Você está na página 1de 34

CONTENTS

Sl Description Page No
Checklist for Submission of DPR i-vii
1. Introduction
i. Report 1-2
ii. Location of the project 2
iii. Need for the intervention 2-3
iv. History of the Original/ improvement if any 3-4
v. Salient features of the project 4-5
vi. Hierarchy of ownership of the project 6
vii. Administrative Approval of Govt 6
2. Hydrology/ Design
i. Description of the basin 7-9
ii. Yield calculations with 75% dependency 10
iii. Cropping pattern (Existing/proposed) 10-11
iv. Calculation of Crop water requirement 12-13
v. Mass curve for Fixation of Storage capacity or Stage 13
vi. Water balance study for % utilisation 13-14
vii. Recharge of Ground water extracted for irrigation 14-15
viii. Design flood calculation 15
ix. Geophysical investigation for Head works 15
3. Project Features
i. Brief description of important components of project 16
ii. Extent of Command area (Villages/GP/ Block) 16
iii. Details of Canal system, Canal Structures (Length/ Nos) 16-17
iv. Control mechanism/ Special instruments if any 17
v. Status of CAD planning/ Work if any 17
vi. Additional arrangements for tail-end irrigation (if any) 17
vii. Conjunctive Water Use Planning 17-18
4. Cost Estimate of Improvement
i. General Abstract Cost 23
ii. Quantity Statement 24-25
iii. Seigniorage Statement 26
iv. Abstract of estimates 27-33b
v. Analysis of Rates 34-41
vi. Year wise expenditure for improvement 42

Sl Description Page No
5. Benefits
i. Calculation of Benefit-Cost Ratio & IRR 18-19
ii. Village wise area to be irrigated 19
iii. Population to be benefitted with % of SC/ST/farmers. 20
iv. Brief description of Demographic Details 20
v. Livestock intervention 20
6. Post-Operation and Maintenance
i. Detail of WUA/Panipanchayat (if any) 21
ii. Arrangement for operation & maintenance 21
7. Implementation Schedule
i. Phasing of work (Physical & Financial); 22

LIST OF CHARTS
CHART
DESCRIPTION Page No.
No.
1.1 Salient Features 4
2.1 Rainfall 8
2.2 Temperature 8
2.3 Humidity 8
2.4 Wind Speed 9
2.5 Sunshine-Radiation-ETo 9
3.1 Schedule of Command Area 16
5.1 Village-wise area to be irrigated 19
7.1 Phasing of works 22
10.1 Periodical Reservoir Water Levels Annexure-10
10.2 Irrigation Demand & Supply Annexure-10
12.1 Ground Water Table Trend Annexure-12
12.2 Reference solar pump type & ratings Annexure-12
i

ANNEXURES for the DPR

Sl Description of Annexure Annexure

1. Index & Quarry Map 1

2. Schematic Diagram of Project 2

3. Catchment Map & Classification 3

4. Command Area Map & command classification 4

5. Rainfall Information 5

6. Climatic Data & Yield Computations 6

7. Crop-Water requirement 7

8. Mass curve of Storage capacity or Stage 8

9. Benefit-Cost Ratio/ IRR 9

10. Hydrologic assessment 10

11. CAD Planning 11

12. Conjunctive Use planning Map 12

13. Drawings of Important Structures 13

Dam section Showing packing 13A

Head Regulator 13B-Page-1

Head Regulator-Pitching 13B-Page-2

Earthwork in Tank Bund


14. 14
(Reservoir contour, L.S, C.S, Calculation Sheet)

15. Photographs 15
i

Checklist - Detailed Project Report

Part-I : Project Identification


1. Name of the Project Dhemalibandha MIP

District: Ganjam

Block: Beguniapada

GP/ Village: Biribatia

2. OIIPCRA Project Identification No. 1129023 (MI Booklet 2015)

Odisha Integrated Irrigation Project for


3. Proposed Funding Scheme
Climate Resilient Agriculture (OIIPCRA)

4. Estimated Cost of Improvement INR 192.72 Lakh

5. Estimated Cost of CADA if any INR 154.79 Lakh

6. Project Duration (days/months/years) 12 Calendar Months

7. Location of the River Basin Rusikulya


project
District Ganjam

Block Beguniapada

GP/ Village Biribatia G.P. – Tirida village

Lat: 19°37’15.15”N
Lat/ Long (DMS) Long: 85° 0’46.20”E

8. Previous phases, if any and Year --

9. Type of Project (Reservoir/ Diversion) Reservoir

10. Name of Command villages (block


Beguniapada Block: Tirida village
wise)
ii

Part-II: Feasibility & Project Design

11. Detail Feasibility Studies done, The project is selected for rehabilitation basing on
if any the studies as follows:
Rainfall information : The average rainfall in the catchment of this project
during last 26 years is 1262.08mm & Daily
dependable rainfall is 1152.30 mm with monsoon
rainfall @ 1067.56mm with estimated 75%
dependable monsoon rainfall as 794.00mm. The
daily rainfall data is at annexure-5.
Catchment Information : The catchment area comprises 4.14 sqkm covers
41.79% (1.73 Sqkm) of Cultivated Bunded(good)
along with and 31.88% (1.32Sqkm) Cultivated
(paddy), 8.94% (0.37Sqkm) Forest (dense), 8.94%
(0.37Sqkm) Forest (scrub), 8.45% (0.35Sqkm) Waste
land area of total land. The soil in catchment area
and in the command is identified as “Black Soil”
(Medium runoff potential & Low runoff potential,
coming under SCS curve category “B” & “C” type,
respectively.
Hydrological Information :

