Certified Mail No.

7018 0040 0000 5607 6529

Gordon Warren Epperly

P.O. Box 34358
Juneau, Alaska 99803

Tel: (907) 789-5659

E-Mail: enter7740@14th-amendment.com

August 26, 2019

Donald J. Trump
President of The United States of America
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20500

In Reg: Birthright Citizenship

Honorable President Donald J. Trump

This “Letter” and the enclosed “Attachment Letter” runs to and addresses
the “Fourteenth Amendment” to the “Constitution” for “The United States of America.” /1
May the information herein be helpful to you in support of your
proposed “Executive Order” to abolish “Birthright Citizenship.”

The “Fourteenth Amendment” has been used as the pretended source of authority for
our “Federal Judges” to make “WAR” upon the “Commandments” and “Ordinances” of
our “Heavenly Father,” the “I am the I am” and his “Son,” our Lord, “Jesus” the Christ.
This “WAR” is with the murdering of his “Children” from the “Wombs” of their “Mothers” to

1/ The Delegates to the “Confederation” of November 15, 1776 did adopt the style of this “Confederation”
to be “The United States of America” at “Article I” of the “Articles of Confederation.”

Page 1 of 9
the legalizing of “Same Sex Marriages” ( thou shalt not lie with mankind,
as with womankind /2 for they are “abominations” in his sight.).

On or about August 21, 2019, you announced that “Birthright Citizenship” for
those “Infants” whom were born to non-citizens of the “States” /3 of the “Union” or of
the “United States” will be terminated by “Executive Order.” Of course, your adversaries
takes a different view in that they believe the authority for “Birthright Citizenship” is with
the “Fourteenth Amendment” to the “Constitution” for “The United States of America”:

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction
thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside, ….”
[Emphasis added].

The subject of “Historical Facts” addressing the ratification of

the “Fourteenth Amendment” to the “Constitution” for “The United States of America”
may be found on my website: www.14th-amendment.com:

1. “Introduction” – ( https://tinyurl.com/hvrz86x /4 ); and

2. “Equal Protection” (Law or Tool of Usurpation) U.S. Congressional Record –

( https://tinyurl.com/y2mzxcd2 /5 ); and

3. “A Treatise” as authored by Judge Lander H. Perez, Louisiana –

( https://tinyurl.com/y3fn49fw /6 ).

2/ see Holy Bible, Leviticus 18:22 - King James Version (KJV).

3/ The word “State” with the upper case letter “S” represents a “Corporation” whereas the word “state” with
the lower case letter “s” represents a “Country” with sovereign powers. For the purpose of this letter, we will
use the word “State” to represent either a “Corporation” or a “Country” of sovereign powers.

4/ http://www.14th-amendment.com/introduction.htm

5/ http://www.14th-amendment.com/Miscellaneous/Articles/Judge_Perez/Judge_Perez.pdf
6/ http://www.14th-amendment.com/Court_Documents/Case_No._J90-010-CV/Exhibits/
A_Treatise/Treatise.pdf

Page 2 of 9
On my website “U.S. Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment – The Amendment That
Never Existed” ( http://www.14th-amendment.com ), there are numerous “Articles” which
address the “Fourteenth Amendment” ( https://tinyurl.com/45q34yy /7 )
including “Birthright Citizenship” as published by “The Patriot Post”
( https://tinyurl.com/yxhvvdtc /8 ).

My “Fourteenth Amendment” website is the only location on the “Internet” which carries
the true and correct copies of the “House” and “Senate Journals” of the “States” of
the “Union” showing that the ratification of the “Fourteenth Amendment” was
expressly “Rejected” by more than one-fourth (¼th) of the “States” that were in
the “Union” during the years of 1866-67. Even though “Google” has blocked my website
from its “Search Engine,” you may view those “House” and “Senate Journals” of
the “States” of the “Union” at: “https://tinyurl.com/7tt52hv” /9.

The “U.S. Congress” of the “Northern States” (during the “Civil War” years) refused to
seat the “Representatives” of the “Southern States” in the “House” and “Senate” of
the “U.S. Congress” and then did overturn the “Negative Votes” of “Ratification” as cast
by the “Southern (Rebel) States” with “Votes of Ratification” as cast by “Members”
of “Military Districts” as established by the “Northern States” sitting in “Congress.”
But here is the problem – MILITARY DISTRICTS ARE NOT STATES and there is no
authority of “Article V” of the “U.S. Constitution” that authorizes the “U.S. Congress” to
substitute the “Votes” as cast by “States” of the “Union” on “Constitutional Amendments”
with “Votes” as cast by “Military Districts.”

7/ http://www.14th-amendment.com/Miscellaneous/Articles/page_frame.htm

8/ http://www.14th-amendment.com/Miscellaneous/Articles/Birthright_Citizenship/
Birthright_Citizenship.pdf
9/ http://www.14th-amendment.com/Historical_Documents/State_Journals/page_frame.htm

Page 3 of 9
There is no authority of the “U.S. Constitution” that authorizes the “U.S. Congress” to rule
upon the legitimacy of the “Votes” as cast by the “States” of the “Union” nor may any
authority be found within the “U.S. Constitution” that authorizes the “U.S. Congress” to
instruct any “Member” of the “Executive Branch” of government to declare any “Vote” as
cast by a “State” to be “null and void” and give the “Votes” as cast by “Military Districts”
legitimacy as was done to “U.S. Secretary, William H. Seward”
( https://tinyurl.com/y3zj2f9v /10 ).

Prominent “Members” of both “Houses” of the “U.S. Congress” have full knowledge that
the “Fourteenth Amendment” is not an “Amendment” to the “U.S. Constitution,”
it is a “fraud” in fact and law (e.g. “https://tinyurl.com/y63lbfyc,”
“https://tinyurl.com/y5ohu74e,” “https://tinyurl.com/yx9tgrum” /11 ). It is the position
of several “Members” of the “U.S. Congress” that the question of ratification
of “Constitutional Amendments” is a “Judicial Question” for the “Federal Courts”
to resolve ( e.g. “https://tinyurl.com/y3v5pmey” /12 ).

I brought the ratification question of the “Fourteenth Amendment” to the “Federal Courts”
with the “U.S. District Courts,” “U.S. Court of Appeals,” and the “U.S. Supreme Court”
declaring that the ratification of “Constitutional Amendments” is
a “Political Question” which the “Federal Courts” could not (will not) address
( see “https://tinyurl.com/yxol2vmy” /13 ).

10/ http://www.14th-amendment.com/Statutes_Proclamations/Proclamations/
William_H._Seward_Proclamation_No._13/Seward_Proclamation_No._13.pdf
11/ http://www.14th-amendment.com/Miscellaneous/Letters/U.S._Congress/
Rep._Don_Young/US_Representative_Don_Young.pdf

http://www.14th-amendment.com/Miscellaneous/Letters/U.S._Congress/Sen._Frank_H._Murkowski/
Letter_U.S._Senator_Murkowski_(09-29-95).pdf

http://www.14th-amendment.com/Miscellaneous/Letters/U.S._Congress/Sen_Ted_Stevens/
US_Senator_Ted_Stevens_(06-28-85).pdf

12/ http://www.14th-amendment.com/Miscellaneous/Letters/U.S._Congress/Sen._Orrin_G._Hatch/
US_Senator_Orrin_G._Hatch.pdf
13/ http://www.14th-amendment.com/Court_Documents/Case_No._J90-010-CV/page_frame.htm

Page 4 of 9
What is a “Political Question”? In the case of “Baker vs. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)”
“Justice Brennon” listed a variety of factors to be considered, noting that:

“[p]rominent on the surface of any case held to involve a political question is found
a textually demonstrable constitutional commitment of the issue to a coordinate
political department; or a lack of judicially discoverable and manageable
standards for resolving it; or the impossibility of deciding without an initial policy
determination of a kind clearly for nonjudicial discretion; or the impossibility of
a court’s undertaking independent resolution without expressing lack of
the respect due coordinate branches of government; or an unusual need for
unquestioning adherence to a political decision already made; or the potentiality
of embarrassment from multifarious pronouncements by various departments on
one question.” [Emphasis added]

At the time the “Fourteenth Amendment” was submitted to the “States” of the “Union”
for ratification, the “U.S. Congress” enacted a law delegating to the “U.S. Secretary
of State” the authority to oversee the casting of votes of ratification
of “Constitutional Amendments”:

“Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That, whenever official notice shall have been
received, at the Department of State, that any amendment which heretofore has
been, or hereafter may be, proposed to the constitution of the United States
has been adopted according to the constitution, it shall be the duty of the said
Secretary of State forth-with to cause the said amendment to be published in the
said newspapers authorized to promulgate the laws, with his certificate, specifying
the states by which the same have been adopted, and that the same has become
valid, to all intents and purposes, as a part of the constitution of the United States.”
[Emphasis added].

FIFTEENTH CONGRESS. Sess. I, Ch. 80. (1818)

With this law of “FIFTEENTH CONGRESS. Sess. I, Ch. 80” we see that
the “U.S. Congress” surrendered any authority it may have had to rule upon the legitimacy

Page 5 of 9
of “Ratification Votes” of “Constitutional Amendments” for the “Members” of
the “U.S. Congress” delegated that authority to the “Executive Branch” of government.
As this provision of law was not “Repealed” at the time the “U.S. Congress”
of “Northern States” took upon itself to rule upon the “Ratification Votes” of
the “Fourteenth Amendment” (and then issuing forth an “Order” upon
the “U.S. Secretary of State, William H. Seward” to proclaim
the “Fourteenth Amendment” to be “Ratified” is an act of “Fraud”
leaving “William H. Seward’s Proclamation No. 13” /14 to be “Null and Void” as a matter
of law.).

Notwithstanding the “Legal Argument” as presented in the “Attachment Letter” to

the “Alaska State Legislature” (that it is the “Legislatures” of the “States” that have
the authority to rule upon the “Constitutionality of Ratification”
of “Constitutional Amendments”), the “U.S. Congress” in the year 1818 law (supra.)
(and within the law of today /15) proclaiming that it is the “Executive Branch” that has been
delegated the authority to determine the “Constitutionality” of “Votes” cast upon
“Constitutional Amendments”:

Ҥ106b. Amendments to Constitution

Whenever official notice is received at the National Archives and Records

Administration that any amendment proposed to the Constitution of
the United States has been adopted, according to the provisions of
the Constitution, the Archivist of the United States shall forthwith cause
the amendment to be published, with his certificate, specifying the States by which
the same may have been adopted, and that the same has become valid, to all

14/ “15 Stat. Lg. 718”

15/ see “1 USC 106b”

Page 6 of 9
 intents and purposes, as a part of the Constitution of the United States.”
[Emphasis added]
(Added Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, § 2(b), 65 Stat. 710;
amended Pub. L. 98–497, title I, § 107(d), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2291.)

leaving the authority with the “President” and his “Cabinet Members”
to rule upon the “Constitutionality” of the “Ratification Votes” as cast
upon “Constitutional Amendments.” The “U.S. Secretary of State, William H. Seward”
had “ruled” within his “Proclamation of Ratification” of July 20, 1868
( “https://tinyurl.com/y6nyq6hm” /16 ) that he had serious questions of the lawful status of
the “Legislatures” of the “Southern (“Rebel”) States” and that the “Votes of Ratification”
as cast by those “States” may not be valid:

“…. And whereas neither the act just quoted from

(“FIFTEENTH CONGRESS. Sess. I, Ch. 80.”), nor any other law,
expressly or by conclusive implication, authorizes the Secretary of State
to determine and decide doubtful questions as to the authenticity of the
organization of State legislatures, /17 or as to the power of any State
legislature to recall a previous act or resolution of ratification of
any amendment proposed to the Constitution; ….

