Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
7. Which from the following should be used to increase correct responses and appropriate
behavior?
(A) Praise
(B) Reward
(C) Ignorance
(D) Strictness
8. Which from the following should be used to decrease minor inappropriate behavior?
(A) Praise
(B) Reward
(C) Ignorance
(D) Strictness
9. The book Emile or “On Education” on the nature of education and man is written by
(A) Aristotle
(B) Plato
(C) John Dewey
(D) Rousseau
12. According to John Dewey, school is a __________ institution, and education is a __________
process.
(A) social, social
(B) social, philosophical
(C) philosophical, philosophical
(D) environmental, psychological
14. Responses that produce a satisfying effect in a particular situation become __________ to
occur again in that situation.
(A) not likely
(B) equally likely
(C) less likely
(D) more likely
15. Responses that produce a discomforting effect become __________ to occur again in that
situation.
(A) not likely
(B) equally likely
(C) less likely
(D) more likely
17. The field of study concerned with the construction of thought processes, including
remembering, problem solving, and decision-making is called
(A) Education
(B) Pedagogy
(C) Cognitive Development
(D) Epistemology
19. The more often a particular ability is used the __________ it becomes.
(A) more important
(B) less important
(C) stronger
(D) weaker
24. The process of reasoning from one or more given statements to reach a logically certain
conclusion is called
(A) Deductive Reasoning
(B) Inductive Reasoning
(C) Qualitative Reasoning
(D) Quantitative Reasoning
25. The reasoning in which the given statements are viewed as supplying strong evidence for the
truth of the conclusion is called
(A) Deductive Reasoning
(B) Inductive Reasoning
(C) Qualitative Reasoning
(D) Quantitative Reasoning
27. Children are usually egocentric during __________ and __________ stages.
(A) Sensorimotor, Preoperational
(B) Preoperational, Concrete operational
(C) Concrete operational, Formal operational
(D) Formal operational, Sensorimotor
28. According to Jean Piaget, children are no longer egocentric when entering
(A) Sensorimotor stage
(B) Preoperational stage
(C) Concrete operational stage
(D) Formal operational stage
29. According to Piaget’s theory of cognitive development, the Concrete operational stage starts
at age
(A) 3
(B) 7
(C) 11
(D) 15
30. According to Piaget’s theory of cognitive development, the Formal operational stage starts at
age
(A) 3
(B) 7
(C) 11
(D) 15
32. Rousseau advocated an educational method which consisted of removing the child from
(A) school
(B) burden
(C) past memory
(D) society
33. Who advocated removing children from their mothers’ care and raising them as wards of the
state?
(A) Socrates
(B) Plato
(C) Aristotle
(D) John Locke
35. “All who have meditated on the art of governing mankind have been convinced that the fate
of empires depends on the education of youth.” This is the saying of
(A) Aristotle
(B) Socrates
(C) Plato
(D) John Locke
40. According to John Locke, a child’s mind does not contain any
(A) innate ideas
(B) memory
(C) observation
(D) imagination
42. The process of selecting units from a population to estimate characteristics of the population
is called
(A) analyzing
(B) inference
(C) research
(D) sampling
44. The __________ is a measure of how spreads out points are from the mean.
(A) arithmetic mean
(B) geometric mean
(C) standard deviation
(D) variance
47. The idea of practical learning means education should apply to the
(A) practice
(B) society
(C) abstract knowledge
(D) real world
48. An aspect of pragmatism is experiential learning, which says, education should come through
(A) experience
(B) practice
(C) knowledge
(D) observations
49. According to Aristotle, virtue is a/an __________ state between excess and deficiency.
(A) natural
(B) intermediate
(C) real
(D) artificial
50. In case of spending money, the virtue is __________ between wastefulness and stringiness.
(A) generosity
(B) penury
(C) lavishness
(D) prodigal
52. According to John Dewey, children should experience __________in school to make them
better citizens.
(A) rules
(B) discipline
(C) democracy
(D) practical implementation
53. Progressivism believes that education comes from the experience of the
(A) child
(B) teacher
(C) principal
(D) society
54. The idea of teaching the whole child in the “philosophy of pragmatism in education” means
teaching students to be good
(A) learners
(B) thinkers
(C) scientists
(D) citizens
57. Which from the following is NOT among the five senses?
(A) vision
(B) touch
(C) smell
(D) thought
58. The application of ideas, knowledge and skills to achieve the desired results is called
(A) problem solving
(B) critical thinking
(C) reasoned arguments
(D) deductive method
65. Robert Sternberg, a famous psychologist, argued that creativity requires __________
different types of intelligence.
(A) 3
(B) 4
(C) 5
(D) 6
68. According to Plato, the highest goal in all of education is knowledge of the
(A) science
(B) mathematics
(C) philosophy
(D) good
72. Idealism is a philosophical approach that argues that __________are the only true reality,
and the only thing worth knowing.
(A) ideas
(B) experiences
(C) observations
(D) physical objects
73. Realism is a philosophical approach that argues that ultimate reality is the world of
(A) ideas
(B) experiences
(C) observations
(D) physical objects
74. Who is called the father of both Realism and the scientific method?
(A) Aristotle
(B) Plato
(C) Socrates
(D) Edward Thorndike
78. The psychologist who for the first time proposed the concept of connectionism in learning
was
(A) Aristotle
(B) Plato
(C) Robert Sternberg
(D) Edward Thorndike
82. The __________ the stimulus-response bond (S-R bond), the better a person has learned the
lesson.
(A) stable
(B) unstable
(C) stronger
(D) weaker
85. According to the law of effect, if a stimulus results in a positive outcome, the S-R bond is
(A) strengthened
(B) weakened
(C) stabilized
(D) unsterilized
87. According to the __________, the more you do something, the better you are at it.
(A) law of effect
(B) law of exercise
(C) law of readiness
(D) law of connectionism
88. According to the __________, S-R bonds are stronger if an individual is ready to learn.
(A) law of effect
(B) law of exercise
(C) law of readiness
(D) law of connectionism
89. The __________ says, we are motivated to gain rewards and avoid punishments.
(A) law of effect
(B) law of exercise
(C) law of readiness
(D) law of connectionism
92. The satiation technique of classroom management is a technique where instead of punishing
negative behaviors, the teacher might decide to actually __________ the negative behavior.
(A) encourage
(B) discourage
(C) ignore
(D) divert
95. The technique of classroom management where the teacher punishes negative behaviors by
removing an unruly student from the rest of the class is called
(A) extinction technique
(B) satiation technique
(C) time out technique
(D) corporal punishment
100. According to the philosophy of Idealism in education, the subject matter of curriculum
should be
(A) mathematics
(B) science
(C) physical world
(D) mind
102. An assessment that is conducted prior to the start of teaching or instruction is called
(A) initial assessment
(B) formal assessment
(C) formative assessment
(D) summative assessment
104. An assessment is __________ if it consistently achieves the same results with the same (or
similar) students.
(A) Valid
(B) Invalid
(C) Reliable
(D) Unreliable
105. A/An __________ assessment is one which measures what it is intended to measure.
(A) Valid
(B) Invalid
(C) Reliable
(D) Unreliable
1.4 Strategies for teaching Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students
Demonstrate broad knowledge and understanding of the impact of culture, cultural identity and
linguistic background on the education of students from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
backgrounds.
1.5 Differentiate teaching to meet the specific learning needs of students across the full
range of abilities
Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of strategies for differentiating teaching to meet the
specific learning needs of students across the full range of abilities.
Illustration of practice
Sound routines
Illustration of practice
Lifecycle of silkworms
Illustration of practice
Maths rotations
Illustration of practice
Sitting and listening
Illustration of practice
Inclusive play
Professional engagement
7 Engage professionally with colleagues, parents/carers and the community
7.1 Meet professional ethics and responsibilities
Understand and apply the key principles described in codes of ethics and conduct for the
teaching profession.
7.2 Comply with legislative, administrative and organisational requirements
Understand the relevant legislative, administrative and organisational policies and processes
required for teachers according to school stage.
7.3 Engage with the parents/carers
Understand strategies for working effectively, sensitively and confidentially with parents/carers.
So, that’s it for this post. I hope you’ve learned more about the fixed and growth mindset and
what to do to encourage a growth mindset in your classroom to achieve student success. Spread
the word by sharing this post. Thanks!
Responding to student misbehavior
1. Ignoring misbehaviors
2. Stop few seconds then continue
3. Gesturing nonverbally
Sometimes it works to communicate using gestures, eye contact, or “body language” that
involve little or no speaking. Nonverbal cues are often appropriate if a misbehavior is just a bit
too serious or frequent to ignore, but not serious or frequent enough to merit taking the time
deliberately to speak to or talk with the student. If two students are chatting off-task for a
relatively extended time, for example, sometimes a glance in their direction, a frown, or even
just moving closer to the students is enough of a reminder to get them back on task. Even if
these responses prove not to be enough, they may help to keep the off-task behavior from
spreading to other students.
3. Natural and logical consequences
Consequences are the outcomes or results of an action. When managing a classroom, two kinds
of consequences are especially effective for influencing students’ behavior: natural
consequences and logical consequences. As the term implies, natural consequences happen
“naturally,” without deliberate intention by anyone. If a student is late for class, for example, a
natural consequence is that he misses information or material that needed to do an assignment.
Logical consequences are ones that happen because of the responses of or decisions by others,
but that also have an obvious or “logical” relationship to the original action. If one student steals
another’s lunch, for example, a logical consequence might be for the thief to reimburse the
victim for the cost of the lunch. Natural and logical consequences are often woven together and
thus hard to distinguish: if one student picks a fight with another student, a natural consequence
might be injury not only to the victim, but also to the aggressor (an inherent byproduct of
fighting), but a logical consequence might be to lose friends (the response of others to fighting).
In practice both may occur.
Table 1: Differences between consequences and punishments
Focused on future solutions Focused on past mistakes
Focused on individual’s actions Focused on character of student or child
Focused on repairing mistakes Focused on establishing blame
Focused on restoring positive relationships Focused on isolating wrong-doer
Tend to reduce emotional pain and conflict Tend to impose emotional pain or conflict
Conflict resolution and problem solving
Step 1: clarifying and focusing: problem ownership
Classrooms can be emotional places even though their primary purpose is to promote thinking
rather than expression of feelings. The emotions can be quite desirable: they can give teachers
and students “passion” for learning and a sense of care among members of the class. But
feelings can also cause trouble if students misbehave: at those moments negative feelings—
annoyance, anger, discomfort—can interfere with understanding exactly what is wrong and how
to set things right again. Gaining a bit of distance from the negative feelings is exactly what those
moments need, especially on the part of the teacher, the person with (presumably) the greatest
maturity.
In a widely cited approach to conflict resolution called Teacher Effectiveness Training, the
educator Thomas Gordon describes this challenge as an issue of problem ownership, or deciding
whose problem a behavior or conflict it really is (Gordon, 2003). The “owner” of the problem is
the primary person who is troubled or bothered by it. The owner can be the student committing
the behavior, the teacher, or another student who merely happens to see the behavior. Since
the owner of a problem needs to take primary responsibility for solving it, identifying ownership
makes a difference in how to deal with the behavior or problem effectively.
Suppose, for example, that a student named David makes a remark that the teacher finds
offensive (like “Sean is fat”). Is this remark the student’s problem or the teacher’s? If David made
the comment privately to the teacher and is unlikely to repeat it, then maybe it is only the
teacher’s problem. If he is likely to repeat it to other students or to Sean himself, however, then
maybe the problem is really David’s. On the other hand, suppose that a different student, Sarah,
complains repeatedly that classmates refuse to let her into group projects. This is less likely to be
the teacher’s problem rather than Sarah’s: her difficulty may affect her ability to do her own
work, but not really affect the teacher or classmates directly. As you might suspect, too, a
problem may sometimes affect several people at once. David, who criticized Sean, may discover
that he offended not only the teacher, but also classmates, who therefore avoid working with
him. At that point the whole class begins to share in some aspect of “the” problem: not only is
David prevented from working with others comfortably, but also classmates and the teacher
begin dealing with bad feelings about David.
