See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/277140571

Modeling of oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane to ethylene on a

MoVTeNbO/TiO2 catalyst in an industrial-scale packed bed catalytic reactor

Article in The Chemical Engineering Journal · November 2015

DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.05.128

CITATIONS READS

17 481

4 authors:

Gamaliel Che-Galicia R.s. Ruiz

Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla Metropolitan Autonomous University
10 PUBLICATIONS 65 CITATIONS 28 PUBLICATIONS 217 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Felipe Lopez-Isunza Carlos O. Castillo-Araiza

Metropolitan Autonomous University Metropolitan Autonomous University- Campus Iztapalapa
57 PUBLICATIONS 670 CITATIONS 50 PUBLICATIONS 245 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

On the Understanding and Scaling up of Catalytic Selective Oxidations. View project

Elucidating Kinetic, Adsorption and Partitioning Phenomena from a Single Well Tracer Method: Laboratory and Bench Scale Studies View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Carlos O. Castillo-Araiza on 23 April 2016.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 Chemical Engineering Journal 280 (2015) 682–694

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Chemical Engineering Journal

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/cej

Modeling of oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane to ethylene

on a MoVTeNbO/TiO2 catalyst in an industrial-scale packed
bed catalytic reactor
Gamaliel Che-Galicia, Richard S. Ruiz-Martínez, Felipe López-Isunza, Carlos O. Castillo-Araiza ⇑
Grupo de Procesos de Transporte y Reacción en Sistemas Multifásicos, Depto. de Ingeniería de Procesos e Hidráulica, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana – Iztapalapa, Av. San
Rafael Atlixco No. 186, C.P. 09340 México D.F., Mexico

highlights graphicalabstract

● This work simulates the industrial

catalytic behavior of ODH-Et on
MoVTeNbO.
● Simulations are carried out using a 2D
pseudo-heterogeneous model.
● A kinetic model is developed and it
describes successfully laboratory
experiments.
● Industrial reactor model accounts for
the effect of hydrodynamics on heat
transfer.
● Wall-cooled packed-bed reactor is an
ideal design for the ODH-Et on
MoVTeNbO.

articleinfo abstract

Article history: The oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane (ODH-Et) seems the most promising alternative to produce ethy-
Received 5 March 2015 lene compared to conventional processes. Nevertheless, there is not even a pilot plant for ODH-Et world-
Received in revised form 20 May 2015 wide nowadays. This work presents the simulation of the catalytic behavior of a highly active and selective
Accepted 22 May 2015 MoVTeNbO catalyst for the ODH-Et in a wall-cooled industrial-scale packed-bed reactor with a tube to
Available online 6 June 2015
particle diameter ratio equal to 3.12. The feasibility of using this complex yet necessary reactor design,
as well as the influence of operating conditions on conversion and yield along the reactor are analyzed.
Keywords:
The simulations are carried out using a two-dimensional pseudo-heterogeneous model, which makes
Oxidative dehydrogenation reaction
use of both a reliable kinetic model and reliable transport parameters. Specifically, the kinet ic model,
Low dt/dp packed bed reactor
Hydrodynamics
obtained from lab-scale experimental data, is coupled to the reactor model accounting for transport phe -
Ethylene nomena wherein the effect of hydrodynamics on heat transfer is assessed from independent experiments
Reaction kinetics in absence of reaction in an industrial-scale reactor. The developed kinetics successfully accounts for both
MoVTeNbO catalyst the inhibiting effect of adsorbed water on oxidative dehydrogenation and total oxidations and the effect of
the inlet partial pressure of oxygen and ethane on conversion and selectivity. Besides, the reactor model
elucidates the importance of accounting for the role of the hydrodynamics on the heat transport in order to
have reliable conversion and yield predictions. From the parametric sensitivity study, the temperature of
the coolant fluid and the inlet ethane concentration are variables for tuning the reactor performance.
© 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Abbreviations: BIC, Bayesian information criterion; BLA, boundary layer approximation; CA, classical approach; dt/dp, tube-to-particle diameter ratio; ER, Eley–Rideal; GC,
gas chromatograph; HTP, heat transport parameters; LHHW, Langmuir–Hinshelwood–Hougen–Watson; MvK, Mars-van Krevelen; ODEs, ordinary differential equations; ODH-
Et, oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane; PL, power law.
⇑ Corresponding author. Tel.: +52 55 5804 4648.
E-mail addresses: gamaliel.che@gmail.com (G. Che-Galicia), coca@xanum.uam.mx (C.O. Castillo-Araiza).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.05.128
1385-8947/© 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
 G. Che-Galicia et al. / Chemical Engineering Journal 280 (2015) 682–694 683

Nomenclature

Roman letters wn objective function weight factor of each response

as external surface to particle volume ratio, m—s1
Wcat mass of catalyst, gcat
Ai
0
natural logarithm of pre-exponential factor, mmol (gcat - Xn conversion of component n
h)—1 Yn yield of component n
Cn molar concentration of component n in the gas phase, z axial position, mr
kmol m— f 3
Cn,ss molar concentration of component n in the gas phase at Greek letters
steady state, kmol m—f
3 a vector of parameters accounted for in the objective
Cno feed molar concentration of component n, kmol m— f 3 function
Cns molar concentration of component n in the solid phase, b vector of parameters accounted for in the objective
kmol m— s3 function
Cns,ss molar concentration of component n in the solid phase DH○n standard enthalpy of adsorption for component n, kJ
at steady state, kmol m— s
3 (mol K)—1
Cpf heat capacity of the fluid, kJ (kg f K)—1 DHi reaction enthalpy, kJ mol—1
Cps heat capacity of the solid, kJ (kg s K)—1 DS○n Standard entropy of adsorption for component n used in
dp particle diameter, ms Eq. (17), kJ (mol K)—1
dt reactor diameter, mr DS○n Standard entropy of adsorption for component n, J (-
Deffr radial mass dispersion coefficient, m2r h—1 mol K)—1
Deffz axial mass dispersion coefficient, m 2r h—1 cC2 H6 ratio of oxygen and ethane partial pressure,
E activation energy, kJ mol—1 molO mol—1
A 2 C2 H6
Fn molar flow rate of the component n, mmol h —1 cC H 2 4 ratio of oxygen and ethene partial pressure,
h interfacial heat transport coefficient, kJ m —2 (h K)—1 molO mol—1
g s 2 C2 H4 3 —3
hw wall heat transfer coefficient, kJ m— —
r 2 (h K) 1 e void fraction, mf mr
ki reaction rate coefficient, mmol (g cat h) —1
mi stoichiometric number
keffr radial effective thermal conductivity, kJ (m r h K)—1 h fractional surface coverage
keffz axial effective thermal conductivity, kJ (mr h K)—1 qb bed density, kgcat m—r
3

kg interfacial mass transfer coefficient, m 3f m—s2 h—1 qf fluid density, kgf m—f 3

Kn adsorption equilibrium coefficient for component n, rj Horiuti number

Pa—1
L reactor length, mr Subscripts
m partial reaction order for oxygen cat catalyst
pi partial pressure of component n, Pa eff effective
r radial position, mr exp experiment
ri specific reaction rate of reaction i, mmol (gcat h)—1 f fluid
Rn net reaction rate of the component n, mmol (gcat h)—1 n component n
R universal gas constant, kJ (mol K)—1 o inlet, superficial
RSS objective function (residual sum of squares) p particle
S active sites for kinetic model mechanism r reactor
Sg standard entropy of gas phase molecule, J (mol K)—1 s solid
t time, h tab tabulated
T temperature, K ⁄ vacant sites density
To feed temperature, K
Tb salt bath temperature, K Superscripts
Ts solid temperature, K ^ calculated
Ts,ss steady state solid temperature, K o inlet, standard
Tss steady state fluid temperature, K ⁄ reference
uo superficial velocity, mf3 m— 2 —1
r h

1. Introduction instance: it overcomes equilibrium limitations; permits lower tem-

Ethylene is one of the principal building blocks in petrochemical
industry as it is used as intermediate for the production of many
valuable products, namely polyethylene, ethylene oxide, ethylene
dichloride and ethylene benzene, among other important chemical
compounds [1,2]. Industry and academy have focused their
research on finding competitive technologies to produce ethylene
[2–5] so as to face its increasing demand and also, as an effort of
reducing the environmental impact and energy consumption of
the conventional commercial processes for producing this olefin,
i.e., pyrolysis, fluid catalytic cracking and catalytic dehydrogena-
tion [5,6]. The oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane (ODH-Et), in
this regard, seems to be the most promising alternative since it
offers many advantages compared to conventional processes, for
perature operation (<500 °C) and, hence, energy saving; it
decreases the number of side reactions; and, also, avoids catalyst
deactivation by coke formation due to the presence of molecular
oxygen contained in the reaction mixture [4,5,7,8].
Notwithstanding these advantages there are two industrial chal-
lenges for producing ethylene via ODH-Et. One of them is related
to the design of an active and selective catalyst to produce ethy-
lene, while the other one has to do with the design of the reactor
technology. In fact today, to the best of our knowledge, there is
not even a pilot plant for ODH-Et worldwide.
A broad variety of catalytic formulations to produce ethylene out
of ethane in presence of oxygen have been investigated [9–19].
From these formulations, the multimetallic mixed oxide catalyst
based on Mo, V, Te and Nb is, undoubtedly, the most efficient and
684 G. Che-Galicia et al. / Chemical Engineering Journal 280 (2015) 682–694

