RECUSED US District Court Judge - Allison Dale Burroughs, Who Already Stands Formally Accused of Judicial Treason, Issues A New (VOID) Order On 7/29/19 - HARIHAR V US BANK Et Al, 15-cv-11880
As a matter of record the Plaintiff has previously brought SIX (6) formal counts of Treason against Judge Burroughs under ARTICLE III for ruling w/out jurisdiction. Per Federal Law, the 7/29/19 order calls now for bringing an incremental claim of Treason, and notifying POTUS. EVEN IF Judge Burroughs still had jurisdiction (which she clearly does not), the content of the order is falsely/inaccurately stated, and a Plaintiff REPLY to the order will necessarily be forthcoming.
Título original
RECUSED US District Court Judge - Allison Dale Burroughs, who Already Stands Formally Accused of Judicial Treason, Issues a New (VOID) Order on 7/29/19 - HARIHAR v US BANK et al, 15-cv-11880
As a matter of record the Plaintiff has previously brought SIX (6) formal counts of Treason against Judge Burroughs under ARTICLE III for ruling w/out jurisdiction. Per Federal Law, the 7/29/19 order calls now for bringing an incremental claim of Treason, and notifying POTUS. EVEN IF Judge Burroughs still had jurisdiction (which she clearly does not), the content of the order is falsely/inaccurately stated, and a Plaintiff REPLY to the order will necessarily be forthcoming.
RECUSED US District Court Judge - Allison Dale Burroughs, Who Already Stands Formally Accused of Judicial Treason, Issues A New (VOID) Order On 7/29/19 - HARIHAR V US BANK Et Al, 15-cv-11880
As a matter of record the Plaintiff has previously brought SIX (6) formal counts of Treason against Judge Burroughs under ARTICLE III for ruling w/out jurisdiction. Per Federal Law, the 7/29/19 order calls now for bringing an incremental claim of Treason, and notifying POTUS. EVEN IF Judge Burroughs still had jurisdiction (which she clearly does not), the content of the order is falsely/inaccurately stated, and a Plaintiff REPLY to the order will necessarily be forthcoming.
Case L:iScvebHBB0.AOE Document 187 Filed 07/20/49 Page Lol
UNITED STATES DISTT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS.
-MOMAN HARINAR, :
Plant,
Chl Ati No. eet" 1TBEC-AD
USS BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
au
Dafindass,
BURROVOMS, DJ
Plant? Mobas Mara (‘arhar), precoding pre ae inti thit ction on May 30,
‘2008, (EOF No.2} Matar mended in comple ryt azo 2015 ad aga
‘Noramber 2015, (ECF Max 4.24], Hin I-pagvamdad conplaist was accompanied by mare
hue 1900 pages of wtacasans. and auhough fro gaions wae sme una. he
sven 0 eae wan BARNS. Bak wally foreclosed ou his eb Low,
‘Mavachiatis and at rwanda etn wuboeuety veceaad the agit of
‘at foreclovrn Sin ganacally [EC Mo, 24) Based on tun allan, Marta brought
savertoan cous cluding clin fo asaturing, capri i ingamant,volnows of
omits igh, and unr! dacaptvepeastce, agus rs hanks, thw Conic
cof Mauachuvets, and wverl individuals and law fom, fe ECF No. 2499 10753).
‘i. Apeil2016 tha Cour Assad sora of tho coun. (ECR Na 43}. Marta sought
to thar mand his complaint; but the Cont anid thon runt becasve it eu iat
ropowd sandman ware fla and would kv bos wads audi the DefeedansCnae LASonLIHROADE DacumenAS? Pied 072849 Page 2 al 4
(HEY ou 61,224,118 185) Tha Cou ao done mapa aquest or ijn rai
(HCH Nou 120,135) Maa rnpods thas abun ules by lg mates tha
(Couns wcuah antigua the itn of mane govt cougar. ad
oun oe and ot soe th pevwmuat a (ECE Now. 122, 128, 124,126 127,128,
224,114,184, On March 3,207, Cou dite he raining sous ith
ojuton (ECPNo 235] On Seay 17.2018 tha Cou con wns find byte Pent
(Cound on Ape 1,201, he Barone Coa ind Haars pits oat of
cona,San (ECP Mou. 19, 124) Av of Ap 25,2019 hac hada fil and
comple tre win the fara iil ye
(nm ey 25,2018, somtnanding te ccackain of hi aciow and Hua pasion
tapout ts Court ha seid "Thanos ths Coton” and gag in
“PATTER GH CORRUPT CONDUCT ht sonitd inna sue ofc 1 eau hat
“MENTAL ILLNESS» eld not bold out Md an
scurgancy ote anand i complit and rors an ain om Manchu Supra
Coun tothis Coun pusentt Feat Ralf Cli Proce 603) an 64) nd 28
US, § 148, (LCE, 155, L966) provide tha “o}amoton andj tm the
cour may rave pty logu eprsenti fom inl judgant, re, or poceeding
foro thar posal ald nie or ween), miprautton,olacndct
CPN 4B
‘yam oppaving par (or bwcame th judgmanis void” Fad RG, P 60). 28USC.