i. Basin details The project is coming under the Rusikulya river


basin and the East & South Eastern Coastal
Plateau (SEAP) Agro-Climatic zone.
ii. Yield calculations with The 75% dependable yield from the catchment
75% dependency: during monsoon is estimated to be 1.586MCM.
iii. Cropping pattern: There is High & medium land of 92Ha and low
land of 102Ha in the total command area.
The command area is cultivated mostly with paddy
of high yield & medium variety during khariff.
iv. Calculation of Crop water The irrigation water requirement comes to
requirement: 218.78mm for khariff paddy with the observed
rainfall distribution.
iii

v. Water balance study for The monsoon rainfall distribution is about


% utilisation: 631.20mm, which is about 79.49%of its
dependable distribution. The water balance study
shows that the water utilisation during khariff for
the designed command of 194Ha of paddy and
during Rabi for 109Ha (9Ha of Groundnut & 100Ha
of Pulses) is about 0.499MCM, which is about
31.46% of the dependable yield of 1.586MCM.
vi. Mass curve for Fixation of The area-capacity curve shows that, the live-storage
Storage capacity or Stage: capacity of the reservoir is 6.40Ha.m which is about
12.82% of the irrigation Water requirement and
water spread area at FRL is 2.87Ha.
vii. Geophysical investigation Not undertaken as no such work is encountered in
for Head works: this project.
viii. Climate Information : The climate data relating to meteorological station
at Gopalpur is considered effective for the project
area. The detail climate data is at Annexure-6.
ix. Social/ Economic The command area comprises of about 15.06%
Information : SC/ST, about 84.94% other backward caste &
about 20% General population as per District
Census Handbook Ganjam (2011).
iv

12. Executing agency & Hierarchy

Irrigation Section Level: Minor Irrigation Section- Beguniapada

Sub-Division Level: Minor Irrigation Sub-Division, Khalikote

Executive Level: Minor Irrigation Division, Ganjam-II, Berhampur

Superintending Level: Southern Minor Irrigation Circle, Berhampur

Chief Engineer Level: Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation, Odisha

13. Basic design of the project

i. Goals and Objectives The development objective is envisioned to


i. Improve the water resource planning,
ii. Tank irrigation efficiency increased 156.18%.
iii. Selected agri-business supply chain (of 2-3 high
value crops). Paddy and Groundnut produced in
the ayacut are marketed locally
iv. Enhanced capacity of water and farm institutions
(Existing Nos./ Name etc)
ii. Activities involved 1. Improving irrigated agriculture efficiency at farm
(Structural Rehabilitation of level through a detailed CAD network
Civil works) considering that, a sub-command of 1.0 Ha is
independently irrigated.
2. In-flow hydrology management: It is proposed
to adopt efficient & smaller sections of
watercourses & field channels of optimal
capacity under CAD network for improving water
productivity.
3. Innovation and Technology Transfer :
It is proposed to use ground water in
conjunction with surface water for irrigation to
create a cycle of ground water recharge & drawl
to reduce the rising of soil salinity. It is further
proposed to use Solar Power for ground water
pumping & distribution for irrigation.
v

iii. Outputs of the project Key Project Outputs include:


a) Improvement in minor irrigation facilities through
effective surface and groundwater management
is proposed for a systemic conjunctive water use
plan to recover the lost ayacut of 92Ha in the
tail-end of the command.
b) Comprehensive command area stabilization of its
designed ayacut and extension of Rabi ayacut for
109 Ha raising the intensity up to 156.18%.
c) Comprehensive treatment of MIPs leading to
savings reservoir water wasted through leakage
in HR structures in the canals.
d) Smart irrigation for increased water use efficiency
is expected to saving percolated water down at
the outlet points by the proposed provision of
detailed CAD network of 1 Ha sub-commands.
iv. Outcome of the project 1. Command area stabilization of 194Ha.
(BC Ratio/ IRR) 2. Water use efficiency enhancement in 109Ha
command area
3. The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) out of the
investment on project computed to be 16.71%.
4. The cost per Hectare of renovation computed to
Rs.99,343/-
14. Target population/ groups Farmers, fisher folk and landless in the command
villages expected to benefit around 402 households
as direct beneficiaries (at least 2058 rural
inhabitants). Detail study taken from District
Census Handbook Ganjam (2011).
15. Detailed Action Plan (Year The details of the proposed physical and financial
wise) progress
Year CCA to be restored Financial (INR)
i. 2019-20 194.0Ha 192.72 Lakh
vi

16. Environment sustainability of The infrastructure investment activities supported are


the project within the project that is entirely within the state and
utilise own water resources and
- the project parameters are kept unchanged as
designed excepting for safety concerns and
- the interventions proposed is not affecting the
riparian rights of the downstream or
- no such works proposed which are affecting
the surrounding ecosystem and
- The project after restoration will only utilise
the water for the designed command and no
additional command area is considered for
extension.
17. Finance Plus Element

I. Systemic of Transformational Actions proposed for increasing the intensity of


Impact if any irrigation up to 156.18% along with interventions to

stabilize the designed ayacut. However, nothing is

proposed or envisaged towards enhancement or

extension of the Command area.

