+(8*1)+(5*1)-(9a*1) 14235.566 178.345 288.739 2089.685 4125.750

Page # 55
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO EXISTING ROB BETWEEN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

COMBINATION 3
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H. Tran. H. F Moment moment
Case - (i) Longitudinal Seismic Case (Kn) F (Kn) (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4m)*0.2+(7*0)+(5*1.35)+(1 18433.625 934.175 429.219 11450.464 5996.261
0a*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1.5)
b): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4n)*0.2+(7*0)+(8*1)+(6*1. 17834.190 933.592 478.321 11442.481 6826.489
35)-(9a*1)+(10b*1.25*1.5)
c): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4n)*0.2+(7*0)+(8*1)+(6*1.3 15594.538 934.551 478.321 11455.611 7079.295
5)-(9a*1)+(10b*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1.5)

Case - (ii) Transverse Seismic Case


a): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4m)*0.2+(7*0)+(5*1.35)+(1 18618.402 280.661 1430.729 3007.288 19546.036
0d*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1.5)
b): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4n)*0.2+(7*0)+(8*1)+(6*1. 14602.466 280.078 1594.404 2999.305 22313.462
35)-(9a*1)+(10e*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1.5)
c): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4n)*0.2+(7*0)+(8*1)+(6*1.3 15388.622 281.037 1594.404 3012.435 22566.269
5)-(9a*1)+(10e*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1.5)

Page # 56
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
VARANGAOL ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

10.1 Summary of Base Pressures for Foundation Design


L-L Dir. T-T Dir.
Area of Footing A = 5.100 x 9.000 = 45.90 m^2
Section Modulus along L-L Axis ZL = 9.000 x 5.100 ^2/6 = 39.02 m^3
Section Modulus along T-T Axis ZT = 5.100 x 9.000 ^2/6 = 68.85 m^3

Base Pressure = P/A ± ML / ZL ± MT / ZT

Load Load Case Description Vertical Long. Transverse P/A M L / ZL M T / ZT Pressure Pressure Pressure Pressure
Case Load Moment Moment at A at B at C at D
No P ML MT PA PB PC PD
(KN) (KNm) (KNm) (KN/m^2) (KN/m^2) (KN/m^2) (KN/m^2) (KN/m^2) (KN/m^2) (KN/m^2)
Combination 1
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 20878.51 1742.49 4535.17 454.87 44.67 65.88 565.42 433.66 476.08 344.32
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 20885.95 10034.82 8140.78 455.04 257.21 118.24 830.49 594.01 316.07 79.59
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 20697.01 2128.86 6599.22 450.92 54.57 95.85 601.34 409.64 492.20 300.50

Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load


a): Maximum Reaction Case 19042.03 2321.21 4760.48 414.86 59.50 69.15 543.51 405.21 424.51 286.21
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 19042.03 2321.21 4760.48 414.86 59.50 69.15 543.51 405.21 424.51 286.21
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 19042.03 2321.21 4760.48 414.86 59.50 69.15 543.51 405.21 424.51 286.21

Combination 2
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 15840.99 1627.34 3993.96 345.12 41.72 58.01 444.85 328.83 361.41 245.39
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 15847.43 8814.02 7118.81 345.27 225.92 103.40 674.59 467.79 222.75 15.95
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 15683.68 1962.19 5782.80 341.70 50.30 84.00 476.00 308.00 375.40 207.40

Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load


a): Maximum Reaction Case 14235.57 2089.68 4125.75 310.15 53.57 59.93 423.65 303.79 316.51 196.65
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 14235.57 2089.68 4125.75 310.15 53.57 59.93 423.65 303.79 316.51 196.65
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 14235.57 2089.68 4125.75 310.15 53.57 59.93 423.65 303.79 316.51 196.65

Combination 3
Case - (i) Longitudinal Seismic Case
a): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case 18433.62 11450.46 5996.26 401.61 293.49 87.10 782.20 608.00 195.22 21.02
b): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case 17834.19 11442.48 6826.49 388.55 293.29 99.16 781.00 582.68 194.42 -3.90
c): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case 15594.54 11455.61 7079.30 339.76 293.63 102.83 736.22 530.56 148.96 -56.70

Case - (ii) Transverse Seismic Case


a): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case 18618.40 3007.29 19546.04 405.63 77.09 283.90 766.62 198.82 612.44 44.64
b): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case 14602.47 2999.30 22313.46 318.14 76.88 324.09 719.11 70.93 565.35 -82.83
c): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case 15388.62 3012.44 22566.27 335.27 77.22 327.76 740.25 84.73 585.81 -69.71

Page # 57
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY
10.2 Design of Toe Footing
L-L Dir. T-T Dir.
Size of Pier = 1.20 x 8.00 m
Size of Section for flexure / Sec 1-1 = 1.20 x 8.00 m
Size of Footing 5.10 x 9.00 m
Clear Cover to reinforcement = 75 mm
Depth of Footing (D) = 1500 mm
Width of the meber (b) = 5100.00 mm

Design Properties
Concrete
Grade of Concrete = M 35
Charactristic strength of concrete (fck) = M35 Mpa (Table no:6.5, IRC:112-2011)
Tensile strength of concrete (fctm) = 2.8 MPa

Type of Combination = Basic&Seis


Partial material safety factor for concrete (gm) = 1.5 Page 49: (IRC:112-2011)
Ultimate compressive strain in the concrete (єcu3) = 0.0035 Mpa (Table no:6.5 (IRC:112-2011))
Modulus of elasticity of concrete (Ecm) = 32000 MPa
Modular ratio αe (Es/Ecm)=200000/32000 = 6.25

Steel
Grade of Steel = S 500
Characteristic strength of steel (fy)or(fyk) = 500 MPa Table no:18.1 (IRC:112-2011)
Design yield strength of shear reinforcement fywd = 348 MPa 0.8*fyk/γs
Partial material safety factor for Steel (gs) = 1.15 Page 30: (IRC:112-2011)
Ultimate tensile strain in the steel (єs) = 0.00417 [{fyk/(ϒs xEs)}+0.002]
Modulus of elasticity of reinforcing of steel (Es) = 200000 MPa Clause 6.2.2 (IRC:112-2011) &6.3.5
fYd = 434.8 N/mm
2

Design Factors
Coefficient to consider the influence of the concrete strength (a) = 0.67 Cube A2.10 Page : 244 (IRC:112-2011)
Factor (l ) = 0.8 Eq.A2-33 & Eq. A2-34 (IRC:112-2011);
Factor (h) = 1 Eq.A2-35 & Eq. A2-36 (IRC:112-2011);
Design value of concrete compressive strength fcd = (a*fck/gm) = 15.633
Factor Fav, (hfcdl) = 12.507
Factor b = (l/2) = 0.400
Lever arm z= = 0.9

Cu = fcd*b*(3/7xu,lim + 2/3*4/7xu,lim)
= 17/21*fcd*b*xu
= 0.8095*fcd*b*xu
cg of compression block from top = 0.416xu
Tu = (fy/1.15)*Ast
2
Rlim = mu,Lim/BD
= 0.8095fcd*(xu/d)*(1-0.416*xu/d)
xu,lim/d = 0.456
Rlim = 4.68

Page # 58
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY
10.2 Design of Toe Footing

T
344.320 433.660
D G B 433.66

2
kN/m
2
kN/m 1.2 m dia.

