Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Aims The classification of an acute ischaemic cardiac event mortality (OR=2·8–3·7, p<0·001) for outcome both at 1
is traditionally based on cardiac enzymes, electrocardiogra- and 5 years. Typical pain and a positive Minnesota ECG
phy (ECG) and clinical symptoms. The impact of new had no prognostic relevance. However, an analysis algor-
specific cardiac markers on the diagnostic classification of ithm of the admission ECG was predictive of 1- and 5-year
suspected acute myocardial infarction remains poorly survival.
studied. We therefore set out to compare the diagnostic and
prognostic information provided by the MONICA code Conclusions The epidemiological classification of sus-
and a patient classification based on the maximal level of pected acute myocardial infarction could be based solely on
creatine kinase MB isoenzyme. The significance of typical a specific cardiac marker, such as creatine kinase MB mass.
pain and various ECG algorithms were separately analysed. This approach contains prognostic information and is
accurate enough for the structured diagnosis of acute
Methods and Results The study population consisted of myocardial infarction. Other outcome predictors could be
311 consecutive patients who were evaluated for suspected used to identify patient subgroups and assess therapy.
acute myocardial infarction in a regional referral hospital. (Eur Heart J 1999; 20: 1459–1464)
Patients were retrospectively classified according to the 1999 The European Society of Cardiology
MONICA criteria, by a simplified code combining symp-
toms and creatine kinase MB, and solely using the maximal Key Words: Myocardial, infarction, classification,
creatine kinase MB concentration. Total mortality was MONICA, creatine kinase MB.
followed for 1 and 5 years. The creatine kinase MB based
classification was shown to be the strongest predictor of See page 1446 for the Editorial comment on this article
Table 1 Criteria of the new combination code, designed ECG acquisition and analysis
to mimic MONICA classification
The Marquette automated 12-lead system (Marquette
CK-MB Typical symptom Atypical symptom Electronics Inc., Milwaukee, WI, U.S.A.) was used
for data collection and storage. The data matrix of
>40 ìg . l 1 Definite AMI Definite AMI Marquette Electronics was used for the durations and
20–40 ìg . l 1 Definite AMI Possible AMI amplitudes of the Q, R and S waves as well as for the
<20 ìg . l 1 Possible AMI No AMI magnitudes of ST deviations. All available 12-lead
ECGs were manually coded according to the Minnesota
code in five categories: definite acute myocardial
infarction, possible acute myocardial infarction, non-
12-lead ECG and a serum sample for markers of myo- developing changes, no acute myocardial infarction and
cardial injury were obtained immediately upon admis- uncodable ECG.
sion and then every 8 h for 48 h and thereafter daily for To categorize the admission ECGs, we first used the
3 days. Two patients were excluded because of techni- simplified Selvester QRS score to detect already existing
cally incomplete data. Thus, the final study population Q wave infarctions[11]. The Selvester QRS score was
consisted of 309 patients. All available information was originally developed to assess myocardial injury size, so
used for the purpose of our study. Two hundred and that 1 point corresponds to a 3% loss of left ventricular
seventy-one (88%) of the patients were hospitalized for mass. When the admission Selvester QRS score was
at least one day. Mortality information was collected <10, patients were classified based on the amount of ST
from the national register and was available in 305 out elevation (modified Aldrich score)[12]. The Aldrich score
of 309 patients (99%) at 1 and 5 years follow-up. The was originally developed to predict the size of the injury
total in-hospital mortality was 14%. The total 1 year from the admission ECG. ST depressions (horizontal or
mortality was 24% and the 5 year mortality 41%. downsloping d1 mm) were recorded according to the
MPIP code[13]. The presence of left bundle branch block
or pacemaker rhythm was coded, as suggested by the
Patient classification Marquette automated diagnosis. If none of the above
mentioned criteria were fulfilled, the classification of the
We studied three different classifications: the WHO admission ECG was no diagnostic changes. The categor-
MONICA, a combination of clinical symptoms and ization of the admission ECGs was fully automated
creatine kinase MB isoenzyme concentration data, and a and computerized and was based on the commercially
creatine kinase MB based classification. The cut-off available Marquette data matrix.
limits for the new combination code were interactively
chosen to reach maximal concordance with the
MONICA after the exclusion of ECG data (Table 1).
The creatine kinase MB classification was based on the Statistical methods
maximal value of creatine kinase MB during hospital-
ization regardless of the number of available samples. Observer agreement of categorical assessment[14], a
The limits d5 ìg . l 1 and d10 ìg . l 1 were used as method to assess the inter-observer variation of categ-
cut-offs for possible and definite acute myocardial orical assessments, was used to study the concordance of
infarction. the different classifications. The level of the proportion
of agreement that signifies agreement is arbitrary[14].