To reduce the long-term effects of rising

salinity in the soil, ground water will be extracted

within the command and used for irrigation as a

supplemental during scarce periods of crop-water

demand and during Rabi irrigation to some extent. It

is also intended to encourage extract & use of

ground water in-place of reservoir storage during

Khariff to facilitate & enhance the recharge of

ground water storage from the reservoir water

storage.
vii

II. Innovation and Piloting of new To reduce the losses due to leaching/ percolation
Approaches if any into the soil, it is proposed to introduce a denser
network of CAD considering direct supply of
irrigation to 1.0 Ha sub-command and the water
saved will be used for extension of the crop area
during Rabi irrigation.
III. Innovation in financing and Convergence of funds and existing technological
Leveraging if any assets/ information systems from other state
departments is on the way to assist for
implementation of the activities in this project.
However, no expenditure towards this convergence is
proposed for in this project.

Executive Engineer

Superintending Engineer
1

1. Introduction
i. Report
Government of Odisha have decided to implement the World Bank
supported Odisha Integrated Irrigation Project for Climate Resilient
Agriculture (OIIPCRA) through the Department of Water Resources (DoWR).
The cost outlay of the project would be Rs. 1,560 Cr (US$ 230.62 Million) out of
which Rs. 1,040 Cr (US$ 161.44 Million) is funded through World Bank
assistance at 70:30 (Centre: State) cost sharing. The period of the project is 6
Years from 2017 to 2022. The project duration after signing of legal agreement
will be 5 Years.
The project will be implemented through the “Odisha Community Tank
Development & Management Society (OCTDMS), a Special Purpose Vehicle
(SPV) created under the Department of Water Resources (DoWR), Government
of Odisha.
The OIIPCRA will be a unique project, which aims at converging the
activities of three departments of the Government i.e. Department of Water
Resources (DoWR), Agriculture and Farmers’ Empowerment (A&FE) and
Fisheries and Animal Resources Development (FARD) Departments for
augmenting the capacity and income of the farmers in the project area through
climate resilient agricultural practices.
A part of the above funds is proposed to be spent for the rehabilitation of
this “Dhemalibandha Minor Irrigation Project” through OIIPCRA as a scheme.
The estimated cost of the rehabilitation comes to Rs. 192.72 Lakh. The
following works are proposed in this report for the rehabilitation of this project:

1. Re-sectioning of Tank Bund


The dam section has been damaged due to rain and other day to day
activity of the villagers. Due to inadequacy of fund the maintenance work
could not be done. Hence it requires Re-sectioning.
2. Reconstruction of Head Regulator:-
Major damage has occurred in the structure & economical repair is not
possible. Hence it is suggested to go for the re-construction of HR .
2

3. CAD Work:-
Construction of extensive CAD work in the command area up to one-
hector Farm land.
ii. Location of the project
The Dhemalibandha Minor Irrigation Project is situated across a local nala/
valley in Tirida village under Biribatia GP in Beguniapada block of Ganjam
District. The catchment area and the command area of the project are situated
within Rusikulya River basin. The project is geographically located at Latitude
19°37’15.15”North & Longitude 85° 0’46.20”East.
iii. Need for the intervention
a) Stabilisation of designed ayacut
The area receives a good amount of average rain during monsoon to up
to 1067.56mm. The designed reservoir capacity is also observed to be
sufficient for the water demand of the crops of the command. The designed
ayacut of the project is 194Ha in Khariff. As found from the ayacutdars for
statistics of irrigation in the prevailing years, the project is able to provide
irrigation to only about 102 Ha in Khariff leaving a gap in ayacut for 92 Ha
during Khariff. The gap ayacut of 92 Ha in Khariff is dependent on rain with
meagre irrigation from the tank in the years of good rainfall or remains
uncultivated most of the times.
Out of the many deficiencies or disputes like social, managerial or
operational, reduction in the timely inflow to the reservoir, live capacity of the
tank along with the efficiency of the conveyance system/ practice of field
application of irrigation water in the upper reaches, the reservoir & supply
systems need renovation and up gradation for the present needs to restore
irrigation of its designed ayacut. In addition, there is need for a study of the
hydrologic water balance to extend irrigation for the crops during Rabi season.
b) Improvement of irrigation intensity
Improvement in irrigation intensity backed by arrangements for assured
irrigation will create enthusiasm in the water users for agriculture. As from the
discussion with the WUA, the project is continually failing to provide irrigation
3

to the designated ayacut and people have lost faith to depend on irrigation
from the project. As such, there is need for a study of practice of water use
and find out the deficiencies in it. The study will cover the water availability,
crop-water needs and dependability features according to local climatic
adverse and conclude with a finite result of the irrigation capacity of the
project to prepare a plan of action for raising the irrigation intensity.
c) Identification of shadow areas
There is need for a study of the shadow areas for the failed irrigation
capacity relating to administrative, social conflict, management problems,
infrastructure deficiencies and behavioural aspects etc. to suggest a better
rehabilitation strategy.
A participatory-walk-through has been conducted for this purpose on dt:
1st June ‘2018 with the local sub-divisional engineers and WUA members/
villagers. The village Tirida is near by the project that is dependent on this only
project for their social use. The village is depending on this project for their
daily social use and animals of the village having a population of about 1896 is
also depend on this project. Hence, they are facing shortage of water for
bathing purpose and for animals during dry season.
iv. History of the Original/ improvement if any
This project could not be maintained every year due to shortage
of fund as a result of which the tank bund cross section got reduced, weed
growth in reservoir increased, reservoir and its feeder channel got silted up, the
condition of Head Regulator, its gate & Surplus Escape became unserviceable
over a period of time. The irrigation canal also got silted up. There by the
irrigation efficiency gone down followed by reduction in irrigation capacity.
Because of this reason the economic condition of the farmers gone down. So
there is need of intervention through World Bank Funding. Apart from this
additional arrangements were made for micro irrigation arrangement to
provide Kharif supplementation each and every plot of command area and
Rabi irrigation for low duty crop.
It is reported by the field engineers that Dhemalibandha Minor Irrigation
Project was constructed before independence & transferred to Minor Irrigation
Department from Revenue Department (Beguniapada Block). As information
4

collected from the local villagers and site engineers that no special
improvement work was taken up since last 5 years. So special attention is
required to be paid for renovation of this project.
v. Salient features of the project
This is a Reservoir irrigation project which is a located in a valley. There is
no defined nala or stream in the catchment area of the project. The command
area of the project is spreading over the Beguniapada blocks in two villages
(Detail villages in Table-5.1).The schematic diagram of the project is depicted
in Annexure-2 and the detailed features are indicated in the Table-1.1.

Table-1.1 SALIENT FEATURES


1. Name of the Project : Dhemalibandha MIP
2. Location
a. District : Ganjam
b. Block/ Tahasil : Beguniapada
Lat: 19°37’15.15”N
c. Latitude/ Longitude :
Long:85°0’46.20”E
d. Topo sheet reference : E45B2
e. River/ Nallah : Local Valley
f. Basin/ Sub-basin : Rusikulya River
3. Hydrological Data
a. Catchment Area in Sq.km : 4.14
b. Rainfall data:
i. Location of nearest Gauge station : Beguniapada Block
Average Rainfall during monsoon in
ii. : 1067.56
mm
75% dependable rainfall during
iii. : 794.00
monsoon in mm
c. Run-off
i. Maximum flood discharge (Cumec) : 56.33
ii. Maximum Water Level(m) : 49.80
4. Head Works
a. Type (Reservoir/Diversion Weir) : Reservoir
5

b. i. Length of Dam embankment (m) : 615.0


ii. Maximum Dam Height of Reservoir(m) : 4.50
iii. DSL(m) : 46.80
iv. FRL(m) : 49.45
v. MWL(m) : 49.80
vi. TBL(m) : 51.30
vii. Water Spread Area at FRL(Ha) : 2.87
c. Surplus Escape (Res)
i. Type : Broad Crested
ii. Length of Surplus Escape(m) : 20.20
iii. Height of Body wall(m) : 0.60
iv. Gated/ Ungated : Un-gated
d. Head Regulator
i. No. of Head Regulators : 1 No.
ii. Canal Sill Level (m) : 47.00
Design discharge at canal head
iii. : 0.259
(Cumec)
iv. Bed width of Canal at Head(m) 0.90
5. Distribution System

a. GCA in Ha. : 210

b. CCA in Ha. : 194.00


c. Ayacut in Khariff in Ha. : 194.00
d. Ayacut in Rabi in Ha. : 109.00
e. Class of Irrigation provided : 3
f. Length of Main Canal in m : 410
g. Maximum ayacut level in m : 46.0

h. Name of the Command villages Beguniapada Block: Tirida , Kalamul


:
Mardarajpur Village
6

vi. Hierarchy of ownership of the project


The Minor Irrigation department owns the project. The hierarchy of the project
authorities vested for operation & maintenance listed as under:

Sl Level Authority

1. Irrigation Section: Minor Irrigation Section, Beguniapada

2. Irrigation Sub-Division: Minor Irrigation Sub-Division, Khalikote

3. Irrigation Division : Minor Irrigation Division, Ganjam-II, Berhampur

4. Irrigation Circle : Southern Minor Irrigation Circle, Berhampur

5. Chief Engineer: Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation, Odisha

vii. Administrative Approval of Govt


The project is approved for inclusion under the Odisha Integrated
Irrigation Project for Climate Resilient Agriculture (OIIPCRA) by the Govt vides
File No. Tech-01/2018 on dated 3.2.2018 and cleared by the state TAC on
dated: ……………………………. in it’s ……….the meeting.
7

