Você está na página 1de 4




Morros Di-Bemardo *
Márcio 1100xes-Martins**
Roherto }Ja/ltisla de Oliveira*

Proposla de retirada rle oito espécies de serpentes da herpe'ofauna do Estado do
Rio Grande do Snl, Brasil
São rcvistas as citaçõcs dc cspécies de serpenles para o cstiHlo do Rio Grande do
Sul. Oito espécies. para as quais os registros silo equívoeos c/ou nilo são conhecidos
cspécimes-testcmunho. silo retiradas. Silo elas o boídco EIII1<,cl('sl10laellS Cope. 1862
e os coluhrídeos Chirol1illsjlavolilleallls (Jan, 1863), Uophi.1 n".ridiollalis (Schenkel,
190 I), Uophis regillae (Linnaeus. 1758). Liophis Iyphlus (Linnacus, 1758), LYSlrophi.f
semicinclll.\' (Duméril. Bihron & Duméril, 1854), Sibynomor!,hll.f mikallii (Schlegel,
1837) c Siphlo!,his Plllcher (Raddi, 1820). Após esta reavaliação, a rauna de scrpcn-
tes do Rio Grande do Sul passa a ser composla por 73 espécics
P,,:nvras-chave: répteis, distrihuiçilo gcográfica, Doidac. ('oluhridac. Rio Gran-
de do Sul.

Most or lhe knowledgc on lhe rcplilc fauna frol11the Slate of Rio Grande
do Sul (RS) was provided by Thales de Lema, who has workcd on this subject
since lhe 1950's. During the last 45 years, Lema and collahorators published a
series of articles listing the reptile species ofRS (e.g. Lcma, 1958, 1973, 1982,
]987, 1994; Lema & Fabián-Beunnann, 1977; Lema ei a/.. 1980, 1984; Lema
& Ferreira, 1990). The lasl and most comprehensive list of reptik3 from Rio
Grande do Sul was presented in Lema (1994), in which the author revised the
rrevious lists and made comments on the distribution of 78 species of snakes.
Since then, three species have been added: Clelia bic%!' (Peracca, 1904),
-- --- -
· Faculdadc dc l3iociências and Museu de Ciêneias e Tecnologia da ponrincia Universidade
Católica cio Rio Grande do Sul. Av. Ipiranga, 6681, CEP 90619-900. Porto Alegre, RS,
I1ral.il. E-mail: madihe@puers.hrandrholivei@pucrs.br.
.. Museu d" Ciêm ias Nallllais. Fundaçno Zooholâniea do Rio Grande do Sul. Rua DI'. Salvador
França, 1427, CEI' 90690-000. Porto Alegre. RS, Rrazil. E-mail: marciohmartins@fzh.rs.gov.br

COI11UI1.Mus. Ciêl1c Tecl1or. PUCRS. Sér. Zoal.. Porto Alegre. v. 17. 11. I. p. 45-50. jan.-jun. 2004
46 47