effective material since it presents an outstanding activity and method is used. From XRD pattern using Rietveld refinement, the
selectivity to ethylene, apparently attributed to the presence of crystalline phase composition (wt%) is analyzed to be the M1 major
the M1 crystalline phase. Particularly, V species are the active sites crystalline phase present in the catalyst (92 wt% M1 and 8 wt% M2
—1
in ethane activation, Mo species enhance the catalytic activity of V crystalline phase) [18]. A specific surface area of 7 m 2 gcat is
atoms, Te species are associated with the formation of the active obtained from N 2 physisorption in an AUTOSORB-I instrument.
and selective crystalline phase M1, and Nb species leads to enhance Details concerning the preparation as well as the physicochemical
the selectivity to ethylene [11,13,20–23]. From this end, envisaging characteristics of this catalyst are given elsewhere [18].
a possible future application of this material in ODH-Et to a com-
mercial scale requires, as a first step, of the conceptual design of 2.2. Experimental data
the catalytic reactor technology. Nevertheless, owing to the
exothermicity of the ODH-Et reaction, mainly related to the The data used in the kinetic modeling is obtained from experi-
unavoidably heat released during the formation of COX (CO and ments carried out in a laboratory isothermal fixed-bed reactor at
CO2) out of ethane and ethylene, the reactor design is as yet a com- atmospheric pressure. The fixed-bed reactor, made of quartz, has an
plex chemical engineering assignment, as it is analyzed in the internal diameter of 1.0 × —2 m and length of 4.0 10×—2 m.
10
following. Experiments were performed using a bed consisting of 0.60 g of
The wall-cooled catalytic reactor with low tube-to-particle catalyst with average particle size of 150 lm. The reaction feed-
diameter ratio (dt/dp < 5) seems a suitable option to commercially stock was composed of a mixture of ethane (or ethylene), oxygen
achieve the ODH-Et over the MoVTeNbO formulation [24,25], since and nitrogen with a varying composition depending on the exper-
this configuration and catalyst design promote the fast removal of iment. The experimental conditions and conversion ranges are
the heat generated, maximize the desirable product yield, and listed in Table 1. The reactor effluent was analyzed online period-
avoids strong catalyst deactivation by a sintering process [26–34], ically by gas chromatography (GC). A detailed description of the
as observed for other well-known studied exothermic partial oxida- equipment has been reported in a previous study [57].
tion reactions. In fact, several researches [35–41] have considered
the wall-cooled packed bed catalytic reactor for simulating the pos- 2.3. Reaction rates
sible performance of the ODH-Et over catalytic systems different to
the MoVTeNbO formulation. Nevertheless, these studies are ques- The reaction network for ODH-Et over MoVTeNbO catalysts is
tionable since they do not make use of reliable kinetic models and proposed taking into account the experimental observations given
neglect the effect of the low dt/dp on the void fraction profile and, in [57]. Both parallel and consecutive reactions are considered, in
hence, on velocity field and its role on the heat transport [42–46]. which the species detected by GC (ethane, ethylene, carbon
The conceptual design of the industrial reactor for the ODH-Et monoxide and carbon dioxide) are only included. In this regard:
over a MoVTeNbO catalyst requires of both a reliable kinetic model Ethylene is produced from oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane
and reliable transport parameters. A few number of kinetic models (r1):
have been developed to describe the macroscopic mechanism of
C2 H6 þ 0:5O 2 ! C 2H 4 þ H 2O ð1Þ
ODH-Et, namely power law (PL), Langmuir–Hinshelwood–Houge
n–Watson (LHHW), Eley Rideal (ER), Mars-van Krevelen (MvK) or Ethane can also be oxidized to form CO 2 (r2) and/or CO (r3):
a combination of MvK and LHHW (MvK–LHHW) [47–58], neverthe-
less, these models are specific for every catalyst formulation. C2 H6 þ 3:5O2 ! 2CO2 þ 3H 2 O ð2Þ
Specifically for the MoVTeNbO catalyst, the LHHW model, devel-
oped by our research group, is one of the most suitable one nowa- C2 H6 þ 2:5O 2 ! 2CO þ 3H 2O ð3Þ
days [57] since other kinetic models present a lack of statistical Ethylene can also react to form CO 2 (r4) and/or CO (r5).
and phenomenological significance. Notwithstanding LHHW is a
potential kinetic model to overcome the conceptual design of the C2 H4 þ 3O 2 ! 2CO 2 þ 2H 2O ð4Þ
industrial ODH-Et reactor using the MoVTeNbO catalytic system,
some aspects need to be accounted for, i.e., the relatively weak effect C2 H4 þ 2O 2 ! 2CO þ 2H 2O ð5Þ
of oxygen partial pressure on reaction rates, the high affinity of Table 2 shows the reaction mechanism considered for building
water to adsorb on active sites affecting negatively reaction rates the kinetic model. The mechanism accounts for some of the partic-
and the significative effect of inlet partial pressure of ethane on ular aspects of the MoVTeNbO formulation reported in the litera-
reaction rates. ture [57], namely a relatively weak effect of oxygen partial
The aim of this study is to model the industrial performance of a pressure on reaction rates, a high tendency of water to adsorb on
highly active/selective MoVTeNbO catalyst for the production of active sites and the significative effect of inlet partial pressure of
ethylene out of ethane via ODH-Et in a wall-cooled packed bed cat-
alytic reactor presenting a dt/dp equal to 3.12. This industrial-scale
reaction system is simulated using a two-dimensional pseudo- Table 1
Range of experimental conditions during the steady state in the ODH-Et experiments.
heterogeneous model coupled to a kinetic model devel- oped
herein for MoVTeNbO formulation and accounts, in some detail, Operational condition Unit Range
for the effect of hydrodynamics on heat transfer through the pC2 H6 ;o kPa 5–22
proper estimation of heat transport parameters from pilot plant pC2 H4 ;o kPa 5–22
experiments in absence of reaction. pO2 ;o kPa 5–22
cC H ¼ yO ;oy—1
26 2C H ;o
2 6 molO2;omol
—1
C2 H6 ;o 0.5–2.0
cC H ¼ yO ;oy—1
24 2C H ;o
2 4 mol Omol
2 ;o
—1
C2 H4 ;o
0.5–2.0
2. Reaction kinetics Wcat F—C21H6 ;o 1
gcat h mol—C2 H6 ;o 10–140

Wcat F—C21 H4 ;o gcat h mol—C21H4 ;o 10–130

2.1. Catalyst T °C 400–480
XC2 H6 molC H mol—1C2 H6 ;o 0.17–0.85
2 6

A MoVTeNbO catalyst with a nominal atomic ratio of XC2 H4 molC H2 mol

4
—1
C2 H4 ;o
0.03–0.14
Mo:V:Te:Nb equal to 1:0.24:0.24:0.18 prepared by precipitation
 G. Che-Galicia et al. / Chemical Engineering Journal 280 (2015) 682–694 685

Table 2 represented by pn, and the fraction coverage of active sites is

Reaction steps and catalytic cycles considered for the kinetic model to describe the denoted by hm. The fraction of free active sites is obtained by com-
ODH-Et.
bining Eqs. (11) to (13) resulting in Eq. (14):
Step Elementary reaction step rI rII rIII rIV rV
A O2 þ 2S ¢ 2OAS 1 7 5 3 2 1
1 C2 H6 þ OAS ! C2H 4 þ H2OAS 2 0 0 0 0 hm ¼ ð14Þ
2 C2H6 þ 7OAS ! 2CO2 þ 3H2OAS þ 4S 0 2 0 0 0 1 þ ðK O2 pO Þ21 þ K H2 O pH O
2 2
3 C2 H6þ 5OAS ! 2CO þ 3H2 O — S þ 2S 0 0 2 0 0
4 C2H4 þ 6OAS ! 2CO2 þ 2H2OAS þ 4S 0 0 0 1 0 The combination of specific reaction rates gives the net reaction
5 C2H4 þ 4OAS ! 2CO þ 2H2OAS þ 2S 0 0 0 0 1 rate of formation for the n-th component, which is expressed by
B H2OAS ¢ H 2 O þ S 2 6 6 2 2
Eq. (15):

5
X
ethane on conversion and selectivity. Thus, the model accounts for Rn ¼ mn;i ri ð15Þ
the following assumptions: (i) there is a single type of active sites i¼1
(S) on the catalyst surface, (ii) the only compounds adsorbed on the
where mn;i is the stoichiometric coefficient of the component n in the
active sites are oxygen and water, (iii) oxygen adsorption is disso-
i-th reaction, vide Eqs. (1)–(5). In order to reduce the correlation
ciative (step A) while water adsorption is associative (step B), (iv)
between activation energies and pre-exponential factors as well
surface reaction steps (steps 1–5) are considered to be fast taking
as standard adsorption enthalpies and entropies during the param-
place over a finite number of active sites, (v) since the construction
eters estimation procedure, both Arrhenius and van’t Hoff equations
of the model is based on the pseudo equilibrium approach, surface
reactions are the rate-determining steps and adsorption and des- are used Σin their reparametrized
. ΣΣ form.
EA;i 1 1
orption steps are quasi-equilibrated. In Table 2, rj is the so-called k ¼ exp A0 — — ð16Þ
i i
Horiuti number, that describes the times that every adsorption– R T Tm
desorption and/or reaction steps need to occur in order to com-
plete a single catalytic cycle comprising the overall reactions Σ . ΣΣ
DSno DHno 1 1
(Eqs. (1)–(5)). Notice that the adsorption of molecular O 2 (step A) Kn ¼ exp — — ð17Þ
R R T Tm
is a crucial stage for the surface reactions to take place (steps 1–5).
The equations that describe the rate of reactions for ODH-Et over where A0i is the natural logarithm of the pre-exponential factor for
MoVTeNbO are given through Eqs. (6)–(10), and are written as a the i-th reaction, EA,i is the activation energy factor for the i-th reac-
function of the partial pressures of the gas phase components tion, T is the reaction temperature, T* is the averaged reaction tem-
according to the reaction mechanism. The calculation of ri involves perature, DSno is the standard adsorption entropy of component n,
a rate coefficient denoted by ki, an adsorption equilibrium coeffi- DHno is the standard adsorption enthalpy of component n and R is
cient for the n-th component represented by Kn, the partial pres- the universal gas constant.
sure of the reactant n represented by pn, the fraction coverage of
oxygen denoted by hO and the reaction order related to the partial 2.3.1. Laboratory reactor model
pressure of the gas phase denoted by mi: The continuity equation for component n at the steady state
assumes that the flow pattern in the laboratory reactor is of plug
flow type and that there is no radial temperature or concentration
r 1 ¼ k1 pC2 H6 hO ð6Þ
gradient as corroborated elsewhere [57]:
r 2 ¼ k2 pC H h m2 ð7Þ dF
n
26 O
¼ Rn ð18Þ
dW cat
r 3 ¼ k3 pC 2 H6 hm
O
3
ð8Þ
with the following initial conditions:
m4
r 4 ¼ k4 pC H h ð9Þ F n ¼ F no ; for W cat ¼ 0 ð19Þ
2 4 O