2. Hydrology/ Design
i. Description of the basin
a. Rainfall:
The run-off in the catchment of the project is influenced by the rainfall
of Beguniapada Block. The average rainfall of 26 years is about
1262.08mm/year with effective rainfall at 856.2 mm/year(Annexure-6).
However, the average monsoon rainfall during last 26 years is recorded to
be 1067.56mm, which is about 84.58%of the yearly rainfall. The 75%
dependable monsoon rain fall is estimated at 794.00mm which is almost
62.91% of the yearly average. The month-wise normal distribution of
rainfall in the area is graphically represented as under in Chart-2.1.Details
in Annexure-10.
It is observed from the last 26 years rainfall data that, the on-set of
monsoon is shifting for about 4.08 days early over the normal on-set
period. A trend of monsoon on-set is furnished graphically in the
Annexure-5/Page-31.
b. Climate information
The area of the project experiences with the mean minimum &
maximum temperature (Chart-2.2) of 22.6°C & 30.9°C respectively during
the months of March & July. The relative humidity (Chart-2.3) in the area
prevails at about from 68% during winter to up to 81 % during rainy
season. The average wind speed (Chart-2.4) observed to be 354 km/day
and the average sunshine hours in the area observed to be 5.90 hours/day.
The average radiation of sun is about 16.6 MJ/sqm/day and the average
ETo observed is 3.74mm/day (Chart-2.5).Details in Annexure-6.
c. Land use & Soil type in the Catchment-Command area
The gross Catchment area of the project covers about 41.79% (1.73
Sqkm) of Cultivated Bunded(good) along with and 31.88% (1.32Sqkm)
Cultivated (paddy), 8.94% (0.37Sqkm) Forest (dense), 8.94% (0.37Sqkm)
Forest (scrub), 8.45% (0.35Sqkm) Waste land.The land use/ land cover of the
catchment area is enclosed in Annexure-3.
The soil type in the Catchment area consists of “Black Clay Soil” and
grouped under “Medium Infiltration (B)” & “Slow Infiltration (C)” type
8

2.1 Rain Fall Chart


350
300

Rainfall in mm
250
200
150
100
50
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Rain mm Eff rain mm

40
2.2 Temperature Graph
Temperature in °C

30

20

10

0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Min Temp °C Max Temp °C

2.3 Humidity Graph


90
85
Humidity in %

80
75
70
65
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Humidity %
9

2.4 Wind Km/Day


700
600
500
Wind Speed

400
300
200
100
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Wind km/day

2.5 Sun-Radiation-ETo Chart


25

20

15

10

0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Sun hours Rad MJ/m²/day ETo mm/day


10

ii. Yield calculations with 75% dependency


As there is no gauge data available for the project site, rainfall records
from IMD data for Gopalpur station and Beguniapada block have been
considered for approximation of the yield. The yield of run-off has been
worked out adopting the AMC condition as per the USDA, SCS curve
number method modified for Indian conditions. The detail daily and 5-day
antecedent rainfall, the 75% dependable rainfall, Soil type, Land Cover &
Land Use in the catchment is worked out as in Annexure-10.The 5-daily
run-off from the catchment have been computed considering the AMC
conditions for a 5-day antecedent rainfall amount, initial abstraction Ia for
wet & dry conditions of the soil for the maximum 5-day antecedent rainfall.
The effective rainfall is computed using following formulae:

Pm x (125-0.2 x Pm)/125 Pm<= 250 mm

125 + 0.1 x Pm Pm> 250 mm

The run-off is estimated using the following method for Indian conditions:
(𝑃−𝐼𝑎)2
𝑄= Where S= (25400/CN)-254
(𝑃−𝐼𝑎+𝑆)

The corresponding yields to the dependable rainfall and antecedent rainfall


& moisture condition have been taken into account for the yield
calculations.
The run-off from the catchment for the 75% dependable rainfall
computed to be 1.586MCM for the Khariff season and for the year. The
detail computation of run-off yield is in the Annexure-6/Page-2.
iii. Cropping pattern (Existing/proposed)
The normal cropping in the command area is Paddy in Khariff and
Groundnut /pulses during Rabi season. Out of the total command area,
about 100% of the land remains unused/ uncultivated during Rabi as there
is no assured irrigation available.
11

The Block-wise/ village-wise cropping practice and the possibilities of


crop-diversification as per the general cultural practices of the farming
societies in the locality in the total command area are tabulated as under.
The present water use for the crops has been discussed with the users
and it is seen that, the water use has not been documented but it is
estimated to be much more than the requirement. Due to this over use of
water without any estimate of field requirement and non-functioning of
some canal structures, the irrigated command is reduced at present and
some of the command area is being deprived of the required amount of
irrigation.
No area being cultivated during Rabi and proposal has been made to
raise the area up to 56.18% of the total command area.

