Você está na página 1de 1138

Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom:

Clark Y
Joukovski 11
Göttingen 628
Eppler 793
Naca 0012
RAE 104
SC 20406
NLF 015
Whitcomb

Parametric Airfoil Catalog, Part I


An Aerodynamic and Geometric Comparison Between Parametrized and Point Cloud Airfoils
Tomas Melin

Copyright 2013,
c Tomas Melin

Published by:
Fluid and Mechatronic Systems,
Department of Management and Engineering,
The Institute of Technology,
Linköping University,
Linköping, Sweden

Visit our website at www.iei.liu.se

Printed by:
Linköping University
LiU-Tryck
581 83 Linköping
SWEDEN

Typeset in LATEX

ISBN: 978-91-7519-656-5
First Edition, March 2013
Parametric Airfoil Catalog
Part I
Archer A18 to Göttingen 655

An Aerodynamic and Geometric Comparison Between Parametrized and Point Cloud Airfoils.

Tomas Melin

Research Associate
Fluid and Mechatronic Systems,
Department of Management and Engineering,
The Institute of Technology,
Linköping University,
Linköping, Sweden
Contents ah7476 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
ah79100a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
1 Acknowledgements 1 ah79100b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
ah79100c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
2 Introduction 1 ah80129 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
ah80136 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
3 Background 1
ah80140 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
ah82150a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
4 Method 2
ah82150f . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
4.1 Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
ah83150q . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
4.2 Parameterization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
ah83159 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
4.3 Base change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
ah93156 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
4.4 Reproducing known airfoils . . . . . . . . 4
ah93157 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
5 Discussion 5 ah94145 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
ah94156 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
6 Software 6 ah95160 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
ames01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
7 Airfoil Catalog 6 ames02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
a18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 ames03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
a18sm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 amsoil1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
a63a108c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 amsoil2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
ag03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 aquilasm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
ag04 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 arad6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
ag09 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 arad10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
ag10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 arad20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
ag11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 as5045 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
ag12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 as5046 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
ag13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 as5048 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
ag14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 atr72sm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
ag16 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 avistar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
ag17 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 b29root . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
ag18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 b29tip . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
ag19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 b707e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
ag24 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 b737a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
ag25 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 b737b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
ag26 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 b737d . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
ag27 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 bacj . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
ag35 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 bacxxx . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
ag36 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 be50 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
ag37 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 boe106 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
ag38 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 bqm34 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
ag44ct02r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 c5a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
ag45c03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 c5b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
ag45ct02r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 c5c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
ag46c03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 c141a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
ag46ct02r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 c141b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
ag47c03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 c141c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
ag47ct02r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 c141d . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
ag455ct02r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 c141e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
ah21-7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 c141f . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
ah21-9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 cast102 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
ah63k127 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 clarkk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
ah79k132 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 clarkv . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
ah79k135 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 clarkx . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
ah85l120 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 clarky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
ah93w145 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 clarkyh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
ah93w174 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 clarkysm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
ah93w215 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 clarkz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
ah93w257 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 clarym15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108
ah6407 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 clarym18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109

3
cootie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 e341 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170
cr001sm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 e342 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171
curtisc72 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 e343 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172
dae11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 e360 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173
dae21 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 e361 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174
dae31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 e374 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175
dae51 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 e385 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176
davis-corrected . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 e387 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177
davis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 e392 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178
daytonwright6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 e393 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179
defcnd1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 e395 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180
defcnd2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 e396 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181
defcnd3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122 e397 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182
df101 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 e399 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183
dillner2032c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 e403 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184
doa5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 e417 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185
du8608418 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 e422 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186
e66 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 e426 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187
e67 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 e428 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188
e168 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129 e431 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189
e169 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 e432 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190
e171 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 e433 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191
e174 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 e434 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192
e176 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 e435 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193
e178 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134 e471 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194
e180 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 e472 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
e182 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 e473 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196
e184 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137 e474 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
e186 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 e475 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198
e193 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139 e476 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
e195 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140 e477 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200
e197 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141 e478 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201
e201 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142 e479 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202
e203 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 e502 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203
e205 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144 e542 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204
e207 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145 e543 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205
e209 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146 e544 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206
e210 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147 e545 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207
e211 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148 e546 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208
e212 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 e548 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209
e214 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150 e550 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210
e216 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151 e552 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211
e220 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152 e554 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212
e221 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153 e556 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213
e222 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 e557 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214
e224 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 e558 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215
e226 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156 e559 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216
e228 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 e560 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217
e230 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 e561 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218
e231 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 e562 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219
e326 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 e580 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220
e327 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 e583 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221
e331 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162 e584 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222
e332 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 e587 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223
e334 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164 e591 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224
e335 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165 e593 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225
e336 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166 e598 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226
e337 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167 e603 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227
e338 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168 e604 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228
e340 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169 e625 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229
e635 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230 fx84w127 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 290
e636 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231 fx84w140 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291
e637 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232 fx84w150 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292
e638 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233 fx84w175 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 293
e639 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234 fx84w218 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294
e642 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235 fx05188 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 295
e654 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236 fx05191 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 296
e655 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237 fx60100 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297
e656 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238 fx60100sm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 298
e657 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239 fx60126 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 299
e662 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240 fx60157 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300
e664 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241 fx60160 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301
e668 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242 fx60177 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 302
e682 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 243 fx61140 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 303
e694 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244 fx61147 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 304
e715 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245 fx601261 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 305
e748 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246 fx711530 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 306
e793 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247 fxl142k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 307
e817 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 248 fxm2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308
e836 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249 fxs03182 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 309
e837 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250 fxs21158 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310
e838 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251 giiia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 311
e851 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252 giiib . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 312
e852 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253 giiic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313
e853 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 254 giiid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 314
e854 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255 giiie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315
e856 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256 giiif . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 316
e857 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257 giiig . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317
e874 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258 giiih . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 318
e1098 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 259 giiii . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 319
e1200 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 260 giiij . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 320
e1210 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 261 giiik . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321
e1211 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262 giiil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 322
e1212 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263 gm15sm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323
e1212mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 264 goe07k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 324
e1213 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265 goe08k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325
e1214 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 266 goe11k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 326
e1230 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267 goe14k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327
e1233 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268 goe15k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 328
ea61012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269 goe16k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 329
eh0009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270 goe29b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 330
eh1070 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271 goe54 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 331
eh1090 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272 goe55 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 332
eh1590 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273 goe57 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 333
eh2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274 goe79 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 334
eh2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275 goe81 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 335
eiffel385 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 276 goe92 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336
eiffel428 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 277 goe114 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 337
eppler793 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 278 goe115 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 338
falcon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 279 goe116 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339
fg2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280 goe117 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 340
fg3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281 goe118 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341
fg4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282 goe121 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 342
fx2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 283 goe122 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 343
fx08s176 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284 goe123 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 344
fx66a175 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285 goe124 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 345
fx78k140 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286 goe134 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 346
fx83w160 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 287 goe137 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 347
fx83w227 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 288 goe140 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 348
fx84w097 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289 goe142 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 349
goe143 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 350 goe329 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 410
goe144 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 351 goe331 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 411
goe147 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352 goe332 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 412
goe155 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 353 goe335 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 413
goe164 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 354 goe342 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 414
goe165 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 355 goe346 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 415
goe167 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 356 goe358 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 416
goe173 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357 goe359 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 417
goe174 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 358 goe360 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 418
goe176 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 359 goe361 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 419
goe177 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360 goe362 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 420
goe178 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 361 goe363 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 421
goe180 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 362 goe364 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 422
goe182 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 363 goe365 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 423
goe184 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364 goe366 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 424
goe190 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 365 goe367 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 425
goe195 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 366 goe368 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 426
goe199 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 367 goe369 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 427
goe210 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 368 goe371 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 428
goe217 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 369 goe372 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 429
goe222 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 370 goe373 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 430
goe223 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371 goe374 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 431
goe225 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 372 goe381 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 432
goe226 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373 goe383 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 433
goe227 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 374 goe385 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 434
goe229 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 375 goe387 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 435
goe233 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 376 goe389 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 436
goe234 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 377 goe392 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 437
goe239 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 378 goe393 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 438
goe240 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 379 goe394 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 439
goe242 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 380 goe395 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 440
goe255 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 381 goe396 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 441
goe256 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 382 goe397 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 442
goe257 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 383 goe398 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 443
goe264 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 384 goe399 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 444
goe265 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 385 goe400 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 445
goe269 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 386 goe402 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 446
goe276 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 387 goe403 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 447
goe277 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 388 goe405 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 448
goe278 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 389 goe409 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 449
goe279 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 390 goe410 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450
goe280 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 391 goe411 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 451
goe281 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 392 goe413 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 452
goe282 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 393 goe414 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 453
goe284 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 394 goe416a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 454
goe285 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 395 goe417 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 455
goe286 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 396 goe418 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 456
goe287 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 397 goe419 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 457
goe288 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 398 goe420 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 458
goe289 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 399 goe423 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 459
goe290 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 400 goe424 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 460
goe298 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 401 goe425 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 461
goe300 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 402 goe426 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 462
goe301 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 403 goe427 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 463
goe303 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 404 goe428 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 464
goe304 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 405 goe430 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 465
goe320 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 406 goe431 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 466
goe325 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 407 goe432 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 467
goe326 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 408 goe433 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 468
goe328 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 409 goe436 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 469
goe437 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 470 goe595 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 530
goe438 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 471 goe596 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 531
goe439 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 472 goe598 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 532
goe442 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 473 goe599 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 533
goe445 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 474 goe600 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 534
goe446 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 475 goe601 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 535
goe447 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 476 goe602 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 536
goe449 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 477 goe602m . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 537
goe450 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 478 goe604 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 538
goe456 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 479 goe610bm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 539
goe457 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 480 goe611 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 540
goe458 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 481 goe613 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 541
goe459 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 482 goe615 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 542
goe460 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 483 goe617 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 543
goe464 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 484 goe619 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 544
goe477 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 485 goe620 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 545
goe478 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 486 goe621 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 546
goe479 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 487 goe622 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 547
goe480 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 488 goe623 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 548
goe481a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 489 goe624 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 549
goe483 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 490 goe626 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 550
goe484 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 491 goe627 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 551
goe492 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 492 goe628 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 552
goe493 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 493 goe629 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 553
goe494 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 494 goe630 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 554
goe495 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 495 goe645 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 555
goe496 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 496 goe646 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 556
goe497 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 497 goe647 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 557
goe498 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 498 goe648 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 558
goe499 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 499 goe650 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 559
goe500 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500 goe654 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 560
goe501 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 501 goe655 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 561
goe502 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 502
goe504 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 503
goe506 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 504
goe508 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 505
goe517 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 506
goe526 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 507
goe527 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 508
goe528 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 509
goe529 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 510
goe532 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 511
goe533 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 512
goe534 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 513
goe535 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 514
goe546 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 515
goe547 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 516
goe548 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 517
goe549 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 518
goe550 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 519
goe553 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 520
goe559 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 521
goe563 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 522
goe564 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 523
goe565 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 524
goe567 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 525
goe575 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 526
goe584 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 527
goe591 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 528
goe592 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 529
1 Acknowledgements cating the trailing edge to make sure that the upper and
lower sides both ended at x=1.
This collection of parametrized airfoils would not have
been possible without the prior work of several indi-
viduals. Many thanks goes to Prof. Michael Selig at 3 Background
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign for supply-
ing the original point cloud airfoil database on which
this work is based. All my appreciation to Brenda Kul-A fundamental part of aircraft design involves wing air-
foil optimization, establishing an outer shape of the wing
fan from Boeing for her inspiring work on class function
/ shape function transformation technique. My warm which has good aerodynamic performance for the design
thanks tho the research team at Linköping University:mission, good internal volume distribution for fuel and
Anton Jonzén, Chetan Nangunoori, Jacob Bjärkmar, Jo-systems and which also serves as an efficient structural
han Karlén, Svante Löthgren and Vijaykumar Govin- member supporting the load of the weight of the air-
darajan. craft. The underlying idea with this parametrization is
to couple an appropriate number of parameters, balanc-
The author also wishes to thank the sponsors: VIN- ing the need of geometric accuracy with the necessity of
NOVA and the industrial partner Saab AB for their few airfoil parameters in order to facilitate en expedient
funding through Nationella Flygtekniska Frsksprogram- optimisation, with the intrinsic value of having param-
met, NFFP5. eters that makes sense for a human; such as thickness,
camber and trailing edge thickness. Several approaches
to parametrization of wing profiles can be found in the
literature.
2 Introduction
Airfoils can be described by point clouds as done in most
airfoil libraries [1]. The number of parameters is twice
This book is intended to serve as a reference for students, as large as the number of points used (x and y coordi-
engineers and researchers requiring a parametrized air- nates) and in the case of aerodynamic optimization this
foil that can model existing airfoils well as providing parametrization will most certainly be not well behaved,
a significant design space for optimisation. The pro- since no smoothing function is included and must there-
posed method covers at least one thousand of the known fore be employed. Other problems may arise for the fact
profiles used in aeronautics today, while enabling many that the airfoils sometimes are defined with too few co-
more. The method uses 15 parameters defining a wing ordinate points and/or too few decimals, a problem oc-
profile. This way many existing airfoils can be mod- curring especially with old airfoils. On the other hand,
elled with close tolerance. In the following volumes, the design space that this kind of parametrization allows
the parametrized airfoils are compared with the origi- representing is extremely large, as any and all shapes can
nal point cloud data. The comparison is made for ge- be reproduced, even degenerate ones.
ometrical and aerodynamic similarity, but is should be
noted that the point clouds used may in some instances Airfoils can also be represented by mathematical func-
not be representative for the original airfoil due to round tions. Among the most common representatives of this
off errors, discretisation error and other other unknown category are indeed the NACA 4-, 5- and 6-digits for-
errors. The parametrisation is intended for two dimen- mulations [2] [3]. Compared to point clouds, they could
sional airfoils but the method can easily be extended to be said to represent the opposite case: they are very
a three dimensional wing. well behaving parametrizations, but they cannot cover a
very large design space, since they only provide four to
The coordinate resolution becomes infinite and point dis- six parameters respectively to be tuned. The NACA 4
tribution becomes a non-issue by employing a functional digit series is particularly interesting as the parameters
parametric description with built-in smoothing and in- are a part of the name of the airfoil. In the case of the
terpolation. In order to facilitate this, some basic as- 5- and 6 digit series, the name is instead constructed
sumptions regarding the shape of an airfoil are made: from the airfoils aerodynamic characteristic and geome-
The airfoil is assumed to have one distinct top and bot- try. Another known set of theoretically defined airfoils
tom point, the chord line has a length of exactly one, are the Joukowski profiles [4]. Using the conformal map-
forming the x-axis of the profile, the trailing edge is as- ping method, airfoils with a round nose and sharp trail-
sumed to be either sharp, i.e. with a y-coordinate of zero ing edge can be represented. Sadly the method is not to
for both top and bottom sides, or blunt with the y coor- recommend for trying to match known airfoils and the
dinates of the top and bottom trailing edges being sym- design space it describes is quite confined to airfoils with
metric around the chord line. These assumptions means often poor performances.
that a lot of historical airfoils needed to be preprocessed
before they could be parametrized. Preprocessing usu- More recently a very interesting and powerful represen-
ally involved rotating the coordinate cloud to form an tation method, the class function/shape function’ trans-
x-axis from the nose to the trailing edge, scaling to set formation CST method was presented by Kulfan[5]. The
the length of the airfoil to exactly unity and finally trun- method is based on simple well behaved mathematical

1
functions that allow for increasing the number of pa-
rameters at will. Also the formulation is not restricted
to round nose and sharp trailing edge profiles, but can
describe almost any shape.
Figure 2: Parametrized transonic wing airfoil with
Beziér control points and control vectors, and the num-
bering of the control points.
4 Method

4.1 Model the curve, giving 26 variables when both x and y co-
ordinates are taken into account. However when some
The envelope of the airfoil is described by a set of para- symmetries and simplifications valid for wing profiles are
metric Beziér curves, which are closely related to Bern- taken into account the number of independent parame-
stein polynomials. The equation for an n-dimensional ters are reduced to 14. Control point 1 and 13 always
cubic Beziér curve is shown in equation 1. The cubic have the same x-coordinate, one, and the same absolute
Beziér curve requires the four control points, P0 to P3 value of their y-coordinate is also equal as their average,
in order to be defined. The points P0 to P2 span the the camber line, must be on the x-axis at the trailing
first control vector, and P2 to P3 span the second con- edge. Control points 3,4 and 5 on the bottom side have
trol vector, as shown in figure 1. The Beziér is tangential the same y-coordinate. The same goes for the top side
to the control vectors at the start and endpoints of the control points 9, 10 and 11. The leading edge points 6,7
curve. This behaviour will ensure that the leading edge and 8 all have an x-coordinate of zero. Table 1 show the
is tangential with the z-axis and that the curve at top dependent parameters for the control points.
point of the airfoil is tangential with the x-axis. The air-
Table 1: Coordinate dependency for the control points.
Some always take the value one or zero, while others
(a,b,c) always shares the same numerical while (xn yn )
are allowed any value.

Coordinate
Point nr. X Y
1 1 a
2 x2 y2
3 x3 b
4 x4 b
5 x5 b
6 0 y6
7 0 0
Figure 1: Generic cubic Beziér curve with the four con-
8 0 y8
trol points P0 to P3 marked. The Beziér is tangential
9 x9 c
to the control vectors at the start and endpoints of the
10 x10 c
curve.
11 x11 c
foil’s top and bottom curves are modelled individually 12 x12 y12
by two cubic Beziér curves in parametric form being C1 13 1 −a
continuous at the defined top and bottom points, as well
as the leading edge. C1 continuity was selected over C2
continuity in order to allow curve fitting with many older The control points for each of the investigated airfoils
airfoils which only exhibit C1 continuity. are available in this tabulated form in the results section
of this book.
B̄ = (1 − t)3 P̄0 + 3t(1 − t)2 P̄1 + 3t2 (1 − t)P̄2 + t3 P̄3 (1)
When modelling modern profiles, the proposed method
does allow C2 continuity as well. Figure 2 gives an ex- 4.2 Parameterization
ample of a transonic wing airfoil, the Lockheed C-5A
BL576, and show the outer envelope and the Beziér Handling the control point coordinates directly when
control points and control vectors. The control points specifying an airfoil is not user friendly. The coordi-
are numbered clockwise from the bottom side trailing nates themselves have no obvious relation to shape of
edge. The method of representing an airfoil is straight- the airfoil when reviewed alone and the possible range
forward. For a generic envelope built up by four cu- of the coordinate values exceed the allowed range for
bic Beziér curves, 13 control points are needed to define non-degenerate airfoils. To alleviate this concern, and

2
to reduce the number of free parameters, the following
parameter transformations are done:

The lengths of the control vectors are limited to prevent


degenerate cases. For example the upper leading edge Figure 4: Definition of the leading edge control vector
control vector needs to be shorter than the distance be- parameters.
tween the top point and the chord line to prevent leading
edge overshoot. Figure 3 shows the bounding box lim-
iting the range of the control vectors. None of the con- nr.10 to nr.9 has its length limited to a fraction, k2 , of the
trol points are allowed outside of this box, furthermore top point position in the same way in order to prevent
the trailing edge control vectors, governed by the two an overshoot of the profile into negative x-coordinates.
control points nr.2 and nr.12 may never reach further Likewise the control vector defined by points 10 to 11,
forward than points nr.3 and nr.11 respectively. -Shown the top to TE vector is a fraction k4 of the length be-
by the limit lines L1 and L2 in figure 3. Thickness: The tween the upper thickness position (nr.10) and the trail-
ing edge (x=1). The trailing edge is defined by five pa-

Figure 5: Definition of the top side control vector pa-


rameters.
Figure 3: Bounding box of the control vectors, together
with the trailing edge vectors forward limits L1 and L2 .
rameters, some shown in figure 6. The trailing edge gap
g, is the distance between the upper and lower side of
x and y coordinates of the top and bottom points (nr. the airfoil at the trailing edge. It is parametrized accord-
4 and nr.10) are kept as is and named upper thickness ing to equation 4, where Gmax is the maximum allowed
and upper thickness position and similarly for the lower trailing edge gap of 5% of the chord.
side. The upper height is parametrized as a factor k4
times the maximum allowed upper thickness, 0.15, ac- g = k15 · Gmax (4)
cording to equation 2. As the lower side is treated in the
The release angle α, which is the angle between the cam-
same way, this means that the maximum thickness al-
ber line tangent and the chord line at the trailing edge,
lowed with this parametrization is 30% of the chord. The
is parametrized similarly according to equation 5. The
difference between the upper and lower thickness then
release angle is a fraction k14 times the maximum al-
becomes the ram thickness. The ram thickness equals
lowed release angle αmax of 0.35 radians ( about 20◦ ).
the airfoil thickness in case the thickness positions are
Is should be noted that the release angle may take on
equals. If the upper and lower thickness positions are
both positive and negative values.
not equal, the ram thickness will be slightly larger than
the traditional airfoil thickness. α=k ·α (5)
14 max

y9,10,11 = hu = k5 · 0.15 (2) The boat tail angle β, which is the angle between tan-
gents of the upper and lower sides of the airfoil at the
Control vectors: The upper leading edge control vec-
trailing edge is defined in equation 6. It is treated in a
tor spanned by its start point, the leading edge at [0 0]
similar way to the release angle. The boat tail angle β is
which is point nr.7, and point nr.8. The length of this
a factor k13 times the maximum allowed boat tail angle
vector is defined as a fraction k1 of the upper thickness
βmax of 1 radian ( about 57◦ ).
hu , according to equation 3 The constant k1 is then only
allowed to be in the range [0..1], see figure 4. This en- β = k13 · βmax (6)
sures that the part of the profile going from the leading
edge to the top point does not overshoot the top points
y value.
y8 = k1 · hu (3)
The top side of the airfoil is controlled by three param-
eters, shown in figure 5. The top point position Pu is
in itself a fraction of the chord length and need not to
be parametrized further, is renamed k3 . The two frac- Figure 6: Definition of the top side control vector pa-
tions k2 and k4 control the lengths of the forward and rameters.
aft control vectors. The control vector going from the
top point towards the leading edge, i.e. between points

3
The length of the upper and lower side trailing edge con- from 10% to 1.6% for each parameter value. Some mod-
trol vectors together with the trailing edge gap, the boat ification to the new base numbering has to be made as
tail angle and the release angle determines the position both zero and one needs to be modelled, and any double
of control points nr. 2 and nr. 12. These lengths are are digit parameter is disallowed. The encoding follows the
also parametrized according to equation 7. The length RFC3548 [6]. The series [0, 1, 2, .., 25, 26, ..., 51, 52, ...63]
of the upper vector, V , is a fraction k11 of the maximum maps to [A, B, C, .., Z, a, ..., z, 0, ... ]. By rounding the
allowed length Vmax . The maximum allowed length is in base 10 multi-decimal parameter towards the closest
turn dependent on the bounding box of the airfoil and 63:rd as shown in table 3, a reasonable accurate value
the position of the forward limit L1 set by the x-position can be stored in a single digit. With this system an air-
of control point nr. 11.
Table 3: Base change example.
V = k11,12 · Vmax (7)

The parameters of the lower side of the airfoil are de- Parameter 63:rds base 64 error
fined in the same manner as the upper side parameters, k1 = 0 0 A 0%
numbering the parameters in the same way from 6 to 10. k2 = 0.3333 21 V 0%
k3 = 0.5 32 g 1.6 %
With the five parameters defining the trailing edge, the k4 = 0.7 44 s -0.3 %
number of parameters are now reduced to 15. See table k5 = 1 63 0%
2. By the limits of the fractions many degenerate airfoils
are now hard to impossible to generate. By using the
chord length as normalizing agent, the parameters are foil with know parameters k to k can be expressed as
1 15
also dimensionless and fully scalable. a single string. For example will the Naca747a415 profile
shown in figure 6 be represented as the string shown in
Table 2: Parameter names and order. table 4

Table 4: Base 64 representation:


Name Parameter Range
Upper side
Upper nose fraction k1 [0..1] ggaQszVsoTL8DeA
Upper forward fraction k2 [0..1]
Upper thickness position k3 [0..1]
Upper rearward fraction k4 [0..1]
Upper thickness k5 [0..1]
Lower side 4.4 Reproducing known airfoils
Lower nose fraction k6 [0..1]
Lower forward fraction k7 [0..1] In many design cases it will not be appropriate to start
Lower thickness position k8 [0..1] with a generic airfoil for design optimization. Instead,
Lower rearward fraction k8 [0..1] by employing a known airfoil, whether it is a Clark-Y,
Lower thickness k10 [0..1] NACA0012 or any other known airfoil there is a need
of having the traditional airfoil shape expressed in the
Trailing edge
proposed parameters. Modelling known airfoils require
Upper length fraction k11 [0..1]
slightly more work than creating new airfoils.
Lower length fraction k12 [0..1]
Boat tail angle fraction k13 [0..1] When fitting known wing profiles to the parametrization,
Release angle fraction k10 [0..1] the input data are sometimes in poor condition and in
Trailing edge gap fraction k10 [0..1] need of preprocessing. The point cloud must have its
leading edge at [0 0] and the trailing edge cord have to
end at [1 0], if the profile has a trailing edge gap, this
should be symmetrically distributed around the [1 0]. If
this is not the case som geometrical rotation, transla-
4.3 Base change tion and scaling will have to be employed. This means
that some aerodynamic properties such has zero lift an-
gle and stall angle of attack will shift when comparing
By listing the parameters k1 to k15 when rounded of the parametrized airfoil with external aero data.
to the nearest tenth, a 15 digit number could be used
to present a large set of airfoils. This approach would One example of a wing profile that needs preprocessing is
however introduce large round off errors which would the Clark-Y profile, an older propeller profile today used
make the process of modelling known airfoils trouble- frequently amongst model aircraft builders for its ease
some. This is alleviated by changing the base from base of manufacture rather than aerodynamic performance.
10 to base 64. With base 64 the resolution increases The coordinate data for the Clark-Y profile, as presented

4
in some databases [7] has the lower side flank parallel to scatter is found any offset bias or systematic error can
the x-axis, rather than letting the chord line define the be assumed to be small.
x-axis.
To further investigate the correlation between the orig-
A starting guess of parameters were created by evaluat- inal data point cloud and the parametric wing pro-
ing the profile radius at the leading edge, top and bot- file, an aerodynamic study was performed utilizing the
tom, at the upper maximum y- position and at the lower panel method XFOIL [8]. The original airfoil and the
minimum y-position. Together with the trailing edge parametrized airfoil were both subjected to a CL sweep
gap and the slope of the upper and lower sides of the ranging from −0.3 to 1 at a Reynolds number of 6 · 106 .
airfoil at the trailing edge. The radius at these points The drag and moment coefficients were evaluated, as well
are computed with a three point circle algorithm from as the boundary layer transition point for both profiles.
which the length of the control vectors can be computed
according to equation 8, where a is the outgoing control The proposed parametrization method was tested on a
vector length and h the perpendicular distance to the set of over 1100 different airfoils. Results for these pro-
next control point as shown in figure 7. files are presented in this report, in the catalog section.
For each of the investigated airfoils the reported curva-
1 2h ture distribution graph is truncated at the leading edge
= 3 (8) in order to give a better scale of the results for the rest of
r 3a
the profile. Each profile is reported on a separate page
consisting of the following sections

• Full name, if one is available

• Data source, usually the UIUC [1] database, but


also NACA or other sources.

• A geometry plot, showing both a scaled up y-axis


Figure 7: Definition radius parameters. with camber and thickness, as well as an axis equal
profile plot.

• A geometrical data table containing maximum


thickness, maximum thickness position etc...
With the obtained starting guess, a standard optimiza-
tion is run in MATLAB to fit the parameter curve to the • Coordinates of the Beziér curve control points.
corresponding point cloud. The mathematical method • Base 64 parametrized airfoil name
used is the built-in fsolve method, which in this case
utilizes the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. The run is • A table showing the average errors in position, cur-
set to minimize the root mean square error of the verti- vature as well as errors in drag- and pitching mo-
cal position of the coordinate points between parameter ment coefficient and transition point position for
points and point cloud. control point and parameter curves at a standard
CL of 0.3
The optimization is nested in two layers in order to treat
the parameter nature of the Beziér curve. The outer loop • A graph showing the position and curvature error
solves for the control parameters governing the curve over the entire profile.
segment in question and an inner loop solving for the
curvilinear position parameter vector t, with respect to • A figure showing the error in drag- and pitching
the x coordinate. As the original data points may have moment coefficient as well as the error in transition
any distribution along the x-axis, it cannot be assumed point position for a range of lift coefficients.
that the t vector in equation 1 is evenly distributed.

The optimization results is evaluated both from a geo-


metrical point of view, were the error of vertical position
5 Discussion
of each point is plotted for the profile. The average RMS
error for the profile is a general quality control. The av- The conducted aerodynamic study covers only some
erage RMS error was usually in the order of 10−4 , ne- aerodynamic phenomena in the linear domain of low
cessitating the use of the unit error counts (ects), where speed flight. For a more thorough comparison higer or-
1 ects = 10−4 . Similarly, the curvature and error in der effects needs to be modelled. Notably stall angle of
curvature between were evaluated Notably many of the attack and post-stall behaviour, which cannot be cap-
available airfoils had very noisy curvature distributions, tured well with XFOIL. Likewise High speed shock for-
making an error plot of curvature fitting interesting but mation similarities and drag rise needs to be assessed
not a good indicator to whether the parametric inter- before this parametric wing profile description can be
polation was good or bad. Instead, as long as a good said to model the point cloud airfoils in every aspect.

5
The method as described does not require C2 continuity [6] S. Josefsson, Ed., The Base16, Base32, and Base64
at the top and bottom points. Adding this constraint Data Encodings, Request for Comments: 3548, Net-
to the method will reduce the number of free parame- work Working Group, The Internet Society, 2003.
ters with two, and also give a more traditional curvature
continuity. However, the geometrical fitting of known [7] Louden, F A , Collection of wind-tunnel data
airfoils would suffer in having a higher geometrical er- on commonly used wing sections, NACA-TR-331,
ror. For most known airfoils tested, the optimized cur- 93R20691,1930
vature is indeed discontinuous, but with a very small [8] Drela, M, XFOIL - An analysis and design system
step. This discontinuity does not appear to have a sig- for low Reynolds number airfoils, Proceedings of the
nificant impact on the aerodynamic performance of the Conference, Notre Dame, Germany; 5-7 June 1989.
parametrized airfoil. pp. 1-12. 1989.
Some of the airfoils in the catalog have an improper set
of control points. In the numerical optimisation used
to compute the control points, some profiles got a zero 7 Airfoil Catalog
length control vector at the trailing edge. While the
geometric representation using the control points works,
as well as creating the base 64 string, creating control .
points from the BM64 string will not work. The zero-
length control vector destroys the information about its
orientation.

6 Software

MATLAB code needed for evaluating the airfoils in the


database, as well as an electronic version of the database
will be available at:

Linköping University:
http://www.iei.liu.se/flumes/aircraft-design/
software
and at Redhammer Consulting:
http://www.redhammer.se/software

References
[1] Michael Selig, UIUC Airfoil Coordinates
Database, University of Illinois at Urbana-
Champaign, Dept of Aerospace Engineering,
Urbana, Illinois, http://www.ae.illinois.edu/m-
selig/ads/coord database.html, webpage retrieved
2012-01-01

[2] E. N. Jacobs, K. E. Ward, & R. M. Pinkerton The


characteristics of 78 related airfoil sections from tests
in the variable-density wind tunnel, NACA Report
No. 460,1933

[3] P. Marzocca. The NACA airfoil series, Clarkson Uni-


versity, Retrieved 07-03-2009.

[4] R. Von Mises, Theory of Flight, Dover Publications


Inc., New York, 1959

[5] B. Kulfan, Universal Parametric Geometry Repre-


sentation Method, AIAA Journal of Aircraft, vol.45
no.1, pp.142-158, 2008

6
Profile: a18 Table 8: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.139 4.145 ects
Information: Archer A18 F1C free flight airfoil(original) RMS curvature error: 82.32 81.84 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -6 -6.3 dcts
Cm error -4 16 mcts
Upper transition point 16.75 16.76 %

Figure 8: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 9: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.

Table 5: Geometrical properties


Maximum Thickness: 7.3716 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 3.8388 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.6139 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.87604 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.305 deg
Release Angle: 8.7462 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.1754 deg
Camber deflection: 13.9216 deg

Table 6: Controlpoints
1 -0.0030695
0.51761 0.035689
0.22225 -0.017479
0.075281 -0.017479
0 -0.017479
0 -0.0027967
0 0
0 0.034595
0.20492 0.071454
0.34893 0.071454
0.52472 0.071454
0.74869 0.060622
1 0.0030695

Table 7: Base 64 representation:


faWReK FKH1nJtP

Figure 10: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

7
Profile: a18sm Table 12: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.613 3.97 ects
Information: Archer A18 F1C free flight airfoil (smoothed) RMS curvature error: 33.8 33.06 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.4 -42.1 dcts
Cm error -11 38 mcts
Upper transition point 1.59 0.11 %

Figure 11: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 12: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 9: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.3004 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 3.8292 % @0.48C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.6139 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.80441 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.7243 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.6557 deg
Release Angle: 8.7335 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.6017 deg
Camber deflection: 13.3351 deg

Table 10: Controlpoints


1 -0.0030695
0.50962 0.034711
0.22382 -0.017479
0.075281 -0.017479
0.026042 -0.017479
0 -0.011214
0 0
0 0.031215
0.1817 0.071454
0.37893 0.071454
0.4767 0.071454
0.73763 0.063939
1 0.0030695

Table 11: Base 64 representation:


chYKeopFKH4oKtP

Figure 13: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

8
Profile: a63a108c Table 16: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.074 5.126 ects
Information: NASA/AMES modification of the NACA 63A-108 RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
airfoil CD error 1.5 1.7 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 12 19 mcts
Upper transition point -1.95 -2.4 %

Figure 15: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 14: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- curvature of the parameter curve.
tribution.
Table 13: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.7324 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 0.44446 % @0.17C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.7 %C
Upper nose radius: 7.3484 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.96721 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.6362 deg
Release Angle: -1.8163 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.1186 deg
Camber deflection: 6.3023 deg

Table 14: Controlpoints


1 -0.0035
0.67387 -0.021359
0.53376 -0.034625
0.34988 -0.034625
0.043735 -0.034625
0 -0.016793
0 0
0 0.017524
0.0062687 0.0428
0.30015 0.0428
0.65936 0.0428
0.89177 0.002559
1 0.0035

Table 15: Base 64 representation:


a-TgSf3WSPUsDsS
Figure 16: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

9
Profile: ag03 Table 20: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.57 4.651 ects
Information: Drela AG03 (flat aft bottom) airfoil RMS curvature error: 64.95 Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.8 2.8 dcts
Cm error 2 -1 mcts
Upper transition point 0.03 -0.11 %

Figure 17: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 18: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 17: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.2362 % @0.24C
Maximum Camber: 2.0801 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.12109 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.91155 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.28905 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.2667 deg
Release Angle: 2.5067 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.4494 deg
Camber deflection: 12.9561 deg

Table 18: Controlpoints


1 -0.000605
0.24106 -0.011456
0.14104 -0.013042
0.11285 -0.013042
0.032851 -0.013042
0 -0.0074338
0 0
0 0.018966
0.062535 0.051261
0.28141 0.051261
0.45191 0.051261
0.6626 0.035301
1 0.000605

Table 19: Base 64 representation:


YxSPWjsHCGr4HjD

Figure 19: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

10
Profile: ag04 Table 24: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.772 3.504 ects
Information: Drela AG04 airfoil RMS curvature error: 78.17 77.96 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.1 0 dcts
Cm error -8 -5 mcts
Upper transition point 0 -0.47 %

Figure 20: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 21: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 21: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.431 % @0.22C
Maximum Camber: 1.7383 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.134 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.11324 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.38937 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.4372 deg
Release Angle: 2.54 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.8897 deg
Camber deflection: 7.4297 deg

Table 22: Controlpoints


1 -0.00067001
0.41458 -0.0024952
0.31306 -0.018619
0.12471 -0.018619
0.037228 -0.018619
0 -0.010154
0 0
0 0.0032762
0.014218 0.047906
0.28091 0.047906
0.46682 0.047906
0.70227 0.028073
1 0.00067001

Table 23: Base 64 representation:


E8SRUisIOIk2GjD

Figure 22: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

11
Profile: ag08 Table 28: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.235 3.282 ects
Information: Drela AG08 airfoil RMS curvature error: 53.77 58.42 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.2 -0.1 dcts
Cm error -8 -8 mcts
Upper transition point 0.45 0.28 %

Figure 23: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 24: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 25: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 5.8158 % @0.2C
Maximum Camber: 1.7887 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.1599 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.14748 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.49865 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.5484 deg
Release Angle: 2.8292 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.0776 deg
Camber deflection: 6.9068 deg

Table 26: Controlpoints


1 -0.0007995
0.35178 -0.00017682
0.25139 -0.016274
0.10702 -0.016274
0.013992 -0.016274
0 -0.0069976
0 0
0 0.0037576
0.014361 0.045229
0.2797 0.045229
0.46324 0.045229
0.75563 0.024775
1 0.0007995

Table 27: Base 64 representation:


F8SQTc3HKHi2GkE

Figure 25: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

12
Profile: ag09 Table 32: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.638 7.178 ects
Information: Drela AG09 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.4 1.5 dcts
Cm error -5 6 mcts
Upper transition point 0.05 0.6 %

Figure 26: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 27: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 29: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 4.8323 % @0.19C
Maximum Camber: 1.7992 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.1953 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.13559 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.58733 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.3115 deg
Release Angle: 2.3245 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.0164 deg
Camber deflection: 5.3409 deg

Table 30: Controlpoints


1 -0.00097652
0.18565 0.0014228
0.1208 -0.012956
0.053016 -0.012956
0.014118 -0.012956
0 -0.007435
0 0
0 0.0034204
0.012943 0.041311
0.25799 0.041311
0.44519 0.041311
0.70899 0.023779
1 0.00097652

Table 31: Base 64 representation:


F8RQSkuDFGj6FjF

Figure 28: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

13
Profile: ag10 Table 36: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.221 6.221 ects
Information: Drela AG10 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.5 1.4 dcts
Cm error -12 -2 mcts
Upper transition point -0.04 1.08 %

Figure 29: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 30: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 33: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 4.6276 % @0.17C
Maximum Camber: 1.6779 % @0.3C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.3617 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.70733 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2777 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.9621 deg
Release Angle: 2.2757 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.7855 deg
Camber deflection: 7.0612 deg

Table 34: Controlpoints


1 -0.0018085
0.19456 0.0023339
0.13144 -0.012762
0.052895 -0.012762
0.0020376 -0.012762
0 -0.0041661
0 0
0 0.015276
0.049489 0.039103
0.23424 0.039103
0.33993 0.039103
0.6342 0.029035
1 0.0018085

Table 35: Base 64 representation:


ZxPJRV9DFFu6EjJ

Figure 31: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

14
Profile: ag11 Table 40: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.697 3.676 ects
Information: Drela ag11 Airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.7 0.4 dcts
Cm error -9 -19 mcts
Upper transition point 0.35 -0.71 %

Figure 32: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 33: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 37: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 5.8281 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 2.2378 % @0.3C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.23211 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0233 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.48629 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.3025 deg
Release Angle: 2.7502 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.8638 deg
Camber deflection: 14.614 deg

Table 38: Controlpoints


1 -0.0011605
0.12818 -0.0072634
0.12818 -0.0085929
0.062559 -0.0085929
0.022776 -0.0085929
0 -0.0085929
0 0
0 0.017122
0.042974 0.051424
0.27237 0.051424
0.49516 0.051424
0.80514 0.021303
1 0.0011605

Table 39: Base 64 representation:


V1RUW oEEEa HkG

Figure 34: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

15
Profile: ag12 Table 44: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.57 4.006 ects
Information: Drela AG12 airfoil RMS curvature error: 23.77 20 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 -1.1 dcts
Cm error 1 15 mcts
Upper transition point -0.08 1.09 %

Figure 35: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 36: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 41: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.2467 % @0.21C
Maximum Camber: 1.8519 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.0942 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.29309 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.39563 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.5704 deg
Release Angle: 3.557 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.4867 deg
Camber deflection: 9.0437 deg

Table 42: Controlpoints


1 -0.000471
0.58904 0.012241
0.32192 -0.017368
0.1367 -0.017368
0.1121 -0.017368
0 -0.017195
0 0
0 0.007639
0.029865 0.047421
0.27642 0.047421
0.33811 0.047421
0.50871 0.046411
1 0.000471

Table 43: Base 64 representation:


K4SFU-MJOH-mElC

Figure 37: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

16
Profile: ag13 Table 48: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.746 3.442 ects
Information: Drela AG13 airfoil RMS curvature error: 21.55 22.19 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.4 -0.5 dcts
Cm error -1 -8 mcts
Upper transition point 0.67 1.14 %

Figure 38: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 39: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 45: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 5.8377 % @0.21C
Maximum Camber: 1.9847 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.0948 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.15829 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.34629 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.7275 deg
Release Angle: 3.7369 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.2355 deg
Camber deflection: 9.9724 deg

Table 46: Controlpoints


1 -0.000474
0.54498 0.014407
0.31541 -0.014817
0.11427 -0.014817
0.020217 -0.014817
0 -0.0068317
0 0
0 0.0037237
0.01314 0.046611
0.28113 0.046611
0.49014 0.046611
0.8484 0.015341
1 0.000474

Table 47: Base 64 representation:


F8STUe0HPGVqElC

Figure 40: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

17
Profile: ag14 Table 52: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.583 4.503 ects
Information: Drela AG14 airfoil RMS curvature error: 20.49 20.58 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 -0.3 dcts
Cm error 4 18 mcts
Upper transition point -0.21 -0.82 %

Figure 41: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 42: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 49: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 5.3797 % @0.2C
Maximum Camber: 2.1006 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.0956 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.20363 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.46443 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.5983 deg
Release Angle: 3.4341 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.6902 deg
Camber deflection: 10.1242 deg

Table 50: Controlpoints


1 -0.000478
0.54239 0.016581
0.24845 -0.01217
0.089637 -0.01217
0.0050921 -0.01217
0 -0.0039707
0 0
0 0.0050753
0.018974 0.045611
0.26974 0.045611
0.54821 0.045611
0.97943 0.0021814
1 0.000478

Table 51: Base 64 representation:


H6RYTV7GLFDmDlC

Figure 43: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

18
Profile: ag16 Table 56: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.504 3.053 ects
Information: Drela AG16 airfoil RMS curvature error: 16.44 20.4 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.1 0.8 dcts
Cm error -2 -8 mcts
Upper transition point -0.56 -2.3 %

Figure 44: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 45: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 53: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.1257 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 1.8923 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.0929 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.38526 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.47317 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.2561 deg
Release Angle: 3.9528 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.6057 deg
Camber deflection: 8.5585 deg

Table 54: Controlpoints


1 -0.0004645
0.62188 0.011582
0.35229 -0.021861
0.15 -0.021861
0.1455 -0.021861
0 -0.021424
0 0
0 0.010942
0.046612 0.051721
0.28899 0.051721
0.39848 0.051721
0.57165 0.046097
1 0.0004645

Table 55: Base 64 representation:


O1SKW-CKPJ4kFmC

Figure 46: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

19
Profile: ag17 Table 60: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.447 5.281 ects
Information: Drela AG17 airfoil RMS curvature error: 21.13 23.58 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.1 -0.5 dcts
Cm error -2 -13 mcts
Upper transition point -0.22 0.69 %

Figure 47: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 48: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 57: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.4999 % @0.22C
Maximum Camber: 2.0372 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.0939 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.33128 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.38325 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.9266 deg
Release Angle: 3.9986 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.0635 deg
Camber deflection: 10.0621 deg

Table 58: Controlpoints


1 -0.0004695
0.59646 0.013871
0.32561 -0.017646
0.13694 -0.017646
0.11914 -0.017646
0 -0.017646
0 0
0 0.0086
0.033488 0.050086
0.28915 0.050086
0.42436 0.050086
0.611 0.041094
1 0.0004695

Table 59: Base 64 representation:


L4TMV IJOIzlEmC

Figure 49: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

20
Profile: ag18 Table 64: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.397 2.922 ects
Information: Drela AG18 airfoil RMS curvature error: 20.92 22.8 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 -0.2 dcts
Cm error -2 -11 mcts
Upper transition point -0.03 1.38 %

Figure 50: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 51: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 61: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 5.8638 % @0.21C
Maximum Camber: 2.1825 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.0948 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.22085 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.32579 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.6509 deg
Release Angle: 4.021 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.2609 deg
Camber deflection: 11.2819 deg

Table 62: Controlpoints


1 -0.000474
0.54809 0.016852
0.3181 -0.013804
0.096885 -0.013804
0.072651 -0.013804
0 -0.012562
0 0
0 0.0047717
0.015465 0.048451
0.28931 0.048451
0.44443 0.048451
0.6416 0.037172
1 0.000474

Table 63: Base 64 representation:


G8TOV5QGQGwpEmC

Figure 52: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

21
Profile: ag19 Table 68: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.908 2.946 ects
Information: Drela AG19 profile RMS curvature error: 25.17 27.39 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.2 -0.6 dcts
Cm error -5 -4 mcts
Upper transition point 0.97 1.77 %

Figure 53: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 54: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 65: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 5.4039 % @0.2C
Maximum Camber: 2.2958 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.0954 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.16958 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.29661 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.3048 deg
Release Angle: 4.1143 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.1149 deg
Camber deflection: 12.2292 deg

Table 66: Controlpoints


1 -0.000477
0.53884 0.01935
0.25592 -0.01147
0.083848 -0.01147
0.072714 -0.01147
0 -0.01147
0 0
0 0.0018582
0.0030542 0.047306
0.28942 0.047306
0.45507 0.047306
0.65678 0.035138
1 0.000477

Table 67: Base 64 representation:


D-TPU IFMFunEmC

Figure 55: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

22
Profile: ag24 Table 72: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.631 4.258 ects
Information: AG24 Bubble Dancer DLG by Mark Drela RMS curvature error: 18.03 20.46 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.5 1.1 dcts
Cm error -5 -2 mcts
Upper transition point -0.43 -1.13 %

Figure 56: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 57: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 69: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.4185 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 2.232 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.0971 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.48654 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.47278 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.0698 deg
Release Angle: 5.3831 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.9859 deg
Camber deflection: 11.3689 deg

Table 70: Controlpoints


1 -0.0004855
0.78905 0.011856
0.39277 -0.023806
0.17708 -0.023806
0.11797 -0.023806
0 -0.019283
0 0
0 0.014478
0.064627 0.06255
0.31499 0.06255
0.58855 0.06255
0.88291 0.01573
1 0.0004855

Table 71: Base 64 representation:


PyUabzVLRKSWFoC

Figure 58: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

23
Profile: ag25 Table 76: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.417 4.012 ects
Information: AG25 Bubble Dancer DLG by Mark Drela RMS curvature error: 12.22 12.91 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.1 0.4 dcts
Cm error -2 -2 mcts
Upper transition point 0.13 -0.38 %

Figure 59: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 60: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 73: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.5788 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 2.4182 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.0963 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.4144 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.41098 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.3626 deg
Release Angle: 5.3241 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.8875 deg
Camber deflection: 12.2116 deg

Table 74: Controlpoints


1 -0.0004815
0.72414 0.014665
0.34085 -0.019003
0.1501 -0.019003
0.10207 -0.019003
0 -0.016723
0 0
0 0.011777
0.050208 0.059926
0.3156 0.059926
0.57181 0.059926
0.8617 0.018703
1 0.0004815

Table 75: Base 64 representation:


N1UYa3UKOIVbFoC

Figure 61: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

24
Profile: ag26 Table 80: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.315 5.753 ects
Information: AG26 Bubble Dancer DLG by Mark Drela RMS curvature error: 19.31 19.78 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.3 1 dcts
Cm error 0 -4 mcts
Upper transition point -0.44 -1.14 %

Figure 62: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 63: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.

Table 77: Geometrical properties


Maximum Thickness: 6.8375 % @0.24C
Maximum Camber: 2.5649 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.0999 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.40075 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.36598 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.5466 deg
Release Angle: 5.0101 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.8733 deg
Camber deflection: 12.8835 deg

Table 78: Controlpoints


1 -0.0004995
0.62383 0.017482
0.31741 -0.015296
0.10998 -0.015296
0.069288 -0.015296
0 -0.013002
0 0
0 0.010201
0.038946 0.057438
0.31627 0.057438
0.50477 0.057438
0.72377 0.035804
1 0.0004995

Table 79: Base 64 representation:


L3USZ1YHPHniFnD

Figure 64: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

25
Profile: ag27 Table 84: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.371 6.741 ects
Information: AG27 Bubble Dancer DLG by Mark Drela RMS curvature error: 22.21 25.4 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.4 0.4 dcts
Cm error 7 7 mcts
Upper transition point -0.8 -0.8 %

Figure 65: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 66: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 81: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.1212 % @0.22C
Maximum Camber: 2.6939 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.1035 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.066651 %C
Lower nose radius: 16.9447 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.1799 deg
Release Angle: 4.7444 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.2214 deg
Camber deflection: 11.9658 deg

Table 82: Controlpoints


1 -0.00051751
0.51098 0.022154
0.28019 -0.012895
0.079122 -0.012895
6.636e-005 -0.012895
0 -0.0027379
0 0
0 0.001851
0.0077103 0.054524
0.31772 0.054524
0.53295 0.054524
0.80092 0.024377
1 0.00051751

Table 83: Base 64 representation:


C9UUXO FOGcqFnD

Figure 67: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

26
Profile: ag35 Table 88: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.47 8.015 ects
Information: AG35 - Not so good fit. RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.2 2.1 dcts
Cm error -58 -84 mcts
Upper transition point -0.58 -1.12 %

Figure 68: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 69: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 85: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.7243 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 2.3805 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.24889 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.6654 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.7988 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 41.5742 deg
Release Angle: 19.2444 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.3739 deg
Camber deflection: 25.6183 deg

Table 86: Controlpoints


1 -0.0012445
0.35219 -0.018691
0.25219 -0.022407
0.17008 -0.022407
0.014579 -0.022407
0 -0.0088112
0 0
0 0.017463
0.068748 0.066862
0.31591 0.066862
0.57871 0.066862
0.99811 0.0028315
1 0.0012445

Table 87: Base 64 representation:


RxUZsZ6LGKC2t-G

Figure 70: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

27
Profile: ag36 Table 92: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.899 3.694 ects
Information: AG46 RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.6 1.2 dcts
Cm error -2 -16 mcts
Upper transition point -1.17 -1.71 %

Figure 71: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 72: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 89: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.1678 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 2.2378 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.26691 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.52526 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.85103 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.4311 deg
Release Angle: 3.2997 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.2392 deg
Camber deflection: 8.5389 deg

Table 90: Controlpoints


1 -0.0013346
0.34869 -0.017432
0.24869 -0.020814
0.16994 -0.020814
0.016336 -0.020814
0 -0.0096272
0 0
0 0.014821
0.062726 0.062778
0.31615 0.062778
0.42013 0.062778
0.6665 0.048296
1 0.0013346

Table 91: Base 64 representation:


PyUKbe5LGJw2LlH

Figure 73: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

28
Profile: ag37 Table 96: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.016 2.592 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: N/A CD error 0.8 1.6 dcts
Cm error -8 -4 mcts
Upper transition point -0.71 -1.6 %

Figure 74: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 75: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.

