BP America- Driving Safety

Mike W. Thompson, CSP

Where BP Operates

oil
gas
chemicals
refining
market
positions
Objectives for Today’s Session

• Background/Context
• Brief Overview of BP Group Functional Standard for
Personal Safety-Driving
• Discuss BP E&P Segment Immersions Process
• BP Onshore US BU Activities and Tools
• Sustaining the Progress
• Q&A
Driving Fatality Statistics

• Driving and vehicle related fatalities are the number

one cause of fatalities in BP Group (82% in 2003).
• In E&P, 31 fatalities (9 within the OUSBU) over the
past two years, including 3 children.
• In 2004, we have had 2 contractors and 2 members
of the public die in driving and vehicle-related
incidents – 3 in the US, 1 in Algeria.
Driving Safety- Why the Urgency?
• We drive 56,863,834 miles per year (116 round trips to the moon!)
• 73 Vehicle Incidents in 2003
• 3 of 22 HIPOS in 2003 were vehicle related
• 5 of 63 SORs in 2003 were vehicle related
• Our driving performance places us in the bottom one-third of E&P
business units.
 Severe Vehicle Incidents – 2004 thru YTD May 2005

30 Severe Vehicle Incidents 04’-05’ (20/30 in Operations; 28/30 Contractors)

Operations / Wells
NA Gas SPU STVAR/SVAR 04-YTD May 05

25 2.50

• 67% of severe vehicle incidents occurred in Operations

2004 TVAR = 1.21
• 13% of 2004 HiPo’s are driving related (4 Incidents) 2.09
2005 TVAR = 0.98
20 2.00
• One 3rd Party Vehicle Fatality in OUSBU / Two in Shelf
1.75

Assets 15
1.49
1.44
1.50
1.34
1.25 1.25
• Two TUs (Arkoma and Canada) had 39% of the severe 1.22 1.22 1.20
1.23 1.26 1.22 1.21 1.19

vehicle incidents. 1.13

10 0.981.00
• Hugoton had 3 HIPOs involving vehicle incidents
• Two assets did not have any severe vehicle
incidents: Permian and South Louisiana 5
0.33
0.50
0.32
0.26

Companies Involved
0.22 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.21 0.19 0.20 0.20 0.20
0.00 0.10 0.10
0.07 0.10
0 0.00

• 21 companies (incl. BP) reported severe vehicle Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May

incidents Total SVAR Total Veh Veh TVAR Veh SVAR

• 76% of companies reported single incidents

•
Interventions
Companies reporting ≥2 incidents
• A & A Tank and Truck Co. (Arkoma) • Developing contract language for high risk &
100% use contractors
• Bob Dale (FTE) (Canada)
• 3rd Party Fatality Reviews - SET
• Flare Construction (Overthrust/Moxa)
• Implemented Driving Standard
• Hodges Trucking Company (Arkoma)
• Targeted Transportation Sector Commitment
• Triple S Trucking (San Juan North and South) Sessions
• U.S. Logistics - CVP
Objectives for Today’s Session

• Background/Context
• Brief Overview of BP Group Functional Standard
for Personal Safety-Driving
• Discuss BP E&P Segment Immersions Process
• BP Onshore US BU Activities and Tools
• Sustaining the Progress
• Q&A
The Golden Rule for Driving Safety

• All categories of vehicle, including self-propelled mobile

plant, must not be operated unless:

 vehicle is fit for purpose, inspected and confirmed to be in safe working order
 passenger number does not exceed manufacturer’s design specification for the vehicle
 loads are secure and do not exceed manufacturer’s design specifications or legal limits for the
vehicle
 seat belts are installed and worn by all occupants
 safety helmets are worn by riders and passengers of motorcycles, bicycles, quads, snow-
mobiles and similar types of vehicle

Drivers must not be authorised to operate the vehicle unless:

 they are trained, certified and medically fit to operate the class of vehicle
 they are not under the influence of alcohol or drugs, and are not suffering from fatigue
 they do not use hand-held cell phones and radios while driving (best practice is to switch off all
phones and two-way radios when driving)

OUSBU HSE Training

The Group Functional Standard – Driving
Objectives
The new Standard will:

rd h a s been Be the first of the BP

r iv in g Standa e number Group Functional HSSE
The D d to reduce th ng related
designequency of drivi s and Standards
and fre ts and fatalitie ance by
acciden safety performto which Help save lives, by
improveg both the risk osed and improving in areas that
reducin loyees are expto members
BP emp ntial for harm have contributed to driving
the poteublic. e ho lder related fatalities in BP in
of th e p s ha r
a ls o p rotect e the past
l
It wil y reducing th driving
value b uential cost of
conseq accidents. Focus on improving:
related
– Skill and competency of
the driver
– Safety of the journey

– Safety of vehicle
The BP Driving Standard- A
Standard with 10 Elements

BP Driving Standard
Vehicle Requirements

1. The vehicle is fit for purpose, well maintained with seatbelts

2. The number of passengers not exceed spec for the vehicle
3. Loads are secure

Driver Requirements
4. They are licensed, trained, and medically fit
5. They are appropriately rested and alert
6. They do not use a mobile phone while operating the vehicle
7. In high risk countries journey management plans in place