Step 2: active, empathetic listening
Diagnosing accurately who really has a problem with a behavior—who “owns” it—is helped by a
number of strategies. One is active listening—attending carefully to all aspects of what a student
says and attempting to understand or empathize as fully as possible, even if you do not agree
with what is being said (Cooper & Simonds, 2003). Active listening involves asking questions in
order continually to check your understanding. It also involves encouraging the student to
elaborate on his or her remarks, and paraphrasing and summarizing what the student says in
order to check your perceptions of what is said. It is important not to move too fast toward
solving the problem with advice, instructions, or scolding, even if these are responses that you
might, as a teacher, feel responsible for making. Responding too soon with solutions can shut
down communication prematurely, and leave you with inaccurate impressions of the source or
nature of the problem.
Step 3: assertive discipline and I-messages
Once you have listened well to the student’s point of view, it helps to frame your responses and
comments in terms of how the student’s behavior affects you in particular, especially in your
role as the teacher. The comments should have several features:
They should be assertive—neither passive and apologetic, nor unnecessarily hostile and
aggressive (Cantor, 1996). State the problem as matter-of-factly as possible: “Joe, you are
talking while I’m explaining something,” instead of either “Joe, do you think you could be
quiet now?” or “Joe, be quiet!”
The comments should emphasize I-messages (Gordon, 1981), which are comments that
focus on how the problem behavior is affecting the teacher’s ability to teach, as well as
how the behavior makes the teacher feel. They are distinct from you-messages, which
focus on evaluating the mistake or problem which the student has created. An I-message
might be, “Your talking is making it hard for me to remember what I’m trying to say.” A
you-message might be, “Your talking is rude.”
The comments should encourage the student to think about the effects of his or her
actions on others—a strategy that in effect encourages the student to consider the ethical
implications of the actions (Gibbs, 2003). Instead of simply saying: “When you cut in line
ahead of the other kids, that was not fair to them,” you can try saying, “How do you think
the other kids feel when you cut in line ahead of them?”
Step 4: negotiation
The first three steps describe ways of interacting that are desirable, but also fairly specific in
scope and limited in duration. But in themselves, they may not be enough when conflict persists
over time and develops a number of complications or confusing features. A student may persist
in being late for class, for example, in spite of efforts by the teacher to modify this behavior. Or
two students may repeatedly speak rudely to each other, even though the teacher has mediated
this conflict in the past. Or a student may fail to complete homework, time after time. Because
these problems develop over time, and because they may involve repeated disagreements, they
can eventually become stressful for the teacher, the student, and any classmates who may be
affected. Their persistence can tempt a teacher simply to dictate a resolution—a decision that
can leave everyone feeling defeated, including the teacher.
Often in these situations it is better to negotiate a solution, which means systematically
discussing options and compromising on one if possible. Although negotiation always requires
time and effort, it is often less time or effort than continuing to cope with the original problem,
and the results can be beneficial to everyone. A number of experts on conflict resolution have
suggested strategies for negotiating with students about persistent problems (Davidson &
Wood, 2004). The suggestions vary in detail, but usually include some combination of the steps
we have already discussed above, along with a few others:
Decide as accurately as possible what the problem is. Usually this step involves a lot of the
active listening described above.
Brainstorm possible solutions, and then consider their effectiveness. Remember to include
students in this step; otherwise you end up simply imposing a solution on others, which is
not what negotiation is supposed to achieve.
If possible, choose a solution by consensus. Complete agreement on the choice may not
be possible, but strive for it as best you can. Remember that taking a vote may be a
democratic, acceptable way to settle differences in some situations, but if feelings are
running high, voting does not work as well. In that case voting may simply allow the
majority to impose its will on the minority, leaving the underlying conflict unresolved.
Pay attention to how well the solution works after it is underway. For many reasons,
things may not work out the way you or students hope or expect. You may need to
renegotiate the solution at a later time.
Cooperative learning
Even though inquiry-oriented discussion and investigation benefits when it involves the teacher,
it can also be useful for students to work together somewhat independently, relying on a
teacher’s guidance only indirectly. Working with peers is a major feature of cooperative learning
(sometimes also called collaborative learning). In this approach, students work on a task in
groups and often are rewarded either partially or completely for the success of the group as a
whole. Aspects of cooperative learning have been part of education for a long time; some form
of cooperation has always been necessary to participate on school sports teams, for example, or
to produce a student-run school newspaper. What is a bit newer is using cooperative or
collaborative activities systematically to facilitate the learning of a range of educational goals
central to the academic curriculum (Prince, 2004).