Table 93: Geometrical properties


Maximum Thickness: 7.7335 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 2.2045 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.35071 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.88948 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.59804 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.1333 deg
Release Angle: 3.8549 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.3885 deg
Camber deflection: 12.2434 deg

Table 94: Controlpoints


1 -0.0017535
0.35094 -0.015482
0.25094 -0.018345
0.16989 -0.018345
0.026545 -0.018345
0 -0.010288
0 0
0 0.022021
0.081779 0.060398
0.30209 0.060398
0.47148 0.060398
0.82934 0.028544
1 0.0017535

Table 95: Base 64 representation:


XuTQaj1LGIs2LlJ

Figure 76: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

29
Profile: ag38 Table 100: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.99 2.97 ects
Information: AG38 - Sequential flat top. RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.3 1 dcts
Cm error -13 -24 mcts
Upper transition point -0.69 -0.7 %

Figure 77: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 78: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 97: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.09 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 2.1139 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.46973 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.96108 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.65407 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.8477 deg
Release Angle: 4.0734 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.5099 deg
Camber deflection: 12.5833 deg

Table 98: Controlpoints


1 -0.0023511
0.35859 -0.013357
0.25859 -0.015859
0.15767 -0.015859
0.020048 -0.015859
0 -0.0088358
0 0
0 0.023723
0.086492 0.055832
0.31472 0.055832
0.44798 0.055832
0.8073 0.033007
1 0.0023511

Table 99: Base 64 representation:


btUMYj3KIHk2LmM

Figure 79: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

30
Profile: ag44ct02r Table 104: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.635 4.322 ects
Information: Drela AG44ct -02f airfoil RMS curvature error: 88.77 75.82 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.2 -0.3 dcts
Cm error 15 10 mcts
Upper transition point -0.39 0.95 %

Figure 80: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 81: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 101: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.2978 % @0.24C
Maximum Camber: 1.9711 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.0534 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.55571 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.38892 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.0413 deg
Release Angle: 2.521 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.5092 deg
Camber deflection: 11.0302 deg

Table 102: Controlpoints


1 -0.000267
0.63271 -0.0034701
0.34543 -0.018389
0.16335 -0.018389
0.089844 -0.018389
0 -0.015263
0 0
0 0.012551
0.042522 0.055628
0.27448 0.055628
0.41942 0.055628
0.51942 0.046894
1 0.000267

Table 103: Base 64 representation:


O1SNY0sKOI1jHjB

Figure 82: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

31
Profile: ag45c03 Table 108: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.928 4.224 ects
Information: Drela AG45c -03f airfoil RMS curvature error: 87.7 88.93 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.5 -1.1 dcts
Cm error 20 26 mcts
Upper transition point -0.39 -0.02 %

Figure 83: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 84: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 105: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.9341 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 2.056 % @0.32C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.089404 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.68748 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.36316 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.8362 deg
Release Angle: 2.5406 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.1188 deg
Camber deflection: 11.6595 deg

Table 106: Controlpoints


1 -0.00044702
0.84572 0.0025761
0.25739 -0.016272
0.13659 -0.016272
0.084686 -0.016272
0 -0.014156
0 0
0 0.016085
0.056449 0.054761
0.26295 0.054761
0.45884 0.054761
0.55884 0.030977
1 0.00044702

Table 107: Base 64 representation:


TxRRX3YJJHzNDjC

Figure 85: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

32
Profile: ag45ct02r Table 112: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.456 6.225 ects
Information: Drela AG45ct -02f airfoil RMS curvature error: 92.91 75.5 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 -0.6 dcts
Cm error 16 14 mcts
Upper transition point -0.82 -0.08 %

Figure 86: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 87: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 109: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.9066 % @0.24C
Maximum Camber: 1.877 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.0622 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.64802 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.33101 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.9582 deg
Release Angle: 2.2012 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.7934 deg
Camber deflection: 10.9945 deg

Table 110: Controlpoints


1 -0.000311
0.66001 -0.0019602
0.3403 -0.017269
0.15022 -0.017269
0.088631 -0.017269
0 -0.014679
0 0
0 0.015506
0.055655 0.052819
0.26292 0.052819
0.44337 0.052819
0.54337 0.037694
1 0.000311

Table 111: Base 64 representation:


TxRQX1aKOH0gGjC

Figure 88: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

33
Profile: ag46c03 Table 116: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.853 4.31 ects
Information: Drela AG46c -03f airfoil RMS curvature error: 86.88 80.23 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.8 -1.1 dcts
Cm error 13 -7 mcts
Upper transition point -0.08 0.32 %

Figure 89: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 90: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 113: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.0359 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 1.7305 % @0.32C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.079396 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.7473 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.32371 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.3184 deg
Release Angle: 2.3813 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.6922 deg
Camber deflection: 11.0735 deg

Table 114: Controlpoints


1 -0.00039698
0.89349 0.0018752
0.27658 -0.014689
0.1229 -0.014689
0.077426 -0.014689
0 -0.012926
0 0
0 0.016951
0.057676 0.047087
0.26216 0.047087
0.47656 0.047087
0.57657 0.026595
1 0.00039698

Table 115: Base 64 representation:


XxRTU3YILGzJDjC

Figure 91: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

34
Profile: ag46ct02r Table 120: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.848 3.968 ects
Information: Drela AG46ct -02f airfoil RMS curvature error: 83.73 77.17 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.7 -1.6 dcts
Cm error 24 22 mcts
Upper transition point -0.3 0.13 %

Figure 92: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 93: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 117: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.0803 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 1.7152 % @0.32C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.0793 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.63476 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.33084 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.1401 deg
Release Angle: 2.5804 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.2892 deg
Camber deflection: 10.8696 deg

Table 118: Controlpoints


1 -0.0003965
0.87999 0.0017202
0.24385 -0.015231
0.1365 -0.015231
0.10101 -0.015231
0 -0.014926
0 0
0 0.013702
0.044364 0.047085
0.26215 0.047085
0.41713 0.047085
0.50752 0.036134
1 0.0003965

Table 119: Base 64 representation:


T0RNU-RJIG1KEjC

Figure 94: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

35
Profile: ag47c03 Table 124: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.602 6.302 ects
Information: Drela AG47c -03f airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.6 -0.3 dcts
Cm error 21 27 mcts
Upper transition point -0.1 -1.19 %

Figure 95: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 96: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 121: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 5.0652 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 1.3685 % @0.32C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.069288 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0218 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.25118 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.1028 deg
Release Angle: 1.7923 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.7223 deg
Camber deflection: 11.5146 deg

Table 122: Controlpoints


1 -0.00034644
0.72118 -0.00053732
0.27908 -0.01318
0.12359 -0.01318
0.087941 -0.01318
0 -0.01315
0 0
0 0.011766
0.029761 0.038643
0.2659 0.038643
0.48035 0.038643
0.58035 0.020088
1 0.00034644

Table 123: Base 64 representation:


T4RTQ SILGzZDhC

Figure 97: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

36
Profile: ag47ct02r Table 128: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.536 4.959 ects
Information: Drela AG47ct -02f airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf 91.7 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.2 0.1 dcts
Cm error 20 26 mcts
Upper transition point -0.8 -1.41 %

Figure 98: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 99: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 125: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 5.0109 % @0.2C
Maximum Camber: 1.334 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.069302 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5382 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.25118 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.7209 deg
Release Angle: 2.101 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.7206 deg
Camber deflection: 14.8216 deg

Table 126: Controlpoints


1 -0.00034651
0.72071 -0.00054082
0.27896 -0.01318
0.12358 -0.01318
0.087959 -0.01318
0 -0.013151
0 0
0 0.012521
0.029276 0.037867
0.26588 0.037867
0.42966 0.037867
0.52966 0.027645
1 0.00034651

Table 127: Base 64 representation:


V4ROQ SILG0ZEiC

Figure 100: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

37
Profile: ag455ct02r Table 132: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.599 5.74 ects
Information: Drela AG47ct -02f airfoil RMS curvature error: 90.26 94.22 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.5 0.2 dcts
Cm error 17 5 mcts
Upper transition point -0.19 -0.29 %

Figure 101: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 102: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 129: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.4629 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 1.8645 % @0.32C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.084402 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.58885 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.3227 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.5673 deg
Release Angle: 2.6828 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.0365 deg
Camber deflection: 11.7193 deg

Table 130: Controlpoints


1 -0.00042201
0.8476 0.00197
0.25994 -0.015703
0.13673 -0.015703
0.080672 -0.015703
0 -0.013505
0 0
0 0.012275
0.038382 0.050471
0.2637 0.050471
0.42269 0.050471
0.5227 0.037705
1 0.00042201

Table 131: Base 64 representation:


Q2ROW2aJJH0NEkC

Figure 103: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

38
Profile: ah21-7 Table 136: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.775 2.128 ects
Information: Andrew Hollom AH 21 airfoil (7 RMS curvature error: 20.94 22.37 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.8 1.7 dcts
Cm error -4 -5 mcts
Upper transition point -0.95 -2.49 %

Figure 104: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 105: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 133: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.0217 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 2.2717 % @0.58C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2939 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.55902 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.5473 deg
Release Angle: 12.0864 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.4152 deg
Camber deflection: 20.5015 deg

Table 134: Controlpoints


1 0
0.94178 0.007989
0.53283 -0.026163
0.25509 -0.026163
0.18366 -0.026163
0 -0.026163
0 0
0 0.045185
0.23669 0.065727
0.39727 0.065727
0.48498 0.065727
0.7761 0.065727
1 0

Table 135: Base 64 representation:


raZJc SQYL IKzA

Figure 106: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

39
Profile: ah21-9 Table 140: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.251 4.294 ects
Information: Andrew Hollom AH 21 airfoil (original 9 RMS curvature error: 18.9 17.93 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.8 -0.8 dcts
Cm error -3 6 mcts
Upper transition point -2.39 -3.43 %

Figure 107: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 108: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 137: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.9745 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 1.7394 % @0.58C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.76099 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.35479 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.7118 deg
Release Angle: 9.1924 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.3248 deg
Camber deflection: 15.5172 deg

Table 138: Controlpoints


1 0
0.93404 0.0061614
0.54915 -0.020163
0.25509 -0.020163
0.1301 -0.020163
0 -0.017542
0 0
0 0.031239
0.19236 0.050727
0.39727 0.050727
0.49371 0.050727
0.78112 0.050727
1 0

Table 139: Base 64 representation:


mgZKW3fQZJ JJuA

Figure 109: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

40
Profile: ah63k127 Table 144: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.624 6.583 ects
Information: Althaus AH 63-K-127/24 airfoil for use with flaps RMS curvature error: 50.43 49.22 %
(K) CD error 0.6 0.4 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 97 98 mcts
Upper transition point -5.44 -5.07 %

Figure 111: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 110: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 141: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.7016 % @0.42C
Maximum Camber: 3.754 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.80776 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.38153 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.2212 deg
Release Angle: 6.977 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.7159 deg
Camber deflection: 16.6929 deg

Table 142: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79049 0.012324
0.78992 -0.0263
0.37059 -0.0263
0.2483 -0.0263
0 -0.0263
0 0
0 0.030733
0.17539 0.10098
0.43474 0.10098
0.63509 0.10098
0.73509 0.049517
1 0

Table 143: Base 64 representation:


TlcXq VYqLt IqA
Figure 112: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

41
Profile: ah79k132 Table 148: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.534 8.047 ects
Information: Althaus AH 6-407 airfoil RMS curvature error: 49.62 50.2 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1 -1 dcts
Cm error 121 104 mcts
Upper transition point -5.15 -4.31 %

Figure 113: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 114: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 145: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.2012 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 3.6792 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.56806 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.83926 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.5694 deg
Release Angle: 4.8172 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.8891 deg
Camber deflection: 10.7062 deg

Table 146: Controlpoints


1 0
0.83607 0.0015234
0.83607 -0.02924
0.43474 -0.02924
0.085303 -0.02924
0 -0.021847
0 0
0 0.021256
0.1193 0.1028
0.40245 0.1028
0.65086 0.1028
0.75086 0.039914
1 0

Table 147: Base 64 representation:


NsabrvycsMt KnA

Figure 115: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

42
Profile: ah79k135 Table 152: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.873 5.963 ects
Information: Althaus AH 79-K-135/20 airfoil for use with flaps RMS curvature error: 52.71 54.14 %
(K) CD error -3.7 -4.2 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 96 95 mcts
Upper transition point -4.73 -4.5 %

Figure 117: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 116: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 149: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.4838 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 3.0551 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.61238 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.6081 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.9066 deg
Release Angle: 4.14 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.2982 deg
Camber deflection: 10.4382 deg

Table 150: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80797 -0.0010499
0.80797 -0.03693
0.37059 -0.03693
0.30008 -0.03693
0 -0.034879
0 0
0 0.022397
0.12287 0.09796
0.40245 0.09796
0.65402 0.09796
0.75402 0.037171
1 0

Table 151: Base 64 representation:


Prabp7MYrQt KmA
Figure 118: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

43
Profile: ah85l120 Table 156: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.683 3.57 ects
Information: Althaus AH 85-L-120/17 symmetrical airfoil RMS curvature error: 19.95 17.77 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1 -0.9 dcts
Cm error -3 -2 mcts
Upper transition point 3.3 3.02 %

Figure 119: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 120: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 153: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.1092 % @0.44C
Maximum Camber: -3.4043e-005 % @0.81C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.53477 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.53477 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.3674 deg
Release Angle: 0.00065455 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 0.00065455 deg

Table 154: Controlpoints


1 -0.0008
0.79081 -0.017154
0.75818 -0.06055
0.43474 -0.06055
0.17971 -0.06055
0 -0.025312
0 0
0 0.025312
0.17971 0.06055
0.43474 0.06055
0.75818 0.06055
0.79076 0.017158
1 0.0008

Table 155: Base 64 representation:


blckablcka22KgE

Figure 121: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

44
Profile: ah93w145 Table 160: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.884 4.645 ects
Information: Althaus AH 93-W-145 airfoil for use on wind turbines RMS curvature error: 84.55 82.73 %
(W) CD error 2.2 1.8 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 32 40 mcts
Upper transition point -4.49 -4.05 %

Figure 123: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 122: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 157: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.4707 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 3.9019 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.195 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2431 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.3124 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.7316 deg
Release Angle: 10.1715 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.9352 deg
Camber deflection: 16.1067 deg

Table 158: Controlpoints


1 -0.000975
0.89902 0.0092925
0.62672 -0.035207
0.22223 -0.035207
0.12428 -0.035207
0 -0.032975
0 0
0 0.034918
0.14712 0.11118
0.37052 0.11118
0.49268 0.11118
0.92002 0.021715
1 0.000975

Table 159: Base 64 representation:


UmYMu7cOgPMRKvF
Figure 124: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

45
Profile: ah93w174 Table 164: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.753 6.669 ects
Information: Althaus AH 93-W-174 airfoil for use on wind turbines RMS curvature error: 78.48 83.07 %
(W) CD error -0.3 -0.4 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 40 15 mcts
Upper transition point -1.06 -0.24 %

Figure 126: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 125: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 161: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.4475 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 3.9126 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.7815 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.0808 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.2892 deg
Release Angle: 8.9863 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.2294 deg
Camber deflection: 13.2157 deg

Table 162: Controlpoints


1 0
0.84886 0.015463
0.613 -0.050272
0.22221 -0.050272
0.18218 -0.050272
0 -0.050272
0 0
0 0.043819
0.16167 0.1259
0.33928 0.1259
0.49336 0.1259
0.59336 0.087406
1 0

Table 163: Base 64 representation:


WhWP1 MOgVyZHuA
Figure 127: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

46
Profile: ah93w215 Table 168: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.18 7.484 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: 95.88 97.91 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.4 2.2 dcts
Cm error -7 -6 mcts
Upper transition point -2.4 -3.02 %

Figure 128: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 129: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 165: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 21.2437 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 3.0646 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.753 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.3159 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.1904 deg
Release Angle: 7.4024 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.0573 deg
Camber deflection: 10.4597 deg

Table 166: Controlpoints


1 0
0.84803 -0.0018376
0.5608 -0.076241
0.30873 -0.076241
0.05013 -0.076241
0 -0.033289
0 0
0 0.04945
0.13324 0.13643
0.33916 0.13643
0.42374 0.13643
0.52374 0.13206
1 0

Table 167: Base 64 representation:


XmVI5c1TXg9WSrA

Figure 130: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

47
Profile: ah93w257 Table 172: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.099 6.424 ects
Information: Althaus AH 93-W-257 airfoil for use on wind turbines RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
(W) CD error 1.8 0.9 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 8 5 mcts
Upper transition point -1.25 -0.01 %

Figure 132: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 131: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 169: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 25.6792 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 2.0965 % @0.77C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.77298 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.6975 %C
Lower nose radius: 5.161 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.2101 deg
Release Angle: 10.3267 deg
Nose Incidence: -9.5731 deg
Camber deflection: 0.75361 deg

Table 170: Controlpoints


1 -0.0038649
0.71895 0.036744
0.59478 -0.12504
0.27931 -0.12504
0.15226 -0.12504
0 -0.07238
0 0
0 0.055391
0.17061 0.13298
0.33881 0.13298
0.49148 0.13298
0.59148 0.093922
1 0.0038649

Table 171: Base 64 representation:


bgWP4ksSc0yrFwT
Figure 133: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

48
Profile: ah6407 Table 176: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.06 7.317 ects
Information: Althaus AH 6-407 airfoil RMS curvature error: 20.37 22.91 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.4 -1.5 dcts
Cm error -10 -28 mcts
Upper transition point 3.43 4.28 %

Figure 134: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 135: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 173: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.5703 % @0.21C
Maximum Camber: 5.5815 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.7 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.27329 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.28999 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.6106 deg
Release Angle: 11.1239 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.1234 deg
Camber deflection: 24.2473 deg

Table 174: Controlpoints


1 -0.0035
0.44662 0.072486
0.14596 -0.00789
0.02504 -0.00789
0.010293 -0.00789
0 -0.0044609
0 0
0 0.007632
0.03197 0.0848
0.39962 0.0848
0.46529 0.0848
0.70548 0.07928
1 0.0035

Table 175: Base 64 representation:


G6aHjjlCID7oHxS

Figure 136: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

49
Profile: ah7476 Table 180: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 7.241 10.766 ects
Information: Althaus AH 7-476 airfoil RMS curvature error: 34.29 35.59 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -7.8 -60.1 dcts
Cm error 155 90 mcts
Upper transition point -1.25 -0.42 %

Figure 137: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 138: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 177: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 5.9405 % @0.21C
Maximum Camber: 6.3046 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.7 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.079989 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.87837 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.6763 deg
Release Angle: 13.5158 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.4496 deg
Camber deflection: 21.9654 deg

Table 178: Controlpoints


1 -0.0035
0.51304 0.097146
0.071788 -0.00794
0.01254 -0.00794
0.010072 -0.00794
0 -0.0076798
0 0
0 0.0047147
0.041684 0.0878
0.3996 0.0878
0.65964 0.0878
0.77348 0.065699
1 0.0035

Table 179: Base 64 representation:


D4ack9NBEDuhE1S

Figure 139: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

50
Profile: ah79100a Table 184: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.745 4.624 ects
Information: Althaus AH 79-100A airfoil RMS curvature error: 39.17 40.9 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.8 -1.3 dcts
Cm error -19 -24 mcts
Upper transition point 1.08 1.56 %

Figure 140: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 141: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 181: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.0067 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 3.6581 % @0.54C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.86267 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.70617 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.9717 deg
Release Angle: 8.9858 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.5735 deg
Camber deflection: 15.5593 deg

Table 182: Controlpoints


1 0
0.66209 0.035516
0.42584 -0.02522
0.17033 -0.02522
0.12722 -0.02522
0 -0.024473
0 0
0 0.025743
0.11523 0.08065
0.37059 0.08065
0.61764 0.08065
0.84435 0.033003
1 0

Table 183: Base 64 representation:


UrYZh9QLULalHuA

Figure 142: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

51
Profile: ah79100b Table 188: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.698 6.614 ects
Information: Althaus AH 79-100B airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.9 -1.3 dcts
Cm error 57 30 mcts
Upper transition point 1.67 2.19 %

Figure 143: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 144: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 185: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9461 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 6.4433 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.99884 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.80137 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.0518 deg
Release Angle: 20.0535 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.9239 deg
Camber deflection: 31.9774 deg

Table 186: Controlpoints


1 0
0.74657 0.075202
0.25193 -0.01087
0.03806 -0.01087
0.019411 -0.01087
0 -0.0094569
0 0
0 0.030719
0.14172 0.11015
0.40245 0.11015
0.68111 0.11015
0.96443 0.015524
1 0

Table 187: Base 64 representation:


Soaeu3fCOFJWI A

Figure 145: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

52
Profile: ah79100c Table 192: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.373 7.013 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: Althaus AH 79-100C airfoil CD error -3.8 -3.4 dcts
Cm error -6 -21 mcts
Upper transition point 5.48 5.7 %

Figure 146: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 147: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 189: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.0292 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 6.6587 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.99595 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.6709 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.1488 deg
Release Angle: 19.3278 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.2653 deg
Camber deflection: 31.5931 deg

Table 190: Controlpoints


1 0
0.70972 0.065703
0.13254 -0.01284
0.03806 -0.01284
0.023978 -0.01284
0 -0.011299
0 0
0 0.028234
0.12006 0.11399
0.43474 0.11399
0.54779 0.11399
0.81454 0.090063
1 0

Table 191: Base 64 representation:


QtcNw3YCGFyVP-A

Figure 148: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

53
Profile: ah80129 Table 196: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.563 3.711 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: 61.19 57.21 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.4 -0.8 dcts
Cm error 24 3 mcts
Upper transition point -0.16 0.29 %

Figure 149: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 150: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 193: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.8712 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 4.0554 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.55711 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.38961 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.7904 deg
Release Angle: 1.4418 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.0138 deg
Camber deflection: 9.4557 deg

Table 194: Controlpoints


1 0
0.78366 -0.016849
0.62555 -0.02393
0.33928 -0.02393
0.1866 -0.02393
0 -0.022016
0 0
0 0.025236
0.17148 0.1049
0.40245 0.1049
0.68227 0.1049
0.78227 0.028035
1 0

Table 195: Base 64 representation:


Pkaes6sWcKrsNiA

Figure 151: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

54
Profile: ah80136 Table 200: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.103 6.286 ects
Information: Althaus AH 80-136 airfoil RMS curvature error: 57.14 58.96 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.2 -2.6 dcts
Cm error 6 2 mcts
Upper transition point -1.75 -1.16 %

Figure 152: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 153: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 197: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.5517 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 3.3823 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.175 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.84971 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.49247 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.0436 deg
Release Angle: -3.4963 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.9598 deg
Camber deflection: 6.4634 deg

Table 198: Controlpoints


1 -0.000875
0.75494 -0.02671
0.44631 -0.034037
0.37057 -0.034037
0.20381 -0.034037
0 -0.025868
0 0
0 0.027342
0.13197 0.10157
0.33934 0.10157
0.5873 0.10157
0.73833 -0.0035761
1 0.000875

Table 199: Base 64 representation:


RmWYqwsYIPoxGaE

Figure 154: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

55
Profile: ah80140 Table 204: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.615 3.506 ects
Information: Althaus AH 80-140 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.2 -0.6 dcts
Cm error 10 2 mcts
Upper transition point -0.54 -0.11 %

Figure 155: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 156: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 201: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.9637 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 4.3499 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.194 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.1768 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.1077 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.2466 deg
Release Angle: 4.0124 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.1648 deg
Camber deflection: 16.1772 deg

Table 202: Controlpoints


1 -0.00097
0.9077 0.00046242
0.53368 -0.02812
0.17033 -0.02812
0.029421 -0.02812
0 -0.020332
0 0
0 0.038079
0.099917 0.11315
0.33928 0.11315
0.48726 0.11315
0.602 0.050795
1 0.00097

Table 203: Base 64 representation:


WsWOvt0LcMxNHmF

Figure 157: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

56
Profile: ah82150a Table 208: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.921 4.923 ects
Information: Althaus AH 82-150 A airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.9 -1.7 dcts
Cm error 10 18 mcts
Upper transition point -1.78 -1.77 %

Figure 158: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 159: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 205: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.9986 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 3.2794 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.71577 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.70306 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.9398 deg
Release Angle: 10.0499 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.8471 deg
Camber deflection: 15.897 deg

Table 206: Controlpoints


1 0
0.81227 0.019997
0.7937 -0.0422
0.40245 -0.0422
0.31348 -0.0422
0 -0.038331
0 0
0 0.027064
0.1535 0.10779
0.40245 0.10779
0.61113 0.10779
0.7555 0.061051
1 0

Table 207: Base 64 representation:


QnaWt5OapSn5JvA

Figure 160: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

57
Profile: ah82150f Table 212: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.741 9.572 ects
Information: Althaus AH 82-150 F airfoil RMS curvature error: 37.67 37.88 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.3 -1.6 dcts
Cm error 22 46 mcts
Upper transition point -1.79 -1.72 %

Figure 161: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 162: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 209: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.9964 % @0.44C
Maximum Camber: 3.6294 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.45748 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.61768 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.0859 deg
Release Angle: 10.0925 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.8232 deg
Camber deflection: 14.9158 deg

Table 210: Controlpoints


1 0
0.90273 0.0085946
0.90273 -0.03869
0.43474 -0.03869
0.2565 -0.03869
0 -0.0325
0 0
0 0.021159
0.1468 0.11128
0.43474 0.11128
0.6894 0.11128
0.6894 0.084014
1 0

Table 211: Base 64 representation:


Mpcsu1ac0R LvA

Figure 163: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

58
Profile: ah83150q Table 216: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.976 6.838 ects
Information: Althaus AH 83-150 Q airfoil RMS curvature error: 44.85 46.45 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.8 -2.2 dcts
Cm error -19 -21 mcts
Upper transition point -0.49 -0.06 %

Figure 164: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 165: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 213: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.999 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 4.1388 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.0317 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.42547 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.6594 deg
Release Angle: 6.3853 deg
Nose Incidence: 18.2383 deg
Camber deflection: 24.6235 deg

Table 214: Controlpoints


1 0
0.82897 0.010627
0.82897 -0.03393
0.43474 -0.03393
0.2923 -0.03393
0 -0.028794
0 0
0 0.045474
0.15267 0.11633
0.37059 0.11633
0.61432 0.11633
0.71432 0.046347
1 0

Table 215: Base 64 representation:


ZlYZx1VcsOu GpA

Figure 166: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

59
Profile: ah83159 Table 220: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.846 6.277 ects
Information: Althaus AH 83-159 airfoil RMS curvature error: 40.01 41.47 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1 -2.6 dcts
Cm error 17 27 mcts
Upper transition point 0.33 0.8 %

Figure 167: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 168: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 217: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.9354 % @0.41C
Maximum Camber: 3.8498 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1429 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.5222 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.753 deg
Release Angle: 7.8153 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.3271 deg
Camber deflection: 19.1423 deg

Table 218: Controlpoints


1 0
0.82785 0.014876
0.82785 -0.04127
0.43474 -0.04127
0.19661 -0.04127
0 -0.026163
0 0
0 0.03577
0.16792 0.11816
0.40245 0.11816
0.66164 0.11816
0.76164 0.045002
1 0

Table 219: Base 64 representation:


TkacxoicsSs GsA

Figure 169: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

60
Profile: ah93156 Table 224: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.569 5.248 ects
Information: Althaus AH 93-156 airfoil RMS curvature error: 54.35 56.78 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.7 -1 dcts
Cm error 59 52 mcts
Upper transition point -1.08 -0.66 %

Figure 170: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 171: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 221: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.6609 % @0.41C
Maximum Camber: 3.8872 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1372 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.93261 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.0201 deg
Release Angle: 6.6573 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.1926 deg
Camber deflection: 15.8499 deg

Table 222: Controlpoints


1 0
0.88374 0.0033436
0.88374 -0.039503
0.3798 -0.039503
0.12024 -0.039503
0 -0.027342
0 0
0 0.030334
0.12137 0.11716
0.41464 0.11716
0.65172 0.11716
0.75172 0.051268
1 0

Table 223: Base 64 representation:


RsbaxrrYzRt LqA

Figure 172: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

61
Profile: ah93157 Table 228: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.57 5.816 ects
Information: Althaus AH 93-157 airfoil RMS curvature error: 33.91 35.24 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.3 -0.2 dcts
Cm error 20 -6 mcts
Upper transition point -0.42 0.06 %

Figure 173: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 174: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 225: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.6848 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 3.8126 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.96113 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2972 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.1157 deg
Release Angle: 7.4427 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.3068 deg
Camber deflection: 13.7495 deg

Table 226: Controlpoints


1 0
0.87517 0.0051988
0.87517 -0.040349
0.37621 -0.040349
0.056429 -0.040349
0 -0.02209
0 0
0 0.027677
0.11955 0.11654
0.40294 0.11654
0.63248 0.11654
0.74479 0.056582
1 0

Table 227: Base 64 representation:


PsaZxi1YyRr LrA

Figure 175: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

62
Profile: ah94145 Table 232: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.079 3.941 ects
Information: Althaus AH 94-145 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.8 0.9 dcts
Cm error 26 28 mcts
Upper transition point -1.52 -1.64 %

Figure 176: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 177: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 229: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.6578 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 5.6052 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.19609 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.1131 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.3181 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.8755 deg
Release Angle: 10.6815 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.552 deg
Camber deflection: 23.2335 deg

Table 230: Controlpoints


1 -0.00098044
0.87449 0.014973
0.48992 -0.023332
0.12872 -0.023332
0.06195 -0.023332
0 -0.023332
0 0
0 0.052269
0.19393 0.12868
0.40753 0.12868
0.57644 0.12868
0.66674 0.084809
1 0.00098044

Table 231: Base 64 representation:


ahaS2 gIbKxQIwF

Figure 178: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

63
Profile: ah94156 Table 236: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.417 5.889 ects
Information: Althaus AH 94-156 airfoil RMS curvature error: 42.87 45.29 %
Reference: N/A CD error 0 0.1 dcts
Cm error 0 5 mcts
Upper transition point 0 -0.73 %

Figure 179: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 180: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.

Table 233: Geometrical properties


Maximum Thickness: 15.6064 % @0.41C
Maximum Camber: 3.7388 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1489 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.61645 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.5658 deg
Release Angle: 5.979 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.4966 deg
Camber deflection: 17.4757 deg

Table 234: Controlpoints


1 0
0.84042 0.003332
0.84042 -0.040653
0.40456 -0.040653
0.17308 -0.040653
0 -0.02667
0 0
0 0.030932
0.12492 0.11542
0.41494 0.11542
0.65601 0.11542
0.77522 0.042724
1 0

Table 235: Base 64 representation:


RsbawpkauRp LpA

Figure 181: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

64
Profile: ah95160 Table 240: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.212 3.912 ects
Information: Althaus AH 95-160 airfoil RMS curvature error: 85.1 87.73 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1 0.9 dcts
Cm error -14 -14 mcts
Upper transition point -0.73 -0.63 %

Figure 182: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 183: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 237: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.026 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 5.6353 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.21609 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.5009 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.668 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.4059 deg
Release Angle: 10.2939 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.5123 deg
Camber deflection: 22.8062 deg

Table 238: Controlpoints


1 -0.0010804
0.87643 0.012105
0.53283 -0.02883
0.17342 -0.02883
0.069502 -0.02883
0 -0.0278
0 0
0 0.056787
0.19341 0.13581
0.40752 0.13581
0.58887 0.13581
0.68887 0.081525
1 0.0010804

Table 239: Base 64 representation:


bhaU59lLcMvRJwF

Figure 184: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

65
Profile: ames01 Table 244: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.936 7.448 ects
Information: NASA/AMES/Hicks A-01 transonic rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.1 -2.1 dcts
Cm error -14 -42 mcts
Upper transition point 3.75 4.93 %

Figure 185: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 186: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 241: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.3007 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 1.3084 % @0.27C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.599 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3555 %C
Lower nose radius: 23.731 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.2046 deg
Release Angle: -2.3196 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.5651 deg
Camber deflection: 5.2455 deg

Table 242: Controlpoints


1 -0.002995
0.91432 -0.014917
0.62095 -0.038658
0.35 -0.038658
0.00061088 -0.038658
0 -0.0098309
0 0
0 0.012304
0.016752 0.064462
0.3 0.064462
0.71468 0.064462
0.79036 0.015019
1 0.002995

Table 243: Base 64 representation:


M7TlcQ WbQuVNcP

Figure 187: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

66
Profile: ames02 Table 248: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.776 3.336 ects
Information: NASA/AMES/Hicks A-02 transonic rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.9 2.4 dcts
Cm error -2 -5 mcts
Upper transition point -1.88 -2.37 %

Figure 188: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 189: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 245: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.7314 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 0.45299 % @0.15C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.7 %C
Upper nose radius: 6.7948 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.4552 deg
Release Angle: -1.7146 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.7258 deg
Camber deflection: 6.0112 deg

Table 246: Controlpoints


1 -0.0035
0.68162 -0.019863
0.53154 -0.03462
0.34988 -0.03462
0 -0.03462
0 -0.0094561
0 0
0 0.017436
0.0067117 0.042799
0.30015 0.042799
0.65893 0.042799
0.89584 0.0026146
1 0.0035

Table 247: Base 64 representation:


a-TgSR WSPUqDsS

Figure 190: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

67
Profile: ames03 Table 252: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.458 8.898 ects
Information: NASA/AMES/Kennelly A-03 transonic rotorcraft RMS curvature error: 65.79 65.23 %
airfoil CD error -0.3 -0.4 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -23 -22 mcts
Upper transition point 0.7 0.54 %

Figure 192: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 191: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 249: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9995 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 1.189 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.6 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.1006 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.66993 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0.69717 deg
Release Angle: -2.5437 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.3671 deg
Camber deflection: 8.8235 deg

Table 250: Controlpoints


1 -0.003
0.79009 -0.013605
0.69201 -0.03811
0.37504 -0.03811
0.27029 -0.03811
0 -0.034744
0 0
0 0.053248
0.20247 0.06189
0.37494 0.06189
0.80609 0.06189
0.80609 -0.0044326
1 0.003

Table 251: Base 64 representation:


2sYra5SYgQ rBcP
Figure 193: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

68
Profile: amsoil1 Table 256: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.344 4.387 ects
Information: Rutan AMSOIL racer canard airfoil RMS curvature error: 41.17 41.55 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.2 -3.3 dcts
Cm error 2 -3 mcts
Upper transition point 3.29 3.83 %

Figure 194: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 195: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 253: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.6165 % @0.41C
Maximum Camber: 2.0787 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.442 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.1341 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.4458 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.0719 deg
Release Angle: 2.8778 deg
Nose Incidence: 1.2873 deg
Camber deflection: 4.1651 deg

Table 254: Controlpoints


1 -0.00221
0.8317 -0.0070818
0.67106 -0.03744
0.39 -0.03744
0.053285 -0.03744
0 -0.034987
0 0
0 0.073537
0.38009 0.07884
0.42 0.07884
0.64477 0.07884
0.85288 0.021353
1 0.00221

Table 255: Base 64 representation:


7GbZh72ZsQbgKkL

Figure 196: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

69
Profile: amsoil2 Table 260: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.424 4.49 ects
Information: Rutan AMSOIL racer wing airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -7.3 -7.2 dcts
Cm error -9 -4 mcts
Upper transition point 13.55 13.19 %

Figure 197: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 198: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 257: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.7688 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 0.96542 % @0.51C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.448 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.7928 %C
Lower nose radius: 4.2782 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.2696 deg
Release Angle: 2.2487 deg
Nose Incidence: -2.3895 deg
Camber deflection: -0.14082 deg

Table 258: Controlpoints


1 -0.00224
0.83883 -0.0089559
0.64718 -0.0496
0.38975 -0.0496
0.025845 -0.0496
0 -0.02715
0 0
0 0.065289
0.35663 0.06819
0.41973 0.06819
0.65959 0.06819
0.83604 0.022033
1 0.00224

Table 259: Base 64 representation:


8Kbasi7ZbVfsKjL

Figure 199: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

70
Profile: aquilasm Table 264: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.811 2.097 ects
Information: AQUILA R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: N/A CD error 0.4 0.4 dcts
Cm error 2 15 mcts
Upper transition point -0.21 -0.37 %

Figure 200: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 201: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.

Table 261: Geometrical properties


Maximum Thickness: 9.4192 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 4.0321 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.9408 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.81541 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.1572 deg
Release Angle: 4.4641 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.9924 deg
Camber deflection: 17.4565 deg

Table 262: Controlpoints


1 0
0.92916 -0.00075984
0.03333 -0.00947
0.03333 -0.00947
0.012857 -0.00947
0 -0.0083602
0 0
0 0.023015
0.084455 0.08735
0.31333 0.08735
0.51635 0.08735
0.70872 0.048967
1 0

Table 263: Base 64 representation:


RuUTk3mCAEmFLmA

Figure 202: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

71
Profile: arad6 Table 268: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.829 4.788 ects
Information: Aeronautical Research Association/Bocci-Dowty Ro- RMS curvature error: 11.82 12.91 %
tol ARA-D 6 CD error 1 1.8 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -3 -20 mcts
Upper transition point -0.32 -1.04 %

Figure 204: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 203: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 265: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.0945 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 5.0112 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 1.1 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5979 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.54266 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.4534 deg
Release Angle: 9.6398 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.467 deg
Camber deflection: 24.1068 deg

Table 266: Controlpoints


1 -0.0055
0.32894 0.05809
0.13008 -0.009318
0.04 -0.009318
0.024 -0.009318
0 -0.009318
0 0
0 0.041613
0.16256 0.079022
0.4 0.079022
0.45804 0.079022
0.70217 0.079022
1 0.0055

Table 267: Base 64 representation:


hlaGh aDGE wJvc
Figure 205: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

72
Profile: arad10 Table 272: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.789 4.891 ects
Information: Aeronautical Research Association/Bocci-Dowty Ro- RMS curvature error: 96.42 95.85 %
tol ARA-D 10 CD error -2.2 -1.2 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -27 -14 mcts
Upper transition point 4.29 2.8 %

Figure 207: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 206: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 269: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9606 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 3.9799 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 1.5 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.1781 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1583 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.9166 deg
Release Angle: 6.0144 deg
Nose Incidence: 19.4377 deg
Camber deflection: 25.4521 deg

Table 270: Controlpoints


1 -0.0075
0.24017 -0.00012525
0.14017 -0.021626
0.07 -0.021626
0.0483 -0.021626
0 -0.019031
0 0
0 0.042961
0.066262 0.088961
0.35 0.088961
0.40501 0.088961
0.62524 0.083561
1 0.0075

Table 271: Base 64 representation:


fzWFl3UEFJ74Mpm
Figure 208: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

73
Profile: arad20 Table 276: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.254 5.213 ects
Information: Aeronautical Research Association/Bocci-Dowty Ro- RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
tol ARA-D 20 CD error -0.3 -0.6 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 1 27 mcts
Upper transition point 1.07 1.24 %

Figure 210: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 209: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 273: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 20.0157 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 3.7574 % @0.24C
Trailing Edge Gap: 2.5 %C
Upper nose radius: 11.7128 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.9751 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.1567 deg
Release Angle: 4.791 deg
Nose Incidence: 32.783 deg
Camber deflection: 37.5741 deg

Table 274: Controlpoints


1 -0.0125
0.87115 -0.014271
0.57122 -0.063102
0.3 -0.063102
0.1011 -0.063102
0 -0.036486
0 0
0 0.11413
0.185 0.1375
0.25 0.1375
0.37054 0.1375
0.47054 0.10938
1 0.0125

Table 275: Base 64 representation:


0RQK6kpTZb1TMn
Figure 211: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

74
Profile: as5045 Table 280: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.842 6.062 ects
Information: AS5045 airfoil Ashok Gopalarathnam/Selig 15 RMS curvature error: 40.84 40.83 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.8 1.8 dcts
Cm error 103 88 mcts
Upper transition point -3.47 -3.37 %

Figure 212: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 213: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 277: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.9991 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 1.0235 % @0.22C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.25 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3009 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.66609 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.7122 deg
Release Angle: 4.8927 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.4613 deg
Camber deflection: 13.354 deg

Table 278: Controlpoints


1 -0.00125
0.75215 0.0075637
0.65215 -0.06506
0.3737 -0.06506
0.17234 -0.06506
0 -0.027664
0 0
0 0.027035
0.08428 0.08494
0.37478 0.08494
0.57681 0.08494
0.67681 0.045228
1 0.00125

Table 279: Base 64 representation:


UxYVjbhYccwtGnG

Figure 214: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

75
Profile: as5046 Table 284: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.116 6.988 ects
Information: AS5046 airfoil Ashok Gopalarathnam/Selig 16 RMS curvature error: 83.31 81.5 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.3 1.3 dcts
Cm error 138 155 mcts
Upper transition point -3.08 -3.43 %

Figure 215: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 216: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 281: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.9988 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 1.0262 % @0.19C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.26801 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.12 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.88518 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.0428 deg
Release Angle: 4.8557 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.314 deg
Camber deflection: 12.1697 deg

Table 282: Controlpoints


1 -0.00134
0.74948 -0.0020646
0.64948 -0.070471
0.37213 -0.070471
0.19747 -0.070471
0 -0.034136
0 0
0 0.020986
0.058983 0.089528
0.37639 0.089528
0.53882 0.089528
0.63882 0.064227
1 0.00134

Table 283: Base 64 representation:


P1YRlfeYcextLnH

Figure 217: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

76
Profile: as5048 Table 288: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 8.956 9.519 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: 63.48 61.31 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.7 2.9 dcts
Cm error 167 208 mcts
Upper transition point -5.19 -5.89 %

Figure 218: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 219: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 285: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.9949 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 1.0723 % @0.73C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.29904 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4229 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1707 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 18.4928 deg
Release Angle: 4.4346 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.6368 deg
Camber deflection: 10.0714 deg

Table 286: Controlpoints


1 -0.0014952
0.71706 -0.025313
0.61706 -0.080073
0.40594 -0.080073
0.19237 -0.080073
0 -0.038749
0 0
0 0.030375
0.097264 0.099936
0.38219 0.099936
0.4625 0.099936
0.5956 0.099936
1 0.0014952

Table 287: Base 64 representation:


TvYIqehaWi vUmI

Figure 220: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

77
Profile: atr72sm Table 292: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.474 5.201 ects
Information: ATR 72 wing airfoil (from NTSB report) RMS curvature error: 54.51 54.38 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.8 -2.4 dcts
Cm error -14 -10 mcts
Upper transition point 2.8 2.37 %

Figure 221: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 222: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 289: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.5823 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 2.8148 % @0.24C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.86638 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.6243 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.6051 deg
Release Angle: 2.8075 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.3448 deg
Camber deflection: 13.1523 deg

Table 290: Controlpoints


1 0
0.90116 -0.0060367
0.6469 -0.045228
0.32099 -0.045228
0.026785 -0.045228
0 -0.021648
0 0
0 0.012751
0.02815 0.10095
0.25401 0.10095
0.51655 0.10095
0.87227 0.020482
1 0

Table 291: Base 64 representation:


I4QXqf6VfTRSOkA

Figure 223: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

78
Profile: avistar Table 296: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 8.271 9.849 ects
Information: Hobbico R/C Avistar trainer airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -15.1 -15.7 dcts
Cm error -147 -142 mcts
Upper transition point 2.97 3.82 %

Figure 224: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 225: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 293: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.5233 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 2.28 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.3211 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3411 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.5274 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.8512 deg
Release Angle: 2.299 deg
Nose Incidence: 2.6839 deg
Camber deflection: 4.9829 deg

Table 294: Controlpoints


1 -0.0016055
0.80192 -0.024618
0.52228 -0.050138
0.30602 -0.050138
0.16602 -0.050138
0 -0.041116
0 0
0 0.03689
0.15221 0.095276
0.34218 0.095276
0.57564 0.095276
0.78266 0.044737
1 0.0016055

Table 295: Base 64 representation:


ZjWXozsUUVgeUjI

Figure 226: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

79
Profile: b29root Table 300: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.119 4.934 ects
Information: Hobbico R/C Avistar trainer airfoil RMS curvature error: 13.43 13.36 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 5.1 5.9 dcts
Cm error 25 26 mcts
Upper transition point -5.5 -6.14 %

Figure 227: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 228: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 297: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 21.985 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.7319 % @0.29C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.2698 %C
Lower nose radius: 4.0538 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 26.5107 deg
Release Angle: -2.2444 deg
Nose Incidence: -0.38815 deg
Camber deflection: -2.6325 deg

Table 298: Controlpoints


1 0
0.92574 -0.020595
0.59985 -0.092625
0.30164 -0.092625
0.27108 -0.092625
0 -0.085593
0 0
0 0.063433
0.18459 0.12723
0.29943 0.12723
0.56746 0.12723
0.66746 0.064705
1 0

Table 299: Base 64 representation:


gZTY16GTbnwOecA

Figure 229: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

80
Profile: b29tip Table 304: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.314 5.394 ects
Information: Boeing B-29 tip airfoil RMS curvature error: 26.13 30.99 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.1 1.5 dcts
Cm error 0 7 mcts
Upper transition point -3.46 -3.92 %

Figure 230: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 231: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 301: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.9995 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 2.2285 % @0.3C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.64544 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.80831 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.9262 deg
Release Angle: -1.4983 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.0445 deg
Camber deflection: 1.5462 deg

Table 302: Controlpoints


1 0
0.81399 -0.022713
0.57475 -0.022713
0.3001 -0.022713
0.081026 -0.022713
0 -0.020896
0 0
0 0.026587
0.16428 0.067283
0.29984 0.067283
0.57323 0.067283
0.69992 0.020798
1 0

Table 303: Base 64 representation:


ZsTZs6uTZKs MsA

Figure 232: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

81
Profile: b707e Table 308: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
Information: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company model 737 RMS position error: 4.933 6.822 ects
airfoils RMS curvature error: 96.85 Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 233: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 234: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.

Table 305: Geometrical properties


Maximum Thickness: 8.9979 % @0.42C
Maximum Camber: 1.82 % @0.31C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.23536 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.12606 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.6067 deg
Release Angle: 2.7121 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.7378 deg
Camber deflection: 11.4499 deg

Table 306: Controlpoints


1 0
0.64605 -0.019115
0.54178 -0.027525
0.44 -0.027525
0.35377 -0.027525
0 -0.017243
0 0
0 0.0093995
0.056307 0.062679
0.4 0.062679
0.55692 0.062679
0.6985 0.045142
1 0

Table 307: Base 64 representation:


K2aRbnNcMMtwNkA
Figure 235: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

82
Profile: b737a Table 312: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.65 5.563 ects
Information: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company model 737 RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
airfoils CD error -9.4 -10 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -4 15 mcts
Upper transition point 2.66 2.47 %

Figure 237: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 236: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 309: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.3686 % @0.2C
Maximum Camber: 0.15564 % @0.03C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.05999 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.3013 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.4956 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.8793 deg
Release Angle: 0.97905 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.5236 deg
Camber deflection: 4.5026 deg

Table 310: Controlpoints


1 -0.00029995
0.74873 -0.019901
0.53685 -0.077431
0.1967 -0.077431
0.086548 -0.077431
0 -0.04491
0 0
0 0.035842
0.0448 0.076259
0.19478 0.076259
0.47638 0.076259
0.66429 0.038067
1 0.00029995

Table 311: Base 64 representation:


ewMWgkjNbgoiMhC
Figure 238: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

83
Profile: b737b Table 316: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.201 6.429 ects
Information: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company model 737 RMS curvature error: 65.81 75.14 %
airfoils CD error -2.3 -2.2 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 25 14 mcts
Upper transition point 3.64 3.96 %

Figure 240: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 239: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 313: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.5246 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 0.77916 % @0.17C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.079996 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.9192 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.5174 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.1562 deg
Release Angle: 0.85944 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.6768 deg
Camber deflection: 9.5363 deg

Table 314: Controlpoints


1 -0.00039998
0.67585 -0.030006
0.48586 -0.056074
0.31 -0.056074
0.1891 -0.056074
0 -0.043738
0 0
0 0.053513
0.14714 0.069497
0.2494 0.069497
0.45179 0.069497
0.55179 0.054938
1 0.00039998

Table 315: Base 64 representation:


waQRexZUQYznOhC
Figure 241: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

84
Profile: b737d Table 320: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.845 6.768 ects
Information: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company model 737 RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
airfoils CD error -1.7 -1.3 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -6 14 mcts
Upper transition point 1.78 0.17 %

Figure 243: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 242: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 317: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.7117 % @0.42C
Maximum Camber: 1.5979 % @0.25C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.99822 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.23237 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.8567 deg
Release Angle: 1.7058 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.2342 deg
Camber deflection: 12.94 deg

Table 318: Controlpoints


1 -0.0008
0.75901 -0.018593
0.57822 -0.0404
0.45 -0.0404
0.34709 -0.0404
0 -0.023188
0 0
0 0.029198
0.1281 0.0678
0.35 0.0678
0.61207 0.0678
0.71207 0.039393
1 0.0008

Table 319: Base 64 representation:


coWaskPsPRvkNiE
Figure 244: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

85
Profile: bacj Table 324: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.185 5.847 ects
Information: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company airfoil J RMS curvature error: 49.07 49.73 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -24.3 NaN dcts
Cm error -419 NaN mcts
Upper transition point 30.07 NaN %

Figure 245: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 246: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 321: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.1097 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 1.6588 % @0.78C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.96445 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.5021 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.683 deg
Release Angle: 8.3534 deg
Nose Incidence: -3.3978 deg
Camber deflection: 4.9555 deg

Table 322: Controlpoints


1 0
0.76326 0.016604
0.67472 -0.046212
0.34996 -0.046212
0.13648 -0.046212
0 -0.03697
0 0
0 0.047509
0.35104 0.055892
0.45005 0.055892
0.71762 0.055892
0.83436 0.037313
1 0

Table 323: Base 64 representation:


1OsfYymWgUquKtA

Figure 247: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

86
Profile: bacxxx Table 328: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.592 5.085 ects
Information: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company BACXXX RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Energy Efficient Transport Program airfoil CD error -2.8 -1.9 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -29 -44 mcts
Upper transition point 4.41 4.09 %

Figure 249: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 248: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 325: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.2971 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 1.3759 % @0.16C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.08 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.90319 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.28774 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 19.8474 deg
Release Angle: 5.2222 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.4306 deg
Camber deflection: 17.6527 deg

Table 326: Controlpoints


1 -0.0004
0.63713 -0.030243
0.53713 -0.0458
0.35 -0.0458
0.25733 -0.0458
0 -0.022218
0 0
0 0.016037
0.042713 0.0674
0.3 0.0674
0.65 0.0674
0.87624 0.0339
1 0.0004

Table 327: Base 64 representation:


P2TgsfRWSUgxWoC
Figure 250: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

87
Profile: be50 Table 332: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.931 6.218 ects
Information: Verbitsky BE50 free flight airfoil (original) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 251: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 252: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 329: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.1585 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 4.0295 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.25998 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4925 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.60901 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.7578 deg
Release Angle: 8.4147 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.4032 deg
Camber deflection: 20.8179 deg

Table 330: Controlpoints


1 -0.0012999
0.51542 0.0414
0.25001 -0.012109
0.050141 -0.012109
0.032592 -0.012109
0 -0.011503
0 0
0 0.035368
0.12571 0.072179
0.3492 0.072179
0.55301 0.072179
0.82825 0.03716
1 0.0012999

Table 331: Base 64 representation:


foWUf8WDNFgoItH

Figure 253: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

88
Profile: boe106 Table 336: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.139 3.539 ects
Information: Boeing 106 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 254: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 255: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 333: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.0181 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 3.3175 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.04 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.5538 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.001 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.313 deg
Release Angle: 4.27 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.9001 deg
Camber deflection: 18.1701 deg

Table 334: Controlpoints


1 -0.0002
0.82035 -0.013981
0.51619 -0.03288
0.19999 -0.03288
0.16199 -0.03288
0 -0.03288
0 0
0 0.053614
0.17783 0.09788
0.30002 0.09788
0.44879 0.09788
0.57441 0.09788
1 0.0002

Table 335: Base 64 representation:


iaTOp MNZO bTmB

Figure 256: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

89
Profile: bqm34 Table 340: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.779 1.938 ects
Information: Ryan BQM-34 Firebee wing airfoil (NACA 63-014A RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
W/NACA 0014 nose and thinned to .09899 to account for sweep) CD error NaN NaN dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 258: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 257: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 337: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.8987 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: -2.329e-006 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0351 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0351 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.5704 deg
Release Angle: -2.3922e-005 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -2.3922e-005 deg

Table 338: Controlpoints


1 0
0.69256 -0.028441
0.52128 -0.049498
0.32527 -0.049498
0.15938 -0.049498
0 -0.034401
0 0
0 0.034401
0.15938 0.049498
0.32527 0.049498
0.52128 0.049498
0.69258 0.028439
1 0

Table 339: Base 64 representation:


rgVTVrgVTVooMgA
Figure 259: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

90
Profile: c5a Table 344: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.861 5.197 ects
Information: Lockheed-Georgia C-141 transonic wing airfoils, RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
LOCKHEED C-5A BL0 AIRFOIL. CD error -8.7 -8.3 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -18 -8 mcts
Upper transition point 17.41 16.31 %

Figure 261: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 260: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 341: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.1004 % @0.42C
Maximum Camber: 0.70732 % @0.82C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.25781 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1138 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.3068 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 18.8002 deg
Release Angle: 5.9534 deg
Nose Incidence: -1.389 deg
Camber deflection: 4.5644 deg

Table 342: Controlpoints


1 -0.0012891
0.86872 -0.0093871
0.62577 -0.065409
0.40037 -0.065409
0.26424 -0.065409
0 -0.047749
0 0
0 0.04162
0.22481 0.066063
0.44963 0.066063
0.52891 0.066063
0.78506 0.060448
1 0.0012891

Table 343: Base 64 representation:


ngsJcuWaYc5WVpG
Figure 262: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

91
Profile: c5b Table 348: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.399 5.85 ects
Information: LOCKHEED C-5A BL488.2 AIRFOIL RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: N/A CD error -10.1 -9.9 dcts
Cm error -21 -37 mcts
Upper transition point 21.56 22.09 %

Figure 263: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 264: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.

