Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Given the chance, cows nurture their young and form lifelong friendships with on
e another. They play games and have a wide range of emotions and personality tra
its. But most cows raised for the dairy industry are intensively confined, leavi
ng them unable to fulfill their most basic desires, such as nursing their calves
, even for a single day. They are treated like milk-producing machines and are g
enetically manipulated and pumped full of antibiotics and hormones that cause th
em to produce more milk. While cows suffer on factory farms, humans who drink th
eir milk increase their chances of developing heart disease, diabetes, cancer, a
nd many other ailments.
Mastitis
Painful inflammation of the mammary glands, or mastitis, is common among cows ra
ised for their milk, and it is one of dairy farms' most frequently cited reasons
for sending cows to slaughter. There are about 150 bacteria that can cause the
disease, one of which is E. coli.(11) Symptoms are not always visible, so milk's
somatic cell count (SCC) is checked to determine whether the milk is infected.
Somatic cells include white blood cells and skin cells that are normally shed fr
om the lining of the udder. As in humans, white blood cells also known as "pus" are
produced as a means of combating infection. The SCC of healthy milk is below 100
,000 cells per milliliter; however, the dairy industry is allowed to combine mil
k from all the cows in a herd in order to arrive at a "bulk tank" somatic cell c
ount (BTSCC).(12) Milk with a maximum BTSCC of 750,000 cells per milliliter can
be sold.(13) A BTSCC of 700,000 or more generally indicates that two-thirds of t
he cows in the herd are suffering from udder infections.(14)
Studies have shown that providing cows with cleaner housing, more space, and bet
ter diets, bedding, and care lowers their milk's SCC as well as their incidence
of mastitis.(15) A Danish study of cows subjected to automated milking systems f
ound "acutely elevated cell counts during the first year compared with the previ
ous year with conventional milking. The increase came suddenly and was synchroni
zed with the onset of automatic milking."(16) Instead of improving conditions in
factory farms or easing cows' production burden, the dairy industry is explorin
g the use of cattle who have been genetically manipulated to be resistant to mas
titis.(17)
Environmental Destruction
Large dairy farms have an enormously detrimental effect on the environment. In C
alifornia, America's top milk-producing state, manure from dairy farms has poiso
ned hundreds of square miles of groundwater, rivers, and streams. Each of the mo
re than 1 million cows on the state's dairy farms excretes 18 gallons of manure
daily.(21,22) Overall, factory-farmed animals, including those on dairy farms, p
roduce 1.65 billion tons of manure each year, much of which ends up in waterway
s and drinking water.(23) The Environmental Protection Agency reports that agric
ultural runoff is the primary cause of polluted lakes, streams, and rivers. The
dairy industry is the primary source of smog-forming pollutants in California; a
single cow emits more of these harmful gasses than a car does.(24)
Two-thirds of all agricultural land in the U.S. is used to raise animals for foo
d or to grow grain to feed them.(25) Each cow raised by the dairy industry consu
mes as much as 40 gallons of water per day.(26)
References
1) David Goldstein, "Up Close: A Beef With Dairy," KCAL, 30 May 2002.
2) Stephanie Simon, "Mad Cow Casts Light on Beef Uses," Los Angeles Times 4 Jan.
2004.
3) Department of Animal Science, "Dairy Cattle Teaching & Research Center," Mich
igan State University, 14 Apr. 2009.
4) Anne Karpf, "Dairy Monsters," The Guardian 13 Dec. 2003.
5) Richard L. Wallace, "Market Cows: A Potential Profit Center," University of I
llinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2004.
6) U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agriculture Statistics Service, "Mil
k Cows and Production Estimates 2003-2007," Mar. 2009.
7) Don P. Blaney, "The Changing Landscape of U.S. Milk Production," Statistical
Bulletin Number 978, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Jun. 2002.
8) U.S. Department of Agriculture.
9) David Pace, "Feeding a Bucket Calf," Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service,
Oklahoma State University.
10) Simon.