Even though teachers usually value cooperation in students, circumstances at school can
sometimes reduce students’ incentives to show it. The traditional practice of assessing students
individually, for example, can set the stage for competition over grades, and cultural and other
forms of diversity can sometimes inhibit individuals from helping each other spontaneously.
Strategies exist, however, for reducing such barriers so that students truly benefit from each
other’s presence, and are more likely to feel like sharing their skills and knowledge. Here, for
example, are several key features that make cooperative learning work well (Johnson & Johnson,
1998; Smith, et al., 2005):
Students need time and a place to talk and work together. This may sound obvious, but it
can be overlooked if time in class becomes crowded with other tasks and activities, or
with interruptions related to school (like assemblies) but not to the classroom. It is never
enough simply to tell students to work together, only to leave them wondering how or
when they are to do so.
Students need skills at working together. As an adult, you may feel relatively able to work
with a variety of partners on a group task. The same assumption cannot be made,
however, about younger individuals, whether teenagers or children. Some students may
get along with a variety of partners, but others may not. Many will benefit from advice
and coaching about how to focus on the tasks at hand, rather than on the personalities of
their partners.
Assessment of activities should hold both the group and the individuals accountable for
success. If a final mark for a project goes only to the group as a whole, then freeloading is
possible: some members may not do their share of the work and may be rewarded more
than they deserve. Others may be rewarded less than they deserve. If, on the other hand,
a final grade for a group project goes only to each member’s individual contribution to a
group project, then overspecialization can occur: individuals have no real incentive to
work together, and cooperative may deteriorate into a set of smaller individual projects
(Slavin, 1994).
Students need to believe in the value and necessity of cooperation. Collaboration will not
occur if students privately assume that their partners have little to contribute to their
personal success. Social prejudices from the wider society—like racial bias or gender
sexism, for example—can creep into the operations of cooperative groups, causing some
members to be ignored unfairly while others are overvalued. Teachers can help reduce
these problems in two ways: first by pointing out and explaining that a diversity of talents
is necessary for success on a group project, and second by pointing out to the group how
undervalued individuals are contributing to the overall project (Cohen, Brody, & Sapon-
Shevin, 2004).
As these comments imply, cooperative learning does not happen automatically, and requires
monitoring and support by the teacher. Some activities may not lend themselves to cooperative
work, particularly if every member of the group is doing essentially the same task. Giving
everyone in a group the same set of arithmetic problems to work on collaboratively, for
example, is a formula for cooperative failure: either the most skilled students do the work for
others (freeloading) or else members simply divide up the problems among themselves in order
to reduce their overall work (overspecialization). A better choice for a cooperative task is one
that clearly requires a diversity of skills, what some educators call a rich group work task (Cohen,
Brody, & Sapon-Shevin, 2004). Preparing a presentation about medieval castles, for example,
might require (a) writing skill to create a report, (b) dramatic skill to put on a skit and (c) artistic
talent to create a poster. Although a few students may have all of these skills, more are likely to
have only one, and they are therefore likely to need and want their fellow group members’
participation.
Examples of cooperative and collaborative learning
Although this description may make the requirements for cooperative learning sound somewhat
precise, there are actually a variety of ways to implement it in practice. Table 1 summarizes
several of them. As you can see, the strategies vary in the number of how many students they
involve, the prior organization or planning provided by the teacher, and the amount of class time
they normally require.
Table 1: Strategies for encouraging cooperative learning
Type of groups
Strategy What the teacher does What the students do
involved
First, students think individually of
Pairs of students, the answer; second, they share
Think-pair-share Teacher poses initial problem
sometimes linked their thinking with partner; third,
(Lyman, 1981) or question.
to one other pair the partnership shares their
thinking with another partnership
Students in each group work
together to become experts in
Jigsaw classroom, Teacher assigns students to
5–6 students per their particular aspect of the
version #1 groups and assigns one aspect
group, and 5–6 problem; later the expert groups
(Aronson, et al., of a complex problem to each
groups overall disband, and form new groups
2001) group.
containing one student from each
of the former expert groups.