1446 prota, tte pa
‘fod unt digo uve ay ciation fom «Sate ot
‘il ish ieee te aio Stes fo edt wd on in
‘it a i png aac orange pa Ea oa
Fen ln pcm ot ma 8
Seiya nists ciate wheeCase L1Scrti882.40R Document LS? Ped 0720/9 Page d oft
muse,
oh
ark’s moti i did fright ono. oa wc cris ha oh
Mavaeva ous hve aa adel Rs of Chl reads 0, feo a x aid
‘basis for relia! because the Fedwal Rules of Civil Procedure do not apply to proswedings in
‘Muvaess at sour aa PR. Clo PTs gvten ta ocean al si
os and recening se Une Stas dot coun aap sd in al 8”
(wmuphasis added) | Second, 90 the wtaat Harihar awake relee{ fora the dissniveal of this action,
Die rumady nappa Con's or, Maas now hao hs sgt apps ution
racouus Thand, Harikar has net properly nomavved the action trom stare court urwoant to 28
‘USC, | 1486 bosarase he bins ot provided « “sheet and plain wtateanwat of the grovands for
ramon” 28K. j 18). Pury Muar ba fd compa 14 ast
‘wotioe of ramovval with tha clock ws required te initiate a removed action im this Cour Sak,
Ma. ih Hr apes plat iu Mancha ton be soko
‘ramp, bat DE U.S.C, 9g 1441 (a) nd 1+46(0) provide for moval by defendants emly. Sinth,
Mavs wage ramon ha ene pending tas eum alot army aly
‘pivwes that hie reprevants dat! hia motions is state cout bavw bean peeling for more thas a mouth,
wharves 2BUS.C, § 144¢(b) nequires that any “ketice of removal of a civil action or proceeding:
al bo ld thn 5 dys arch ong by ha ada, ough aren bar of
py of inal plauing” 28 VC. 514660). Se Oat a wo
an 2 comp acerca th Fun Ra of Ch rent 15, tin aad
‘for the renscen the Coun has prwviowsly articulated in denying Martha's motions to amend Sey
(ECF No. 81, 103, 116, 128), Eighth, because this setion tarmiinatd om March 31, 2017 whee
" Unde Fadaral Ral of Cel Procadure$1(¢) ta rales apply te acons at have be removed
fiom ata cure but sly af th ation be rumovedCase L1S.cuLI8GO.ADB Oseument 187 Filed O7H19 Paget of &
‘he Cour inde all lms wih prejudice, acum ifthe te cout ave could besa to
‘his Coury, wed ot baal wei Bensss mere han Ws yo a6 slapd see
‘his etice Wak Cloned So4LAR, D, Mase, 402680)
aihr' eargoncy moiouo anand his egal complaint and to aeuovw a actin
‘om ata our (ECE Mos. 13, 136] « DENIED Cansaring tat his ntion has bows fy
gad wud ht now bean lsd fa oes ta vy, Marble rh ings
tls docu ey cue ilg ith hn or hs pert lato this ton,
80 ORDERED.
aan
ie ALEISON D
Bmlst
HARIHAR Submits Whistleblower Form to House Financial Services Committee, calling out Evidenced Judicial Abuses, DOJ Failures and Nonfeasance by Legislative Leaders incl. 2020 Presidential Candidate - US Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)
HARIHAR Slams Wells Fargo Executive, Showing Cause to Expand Upon Existing Claims of Slander/Defamation and Economic Espionage against Defendant - WELLS FARGO (Ref. HARIHAR v US BANK et al, Docket No. 15-cv-11880)
HARIHAR Files NOTICE in MA Superior Court RE: Upcoming Congressional Meetings in March (2020) to Discuss the Ongoing Committee Investigation of Defendant - WELLS FARGO Consumer Abuses - Including the Plaintiff's Offer to Testify.