9
L L

M N

C A 565.42
476.080 H 565.420
T
5.100 m

476.080 565.420

10.2.1 Check for Flexure in L-L direction


Combination1 Combination2
Case 1 : Live Load as Leading Load Case 2 : Wind Load as Leading Load Case 3 : Live Load as Leading Load Case 4 : Wind Load as Leading Load
Description of Item Calculations for Case 1 Unit Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8 Case 9 Case 10 Case 11 Case 12 Case 13 Case 14 Case 15 Case 16
Size of Footing along L-L Axis 5.100 m 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100
Size of Footing along T-T Axis 9.000 m 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000
Size of Section for flexure along L-L Axis 1.200 m 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200
Size of Section for flexure along T-T Axis 8.000 m 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000
Projection of footing along L-L axis (5.1 - 1.2) / 2 0 m 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950
Projection of footing along T-T axis (9 - 8) / 2 m 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500
Max Pressure at A 565.42 KN/m^2 565.42 830.49 601.34 0.00 543.51 543.51 543.51 0.00 444.85 674.59 476.00 0.00 423.65 423.65 423.65 0.00
Pressure at B 433.66 KN/m^2 433.66 594.01 409.64 0.00 405.21 405.21 405.21 0.00 328.83 467.79 308.00 0.00 303.79 303.79 303.79 0.00
Pressure at C 476.08 KN/m^2 476.08 316.07 492.20 0.00 424.51 424.51 424.51 0.00 361.41 222.75 375.40 0.00 316.51 316.51 316.51 0.00
Min Pressure at D 344.32 KN/m^2 344.32 79.59 300.50 0.00 286.21 286.21 286.21 0.00 245.39 15.95 207.40 0.00 196.65 196.65 196.65 0.00
Pressure at the H 565.42 + (476.08 - 565.42) x 1.95 / 5.1 KN/m^2 531.27 633.80 559.61 0.00 498.01 498.01 498.01 0.00 412.95 501.83 437.54 0.00 382.69 382.69 382.69 0.00
Pressure at the G 433.66 + (344.32 - 433.66) x 1.95 / 5.1 KN/m^2 399.51 397.32 367.91 0.00 359.71 359.71 359.71 0.00 296.93 295.03 269.54 0.00 262.83 262.83 262.83 0.00
Average pressure along GH (531.27 + 399.51) / 2 KN/m^2 465.39 515.56 463.76 0.00 428.86 428.86 428.86 0.00 354.94 398.43 353.54 0.00 322.76 322.76 322.76 0.00
Average pressure along AB (565.42 + 433.66) / 2 KN/m^2 499.54 712.25 505.49 0.00 474.36 474.36 474.36 0.00 386.84 571.19 392.00 0.00 363.72 363.72 363.72 0.00
Depth of Footing at face of Pier 1.500 m 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500
Unit weight of Concrete 25.00 KN/m^2 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
Depth of Soil at face of Pier 209.872 - 205.75 - 1.5 m 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622
Unit weight of Soil 20.00 KN/m^2 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
Downward Force at root due to weight of footing & overburden earth KN/m^2 121.43 121.42 121.42 121.42 121.42 121.42 121.42 121.42 89.94 89.94 89.94 89.94 89.94 89.94 89.94 89.94
Depth of Footing at tip of footing 0.900 m 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900
Unit weight of Concrete 25.00 KN/m^2 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
Depth of Soil at tip of footing 209.872 - 205.75 - 0.9 m 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222
Unit weight of Soil 20.00 KN/m^2 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
Downward Force at tip due to weight of footing & overburden earth KN/m^2 117.38 117.37 117.37 117.37 117.37 117.37 117.37 117.37 86.94 86.94 86.94 86.94 86.94 86.94 86.94 86.94

Page # 59
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY
10.2 Design of Toe Footing
Net Avg. pressure along AB 499.54 - 117.3825 KN/m^2 382.16 594.89 388.13 -117.37 357.00 357.00 357.00 -117.37 299.90 484.25 305.06 -86.95 276.78 276.78 276.78 -86.95
Net Avg. pressure along GH 465.39 - 121.4325 KN/m^2 343.96 394.15 342.35 -121.42 307.45 307.45 307.45 -121.42 265.00 308.49 263.60 -89.95 232.82 232.82 232.82 -89.95
Net Upward Force (343.96 + 382.16) / 2 x 1.95 x 9 KN 6371.71 8678.83 6409.96 -2095.38 5830.55 5830.55 5830.55 -2095.38 4957.00 6956.29 4989.99 -1552.30 4471.74 4471.74 4471.74 -1552.30
C.G. of the Force from GH (2 x 382.16 + 343.96)/(382.16+343.96)x1.95 / 3 m 0.993 1.041 0.995 0.969 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.969 0.995 1.047 0.999 0.969 1.003 1.003 1.003 0.969
BM at the critical section 6371.71 x 0.993 KNm 6327.11 9034.34 6380.27 -2031.45 5826.10 5826.10 5826.10 -2031.45 4932.60 7283.63 4983.48 -1504.93 4485.31 4485.31 4485.31 -1504.93
Limiting moment of resistance of section Mulimit = 0.3568*Xu/d*(1-0.4*Xu/d)*b*d^2*fck KNm 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
Effective Width of footing 8 + (9 - 8) / 8 { b + (B - b) / 8} m 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125
Effective depth required (6327.11 x 10^6 / (4.68 x 8125) 408.05 487.60 409.76 #NUM! 391.56 391.56 391.56 #NUM! 360.29 437.81 362.14 #NUM! 343.57 343.57 343.57 #NUM!
Effective Depth provided 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415
OK OK OK #NUM! OK OK OK #NUM! OK OK OK #NUM! OK OK OK #NUM!
Main Steel at bottom face along L-L axis of footing
R Mu/bd^2 0.389 0.555 0.392 -0.125 0.358 0.358 0.358 -0.125 0.303 0.448 0.306 -0.093 0.276 0.276 0.276 -0.093
Area of steel required 0.973*(fcd/fyd)*(1-sqrt(1-(2.055*R/fcd)))*b*d mm^2 10416.74 14959.41 10505.44 -3287.76 9581.81 9581.81 9581.81 -3287.76 8097.22 12015.72 8181.60 -2438.20 7356.12 7356.12 7356.12 -2438.20
Area of steel required / meter width Ast required/B mm^2 1157.42 1662.16 1167.27 -365.31 1064.65 1064.65 1064.65 -365.31 899.69 1335.08 909.07 -270.91 817.35 817.35 817.35 -270.91
Min Area of steel required max(0.26*fctm/fyk*bt*d, 0.0013btd) mm^2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2
Area of steel to be provided Max(1157.42 , 2060.24) 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2
Spacing of steel required at bottom 20 mm + 0 mm dia bars mm 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152
Ast provided at bottom 20 mm + 0 mm @ 125 mm c/c mm^2 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514
Status O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K
% of steel provided 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178
Max. area of tension reinforcement 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375
Status O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K
Distribution Steel
Ast req at top face along L-L axis 20 % of Ast mm^2 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048
Spacing of steel required at top 12 mm dia bars 274 274 274 274 274 274 274 274 274 274 274 274 274 274 274 274
Ast provided at top 12 mm bars @ @ 125 mm c/c mm^2 905 905 905 905 905 905 905 905 905 905 905 905 905 905 905 905
Area of Dist. Steel req on b/face 20 % of Ast mm^2 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048

Combination3
Case 1 : Longitudinal Seismic Case Case 2 : Transverse Seismic Case
Description of Item Calculations for Case 1 Unit Case 17 Case 18 Case 19 Case 20 Case 21 Case 22 Case 23 Case 24
Size of Footing along L-L Axis 5.100 m 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100
Size of Footing along T-T Axis 9.000 m 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000
Size of Section for flexure along L-L Axis 1.200 m 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200
Size of Section for flexure along T-T Axis 8.000 m 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000
Projection of footing along L-L axis (5.1 - 1.2) / 2 0 m 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950
Projection of footing along T-T axis (9 - 8) / 2 m 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500
Max Pressure at A 782.20 KN/m^2 782.20 781.00 736.22 0.00 766.62 719.11 740.25 0.00
Pressure at B 608.00 KN/m^2 608.00 582.68 530.56 0.00 198.82 70.93 84.73 0.00
Pressure at C 195.22 KN/m^2 195.22 194.42 148.96 0.00 612.44 565.35 585.81 0.00
Min Pressure at D 21.02 KN/m^2 21.02 -3.90 -56.70 0.00 44.64 -82.83 -69.71 0.00
Pressure at the H 782.2 + (195.22 - 782.2) x 1.95 / 5.1 KN/m^2 557.77 556.72 511.68 0.00 707.67 660.32 681.20 0.00
Pressure at the G 608 + (21.02 - 608) x 1.95 / 5.1 KN/m^2 383.57 358.40 306.02 0.00 139.87 12.14 25.68 0.00
Average pressure along GH (557.77 + 383.57) / 2 KN/m^2 470.67 457.56 408.85 0.00 423.77 336.23 353.44 0.00
Average pressure along AB (782.2 + 608) / 2 KN/m^2 695.10 681.84 633.39 0.00 482.72 395.02 412.49 0.00
Depth of Footing at face of Pier 1.500 m 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500
Unit weight of Concrete 25.00 KN/m^2 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
Depth of Soil at face of Pier 209.872 - 205.75 - 1.5 m 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622 2.622
Unit weight of Soil 20.00 KN/m^2 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
Downward Force at root due to weight of footing & overburden earth KN/m^2 121.43 121.42 121.42 121.42 121.42 121.42 121.42 121.42
Depth of Footing at tip of footing 0.900 m 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900
Unit weight of Concrete 25.00 KN/m^2 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
Depth of Soil at tip of footing 209.872 - 205.75 - 0.9 m 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222 3.222
Unit weight of Soil 20.00 KN/m^2 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
Downward Force at tip due to weight of footing & overburden earth KN/m^2 117.38 117.37 117.37 117.37 117.37 117.37 117.37 117.37
Net Avg. pressure along AB 695.1 - 117.3825 KN/m^2 577.72 564.48 516.03 -117.37 365.36 277.66 295.13 -117.37
Net Avg. pressure along GH 470.67 - 121.4325 KN/m^2 349.24 336.15 287.44 -121.42 302.36 214.82 232.03 -121.42
Net Upward Force (349.24 + 577.72) / 2 x 1.95 x 9 KN 8134.08 7903.03 7050.45 -2095.38 5859.24 4321.51 4625.83 -2095.38
C.G. of the Force from GH (2 x 577.72 + 349.24)/(577.72+349.24)x1.95 / 3 m 1.056 1.057 1.067 0.969 1.006 1.016 1.014 0.969
BM at the critical section 8134.08 x 1.056 KNm 8589.59 8356.62 7526.10 -2031.45 5892.43 4392.69 4690.14 -2031.45
Limiting moment of resistance of section Mulimit = 0.3568*Xu/d*(1-0.4*Xu/d)*b*d^2*fck KNm 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4

Page # 60
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY
10.2 Design of Toe Footing
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
Effective Width of footing 8 + (9 - 8) / 8 { b + (B - b) / 8} m 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125
Effective depth required (8589.59 x 10^6 / (0.00 x 8125) 475.45 468.95 445.04 #NUM! 393.79 340.00 351.32 #NUM!
Effective Depth provided 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415
OK OK OK #NUM! OK OK OK #NUM!
Main Steel at bottom face along L-L axis of footing
R Mu/bd^2 0.528 0.514 0.463 -0.125 0.362 0.270 0.288 -0.125
Area of steel required 0.973*(fcd/fyd)*(1-sqrt(1-(2.055*R/fcd)))*b*d mm^2 14209.48 13817.23 12422.08 -3287.76 9692.25 7202.82 7695.31 -3287.76
Area of steel required / meter width Ast required/B mm^2 1578.83 1535.25 1380.23 -365.31 1076.92 800.31 855.03 -365.31
Min Area of steel required max(0.26*fctm/fyk*bt*d, 0.0013btd) mm^2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2
Area of steel to be provided Max(1578.83 , 2060.24) 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2
Spacing of steel required at bottom 20 mm + 0 mm dia bars mm 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152
Ast provided at bottom 20 mm + 0 mm @ 125 mm c/c mm^2 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514
O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K
% of steel provided 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178
Max. area of tension reinforcement 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375
O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K
Distribution Steel
Ast req at top face along L-L axis 20 % of Ast mm^2 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048
Spacing of steel required at top 12 mm dia bars 274 274 274 274 274 274 274 274
Ast provided at top 12 mm bars @ @ 125 mm c/c mm^2 905 905 905 905 905 905 905 905
Area of Dist. Steel req on b/face 20 % of Ast mm^2 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048

10.2.2 Check For Shear in L-L direction Combination1 Combination2


Case 1 : Live Load as Leading Load Case 2 : Wind Load as Leading Load Case 3 : Live Load as Leading Load Case 4 : Wind Load as Leading Load
Description of Item Calculations for Case 1 Unit Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8 Case 9 Case 10 Case 11 Case 12 Case 13 Case 14 Case 15 Case 16
Size of Footing along L-L Axis 5.100 m 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100
Size of Footing along T-T Axis 9.000 m 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000
Size of Pier along L-L Axis 1.200 m 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200
Size of Pier along T-T Axis 8.000 m 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000
Projection of footing along L-L axis (5.1 - 1.2) / 2 0 m 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950
Projection of footing along T-T axis (9 - 8) / 2 m 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500
Dist of critical section from Sec 1-1 1.415 m 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150
Length of footing from critical section 1.95 - 1.415 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535
Width of triangular portion ((9 - 8) / 2 ) / 1.95 x 1.415 m 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363
Eff width of footing at critical section 0.363*2 + 8 m 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726
Net Avg. pressure along AB 382.16 kN/m^2 382.16 594.89 388.13 -117.37 357.00 357.00 357.00 -117.37 299.90 484.25 305.06 -86.95 276.78 276.78 276.78 -86.95
Net Avg. pressure along GH 343.96 kN/m^2 343.96 394.15 342.35 -121.42 307.45 307.45 307.45 -121.42 265.00 308.49 263.60 -89.95 232.82 232.82 232.82 -89.95
Pressure at Critical Section 382.16+ (343.96 - 382.16)x0.535/ 1.95 kN/m^2 371.68 539.82 375.57 -118.49 343.41 343.41 343.41 -118.49 290.33 436.03 293.69 -87.78 264.72 264.72 264.72 -87.78
Net Upward Force V ((382.16 + 371.68) / 2 ) x 0.535 x 9 KN 1028.43 1548.03 1041.88 -321.78 955.54 955.54 955.54 -321.78 805.23 1255.50 816.85 -238.38 738.75 738.75 738.75 -238.38
CG of Force ((2x382.16+371.68)/(382.16+371.68)x0.535/3 m 0.269 0.272 0.269 0.268 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.268 0.269 0.273 0.27 0.268 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.268
BM at Critical Section 1028.43 x 0.269 KNm 276.65 421.07 280.27 -86.24 258.00 258.00 258.00 -86.24 216.61 342.76 220.55 -63.89 199.47 199.47 199.47 -63.89
Eff. Depth at critical Section, d mm 980 980 980 980 980 980 980 980 980 980 980 980 980 980 980 980
Slope top face of footing tan b (1.5 - 0.9) / 1.95 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308
M tan b / d 276.65 x 0.308 / 0.98 KN 86.95 132.34 88.09 -27.11 81.09 81.09 81.09 -27.11 68.08 107.73 69.32 -20.08 62.70 62.70 62.70 -20.08
Design Shear Force VED 1028.43 - 86.95 KN 941.48 1415.69 953.79 -294.67 874.45 874.45 874.45 -294.67 737.15 1147.77 747.53 -218.30 676.05 676.05 676.05 -218.30
Shear force per m width KN 107.89 162.24 109.30 -33.77 100.21 100.21 100.21 -33.77 84.48 131.53 85.67 -25.02 77.48 77.48 77.48 -25.02
Strength reduction factor ⱱ 0.6*[1-(fck/310)] N/mm2 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53
Shear Force VED <=(0.5*bw*d*ⱱ*fcd) KN 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578
Status OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
Longitudinal force NED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
K (1+sqrt(200/d))<2.0 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45
σcp NED/Ac<0.2*fcd 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
ρ1 Asl/bwd<=0.02 0.00178 0.00178 0.00178 0.00178 0.00178 0.00178 0.00178 0.00178 0.00178 0.00178 0.00178 0.00178 0.00178 0.00178 0.00178 0.00178
3/2 1/2
ⱱmin 0.031*K *fck 0.321 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32
Shear Resistance VRDC min (ⱱmin + 0.15*σcp)*bw*d KN 314.38 314.38 314.38 314.38 314.38 314.38 314.38 314.38 314.38 314.38 314.38 314.38 314.38 314.38 314.38 314.38
Design shear resistance VRdc [0.12K(80ρ1.fck)^0.33+0.15σcp]bw.d KN 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89
VRDC min 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