Table 345: Geometrical properties


Maximum Thickness: 11.5452 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 1.2295 % @0.69C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.22038 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0024 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2139 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 20.2268 deg
Release Angle: 5.1949 deg
Nose Incidence: -0.32199 deg
Camber deflection: 4.8729 deg

Table 346: Controlpoints


1 -0.0011019
0.75185 -0.022457
0.60483 -0.048739
0.35028 -0.048739
0.21017 -0.048739
0 -0.04124
0 0
0 0.033803
0.17099 0.067422
0.44961 0.067422
0.63521 0.067422
0.82432 0.049189
1 0.0011019

Table 347: Base 64 representation:


gnsWs1aWZVtnXoG

Figure 265: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

92
Profile: c5c Table 352: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.39 4.697 ects
Information: Lockheed-Georgia C-5A transonic wing airfoils, RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
LOCKHEED C-5A BL576 AIRFOIL. CD error -13.1 -13.2 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -58 -72 mcts
Upper transition point 29.81 30.84 %

Figure 267: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 266: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 349: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.1205 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 1.4176 % @0.64C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.21898 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0064 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2654 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 20.9699 deg
Release Angle: 5.5991 deg
Nose Incidence: -0.32625 deg
Camber deflection: 5.2729 deg

Table 350: Controlpoints


1 -0.0010949
0.74354 -0.023018
0.57573 -0.04395
0.35025 -0.04395
0.20665 -0.04395
0 -0.041752
0 0
0 0.034299
0.17535 0.067976
0.44961 0.067976
0.56201 0.067976
0.79583 0.059964
1 0.0010949

Table 351: Base 64 representation:


gmsNs8aWWT3mXoG
Figure 268: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

93
Profile: c141a Table 356: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.927 5.843 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: 64.08 58.2 %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN -0.8 dcts
Cm error NaN -29 mcts
Upper transition point NaN 2.29 %

Figure 269: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 270: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 353: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.9772 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 1.1473 % @0.64C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.1096 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.9453 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.4474 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 23.0557 deg
Release Angle: 3.2498 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.9496 deg
Camber deflection: 7.1994 deg

Table 354: Controlpoints


1 -0.000548
0.62161 -0.055602
0.44774 -0.055602
0.35486 -0.055602
0.28365 -0.055602
0 -0.052316
0 0
0 0.071519
0.39441 0.074499
0.40246 0.074499
0.68991 0.074499
0.84269 0.042046
1 0.000548

Table 355: Base 64 representation:


8BZef7NWJXj ZlD

Figure 271: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

94
Profile: c141b Table 360: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.091 4.324 ects
Information: Lockheed-Georgia C-141 transonic wing airfoils, RMS curvature error: 45.21 44.97 %
LOCKHEED C-141 BL113.6 AIRFOIL. CD error -2.4 -1.8 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -13 1 mcts
Upper transition point 4.83 3.19 %

Figure 273: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 272: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 357: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.6496 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 1.1303 % @0.63C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.1234 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.7774 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.3775 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 22.4177 deg
Release Angle: 3.2209 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.5147 deg
Camber deflection: 6.7357 deg

Table 358: Controlpoints


1 -0.000617
0.62386 -0.053399
0.43873 -0.053399
0.35486 -0.053399
0.19872 -0.053399
0 -0.042719
0 0
0 0.058597
0.28977 0.073246
0.40246 0.073246
0.68562 0.073246
0.84203 0.041265
1 0.000617

Table 359: Base 64 representation:


ySaefycXIXj ZkD
Figure 274: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

95
Profile: c141c Table 364: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.594 3.038 ects
Information: Lockheed-Georgia C-141 transonic wing airfoils, RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
LOCKHEED C-141 BL426.57 AIRFOIL. CD error -0.1 0.7 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -1 -5 mcts
Upper transition point 0.61 -0.42 %

Figure 276: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 275: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 361: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.9952 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 1.3082 % @0.55C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.1854 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4687 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.08 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 19.313 deg
Release Angle: 3.2163 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.0787 deg
Camber deflection: 7.295 deg

Table 362: Controlpoints


1 -0.000927
0.63125 -0.042551
0.43421 -0.042551
0.35486 -0.042551
0.17743 -0.042551
0 -0.035743
0 0
0 0.05509
0.30996 0.067546
0.40246 0.067546
0.63536 0.067546
0.79717 0.04728
1 0.000927

Table 363: Base 64 representation:


zPaZs1gXISs WkF
Figure 277: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

96
Profile: c141d Table 368: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.091 5.505 ects
Information: LOCKHEED C-141 BL426.57 AIR- RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
FOIL,LOCKHEED C-141 BL610.61 AIRFOIL. CD error -4.7 -4.4 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -10 1 mcts
Upper transition point 5.92 4.26 %

Figure 279: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 278: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 365: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.774 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 1.5438 % @0.52C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.2188 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5674 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1922 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 19.6945 deg
Release Angle: 4.0733 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.4917 deg
Camber deflection: 8.565 deg

Table 366: Controlpoints


1 -0.001094
0.62457 -0.039056
0.42511 -0.039056
0.35486 -0.039056
0.14194 -0.039056
0 -0.033588
0 0
0 0.050232
0.24147 0.068811
0.40246 0.068811
0.49109 0.068811
0.72679 0.068811
1 0.001094

Table 367: Base 64 representation:


uaaJs2lXHR WmG
Figure 280: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

97
Profile: c141e Table 372: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.701 3.624 ects
Information: Lockheed-Georgia C-141 transonic wing airfoils, RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
LOCKHEED C-141 BL761.11 AIRFOIL. CD error -5.3 -5.5 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -13 -11 mcts
Upper transition point 3.83 4.64 %

Figure 282: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 281: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 369: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.519 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 1.7989 % @0.5C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.2546 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.8099 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.3202 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 19.507 deg
Release Angle: 4.7901 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.6287 deg
Camber deflection: 8.4188 deg

Table 370: Controlpoints


1 -0.001273
0.61072 -0.03508
0.42647 -0.03508
0.35486 -0.03508
0.04072 -0.03508
0 -0.025097
0 0
0 0.056182
0.2616 0.070227
0.40246 0.070227
0.48212 0.070227
0.73421 0.070227
1 0.001273

Table 371: Base 64 representation:


yWaJet4XHP WnG
Figure 283: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

98
Profile: c141f Table 376: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.513 5.819 ects
Information: Lockheed-Georgia C-141 transonic wing airfoils, RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
LOCKHEED C-141 BL958.89 AIRFOIL. CD error -7.2 -7.5 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -29 -26 mcts
Upper transition point 16.09 16.78 %

Figure 285: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 284: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 373: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.0056 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 2.3067 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.3249 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.353 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 18.7485 deg
Release Angle: 6.0132 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.1206 deg
Camber deflection: 9.1338 deg

Table 374: Controlpoints


1 -0.0016245
0.56554 -0.02714
0.44704 -0.02714
0.35486 -0.02714
0 -0.02714
0 -0.02714
0 0
0 0.058388
0.21733 0.072984
0.40246 0.072984
0.60911 0.072984
0.81377 0.052876
1 0.0016245

Table 375: Base 64 representation:


ysaWf XJMt VpI
Figure 286: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

99
Profile: cast102 Table 380: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.586 5.394 ects
Information: CAST 10-2/DOA 2 transonic airfoil RMS curvature error: 46.72 45.62 %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 287: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 288: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 377: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.1769 % @0.46C
Maximum Camber: 1.5445 % @0.71C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.49994 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.99643 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.45969 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.5293 deg
Release Angle: 5.5067 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.4502 deg
Camber deflection: 14.9569 deg

Table 378: Controlpoints


1 -0.0024997
0.80803 -0.0083916
0.60382 -0.049587
0.45577 -0.049587
0.3521 -0.049587
0 -0.032849
0 0
0 0.016108
0.03906 0.072198
0.45389 0.072198
0.713 0.072198
0.80914 0.045763
1 0.0024997

Table 379: Base 64 representation:


O5sefpPsRVqfQoN

Figure 289: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

100
Profile: clarkk Table 384: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.884 7.461 ects
Information: CLARK K airfoil. RMS curvature error: 72.31 Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.9 -1.6 dcts
Cm error -10 -4 mcts
Upper transition point 2.56 2.05 %

Figure 290: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 291: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 381: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.5688 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 3.291 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.12 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.023482 %C
Lower nose radius: 10.3995 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.7581 deg
Release Angle: 5.6263 deg
Nose Incidence: -4.7077 deg
Camber deflection: 0.91866 deg

Table 382: Controlpoints


1 -0.0006
0.31285 -0.027631
0.21285 -0.03177
0.20125 -0.03177
0.0078353 -0.03177
0 -0.023307
0 0
0 0.0017924
0.020522 0.08962
0.39647 0.08962
0.42948 0.08962
0.64406 0.086089
1 0.0006

Table 383: Base 64 representation:


B8ZElu9NBO83SoD

Figure 292: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

101
Profile: clarkv Table 388: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.597 3.781 ects
Information: CLARK V airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 -0.8 dcts
Cm error -5 -30 mcts
Upper transition point 0.47 1.84 %

Figure 293: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 294: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 385: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.6941 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 3.397 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.14 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.98557 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0949 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 20.0796 deg
Release Angle: 7.8072 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.5321 deg
Camber deflection: 14.3392 deg

Table 386: Controlpoints


1 -0.0007
0.40638 -0.023843
0.30638 -0.02958
0.19998 -0.02958
0.062887 -0.02958
0 -0.021425
0 0
0 0.023659
0.085191 0.09114
0.40006 0.09114
0.54896 0.09114
0.78633 0.069496
1 0.0007

Table 387: Base 64 representation:


RxaQmtrNJNw2WsE

Figure 295: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

102
Profile: clarkx Table 392: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.585 6.543 ects
Information: CLARK X airfoil. RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.7 -1.9 dcts
Cm error -10 1 mcts
Upper transition point 2.56 3.02 %

Figure 296: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 297: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 389: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.605 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 3.2982 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.12 %C
Upper nose radius: NaN %C
Lower nose radius: 1.4434 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.7207 deg
Release Angle: 5.7105 deg
Nose Incidence: 0.86931 deg
Camber deflection: 6.5799 deg

Table 390: Controlpoints


1 -0.0006
0.35123 -0.024954
0.27038 -0.03189
0.12017 -0.03189
0.052159 -0.03189
0 -0.022404
0 0
0 0
0.017753 0.08976
0.39005 0.08976
0.46426 0.08976
0.66771 0.08081
1 0.0006

Table 391: Base 64 representation:


A8ZIlsjILO54SoD

Figure 298: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

103
Profile: clarky Table 396: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.026 3.361 ects
Information: CLARK Y airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 3.5 3.9 dcts
Cm error 1 -1 mcts
Upper transition point -1.74 -1.94 %

Figure 299: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 300: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 393: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.6912 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 3.4304 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.11986 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.15532 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.0061 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.579 deg
Release Angle: 5.7043 deg
Nose Incidence: 0.94453 deg
Camber deflection: 6.6489 deg

Table 394: Controlpoints


1 -0.0005993
0.31272 -0.025623
0.21272 -0.030255
0.16 -0.030255
0.038889 -0.030255
0 -0.022806
0 0
0 0.005981
0.034548 0.091627
0.36 0.091627
0.46778 0.091627
0.66301 0.081466
1 0.0005993

Table 395: Base 64 representation:


E5XLmvvKEN43RoD

Figure 301: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

104
Profile: clarkyh Table 400: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.19 4.897 ects
Information: CLARK YH AIRFOIL RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 302: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 303: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 397: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.9776 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 2.4518 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.099978 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1314 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2635 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 18.2997 deg
Release Angle: -2.8648 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.5777 deg
Camber deflection: 0.71292 deg

Table 398: Controlpoints


1 -0.00049989
0.86462 -0.029311
0.1593 -0.037917
0.15081 -0.037917
0.15081 -0.037917
0 -0.035642
0 0
0 0.030047
0.11969 0.084132
0.29834 0.084132
0.58504 0.084132
0.84365 0.01772
1 0.00049989

Table 399: Base 64 representation:


XlTaj7AKBQYwUbD

Figure 304: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

105
Profile: clarkysm Table 404: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.573 3.703 ects
Information: CLARK Y airfoil, Smoothed. RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.7 -0.8 dcts
Cm error -13 -16 mcts
Upper transition point 0.52 1.22 %

Figure 305: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 306: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 401: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.7483 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 3.5162 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5108 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2936 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.3641 deg
Release Angle: 6.0345 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.134 deg
Camber deflection: 14.1685 deg

Table 402: Controlpoints


1 0
0.29031 -0.026613
0.19535 -0.028791
0.14646 -0.028791
0.061515 -0.028791
0 -0.023033
0 0
0 0.032366
0.10401 0.092869
0.33924 0.092869
0.41297 0.092869
0.63343 0.092869
1 0

Table 403: Base 64 representation:


WrWHnykJEM 6SpA

Figure 307: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

106
Profile: clarkz Table 408: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.359 5.62 ects
Information: CLARK Z airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.8 3.8 dcts
Cm error 5 26 mcts
Upper transition point -5.46 -7.43 %

Figure 308: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 309: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 405: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.7765 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 3.9663 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.12 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.4048 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.2179 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.7157 deg
Release Angle: 6.3162 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.3225 deg
Camber deflection: 15.6387 deg

Table 406: Controlpoints


1 -0.0006
0.21915 -0.021615
0.11915 -0.0246
0.099985 -0.0246
0.035234 -0.0246
0 -0.022825
0 0
0 0.04936
0.15197 0.098
0.30006 0.098
0.42579 0.098
0.61434 0.098
1 0.0006

Table 407: Base 64 representation:


ggTLp6oGBK 4SpD

Figure 310: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

107
Profile: clarym15 Table 412: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.656 9.154 ects
Information: CLARK YM15 airfoil RMS curvature error: 83.52 58.49 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.1 -3 dcts
Cm error -17 -29 mcts
Upper transition point 5.57 4.76 %

Figure 311: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 312: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 409: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.8137 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 3.5659 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.7016 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.1275 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 20.108 deg
Release Angle: 5.8021 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.7887 deg
Camber deflection: 15.5908 deg

Table 410: Controlpoints


1 -0.0008
0.44644 -0.041955
0.2015 -0.04367
0.2015 -0.04367
0.074428 -0.04367
0 -0.032491
0 0
0 0.011317
0.01129 0.10873
0.39626 0.10873
0.40722 0.10873
0.62484 0.10736
1 0.0008

Table 411: Base 64 representation:


H9ZBtvnNAT-8WpE

Figure 313: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

108
Profile: clarym18 Table 416: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.074 3.947 ects
Information: CLARK YM18 airfoil RMS curvature error: 9.34 9.3 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.3 2.1 dcts
Cm error 9 10 mcts
Upper transition point -3.58 -3.46 %

Figure 314: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 315: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 413: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18.0429 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 3.4299 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.18 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.4346 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.8804 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 23.9336 deg
Release Angle: 5.6339 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.1999 deg
Camber deflection: 14.8337 deg

Table 414: Controlpoints


1 -0.0009
0.51316 -0.054931
0.25739 -0.05825
0.202 -0.05825
0.16301 -0.05825
0 -0.055948
0 0
0 0.049525
0.10712 0.12367
0.29575 0.12367
0.42582 0.12367
0.613 0.12367
1 0.0009

Table 415: Base 64 representation:


aoTM08MNEZ 7boF

Figure 316: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

109
Profile: cootie Table 420: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.264 7.933 ects
Information: Waco Cootie airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 -3.1 dcts
Cm error -45 -66 mcts
Upper transition point 1.47 2.21 %

Figure 317: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 318: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 417: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.3639 % @0.36C
Maximum Camber: 5.43 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.49997 %C
Upper nose radius: NaN %C
Lower nose radius: 0.69559 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.5514 deg
Release Angle: 8.0764 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.4326 deg
Camber deflection: 19.509 deg

Table 418: Controlpoints


1 -0.0024999
0.1931 0.036973
0.10208 -0.010787
0.025093 -0.010787
0.019321 -0.010787
0 -0.010787
0 0
0 0
0.023175 0.095996
0.3992 0.095996
0.43502 0.095996
0.62828 0.090727
1 0.0024999

Table 419: Base 64 representation:


A7aEo PCFF75MsN

Figure 319: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

110
Profile: cr001sm Table 424: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.84 3.203 ects
Information: Cody Robertson CR 001 R/C hand-launch low RMS curvature error: 32.55 32.21 %
Reynolds number airfoil (smoothed) CD error -0.1 0.5 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -4 11 mcts
Upper transition point -0.52 -1.45 %

Figure 321: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 320: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 421: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.337 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 4.0776 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.001 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.58754 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.78025 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.93 deg
Release Angle: 10.7904 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.1596 deg
Camber deflection: 19.95 deg

Table 422: Controlpoints


1 -5e-006
0.5909 0.03453
0.25595 -0.010074
0.054679 -0.010074
0.0095165 -0.010074
0 -0.0070357
0 0
0 0.017598
0.079066 0.074825
0.37887 0.074825
0.64299 0.074825
0.93673 0.019053
1 5e-006

Table 423: Base 64 representation:


PyYbgs0DOEQiNwA
Figure 322: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

111
Profile: curtisc72 Table 428: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.483 4.599 ects
Information: Curtis C-72 airfoil RMS curvature error: 21.92 21.59 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.1 0.4 dcts
Cm error -5 -1 mcts
Upper transition point 0.21 -0.76 %

Figure 323: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 324: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 425: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.5477 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 3.7881 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.09994 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.20184 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.6827 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.165 deg
Release Angle: 7.466 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.2516 deg
Camber deflection: 15.7177 deg

Table 426: Controlpoints


1 -0.0004997
0.53097 0.0067334
0.43097 -0.028123
0.15106 -0.028123
0.017255 -0.028123
0 -0.013913
0 0
0 0.0014875
0.0016443 0.092905
0.39704 0.092905
0.40507 0.092905
0.63392 0.092103
1 0.0004997

Table 427: Base 64 representation:


B ZBng4KVM-0PrD

Figure 325: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

112
Profile: dae11 Table 432: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.936 4.055 ects
Information: Drela DAE11 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 38.38 39.62 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.4 -0.2 dcts
Cm error -1 -13 mcts
Upper transition point -0.72 -0.04 %

Figure 326: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 327: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 429: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.8254 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 6.6267 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.7324 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.4733 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.3952 deg
Release Angle: 7.4997 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.6256 deg
Camber deflection: 22.1253 deg

Table 430: Controlpoints


1 0
0.59804 0.033768
0.22088 -0.015066
0.064895 -0.015066
0.018232 -0.015066
0 -0.013382
0 0
0 0.040203
0.13995 0.12885
0.38618 0.12885
0.62241 0.12885
0.72241 0.049933
1 0

Table 431: Base 64 representation:


UoZZ24tELGugGrA

Figure 328: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

113
Profile: dae21 Table 436: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.986 3.59 ects
Information: Drela DAE21 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 18.12 22.02 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.5 -1 dcts
Cm error -6 4 mcts
Upper transition point 0.02 -0.08 %

Figure 329: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 330: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 433: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.7894 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 6.5774 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.1169 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.4746 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.2589 deg
Release Angle: 7.7853 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.8383 deg
Camber deflection: 21.6236 deg

Table 434: Controlpoints


1 0
0.55989 0.043586
0.18619 -0.015019
0.041667 -0.015019
0.01094 -0.015019
0 -0.013434
0 0
0 0.045612
0.14742 0.12269
0.37822 0.12269
0.64145 0.12269
0.7625 0.041513
1 0

Table 435: Base 64 representation:


YmYbz4uDKGpiFsA

Figure 331: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

114
Profile: dae31 Table 440: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.611 3.724 ects
Information: Drela DAE31 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 18.95 18.88 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.2 -1.5 dcts
Cm error -5 -1 mcts
Upper transition point -0.43 -0.55 %

Figure 332: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 333: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 437: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.0877 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 6.7502 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.9396 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.3233 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.7207 deg
Release Angle: 9.3847 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.4675 deg
Camber deflection: 20.8523 deg

Table 438: Controlpoints


1 0
0.51552 0.055408
0.17167 -0.015984
0.029729 -0.015984
0.0063793 -0.015984
0 -0.011888
0 0
0 0.041121
0.13077 0.11991
0.38109 0.11991
0.67725 0.11991
0.79526 0.044435
1 0

Table 439: Base 64 representation:


WpYfyvxCJHokGuA

Figure 334: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

115
Profile: dae51 Table 444: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.977 4.335 ects
Information: Drela DAE51 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 62.33 61.58 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.2 0 dcts
Cm error 2 7 mcts
Upper transition point -0.46 -0.79 %

Figure 335: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 336: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 441: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.3554 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 4.0467 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.77661 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2184 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.2533 deg
Release Angle: 6.661 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.5361 deg
Camber deflection: 14.197 deg

Table 442: Controlpoints


1 -0.001
0.681 0.018703
0.30632 -0.016069
0.091899 -0.016069
0.010108 -0.016069
0 -0.0090615
0 0
0 0.023144
0.10346 0.085631
0.38877 0.085631
0.63108 0.085631
0.85818 0.025466
1 0.001

Table 443: Base 64 representation:


RuZZkj4GPHZsHqF

Figure 337: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

116
Profile: davis-corrected Table 448: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.084 5.839 ects
Information: Davis basic B-24 wing airfoil RMS curvature error: 5.16 10.12 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.2 -0.4 dcts
Cm error 0 6 mcts
Upper transition point 0.21 0.38 %

Figure 338: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 339: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 445: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.9068 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 2.478 % @0.3C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.6159 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0665 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.103 deg
Release Angle: 0.70178 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.374 deg
Camber deflection: 11.0758 deg

Table 446: Controlpoints


1 0
0.74361 -0.030798
0.48025 -0.054821
0.2785 -0.054821
0.015888 -0.054821
0 -0.010628
0 0
0 0.051207
0.15036 0.1043
0.29591 0.1043
0.47606 0.1043
0.69128 0.044781
1 0

Table 447: Base 64 representation:


ffTQsM7SSXljRgA

Figure 340: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

117
Profile: davis Table 452: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.919 6.565 ects
Information: Consolidated/Davis airfoil (B-24 wing?) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.8 -4.6 dcts
Cm error -14 -9 mcts
Upper transition point 4.86 5.77 %

Figure 341: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 342: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 449: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.1331 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 3.7124 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: NaN %C
Lower nose radius: 0.1768 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.2399 deg
Release Angle: 7.0195 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.065 deg
Camber deflection: 14.0845 deg

Table 450: Controlpoints


1 0
0.37608 -0.011985
0.28325 -0.027
0.15 -0.027
0.020128 -0.027
0 -0.0048708
0 0
0 0
0.027986 0.0915
0.4 0.0915
0.4 0.0915
0.66851 0.089688
1 0

Table 451: Base 64 representation:


A7aAmM2KKM-3SqA

Figure 343: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

118
Profile: daytonwright6 Table 456: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.385 8.269 ects
Information: Dayton-Wright 6 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2 2.2 dcts
Cm error 16 19 mcts
Upper transition point -5.04 -5.16 %

Figure 344: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 345: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 453: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.9901 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 4.6761 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.74808 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.9586 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 57.2958 deg
Release Angle: -20.0535 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.9346 deg
Camber deflection: -15.1189 deg

Table 454: Controlpoints


1 0
0.99248 -0.0085561
0.10073 -0.027781
0.10073 -0.027781
0.053926 -0.027781
0 -0.026535
0 0
0 0.020267
0.08236 0.11639
0.29717 0.11639
0.64251 0.11639
0.99643 0.00054029
1 0

Table 455: Base 64 representation:


LtTfx8eGAMBU AA

Figure 346: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

119
Profile: defcnd1 Table 460: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.097 4.434 ects
Information: Rutan DEFIANT canard BL20 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.6 -5.4 dcts
Cm error 9 3 mcts
Upper transition point 1.26 2.2 %

Figure 347: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 348: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 457: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 20.8575 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 4.5106 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.2457 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.1417 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.87 deg
Release Angle: 4.1033 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.6122 deg
Camber deflection: 10.7155 deg

Table 458: Controlpoints


1 0
0.46285 -0.045405
0.36285 -0.062828
0.21597 -0.062828
0.10335 -0.062828
0 -0.046526
0 0
0 0.037129
0.09208 0.14811
0.3227 0.14811
0.47853 0.14811
0.57853 0.0976
1 0

Table 459: Base 64 representation:


QtVP-ugOMbz1UmA

Figure 349: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

120
Profile: defcnd2 Table 464: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.236 4.498 ects
Information: Rutan DEFIANT canard BL110 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.8 -2.3 dcts
Cm error -1 15 mcts
Upper transition point -0.14 -0.4 %

Figure 350: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 351: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 461: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.7434 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 3.8084 % @0.28C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.21 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.3505 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.2094 deg
Release Angle: 4.1641 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.6738 deg
Camber deflection: 13.8378 deg

Table 462: Controlpoints


1 0
0.71148 -0.019875
0.61148 -0.035746
0.3227 -0.035746
0.0044665 -0.035746
0 -0.0099884
0 0
0 0.032256
0.12898 0.11178
0.28565 0.11178
0.55891 0.11178
0.729 0.058932
1 0

Table 463: Base 64 representation:


SiSYvS-VbPmvSmA

Figure 352: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

121
Profile: defcnd3 Table 468: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.487 5.171 ects
Information: Rutan DEFIANT canard BL145 airfoil RMS curvature error: 52.49 52.98 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4 -3.1 dcts
Cm error -16 -26 mcts
Upper transition point 4.39 4.03 %

Figure 353: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 354: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 465: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.4833 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 2.3782 % @0.28C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.4474 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.59619 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 20.0437 deg
Release Angle: 7.1964 deg
Nose Incidence: 19.9349 deg
Camber deflection: 27.1313 deg

Table 466: Controlpoints


1 0
0.5979 -0.019845
0.45086 -0.033645
0.28565 -0.033645
0.2838 -0.033645
0 -0.033586
0 0
0 0.053227
0.12327 0.081201
0.28565 0.081201
0.48846 0.081201
0.94676 0.0165
1 0

Table 467: Base 64 representation:


pjSSi ASPONuWrA

Figure 355: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

122
Profile: df101 Table 472: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.256 4.326 ects
Information: David Fraser DF 101 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 43.63 43.56 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.1 -0.5 dcts
Cm error 36 17 mcts
Upper transition point -0.76 1.02 %

Figure 356: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 357: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 469: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.0387 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 2.2805 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.007 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.49058 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.43754 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.7781 deg
Release Angle: 1.7502 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.084 deg
Camber deflection: 8.8342 deg

Table 470: Controlpoints


1 -3.5e-005
0.92563 -0.0040182
0.33219 -0.036287
0.20782 -0.036287
0.036598 -0.036287
0 -0.010332
0 0
0 0.011358
0.039447 0.076528
0.33765 0.076528
0.63224 0.076528
0.91983 0.0092636
1 3.5e-005

Table 471: Base 64 representation:


J4WcgS0NKPOHLiA

Figure 358: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

123
Profile: 2032c Table 476: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.404 8.579 ects
Information: Dillner 20-32-C low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 33.82 38.99 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.4 -1.1 dcts
Cm error -43 -37 mcts
Upper transition point 3.9 4.28 %

Figure 359: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 360: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 473: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.6448 % @0.19C
Maximum Camber: 6.974 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.32 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.067588 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.07681 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.408 deg
Release Angle: 14.0477 deg
Nose Incidence: 18.1891 deg
Camber deflection: 32.2368 deg

Table 474: Controlpoints


1 -0.0016
0.28774 0.090194
0.1165 -0.005
0.0125 -0.005
0.0078115 -0.005
0 -0.002
0 0
0 0.004192
0.039 0.1048
0.3 0.1048
0.55395 0.1048
0.99635 0.002984
1 0.0016

Table 475: Base 64 representation:


D3TXsZYBHCBzP2I

Figure 361: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

124
Profile: doa5 Table 480: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.668 6.113 ects
Information: Dornier A-5 airfoil (reconstruction) (DO 228 wing) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -32.9 -32.9 dcts
Cm error -154 -134 mcts
Upper transition point 37.3 36.73 %

Figure 362: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 363: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 477: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.2413 % @0.41C
Maximum Camber: 2.5397 % @0.76C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.0949 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1589 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.0663 deg
Release Angle: 7.8135 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.3888 deg
Camber deflection: 21.2024 deg

Table 478: Controlpoints


1 0
0.78605 0.021658
0.6671 -0.06347
0.4012 -0.06347
0.38571 -0.06347
0 -0.05459
0 0
0 0.057373
0.15954 0.099
0.42116 0.099
0.75989 0.099
0.99457 0.000943
1 0

Table 479: Base 64 representation:


knbkp2CacbBoFsA

Figure 364: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

125
Profile: du8608418 Table 484: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.366 5.542 ects
Information: Deflt University DU 86-084/18 low Reynolds number RMS curvature error: 56.52 57.73 %
airfoil CD error -0.4 -1.1 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 82 73 mcts
Upper transition point -0.3 1.35 %

Figure 366: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 365: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 481: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.4592 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 1.1477 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.65558 %C
Lower nose radius: 56.5593 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.3556 deg
Release Angle: 3.5689 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.0742 deg
Camber deflection: 6.6431 deg

Table 482: Controlpoints


1 0
0.86009 -0.0027964
0.86009 -0.031122
0.32141 -0.031122
0.0079763 -0.031122
0 -0.0028345
0 0
0 0.018632
0.084372 0.053588
0.3687 0.053588
0.77372 0.053588
0.79049 0.0063279
1 0

Table 483: Base 64 representation:


WwYoXG9VyN6 DgA
Figure 367: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

126
Profile: e66 Table 488: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.687 5.899 ects
Information: Eppler E66 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 24.51 24.46 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.1 0.6 dcts
Cm error -4 -29 mcts
Upper transition point 1.43 1.82 %

Figure 368: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 369: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 485: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.2438 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 4.0357 % @0.52C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5812 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.37322 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.2636 deg
Release Angle: 13.8886 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.8538 deg
Camber deflection: 28.7425 deg

Table 486: Controlpoints


1 0
0.83892 0.029674
0.34008 -0.021685
0.13854 -0.021685
0.0020778 -0.021685
0 -0.0011842
0 0
0 0.037192
0.15998 0.088018
0.37797 0.088018
0.74353 0.088018
0.98611 0.0054353
1 0

Table 487: Base 64 representation:


bkYllD-JPJEQM5A

Figure 370: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

127
Profile: e67 Table 492: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.236 2.406 ects
Information: Eppler E67 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 16 15.81 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2 1.7 dcts
Cm error 1 -10 mcts
Upper transition point -2.41 -1.5 %

Figure 371: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 372: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 489: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.5255 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 3.7961 % @0.56C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.85248 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.5936 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.3305 deg
Release Angle: 12.3829 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.9678 deg
Camber deflection: 19.3507 deg

Table 490: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85954 0.021413
0.42512 -0.03048
0.1829 -0.03048
0.16278 -0.03048
0 -0.03048
0 0
0 0.019929
0.089012 0.09157
0.41937 0.09157
0.61493 0.09157
0.86524 0.044393
1 0

Table 491: Base 64 representation:


OxbWm HMTNfQL1A

Figure 373: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

128
Profile: e168 Table 496: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.327 6.126 ects
Information: Eppler E168 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 52.08 48.38 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 0.1 dcts
Cm error 2 2 mcts
Upper transition point -0.05 0.2 %

Figure 374: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 375: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 493: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.4415 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 3.8911e-007 % @0.03C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.59202 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.59202 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.5485 deg
Release Angle: 1.9911e-006 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.8091e-006 deg
Camber deflection: 1.08e-005 deg

Table 494: Controlpoints


1 0
0.6353 -0.03046
0.43483 -0.06221
0.26739 -0.06221
0.04968 -0.06221
0 -0.014003
0 0
0 0.014003
0.04968 0.06221
0.26739 0.06221
0.43483 0.06221
0.6353 0.03046
1 0

Table 495: Base 64 representation:


OzRPbOzRPbooLgA

Figure 376: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

129
Profile: e169 Table 500: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.659 3.282 ects
Information: Eppler E169 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 35.52 38.16 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.2 -0.3 dcts
Cm error 2 2 mcts
Upper transition point -0.18 0.01 %

Figure 377: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 378: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 497: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.402 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 6.4599e-007 % @0.61C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.92556 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.92556 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.1409 deg
Release Angle: -7.4978e-006 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -7.4978e-006 deg

Table 498: Controlpoints


1 0
0.63539 -0.032351
0.44342 -0.07202
0.26456 -0.07202
0.076241 -0.07202
0 -0.02169
0 0
0 0.02169
0.076241 0.07202
0.26456 0.07202
0.44342 0.07202
0.63539 0.032351
1 0

Table 499: Base 64 representation:


TtRQfTtRQfppLgA

Figure 379: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

130
Profile: e171 Table 504: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.889 2.568 ects
Information: Eppler E171 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 41.92 42.62 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.9 -0.4 dcts
Cm error 3 4 mcts
Upper transition point 1.19 0.22 %

Figure 380: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 381: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 501: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.2529 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 2.4257e-006 % @0.57C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.68109 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.68109 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.8573 deg
Release Angle: -1.5801e-005 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -1.5801e-005 deg

Table 502: Controlpoints


1 0
0.63917 -0.03429
0.54821 -0.06127
0.32389 -0.06127
0.13312 -0.06127
0 -0.024585
0 0
0 0.024585
0.13312 0.06127
0.32389 0.06127
0.54821 0.06127
0.63917 0.03429
1 0

Table 503: Base 64 representation:


alVVaalVVayyMgA

Figure 382: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

131
Profile: e174 Table 508: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.893 3.847 ects
Information: Eppler E174 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 38.59 39.53 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.7 -2 dcts
Cm error 1 10 mcts
Upper transition point -0.28 0.39 %

Figure 383: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 384: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 505: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.9593 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 3.6845 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.4621 %C
Lower nose radius: -29.6556 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.047 deg
Release Angle: 5.7684 deg
Nose Incidence: 2.3288 deg
Camber deflection: 8.0973 deg

Table 506: Controlpoints


1 0
0.69834 0.014463
0.2493 -0.016651
0.084722 -0.016651
0 -0.016651
0 -0.0060498
0 0
0 0.019739
0.12648 0.080566
0.35541 0.080566
0.52561 0.080566
0.6584 0.052834
1 0

Table 507: Base 64 representation:


QoXRhX FMHtaHoA

Figure 385: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

132
Profile: e176 Table 512: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.451 6.244 ects
Information: Eppler E176 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 54.69 45.49 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.8 -2.1 dcts
Cm error -4 13 mcts
Upper transition point -0.13 -1.21 %

Figure 386: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 387: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 509: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.9429 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 3.1746 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.716 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.78964 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.0419 deg
Release Angle: 3.8907 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.1199 deg
Camber deflection: 10.0106 deg

Table 510: Controlpoints


1 0
0.68212 0.0048983
0.27673 -0.017581
0.12487 -0.017581
0.0016532 -0.017581
0 -0.0062298
0 0
0 0.022641
0.12984 0.075944
0.3492 0.075944
0.55653 0.075944
0.73128 0.031962
1 0

Table 511: Base 64 representation:


TnWUgX-ILImcHlA

Figure 388: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

133
Profile: e178 Table 516: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.477 2.643 ects
Information: Eppler E178 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 44.18 48.57 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.8 -1.3 dcts
Cm error -8 -11 mcts
Upper transition point -0.3 -0.15 %

Figure 389: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 390: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 513: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.7178 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 2.7917 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.66464 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.44448 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.4151 deg
Release Angle: 1.837 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.9287 deg
Camber deflection: 8.7657 deg

Table 514: Controlpoints


1 0
0.56965 -0.0065393
0.31071 -0.018901
0.17054 -0.018901
0.077156 -0.018901
0 -0.015121
0 0
0 0.024397
0.13433 0.070978
0.34251 0.070978
0.56915 0.070978
0.7696 0.018313
1 0

Table 515: Base 64 representation:


WmWWeyiLLIhnGiA

Figure 391: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

134
Profile: e180 Table 520: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.699 3.287 ects
Information: Eppler E180 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 51.43 50.12 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.9 2.9 dcts
Cm error -2 19 mcts
Upper transition point -0.94 -2.19 %

Figure 392: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 393: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 517: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.5952 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 2.342 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.90845 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.31375 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.3582 deg
Release Angle: -1.79 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.1677 deg
Camber deflection: 7.3776 deg

Table 518: Controlpoints


1 0
0.9678 -0.0033668
0.36502 -0.021087
0.22115 -0.021087
0.020781 -0.021087
0 -0.0065929
0 0
0 0.030727
0.15589 0.066125
0.33525 0.066125
0.57543 0.066125
0.78797 0.0088461
1 0

Table 519: Base 64 representation:


ehVXcU5OMJgKJsA

Figure 394: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

135
Profile: e182 Table 524: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.913 4.181 ects
Information: Eppler E182 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 85.76 84.6 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.2 -0.4 dcts
Cm error 12 24 mcts
Upper transition point -0.85 -0.6 %

Figure 395: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 396: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 521: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.4787 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 1.5775 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.31678 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.3629 deg
Release Angle: -3.6738 deg
Nose Incidence: -1.5139 deg
Camber deflection: -5.1878 deg

Table 522: Controlpoints


1 0
0.92477 -0.0097112
0.44072 -0.027577
0.2297 -0.027577
0.002297 -0.027577
0 -0.0076412
0 0
0 0.015985
0.11237 0.057946
0.32793 0.057946
0.59081 0.057946
0.79401 2.7355e-005
1 0

Table 523: Base 64 representation:


SpVZZS-PSMgXIaA

Figure 397: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

136
Profile: e184 Table 528: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.563 3.322 ects
Information: Eppler E184 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 49.76 52.57 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.6 -1.8 dcts
Cm error -21 -27 mcts
Upper transition point 2.52 3.3 %

Figure 398: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 399: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 525: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.3332 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 1.1365 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.5558 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.7128 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.4188 deg
Release Angle: -4.4509 deg
Nose Incidence: 1.1355 deg
Camber deflection: -3.3154 deg

Table 526: Controlpoints


1 0
0.90801 -0.015181
0.49265 -0.030414
0.28433 -0.030414
0.048832 -0.030414
0 -0.0137
0 0
0 0.016069
0.1052 0.053008
0.32108 0.053008
0.59184 0.053008
0.80538 -0.0077588
1 0

Table 527: Base 64 representation:


TqVaXs0STNfgIWA

Figure 400: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

137
Profile: e186 Table 532: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.29 5.224 ects
Information: Eppler E186 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 92.52 90.05 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.6 -1.9 dcts
Cm error -45 -34 mcts
Upper transition point 2.26 0.97 %

Figure 401: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 402: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 529: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.2741 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 1.2618 % @0.3C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.44421 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.55503 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.3655 deg
Release Angle: -8.56 deg
Nose Incidence: 2.0769 deg
Camber deflection: -6.4831 deg

Table 530: Controlpoints


1 0
0.90778 -0.024267
0.54162 -0.038855
0.33815 -0.038855
0.04765 -0.038855
0 -0.013278
0 0
0 0.016338
0.090141 0.06397
0.31 0.06397
0.50527 0.06397
0.80754 -0.0079902
1 0

Table 531: Base 64 representation:


QsUSbW2WURZnOSA

Figure 403: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

138
Profile: e193 Table 536: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.867 4.537 ects
Information: Eppler E193 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 61.25 61.92 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.4 -0.9 dcts
Cm error 8 -7 mcts
Upper transition point -1.25 -0.04 %

Figure 404: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 405: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 533: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.2635 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 3.4689 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.61428 %C
Lower nose radius: 7.4648 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.3134 deg
Release Angle: 5.259 deg
Nose Incidence: 2.9292 deg
Camber deflection: 8.1881 deg

Table 534: Controlpoints


1 0
0.65979 0.00060744
0.29352 -0.022725
0.15679 -0.022725
0 -0.022725
0 -0.0084615
0 0
0 0.023693
0.13708 0.084821
0.3537 0.084821
0.43714 0.084821
0.53856 0.084821
1 0

Table 535: Base 64 representation:


SmXIjY KKK fMoA

Figure 406: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

139
Profile: e195 Table 540: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.98 4.41 ects
Information: Eppler E195 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 47.07 46.97 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.1 -0.7 dcts
Cm error -10 20 mcts
Upper transition point 0.27 -1.44 %

Figure 407: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 408: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 537: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.8261 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 3.1047 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.92124 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0797 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.5095 deg
Release Angle: 5.2653 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.0739 deg
Camber deflection: 9.3392 deg

Table 538: Controlpoints


1 0
0.65381 -0.0059462
0.43936 -0.031553
0.20137 -0.031553
0.15274 -0.031553
0 -0.0291
0 0
0 0.027896
0.14611 0.089306
0.34979 0.089306
0.49641 0.089306
0.5916 0.075038
1 0

Table 539: Base 64 representation:


UkWOl6PNTN1nNnA

Figure 409: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

140
Profile: e197 Table 544: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.214 3.315 ects
Information: Eppler E197 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 50.51 51.81 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.5 0.5 dcts
Cm error 12 31 mcts
Upper transition point -0.65 -1.27 %

Figure 410: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 411: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 541: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.4779 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 2.7405 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0894 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.94109 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.2106 deg
Release Angle: 4.7712 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.9484 deg
Camber deflection: 10.7196 deg

Table 542: Controlpoints


1 0
0.65027 -0.012434
0.47902 -0.042133
0.24819 -0.042133
0.096972 -0.042133
0 -0.022367
0 0
0 0.033138
0.15675 0.094
0.34549 0.094
0.52422 0.094
0.61951 0.069662
1 0

Table 543: Base 64 representation:


XiWRnhmQUSyqOmA

Figure 412: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

141
Profile: e201 Table 548: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.697 5.158 ects
Information: Eppler E201 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 40.68 41 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 -0.7 dcts
Cm error 19 4 mcts
Upper transition point -1.98 -0.76 %

Figure 413: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 414: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 545: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.876 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 3.0041 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.76493 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.8781 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.1612 deg
Release Angle: 5.8243 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.6743 deg
Camber deflection: 9.4986 deg

Table 546: Controlpoints


1 0
0.69731 0.0012878
0.46833 -0.033299
0.19911 -0.033299
0.17945 -0.033299
0 -0.032411
0 0
0 0.027119
0.14422 0.088131
0.35267 0.088131
0.4502 0.088131
0.60248 0.080191
1 0

Table 547: Base 64 representation:


UlXKl9GNWO5jMpA

Figure 415: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

142
Profile: e203 Table 552: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.956 4.467 ects
Information: Eppler E203 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 44.57 45 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.1 2.9 dcts
Cm error 19 37 mcts
Upper transition point -3.37 -5.22 %

Figure 416: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 417: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 549: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.6904 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 2.6195 % @0.51C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.97104 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.67393 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.9273 deg
Release Angle: 6.9945 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.1735 deg
Camber deflection: 11.168 deg

Table 550: Controlpoints


1 0
0.78156 0.0058377
0.43778 -0.046385
0.28703 -0.046385
0.03621 -0.046385
0 -0.012755
0 0
0 0.032411
0.15674 0.091701
0.35148 0.091701
0.4747 0.091701
0.66794 0.073361
1 0

Table 551: Base 64 representation:


XiWMmS3SOUyZMqA

Figure 418: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

143
Profile: e205 Table 556: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.567 3.921 ects
Information: Eppler E205 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.4 -1.7 dcts
Cm error 2 21 mcts
Upper transition point -0.25 -0.18 %

Figure 419: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 420: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 553: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.4126 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 3.0037 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.6292 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.65545 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.8455 deg
Release Angle: 2.2589 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.2382 deg
Camber deflection: 8.4971 deg

Table 554: Controlpoints


1 0
0.96448 -0.0025856
0.34473 -0.024819
0.16627 -0.024819
0.11408 -0.024819
0 -0.022164
0 0
0 0.02013
0.0966 0.081779
0.34095 0.081779
0.45507 0.081779
0.61551 0.058709
1 0

Table 555: Base 64 representation:


QtWLi4ULOLtHOjA

Figure 421: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

144
Profile: e207 Table 560: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.134 3.728 ects
Information: Eppler E207 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf 92.43 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.1 0 dcts
Cm error 18 16 mcts
Upper transition point -0.33 -0.03 %

Figure 422: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 423: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 557: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.0138 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 2.5228 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.85169 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.58536 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.1243 deg
Release Angle: 3.4197 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.8756 deg
Camber deflection: 10.2953 deg

Table 558: Controlpoints


1 0
0.5593 -0.020339
0.45031 -0.035998
0.25292 -0.035998
0.05595 -0.035998
0 -0.014776
0 0
0 0.024692
0.10738 0.084929
0.33982 0.084929
0.42565 0.084929
0.55755 0.073897
1 0

Table 559: Base 64 representation:


TrWIjaxQRP3yOlA

Figure 424: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

145
Profile: e209 Table 564: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.433 2.664 ects
Information: Eppler E209 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 38.05 37.25 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.9 0.9 dcts
Cm error 17 1 mcts
Upper transition point -1.59 -0.89 %

Figure 425: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 426: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 561: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.7103 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 2.0358 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1718 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.44234 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.316 deg
Release Angle: 4.6371 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.2244 deg
Camber deflection: 12.8616 deg

Table 562: Controlpoints


1 0
0.73787 -0.0092494
0.46671 -0.049095
0.29783 -0.049095
0.060051 -0.049095
0 -0.013307
0 0
0 0.030886
0.12211 0.088361
0.33846 0.088361
0.52542 0.088361
0.94719 0.010547
1 0

Table 563: Base 64 representation:


WoWSlRyTPVIfPnA

Figure 427: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

146
Profile: e210 Table 568: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.496 5.238 ects
Information: Eppler E210 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 29.41 29.05 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.2 2.5 dcts
Cm error 7 18 mcts
Upper transition point -1.45 -2.79 %

Figure 428: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 429: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 565: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.558 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 4.0981 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4223 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.75486 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.6278 deg
Release Angle: 13.5328 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.1212 deg
Camber deflection: 25.654 deg

Table 566: Controlpoints


1 0
0.76951 0.025116
0.4815 -0.031717
0.22079 -0.031717
0.17663 -0.031717
0 -0.029814
0 0
0 0.032907
0.1142 0.1071
0.36564 0.1071
0.50871 0.1071
0.86982 0.049573
1 0

Table 567: Base 64 representation:


UrXOt7NOVOecQ1A

Figure 430: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

147
Profile: e211 Table 572: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.628 4.874 ects
Information: Eppler E211 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 71.92 71.7 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.7 -0.4 dcts
Cm error 11 12 mcts
Upper transition point -2.21 -2.84 %

Figure 431: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 432: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 569: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.9681 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 2.4883 % @0.59C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.57134 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.16601 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.621 deg
Release Angle: 11.806 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.1622 deg
Camber deflection: 17.9682 deg

Table 570: Controlpoints


1 0
0.78045 0.019191
0.57891 -0.033817
0.23841 -0.033817
0.021457 -0.033817
0 -0.010361
0 0
0 0.021191
0.1179 0.077471
0.36293 0.077471
0.57293 0.077471
0.89106 0.036696
1 0

Table 571: Base 64 representation:


SqXVgU5PsOegPyA

Figure 433: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

148
Profile: e212 Table 576: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.42 3.414 ects
Information: Eppler E212 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 0.4 dcts
Cm error -5 0 mcts
Upper transition point -0.87 -2.21 %

Figure 434: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 435: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 573: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.5966 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 2.8357 % @0.59C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.36016 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.81278 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.4642 deg
Release Angle: 15.2873 deg
Nose Incidence: -0.044982 deg
Camber deflection: 15.2423 deg

Table 574: Controlpoints


1 0
0.8486 0.02958
0.42564 -0.034845
0.18603 -0.034845
0.018603 -0.034845
0 -0.01004
0 0
0 0.01355
0.07647 0.075685
0.36652 0.075685
0.63998 0.075685
0.92641 0.026087
1 0

Table 575: Base 64 representation:


LyXcgS5MTPWRJ4A

Figure 436: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

149
Profile: e214 Table 580: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.149 3.337 ects
Information: Eppler E214 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 27.03 26.96 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.6 0.8 dcts
Cm error 15 23 mcts
Upper transition point -1.4 -1.92 %

Figure 437: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 438: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 577: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.13 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 4.0814 % @0.51C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3109 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.5982 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.4079 deg
Release Angle: 14.1633 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.4632 deg
Camber deflection: 26.6266 deg

Table 578: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80272 0.03287
0.49698 -0.021744
0.17753 -0.021744
0.015325 -0.021744
0 -0.0075684
0 0
0 0.033823
0.13843 0.093861
0.3765 0.093861
0.5228 0.093861
0.81075 0.064675
1 0

Table 579: Base 64 representation:


XnYPnW5LZJrZL2A

Figure 439: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

150
Profile: e216 Table 584: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.956 8.683 ects
Information: Eppler E216 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 24.4 28.14 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.8 -3.4 dcts
Cm error 64 84 mcts
Upper transition point 1.87 1.31 %

Figure 440: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 441: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 581: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.5375 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 5.0547 % @0.57C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.80245 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.2464 deg
Release Angle: 19.6525 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.1492 deg
Camber deflection: 24.8017 deg

Table 582: Controlpoints


1 0
0.77154 0.061339
0.34628 -0.022307
0.11773 -0.022307
0 -0.022307
0 -0.0077417
0 0
0 0.02459
0.11303 0.096134
0.39681 0.096134
0.491 0.096134
0.81701 0.082528
1 0

Table 583: Base 64 representation:


QtZKoW IRK2WK A

Figure 442: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

151
Profile: e220 Table 588: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.404 7.672 ects
Information: Eppler E220 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 31.22 31.18 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.2 -1.7 dcts
Cm error -21 -1 mcts
Upper transition point 0.7 0.34 %

Figure 443: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 444: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 585: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.4738 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 2.5657 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6367 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.52191 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.0799 deg
Release Angle: -1.8082 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.1166 deg
Camber deflection: 10.3083 deg

Table 586: Controlpoints


1 0
0.81018 -0.024478
0.47535 -0.032015
0.31815 -0.032015
0.29111 -0.032015
0 -0.031826
0 0
0 0.044477
0.1813 0.082972
0.37713 0.082972
0.60808 0.082972
0.75586 0.015923
1 0

Table 587: Base 64 representation:


hgYYi FUPOnwMsA

Figure 445: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

152
Profile: e221 Table 592: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.823 8.074 ects
Information: Eppler E221 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 34.66 35.79 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2 0.9 dcts
Cm error -38 -41 mcts
Upper transition point -1.32 -1.74 %

Figure 446: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 447: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 589: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.3884 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 1.9851 % @0.29C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5389 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.48059 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.044 deg
Release Angle: -0.42535 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.5266 deg
Camber deflection: 11.1012 deg

Table 590: Controlpoints


1 0
0.77468 -0.019504
0.41401 -0.027103
0.27095 -0.027103
0.21347 -0.027103
0 -0.026152
0 0
0 0.040428
0.15931 0.066791
0.281 0.066791
0.51272 0.066791
0.78405 0.015467
1 0

Table 591: Base 64 representation:


mcSVc9ORNMctKfA

Figure 448: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

153
Profile: e222 Table 596: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.876 4.42 ects
Information: Eppler E222 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 19.75 20.3 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.8 -1.8 dcts
Cm error -4 -16 mcts
Upper transition point -0.75 0.45 %

Figure 449: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 450: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 593: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.1839 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 2.462 % @0.51C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.44736 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.72606 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.058 deg
Release Angle: 10.5293 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.0154 deg
Camber deflection: 13.5447 deg

Table 594: Controlpoints


1 0
0.86553 0.015322
0.46122 -0.031444
0.19777 -0.031444
0.088143 -0.031444
0 -0.020655
0 0
0 0.015003
0.075473 0.073142
0.35707 0.073142
0.63357 0.073142
0.93415 0.017102
1 0

Table 595: Base 64 representation:


NxXcfpiNVNPQJwA

Figure 451: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

154
Profile: e224 Table 600: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.866 1.653 ects
Information: Eppler E224 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 12.68 12.68 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.3 -0.2 dcts
Cm error -3 -11 mcts
Upper transition point 0.74 0.64 %

Figure 452: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 453: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 597: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.1778 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.8184 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.84536 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.24209 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.8962 deg
Release Angle: 6.2109 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.6897 deg
Camber deflection: 13.9006 deg

Table 598: Controlpoints


1 0
0.88229 0.0056804
0.48106 -0.035029
0.25343 -0.035029
0.030412 -0.035029
0 -0.0070058
0 0
0 0.021572
0.082571 0.067712
0.34459 0.067712
0.46991 0.067712
0.67837 0.054741
1 0

Table 599: Base 64 representation:


UwWMsN3QUPzPIpA

Figure 454: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

155
Profile: e226 Table 604: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.985 2.664 ects
Information: Eppler E226 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 19.24 19.81 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.7 1.7 dcts
Cm error 5 5 mcts
Upper transition point -3.41 -3.14 %

Figure 455: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 456: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 601: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.1964 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 0.85356 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.078348 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.73925 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.2214 deg
Release Angle: 1.1434 deg
Nose Incidence: -3.1937 deg
Camber deflection: -2.0503 deg

Table 602: Controlpoints


1 0
0.86481 -0.005825
0.50397 -0.043844
0.26657 -0.043844
0.031989 -0.043844
0 -0.012556
0 0
0 0.0043234
0.035786 0.058568
0.33164 0.058568
0.59018 0.058568
0.90473 0.0079233
1 0

Table 603: Base 64 representation:


F4VZZS3RVTPRIhA

Figure 457: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

156
Profile: e228 Table 608: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.4 4.716 ects
Information: Eppler E228 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 22.31 21.86 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.8 0.3 dcts
Cm error 3 -2 mcts
Upper transition point -2.24 -1.45 %

Figure 458: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 459: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 605: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.0531 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 0.28126 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.27812 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.52866 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.4763 deg
Release Angle: -3.4669 deg
Nose Incidence: 0.88528 deg
Camber deflection: -2.5816 deg

Table 606: Controlpoints


1 0
0.61375 -0.041995
0.3962 -0.047721
0.27946 -0.047721
0.073426 -0.047721
0 -0.016087
0 0
0 0.0068818
0.025542 0.052937
0.31928 0.052937
0.55882 0.052937
0.91888 -0.0010318
1 0

Table 607: Base 64 representation:


I6UXXWuSKUM3GaA

Figure 460: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

157
Profile: e230 Table 612: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.19 6.128 ects
Information: Eppler E230 airfoil RMS curvature error: 22.35 23.11 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -6.2 -6.4 dcts
Cm error 18 17 mcts
Upper transition point 6.28 5.81 %

Figure 461: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 462: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 609: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9486 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: -0.74331 % @0.78C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1467 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.010553 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.5667 deg
Release Angle: -7.8036 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.6181 deg
Camber deflection: -2.1856 deg

Table 610: Controlpoints


1 0
0.90314 -0.019859
0.55725 -0.052392
0.33979 -0.052392
0.019005 -0.052392
0 -0.0010478
0 0
0 0.030909
0.12497 0.0477
0.2601 0.0477
0.55002 0.0477
0.8891 -0.0077945
1 0

Table 611: Base 64 representation:


ogRZUB7WVWQYITA

Figure 463: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

158
Profile: e231 Table 616: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.412 3.049 ects
Information: Eppler E231 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 18.89 18.95 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 28.4 0.3 dcts
Cm error 1 5 mcts
Upper transition point 0.98 -0.29 %

Figure 464: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 465: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 613: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.3368 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 2.4603 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.97123 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.2788 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.7709 deg
Release Angle: 2.7977 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.8575 deg
Camber deflection: 13.6551 deg

Table 614: Controlpoints


1 0
0.88622 -0.0051422
0.81538 -0.03711
0.41385 -0.03711
0.034384 -0.03711
0 -0.0079943
0 0
0 0.025971
0.10417 0.08628
0.39357 0.08628
0.69916 0.08628
0.81507 0.026593
1 0

Table 615: Base 64 representation:


TuZgkO6arQmmMkA

Figure 466: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

159
Profile: e326 Table 620: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.608 4.448 ects
Information: Eppler E326 flying wing airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.3 -0.3 dcts
Cm error 30 26 mcts
Upper transition point 0.32 0.07 %

Figure 467: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 468: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 617: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.8623 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 2.1169 % @0.2C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0462 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.48234 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.515 deg
Release Angle: -0.63884 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.2192 deg
Camber deflection: 11.5804 deg

Table 618: Controlpoints


1 0
0.83659 -0.021213
0.78288 -0.052117
0.5368 -0.052117
0.358 -0.052117
0 -0.033929
0 0
0 0.02259
0.073172 0.083757
0.26844 0.083757
0.43033 0.083757
0.63686 0.038928
1 0

Table 619: Base 64 representation:


RuROjpVhhWovPfA

Figure 469: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

160
Profile: e327 Table 624: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.482 5.169 ects
Information: Eppler E327 flying wing airfoil RMS curvature error: 35.82 36.41 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.8 -1.5 dcts
Cm error 28 15 mcts
Upper transition point 0.73 2.04 %

Figure 470: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 471: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 621: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.097 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 2.5941 % @0.23C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4167 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.43109 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.6762 deg
Release Angle: 1.5267 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.1183 deg
Camber deflection: 16.645 deg

Table 622: Controlpoints


1 0
0.84205 -0.013295
0.80454 -0.047031
0.52878 -0.047031
0.39797 -0.047031
0 -0.034043
0 0
0 0.028588
0.086533 0.090218
0.27569 0.090218
0.41555 0.090218
0.56601 0.059949
1 0

Table 623: Base 64 representation:


UrSMltQhkUvzOiA

Figure 472: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

161
Profile: e331 Table 628: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.148 3.913 ects
Information: Eppler E331 flying wing airfoil RMS curvature error: 37.19 39.18 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.3 -0.8 dcts
Cm error 33 52 mcts
Upper transition point 1.91 0.9 %

Figure 473: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 474: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 625: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.3023 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 2.6529 % @0.23C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5106 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.24915 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.5303 deg
Release Angle: -1.8533 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.6325 deg
Camber deflection: 15.7792 deg

Table 626: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85832 -0.021474
0.81351 -0.036634
0.53928 -0.036634
0.4341 -0.036634
0 -0.026852
0 0
0 0.028747
0.082057 0.082281
0.26996 0.082281
0.43136 0.082281
0.69378 0.026316
1 0

Table 627: Base 64 representation:


WsROiuMilQhwPsA

Figure 475: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

162
Profile: e332 Table 632: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.187 6.43 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: 45.76 47.88 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.4 -2.8 dcts
Cm error 58 38 mcts
Upper transition point -0.31 -0.11 %

Figure 476: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 477: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 629: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.6639 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 3.0042 % @0.24C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.495 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.29548 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.4965 deg
Release Angle: 0.12538 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.188 deg
Camber deflection: 17.3133 deg

Table 630: Controlpoints


1 0
0.83514 -0.019142
0.83514 -0.032186
0.53121 -0.032186
0.5259 -0.032186
0 -0.029933
0 0
0 0.03078
0.095057 0.087967
0.26714 0.087967
0.4365 0.087967
0.61102 0.04689
1 0

Table 631: Base 64 representation:


WpRPl7BhpOr PgA

Figure 478: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

163
Profile: e334 Table 636: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.028 5.49 ects
Information: Eppler E334 flying wing airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.9 -2.4 dcts
Cm error 14 -4 mcts
Upper transition point 1.36 2.53 %

Figure 479: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 480: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 633: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.1054 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 3.9453 % @0.28C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5713 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.2097 deg
Release Angle: 4.9531 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.5396 deg
Camber deflection: 22.4927 deg

Table 634: Controlpoints


1 0
0.90387 -0.0002546
0.90387 -0.022072
0.51463 -0.022072
0 -0.022072
0 -0.010072
0 0
0 0.031329
0.093694 0.099928
0.29152 0.099928
0.36661 0.099928
0.47588 0.092963
1 0

Table 635: Base 64 representation:


UqTHqs gyJ7 LnA

Figure 481: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

164
Profile: e335 Table 640: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.448 3.555 ects
Information: Eppler E335 flying wing airfoil RMS curvature error: 41.25 41.87 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.3 -1.4 dcts
Cm error 0 12 mcts
Upper transition point 1.01 1.35 %

Figure 482: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 483: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 637: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.564 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 2.2936 % @0.21C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.9909 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.48712 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.3633 deg
Release Angle: -1.7861 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.9035 deg
Camber deflection: 10.1173 deg

Table 638: Controlpoints


1 0
0.91836 -0.010035
0.86863 -0.0488
0.54452 -0.0488
0.40356 -0.0488
0 -0.035264
0 0
0 0.022798
0.071699 0.084794
0.2623 0.084794
0.42685 0.084794
0.68728 0.02453
1 0

Table 639: Base 64 representation:


RuROjtRitVinNeA

Figure 484: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

165
Profile: e336 Table 644: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.451 3.961 ects
Information: Eppler E336 flying wing airfoil RMS curvature error: 54.57 54.52 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2 -1.5 dcts
Cm error 12 17 mcts
Upper transition point 2.19 1.39 %

Figure 485: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 486: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 641: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.8563 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 2.7974 % @0.23C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4909 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.39819 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.3458 deg
Release Angle: 0.24389 deg
Nose Incidence: 16.3344 deg
Camber deflection: 16.5783 deg

Table 642: Controlpoints


1 0
0.90153 -0.010226
0.8746 -0.043764
0.53648 -0.043764
0.46167 -0.043764
0 -0.035211
0 0
0 0.029089
0.08513 0.091379
0.26952 0.091379
0.42638 0.091379
0.64752 0.039642
1 0

Table 643: Base 64 representation:


UrROmyJhuTmxOgA

Figure 487: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

166
Profile: e337 Table 648: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.798 6.478 ects
Information: Eppler E337 flying wing airfoil RMS curvature error: 38.02 38.14 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.9 -1.3 dcts
Cm error 24 11 mcts
Upper transition point 0.94 1.85 %

Figure 488: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 489: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 645: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.2291 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 3.1226 % @0.25C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.385 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.44182 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.6411 deg
Release Angle: 1.8205 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.9152 deg
Camber deflection: 17.7356 deg

Table 646: Controlpoints


1 0
0.88641 -0.0089396
0.87786 -0.03945
0.52838 -0.03945
0.51253 -0.03945
0 -0.037083
0 0
0 0.028377
0.087214 0.096881
0.27646 0.096881
0.4178 0.096881
0.57997 0.060086
1 0

Table 647: Base 64 representation:


TrSNo7ChuRt7OiA

Figure 490: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

167
Profile: e338 Table 652: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.326 7.326 ects
Information: Eppler E338 flying wing airfoil RMS curvature error: 49.28 51.45 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -8.8 -10.3 dcts
Cm error 35 44 mcts
Upper transition point 1.58 0.51 %

Figure 491: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 492: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 649: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.4203 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 3.6648 % @0.26C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.7014 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.329 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.4107 deg
Release Angle: 4.0296 deg
Nose Incidence: 19.294 deg
Camber deflection: 23.3237 deg

Table 650: Controlpoints


1 0
0.89654 -0.0030266
0.8955 -0.034113
0.52012 -0.034113
0.51492 -0.034113
0 -0.032066
0 0
0 0.032971
0.09584 0.10339
0.28365 0.10339
0.38898 0.10339
0.50059 0.08568
1 0

Table 651: Base 64 representation:


UpSJr7BgxPz-NmA

Figure 493: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

168
Profile: e340 Table 656: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
Information: Eppler E340 flying wing airfoil RMS position error: 3.845 5.148 ects
Reference: UIUC RMS curvature error: 47.89 45.86 %
CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN 68.34 %

Figure 494: Wing profile with camber and thickness


Figure 495: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution.
curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 653: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.6531 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 2.5869 % @0.21C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.4791 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.556 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.0165 deg
Release Angle: -1.2465 deg
Nose Incidence: 18.1132 deg
Camber deflection: 16.8667 deg

Table 654: Controlpoints


1 0
0.88151 -0.017191
0.87024 -0.052266
0.54219 -0.052266
0.49336 -0.052266
0 -0.041813
0 0
0 0.035975
0.10192 0.093166
0.26141 0.093166
0.40379 0.093166
0.66698 0.033602
1 0

Table 655: Base 64 representation:


ZmRMnyGitWj5QeA

Figure 496: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

169
Profile: e341 Table 660: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
Information: Eppler E341 flying wing airfoil RMS position error: 4.46 6.509 ects
Reference: UIUC RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN 68.1 %

Figure 497: Wing profile with camber and thickness


Figure 498: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution.
curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 657: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.1003 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 2.8866 % @0.23C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4246 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.62274 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.5152 deg
Release Angle: 0.31021 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.3178 deg
Camber deflection: 14.6281 deg

Table 658: Controlpoints


1 0
0.88862 -0.012587
0.87049 -0.048043
0.53421 -0.048043
0.52886 -0.048043
0 -0.044211
0 0
0 0.028443
0.085182 0.098613
0.26826 0.098613
0.42253 0.098613
0.62618 0.046349
1 0

Table 659: Base 64 representation:


SrRNp6BhtUo2PgA

Figure 499: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

170
Profile: e342 Table 664: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.473 6.385 ects
Information: Eppler E342 flying wing airfoil RMS curvature error: 37.48 38.02 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -6.1 -7.4 dcts
Cm error 54 37 mcts
Upper transition point 0.85 1.9 %

Figure 500: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 501: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 661: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.3972 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 3.3856 % @0.25C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.8637 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.52878 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.4263 deg
Release Angle: 2.1166 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.6821 deg
Camber deflection: 19.7988 deg

Table 662: Controlpoints


1 0
0.88097 -0.00957
0.88097 -0.043061
0.526 -0.043061
0.52074 -0.043061
0 -0.040047
0 0
0 0.034567
0.09617 0.10532
0.27526 0.10532
0.41145 0.10532
0.58412 0.064604
1 0

Table 663: Base 64 representation:


VpSMs7BhvSs PjA

Figure 502: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

171
Profile: e343 Table 668: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.417 8.143 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: 48.61 45.34 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -10.1 -11.9 dcts
Cm error 71 116 mcts
Upper transition point 1.27 1.44 %

Figure 503: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 504: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 665: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.6096 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 3.9213 % @0.26C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.2946 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.4132 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.7481 deg
Release Angle: 2.5162 deg
Nose Incidence: 21.1601 deg
Camber deflection: 23.6763 deg

Table 666: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85846 -0.013275
0.85846 -0.037765
0.51773 -0.037765
0.50738 -0.037765
0 -0.035877
0 0
0 0.040184
0.10556 0.1119
0.28232 0.1119
0.38544 0.1119
0.49603 0.092406
1 0

Table 667: Base 64 representation:


XnSJv8BhtQ0 RjA

Figure 505: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

172
Profile: e360 Table 672: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.87 3.011 ects
Information: Eppler E360 rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: 32.71 32.95 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.7 -1.4 dcts
Cm error 4 6 mcts
Upper transition point 1.71 2.98 %

Figure 506: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 507: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 669: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.239 % @0.36C
Maximum Camber: 1.5982 % @0.25C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.2765 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.60935 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.787 deg
Release Angle: 1.5602 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.8201 deg
Camber deflection: 15.3804 deg

Table 670: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79047 -0.017717
0.69743 -0.046705
0.4198 -0.046705
0.22273 -0.046705
0 -0.03008
0 0
0 0.045856
0.13855 0.076474
0.32745 0.076474
0.48041 0.076474
0.58041 0.058624
1 0

Table 671: Base 64 representation:


lkVPgoebfUzrOiA

Figure 508: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

173
Profile: e361 Table 676: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.864 2.375 ects
Information: Eppler E361 rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.9 -1.1 dcts
Cm error -17 -4 mcts
Upper transition point 1.85 1.84 %

Figure 509: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 510: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 673: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.1111 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 1.7073 % @0.26C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.3433 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.59245 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.1071 deg
Release Angle: 0.75858 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.3547 deg
Camber deflection: 15.1133 deg

Table 674: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79081 -0.019388
0.69081 -0.044822
0.42194 -0.044822
0.20869 -0.044822
0 -0.02871
0 0
0 0.04835
0.14964 0.077109
0.32473 0.077109
0.51884 0.077109
0.65727 0.040942
1 0

Table 675: Base 64 representation:


niVSgogbeTtqOgA

Figure 511: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

174
Profile: e374 Table 680: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.705 4.451 ects
Information: Eppler E374 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.9 -0.1 dcts
Cm error -1 1 mcts
Upper transition point 0.21 0.28 %

Figure 512: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 513: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 677: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.901 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 2.3162 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.76754 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.48463 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.5078 deg
Release Angle: 2.3962 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.3419 deg
Camber deflection: 9.7381 deg

Table 678: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85221 -0.011262
0.63969 -0.031721
0.31145 -0.031721
0.27407 -0.031721
0 -0.031721
0 0
0 0.024399
0.11634 0.0776
0.3894 0.0776
0.51246 0.0776
0.67286 0.052693
1 0

Table 679: Base 64 representation:


UsZNg IUfOqaPjA

Figure 514: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

175
Profile: e385 Table 684: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
Information: Eppler E385 airfoil RMS position error: 3.167 6.536 ects
Reference: UIUC RMS curvature error: 44.97 44.28 %
CD error NaN -1.9 dcts
Cm error NaN -9 mcts
Upper transition point NaN 1.03 %

Figure 515: Wing profile with camber and thickness


Figure 516: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution.
curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 681: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.5137 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 5.6099 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.64644 %C
Lower nose radius: 10.4492 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.6441 deg
Release Angle: 14.7474 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.9018 deg
Camber deflection: 22.6492 deg

Table 682: Controlpoints


1 0
0.71024 0.05856
0.11035 -0.010234
0.037628 -0.010234
0.00069744 -0.010234
0 -0.0069703
0 0
0 0.024457
0.13879 0.096631
0.38304 0.096631
0.6317 0.096631
0.9757 0.0079273
1 0

Table 683: Base 64 representation:


QoZaor-CFEFVH3A

Figure 517: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

176
Profile: e387 Table 688: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.901 5.151 ects
Information: Eppler E387 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 57.66 Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2 -1.8 dcts
Cm error 1 -7 mcts
Upper transition point -0.28 -0.36 %

Figure 518: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 519: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 685: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.1591 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 3.5864 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.75179 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.8281 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.4468 deg
Release Angle: 5.7281 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.3926 deg
Camber deflection: 10.1206 deg

Table 686: Controlpoints


1 0
0.68788 0.01261
0.26632 -0.017148
0.085328 -0.017148
0.0025598 -0.017148
0 -0.0064763
0 0
0 0.01979
0.12535 0.080996
0.35458 0.080996
0.51888 0.080996
0.65188 0.054281
1 0

Table 687: Base 64 representation:


QoXQiY9FNHtbHoA

Figure 520: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

177
Profile: e392 Table 692: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.684 3.924 ects
Information: Eppler E392 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 31.84 34.44 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.1 2 dcts
Cm error 5 -3 mcts
Upper transition point -1.09 -0.99 %

Figure 521: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 522: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 689: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.1587 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 4.0063 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4693 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.15495 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.5507 deg
Release Angle: 8.3892 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.7674 deg
Camber deflection: 24.1567 deg

Table 690: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79476 0.020174
0.39078 -0.016641
0.1498 -0.016641
0.0068968 -0.016641
0 -0.0028356
0 0
0 0.041028
0.17184 0.089684
0.36018 0.089684
0.43945 0.089684
0.55825 0.087186
1 0

Table 691: Base 64 representation:


sgXIlL8KSH9WGtA

Figure 523: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

178
Profile: e393 Table 696: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.641 4.851 ects
Information: Eppler E393 airfoil RMS curvature error: 26.74 26.84 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.1 1 dcts
Cm error 12 -11 mcts
Upper transition point -2.34 -0.89 %

Figure 524: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 525: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 693: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.5321 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 3.9719 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.90714 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.47538 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.5153 deg
Release Angle: 12.1505 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.808 deg
Camber deflection: 21.9585 deg

Table 694: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79535 0.028371
0.46909 -0.02412
0.18357 -0.02412
0.14686 -0.02412
0 -0.023879
0 0
0 0.030843
0.1477 0.09558
0.36746 0.09558
0.62025 0.09558
0.98746 0.0036938
1 0

Table 695: Base 64 representation:


VlYao-NMWKCZKzA

Figure 526: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

179
Profile: e395 Table 700: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.337 5.152 ects
Information: Eppler E395 human powered aircraft airfoil RMS curvature error: 22.27 21.83 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.3 -1 dcts
Cm error 24 9 mcts
Upper transition point 0.06 -0.06 %

Figure 527: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 528: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 697: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.3638 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 5.1894 % @0.51C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1961 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.41983 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.1529 deg
Release Angle: 15.0156 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.0101 deg
Camber deflection: 25.0256 deg

Table 698: Controlpoints


1 0
0.78608 0.045233
0.31894 -0.027614
0.12626 -0.027614
0.025421 -0.027614
0 -0.0084351
0 0
0 0.035598
0.15892 0.109
0.38373 0.109
0.45768 0.109
0.66966 0.10792
1 0

Table 699: Base 64 representation:


VkZIuUyIOM-UH3A

Figure 529: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

180
Profile: e396 Table 704: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.982 4.491 ects
Information: Eppler E396 human powered aircraft airfoil RMS curvature error: 23.38 23.86 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.7 -0.5 dcts
Cm error 21 37 mcts
Upper transition point -0.81 -0.86 %

Figure 530: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 531: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 701: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.2294 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 5.276 % @0.48C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.84055 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.77615 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.0471 deg
Release Angle: 15.0905 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.7158 deg
Camber deflection: 23.8063 deg

Table 702: Controlpoints


1 0
0.78202 0.042451
0.33105 -0.028577
0.12566 -0.028577
0.028188 -0.028577
0 -0.0088284
0 0
0 0.038899
0.16305 0.11536
0.38237 0.11536
0.47045 0.11536
0.64435 0.11536
1 0

Table 703: Base 64 representation:


WkYJwUxIPM VI2A

Figure 532: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

181
Profile: e397 Table 708: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.097 4.805 ects
Information: Eppler E397 human powered aircraft airfoil RMS curvature error: 22.31 22.56 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.6 1.1 dcts
Cm error 20 42 mcts
Upper transition point -2.36 -3.14 %

Figure 533: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 534: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 705: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.5793 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 5.239 % @0.5C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.185 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.7447 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.3108 deg
Release Angle: 14.985 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.2019 deg
Camber deflection: 19.187 deg

Table 706: Controlpoints


1 0
0.8009 0.040376
0.33313 -0.032359
0.164 -0.032359
0.0072084 -0.032359
0 -0.0042447
0 0
0 0.029409
0.12593 0.1159
0.42837 0.1159
0.66121 0.1159
0.99447 0.0018423
1 0

Table 707: Base 64 representation:


QsbawI8KNOBTI3A

Figure 535: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

182
Profile: e399 Table 712: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.359 5.954 ects
Information: Eppler E399 human powered aircraft airfoil RMS curvature error: 25.44 25.33 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.7 3.7 dcts
Cm error 26 54 mcts
Upper transition point -0.58 -2.26 %

Figure 536: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 537: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 709: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.8924 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 4.981 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6081 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2874 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.5934 deg
Release Angle: 14.5573 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.2369 deg
Camber deflection: 22.7942 deg

Table 710: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79946 0.039929
0.38619 -0.03758
0.16455 -0.03758
0.1629 -0.03758
0 -0.033446
0 0
0 0.04157
0.16119 0.12103
0.37656 0.12103
0.4389 0.12103
0.62796 0.11983
1 0

Table 711: Base 64 representation:


WkYGz4BLRQ-VH2A

Figure 538: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

183
Profile: e403 Table 716: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.797 6.283 ects
Information: Eppler E403 general purpose airfoil RMS curvature error: 21.6 21.72 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.2 1.3 dcts
Cm error 34 66 mcts
Upper transition point -2.43 -3.18 %

Figure 539: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 540: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 713: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.848 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 3.2273 % @0.75C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.090138 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0849 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.2558 deg
Release Angle: 12.8395 deg
Nose Incidence: -1.721 deg
Camber deflection: 11.1186 deg

Table 714: Controlpoints


1 0
0.78839 0.040029
0.65623 -0.058153
0.32273 -0.058153
0.25319 -0.058153
0 -0.042212
0 0
0 0.0055899
0.051998 0.092939
0.47566 0.092939
0.79499 0.092939
0.94723 0.014108
1 0

Table 715: Base 64 representation:


E4emntOVgZQmF0A

Figure 541: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

184
Profile: e417 Table 720: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.828 4.571 ects
Information: Eppler E417 general purpose airfoil RMS curvature error: 22.75 22.9 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.2 -1.4 dcts
Cm error 19 3 mcts
Upper transition point -2.12 -1.87 %

Figure 542: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 543: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 717: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.1933 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 3.1038 % @0.76C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.16237 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.90705 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.7701 deg
Release Angle: 18.3652 deg
Nose Incidence: -1.7543 deg
Camber deflection: 16.6109 deg

Table 718: Controlpoints


1 0
0.81861 0.040148
0.60804 -0.056873
0.36955 -0.056873
0.18278 -0.056873
0 -0.032907
0 0
0 0.0086056
0.068417 0.086649
0.48091 0.086649
0.58571 0.086649
0.82796 0.077497
1 0

Table 719: Base 64 representation:


G2fNkkgYYY4eN9A

Figure 544: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

185
Profile: e422 Table 724: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.303 5.2 ects
Information: Eppler E422 high lift airfoil RMS curvature error: 55.82 55.94 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1 -0.9 dcts
Cm error -28 -10 mcts
Upper transition point -2.03 -2.16 %

Figure 545: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 546: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 721: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.9687 % @0.24C
Maximum Camber: 7.1082 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.3674 %C
Lower nose radius: 6.0013 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 18.3923 deg
Release Angle: 12.6554 deg
Nose Incidence: 20.0345 deg
Camber deflection: 32.6899 deg

Table 722: Controlpoints


1 0
0.32292 0.040929
0.22292 -0.021756
0.082488 -0.021756
0.0017793 -0.021756
0 -0.0086547
0 0
0 0.054629
0.13294 0.13824
0.31223 0.13824
0.50385 0.13824
0.98553 0.0058017
1 0

Table 723: Base 64 representation:


ZkUS6Z-FKJD3VzA

Figure 547: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

186
Profile: e426 Table 728: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.687 7.957 ects
Information: Eppler E426 airfoil RMS curvature error: 35.4 37.27 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4 -4.3 dcts
Cm error 21 1 mcts
Upper transition point 3.42 4.22 %

Figure 548: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 549: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 725: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.845 % @0.22C
Maximum Camber: 0.56979 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6555 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.4191 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.2746 deg
Release Angle: 1.7379 deg
Nose Incidence: -2.9282 deg
Camber deflection: -1.1903 deg

Table 726: Controlpoints


1 0
0.6756 -0.010758
0.48286 -0.050331
0.17289 -0.050331
0.060904 -0.050331
0 -0.031341
0 0
0 0.029386
0.078244 0.058458
0.22861 0.058458
0.44872 0.058458
0.54326 0.042975
1 0

Table 727: Base 64 representation:


gpPSZnoLYV0nIiA

Figure 550: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

187
Profile: e428 Table 732: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.725 4.271 ects
Information: Eppler E428 airfoil RMS curvature error: 41.39 39.09 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.6 -3 dcts
Cm error -10 2 mcts
Upper transition point 3.46 4.09 %

Figure 551: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 552: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 729: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.1979 % @0.21C
Maximum Camber: 0.50069 % @0.52C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.044566 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.0757 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.9263 deg
Release Angle: 1.7054 deg
Nose Incidence: -4.2974 deg
Camber deflection: -2.592 deg

Table 730: Controlpoints


1 0
0.73551 -0.0081168
0.41365 -0.054415
0.17196 -0.054415
0.096363 -0.054415
0 -0.036517
0 0
0 0.0011607
0.0045342 0.058033
0.22671 0.058033
0.45769 0.058033
0.55769 0.040008
1 0

Table 731: Base 64 representation:


B-PTZqcLTXzsIiA

Figure 553: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

188
Profile: e431 Table 736: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.159 5.104 ects
Information: Eppler E431 sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 24.63 24.7 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.4 0.1 dcts
Cm error -19 2 mcts
Upper transition point 2.86 -2.2 %

Figure 554: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 555: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 733: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.1316 % @0.41C
Maximum Camber: 4.2242 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3472 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.1913 deg
Release Angle: 13.0692 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.9904 deg
Camber deflection: 27.0596 deg

Table 734: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85134 0.022147
0.7573 -0.033702
0.37384 -0.033702
0 -0.033702
0 -0.0069425
0 0
0 0.03149
0.11041 0.11781
0.41863 0.11781
0.48897 0.11781
0.64718 0.11236
1 0

Table 735: Base 64 representation:


RubIxN YmO8mK0A

Figure 556: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

189
Profile: e432 Table 740: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.899 4.28 ects
Information: Eppler E432 sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 26.55 26.97 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.4 1 dcts
Cm error 23 50 mcts
Upper transition point -2.34 -3.67 %

Figure 557: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 558: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 737: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.9831 % @0.36C
Maximum Camber: 4.4687 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.161 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.64345 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.0648 deg
Release Angle: 11.9666 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.2474 deg
Camber deflection: 29.2141 deg

Table 738: Controlpoints


1 0
0.83586 0.021418
0.76147 -0.035241
0.37349 -0.035241
0.18288 -0.035241
0 -0.027721
0 0
0 0.04662
0.15086 0.12461
0.36457 0.12461
0.42763 0.12461
0.58345 0.12338
1 0

Table 739: Base 64 representation:


YlXG0xgYnP-rKyA

Figure 559: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

190
Profile: e433 Table 744: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.127 3.743 ects
Information: Eppler E433 sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 24.93 24.89 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.2 0 dcts
Cm error 24 33 mcts
Upper transition point -1.93 -1.98 %

Figure 560: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 561: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 741: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.2308 % @0.41C
Maximum Camber: 3.9499 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1128 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.8253 deg
Release Angle: 12.8808 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.3609 deg
Camber deflection: 25.2416 deg

Table 742: Controlpoints


1 0
0.81816 0.022224
0.77695 -0.031996
0.3742 -0.031996
0.011226 -0.031996
0 -0.0094384
0 0
0 0.028591
0.11019 0.11052
0.42419 0.11052
0.55017 0.11052
0.71803 0.095955
1 0

Table 743: Base 64 representation:


RubOuT9YoO3zN0A

Figure 562: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

191
Profile: e434 Table 748: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.599 3.757 ects
Information: Eppler E434 sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 28.56 28.08 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 -0.2 dcts
Cm error 32 8 mcts
Upper transition point -1.93 -1.3 %

Figure 563: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 564: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 745: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.3205 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 4.3207 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1651 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.8462 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.0852 deg
Release Angle: 8.4131 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.926 deg
Camber deflection: 22.3392 deg

Table 746: Controlpoints


1 0
0.84516 0.0064099
0.84516 -0.023964
0.28331 -0.023964
0.0028104 -0.023964
0 -0.0073025
0 0
0 0.028324
0.10328 0.10975
0.41053 0.10975
0.5654 0.10975
0.7141 0.073703
1 0

Table 747: Base 64 representation:


QvaRuT-SxKq NtA

Figure 565: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

192
Profile: e435 Table 752: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.421 5.955 ects
Information: Eppler E435 sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 25.55 24.5 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.1 -1.4 dcts
Cm error 19 35 mcts
Upper transition point -2.21 -2.94 %

Figure 566: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 567: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 749: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.1505 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 4.3918 % @0.51C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4087 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0.57296 deg
Release Angle: 10.1977 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.6764 deg
Camber deflection: 22.8741 deg

Table 750: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79354 0.036075
0.66134 -0.040072
0.30936 -0.040072
0 -0.040072
0 -0.0048087
0 0
0 0.032185
0.1103 0.12315
0.42594 0.12315
0.67779 0.12315
0.99678 0.00059625
1 0

Table 751: Base 64 representation:


Rubc0I UgRBmBwA

Figure 568: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

193
Profile: e471 Table 756: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
Information: Eppler E471 airfoil RMS position error: 1.946 4.727 ects
Reference: UIUC RMS curvature error: 28.58 29.45 %
CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 569: Wing profile with camber and thickness


Figure 570: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution.
curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 753: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.3025 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 4.7036 % @0.52C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.48145 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.56069 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.4116 deg
Release Angle: 15.2044 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.9907 deg
Camber deflection: 24.1951 deg

Table 754: Controlpoints


1 0
0.72965 0.057457
0.13912 -0.0079901
0.043432 -0.0079901
0.0022641 -0.0079901
0 -0.0031759
0 0
0 0.018889
0.11116 0.075372
0.43838 0.075372
0.70359 0.075372
0.92451 0.025127
1 0

Table 755: Base 64 representation:


QvcegZ8DGDVUH4A

Figure 571: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

194
Profile: e472 Table 760: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.241 2.451 ects
Information: Eppler E472 aerobatic aircraft airfoil RMS curvature error: 45.22 44.85 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.2 0.4 dcts
Cm error 10 8 mcts
Upper transition point 0.65 0.8 %

Figure 572: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 573: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 757: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.0956 % @0.18C
Maximum Camber: 0.058049 % @0.76C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.904 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.0457 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.4834 deg
Release Angle: 0.41407 deg
Nose Incidence: -0.63635 deg
Camber deflection: -0.22229 deg

Table 758: Controlpoints


1 0
0.94873 -0.012546
0.35911 -0.06049
0.17462 -0.06049
0.017933 -0.06049
0 -0.0096891
0 0
0 0.0096889
0.017933 0.06049
0.17462 0.06049
0.35904 0.06049
0.94854 0.012567
1 0

Table 759: Base 64 representation:


K4LOaK4LOaNNfgA

Figure 574: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

195
Profile: e473 Table 764: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.077 5.962 ects
Information: Eppler E473 aerobatic aircraft airfoil RMS curvature error: 65.82 67.7 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.3 -0.6 dcts
Cm error 7 7 mcts
Upper transition point 0.97 1.6 %

Figure 575: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 576: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 761: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.1857 % @0.21C
Maximum Camber: 0.070905 % @0.77C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.4957 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.4957 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.6803 deg
Release Angle: 0.49724 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 0.49724 deg

Table 762: Controlpoints


1 0
0.97555 -0.0074336
0.35965 -0.08095
0.21239 -0.08095
0.059483 -0.08095
0 -0.023898
0 0
0 0.023898
0.059483 0.08095
0.21239 0.08095
0.35958 0.08095
0.97521 0.0074797
1 0

Table 763: Base 64 representation:


TtOMiTtOMiGGlgA

Figure 577: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

196
Profile: e474 Table 768: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.156 4.26 ects
Information: Eppler E474 aerobatic aircraft airfoil RMS curvature error: 49.4 51.62 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.9 -1.2 dcts
Cm error 12 13 mcts
Upper transition point 1.04 1.27 %

Figure 578: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 579: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 765: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.0811 % @0.21C
Maximum Camber: 1.1006e-005 % @0.31C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.45891 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.45891 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.6449 deg
Release Angle: 0.0001455 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 0.0001455 deg

Table 766: Controlpoints


1 0
0.68837 -0.045586
0.31135 -0.07042
0.21517 -0.07042
0.016207 -0.07042
0 -0.0063374
0 0
0 0.0063374
0.016207 0.07042
0.21517 0.07042
0.3114 0.07042
0.68845 0.045575
1 0

Table 767: Base 64 representation:


G6OIeG6OIeooTgA

Figure 580: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

197
Profile: e475 Table 772: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.569 4.272 ects
Information: Eppler E475 aerobatic aircraft airfoil RMS curvature error: 87.74 86.55 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.2 -0.2 dcts
Cm error 18 17 mcts
Upper transition point 1.11 1.25 %

Figure 581: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 582: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 769: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.9988 % @0.22C
Maximum Camber: 7.3343e-007 % @0.6C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.99937 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.99937 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 20.6642 deg
Release Angle: -6.1749e-006 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -6.1749e-006 deg

Table 770: Controlpoints


1 0
0.68066 -0.05822
0.31521 -0.075
0.21656 -0.075
0.03637 -0.075
0 -0.015566
0 0
0 0.015566
0.03637 0.075
0.21656 0.075
0.3152 0.075
0.68065 0.05822
1 0

Table 771: Base 64 representation:


N0OIgN0OIgxxXgA

Figure 583: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

198
Profile: e476 Table 776: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.248 4.578 ects
Information: Eppler E476 aerobatic aircraft airfoil RMS curvature error: 25.29 23.45 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.3 0.7 dcts
Cm error 10 6 mcts
Upper transition point -1.28 -1.3 %

Figure 584: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 585: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 773: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.7273 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 0.075281 % @0.82C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.6425 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.6425 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.3936 deg
Release Angle: 0.55766 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 0.55766 deg

Table 774: Controlpoints


1 0
0.77434 -0.025606
0.60965 -0.08364
0.31687 -0.08364
0.09664 -0.08364
0 -0.025389
0 0
0 0.025389
0.09664 0.08364
0.31687 0.08364
0.60965 0.08364
0.77434 0.025607
1 0

Table 775: Base 64 representation:


TrUbjTrUbjkkOgA

Figure 586: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

199
Profile: e477 Table 780: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.258 3.654 ects
Information: Eppler E477 aerobatic aircraft airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.2 0.5 dcts
Cm error 5 3 mcts
Upper transition point -0.43 -0.43 %

Figure 587: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 588: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 777: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.3532 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 0.066277 % @0.82C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.5801 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.5801 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.5981 deg
Release Angle: 0.49174 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 0.49174 deg

Table 778: Controlpoints


1 0
0.77556 -0.023618
0.56591 -0.07677
0.31651 -0.07677
0.073466 -0.07677
0 -0.019481
0 0
0 0.019481
0.073466 0.07677
0.31651 0.07677
0.56591 0.07677
0.77556 0.023618
1 0

Table 779: Base 64 representation:


QwUXgQwUXgggNgA

Figure 589: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

200
Profile: e478 Table 784: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.34 5.567 ects
Information: Eppler E478 aerobatic aircraft airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.2 -0.3 dcts
Cm error 3 4 mcts
Upper transition point -0.44 -0.37 %

Figure 590: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 591: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 781: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.6959 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 0.058753 % @0.79C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0831 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0831 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.8789 deg
Release Angle: 0.42076 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 0.42076 deg

Table 782: Controlpoints


1 0
0.69068 -0.033125
0.41558 -0.07848
0.25879 -0.07848
0.028279 -0.07848
0 -0.012217
0 0
0 0.012217
0.028279 0.07848
0.25879 0.07848
0.41561 0.07848
0.69094 0.033092
1 0

Table 783: Base 64 representation:


K4ROgK4ROghhOgA

Figure 592: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

201
Profile: e479 Table 788: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.965 4.369 ects
Information: Eppler E479 aerobatic aircraft airfoil RMS curvature error: 37.36 38.71 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.2 0.5 dcts
Cm error 3 5 mcts
Upper transition point -0.01 -0.62 %

Figure 593: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 594: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 785: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.5671 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: -1.7264e-006 % @0.91C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2787 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2787 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.132 deg
Release Angle: -2.5828e-005 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -2.5828e-005 deg

Table 786: Controlpoints


1 0
0.70174 -0.031696
0.42437 -0.08284
0.25734 -0.08284
0.046499 -0.08284
0 -0.019909
0 0
0 0.019909
0.046499 0.08284
0.25734 0.08284
0.42437 0.08284
0.70175 0.031694
1 0

Table 787: Base 64 representation:


PzQOiPzQOiggOgA

Figure 595: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

202
Profile: e502 Table 792: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.268 4.287 ects
Information: Eppler E502 general purpose airfoil RMS curvature error: 52.29 53.77 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.7 -0.9 dcts
Cm error 6 -6 mcts
Upper transition point -0.66 -0.18 %

Figure 596: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 597: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 789: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.6852 % @0.44C
Maximum Camber: 1.4825 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.6227 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.56164 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.4665 deg
Release Angle: 2.2909 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.1828 deg
Camber deflection: 7.4736 deg

Table 790: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80744 -0.01496
0.71704 -0.064149
0.47141 -0.064149
0.20318 -0.064149
0 -0.027582
0 0
0 0.020929
0.10552 0.092899
0.43276 0.092899
0.60968 0.092899
0.72129 0.044264
1 0

Table 791: Base 64 representation:


OvcUncjeebtrPjA

Figure 598: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

203
Profile: e542 Table 796: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.5 4.602 ects
Information: Eppler E542 general aviation airfoil RMS curvature error: 83.07 86.58 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.7 -0.9 dcts
Cm error 56 77 mcts
Upper transition point -0.17 -0.1 %

Figure 599: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 600: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 793: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.8771 % @0.42C
Maximum Camber: 1.9322 % @0.3C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2469 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.45718 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.8117 deg
Release Angle: 5.7895 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.778 deg
Camber deflection: 16.5675 deg

Table 794: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80113 -0.0056119
0.78393 -0.067863
0.51272 -0.067863
0.19482 -0.067863
0 -0.024368
0 0
0 0.033265
0.13311 0.1025
0.39133 0.1025
0.48273 0.1025
0.59618 0.094681
1 0

Table 795: Base 64 representation:


VpZKrXngjs66RoA

Figure 601: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

204
Profile: e543 Table 800: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.111 5.181 ects
Information: Eppler E543 general aviation airfoil RMS curvature error: 88.4 95.3 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.9 -0.8 dcts
Cm error 37 41 mcts
Upper transition point -0.25 -0.38 %

Figure 602: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 603: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 797: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.281 % @0.42C
Maximum Camber: 1.8766 % @0.29C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2671 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.53687 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.4296 deg
Release Angle: 6.8434 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.2916 deg
Camber deflection: 17.135 deg

Table 798: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79998 0.00044898
0.75263 -0.069263
0.45612 -0.069263
0.22493 -0.069263
0 -0.028374
0 0
0 0.033439
0.13237 0.10415
0.39354 0.10415
0.47957 0.10415
0.59643 0.097323
1 0

Table 799: Base 64 representation:


VpZJragsie7zPqA

Figure 604: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

205
Profile: e544 Table 804: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.408 3.355 ects
Information: Eppler E544 general aviation airfoil RMS curvature error: 80.26 83.56 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.3 -0.1 dcts
Cm error 38 58 mcts
Upper transition point -0.53 -0.8 %

Figure 605: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 606: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 801: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.5242 % @0.41C
Maximum Camber: 1.8627 % @0.31C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2783 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.5217 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.3548 deg
Release Angle: 7.2115 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.275 deg
Camber deflection: 17.4864 deg

Table 802: Controlpoints


1 0
0.78796 0.0019765
0.68796 -0.070018
0.44905 -0.070018
0.18838 -0.070018
0 -0.025596
0 0
0 0.033452
0.13131 0.10563
0.39569 0.10563
0.47672 0.10563
0.59672 0.099718
1 0

Table 803: Base 64 representation:


UqZJsXksce7qPrA

Figure 607: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

206
Profile: e545 Table 808: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.332 4.907 ects
Information: Eppler E545 general aviation airfoil RMS curvature error: 43.16 42.85 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.6 -2.4 dcts
Cm error 36 51 mcts
Upper transition point 4.47 3.82 %

Figure 608: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 609: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 805: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.448 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 1.7787 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1206 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.58565 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.9766 deg
Release Angle: 7.0072 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.5961 deg
Camber deflection: 16.6034 deg

Table 806: Controlpoints


1 0
0.76468 0.0062398
0.65485 -0.069462
0.39248 -0.069462
0.1979 -0.069462
0 -0.027797
0 0
0 0.028029
0.10516 0.10503
0.39595 0.10503
0.59676 0.10503
0.99597 0.00089362
1 0

Table 807: Base 64 representation:


RuZVsagZceBrMqA

Figure 610: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

207
Profile: e546 Table 812: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.951 3.673 ects
Information: Eppler E546 general aviation airfoil RMS curvature error: 42.84 41.5 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.5 -0.4 dcts
Cm error 53 56 mcts
Upper transition point -0.3 -0.45 %

Figure 611: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 612: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 809: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.2813 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 1.7993 % @0.27C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3341 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.47551 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.6246 deg
Release Angle: 6.3036 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.5922 deg
Camber deflection: 16.8957 deg

Table 810: Controlpoints


1 0
0.77506 -3.4303e-005
0.69327 -0.065893
0.45223 -0.065893
0.18129 -0.065893
0 -0.023973
0 0
0 0.035524
0.14189 0.098006
0.34386 0.098006
0.41669 0.098006
0.56212 0.098006
1 0

Table 811: Base 64 representation:


XlWHpXlscc uOpA

Figure 613: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

208
Profile: e548 Table 816: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.532 5.761 ects
Information: Eppler E548 general aviation airfoil RMS curvature error: 48.13 46.9 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.4 -0.6 dcts
Cm error 47 52 mcts
Upper transition point 0.21 0.63 %

Figure 614: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 615: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 813: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.4304 % @0.36C
Maximum Camber: 2.1083 % @0.27C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5067 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.66405 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.9135 deg
Release Angle: 5.4113 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.9252 deg
Camber deflection: 16.3365 deg

Table 814: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79784 0.001015
0.67995 -0.068205
0.45171 -0.068205
0.18958 -0.068205
0 -0.027735
0 0
0 0.035973
0.12609 0.10819
0.33428 0.10819
0.42562 0.10819
0.52562 0.092025
1 0

Table 815: Base 64 representation:


VnVJtalcas2oMoA

Figure 616: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

209
Profile: e550 Table 820: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.77 4.451 ects
Information: Eppler E550 general aviation airfoil RMS curvature error: 56.27 62.03 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.5 0.4 dcts
Cm error 49 60 mcts
Upper transition point -0.19 -0.33 %

Figure 617: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 618: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 817: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18.2171 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 2.2201 % @0.29C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6229 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.69196 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.5147 deg
Release Angle: 7.2681 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.4914 deg
Camber deflection: 18.7595 deg

Table 818: Controlpoints


1 0
0.78794 0.0092988
0.58415 -0.069831
0.38703 -0.069831
0.17268 -0.069831
0 -0.028224
0 0
0 0.037164
0.12766 0.11281
0.33977 0.11281
0.40638 0.11281
0.50115 0.10627
1 0

Table 819: Base 64 representation:


VnWGvaiZVe7gLrA

Figure 619: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

210
Profile: e552 Table 824: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.694 3.706 ects
Information: Eppler E552 general aviation airfoil RMS curvature error: 78.44 72.56 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.6 0.6 dcts
Cm error 47 55 mcts
Upper transition point -0.52 -0.79 %

Figure 620: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 621: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 821: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18.4691 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 2.5363 % @0.48C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6702 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.75124 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.27 deg
Release Angle: 8.7648 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.0333 deg
Camber deflection: 19.7981 deg

Table 822: Controlpoints


1 0
0.78808 0.017162
0.4877 -0.068208
0.3244 -0.068208
0.14103 -0.068208
0 -0.026577
0 0
0 0.037766
0.12809 0.11664
0.34506 0.11664
0.38718 0.11664
0.4907 0.11664
1 0

Table 823: Base 64 representation:


VnWExZjVPs aJtA

Figure 622: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

211
Profile: e554 Table 828: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.319 4.915 ects
Information: Eppler E554 general aviation airfoil RMS curvature error: 57.61 58.08 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.3 1.2 dcts
Cm error 0 20 mcts
Upper transition point 0.56 -0.03 %

Figure 623: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 624: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 825: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18.1123 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 2.5872 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2375 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.92597 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.3174 deg
Release Angle: 15.1684 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.7871 deg
Camber deflection: 24.9554 deg

Table 826: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79612 0.026876
0.5112 -0.067418
0.27395 -0.067418
0.17052 -0.067418
0 -0.032445
0 0
0 0.026353
0.084183 0.11496
0.3456 0.11496
0.48084 0.11496
0.96605 0.01429
1 0

Table 827: Base 64 representation:


PvWNwfYSVsIbR3A

Figure 625: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

212
Profile: e556 Table 832: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.828 4.575 ects
Information: Eppler E556 general aviation airfoil RMS curvature error: 53.58 52.96 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.7 1.9 dcts
Cm error 55 52 mcts
Upper transition point -1.88 -2.28 %

Figure 626: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 627: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 829: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.9319 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 3.1109 % @0.64C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2559 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.78115 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 24.4233 deg
Release Angle: 20.0535 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.7103 deg
Camber deflection: 28.7638 deg

Table 830: Controlpoints


1 0
0.76109 0.032904
0.47733 -0.06011
0.26719 -0.06011
0.14762 -0.06011
0 -0.027726
0 0
0 0.028299
0.095648 0.10134
0.36288 0.10134
0.60923 0.10134
0.97528 0.015607
1 0

Table 831: Base 64 representation:


SuXZqesRSaKsb A

Figure 628: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

213
Profile: e557 Table 836: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.931 5.374 ects
Information: Eppler E557 general aviation airfoil RMS curvature error: 50.91 52.47 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.2 0.4 dcts
Cm error 94 102 mcts
Upper transition point -2.17 -1.25 %

Figure 629: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 630: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 833: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.9636 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 3.4304 % @0.61C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4183 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.79037 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 23.5937 deg
Release Angle: 20.0535 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.0877 deg
Camber deflection: 30.1413 deg

Table 834: Controlpoints


1 0
0.73656 0.038228
0.47313 -0.055882
0.25863 -0.055882
0.13792 -0.055882
0 -0.026957
0 0
0 0.030874
0.10081 0.10655
0.3697 0.10655
0.61289 0.10655
0.96677 0.020644
1 0

Table 835: Base 64 representation:


TuYZsfeRTYMga A

Figure 631: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

214
Profile: e558 Table 840: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.718 6.984 ects
Information: Eppler E558 general aviation airfoil RMS curvature error: 42.42 42.79 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.8 -0.2 dcts
Cm error 6 -9 mcts
Upper transition point -1.45 0.17 %

Figure 632: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 633: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 837: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.0359 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 3.7619 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.1804 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.0054948 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 20.8099 deg
Release Angle: 15.9318 deg
Nose Incidence: 20.0484 deg
Camber deflection: 35.9802 deg

Table 838: Controlpoints


1 0
0.76041 0.023183
0.36115 -0.049946
0.2156 -0.049946
0.020816 -0.049946
0 -0.00087325
0 0
0 0.053396
0.13447 0.11346
0.30568 0.11346
0.54028 0.11346
0.9666 0.016532
1 0

Table 839: Base 64 representation:


ejUWvB5OMVJYX5A

Figure 634: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

215
Profile: e559 Table 844: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.886 3.421 ects
Information: Eppler E559 general aviation airfoil RMS curvature error: 49.49 49.5 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.1 2.2 dcts
Cm error 30 19 mcts
Upper transition point -2.6 -2.82 %

Figure 635: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 636: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 841: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.9745 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 4.2563 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.3014 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.70501 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 20.865 deg
Release Angle: 17.8429 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.3102 deg
Camber deflection: 32.1531 deg

Table 842: Controlpoints


1 0
0.73872 0.033981
0.37696 -0.048853
0.1669 -0.048853
0.066444 -0.048853
0 -0.017672
0 0
0 0.042585
0.1182 0.11694
0.31462 0.11694
0.55698 0.11694
0.95679 0.023245
1 0

Table 843: Base 64 representation:


XnUXxXmLQVNbX8A

Figure 637: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

216
Profile: e560 Table 848: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.21 5.966 ects
Information: Eppler E560 general aviation airfoil RMS curvature error: 77.65 74.39 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.8 0.3 dcts
Cm error 47 17 mcts
Upper transition point -3.11 -1.7 %

Figure 638: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 639: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 845: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.0397 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 4.7741 % @0.51C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.7093 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.246 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 20.7399 deg
Release Angle: 20.0535 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.917 deg
Camber deflection: 28.9706 deg

Table 846: Controlpoints


1 0
0.74068 0.04425
0.33429 -0.048215
0.1575 -0.048215
0.066904 -0.048215
0 -0.023574
0 0
0 0.035573
0.11105 0.1208
0.32322 0.1208
0.57217 0.1208
0.95075 0.028923
1 0

Table 847: Base 64 representation:


TpVYzfkKNVPZX A

Figure 640: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

217
Profile: e561 Table 852: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.689 4.437 ects
Information: Eppler E561 general aviation airfoil RMS curvature error: 50.75 50.08 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.3 -0.3 dcts
Cm error 28 18 mcts
Upper transition point -2.44 -1.28 %

Figure 641: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 642: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 849: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.876 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 5.0077 % @0.48C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.733 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.6084 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 21.8828 deg
Release Angle: 20.2228 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.596 deg
Camber deflection: 28.8188 deg

Table 850: Controlpoints


1 0
0.74005 0.043027
0.35499 -0.048507
0.15686 -0.048507
0.090717 -0.048507
0 -0.030972
0 0
0 0.035709
0.11037 0.12856
0.32087 0.12856
0.55927 0.12856
0.95905 0.024322
1 0

Table 851: Base 64 representation:


SpVW2obKPVMaY A

Figure 643: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

218
Profile: e562 Table 856: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.434 3.907 ects
Information: Eppler E562 general aviation airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.8 2.2 dcts
Cm error 24 37 mcts
Upper transition point -3.37 -5.38 %

Figure 644: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 645: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 853: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.0684 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 3.9515 % @0.54C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.128 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.27367 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 19.7247 deg
Release Angle: 18.8722 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.7028 deg
Camber deflection: 33.5751 deg

Table 854: Controlpoints


1 0
0.77594 0.035527
0.38253 -0.046297
0.21045 -0.046297
0.035851 -0.046297
0 -0.0080877
0 0
0 0.042581
0.12781 0.10822
0.31889 0.10822
0.5822 0.10822
0.9502 0.027301
1 0

Table 855: Base 64 representation:


ZlUZtL0NOUQXW9A

Figure 646: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

219
Profile: e580 Table 860: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.574 3.844 ects
Information: Eppler E580 general purpose airfoil RMS curvature error: 24.82 24.87 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.6 -2.4 dcts
Cm error -2 10 mcts
Upper transition point 0.74 -0.79 %

Figure 647: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 648: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 857: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.0665 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 4.2226 % @0.63C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6624 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0046 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.5065 deg
Release Angle: 16.2775 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.1401 deg
Camber deflection: 27.4176 deg

Table 858: Controlpoints


1 0
0.78021 0.04463
0.57832 -0.044941
0.30762 -0.044941
0.22237 -0.044941
0 -0.03337
0 0
0 0.032295
0.11508 0.11672
0.37462 0.11672
0.58931 0.11672
0.89218 0.045872
1 0

Table 859: Base 64 representation:


SrYWxvSUZTZgN7A

Figure 649: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

220
Profile: e583 Table 864: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.64 4.469 ects
Information: Eppler E583 sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 40.63 42.55 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 0 dcts
Cm error 13 9 mcts
Upper transition point -2.52 -2.76 %

Figure 650: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 651: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 861: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.4779 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 4.4734 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3466 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.6712 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.8713 deg
Release Angle: 11.4885 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.6728 deg
Camber deflection: 26.1614 deg

Table 862: Controlpoints


1 0
0.86235 0.015812
0.82544 -0.037738
0.38007 -0.037738
0.0038007 -0.037738
0 -0.0065072
0 0
0 0.030931
0.10657 0.12711
0.40991 0.12711
0.4843 0.12711
0.59559 0.11921
1 0

Table 863: Base 64 representation:


QuaI1L-YtQ7xLyA

Figure 652: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

221
Profile: e584 Table 868: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.147 5.21 ects
Information: Eppler E584 sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 51.4 51.56 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.1 1.9 dcts
Cm error 30 46 mcts
Upper transition point -4.69 -5.35 %

Figure 653: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 654: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 865: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.6148 % @0.41C
Maximum Camber: 4.5031 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4189 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.7557 deg
Release Angle: 11.0142 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.1387 deg
Camber deflection: 26.1528 deg

Table 866: Controlpoints


1 0
0.86417 0.01221
0.86417 -0.038083
0.43588 -0.038083
0 -0.038083
0 -0.0071507
0 0
0 0.03232
0.11043 0.1281
0.40923 0.1281
0.45549 0.1281
0.57815 0.1281
1 0

Table 867: Base 64 representation:


QuaF2M cwQ NxA

Figure 655: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

222
Profile: e587 Table 872: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.195 3.607 ects
Information: Eppler E587 sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 63.84 61.95 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.7 0.9 dcts
Cm error 15 24 mcts
Upper transition point -2.8 -3.45 %

Figure 656: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 657: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 869: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.6447 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 4.1893 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5798 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.46007 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 19.0401 deg
Release Angle: 20.0535 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.6221 deg
Camber deflection: 35.6757 deg

Table 870: Controlpoints


1 0
0.81431 0.034527
0.66002 -0.042818
0.36098 -0.042818
0.097876 -0.042818
0 -0.017326
0 0
0 0.035548
0.11998 0.12429
0.42639 0.12429
0.67106 0.12429
0.98871 0.006406
1 0

Table 871: Base 64 representation:


Stbb0auXeSDiV A

Figure 658: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

223
Profile: e591 Table 876: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.576 8.687 ects
Information: Eppler E591 airfoil RMS curvature error: 42.96 43.15 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.8 -1 dcts
Cm error 109 113 mcts
Upper transition point -0.72 -1.28 %

Figure 659: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 660: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 873: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.564 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 6.5886 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.6233 %C
Lower nose radius: 26.1472 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.8003 deg
Release Angle: 20.0535 deg
Nose Incidence: 21.8934 deg
Camber deflection: 41.947 deg

Table 874: Controlpoints


1 0
0.72045 0.065329
0.32632 -0.02935
0.13616 -0.02935
0.00048855 -0.02935
0 -0.0092283
0 0
0 0.041231
0.070378 0.13699
0.33475 0.13699
0.57091 0.13699
0.91541 0.043017
1 0

Table 875: Base 64 representation:


TyVX5U JONUbP A

Figure 661: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

224
Profile: e593 Table 880: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.083 4.346 ects
Information: Eppler E593 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 0.3 dcts
Cm error -33 -25 mcts
Upper transition point -1.14 -1.18 %

Figure 662: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 663: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 877: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.368 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 4.622 % @0.3C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.8067 %C
Lower nose radius: -2.0108 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.1089 deg
Release Angle: 2.2306 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.7377 deg
Camber deflection: 16.9683 deg

Table 878: Controlpoints


1 0
0.21169 -0.0044561
0.13373 -0.018727
0.083622 -0.018727
0.00083622 -0.018727
0 -0.00346
0 0
0 0.040125
0.13367 0.10277
0.28427 0.10277
0.45848 0.10277
0.57163 0.035858
1 0

Table 879: Base 64 representation:


ZhSQrM-FDIy5GjA

Figure 664: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

225
Profile: e598 Table 884: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.367 4.783 ects
Information: Eppler E598 airfoil RMS curvature error: 61.05 62.44 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.8 1.6 dcts
Cm error -42 -35 mcts
Upper transition point -2.03 -3.33 %

Figure 665: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 666: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 881: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.2256 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 4.4652 % @0.31C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6263 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.5067 deg
Release Angle: 2.2136 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.2692 deg
Camber deflection: 16.4828 deg

Table 882: Controlpoints


1 0
0.20039 -0.007533
0.11803 -0.019042
0.083493 -0.019042
0.00083493 -0.019042
0 -0.0034443
0 0
0 0.035141
0.1139 0.10046
0.28789 0.10046
0.50506 0.10046
0.70088 0.025996
1 0

Table 883: Base 64 representation:


WmSUqM-FCIm5GjA

Figure 667: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

226
Profile: e603 Table 888: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.321 8.665 ects
Information: Eppler E603 general purpose airfoil RMS curvature error: 55.94 59.91 %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN 2.6 dcts
Cm error NaN 26 mcts
Upper transition point NaN -0.76 %

Figure 668: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 669: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 885: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 19.0087 % @0.41C
Maximum Camber: 3.5427 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.0898 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.43129 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.4315 deg
Release Angle: 10.5002 deg
Nose Incidence: 20.9449 deg
Camber deflection: 31.4451 deg

Table 886: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80573 0.01968
0.7492 -0.059816
0.43299 -0.059816
0.13269 -0.059816
0 -0.019533
0 0
0 0.057993
0.16327 0.13041
0.40013 0.13041
0.51063 0.13041
0.60259 0.10809
1 0

Table 887: Base 64 representation:


claM3VrcjazxLwA

Figure 670: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

227
Profile: e604 Table 892: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.26 6.526 ects
Information: Eppler E604 sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 26.37 26.6 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2 2.9 dcts
Cm error 38 55 mcts
Upper transition point -1.51 -2.94 %

Figure 671: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 672: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 889: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18.7887 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 3.4243 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.2304 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.56113 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.0988 deg
Release Angle: 12.4441 deg
Nose Incidence: 16.2446 deg
Camber deflection: 28.6887 deg

Table 890: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80708 0.023327
0.68735 -0.060343
0.37322 -0.060343
0.14702 -0.060343
0 -0.023452
0 0
0 0.047155
0.14954 0.12781
0.41174 0.12781
0.49878 0.12781
0.63423 0.1188
1 0

Table 891: Base 64 representation:


YoaJ2ZmYga6mMzA

Figure 673: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

228
Profile: e625 Table 896: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.064 6.33 ects
Information: Eppler E625 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.2 1 dcts
Cm error -16 -18 mcts
Upper transition point -1.03 -0.83 %

Figure 674: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 675: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 893: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.1716 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 2.7905 % @0.2C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5724 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.612 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.2806 deg
Release Angle: -1.6607 deg
Nose Incidence: 21.3759 deg
Camber deflection: 19.7152 deg

Table 894: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79792 -0.036997
0.70674 -0.042988
0.55001 -0.042988
0.0055001 -0.042988
0 -0.013084
0 0
0 0.019649
0.048249 0.09291
0.24998 0.09291
0.48812 0.09291
0.70761 0.033839
1 0

Table 895: Base 64 representation:


OzQUnT-iWSk2TsA

Figure 676: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

229
Profile: e635 Table 900: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.119 4.774 ects
Information: Eppler E635 airfoil RMS curvature error: 64.9 66.66 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.7 -2.2 dcts
Cm error 15 5 mcts
Upper transition point 2.24 3.18 %

Figure 677: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 678: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 897: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.8624 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 2.7175 % @0.23C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.2521 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.42107 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.6113 deg
Release Angle: -4.0204 deg
Nose Incidence: 18.4469 deg
Camber deflection: 14.4265 deg

Table 898: Controlpoints


1 0
0.86204 -0.032689
0.6347 -0.036188
0.54352 -0.036188
0.43984 -0.036188
0 -0.029646
0 0
0 0.027523
0.073792 0.086159
0.26146 0.086159
0.41634 0.086159
0.72773 0.013515
1 0

Table 899: Base 64 representation:


UtRNkzMiNPe5SXA

Figure 679: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

230
Profile: e636 Table 904: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.687 4.619 ects
Information: Eppler E636 airfoil RMS curvature error: 53.9 53.08 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -20.4 -19.9 dcts
Cm error 103 116 mcts
Upper transition point 1.83 1.26 %

Figure 680: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 681: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 901: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.9793 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 3.1452 % @0.24C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1099 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.31109 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.958 deg
Release Angle: -3.0287 deg
Nose Incidence: 16.5742 deg
Camber deflection: 13.5455 deg

Table 902: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85338 -0.028521
0.63529 -0.032072
0.53565 -0.032072
0.48072 -0.032072
0 -0.030683
0 0
0 0.023275
0.073214 0.091054
0.269 0.091054
0.42519 0.091054
0.69568 0.026358
1 0

Table 903: Base 64 representation:


QuROm8HhOOh4SbA

Figure 682: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

231
Profile: e637 Table 908: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.485 4.851 ects
Information: Eppler E637 airfoil RMS curvature error: 93.07 Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 6.8 -7.7 dcts
Cm error -18 25 mcts
Upper transition point -1.55 2.36 %

Figure 683: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 684: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 905: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.2464 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 3.4698 % @0.26C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.86149 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.3568 deg
Release Angle: -0.82565 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.8494 deg
Camber deflection: 12.0237 deg

Table 906: Controlpoints


1 0
0.82506 -0.026157
0.62506 -0.027923
0.47367 -0.027923
0 -0.027923
0 -0.010997
0 0
0 0.020993
0.076732 0.095841
0.27618 0.095841
0.42826 0.095841
0.65092 0.041951
1 0

Table 907: Base 64 representation:


OtSNoZ eSMm7ReA

Figure 685: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

232
Profile: e638 Table 912: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.143 5.416 ects
Information: Eppler E638 airfoil RMS curvature error: 74.76 78.52 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.8 -0.7 dcts
Cm error 5 9 mcts
Upper transition point 2.22 1.86 %

Figure 686: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 687: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 909: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.4456 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 4.3711 % @0.27C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.7543 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.12687 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.251 deg
Release Angle: 1.8678 deg
Nose Incidence: 26.5125 deg
Camber deflection: 28.3803 deg

Table 910: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79066 -0.019264
0.69066 -0.020482
0.51853 -0.020482
0.47221 -0.020482
0 -0.018756
0 0
0 0.04591
0.11479 0.10585
0.28414 0.10585
0.41442 0.10585
0.59721 0.063747
1 0

Table 911: Base 64 representation:


clSMs6GgXJr7QiA

Figure 688: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

233
Profile: e639 Table 916: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.102 4.638 ects
Information: Eppler E639 airfoil RMS curvature error: 87.36 88.6 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.9 0.2 dcts
Cm error 15 9 mcts
Upper transition point 1.61 2.78 %

Figure 689: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 690: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 913: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.6396 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 4.7637 % @0.29C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.1622 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.2658 deg
Release Angle: 3.439 deg
Nose Incidence: 22.6124 deg
Camber deflection: 26.0514 deg

Table 914: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79019 -0.013545
0.70798 -0.016153
0.51037 -0.016153
0 -0.016153
0 -0.01006
0 0
0 0.039141
0.10629 0.11083
0.29167 0.11083
0.38737 0.11083
0.51059 0.091343
1 0

Table 915: Base 64 representation:


XoTJun gaH01QlA

Figure 691: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

234
Profile: e642 Table 920: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.473 5.723 ects
Information: Eppler E642 sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 75.88 73.39 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -5.2 -4.5 dcts
Cm error 7 16 mcts
Upper transition point -1.02 -1.58 %

Figure 692: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 693: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 917: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.0837 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 3.0308 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.78371 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.80989 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.1881 deg
Release Angle: 6.8265 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.7684 deg
Camber deflection: 13.5949 deg

Table 918: Controlpoints


1 0
0.86902 0.0051063
0.86769 -0.045131
0.40408 -0.045131
0.35719 -0.045131
0 -0.043416
0 0
0 0.024108
0.11124 0.10572
0.39424 0.10572
0.57749 0.10572
0.6273 0.075289
1 0

Table 919: Base 64 representation:


PtZTs9HaxT3-KqA

Figure 694: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

235
Profile: e654 Table 924: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.21 3.393 ects
Information: Eppler E654 sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 40.72 39.54 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 -0.2 dcts
Cm error 20 14 mcts
Upper transition point -1.73 -1.52 %

Figure 695: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 696: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 921: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.1649 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 4.9002 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.2756 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.8283 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.5786 deg
Release Angle: 13.0325 deg
Nose Incidence: 16.6443 deg
Camber deflection: 29.6769 deg

Table 922: Controlpoints


1 0
0.82128 0.029085
0.72128 -0.03973
0.26246 -0.03973
0.1307 -0.03973
0 -0.026865
0 0
0 0.044722
0.13184 0.13403
0.4167 0.13403
0.55286 0.13403
0.64546 0.10719
1 0

Table 923: Base 64 representation:


VrbP4qgRnRyoI0A

Figure 697: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

236
Profile: e655 Table 928: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.283 6.031 ects
Information: Eppler E655 sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 32.41 28.71 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.3 1.1 dcts
Cm error 36 61 mcts
Upper transition point -1.3 -1.67 %

Figure 698: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 699: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 925: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.3722 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 3.9397 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6311 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1655 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.2633 deg
Release Angle: 9.7926 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.141 deg
Camber deflection: 19.9336 deg

Table 926: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79703 0.016548
0.72419 -0.048647
0.32264 -0.048647
0.11519 -0.048647
0 -0.029917
0 0
0 0.036631
0.1234 0.12583
0.40804 0.12583
0.58128 0.12583
0.66885 0.088263
1 0

Table 927: Base 64 representation:


TsaT1moVlVyuLvA

Figure 700: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

237
Profile: e656 Table 932: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.191 3.762 ects
Information: Eppler E656 sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 31.85 30.9 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.6 -1.1 dcts
Cm error 10 -11 mcts
Upper transition point -1.04 -0.43 %

Figure 701: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 702: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 929: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.2437 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 4.8117 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.9021 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.80307 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.3901 deg
Release Angle: 12.106 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.0501 deg
Camber deflection: 27.1562 deg

Table 930: Controlpoints


1 0
0.87069 0.020275
0.75133 -0.034917
0.26961 -0.034917
0.20101 -0.034917
0 -0.033024
0 0
0 0.04149
0.13575 0.12897
0.41419 0.12897
0.58917 0.12897
0.6729 0.089492
1 0

Table 931: Base 64 representation:


VqbT28QRpPygHzA

Figure 703: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

238
Profile: e657 Table 936: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.708 5.665 ects
Information: Eppler E657 sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 33.44 34 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.6 -0.8 dcts
Cm error 10 -1 mcts
Upper transition point -0.59 -0.53 %

Figure 704: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 705: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 933: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.6331 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 4.6225 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6781 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.78706 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.9871 deg
Release Angle: 12.551 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.5844 deg
Camber deflection: 26.1354 deg

Table 934: Controlpoints


1 0
0.87669 0.020762
0.74974 -0.033999
0.26991 -0.033999
0.026991 -0.033999
0 -0.011901
0 0
0 0.039251
0.13771 0.12385
0.41891 0.12385
0.63674 0.12385
0.71517 0.07923
1 0

Table 935: Base 64 representation:


UqbY0W5RpPxgHzA

Figure 706: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

239
Profile: e662 Table 940: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.325 5.727 ects
Information: Eppler E662 sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 53.38 54.44 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.9 -1.7 dcts
Cm error 20 53 mcts
Upper transition point -2.15 -2.65 %

Figure 707: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 708: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 937: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.0057 % @0.41C
Maximum Camber: 4.1062 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3247 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.3244 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.4782 deg
Release Angle: 14.7445 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.6988 deg
Camber deflection: 25.4433 deg

Table 938: Controlpoints


1 0
0.86732 0.027007
0.83885 -0.03512
0.32061 -0.03512
0.0094046 -0.03512
0 -0.0091125
0 0
0 0.035585
0.14338 0.1157
0.42776 0.1157
0.65477 0.1157
0.74962 0.081276
1 0

Table 939: Base 64 representation:


UqbZwR9VwPt0H3A

Figure 709: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

240
Profile: e664 Table 944: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.554 7.651 ects
Information: Eppler E664 variable geometry sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 41.19 41.11 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.5 -0.9 dcts
Cm error 18 11 mcts
Upper transition point -0.88 -0.98 %

Figure 710: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 711: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 941: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.6073 % @0.42C
Maximum Camber: 2.6368 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.95706 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1129 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.6783 deg
Release Angle: 9.6388 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.1332 deg
Camber deflection: 13.772 deg

Table 942: Controlpoints


1 0
0.82954 0.014313
0.82139 -0.057003
0.44556 -0.057003
0.43357 -0.057003
0 -0.056424
0 0
0 0.029945
0.14054 0.10927
0.40688 0.10927
0.64027 0.10927
0.74027 0.067065
1 0

Table 943: Base 64 representation:


SpaZu-CsqYt8LvA

Figure 712: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

241
Profile: e668 Table 948: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.079 3.764 ects
Information: Eppler E668 sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 29.09 30.79 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.4 0.5 dcts
Cm error 35 31 mcts
Upper transition point -2.44 -1.86 %

Figure 713: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 714: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 945: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.9895 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 3.9109 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1934 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1478 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.122 deg
Release Angle: 12.7308 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.9479 deg
Camber deflection: 23.6787 deg

Table 946: Controlpoints


1 0
0.83791 0.021506
0.74848 -0.033065
0.27361 -0.033065
0.023512 -0.033065
0 -0.0090207
0 0
0 0.035625
0.14029 0.10836
0.42218 0.10836
0.68056 0.10836
0.76158 0.065454
1 0

Table 947: Base 64 representation:


VqbstR6SpOvoJyA

Figure 715: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

242
Profile: e682 Table 952: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.049 4.98 ects
Information: Eppler E682 sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 89.62 90.2 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 4.9 -4.7 dcts
Cm error -15 9 mcts
Upper transition point 2.23 -1.99 %

Figure 716: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 717: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 949: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.2931 % @0.42C
Maximum Camber: 2.9354 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.83032 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.83956 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.8593 deg
Release Angle: 7.7029 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.6696 deg
Camber deflection: 13.3725 deg

Table 950: Controlpoints


1 0
0.87116 0.0084972
0.85925 -0.047352
0.454 -0.047352
0.34671 -0.047352
0 -0.043763
0 0
0 0.027612
0.13773 0.10576
0.40324 0.10576
0.68507 0.10576
0.7539 0.050664
1 0

Table 951: Base 64 representation:


Rpaes6PsvUx6JsA

Figure 718: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

243
Profile: e694 Table 956: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.76 5.156 ects
Information: Eppler E694 sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 60.98 59.89 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -6.3 -6.8 dcts
Cm error -40 -55 mcts
Upper transition point 5.07 5.38 %

Figure 719: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 720: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 953: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.4424 % @0.43C
Maximum Camber: 4.8784 % @0.58C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.59763 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.4588 deg
Release Angle: 16.0492 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.7981 deg
Camber deflection: 20.8473 deg

Table 954: Controlpoints


1 0
0.84246 0.040215
0.80132 -0.034526
0.25315 -0.034526
0 -0.034526
0 -0.0074427
0 0
0 0.021946
0.12089 0.12399
0.49806 0.12399
0.78561 0.12399
0.97059 0.0094292
1 0

Table 955: Base 64 representation:


Lvgk0O QuPJyE5A

Figure 721: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

244
Profile: e715 Table 960: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.295 5.485 ects
Information: Eppler E715 tailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 54.14 54.52 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.1 1 dcts
Cm error -34 -11 mcts
Upper transition point -1 -1.26 %

Figure 722: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 723: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 957: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.0309 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 2.8042 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3862 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.62166 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.196 deg
Release Angle: 2.6048 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.1654 deg
Camber deflection: 11.7702 deg

Table 958: Controlpoints


1 0
0.5556 -0.0077045
0.46628 -0.050173
0.24853 -0.050173
0.087402 -0.050173
0 -0.019032
0 0
0 0.036085
0.14091 0.10154
0.33114 0.10154
0.52888 0.10154
0.66042 0.036908
1 0

Table 959: Base 64 representation:


XkVTqYoQTVt0IjA

Figure 724: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

245
Profile: e748 Table 964: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.784 5.561 ects
Information: Eppler E748 sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 38.75 40.14 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.3 2.6 dcts
Cm error 31 39 mcts
Upper transition point -2.14 -2.92 %

Figure 725: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 726: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 961: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 19.6781 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 4.5304 % @0.57C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.2442 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.6163 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.0649 deg
Release Angle: 18.7652 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.4413 deg
Camber deflection: 30.2065 deg

Table 962: Controlpoints


1 0
0.75076 0.049499
0.42175 -0.063665
0.24342 -0.063665
0.14681 -0.063665
0 -0.039773
0 0
0 0.040153
0.10776 0.13542
0.3154 0.13542
0.51605 0.13542
0.92096 0.03906
1 0

Table 963: Base 64 representation:


TpUT5nZQPbScR9A

Figure 727: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

246
Profile: e793 Table 968: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.346 5.464 ects
Information: N/AEppler E793 general purpose airfoil (gyroflug RMS curvature error: 30.69 31.18 %
speed canard canard) CD error 3.2 3.7 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 8 -9 mcts
Upper transition point -1.21 -0.63 %

Figure 729: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 728: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 965: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.6607 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 4.1351 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.6588 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.3026 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.9076 deg
Release Angle: 15.2339 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.5962 deg
Camber deflection: 29.8301 deg

Table 966: Controlpoints


1 0
0.78409 0.027583
0.38887 -0.043062
0.21354 -0.043062
0.21354 -0.043062
0 -0.04177
0 0
0 0.044352
0.11098 0.11633
0.30914 0.11633
0.55962 0.11633
0.96624 0.014462
1 0

Table 967: Base 64 representation:


YoUXx9AOOSIXS4A
Figure 730: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

247
Profile: e817 Table 972: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.542 3.082 ects
Information: Eppler E817 hydrofoil RMS curvature error: 17.93 18.13 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.3 -0.3 dcts
Cm error -2 -4 mcts
Upper transition point -0.01 0.22 %

Figure 731: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 732: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 969: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.035 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 2.8812 % @0.68C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.45755 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.27915 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.7895 deg
Release Angle: 12.6951 deg
Nose Incidence: 1.5537 deg
Camber deflection: 14.2489 deg

Table 970: Controlpoints


1 0
0.83328 0.028798
0.46246 -0.044482
0.23587 -0.044482
0.069868 -0.044482
0 -0.011403
0 0
0 0.023552
0.18185 0.073397
0.47424 0.073397
0.65317 0.073397
0.77119 0.063842
1 0

Table 971: Base 64 representation:


VmeWfQsPTT3UG0A

Figure 733: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

248
Profile: e836 Table 976: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.955 1.182 ects
Information: Eppler E836 hydrofoil RMS curvature error: 23.7 24.25 %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN 0.5 dcts
Cm error NaN 9 mcts
Upper transition point NaN -0.41 %

Figure 734: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 735: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 973: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.6396 % @0.43C
Maximum Camber: -1.0511e-006 % @0.67C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.37976 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.37976 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.4629 deg
Release Angle: -6.2193e-006 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -6.2193e-006 deg

Table 974: Controlpoints


1 0
0.82365 -0.016146
0.65633 -0.0632
0.42784 -0.0632
0.090605 -0.0632
0 -0.015146
0 0
0 0.015146
0.090605 0.0632
0.42784 0.0632
0.65633 0.0632
0.82365 0.016146
1 0

Table 975: Base 64 representation:


PxbabPxbabggMgA

Figure 736: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

249
Profile: e837 Table 980: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.225 5.268 ects
Information: Eppler E837 hydrofoil RMS curvature error: 19.14 19.8 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 -0.6 dcts
Cm error 5 4 mcts
Upper transition point 0.18 1.01 %

Figure 737: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 738: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 977: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.106 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 8.423e-007 % @0.92C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.75337 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.75337 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.1391 deg
Release Angle: 1.4002e-005 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 1.4002e-005 deg

Table 978: Controlpoints


1 0
0.75735 -0.023662
0.59753 -0.08053
0.36943 -0.08053
0.12886 -0.08053
0 -0.02544
0 0
0 0.02544
0.12886 0.08053
0.36943 0.08053
0.59753 0.08053
0.75734 0.023662
1 0

Table 979: Base 64 representation:


UpYXhUpYXhmmMgA

Figure 739: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

250
Profile: e838 Table 984: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.493 4.196 ects
Information: Eppler E838 hydrofoil RMS curvature error: 29.61 29.3 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.1 -0.4 dcts
Cm error 8 8 mcts
Upper transition point -1.09 -0.63 %

Figure 740: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 741: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 981: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18.3675 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: -3.1461e-005 % @0.79C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.96227 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.96227 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.5673 deg
Release Angle: -0.00017386 deg
Nose Incidence: -1.9372e-005 deg
Camber deflection: -0.00019323 deg

Table 982: Controlpoints


1 0
0.73439 -0.029248
0.63876 -0.09184
0.37177 -0.09184
0.19576 -0.09184
0 -0.035438
0 0
0 0.035438
0.19576 0.09184
0.37177 0.09184
0.63876 0.09184
0.73439 0.029246
1 0

Table 983: Base 64 representation:


ZeYbmZeYbmuuOgA

Figure 742: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

251
Profile: e851 Table 988: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.8 5.41 ects
Information: Eppler E851 propeller airfoil RMS curvature error: 26.03 25.47 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.1 -0.1 dcts
Cm error 17 4 mcts
Upper transition point -0.07 0.19 %

Figure 743: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 744: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 985: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.039 % @0.36C
Maximum Camber: 2.2669 % @0.65C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.39918 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.19014 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.461 deg
Release Angle: 9.0981 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.9353 deg
Camber deflection: 13.0334 deg

Table 986: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79096 0.015966
0.49906 -0.031421
0.29575 -0.031421
0.073223 -0.031421
0 -0.0096342
0 0
0 0.021483
0.17342 0.062231
0.4684 0.062231
0.54298 0.062231
0.74719 0.062231
1 0

Table 987: Base 64 representation:


WneJbUvTSN bLuA

Figure 745: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

252
Profile: e852 Table 992: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.602 3.637 ects
Information: Eppler E852 propeller airfoil RMS curvature error: 39.07 41.05 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.4 0.1 dcts
Cm error 9 11 mcts
Upper transition point -1.58 -1.15 %

Figure 746: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 747: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 989: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.0587 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 2.7449 % @0.59C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.49929 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.15367 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.3838 deg
Release Angle: 12.5543 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.862 deg
Camber deflection: 18.4162 deg

Table 990: Controlpoints


1 0
0.794 0.019336
0.48725 -0.03134
0.28915 -0.03134
0.042363 -0.03134
0 -0.0065879
0 0
0 0.022356
0.15015 0.073086
0.46796 0.073086
0.68283 0.073086
0.97163 0.010185
1 0

Table 991: Base 64 representation:


UqeafN2TSNJaQzA

Figure 748: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

253
Profile: e853 Table 996: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.466 2.577 ects
Information: Eppler E853 propeller airfoil RMS curvature error: 57.36 57.99 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.6 0.5 dcts
Cm error 3 10 mcts
Upper transition point -1.28 -1.16 %

Figure 749: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 750: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 993: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.7248 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 2.8635 % @0.58C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.44709 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.95534 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.2864 deg
Release Angle: 11.7462 deg
Nose Incidence: -0.15402 deg
Camber deflection: 11.5922 deg

Table 994: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79088 0.024068
0.48254 -0.035224
0.28146 -0.035224
0.080512 -0.035224
0 -0.014804
0 0
0 0.026487
0.16377 0.084498
0.41769 0.084498
0.63912 0.084498
0.96764 0.013405
1 0

Table 995: Base 64 representation:


UmbYjbtSSPKaS2A

Figure 751: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

254
Profile: e854 Table 1000: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.839 3.516 ects
Information: Eppler E854 propeller airfoil RMS curvature error: 43.33 44.67 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.6 0.1 dcts
Cm error 19 13 mcts
Upper transition point -2.23 -1.15 %

Figure 752: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 753: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 997: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.4837 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 3.1656 % @0.57C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.60085 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.7353 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.1236 deg
Release Angle: 12.6034 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.991 deg
Camber deflection: 16.5945 deg

Table 998: Controlpoints


1 0
0.77386 0.022207
0.48595 -0.039915
0.27571 -0.039915
0.08327 -0.039915
0 -0.016033
0 0
0 0.033237
0.16638 0.096416
0.36739 0.096416
0.59692 0.096416
0.95806 0.020142
1 0

Table 999: Base 64 representation:


WiYXoasSTRNcW4A

Figure 754: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

255
Profile: e856 Table 1004: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.275 4.723 ects
Information: Eppler E856 propeller airfoil RMS curvature error: 38.29 39.56 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 -0.3 dcts
Cm error 40 61 mcts
Upper transition point 0.4 0.19 %

Figure 755: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 756: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1001: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18.0511 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 4.1759 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3799 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.223 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 25.5728 deg
Release Angle: 16.8649 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.6367 deg
Camber deflection: 26.5017 deg

Table 1002: Controlpoints


1 0
0.73583 0.018837
0.46776 -0.053652
0.25834 -0.053652
0.14926 -0.053652
0 -0.034885
0 0
0 0.030916
0.1039 0.12957
0.36174 0.12957
0.50989 0.12957
0.93229 0.038545
1 0

Table 1003: Base 64 representation:


PtXP2pbRSXTgs6A

Figure 757: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

256
Profile: e857 Table 1008: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.908 6.74 ects
Information: Eppler E857 propeller airfoil RMS curvature error: 47.08 45.29 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.4 0.5 dcts
Cm error 105 93 mcts
Upper transition point -2.22 -2.58 %

Figure 758: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 759: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1005: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 20.3356 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 4.827 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.6165 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.5598 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 32.3019 deg
Release Angle: 19.9667 deg
Nose Incidence: 25.2762 deg
Camber deflection: 45.2429 deg

Table 1006: Controlpoints


1 0
0.71664 0.018899
0.46478 -0.056598
0.24865 -0.056598
0.08585 -0.056598
0 -0.018465
0 0
0 0.069606
0.15742 0.14826
0.31485 0.14826
0.51948 0.14826
0.95126 0.035563
1 0

Table 1007: Base 64 representation:


egUT-VpQSYPhj A

Figure 760: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

257
Profile: e874 Table 1012: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.849 6.555 ects
Information: Eppler E874 hydrofoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1 -9.1 dcts
Cm error 45 28 mcts
Upper transition point -5.06 14.84 %

Figure 761: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 762: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1009: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.8914 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 0.89093 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.2132 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.30403 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 57.2958 deg
Release Angle: 10.1855 deg
Nose Incidence: -2.2629 deg
Camber deflection: 7.9226 deg

Table 1010: Controlpoints


1 0
0.97627 -0.0079214
0.37151 -0.031686
0.20663 -0.031686
0.03144 -0.031686
0 -0.0079827
0 0
0 0.013909
0.1361 0.048088
0.28781 0.048088
0.46706 0.048088
0.99401 0.004822
1 0

Table 1011: Base 64 representation:


ThSQVQ1NNOGQ wA

Figure 763: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

258
Profile: e1098 Table 1016: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.635 6.588 ects
Information: Eppler E1098 general aviation airfoil RMS curvature error: 32.95 30.18 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 0 dcts
Cm error 23 59 mcts
Upper transition point -0.06 -0.64 %

Figure 764: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 765: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1013: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 19.027 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 3.6806 % @0.55C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4949 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.62768 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.2101 deg
Release Angle: 10.7745 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.3328 deg
Camber deflection: 22.1073 deg

Table 1014: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80159 0.021447
0.53405 -0.062616
0.36936 -0.062616
0.13161 -0.062616
0 -0.023468
0 0
0 0.039257
0.15464 0.12819
0.41054 0.12819
0.57369 0.12819
0.67369 0.089756
1 0

Table 1015: Base 64 representation:


UnaS2YoYRbwbKwA

Figure 766: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

259
Profile: e1200 Table 1020: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.534 4.366 ects
Information: Eppler E1200 general aviation airfoil RMS curvature error: 70.43 72.82 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.6 -1.3 dcts
Cm error 21 35 mcts
Upper transition point -1.38 -1.74 %

Figure 767: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 768: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1017: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.9249 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 3.5095 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.8003 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1965 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.6207 deg
Release Angle: 10.6589 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.1915 deg
Camber deflection: 23.8504 deg

Table 1018: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79749 0.018959
0.69155 -0.051331
0.32296 -0.051331
0.23862 -0.051331
0 -0.043628
0 0
0 0.027538
0.063185 0.11869
0.40767 0.11869
0.57888 0.11869
0.67813 0.092107
1 0

Table 1019: Base 64 representation:


P1aSy1RViWwpMwA

Figure 769: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

260
Profile: e1210 Table 1024: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.172 3.385 ects
Information: Eppler E1210 general aviation airfoil RMS curvature error: 46.9 43.88 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 3 2.4 dcts
Cm error 39 58 mcts
Upper transition point -5.12 -4.57 %

Figure 770: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 771: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1021: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.8942 % @0.22C
Maximum Camber: 5.183 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.6704 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.5563 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.1293 deg
Release Angle: 7.6243 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.4776 deg
Camber deflection: 23.1019 deg

Table 1022: Controlpoints


1 0
0.66596 0.014933
0.21259 -0.037761
0.090536 -0.037761
0.076592 -0.037761
0 -0.036129
0 0
0 0.046098
0.086845 0.12886
0.24911 0.12886
0.37717 0.12886
0.47151 0.11899
1 0

Table 1023: Base 64 representation:


XpQL28KGJQ6bLrA

Figure 772: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

261
Profile: e1211 Table 1028: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.245 9.174 ects
Information: Eppler E1211 general aviation airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.5 -0.2 dcts
Cm error 41 50 mcts
Upper transition point 2.37 1.24 %

Figure 773: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 774: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1025: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.8356 % @0.22C
Maximum Camber: 4.4099 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6281 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.402 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.2644 deg
Release Angle: 7.4949 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.1112 deg
Camber deflection: 20.6061 deg

Table 1026: Controlpoints


1 0
0.69006 0.015499
0.28028 -0.056159
0.12741 -0.056159
0.079956 -0.056159
0 -0.035782
0 0
0 0.01817
0.030418 0.13001
0.28774 0.13001
0.46956 0.13001
0.9947 0.0011398
1 0

Table 1027: Base 64 representation:


J4SQ2oYILYBcKrA

Figure 775: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

262
Profile: e1212 Table 1032: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.156 5.495 ects
Information: Eppler E1212 general aviation airfoil RMS curvature error: 39.76 39.44 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.5 -3.8 dcts
Cm error 13 -7 mcts
Upper transition point 4.26 5.68 %

Figure 776: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 777: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1029: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.6421 % @0.22C
Maximum Camber: 3.2327 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4407 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.8946 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.1182 deg
Release Angle: 5.0066 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.1445 deg
Camber deflection: 16.1511 deg

Table 1030: Controlpoints


1 0
0.71115 -0.0027854
0.2777 -0.06247
0.1791 -0.06247
0.051939 -0.06247
0 -0.025613
0 0
0 0.016457
0.028198 0.11756
0.27463 0.11756
0.40541 0.11756
0.5987 0.074852
1 0

Table 1031: Base 64 representation:


J4SMxasLIbqaMnA

Figure 778: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

263
Profile: e1212mod Table 1036: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 7.824 11.096 ects
Information: Eppler E1212 general aviation airfoil (as modified for RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
use as Quickie wing airfoil) CD error -0.6 -0.9 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 9 -7 mcts
Upper transition point -0.72 -1.06 %

Figure 780: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 779: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1033: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.7579 % @0.22C
Maximum Camber: 2.5911 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.35939 %C
Lower nose radius: 20.6027 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.1383 deg
Release Angle: 2.3515 deg
Nose Incidence: -17.2469 deg
Camber deflection: -14.8954 deg

Table 1034: Controlpoints


1 0
0.41171 -0.038225
0.29549 -0.069418
0.14956 -0.069418
0.0034898 -0.069418
0 -0.021894
0 0
0 0.010876
0.049366 0.11131
0.2507 0.11131
0.44954 0.11131
0.63016 0.05475
1 0

Table 1035: Base 64 representation:


GyQRuU-KLeq0OjA
Figure 781: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

264
Profile: e1213 Table 1040: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.291 7.438 ects
Information: Eppler E1213 general aviation airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.6 -3.5 dcts
Cm error 7 -11 mcts
Upper transition point 4.14 4.86 %

Figure 782: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 783: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1037: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.3463 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 2.0805 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: NaN %C
Lower nose radius: 2.3244 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.6486 deg
Release Angle: 1.4126 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.1419 deg
Camber deflection: 11.5545 deg

Table 1038: Controlpoints


1 0
0.59131 -0.031531
0.31085 -0.068915
0.19615 -0.068915
0.12554 -0.068915
0 -0.044106
0 0
0 0
0 0.10593
0.26177 0.10593
0.42272 0.10593
0.69047 0.039305
1 0

Table 1039: Base 64 representation:


A ROsoXNJshlNiA

Figure 784: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

265
Profile: e1214 Table 1044: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.536 4.675 ects
Information: Eppler E1214 general aviation airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.6 -2.5 dcts
Cm error 1 -20 mcts
Upper transition point 3.3 3.73 %

Figure 785: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 786: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1041: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 19.8279 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 2.142 % @0.32C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.041 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.9082 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.9828 deg
Release Angle: 1.7735 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.8824 deg
Camber deflection: 12.6559 deg

Table 1042: Controlpoints


1 0
0.56496 -0.043561
0.35149 -0.078574
0.23914 -0.078574
0.095552 -0.078574
0 -0.034865
0 0
0 0.025619
0.048235 0.1199
0.2617 0.1199
0.41555 0.1199
0.6381 0.059036
1 0

Table 1043: Base 64 representation:


OzRNyclPJhnqRiA

Figure 787: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

266
Profile: e1230 Table 1048: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.455 6.487 ects
Information: Eppler E1230 general aviation airfoil (Long-EZ and RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Defiant wing airfoil) CD error 0.5 1.1 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -37 -22 mcts
Upper transition point -0.2 -0.5 %

Figure 789: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 788: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1045: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.4633 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 3.5999 % @0.27C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.02 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.3072 %C
Lower nose radius: -9.0651 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 29.4743 deg
Release Angle: 11.3468 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.0769 deg
Camber deflection: 26.4237 deg

Table 1046: Controlpoints


1 -0.0001
0.64565 -0.022872
0.56728 -0.05162
0.3261 -0.05162
0 -0.05162
0 -0.0071678
0 0
0 0.036213
0.085255 0.12325
0.2819 0.12325
0.495 0.12325
0.9536 0.023104
1 0.0001

Table 1047: Base 64 representation:


TsST0J VXWMzhxA
Figure 790: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

267
Profile: e1233 Table 1052: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.009 4.483 ects
Information: Eppler E1233 general aviation airfoil RMS curvature error: 40.71 40.24 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.4 0.8 dcts
Cm error 37 28 mcts
Upper transition point -1.47 -2.09 %

Figure 791: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 792: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1049: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18.9382 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 4.3938 % @0.29C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.1897 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2658 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 25.4584 deg
Release Angle: 18.4608 deg
Nose Incidence: 19.5588 deg
Camber deflection: 38.0196 deg

Table 1050: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79806 0.020268
0.70811 -0.050927
0.32603 -0.050927
0.20325 -0.050927
0 -0.041415
0 0
0 0.046362
0.10108 0.1386
0.29843 0.1386
0.51263 0.1386
0.94058 0.035973
1 0

Table 1051: Base 64 representation:


VpTU6zYVjWRrc9A

Figure 793: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

268
Profile: ea61012 Table 1056: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.893 6.725 ects
Information: Eppler EA 6(-1)-012 airfoil RMS curvature error: 82.39 79.8 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.6 -0.1 dcts
Cm error -8 -7 mcts
Upper transition point -0.04 0.03 %

Figure 794: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 795: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1053: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: -0.022039 % @0.79C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.8182 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.8182 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.7785 deg
Release Angle: 0.0085428 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 0.0085428 deg

Table 1054: Controlpoints


1 0
0.75489 -0.014479
0.65489 -0.06
0.3 -0.06
0.297 -0.06
0 -0.06
0 0
0 0.06
0.297 0.06
0.3 0.06
0.6614 0.06
0.73591 0.01568
1 0

Table 1055: Base 64 representation:


BTga BTgaxsIgA

Figure 796: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

269
Profile: eh0009 Table 1060: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.591 2.028 ects
Information: John Yost EH 0.0/9.0 for tailless R/C aircraft RMS curvature error: 49.7 52.64 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.1 -1.1 dcts
Cm error 4 5 mcts
Upper transition point 2.07 1.76 %

Figure 797: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 798: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1057: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.9998 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 0.0001035 % @0.78C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.39093 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.39093 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.1397 deg
Release Angle: -0.0022309 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -0.0022309 deg

Table 1058: Controlpoints


1 0
0.853 -0.0091769
0.56137 -0.045
0.28711 -0.045
0.065485 -0.045
0 -0.013064
0 0
0 0.013064
0.065485 0.045
0.28711 0.045
0.56146 0.045
0.85345 0.009137
1 0

Table 1059: Base 64 representation:


TwSZTTwSZTVVIgA

Figure 799: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

270
Profile: eh1070 Table 1064: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.698 2.509 ects
Information: John Yost EH 1.0/7.0 for tailless R/C aircraft RMS curvature error: 41.06 40.93 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.4 0.5 dcts
Cm error -4 -17 mcts
Upper transition point 0.13 0.26 %

Figure 800: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 801: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1061: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.9849 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 1.0159 % @0.25C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.17121 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.27381 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.4728 deg
Release Angle: 0.13104 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.1089 deg
Camber deflection: 3.24 deg

Table 1062: Controlpoints


1 0
0.88434 -0.0052628
0.68221 -0.02551
0.37566 -0.02551
0.26248 -0.02551
0 -0.024745
0 0
0 0.0080414
0.056653 0.04487
0.28711 0.04487
0.47553 0.04487
0.79851 0.010092
1 0

Table 1063: Base 64 representation:


LySRT9TYfLZXGgA

Figure 802: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

271
Profile: eh1090 Table 1068: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.811 3.677 ects
Information: John Yost EH 1.0/9.0 for tailless R/C aircraft RMS curvature error: 34.09 31.52 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.5 -0.4 dcts
Cm error 2 6 mcts
Upper transition point 0.69 -0.09 %

Figure 803: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 804: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1065: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.9939 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 0.9944 % @0.26C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.30633 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.51515 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.6136 deg
Release Angle: 0.27741 deg
Nose Incidence: 2.0357 deg
Camber deflection: 2.3131 deg

Table 1066: Controlpoints


1 0
0.90055 -0.0052631
0.65957 -0.035392
0.34549 -0.035392
0.034567 -0.035392
0 -0.01125
0 0
0 0.01087
0.057855 0.054791
0.28711 0.054791
0.48872 0.054791
0.82026 0.011259
1 0

Table 1067: Base 64 representation:


NySSXU5WfPWTHgA

Figure 805: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

272
Profile: eh1590 Table 1072: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.964 4.015 ects
Information: John Yost EH 1.5/9.0 for tailless R/C aircraft RMS curvature error: 26.63 28.47 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.3 -0.9 dcts
Cm error 1 5 mcts
Upper transition point 1.36 -0.08 %

Figure 806: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 807: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1069: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.0117 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.4771 % @0.26C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.26588 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.54334 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.0031 deg
Release Angle: 0.23511 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.3812 deg
Camber deflection: 3.6164 deg

Table 1070: Controlpoints


1 0
0.89581 -0.0059463
0.6993 -0.030963
0.40631 -0.030963
0.18249 -0.030963
0 -0.02571
0 0
0 0.0099575
0.055937 0.05972
0.28711 0.05972
0.46759 0.05972
0.78416 0.014096
1 0

Table 1071: Base 64 representation:


LzSQZ0iagNaWIgA

Figure 808: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

273
Profile: eh2010 Table 1076: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.697 3.259 ects
Information: John Yost EH 2.0/10 for tailless R/C aircraft RMS curvature error: 37.11 37.84 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.5 -1.1 dcts
Cm error 7 11 mcts
Upper transition point 1.87 1.09 %

Figure 809: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 810: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1073: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.1387 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.9546 % @0.26C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.28625 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.69696 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.6609 deg
Release Angle: -0.089529 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.7351 deg
Camber deflection: 4.6455 deg

Table 1074: Controlpoints


1 0
0.82176 -0.013778
0.70151 -0.032158
0.43733 -0.032158
0.074452 -0.032158
0 -0.018599
0 0
0 0.010114
0.053605 0.070114
0.28711 0.070114
0.45872 0.070114
0.76637 0.017324
1 0

Table 1075: Base 64 representation:


JzSPek0ceOclKgA

Figure 811: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

274
Profile: eh2012 Table 1080: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.287 4.829 ects
Information: John Yost EH 2.0/12 for tailless R/C aircraft RMS curvature error: 40.11 40.84 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.7 -1.3 dcts
Cm error 0 24 mcts
Upper transition point 1.86 0.92 %

Figure 812: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 813: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1077: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.0145 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.9693 % @0.26C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.47346 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.96598 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.1858 deg
Release Angle: 0.35049 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.5071 deg
Camber deflection: 4.8576 deg

Table 1078: Controlpoints


1 0
0.89887 -0.007502
0.70058 -0.04128
0.40631 -0.04128
0.18223 -0.04128
0 -0.034257
0 0
0 0.013291
0.055963 0.07962
0.28711 0.07962
0.46784 0.07962
0.78601 0.018509
1 0

