Hello ladies and gentleman . I’m the 2 nd speaker opposstion will oppose the affirmative side.

National examination have positive impacts for all elements . so, moreover many country in a
world use national examination a standart graduation in their education development. So, why
national examination should be abolished? Is there better way if without national examination ?i
belive there is no, until a better form of demonstrating know legde comes along , UN must be still
best pleace at the first , I want to refuse the AFF side, you said that UN

Make big expenditure for students parents like take a courses , buy books and key answer we have
to responses.that is not true . first students should not to take a courses because school always help
the study guidare after in every years.second, students is not advisable to by book, ducation
minister time give many helping for all schools in Indonesia, especially books . so, students
enough study ang borrow some books from library in their school.and key answere . it is not
necessary because it is a farlt in process of national examination, it needs an extra socialitation so,
students but it is not reason to abolish UN from curriculum of education an Indonesia because
there is still many students ta=hat do a true way to prepare the national examination

On the second point , you said that UN doesn’t have positive result as a burgeon country ,
Indonesia still need time to adapt with national examination until Indonesia can make the best
method of help of national examination

With the result , kemendigbud can mapping the education levels and knoeing condition of
education development

Okay, I have refusedthe AFF side, noe I will deliver my argument education development in
Indonesia . national examination as a form that is used by government to slow a fairness to all
student in Indonesia

National examination made by professional person in kemendigbud far before the national
examination be help, kemendigbud give some lattice of national examination

10 SMA tahat get the highest scores in indonesia , according the evidence, government can
helping and make the comparison of education development in Indonesia

Secondly, must national examination government van devide education budget for every school in
Indonesia fairly we can see, last year SMAN that get the highest scores get many advantages 8 of
to 10 from government . Thank you J
On the first point, give the negative impacts for student’s health ? it’s wrong. It is the little part
from all facts. There is still many students that feel advantages of national examination.

On the second point, they said that national examination can disturb the student’s psychology. But
you don’t see some students that have the true way to face the national examination. It’s not a
reason to abolish National Examination. Basically, national examination is same with the other
exams ? the other exam that in form essay but national examination no! it is made in form multiple
choice. Or do you have the other method if without national examination ?

Then I will mention some advantages of national examination for all elements according
arguments that have been delivered by the 1stOpp and 2ndOpp.

First, For students :

knowing their ability and performance

national examination may encourage people to work and learn
create the competition score which push the students to their best
helps in developing one’s own personality and convidence
if a person pass the exam and got the good result, it helps to get scholarship which will bring to
have a good job.
Second, for schools :

Trough national examination the teachers can get the feedback of the student.
School can decide the best students untuil stupid students easily
If the schools have the best students they will get the appreciation from government or usually we
call Kemendigbud
Third, For Government :

Mapping the quality of programme and or educational units

The basic of selection in to the next educational level
Give the appreciation for best shool and best students easily

So, should we abolish the national examnation ?

No , absolutely no. because without exams student would be more and more stupid, lazier and less
motivated to learn. With that argument that have delivered, we are from opposition team strongly
disagree with that motion. National examination should never be abolished.
1. the first points was health. They said that UN give negative impacts for students healthy.
Because UN be a standart graduation from the school we halce to responses, it clearly that is not
on by UN be standart graduation from the school. But from 2010 in Indonesia. The minister of
education firm up the roles that graduation will determine from60% result of UN 40% result of
UAS. And if we UN think that UN is only one to deternine the graduation, we sure feel stress but
factually is not true. UN is not only one to determine graduation UAS be an important scone too.

2. their second point was psychology they said that national examination can disturb the students
psychology. We have to responses, first 1 the porpose of an exam in school, UAS or UN is to
practice our mental to pace the vations exam this is very usefull to continue higher education abd
get work doatest. Basically, UN and us are same, its differences are UN make from capital by
kemendigbud and UAS from school. Government try to show the fairmuse for all students in
Indonesia so they firm up UN disturb students psychology ? it’s just parlittle part of all students in
Indonesia it connot be areason to abolish UN. UN can give positive impact for all elemen for the
affirmative argument let’s us see best argument of student, teacher, parents and government
Thank you nurul huda

Nexy ladies and gentelmen i will