Given the size of our population under consideration,
Cardiac injury markers we chose 0·70 to indicate agreement between two codes.
The odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals
Serum creatine kinase isoenzyme MB mass fraction was (95% CI) were calculated, using the SAS system for
determined by Microparticle Enzyme Immunoassay Windows release 6.12/1996. P values less than 0·05 were
(MEIA) using the IMX CK-MB assay (Abbot Labora- interpreted as statistically significant.
tories, Abbot Park, IL, U.S.A.). The upper reference
limit was 5 ìg . l 1. Coefficient of variation in our
laboratory was 4%.
Serum creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase and its Results
isoenzyme 1 activities were determined by using an
Hitachi 704 or 717 analyser (Hitachi Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) Table 2 shows the distribution of patients into the
as described previously[10]. The upper reference limit categories of definite, possible and no acute myocardial
used for CK was 201 IU . l 1, for lactate dehydrogenase infarction using the three different classifications. The
451 IU . l and for lactate dehydrogenase 1 131 IU . l 1. MONICA code classified almost half of the patients
These enzymes were defined as raised when more than presenting with suspected myocardial infarction as poss-
twice the upper reference limit was achieved, and as ible acute myocardial infarctions. After omitting manual
borderline when the maximal value was elevated but ECG Minnesota coding, we could, at best, achieve
remained less than twice the upper reference range. the same diagnosis as that given by the MONICA in
Table 4 Relative odds ratios for mortality at 1 year (panel A) and 5 years (panel B) using
the three different classifications. OR=odds ratio, CI=confidence interval. P-value <0·05
indicates that the classification as a whole was statistically significantly associated with
prognosis
A.
1 year
MONICA 0·033
Definite 31/97 (32) 1·3 0·7 to 2·5
Possible 22/133 (17) 0·6 0·3 to 1·1
No AMI 21/75 (28) 1
Combination code 0·002
Definite 35/107 (33) 1·2 0·7 to 2·3
Possible 15/113 (13) 0·4 0·2 to 0·8
No AMI 24/85 (28) 1
CK-MB class <0·001
Definite (d10 ìg . l 1) 46/140 (33) 3·5 1·9 to 6·5
Possible (d5 ìg . l 1) 12/35 (34) 3·7 1·6 to 8·9
No AMI 16/130 (12) 1
B.
5 years
MONICA 0·036
Definite 47/97 (48) 1·1 0·6 to 2·0
Possible 44/133 (33) 0·6 0·3 to 1·03
No AMI 34/75 (45) 1
Combination code 0·001
Definite 54/107 (50) 1·1 0·6 to 2·0
Possible 31/113 (27) 0·4 0·2 to 0·8
No AMI 40/85 (47) 1
CK-MB class <0·001
Definite (d10 ìg . l 1) 75/140 (54) 3·4 2·0 to 5·7
Possible (d5 ìg . l 1) 17/35 (49) 2·8 1·3 to 6·0
No AMI 33/130 (25) 1
epidemiological purposes, the tailored ECG scores and logical acute myocardial infarction classification. Bio-
specific cardiac markers. Our study was designed to chemical tissue damage was found to be the most
emphasize the prognostic significance of an epidemio- powerful in the detection of patients with adverse
outcome after an ischaemic event (Tables 4A and B).
Table 5 Significant predictors of 1 year (panel A) and 5 We chose the admission ECG to represent electrocar-
year (panel B) mortality among to the MONICA vari- diographic information because this data is consistently
ables. OR=relative odds ratio compared to the normal available and is used to guide therapeutic choices.
findings group, CI=confidence interval Regardless of the presence or absence of a classified
ischaemic event, the admission ECG score was found to
P-value Died/n (%) OR 95% CI be a strong predictor of long-term survival (Table 6).
Previous studies[7–9] have shown that with the use of
A.
