LibertyForum Visit our Home Page

Main Index | Latest Articles | Latest Posts | Self Search | Search | Control Panel | Who's Online |
FAQ | Logout | User List

Miscellaneous Issues and Topics

Member Opinions & Questions
Thread views: 1059 Previous Index Next Flat Threaded

There are no posts below your current threshold: 0 Change | Favorite! | Print Thread

The_Skunk The Reason Bush Is Pushing For Syria's Invasion [ Post 294139831 ]
(Son of Liberty)
11/12/05 06:54
PM

The Mossad Has Been Behind These Pipeline Bombings

Why Would Arabs Blow Their Own Pipelines?

The Pipelines Go To Turkey, Lebanon, and the Persian Gulf

 This Is the New Pipeline Israel Wants

The Mossad Has Blown Every Pipeline, Except One

The Mossad has been busy blowing every pipeline, except the one that goes
west, from Mosul to Israel. This has caused gas to go from $1.75 to $3.00 at the
pumps, and Bush sees an Israeli pipeline as the answer.
 Pipeline Must Go Through Syria

Today, there are six 24” lines going to the pumping stations at Haditha (major
hydro-electric dam for power). They cross over the Euphrates, into Syria, and
onto the refineries at Tripoli. The smart route, is to junction off this major line,
and go through Syria, and onto Haifa, Israel. This is what ‘Operation Matador’ is
all about.

Marines Have Secured Bases

The US has established three major bases at H1, H2, and H3. We will continue
to have our troops die for Israel, we will pay for, and build the pipeline, and
Israel will sell us the oil. Whoever controls Iraq and the fields (Zionists), will sell
the oil to Yukos, and their Haifa refineries. When it’s all said and done, Israel will
control 40% of the world’s oil, and we will probably be paying $5.00 a gallon for
gas at the pumps.

All the phony ambushes, supposedly coming from Syria, have been Israeli false-
flag provocations, to drive us into a Syrian occupation.

Judicial Index

Reply | Private Reply | Flag | First | Last | Context Post Extras:

The_Skunk Re: The Reason Bush Is Pushing For Syria's Invasion [ To: The_Skunk | Post 294139833,
(Son of Liberty)
11/12/05 06:54 reply to 294139831 ] (Score: 2)
PM

Music

US has established three bases to guard the Mosul-Haifi pipeline

Here Is Why American Kids Are Dying In Iraq

H-3 Has A Combat Regiment And An Air Wing

Camp Korean Village is located in a remote stretch of Iraq's western desert, close to the
Syrian-Iraq border, and near the highway that connects Jordan with Baghdad. Ar-Rutbah is
the closest town to Camp Korean Village, also dubbed "Camp KV". Camp Korean Village is
believed to be located at one of the H-3 facilities. 1st Marine Division's Regimental Combat
Team 7, which help the Iraqis run checkpoints along the Syrian and Jordanian borders and
patrol western Iraq.

H-2 Is An Airbase

H-2 Airbase is located in Southern Iraq, approximately 350 kilometers west of Baghdad. The
airfield is served by two runways 12,600 and 8,800 feet long. H-2 occupies a 41 square
 kilometer site, and is protected by a 26-kilometer security perimeter.

H-1 Is An Airbase

H-1 Airbase is located in Southern Iraq. The 2nd Air Defense Sector, also known as the
Western Air Defense Sector, has a Strategic Operations Command (SOC) at H-3 Airfield,
with Individual Operation Commands (IOC) at H-1 Airfield, H-3 Airfield, and Ar-Rutbah.

The US Army's 75th Ranger Regiment captured H1 airfield in a night-time parachute assault
on March 25th, 2003.

H-1 US Army Base

H-2 US Army Base

H-3 US Army Base

Reply | Private Reply | Flag | First | Last | Context Post Extras:

The_Skunk Re: The Reason Bush Is Pushing For Syria's Invasion [ To: The_Skunk | Post 294139836,
(Son of Liberty)
11/12/05 06:54 reply to 294139833 ] (Score: 2)
PM

syria

Reply | Private Reply | Flag | First | Last | Context Post Extras:

The_Skunk Re: The Reason Bush Is Pushing For Syria's Invasion [ To: The_Skunk | Post 294139852,
(Son of Liberty)
11/12/05 06:59 reply to 294139836 ] (Score: 2)
PM

Oil from Iraq : An Israeli pipedream

Israel stands to benefit greatly from the US led war on Iraq, primarily by getting rid of an
implacable foe in President Saddam Hussein and the threat from the weapons of mass
destruction he was alleged to possess. But it seems the Israelis have other things in mind.

An intriguing pointer to one potentially significant benefit was a report by Haaretz on 31

March that minister for national infrastructures Joseph Paritzky was considering the
possibility of reopening the long-defunct oil pipeline from Mosul to the Mediterranean port of
Haifa. With Israel lacking energy resources of its own and depending on highly expensive oil
from Russia, reopening the pipeline would transform its economy.

To resume supplies from Mosul to Haifa would require the approval of whatever Iraqi
government emerges and presumably the Jordanian government, through whose territory it
would be likely to run. Paritzky's ministry was reported to have said on 9 April that it would
hold discussions with Jordanian authorities on resuming oil supplies from Mosul, with one
source saying the Jordanians were "optimistic". Jordan, aware of the deep political
sensitivities involved, immediately denied there were any such talks.

Paritzky said he was certain the USA would respond favourably to the idea of resurrecting the
pipeline. Indeed, according to Western diplomatic sources in the region, the USA has
discussed this with Iraqi opposition groups.

It is understood from diplomatic sources that the Bush administration has said it will not
support lifting UN sanctions on Iraq unless Saddam's successors agree to supply Israel with
 oil.

All of this lends weight to the theory that Bush's war is part of a masterplan to reshape the
Middle East to serve Israel's interests. Haaretz quoted Paritzky as saying that the pipeline
project is economically justifiable because it would dramatically reduce Israel's energy bill.

US efforts to get Iraqi oil to Israel are not surprising. Under a 1975 Memorandum of
Understanding (MoU), the US guaranteed all Israel's oil needs in the event of a crisis. The
MoU, which has been quietly renewed every five years, also committed the USA to construct
and stock a supplementary strategic reserve for Israel, equivalent to some US$3bn in 2002.
Special legislation was enacted to exempt Israel from restrictions on oil exports from the
USA.

Moreover, the USA agreed to divert oil from its home market, even if that entailed domestic
shortages, and guaranteed delivery of the promised oil in its own tankers if commercial
shippers were unwilling or not available to carry the crude to Israel. All of this adds up to a
potentially massive financial commitment.

The USA has another reason for supporting Paritzky's project: a land route for Iraqi oil direct
to the Mediterranean would lessen US dependence on Gulf oil supplies. Direct access to the
world's second-largest oil reserves (with the possibility of expansion through so-far
untapped deposits) is an important strategic objective.

http://www.janes.com/regional_news/africa_middle_east/news/fr/fr030416_1_n.shtml

Reply | Private Reply | Flag | First | Last | Context Post Extras:

The_Skunk Re: The Reason Bush Is Pushing For Syria's Invasion [ To: The_Skunk | Post 294139868,
(Son of Liberty)
11/12/05 07:05 reply to 294139852 ] (Score: 2)
PM

Current proposals for a Mosul-Haifa pipeline.

i Neoconservatives in Washington want the new government in Baghdad to help pay for the
reconstruction of the long abandoned Mosul-Haifa pipeline. The pipeline – the resurrection of
which would inevitably stir discontent in the Arab world – passes through Jordan and Syria,
and ends in the Israeli port city of Haifa. While much of the original 8” diameter pipeline is
intact, the section that travels though Iraq lays in ruins. [Christian Science Monitor,
4/23/03; Ha’aretz, 8/25/03]

U.S. asked Israel to prepare a plan for bringing oil from Northern Iraq to Haifa

(A) In mid-August 2003, an unnamed senior Pentagon official sent a telegram to a top
Israeli Foreign Ministry official in Jerusalem, requesting a cost estimate for rebuilding the
Mosul-Haifa oil pipeline. The proposed pipeline was considered by some to be a “bonus” to Israel
for its support of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

Pipeline article

Reply | Private Reply | Flag | First | Last | Context Post Extras:

The_Skunk Re: The Reason Bush Is Pushing For Syria's Invasion [ To: The_Skunk | Post 294139882,
(Son of Liberty)
11/12/05 07:09 reply to 294139868 ] (Score: 2)
PM

That Pipeline Is The Reason We Slaughtered Fallujah

 A Second Generation Polish Jew Named Gen Natonski Led the Slaughter

Reply | Private Reply | Flag | First | Last | Context Post Extras:

wacsog10 Re: The Reason Bush Is Pushing For Syria's Invasion [ To: The_Skunk | Post 294139919,
(insurgent)
11/12/05 07:23 reply to 294139882 ] (Score: 1)
PM

Hotels in Jordan are getting hard to insure these days.

Osama is suddenly pissed off against Hyatt Hotels? Was the King David hotel part of the
Hyatt chain?

Jordan's king is screaming about terrorism, and Al Queda.