HARIHAR Updates National Association of REALTORS (NAR), Seeking Licensure Revocation for Evidenced Code of Ethics Violations by WEICHERT Realtors/Daher Companies in Massachusetts (Ref. HARIHAR v US BANK, et al, Docket No. 15-cv-11880)
HARIHAR to K&L Gates Chairman Michael Caccese: " K&L Gates, LLP can now be credited for helping to publicly expose an unprecedented, and certainly egregious level of judicial abuse in both the MA State and Federal Judiciary..."
HARIHAR's NOTICE Officially Docketed w/ Massachusetts Superior Court, Exposing MA AGO's Failure (or REFUSAL) to Bring Criminal Indictments Against Defendants - WELLS FARGO, US BANK, Judicial Officers and other Named Defendants
HARIHAR Extends Opportunity To Reach Settlement Agreement W/ Real Estate Brokers WEICHERT REALTORS/Daher Companies in Methuen, MA (Ref. HARIHAR V US BANK Et Al, Docket No. 15-cv-11880)
In Addition to Civil/Criminal Penalties, HARIHAR Seeks Revocation of Professional Licensure from WEICHERT Real Estate Brokers - Ken and Mary Daher (Daher Companies - Methuen, MA)... Ref. HARIHAR v US BANK, et al, Docket No. 15-cv-11880
HARIHAR Files Notice w/ MA Superior Court: "MA AGO’S Continued Failures to Address Evidenced Criminal Violations of Record Shows Cause to Expand Upon Color of Law, Due Process, RICO Claims, etc., against the Commonwealth of Massachusetts"
HARIHAR Exposes Tangled Web of Corruption in Massachusetts Courts - Involving Disqualified MA Superior Court Judge - Hon. Janice W. Howe, Her Husband - Real Estate Businessman Douglas Howe Jr. and Attorneys for Bank Defendants - WELLS FARGO, US Bank and MERS Inc.
HARIHAR Files NOTICE w/ MA Superior Court - Documenting Email to Mass AG Maura Healey and Extended Offer to Reach a Mutual Agreement with the DEFENDANT - Commonwealth of Massachusetts (Ref. HARIHAR v US BANK et al, Docket No. 15-cv-11880)
HARIHAR's Increased Exposure of CORRUPTION Between Government and Bank Defendants - WELLS FARGO/US BANK Calls For Intervention by DOJ and US Secret Service To Enforce EO No. 13818
HARIHAR Files EMERGENCY Motion for the Removal of Disqualified MA Superior Court Judge - Hon. Janice W. Howe, Including NEW Claims against Defendant - Commonwealth of Massachusetts in Related Fed Lawsuit (Ref. HARIHAR v US BANK et al, Docket No. 15-cv-11880)
HARIHAR Brings Evidenced Obstruction of Justice Claims Involving RECUSED US District Court Judge - Hon. Allison Dale Burroughs and Referenced Clerks to the Attn of US Attorney Andrew Lelling (MA) and Deputy Chief Dan Jackson (AO US Courts)
BREAKING NEWS: HARIHAR's NEW Discovery Evidences UNDISCLOSED Conflict of Interest Between Middlesex Superior Court Judge - Hon. Janice W. Howe and her Husband - William Raveis Managing Partner (Andover, MA), Douglas Howe, Jr. (Ref. HARIHAR v WELLS FARGO, Docket No. 1981-cv-00050)
HARIHAR Brings Evidenced Obstruction of Justice Claims Under 18 U.S. Code § 1503 Against Disqualified MA Superior Court Judge - Hon. Janice W. Howe and Court Clerk (HARIHAR v WELLS FARGO et al, Docket No. 1981-cv-11880)
HARIHAR Evidences Incremental Criminal Violations Against WELLS FARGO, US BANK & Atty's for K&L Gates LLP, Including Misprision of Treason, Fraud, RICO and Economic Espionage (Ref. HARIHAR v US BANK et al, Docket No. 15-cv-11880)