reported by Zaher (1996), Micr/ltlls lell/niscat/ls (Linnaeus, 1758), reported UOIJhis IIIcridionalis (Schenkel, 190 I) was attribllted 10 RS by Lema
by Di-Bernardo et aI. (2001), and Apostolepis q/lirogai Giraudo & Scrocchi, (1987), who wrole: "Cilation of lIoge (1952). Wedid no! see it" [translation
1998,reported by Lema & Cappellari (2001). by lhe allthors]. lIoge (1952) did not mention the species (at that time it was
. Attempting to access the conservationstatus of the reptile species from considered as subspecies of Uophis lineatlls (Linnaeus, 1758» from RS, but
RS (Borges-Martins et aI., 2002; Di-Bernardoet aI., 2003), we carried out a 10"sollthern Brazil", and lisled specimens hOllsed in the collection of Instituto
wide revision of records of ali species cited as occurrll1g in the slate. The nlllanl..n prorccding from lhe Arazilian states ofMinas (Jerais, MaIo Grosso,
results of lhe aCCllnllJlalcd rcsearch have prodnced no evidence (lf lhe SiI" I'alllo and I'arami. The asslII1Iplion 01' I.erna (199'1) Ihal I,. ",('/'idirJ/1(/li.~
occurrence of eighl spccics 01"snakes recorded mistakenly, or to which Ihere reaches thl' northwl'stern RS nceds conlirmalion, sincc. 10 0111'knowledge, no
is no voucher material. individual IVasever rccordcd.
Chironillsflavolineallls (.Ian, 1863) was rnenlioned by Lema (1994) to Dixon (1983, 1(89) plotlcd one specilllen of LiofJhi.l'reginac (Linl1aeus,
the "EncoslaInferiordoNordesle". Lema(OfJ.cit.) recorded the speciesafter 1758) inlo lhe mal' of RS. According to Dixon (200 I, in litt.), the mal' is in
examining seven embryonic eggs in lhe final stage of development (not error, and lhe specific plot was based on ol1e specimen (j'0111Minas Gerais
included in any collection). TJlecggs were fOllnd between lhe roots of a big (Museu de Zoologia da Univcrsidade de São Paulo, MZUSP 829). HlIssarn
tree in nalive forest, in the upper portion of Rio dos Sinos, Poço do Carvão, Z<lher (200 I, pers. com.) revised lhe daI a on this spccimcn, and:onfirmed
municipalily ofSão Leopoldo.Twoeggswereopened,revealingembryoswith Ihal il \Vas collectcd in lhe IIlllnicipality of Pirapor<l, Mil1(ls Gerais. The
colors similar to the adlllt of C. flavolineallls. following Dixon el aI. (1993), asslII1Iplion of LCl11a (1994) lhal L. /'eginac reaches lhe northweslern RS
in Brazil, C.flavolincal/ls occurs in the grasssteppesof the MarajóIsland seellls 10 be hased on Dixon's (1983, J(89) mal'.
(Pará), in caatinga-agreste-savannaformalionsof northeastern Brazil, and in UOfJhi.l' tYfJhlll.l'(Linnaeus, 1758) was inclllded in the herpetofauna of
the CamposCerrados of Mato Grosso, Bahia, Goiás, Minas Gerais, and São weslern RS by Lema (1987). Later, Lema (1994) reslricted the geographic
Paulo. Dixonet aI.(op. cit.) also statedthat"it seemsto becommon knowledge dislriblltion of lhe species to the municipality of São Borja. In both cases,
that this species lives in grassland-savanl1asiluations".The arca in which the however, no voucher was cited. Following Dixon (1987, j 989), the
eggs were found is not in accordancewith lhe supposed habitats ofthe species, southernmosl range oflhis species is northeasternParami,Brazil, in locations
aI leasl 600 km from São Bo~ja. We have not found any specimens of L. typhlus
and falls far out ofits known geographical range, Jeaving ~s to assume that lhe
embryos correspond to other species. rrom RS in any herpetological colleclion, and sllggest thal further evidence is
Eunecles notaells Cope, 1862 was added to the herpetofaunaofthe RS by
needed for consideringIhis species as pertaining to the RS herpetofilllna.
We arglle for lhe excJusion of Lystrophis .l'emicinctll.l' (Duméril, Bibron &
Lema (1987). IIe staled Ihat individuais of this speciesreach the stale when
Dllméril, 1854) from the list ofthe snakes ofRS becallse specil11ens ofthis
involuntarily dragged from northern regions by lhe Uruguay River, during
species \Vere ncver recorded in Ihis State, despite references in Lema & Fabián-
flooding periods. Following Lema (1994), some specimens collected in
BellI'Jnann (1977) and Lema (1987, 1994). Lema & Fabián-Beurrnann(1977)
Uruguaiana in 1990 were deposiled in the lI1useurnof the Facilidade de
slaled Ihal lhe species "is rarely fOllnd in RS" [Iranslation hy the authorsl, but
Zootecnia. Ilowever, the IInique spccil11en of E. nolac/ls deposited in that
no spccimcn 01' locality W<lSgiven. Lema (1987) probahly lollo\Ved Lema &
collection (one unnlll11bcrcd, taxidermizcd head) is frol11Argentina (M.V.M.
Fabián-BclIrmann (1977). Lema (1994) n1(linlained lhe spccics in its lisl, but
Querol and/\.B. Santos,2002, Curatorsofthe IlerpetologicalCollection,pers. affinnerl he never saw specimens from RS.
com.). This species is found il1norlhwesterlÍ Urllgllay (/\chaval-Elena, 200 I), UnIil Franco's revision (franco, 19(4) of the name Sihynomorplllls
and eastern Corrientes, Argentina (Giraudo, 2001). The proximity of these mikanii (Schlegel, 1837), it was applied erroneously to designate the
are as to RS is noteworthy, leaving us to assume that the species may actually specil1';;ns ofS. neuwiedi from RS (e.g. Lema, 1987). Lel11a(1994) followed
reach Ihis state. /\lthollgh, to our knowledge, no specimen from the RS is fn1l1co's t<lxonomic arrangemcnt, but cited S. mikanii as "very rare in RS"
preserved in any herpetological collection. Therefore, we cautiously preferred wilholll reporting any specimen. According to Franco (1994), the southernmost
do not consider its occllrrence in this state.
range of S mikol1ii is Ihc northern portion of Santa Calarina. We suggest Ihat
Comun. Mus. (,iêne. Teenol. I'lJCRS. S~r. 7.001.. I'orto Alegre. v. 17. n I. p. 45-50. jall.-juII. 2004
COlllllll. Mus Ciêlle. Teellol. I'UCRS, Sér. 7.001, Porto Alegre. v. 17, 11 '. I' 45-50. jan.-jun. 2004
48 49

