Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Types of Choices
1. A Dilemma
2. Hobson’s Choice
3. Sophie’s Choice
4. Morton’s Fork
A Dilemma
It represents a choice where we have two outcomes but both of them are
equally unwelcome. Our task here is to then choose between one of these
unpleasant outcomes.
As an example, a dilemma would be where you need to drive home in exceptionally heavy
traffic, knowing that whatever choice of route you make, it's going to take a long time.
Hobson’s Choice
A choice where we get a choice between one thing or nothing. This
terminology is typically applied where the thing we are offered is not what
we really wanted.
An example of a Hobson's Choice would be arriving home late and having a choice
between unappealing food or no food at all.
Sophie’s Choice
Sophie's Choice is a moral choice. We have to make a choice between
two desirable things, knowing that once we had chosen, we can never
choose the other thing as well.
If two friends invited us to their weddings at the same time on the same day, that would be a
Sophie's Choice.
Morton’s Fork
A Morton's Fork is really a logical fallacy. Even though it might appear that
you get a choice, either action that you take leads to the same bad
outcome.
For example, a student who procrastinates for too long before doing a major assignment
still ends up having the same amount of time do the assignment, no matter what they did to
procrastinate. The activities that they choose between to procrastinate are a Morton's Fork.
WHAT IS A CONSEQUENCE?
A result or effect of an action or condition.
Types of Consequences
1. Positive Reinforcement
2. Negative Reinforcement
3. Positive Punishment
4. Negative Punishment
Positive Reinforcement
Using positive reinforcement involves offering a reward for positive
behaviors to encourage your child to keep doing them.
"Positive reinforcement is probably the most effective method of shaping
behavior. Children who are praised and are acknowledged for their efforts are
more likely to continue to want to do those behaviors.” says Dr. Eichenstein.
Negative Reinforcement
This method takes away something unpleasant to reinforce good
behavior. A child will clean his room to get his parents off his back about
the mess. His good behavior is reinforced by the removal of his parents'
constant reminders. In negative reinforcement, you're not actually doing
anything negative -- the "negative" refers to removing something from the
equation.
Positive Punishment
This form of punishment presents a negative consequence in response to
a negative behavior ("positive" refers to the fact that you're adding a
consequence). There are better types of positive punishment, however.
You can let a child experience the "natural consequence" of a negative
behavior -- getting a bad grade when she doesn't study, for example.
Negative Punishment
Rather than introducing a consequence, negative punishment takes
something away in response to a negative behavior. Take away a toy
after your child fails to clean his room, or refuse to. In this case, a more
beneficial strategy, however, would be to use positive reinforcement of
increased screen time if their son behaves well, as rewards are generally
more effective than punishment in modifying future behaviors in children.
5.3B SOME THINGS ARE GIVEN UP WHILE OTHERS ARE OBTAINED
IN MAKING CHOICES
We all face moments where we must choose between one thing and
another. We need to choose things everyday, but we don't seem to know
much about the different types of choices that we face. It would help us to
know more about the different types of choices; then we can see that
some choices are hardly choices at all.
The Anglo-Saxon king Alfred the Great (c. 849 – 26 October 899), who
was the first known person to have written the word 'freedom' in English,
suggested that to be governed by righteousness is to be "on tham
hehstan freodome," that is, in the highest freedom. The Christian idea of
freedom includes the expectation that a truly free person will live following
their conscience. As Saint Augustine said, "Love God and do what you
want."
The laws of the Magna Carta issued in 1215 advanced the freedom of
Englishmen Freedom allows people to pursue their interests within the
framework of law. It means that people are not controlled and not part of
someone else's plans and purposes.
In short the freedom to follow their conscience. Such a person would
naturally live within the moral law. Each person and institution freely
makes make their own plans and self-coordinates them with others. It has
been called a cataplexy by F.A. Hayek.
Two Concepts of Freedom
1. Positive Liberty
2. Negative Liberty
Positive Liberty
The idea of self-mastery, or the capacity to determine oneself, to be in
control of one's destiny. Positive liberty should be exercised within the
constraints of negative liberty. Concepts of liberty represent valid human
ideals, as a matter of history the positive concept of liberty has proven
particularly susceptible to political abuse. Advocates of positive liberty
claim that a person who cannot achieve his ambitions because he doesn't
have enough resources is not free.
Negative Liberty
Absence of constraints on, or interference with, an agent's possible action.
Greater "negative freedom" meant fewer restrictions on possible action.
This negative liberty is central to the claim for toleration due to
incommensurability.
Inner Autonomy
Freedom can also signify inner autonomy, or mastery over one's inner
condition. This has several possible significances according to Susan
Wolf: 1. The ability to act in accordance with the dictates of reason;
2. The ability to act in accordance with one's own true self or values;
3. The ability to act in accordance with universal values (such as the True and
the Good)
4. The ability to act independently of both the dictates of reason and the
urges of desires, i.e., arbitrarily (autonomously).
Freedom and Determinism
Determinists argue that in a law governed universe the future is contained
within the past. Everything that will happen tomorrow could be predicted
by a being that knows all facts about the past and the present and knows
all natural laws that govern the universe. In other words things cannot be
other than they are. So if everything including the behavior of human
beings is determined by the immutable laws of cause and effect, free will
and hence freedom is an illusion. People do not really make free choices
as what they decide to do has already been determined by the laws of
physics and chemical interactions.
Consequence
Logical consequence (also entailment) is a fundamental concept in logic,
which describes the relationship between statements that hold true when
one statement logically follows from one or more statements. A valid
logical argument is one in which the conclusion is entailed by
the premises, because the conclusion is the consequence of the
premises.
Logical consequence is necessary and formal, by way of examples that explain
with formal proof and models of interpretation.
Three Types of Logical Consequences
1. “You break it, you fix it”
This type of logical consequence is used in situations when something has been
broken or a mess has been made—whether accidentally or intentionally. The
consequence is that those responsible for the problem take responsibility for
fixing it. Teachers use this type of logical consequence when they see an
opportunity for a child to solve a problem he or she has caused.
Examples:
Adam jiggles the table and causes water to spill. The teacher directs Adam to clean it
up.
Jana accidentally knocks Pedro down on the playing field. The teacher prompts Jana to
help Pedro up, ask if he’s OK, and go with him to get first aid if needed.
2. Loss of Privilege
This type of logical consequence is used when children’s behavior does not
meet pre-established expectations. The consequence is that the child loses the
privilege of participating in an activity or using materials for a brief time, usually a
class period or a day.
What’s taken away must be directly related to the misbehavior, and the teacher
must make sure that the child truly understands and can live up to expectations.
Teachers use this type of logical consequence when children defy, test, or
simply forget the rules.
Examples:
Dana insists on using the watercolor brush in a way that damages its bristles. The
teacher tells Dana that she cannot use watercolors during choice time until she’s
reviewed correct use of the brush and shown the teacher that she knows how to use it
without damaging it.
Garth’s class job for the week is line leader, but as he leads the class to lunch, he leans
into a classroom to wave hello to a friend. The teacher tells Garth that he has lost the
privilege of being line leader for the day and temporarily gives that responsibility to
another child. Later, she checks in with Garth to make sure he remembers and
understands the expectations for walking in line.
3. Positive Time-Out
This type of logical consequence is used when a teacher believes that a child
needs a way to calm down and recover self-control. The consequence is that the
child moves to a pre-established place in the classroom, takes time to regroup,
and then rejoins the class once he or she has calmed down.
Example:
Mark disrupts a math lesson by calling out answers without raising his hand. The teacher
sends him to the time-out place. In the minute or two he spends there, Mark calms down
using self-calming techniques the class has learned, and then returns to his regular seat.