m5
where Fn is the molar flow rate of component n, Fno is the inlet
r5¼ k p5 C2 H4 hO ð10Þ molar flow rate of component n and Wcat is the mass of the catalyst
Since the fraction coverage of different species on the catalytic loaded into the reactor.
surface is conserved through time, the global balance of the frac-
tion sites corresponds to Eq. (11): 2.3.2. Parameter estimation
The development of a kinetic model must account for a proper
assessment of the model parameters from both physicochemical
hm þ hO þ hH2 O ¼ 1 ð11Þ and statistical perspectives since these evaluations are essential
The fraction coverage of a specific component is defined as the for carrying out a reliable chemical reactor design. The kinetic
number of sites occupied by such a species relative to the total parameters are estimated by minimization of the following
number of available sites corresponding to Eq. (12) for oxygen weighted objective function:
and Eq. (13) for water: n resp nexp
X X 2 b ;b ;...;b
RSSðbÞ ¼ w ðF k;n — F^k;n Þ 1 —2! n min ð20Þ
n¼1 k¼1
1
hO ¼ ðK O2 pO2 Þ hm 2
ð12Þ
where b is an optimal parameter vector, nexp is the number of inde-
hH O ¼ K H O p h ð13Þ pendent experiments, nresp is the number of responses, Fk,n and F^ k;n
2 2 H2 O m
are the n-th experimental and predicted responses for the k-th
where the adsorption equilibrium coefficient for the n-th compo- observation, respectively; and wn is the weight factor assigned to
nent is represented by Kn, the partial pressure of the reactant n is the n-th response.
686 G. Che-Galicia et al. / Chemical Engineering Journal 280 (2015) 682–694

The subroutine VODE is used to solve the corresponding set of Table 3

ODEs [59]. The initial minimization of the objective function, vide Reactor dimensions, catalyst dimensions, parameters and operational conditions used
in the reactor model.
Eq. (20), in the model regression is carried out using the
Rosenbrock method [60] and then, the ODRPACK subroutines are Value Refs.
called for fitting the corresponding experimental data points [61]. Reactor and catalyst dimensions
These subroutines can perform either weighted orthogonal distance L, mr 2.5 –
regression or nonlinear least square problems for explicit and impli- dt, mr 0.0256 [45]
cit models using multi-response data with an implementation of the dp, m3 s —3
0.0082 [45]
e, mf mr 0.48 [68]
Levenberg–Marquardt method, as documented elsewhere [62]. qb, kgcat m—r 3 75 –
Three criteria are used to evaluate the kinetic model. Firstly, the Operational conditions
agreement between the calculated and experimental molar flows P, atm 1 –
is compared using the so-called parity plot, thus, a careful assess- Tb, °C 400–480 –
ment of both individual and global statistical significance is carried To, °C 200 –
Rep 1400a –
out. The individual statistical significance of the parameters is
Flow rate, N m3 h— 1 4 [68]
assessed by a t-test while the global significance of the regression Ethane feed concentration, % mole 1–40 –
is assessed by the F-test. Aside, the parameter correlation between Oxygen feed concentration, % mole 7 –
pairs of estimated parameters is accounted for by computing the Transport parameters
so-called binary linear correlation coefficients (qij). When the value Deffr, mr2 h—1 32 [68,69]
of qij is close to ±1 a strong linear relationship between the esti- Deffz, mr2 h—1 53 [68,69]
mated parameters i and j occurs. kg, m3f m— 2 —1
s h 576 [68,69]
hg, kJ m— 2 (h K) —1 928.8 [68,69]
Finally, kinetic parameters have to be contrasted with a series of s

keffr, kJ (mr h K)— 1 8.35b [45]

thermodynamic criteria in order to determine whether they are keffr, kJ (mr h K)— 1 9.72c [45]
physically meaningful or not. In relation to the Arrhenius equation hw , kJ m— r
2 (h K)— 1 468b [45]
parameters, the activation energy should be lower to 210 kJ mol—1 hw , kJ m— r
2 (h K) —1 1051.2c [45]
[63] since larger values indicate the presence of catalyst deactiva- a
Calculated at standard conditions.
tion, for instance, by sintering [64]; whereas for the van’t Hoff equa- b
Estimated by classical approach.
tion parameters, estimated values of standard adsorption enthalpy c
Estimated by boundary layer approximation.
and entropy need to be confronted with a set of criteria stipulated
by Boudart [65], which are, often, overlooked in literature. catalytic reactor with low dt/dp. This methodology accounts for
Since adsorption is an exothermic process, the adsorption the role of void fraction and hydrodynamics on heat transport in
enthalpy has to satisfy the inequality: the reactor through the proper determination, using experiments
—DHon > 0 ð21Þ in absence of reaction, of the effective heat transport parameters
(HTP) such as the radial and axial effective thermal conductivities,
the negative value of the standard entropy of adsorption must keffr and keffz, respectively, and the wall heat transfer coefficient, hw.
be higher than zero and lower than the corresponding standard Namely, these parameters are estimated using the boundary layer
entropy of the gas phase specie (S○n;g ), namely: approximation that makes use of a two-dimensional heat transport
model coupled to the Navier–Stokes–Darcy–Forchheimer equation
0 < —DSn○ < S○n;g ð22Þ and the existing void fraction profile [45].
Table 3 presents the main variables used for all simulations dis-
where DS○n is the standard entropy of adsorption.
The entropy in fact decreases when a gaseous molecule is trans- played in this study for the industrial-scale reactor modeling.
ferred from a three-dimensional phase, i.e, the gas phase, to a Reactor and catalyst dimensions are the same as those used to
two-dimensional phase, i.e, the catalyst surface. The gas phase obtain observations in absence of reaction from an industrial scale
standard entropy values of ethane, oxygen, ethylene, CO, CO2 and wall-cooled packed bed reactor [68]. These pure heat transport
experiments were used in a previous research [45] to estimate
water are computed at 440 °C amounting to 275, 231, 257, 223,
the heat transport parameters (keffr, keffz, and hw), which are crucial
246 and 218 J (mol K)—1, respectively, based on reference [57].
for modeling the studied reactor with low dt/dp. Besides, the calcu-
An additional criterion to be satisfied during the parameter esti-
mation for the nonisothermal situation related to adsorption reac- lated active catalyst density (qb) is ca. 75 kg m—3, this value corre-
tion, relates to the change in volume that occurs when a gaseous sponds to the active MoVTeNbO formulation coated over the
molecule is adsorbed over the surface of a solid. This is specifically external surface of TiO2 pellets packed in the reactor. The
expressed in the following form: MoVTeNbO active layer is considered to be 0.15 mm since mass
and heat transport limitations are, properly, minimized as
41:8 < —DSo < 51:04 — 1:4DHo ð23Þ observed from kinetic experiments. The feedstock is a mixture of
n n
ethane, oxygen and an inert with composition defined from kinetic
experiments. Thus, the feed inlet O 2/C2H6 ratios are strategically
3. Industrial-scale reactor model selected to be out of the explosive region.
The wall-cooled packed bed reactor model is based on averaged
The performance of a multi-tubular wall-cooled packed bed cat- general conservation relations for mass and energy but considering
alytic reactor is, normally, predicted by the modeling of a single effective transport parameters. The two-dimensional pseudo-
tube, assuming, in a reliable manner, that all tubes behave almost heterogeneous model used is given as follows:
identically [66,67]. Due to this, this work simulates the perfor- Gas phase:
mance of the MoVTeNbO catalytic formulation during the ODH-
Et in a single tube industrial-scale packed bed reactor operat- !
ing in a non-isothermal and non-adiabatic mode. The reliability of @C n @C n @2 Cn 1 @C n @ 2 Cn
e e e
Deffr þ Deffz
the simulations is based on the modeling approach proposed by þ uo ¼ þ @z2
Castillo-Araiza and López-Isunza [33,34,45], which allows the pre- @t @z @r 2 r @r
þ ð1 — eÞkg as ðC ns — C n Þ ð24Þ
diction of the observed behavior of a wall-cooled packed bed
 G. Che-Galicia et al. / Chemical Engineering Journal 280 (2015) 682–694 687
!
@T @T @2 T 1 @T @2 T is carried out in order to support the main kinetic assumptions.
e
qf C pf þ uo qf C pf ¼ keffr þ þ keffz 2 On the other hand, Section 4.2 presents the industrial-scale cat-
@t @z @r 2 r @r @z alytic reactor simulations, which are aimed at elucidating the per-
þ ð1 — eÞhg as ðT s — TÞ ð25Þ formance of MoVTeNbO catalyst during the ODH-Et in the wall-
Solid phase: cooled packed bed reactor. Firstly, the catalytic reactor is modeled
either considering those HTP that are estimated assuming plug
@C ns X5 flow, as treated nowadays in literature simulations [68,72–
ð1 — eÞ ¼ ð1 — eÞkg as ðC n — C ns Þ þ q b mni ri ð26Þ 74], or considering HTP that accounts for the effect of hydrody-
@t i¼1
namics on heat transport phenomena [33,34,45]. The comparison
5 of these simulations allows elucidate the need for considering
@T X the role of velocity field on heat transport via the corresponding
qb Cps s ¼ ð1 — eÞhg as ðT — T s Þ þ q b ð—DHi Þri ð27Þ HTP when a packed bed reactor presenting a low d /d t p is modeled.
@t i¼1
Secondly, a parametric sensibility analysis is presented with the
The corresponding initial and boundary conditions are:
aim to unfold the influence of coolant temperature, ethane and
t ¼ 0; C n ¼ C n;ss and C ns ¼ C ns;ss ð28Þ oxygen inlet concentrations on the catalytic performance of
MoVTeNbO catalyst. Finally, an analysis of the influence of the
T ¼ T ss and T s ¼ T s;ss ð29Þ adsorption of both water and oxygen on industrial reactor perfor-
mance is presented.
@C n
z ¼ 0; uo C no ¼ uo C n — eDeffz ð30Þ
@z 4.1. Kinetics
@T
uoq Cpf To ¼ uoq Cpf T — keffz ð31Þ MoVTeNbO material is an attractive catalytic formulation since
f f
@z it leads to ethane conversion and selectivity to ethylene relevant
@C n @T for the industry [8]. A previous publication [57] was dedicated to
z ¼ L; ¼0 and ¼0 ð32Þ study the effect of feedstock composition, temperature and
@z @z space-time on a set of catalytic responses over the MoVTeNbO cat-
@Cn @T alyst formulation. Fig. 1 summarizes main ODH-Et observations at
r ¼ 0; ¼ 0 and ¼0 ð33Þ different ethane conversions and selectivity to ethylene, CO and
@r @r CO2. Specifically, the selectivity to the reaction products decreases
@C n @T in the following order: ethylene >> CO > CO 2, ranging from 76% to
r ¼ Rt ; ¼ 0 and keffr ¼ hw ðT — T b Þ ð34Þ 96% for ethylene, 2.5–16.5% for CO and 1.5–7.5% for CO2. The region
@r @r of high ethane conversion demands operating at large values of
where Cn is the molar concentration of component n in the gas both: temperature (480 °C) and space-time (70 gcat h mol —1
ethane ), a
phase, Deffr is the radial mass dispersion coefficient, Deffz is the axial scenario at which the selectivity to ethylene decreases and, hence,
mass dispersion coefficient, qb is the fixed-bed density (active cat- that of COx is favored. Besides, Fig. 1 also presents how the pro-
alyst density), qf is the fluid density, Cpf is the specific heat capacity posed kinetic model (Eqs. (6)–(11)) fits adequately the conversion
of the fluid, Cps is the specific heat capacity of the solid, keffr is the of ethane and the main reaction products in the ODH-Et.
radial effective thermal conductivity, keffz is the axial effective ther- The model adequacy is also evaluated by means of both statis-
mal conductivity and hw is the wall heat transfer coefficient.
tical and phenomenological tests. Fig. 2 shows the parity plot for
The performance of the reactor is evaluated by the conversion
the molar flow rates of all observed components (C 2H6, C2H4, CO,
of reactants as well as by the yield of products. The conversion is
CO2, O2 and H2O). Model regression presents statistical signifi-
defined as:
cance, yielding adequate agreement with the experimental data
number of moles of n reacted over a wide range of experimental conditions, vide Table 1.
Xn¼ n ¼ C2 H6 or O2 ð35Þ Namely, deviations from observations are random without pre-
number of moles of n fed
senting any undesired statistical trend. In this result, the random
while the yield of the n-th product is defined as:
error is constant, without the presence of a systematic association
number of moles of product n formed
Y¼
n
number of moles of ethane fed 100
n ¼ C2 H4 ; CO; CO2 ; and H2 O ð36Þ
The resulting model is given in terms of a set of parabolic partial 80
differential equations, which is solved numerically by the method
Selectivity [%]