Table 1079: Base 64 representation:


LzSQh0iagSaWKgA

Figure 814: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

275
Profile: eiffel385 Table 1084: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.512 8.359 ects
Information: Eiffel 385 (S.T. Ae) airfoil RMS curvature error: 58.38 59.27 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.6 -3.1 dcts
Cm error -11 5 mcts
Upper transition point -1.2 -1.35 %

Figure 815: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 816: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1081: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.3346 % @0.21C
Maximum Camber: 4.4832 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0082 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.3808 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.3951 deg
Release Angle: 8.6073 deg
Nose Incidence: 2.5929 deg
Camber deflection: 11.2002 deg

Table 1082: Controlpoints


1 0
0.35943 0.010172
0.25999 -0.043726
0.15248 -0.043726
0.12046 -0.043726
0 -0.043726
0 0
0 0.016481
0.040413 0.104
0.39512 0.104
0.48506 0.104
0.79287 0.060588
1 0

Table 1083: Base 64 representation:


K4ZKr NKITk2RtA

Figure 817: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

276
Profile: eiffel428 Table 1088: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.231 6.604 ects
Information: Eiffel 428 (Bleriot) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -21.7 -19 dcts
Cm error -56 -88 mcts
Upper transition point 45.4 46.67 %

Figure 818: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 819: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1085: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.4051 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 3.9194 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6815 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2029 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.1696 deg
Release Angle: 5.3715 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.1368 deg
Camber deflection: 14.5083 deg

Table 1086: Controlpoints


1 0
0.34009 0.0096448
0.24009 -0.014623
0.025222 -0.014623
0.025222 -0.014623
0 -0.01243
0 0
0 0.019351
0.1114 0.08599
0.39876 0.08599
0.57528 0.08599
0.98532 0.0019208
1 0

Table 1087: Base 64 representation:


OtaTk1ACOGC3HmA

Figure 820: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

277
Profile: eppler793 Table 1092: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.873 2.83 ects
Information: Eppler E793 general purpose airfoil (gyroflug speed RMS curvature error: 29.78 30.25 %
canard canard) CD error 0.1 0.6 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 10 -14 mcts
Upper transition point -1.96 -0.64 %

Figure 822: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 821: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1089: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.675 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 4.0212 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.9085 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2467 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.2668 deg
Release Angle: 15.2372 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.4383 deg
Camber deflection: 26.6756 deg

Table 1090: Controlpoints


1 0
0.78214 0.027151
0.38684 -0.04463
0.21372 -0.04463
0.071076 -0.04463
0 -0.024306
0 0
0 0.035331
0.09811 0.11493
0.30899 0.11493
0.56413 0.11493
0.96865 0.013547
1 0

Table 1091: Base 64 representation:


UrUYwiqOOTIXS4A
Figure 823: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

278
Profile: falcon Table 1096: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.6 7.774 ects
Information: Falcon airfoil used on the Carl Goldberg Falcon 56 RMS curvature error: 98.32 Inf %
Mk II R/C powerplane CD error -3.3 -3.7 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -92 -97 mcts
Upper transition point 4.58 5.93 %

Figure 825: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 824: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1093: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.6811 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 1.5626 % @0.25C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.2891 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.2104 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.252 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 30.9397 deg
Release Angle: 6.3805 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.4081 deg
Camber deflection: 10.7885 deg

Table 1094: Controlpoints


1 -0.0014455
0.92306 -0.013755
0.63286 -0.053429
0.34201 -0.053429
0.34201 -0.053429
0 -0.053429
0 0
0 0.0056248
0.022556 0.083679
0.30614 0.083679
0.52357 0.083679
0.98961 0.0056107
1 0.0014455

Table 1095: Base 64 representation:


E6UUj AWcXDPipH
Figure 826: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

279
Profile: fg2 Table 1100: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.125 9.097 ects
Information: Fage & Collins 2 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.3 NaN dcts
Cm error 72 NaN mcts
Upper transition point -6.69 NaN %

Figure 827: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 828: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1097: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.1903 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 3.3339 % @0.31C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.19911 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.79056 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 21.7231 deg
Release Angle: 5.0005 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.5988 deg
Camber deflection: 13.5993 deg

Table 1098: Controlpoints


1 0
0.92737 -0.0074555
0.012527 -0.0082587
0.012527 -0.0082587
0.010022 -0.0082587
0 -0.0072677
0 0
0 0.0075691
0.043159 0.07429
0.29976 0.07429
0.52254 0.07429
0.90544 0.026867
1 0

Table 1099: Base 64 representation:


H2TUg3NBAEX5YnA

Figure 829: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

280
Profile: fg3 Table 1104: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.02 8.797 ects
Information: Fage & Collins 3 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.6 -3.7 dcts
Cm error -69 -40 mcts
Upper transition point 7.02 5.94 %

Figure 830: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 831: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1101: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.1823 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 4.2728 % @0.3C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.062179 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.79494 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 22.0368 deg
Release Angle: 4.1604 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.0746 deg
Camber deflection: 14.2351 deg

Table 1102: Controlpoints


1 0
0.95005 -0.0060078
0.93982 -0.0082775
0.012515 -0.0082775
0.010012 -0.0082775
0 -0.0072842
0 0
0 0.0043705
0.046081 0.09364
0.29983 0.09364
0.66525 0.09364
0.93994 0.016294
1 0

Table 1103: Base 64 representation:


D1Tgn3NB7EL0ZmA

Figure 832: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

281
Profile: fg4 Table 1108: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.725 9.556 ects
Information: Fage & Collins 4 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 42.8 -24.7 dcts
Cm error -371 -388 mcts
Upper transition point 35.02 35.05 %

Figure 833: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 834: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1105: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.7579 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 4.7055 % @0.32C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.4066 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.2038 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 55.7064 deg
Release Angle: 14.3048 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.9488 deg
Camber deflection: 30.2536 deg

Table 1106: Controlpoints


1 0
0.95213 -0.011536
0.025248 -0.019686
0.025248 -0.019686
0.020427 -0.019686
0 -0.017324
0 0
0 0.046071
0.093459 0.11074
0.29864 0.11074
0.62827 0.11074
0.97621 0.021538
1 0

Table 1107: Base 64 representation:


brTeu3MCAIMl92A

Figure 835: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

282
Profile: fx2 Table 1112: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.215 6.899 ects
Information: Wortmann FX 2 airfoil RMS curvature error: 74.1 75.21 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.7 -2.7 dcts
Cm error 46 47 mcts
Upper transition point -0.87 -0.89 %

Figure 836: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 837: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1109: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 20.5061 % @0.46C
Maximum Camber: 3.7385 % @0.71C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5549 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.89292 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.995 deg
Release Angle: 11.6761 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.4578 deg
Camber deflection: 19.134 deg

Table 1110: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79549 0.018535
0.66207 -0.07585
0.43474 -0.07585
0.16685 -0.07585
0 -0.031516
0 0
0 0.047376
0.21652 0.13015
0.5 0.13015
0.76658 0.13015
0.78608 0.070224
1 0

Table 1111: Base 64 representation:


Xjgh3bmcag6mPyA

Figure 838: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

283
Profile: fx08s176 Table 1116: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.032 6.001 ects
Information: Wortmann FX 08-S-176 airfoil RMS curvature error: 69.16 70.37 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.2 1.4 dcts
Cm error 92 92 mcts
Upper transition point -2.02 -2.06 %

Figure 839: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 840: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1113: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.6259 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 5.6556 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0246 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.352 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.2203 deg
Release Angle: 8.9896 deg
Nose Incidence: 16.7193 deg
Camber deflection: 25.7089 deg

Table 1114: Controlpoints


1 0
0.8581 0.012114
0.84911 -0.03245
0.5 -0.03245
0.35042 -0.03245
0 -0.028676
0 0
0 0.03042
0.13548 0.14462
0.37059 0.14462
0.51294 0.14462
0.55989 0.10241
1 0

Table 1115: Base 64 representation:


NoYO94TgsO57JuA

Figure 841: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

284
Profile: fx66a175 Table 1120: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.787 6.268 ects
Information: Wortmann FX 66-17A-175 airfoil RMS curvature error: 43.49 46.2 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.1 -0.2 dcts
Cm error 43 30 mcts
Upper transition point -0.77 0.04 %

Figure 842: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 843: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1117: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.5293 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 4.1479 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0901 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.36939 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.7942 deg
Release Angle: 9.0065 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.7673 deg
Camber deflection: 21.7737 deg

Table 1118: Controlpoints


1 0
0.60081 0.012815
0.48785 -0.04683
0.30866 -0.04683
0.095945 -0.04683
0 -0.014729
0 0
0 0.028585
0.14053 0.12889
0.33928 0.12889
0.40879 0.12889
0.5088 0.11407
1 0

Table 1119: Base 64 representation:


OkWH2UrURU4xNrA

Figure 844: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

285
Profile: fx78k140 Table 1124: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.576 5.576 ects
Information: Wortmann FX 78-K-140/20 airfoil for use with flaps RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
(K) CD error -0.2 0.4 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 43 31 mcts
Upper transition point -1.51 -1.22 %

Figure 846: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 845: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1121: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.0943 % @0.43C
Maximum Camber: 4.3794 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.58512 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.47352 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.5986 deg
Release Angle: -1.1627 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.2143 deg
Camber deflection: 7.0516 deg

Table 1122: Controlpoints


1 0
0.76435 -0.02669
0.52748 -0.02669
0.40245 -0.02669
0.17215 -0.02669
0 -0.023312
0 0
0 0.024926
0.15928 0.11427
0.43474 0.11427
0.6908 0.11427
0.7908 0.01513
1 0

Table 1123: Base 64 representation:


Oocsw3kaNLq MeA
Figure 847: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

286
Profile: fx83w160 Table 1128: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.216 5.018 ects
Information: Wortmann FX 83-W-160 airfoil for use on wind tur- RMS curvature error: 33.95 33.07 %
bines (W) CD error -1 -1.4 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 13 3 mcts
Upper transition point 0.57 0.64 %

Figure 849: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 848: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1125: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.0651 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 3.8308 % @0.63C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.4454 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.0512 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.1497 deg
Release Angle: 12.8508 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.0952 deg
Camber deflection: 17.946 deg

Table 1126: Controlpoints


1 0
0.73482 0.022156
0.53705 -0.05559
0.25 -0.05559
0.175 -0.05559
0 -0.049475
0 0
0 0.059161
0.21469 0.11062
0.43474 0.11062
0.66596 0.11062
0.87375 0.048275
1 0

Table 1127: Base 64 representation:


hgcau4TQYYckS0A
Figure 850: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

287
Profile: fx83w227 Table 1132: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.021 3.241 ects
Information: Wortmann FX 83-W-227 airfoil for use on wind tur- RMS curvature error: 53.12 56.89 %
bines (W) CD error -0.8 -1.7 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 61 42 mcts
Upper transition point 0.5 1.08 %

Figure 852: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 851: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1129: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 22.6366 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 3.4419 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.3466 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.6212 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 28.175 deg
Release Angle: 6.5453 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.8599 deg
Camber deflection: 10.4052 deg

Table 1130: Controlpoints


1 0
0.70151 -0.03952
0.55432 -0.07979
0.30866 -0.07979
0.025706 -0.07979
0 -0.021194
0 0
0 0.042965
0.118 0.1472
0.37059 0.1472
0.55955 0.1472
0.79991 0.075341
1 0

Table 1131: Base 64 representation:


TrYT-R6UXhgqfqA
Figure 853: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

288
Profile: fx84w097 Table 1136: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.356 4.413 ects
Information: Wortmann FX 84-W-097 airfoil for use on wind tur- RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
bines (W) CD error 0.3 NaN dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -15 NaN mcts
Upper transition point -0.74 NaN %

Figure 855: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 854: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1133: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.8081 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 2.782 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.76206 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.79182 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0.49482 deg
Release Angle: 4.8726 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.4999 deg
Camber deflection: 9.3725 deg

Table 1134: Controlpoints


1 0
0.9496 0.0040778
0.53802 -0.02298
0.17033 -0.02298
0.08073 -0.02298
0 -0.020644
0 0
0 0.027248
0.14614 0.07659
0.33928 0.07659
0.60639 0.07659
0.81271 0.016781
1 0

Table 1135: Base 64 representation:


XjWag4hLcKeHBnA
Figure 856: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

289
Profile: fx84w127 Table 1140: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.75 4.324 ects
Information: Wortmann FX 84-W-127 airfoil for use on wind tur- RMS curvature error: 14.1 16.19 %
bines (W) CD error 0 -0.3 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -5 -23 mcts
Upper transition point -0.11 0.84 %

Figure 858: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 857: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1137: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.8028 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 3.7217 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1293 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1598 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.8886 deg
Release Angle: 5.8742 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.8469 deg
Camber deflection: 11.721 deg

Table 1138: Controlpoints


1 0
0.89811 0.0078936
0.59627 -0.02916
0.19562 -0.02916
0.092572 -0.02916
0 -0.026754
0 0
0 0.033781
0.15158 0.10084
0.37059 0.10084
0.63129 0.10084
0.85509 0.018611
1 0

Table 1139: Base 64 representation:


VlYbq6hNgMZQDpA
Figure 859: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

290
Profile: fx84w140 Table 1144: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.028 4.066 ects
Information: Wortmann FX 84-W-140 airfoil for use on wind tur- RMS curvature error: 15.1 15.32 %
bines (W) CD error -0.1 -0.3 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -5 -16 mcts
Upper transition point -0.1 0.38 %

Figure 861: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 860: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1141: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.137 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 4.1826 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3888 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.3319 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.5071 deg
Release Angle: 7.0244 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.8365 deg
Camber deflection: 13.8608 deg

Table 1142: Controlpoints


1 0
0.88002 0.010013
0.62575 -0.0313
0.19562 -0.0313
0.084843 -0.0313
0 -0.027447
0 0
0 0.039258
0.16646 0.1121
0.37059 0.1121
0.64603 0.1121
0.84239 0.025747
1 0

Table 1143: Base 64 representation:


WiYcv3jNhNcVFqA
Figure 862: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

291
Profile: fx84w150 Table 1148: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.912 2.745 ects
Information: Wortmann FX 84-W-150 airfoil for use on wind tur- RMS curvature error: 13.79 13.52 %
bines (W) CD error -0.1 -0.2 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -4 -24 mcts
Upper transition point -0.19 0.62 %

Figure 864: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 863: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1145: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.0347 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 4.1854 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5722 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.5098 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.0066 deg
Release Angle: 6.8907 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.8611 deg
Camber deflection: 13.7518 deg

Table 1146: Controlpoints


1 0
0.8751 0.0095826
0.63663 -0.035409
0.22226 -0.035409
0.097096 -0.035409
0 -0.031262
0 0
0 0.041672
0.16568 0.11663
0.37044 0.11663
0.64568 0.11663
0.84501 0.025642
1 0

Table 1147: Base 64 representation:


XiYcx4jOhPcWGqA
Figure 865: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

292
Profile: fx84w175 Table 1152: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.081 2.237 ects
Information: Wortmann FX 84-W-175 airfoil for use on wind tur- RMS curvature error: 15.7 15.78 %
bines (W) CD error 0.1 -0.1 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -3 -22 mcts
Upper transition point -0.26 0.77 %

Figure 867: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 866: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1149: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.6521 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 4.3429 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.126 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.2464 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.1985 deg
Release Angle: 7.5827 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.0916 deg
Camber deflection: 13.6743 deg

Table 1150: Controlpoints


1 0
0.86672 0.010451
0.63809 -0.04694
0.25 -0.04694
0.095618 -0.04694
0 -0.037842
0 0
0 0.048626
0.16683 0.13114
0.37059 0.13114
0.65235 0.13114
0.84394 0.029437
1 0

Table 1151: Base 64 representation:


YiYs3znQgUsYHrA
Figure 868: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

293
Profile: fx84w218 Table 1156: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.041 3.507 ects
Information: Wortmann FX 84-W-218 airfoil for use on wind tur- RMS curvature error: 16.41 18.63 %
bines (W) CD error -0.5 -0.8 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -1 1 mcts
Upper transition point 0.91 1.36 %

Figure 870: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 869: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1153: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 21.9295 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 3.2472 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.4774 %C
Lower nose radius: 4.062 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.142 deg
Release Angle: 4.2946 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.6545 deg
Camber deflection: 7.9491 deg

Table 1154: Controlpoints


1 0
0.86875 0.0039496
0.61464 -0.07945
0.27886 -0.07945
0.22387 -0.07945
0 -0.077861
0 0
0 0.053125
0.12174 0.14121
0.37059 0.14121
0.62008 0.14121
0.87784 0.014709
1 0

Table 1155: Base 64 representation:


YqYZ7-NSehVWGmA
Figure 871: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

294
Profile: fx05188 Table 1160: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.77 7.204 ects
Information: Wortmann FX 05-188 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.8 -0.9 dcts
Cm error 82 94 mcts
Upper transition point -2.79 -2.82 %

Figure 872: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 873: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1157: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18.8134 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 2.652 % @0.52C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6557 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1612 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.9138 deg
Release Angle: 11.7544 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.1987 deg
Camber deflection: 18.9531 deg

Table 1158: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79808 0.02765
0.70014 -0.0695
0.37059 -0.0695
0.21418 -0.0695
0 -0.040365
0 0
0 0.042793
0.1659 0.11934
0.43474 0.11934
0.57148 0.11934
0.68966 0.0873
1 0

Table 1159: Base 64 representation:


XncPykbYhetqJyA

Figure 874: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

295
Profile: fx05191 Table 1164: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.88 7.2 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: 44.55 44.89 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.7 -2.9 dcts
Cm error 90 93 mcts
Upper transition point 1 1.45 %

Figure 875: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 876: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1161: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 19.1131 % @0.41C
Maximum Camber: 2.6191 % @0.53C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6681 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1359 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.3751 deg
Release Angle: 11.357 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.2674 deg
Camber deflection: 18.6245 deg

Table 1162: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80433 0.021151
0.74223 -0.07083
0.37059 -0.07083
0.24656 -0.07083
0 -0.043211
0 0
0 0.045378
0.18517 0.12091
0.43474 0.12091
0.64558 0.12091
0.8136 0.055373
1 0

Table 1163: Base 64 representation:


YkcYzmVYlehwMxA

Figure 877: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

296
Profile: fx60100 Table 1168: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.725 4.21 ects
Information: Wortmann FX 60-100 airfoil RMS curvature error: 83.19 84.02 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -7.4 -10 dcts
Cm error 5 1 mcts
Upper transition point 14.51 14.87 %

Figure 878: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 879: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1165: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9129 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 3.563 % @0.56C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4835 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.19502 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.5018 deg
Release Angle: 9.185 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.0321 deg
Camber deflection: 24.2171 deg

Table 1166: Controlpoints


1 0
0.69471 0.042547
0.46866 -0.02503
0.17033 -0.02503
0.060987 -0.02503
0 -0.0089046
0 0
0 0.032622
0.1076 0.07898
0.37059 0.07898
0.64801 0.07898
0.93926 0.011188
1 0

Table 1167: Base 64 representation:


asYchXoLXLLkDuA

Figure 880: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

297
Profile: fx60100sm Table 1172: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.341 3.441 ects
Information: Wortmann FX 60-100 airfoil (smoothed) RMS curvature error: 36.06 40.04 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.5 -2.1 dcts
Cm error 2 0 mcts
Upper transition point -0.82 0.22 %

Figure 881: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 882: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1169: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9666 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 3.4915 % @0.56C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.9876 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.44583 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 1.9441 deg
Release Angle: 9.4462 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.2841 deg
Camber deflection: 19.7304 deg

Table 1170: Controlpoints


1 0
0.72145 0.041501
0.42251 -0.026322
0.19566 -0.026322
0.074937 -0.026322
0 -0.014924
0 0
0 0.023355
0.082845 0.077906
0.37048 0.077906
0.65119 0.077906
0.93824 0.011355
1 0

Table 1171: Base 64 representation:


TxYsgjmNSLLfCuA

Figure 883: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

298
Profile: fx60126 Table 1176: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.994 2.426 ects
Information: Wortmann FX 60-126 airfoil RMS curvature error: 97.16 87.78 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -8.6 -8.4 dcts
Cm error 0 0 mcts
Upper transition point 7.73 8.12 %

Figure 884: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 885: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1173: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.6182 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 3.5665 % @0.56C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.199 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.19488 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.2762 deg
Release Angle: 9.6214 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.2039 deg
Camber deflection: 24.8253 deg

Table 1174: Controlpoints


1 0
0.7228 0.038876
0.43664 -0.03751
0.22221 -0.03751
0.01966 -0.03751
0 -0.0050541
0 0
0 0.042885
0.12545 0.0916
0.33928 0.0916
0.6124 0.0916
0.88488 0.022918
1 0

Table 1175: Base 64 representation:


enWamJ5OSQTfEvA

Figure 886: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

299
Profile: fx60157 Table 1180: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.047 5.745 ects
Information: Wortmann FX 60-157 airfoil RMS curvature error: 63.74 64.12 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -28.2 -29.4 dcts
Cm error -88 -72 mcts
Upper transition point 24.72 25.18 %

Figure 887: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 888: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1177: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.6449 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 2.6422 % @0.75C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.3582 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.51979 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.6382 deg
Release Angle: 16.2517 deg
Nose Incidence: 16.4923 deg
Camber deflection: 32.744 deg

Table 1178: Controlpoints


1 0
0.83795 0.034246
0.73795 -0.05537
0.33933 -0.05537
0.17384 -0.05537
0 -0.024544
0 0
0 0.041158
0.10775 0.10151
0.40243 0.10151
0.54351 0.10151
0.77259 0.085344
1 0

Table 1179: Base 64 representation:


auaPqcfWmY1nK5A

Figure 889: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

300
Profile: fx60160 Table 1184: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.44 6.327 ects
Information: Wortmann FX 60-160 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -8.9 -8.7 dcts
Cm error -19 -29 mcts
Upper transition point -1.16 -0.06 %

Figure 890: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 891: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1181: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.5934 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 3.0886 % @0.6C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3853 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.91262 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.0002 deg
Release Angle: 10.3537 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.7988 deg
Camber deflection: 18.1526 deg

Table 1182: Controlpoints


1 0
0.71257 0.019361
0.66062 -0.05
0.3 -0.05
0.264 -0.05
0 -0.040078
0 0
0 0.039807
0.17158 0.10725
0.4 0.10725
0.61623 0.10725
0.87448 0.038024
1 0

Table 1183: Base 64 representation:


YkaXtyITgVX1PwA

Figure 892: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

301
Profile: fx60177 Table 1188: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.711 5.867 ects
Information: Wortmann FX 60-177 airfoil RMS curvature error: 35.9 37.61 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.4 -4.5 dcts
Cm error 45 51 mcts
Upper transition point 1.73 2.2 %

Figure 893: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 894: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1185: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.7118 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 2.6853 % @0.79C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.4124 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.31225 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0 deg
Release Angle: 11.8416 deg
Nose Incidence: 21.5095 deg
Camber deflection: 33.3511 deg

Table 1186: Controlpoints


1 0
0.83055 0.035529
0.73985 -0.06663
0.37056 -0.06663
0.1154 -0.06663
0 -0.015499
0 0
0 0.049479
0.10762 0.11062
0.40243 0.11062
0.76683 0.11062
0.99767 0.00048888
1 0

Table 1187: Base 64 representation:


suamuPrYlcBpAyA

Figure 895: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

302
Profile: fx61140 Table 1192: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.418 5.996 ects
Information: Wortmann FX 61-140 airfoil RMS curvature error: 20.76 20.46 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.1 1 dcts
Cm error 87 70 mcts
Upper transition point -1.28 -0.27 %

Figure 896: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 897: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1189: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.9829 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 2.4525 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.88241 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.27124 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 18.3149 deg
Release Angle: 20.0535 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.0133 deg
Camber deflection: 32.0669 deg

Table 1190: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79833 0.038822
0.68279 -0.04539
0.33928 -0.04539
0.13509 -0.04539
0 -0.01563
0 0
0 0.024475
0.10182 0.09444
0.33928 0.09444
0.5121 0.09444
0.96312 0.020622
1 0

Table 1191: Base 64 representation:


RsWRnWmWgTOoU A

Figure 898: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

303
Profile: fx61147 Table 1196: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.29 4.448 ects
Information: Wortmann FX 61-147 airfoil RMS curvature error: 27.04 27.52 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 7.4 6 dcts
Cm error 71 60 mcts
Upper transition point -2.85 -2.05 %

Figure 899: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 900: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1193: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.7659 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 3.184 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5545 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.26575 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.504 deg
Release Angle: 17.1443 deg
Nose Incidence: 16.7492 deg
Camber deflection: 33.8936 deg

Table 1194: Controlpoints


1 0
0.78946 0.038612
0.68075 -0.04199
0.33933 -0.04199
0.12858 -0.04199
0 -0.015093
0 0
0 0.035309
0.1203 0.10567
0.33933 0.10567
0.50446 0.10567
0.9119 0.039034
1 0

Table 1195: Base 64 representation:


VoWQsXnWgSYpP7A

Figure 901: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

304
Profile: fx601261 Table 1200: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 7.121 8.974 ects
Information: Wortmann FX 60-126/1 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 37.6 NaN dcts
Cm error 16 NaN mcts
Upper transition point 11.95 NaN %

Figure 902: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 903: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1197: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.6105 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 3.9448 % @0.54C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.093852 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.66713 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 1.6114 deg
Release Angle: 11.4151 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.1691 deg
Camber deflection: 22.5842 deg

Table 1198: Controlpoints


1 0
0.76179 0.04462
0.42201 -0.03426
0.19558 -0.03426
0.12425 -0.03426
0 -0.023508
0 0
0 0.0025893
0.020108 0.09577
0.33933 0.09577
0.58402 0.09577
0.79042 0.045393
1 0

Table 1199: Base 64 representation:


C7WYorXNSPgaCxA

Figure 904: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

305
Profile: fx711530 Table 1204: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.572 3.862 ects
Information: Wortmann FX 71-L-150/30 airfoil RMS curvature error: 76.83 76.94 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -17.8 -17.3 dcts
Cm error -26 -26 mcts
Upper transition point 27.74 26.96 %

Figure 905: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 906: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1201: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: -0.00011002 % @0.59C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.947 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.947 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.1343 deg
Release Angle: 0.00084225 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 0.00084225 deg

Table 1202: Controlpoints


1 0
0.68176 -0.022623
0.58176 -0.075
0.33928 -0.075
0.2101 -0.075
0 -0.052222
0 0
0 0.052222
0.2101 0.075
0.33928 0.075
0.58171 0.075
0.68171 0.022637
1 0

Table 1203: Base 64 representation:


sYWXgsYWXgwwJgA

Figure 907: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

306
Profile: fxl142k Table 1208: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.841 3.796 ects
Information: Wortmann FX LIII-142 K 25 airfoil RMS curvature error: 81.78 80.86 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -12 -11.9 dcts
Cm error -27 -26 mcts
Upper transition point 18.73 18.17 %

Figure 908: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 909: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1205: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.1999 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: -1.2692e-005 % @0.58C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4285 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.4285 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.663 deg
Release Angle: -7.8036e-006 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -7.8036e-006 deg

Table 1206: Controlpoints


1 0
0.61543 -0.032507
0.51543 -0.071
0.30861 -0.071
0.12123 -0.071
0 -0.033978
0 0
0 0.033978
0.12123 0.071
0.30861 0.071
0.51542 0.071
0.61542 0.032507
1 0

Table 1207: Base 64 representation:


fmUTefmUTeyyLgA

Figure 910: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

307
Profile: fxm2 Table 1212: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 7.539 8.604 ects
Information: Wortmann FX M2 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -9.9 -9.6 dcts
Cm error 3 -7 mcts
Upper transition point 18.76 18.97 %

Figure 911: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 912: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1209: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.6614 % @0.2C
Maximum Camber: 4.5886 % @0.3C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 5.6095 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.79546 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.4252 deg
Release Angle: 10.8419 deg
Nose Incidence: 28.4103 deg
Camber deflection: 39.2521 deg

Table 1210: Controlpoints


1 0
0.67041 0.041224
0.01704 -0.0098
0.01704 -0.0098
0.01704 -0.0098
0 -0.0098
0 0
0 0.08809
0.205 0.08809
0.25 0.08809
0.3885 0.08809
0.83372 0.043171
1 0

Table 1211: Base 64 representation:


MQMl ABAEfVIxA

Figure 913: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

308
Profile: fxs03182 Table 1216: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.388 6.635 ects
Information: Wortmann FX S 03-182 airfoil RMS curvature error: 47.23 46.77 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -21.3 -21.3 dcts
Cm error -5 -15 mcts
Upper transition point 1.33 1.64 %

Figure 914: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 915: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1213: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18.2327 % @0.42C
Maximum Camber: 2.8826 % @0.54C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.7005 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.43915 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.1831 deg
Release Angle: 12.3948 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.558 deg
Camber deflection: 24.9527 deg

Table 1214: Controlpoints


1 0
0.84281 0.024344
0.6183 -0.06409
0.40243 -0.06409
0.13826 -0.06409
0 -0.020119
0 0
0 0.047593
0.1998 0.11852
0.43469 0.11852
0.53843 0.11852
0.63843 0.10359
1 0

Table 1215: Base 64 representation:


aicMyUpaXb3aIzA

Figure 916: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

309
Profile: fxs21158 Table 1220: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.893 6.062 ects
Information: Wortmann FX S 02/1-158 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -28.8 -29.1 dcts
Cm error 23 2 mcts
Upper transition point 23.08 23.79 %

Figure 917: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 918: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1217: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.7592 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 3.5183 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1823 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.59184 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.8767 deg
Release Angle: 7.3769 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.7245 deg
Camber deflection: 18.1013 deg

Table 1218: Controlpoints


1 0
0.64987 0.024106
0.51662 -0.04431
0.27891 -0.04431
0.21597 -0.04431
0 -0.029192
0 0
0 0.035715
0.16183 0.11355
0.30861 0.11355
0.43144 0.11355
0.53144 0.089511
1 0

Table 1219: Base 64 representation:


UeULvpOSVT0tIrA

Figure 919: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

310
Profile: giiia Table 1224: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.228 8.17 ects
Information: Grumman/Gulfstream GIII transonic airfoils RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -5.2 -5.6 dcts
Cm error -44 -69 mcts
Upper transition point 10.87 11.95 %

Figure 920: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 921: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1221: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.0192 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 0.74886 % @0.2C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.03588 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.55796 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.8303 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.1887 deg
Release Angle: -1.2032 deg
Nose Incidence: 1.8757 deg
Camber deflection: 0.67245 deg

Table 1222: Controlpoints


1 -0.0001794
0.74724 -0.043828
0.53789 -0.051124
0.4529 -0.051124
0.3488 -0.051124
0 -0.04394
0 0
0 0.01522
0.062276 0.06088
0.29655 0.06088
0.56882 0.06088
0.78882 0.027574
1 0.0001794

Table 1223: Base 64 representation:


QyTYa2OsKVf2TeB

Figure 922: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

311
Profile: giiib Table 1228: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.075 6.04 ects
Information: Grumman/Gulfstream GIII transonic airfoils, GIII RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
BL45 AIRFOIL. CD error -2.4 -1.8 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 1 -15 mcts
Upper transition point 4.78 5.18 %

Figure 924: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 923: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1225: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.4799 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 0.81403 % @0.24C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.03692 %C
Upper nose radius: NaN %C
Lower nose radius: 0.74176 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.5363 deg
Release Angle: -1.4028 deg
Nose Incidence: 2.0826 deg
Camber deflection: 0.67978 deg

Table 1226: Controlpoints


1 -0.0001846
0.72097 -0.042738
0.50755 -0.045803
0.45216 -0.045803
0.34364 -0.045803
0 -0.041223
0 0
0 0
0.0034718 0.059828
0.34718 0.059828
0.58185 0.059828
0.86986 0.013553
1 0.0001846

Table 1227: Base 64 representation:


A-WXa5PsGUU7QeB
Figure 925: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

312
Profile: giiic Table 1232: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.877 3.288 ects
Information: Grumman/Gulfstream GIII transonic airfoils,GIII RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
BL75 AIRFOIL. CD error -1.1 -1.3 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 5 4 mcts
Upper transition point 1.38 1.8 %

Figure 927: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 926: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1229: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9587 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 0.9238 % @0.27C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.03694 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.445 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.6325 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.1312 deg
Release Angle: -0.97949 deg
Nose Incidence: 2.527 deg
Camber deflection: 1.5475 deg

Table 1230: Controlpoints


1 -0.0001847
0.86984 -0.01627
0.66668 -0.041723
0.45167 -0.041723
0.36515 -0.041723
0 -0.039239
0 0
0 0.013161
0.058381 0.058524
0.34767 0.058524
0.61048 0.058524
0.78487 0.019332
1 0.0001847

Table 1231: Base 64 representation:


O0WaZ7MsZSiZOeB
Figure 928: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

313
Profile: giiid Table 1236: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.993 4.377 ects
Information: Grumman/Gulfstream GIII transonic airfoils, GIII RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
BL86 AIRFOIL. CD error -1.2 -1.1 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 8 -6 mcts
Upper transition point 1.35 1.69 %

Figure 930: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 929: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1233: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.7337 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 0.95819 % @0.28C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.03694 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.51389 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.59112 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.7485 deg
Release Angle: -0.76884 deg
Nose Incidence: 2.7792 deg
Camber deflection: 2.0103 deg

Table 1234: Controlpoints


1 -0.0001847
0.80766 -0.022585
0.64271 -0.040117
0.45149 -0.040117
0.36275 -0.040117
0 -0.037809
0 0
0 0.016221
0.0768 0.057811
0.34786 0.057811
0.62076 0.057811
0.74382 0.023073
1 0.0001847

Table 1235: Base 64 representation:


SxWbZ7NsWRqjNfB
Figure 931: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

314
Profile: giiie Table 1240: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.97 6.121 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.1 -0.1 dcts
Cm error 4 -8 mcts
Upper transition point -0.78 -1.22 %

Figure 932: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 933: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1237: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.812 % @0.42C
Maximum Camber: 1.1048 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.03598 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.47458 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.39128 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.8331 deg
Release Angle: 0.5339 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.112 deg
Camber deflection: 4.6459 deg

Table 1238: Controlpoints


1 -0.0001799
0.83825 -0.013997
0.64672 -0.033633
0.50087 -0.033633
0.39433 -0.033633
0 -0.032072
0 0
0 0.016583
0.086915 0.05491
0.39859 0.05491
0.58937 0.05491
0.71805 0.029567
1 0.0001799

Table 1239: Base 64 representation:


TxaUX8OgTOrsMgB

Figure 934: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

315
Profile: giiif Table 1244: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.677 6.163 ects
Information: Grumman/Gulfstream GIII transonic airfoils, RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
BL145. CD error -0.9 -1.6 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 3 -13 mcts
Upper transition point -0.04 2.51 %

Figure 936: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 935: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1241: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.257 % @0.43C
Maximum Camber: 1.2094 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.03698 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.4781 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.23383 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.7196 deg
Release Angle: 1.1637 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.8441 deg
Camber deflection: 7.0077 deg

Table 1242: Controlpoints


1 -0.0001849
0.76582 -0.017366
0.63699 -0.030291
0.5006 -0.030291
0.40548 -0.030291
0 -0.025141
0 0
0 0.019513
0.11945 0.052966
0.39896 0.052966
0.58306 0.052966
0.70169 0.034297
1 0.0001849

Table 1243: Base 64 representation:


YsaUX0MgRNtoMhB
Figure 937: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

316
Profile: giiig Table 1248: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.585 5.156 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.9 -1.9 dcts
Cm error -2 -13 mcts
Upper transition point -2.91 3.65 %

Figure 938: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 939: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1245: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.282 % @0.43C
Maximum Camber: 1.2133 % @0.32C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.03598 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.52453 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.23245 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.7094 deg
Release Angle: 1.1905 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.3674 deg
Camber deflection: 7.5579 deg

Table 1246: Controlpoints


1 -0.0001799
0.77954 -0.016231
0.63601 -0.03035
0.50055 -0.03035
0.38042 -0.03035
0 -0.02428
0 0
0 0.020189
0.11656 0.053129
0.39904 0.053129
0.58517 0.053129
0.7197 0.03234
1 0.0001799

Table 1247: Base 64 representation:


YsaUXyPgRNqmMhB

Figure 940: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

317
Profile: giiih Table 1252: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.619 4.945 ects
Information: Grumman/Gulfstream GIII transonic airfoils, Warn RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
-Cuspe CD error 0 -1.2 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 0 -3 mcts
Upper transition point 0 0.51 %

Figure 942: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 941: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1249: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.3518 % @0.43C
Maximum Camber: 1.2161 % @0.31C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.036 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.61695 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.23843 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.5004 deg
Release Angle: 1.2826 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.2574 deg
Camber deflection: 8.5401 deg

Table 1250: Controlpoints


1 -0.00018
0.76189 -0.016695
0.66189 -0.030486
0.45046 -0.030486
0.43244 -0.030486
0 -0.026218
0 0
0 0.020953
0.10675 0.053442
0.3992 0.053442
0.59178 0.053442
0.7667 0.026897
1 0.00018

Table 1251: Base 64 representation:


ZuaVX2DsZNksMhB
Figure 943: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

318
Profile: giiii Table 1256: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.967 5.026 ects
Information: Grumman/Gulfstream GIII transonic airfoils RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.7 -1.2 dcts
Cm error 3 15 mcts
Upper transition point 2.41 0.71 %

Figure 944: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 945: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1253: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.4351 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 1.2997 % @0.29C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.036 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.99504 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.27278 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.7191 deg
Release Angle: 1.3341 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.4321 deg
Camber deflection: 10.7662 deg

Table 1254: Controlpoints


1 -0.00018
0.73291 -0.018976
0.63264 -0.030458
0.4502 -0.030458
0.4412 -0.030458
0 -0.028326
0 0
0 0.033523
0.1694 0.054721
0.34964 0.054721
0.59022 0.054721
0.75962 0.028391
1 0.00018

Table 1255: Base 64 representation:


mgWYX7BsVNluMhB

Figure 946: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

319
Profile: giiij Table 1260: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.836 5.794 ects
Information: Grumman/Gulfstream GIII transonic airfoils RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.4 -0.3 dcts
Cm error 7 6 mcts
Upper transition point -1.4 -0.66 %

Figure 947: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 948: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1257: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.5076 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 1.3578 % @0.29C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.036 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2521 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.2908 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.2312 deg
Release Angle: 1.1868 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.0551 deg
Camber deflection: 12.2419 deg

Table 1258: Controlpoints


1 -0.00018
0.74777 -0.017503
0.62909 -0.029975
0.45 -0.029975
0.38507 -0.029975
0 -0.027323
0 0
0 0.036681
0.16118 0.055777
0.35 0.055777
0.59753 0.055777
0.88002 0.01343
1 0.00018

Table 1259: Base 64 representation:


piWYY5JsVNTrLhB

Figure 949: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

320
Profile: giiik Table 1264: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.054 5.377 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 -3.2 dcts
Cm error 0 -13 mcts
Upper transition point 0 -0.05 %

Figure 950: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 951: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1261: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.5504 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 1.4284 % @0.29C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.036 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5485 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.5788 deg
Release Angle: 1.4761 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.5575 deg
Camber deflection: 9.0335 deg

Table 1262: Controlpoints


1 -0.00018
0.75889 -0.016251
0.62808 -0.029139
0.44979 -0.029139
0 -0.029139
0 -0.012552
0 0
0 0.055004
0.29308 0.05695
0.30041 0.05695
0.55872 0.05695
0.76324 0.028268
1 0.00018

Table 1263: Base 64 representation:


9CTYYc sVMhoMiB

Figure 952: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

321
Profile: giiil Table 1268: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.339 5.702 ects
Information: Grumman/Gulfstream GIII transonic airfoils RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 953: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 954: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1265: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.5696 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 1.5039 % @0.29C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.036 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.682 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.2536 deg
Release Angle: 1.3686 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.2125 deg
Camber deflection: 9.581 deg

Table 1266: Controlpoints


1 -0.00018
0.75379 -0.016353
0.62813 -0.028458
0.44967 -0.028458
0 -0.028458
0 -0.013248
0 0
0 0.057233
0.29212 0.057811
0.30067 0.057811
0.559 0.057811
0.82466 0.020143
1 0.00018

Table 1267: Base 64 representation:


-CTYZe sVMZpLhB

Figure 955: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

322
Profile: gm15sm Table 1272: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.261 4.858 ects
Information: Gilbert Morris GM15 F1C class free flight flapper RMS curvature error: 42.69 43.41 %
airfoil CD error -0.6 -1.4 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 18 19 mcts
Upper transition point 0.45 1.07 %

Figure 957: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 956: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1269: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.6981 % @0.2C
Maximum Camber: 4.7697 % @0.48C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.007 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.30221 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.43938 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.8712 deg
Release Angle: 10.5697 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.1966 deg
Camber deflection: 16.7663 deg

Table 1270: Controlpoints


1 -3.5e-005
0.45337 0.068382
0.271 -0.011922
0.054677 -0.011922
0.041845 -0.011922
0 -0.011071
0 0
0 0.012732
0.080455 0.073629
0.37889 0.073629
0.51216 0.073629
0.7924 0.051816
1 3.5e-005

Table 1271: Base 64 representation:


LxYOf6PDPFsvIwA
Figure 958: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

323
Profile: goe07k Table 1276: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.386 3.657 ects
Information: Gottingen 7K airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.4 -2.3 dcts
Cm error -167 -164 mcts
Upper transition point 3.3 3.33 %

Figure 959: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 960: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1273: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.0274 % @0.48C
Maximum Camber: 4.5482 % @0.53C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.74148 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.4225 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 32.6586 deg
Release Angle: 8.709 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.7756 deg
Camber deflection: 17.4846 deg

Table 1274: Controlpoints


1 0
0.97515 -0.0055313
0.15 -0.01362
0.15 -0.01362
0 -0.01362
0 -0.0069836
0 0
0 0.032646
0.2156 0.10045
0.5 0.10045
0.81872 0.10045
0.98921 0.0038277
1 0

Table 1275: Base 64 representation:


Vjgoqg KAGEajlA

Figure 961: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

324
Profile: goe08k Table 1280: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.309 6.667 ects
Information: Gottingen 8K airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -5.2 -4.7 dcts
Cm error -256 -259 mcts
Upper transition point 4.37 4.27 %

Figure 962: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 963: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1277: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.97 % @0.48C
Maximum Camber: 6.0907 % @0.53C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3249 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.0331 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 28.0749 deg
Release Angle: 10.3132 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.5523 deg
Camber deflection: 21.8655 deg

Table 1278: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85596 -0.0077858
0.218 -0.01847
0.15 -0.01847
0 -0.01847
0 -0.0091075
0 0
0 0.043491
0.21414 0.13555
0.5 0.13555
0.82283 0.13555
0.98973 0.005038
1 0

Table 1279: Base 64 representation:


Vkgo5g KFIEbgyA

Figure 964: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

325
Profile: goe11k Table 1284: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.174 8.405 ects
Information: Gottingen 11K airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.7 2.7 dcts
Cm error -48 -31 mcts
Upper transition point -3.34 -5.38 %

Figure 965: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 966: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1281: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.6429 % @0.44C
Maximum Camber: 2.6614 % @0.53C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.73767 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.67303 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.6342 deg
Release Angle: 17.2322 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.9146 deg
Camber deflection: 21.1468 deg

Table 1282: Controlpoints


1 0
1 0
0.415 -0.01609
0.1 -0.01609
0.057699 -0.01609
0 -0.01609
0 0
0 0.034084
0.23623 0.06445
0.5 0.06445
0.505 0.06445
0.83253 0.06445
1 0

Table 1283: Base 64 representation:


hhgBb bGWH AJ7A

Figure 967: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

326
Profile: goe14k Table 1288: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.558 5.403 ects
Information: Gottingen 14K airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 7.3 5.3 dcts
Cm error 268 245 mcts
Upper transition point -17.45 -16.31 %

Figure 968: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 969: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1285: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.1887 % @0.48C
Maximum Camber: 2.6132 % @0.51C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1186 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.80102 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 57.2958 deg
Release Angle: 0 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.0593 deg
Camber deflection: 5.0593 deg

Table 1286: Controlpoints


1 0
0.93447 -0.0358
0.426 -0.0358
0.3 -0.0358
0.228 -0.0358
0 -0.0358
0 0
0 0.044759
0.26864 0.087
0.5 0.087
0.505 0.087
0.84075 0.087
1 0

Table 1287: Base 64 representation:


gegBk PTMP gA

Figure 970: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

327
Profile: goe15k Table 1292: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.959 8.222 ects
Information: Gottingen 15K airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -6.3 5.9 dcts
Cm error -351 357 mcts
Upper transition point 10.82 -10.45 %

Figure 971: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 972: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1289: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.2642 % @0.48C
Maximum Camber: 3.2502 % @0.51C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.7486 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.335 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 57.2958 deg
Release Angle: 5.615 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.7423 deg
Camber deflection: 11.3573 deg

Table 1290: Controlpoints


1 0
0.89474 -0.04475
0.496 -0.04475
0.3 -0.04475
0.225 -0.04475
0 -0.04475
0 0
0 0.056029
0.2693 0.10875
0.5 0.10875
0.505 0.10875
0.84036 0.10875
1 0

Table 1291: Base 64 representation:


gegBt QTST oA

Figure 973: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

328
Profile: goe16k Table 1296: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 9.969 10.27 ects
Information: Gottingen 16K airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.3 -0.7 dcts
Cm error 200 214 mcts
Upper transition point 1.01 0.8 %

Figure 974: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 975: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1293: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18.2785 % @0.47C
Maximum Camber: 4.0669 % @0.53C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.5664 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.4634 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 57.2958 deg
Release Angle: 9.3965 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.9691 deg
Camber deflection: 19.3656 deg

Table 1294: Controlpoints


1 0
0.84509 -0.0541
0.587 -0.0541
0.3 -0.0541
0.225 -0.0541
0 -0.0541
0 0
0 0.067653
0.26751 0.1316
0.5 0.1316
0.565 0.1316
0.83183 0.1316
1 0

Table 1295: Base 64 representation:


gegI3 QTaX uA

Figure 976: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

329
Profile: goe29b Table 1300: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.244 6.439 ects
Information: Gottingen 29B airfoil RMS curvature error: 63.07 68.32 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.9 -3.3 dcts
Cm error -34 -49 mcts
Upper transition point 3.57 3.71 %

Figure 977: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 978: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1297: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.0309 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 6.3362 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.28 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.1603 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.7628 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.6432 deg
Release Angle: 7.8473 deg
Nose Incidence: 16.5006 deg
Camber deflection: 24.3479 deg

Table 1298: Controlpoints


1 -0.0014
0.16918 0.058681
0.069181 -0.01953
0.02536 -0.01953
0.023668 -0.01953
0 -0.01834
0 0
0 0.0022408
0.018677 0.11204
0.29792 0.11204
0.51372 0.11204
0.86004 0.028084
1 0.0014

Table 1299: Base 64 representation:


B7TUv7ECDIS4HrH

Figure 979: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

330
Profile: goe54 Table 1304: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 7.879 8.924 ects
Information: Gottingen 54 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 67.9 -11 dcts
Cm error -21 14 mcts
Upper transition point -6.34 7.25 %

Figure 980: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 981: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1301: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.3305 % @0.2C
Maximum Camber: 3.0407 % @0.23C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.35 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.075 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0185 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 1.7694 deg
Release Angle: 3.4157 deg
Nose Incidence: 18.3506 deg
Camber deflection: 21.7663 deg

Table 1302: Controlpoints


1 -0.00175
0.11049 0.016032
0.01258 -0.0099
0.01258 -0.0099
0.003774 -0.0099
0 -0.00693
0 0
0 0.06628
0.19945 0.06695
0.19945 0.06695
0.32062 0.06695
0.42062 0.040848
1 0.00175

Table 1303: Base 64 representation:


-ANKsssBAE25DjJ

Figure 982: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

331
Profile: goe55 Table 1308: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.049 3.375 ects
Information: Gottingen 55 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.9 -4 dcts
Cm error 21 22 mcts
Upper transition point 9.42 10.01 %

Figure 983: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 984: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1305: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 5.8437 % @0.15C
Maximum Camber: 2.2525 % @0.23C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.75 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.8261 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.88268 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0.28648 deg
Release Angle: 3.4377 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.5389 deg
Camber deflection: 12.9767 deg

Table 1306: Controlpoints


1 -0.00375
0.46885 0.0068742
0.059728 -0.01681
0.05023 -0.01681
0.031444 -0.01681
0 -0.01681
0 0
0 0.042046
0.14522 0.05094
0.1993 0.05094
0.22853 0.05094
0.99229 0.0039815
1 0.00375

Table 1307: Base 64 representation:


0RNCW YDBHBjBiT

Figure 985: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

332
Profile: goe57 Table 1312: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.502 5.602 ects
Information: Gottingen 57 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -17.8 -8.9 dcts
Cm error -7 -12 mcts
Upper transition point 22.4 21.62 %

Figure 986: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 987: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1309: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.427 % @0.21C
Maximum Camber: 5.0874 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.17 %C
Upper nose radius: NaN %C
Lower nose radius: 0.81989 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.6801 deg
Release Angle: 8.3867 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.4808 deg
Camber deflection: 13.8675 deg

Table 1310: Controlpoints


1 -0.00085
0.19219 0.056299
0.074135 -0.01172
0.02513 -0.01172
0.01935 -0.01172
0 -0.01172
0 0
0 0
0.033321 0.08153
0.29909 0.08153
0.41803 0.08153
0.64277 0.08153
1 0.00085

Table 1311: Base 64 representation:


A4TLi PCDF 3KtE

Figure 988: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

333
Profile: goe79
Table 1316: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Information: Gottingen 79 (Pfalz 11) airfoil Control points Base64
Reference: UIUC RMS position error: 4.574 5.809 ects
RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point -14.78 NaN %

Figure 990: Error distribution of vertical position and


curvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 989: Wing profile with camber and thickness


distribution.
Table 1313: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 5.5536 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 6.2117 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.56 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.0106 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.3568 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.9154 deg
Release Angle: 7.8752 deg
Nose Incidence: 21.2597 deg
Camber deflection: 29.135 deg

Table 1314: Controlpoints


1 -0.0028
0.11115 0.077402
0.047518 -0.01109
0.01259 -0.01109
0.003777 -0.01109
0 -0.007763
0 0
0 0.041812
0.09769 0.08931
0.29925 0.08931
0.36933 0.08931
0.53558 0.08931
1 0.0028

Table 1315: Base 64 representation:


eqTGlssBCF 7GsO
Figure 991: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

334
Profile: goe81
Information: Gottingen 81 airfoil Table 1320: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Reference: UIUC Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.086 5.559 ects
RMS curvature error: 76.62 80.55 %
CD error NaN -145.8 dcts
Cm error NaN -24 mcts
Upper transition point NaN 1.01 %

Figure 992: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 993: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1317: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.3085 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 5.992 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.27 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.6931 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.018 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.771 deg
Release Angle: 8.7894 deg
Nose Incidence: 20.6926 deg
Camber deflection: 29.482 deg

Table 1318: Controlpoints


1 -0.00135
0.16048 0.064739
0.060482 -0.00989
0.01259 -0.00989
0.008495 -0.00989
0 -0.003956
0 0
0 0.043763
0.14352 0.10019
0.29913 0.10019
0.43393 0.10019
0.59565 0.10019
1 0.00135

Table 1319: Base 64 representation: Figure 994: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
cgTMqaVBDE 4KuH
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

