Você está na página 1de 1

Log in   |   Sign Up for Free E-Mail Newsletter   | Language

Rupert Spira
Contemplating the Nature of Experience

Home About Introduction Watch Listen Read Events Webinars Store Friends Contribute Contact Sahaja Publications

Be knowingly the inherently peaceful presence of Awareness, in which thoughts, feelings, sensations and perceptions appear. Allow these
to evolve without interference and, if there is interference, simply allow that also. In allowing everything to be exactly as it is from moment
to moment, we are, without realizing it at rst, taking our stand as Awareness.

Only Awareness is Aware

Could it be that the mind is so quick, powerful and versatile that one of its functions is also the ability to perceive itself?

Dear Rupert, Awareness is ever-present; thoughts are intermittent. Something that is ever-
present cannot be made of or indeed be known by something that is intermittent.
It is often said that the perceiver cannot be the perceived. So, if I can be aware of This is, of course, said from the point of view of Enlightened Duality in which we
my mind, by definition, I cannot be the mind. But I wonder whether this is really provisionally concede a distinction between Awareness and its objects, in this
the case. Could it be that the mind is so quick, powerful and versatile that one of case, thoughts.
its functions is also the ability to perceive itself? Much like a multi-cored computer
can set its processing to make calculations and also at the same time set aside If we go more deeply into the nature of experience, we do not find this distinction.
time to watch the processing and analyse the results of that processing. In this case, the thought is understood to be nothing other than Awareness itself (if
we can still legitimately call it ‘Awareness’). As such, a thought is the shape that
Best wishes,  Awareness is taking at that particular moment – a temporary name and form of its
ever-present, nameless, formless substance – and it is Awareness that knows it
John as such. In other words, it is Awareness that knows itself modulating itself in the
form of an apparent thought.
 
So it is Awareness, not the mind (using my definitions of the words) that has the
Dear John, ability to perceive – either to perceive an apparent object (Enlightened Duality) or
to know itself alone (Embodied Enlightenment).
For the sake of clarity, let me define the way I use the terms ‘Awareness’ and
‘mind’. By ‘Awareness’ I mean whatever it is that is aware of our experience. By The belief that the mind perceives or is aware, doesn’t make sense. Mind is
‘mind’ I mean thoughts and images (although in a wider context I sometimes use perceived; it does not perceive. Only Awareness is aware.
the term to include feelings, sensations and perceptions as well.)
With kind regards, 
The relationship of Awareness to the mind (thoughts) is very similar to the
relationship of the screen (a self-aware screen) to an image that appears on it: the Rupert
image is made of the screen but the screen is not made of the image. All thoughts
are made out of Awareness (that is, they are made of the ‘knowing’ – awareness –
of them) but Awareness is not made out of thought. 

About Non-Duality Video Non-Duality Audio Non-Duality Writings Non-Duality Events My Account
About Rupert Meditations & Dialogues Meditations & Dialogues Essays United Kingdom Login
About Non-Duality Yoga Meditations & Dialogues Yoga Meditations & Dialogues Questions & Answers United States Sign Up
Links Dialogue Only Dialogue Only Interviews France Contact
Groups Yoga Meditation Only Yoga Meditation Only Quotes Spain
Volunteer Interviews Interviews Books Netherlands
Scholarship Fund Podcasts Podcasts Kindle eBooks Denmark
Contact Video Subscription Audio Subscription Italy
DVDs Webinars

Privacy & Cookie Policy | Cancellations & Refund Policy


© 2011-2019 Aware Presence Ltd, PO Box 887, Oxford, Oxon OX1 9PR, United Kingdom
Registered in England number 07921678
VAT Registered number 200 2316 86

Você também pode gostar