of orthogonal collocation using 5 and 50 interior collocation points C2H4 Kinetic model
60
at the radial and axial coordinates, respectively, employing shifted CO
CO2
Legendre polynomials [70]. The resulting set of ordinary differen-
tial equations is, then, solved by a Runge–Kutta method [71]. 40

4. Results and discussion 20

The results are divided in two sections. Section 4.1 discusses the
0
kinetics of ODH-Et on MoVTeNbO catalytic system. The model reli-
0 20 40 60 80 100
ability is firstly discussed, in terms of the statistical significance of
both the regression and the parameters; thus, the parameter values Ethane conversion [%]
are analyzed to evaluate whether they are physically meaningful or
Fig. 1. Selectivity to ethylene, CO2, and CO versus ethane conversion. Full lines
not. An analysis on the adsorption phenomena of both water and are calculated with the kinetic model (T = 400–480 °C; space-time = 23–70 gcat
oxygen on the active sites from MoVTeNbO catalytic formulation
h mol— 1 ; nominal inlet molar ratio C /O /N = 9/7/84).
ethane 22 2
688 G. Che-Galicia et al. / Chemical Engineering Journal 280 (2015) 682–694

15 [79], in order to discard that model resulting in overfitting because

50 of the addition of unnecessary phenomena/parameters. From this
end, the developed kinetics is the most suitable one to describe
10
Fn calculated [mmol/h]

40 5
ODH-Et observations since it leads to a lower value of BIC (110.7)
than the LHHW model (159.6), obtaining an absolute difference
0 (DBIC) of ca. 49 [79]. Experimental data reported elsewhere [57]
30 0 5 10 15
elucidated how the inlet partial pressure of ethane gives rise to a
C2H6
positive effect on ethane conversion due to its over oxidation to
O2
20 carbon oxides rather than its adsorption on catalytic active sites.
C2H4
CO In this respect, the developed kinetics accounts for the effect of
10 CO2 inlet partial pressure of ethane on reaction rates; a situation that is
H2O
not possible when the LHHW model since it was insensitive to the
0 inlet partial pressure of ethane [57]. Therefore, statistical and
0 10 20 30 40 50 experimental evidences do indicate that the kinetic model devel-
Fn observed [mmol/h] oped in this study is the most suitable to be evaluated during
industrial-scale reactor simulations.
Fig. 2. Parity plot comparing experimental with calculated reactor outlet molar The estimated values for the adsorption equilibrium constants
flow rates for the kinetic model. The full lines are the first bisector and the dashed for oxygen and water, vide Table 4, indicate that standard
lines represent a deviation of 10%.
adsorption enthalpies are negative with water being the compo-
nent with the smallest standard adsorption enthalpy (DH○n = —128.2
kJ mol—1). This suggests that water binds more strongly to
Table 4
MoVTeNbO catalyst formulation than oxygen (DH○n = —45.6 kJ mol—
Kinetic parameters values and corresponding 95% probability confidence intervals of
1). Furthermore, Boudart0 s criteria are totally satisfied since the
the kinetic model used to describe the ODH-Et over the MoVTeNbO catalyst.
values of standard adsorption entropies are between 41.8 J (mol K)—
Parameter Estimated Lower Upper t-Value
1 and the corresponding gas phase molec- ular standard entropy.
value limit limit
The magnitude of the estimated standard
A01 ; mmol (gcat h)— 1 5.50E+00 5.49E+00 5.52E+00 7.59E+02
adsorption enthalpies is similar to those values reported in litera-
A02 ; mmol (gcat h)— 1 6.86E-01 6.84E-01 6.88E-01 6.79E+02
A03 ; mmol (gcat h)— 1 1.58E+00 1.57E+00 1.58E+00 6.61E+02
ture [57,75–77]. For instance, the standard adsorption enthalpy of
oxygen is reported from —19 to —98 kJ mol—1 [75] and the adsorp-
A40 ; mmol (g cat h)—1 2.60E+00 2.59E+00 2.61E+00 4.80E+02
A05 ; mmol (gcat h)— 1 7.87E-01 7.84E-01 7.90E-01 5.14E+02 tion heat of water, measured on various metal oxides surfaces,
EA;1; kJ mol—1 9.05E+01 9.02E+01 9.07E+01 7.90E+02 ranges between — — kJ mol —1 [76,77]. According to the
36 and 113
EA;2; kJ mol—1 1.65E+02 1.64E+02 1.66E+02 5.43E+02 estimated activation energies, the rate of formation of ethylene
EA;3; kJ mol—1 1.50E+02 1.49E+02 1.50E+02 7.91E+02
from ethane, vide Eq. (1), is the reaction that presents the lowest
EA;4; kJ mol—1 1.39E+02 1.38E+02 1.39E+02 5.31E+02
activation energy i.e., 90.5 kJ mol —1. In contrast, the formation of
EA;5; kJ mol—1 1.32E+02 1.31E+02 1.32E+02 4.96E+02
—DSOo2; J (mol K)—1 2.15E+02 2.14E+02 2.16E+02 8.33E+02
COX from both ethane and ethylene, vide Eqs. (2)–(5), require acti-
—DSHo2;OJ (mol K)—1 4.20E+01 4.19E+01 4.21E+01 6.75E+02 vation energies ranging from 131.8 kJ mol—1 to 165.0 kJ mol—1.
—DH —1
4.56E+01 4.55E+01 4.57E+01 8.56E+02 Specifically, ethylene is the principal contributor to COX because
O2 ; kJ mol
o —1
Ho2 O
—DH ; kJ mol— 1 1.28E+02 1.28E+02 1.28E+02 7.48E+02 total oxidations from ethane (ca. 150 kJ mol ) require even more
m2 9.22E-01 9.19E-01 9.24E-01 7.37E+02 energy than the total oxidations from ethylene (ca. 130 kJ mol —1).
m3 9.06E-01 9.03E-01 9.08E-01 7.23E+02 Our estimated values of activation energies, ranging from 90.5 to
m4 1.23E+00 1.22E+00 1.23E+00 5.79E+02 165.0 kJ mol—1, are similar to the values reported in the literature
m5 9.05E-01 9.02E-01 9.08E-01 6.37E+02
for different catalytic systems for the ODH-Et (from 50 to
Note: F value = 7642, Ftab = 2.79, ttab = 1.97 at 1-a = 0.95 and 396° of freedom. 150 kJ mol—1) [53,57,78]. The reaction orders associated to the par-
tial pressure of oxygen are found to be below 1.0, indicating that
reaction rates are weakly affected by changes in oxygen partial
between experimental points at any of the different operating con- pressure.
ditions studied.
Table 4 presents the F-value of the regression, and the esti-
mated parameters along with the 95% confidence interval and t-
value. The calculated F-value amounts to 7642, a value three orders 4.1.1. Fractional surface coverage
of magnitude larger than the tabulated one (2.79), corrobo- rating Adsorption phenomenon on MoVTeNbO formulation seems a
the satisfactory global significance of the model regression. Besides, key aspect to be analyzed during a proper kinetic study since reac-
all parameters are statistically significant since their con- fidence tant and product adsorptions affect significantly reaction rates and,
interval is significantly narrow and their t-value (ca. 240– hence, catalyst activity and selectivity. Fig. 3 displays the predicted
435) is higher than the t-value tabulated (1.97). All parameters surface coverage of adsorbed oxygen and adsorbed water as a func-
are not statistically correlated since their binary correlations coef- tion of temperature and space-time, which are calculated from Eqs.
ficients (qij) are always lower than 0.5. (12) and (13), respectively. The MoVTeNbO active sites are mostly
As commented earlier the LHHW model has been the most suit- covered with adsorbed water (ca. 0.95) rather than with adsorbed
able one nowadays for describing the ODH-Et on the MoVTeNbO oxygen (ca. 0.0). Thus, the present kinetics accounts properly for
catalytic formulation [57], since other kinetic models present a lack the negative effect of adsorbed water on reaction rates since the
of statistical significance. In this regard, a statistical analysis is car- high levels of water concentration and its affinity on active sites,
ried out to discriminate between this previously reported LHHW based on the highest water adsorption enthalpy, do indeed inhibit
model and the kinetic model developed in this study. oxidative dehydrogenation and total oxidations. Besides, the low
Notwithstanding the proposed kinetic model presents a slightly fraction coverage of oxygen on catalyst active sites and the low
better F-value (7642) than the LHHW model (7567), both models are reaction orders associated to the partial pressure of oxygen, indi-
evaluated through the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) cate that the kinetics accounts satisfactorily for the weak effect
 G. Che-Galicia et al. / Chemical Engineering Journal 280 (2015) 682–694
1.00
Fractional coverage [-]
0.95
0.90
0.10