Page # 61
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY
10.2 Design of Toe Footing
Combination3
Case 1 : Longitudinal Seismic Case Case 2 : Transverse Seismic Case
Description of Item Calculations for Case 1 Unit Case 17 Case 18 Case 19 Case 20 Case 21 Case 22 Case 23 Case 24
Size of Footing along L-L Axis 5.100 m 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100
Size of Footing along T-T Axis 9.000 m 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000
Size of Pier along L-L Axis 1.200 m 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200
Size of Pier along T-T Axis 8.000 m 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000
Projection of footing along L-L axis (5.1 - 1.2) / 2 + 0 m 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950
Projection of footing along T-T axis (9 - 8) / 2 m 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500
Dist of critical section from Sec 1-1 1.415 mm 1.415 1.415 1.415 1.415 1.415 1.415 1.415 1.415
Length of footing from critical section 1.95 - 1.415 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535
Width of triangular portion ((9 - 8) / 2 ) / 1.95 x 1.415 m 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363
Eff width of footing at critical section 0.363*2 + 8 m 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726
Net Avg. pressure along AB 577.72 kN/m^2 577.72 564.48 516.03 -117.37 365.36 277.66 295.13 -117.37
Net Avg. pressure along GH 349.24 kN/m^2 349.24 336.15 287.44 -121.42 302.36 214.82 232.03 -121.42
Pressure at Critical Section 577.72 + (349.24 - 577.72) x 0.535 / 1.95 kN/m^2 515.04 501.84 453.32 -118.49 348.08 260.42 277.82 -118.49
Net Upward Force V ((577.72 + 515.04) / 2 ) x 0.535 x 9 KN 2630.82 2567.17 2333.72 -567.84 1717.61 1295.43 1379.38 -567.84
CG of Force ((2x577.72+515.04)/(577.72+515.04)x0.535/3 m 0.273 0.273 0.274 0.268 0.27 0.271 0.271 0.268
BM at Critical Section 2630.82 x 0.273 KNm 718.22 700.84 639.44 -152.19 463.76 351.07 373.82 -152.19
Eff. Depth at critical Section, d mm 980 980 980 980 980 980 980 980
Slope top face of footing tan b (1.5 - 0.9) / 1.95 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308
M tan b / d 718.22 x 0.308 / 0.98 KN 225.73 220.27 200.97 -47.84 145.76 110.34 117.49 -47.84
Design Shear Force VED 2630.82 - 225.73 KN 2405.09 2346.90 2132.75 -520.00 1571.85 1185.09 1261.89 -520.00
275.62 268.95 244.41 -59.59 180.13 135.81 144.61 -59.59
Strength reduction factor ⱱ 0.6*[1-(fck/310)] N/mm2 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53
Shear Force VED <=(0.5*bw*d*ⱱ*fcd) KN 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578
Status OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
Longitudinal force NED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
K (1+sqrt(200/d))<2.0 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45
σcp NED/Ac<0.2*fcd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
ρ1 Asl/bwd<=0.02 0.00178 0.00178 0.00178 0.00178 0.00178 0.00178 0.00178 0.00178
3/2 1/2
ⱱmin 0.031*K *fck 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32
Shear Resistance VRDC min (ⱱmin + 0.15*σcp)*bw*d KN 314.38 314.38 314.38 314.38 314.38 314.38 314.38 314.38
Design shear resistance VRdc [0.12K(80ρ1.fck)^0.33+0.15σcp]bw.d KN 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89
VRDC min 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89 289.89
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

10.2.5 Punching Shear


Critical Case for punching shear check
Vertical Long. Transverse P / A M L / ZL MT / ZT Pressure Pressure Pressure Pressure
S.No Load Moment Moment at A at B at C at D
P ML MT PA PB PC PD
(KN) (KNm) (KNm) (KN/m^2)(KN/m^2)(KN/m^2)(KN/m^2) (KN/m^2) (KN/m^2) (KN/m^2)
Case - (i) 20878.51 1742.4904 4535.17 454.87 44.67 65.88 565.42 433.66 476.08 344.32
Calculation of Punching Shear
Axial load at base of the pier VED KN 20878.51
Moment at the base of the pier KN-m 4858.4
Average base pressure Pav Kn/m^2 454.9
Effective depth of Footing m 1.40
C1 C2
Size of Pier m 8.0 X 1.2
C1/C2 6.7
K 0.80
Size of Footong at distance 'd' m 9.40 X 2.60
Dist. Critical section for punching shear from the face of pier 0.70
Effective depth of footing at a distance d/s (Critical section) m 0.219
length of Perimeter at critical shear section Ui m 23.99
Area of the critical section Sqm 24.40

Net Upward Pressure at Critical Section Kn/m^2 454.87


Upward Force ΔVED Kn 11097.92
VED Red = VED - ΔVED Kn 9780.59
W 54.40
VED 0.22
Punching Shear resistance
Distance frm column to perpherya' m 1.40
K 1.96
Vmin 0.502
ρly 0.002
ρlz 0.001
ρl 0.002
ⱱ Rd= 0.12*K(80*ρ1*fck)^(1/3)*2*d/a>=ⱱmin2*d/a Kn 0.31
V 0.6*[1-(fck/310)] 0.53
ⱱRd .max= 1/2*ⱱ*fcd Kn 4.16
STATUS O.K
Punching shear reinforcement not required

Page # 62
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19

TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET


DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY
10.3 Design of Heel Footing
L-L Dir. T-T Dir.
Size of Pier = 1.20 x 8.00 m
Size of Section for flexure / Sec 1-1 = 1.20 x 8.00 m
Size of Footing 5.10 x 9.00 m
Clear Cover to reinforcement = 75 mm
Depth of Footing (D) = 1500 mm
Width of the meber (b) = 5100.00 mm

Design Properties
Concrete
Grade of Concrete = M 35
Charactristic strength of concrete (fck) = M35 Mpa (Table no:6.5, IRC:112-2011)
Tensile strength of concrete (fctm) = 2.8 MPa

Type of Combination = Basic&Seis


Partial material safety factor for concrete (gm) = 1.5 Page 49: (IRC:112-2011)
Ultimate compressive strain in the concrete (єcu3) = 0.0035 Mpa (Table no:6.5 (IRC:112-2011))
Modulus of elasticity of concrete (Ecm) = 32000 MPa
Modular ratio αe (Es/Ecm)=200000/32000 = 6.25

Steel
Grade of Steel = S 500
Characteristic strength of steel (fy)or(fyk) = 500 MPa Table no:18.1 (IRC:112-2011)
Design yield strength of shear reinforcement fywd = 348 MPa 0.8*fyk/γs
Partial material safety factor for Steel (gs) = 1.15 Page 30: (IRC:112-2011)
Ultimate tensile strain in the steel (єs) = 0.00417 [{fyk/(ϒs xEs)}+0.002]
Modulus of elasticity of reinforcing of steel (Es) = 200000 MPa Clause 6.2.2 (IRC:112-2011) &6.3.5
fYd = 434.8 N/mm
2

Design Factors
Coefficient to consider the influence of the concrete strength (a) = 0.67 Cube A2.10 Page : 244 (IRC:112-2011)
Factor (l ) = 0.8 Eq.A2-33 & Eq. A2-34 (IRC:112-2011);
Factor (h) = 1 Eq.A2-35 & Eq. A2-36 (IRC:112-2011);
Design value of concrete compressive strength fcd = (a*fck/gm) = 15.633
Factor Fav, (hfcdl) = 12.507
Factor b = (l/2) = 0.400
Lever arm z= = 0.9

Cu = fcd*b*(3/7xu,lim + 2/3*4/7xu,lim)
= 17/21*fcd*b*xu
= 0.8095*fcd*b*xu
cg of compression block from top = 0.416xu
Tu = (fy/1.15)*Ast
Rlim = mu,Lim/BD2
= 0.8095fcd*(xu/d)*(1-0.416*xu/d)
xu,lim/d = 0.456
Rlim = 4.68

Page # 63
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19

TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET


DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY
10.3 Design of Heel Footing

T
344.320 433.660
D G B 433.66

kN/m2
kN/m2 1.2 m dia.