335
Profile: goe92 Table 1324: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.645 6.626 ects
Information: Gottingen 92 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -7 -6.6 dcts
Cm error -46 -23 mcts
Upper transition point 11.71 10.83 %

Figure 995: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 996: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1321: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.1008 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 4.8889 % @0.31C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.0213 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.71994 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.4933 deg
Release Angle: 6.631 deg
Nose Incidence: 26.8413 deg
Camber deflection: 33.4723 deg

Table 1322: Controlpoints


1 -0.0008
0.1704 0.030325
0.028863 -0.00485
0.01252 -0.00485
0.010981 -0.00485
0 -0.00097
0 0
0 0
0.03288 0.09933
0.29959 0.09933
0.56724 0.09933
0.99567 0.0016435
1 0.0008

Table 1323: Base 64 representation:


A4TYpNIBBCB2KqE

Figure 997: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

336
Profile: goe114
Table 1328: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Information: Gottingen 114 (MVA MK.1) airfoil Control points Base64
Reference: UIUC RMS position error: 2.368 3.103 ects
RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
CD error NaN -1.3 dcts
Cm error NaN -12 mcts
Upper transition point NaN 3.32 %

Figure 998: Wing profile with camber and thickness


distribution.
Table 1325: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.0747 % @0.33C Figure 999: Error distribution of vertical position and
Maximum Camber: 2.8786 % @0.47C curvature of the parameter curve.
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.82 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.77013 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.329 deg
Release Angle: 5.5483 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.8044 deg
Camber deflection: 9.3527 deg

Table 1326: Controlpoints


1 0
0.40118 0.010378
0.30118 -0.0282
0.201 -0.0282
0.03951 -0.0282
0 0
0 0
0 0.003014
0.13612 0.07762
0.39726 0.07762
0.56524 0.07762
0.72654 0.055569
1 0

Table 1327: Base 64 representation:


CpZSgAyNIMt2MpA
Figure 1000: Error distribution of drag- and pitching
moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

337
Profile: goe115 Table 1332: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.364 6.234 ects
Information: Gottingen 115 (MVA MK.2) airfoil RMS curvature error: 78.08 77.54 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -8.1 -8.1 dcts
Cm error -8 10 mcts
Upper transition point 0.59 0.28 %

Figure 1001: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1002: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1329: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.2606 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 3.3047 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3121 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.046 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.1053 deg
Release Angle: 5.5947 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.5042 deg
Camber deflection: 11.0989 deg

Table 1330: Controlpoints


1 0
0.40265 0.013005
0.30265 -0.02603
0.15081 -0.02603
0.095112 -0.02603
0 -0.01526
0 0
0 0.015057
0.12606 0.08334
0.39735 0.08334
0.44135 0.08334
0.60035 0.076511
1 0

Table 1331: Base 64 representation:


MrZFjlYKLL62LpA

Figure 1003: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

338
Profile: goe116 Table 1336: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.899 4.071 ects
Information: Gottingen 116 (MVA MK.3) airfoil RMS curvature error: 68.17 77.62 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.1 0.6 dcts
Cm error 1 0 mcts
Upper transition point 0.22 -0.11 %

Figure 1004: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1005: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1333: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9872 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 3.8872 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.35 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1729 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.8917 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.5 deg
Release Angle: 6.1516 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.9889 deg
Camber deflection: 12.1405 deg

Table 1334: Controlpoints


1 -0.00175
0.36222 0.010464
0.12215 -0.02545
0.10067 -0.02545
0.038936 -0.02545
0 -0.0031763
0 0
0 0.016137
0.14874 0.08738
0.3977 0.08738
0.52192 0.08738
0.62192 0.072957
1 0.00175

Table 1335: Base 64 representation:


MnZNkImGCL0tLpJ

Figure 1006: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

339
Profile: goe117 Table 1340: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.251 7.198 ects
Information: Gottingen 117 (MVA MK.4) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.8 -1.6 dcts
Cm error 11 18 mcts
Upper transition point -0.66 -1.34 %

Figure 1007: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1008: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1337: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.1897 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 4.4574 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3721 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.99385 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.138 deg
Release Angle: 6.3517 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.8735 deg
Camber deflection: 14.2252 deg

Table 1338: Controlpoints


1 0
0.30207 0.020705
0.22286 -0.01763
0.10035 -0.01763
0.10035 -0.01763
0 -0.017277
0 0
0 0.016816
0.15151 0.08931
0.39825 0.08931
0.39825 0.08931
0.62881 0.084335
1 0

Table 1339: Base 64 representation:


MnZAl-AGJI74MrA

Figure 1009: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

340
Profile: goe118
Table 1344: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Information: Gottingen 118 (MVA MK.7) airfoil Control points Base64
Reference: UIUC RMS position error: 3.263 5.435 ects
RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
CD error NaN -0.5 dcts
Cm error NaN -11 mcts
Upper transition point NaN 1.92 %

Figure 1010: Wing profile with camber and thickness


distribution.
Table 1341: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.2482 % @0.34C Figure 1011: Error distribution of vertical position and
Maximum Camber: 5.8781 % @0.42C curvature of the parameter curve.
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.21 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.0099716 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.08668 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.3965 deg
Release Angle: 9.3965 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.1671 deg
Camber deflection: 16.5636 deg

Table 1342: Controlpoints


1 -0.00105
0.36871 0.043213
0.11189 -0.0087
0.05007 -0.0087
0.05007 -0.0087
0 -0.005205
0 0
0 0.0025984
0.10156 0.09941
0.3992 0.09941
0.59099 0.09941
0.97971 0.0061006
1 0.00105

Table 1343: Base 64 representation:


CvaUplADEEDsLuF
Figure 1012: Error distribution of drag- and pitching
moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

341
Profile: goe121 Table 1348: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.058 6.94 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -7.8 -7.3 dcts
Cm error 52 54 mcts
Upper transition point 12.67 12.33 %

Figure 1013: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1014: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1345: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.5645 % @0.2C
Maximum Camber: 4.4737 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.50145 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.91344 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.8801 deg
Release Angle: 7.4786 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.4551 deg
Camber deflection: 11.9337 deg

Table 1346: Controlpoints


1 -0.001
0.2258 0.046876
0.1258 -0.01449
0.05021 -0.01449
0.021424 -0.01449
0 -0.01449
0 0
0 0.01777
0.094453 0.07524
0.29893 0.07524
0.32198 0.07524
0.63243 0.07524
1 0.001

Table 1347: Base 64 representation:


PrTCg kDFG 4JrF

Figure 1015: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

342
Profile: goe122 Table 1352: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.776 4.529 ects
Information: Gottingen 122 (MVA H.2) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.3 -5.5 dcts
Cm error -30 -27 mcts
Upper transition point 6.32 5.66 %

Figure 1016: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1017: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1349: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.3966 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 4.05 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.25 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.82018 %C
Lower nose radius: NaN %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.2465 deg
Release Angle: 4.0106 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.2896 deg
Camber deflection: 17.3002 deg

Table 1350: Controlpoints


1 -0.00125
0.23031 0.017391
0.13031 -0.00762
0.01255 -0.00762
0.012161 -0.00762
0 -0.000762
0 0
0 0.022363
0.091466 0.07713
0.2995 0.07713
0.55573 0.07713
0.89466 0.013501
1 0.00125

Table 1351: Base 64 representation:


TrTXgGCBIDP4GmG

Figure 1018: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

343
Profile: goe123 Table 1356: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 10.325 11.534 ects
Information: Gottingen 123 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.8 NaN dcts
Cm error -83 NaN mcts
Upper transition point -1.75 34.16 %

Figure 1019: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1020: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1353: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.037 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 5.3415 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %C
Upper nose radius: NaN %C
Lower nose radius: 0.94746 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.9901 deg
Release Angle: 7.2766 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.0421 deg
Camber deflection: 19.3187 deg

Table 1354: Controlpoints


1 -0.001
0.10138 0.071043
0.083127 -0.0088825
0.012491 -0.0088825
0.0074947 -0.0088825
0 -0.0061289
0 0
0 0
0.00029886 0.0836
0.40008 0.0836
0.64875 0.0836
0.99649 0.0017193
1 0.001

Table 1355: Base 64 representation:


A abjraBFEB-IsF

Figure 1021: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

344
Profile: goe124 Table 1360: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.349 5.421 ects
Information: Gottingen 124 (MVA H.4) airfoil RMS curvature error: 48.91 51.11 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 6.6 NaN dcts
Cm error 29 NaN mcts
Upper transition point -0.65 NaN %

Figure 1022: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1023: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1357: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.0108 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 5.4663 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.5 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.7123 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.70647 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.0248 deg
Release Angle: 7.4232 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.3585 deg
Camber deflection: 19.7817 deg

Table 1358: Controlpoints


1 -0.0025
0.32344 0.049687
0.078552 -0.01089
0.01259 -0.01089
0.005036 -0.01089
0 -0.004356
0 0
0 0.042854
0.16088 0.09324
0.29921 0.09324
0.56071 0.09324
0.66071 0.06499
1 0.0025

Table 1359: Base 64 representation:


seTYnalBEFwuHrN

Figure 1024: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

345
Profile: goe134 Table 1364: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.058 2.753 ects
Information: Gottingen 134 (MVA H.12) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.6 -2.2 dcts
Cm error -5 -5 mcts
Upper transition point -2.8 -3.66 %

Figure 1025: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1026: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1361: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.2065 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 4.0984 % @0.32C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.90001 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.3233 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.93703 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.1995 deg
Release Angle: 6.4246 deg
Nose Incidence: 19.1729 deg
Camber deflection: 25.5975 deg

Table 1362: Controlpoints


1 -0.0045001
0.73862 -0.0056466
0.01246 -0.0088462
0.01246 -0.0088462
0.0049841 -0.0088462
0 -0.0053077
0 0
0 0.02766
0.092109 0.086919
0.30039 0.086919
0.58597 0.086919
0.93942 0.018828
1 0.0045001

Table 1363: Base 64 representation:


UrTakllBAELRPqX

Figure 1027: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

346
Profile: goe137 Table 1368: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.388 5.376 ects
Information: Gottingen 137 (MVA H.15) airfoil RMS curvature error: 54.28 54.78 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.2 -2.7 dcts
Cm error -24 -16 mcts
Upper transition point 2.73 2.04 %

Figure 1028: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1029: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1365: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.4501 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 4.0025 % @0.32C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.29 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.8632 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.14017 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.3522 deg
Release Angle: 6.0606 deg
Nose Incidence: 21.2808 deg
Camber deflection: 27.3414 deg

Table 1366: Controlpoints


1 -0.00145
0.23027 0.014948
0.13027 -0.01121
0.07512 -0.01121
0.027728 -0.01121
0 -0.01121
0 0
0 0.023969
0.1027 0.08706
0.29908 0.08706
0.40958 0.08706
0.54887 0.08706
1 0.00145

Table 1367: Base 64 representation:


SpTKk nFEF 4LpH

Figure 1030: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

347
Profile: goe140 Table 1372: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 8.143 9.994 ects
Information: Gottingen 140 (MVA H.17) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2 -4.2 dcts
Cm error -37 -19 mcts
Upper transition point 4.66 4.07 %

Figure 1031: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1032: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1369: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.3067 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 5.1206 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.58 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.031033 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2034 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.9588 deg
Release Angle: 7.4485 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.881 deg
Camber deflection: 14.3295 deg

Table 1370: Controlpoints


1 -0.0029
0.37151 0.037378
0.0251 -0.01138
0.0251 -0.01138
0.012889 -0.01138
0 -0.01138
0 0
0 0.0030719
0.045613 0.0968
0.29916 0.0968
0.53924 0.0968
0.98627 0.0052287
1 0.0029

Table 1371: Base 64 representation:


C1TWo fCAFCoHqP

Figure 1033: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

348
Profile: goe142 Table 1376: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.836 4.485 ects
Information: Gottingen 142 (MVA H.19) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.1 0 dcts
Cm error -12 4 mcts
Upper transition point -0.77 -1.74 %

Figure 1034: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1035: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1373: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.245 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 3.807 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.52396 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.61642 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.2144 deg
Release Angle: 5.4255 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.7989 deg
Camber deflection: 14.2244 deg

Table 1374: Controlpoints


1 -0.001
0.17992 0.025034
0.079916 -0.00939
0.02509 -0.00939
0.020674 -0.00939
0 -0.0092172
0 0
0 0.014986
0.064293 0.06876
0.29937 0.06876
0.5874 0.06876
0.88053 0.019992
1 0.001

Table 1375: Base 64 representation:


OxTas-LCEET4IoF

Figure 1036: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

349
Profile: goe143 Table 1380: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.371 5.874 ects
Information: Gottingen 143 (MVA H.20) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.6 -1.6 dcts
Cm error -23 -3 mcts
Upper transition point 4.15 3.38 %

Figure 1037: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1038: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1377: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.1027 % @0.22C
Maximum Camber: 4.0669 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.29 %C
Upper nose radius: -0.48563 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.8393 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.9015 deg
Release Angle: 5.615 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.6791 deg
Camber deflection: 9.2941 deg

Table 1378: Controlpoints


1 -0.00145
0.34282 0.019916
0.064372 -0.01407
0.02518 -0.01407
0.024928 -0.01407
0 -0.011299
0 0
0 0
0.015033 0.07477
0.29903 0.07477
0.57999 0.07477
0.9958 0.0020226
1 0.00145

Table 1379: Base 64 representation:


A8TagyBCDGBsHnH

Figure 1039: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

350
Profile: goe144 Table 1384: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.026 6.061 ects
Information: Gottingen 144 (MVA H.21) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.6 1.7 dcts
Cm error -16 6 mcts
Upper transition point -1.35 -2.03 %

Figure 1040: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1041: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1381: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.7039 % @0.21C
Maximum Camber: 4.4619 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6285 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.49962 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.5988 deg
Release Angle: 6.6459 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.052 deg
Camber deflection: 21.6979 deg

Table 1382: Controlpoints


1 0
0.2039 0.041079
0.15923 -0.01425
0.05021 -0.01425
0.05021 -0.01425
0 -0.012624
0 0
0 0.017322
0.087396 0.08138
0.29878 0.08138
0.59401 0.08138
0.94084 0.017079
1 0

Table 1383: Base 64 representation:


OsTbi4ADHGN8PuA

Figure 1042: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

351
Profile: goe147 Table 1388: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 7.939 9.825 ects
Information: Gottingen 147 (MVA H.6) airfoil RMS curvature error: 95 Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -6.1 -6.9 dcts
Cm error -19 -24 mcts
Upper transition point 15 14.69 %

Figure 1043: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1044: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1385: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.087 % @0.18C
Maximum Camber: 3.6984 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.33 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.57005 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.11162 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.1154 deg
Release Angle: 4.3602 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.8753 deg
Camber deflection: 20.2355 deg

Table 1386: Controlpoints


1 -0.00165
0.21288 0.02312
0.11288 -0.01585
0.07524 -0.01585
0.02259 -0.01585
0 -0.0041
0 0
0 0.004302
0.00487 0.07079
0.29891 0.07079
0.36619 0.07079
0.46619 0.066417
1 0.00165

Table 1387: Base 64 representation:


E-TGeRsFDH74GmI

Figure 1045: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

352
Profile: goe155 Table 1392: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.442 9.176 ects
Information: Gottingen 155 (SSW D.1) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 58.4 -3.1 dcts
Cm error 61 -83 mcts
Upper transition point 6.49 -5.38 %

Figure 1046: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1047: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1389: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.0686 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 5.2356 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.4 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.61304 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.4038 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.365 deg
Release Angle: 5.9729 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.282 deg
Camber deflection: 15.2548 deg

Table 1390: Controlpoints


1 -0.002
0.13521 0.047718
0.13521 -0.00822
0.01255 -0.00822
0.00502 -0.00822
0 -0.004932
0 0
0 0.021643
0.11462 0.08699
0.29945 0.08699
0.65446 0.08699
0.75446 0.039377
1 0.002

Table 1391: Base 64 representation:


QnTgkllBIEs GpK

Figure 1048: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

353
Profile: goe164 Table 1396: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.473 8.265 ects
Information: Gottingen 164 (MVA MK.10) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -6.4 -4.7 dcts
Cm error 58 65 mcts
Upper transition point 11.09 9.57 %

Figure 1049: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1050: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1393: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.1256 % @0.18C
Maximum Camber: 6.2828 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.11 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2329 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.23637 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.1933 deg
Release Angle: 10.1414 deg
Nose Incidence: 19.2087 deg
Camber deflection: 29.3501 deg

Table 1394: Controlpoints


1 -0.00055
0.31624 0.082938
0.20458 -0.01031
0.07511 -0.01031
0.059944 -0.01031
0 -0.01031
0 0
0 0.027676
0.093194 0.10205
0.29892 0.10205
0.66864 0.10205
0.92452 0.021807
1 0.00055

Table 1395: Base 64 representation:


RrThr NFJEP2KxD

Figure 1051: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

354
Profile: goe165 Table 1400: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 8.25 9.385 ects
Information: Gottingen 165 (MVA MK.11) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -9.1 -9.1 dcts
Cm error 70 70 mcts
Upper transition point 14.44 14.45 %

Figure 1052: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1053: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1397: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.1218 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 5.3915 % @0.51C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.12 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.33121 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.15463 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.3025 deg
Release Angle: 11.0581 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.541 deg
Camber deflection: 26.5991 deg

Table 1398: Controlpoints


1 -0.00060059
0.50871 0.076402
0.40674 -0.023438
0.15625 -0.023438
0.097656 -0.023438
0 -0.0095215
0 0
0 0.011279
0.060303 0.10312
0.29688 0.10312
0.67041 0.10312
0.9073 0.024193
1 0.00060059

Table 1399: Base 64 representation:


HyThraYKTKS0GyD

Figure 1054: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

355
Profile: goe167 Table 1404: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.203 4.597 ects
Information: Gottingen 167 (V.Karman PROP.2) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.8 0 dcts
Cm error -7 -9 mcts
Upper transition point -1.89 -2.11 %

Figure 1055: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1056: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1401: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.2219 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 4.487 % @0.32C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.9 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.958 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1099 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.1375 deg
Release Angle: 6.7485 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.069 deg
Camber deflection: 21.8175 deg

Table 1402: Controlpoints


1 -0.0045
0.3729 0.0029649
0.02509 -0.01201
0.02509 -0.01201
0.01957 -0.01201
0 -0.01201
0 0
0 0.034052
0.15936 0.0958
0.29926 0.0958
0.44868 0.0958
0.54868 0.083113
1 0.0045

Table 1403: Base 64 representation:


XeTOo OCAF2oKoX

Figure 1057: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

356
Profile: goe173 Table 1408: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.094 5.075 ects
Information: Gottingen 173 (Albatros 6020) airfoil RMS curvature error: 69.48 84.37 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.3 1.2 dcts
Cm error 31 51 mcts
Upper transition point -1.61 -2.74 %

Figure 1058: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1059: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1405: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.7948 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 5.8597 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.18 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.36885 %C
Lower nose radius: -9.4477e-006 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.6203 deg
Release Angle: 8.0214 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.1298 deg
Camber deflection: 25.1512 deg

Table 1406: Controlpoints


1 -0.0009
0.25163 0.054205
0.08886 -0.00544
0.01253 -0.00544
0.011273 -0.00544
0 -0.001632
0 0
0 0.01209
0.059444 0.09648
0.29956 0.09648
0.62993 0.09648
0.9963 0.0016752
1 0.0009

Table 1407: Base 64 representation:


IyTeoTGBFCB0JsF

Figure 1060: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

357
Profile: goe174 Table 1412: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.052 7.265 ects
Information: Gottingen 174 (Albatros 5020) airfoil RMS curvature error: 59.68 60.93 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.4 -7.6 dcts
Cm error 68 72 mcts
Upper transition point -1.07 -1.62 %

Figure 1061: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1062: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1409: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.5583 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 5.56 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.29 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.91341 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.4485 deg
Release Angle: 7.4485 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.3491 deg
Camber deflection: 21.7976 deg

Table 1410: Controlpoints


1 -0.00145
0.25978 0.043016
0.17626 -0.00812
0.01255 -0.00812
0.003765 -0.00812
0 -0.005684
0 0
0 0.02234
0.08196 0.09672
0.29935 0.09672
0.58747 0.09672
0.90603 0.020499
1 0.00145

Table 1411: Base 64 representation:


PtTaossBLDP5JrH

Figure 1063: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

358
Profile: goe176 Table 1416: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.696 8.374 ects
Information: Gottingen 176 (Albatros 7020) airfoil RMS curvature error: 66.66 65.68 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -8.6 -9.6 dcts
Cm error 92 100 mcts
Upper transition point 16.83 16.31 %

Figure 1064: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1065: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1413: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.2323 % @0.19C
Maximum Camber: 5.5542 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.23 %C
Upper nose radius: 13.433 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.18926 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.3339 deg
Release Angle: 8.709 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.2675 deg
Camber deflection: 23.9765 deg

Table 1414: Controlpoints


1 -0.00115
0.3791 0.050503
0.25357 -0.01568
0.10025 -0.01568
0.043985 -0.01568
0 -0.0074496
0 0
0 0
0.032823 0.09942
0.29839 0.09942
0.61966 0.09942
0.94256 0.014055
1 0.00115

Table 1415: Base 64 representation:


A4TspejGLHK0JtG

Figure 1066: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

359
Profile: goe177 Table 1420: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.501 6.476 ects
Information: Gottingen 177 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.4 -4.8 dcts
Cm error -26 -44 mcts
Upper transition point 8.84 8.5 %

Figure 1067: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1068: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1417: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.5578 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 4.9866 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.19815 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.11096 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.9283 deg
Release Angle: 7.6838 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.2156 deg
Camber deflection: 19.8994 deg

Table 1418: Controlpoints


1 -0.001
0.24282 0.041593
0.14282 -0.0086
0.049991 -0.0086
0.021496 -0.0086
0 -0.00516
0 0
0 0.0096819
0.07096 0.0864
0.30009 0.0864
0.51426 0.0864
0.89447 0.023716
1 0.001

Table 1419: Base 64 representation:


HwTUkljDGER4KsF

Figure 1069: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

360
Profile: goe178 Table 1424: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.007 4.176 ects
Information: Gottingen 178 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1 1.7 dcts
Cm error -16 -22 mcts
Upper transition point 0.33 -0.45 %

Figure 1070: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1071: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1421: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.4025 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 3.9389 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6702 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0938 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.9352 deg
Release Angle: 6.4879 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.6762 deg
Camber deflection: 18.1641 deg

Table 1422: Controlpoints


1 -0.0015
0.42475 0.026453
0.10402 -0.014325
0.049979 -0.014325
0.026688 -0.014325
0 -0.011752
0 0
0 0.01753
0.102 0.08605
0.30013 0.08605
0.32635 0.08605
0.56548 0.07997
1 0.0015

Table 1423: Base 64 representation:


NpTCk0eDEG6oIqI

Figure 1072: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

361
Profile: goe180 Table 1428: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.604 5.446 ects
Information: Gottingen 180 (MVA H.26) airfoil RMS curvature error: 57.3 52.88 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.4 -2 dcts
Cm error 77 96 mcts
Upper transition point 2.29 1.42 %

Figure 1073: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1074: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1425: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.7645 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 4.4116 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.25 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2431 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.045 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.5371 deg
Release Angle: 5.9015 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.3688 deg
Camber deflection: 18.2702 deg

Table 1426: Controlpoints


1 -0.00125
0.33164 0.017803
0.13232 -0.012413
0.049985 -0.012413
0.006695 -0.012413
0 -0.0068294
0 0
0 0.03017
0.10983 0.087025
0.30011 0.087025
0.61899 0.087025
0.9362 0.012695
1 0.00125

Table 1427: Base 64 representation:


WoTski2DGFLwKpG

Figure 1075: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

362
Profile: goe182 Table 1432: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.834 8.108 ects
Information: Gottingen 182 (MVA H.27) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.8 -4.3 dcts
Cm error -74 -82 mcts
Upper transition point 12.11 11.9 %

Figure 1076: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1077: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1429: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.1444 % @0.19C
Maximum Camber: 5.3328 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.15 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.26931 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.60932 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.5875 deg
Release Angle: 8.1776 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.3448 deg
Camber deflection: 21.5224 deg

Table 1430: Controlpoints


1 -0.00075
0.34348 0.049581
0.18683 -0.01428
0.0502 -0.01428
0.028614 -0.01428
0 -0.01428
0 0
0 0.0080795
0.036359 0.09536
0.29864 0.09536
0.47444 0.09536
0.85516 0.03146
1 0.00075

Table 1431: Base 64 representation:


F3TQo cDJGVzIsE

Figure 1078: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

363
Profile: goe184 Table 1436: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.959 6.999 ects
Information: Gottingen 184 (MVA H.29) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.3 -2.4 dcts
Cm error -16 -35 mcts
Upper transition point 2.07 2.22 %

Figure 1079: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1080: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1433: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.3137 % @0.21C
Maximum Camber: 5.178 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.22 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.2956 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0213 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.3782 deg
Release Angle: 7.0307 deg
Nose Incidence: 16.6305 deg
Camber deflection: 23.6613 deg

Table 1434: Controlpoints


1 -0.0011
0.23061 0.042444
0.13061 -0.01387
0.0502 -0.01387
0.046184 -0.01387
0 -0.01387
0 0
0 0.030813
0.11408 0.09166
0.29866 0.09166
0.37535 0.09166
0.55489 0.09166
1 0.0011

Table 1435: Base 64 representation:


WnTHm FDFG 4JrG

Figure 1081: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

364
Profile: goe190 Table 1440: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.101 6.468 ects
Information: Gottingen 190 (MVA MK.18) airfoil RMS curvature error: 65.12 66.77 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 3.2 3.2 dcts
Cm error -82 -81 mcts
Upper transition point -3.49 -3.34 %

Figure 1082: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1083: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1437: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.123 % @0.22C
Maximum Camber: 5.7206 % @0.51C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.294 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.3449 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.8771 deg
Release Angle: 10.5061 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.846 deg
Camber deflection: 28.3521 deg

Table 1438: Controlpoints


1 0
0.39477 0.073358
0.39477 -0.02938
0.15103 -0.02938
0.14479 -0.02938
0 -0.029062
0 0
0 0.051365
0.15318 0.10763
0.29621 0.10763
0.59315 0.10763
0.90789 0.036698
1 0

Table 1439: Base 64 representation:


ffTbt-DKSNW R2A

Figure 1084: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

365
Profile: goe195 Table 1444: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.084 6.171 ects
Information: Gottingen 195 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.1 -2.8 dcts
Cm error -37 -49 mcts
Upper transition point 4.07 4.3 %

Figure 1085: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1086: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1441: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.4849 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 4.7827 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.2551 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1821 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.7093 deg
Release Angle: 8.727 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.8639 deg
Camber deflection: 24.591 deg

Table 1442: Controlpoints


1 -0.001
0.43374 0.059865
0.27718 -0.015795
0.074984 -0.015795
0.0073146 -0.015795
0 -0.0096955
0 0
0 0.0162
0.052663 0.0874
0.40009 0.0874
0.40009 0.0874
0.69183 0.079957
1 0.001

Table 1443: Base 64 representation:


M3aAkm5FOH5xJwF

Figure 1087: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

366
Profile: goe199 Table 1448: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 7.266 10.362 ects
Information: Gottingen 199 (L.F.G. 5406) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 28.9 16 dcts
Cm error -116 -121 mcts
Upper transition point 7.35 5.63 %

Figure 1088: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1089: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1445: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.5277 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 5.1059 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 1.1 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.63811 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.83734 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.6995 deg
Release Angle: 6.86 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.8572 deg
Camber deflection: 19.7172 deg

Table 1446: Controlpoints


1 -0.0055
0.13553 0.03996
0.035525 -0.00836
0.01252 -0.00836
0.011268 -0.00836
0 -0.006688
0 0
0 0.016175
0.061499 0.08847
0.29974 0.08847
0.52159 0.08847
0.64193 0.073221
1 0.0055

Table 1447: Base 64 representation:


MyTUlyGBBEz4Jqc

Figure 1090: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

367
Profile: goe210 Table 1452: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.216 7.303 ects
Information: Gottingen 210 (DAIMLER) airfoil RMS curvature error: 52.77 52.36 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.4 -3.6 dcts
Cm error 25 12 mcts
Upper transition point 2.51 2.97 %

Figure 1091: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1092: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1449: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.3236 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 4.4934 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0723 %C
Lower nose radius: -1.0158e-005 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.0474 deg
Release Angle: 6.589 deg
Nose Incidence: 18.1449 deg
Camber deflection: 24.7339 deg

Table 1450: Controlpoints


1 -0.0008
0.29207 0.030014
0.069981 -0.00574
0.01253 -0.00574
0.01022 -0.00574
0 -0.0006314
0 0
0 0.010479
0.015361 0.0762
0.39962 0.0762
0.62796 0.0762
0.9705 0.0063669
1 0.0008

Table 1451: Base 64 representation:


J9aYgHMBECFwJqE

Figure 1093: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

368
Profile: goe217 Table 1456: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 8.613 9.941 ects
Information: Gottingen 217 (MVA MK.12) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.4 1.4 dcts
Cm error -115 -136 mcts
Upper transition point -5.17 -4.23 %

Figure 1094: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1095: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1453: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 19.1848 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 6.4451 % @0.59C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.74 %C
Upper nose radius: 11.4589 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.6354 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.0952 deg
Release Angle: 16.4622 deg
Nose Incidence: 34.7006 deg
Camber deflection: 51.1628 deg

Table 1454: Controlpoints


1 -0.0037
0.55312 0.090592
0.54396 -0.04768
0.15266 -0.04768
0.15266 -0.04768
0 -0.036506
0 0
0 0.14479
0.29167 0.14927
0.29167 0.14927
0.44205 0.14927
0.81234 0.075772
1 0.0037

Table 1455: Base 64 representation:


9ATO wAKeUg-K6T

Figure 1096: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

369
Profile: goe222 Table 1460: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 8.68 10.541 ects
Information: Gottingen 222 (MVA H.33) airfoil RMS curvature error: 33.94 35.46 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.8 -2.5 dcts
Cm error -8 0 mcts
Upper transition point 2.82 2.7 %

Figure 1097: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1098: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1457: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18.1758 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 7.1173 % @0.53C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4232 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.9792 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.9267 deg
Release Angle: 16.5271 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.3769 deg
Camber deflection: 33.904 deg

Table 1458: Controlpoints


1 -0.0015
0.62274 0.055311
0.34859 -0.04318
0.20231 -0.04318
0.045894 -0.04318
0 -0.017309
0 0
0 0.023379
0.057608 0.15
0.39179 0.15
0.60315 0.15
0.81145 0.087389
1 0.0015

Table 1459: Base 64 representation:


K2ZW awNMSkkS6I

Figure 1099: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

370
Profile: goe223 Table 1464: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.916 8.84 ects
Information: Gottingen 223 (MVA H.34) airfoil RMS curvature error: 59.94 61.69 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -7.8 -8.2 dcts
Cm error -64 -49 mcts
Upper transition point 10.75 11.16 %

Figure 1100: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1101: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1461: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18.5405 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 5.9037 % @0.54C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %C
Upper nose radius: -0.066341 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.84704 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 24.5075 deg
Release Angle: 19.1941 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.0783 deg
Camber deflection: 33.2724 deg

Table 1462: Controlpoints


1 -0.001
0.61158 0.042345
0.49695 -0.0483
0.20314 -0.0483
0.18248 -0.0483
0 -0.032101
0 0
0 0
0.025197 0.14389
0.39065 0.14389
0.60703 0.14389
0.99772 0.0024289
1 0.001

Table 1463: Base 64 representation:


A7ZX8qHNYVBws-F

Figure 1102: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

371
Profile: goe225 Table 1468: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.828 6.649 ects
Information: Gottingen 225 (MVA H.35) airfoil RMS curvature error: 59.18 60.47 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.5 2.8 dcts
Cm error -13 -6 mcts
Upper transition point -4.94 -5.17 %

Figure 1103: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1104: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1465: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.9069 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 7.7503 % @0.5C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.6 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.723 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0738 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.7844 deg
Release Angle: 13.5592 deg
Nose Incidence: 16.0875 deg
Camber deflection: 29.6466 deg

Table 1466: Controlpoints


1 -0.003
0.53906 0.096381
0.30873 -0.02325
0.07551 -0.02325
0.055877 -0.02325
0 -0.02325
0 0
0 0.030152
0.079151 0.1306
0.39714 0.1306
0.67673 0.1306
0.96112 0.013382
1 0.003

Table 1467: Base 64 representation:


PyZe3 RFQKIqD1P

Figure 1105: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

372
Profile: goe226 Table 1472: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 11.047 12.016 ects
Information: Gottingen 226 (MVA H.36) airfoil RMS curvature error: 75.48 78.02 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.9 3 dcts
Cm error 19 38 mcts
Upper transition point 2.42 2.08 %

Figure 1106: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1107: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1469: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.1374 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 8.3427 % @0.51C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.3691 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2804 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.943 deg
Release Angle: 14.1116 deg
Nose Incidence: 23.6366 deg
Camber deflection: 37.7482 deg

Table 1470: Controlpoints


1 -0.001
0.44575 0.097189
0.34575 -0.02457
0.07563 -0.02457
0.051428 -0.02457
0 -0.02457
0 0
0 0.016785
0.04426 0.13961
0.39644 0.13961
0.63335 0.13961
0.93094 0.020437
1 0.001

Table 1471: Base 64 representation:


I4ZZ7 UFTKM1G0F

Figure 1108: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

373
Profile: goe227 Table 1476: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.79 7.059 ects
Information: Gottingen 227 (MVA H.37) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.4 0.4 dcts
Cm error -8 -11 mcts
Upper transition point 4.14 4.25 %

Figure 1109: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1110: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1473: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.3591 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 7.6239 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.42932 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.4515 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.116 deg
Release Angle: 17.1706 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.5119 deg
Camber deflection: 25.6824 deg

Table 1474: Controlpoints


1 -0.0015
0.63246 0.090906
0.33311 -0.026933
0.07496 -0.026933
0.05622 -0.026933
0 -0.026933
0 0
0 0.013653
0.065123 0.14
0.40021 0.14
0.44819 0.14
0.62415 0.14
1 0.0015

Table 1475: Base 64 representation:


G1aF7 QFSL iH7I

Figure 1111: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

374
Profile: goe229 Table 1480: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 13.132 14.261 ects
Information: Gottingen 229 (MVA H.39) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -27.7 -27.6 dcts
Cm error -53 -45 mcts
Upper transition point 44.12 43.6 %

Figure 1112: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1113: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1477: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18.922 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 6.1376 % @0.53C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.0098 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.0474 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.8676 deg
Release Angle: 12.2937 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.8435 deg
Camber deflection: 24.1372 deg

Table 1478: Controlpoints


1 -0.001
0.60957 0.042725
0.50957 -0.04898
0.20326 -0.04898
0.15029 -0.04898
0 -0.026214
0 0
0 0
0.0055094 0.14844
0.39013 0.14844
0.41218 0.14844
0.61814 0.14438
1 0.001

Table 1479: Base 64 representation:


A-ZC-hRNZV9yQ1F

Figure 1114: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

375
Profile: goe233 Table 1484: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.584 7.214 ects
Information: Gottingen 233 (MVA CA4) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.8 -4.4 dcts
Cm error -85 -84 mcts
Upper transition point 1.12 1.08 %

Figure 1115: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1116: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1481: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.7496 % @0.21C
Maximum Camber: 7.8877 % @0.51C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.31 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.204 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.77354 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.5611 deg
Release Angle: 14.3239 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.2799 deg
Camber deflection: 31.6038 deg

Table 1482: Controlpoints


1 -0.00155
0.45733 0.14107
0.35733 -0.02103
0.10046 -0.02103
0.080368 -0.02103
0 -0.02103
0 0
0 0.042191
0.12115 0.1194
0.39741 0.1194
0.64 0.1194
0.9964 0.0024961
1 0.00155

Table 1483: Base 64 representation:


XrZay NGSJB1A3I

Figure 1117: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

376
Profile: goe234 Table 1488: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 8.074 12.062 ects
Information: Gottingen 234 (MVA CA5) airfoil RMS curvature error: 83.73 85.33 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.2 -0.5 dcts
Cm error -95 -70 mcts
Upper transition point -3.25 -4 %

Figure 1118: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1119: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1485: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.8625 % @0.22C
Maximum Camber: 9.0649 % @0.53C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.74 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.8451 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.88889 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 1.6043 deg
Release Angle: 17.1314 deg
Nose Incidence: 18.3166 deg
Camber deflection: 35.4481 deg

Table 1486: Controlpoints


1 -0.0037
0.46328 0.15355
0.38183 -0.02601
0.10067 -0.02601
0.10067 -0.02601
0 -0.02523
0 0
0 0.031244
0.083326 0.13659
0.39649 0.13659
0.65505 0.13659
0.99655 0.0048164
1 0.0037

Table 1487: Base 64 representation:


PyZb59AGULB3C7T

Figure 1120: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

377
Profile: goe239 Table 1492: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.568 6.84 ects
Information: Gottingen 239 (MVA H.31) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.1 0.2 dcts
Cm error 21 23 mcts
Upper transition point 1.86 1.35 %

Figure 1121: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1122: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1489: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.3629 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 6.1959 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.42 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.035 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2375 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.7892 deg
Release Angle: 10.3286 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.069 deg
Camber deflection: 27.3976 deg

Table 1490: Controlpoints


1 -0.0021
0.40964 0.053939
0.30827 -0.01893
0.07534 -0.01893
0.052217 -0.01893
0 -0.01893
0 0
0 0.010485
0.032486 0.10984
0.398 0.10984
0.398 0.10984
0.66809 0.10004
1 0.0021

Table 1491: Base 64 representation:


G6ZAu UFQI52MxL

Figure 1123: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

378
Profile: goe240 Table 1496: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 7.266 11.526 ects
Information: Gottingen 240 (KOLLER) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -6.8 -6.9 dcts
Cm error -70 -69 mcts
Upper transition point 6.95 7.25 %

Figure 1124: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1125: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1493: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.8803 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 5.1087 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.22 %C
Upper nose radius: NaN %C
Lower nose radius: NaN %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.1312 deg
Release Angle: 8.2783 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.0447 deg
Camber deflection: 23.323 deg

Table 1494: Controlpoints


1 -0.0011
0.19924 0.043848
0.11289 -0.00851
0.01256 -0.00851
0.012083 -0.00851
0 -0.003404
0 0
0 0
0.0039936 0.0853
0.39936 0.0853
0.54205 0.0853
0.83662 0.039853
1 0.0011

Table 1495: Base 64 representation:


A-aPjaCBHEs5LsG

Figure 1126: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

379
Profile: goe242 Table 1500: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.715 6.972 ects
Information: Gottingen 242 (MVA PR.2) airfoil RMS curvature error: 28.91 28 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.2 -0.6 dcts
Cm error -20 -11 mcts
Upper transition point -0.94 -1.73 %

Figure 1127: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1128: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1497: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.9379 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 7.5325 % @0.54C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.4 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.53148 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.52671 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.101 deg
Release Angle: 17.7839 deg
Nose Incidence: 20.5214 deg
Camber deflection: 38.3052 deg

Table 1498: Controlpoints


1 -0.002
0.62788 0.10635
0.52788 -0.02366
0.1506 -0.02366
0.1506 -0.02366
0 -0.022996
0 0
0 0.012734
0.045766 0.1466
0.39626 0.1466
0.39626 0.1466
0.59196 0.14517
1 0.002

Table 1499: Base 64 representation:


G4ZA-9AKcK-xD8K

Figure 1129: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

380
Profile: goe255 Table 1504: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.811 4.188 ects
Information: Gottingen 255 (MVA CA.6) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.2 -2.5 dcts
Cm error -10 -6 mcts
Upper transition point 3.03 3.5 %

Figure 1130: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1131: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1501: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18.4154 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 4.8452 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.50001 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.1878 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.4709 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.4744 deg
Release Angle: 8.2144 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.3019 deg
Camber deflection: 22.5163 deg

Table 1502: Controlpoints


1 -0.0025
0.52938 -0.014354
0.42938 -0.051691
0.20358 -0.051691
0.070113 -0.051691
0 -0.015586
0 0
0 0
0.016801 0.13875
0.39038 0.13875
0.41516 0.13875
0.6077 0.13414
1 0.0025

Table 1503: Base 64 representation:


A8ZD6TpNSW90WtN

Figure 1132: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

381
Profile: goe256 Table 1508: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.713 9.403 ects
Information: Gottingen 256 (JUNKERS E) airfoi RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.9 -2.7 dcts
Cm error 27 45 mcts
Upper transition point 6.57 5.54 %

Figure 1133: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1134: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1505: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.9444 % @0.36C
Maximum Camber: 4.6763 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.25 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.2247 %C
Lower nose radius: 4.3846 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 22.0788 deg
Release Angle: 5.5593 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.9405 deg
Camber deflection: 14.4998 deg

Table 1506: Controlpoints


1 -0.00125
0.85827 -0.026334
0.20114 -0.03651
0.20114 -0.03651
0.06526 -0.03651
0 -0.03651
0 0
0 0
0.011467 0.12588
0.39607 0.12588
0.60644 0.12588
0.85921 0.045772
1 0.00125

Table 1507: Base 64 representation:


A9ZW1 qNAQXtflG

Figure 1135: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

382
Profile: goe257 Table 1512: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.482 3.708 ects
Information: Gottingen 257 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.4 -5.8 dcts
Cm error -31 -39 mcts
Upper transition point 3.67 2.66 %

Figure 1136: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1137: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1509: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.925 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 4.0478 % @0.32C
Trailing Edge Gap: 1.28 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6687 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.9912 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.988 deg
Release Angle: 6.8861 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.213 deg
Camber deflection: 21.0991 deg

Table 1510: Controlpoints


1 -0.0064
0.21791 0.0042565
0.09667 -0.00956
0.01253 -0.00956
0.011666 -0.00956
0 -0.000478
0 0
0 0.023704
0.12331 0.08496
0.29973 0.08496
0.42382 0.08496
0.53882 0.08496
1 0.0064

Table 1511: Base 64 representation:


SlTLjDEBFE 2Kog

Figure 1138: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

383
Profile: goe264 Table 1516: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.785 8.832 ects
Information: Gottingen 264 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 3 0.3 dcts
Cm error -9 -33 mcts
Upper transition point -6.13 -4.43 %

Figure 1139: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1140: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1513: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.6938 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 5.5683 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.64 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.64463 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.68903 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.9551 deg
Release Angle: 6.7228 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.9901 deg
Camber deflection: 14.7129 deg

Table 1514: Controlpoints


1 -0.0032
0.18439 0.064504
0.084389 -0.01096
0.02615 -0.01096
0.02615 -0.01096
0 -0.010302
0 0
0 0.023527
0.12879 0.08802
0.28926 0.08802
0.63109 0.08802
0.94279 0.011955
1 0.0032

Table 1515: Base 64 representation:


RjTfl7ACEFK4EqQ

Figure 1141: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

384
Profile: goe265 Table 1520: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.001 9.494 ects
Information: Gottingen 265 airfoil RMS curvature error: 52.85 60.76 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.2 -2 dcts
Cm error -61 -55 mcts
Upper transition point 1.1 0.53 %

Figure 1142: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1143: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1517: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.5622 % @0.13C
Maximum Camber: 7.2624 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.21 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.2796 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.51072 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.3545 deg
Release Angle: 9.1079 deg
Nose Incidence: 22.0725 deg
Camber deflection: 31.1804 deg

Table 1518: Controlpoints


1 -0.00105
0.13955 0.095932
0.13955 -0.00978
0.02509 -0.00978
0.02509 -0.00978
0 -0.0092427
0 0
0 0.037183
0.090979 0.10698
0.29904 0.10698
0.40649 0.10698
0.52192 0.1008
1 0.00105

Table 1519: Base 64 representation:


WsTKt7ACIE7 GuF

Figure 1144: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

385
Profile: goe269 Table 1524: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.105 7.954 ects
Information: Gottingen 269 airfoil RMS curvature error: 40.95 40.89 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.1 0 dcts
Cm error -21 -15 mcts
Upper transition point -1.23 -1.52 %

Figure 1145: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1146: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1521: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.0889 % @0.2C
Maximum Camber: 4.9198 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.58 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.1235 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1645 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.9384 deg
Release Angle: 7.0501 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.8146 deg
Camber deflection: 20.8647 deg

Table 1522: Controlpoints


1 -0.0029
0.18391 0.054138
0.083914 -0.0135
0.02517 -0.0135
0.02517 -0.0135
0 -0.012825
0 0
0 0.033548
0.12223 0.08246
0.29902 0.08246
0.43725 0.08246
0.55584 0.080217
1 0.0029

Table 1523: Base 64 representation:


alTNi8ACEG94HqP

Figure 1147: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

386
Profile: goe276 Table 1528: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.412 5.468 ects
Information: Gottingen 276 (DAIMLER VII) airfoil RMS curvature error: 68.01 70.09 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 75 -60.7 dcts
Cm error -2 37 mcts
Upper transition point 4.82 3.6 %

Figure 1148: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1149: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1525: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.6678 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 3.8774 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.8 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.8361 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.66746 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.1143 deg
Release Angle: 7.2811 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.3118 deg
Camber deflection: 22.5929 deg

Table 1526: Controlpoints


1 -0.004
0.37009 0.022599
0.01255 -0.00883
0.01255 -0.00883
0.00502 -0.00883
0 -0.003532
0 0
0 0.011553
0.051041 0.07662
0.29959 0.07662
0.29959 0.07662
0.66993 0.07662
1 0.004

Table 1527: Base 64 representation:


K0TAgalBAE oLrU

Figure 1150: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

387
Profile: goe277 Table 1532: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.86 6.136 ects
Information: Gottingen 277 (DAIMLER VIII) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.6 -5 dcts
Cm error -9 8 mcts
Upper transition point 3.38 2.99 %

Figure 1151: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1152: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1529: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.1321 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 4.0152 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.32 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.0059 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.98717 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.368 deg
Release Angle: 6.4175 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.9788 deg
Camber deflection: 24.3963 deg

Table 1530: Controlpoints


1 -0.0016
0.25682 0.016178
0.081652 -0.01037
0.02509 -0.01037
0.020005 -0.01037
0 -0.008296
0 0
0 0.018598
0.076462 0.08559
0.29923 0.08559
0.51619 0.08559
0.80419 0.043307
1 0.0016

Table 1531: Base 64 representation:


OvTUkyNCEEgzMqI

Figure 1153: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

388
Profile: goe278 Table 1536: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.266 6.932 ects
Information: Gottingen 278 (DAIMLER IX) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 11.4 7 dcts
Cm error -19 -9 mcts
Upper transition point 4.28 2.61 %

Figure 1154: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1155: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1533: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.4334 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 3.7758 % @0.32C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.3007 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.89633 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.4513 deg
Release Angle: 6.0834 deg
Nose Incidence: 19.5893 deg
Camber deflection: 25.6726 deg

Table 1534: Controlpoints


1 -0.001
0.12761 0.01942
0.027607 -0.00821
0.01256 -0.00821
0.003768 -0.00821
0 -0.005747
0 0
0 0.030225
0.111 0.07979
0.29942 0.07979
0.61757 0.07979
0.85834 0.031063
1 0.001

Table 1535: Base 64 representation:


YnTshssBBEY4MqF

Figure 1156: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

389
Profile: goe279 Table 1540: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.399 5.659 ects
Information: Gottingen 279 (DAIMLER X) airfoil RMS curvature error: 47.14 45.85 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 4.2 -0.2 dcts
Cm error 47 61 mcts
Upper transition point -3.67 -3.88 %

Figure 1157: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1158: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1537: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.4413 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 4.7096 % @0.32C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.37 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.9881 %C
Lower nose radius: NaN %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.766 deg
Release Angle: 7.9453 deg
Nose Incidence: 21.7037 deg
Camber deflection: 29.649 deg

Table 1538: Controlpoints


1 -0.00185
0.16152 0.028342
0.037592 -0.00565
0.01252 -0.00565
0.011847 -0.00565
0 -0.0006215
0 0
0 0.037855
0.10812 0.08415
0.29968 0.08415
0.32785 0.08415
0.66565 0.08415
1 0.00185

Table 1539: Base 64 representation:


soTDjHDBCC 3NsJ

Figure 1159: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

390
Profile: goe280 Table 1544: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 14.329 15.823 ects
Information: Gottingen 280 (DAIMLER XI) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -19.1 -21 dcts
Cm error -70 -58 mcts
Upper transition point 3.56 2.77 %

Figure 1160: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1161: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1541: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.1632 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 4.4821 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.8 %C
Upper nose radius: NaN %C
Lower nose radius: 0.0077883 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.2506 deg
Release Angle: 7.4485 deg
Nose Incidence: 20.2021 deg
Camber deflection: 27.6505 deg

Table 1542: Controlpoints


1 -0.004
0.53809 0.019578
0.01252 -0.00667
0.01252 -0.00667
0.010368 -0.00667
0 -0.0007337
0 0
0 0
0.00071735 0.08511
0.29977 0.08511
0.64864 0.08511
0.99649 0.004694
1 0.004

Table 1543: Base 64 representation:


A TgjHLBADBeJqU

Figure 1162: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

391
Profile: goe281 Table 1548: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.284 8.063 ects
Information: Gottingen 281 (DAIMLER XII) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -59.1 4.9 dcts
Cm error 4 -39 mcts
Upper transition point -6.63 -6.3 %

Figure 1163: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1164: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1545: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.0487 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 4.525 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.52 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.23127 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.84938 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.0867 deg
Release Angle: 7.0741 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.0933 deg
Camber deflection: 16.1674 deg

Table 1546: Controlpoints


1 -0.0026
0.30304 0.022113
0.037172 -0.00843
0.01255 -0.00843
0.011295 -0.00843
0 -0.0075027
0 0
0 0.0094094
0.057424 0.08507
0.2995 0.08507
0.35785 0.08507
0.61588 0.08507
1 0.0026

Table 1547: Base 64 representation:


HzTFj4GBCE tLrN

Figure 1165: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

392
Profile: goe282 Table 1552: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.294 6.458 ects
Information: Gottingen 282 (DAIMLER XIII) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.2 1.3 dcts
Cm error 2 14 mcts
Upper transition point -2.15 -3.18 %

Figure 1166: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1167: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1549: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.4156 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 4.3098 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.64 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3071 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.30781 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.8808 deg
Release Angle: 8.3943 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.5684 deg
Camber deflection: 25.9627 deg

Table 1550: Controlpoints


1 -0.0032
0.24972 0.027724
0.14971 -0.01513
0.0752 -0.01513
0.050627 -0.01513
0 -0.014836
0 0
0 0.018267
0.068705 0.09465
0.29878 0.09465
0.64258 0.09465
0.91447 0.027145
1 0.0032

Table 1551: Base 64 representation:


MwTfn-VFFGR3PuQ

Figure 1168: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

393
Profile: goe284 Table 1556: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.135 5.874 ects
Information: Gottingen 284 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.5 1.7 dcts
Cm error -20 -4 mcts
Upper transition point -5.07 -4.38 %

Figure 1169: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1170: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1553: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.7117 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 4.987 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.59 %C
Upper nose radius: 5.1796 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.1007 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.9088 deg
Release Angle: 6.7187 deg
Nose Incidence: 21.669 deg
Camber deflection: 28.3877 deg

Table 1554: Controlpoints


1 -0.00295
0.32439 -0.036614
0.22439 -0.04537
0.10232 -0.04537
0.021812 -0.04537
0 -0.016476
0 0
0 0.063647
0.14947 0.13739
0.29297 0.13739
0.49955 0.13739
0.59955 0.10562
1 0.00295