Present Cropping Pattern

Total Non- Unused


Block Village Paddy
Command Paddy Land
Khariff Season
Beguniapada Tirida, 194 102 0 92
Kalamul
Mardarajpur
Rabi Season
Beguniapada Tirida, 194 0 0 194
Kalamul
Mardarajpur

The possibilities of crop-diversification have been discussed with the


users and the possible alternatives are worked out as under:

Possible Cropping Pattern Proposed

Total Non- Unused


Block Village Paddy
Command Paddy Land
Khariff Season
Beguniapada Tirida, 194 194 0 0
Kalamul
Mardarajpur
12

Rabi Season
Beguniapada Tirida, 194 0 109 85
Kalamul
Mardarajpur
iv. Calculation of Crop water requirement
The crop-water requirements have been computed considering the
climate data of the metrological station at Gopalpur. The requirement of
irrigation supplement is computed basing on the cropping pattern proposed
in the above tables. The crop-water requirement for medium paddy,
groundnut and pulses is considered at 22.35 inches, 20.00 inches & 10.00
inches respectively. The dependable rainfall is then deducted to get the
irrigation supplementation for the crop.
It is proposed to use ground water in irrigation in conjunction with
reservoir water. To achieve the total ayacut under irrigation, a reservoir-
working table involving conjunctive use of ground water is developed. In
this system, the head regulator is operated to maintain the reservoir water
level at FRL and at the periods of shortage of supply from reservoir while
maintaining the reservoir at FRL, ground water is supplemented for
irrigation. This process is adopted to have full reservoir at the end of Khariff.
The total reservoir water available at the end of Khariff would be provided
for Rabi irrigation in extending the ayacut of Rabi irrigation area, which was
previously no Rabi irrigation.
It is estimated that, the supplementation through irrigation comes to be
218.78mm for paddy after compensating for the effective rain of 562.90
mm. A water balance study for irrigation with conjunctive use of ground
water is prepared which, shows for the paddy crop of 194Ha during Khariff,
the irrigation water requirement computed to 0.467MCM and for the light
duty crop of 109 Ha proposed during Rabi, the irrigation water requirement
computed to 0.225MCM.
The detail computation of Crop-water requirement is enclosed at
Annexure-7. The irrigation water requirement and water balance through
conjunctive use is proposed as under.
13

Irrigation Water Balance

Irrigation Quantum
Name of Total Balance/
Water of Water
Sl Crop & Command Deficit of Water Source
Demand available
Type Area (Ha) Irrigation
(Ha.m) (Ha.m)

Khariff Crop
Med
1 194.00 46.69 46.69 0.00 Reservoir
Paddy

Total 194.00 46.69 41.03 0.00 Reservoir


Rabi Crop
1 Groundnut 9.00 4.47 3.19 1.28 Ground Water
2 Pulses 109.00 17.98 - 17.98 Ground Water
Total 109.00 22.45 3.19 19.27 Ground Water

v. Mass curve for Fixation of Storage capacity or Stage


The mass curve of the reservoir shows the maximum live capacity of the
reservoir to be 6.40Ha.m. The water available for irrigation from the
reservoir through reservoir routing (working table) is annexed. There is
spilling of water from reservoir for 1.057 MCM. The maximum spill of flow
is seen during the month of September for 0.136 MCM. (Details at
Annexure-10)
vi. Water balance study for % utilisation
The objective of water use in the project envisaged to reduce the use
of surface water (reservoir stock) during khariff and the saved water in the
reservoir to be utilized for Rabi crops. The water that is being lost as surplus
due to insufficient capacity of the reservoir is proposed to be routed to
irrigation during Khariff season keeping the reservoir at FRL all times. Crops
are chosen basing on the average rate of discharge of water over the
surplus. The deficit in any period would have been met by providing Ground
water in conjunction with surplus water from reservoir. The water stored at
14

the end of Khariff in the reservoir shall be used for Rabi irrigation. This
would increase the intensity of irrigation during Rabi.
A water balance study for irrigation with conjunctive use of ground
water is prepared to save as much as of the reservoir water and use
groundwater. The analysis of this reservoir operation through conjunctive
use of water is shown as under:
The crop-water analysis for utilisation of water shows that, the water
available from the catchment at the point of collection during Khariff season
to be 1.586 MCM and the irrigation demand depending on the 75%
dependable rainfall for 194Ha in Khariff (194 Ha of Paddy) and 109 Ha in
Rabi (9 Ha of Groundnut & 100Ha of Pulses) comes to 0.499MCM. The
evaporation loss computed to 0.031 MCM. The reservoir-working table
shows it could provide water during the irrigation demand for only
0.225MCM, which necessitates that, an amount of 0.193MCM to be
extracted from ground water to meet the periods of shortage in water
requirement.
vii. Recharge of ground water extracted for irrigation
The ground water potential and trend from the years 1998 to 2018 in
different periods of a year viz at Pre-Monsoon, Mid of Monsoon, and Post-
Monsoon and during winter is shown in the Chart-12.1. It depicts that, the
trend of ground water table is rising to the ground level from 5.23 m to as
low as 4.04 m during Winter periods. The ground water table is away from
ground level during pre-monsoon period. The ground water table are No
Change from ground level during Mid-monsoon & Post-monsoon period.
The average ground water table is at 2.22m during monsoon and 4.04m
during non-monsoon periods. The annual ground water potential available
in Beguniapada block is known to be 0.217MCM (Source: State Ground
Water Board, Odisha).

As the ground water potential and levels of its availability inferred to be


utilised for irrigation during the shortage of irrigation water from the
reservoir and raise the irrigation potential of the project during Rabi season.
15

However, in this regard, question was also raised to verify the need for
recharge conditions of ground water to be extracted for use in irrigation.
The above aspect was tested for whether there is a need for recharging the
ground water to maintain the ground water table at a reasonable level
when it is extracted for use in irrigation. A computation of recharge to
ground water by the project components is furnished in Annexure-12/
Page-2. This result shows that an amount of 0.217MCM/Annum of water is
being recharged annually through the existing project components. The
water being proposed to be extracted & utilised for irrigation comes to
0.193MCM, which is 88.59% of the quantity of recharge by the project.
viii. Design Flood Calculation

ACZ 4 50 years return period (catchment >25Sqkm)


A = Catchment in SqKM = 4.14
L = Length of Surplus Escape = 20.20
Design Flood Discharge in
Q p = Cumec = 64.99
H = Depth of Flow over Crest = 1.47
C = Constant = 1.80
For All ACZ (Agriclimatic Zone)
25 years return period (catchment <25Sqkm)
Log Q25=0.6881*logA+0.4574
C = Constant = 1.80
A = Catchment in SqKM = 4.14
L = Length of Surplus Escape = 20.20
Design Flood Discharge in
Q p = Cumec = 7.62
H = Depth of Flow over Crest = 0.35
Say 0.35 m
FRL LEVEL = 49.456 m
Depth of Flow = 0.350 m
MWL = 49.806 m
Add Free Board 1.50m = 1.500 m
TBL = 51.306 m

ix. Geophysical investigation for Head works


No geo-physical study has been taken up or proposed, as only the
repairs and restoration to the existing structures will be taken up without
introduction of any new structure or changes in the parameters of the dam
or its command area.
16

3. Project Features
i. Brief description of important components of project
This is a Reservoir scheme of Minor Irrigation project. The project consists
of an un-gated surplus weir with a length of over-flow section of 20.20 m and
body wall height of 0.60 m. The water spread area of the reservoir at FRL
computed to be 2.87Ha. There is one main canal from the head regulator.
ii. Extent of Command area (Villages/GP/ Block)
The command area covering the villages, GPs & blocks are as indicated in
the table below:

Table 3.1 : Schedule of Command Area

Command
Name of Name of Name of
Name of Villages Area in
District Block GP
Ha

Ganjam Beguniapada Biribatia Tirida,


194
Kalamul Mardarajpur
Total: 194

iii. Details of Canal system, Canal Structures (Length/ Nos)


The record available on the design of the canal shows that, duty for the
design of the canal has been considered at 900 Ha per cumec. The canal is
constructed as earthen channel with design parameters fixed as per Pillai chart.
The existing canal is running on contours/ridge line with structures constructed
out of stone masonry.

It is found that, CC lining for 235 m already exist from the head where as
remaining 175 m is unlined out of a total canal length of 410 m of main canal.
There is only one outlet structure in this canal. However a list of structures and
their status is tabulated as under:

Schedule of Structures in Distribution system

Name of Canal/ Canal No. of


No. of CDs Remarks
Disty Length in m Out-lets

Main Canal 410 Nil 1


17

List of Damaged Structures in Distribution system (as on 01.6.2018)

Name of Canal/ Canal No. of


No. of CDs Remarks
Disty Length in m Out-lets
Main Canal 410 Nil 0

iv. Control mechanism/ Special instruments if any


There is no control system or special instruments fixed in the project.
However, pre-moulded flow-measuring CTF one may be installed in the main
canal at the head reach.
v. Status of CAD planning/ Work if any
No CAD work is developed previously in the command area. It is proposed
to develop CAD network for the total command area of the project to about
1.0 Ha of sub-command and accordingly estimates have been prepared. The
detail CAD development map for the command area is attached at Annexure-
11.
vi. Additional arrangements for tail-end irrigation (if any)
Area under Rabi crops are not developed in the command due to
insufficient irrigation supply to the tail end due to many reasons. The farmers
in the head reach are using the lean base flow, which is being available and
arranged some alternate sources of water for their minor rabi crops.
It is proposed to develop the Rabi command for about 109 Ha partly
supplemented through conjunctive use of ground water. Accordingly, a
proposal to install ground water pumping stations and increase conjunctive use
for irrigation in the tail end command is envisaged. The detail proposal for
ground water pumping station and connectivity & distribution layout in the
project command for irrigation is attached at Annexure-12.
vii. Conjunctive Water Use Planning
It is observed that, the highest possible area of irrigation supply through
the reservoir is 194.00 Ha in Khariff and 109 Ha during Rabi with quantity of
spilling from reservoir @1.057MCM annually.
It is proposed to use the ground water and restrict the use of reservoir
water during Khariff. The reservoir is to be maintained at FRL at all times by
18

restricting the irrigation supply from the reservoir and supplement with ground
water for the periods of shortfall in irrigation. It is observed that, the full
reservoir water remained at the end of khariff along with conjunctive use of
ground water can be managed for 109 Ha of Rabi irrigation in the project. The
reservoir-working table for this operation is attached at page-10 in the
Annexure-10. It is estimated that, about 19.27Ha.m of ground water needs to
be supplemented for the Rabi crop @ 1.49Ha.m of 5-day maximum drawl.
Proposals to install ground water pumping stations with detail connectivity
& distribution layout in the project command for irrigation is attached at
Annexure-12.
The maximum drawal of ground water during this period comes to
2981.20Cum/ day which require installation of 35 Nos. of 03 HP solar pumps
for 20m suction head having discharge rate of 99.00 cum/ day.
4. Cost Estimate of Improvement
i. Provisioning of costs
The estimates have been prepared basing on the Odisha Schedule of Rates
2018 and Analysis of Rates 2006 of the Works Department of Odisha. The
general lead of the Construction materials has been proposed as per the
departmental approved quarry map.

