Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
FOUR TRADITIONS
Academic Scientific Psychology or Akademiko-siyentipikal na Sikolohiya:
Western Tradition: This follows the tradition of Wilhelm Wundt in 1876
and is essentially the American-oriented Western psychology being studied
in the Philippines.
BASIC TENETS
Core value or Kapwa (togetherness)
Kapwa, meaning 'togetherness', is the core construct of Filipino Psychology.
Kapwa refers to community; not doing things alone. Kapwa has two
categories, Ibang Tao (other people) and Hindi Ibang Tao (not other people).
Filipinos value conformity because unlike non-Asian countries, its culture
is predominantly Confucian. This runs into conflict with individualism
(kanya-kanya) which was brought about by Western colonialism
Ibang Tao ("outsider") There are five domains in this construct:
Pakikitungo: civility - In Confucian ethics, right behavior meant right
demeanor towards authorities (Parents, Elders, etc.).
Societal values
Karangalan: Loosely translated to dignity, this actually refers to what other
people see in a person and how they use that information to make a stand or
judge about his/her worth.
Puri: the external aspect of dignity. May refer to how other people judge a
person of his/her worth. This compels a common Filipino to conform to
social norms, regardless how obsolete they are.
Dangal: the internal aspect of dignity. May refer to how a person judges his
own worth.
Panunuluyan: In this method, the researcher stays in the home of his kalahok
or participant while he conducts the research with consent by the host
family, whose head serves as the tulay to an umpukan. The term tuloy,
which is the root word of the term panunuluyan, literally means 'to go in’.
Usog: A concept that explains how a baby who has been greeted by a
stranger acquires a mysterious illness. Apparently derived from the Spanish
tradition of Mal de Ojo.
Gabâ or gabaa: The Visayan concept of negative Karma.
In the 1970’s and 1980’s there were quite a number of these organizations
in the UnitedStates (San Francisco and New Haven), Japan, Malaysia,
Thailand and Hongkong. With thedeath of Enriquez, however, only one has
managed to continue with its activities and this is the association in San
Francisco, California. However, there are still a number of individuals in
these countries who believe in the Sikolohiyang Pilipino orientation and
tradition though
they may no longer have the organizational expression.
SPREAD OF FILIPINO PSYCHOLOGY OUTSIDE THE PHILIPPINES
Filipino psychology
From Wikipedia,
History
Filipino Psychology emerged and grew as part of the nationalist
indigenization movement in the Philippines that was formalized in 1975.
The roots of Filipino Psychology can be traced back to the introduction of the
American education system in the Philippines. Agustin Alonzo was among the
first Filipino psychologist to return from his education in America 1925 to
teach at the College of Education in the University of the Philippines. Arriving
with them psychological knowledge rooted in the American tradition of
psychology. Western psychology is taught in schools as universal and
scientific despite being insensitive and inappropriate to Philippine culture.
This hegemony of Western American Psychology is referred to as Colonial
Psychology.
During the 1960s, many Filipino intellectuals and scholars were already
aware of the limitations and inapplicability of Western Psychology. Western-
oriented approaches in research in particular, had led scholars to paint the
Filipino through the “judgmental and impressionistic views of the colonizers.”[1]
It is with the use of American categories and standards that “the native
Filipino invariably suffers from the comparison in not too subtle attempts to
put forward Western behavior patterns as models for the Filipino.”[2] Early
efforts to correct the traditional way of teaching and studying psychology in
the 1960s include the translation of foreign materials and the use of the
Filipino language as a mode of instruction, however, these efforts fails to
address the problems brought about by colonial psychology as these efforts
were sparse and not collaborated upon by psychologists.
It was only in the 1970s when a concerted effort to address colonial
psychology in the form of Filipino Psychology. It was during the turbulent time
of Ferdinand Marcos' dictatorship when nationalist and radical sentiment
among scholars had allowed Filipino Psychology to emerge. Filipino
Psychology, along with advances in Filipinology and similarly History’s
Pantayong Pananaw, was led by Virgilio Enriquez, Prospero Covar, and Zeus
A. Salazar in the indigenization movement of their respective fields.
Enriquez returned from his studies to the Philippines in 1971 and established
the Philippine Psychology Research House (now Philippine Psychology
Research and Training House, PPRTH). In 1975, the very first annual
national conference on Filipino Psychology was held by the Pambansang
Samahan sa Sikolohiyang Pilipino (PSSP) marking the formalization of
Filipino Psychology.
Organizations
• Pambansang Samahan sa Sikolohiyang Pilipino (National Society for
Filipino Psychology)
• Bukluran sa Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Union of Filipino Psychology)
• TATSULOK - Alyansa ng mga Mag-aaral sa Sikolohiyang Pilipino
(TATSULOK - Alliance of Students of Filipino Psychology)
See also[edit]
• Asian psychology
• Indigenous psychology
• Filipino values
• Men in the Philippines
• Women in the Philippines
• Loob
• Tampo
• Mental health care in the Philippines
References[edit]
1. ^ Enriquez, V.G. (1992). From Colonial to Liberation Psychology. Quezon City:
University of the Philippines Press. p.57
2. ^ Enriquez, V.G. (1992). From Colonial to Liberation Psychology. Quezon City:
University of the Philippines Press. p.57
3. ^ Salazar, Z. (2018). Four Filiations in Philippine Psychological Thought.