11) Helen Pearson, "Udder Suicide, E. Coli Kill Off Milk-Making Mammary Cells,"
Nature 6 Aug. 2001.
12) National Mastitis Council, "Guidelines on Normal and Abnormal Raw Milk Based
on Somatic Cell Counts and Signs of Clinical Mastitis," 2001.
13) P.L. Ruegg, "Practical Food Safety Interventions for Dairy Production," Jour
nal of Dairy Science 86 (2003): E1-E9.
14) National Mastitis Council.
15) S. Waage et al., "Identification of Risk Factors for Clinical Mastitis in Da
iry Heifers," Journal of Dairy Science 81 (1998): 1275-84.
16) Morten Dam Rasmussen et al., "The Impact of Automatic Milking on Udder Healt
h," Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Mastitis and Milk Quali
ty (Vancouver: 2001).
17) Shannon Linderoth, "Mastitis Resistance in the Genes," Dairy Herd Management
1 Dec. 2006.
18) Susan C. Kahler, "Raising Contented Cattle Makes Welfare, Production Sense,"
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 218 (2001): 182-6.
19) U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, "Safety
of Veal, From Farm to Table," Oct. 2006.
20) John M. Smith, "Raising Dairy Veal," Ohio State University; information adap
ted from the Guide for the Care and Production of Veal Calves, 4th ed., 1993, Am
erican Veal Association, Inc.
21) United States Environmental Protection Agency, "California Animal Waste Mana
gement," 11 Aug. 2009.
22) John Burnett, "New Mexico Dairy Pollution Sparks 'Manure War'," National Pub
lic Radio, 8 Dec. 2009.
23) M. Jenkins and D.D. Bowman, "Viability of Pathogens in the Environment," Pat
hogens in the Environment Workshop Proceedings (Kansas City, Mo.: 23-25 Feb. 200
4).
24) James Owen, "California Cows Fail Latest Emissions Test," National Geographi
c News 16 Aug. 2005.
25) Ruben Lubowski et al., "Major Uses of Land in the United States, 2002," Econ
omic Information Bulletin No. (EIB-14), U.S. Department of Agriculture, 14 May 2
006.
26) T. Wright, "Water Quality for Dairy Cattle," Factsheet Oct. 2003.
27) Ontario Farm Animal Council, "Beef Cattle Farming in Ontario," 2005.
28) American Gastroenterological Association, "American Gastroenterological Asso
ciation Medical Position Statement: Guidelines for the Evaluation of Food Allerg
ies," Gastroenterology 120 (2001): 1023-5.
29) National Digestive Diseases Information Clearinghouse, "Lactose Intolerance,
" National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Jun. 2009.
30) Courtney Taylor, "Got Milk (Intolerance)? Digestive Malady Affects 30-50 Mil
lion," The Clarion-Ledger 1 Aug. 2003.
31) Severin Carrell, "Milk Causes Serious Illness for 7M Britons. Scientists Say U
ndetected Lactose Intolerance Is to Blame for Chronic Fatigue, Arthritis, and Bo
wel Problems," The Independent 22 Jun. 2003.
32) Karpf.
33) D. Feskanich et al., "Milk, Dietary Calcium, and Bone Fractures in Women: A
12-Year Prospective Study," American Journal of Public Health 87(1997): 992-97.
34) Karpf.
35) U.S. National Library and the National Institutes of Health, "Kwashiorkor,"
Medline Plus Medical Encyclopedia, 18 Dec. 2009.
36) Reuters, "Animal Protein and Fat Raise Endometrial Cancer Risk," 21 Mar. 200
7.
37) June M. Chan et al., "Pancreatic Cancer, Animal Protein and Dietary Fat in a
Population-Based Study," Cancer Causes and Control 18 (2007): 1153-67.
38) N.E. Allen et al., "Animal Foods, Protein, Calcium and Prostate Cancer Risk:
The European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition," British Jour
nal of Cancer 98 (2008): 1574-81.
39) Karpf.