Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
ISSN No:-2456-2165
Abstract:- PT. X is a testing laboratory that has been very expensive. All work events or accidents at the
accredited by KAN (National Accreditation Laboratory can actually be avoided and anticipated if
Committee), which is engaged in environmental testing workers at the Laboratory know and always follow safe
services. This dangerous work environment will work procedures at the workplace.
certainly result in a large amount of work accident risk.
This problem needs to be overcome to reduce Laboratory Safety is an important matter, as a safety
workplace accidents that might occur. This research measure in working in the Laboratory, with the aim of
focuses on the FMEA (Failure Mode Effects Analysis) protecting workers and those around them from the risk of
method to identify work accidents that occur and then health problems caused in the Laboratory. Working safely
determine the level of risk. Finally, work accidents that and safely means reducing the risk of accidents.
have occurred are determined by the risk level
calculated by the value of the RPN (Risk Priority PT. X is a testing laboratory that has been accredited
Number). This study found ten work accidents that by KAN (National Accreditation Committee), which is
have the potential to occur in building projects that are engaged in environmental testing services. Work accidents
used as research objects. The ten work accidents are as analysts often occur in material testing. This problem
calculated each RPN value to determine the level of needs to be addressed to reduce workplace accidents that
risk. Based on the value of the RPN, the study found might occur. The following is work accident data at PT. X
that the analysis preparation work on the lab table had in 2013-2018.
the highest RPN value so it can be concluded that this
work needs attention to improve its safety against work No Type of Work Accident Number of Incidents
accidents. 1 Eye accident 8
2 Inhalation of hazardous gas 12
Keywords:- Work Accident, FMEA (Failure Mode And 3 Irritations 27
Effects Analysis), Severity, Occurance, Detection, (RPN) 4 Hit by glass 38
Risk Priority Number. 5 Injury lifts heavy items 10
6 Burns 9
I. INTRODUCTION 7 Bad odor 7
8 Chemical spills 49
A. Background 9 Fatigue 2
Occupational safety and health (K3) is a thought and
10 Slip 3
effort to ensure wholeness and perfection both physically
Table 1:- Table Frequency of Occupational Accidents in
and spiritually. Work safety has been a concern among
the Laboratory of PT. X of 2013 - 2018
governments and businesses for a long time. The safety
Source : PT.X
factor becomes very important because it is related to
employee performance and to company performance.
Based on the description above, the authors will
conduct a study to reduce the risk of workplace accidents
One type of hazardous work is in the Laboratory. The
with the research title: "Work Accident Risk Analysis in
laboratory is a place for conducting experiments, research
the Laboratory of PT. X With the Failure Mode And
and development, or quality control. Working in the
Effects Analysis (FMEA) Method".
Laboratory will not be separated from the various kinds of
possible dangers of the materials used. In addition, the
B. Formulation of the Problem
equipment in the Laboratory can also cause a high risk
Based on the background described above, the
hazard for people who are conducting research if they do
problem formulation in this study is as follows:
not know how and how to use the equipment to be used.
1. What are the potential hazards of work accidents in the
activities of analysts at PT. X ?
Understanding and awareness is needed for safety
2. What is the level of risk of workplace accidents in the
and work hazards in the Laboratory. There have been many
activities of analysts at PT. X ?
accidents or injuries that are permanent, minor injuries, or
internal health problems that can cause chronic or acute
illness, as well as damage to laboratory supporting
facilities and equipment such as instruments which are
Level Occurance
10 Almost impossible
9 Very difficult
8 Difficult
7 Quite difficult
6 A little difficult
5 Just ordinary
4 Easy enough
3 Easy
2 Very easy
1 Almost certainly
Table 2:- Scale of Detection FMEA
Source : (Sellappan & Palanikumar, 2013)
No Respondent Status
R Table R Calculate Average
Question 1 2 3 4 (R table < R count)
1 5 5 5 6 0,811 0,9656 5,3 Valid
