Examination be Held or Not?

National Examination of any year to be a frightening specter for all people, not just student, but
parents, brothers, family. Although fact is not something that should be feared, but should be the
concern of any clutter maintenance national examination year. Did not the first time Indonesia
implement national examination, but only upon the chaos of any year. Whether it's a technical
issue or related pros and cons of national examination. When the government arrested the strong
need for the establishment of the exam, there are actually a lot of things that should be assessed
as to whether national examination should exist or not.

For people who agree, national examination is necessary for students as a requirement to graduate
from a school. People who support the national examination explain that the quality of the
Indonesia education will drop without national examination, so they try to defend the current
system. They also think that national examination can motivate students to study harder.

However there are people who disagree with the opinion. Those who against this national
examination kept in school education say that it doesn't need the national examination because
the quality of education does not just depend on the national examination. Further, the national
examination only measure a small portion of students' competence in specific subjects, and does
not measure students' competence throughout the semester. There is also opinion that the national
examination will make the students depressed and stress. Moreover the quality of education in
Indonesia is causing uneven result national examination inequality between urban areas with
advanced education than rural areas with limited education facilities. On the other hand society is
too focused on national examination, if a child gets bad grades when national examination does
not pass, then the students would be abused and would deprive the students' confidence. In
addition to the events that occur every year when it will be implemented nationwide exam is still
chaotic distribution of matter and not timely.

In conclusion, national examination can still be useful as an instrument of evaluate or detect the
level of students' cognitive competence in several subjects, on a national scale. However, is not
fair if only national examination score that judge whether students pass or not. Government should
make a regulation that national examination is not the only requirement for students to graduate.
There should be other requirements added such as students' daily score, behavior, and
achievement.

A. The Purpose
To discuss an issue "Should National Examination be held or not?".

B. The Generic Structure

Issue National Examination of any year to be a frightening specter for all people, not
just student, but parents, brothers, family. Although fact is not something that
should be feared, but should be the concern of any clutter maintenance national
examination year. Did not the first time Indonesia implement national
examination, but only upon the chaos of any year. Whether it's a technical issue
or related pros and cons of national examination. When the government
arrested the strong need for the establishment of the exam, there are actually a
lot of things that should be assessed as to whether national examination should
exist or not.
 Arguments Pros  National examination is necessary for students as a requirement to
graduate from a school.
 National examination explain that the quality of the Indonesia
education will drop without national examination.
 National examination can motivate students to study harder.
Arguments Cons  The quality of education does not just depend on the national
examination.
 National examination only measure a small portion of students'
competence in specific subjects.
 National examination will make the students depressed and stress.
 If the students does not pass then it would be abused by the local
communities and will eliminate the students' confidence.
Conclusion In conclusion, national examination can still be useful as an instrument of
evaluate or detect the level of students' cognitive competence in several
subjects, on a national scale. However, is not fair if only national examination
score that judge whether students pass or not. Government should make a
regulation that national examination is not the only requirement for students
to graduate. There should be other requirements added such as students' daily
score, behavior, and achievement.

C. Linguistic Features

· It uses present tense

"Although fact is not something that should be feared".

"National Exam is necessary for students as a requirement to graduate from a school".

It focuses on generic participant

Human participant
a. Students
b. Parents

c. Brothers
d. People
Nonhuman participant
a. School

It uses contrastive conjunction

"Although fact is not something that should be feared".

" However there are people who disagree with the opinion".

" On the other hand society is too focused on national examination".

It often uses modality

"But should be the concern of any clutter maintenance national examination year".

"There is also opinion that the national examination will make the students depressed and stress".

"National examination can still be useful as an instrument of evaluate or detect the level of students'
cognitive competence in several subjects, on a national scale".

"Then the child would be abused and would deprive the child's confidence".

It often uses additives

"In addition to the events that occur every year when it will be implemented nationwide exam is
still chaotic distribution of matter and not timely".

"Moreover the quality of education in Indonesia is causing uneven result national examination
inequality between urban areas with advanced education than rural areas with limited education
facilities".

Sekarang, sobat sudah tahu ujian nasional sebaiknya diadakan atau tidak, semuanya ada pro dan
kontra, karena tidak semua orang mempunyai pendapat yang sama. Selain itu, sobat juga tahu
bagaimana generic structure dan linguistic features dari teks diskusi should national be held or not.