Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Volume 3 Issue 2
Mansukh Gorasiya
Student
Department of Mechanical Engineering
HJD Institute of Technical Education and Research, Kera Kutch
Corresponding Authors’ email id: mansukhgorasiya@gmail.com
Abstract
Gears are most critical elements in mechanical systems. The gears are
commonly used to transmit motion, the effectiveness of transmission is very
high as compare to others. Today’s competitive market required to optimize
Weight and Volume of the gear design. Weight and Volume optimization of
gear pairs is difficult to solve because it includes various objectives and
large number of variables. Therefore, to solve such difficulty robust
optimization technique will be useful to get optimal solution. Genetic
algorithm will be useful to solve such difficulty using MATLAB. Helical
gear of cast iron material is manufactured by Hobbing process. Experiment
done on gear test rig is necessary for evaluating the performance of gear.
Testing of gears are going to be conduct under lubrication conditions.
Tooth damage investigation is carryout on optical microscope. Results can
be helpful to employ for a least material and cost by fulling design
accuracy and other required performance.
9) In this paper A twin-disc test rig 11) In this study, with the help
was developed to measure contact dynamic FEA method, the
fatigue characteristic. The device is interactions between transient
aimed to reproduce the most engaging performance and the
influencing operating conditions of modification coefficient and the
gears at the most critical point helical angle are investigated. The
along the tooth profile with regard FEA results have shown that
to pitting damage. To allow the transient performance of gears with
implementation of complete tests different modification coefficients
without the need for inspection by and different helical angles so that
an operator, the rig has been the cost of design and
provided with a vision system manufacturing of gears can be
considered to automatically reduced greatly. Yumei Hu et. al
identify the onset of pitting on the [11]
surface of specimens. G.
Meneghetti et. al [09] 12) In this paper A test rig to evaluate
the performance of a micro
10) In this study, the performance involute gear has been developed.
investigation of helical gears with Shaft position and shaft centre
applied surface coatings like distance of gears have great
Balinit C, C6 + IFLM and Nb–S influence on the gear performance
coatings is carried out. The tests and therefore they must be adjusted
were conducted up to 50 million precisely. The meshing condition
cycles to compute the performance of micro involute gears is
of the different coatings in investigated experimentally. The
𝟓 × 𝝅 × 𝒎𝟐𝒏 𝒃 𝟐
𝑓 𝑥 = 𝑉 = 𝑓[𝑚𝑛 , 𝑏, 𝑍1 , 𝛽] = 𝑓[𝑥1, 𝑥2, 𝑥3, 𝑥4] = (𝒁𝟏 )
𝟒 𝒄𝒐𝒔𝟐 𝜷
Where,
𝑥2 = 𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑒 𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡 𝑖𝑛 𝑚𝑚
𝑥3 = 𝑁𝑜. 𝑜f teeth on pinion
𝑥4 = 𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑥 𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑒
Design variables:
The variables used in optimizing of helical gear pair are normal module, face width, number
2 Face Width ( ) 20 to 25 mm
4 Helix angle ( ) to
Constraints considered:
Following constraint are taken in study Bending Stress, Compressive Stress,Normal Module,
Bending Stress
1
×
Compressive
2
Stress
3 Normal Module
4 Gear Ratio
Centre Distance
5 Between Pinion And
Gear
Round
0.25 2.24 23 15 311.71
off
From above table average value of decision variable should be taken such as module (m n) =
0.25 cm, face width (b) = 2.24 cm, No. of teeth on pinion (Z1) = 23 and Helix angle (β) = 15o.
Value of objective function that is volume = 311.71 cm3
5. Experimental Set-Up
Analytical G. A
Sr. Genetic
Parameters Difference
no algorithm
method Rounded-off
Module ( )
1 2.5 2.5 2.5 0
(mm)
Face width ( )
2 25 22.33 22.40 2.6
(mm)
Helix angle ( )
4 15o 14.87o 15o 0o
(Degree)
Volume (V)
5 378.80 289.19 311.71 67.09
(cm3)
Mass (M)
6 2.72 2.08 2.244 0.483
(kg)
As from the comparisons between analytical method and genetic algorithm tool in above
table it is clear shows that the reduction in value of design variables i.e. helix angle, no. of
teeth on pinion, and face width of gear pair. Also the weight and volume of the helical pair is
Above chart unit for various parameter please refer table 6.1
As from the Actual observation data comparisons in above table and chart it can be shows
that the material cost, manufacturing time, material requirement, and overall cost of the gear
pair are reduced. It can be say that the genetic algorithm tool has provide better performance
as compared to analytical method.
As above table shows the comparisons of cm3 and reduction in mass is 0.483
three tested report results. Here 4 tooth are kg.
to be tested to quantify the comparisons
between them and tested 4 tooth are to be 2) In the Actual observation data
selected in random way. Images shows the comparisons with genetic
profile damage and wear on normal tooth algorithm it is found that total
is little high as compared to optimized weight of helical gear pair is
tooth. From above Images Comparisons its reduce to 0.422 kg, reduction in
show that the performance of optimized Tooth Manufacturing time is 8
gear is better as compared to normal gear. minute, reduction in Material
Requirements is 0.2 kg, reduction
CONCLUSIONS in material cost is Rs. 12 and
1) From results comparisons of overall cost reduction is Rs. 80. So
analytical method and genetic it is concluded that the genetic
algorithm tool it is found that the algorithm is effective tool to
reduction in face width is 2.6 mm, improve the gear design with high
reduction in no. of teeth on pinion accuracy.
is 1, reduction in volume is 67.09
II. K. Tamboli, S. Patel, P.M. George, VII. Faruk Mendi, et. al, “Optimization
et al., “Optimal design of a heavy of module, shaft diameter and
duty helical gear pair using particle rolling bearing for spur gear
swarm optimization technique” [J], through genetic algorithm.” [J],
Procedia Technology 14 (2014) Expert Systems with Applications
513 – 519 37 (2010) 8058–8064
VIII. Giorgio Bonori, et. al, “Optimum XIII. Genetic Algorithms and
profile modifications of spur gears Engineering Optimization. Mitsuo
by means of genetic algorithms.” Gen and Runwei Cheng,John
[J], Journal of Sound and Vibration Wiley & Sons, 2000
313 (2008) 603–616
XIV. Gear Materials, Properties, And
IX. G. Meneghetti et. al, “A Twin Disc Manufacture by J.R. Davis, Davis
Test Rig For Contact Fatigue & Associates, ASM International,
Characterization Of Gear United States of America, 2005
Materials.” [J], Procedia Structural
Integrity 2 (2016) 3185–3193 XV. Handbook of Gear Design by Gitin
M. Maitra, Tata McGraw-Hill
X. V. Moorthy et. al, “Contact fatigue Education, 1994
performance of helical gears with
surface coatings.” [J], Wear 276– XVI. Design Data Book, Faculty of
277 (2012) 130– 140 Mechanical Engineering, PSG
College of Technology,
XI. Yumei Hu et. al,“Transient Coimbatore 641004, Tamilnadu,
meshing performance of gears with India.
different modification coefficients
and helical angles using explicit
dynamic FEA.” [J], Mechanical
Systems and Signal Processing 25
(2011) 1786-1802