S. mikollii should hc removed rrom the list orsnakes ofRS, sinee no specimen Dixon..I R, 1(11), SystclIlalies 01' UOl'his /'('gil/tll' and I \I'iI/iam.ri (Serpentes,
is known 10 Ihis slate. Colubridae), with a descriptiou 01'a new species, Ann, Carneg. Mus., Piltsburgh,
52(6): '13-138,
Siphlop"is pulc"e/' (Raddi, 1820) was citeel to the state 01'Rio Grande do
__ 1987. TnxonolllY and geographic variation 01' L/ol'l1i.r Iyphlus and related
Sul by Peters & Orcjas-Minll1da (1970), and to the mlmicipfllity of Torres "grcen" spcdes 01' South AlIlerica (Serpentes: Colubrida<~). Ann. Carneg. Mus.,
(RS) by Lema (1987, 1(94), hut no specimens \Verereferred by these authors. I'iltshurgh. 56(8): 173-191.
Prudente (1998), following Lema (1987. '99-1), citc S. 11lllr:"e/,to lhe RS. _ . 1989. A kcy and checklisl to the Neotropical snakc genus UOl'his whith
Notwithstanding, Prudente (pers. COI11. 200') diel not find any individunl 01' cnunlr)' lists and lIlaps. Sl1Iithsonian 'lerpetologicallnfonl1ation Service. Washing-
S. fJ/llc:he/'from RS anel' examining the 1110stimportant Brflzilinn ('ollections. ton. 7(): 1-,10.
In addilion, Lema (pcrs. COI11. 2003) sniel Ihat no individlml 01' Ihis specics. Di\nn. .I, IC; Wicsl .lr...I. A. &. Cei,.I. M. 1993. Revision 01'thc Neotropical snakes
proeeeding rrom RS, was ever seen, and Ihat the previous citations (Lema genus Chimlli/l.r Fitzingcr (Serpentes. Colubridac). 'Ji)f'ino, Museo Regionale di
Seienze Naturali, (Monografie XIII). 279 p.
1987, 1994) were made considering the existence ofthis species ;n lhe nearby
Frauco. I" I.. 1994. O gênero SibY/lOlIIo/'phus Fitzinger, I R43. no nrasil (Colubridae;
state ofSanta Calarina. We suggesl that rurlher evidence is needed rrior 10 the
Xenodonliuae; Dipsadini). Dissertação de Mestrado. FaLuldade de Biociências,
inclusion of this species in lhe herpetoraunaspecies list 01'RS. l'ontif1cia Universidade CatÓlica do Rio Grande do Sul. 1.14 p.
Giraudo, A. R. 200 I. Serpientes de Ia Selva Paranaense y dei Chaco IIÚmedo. Buenos
Aires. L.O,L.i\. 32R p.
To Airton Batista Santos and Mareus V. M. Querol (Pol1tilieifllJniversidade Ca- lIoge. A. R. '952. Notes on l,ygol'his Fitzinger - revalidalion 01' two subspecies.
tólicado RS. Uruguaial1a).
Ana I.Úeia da Costa Prudel1te(Museu I'araense Emílio Mern. Inst. Butantan. São Paulo. 24(2): 245-268.
Goeldi, Belém). Francisco Luís Franco (Instituto Bulantan. S1\oPaulo), Glaucia Ma-
ria Funk Pontes, .losé Francisco I'ezzi da Silva and Thalcs de I.ema (Pontilieia Uni- Lema. 'I'. 195R, Notas sobre os répteis do estado do Rio Grande do Sul- Brasil. Notas
I a IV. (heringia, Sér. Zool.. Porto Alegre, (10): I-I R,.
versidade Católica do RS, Porto Alegre). Hussam EI Dine Zahcr (Museu de Zoologia
da Universidade de S1\oPaulo, S1\oPaulo). James R, Dixon (Texas A & M University. _' :973. As serpentes do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Iheringia, Sér. Divulg.,
Collcge Station, USA), Moema Leitão de Araujo (Museu de Ciências Naturais da Porto Alegre. (3): 19-33.
Fundação Zoobotâniea do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre), Sônia Tere7.inha Zanini _' 19R2.Fauna de serpentes da provlncia pampeana e inler-relaçôes com as pro-
Cechin (Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria). and Eliseu Dias for víncias lilllítrofes. Mem. Inst. Rutantan, São Paulo, (46): 173-182.
providing data and il1/imnation. .101111Measey (Université Paris VI. Rondy Cedex,
__o 1987. Lista preliminar das serpentes registradas para o estado do Rio Urande
France) and Tami Molt (University ofCalifornia. Berkeley. USA) gently revised first
drafis ofthc manuscripl. do Sul (Brasil Meridional) (Reptilia, Lepidosaurifl. Squamata). Acta Biol.
Leopoldensia. São Leopoldo, 9(2): 225-240.
LITERATURE CITED __o 1994. Lista comentada dos répteis ocorrentes no Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil.
COlllun. Mus. Ciênc. Tecnol. PUCRS, Sér. Zool.. Porto Alegre, 7: 41-150.
Achaval-Elena, F. 200 I. Aetuali7.acilÍn sistemática y mflras de distribueiÓn de los
Lema. T. &. Cappellari. L. 11. 2001. Geographic distrihution: Aposlolepis qllirogai.
reptiles dellJruguay. Smithsonian lIerpetological Information Serviee, Washing-
ton, 129: 1-37. I/erp. Revicw, SI. Louis, 32(2): 121.
Lemfl. 1'. &. Fahián-Beurmann, M. E. 1977. Levantamento preliminar dos répteis da
Borges-Martins. 1'.1.:Di-Rernardo. M. &. Oliveira. R. n. 2002. Répteis. 1'. 29-30, il/:
Marque~. A.A.I\.: F!'lItana. C.S.; Vl'll'I. 1:.; Ikneke. (i.A.: Sehneider. M. &. Reis. rl'gi~o da fronleira nmsil-lh IIgu:Jj, Iheringia. Porto Akgn'. (50): li 1-92.
R. (eds.). Lista dfls espécies da fallna ameaçadas de extil1çi\o no Rio (,mnde do Lema. '1'.. Fahi;Ín-Beurmann, M. E.; Lcitão-de-Araujo. M.: AI\'es, M. L. M. & Vieira,
Sul. Decrelo n" " 1.672. de 11 de junho de 2002. Porto Alegre. Fi'J \!M ( 'T-l'lJCRSI M, 1. 1980. I.isla de répteis l'neontrfldos tUlRegi~o da Grande Porto Alegre, Estado
PANGEA. 52 p. (I'uhlicações Avulsas FZB. 11). do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Iheringia, Porto Alegre, (55): 27-36.
Di-Dernarrlo, M; Rorges-Martins. M. & Cappellari. L. 11. 200 I. Geographic Dis- Lema. T. &. Ferreira. M. T. S. 1990. Contribuição ao eonhecimcnto dos Testudines do
tríbution. Mic/'/I/'l/s lellll/i.rcal/ls (South Al11erk~n Coral Snake). flerp. Revíew. Rio Grande do Sul (Brasil) - Listfl sistemática comentada (Reptilia). Acta Biol.
SI. Louis. 32( I): 60. I,eopoldensia. S1\o I,copoldo, 12( I): 125-1 ó4.
Di-Bernardo, M.: Borges-Martins. M. & Oliveim, R. B. 2003. Répteis. 1'. 165-1 RI!. Lema. T.; Vieira. M. I. &.Leit1\o-de-Amujo.M. 1984. Fauna reptiliana do Norte da
il1: Fonlmla. C. S., Bencke. G. A. &. ({eis. R. (eds.). Livro vermelho da f1l\ma (irande Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Revta, nl flS.7.001., Rio de Janei-
ameaçatla de extinç1\o no Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre. EDll'lICRS. ro, 2(4): 203-227.