the new specific cardiac injury markers the prognostic
Enzymes 0·003 classification of suspected acute myocardial infarction
Raised 29/102 (28) 2·1 1·1 to 4·1 patients can be enhanced, particularly in the unstable
Minnesota ECG 0·005 angina subgroups. Our approach was more epidemio-
Non-developing 34/99 (34) 6·1 1·7 to 21·3 logical in nature. In fact, we originally set out to study
Uncodable 11/30 (37) 6·8 1·7 to 28·6
Pain 0·085
the prognostic value of peak creatine kinase MB concen-
B. tration in the entire study population. The cut-off limit
Enzymes <0·001 of d5 ìg . l 1 and d10 ìg . l 1 bear no difference in
Raised 46/102 (45) 2·5 1·4 to 4·4 predictive power (Tables 4A and B), but are presented
Borderline 34/75 (45) 2·5 1·3 to 4·6 separately because 10 ìg . l 1 was the most accurate
Minnesota ECG <0·001
cut-off point for the MONICA definite acute myocardial
Possible 42/102 (41) 3·9 1·5 to 10·2
Non-developing 50/99 (51) 5·4 2·1 to 14·1 infarction group. The analysis of several clinical and
Uncodable 20/30 (67) 9·1 2·8 to 29·4 laboratory measures and their combinations (Tables
Pain 0·051 4–6) revealed no benefit over the simplistic approach
based on maximum creatine kinase MB alone. The
Table 6 Prognostic significance of automated classifica- by new markers and maintain coding stability, but this
tion of admission ECG, based on injury scores, for 1 will probably not be possible in most centres. Therefore,
(panel A) and 5 years (panel B) mortality. OR=relative we suggest that the time has come to redefine the goals
odds ratio compared with the no diagnostic ECG changes and practices of epidemiological classification of acute
group, CI=confidence interval ischaemic syndromes.
P-value Died/n (%) OR 95% CI We wish to acknowledge The EVO Foundation of the Turku
University Central Hospital; Heart Foundation of South-
western Finland; Finnish Heart Foundation; Turku University
A. Foundation.
1 year <0·001
Q-wave 17/33 (52) 7·6 3·3 to 17·9
ST-elevation 13/59 (22) 1.9 0.9 to 4.2
ST-depression 15/48 (31) 3·2 1·4 to 6·9 References
LBBB or pacemaker 10/20 (50) 6·8 2·5 to 18·2
No diagnostic changes 19/145 (13) 1
[1] Gillum RF, Fortmann SP, Prineas RJ, Kottke TE. Inter-
B.
national diagnostic criteria for acute myocardial infarction
5 years <0·001
and acute stroke. Am Heart J 1984; 108: 150–8.
Q-wave 19/33 (58) 3·6 1·7 to 8·1
[2] Blackburn H, Keys A, Simonson E, Rautaharju PM, Punsar
ST-elevation 22/59 (37) 2·8 0·8 to 2·8
S. The electrocardiogram in population studies. A classifi-
ST-depression 26/48 (54) 3·1 1·6 to 6·1
cation system. Circulation 1960; 21: 1160–75.
LBBB or pacemaker 16/20 (80) 10·0 3·2 to 31·3
[3] Rautaharju PM, Warren JW, Jain U, Wolf HK, Nielsen CL.
No diagnostic changes 42/145 (29) 1
Cardiac infarction injury score: an electrocardiographic cod-
ing scheme for ischemic heart disease. Circulation 1981; 64:
249–56.
[4] Puleo P, Meyer D, Wathen C et al. Use of rapid assay of
validity of our approach is of course dependent on the subforms of creatine kinase MB to diagnose or rule out acute
myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 561–6.
ultimate purpose of the classification. We suggest that
[5] Hamm CW, Goldmann BU, Heeschen C, Kreymann G,
prognosis, represented by the 1 and 5 years mortalities in Berger J, Meinertz T. Emergency room triage of patients with
our study, should be the central goal of an epidemiologi- acute chest pain by means of rapid testing for cardiac troponin
cal classification of acute ischaemic syndromes. If this T or troponin I. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 1648–53.
task is successfully fulfilled by biochemical data alone, [6] Winter R, Koster R, Sturk A, Sanders G. Value of myoglobin,
any further characterization of patient subpopulations Troponin T, and CK-MB mass in ruling out an acute myo-
cardial infarction in the emergency room. Circulation 1995;
could rely on other methods, such as ECG, which can be 92: 3401–7.
specifically adjusted to the particular needs in question. [7] Lindahl B, Venge P, Wallentin L and the FRISC study group.
In line with previous observations[15], the uncodable Relation between Troponin T and the risk of subsequent
ECG population also had the highest mortality in our cardiac events in unstable coronary artery disease. Circulation
study. On the other hand, previous studies have associ- 1996; 93: 1651–7.
[8] Hamm C, Ravkilde J, Gerhardt W et al. The prognostic value
ated specific ECG features with adverse outcome in the of serum troponin T in unstable angina. N Eng J Med 1992;
acute myocardial infarction population. The non-Q 327: 146–50.
wave acute myocardial infarction patients now have a [9] Ravkilde J, Nissen H, Horder M, Thygesen K. Independent
better short- as well as long-term prognosis than patients prognostic value of serum creatine kinase isoenzyme MB
who ultimately develop Q waves[16–22]. This evidently mass, cardiac troponin T and myosin light chain levels in
suspected acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol
means that the non-Q wave acute myocardial infarction 1995; 25: 574–81.
patients with initial ST elevation have a relatively good [10] Kairisto V, Hänninen K-P, Leino A et al. Generation of
prognosis after thrombolysis[16,17,21], but patients with reference values for cardiac enzymes from hospital admission
ST-depression or left bundle branch block do laboratory data. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1994; 32:
worse[18,19,21]. Also the use and benefits of various 789–96.
treatments differ in the various ECG subgroups[22–24]. [11] Wagner G, Freye V, Palmeri S et al. Evaluation of a new QRS
scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size. I.