Reply | Private Reply | Flag | First | Last | Context Post Extras:

wadosy Re: The Reason Bush Is Pushing For Syria's Invasion [ To: The_Skunk | Post 294141141,
(agent
provocateur) reply to 294139852 ] (Score: 2)
11/13/05 09:38
AM
yeah, i know, i should have been more diligent in looking up how to spell diligently.

in the meantime, the original 1953 map can be seen in its full glory here, an article from the
dept of energy about saddam's use of the syrian pipeline to smuggle oil can be found here.

and a map of israeli pipeline ambitions for the middle east, central asia and europe is below:
 for those of you who need to look into the israeli likud party's ambition to control the world
through control of energy sources and pipelines, go here and here.

kennedy assassination israel "nuclear weapons" OR bomb

Reply | Private Reply | Flag | First | Last | Context Post Extras:

wadosy Re: The Reason Bush Is Pushing For Syria's Invasion [ To: wadosy | Post 294141368,
(agent
provocateur) reply to 294141141 ] (Score: 2)
11/13/05 11:03
AM

the much-touted afghanistan pipeline was most likely some kind of fairy tale cooked up to
recruit musharaff of pakistan into the "war on terror".

it seems very unlikely that israel ever had even remotely serious intentions of building a
pipeline through the only muslim country with nukes, a country whose leader controls
maybe half that country ----when any popular govt deposing him would likely be rabidly
anti-zionist.

not to mention the problem of possibly fucking up a main source of funds for the "terrorists"
who are providing the pretext for continuing the "war on terror".... that source being the the
opium industry in afghanistan, which is much more profitable for the warlords than pipeline
transit fees ever could be. and, mainstream banks are propped up by laundering billions of
dollars-worth of opium money every year from the opium trade.
 there is yet another reason the afghan pipeline will remain a pipedream: the chinese are
building a tanker port at gwadar, pakistan, and pakistan is traditionally friendly with china.
why would israeli americans go to all the trouble to build a pipeline that might eventually
help the chinese access central asian oil when the goal is to control oil so china cant
industrialize into a military rival of israeli america?

and one more final tidbit: israel and india have signed a deal that would eliminate
afghanistan and pakistan completely from the pipeline route. israel intends to build a
pipeline through israel bypassing the suez, thus taking control of oil from muslim egypt and
giving it to israel. the oil would then go on to israel's buddy, india. the oil would have to
travel maybe 5 times further than it would if it were piped straight through afghanistan and
pakistan, but the main thing here is israeli control of oil. that's more important than
anything if israel is to control the oil and the world, and it is one more indication that israel
has no intention of allowing the trans afghan pipe to be built.

it is entirely possible that, once israel's proxy american armies subdue syria, iraq and iran,
central asian oil will wind up in india via iran, iraq and syria, while afghanistan grows opium
and pakistan becomes ever more radicalized and is driven further into the chinese camp.

kennedy assassination israel "nuclear weapons" OR bomb

Reply | Private Reply | Flag | First | Last | Context Post Extras:

wadosy Re: The Reason Bush Is Pushing For Syria's Invasion [ To: The_Skunk | Post 294141858,
(agent reply to 294139882 ] (Score: 2)
provocateur)
11/13/05 02:00
PM

sorry for that detour into the weeds of afghanistan and pakistan, but we cant hope to
understand what's going on if we compartmentalize.

here's another reason for israel's interest in syria..... water.

there's a mistake on the map; that is the EUPHRATES running through syria, not the tigris,
as labelled. sorry.

i've mention yossi maiman a couple times. this guy is involved in PNAC projects from
venezuela to serbia to turkey to turkmenistan. he's the point man in washington dc for the
trans-caspian pipeline project, which seems to be on hold now that the usa may capture the
more efficient land route for the pipeline from iran.
 yossi's building dams in southeast turkey from which israel will be shipping water to israel.

the special-built tankers will load water from the oil tanker port at ceyhan turkey.

which all goes to show that the watery motive for controlling syria will be much more
important than the oil motive once the oil runs out. and believe me, the israeli
psychohistorians are looking that far ahead.

kennedy assassination israel "nuclear weapons" OR bomb

Reply | Private Reply | Flag | First | Last | Context Post Extras:

Favorite! | Print Thread

Previous Index Next Flat Threaded

Jump to Member Opinions & Questions Jump

libertyforum.org | Contact Us Ain't Nobody's Business If You Do

Main Index | Latest Articles | Latest Posts | Self Search | Search | Control Panel | Who's Online | FAQ |
Logout | User List
Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available in an
effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We
believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section
107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposes.

For more information please visit: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.

If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission directly from the copyright owner.