MAERSK V CA  delay in the delivery of the goods spanning a period of two 2

months and seven 7 days falls was beyond the realm of

reasonableness
 through MAERSK negligence was mishipped to Richmond, Virginia.
LIABLE MAERSK
FGU V CA  To be exempted from responsibility, the natural disaster should have
been the proximate and only cause of the loss. There must have been no
contributory negligence on the part of the common carrier.
o there was blatant negligence on the part of M/T ANCO’s
crewmembers, first in leaving the engine-less barge D/B Lucio at
the mercy of the storm without the assistance of the tugboat, and
again in failing to heed the request of SMC’s representatives to
have the barge transferred to a safer place

DSR SENATOR V FEDERAL  NO, In addition to Article 1734( NA WALA YUNG FIRE DUN), natural
disaster must have been the proximate and only cause of the loss, and
that the carrier has exercised due diligence to prevent or minimize the loss
before, during or after the occurrence of the disaster.
MAERSK V CA  delay in the delivery of the goods spanning a period of two 2
months and seven 7 days falls was beyond the realm of
reasonableness
 through MAERSK negligence was mishipped to Richmond, Virginia.
LIABLE MAERSK
FGU V CA  To be exempted from responsibility, the natural disaster should have
been the proximate and only cause of the loss. There must have been no
contributory negligence on the part of the common carrier.
o there was blatant negligence on the part of M/T ANCO’s
crewmembers, first in leaving the engine-less barge D/B Lucio at
the mercy of the storm without the assistance of the tugboat, and
again in failing to heed the request of SMC’s representatives to
have the barge transferred to a safer place

DSR SENATOR V FEDERAL  NO, In addition to Article 1734( NA WALA YUNG FIRE DUN), natural
disaster must have been the proximate and only cause of the loss, and
that the carrier has exercised due diligence to prevent or minimize the loss
before, during or after the occurrence of the disaster.
MAERSK V CA  delay in the delivery of the goods spanning a period of two 2
months and seven 7 days falls was beyond the realm of
reasonableness
 through MAERSK negligence was mishipped to Richmond, Virginia.
LIABLE MAERSK
FGU V CA  To be exempted from responsibility, the natural disaster should have
been the proximate and only cause of the loss. There must have been no
contributory negligence on the part of the common carrier.
o there was blatant negligence on the part of M/T ANCO’s
crewmembers, first in leaving the engine-less barge D/B Lucio at
the mercy of the storm without the assistance of the tugboat, and
again in failing to heed the request of SMC’s representatives to
have the barge transferred to a safer place
DSR SENATOR V FEDERAL  NO, In addition to Article 1734( NA WALA YUNG FIRE DUN), natural
disaster must have been the proximate and only cause of the loss, and
that the carrier has exercised due diligence to prevent or minimize the loss
before, during or after the occurrence of the disaster.
MAERSK V CA  delay in the delivery of the goods spanning a period of two 2
months and seven 7 days falls was beyond the realm of
reasonableness
 through MAERSK negligence was mishipped to Richmond, Virginia.
LIABLE MAERSK
FGU V CA  To be exempted from responsibility, the natural disaster should have
been the proximate and only cause of the loss. There must have been no
contributory negligence on the part of the common carrier.
o there was blatant negligence on the part of M/T ANCO’s
crewmembers, first in leaving the engine-less barge D/B Lucio at
the mercy of the storm without the assistance of the tugboat, and
again in failing to heed the request of SMC’s representatives to
have the barge transferred to a safer place

DSR SENATOR V FEDERAL  NO, In addition to Article 1734( NA WALA YUNG FIRE DUN), natural
disaster must have been the proximate and only cause of the loss, and
that the carrier has exercised due diligence to prevent or minimize the loss
before, during or after the occurrence of the disaster.
MAERSK V CA  delay in the delivery of the goods spanning a period of two 2
months and seven 7 days falls was beyond the realm of
reasonableness
 through MAERSK negligence was mishipped to Richmond, Virginia.
LIABLE MAERSK
FGU V CA  To be exempted from responsibility, the natural disaster should have
been the proximate and only cause of the loss. There must have been no
contributory negligence on the part of the common carrier.
o there was blatant negligence on the part of M/T ANCO’s
crewmembers, first in leaving the engine-less barge D/B Lucio at
the mercy of the storm without the assistance of the tugboat, and
again in failing to heed the request of SMC’s representatives to
have the barge transferred to a safer place

DSR SENATOR V FEDERAL  NO, In addition to Article 1734( NA WALA YUNG FIRE DUN), natural
disaster must have been the proximate and only cause of the loss, and
that the carrier has exercised due diligence to prevent or minimize the loss
before, during or after the occurrence of the disaster.
MAERSK V CA  delay in the delivery of the goods spanning a period of two 2
months and seven 7 days falls was beyond the realm of
reasonableness
 through MAERSK negligence was mishipped to Richmond, Virginia.
LIABLE MAERSK
FGU V CA  To be exempted from responsibility, the natural disaster should have
been the proximate and only cause of the loss. There must have been no
 contributory negligence on the part of the common carrier.
o there was blatant negligence on the part of M/T ANCO’s
crewmembers, first in leaving the engine-less barge D/B Lucio at
the mercy of the storm without the assistance of the tugboat, and
again in failing to heed the request of SMC’s representatives to
have the barge transferred to a safer place

DSR SENATOR V FEDERAL  NO, In addition to Article 1734( NA WALA YUNG FIRE DUN), natural
disaster must have been the proximate and only cause of the loss, and
that the carrier has exercised due diligence to prevent or minimize the loss
before, during or after the occurrence of the disaster.
MAERSK V CA  delay in the delivery of the goods spanning a period of two 2
months and seven 7 days falls was beyond the realm of
reasonableness
 through MAERSK negligence was mishipped to Richmond, Virginia.
LIABLE MAERSK
FGU V CA  To be exempted from responsibility, the natural disaster should have
been the proximate and only cause of the loss. There must have been no
contributory negligence on the part of the common carrier.
o there was blatant negligence on the part of M/T ANCO’s
crewmembers, first in leaving the engine-less barge D/B Lucio at
the mercy of the storm without the assistance of the tugboat, and
again in failing to heed the request of SMC’s representatives to
have the barge transferred to a safer place

DSR SENATOR V FEDERAL  NO, In addition to Article 1734( NA WALA YUNG FIRE DUN), natural
disaster must have been the proximate and only cause of the loss, and
that the carrier has exercised due diligence to prevent or minimize the loss
before, during or after the occurrence of the disaster.
MAERSK V CA  delay in the delivery of the goods spanning a period of two 2
months and seven 7 days falls was beyond the realm of
reasonableness
 through MAERSK negligence was mishipped to Richmond, Virginia.
LIABLE MAERSK
FGU V CA  To be exempted from responsibility, the natural disaster should have
been the proximate and only cause of the loss. There must have been no
contributory negligence on the part of the common carrier.
o there was blatant negligence on the part of M/T ANCO’s
crewmembers, first in leaving the engine-less barge D/B Lucio at
the mercy of the storm without the assistance of the tugboat, and
again in failing to heed the request of SMC’s representatives to
have the barge transferred to a safer place

DSR SENATOR V FEDERAL  NO, In addition to Article 1734( NA WALA YUNG FIRE DUN), natural
disaster must have been the proximate and only cause of the loss, and
that the carrier has exercised due diligence to prevent or minimize the loss
before, during or after the occurrence of the disaster.