Thus, incorporation of ECG data in patient characteri- specificity and observer agreement. Circulation 1982; 65:
zation algorithms appears justified, although we do not 342–7.
think that such information is needed to detect the [12] Aldrich H, Wagner N, Boswick J et al. Use of initial ST-
presence of myocardial injury per se. This could now be segment deviation for prediction of final electrocardiographic
based on biochemical information alone. The workload size of acute myocardial infarcts. Am J Cardiol 1988; 61:
749–53.
of ECG classification can be minimized by automating [13] Greenberg H, Gillespie J, Edward M. A new electrocardio-
the ECG coding in epidemiological studies[25–27]. How- graphic classification for post-myocardial infarction clinical
ever, there is no consensus of optimal interpretation trials. Am J Cardiol 1987; 59: 1057–63.
algorithms for that purpose[28]. [14] Grant JM. The fetal heart rate trace is normal isn’t it?
In this study we provide an example of how difficult it Observer agreement of categorical assessments. Lancet 1991;
337: 215–8.
can be to monitor long-term epidemiological trends in
[15] Lim LLY, Kinlay S, Fisher JD, Dobson AJ, Heller RF. Can
today’s clinical environment. In principle, there are two ECG changes predict the long-term outcome in patients
ways to go. By comparing various classification algor- admitted to hospital for suspected acute myocardial
ithms it could be possible to analyse the changes induced infarction?. Cardiology 1997; 88: 460–7.
[16] Barbagelata A, Califf RM, Sgarbossa EB et al. Thrombolysis Q-wave myocardial infarction after thrombolysis. Results
and Q wave versus non-Q wave first acute myocardial infarc- from TIMI II Study. Circulation 1995; 91: 2541–48.
tion: A GUSTO-I substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: [23] White HD, Van de Werf FJJ. Thrombolysis for acute myo-
770–7. cardial infarction. Circulation 1998; 97: 1632–46.
[17] Goodman SG, Langer A, Ross AM et al. Non-Q-wave versus [24] Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists’ (FTT) Colloborative group.
Q-wave myocardial infarction after thrombolytic therapy. Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocar-
Circulation 1998; 97: 444–50. dial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and
[18] Lee HS, Cross SJ, Rawles JM, Jennings KP. Patients major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more
with suspected myocardial infarction who present with ST than 1000 patients. Lancet 1994; 343: 311–22.
depression. Lancet 1993; 342: 1204–7. [25] Rautaharju PM, MacInnis PJ, Warren JW, Wolf HK, Rykers
[19] Belotti G, Rochitte CE, de Albuquerque CP et al. Usefulness PM, Calhoun HP. Methodology of ECG interpretation in the
of ST-segment depression in non-infarct-related electrocardio- Dalhousie program; NOVACODE ECG classification proce-
graphic leads in predicting prognosis after thrombolytic dures for clinical trials and population health surveys. Method
therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1997; Inform Med 1990; 29: 362–74.
97: 1323–8. [26] Michaelis J, Lippold R, Gluck E, Schindler; Scheidt E.
[20] Cannon CP, McCabe CH, Stone PH et al. The electrocardio-
Automated serial ECG-analysis within an epidemiological
gram predicts one-year outcome of patients with unstable study. J Electrocardiol 1987; 20 (Suppl): 34–6.
angina and non-Q wave infarction: results of TIMI III registry
ECG ancillary study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30: 133–40. [27] Porela P, Hänninen K-P, Vuorenmaa T et al. Computer-
[21] Langer A, Goodman SG, Topol EJ et al. Late assessment of assisted electrocardiography in structured diagnosis of acute
thrombolytic efficacy (LATE) study: prognosis in patients myocardial infarction. Scand Cardiovasc J 1999; 33: 89–96.
with non-Q wave myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol [28] Macfarlene PW. A brief history of computer-assisted electro-
1996; 27: 1327–32. cardiography. Methods Inf Med 1990; 29: 272–81.
[22] Aguirre FV, Younis LT, Chaitman BR et al. Early and 1-year
clinical outcome of patients’ evolving non-Q-wave versus