“…. And whereas it further appears from documents on file in

this Department that the amendment to the Constitution of

16/ http://www.14th-amendment.com/Statutes_Proclamations/Proclamations/
William_H._Seward_Proclamation_No._11/Proclamation_No,_11.pdf
17/ At the time the “Ratification Votes” of 1868 were cast, there were no “Southern (“Rebel”) States”
in existence to cast “Votes of Ratification.” The status of “Statehood” of those “Southern States”
were “rescinded” by the “Northern States” (sitting as the “U.S. Congress”) on March 2, 1867, being
they were replaced with “Military Districts” of the “U.S. Congress” subject to the authority
of “Military Commanders,” not the “Civil Authority” of the “People.” They had no representation in
the “Senate” of the “U.S. Congress” as mandated by “Article V” of the “U.S. Constitution” and they had
no voice in the “Resolutions” creating the “Fourteenth Amendment.” (see the laws of “THIRTY-NINTH
CONGRESS, Sess. II. Ch. 153,” “FORTIETH CONGRESS. Sess. I. Ch. 30,” “FORTIETH CONGRESS.
Sess. II. Ch. 70.” See also “Mis. Doc. No. 2, 39th Congress, 2d Session. SENATE” [Senator Sumner’s
Resolution entitled: “RESOLUTIONS declaring the true principles of reconstruction; the jurisdiction
of Congress over the whole subject; the illegality of existing governments in the rebel States, and
the exclusion of such States, with such illegal governments, from representation in Congress and from
voting on constitutional amendments.”], and “Resolution No. 58” of July 20, 1868 [“A Resolution
excluding from the electoral College Votes of States lately in Rebellion, which shall not have been
reorganized.”]).

Page 7 of 9
 the United States, proposed as afore-said, has also been ratified by newly
constituted and newly established bodies avowing themselves to be
and acting as the legislatures, respectively, of the States of Arkansas,
Florida, North Carolina, Louisiana, South Carolina, and Alabama;

“…. And whereas it further appears from official documents on file in

this Department that the legislatures of two of the States first above
enumerated, to wit, Ohio and New Jersey, have since passed resolutions
respectively withdrawing the consent of each of said States to the aforesaid
amendment;

“…. And, whereas the twenty-three States first hereinbefore named, whose
legislatures have ratified the said proposed amendment, and the six States
next thereafter named, having ratified the said proposed amendment by
newly constituted and established legislative bodies, together
constitute three fourths of the whole number of States in the United States:

Now, therefore, be it known that I, William H. Seward, Secretary of State of

the United States ….. do hereby certify that if the resolutions of the
legislatures of Ohio and New Jersey ratifying the aforesaid amendment are
to be deemed as remaining of full force and effect, notwithstanding the
subsequent resolutions of the legislatures of those States, which purport to
withdraw the consent of said States from such ratification, then the
aforesaid amendment has been ratified in the manner hereinbefore
mentioned, and so has become valid, to all intents and purposes, as a part
of the Constitution of the United States.” [Emphasis added].

There are many “Constitutional Defects” which makes the “Fourteenth Amendment” to
be “null and void” as an “Amendment” to the “Constitution” for “The United States
of America.” These “defects” have been addressed within the “Attachment Letter” to
the “Alaska State Legislature.”

Page 8 of 9
Please bring this “Constitutional Fraud” to an end. Proclaim the “Fourteenth Amendment”
to not exist (and that it has never existed) as an “Amendment” to the “Constitution”
for “The United States of America.”

Sincerely Yours

Gordon Warren Epperly

Page 9 of 9