0.05
0.00
400 420 440
Temperature [ºC]
Fig. 3. (a) Fractional surface coverage versus temperature at inlet molar ratio C2H6/O2/N2 = 9/7/84 and space-time of 70 gcat h mol—ethane,o
space-time at inlet molar ratio C2H6/O2/N2 = 9/7/84 and T = 440 °C.
of the inlet partial pressure of oxygen on ethane conversion and
selectivity to ethylene [57].
The presence of oxygen is, as observed, crucial for the oxidative
dehydrogenation of ethane and total oxidations to occur. Although
catalytic studies [80,81] over V materials for other reactions sug-
gest that bulk lattice oxygen participates in the reaction and it is
replaced by catalyst reoxidation with oxygen from the gas phase,
for the current catalyst the superficial lattice oxygen seems to be
the main species participating on several reactions [14,57,81–84],
which explains the high selectivity to ethylene. The activity of V
catalysts mainly depends on the oxygen’s lability, nevertheless this
lability is a function of catalyst chemical composition and crys-
talline structure [14,57,82,83]. In this respect, MoVTeNbO formula-
tion presents a relatively large capacity for oxygen recombination
in its active M1 phase [14,57,82,83], i.e. the oxygen species are
immediately used for oxidation reactions from the first lattice lay-
ers and are overtaken from the gas phase. This might be the reason
why the proposed mechanism, vide Table 2, adequately represents
the observed kinetic phenomenon for MoVTeNbO rather the well-
known Mars and van-Krevelen redox mechanism [85]. Kubo et al.,
[84], during the evaluation of propane ammoxidation with lattice
oxygen from Mo–V–O-based complex metal oxide catalysts,
observed that the migration rate of the oxygen from the bulk to
superficial lattice is too slow in comparison with the consumption
rate of oxygen from the surface lattice. In this respect, a relatively
small amount of oxygen is demanded to reoxidize the metallic
sites that are reduced after the propane oxidation reactions, thus,
explaining the high selectivity to ethylene of this type of mixed
oxide catalysts. Namely, a low amount of oxygen on surface lattice
along with a low reaction temperature give rise to ethylene forma-
tion out of ethane rather than total oxidations.
4.2. Industrial-scale reactor predictions
The adequate consideration of heat transport phenomena in the
model of a wall-cooled packed bed catalytic reactor with low dt/dp
is, undoubtedly, one of the most essential aspects to be accounted
for during the conceptual design of this type of reaction systems.
There are several approximations that have been used to model
heat transport in a wall-cooled catalytic reactor with low dt/dp.
Some studies [33,34,45] suggest that the inclusion of velocity pro-
files improves heat transport description; however, others studies
[68,72–74] have neglected the influence of the hydrodynamics in
the modeling of this type of reactors. In this regard, a practical
but reliable approach, developed by our research group, is herein
applied to account for the role of hydrodynamics on heat transport
689

1.0
(a) (b)
0.8
Fractional coverage [-]
 0.6 
  
  
0.4
0.2
0.0
460 480 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Wcat/Fethane,o [gcat h/molethane,o]
1 ; and (b) Fractional coverage versus
during the modeling of the ODH-Et in a wall-cooled catalytic reac-
tor packed with MoVTeNbO catalyst externally deposited on a non-
porous support of TiO 2. Particularly, the boundary layer
approximation is used to estimate keff and hw from heat transfer
observations in absence of reaction, thus, these parameters con-
taining the hydrodynamic information are used to model the
industrial scale reactor by means of the classical model, vide Eqs.
(24)–(34). This approach uses a less expensive numerical scheme
since it only contains heat and mass balances instead of momen-
tum, heat and mass balances which computationally speaking is
very time-consuming.
In order to be judicious on the modeling approach applied to
elucidate the role of MoVTeNbO externally deposited on TiO 2 for
the ODH-Et in a wall-cooled catalytic reactor with low dt/dp, we
present the simulations of an industrial-scale reactor for the cat-
alytic o-xylene partial oxidation using the aforementioned
approach. The o-xylene partial oxidation is selected since observa-
tions at industrial-scale with and without reaction are available
from studies carried out by the research group [33,34,68].
Moreover, this reaction system presents the same geometric (L and
dt/dp) and operational conditions (Rep) that are used for the
ODH-Et reaction in this work, vide Table 3. From this end, Fig. 4
displays temperature profiles for two oxidation reactions, let0 s
say, the o-xylene partial oxidation used herein as a reference
(Fig. 4a), and the ODH-Et (Fig. 4b). Both reaction cases compare
temperature profiles along the reactor using distinct effective
HTP estimated from the same set of experiments in absence of
reaction: (i) parameters estimated via the classical approach (CA)
assuming an uniform velocity profile with constant void fraction
[68,72–74] and (ii) parameter estimated via the boundary layer
approximation (BLA) in which the role of void fraction profile
and velocity field are assessed [33,34,45]. Table 3 presents the
numerical values of hw and keff estimated via the BLA and CA from
the same experimental dataset. These HTP are larger for BLA,
reflecting differences in the estimated rates of radial heat transport
through the core of the packed bed and close to the wall. To this
end, the predictions of measured temperature profiles in Fig. 4a
for the o-xylene partial oxidation case elucidate the suitability of
the HTP values from the BLA, giving better predictions than when
HTP values using the CA approach are employed in the reactor
model, vide, i.e. Eqs. (24)–(34). Therefore, hw and keff are effective
parameters that through BLA lump differently the hydrodynamic
and heat-transport phenomena in the packed bed leading to better
predictions. Fig. 4b presents temperature profiles for the ODH-Et.
As expected, when the reactor model makes use of HTP estimated
considering plug flow, there is the presence of a higher hot spot
690 G. Che-Galicia et al. / Chemical Engineering Journal 280 (2015) 682–694

460
550 (a) (b)
500 450
Temperature [ºC]

Temperature [ºC]
450
440

400
430
Experimental observation
350 HTP estimated with BLA
HTP estimated with BLA
HTP estimated with CA
HTP estimated with CA
300 420
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
Reactor length [m] Reactor length [m]

Fig. 4. Axial temperature profiles in the reactor using different HTP: (a) Comparison between prediction and observation for the parti al oxidation of o-xylene on a V2O5/TiO2
catalyst at: Tb = 376 °C, inlet molar ratio o-xylene/air = 1/99 and To = 190 °C [33]; and (b) Predictions for the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane on MoVTeNbO/TiO 2 catalyst
at: Tb = 440 °C, inlet molar ratio C2H6/O2/N2 = 9/7/84 and To = 200 °C.