Table 1: Strategies for encouraging cooperative learning
Students initially work in groups to
learn about the entire problem;
later the groups disband and
reform as expert groups, with each
Teacher assigns students to
Jigsaw classroom, 4–5 students per group focusing on a selected
groups and assigns each group
version #2 (Slavin, group, and 4–5 aspect of the general problem; still
to study or learn about the
1994) groups overall later the expert groups disband
same entire complex problem.
and the original general groups
reform to learn what the expert
students can now add to their
general understanding.
Teacher presents a lesson or
STAD (Student- unit to the entire class, and
Students work together to insure
Teams later tests them on it; grades
4–5 students per that team mates improve their
Achievement individuals based partly on
team (or group) performance as much as possible.
Divisions) (Slavin, individuals’ and the team’s
Students take tests as individuals.
1994) improvement, not just on
absolute level of performance.
Various numbers Teacher or students pose a
of students, question or problem of Students work together for
Project-Based depending on the interest to other students; extended periods to investigate
Learning (Katz, complexity of the teacher helps students to the original question or problem;
2000) project, up to and clarify their interests and project leads to a presentation,
including the make plans to investigate the written report, or other product.
entire class. question
Concept Mapping
Use as an in-class pre-assessment. Prior to discussing a topic, ask students to create a
concept map. Then, as you discuss the information, they can add to or modify their map
to reflect their understanding about the topic.
Do as a small group activity. Give your students a problem, case study, or question about
a key concept. Divide them into small groups of 4-5 students. Have each group create a
concept map as they analyze and synthesize previously learned information into this new
scenario. Have the groups present their conclusions.
Do as a whole class activity. As a class, create, a concept map and use it as a springboard
to discuss relationships among the concepts and ideas listed in the map.
Fill in the blanks. Before class, create a concept map of the material you want to cover in
class. Then, remove some of the concepts and labels. Show the partially completed map
to the class and have them fill in the blank spots and label the relationships.
Organize your research. Use a concept map to build and organize your ideas, layer
details, and find connections and relationships that might never have occurred to you
before.
There are several benefits of using concept maps. A concept map:
Helps visual learners grasp the material (however all learners benefit from the activity)
Helps students see relationships between ideas, concepts, or authors
Utilizes the full range of the left and right hemispheres of the brain
Helps memory recall
Helps to clarify and structure ideas
Aids in developing higher-level thinking skills (create, analyze, evaluate)
Helps students synthesize and integrate information, ideas and concepts
Encourages students to think creatively about the subject
Lets students do self-evaluation of beliefs, values, socialization, etc.
Helps students evaluate assumptions.
Bloom’s Taxonomy
How People Learn
Introduction
Commissioned by the National Research Council, How People Learn presents the conclusions of
recent research in cognitive science, and then develops their implications for teaching and
learning. The following highlights of this research may be helpful as you reflect on your own
teaching practice, and how it may better enhance your students’ learning. Many Vanderbilt
faculty members have found the HPL framework useful.
Resources
How People Learn is available for check-out from the CFT Library and on-line.
How People Learn: Bridging Research and Practice
This link takes you to another book on this theory, again co-edited by John Bransford.
Consultation Services
Center for Teaching consultants are available to meet with faculty interested in exploring the
particular application of conclusions from learning science research in their own teaching.
Monitoring Stage
– as students work, meta-cognitive questions are asked about their progress and how they are
monitoring their progress towards the aims and objectives of the task
– students are asked about the challenges they have experienced so far and how they’ve
overcome them
– students peer and/or self assess the work against specific success criteria or using the ACE peer
assessment strategy
Evaluation and Reflection Stage
– students are prompted to consider their success in the strategies they applied to achieve the
aims and objectives of the task or learning goal either through questioning or written review.
– students are asked question such as
‘How well did you do at….?’
‘Is there anything that didn’t go well? What could you have done differently?’
‘What did you find hard with this task? How did you overcome this?’
‘What will you try to take away from this that you can apply to future work?’.
Impact
When I started at my current school there was a class I started with in year 8, I taught them
again in year 9 and continue to teach some of them in year 10 at present. Over that time, I’ve
witnessed their ability to self-regulate develop and grow as has their independence and
enjoyment in the learning process. The ones I still teach, I do less for them now when it comes to
meta-cognition. They’ve been scaffolded through the stages, supported in developing their
independence and I’m now there to facilitate and support their self-regulation through meta-
cognition. It really does support learners independence