8. Seatbelts worn by all occupants

9. Not under the influence of alcohol or drugs
10. Safety helmets worn by rider and passengers of motorcycles
etc
Implementation Planning - Overall
Timeline
Function Accountabilities
• Agree scope
• Define standards
• Create business case
• Define measures
• Review by Legal and HR
• Obtain GCEM approval
• Edit and publish final Standard
• Communicate to Group Leadership
• Develop baseline and gap analysis
tool, including plan and costs
• Develop monitoring and online
training tool
• Develop mechanism for ‘exceptions’
• Contract template (legal)
• Regional Implementation Workshops
• Review implementation plans
• Develop good practice toolbox
• Identify vehicle and training suppliers
• Develop communications packs
• Develop DCT support tools
• Facilitate lessons learned forum
• Create leadership workshops and
toolbox
• Monitor implementation quarterly

Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3

Preparation and approval Base line and gap analysis Implementation and monitoring
May 2003 July 2003 Sept 2003 Jan 2004 30st April 2004 1st Jan 2005 31st Dec 2007

Standard Summit FCG Standard Baseline and gap analysis completed. Standard into force for All contractors in
first Meeting Endorsement
Approved Implementation plans submitted all BP employees and compliance
conceived
vehicles

• Assist development of • Use tool to identify capabilities and • Implement standard

Standard via RSLT
• Network impact widely
• Support implementation pilot
• Communicate pending
approval of Driving Standard
Segment Accountabilities
resources
• Baseline level of compliance and
conduct gap analysis
• Prioritise gaps and estimate costs
• Submit plan of implementation
• Run driver engagement workshops
• Report implementation progress
• Reflect intent of Standard in transport
contracts
• Share good practices
• Leadership engagement and support
(ride-alongs etc)
• Self-verification and monitoring
Engaging our Contractors

s a n d R e g ions shall
ction ct of
in e s s S e g ments, Fun e S ta n d a rd in respe
‘Bus of th
m m e n d th e adoption o m panies who
se
reco n-B P C
ss by all no of the workforce.
BP busine
lo y e e s a re members rd in respect of BP
em p
e n d in g th e Standa w h o s e e m ployees are
Recomm n -BP Comp
anies
. The decisio
n
s s to n o a n d a to ry
busine e workforce
is m
io n of a new
or
e rs o f th a c o n d it
memb k e this Stan
dard
be made in
e r to m a p a n y w il l
wheth Com
ti ng c o n tr act of a BP ri ate BP Functio
ns,
exis pp ro p
n with the a
consultatio
P Legal.
including B any, it
y a n o n -BP Comp
n d a rd is accepted b
tt e n a g re e ment which
If the S ta a wri g
b e in c o rp orated into le m e n ti ng , monitorin
should r imp h
th a t re s p onsibility fo S ta n d a rd will rest wit
states herence to
the
ompany, a
nd
u d it in g a d th e B P C
and a t with vant
o n -B P C o mpany, no ll in d e m n ify the rele
the n y sh a
th e n o n -B P Compan n s e q u e n c es of non-
that e co
C o m p a n y against th
BP
.
compliance dard
a g e 3 D r iving Stan
P
Objectives for Today’s Session

• Background/Context
• Brief Overview of BP Group Functional Standard for
Personal Safety-Driving
• Discuss BP E&P Segment Immersions Process
• BP Onshore US BU Activities and Tools
• Sustaining the Progress
• Q&A
E&P Driving Safety Immersion
Intent and Objectives
Tony Hayward, GVP expectations of leadership
– Make the program work
– Make the program relevant to the local circumstance
– Ensure everyone is included
– Build personal competency and capability
Driving Safety Immersion Intent : Improve the competency and
capability of workforce to operate vehicles safely
Learning Phase – April - July 2004
• Create awareness and knowledge of driving risks and vehicle incident causes
• Share learnings from incidents
Practice Phase – August - November 2004
• Improve knowledge of safe driving by application of Onshore US BU Driving
Practice
• Verify safe driving expectations are clear with workforce (bp and contractor) and
resources available
Testing Phase – December 2004- February 2005
• Provide assurance of competency in safe driving practices and Group Driving
Standard through testing and audit
Driving Safety Immersion
What’s Expected
Driving Safety Tier 1 & 2 Leadership Field Operations/ Wells Driving Safety
Leadership Team
IMMERSION

Phase 1 •Attend Leadership Team Roll •Organize Roll Out Session for •Roll out to
Out Introduce CD or Video Field . (Use CDs or videos and Leadership Team
(Learning) •Cascade to Teams local examples PUL, AM, OCM, •Ongoing activities to
HSE)
All Employees include Immersion,
April/July •Ensure Expectations around VDRs, and Group
•Roll out session of Field (PUL,
driving are clear through use of Standard
AM, Wells Supv,OCM)
Golden Rule •Establish workforce
•BU LT to review feedback on
•Ensure that learning message training plans for
Rollout
makes it’s way to all workforce approved driving
•Conduct Roll Out Sessions for courses (HSE +/-
Driving Safety Team)
key contractors
•Monitor completion
•Feedback VDR roll out plans to
of rollout plans (who,
Driving Safety Team
target date, completed
date)
•Analyze employee
feedback
Objectives for Today’s Session