560 1.0

(a) 1- Conversion and Yield

(b)
520 0.9
Temperature [ºC]

Tb=480 ºC
480
0.8 - - - - Initial steady state
0.2 - - - - Transient state
Tb=440 ºC
440

Tb=400 ºC 0.1
400
Initial steady state Second steady state
Final steady state Transient state
360 0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
Reactor length [m] Reactor length [m]

1.0 1.0
- - - - Final steady state
0.9 (c) (d) - - - - Transient state
1- Conversion and Yield

1- Conversion and Yield

0.8
0.8

0.7 0.6
- - - - Second steady state
- - - - Transient state
0.3 0.4
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
Reactor length [m] Reactor length [m]

Fig. 5. Reactor model predictions when Tb is increased 40 °C in a ramp change with an inlet molar ratio C2H6/O2/N2 = 9/7/84: (a) Temperature profiles; (b) Conversion and
yield profiles at Tb = 400 °C; (c) Conversion and yield profiles at Tb = 440 °C; (d) Conversion and yield profiles at Tb = 480 °C (For (b)–(d): (d) C2H6 conversion; (h) O2
conversion; (s) C2H4 yield; (j) H2O yield; (N) CO yield and (4) CO2 yield).

since the role of hydrodynamics on heat transfer mechanisms is parametric sensitivity study for the performance of MoVTeNbO
neglected. Owing to the above, the following sections present the system during the ODH-Et in an industrial scale wall-cooled
simulations of the industrial-scale reactor for ODH-Et considering packed bed reactor, this section is aimed at simulating the reactor
those HTP estimated from BLA. when perturbations of cooling bath temperature and inlet ethane
concentration are considered. The first case, illustrated in Fig. 5,
4.2.1. Parametric sensitivity study shows the predicted dynamic response when reactor starts up at
The behavior of a reactor is a function of the initial process con- Tb of 400 °C with an inlet molar ratio C 2H6/O2/N2 = 9/7/84, once
ditions, reactor disturbances and the trajectories of the manipu- the steady state is reached, it is followed by perturbations of the
lated reactor variables. In order to analyze an open-loop cooling bath temperature, namely 440 °C and 480 °C. The second
 G. Che-Galicia et al. / Chemical Engineering Journal 280 (2015) 682–694 691

480 1.0
Initial steady state
(a) Second steady state
Third steady state
(b)
470

1- Conversion and Yield

Final steady state 0.8

Temperature [ºC]
Transient state
460
40 mole % of ethane 0.6
18 mole % of ethane - - - - Initial steady state
450 - - - - Transient state
9 mole % of ethane
0.4
440
1 mole % of ethane
0.2
430

420 0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
Reactor length [m] Reactor length [m]

1.0 1.0
(c) (d)
1- Conversion and Yield

1- Conversion and Yield

0.8 0.8

0.6 0.6
- - - - Second steady state - - - - Third steady state
- - - - Transient state - - - - Transient state
0.4 0.4

0.2 0.2

0.0 0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
Reactor length [m] Reactor length [m]

1.0
(e)
1- Conversion and Yield

0.8

0.6
- - - - Final steady state
- - - - Transient state
0.4

0.2

0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
Reactor length [m]

Fig. 6. Reactor model predictions when ethane feed concentration is increased at different% mole in a ramp change with a Tb = 440 °C: (a) Temperature profiles; (b)
Conversion and yield profiles at 1% mole of ethane; (c) Conversion and yield profiles at 9% mole of eth ane; (d) Conversion and yield profiles at 18% mole of ethane; (e)
Conversion and yield profiles at 40% mole of ethane (For (b)–(e): (d) C2H6 conversion; (h) O2 conversion; (s) C2H4 yield; (j) H2O yield; (N) CO yield and (4) CO2 yield).