9
L L

M N

C A 565.42
476.080 H 565.420
T
5.100 m

476.080 565.420

10.3.1 Check for Flexure in L-L direction


Combination1 Combination2
Case 1 : Live Load as Leading Load Case 2 : Wind Load as Leading Load Case 3 : Live Load as Leading Load Case 4 : Wind Load as Leading Load
Description of Item Calculations for Case 1 Unit Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8 Case 9 Case 10 Case 11 Case 12 Case 13 Case 14 Case 15 Case 16
Size of Footing along L-L Axis 5.100 m 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100
Size of Footing along T-T Axis 9.000 m 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000
Size of Section for flexure along L-L Axis 1.200 m 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200
Size of Section for flexure along T-T Axis 8.000 m 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000
Projection of footing along L-L axis (5.1 - 1.2) / 2 + 0 m 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950
Projection of footing along T-T axis (9 - 8) / 2 m 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500
Max Pressure at A 565.42 KN/m^2 565.42 830.49 601.34 0.00 543.51 543.51 543.51 0.00 444.85 674.59 476.00 0.00 423.65 423.65 423.65 0.00
Pressure at B 433.66 KN/m^2 433.66 594.01 409.64 0.00 405.21 405.21 405.21 0.00 328.83 467.79 308.00 0.00 303.79 303.79 303.79 0.00
Pressure at C 476.08 KN/m^2 476.08 316.07 492.20 0.00 424.51 424.51 424.51 0.00 361.41 222.75 375.40 0.00 316.51 316.51 316.51 0.00
Min Pressure at D 344.32 KN/m^2 344.32 79.59 300.50 0.00 286.21 286.21 286.21 0.00 245.39 15.95 207.40 0.00 196.65 196.65 196.65 0.00
Pressure at the H 565.42 + (476.08 - 565.42) x 1.95 / 5.1 KN/m^2 531.27 633.80 559.61 0.00 498.01 498.01 498.01 0.00 412.95 501.83 437.54 0.00 382.69 382.69 382.69 0.00
Pressure at the G 433.66 + (344.32 - 433.66) x 1.95 / 5.1 KN/m^2 399.51 397.32 367.91 0.00 359.71 359.71 359.71 0.00 296.93 295.03 269.54 0.00 262.83 262.83 262.83 0.00
Average pressure along GH (531.27 + 399.51) / 2 KN/m^2 465.39 515.56 463.76 0.00 428.86 428.86 428.86 0.00 354.94 398.43 353.54 0.00 322.76 322.76 322.76 0.00
Average pressure along CD (476.08 + 344.32) / 2 KN/m^2 410.20 197.83 396.35 0.00 355.36 355.36 355.36 0.00 303.40 119.35 291.40 0.00 256.58 256.58 256.58 0.00
Depth of Footing at face of Pier 1.500 m 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500
Unit weight of Concrete 25.00 KN/m^2 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
Depth of Soil at face of Pier 221.458 - 205.75 - 1.5 m 14.208 14.208 14.208 14.208 14.208 14.208 14.208 14.208 14.208 14.208 14.208 14.208 14.208 14.208 14.208 14.208
Unit weight of Soil 20.00 KN/m^2 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
Downward Force at root due to weight of footing & overburden earth KN/m^2 434.24 434.24 434.24 434.24 434.24 434.24 434.24 434.24 321.66 321.66 321.66 321.66 321.66 321.66 321.66 321.66
Depth of Footing at tip of footing 0.900 m 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900
Unit weight of Concrete 25.00 KN/m^2 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
Depth of Soil at tip of footing 217.488 - 205.75 - 0.9 m 14.808 14.808 14.808 14.808 14.808 14.808 14.808 14.808 14.808 14.808 14.808 14.808 14.808 14.808 14.808 14.808
Unit weight of Soil 20.00 KN/m^2 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
Downward Force at tip due to weight of footing & overburden earth KN/m^2 430.19 430.19 430.19 430.19 430.19 430.19 430.19 430.19 318.66 318.66 318.66 318.66 318.66 318.66 318.66 318.66

Page # 64
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19

TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET


DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY
10.3 Design of Heel Footing
Net Avg. pressure along AB 410.2 - 430.191 KN/m^2 -20.00 -232.37 -33.85 -430.20 -74.84 -74.84 -74.84 -430.20 -15.26 -199.31 -27.26 -318.66 -62.08 -62.08 -62.08 -318.66
Net Avg. pressure along GH 465.39 - 434.241 KN/m^2 31.15 81.32 29.52 -434.25 -5.39 -5.39 -5.39 -434.25 33.28 76.77 31.88 -321.66 1.11 1.11 1.11 -321.66
Net Upward Force (31.15 + -20) / 2 x 1.95 x 9 KN 97.85 -1325.46 -38.00 -7585.55 -704.02 -704.02 -704.02 -7585.55 158.13 -1075.29 40.54 -5618.81 -535.01 -535.01 -535.01 -5618.81
C.G. of the Force from GH (2 x -20 + 31.15)/(-20+31.15)x1.95 / 3 m -0.516 1.650 5.731 0.973 1.256 1.256 1.256 0.973 0.100 1.707 -3.185 0.973 1.312 1.312 1.312 0.973
BM at the critical section 97.85 x -0.516 KNm 50.50 2186.94 217.77 -7384.36 884.49 884.49 884.49 -7384.36 15.75 1835.76 129.14 -5469.78 701.85 701.85 701.85 -5469.78
Limiting moment of resistance of section Mulimit = 0.3568*Xu/d*(1-0.4*Xu/d)*b*d^2*fck KNm 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
Effective Width of footing 8 + (9 - 8) / 8 { b + (B - b) / 8} m 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125
Effective depth required (50.5 x 10^6 / (4.68 x 8125) 36.46 239.90 75.70 #NUM! 152.57 152.57 152.57 #NUM! 20.36 219.80 58.30 #NUM! 135.91 135.91 135.91 #NUM!
Effective Depth provided 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415
OK OK OK #NUM! OK OK OK #NUM! OK OK OK #NUM! OK OK OK #NUM!
Main Steel at bottom face along L-L axis of footing
R Mu/bd^2 0.003 0.134 0.013 -0.454 0.054 0.054 0.054 -0.454 0.001 0.113 0.008 -0.336 0.043 0.043 0.043 -0.336
Area of steel required 0.973*(fcd/fyd)*(1-sqrt(1-(2.055*R/fcd)))*b*d mm^2 82.07 3569.72 354.04 -11826.08 1439.92 1439.92 1439.92 -11826.08 25.60 2994.34 209.91 -8792.55 1142.16 1142.16 1142.16 -8792.55
Area of steel required / meter width Ast required/B mm^2 9.12 396.64 39.34 -1314.01 159.99 159.99 159.99 -1314.01 2.84 332.70 23.32 -976.95 126.91 126.91 126.91 -976.95
Min Area of steel required max(0.26*fctm/fyk*bt*d, 0.0013btd) mm^2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2
Area of steel to be provided Max(9.12 , 2060.24) 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2
Spacing of steel required at bottom 20 mm + 0 mm dia bars mm 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152
Ast provided at bottom 20 mm + 0 mm @ 125 mm c/c mm^2 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514
Status O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K
% of steel provided 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178
Max. area of tension reinforcement 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375
Status O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K

Tension at Tension at Tension at Tension at Tension at Tension at Tension at Tension at Tension at Tension at Tension at Tension at
Distribution Steel bottom top top top top top bottom top bottom top top top
Ast req at top face along L-L axis 20 % of Ast mm^2 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048
Spacing of steel required at top 12 mm dia bars 274 274 274 274 274 274 274 274 274 274 274 274 274 274 274 274
Ast provided at top 12 mm bars @ @ 125 mm c/c mm^2 905 905 905 905 905 905 905 905 905 905 905 905 905 905 905 905
Area of Dist. Steel req on b/face 20 % of Ast mm^2 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048