• Background/Context
• Brief Overview of BP Group Functional Standard for
Personal Safety-Driving
• Discuss BP E&P Segment Immersions Process
• BP Onshore US BU Activities and Tools
• Sustaining the Progress
• Q&A
Driving Safety Team

Members:
• BU Champion: Bryant Chapman Team Lead: Bruce Policky

• Representatives:
OC’s: Dave Rothbauer, Gary Munson, Dave McKenna, Kurtis Peden
HSE: Duane Kortsha, Jerry Piper, Cheryl Metzler
Training & Development: Mike Thompson
Drilling/Wells: David Sims
Supply Chain Management: Fred Fitzhugh
Legal: Ken George
Gap Analysis Tool
• Intent
– To assess each element of the Driving Standard and provides
a comprehensive process for conducting a baseline gap
analysis and tracking the progress of implementation going
forward
• Scope
– The Tool captures the detailed gaps, actions and resources
which will inform the Implementation Plans - it is not, in itself,
an Implementation Plan
• Format
– Four Excel spreadsheets
– One PowerPoint user training pack
Gap Analysis Tool - Summary
Dashboard

• The summary spreadsheets present the data in a user-

friendly dashboard
BP Implementation Gap April May June July Aug Sept. Oct Nov Dec
Analysis-Action Plan
Element

1. Vehicle fit for Retrofit/replace vehicles for ABS&Airbags

purpose Assure manuf. specified vehicle maint schedules met and documented

2. No. of Passengers COMPLETE; Assure thru administrative follow-up

3. Loads Secure Assure loads, equipment and vehicle components are addressed

4. Driver Training ID BP Drivers

and document
Conduct trng. for Prof. Drivers (Ongoing 3 yr. Freq.)
Continue trng. for non-Prof. Drivers
Conduct and continue medical assessments
5. Fatigue/Tiredness Develop trng. mat’ls

Training ID Instructors Conduct trng. for Prof. Drivers

6. Mobile Telephones
COMPLETE; Assure thru administrative follow-up

7.Journey Mgm’t N/A- OUSBU not operating in a “High-Risk” Classified Country;

OUSBU Driving Safety “Practice” encourages Journey Management.

8. Seatbelts
COMPLETE; Assure thru administrative follow-up

9. Alcohol/Drugs
COMPLETE; Assure thru administrative follow-up

10. Helmets
COMPLETE; Assure thru administrative follow-up 6 April 2004
Driving Safety Practice Aligned with
Group Standard
Onshore US Driving Safety Practice- Attachments
Centralized Website for Driving
Safety Information
 What Is A VDR?

• A mechanical/electronic system which records and transmits to a portal

key driving performance information

• A black box of sorts for vehicles to record (with set thresholds):

 Location (via GPS)

 Speed/RPMs
 Harsh or rapid bumps, turns, acceleration and brakes
 Impact/crash data
 Seatbelt use
 Trip duration/mileage
 Three Options for Training
• Option One - Basic Defensive Driving Training - Professional
Drivers

• Option 2 - Basic Defensive Driving Training - Non-Professional

Drivers
• Option 3 - Advanced Defensive Driving Training
Fatigue Training for Drivers
Fatigue is the body’s response to continued
Physical or Mental Activity or Sleep Loss
Fatigue results from:
• Working for extended periods of time
• Not getting enough sleep
• Prolonged physical activity
• Irregular work schedules
• Poor physical and environmental
conditions
“Driving Safety Day” Survey Results
Driving Safety Immersion
Conducting an ASA

• Management can demonstrate their commitment to

this Immersion and to promoting Driving Safety
through the ASA process.
• An example of a Driving Safety ASA courtesy of San
Juan North OC is available.
(click on icon for sample ASA)
Microsoft Word
Document
Objectives for Today’s Session

• Background/Context
• Brief Overview of BP Group Functional Standard for
Personal Safety-Driving
• Discuss BP E&P Segment Immersions Process
• BP Onshore US BU Activities and Tools
• Sustaining the Progress
• Q&A
2005 Sustaining New Driving Safety Standard
Purpose and Objectives

 Recognise and reward

driving safety skills and
behaviours

 Motivate BP workforce
drivers to achieve the
highest levels of driving
safety performance

 Build awareness and

understanding of safe
driving techniques and
behaviours
Regional and Final Events

Western Hem HV
12-13 Nov 2004 Europe
2-5 June 2005

Western Hem LV Asia Pacific

16–17 June 2005 7-9 July 2005

Africa, Middle East,

Russia and Caspian
1-3 Sep 2005

IDC Final
Cape Town
4-6 Nov 2005
Thank you for being a safe driver
Questions ?????

Arrive safely. Drive Safely.