The estimated cost of the rehabilitation of civil works comes to Rs. 192.72
lakhs. The supporting estimates and analysis of the cost is presented in the
annexure in the section “Cost Estimates”.
5. Benefits
i. Calculation of Benefit-Cost Ratio and IRR
The benefits of specific civil work intervention is indirectly been computed
considering the irrigation potential that has been extended over the prevailing
status. A micro level analysis of the optimum irrigation potential for a
diversification in the cropping and irrigation management is furnished at
Annexure-10. It is observed that, after improvement of the project, it will
provide irrigation to its designed ayacut for 194 Ha during Khariff and 109 ha
19

during Rabi as against no designed ayacut during Rabi. The reservoir


management and conjunctive use of ground water for the spells of water
shortage from the reservoir is creating the additional irrigation potential.

The crop-diversion along with the use of available water in conjunction of


ground water is estimated to provide irrigation potential of 303 Ha (194 ha
Khariff + 109 Ha Rabi) with 156.18% rise in the irrigation intensity over
designed ayacut.

The detail computations of Benefit-Cost ratio and Internal Rate of Return


(IRR) for the proposed investment on the rehabilitation of civil works come to
1.50 and 16.71% respectively and are enclosed at Annexure-9.
ii. Village –wise area to be irrigated
According to the analysis of the data collected from the project
authorities, the designed command area of 194Ha comes under Tirida village/
settlements. The project after improvement would provide irrigation to 194Ha
in this village during Khariff and 109Ha during Rabi. The village-wise area to
be irrigated is furnished in the Table 5.1.
Table 5.1 Village-wise area to be irrigated
Sl No. Name of village Area in ha
1 Tirida
2 Kalamul 194
Mardarajpur
Total: 194.0

iii. Population to be benefitted with % of SC/ST/Farmers


The total population covering the two villages/settlements under the
command area to about 2058 will be benefitted directly. The command area
comprises of about 14.82% of SC, 0.24% of ST population and about 84.94%
other backward caste & general in the villages of Tirida & Kalamul Mardarajpur
in the command area of Dhemalibandha MIP as per District Census
Handbook ,Gajam (2011).
20

iv. Brief description of Demographic details

The command area having two villages Tirida & Kalamul Mardarajpur. On the
basis of the families the average farm size has been adopted for the purpose of
the economic calculation in the report. The total population of the above said
village in the command is 2058 out of which 1028 are male and 1030 are female.
The schedule caste and schedule tribe population constitution of 14.82% (305
nos.) and 0.24% (5 nos.) of total population respectively. The Command area
population have 211 nos. cultivators (198 Male, 13 female cultivators) and 521
nos. agricultural labourers (221male, 300 female) as per District Census
Handbook Ganjam (2011).

DISTRICT CENSUS HANDBOOK GANJAM (2011)


Population Status
Economic Practice of No. of
Workers
Population Persons
Cultivators 202
Agricultural Labours 209
Main:-
Household Workers 43
Others 102
Cultivators 9
Agricultural Labours 312
Marginal:-
Household Workers 2
Others 117
Non Workers:- 1062
Total No. of Persons:- 2058
Total No of Households 402
v. Livestock Interventions
Through the discussion with the farmers and other households of the
project area people identified that the households are interested for poultry,
goatary, duckery and mushroom cultivation. People of the project area having
similar interest can be grouped for one income generating intervention and for
some income generating activities the support can be provided from the
project and for other income generating activities linkage with line
departments can be ensured, so that the objectives of the livelihood
enhancement component of the project can be realised.
21

6. Post Operation Maintenance


i. Detail of WUA/ Panipanchayat
Panipanchayat for the project was formed long back during the year from
2007 to 2009 as per PP Rules 2003 for operation & maintenance of the
distribution system.
Pani Panchayat is not formed. Member list has not been prepared, no
initiative has been taken by any agency in this aspect and there is conflict in
the eligibility of membership. Farmers have no clear knowledge about the
procedure of the formation of Pani Panchayat
There are no registered office buildings of the Panipanchayat, which are
found to be officiating at their own convenience in local recreation clubs or
personal houses of the Presidents or Secretary of the Panipanchayat.
ii. Arrangement for Operation & maintenance
At present, the department is undertaking operation and maintenance
activities of the project with the help of the WUA members. It is observed that
the Panipanchayat needs to be re-activate to takeover the project for operation
and maintenance.
22

7. Implementation Schedule
i. PHASING OF WORK (PHISICAL & FINANCIAL)

Physical & Financial Progress


Expenditure In Rs CCA in Ha

0.00
2020-21
0

192.72
2019-20
194

Você também pode gostar