Combination3
Case 1 : Longitudinal Seismic Case Case 2 : Transverse Seismic Case
Description of Item Calculations for Case 1 Unit Case 17 Case 18 Case 19 Case 20 Case 21 Case 22 Case 23 Case 24
Size of Footing along L-L Axis 5.100 m 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100
Size of Footing along T-T Axis 9.000 m 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000
Size of Section for flexure along L-L Axis 1.200 m 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200
Size of Section for flexure along T-T Axis 8.000 m 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000
Projection of footing along L-L axis (5.1 - 1.2) / 2 +0 m 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950
Projection of footing along T-T axis (9 - 8) / 2 m 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500
Max Pressure at A 782.20 KN/m^2 782.20 781.00 736.22 0.00 766.62 719.11 740.25 0.00
Pressure at B 608.00 KN/m^2 608.00 582.68 530.56 0.00 198.82 70.93 84.73 0.00
Pressure at C 195.22 KN/m^2 195.22 194.42 148.96 0.00 612.44 565.35 585.81 0.00
Min Pressure at D 21.02 KN/m^2 21.02 -3.90 -56.70 0.00 44.64 -82.83 -69.71 0.00
Pressure at the H 782.2 + (195.22 - 782.2) x 1.95 / 5.1 KN/m^2 557.77 556.72 511.68 0.00 707.67 660.32 681.20 0.00
Pressure at the G 608 + (21.02 - 608) x 1.95 / 5.1 KN/m^2 383.57 358.40 306.02 0.00 139.87 12.14 25.68 0.00
Average pressure along GH (557.77 + 383.57) / 2 KN/m^2 470.67 457.56 408.85 0.00 423.77 336.23 353.44 0.00
Average pressure along AB (782.2 + 608) / 2 KN/m^2 695.10 681.84 633.39 0.00 482.72 395.02 412.49 0.00
Depth of Footing at face of Pier 1.500 m 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500
Unit weight of Concrete 25.00 KN/m^2 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
Depth of Soil at face of Pier 221.458 - 205.75 - 1.5 m 14.208 14.208 14.208 14.208 14.208 14.208 14.208 14.208
Unit weight of Soil 20.00 KN/m^2 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
Downward Force at root due to weight of footing & overburden earth KN/m^2 434.24 434.24 434.24 434.24 434.24 434.24 434.24 434.24
Depth of Footing at tip of footing 0.900 m 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900
Unit weight of Concrete 25.00 KN/m^2 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
Depth of Soil at tip of footing 221.458 - 205.75 - 0.9 m 14.808 14.808 14.808 14.808 14.808 14.808 14.808 14.808
Unit weight of Soil 20.00 KN/m^2 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
Downward Force at tip due to weight of footing & overburden earth KN/m^2 430.19 430.19 430.19 430.19 430.19 430.19 430.19 430.19
Net Avg. pressure along AB 695.1 - 430.191 KN/m^2 264.91 251.65 203.20 -430.20 52.53 -35.18 -17.71 -430.20
Net Avg. pressure along GH 470.67 - 434.241 KN/m^2 36.43 23.32 -25.40 -434.25 -10.48 -98.02 -80.81 -434.25
Net Upward Force (36.43 + 264.91) / 2 x 1.95 x 9 KN 2644.26 2412.86 1560.20 -7585.55 368.99 -1168.83 -864.51 -7585.55
C.G. of the Force from GH (2 x 264.91 + 36.43)/(264.91+36.43)x1.95 / 3 m 1.222 1.245 1.393 0.973 1.462 0.822 0.767 0.973
BM at the critical section 2644.26 x 1.222 KNm 3231.29 3003.71 2173.13 -7384.36 539.46 -960.40 -662.95 -7384.36
Limiting moment of resistance of section Mulimit = 0.3568*Xu/d*(1-0.4*Xu/d)*b*d^2*fck KNm 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4 75753.4

Page # 65
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19

TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET


DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY
10.3 Design of Heel Footing
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
Effective Width of footing 8 + (9 - 8) / 8 { b + (B - b) / 8} m 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125 8.125
Effective depth required (3231.29 x 10^6 / (0.00 x 8125) 291.61 281.15 239.14 #NUM! 119.15 158.98 132.09 #NUM!
Effective Depth provided 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415
OK OK OK #NUM! OK OK OK #NUM!
Main Steel at bottom face along L-L axis of footing
R Mu/bd^2 0.199 0.185 0.134 -0.454 0.033 -0.059 -0.041 -0.454
Area of steel required 0.973*(fcd/fyd)*(1-sqrt(1-(2.055*R/fcd)))*b*d mm^2 5285.73 4911.15 3547.08 -11826.08 877.61 -1557.68 -1075.88 -11826.08
Area of steel required / meter width Ast required/B mm^2 587.30 545.68 394.12 -1314.01 97.51 -173.08 -119.54 -1314.01
Min Area of steel required max(0.26*fctm/fyk*bt*d, 0.0013btd) mm^2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2
Area of steel to be provided Max(587.30 , 2060.24) 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2
Spacing of steel required at bottom 20 mm + 0 mm dia bars mm 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152
Ast provided at bottom 20 mm + 0 mm @ 125 mm c/c mm^2 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514 2514
O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K
% of steel provided 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178 0.178
Max. area of tension reinforcement 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375
O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K
Tension at Tension at Tension at Tension at Tension at Tension at
Distribution Steel bottom bottom bottom bottom top top
Ast req at top face along L-L axis 20 % of Ast mm^2 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048
Spacing of steel required at top 12 mm dia bars 274 274 274 274 274 274 274 274
Ast provided at top 12 mm bars @ @ 125 mm c/c mm^2 905 905 905 905 905 905 905 905
Area of Dist. Steel req on b/face 20 % of Ast mm^2 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048

10.3.2 Check For Shear in L-L direction Combination1 Combination2


Case 1 : Live Load as Leading Load Case 2 : Wind Load as Leading Load Case 3 : Live Load as Leading Load Case 4 : Wind Load as Leading Load
Description of Item Calculations for Case 1 Unit Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8 Case 9 Case 10 Case 11 Case 12 Case 13 Case 14 Case 15 Case 16
Size of Footing along L-L Axis 5.100 m 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100
Size of Footing along T-T Axis 9.000 m 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000
Size of Pier along L-L Axis 1.200 m 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200
Size of Pier along T-T Axis 8.000 m 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000
Projection of footing along L-L axis (5.1 - 1.2) / 2 + 0 m 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950
Projection of footing along T-T axis (9 - 8) / 2 m 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500
Dist of critical section from Sec 1-1 1.415 m 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150 1.4150
Length of footing from critical section 1.95 - 1.415 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535
Width of triangular portion ((9 - 8) / 2 ) / 1.95 x 1.415 m 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363
Eff width of footing at critical section 0.363*2 + 8 m 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726
Net Avg. pressure along AB -20.00 kN/m^2 -20.00 -232.37 -33.85 -430.20 -74.84 -74.84 -74.84 -430.20 -15.26 -199.31 -27.26 -318.66 -62.08 -62.08 -62.08 -318.66
Net Avg. pressure along GH 31.15 kN/m^2 31.15 81.32 29.52 -434.25 -5.39 -5.39 -5.39 -434.25 33.28 76.77 31.88 -321.66 1.11 1.11 1.11 -321.66
Pressure at Critical Section -20+ (31.15 - -20)x0.535/ 1.95 kN/m^2 -5.97 -146.31 -16.47 -431.32 -55.79 -55.79 -55.79 -431.32 -1.95 -123.57 -11.04 -319.49 -44.75 -44.75 -44.75 -319.49
Net Upward Force V ((-20 + -5.97) / 2 ) x 0.535 x 9 KN -35.43 -516.62 -68.65 -1175.33 -178.22 -178.22 -178.22 -1175.33 -23.48 -440.49 -52.26 -870.60 -145.75 -145.75 -145.75 -870.60
CG of Force ((2x-20+-5.97)/(-20+-5.97)x0.535/3 m 0.316 0.288 0.299 0.268 0.281 0.281 0.281 0.268 0.337 0.289 0.306 0.268 0.282 0.282 0.282 0.268
BM at Critical Section -35.43 x 0.316 KNm -11.20 -148.79 -20.53 -314.99 -50.08 -50.08 -50.08 -314.99 -7.92 -127.31 -16.00 -233.33 -41.11 -41.11 -41.11 -233.33
Eff. Depth at critical Section, d mm 980 980 980 980 980 980 980 980 980 980 980 980 980 980 980 980
Slope top face of footing tan b (1.5 - 0.9) / 1.95 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308
M tan b / d -11.2 x 0.308 / 0.98 KN -3.52 -46.77 -6.46 -99.00 -15.74 -15.74 -15.74 -99.00 -2.49 -40.02 -5.03 -73.34 -12.93 -12.93 -12.93 -73.34
Design Shear Force VED -35.43 - -3.52 KN -31.91 -469.85 -62.19 -1076.33 -162.48 -162.48 -162.48 -1076.33 -20.99 -400.47 -47.23 -797.26 -132.82 -132.82 -132.82 -797.26
Shear force per m width KN -3.66 -53.84 -7.13 -123.35 -18.62 -18.62 -18.62 -123.35 -2.41 -45.89 -5.41 -91.37 -15.22 -15.22 -15.22 -91.37
Strength reduction factor ⱱ 0.6*[1-(fck/310)] N/mm2 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53
Shear Force VED <=(0.5*bw*d*ⱱ*fcd) KN 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578
Status OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

Page # 66
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015) C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19

TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET


DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY
10.3 Design of Heel Footing
Combination3
Case 1 : Longitudinal Seismic Case Case 2 : Transverse Seismic Case
Description of Item Calculations for Case 1 Unit Case 17 Case 18 Case 19 Case 20 Case 21 Case 22 Case 23 Case 24
Size of Footing along L-L Axis 5.100 m 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100 5.100
Size of Footing along T-T Axis 9.000 m 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000
Size of Pier along L-L Axis 1.200 m 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200
Size of Pier along T-T Axis 8.000 m 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.000
Projection of footing along L-L axis (5.1 - 1.2) / 2 +0 m 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950 1.950
Projection of footing along T-T axis (9 - 8) / 2 m 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500
Dist of critical section from Sec 1-1 1.415 mm 1.415 1.415 1.415 1.415 1.415 1.415 1.415 1.415
Length of footing from critical section 1.95 - 1.415 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535 0.535
Width of triangular portion ((9 - 8) / 2 ) / 1.95 x 1.415 m 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363 0.363
Eff width of footing at critical section 0.363*2 + 8 m 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726 8.726
Net Avg. pressure along AB 264.91 kN/m^2 264.91 251.65 203.20 -430.20 52.53 -35.18 -17.71 -430.20
Net Avg. pressure along GH 36.43 kN/m^2 36.43 23.32 -25.40 -434.25 -10.48 -98.02 -80.81 -434.25
Pressure at Critical Section 264.91 + (36.43 - 264.91) x 0.535 / 1.95 kN/m^2 202.23 189.01 140.49 -431.32 35.25 -52.43 -35.03 -431.32
Net Upward Force V ((264.91 + 202.23) / 2 ) x 0.535 x 9 KN 1124.64 1060.89 827.44 -2074.11 211.34 -210.93 -126.98 -2074.11
CG of Force ((2x264.91+202.23)/(264.91+202.23)x0.535/3 m 0.28 0.281 0.284 0.268 0.286 0.25 0.239 0.268
BM at Critical Section 1124.64 x 0.28 KNm 314.90 298.12 235.00 -555.87 60.45 -52.74 -30.35 -555.87
Eff. Depth at critical Section, d mm 980 980 980 980 980 980 980 980
Slope top face of footing tan b (1.5 - 0.9) / 1.95 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308 0.308
M tan b / d 314.9 x 0.308 / 0.98 KN 98.97 93.70 73.86 -174.71 19.00 -16.58 -9.54 -174.71
Design Shear Force VED 1124.64 - 98.97 KN 1025.67 967.19 753.58 -1899.40 192.34 -194.35 -117.44 -1899.40
117.54 110.84 86.36 -217.67 22.04 -22.27 -13.46 -217.67
Strength reduction factor ⱱ 0.6*[1-(fck/310)] N/mm2 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53
Shear Force VED <=(0.5*bw*d*ⱱ*fcd) KN 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578 35578
Status OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

Page # 67
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

11.0 Design of Pier Cap in Transverse Direction as Cantilever for Maximum Reaction Case

Size of Pier cap at top = 16.03 x 2.13 m

Effective Size of Pier = 8.00 x 1.20 m

Average height of bearing + pedestal = 0.500 m


Overall depth of abutment cap = 1.60 m = 1600 mm
Straight = 0.60 m = 600 mm at tip
Tapered = 1.00 m = 1000 mm at root

Unit weight of concrete = 25.00 KN/m^3

11.1 Summary of DL + SIDL + CWLL 2 1225.566

Unfactored Loads
Vertical reactions from the left span
Description of Load
1 2 3 4
Girder self weight 2250 2250 2250 2250 2250 2250
SIDL reaction 671 671 671 671 671 671
FPLL reaction 0 0 0 0 0 0
LL reaction left span 612.78 612.78 612.78 612.78 612.78 612.78
Vertical reaction due to tran.moment
Total 3533.28 3533.28 3533.28 #### 3533.28 3533.28

Factored Loads
Partial
Vertical reactions from the left span
Safety
Description of Load 1 2 3 4 5 6 factor
Girder self weight 3037.5 3037.5 3037.5 3037.5 3037.5 3037.5 1.35
SIDL reaction 1139.9 1139.9 1139.9 1139.9 1139.9 1139.9 1.7
FPLL reaction 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.15
LL reaction left span 919.2 919.2 919.2 919.2 919.2 919.2 1.5
Vertical reaction due to tran.moment 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total 5096.52 5096.52 5096.52 #### 5096.52 5096.52

Longitudinal moment (Factored) = 0.00 Kn-m


Transverse moment (Factored) = 2210.10 Kn-m

Horizontal force (factored) = 78.38 KN

Critical section for bending from c/l of abutment = 4.000 m

Page 68
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

Design properties
Concrete
Grade of Concrete = M 35 Mpa
Charactristic strength of concrete (fck) = 35.00 Mpa
Tensile strength of concrete (fctm) = 2.80 Mpa

Type of combination = Basic & Seismic


Partial material safety factor for concrete (gm) = 1.50
Ultimate compressive strain in the concrete (єcu3) = 0.0035 Mpa

Modulus of elasticity of concrete (Ecm) = 32000.0 Mpa


Modular ratio αe (Es/Ecm) = 6.25

Steel
Grade of Steel = FE 500
Characteristic strength of steel (fy)or(fyk) = 500.00 Mpa
Design yield strength of shear reinforcement fywd = 348.00 Mpa
Partial material safety factor for Steel (gs) = 1.15
Modulus of elasticity of reinforcing of steel (E s) = 200000 Mpa
Ultimate tensile strain in the steel (єs) = 0.00417

Design Factors Cube


Coeff. to consider the influence of the conc. strength (a) = 0.67
Factor (l ) = 0.8
Factor (h) = 1
Design value of concrete compressive strength f cd = (a*fck/gm) = 15.633 Mpa
Factor Fav, (hfcdl) = 12.507
Factor b = (l/2) = 0.400
Lever arm z= = 0.9

Design value of steel tensile strength fyd = (fck/gm) = 434.78 Mpa


xu,lim/d = 0.456
Rlim = 0.8095fcd*(xu/d)*(1-0.416*xu/d) = 4.68
No of bearings = 2
c/c distance between bearing = 13.00 m

Distance to outer bearing1 = 6.50

Section Modulus for Outer bearing1 = 1 x ( 6.500 ^2 + 0 ^2 + 0 ^2 ) / 6.500


0 ^2 ) /
= 6.50 m^3

Reaction on outer bearing due to Transverse Moment = 255.01 KN 0.00

Reaction on 1st bearing (Outer) = 5096.5 KN

Dist. of 2nd bearing from Section 1-1 = 2.5 m

Page 69
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

11.2 Design for Flexure:

BM at the face of abut due to reactions = 5351.537 x 2.500 = 13378.84 KNm

BM due to self wt = 333.70 + 185.39 = 519.09 KNm

Torsional Moment due to Braking Force = 39.19 x 1.30 = 50.94 KNm


Torsional Moment due to long.moment = 0.00 = 0.00 KNm
Total torsional bending moment = 50.94 + 0.00 = 50.94 KNm

Equivalent BM = Me*(1+D/b)/1.7 = 52.48 KNM

Page 70
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

Total BM = 13378.84 + 519.09 + 52.48 = 13950.42 KNm

^2
Limiting moment of resistance = Mulimit = 0.3568*Xu/d*(1-0.4*Xu/d)*b*d *fck = 22316.59 KNm
OK

Effective depth required = Sqrt(M/Qb) = ( 13950.42 / 4.68 x 2130 ) ^ 0.5


= 1.183 m

Effective depth available = 1500 mm = 1.500 > 1.183 m O.K

R = Mu/bd^2 = 2.9109

Ast required = 0.973*(fcd/fyd)*(1-sqrt(1-(2.055*R/fcd)))*b*d = 23951.6 mm^2

Ast minimum = = 4153.5 mm^2

Provide 36 Nos of 32 mm dia bars in three layers. Ast = 28953 mm^2)


= 28953 mm^2) OK
11.3 Shear check:

11.3.1 Shear check at a distance effective depth 'd' (Sec 2-2)

Shear will be checked at a distance 'd' from the face of the pieri.e Sec 2-2 = 1.500 m

Overall depth at a distance 'd' = 0.600 + 2.515 / 4.015 x 1.000 = 1.226 m


Effective depth = 1.226 - 0.100 (Effective cover) = 1.126 m

Total reaction at the Sec 2-2 = 5351.54 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 5351.54 KN


SF due to self wt = = 158.54 KN

Total moment at the critical section = 5351.54 x 1.000 + 0.00 x 0.00 = 5351.54 KNm

