Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Literature
Review Procedure hardware, which were backing out from the 1st MPJ. The surgical site was
•
Association = Taiwan Yi Zhi, 96(3), 194-198.
Christensen, J. C., Leff, F. B., Lepow, G. M., Schwartz, R. I., Colon, P. A.,
packed with Calcium Phosphate and infused with Vancomycin powder.
Arminio, S. T., et al. (1981). Congenital polydactyly and
A
6
cm
curvilinear
incision
was
performed
proximal
to
the
left
1st
Amniotic barrier membrane was placed over the dorsal aspect of the polymetatarsalia: Classification, genetics, and surgical correction. The
-‐ Polydactyly
is
characterized
by
the
presence
of
one
or
more
MPJ,
extending
distally
to
the
IPJ
of
the
left
hallux.
The
extensor
metatarsal before closing. The patient was placed on Bactrim (160-800). Journal of Foot Surgery, 20(3), 151-158.
supernumerary
digits.
These
supernumerary
digits
can
appear
hallucis
longus
tendon,
although
not
abnormal
on
pre-‐op
MRI,
At 2 weeks s/p the hardware removal, the original incision had completely • Coppolelli, B. G., Ready, J. E., Awbrey, B. J., & Smith, L. S. (1991).
medially
(pre-‐axial),
laterally
(post-‐axial),
or
centrally.
1,3,4,6,8,10-‐13 was
noted
to
be
bifid
and
then
tenotomized.
A
wedge
of
bone,
closed and there were radiographic signs of healing. A month after the Polydactyly of the foot in adults: Literature review and unusual case
presentation with diagnostic and treatment recommendations. The
-‐ Most
classification
systems
for
polydactyly
are
based
on
including
hypertrophic,
degenerative
cartilage
was
removed
from
hardware removal, the patient denied pain and had returned to full weight Journal of Foot Surgery, 30(1), 12-18.
morphology
and
derive
from
either
metatarsal
or
phalangeal
the
1st
metatarsal
head.
bearing in a post-op shoe. • Farrell, D. J., Adamitis, J., & Skokan, S. J. (1996). Polydactyly in the
extension.
No
pre-‐surgical
classification
system
exists
that
pre-adolescent foot: An unusual case presentation with impending
Next,
the
cartilage
at
the
base
of
the
proximal
phalanx,
head
of
pathologic fracture. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery : Official
accounts
for
tarsal
bone
duplication
with
digital
extension:
1,3-‐ Figure 3
6,8,10,12,13 the
proximal
phalanx
and
base
of
the
distal
phalanx
where
Figure 4 Publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons, 35(1),
54-58.
removed.
An
adductory
contraction
at
the
MPJ
was
noted
and
-‐ While
Watanabe
and
Blauth
Olason
classification
schemes
do
• Kleanthous, J. K., Kleanthous, E. M., & Hahn, P. J.,Jr. (1998).
neutralized
through
a
transverse
tenotomy
of
the
abductor
Polydactyly of the foot. overview with case presentations. Journal of the
account
for
tarsal
extension,
these
were
based
on
either
a
hallucis.
American Podiatric Medical Association, 88(10), 493-499.
rudimentary
digit
extending
from
the
navicular
or
1st metatarsal
• Masada, K., Tsuyuguchi, Y., Kawabata, H., & Ono, K. (1987). Treatment
without
tarsal
duplication
or
an
extra
digit
in
the
hand
The
1st
MTPJ
was
then
fused
using
a
lag
screw
and
a
dorsal
lacking
of preaxial polydactyly of the foot. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery,
extending
from
a
duplicate
trapezoid.1,13 plate.
79(2), 251-258.
Figure
1 Figure
2 • McCarthy, G. J., Lindaman, L., & Stefan, M. (1995). Pedal polydactyly:
-‐ It
is
recommended
that
surgery
should
not
be
delayed
beyond
An overview with case report. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery :
walking
age.8,12,13 Official Publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons,
34(6), 577-582.
-‐ Surgical
correction
of
pre-‐axial
polydactyly
is
considered
to
be
• Meltzer, R. M. (1987). Polydactyly. Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and
challenging
with
complications
like
recurrent
hallux
varus
and
Surgery, 4(1), 57-62.
splaying
of
the
1st ray
or
1st metatarsal
which
does
not
• Morley, S. E., & Smith, P. J. (2001). Polydactyly of the feet in children:
sufficiently
bear
weight.5,7,8,9,11,12 Suggestions for surgical management. British Journal of Plastic
Surgery, 54(1), 34-38.
-‐ The
main
complication
of
pre-‐axial
polydactyly
surgery
is
a
• Phelps, D. A., & Grogan, D. P. (1985). Polydactyly of the foot. Journal of
resultant
hallux
varus.
To
avoid
this,
1st MTPJ
fusion
is
often
Pediatric Orthopedics, 5(4), 446-451.
performed
in
conjunction
with
removal
of
the
accessory
digit.
• Shaheed, N., Nealy, J. A., & Bituin, B. V. (2000). A rare occurrence of
2,7,9,11 polydactyly. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association,
90(8), 425-429.
-‐ When
surgery
is
warranted,
the
most
important
consideration
is
• Watanabe, H., Fujita, S., & Oka, I. (1992). Polydactyly of the foot: An
the
choice
of
digit
to
remove.
This
is
often
based
on
X-‐ray
analysis of 265 cases and a morphological classification. Plastic and
Reconstructive Surgery, 89(5), 856-877.
criteria.
3,4,8-‐12
-‐ While
radiographs
are
standard
imaging
for
evaluating
osseous
deformity,
MRI
can
be
useful
for
assessing
the
locations
of
soft
Ackknowledgements
tissue
in
pre-‐surgical
planning.
4,5 Figure
1:
Pre-‐op
radiograph
visualizing
supernumerary
digit
and
accessory
Figure
3:
DP
radiograph
17
weeks
post-‐op
showing
significant
osteopenia
We would like to thank Dr. Johanna Godoy for her generous assistance in
medial
cuneiform. around
the
surgical
site.
providing the surgical case and her expert input throughout the process. In
Figure
2:
Pre-‐op
clinical
picture
showing
accessory
digit. addition we would like the thank April Yin for her hard work and time
Figure
4:
DP
radiograph
6 weeks
status
post
hardware
removal
suggesting
osseous
healing. dedicated to creating the poster.
www.PosterPresentations.com