Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Objective:
BACTERIA MORPHOLOGY
Staphylococcus epidermis Round scappled, light beige, flat raised spreading edge.
Escherichia coli Lobate, light beige, irregular, irregular and spreading.
Bacillus subtilis Irregular spreading, irregular lobate
Pseudomonas seruginosa Transparent colonies
Serratia marcescens Round scappled, red, flat
Mix 1 Escherichia Coli (E.C)
PLATE DESCRIPTION/OBSERVATION
3 'sprinkles', blotches, round colonies, many growing into the agar
Mix1 diluted X 103
4 Growing into agar, irregular, round, sprinkles
Mix1 diluted X 104
5 Growing into agar, irregular, round, sprinkles
Mix1 diluted X 105
6 Relatively little growth, growing into agar , sprinkles
Mix1 diluted X 106
7 Irregular, spreading, moderate growth, growing into agar, sprinkles
Mix1 diluted X 107
Mix 1 : (Staphylococcus epidermis (S.E), Escherichia Coli (E.C), Bacillus subtilis (B.S)
Discussion:
Isolation by streaking:
- Table 1
- Formation of colonies was successfully achieved in all seven plates.
- In mix 1, only 2 of the 3 colonies were recognized based on their morphology:
Escherichia Coli (E.C) & Bacillus subtilis (B.S).
- In mix 2, only one of the three colonies was recognized based on their morphology:
Serratia marcescens (S.M)
- One possible explanation could be due to the original number of microorganism in the
sample.
- The fact that some bacteria are more fastidious than others could be another explanation.
- Eg. E. coli is non-fastidious so it can grow more easily than others.
Isolation by pouring:
- Table 2
- Mix 1 was used for dilution of the pouring plates.
- E. coli was the only bacteria recognized in the pour plate.
- Absence of “sprinkles” on streak plates is the main difference when compared to the pour
plates.
- Microbes that were streaked on the surface of the agar plates grew more freely as those that
were mixed with the agar.
Calculated concentration:
Conclusion: