Republic of the Philippines RPMS – Individual Performance Commitment & Review Form (IPCRF)

SUMMARY
Department of Education,

Region VII, Central Visayas Name of Teacher: ____________________________________ School:

Position: _________________________________ Name of Rater:
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF
CEBU CITY Rating Period: _____________________________Date of Review

TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

RATING
WEIGHT/ WEIGHT/
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES SCORE
KRA OBJECTIVE Q E T AVE

1. Applied knowledge of content within and across

curriculum teaching areas 7.5% 0 0 0 0
KRA 1:
2. Used a range of teaching strategies that enhance
Content
22.5% learner achievement in literacy and numeracy skills. 7.5% 0 0 0 0 0
Knowledge
and Pedagogy
3. Applied a range of teaching strategies to develop
critical and creative thinking, as well as other higher 7.5% 0 0 0 0 0
order thinking skills.

4. Manage classroom structure to engage learners,

individually or in groups, in meaningful exploration,
discovery and hand-on activitis.es within a range of 7.5% 0 0 0 0 0
physical learning environment
KRA 2.
Learning 5. Managed learner behavior constructively by
Environment 22.5% applying positive and non-violent discipline to ensure 7.5% 0 0 0 0 0
and Diversity learning-focused environments.
of Learners
6. Used differentiated, developmentally appropriate
learning experiences to address learners'. Gender, 7.5% 0 0 0 0 0
needs, strengths, interests and experiences
Basic
Education
Services 7. Planned, managed and implemented
developmentally sequenced teaching and learning 7.5% 0 0 0 0 0
processes to meet curriculum

3. Curriculum
and Planning 22.50% 8. Participated in collegial discussions that use teacher
and learner feedback to enrich teaching practice 7.5% 0 0 0 0 0
9. Selected, developed, organized and used
appropriate teaching and learning resources, including 7.5% 0 0 0 0 0
ICT, to address learning goals.

10. Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic,

formative and summative assessment strategies 7.5% 0 0 0 0 0
consistent with curriculum requirements
4. Assessment
and Reporting 22.5% 11. Monitored and evaluated learner progress and
7.5% 0 0 0 0 0
achievement using learner attainment data
12. Communicated promptly and clearly the learner's
needs, progress and achievement to key 7.5% 0 0 0 0 0
stakeholders,including parents/guardians

13. Performed various related works/activities that

5. Plus Factor 10% conribute to the teaching-learning process 10% 0 0 0 0 0

Final Rating 0
Adjectival Rating 0

Summarry of Ratings Adjectival Rating:

Content Knowledge and Pedagogy(22.5%) 0 4.500 - 5.000 Outstanding

Learningenvironment and Diversity of Learners (22.5%) 0 3.500 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory

Curriculum and Planning (22.5%) 0 2.500 - 3.499 Satisfactory

Assessment and Reporting(22.5%) 0 1.500 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory

Plus Factor (22.5%) 0 below 1.499 Poor

TOTAL 0
Adjectival Rating 0

Prepared by: Rated by:

________________________________ _______________________________________
Name of Teacher Rater, Master Teacher

APPROVED:

__________________________________________
School Principal
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education,
Region VII, Central Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF
CEBU CITY
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES
1. Applied
knowledge of
content within and
across curriculum
teaching areas
1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy(22.5%)
2. Used a range of
Basic teaching strategies
Educatio that enhance
n learner
achievement in
Services
literacy and
numeracy skills.
3. Applied a range of
teaching strategies to
develop critical and
creative thinking, as well as
other higher order thinking
skills.
RPMS – Individual Performance Commitment & Review Form (IPCRF)
for Teacher I-III
Name of Teacher: School
Position: Name of Rater:
Rating Period: Date of Review
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
TIMELINE WEIGHT Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory ACTUAL RESULTS SCORE
/ KRA QET Poor (1) Q E T AVE
(5) (4) (3) (2)
No acceptable
Quality Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of evidence was
content and its integration content and its integration content and its integration content and its integration shown
within and across subject within and across subject within and across subject within and across subject
areas as shown in MOV 1 areas as shown in MOV 1 areas as shown in MOV 1 areas as shown in MOV 1
SY 2018- with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
7.5% 0 0 0.00 0.00
2019
Submitted 3 lessons using Submitted 2 lessons using
Submitted at least 4 lessons MOV 1 and supported by MOV 1 and supported by No acceptable
Submitted any 1 of the
Efficiency using MOV 1 and any 1 of the other given any 1 of the other given given MOV evidence was
supported by any 1 of the shown
MOV MOV
other given MOV
Timeliness
Facilitated using different Facilitated using different Facilitated using different Facilitated using different No acceptable
Quality teaching strategies that teaching strategies that teaching strategies that teaching strategies that evidence was
promote reading, writing promote reading, writing promote reading, writing promote reading, writing shown
and/or numeracy skills as and/or numeracy skills as and/or numeracy skills as and/or numeracy skills as
shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
SY 2018-
7.5% 0 0 0.00 0.00
2019
No acceptable
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 learner- Submitted 2 learner- Submitted 1 learner- evidence was
learner-centered lessons as centered lessons as centered lessons as centered lessons as shown
evidently shown in MOV 1 evidently shown in MOV 1 evidently shown in MOV 1 evidently shown in MOV 1
and supported by any 1 of and supported by any 1 of and supported by any 1 of and supported by any 1 of
the other given MOV the other given MOV the other given MOV the other given MOV
Timeliness
Used different teaching Used different teaching Used different teaching Used different teaching No acceptable
Quality strategies that develop strategies that develop strategies that develop strategies that develop evidence was
critical and creative critical and creative critical and creative critical and creative shown
thinking and /or other thinking and /or other thinking and /or other thinking and /or other
SY 2018- HOTS as shown in MOV 1 HOTS as shown in MOV 1 HOTS as shown in MOV 1 HOTS as shown in MOV 1
7.5% with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 0 0 0.00 0.00
2019
Submitted 3 lessons as Submitted 2 lessons as Submitted 1 lessons as No acceptable
Submitted at least 4 lessons evidenced by MOV 1 and evidenced by MOV 1 and evidenced by MOV 1 and evidence was
Efficiency as evidenced by MOV 1 supported by any 1 of the supported by any 1 of the supported by any 1 of the shown
and supported by any 1 of other given MOV other given MOV other given MOV
the other given MOV
Timeliness
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory ACTUAL RESULTS SCORE
/ KRA QET Poor (1) Q E T AVE
(5) (4) (3) (2)

4. Manage classroom
structure to engage
learners, individually
or in groups, in
meaningful SY 2018-
exploration, discovery 2019
and hand-on
activitis.es within a
range of physical
learning environment
2. Learning Environment and Diversity of Learners (22.5%)
Quality Used classroom
management strategies
that engage learners in
activities/tasks as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating of 7
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 lessons
supported by MOV 1 and
any 1 of the other
acceptable MOV
Used classroom
management strategies
that engage learners in
activities/tasks as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating of 6
Submitted 3 lessons
supported by MOV 1 and
any 1 of the other
acceptable MOV
No acceptable
Used classroom Used classroom evidence was
management strategies management strategies shown
that engage learners in that engage learners in
activities/tasks as shown in activities/tasks as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a rating of 4
0 0 0.00 0.00
No acceptable
Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lessons evidence was
supported by MOV 1 and supported by MOV 1 and shown
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness

Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher

management strategies of management strategies of management strategies of management strategies of
learner behavior that learner behavior that learner behavior that learner behavior that
promote positive and non- promote positive and non- promote positive and non- promote positive and non-
violent discipline as shown violent discipline as shown violent discipline as shown violent discipline as shown No acceptable
Quality in MOV submitted with a in MOV submitted with a in MOV submitted with a in MOV submitted with a evidence was
5. Managed rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 shown
learner behavior
Basic constructively by
Educatio applying positive SY 2018-
n and non-violent 2019
7.5% 0 0 0.00 0.00
Services discipline to ensure Submitted at least 4 of the Submitted at least 4 of the Submitted at least 4 of the
learning-focused given supported as given supported as given supported as
environments. No acceptable
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 of the observed in 3 lessons observed in 2 lessons observed in 1 lesson
evidence was
given strategies as shown
observed in at least 4
lessons
Timeliness
Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied differentiated No acceptable
teaching strategies to teaching strategies to teaching strategies to teaching strategies to evidence was
address learner diversity as address learner diversity as address learner diversity as address learner diversity as shown
Quality shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
6. Used differentiated,
developmentally
appropriate learning
experiences to Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 differentiated Submitted 2 differentiated Submitted any 1 0 0 0.00 0.00
address learners'. 7.5% differentiated teaching teaching strategies in at teaching strategies in at differentiated teaching
Gender, needs, strategies in at least 2 least 2 lessons as least 2 lessons as strategy in only 1 lesson as
strengths, interests lessons as evidenced by evidenced by MOV 1 and evidenced by MOV 1 and evidently shown in any 1 No acceptable
and experiences Efficiency MOV 1 and supported by supported by any 1 of the supported by any 1 of the of the acceptable MOV evidence was
any 1 of the other other acceptable MOV other acceptable MOV shown
acceptable MOV

Timeliness
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT ACTUAL RESULTS SCORE
/ KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) Poor (1) Q E T AVE

No acceptable
Quality Planned and implemented Planned and implemented Planned and implemented Planned and implemented evidence was
developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown
7. Planned, sequenced teaching and sequenced teaching and sequenced teaching and sequenced teaching and
managed and learning process as shown learning process as shown learning process as shown learning process as shown
implemented in MOV 1 with a rating of 7 in MOV 1 with a rating of 6 in MOV 1 with a rating of 5 in MOV 1 with a rating of 4
developmentally SY 2018-2019
sequenced 7.5% 0 0 0.00 0.00
teaching and Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1
learning processes developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally
to meet curriculum No acceptable
Efficiency sequenced teaching and sequenced teaching and sequenced teaching and sequenced teaching and evidence was
learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as shown
evidently shown in MOV 1 evidently shown in MOV 1 evidently shown in MOV 1 evidently shown in MOV 1
and supported by any 1 of and supported by any 1 of and supported by any 1 of and supported by any 1 of
the other given MOV the other given MOV the other given MOV the other given MOV
Timeliness
Frequently participated in Occasionally participated in Rarely participated in
3. Curriculum and Planning (22.5%)

LACs/FGDs/ meetings to LACs/FGDs/ meetings to LACs/FGDs/ meetings to

discuss teacher/learner discuss teacher/learner discuss teacher/learner
feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich
instruction as shown in the instruction as shown in the instruction as shown in the No acceptable
Quality Consistently participated in MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted evidence was
8. Participated in LACs/FGDs/ meetings to shown
Basic collegial
Educatio discuss teacher/learner
discussions that feedback to enrich
n use teacher and SY 2018-2019 7.5% instruction as shown in the 0 0 0.00 0.00
Services learner feedback to MOV submitted
enrich teaching
practice Participated in at least 4 Participated in 3 LACs/FGDs Participated in 2 LACs/FGDs Participated in 1 No acceptable
LACs/FGDs meetings as meetings as evidently meetings as evidently LACs/FGDs meeting as evidence was
Efficiency evidently shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of the given shown in any 1 of the given evidently shown in any 1 of shown
the given MOV MOV MOV the given MOV

Timeliness
Developed and used varied Developed and used varied Developed and used varied Developed and used varied
teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning
resources, including ICT, to resources, including ICT, to resources, including ICT, to resources, including ICT, to
address learning goals as address learning goals as address learning goals as address learning goals as No acceptable
Quality shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with a evidence was
9. Selected, rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 shown
developed,
organized and used
appropriate
teaching and SY 2018-2019 7.5% 0 0 0.00 0.00
learning resources, Submitted at least 4 varied Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any teaching
including ICT, to teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning and learning resources,
address learning No acceptable
resources, including ICT, as resources, including ICT, as resources, including ICT, as including ICT, as evidently
goals. Efficient evidence was
evidently shown in MOV 1 evidently shown in MOV 1 evidently shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 and shown
and supported by any 1 of and supported by any 1 of and supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of the
the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory ACTUAL RESULTS SCORE
/ KRA QET Poor (1) Q E T AVE
(5) (4) (3) (2)

Designed,selected,organize Designed,selected,organize Designed,selected,organize Designed,selected,organize No acceptable