Handbook of Filipino Psychology, p. 38.
• Casuga, S., Rhodius, A., & Vogel, E. (2011). The experience of the
bahala na attitude among Filipino athletes in international sporting
competition (Doctoral dissertation). John F. Kennedy University,
Pleasant Hill, California. ISBN 978-126-745-839-1
• Enriquez, V. (2004) "Indigenous Psychology and National
Consciousness" Chapters 1, 2, 3 & 6 in From Colonial To Liberation
Psychology: The Philippine Experience. De La Salle University Books,
Dasmariñas, Cavite. ISBN 971-542-002-8
• Enriquez, V. (1976) "Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Perspektibo at Direksiyon"
pp 5–21. Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Teorya, Metodo, at Gamit. Inedit ni R.
Pe-Pua. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press, 1995.
• Guanzon, M.A. (1985) "Paggamit ng Panukat na Sikolohikal sa
Pilipinas: Kalagayan at mg Isyu" pp 341–362 nasa New Directions in
Indigenous Psychology: Sikolohiyang Pilipino, Isyu, Pananaw at
Kaalaman. Inedit nina A. Aganon at M.A. David. Manila: National
Bookstore.
• Mendoza, S. L. (2007). Theoretical Advances in the Discourse of
Indigenization. Mga Babasahin Sa Agham Panlipunang Pilipino:
Sikolohiyang Pilipino, Pilipinolohiya, at Pantayong Pananaw., 241-297.
• Orteza, G. (1997) "Pakikipagkuwentuhan: Isang Pamamaraaan ng
Sama-samahang Pananaliksik, Pagpapatotoo at Pagtulong sa
Sikolohiyang Pilipino" nasa PPRTH Occasional Papers Series 1997,
No.
• Orteza, G. at D. Tuazon "Ang Pagmamasid Bilang Katutubong
Pamamaraan ng Pananaliksik sa Sikolohiya" pp 74–90 nasa Mga Piling
Babasahin sa Panlarangang Pananaliksik. Tinipon ni R. Pe-Pua.
Lungsod Quezon: Unibersidad ng Pilipinas.
• Paredes-Canilao, N., & Babaran-Diaz, M. (2013). Sikolohiyang Pilipino:
50 Years of Critical-Emancipatory Social Science in the Philippines.
Critical Psychology in Changing the World, 265-283. Retrieved from
https://thediscourseunit.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/philippines-i-765-
783.pdf.
• Pe-Pua, R. at E. Protacio-Marcelino (1998) "Sikolohiyang Pilipino
(Filipino Psychology): A legacy of Virgilio G. Enriquez. Papel na binasa
sa International Association on Cross-Cultural Psychology Conference
sa Bellingham, Washington State, US, 3–8 August 1998. Fulltext at:
Blackwell-Synergy and IngentaConnect
• Pe-Pua, R. (1985) "Pagtatanong-tanong: Katutubong Metodo ng
Pananaliksik" pp 416–430 nasa New Directions in Indigenous
Psychology: Sikolohiyang Pilipino, Isyu, Pananaw at Kaalaman. Inedit
nina A. Aganon at M.A. David. Manila: National Bookstore.
• Pe-Pua, R. (2006). From Decolonizing Psychology to the Development
of a Cross-Indigenous Perspective in Methodology; The Philippine
Experience. Indigenous and Cultural Psychology; Understanding
People in Context. (pp. 109 - 137). Retrieved October 2, 2016, from
http://indigenouspsych.org/Resources/Indigenous%20and%20Cultural
%20Psychology%20-
%20Understanding%20People%20in%20Context.pdf
• Salazar, Z. (1985) "Hiya: Panlapi at Salita" pp 288–296 nasa New
Directions in Indigenous Psychology: Sikolohiyang Pilipino, Isyu,
Pananaw at Kaalaman. Inedit nina A. Aganon at M. A. David. Manila:
National Bookstore.
• Salazar, Z. A. (1980). Faith Healing in the Philippines. Asian Studies
Journal. Retrieved September 21, 2018, from
http://www.asj.upd.edu.ph/mediabox/archive/ASJ-18-1980/salazar.pdf
• Salazar, Z. (2018). Four Filiations in Philippine Psychological Thought.
Handbook of Filipino Psychology, The University of the Philippines
Press. 32-42.
• Sta. Maria, Madelene and Carlo Magno. Dimensions of Filipino
Negative Social Emotions, 7th Conference of the Asian Association of
Social Psychology, July 25–28, 2007, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia,
scribd.com
• Yacat, J. (2016).
http://www.journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/djwf/article/viewFile/3808/349
2. Journals.upd.edu.ph. Retrieved 18 August 2016, from
http://www.journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/djwf/article/viewFile/3808/349
2