case, illustrated in Fig. 6, displays the predicted dynamic response 400 °C or 440 °C leads to mild hot spots of ca. 1 °C or 7 °C respec-
when reactor starts up at Tb of 440 °C with an inlet molar ratio of tively whereas a Tb equal to 480 °C provokes a pronounced hot spot
C2H6/O2/N2 = 1/7/92, once the steady state is reached, it is followed with a temperature rise of ca. 56 °C. In the latter, the rate of heat
by perturbations of the inlet molar ratio of ethane, specifically removal is minor in comparison with the rate of heat generated.
C2H6/O2/N2 = 9/7/84, C2H6/O2/N2 = 18/7/75 and Besides Figs. 5b–d display the effect of coolant temperature on
C2H6/O2/N2 = 40/7/53. the overall consumption rates of the reactants. The increment of Tb
Fig. 5 displays transient and steady state temperature, conver- favors both ethane and oxygen conversions. Analyzing the pro-
sion (ethane and oxygen) and yield (ethylene, CO X and water) pro- duct distribution, an increase in Tb brings out a positive effect on
files along the reactor length at different coolant temperatures the yield of ethylene out of ethane. However, a higher Tb leads to
maintaining a fixed inlet molar ratio C2H6/O2/N2 = 9/7/84. So far, higher carbon oxides yields, which are the responsible of both
an increment in coolant temperature causes an increase in the the formation of hot spots and the decrease in the selectivity to
magnitude of the hot spot, vide Fig. 5a. Specifically a Tb equal to ethylene. In this regard, a lower Tb is recommended for a
692 G. Che-Galicia et al. / Chemical Engineering Journal 280 (2015) 682–694
1.0
0.8
Fractional coverage [-]
0.6  Tb=400 ºC
 Tb=440 ºC
 Tb=480 ºC
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Reactor length [m]
Fig. 7. Fractional surface coverage along the reactor at differ bath temperatures
with an inlet molar ratio C2H6/O2/N2 = 9/7/84.
satisfactory ethane conversion along with ethylene selectivity
avoiding catalyst damage due to high temperatures [23]. The
behavior of the industrial scale reactor presented in Fig. 5 shows
similar tendencies as those of the typical industrial-scale packed
bed reactors used to perform highly exothermic reactions
[24,30,33,34,67,68].
In the design of this type of complex reactors it is necessary to
operate without the presence of drastic hot spots in order to
decrease the irreversible deactivation of the catalysts by a sintering
phenomenon [86]. Particularly, the stability of the MoVTeNbO cat-
alyst is restricted to operate below 500 °C, due to energy saving
but, mainly, because operations above 500 °C leads to the irre-
versible loss of catalytic activity as a consequence of the removal
of tellurium from the MoVTeNbO catalytic formulation [23], i.e.
specifically, the lost of Te from MoVTeNbO material occurs prefer-
entially from the end section of the M1 crystal phase, across the
[001] plane. The removal of Te species modifies the crystal phase
composition of the M1 phase causing the partial destruction of
the MoVTeNbO with the simultaneous formation of the MoO2
phase and, in consequence, the activity and selectivity to ethylene
are affected as elucidated elsewhere [23].
Fig. 6 compares transient and steady state temperature, conver-
sion (ethane and oxygen) and yield (ethylene, CO X and water) pro-
files along the reactor length at different ethane inlet
concentrations at Tb equals to 440 °C. The position of the hot spot
is located toward the first meter of reactor length, a zone with
higher concentration of ethane. An increment in the inlet ethane
concentration causes a slight increment of the magnitude of the
hot spot, vide Fig. 6a. Particularly, 1% or 9% of ethane in the feed-
stock leads to mild hot spots of ca. 1 °C or 7 °C, respectively,
whereas 18% or 40% of ethane causes hot spots with a temperature
rise of ca. 12 °C or 34 °C, respectively. Figs. 6b–e show the effect of
inlet ethane concentration on ethane conversion and product
yields. An increase in ethane inlet concentration causes a rapid oxy-
dehydrogenation (r1), but mainly of the total oxidations (r2–r5)
reactions, thus, provoking large amounts of heat generation.
Therefore, the increase in ethane inlet concentration favors reactant
conversions and product yields rather than ethylene selectivity
(vide Figs. 6b–e).
Finally, a brief analysis of the influence of the adsorption of both
water and oxygen on catalytic reactor performance is presented. As
observed in Fig. 7, the catalyst surface is mainly occupied by water
and vacancy sites, since the surface coverage of oxygen is found to
be negligibly small along the reactor length, as elucidated from lab-
oratory experiments in Section 4.1.1. The reactions occurring on
the MoVTeNbO catalytic formulation are a function of the surface
coverage profiles. The relatively low fraction coverage of oxygen
determines the product distribution along the reactor, revealing
the selective role of the MoVTeNbO catalyst to produce ethylene
out of ethane. Aside, the high fraction coverage of water leads to
a negative effect on both type of reactions, those selective to pro-
duce ethylene and those selective to obtain CO x (vide Fig. 5).
Therefore, water inhibits the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane
and total oxidations through its adsorption on MoVTeNbO sites.
Thus, water seems to play an important role on this type of cat-
alytic reaction, as documented for other catalytic partial oxidations
of different hydrocarbons [87].
5. Conclusions
2.5
The implementation of a new catalytic material at industrial
level requires the knowledge from the conceptual design of the
reactor technology. Modeling has been the most reliable engineer-
ing tool to carry out the preliminary reactor design. In this regard,
this work shows through modeling the catalytic performance of
MoVTeNbO catalyst for ODH-Et in a wall-cooled industrial-scale
catalytic packed bed reactor presenting a low dt/dp ratio. To have
a confidence on model simulations, a proper determination of both
kinetic parameters and heat transport parameters from indepen-
dent experiments should be carefully carried out. In terms of the
kinetics, an adequate agreement between model and experimental
values is observed, wherein the obtained parameters are physically
meaningful and are found to be statistically significant. The pro-
posed kinetics addresses several aspects observed experimentally,
namely it accounts for both the negative effect of adsorbed water
on reaction rates and the weak effect of the inlet partial pressure
of oxygen on ethane conversion and selectivity to ethylene. In this
respect, even the presence of oxygen is crucial for the oxidative
dehydrogenation of ethane and total oxidations to occur, the
superficial lattice oxygen from the MoVTeNbO catalyst seems to
be the main species participating on reactions, explaining, thus, its
high selectivity to ethylene.
In terms of the industrial-scale reactor, the simulations suggest
that hydrodynamics is an essential aspect to be considered during
the modeling of this type of reaction systems presenting a low dt/-
dp. The coolant temperature is the main variable affecting ethane
conversions and yield to ethylene. For instance, coolant tempera-
tures larger than 440 °C lead to hot spot magnitudes that could
cause the damage to the MoVTeNbO structure. As observed from
laboratory experiments, water formation affects conversion and
selectivity, and catalyst is weakly oxidized along the reactor
length, giving insights on the highly selectivity of the MoVTeNbO
catalytic formulations.
On the basis of the results obtained herein, the wall-cooled
packed-bed reactor represents a promising alternative for petro-
chemical industry to carry out the ODH-Et over a MoVTeNbO cat-
alyst, which is highly selective to ethylene. Besides, the model
developed in this work, in general, and the modeling strategy
based on laboratory and pilot plant experiments in absence of reac-
tion, in particular, are potential tools to be used in future studies
for the conceptual design and scale-up of industrial reactor system
for the ODH-Et on MoVTeNbO material.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by El Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y
Tecnología (CONACYT) under Project No. 181104. Gamaliel Che-
Galicia also thanks CONACYT for providing a postgraduate fel-
lowship. We also acknowledge to Eng. J.C. Castillo-Rodriguez, Eng.
C. Tzompantzi-Flores and Eng. O. Romero-Pérez for the technical
support and discussion on the developed kinetic model. Authors
 G. Che-Galicia et al. / Chemical Engineering Journal 280 (2015) 682–694
also thank valuable comments from the anonymous reviewers
whose careful revisions and critics decisively contributed in
improving the quality of this paper.
References
[1] A. Clements, M. Dunn, V. Firth, L. Hubbard, J. Lazonby, D. Waddington, The
Essential Chemical Industry, Chemical Industry Education Centre, York, 2010.
[2] M.A. Bañares, Supported metal oxide and other catalysts for ethane
conversion: a review, Catal. Today 51 (1999) 319–348.
[3] S. Albonetti, F. Cavani, F. Trifirò, Key aspects of catalyst design for the selective
oxidation of paraffins, Catal. Rev. 38 (1996) 413–438.
[4] F. Cavani, F. Trifirò, The oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane and propane as
an alternative way for the production of light olefins, Catal. Today 24 (1995) 307–
313.
[5] C.A. Gärtner, A.C. van Veen, J.A. Lercher, Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane:
common principles and mechanistic aspects, ChemCatChem 5 (2013) 3196–
3217.
[6] K. Weissermel, H.-J. Arpe, Industrial Organic Chemistry, WILEY-VCH Verlag
GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 2003.
[7] T. Blasco, J.M. López, Nieto, oxidative dehydrogenation of short chain alkanes
on supported vanadium oxide catalysts, Appl. Catal. A 157 (1997) 117–142.
[8] F. Cavani, N. Ballarini, A. Cericola, Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane and
propane: how far from commercial implementation?, Catal Today 127 (2007)
113–131.
[9] E.M. Thorsteinson, T.P. Wilson, F.G. Young, P.H. Kasai, The oxidative
dehydrogenation of ethane over catalysts containing mixed oxides of
molybdenum and vanadium, J. Catal. 52 (1978) 116–132.
[10] E. Morales, J.H. Lunsford, Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane over a lithium-
promoted magnesium oxide catalyst, J. Catal. 118 (1989) 255–265.
[11] J.M. López Nieto, P. Botella, M.I. Vázquez, A. Dejoz, The selective oxidative
dehydrogenation of ethane over hydrothermally synthesized MoVTeNb
catalysts, Chem. Commun. (2002) 1906–1907.
[12] M. Panizza, C. Resini, F. Raccoli, G. Busca, R. Catani, S. Rossini, Oxidation of
ethane over vanadia-alumina-based catalysts: co-feed and redox experiments,
Chem. Eng. J. 93 (2003) 181–189.
[13] P. Botella, E. García-González, A. Dejoz, J.M. López Nieto, M.I. Vázquez, J.
González-García, Selective oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane on
MoVTeNbO mixed metal oxide catalysts, J. Catal. 225 (2004) 428–438.
[14] P. Botella, E. García-González, J.M. López Nieto, J.M. González-Calbet,
MoVTeNbO multifunctional catalysts: Correlation between constituent
crystalline phases and catalytic performance, Solid State Sci. 7 (2005) 507–
519.
[15] E. Heracleous, A.A. Lemonidou, Ni–Nb–O mixed oxides as highly active and
selective catalysts for ethene production via ethane oxidative
dehydrogenation. Part I: Characterization and catalytic, J. Catal. 237 (2006) 162–
174.
[16] B. Solsona, M.I. Vázquez, F. Ivars, A. Dejoz, P. Concepción, J.M. López, Nieto,
Selective oxidation of propane and ethane on diluted Mo-V-Nb-Te mixed-
oxide catalysts, J. Catal. 252 (2007) 271–280.
[17] X. Lin, C.A. Hoel, W.M.H. Sachtler, K.R. Poeppelmeier, E. Weitz, Oxidative
dehydrogenation (ODH) of ethane with O2 as oxidant on selected transition
metal-loaded zeolites, J. Catal. 265 (2009) 54–62.
[18] J.S. Valente, R. Quintana-Solórzano, H. Armendáriz-Herrera, G. Barragán-
Rodríguez, J.M. López-Nieto, Kinetic study of oxidative dehydrogenation of
ethane over MoVTeNb mixed-oxide catalyst, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53 (2014)
1775–1786.