10. Designed, Quality d and used d and used d and used d and used evidence was
selected, organized diagnostic,formative and diagnostic,formative and diagnostic,formative and diagnostic,formative and shown
and used diagnostic, summative assessment summative assessment summative assessment summative assessment
formative and SY 2018- strategies consistent with strategies consistent with strategies consistent with strategies consistent with
summative 7.5% 0 0 0.00 0.00
assessment strategies 2019 currirculum requirements currirculum requirements currirculum requirements currirculum requirements
consistent with as shown in MOV 1 with a as shown in MOV 1 with a as shown in MOV 1 with a as shown in MOV 1 with a
curriculum rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
requirements
Submitted at least 4 varied Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied No acceptable
Efficient assessment tool as assessment tool as assessment tool as Submitted 1 assessment evidence was
evidently shown in any 1 of evidently shown in any 1 of evidently shown in any 1 of tool as evidently shown in shown
the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV any of acceptable MOV
Timeliness
4. Assessment and Reporting(22.5%)

Consistently monitored and Frequently monitored and Occasionally monitored Rarely monitored and No acceptable
Quality evaluated learner progress evaluated learner progress and evaluated learner evaluated learner progress evidence was
and and achievement using and and achievement using progress and and and and achievement using shown
learner attainment data as learner attainment data as achievement using learner learner attainment data as
11. Monitored and shown in the MOV shown in the MOV attainment data as shown shown in the MOV
Basic evaluated learner submitted submitted in the MOV submitted submitted
progress and
Educatio achievement using SY 2018-2019 7.5% Submitted a combination Submitted a combination Submitted 1 acceptable 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
n of 3 of the acceptable MOV of 2 of the acceptable MOV MOV No acceptable
learner attainment
Services data Efficient Submitted a combination evidence was
of at least 4 of the shown
acceptable MOV

No acceptable
Timeliness Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV was evidence was
distributed across 4 distributed across 3 distributed across 2 completed in only 1 shown
quarters quarters quarters quarter

Consistently showed Frequently showed prompt Ocassionally showed

prompt and clear and clear communication prompt and clear Rarely showed prompt and No acceptable
12. Communicated Quality communication of the of the learner's needs, communication of the clear communication of the evidence was
promptly and learner's needs, progress progress and achievement learner's needs, progress learner's needs, progress shown
clearly the and achievement to key to key stakeholders, and achievement to key and achievement to key
learner's needs, stakeholders, including including stakeholders, including stakeholders, including
progress and SY 2018-2019 7.5% parents/guardians as parents/guardians as parents/guardians as parents/guardians as 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
achievement to key shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
stakeholders,includ submitted submitted submitted submitted
ing Submitted a combination Submitted a combination Submitted a combination No acceptable
parents/guardians submitted any 1 of the
Efficiency of at least 4 of the of 3 of the acceptable of 2 of the acceptable evidence was
given MOV
acceptable MOV MOV MOV shown

No acceptable
Timeliness Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV was evidence was
distributed across 4 distributed across 3 distributed across 2 completed in only 1 shown
quarters quarters quarters quarter
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT ACTUAL RESULTS SCORE
/ KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
QET Poor (1) Q E T AVE
(5) (4) (3) (2)

No acceptable
Consistently performed Frequently performed Occasionally performed
Quality Rarely performed various evidence was
13. Performed various related various related various related
5. Plus Factor

various related work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that related work/activities that shown
works/activities contribute to the teaching contribute to the teaching contribute to the teaching contribute to the teaching
that conribute to 10% learning process as shown learning process as shown learning process as shown learning process as shown 0 0 0.00 0.00
the teaching- in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted
learning process
No acceptable
Efficiency submitted at least 4 submitted at least 3 submitted at least 2 evidence was
different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of submitted any 1 of the shown
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

TOTAL 100%
Overall rating 0.00
for accomplishments
Adjectival Rating 0

Summarry of Ratings
Content Knowledge and Pedagogy(22.5%) 0.00
Learningenvironment and Diversity of Learners (22.5%) 0.00
Curriculum and Planning (22.5%) 0.00
Assessment and Reporting(22.5%) 0.00
Plus Factor (22.5%) 0.00
TOTAL 0.00
Adjectival Rating 0

Adjectival Rating:
4.500 - 5.000 Outstanding

3.500 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory

2.500 - 3.499 Satisfactory

1.500 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory

below 1.499 Poor

Prepared by: Rated by: APPROVED:

________________________________ _______________________________________ __________________________________________

Name of Teacher Rater, Master Teacher Principal