Slope of bottom face tanb = 1.00 / 4.015 = 0.249


M * tanb /d = 5351.54 x 0.249 / 1.126 = 1183.81 KN

Equivalent Shear due to torsion = 1.6 x 50.94 / 2.130 = 38.27 KN

Net Shear = 5351.54 + 158.54 + 38.27 - 1183.81 = 4364.53 KN

K = 1+ 200 ≤ 2 = 1.42
d

νmin = 0.031K3/2fck1/2 = 0.31

σcp = NEd/Ac < 0.2fcd = 0

ρl = Asl ≤ 0.02 = 0.0121


bwd

VRd.c = [0.12K(80ρlfck)0.33 + 0.15σcp]bwd ≥ (νmin + 0.15σcp)bwd = 745437.1 N


745.437 KN
Shear reinforcement required
VRd - VRd.c = 3619.1 KN

Provide 6L 12 mm dia stirrups at 125 mm c/c

2
Asw = 678.6 mm
s >min shear reinforcement - OK
= 125 mm
Minimum shear reinforcement ratio
ρmin = 0.072√fck/fyk
= 0.00085
2
Asw.min = ρmin*s*bw = 226.82 mm

Page 71
PROJECT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

z = 0.9d = 1013.4 mm
fywd = 0.8fyk/γm = 348.0 MPa
cotθ = 2.50
αcw = 1 For σcp = 0
bw = 2130 mm
ν1 = 0.6 For fck ≤ 80MPa

Shear resistance by the yielding of shear reinforcement


VRd.s = (Asw/s)*z*fywd*cotθ
= 4786232 N
= 4786.2 KN
Provided Shear reinforcement is OK

VRd.max = αcw*bw*z*ν1*fcd/(cotθ+tanθ)
= 6981767 N
= 6981.77 KN

Page 72
DOCUMENT No. DATE
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO
PROJECT: EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19

DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET


TITLE: DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

12.0 Design of Dirt Wall

12.1 Design Data:

Thickness of Dirt Wall = 0.300 m


Approach Slab Thickness = 0.300 m
Depth of Superstructure = 1.655 m
Thickness of ( Bearing + Pedestal + Camber + W.C ) = 0.703 m
Height of Dirt Wall = 2.358 m

12.2 Concrete Design Parameters

Clear Cover ( c ) = 75 mm
Modular Ratio ( m ) = 10
Concrete design mix strength = 35 MPa
Permissible direct compressible strength of Concrete ( scc ) = 8.75 MPa
Charcteristic strength of steel ( Fy ) = 500 Mpa

12.3 Soil Parameters

Rankines or Coulumbs ("r" or "c")? = c


Angle of Repose of Soil, f (in degrees) f = 30.0
Cohesion, C (in t/m2) C = 0.0
Angle of Wall friction d = 20.0
Bulk Density of Soil g = 20.0
Equiv. Ht. of backfill earth for Live load surcharge heb = 1.2
Batter of Dirt wall with horizontal a = 90.0
Inclination of Backfill with horizontal b = 0.000
Active Earth pressure Coefficient Ka = 0.297
Active Earth pressure Coefficient ( Horizontal ) Kah = 0.279
Active Earth pressure Coefficient ( Vertical ) Kav = 0.102

0.3
0.3

2.358 1.029 0.864


2.058
P1
P2

1.2 Ka g Ka g h
DOCUMENT No. DATE
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO
PROJECT: EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19

DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET


TITLE: DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY

12.4 Slenderness of Dirt Wall

Height of Dirt Wall = 2.358 m


Effective Height of Dirt Wall = 1.2x2.358 = 2.8296 m
Thickness of Dirt Wall ( t ) = 0.3 m
Least Radious of Gyration = t/sqrt(12) = 0.087 m
Ratio of effective Height to Least Radious of Gyration = 32.673 m
Type of Column = Short Column

12.5 Loads & Moments

Height of Dirt Wall below Approach Slab in contact with Earth = h say

Hence, h = ( 2.358 ) m
= 2.358 m
# Load 1
Earth Pressure developed due to surcharge of equivalent height of 1.2 mts is " P 1 " say.

Hence, P1 = 1.2 Kah g = 1.2 x 0.2794 x 20

= 0.00 kn / m2

Vertical Load = Kav g h = 1.2 x 0.1017 x 20


= 2.44 kn / m2
Eccentricity of Load wrt Dirt Wall base is " h1 " say

Hence, h1 = 2.358 / 2 = 1.179 m

# Load 2
Earth Pressure developed due to earth behind the Dirt Wall is " P2 " say.

Hence. P2 = Kah g h = 0.28 x 20 x 2.358


= 0.00 kn / m2

Vertical Load = Kav g h = 0.102 x 20 x 2.358


= 4.80 kn / m2
Eccentricity of Load wrt Dirt Wall base is " h2 " say

Hence, h2 = 0.42 x 2.358 = 0.99036 m

# Load 3
Vertical Load due to self weight of Dirt Wall is " P3 " say.

Hence. P3 = 0.3 x 2.358 x 25 = 17.69 kn/m run


DOCUMENT No. DATE
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO
PROJECT: EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19

DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET


TITLE: DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY
Summary

Vertical Horizontal Force


Load Cases Description Loads Loads Eccentricity Moment
Kn/m width kn / m2 m kn - m
# Load 1 P1 2.44 0.00 1.179 0.000
# Load 2 P2 4.80 0.00 0.99036 0.000
# Load 3 P3 17.69 0.00 0.000 0.000
24.92 0.00 0.00

12.6 Load and Moment due Live Load

The Live Load moment shall be maximum when the 40 T bogie Load is placed on the Dirt wall

Edge of C/Barrier 100 100

2.13 1.93

Effective Width = 6.418 m


Dirt Wall
2.358
Height

Effective Width

Total Load on Dirt Wall = 200 KN


= 31.16 KN / m width

Total Braking Force = 20 % of load on Dirt Wall

= 40 KN

Braking Force / mts width of the Dirt Wall = 40 / 6.418 KN / m width

= 6.23 KN / m width

Impact Factor = 1.5

Shear Due Live Load = 1.5 x 6.24 KN m / m width


= 9.35 KN m / m width

Moment Due Live Load = (2.358 ) x 9.35 kn - m / m width


= 22.04 kn - m / m width
DOCUMENT No. DATE
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF WIDENING TO EXISTING TO
PROJECT: EXISTING ROB BETWEEN RLY STATION BHUSAWAL VARANGAOL
ROB AT KMS 450/305 (ROAD CH: 396+825+015)
C1172708-DN 090 18.04.19

DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET


TITLE: DESIGN OF ABUTMENT & FOUNDATION FOR A1
KJS NRY
As per IRC :6-2016 ,Table B-2
Ultimate Limit State:
Basic Combination:
Case:1 Earth Pressure as a Leading Load L.F
Normal case EP leading condition 1.5
Live Load Surcharge 1.2
Live load is Accompanying Load 1.15
Case:2 Live Load as a Leading Load
Normal case LL leading condition 1.5
Earth Pressure is Accompanying Load 1.0
Live Load Surcharge 1.2
Seismic Combination:
Case:3 Earth Pressure as a Leading Load
Earth Pressure is Leading Load 1
LL is Accompanying Load 0.2
Live Load Surcharge 0.2
Moment Due to Horizontal Force
Case:1 25.35 kn - m / m width
Case:2 33.07 kn - m / m width
Case:3 4.41 kn - m / m width

12.7 Design of Dirt Wall as Cantilever Beam

Diameter of main reinforcement = 12 mm


Spacing of main reinforcement = 200 mm
Diameter of distribution reinforcement = 10 mm
Spacing of distribution reinforcement = 200 mm

Factor Fav = 10.72


Factor β = (λ/2) = 0.4
k av = M/Fav*b*d2 = 0.064
Neutral Axis Depth (mm) = 15 mm
Limiting Neutral axis depth (xlim) = 100 mm

12.7.1 Check for Flexure as per IRC:112-2011

Depth from Mdes (KN.m) Deff reqd. Doverall Deff provd. Ast Min. Ast Ast reqd. Ast provd. Status
top (m) (mm) provd. (mm) (mm2/m) (mm2/m) (mm2/m) (mm2/m)
(mm)
2.358 33.07 143.66 300 219.00 369.84 262.8 369.84 565.49 OK

Provide12 mm diameter bars at 200 mm spacing in earth face

- Distribution Steel (Clause 16.3.2 of IRC:112 - 2011)

Depth from Ast reqd. Ast provd.


top of earth Status
(mm2/m) (mm2/m)
fill (m)
2.358 150.00 392.70 OK

Provide10 mm diameter bars at 200 mm spacing as distribution steel in earth face

Você também pode gostar