[19] J. Santander, E. López, A. Diez, M. Dennehy, M. Pedernera, G. Tonetto, Ni–Nb
mixed oxides: one-pot synthesis and catalytic activity for oxidative
dehydrogenation of ethane, Chem. Eng. J. 255 (2014) 185–194.
[20] J.M. López Nieto, P. Botella, B. Solsona, J.M. Oliver, The selective oxidation of
propane on Mo-V-Te-Nb-O catalysts: the influence of Te-precursor, Catal.
Today 81 (2003) 87–94.
[21] P. Concepción, P. Botella, J.M. López Nieto, Catalytic and FT-IR study on the
reaction pathway for oxidation of propane and propylene on V- or Mo-V based
catalysts, Appl. Catal. A 278 (2004) 45–56.
[22] B. Solsona, F. Ivars, P. Concepción, J.M. López Nieto, Selective oxidation of n-
butane over MoV-containing oxidic bronze catalysts, J. Catal. 250 (2007) 128–
138.
[23] J.S. Valente, H. Armendáriz-Herrera, R. Quintana-Solórzano, P. del Ángel, N.
Nava, A. Massó, J.M. López Nieto, Chemical, structural, and morphological
changes of a MoVTeNb catalyst during oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane,
ACS Catal. 4 (2014) 1292–1301.
[24] G.F. Froment, K.B. Bischoff, Chemical reactor analysis and design, John Wiley &
Sons, New York, 1979.
[25] P. Arpentinier, F. Cavani, F. Trifiro, The Technology of Catalytic Oxidations,
Technip, Paris, 2001.
[26] J. Lerou, G.F. Froment, Velocity, temperature and conversion profiles in fixed
bed catalytic reactor, Chem. Eng. Sci. 32 (1977) 853–861.
[27] T. Daszkowski, G. Eigenberger, A reevaluation of fluid flow heat transfer and
chemical reaction in catalyst filled tubes, Chem. Eng. Sci. 47 (1992) 2245–
2250.
[28] V. Blasco, C. Royo, A. Monzbn, J. Santamaria, Catalyst sintering in fixed-bed
reactors: deactivation rate and thermal history, AIChE J. 38 (1992) 237–243.
[29]
693
Y.S. Cheng, F. López-Isunza, T. Mongkhonsi, L.S. Kershenbaum, Estimation of
catalyst activity profiles in fixed-bed reactors with decaying catalysts, Appl.
Catal. A 106 (1993) 193–199.
[30] J.N. Papageorgiou, G.F. Froment, Simulation models accounting for radial
voidage profiles in fixed-bed reactors, Chem. Eng. Sci. 50 (1995) 3043–3056.
[31] O. Bey, G. Eigenberger, Gas flow and heat transfer through catalyst filled tubes,
Int. J. Therm. Sci. 40 (2001) 152–164.
[32] D. Wen, Y. Ding, Heat transfer of gas flow through a packed bed, Chem. Eng.
Sci. 61 (2006) 3532–3542.
[33] C.O. Castillo-Araiza, F. López-Isunza, Modeling the partial oxidation of o-
xylene in an industrial packed-bed catalytic reactor: the role of
hydrodynamics and catalyst activity in the heat transport, Ind. Eng. Chem.
Res. 49 (2010) 6845–6853.
[34] C.O. Castillo-Araiza, F. López-Isunza, The role of catalyst activity on the steady
state and transient behavior of an industrial-scale fixed bed catalytic reactor
for the partial oxidation of o-xylene on V2O5/TiO2, Chem. Eng. J. 176–177
(2011) 26–32.
[35] M. Fattahi, M. Kazemeini, F. Khorasheh, A. Darvishi, A.M. Rashidi, Fixed-bed
multi-tubular reactors for oxidative dehydrogenation in ethylene process,
Chem. Eng. Technol. 36 (2013) 1692–1700.
[36] Z. Skoufa, E. Heracleous, A.A. Lemonidou, Investigation of engineering aspects
in ethane ODH over highly selective Ni 0.85Nb0.15 Ox catalyst, Chem. Eng. Sci. 84
(2012) 48–56.
[37] M.L. Rodriguez, D.E. Ardissone, E. Heracleous, A.A. Lemonidou, E. López, M.N.
Pedernera, D.O. Borio, Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane to ethylene in a
membrane reactor: a theoretical study, Catal. Today 157 (2010) 303–309.
[38] M.L. Rodriguez, D.E. Ardissone, A.A. Lemonidou, E. Heracleous, E. López, M.N.
Pedernera, D.O. Borio, Simulation of a membrane reactor for the catalytic
oxidehydrogenation of ethane, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48 (2009) 1090–1095.
[39] C. Hamel, Á. Tóta, F. Klose, E. Tsotsas, A. Seidel-Morgenstern, Analysis of single
and multi-stage membrane reactors for the oxidation of short-chain alkanes-
Simulation study and pilot scale experiments, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 86 (2008)
753–764.
[40] E. López, E. Heracleous, A.A. Lemonidou, D.O. Borio, Study of a multitubular
fixed-bed reactor for ethylene production via ethane oxidative
dehydrogenation, Chem. Eng. J. 145 (2008) 308–315.
[41] F.A. Al-Sherehy, A.M. Adris, M.A. Soliman, R. Hughes, Avoidance of
flammability and temperature runaway during oxidative dehydrogenation
using a distributed feed, Chem. Eng. Sci. 53 (1998) 3965–3976.
[42] R.B. Benenati, C.F. Brosilow, Void fraction distribution in beds of spheres, J. Am.
Inst. Chem. Eng. 8 (1962) 359–361.
[43] E. Tsotsas, E.U. Schlunder, Some remarks on channelling and on radial
dispersion in packed beds, Chem. Eng. Sci. 43 (1988) 1200–1203.
[44] M. Winterberg, E. Tsotsas, A. Krischke, D. Vortmeyer, A simple and coherent set
of coeficients for modelling of heat and mass transport with and without
chemical reaction in tubes filled with spheres, Chem. Eng. Sci. 55 (2000) 967–
979.
[45] C.O. Castillo-Araiza, H. Jiménez-Islas, F. López-Isunza, Heat-transfer studies in
packed-bed catalytic reactors of low tube/particle diameter ratio, Ind. Eng.
Chem. Res. 46 (2007) 7426–7435.
[46] C.O. Castillo-Araiza, F. Lopez-Isunza, Hydrodynamic models for packed beds
with low tube-to-particle diameter ratio, Int. J. Chem. Reactor Eng. 6 (2008) A1.
[47] S.T. Oyama, A.A. Middlebrook, G.A. Somorjai, Kinetics of ethane oxidation on
vanadium oxide, J. Phys. Chem. 94 (1990) 5029–5033.
[48] J. Le Bars, J.C. Vedrine, A. Auroux, Role of surface acidity on vanadia/silica
catalysts used in the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane, Appl. Catal. A 88
(1992) 179–195.
[49] C.-Y. Kao, K.-T. Huang, B.-Z. Wan, Ethane oxydehydrogenation over supported
vanadium oxides, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 33 (1994) 2066–2072.
[50] M.D. Argyle, K. Chen, At.T. Bell, E. Iglesia, Ethane oxidative dehydrogenation
pathways on vanadium oxide catalysts, J. Phys. Chem. B 106 (2002) 5421– 5427.
[51] D. Linke, D. Wolf, M. Baerns, S. Zeyß, U. Dingerdissen, Catalytic partial
oxidation of ethane to acetic acid over Mo1V0.25Nb0.12Pd0.0005 Ox: II. Kinetic
modelling, J. Catal. 205 (2002) 32–43.
[52] F. Klose, M. Joshi, C. Hamel, A. Seidel-Morgenstern, Selective oxidation of
ethane over a VOx/c-Al2O3 catalyst – investigation of the reaction network,
Appl. Catal. A 260 (2004) 101–110.
[53] R. Grabowski, J. Słoczyń ski, Kinetics of oxidative dehydrogenation of propane
and ethane on VOx/SiO2 pure and with potassium additive, Chem. Eng. Process.
44 (2005) 1082–1093.
[54] E. Heracleous, A.A. Lemonidou, Ni–Nb–O mixed oxides as highly active and
selective catalysts for ethene production via ethane oxidative
dehydrogenation. Part II: Mechanistic aspects and kinetic modeling, J. Catal.
237 (2006) 175–189.
[55] F. Rahman, K.F. Loughlin, M.A. Al-Saleh, M.R. Saeed, N.M. Tukur, M.M. Hossain,
K. Karim, A. Mamedov, Kinetics and mechanism of partial oxidation of ethane
to ethylene and acetic acid over MoV type catalysts, Appl. Catal. A 375 (2010)
17–25.
[56] S.A. Al-Ghamdi, M.M. Hossain, H.I. de Lasa, Kinetic modeling of ethane
oxidative dehydrogenation over VOx/Al2O3 catalyst in a fluidized-bed riser
simulator, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52 (2013) 5235–5244.
[57] G. Che-Galicia, R. Quintana-Solórzano, J.S. Valente, R.S. Ruiz-Martínez, C.O.
Castillo-Araiza, Kinetic modeling of the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane
to ethylene over a MoVTeNbO catalytic system, Chem. Eng. J. 252 (2014) 75–
88.
694 G. Che-Galicia et al. / Chemical Engineering Journal 280 (2015) 682–694
[58] R. Quintana-Solórzano, G. Barragán-Rodríguez, H. Armendáriz-Herrera, J.M.
López-Nieto, J.S. Valente, Understanding the kinetic behavior of a Mo–V–Te–
Nb mixed oxide in the oxydehydrogenation of ethane, Fuel 138 (2014) 15–26.
[59] P.N. Brown, G.D. Byrne, A.C. Hindmarsh, VODE: a variable-coefficient ODE
solver, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 10 (1989) 1038–1051.
[60] H.H. Rosenbrock, An automatic method for finding the greatest or least value
of a function, Comput. J. 3 (1960) 175–184.
[61] P.T. Boggs, J.R. Donaldson, R.H. Byrd, R.B. Schnabel, Algorithm 676 ODRPACK:
software for weighted orthogonal distance regression, ACM T. Math. Software
15 (1989) 348–364.
[62] D.W. Marquardt, An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear
parameters, J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 11 (1963) 431–441.
[63] E. Santacesaria, Kinetics and transport phenomena, Catal. Today 34 (1997)
393–400.
[64] C.H. Bartholomew, Mechanisms of catalyst deactivation, Appl. Catal. A 212
(2001) 17–60.
[65] M. Boudart, D.E. Mears, M.A. Vannice, Kinetics of heterogeneous catalytic
reactions, Ind. Chim. Belg. 32 (1967) 281–284.
[66] G.F. Froment, Fixed bed catalytic reactors. technological and fundamental
design aspects, Chem. Ing. Tech. 46 (1974) 374–386.
[67] A.I. Anastasov, An investigation of the kinetic parameters of the o-xylene
oxidation process carried out in a fixed bed of high-productive vanadia-titania
catalyst, Chem. Eng. Sci. 58 (2003) 89–98.
[68] F. López-Isunza, Steady state and dynamic behavior of an industrial fixed bed
catalytic reactor Ph.D. thesis, University of London (Imperial College), United
Kingdom, 1983.
[69] C.N. Satterfield, Mass transfer in heterogeneous catalysis, M.I.T. Press,
Cambridge, 1970.
[70] B. Finlayson, Nonlinear Analysis in Chemical Engineering, McGraw-Hill, New
York, 1980.
[71] L. Lapidus, J. Seinfeld, Numerical Solution of Ordinary Differential Equations,
Academic Press, New York, 1971.
[72] C.H. Li, B.A. Finlayson, Heat transfer in packed beds-a reevaluation, Chem. Eng.
Sci. 32 (1977) 1055–1066.
[73] B.D. Kulkarni, L.K. Doraiswamy, Estimation of effective transport properties in
packed bed reactors, Catal. Rev. 22 (1980) 431–483.
[74] D. Wen, Y. Ding, Heat transfer of gas flow through a packed bed, Chem. Eng.
Sci. 61 (2006) 3532–3542.
[75]
View publication stats
G. Saracco, F. Geobaldo, G. Baldi, Methane combustion on Mg-doped LaMnO3
perovskite catalysts, Appl. Catal. B 20 (1999) 277–288.
[76] M. Egashira, S. Kawasumi, S. Kagawa, T. Seiyama, Temperature programmed
desorption study of water adsorbed on metal oxides. I. Anatase and rutile, Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn. 51 (1978) 3144–3149.
[77] M.P. Heynderickx, J.W. Thybaut, H. Poelman, D. Poelman, G.B. Marin, Kinetic
modeling of the total oxidation of propane over CuO–CeO2/c–Al2O3, Appl.
Catal. B 95 (2010) 26–38.
[78] D. Wolf, N. Dropka, Q. Smejkal, O. Buyevskaya, Oxidative dehydrogenation of
propane for propylene production–comparison of catalytic processes, Chem.
Eng. Sci. 56 (2001) 713–719.
[79] G. Schwarz, Estimating the dimension of a model, Ann. Stat. 6 (1978) 461–464.
[80] J.C. Vedrine, J.M.M. Millet, J.-C. Volta, Molecular description of active sites in
oxidation reactions: acid–base and redox properties, and role of water, Catal.
Today 32 (1996) 115–123.
[81] K. Chen, A. Khodakov, J. Yang, A.T. Bell, E. Iglesia, Isotopic tracer and kinetic
studies of oxidative dehydrogenation pathways on vanadium oxide catalysts, J.
Catal. 186 (1999) 325–333.
[82] M. Aouine, J.L. Dubois, J.M.M. Millet, Crystal chemistry and phase composition
of the MoVTeNbO catalysts for the ammoxidation of propane, Chem. Commun.
13 (2001) 1180–1181.
[83] M. Hävecker, S. Wrabetz, J. Kröhnert, L.-I. Csepei, R. Naumann d’Alnoncourt,
Y.V. Kolen’ko, F. Girgsdies, R. Schlögl, A. Trunschke, Surface chemistry of
phase-pure M1 MoVTeNb oxide during operation in selective oxidation of
propane to acrylic acid, J. Catal. 285 (2012) 48–60.
[84] J. Kubo, N. Watanabe, W. Ueda, Propane ammoxidation with lattice oxygen of
Mo-V-O-based complex metal oxide catalysts, Chem. Eng. Sci. 63 (2008) 1648–
1653.
[85] P. Mars, D.W. van Krevelen, Oxidations carried out by means of vanadium
oxide catalysts, Chem. Eng. Sci. Spec. Suppl. 3 (1954) 41–59.
[86] S.S.E.H. Elnashaie, S.S. Elshishini, Modelling, Simulation and Optimization of
Industrial Fixed Bed Catalytic Reactors, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers,
Yverdon, 1993.
[87] M.M. Bettahar, G. Costentin, L. Savary, J.C. Lavalley, On the partial oxidation of
propane and propylene on mixed metal oxide catalysts, App. Catal. A 145
(1996) 1–48.