Você está na página 1de 1

Hasan et al.

205

mately three times that of tangent .sections, and the average This study extends the car[ier woi.k by inve``tigating the
single vehicle run-ot.f-the-road collision rate for curves on ef`fec( of additional geoinelric paramL`ters on perception. The
I.ural roads was about four times that of tangents (OECD parameters examined ini`lude the pro.ten.e or .`pirLLl i.urvc`,
1999). Choueiri et al. (1994) found that the sharper the the length of the spirals, {ind the irosi{i()n {)I. the vertical
curve, the higher the number of run-oft`-the-road incidents, curve midpoint rclalive (o (he horiz()ntal curve.
wliere the deglee of cui.ve was the most successful parame-
ter in explaining the variability in collision rates. Similar re-
sults were f'ound by Ng and Sayed (2004). More receiltly,
several researchers (Hassan and Easa 2003: Lipar ]997; Investigation approach
Smi(h and L{`mm 1994) have Suggested that the risk is even
Similar to the study by Bidu]ka el al. (20()2), (he experi-
greater in (he ``ituation when a vertical cLirve is superim- mental design irl (his ``ludy involvetl lhe creation or three-
posed on a horizontal curve. Combined alignmenL locations dimensional (3-D) computer-generiited road models thi`t
would be ITiore harardous because driver perception of the
would ensure control over the pcrspcc.ive view of the road.
road curvature is often fuzzy or erroneous in such cases. In
thus neutrali7.ing all factors but thtise {o be studied. The
comparison to other Toad categories, the problem is more
study involved interviewing a group of randomly sc]ected
pronounced on two-lane undivided rural highways with drivers. For each alignmeiil combiiiation. the jiTtervicwed
higher operating speeds. Even if horizontal curves are de-
driver was shown at the same in.stance two road .`tjll imngcs
signed to adhere to the design code.`. the presence of a verti-
on a computer sci.e€n. The horizontiil curves in the two im-
cal grade transition may result in optical illusjon.i pi.ompting
age`` had the same radius and similar I.ea(ures but ine hori-
an unsafe operating manoeuvre. With the underlying fact
zontal ..iirve in the top image ovei.lapped with a vertical
that driver perception directly influences the selection ()f ap-
curve and in the bottom image it overliipped with I flat
propriate manoeuvreLs, misperception of hoi.i7.ontal ciirva[ui.e
grade (Fig. I). The driver was then asked to state whc[her
can lead lo increat;cd collision I.isk.
the bottom ciirve appeared to be .`same sharp" a*, "]css
In an earlier study, Bidiilka ct al. (2002) examined a hy- sharp" than. or "moi.e sharp" than the top curve. The expen-
pothesis rela(ed to pei'ception of combined horizontal and ment involved (hree main stages: (I) experimen(a[ design
vertical curvatilre. The hypothesis ,suggested that horizonlal and identification of geomctric ptli.ameters ()1` eiich ro{id
curves appear .Sharper when overlapped with crest vertical model, (2) creation ot` 3-D models, and (3) pi.esentatioli and
curves and flattei. when overlapped with sag vertical curves. data coJlection.
The study concluded that the hypothesis was valid; however,
the study was limited (o simple horizontal curves with coin-
ciding midpoinls of both horizontal and vertical curves. Experimental design
Other conclusions from the a(udy included: The geometric parameters studied in this investigati{)n in-
clude the type of overlapping verticiil .`urvc (i`rcst versus
(I) The effect of the combined alignment i* more pros
sag), holizontal curve radius (A), presence of ``piL.al curves,
ntiuncecl in Lhe case of sag vertical clirve,i, where a
spiral length (Zrs), and vertical ciirve tifl.set (VCO) defined tis
greater percentage ot. drivers would experience the erT{}-
the oft`se{ of (he midpoiiit of the vertical curve rclativc lo (he
Tieous percaption, and thus there would be a higher
midpoint ol` the horizontal ciiTve. 'l`o cope with lhe large
probability of erroneous perception. It should be noted
number ot. road models necessary t.or iill the paramctcrs
that this 'Is (lie mo].e ``eiiou`s condition. with respect lo
``tudied, a limi(ed experiment wax dcsigned as .`h(]wn in Ta-
sat`ety. as dL.ivei.s would tend to drive too f.as{ based on
ble I. As clown in lhe (able, the expel.imen( invt7Ivcd a total
their erroneous perception.
of 36 horizontal ciirves overlapping with vertical curve.i.
(2) The most important single factor affecting perception
which fire ref.erred to as /c,`./ t'.!rvcJ.`'. The driver'` percepti(in
wa,` the i`vaili`hle Sight distance. This would explain lhe
of these cui.ves was evaluated relative to u hoii7.ontal curve
gi.eater pi`obability ot` eri.olleous perception associated
with the same radius and deflection angle biit overlapping
with sag.vertical curves` which genei.ally provide better
with a llat grade, and these ciirve`` :`re ref.eri`ed to ii* rtJfcr-
sight distance than crest curves. Alsti, the available sight
en(`er c'w/.vc'.``. Based ()n the int.()rna(i()n in Tablcl , a tol.Il ol.
distance increflses linearly with the increase of hori7.on-
five I.efei.el`ce curves were used with radii ot` .300, 400, 500,
tal curve radius, thus increa``ing (he probability of erro-
600, and 7()0 in and length ot. curvi` Lc ot` 20() in. To sim-
neoiis pcrccption.
(3) Some geometric paramctcJ.s, `such as I.ate ot sl]per- plify the task of` road ``imulation antl t`ocus primarily (7n (he
eleviili()n and tiiming dii.ection. did not h{`ve :` signifi- parameters under ``tudy and similar lo the study by Bidulka
et al. (2()()2). (he ()lher geoinetL.ii` ]>ai.i`Liieters {`nd I`catui.es
ctlnt ef.feet t)n the perception ot' hori7.ontal curve radius.
were set as follows:
(4) In nddilion [o the type {)1` (}verlapping horizonlal curve,
• The highway is a (wo-lane I.acility.
the perception of horizontal cui.va[ure depends on the
vcrtical curve parametei```. Generally, the grea`ci. the {il- • Hori7,ontal .`urve length (i(,) is 2()() in except when spirzzil
cui.ve.i i`re u``ed. In (hih ca``e, Lt,` r€`iiges 1`rom I I 0 tti I 50 ni
gcbl.aic ditT`ei.ence t)I. vel.(ica] gL.ades or (hc shal.per (he
vertical curve. the greater the pei-centage ot` dnvers who and Ls range`` from 90 to 50 in. ^s shown jn Table I , iill
will perceive the cul.vature erroneously. This trend c:`n ctimbinations or L(` and L`` in (he exi)ei`imclit w{iiild hi`ve
be mainly attributed to the vertical curve becoming the same total deflecLion angle l`{)r the `Lrme Tndius.
more pronounced. and the iilignment becomes more dit'- • Vertii`al curvet` ai'c symme(ric`al, with equiil ra(i` or` vellict`I
t.erent I.rom the case of horiz,ontal curve overlapping Curvature along tlie curve.
with flat gr<nde. • Vertical grndcs arc symmetrictil (|J, = -A.2).

® 2(M)5 NRC Caliada

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction proliibited witliout permission.

Você também pode gostar