Comun. Mus. Ciêne. TeenoII'UCRS. Sér, 7,001, raclo Alegre. v, 17. n. I. p. 45-50. jan.-jun. 2004 COI1lUII.Mus, Ciêne. Tecnol. PUCRS, Sér. 1.,001..Porto Alegre, v. 17, n I, P, 45-50, jan.-jun. 2004

Peters.J.A. & Orejas-Miranda, B. 1970. Catalogue ofthe Neolropical Sqllarnata. Part

I. Snakcs. BIIII.U. S.Na!. Mus~.297: viii ~ 1-347.
Prudente, A.L.C. 1998. Rcvis,10,lilogenia e alimcnlaç50 de Siphlophis Fitzinger. 1843
(Serpentes, Coluhridae, Xcnodontinac, Pselldohoini). Tcse de dOlltorado. Setor dc
CiênciasBiológicas.UnivcrsidadeFederaldo Paraná. 1651"
Zaher, 11. 1996. A new genus and spceies of Pscudohoine snake, wilh a revision of
the genus Clelia (Serpentes, Xcnodontinae). Boll. Mus. Reg. Sei. Na!. Torino,
Torino, 14(2): 289-337.

Rceehido cm: 16 dczcmbro 2003; aceito cm: 16 janeiro 2004.

Comun. Mus. Ciêne. Tecnol. PUCl~S. Sér. Zool., Porto Alegre, v. 17, n. I, p. 45-50, jan.-jun. 2004

Interesses relacionados