Scribd Logo
Fazer o upload

Bem-vindo(a) ao Scribd!

  • Garlet

    Enviado por

    Gertrude Arquillo
    97 visualizações1 página
    The Supreme Court ruled that the marriage between Olanda and Bencidor is not null and void. While the trial court found the marriage null due to Bencidor's psychological incapacity, the Court of Appeals reversed this decision. The Supreme Court agrees with the Court of Appeals, finding Olanda's evidence of Bencidor's psychological incapacity to be insufficient. Specifically, Olanda's allegations imputing many negative traits to Bencidor did not actually demonstrate manifestations of his incapacity, and her testimony contained inconsistencies and contradictions. Additionally, the Court is not bound by the psychological report alone, and such findings must be carefully scrutinized regarding their sources and methodology.

    Descrição original:

    case digest

    Título original

    garlet

    Direitos autorais

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Formatos disponíveis

    DOCX, PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd

    Você considera este documento útil?

    Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

    Denunciar este documento
    The Supreme Court ruled that the marriage between Olanda and Bencidor is not null and void. While the trial court found the marriage null due to Bencidor's psychological incapacity, the Court of Appeals reversed this decision. The Supreme Court agrees with the Court of Appeals, finding Olanda's evidence of Bencidor's psychological incapacity to be insufficient. Specifically, Olanda's allegations imputing many negative traits to Bencidor did not actually demonstrate manifestations of his incapacity, and her testimony contained inconsistencies and contradictions. Additionally, the Court is not bound by the psychological report alone, and such findings must be carefully scrutinized regarding their sources and methodology.

    Direitos autorais:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Baixe no formato DOCX, PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd
    Sinalizar o conteúdo como inadequado
    97 visualizações1 página

    Garlet

    Enviado por

    Gertrude Arquillo
    The Supreme Court ruled that the marriage between Olanda and Bencidor is not null and void. While the trial court found the marriage null due to Bencidor's psychological incapacity, the Court of Appeals reversed this decision. The Supreme Court agrees with the Court of Appeals, finding Olanda's evidence of Bencidor's psychological incapacity to be insufficient. Specifically, Olanda's allegations imputing many negative traits to Bencidor did not actually demonstrate manifestations of his incapacity, and her testimony contained inconsistencies and contradictions. Additionally, the Court is not bound by the psychological report alone, and such findings must be carefully scrutinized regarding their sources and methodology.

    Direitos autorais:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Baixe no formato DOCX, PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd
    Sinalizar o conteúdo como inadequado
    de 1

    =olanda ;. Garlet v. >encidor T. Garlet 3u,ust #( #) ?G.R. No.

    "$'@@
    Facts:
    =olanda ;. Garlet and >encidor T. Garlet met and &ecame intimatelyinvolved /ith each other( /hich resulted in =olanda ,ettin,
    pre,nant. She,ave &irth to their son and later on ,ot married. They soon had another child.>encidor is a/are that
    =olanda is /orkin, in Aapan as an entertainer. There/as no ante+nuptial a,reement &efore they contracted marria,e and
    alsothere /as no separation of properties durin, their marria,e. 3fter a/hile(=olanda and >encidor e4perienced
    marital pro&lems and they separated.=olanda has the custody of the children and she /as the one supportin,them.
    She admitted that they ac*uired properties durin, their coha&itation/ith her o/n money. She then filed for
    a Declaration of Nullity of 8arria,e onthe ,round of >encidor0s psycholo,ical incapacity to fulfill his essential
    maritalo&li,ations to =olanda and their children. =olanda also admitted that >encidordid not under,o a psycholo,ical
    e4amination &y the psycholo,ist sou,ht &yher &ecause he did not appear to the invitation. The clinical
    psycholo,istfound >encidor to &e sufferin, from Narcissistic Type of Personality Disorder.The RTC rendered a
    decision that their marria,e is null and void on the,round of psycholo,ical incapacity. The C3 on appeal rendered a
    decisioncontrary to that of the RTC.
    Issue:
    5hether or not the marria,e &et/een =olanda and >encidor is null andvoid6
    Ruling:
    No. The marria,e &et/een =olanda and >encidor is not null and void.
    Decision:
    The Supreme Court a,rees /ith the C3 that the totality of=olanda0s evidence is insufficient to esta&lish >encidor0s
    psycholo,icalincapacity. =olanda imputes almost every ima,ina&le ne,ative character traita,ainst >encidor( &ut
    not only do they not satisfactorily constitutemanifestations of >encidor0s psycholo,ical incapacity as
    contemplated in the-amily Code( =olanda0s averments are riddled /ith inconsistencies that aresometimes
    contradicted &y her o/n evidence.

    The Court is not &ound &y the psycholo,ical report. 5hile the Court previouslyheld that 9there is no
    re*uirement that the person to &e declaredpsycholo,ically incapacitated &e personally e4amined &y
    a physician(: yet(this is *ualified &y the phrase( 9if the totality of evidence presented is enou,hto sustain
    a findin, of psycholo,ical incapacity.: The psycholo,ist0s findin,smust still &e su&<ected to a careful and
    serious scrutiny as to the &ases of thesame( particularly( the source s of information( as /ell as
    the methodolo,yemployed

    Você também pode gostar