2 5 5 5 6 0,811 0,9656 5,3 Valid
3 5 6 6 7 0,811 0,9386 6,0 Valid
4 5 5 6 7 0,811 0,9045 5,8 Valid
5 5 5 5 6 0,811 0,9656 5,3 Valid
6 4 4 4 5 0,811 0,9656 4,3 Valid
7 5 5 5 6 0,811 0,9656 5,3 Valid
8 3 3 3 4 0,811 0,9656 3,3 Valid
9 2 2 2 3 0,811 0,9656 2,3 Valid
10 1 1 1 2 0,811 0,9656 1,3 Valid
11 5 5 5 6 0,811 0,9656 5,3 Valid
12 5 6 6 7 0,811 0,9386 6,0 Valid
13 5 5 5 6 0,811 0,9656 5,3 Valid
14 3 4 4 5 0,811 0,9386 4,0 Valid
15 2 2 2 3 0,811 0,9656 2,3 Valid
16 3 4 4 5 0,811 0,9386 4,0 Valid
17 3 4 4 5 0,811 0,9463 4,0 Valid
18 2 3 3 4 0,811 0,9386 3,0 Valid
Cronbach's Alpha Value (ɑ) = 0,988
Total 66 72 72 91
Reliable
Table 4:- Severity Assessment Table
Source: Data processed with SPSS version 25
C. Occurance
No Respondent Status
R Table R Calculate Average
Question 1 2 3 4 (R table < R count)
1 2 3 2 2 0,811 0,8947 2,3 Valid
2 5 6 5 5 0,811 0,8947 5,3 Valid
3 3 4 3 3 0,811 0,8947 3,3 Valid
4 2 3 2 2 0,811 0,8947 2,3 Valid
5 3 4 3 3 0,811 0,8947 3,3 Valid
6 2 4 2 2 0,811 0,8947 2,5 Valid
7 8 9 8 9 0,811 0,8812 8,5 Valid
8 4 5 4 5 0,811 0,8812 4,5 Valid
9 4 5 4 5 0,811 0,8812 4,5 Valid
10 5 6 5 6 0,811 0,8812 5,5 Valid
11 5 6 5 6 0,811 0,8812 5,5 Valid
12 3 4 3 4 0,811 0,8812 3,5 Valid
13 2 3 2 2 0,811 0,8947 2,3 Valid
14 1 2 1 1 0,811 0,8947 1,3 Valid
15 3 4 3 4 0,811 0,8812 3,5 Valid
16 1 2 1 1 0,811 0,8947 1,3 Valid
17 6 8 6 7 0,811 0,9987 6,8 Valid
18 7 8 7 8 0,811 0,8812 7,5 Valid
Total 66 86 66 75 Cronbach's Alpha Value (ɑ) = 0,982 (Reliable)
Table 5:- Occurance Assessment Table
Source: Data processed with SPSS version 25
No Respondent Status
R Table R Calculate Average
Question 1 2 3 4 (R table < R count)
1 4 3 4 3 0,811 0,9685 3,5 Valid
2 3 2 4 2 0,811 0,9822 2,8 Valid
3 3 2 3 2 0,811 0,9685 2,5 Valid
4 3 2 4 2 0,811 0,9822 2,8 Valid
5 3 2 3 2 0,811 0,9685 2,5 Valid
6 3 2 3 2 0,811 0,9685 2,5 Valid
7 3 2 4 2 0,811 0,9822 2,8 Valid
8 3 2 3 2 0,811 0,9685 2,5 Valid
9 3 2 3 2 0,811 0,9685 2,5 Valid
10 3 2 4 2 0,811 0,9822 2,8 Valid
11 3 2 4 2 0,811 0,9822 2,8 Valid
12 3 2 3 2 0,811 0,9685 2,5 Valid
13 3 2 4 2 0,811 0,9822 2,8 Valid
14 4 3 4 3 0,811 0,9685 3,5 Valid
15 3 2 4 2 0,811 0,9822 2,8 Valid
16 3 2 3 2 0,811 0,9685 2,5 Valid
17 3 2 4 2 0,811 0,9822 2,8 Valid
18 3 2 3 2 0,811 0,9685 2,5 Valid
Total 56 38 64 38 Cronbach's Alpha Value (ɑ) = 0,993 (Reliable)
Table 6:- Detection Assessment Table
Source: Data processed with SPSS version 25
Activity
No Danger Type Risk impact S Causes O Control D RPN
Type
-Provides PPE and
-Do not use
-Irritation of skin first aid kit
-spilled personal protective
and other organs 5,3 2,3 -Inspection by 3,5 42,7
chemicals equipment (PPE)
affected by spills superiors regarding
-Ignore K3
1 Titration the use of PPE
-The quality of the -Provides good
-The
-Wounds on the glassware is not quality glassware
glassware 5,3 5,3 2,8 78,7
skin good -Work with focus
broke
-Human error and caution
-Provides PPE and
-Inhaling first aid kit
-Respiratory -Don't use PPE
harmful gas 6 3,3 -Inspection by 2,5 49,5
disorders -Ignore K3
fumes superiors regarding
the use of PPE
-Provides PPE and
Preparation -Chemicals in -Irritation of skin first aid kit
-Don't use PPE
2 in the acid contact with and other organs 5,8 2,3 -Inspection by 2,8 37,4
-Ignore K3
room skin/eyes that are in contact superiors regarding
the use of PPE
-Arrangement of
-Narrow ingredients that -Record chemicals
preparation -spilled chemicals 5,3 preparation is not 3,3 for analysis with 2,5 43,7
space good when in the 5R
acid chamber
From the Risk Priority Number analysis, it was found that three work accidents with the highest RPN level were as follows :
Danger
No Activity Type Risk impact S Causes O Control D RPN
Type
-Irritation of -Provides PPE and first aid
Analysis
-spilled skin and other -Don't use PPE kit
1 preparation on 5,3 8,5 2,8 126,1
chemicals organs affected -Ignore K3 -Inspection by superiors
the lab table
by spills regarding the use of PPE
Danger
No Activity Type Risk impact S Causes O Control D RPN
Type
Irritation of
-Provides PPE and first aid
Chemical skin and other
Pipette the -Don't use PPE kit
2 spills / organs affected 5,3 5,5 2,8 81,6
solution -Ignore K3 -Inspection by superiors
spills by splashes /
regarding the use of PPE
spills
-The quality of -Provides good quality
-The
-Wounds on the the glassware glassware
3 Titration glassware 5,3 5,3 2,8 78,7
skin is not good -Work with focus and
broke
-Human error caution
Table 8:- RPN Calculation Results
VI. CONCLUSION
REFERENCES