Table 1555: Base 64 representation:


efTT6XxHJTy3ToP

Figure 1171: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

394
Profile: goe285 Table 1560: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.855 5.673 ects
Information: Gottingen 285 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.6 -2.4 dcts
Cm error 25 27 mcts
Upper transition point 3.75 3.1 %

Figure 1172: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1173: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1557: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.7952 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 3.6729 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.8901 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.5298 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 18.2752 deg
Release Angle: 0.83283 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.5201 deg
Camber deflection: 10.3529 deg

Table 1558: Controlpoints


1 -0.0015
0.95059 -0.0087129
0.09996 -0.02678
0.09996 -0.02678
0.060326 -0.02678
0 -0.02678
0 0
0 0.035433
0.099642 0.09536
0.30014 0.09536
0.61092 0.09536
0.98871 0.0034853
1 0.0015

Table 1559: Base 64 representation:


YqTco ZGALCSUhI

Figure 1174: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

395
Profile: goe286 Table 1564: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.889 6.135 ects
Information: Gottingen 286 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -16.4 -14.9 dcts
Cm error -88 -61 mcts
Upper transition point 31.31 30.58 %

Figure 1175: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1176: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1561: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.2573 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 4.1761 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.5 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1088 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.6584 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.3132 deg
Release Angle: 5.615 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.8485 deg
Camber deflection: 16.4635 deg

Table 1562: Controlpoints


1 -0.0025
0.2808 0.0032537
0.099784 -0.01409
0.05017 -0.01409
0.0091633 -0.01409
0 -0.010065
0 0
0 0.023658
0.075722 0.08775
0.29893 0.08775
0.54244 0.08775
0.99542 0.0033705
1 0.0025

Table 1563: Base 64 representation:


RvTWktzDDGByMoN

Figure 1177: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

396
Profile: goe287 Table 1568: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 12.135 13.25 ects
Information: Gottingen 287 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.2 -4.2 dcts
Cm error -150 -152 mcts
Upper transition point 5.74 5.99 %

Figure 1178: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1179: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1565: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.7121 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 4.9458 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.5 %C
Upper nose radius: 5.6267 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.93603 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.3715 deg
Release Angle: 5.64 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.0312 deg
Camber deflection: 14.6712 deg

Table 1566: Controlpoints


1 -0.0025
0.42436 0.024322
0.044578 -0.0104
0.02508 -0.0104
0.01552 -0.0104
0 -0.0104
0 0
0 0
0.019962 0.09263
0.39925 0.09263
0.5059 0.09263
0.65129 0.055314
1 0.0025

Table 1567: Base 64 representation:


A8aLn YCBEsmHoN

Figure 1180: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

397
Profile: goe288 Table 1572: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.502 7.749 ects
Information: Gottingen 288 airfoil RMS curvature error: 17.15 17.13 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.1 0.7 dcts
Cm error 15 34 mcts
Upper transition point -4.68 -4.17 %

Figure 1181: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1182: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1569: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.6174 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 5.4663 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.59 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.2319 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.6696 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.3543 deg
Release Angle: 9.5547 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.63 deg
Camber deflection: 17.1847 deg

Table 1570: Controlpoints


1 -0.00295
0.48152 0.018577
0.37723 -0.04552
0.15238 -0.04552
0.066157 -0.04552
0 -0.034314
0 0
0 0.040883
0.11233 0.13653
0.29285 0.13653
0.38478 0.13653
0.55565 0.13653
1 0.00295

Table 1571: Base 64 representation:


TmTI5vjKRT 0QuP

Figure 1183: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

398
Profile: goe289 Table 1576: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.534 5.449 ects
Information: Gottingen 289 (MVA 289) airfoil RMS curvature error: 34.37 35.56 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.9 0.5 dcts
Cm error 9 4 mcts
Upper transition point -5.35 -6.04 %

Figure 1184: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1185: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1573: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.7769 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 5.9481 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0866 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.1444 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.487 deg
Release Angle: 8.7149 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.4238 deg
Camber deflection: 14.1386 deg

Table 1574: Controlpoints


1 0
0.4392 0.0027101
0.3392 -0.03445
0.1 -0.03445
0.078185 -0.03445
0 -0.032202
0 0
0 0.037234
0.13383 0.14165
0.3 0.14165
0.39548 0.14165
0.58841 0.14165
1 0

Table 1575: Base 64 representation:


RiTJ77OGRP 1VvA

Figure 1186: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

399
Profile: goe290 Table 1580: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.186 7.085 ects
Information: Gottingen 290 (MVA 290) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.9 -4.3 dcts
Cm error 2 -1 mcts
Upper transition point -2.53 -1.77 %

Figure 1187: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1188: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1577: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.5903 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 3.72 % @0.32C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.60001 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.915 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.1561 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.7537 deg
Release Angle: 5.0696 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.2326 deg
Camber deflection: 15.3022 deg

Table 1578: Controlpoints


1 -0.003
0.42064 -0.041555
0.32064 -0.052871
0.20361 -0.052871
0.18497 -0.052871
0 -0.051564
0 0
0 0.050551
0.1315 0.12474
0.29146 0.12474
0.35523 0.12474
0.50977 0.12474
1 0.003

Table 1579: Base 64 representation:


aiTG09GNJX 2UnP

Figure 1189: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

400
Profile: goe298 Table 1584: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 8.714 13.641 ects
Information: Gttingen 298 profile RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.2 -3.1 dcts
Cm error 31 63 mcts
Upper transition point 5.44 4.57 %

Figure 1190: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1191: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1581: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.3785 % @0.21C
Maximum Camber: 4.5086 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.59 %C
Upper nose radius: 5.3414 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.8661 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.1425 deg
Release Angle: 1.7081 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.6178 deg
Camber deflection: 11.3258 deg

Table 1582: Controlpoints


1 -0.00295
0.25031 -0.0011597
0.1404 -0.04122
0.07671 -0.04122
0.04219 -0.04122
0 -0.032976
0 0
0 0.05643
0.096138 0.104
0.39569 0.104
0.53718 0.104
0.97546 0.004356
1 0.00295

Table 1583: Base 64 representation:


ivZPrysFESD3EiP

Figure 1192: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

401
Profile: goe300 Table 1588: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 10.078 12.537 ects
Information: Gottingen 300 (Friedrichshafen G20) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 3 -1.3 dcts
Cm error -90 -98 mcts
Upper transition point 3.49 3.2 %

Figure 1193: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1194: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1585: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.8583 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 6.5118 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.18 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.8897 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.1318e-006 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.2588 deg
Release Angle: 9.0311 deg
Nose Incidence: 27.5136 deg
Camber deflection: 36.5447 deg

Table 1586: Controlpoints


1 -0.0009
0.13587 0.058037
0.054241 -0.0097725
0.024991 -0.0097725
0.024728 -0.0097725
0 -0.0012931
0 0
0 0.052321
0.13626 0.10873
0.3001 0.10873
0.39901 0.10873
0.57262 0.10873
1 0.0009

Table 1587: Base 64 representation:


fiTJtIBCCE 5LuF

Figure 1195: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

402
Profile: goe301 Table 1592: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.531 7.869 ects
Information: Gottingen 301 (Friedrichshafen G 13) airfoil RMS curvature error: 40.61 42.27 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 5.9 6.1 dcts
Cm error 98 107 mcts
Upper transition point -11.97 -14.32 %

Figure 1196: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1197: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1589: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.1197 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 6.4196 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.8586 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.79986 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.8862 deg
Release Angle: 9.2067 deg
Nose Incidence: 21.376 deg
Camber deflection: 30.5827 deg

Table 1590: Controlpoints


1 -0.0015
0.2602 0.047166
0.043501 -0.01144
0.02512 -0.01144
0.023242 -0.01144
0 -0.011133
0 0
0 0.051381
0.13853 0.11374
0.28864 0.11374
0.64039 0.11374
0.90019 0.027592
1 0.0015

Table 1591: Base 64 representation:


sgSgw9FCBFSxMuI

Figure 1198: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

403
Profile: goe303 Table 1596: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.178 10.011 ects
Information: Gottingen 303 (Friedrichshafen G03) airfoil RMS curvature error: 39.57 43.27 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1 -1 dcts
Cm error -40 -61 mcts
Upper transition point -1.32 -0.44 %

Figure 1199: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1200: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1593: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.6089 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 5.8597 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.45 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.55702 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.8414 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.6917 deg
Release Angle: 9.5986 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.8247 deg
Camber deflection: 27.4233 deg

Table 1594: Controlpoints


1 -0.00225
0.23937 0.034322
0.13937 -0.01224
0.02513 -0.01224
0.02513 -0.01224
0 -0.011873
0 0
0 0.0045864
0.0056645 0.10629
0.39891 0.10629
0.44031 0.10629
0.7105 0.087699
1 0.00225

Table 1595: Base 64 representation:


D-aEs9ACHF04PvL

Figure 1201: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

404
Profile: goe304 Table 1600: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.015 9.481 ects
Information: Gottingen 304 (Friedrichshafen G02) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.5 -0.3 dcts
Cm error -36 -13 mcts
Upper transition point -1.61 -1.88 %

Figure 1202: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1203: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1597: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.822 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 6.2931 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.23 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6762 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.4524 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.1982 deg
Release Angle: 10.1388 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.5525 deg
Camber deflection: 25.6913 deg

Table 1598: Controlpoints


1 -0.00115
0.22239 0.053766
0.074824 -0.01563
0.02523 -0.01563
0.020436 -0.01563
0 -0.015474
0 0
0 0.017829
0.028446 0.10652
0.39842 0.10652
0.51668 0.10652
0.77501 0.066678
1 0.00115

Table 1599: Base 64 representation:


L6ZNs-MCDHn1OvG

Figure 1204: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

405
Profile: goe320 Table 1604: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.565 8.367 ects
Information: Gottingen 320 (Hansa-Brandenburg II.1) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -9.9 -12.7 dcts
Cm error -55 -61 mcts
Upper transition point 21.67 21.58 %

Figure 1205: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1206: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1601: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.5694 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 6.1371 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.53 %C
Upper nose radius: -Inf %C
Lower nose radius: 3.0681 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.0108 deg
Release Angle: 7.138 deg
Nose Incidence: 21.7854 deg
Camber deflection: 28.9234 deg

Table 1602: Controlpoints


1 -0.00265
0.108 0.014985
0.066083 -0.02073
0.02538 -0.02073
0.020592 -0.02073
0 -0.020523
0 0
0 0.0013398
0.0059542 0.12352
0.29771 0.12352
0.57719 0.12352
0.64789 0.08487
1 0.00265

Table 1603: Base 64 representation:


B-TZ0-MCDJ08NrN

Figure 1207: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

406
Profile: goe325 Table 1608: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.393 5.569 ects
Information: Gottingen 325 (Pfalz 54) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2 5.7 dcts
Cm error -21 -2 mcts
Upper transition point -0.07 -0.69 %

Figure 1208: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1209: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1605: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.2472 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 4.6289 % @0.32C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.29177 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.70881 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.676 deg
Release Angle: 7.0166 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.7361 deg
Camber deflection: 16.7527 deg

Table 1606: Controlpoints


1 -0.0015
0.19674 0.02204
0.084994 -0.0098175
0.024985 -0.0098175
0.017149 -0.0098175
0 -0.009002
0 0
0 0.010691
0.058756 0.08725
0.30013 0.08725
0.35865 0.08725
0.66049 0.075865
1 0.0015

Table 1607: Base 64 representation:


IyTFk6UCEE33MqI

Figure 1210: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

407
Profile: goe326 Table 1612: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.075 7.903 ects
Information: Gottingen 326 (Pfalz 55) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -5.1 -5.8 dcts
Cm error -32 -37 mcts
Upper transition point 2.6 1.27 %

Figure 1211: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1212: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1609: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.2286 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 4.7031 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1593 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.71345 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.8853 deg
Release Angle: 6.2262 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.5111 deg
Camber deflection: 18.7373 deg

Table 1610: Controlpoints


1 -0.0015
0.1926 0.023642
0.083433 -0.0106
0.02509 -0.0106
0.022159 -0.0106
0 -0.010266
0 0
0 0.028834
0.10757 0.08772
0.2992 0.08772
0.50868 0.08772
0.6542 0.066645
1 0.0015

Table 1611: Base 64 representation:


VoTTk9HCEFv3KpI

Figure 1213: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

408
Profile: goe328 Table 1616: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.5 5.214 ects
Information: Gottingen 328 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.6 -3.7 dcts
Cm error -15 -3 mcts
Upper transition point 3.74 2.86 %

Figure 1214: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1215: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1613: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.3002 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 4.2627 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.5 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.68633 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.3982 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.3635 deg
Release Angle: 5.3792 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.4067 deg
Camber deflection: 8.7859 deg

Table 1614: Controlpoints


1 -0.0025
0.14033 0.015469
0.04983 -0.014682
0.024963 -0.014682
0.015413 -0.014682
0 -0.014682
0 0
0 0.023275
0.1184 0.08375
0.30021 0.08375
0.5236 0.08375
0.63985 0.063163
1 0.0025

Table 1615: Base 64 representation:


SmTUj YCCGv5JoN

Figure 1216: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

409
Profile: goe329 Table 1620: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.117 5.429 ects
Information: Gottingen 329 (Pfalz 58) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 32.5 -23.6 dcts
Cm error -23 32 mcts
Upper transition point 1.42 -1.82 %

Figure 1217: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1218: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1617: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.2322 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 5.525 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.6 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.93221 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.911 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.6316 deg
Release Angle: 7.4796 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.4949 deg
Camber deflection: 14.9744 deg

Table 1618: Controlpoints


1 -0.003
0.15344 0.021589
0.062811 -0.01268
0.01262 -0.01268
0.011232 -0.01268
0 -0.011412
0 0
0 0.027376
0.1206 0.10613
0.29896 0.10613
0.55007 0.10613
0.74047 0.064328
1 0.003

Table 1619: Base 64 representation:


RlTXs5HBDFk5NrP

Figure 1219: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

410
Profile: goe331 Table 1624: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.707 10.752 ects
Information: Gottingen 331 (Pfalz 60) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -15.6 NaN dcts
Cm error -33 NaN mcts
Upper transition point 1.14 NaN %

Figure 1220: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1221: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1621: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.5941 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 6.8609 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.26 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5775 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.394 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.7943 deg
Release Angle: 10.243 deg
Nose Incidence: 22.0959 deg
Camber deflection: 32.3389 deg

Table 1622: Controlpoints


1 -0.0013
0.13146 0.041876
0.031459 -0.01088
0.01261 -0.01088
0.012484 -0.01088
0 -0.010771
0 0
0 0.01276
0.015483 0.12157
0.39882 0.12157
0.42477 0.12157
0.63756 0.11655
1 0.0013

Table 1623: Base 64 representation:


H9aDz-BBBF84RwH

Figure 1222: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

411
Profile: goe332 Table 1628: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.01 5.608 ects
Information: Gottingen 332 (Pfalz 61) airfoil RMS curvature error: 73.75 77.13 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.7 1.2 dcts
Cm error 18 4 mcts
Upper transition point 0.1 -0.73 %

Figure 1223: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1224: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1625: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.5061 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 6.4167 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.25194 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0995 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 34.3775 deg
Release Angle: 19.6525 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.737 deg
Camber deflection: 32.3894 deg

Table 1626: Controlpoints


1 -0.0015
0.32819 0.027405
0.11797 -0.01622
0.05025 -0.01622
0.019308 -0.01622
0 -0.01622
0 0
0 0.0065529
0.035894 0.12117
0.39812 0.12117
0.59399 0.12117
0.98259 0.014544
1 0.0015

Table 1627: Base 64 representation:


D5ZVz mDFHHwl I

Figure 1225: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

412
Profile: goe335 Table 1632: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.072 7.639 ects
Information: Gottingen 335 (D.F.W.) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 15.4 -16 dcts
Cm error -6 27 mcts
Upper transition point -8.38 7.21 %

Figure 1226: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1227: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1629: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.2281 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 4.526 % @0.32C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.44446 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.78142 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.3012 deg
Release Angle: 7.3956 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.2731 deg
Camber deflection: 17.6687 deg

Table 1630: Controlpoints


1 0
0.13875 0.038799
0.13005 -0.00731
0.025 -0.00731
0.014376 -0.00731
0 -0.0072369
0 0
0 0.015975
0.08613 0.08125
0.3 0.08125
0.37547 0.08125
0.59788 0.08125
1 0

Table 1631: Base 64 representation:


NtTHi-bCHD -KqA

Figure 1228: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

413
Profile: goe342 Table 1636: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.138 4.646 ects
Information: Gottingen 342 airfoil RMS curvature error: 27.8 28.03 %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN 88.1 dcts
Cm error NaN 56 mcts
Upper transition point 32.55 -4.42 %

Figure 1229: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1230: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1633: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 5.2517 % @0.22C
Maximum Camber: 6.1915 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.92859 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.75319 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.8967 deg
Release Angle: 10.5822 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.4924 deg
Camber deflection: 24.0747 deg

Table 1634: Controlpoints


1 -0.0015
0.31744 0.089983
0.034013 -0.0079187
0.012488 -0.0079187
0.011193 -0.0079187
0 -0.0061523
0 0
0 0.019774
0.063162 0.0866
0.40013 0.0866
0.50886 0.0866
0.66127 0.083013
1 0.0015

Table 1635: Base 64 representation:


P1aMkxHBBD8sHwI

Figure 1231: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

414
Profile: goe346 Table 1640: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.951 9.356 ects
Information: Gottingen 346 (Friedrichshafen-Staaken) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN 16.7 dcts
Cm error NaN -62 mcts
Upper transition point 47.1 8.26 %

Figure 1232: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1233: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1637: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 5.7887 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 3.771 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.35 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.52892 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.19 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.2031 deg
Release Angle: 5.9065 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.4364 deg
Camber deflection: 13.3428 deg

Table 1638: Controlpoints


1 -0.00175
0.094516 0.026784
0.024775 -0.00999
0.01258 -0.00999
0.012328 -0.00999
0 -0.0098901
0 0
0 0.005047
0.0092574 0.06664
0.39944 0.06664
0.4833 0.06664
0.67331 0.059401
1 0.00175

Table 1639: Base 64 representation:


F-aJc-BBBE46JpJ

Figure 1234: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

415
Profile: goe358 Table 1644: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.327 5.156 ects
Information: Gottingen 358 airfoil RMS curvature error: 35.06 35.4 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 0.6 dcts
Cm error -29 -30 mcts
Upper transition point -0.25 -1.33 %

Figure 1235: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1236: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1641: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.9294 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 5.609 % @0.52C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.32 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.7952 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0398 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.2441 deg
Release Angle: 11.863 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.6421 deg
Camber deflection: 22.5051 deg

Table 1642: Controlpoints


1 -0.0016
0.44764 0.078399
0.39324 -0.02401
0.099962 -0.02401
0.063483 -0.02401
0 -0.020978
0 0
0 0.043995
0.16172 0.09657
0.30016 0.09657
0.38729 0.09657
0.6572 0.09657
1 0.0016

Table 1643: Base 64 representation:


seTIo3XGVK 5IyI

Figure 1237: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

416
Profile: goe359 Table 1648: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.467 7.72 ects
Information: Gottingen 359 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 6.9 -1.4 dcts
Cm error 50 51 mcts
Upper transition point -3.95 -4.55 %

Figure 1238: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1239: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1645: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.0938 % @0.24C
Maximum Camber: 5.7649 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.15 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.56337 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.0224e-005 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.4258 deg
Release Angle: 6.1973 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.0295 deg
Camber deflection: 20.2268 deg

Table 1646: Controlpoints


1 -0.00075
0.14028 0.051598
0.14028 -0.0074194
0.012494 -0.0074194
0.010486 -0.0074194
0 -0.0001118
0 0
0 0.018735
0.08403 0.097025
0.30007 0.097025
0.61229 0.097025
0.99612 0.0013579
1 0.00075

Table 1647: Base 64 representation:


MtTsoBKBIDB GpE

Figure 1240: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

417
Profile: goe360 Table 1652: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.424 8.513 ects
Information: Gottingen 360 airfoil RMS curvature error: 74.85 75.96 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 43 36.5 dcts
Cm error -14 -16 mcts
Upper transition point 3.77 -3.07 %

Figure 1241: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1242: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1649: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.7669 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 5.8386 % @0.32C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.21 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.92516 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2657 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.1579 deg
Release Angle: 6.5675 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.5775 deg
Camber deflection: 18.1449 deg

Table 1650: Controlpoints


1 -0.00105
0.099013 0.030233
0.035516 -0.01048
0.0126 -0.01048
0.01008 -0.01048
0 -0.0092224
0 0
0 0.025058
0.1018 0.10706
0.29898 0.10706
0.56596 0.10706
0.82773 0.034994
1 0.00105

Table 1651: Base 64 representation:


PpTYt3NBBEZ7KqF

Figure 1243: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

418
Profile: goe361 Table 1656: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.992 5.696 ects
Information: Gottingen 361 airfoil RMS curvature error: 90.08 85.46 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.8 6.7 dcts
Cm error -25 -24 mcts
Upper transition point 3.81 2.68 %

Figure 1244: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1245: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1653: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.7216 % @0.22C
Maximum Camber: 5.5814 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.17619 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.82158 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.804 deg
Release Angle: 8.2741 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.0368 deg
Camber deflection: 16.311 deg

Table 1654: Controlpoints


1 0
0.34409 0.067459
0.057931 -0.00841
0.0125 -0.00841
0.01 -0.00841
0 -0.0074008
0 0
0 0.0086704
0.064003 0.08725
0.3 0.08725
0.59331 0.08725
0.9612 0.0073152
1 0

Table 1655: Base 64 representation:


GxTbk3NBDEGsFsA

Figure 1246: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

419
Profile: goe362 Table 1660: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.761 7.6 ects
Information: Gottingen 362 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.6 2.7 dcts
Cm error -30 -28 mcts
Upper transition point -0.94 -1.22 %

Figure 1247: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1248: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1657: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.6417 % @0.22C
Maximum Camber: 5.3052 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5858 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.051094 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.8451 deg
Release Angle: 8.4111 deg
Nose Incidence: 19.2358 deg
Camber deflection: 27.647 deg

Table 1658: Controlpoints


1 0
0.3514 0.062323
0.14166 -0.00585
0.025 -0.00585
0.008773 -0.00585
0 -0.0017287
0 0
0 0.039272
0.14588 0.0833
0.3 0.0833
0.39579 0.0833
0.59103 0.081971
1 0

Table 1659: Base 64 representation:


egTJjTpCIC-vHtA

Figure 1249: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

420
Profile: goe363 Table 1664: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.919 7.69 ects
Information: Gottingen 363 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -7.3 -7.1 dcts
Cm error -10 -12 mcts
Upper transition point 13.33 13.53 %

Figure 1250: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1251: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1661: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.0102 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 5.6788 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.11 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.80406 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.52159 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.8286 deg
Release Angle: 8.4326 deg
Nose Incidence: 20.9052 deg
Camber deflection: 29.3378 deg

Table 1662: Controlpoints


1 -0.00055
0.27471 0.02501
0.1673 -0.01493
0.07523 -0.01493
0.051601 -0.01493
0 -0.013395
0 0
0 0.013262
0.032812 0.10984
0.29829 0.10984
0.56373 0.10984
0.75604 0.06522
1 0.00055

Table 1663: Base 64 representation:


I4TYu4UFGGl3OtD

Figure 1252: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

421
Profile: goe364 Table 1668: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.703 7.216 ects
Information: Gottingen 364 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.9 -4 dcts
Cm error -45 -11 mcts
Upper transition point 1.09 -0.45 %

Figure 1253: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1254: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1665: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.9015 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 6.5007 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.0046 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.35239 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.0814 deg
Release Angle: 8.8591 deg
Nose Incidence: 28.2032 deg
Camber deflection: 37.0623 deg

Table 1666: Controlpoints


1 0
0.19755 0.032487
0.097553 -0.00791
0.0125 -0.00791
0.0068122 -0.00791
0 -0.0040005
0 0
0 0.054
0.10922 0.1191
0.3 0.1191
0.44618 0.1191
0.65408 0.09528
1 0

Table 1667: Base 64 representation:


soTNygsBGDy4PtA

Figure 1255: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

422
Profile: goe365 Table 1672: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.213 6.453 ects
Information: Gottingen 365 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 3.3 0.4 dcts
Cm error 22 25 mcts
Upper transition point -6.68 -8.51 %

Figure 1256: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1257: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1669: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.7057 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 5.1228 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.2532 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.82568 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.9764 deg
Release Angle: 7.3863 deg
Nose Incidence: 20.945 deg
Camber deflection: 28.3314 deg

Table 1670: Controlpoints


1 0
0.12491 -0.0091923
0.026247 -0.01024
0.02511 -0.01024
0.013123 -0.01024
0 -0.0084992
0 0
0 0.03699
0.091088 0.10964
0.29885 0.10964
0.53276 0.10964
0.68496 0.086627
1 0

Table 1671: Base 64 representation:


WrTVu0fCAEy5SrA

Figure 1258: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

423
Profile: goe366 Table 1676: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.628 5.439 ects
Information: Gottingen 366 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -191.8 NaN dcts
Cm error 63 NaN mcts
Upper transition point -10.2 NaN %

Figure 1259: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1260: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1673: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.1888 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 7.2187 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.4342 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.6543 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.9201 deg
Release Angle: 11.1957 deg
Nose Incidence: 16.5136 deg
Camber deflection: 27.7093 deg

Table 1674: Controlpoints


1 -0.0015
0.20547 0.029517
0.03978 -0.0168
0.01276 -0.0168
0.010208 -0.0168
0 -0.01344
0 0
0 0.058128
0.14758 0.13752
0.29787 0.13752
0.51442 0.13752
0.69987 0.11166
1 0.0015

Table 1675: Base 64 representation:


bgTU6yNBCHz0UxI

Figure 1261: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

424
Profile: goe367 Table 1680: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.421 5.583 ects
Information: Gottingen 367 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -6 -5.5 dcts
Cm error -29 -23 mcts
Upper transition point 7.47 6.76 %

Figure 1262: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1263: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1677: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.2696 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 4.5953 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.32 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.7669 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.4886 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.3072 deg
Release Angle: 6.9749 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.9475 deg
Camber deflection: 12.9224 deg

Table 1678: Controlpoints


1 -0.0016
0.93579 -0.0029211
0.83244 -0.03758
0.10097 -0.03758
0.067069 -0.03758
0 -0.033357
0 0
0 0.032802
0.091345 0.12717
0.39671 0.12717
0.61898 0.12717
0.96137 0.012044
1 0.0016

Table 1679: Base 64 representation:


RwZY14VGzQGZSqI

Figure 1264: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

425
Profile: goe368 Table 1684: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 9.465 10.442 ects
Information: Gottingen 368 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.6 -4.3 dcts
Cm error -16 -31 mcts
Upper transition point 10.19 9.94 %

Figure 1265: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1266: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1681: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.2974 % @0.17C
Maximum Camber: 3.7096 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: -Inf %C
Lower nose radius: 0.1362 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.2051 deg
Release Angle: 5.2111 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.5778 deg
Camber deflection: 22.789 deg

Table 1682: Controlpoints


1 0
0.1942 0.022629
0.1457 -0.01572
0.07527 -0.01572
0.055331 -0.01572
0 -0.0070879
0 0
0 0.00068932
0.0089634 0.07158
0.29878 0.07158
0.46427 0.07158
0.95791 0.0065261
1 0

Table 1683: Base 64 representation:


B9TPfsRFFHG7IoA

Figure 1267: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

426
Profile: goe369 Table 1688: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.339 7.588 ects
Information: Gottingen 369 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.8 NaN dcts
Cm error -12 NaN mcts
Upper transition point 2.07 NaN %

Figure 1268: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1269: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1685: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 5.8831 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 5.3543 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.7469 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.00047573 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.0923 deg
Release Angle: 6.5577 deg
Nose Incidence: 28.1874 deg
Camber deflection: 34.7451 deg

Table 1686: Controlpoints


1 0
0.095197 0.055522
0.061125 -0.0009875
0.012501 -0.0009875
0.012299 -0.0009875
0 -0.0001975
0 0
0 0.059886
0.19584 0.0828
0.29992 0.0828
0.4509 0.0828
0.52399 0.080544
1 0

Table 1687: Base 64 representation:


tWTOiNBBDA99HqA

Figure 1270: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

427
Profile: goe371 Table 1692: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.432 6.053 ects
Information: Gttingen 371 Airfoil RMS curvature error: 34.92 36.89 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.2 -9.8 dcts
Cm error 10 28 mcts
Upper transition point 5.5 4.8 %

Figure 1271: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1272: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1689: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.0085 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 4.5465 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2408 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.66627 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.1859 deg
Release Angle: 7.0192 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.1755 deg
Camber deflection: 20.1947 deg

Table 1690: Controlpoints


1 0
0.22683 0.032761
0.14092 -0.00742
0.01255 -0.00742
0.01004 -0.00742
0 -0.006678
0 0
0 0.035149
0.14936 0.07945
0.29948 0.07945
0.46147 0.07945
0.62758 0.076529
1 0

Table 1691: Base 64 representation:


cgTPh5NBID95KqA

Figure 1273: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

428
Profile: goe372 Table 1696: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.339 4.481 ects
Information: Gttingen 372 Profile RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.6 NaN dcts
Cm error -38 NaN mcts
Upper transition point 4.95 NaN %

Figure 1274: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1275: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1693: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.0951 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 4.2968 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.029119 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.53134 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.1261 deg
Release Angle: 7.1181 deg
Nose Incidence: 1.374 deg
Camber deflection: 8.4921 deg

Table 1694: Controlpoints


1 0
0.27444 0.038725
0.1357 -0.01192
0.05014 -0.01192
0.010028 -0.01192
0 -0.00596
0 0
0 0.0036295
0.067859 0.07259
0.39917 0.07259
0.42901 0.07259
0.64579 0.070015
1 0

Table 1695: Base 64 representation:


D0aDfgyDGF91JrA

Figure 1276: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

429
Profile: goe373 Table 1700: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
Information: Gttingen 373 Profile RMS position error: 2.899 5.061 ects
Reference: UIUC RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
CD error NaN -65.7 dcts
Cm error NaN 15 mcts
Upper transition point NaN 0.18 %

Figure 1277: Wing profile with camber and thickness


Figure 1278: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution.
curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1697: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.5944 % @0.24C
Maximum Camber: 5.0853 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.42147 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.8942 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.2361 deg
Release Angle: 7.2929 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.2961 deg
Camber deflection: 15.589 deg

Table 1698: Controlpoints


1 0
0.21053 0.050705
0.022759 -0.00987
0.0126 -0.00987
0.00378 -0.00987
0 -0.006909
0 0
0 0.012845
0.05872 0.08299
0.29917 0.08299
0.35524 0.08299
0.56948 0.08299
1 0

Table 1699: Base 64 representation:


KyTFissBBE zIrA

Figure 1279: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

430
Profile: goe374 Table 1704: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.956 8.86 ects
Information: Gttingen 374 profile RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 4 -0.5 dcts
Cm error -35 -39 mcts
Upper transition point 3.74 3.16 %

Figure 1280: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1281: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1701: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.6411 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 4.4309 % @0.3C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.473 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.30378 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.5858 deg
Release Angle: 5.9005 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.7723 deg
Camber deflection: 23.6728 deg

Table 1702: Controlpoints


1 0
0.022395 0.027436
0.022395 -0.00394
0.01252 -0.00394
0.003756 -0.00394
0 -0.002758
0 0
0 0.010907
0.037729 0.0775
0.29961 0.0775
0.33543 0.0775
0.58492 0.074636
1 0

Table 1703: Base 64 representation:


J3TDgssBBC9 KpA

Figure 1282: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

431
Profile: goe381 Table 1708: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 9.044 9.729 ects
Information: Gttingen 381 RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 56.6 -4 dcts
Cm error -14 -30 mcts
Upper transition point 5.41 5.34 %

Figure 1283: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1284: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1705: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.7682 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 5.586 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.091186 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.17082 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.2804 deg
Release Angle: 6.7586 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.7689 deg
Camber deflection: 18.5275 deg

Table 1706: Controlpoints


1 -0.0008
0.074652 0.057717
0.033645 -0.00534
0.01252 -0.00534
0.00626 -0.00534
0 -0.00267
0 0
0 0.0060353
0.05093 0.08948
0.29959 0.08948
0.61732 0.08948
0.88026 0.021696
1 0.0008

Table 1707: Base 64 representation:


E0TslggBBCU8HqE

Figure 1285: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

432
Profile: goe383 Table 1712: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.511 6.624 ects
Information: Gottingen 383 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.9 2.1 dcts
Cm error -5 0 mcts
Upper transition point -7.18 -7.75 %

Figure 1286: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1287: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1709: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 20.1888 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 4.9227 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.32001 %C
Upper nose radius: 7.083 %C
Lower nose radius: 10.6884 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 21.6699 deg
Release Angle: 5.9322 deg
Nose Incidence: 20.5927 deg
Camber deflection: 26.5249 deg

Table 1710: Controlpoints


1 -0.0016
0.65527 -0.031171
0.49708 -0.052531
0.20466 -0.052531
0.0027949 -0.052531
0 -0.014112
0 0
0 0.098118
0.20388 0.14996
0.28668 0.14996
0.5177 0.14996
0.6177 0.11678
1 0.0016

Table 1711: Base 64 representation:


pSSV R-NYWyrYpI

Figure 1288: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

433
Profile: goe385 Table 1716: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.133 5.161 ects
Information: Gottingen 385 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.8 -1.8 dcts
Cm error -16 -24 mcts
Upper transition point 2.42 1.89 %

Figure 1289: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1290: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1713: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.8934 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 4.15 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.42 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.96711 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.69449 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.4112 deg
Release Angle: 5.2183 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.7174 deg
Camber deflection: 17.9358 deg

Table 1714: Controlpoints


1 -0.0021
0.12369 -0.0095528
0.02509 -0.01039
0.02509 -0.01039
0.023316 -0.01039
0 -0.01039
0 0
0 0.024044
0.089664 0.09084
0.29923 0.09084
0.41803 0.09084
0.54021 0.09084
1 0.0021

Table 1715: Base 64 representation:


RsTLm FCAE 5NoL

Figure 1291: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

434
Profile: goe387 Table 1720: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.549 5.216 ects
Information: Gottingen 387 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1 -0.9 dcts
Cm error -36 -46 mcts
Upper transition point -0.51 -1.01 %

Figure 1292: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1293: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1717: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.9015 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 5.483 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.6524 %C
Lower nose radius: 4.8328 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.8505 deg
Release Angle: 7.4367 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.9356 deg
Camber deflection: 23.3723 deg

Table 1718: Controlpoints


1 0
0.33849 -0.011414
0.23849 -0.02795
0.1 -0.02795
0.0052404 -0.02795
0 -0.012994
0 0
0 0.058467
0.14039 0.12765
0.3 0.12765
0.43832 0.12765
0.55075 0.12765
1 0

Table 1719: Base 64 representation:


shTN1e8GKM 3TrA

Figure 1294: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

435
Profile: goe389 Table 1724: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.479 4.884 ects
Information: Gottingen 389 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.7 -0.8 dcts
Cm error 17 37 mcts
Upper transition point 2.08 1.56 %

Figure 1295: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1296: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1721: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.4259 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 3.9925 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.21 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.86353 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.191 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.333 deg
Release Angle: 6.3975 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.9206 deg
Camber deflection: 13.318 deg

Table 1722: Controlpoints


1 -0.00105
0.39392 0.0013931
0.27082 -0.01918
0.10039 -0.01918
0.021484 -0.01918
0 -0.013061
0 0
0 0.025596
0.11381 0.09061
0.29817 0.09061
0.40673 0.09061
0.62062 0.085602
1 0.00105

Table 1723: Base 64 representation:


SnTKmrxGMI70OpF

Figure 1297: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

436
Profile: goe392 Table 1728: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.535 5.513 ects
Information: Gottingen 392 airfoil RMS curvature error: 71.96 69.03 %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1298: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1299: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1725: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9366 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 4.836 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.0045356 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.12774 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.7899 deg
Release Angle: 12.0552 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.3331 deg
Camber deflection: 18.3883 deg

Table 1726: Controlpoints


1 0
0.58345 0.022999
0.30099 -0.0119
0.15 -0.0119
0.11866 -0.0119
0 -0.010053
0 0
0 0.0016815
0.09351 0.0966
0.4 0.0966
0.57583 0.0966
0.92796 0.027582
1 0

Table 1727: Base 64 representation:


BwaTo1NKLFSlUyA

Figure 1300: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

437
Profile: goe393 Table 1732: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 8.54 10.952 ects
Information: Gottingen 393 airfoil RMS curvature error: 91.73 95.63 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.3 0.6 dcts
Cm error -119 -139 mcts
Upper transition point 3.19 3.05 %

Figure 1301: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1302: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1729: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.2277 % @0.24C
Maximum Camber: 4.0578 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.13 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.96849 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.7509 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.7154 deg
Release Angle: 4.2643 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.8687 deg
Camber deflection: 11.133 deg

Table 1730: Controlpoints


1 -0.00065
0.15186 0.034995
0.070451 -0.01293
0.05017 -0.01293
0.011092 -0.01293
0 -0.011378
0 0
0 0.02596
0.10437 0.07099
0.29905 0.07099
0.43282 0.07099
0.53282 0.050758
1 0.00065

Table 1731: Base 64 representation:


XpTMe3xDBG05EmD

Figure 1303: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

438
Profile: goe394 Table 1736: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 7.722 10.136 ects
Information: Gottingen 394 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1 -0.1 dcts
Cm error -63 -65 mcts
Upper transition point -2.41 -3.16 %

Figure 1304: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1305: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1733: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.0591 % @0.19C
Maximum Camber: 5.8436 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.15 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2492 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.74737 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.5124 deg
Release Angle: 7.5294 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.725 deg
Camber deflection: 18.2544 deg

Table 1734: Controlpoints


1 -0.00075
0.23875 0.082933
0.14058 -0.01122
0.02513 -0.01122
0.019566 -0.01122
0 -0.0098736
0 0
0 0.037441
0.16833 0.08486
0.29905 0.08486
0.64591 0.08486
0.65679 0.053794
1 0.00075

Table 1735: Base 64 representation:


ccTgj3OCIF94DrE

Figure 1306: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

439
Profile: goe395 Table 1740: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 9.631 13.103 ects
Information: Gottingen 395 airfoil RMS curvature error: 95.3 Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.5 4.4 dcts
Cm error -20 -27 mcts
Upper transition point 1.02 1.1 %

Figure 1307: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1308: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1737: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.1672 % @0.12C
Maximum Camber: 6.9883 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.15 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.072 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.70554 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.7148 deg
Release Angle: 9.7627 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.4391 deg
Camber deflection: 21.2018 deg

Table 1738: Controlpoints


1 -0.00075
0.21489 0.10827
0.17059 -0.01094
0.02511 -0.01094
0.021835 -0.01094
0 -0.010134
0 0
0 0.029422
0.12113 0.09497
0.39901 0.09497
0.6214 0.09497
0.72676 0.056939
1 0.00075

Table 1739: Base 64 representation:


UsaYo6ICKFt8EvE

Figure 1309: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

440
Profile: goe396 Table 1744: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 7.817 12.179 ects
Information: Gottingen 396 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.4 -3.1 dcts
Cm error -113 -101 mcts
Upper transition point 4.7 4.8 %

Figure 1310: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1311: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1741: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 4.8735 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 5.6094 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.23575 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.15617 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.7566 deg
Release Angle: 8.8548 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.0467 deg
Camber deflection: 18.9015 deg

Table 1742: Controlpoints


1 0
0.22204 0.074587
0.12887 -0.00396
0.0125 -0.00396
0.0034259 -0.00396
0 -0.0018886
0 0
0 0.012915
0.10613 0.0802
0.4 0.0802
0.59918 0.0802
0.85843 0.030695
1 0

Table 1743: Base 64 representation:


KuaVhftBICY4ItA

Figure 1312: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

441
Profile: goe397 Table 1748: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.728 6.287 ects
Information: Gottingen 397 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1313: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1314: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1745: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 5.1462 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 3.8917 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.43066 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.41407 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.2804 deg
Release Angle: 5.4493 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.2984 deg
Camber deflection: 10.7477 deg

Table 1746: Controlpoints


1 0
0.15949 0.033892
0.098916 -0.00742
0.0125 -0.00742
0.0050897 -0.00742
0 -0.0037483
0 0
0 0.019194
0.12832 0.0646
0.4 0.0646
0.48549 0.0646
0.62364 0.056848
1 0

Table 1747: Base 64 representation:


TqaJcglBGD37HoA

Figure 1315: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

442
Profile: goe398 Table 1752: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.031 4.707 ects
Information: Gottingen 398 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.2 2.9 dcts
Cm error -52 -33 mcts
Upper transition point 0.84 -0.79 %

Figure 1316: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1317: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1749: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.8849 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 4.855 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.6124 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.88874 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.16 deg
Release Angle: 7.3088 deg
Nose Incidence: 24.1491 deg
Camber deflection: 31.4579 deg

Table 1750: Controlpoints


1 0
0.40538 -0.013195
0.25755 -0.0258
0.15 -0.0258
0.087 -0.0258
0 -0.022704
0 0
0 0.071678
0.16709 0.1169
0.3 0.1169
0.45638 0.1169
0.6386 0.10287
1 0

Table 1751: Base 64 representation:


mcTOx3bKIL3yTrA

Figure 1318: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

443
Profile: goe399 Table 1756: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.897 5.951 ects
Information: Gottingen 399 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.2 NaN dcts
Cm error -52 NaN mcts
Upper transition point -1.35 NaN %

Figure 1319: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1320: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1753: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.9305 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 4.1927 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.78557 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.26656 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.6276 deg
Release Angle: 6.1849 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.4645 deg
Camber deflection: 15.6494 deg

Table 1754: Controlpoints


1 0
0.20721 0.025899
0.10951 -0.0093
0.02507 -0.0093
0.011596 -0.0093
0 -0.0045396
0 0
0 0.028964
0.16019 0.0759
0.29939 0.0759
0.47792 0.0759
0.63552 0.067543
1 0

Table 1755: Base 64 representation:


YeTQgfhCGE44KpA

Figure 1321: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

444
Profile: goe400 Table 1760: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.372 10.667 ects
Information: Gottingen 400 airfoil RMS curvature error: 71.98 73.55 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.3 0.5 dcts
Cm error -92 -73 mcts
Upper transition point 1.52 1 %

Figure 1322: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1323: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1757: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.2388 % @0.21C
Maximum Camber: 4.7808 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.08 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.94009 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.175 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.0672 deg
Release Angle: 6.0315 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.6319 deg
Camber deflection: 12.6634 deg

Table 1758: Controlpoints


1 -0.0004
0.2082 0.054939
0.12677 -0.01267
0.024995 -0.01267
0.024992 -0.01267
0 -0.012037
0 0
0 0.027185
0.11792 0.07693
0.30003 0.07693
0.47384 0.07693
0.56863 0.061525
1 0.0004

Table 1759: Base 64 representation:


XmTQg8ACHFz5FpC

Figure 1324: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

445
Profile: goe402 Table 1764: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.218 6.897 ects
Information: Gottingen 402 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.9 -0.4 dcts
Cm error -5 3 mcts
Upper transition point -0.1 -0.55 %

Figure 1325: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1326: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1761: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.8344 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 5.6931 % @0.32C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.82092 %C
Lower nose radius: 7.8343e-006 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.5388 deg
Release Angle: 6.8826 deg
Nose Incidence: 18.2916 deg
Camber deflection: 25.1742 deg

Table 1762: Controlpoints


1 0
0.12013 0.05556
0.078913 -0.00493
0.0125 -0.00493
0.011205 -0.00493
0 -0.00060677
0 0
0 0.02095
0.080198 0.0908
0.3 0.0908
0.56649 0.0908
0.97118 0.0051601
1 0

Table 1763: Base 64 representation:


PuTYmIHBECE8HqA

Figure 1327: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

446
Profile: goe403 Table 1768: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.8 4.009 ects
Information: Gottingen 403 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.7 2 dcts
Cm error -3 3 mcts
Upper transition point -1.2 -2.24 %

Figure 1328: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1329: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1765: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.7443 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 4.27 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.13582 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.32985 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.7623 deg
Release Angle: 6.5412 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.2673 deg
Camber deflection: 10.8085 deg

Table 1766: Controlpoints


1 0
0.25933 0.034412
0.14177 -0.00997
0.0501 -0.00997
0.031675 -0.00997
0 -0.00997
0 0
0 0.010166
0.11413 0.07514
0.29921 0.07514
0.40232 0.07514
0.59149 0.07514
1 0

Table 1767: Base 64 representation:


JnTJg YDGE 2JqA

Figure 1330: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

447
Profile: goe405 Table 1772: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.115 7.693 ects
Information: Gottingen 405 airfoil RMS curvature error: 29.9 29.75 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 5.3 0.4 dcts
Cm error -19 -31 mcts
Upper transition point -0.97 -0.37 %

Figure 1331: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1332: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1769: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.0564 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 6.508 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.038292 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.46764 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.0051 deg
Release Angle: 10.5091 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.4431 deg
Camber deflection: 22.9522 deg

Table 1770: Controlpoints


1 0
0.25061 0.032805
0.14203 -0.0148
0.075 -0.0148
0.049258 -0.0148
0 -0.0148
0 0
0 0.0021895
0.044978 0.1199
0.4 0.1199
0.44806 0.1199
0.66284 0.11289
1 0

Table 1771: Base 64 representation:


B4aFy WFFG73SwA

Figure 1333: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

448
Profile: goe409 Table 1776: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.404 5.271 ects
Information: Gottingen 409 airfoil RMS curvature error: 43.36 43.66 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -7.8 -7.8 dcts
Cm error 45 56 mcts
Upper transition point 10.32 10.01 %

Figure 1334: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1335: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1773: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.6576 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: -0.12769 % @0.04C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5858 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.076 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.0583 deg
Release Angle: -5.2803 deg
Nose Incidence: -2.7304 deg
Camber deflection: -8.0107 deg

Table 1774: Controlpoints


1 0
0.64362 -0.05842
0.42276 -0.0635
0.4 -0.0635
0.34335 -0.0635
0 -0.0635
0 0
0 0.048473
0.22811 0.0635
0.3 0.0635
0.70908 0.0635
0.96173 -0.0008357
1 0

Table 1775: Base 64 representation:


wPTkb JaCbI6JXA

Figure 1336: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

449
Profile: goe410 Table 1780: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.579 5.948 ects
Information: Gottingen 410 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.8 -4.4 dcts
Cm error -4 -3 mcts
Upper transition point 6.73 6.32 %

Figure 1337: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1338: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1777: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.1 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: -5.8149e-007 % @0.94C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.917 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.917 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.927 deg
Release Angle: -1.3457e-005 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -1.3457e-005 deg

Table 1778: Controlpoints


1 0
0.78865 -0.016498
0.44556 -0.0805
0.3 -0.0805
0.027951 -0.0805
0 -0.022509
0 0
0 0.022509
0.027951 0.0805
0.3 0.0805
0.44556 0.0805
0.7886 0.016502
1 0

Table 1779: Base 64 representation:


S5TNhS5TNhYYKgA

Figure 1339: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

450
Profile: goe411 Table 1784: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.058 4.568 ects
Information: Gottingen 411 airfoil RMS curvature error: 31.81 32.03 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -5.5 2.4 dcts
Cm error -14 14 mcts
Upper transition point 7.42 -6.29 %

Figure 1340: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1341: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1781: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.2 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: -0.0091147 % @0.93C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.088551 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.088551 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0 deg
Release Angle: -0.43625 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -0.43625 deg

Table 1782: Controlpoints


1 0
0.9991 -6.8401e-006
0.68234 -0.066
0.3 -0.066
0.073127 -0.066
0 -0.0065704
0 0
0 0.0065704
0.073127 0.066
0.3 0.066
0.68234 0.066
0.99682 -2.4187e-005
1 0

Table 1783: Base 64 representation:


GvTicGvTicBAAfA

Figure 1342: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

451
Profile: goe413 Table 1788: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.079 5.153 ects
Information: Gottingen 413 airfoil RMS curvature error: 58.08 57.71 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.2 -0.3 dcts
Cm error 6 10 mcts
Upper transition point -6.09 -7.1 %

Figure 1343: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1344: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1785: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.5159 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 4.6018 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.6724 %C
Lower nose radius: 6.6392 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.5479 deg
Release Angle: 8.4417 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.4003 deg
Camber deflection: 12.842 deg

Table 1786: Controlpoints


1 -0.0008
0.72698 0.019095
0.29494 -0.04963
0.14996 -0.04963
0.0096499 -0.04963
0 -0.020171
0 0
0 0.064342
0.1691 0.12355
0.3001 0.12355
0.56336 0.12355
0.68618 0.071612
1 0.0008

Table 1787: Base 64 representation:


gcTY0a7KLVtZKtE

Figure 1345: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

452
Profile: goe414 Table 1792: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.047 8.447 ects
Information: Gottingen 414 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -9.4 -9 dcts
Cm error -68 -81 mcts
Upper transition point 12 11.12 %

Figure 1346: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1347: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1789: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.2978 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 5.2326 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.21 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.0016212 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.43332 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 18.2078 deg
Release Angle: 8.6647 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.9485 deg
Camber deflection: 15.6132 deg

Table 1790: Controlpoints


1 -0.00105
0.35163 -0.0060195
0.26023 -0.02535
0.10072 -0.02535
0.022889 -0.02535
0 -0.008385
0 0
0 0.00062492
0.048875 0.11791
0.39667 0.11791
0.42608 0.11791
0.6477 0.11395
1 0.00105

Table 1791: Base 64 representation:


A3ZDxVwGLL93UtF

Figure 1348: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

453
Profile: goe416a Table 1796: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.495 6.12 ects
Information: Gottingen 416A airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.9 -0.9 dcts
Cm error -11 -31 mcts
Upper transition point 1.62 2.44 %

Figure 1349: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1350: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1793: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.6911 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.3532 % @0.63C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.27 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.98012 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.049095 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.178 deg
Release Angle: 3.3666 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.7504 deg
Camber deflection: 15.117 deg

Table 1794: Controlpoints


1 -0.00135
0.58764 -0.0065496
0.49271 -0.050061
0.30381 -0.050061
0.096562 -0.050061
0 -0.0056218
0 0
0 0.028124
0.12105 0.066861
0.2949 0.066861
0.5612 0.066861
0.85388 0.020472
1 0.00135

Table 1795: Base 64 representation:


blTYsHrTRVVzJlH

Figure 1351: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

454
Profile: goe417 Table 1800: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.999 8.437 ects
Information: Gottingen 417 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -13.7 -15.9 dcts
Cm error -36 -53 mcts
Upper transition point 2.8 2.1 %

Figure 1352: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1353: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1797: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 5.7871 % @0.21C
Maximum Camber: 6.0741 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.54844 %C
Lower nose radius: 9.6905e-006 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.0024 deg
Release Angle: 9.5776 deg
Nose Incidence: 16.7286 deg
Camber deflection: 26.3061 deg

Table 1798: Controlpoints


1 0
0.12039 0.078138
0.11095 -0.00592
0.0125 -0.00592
0.011977 -0.00592
0 -8.716e-005
0 0
0 0.014938
0.061033 0.08845
0.3 0.08845
0.41323 0.08845
0.64731 0.08845
1 0

Table 1799: Base 64 representation:


LyTKlBDBGD -KvA

Figure 1354: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

455
Profile: goe418 Table 1804: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.265 6.278 ects
Information: Gottingen 418 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1 -0.3 dcts
Cm error -12 -24 mcts
Upper transition point 1 -0.04 %

Figure 1355: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1356: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1801: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.6486 % @0.24C
Maximum Camber: 4.9479 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 5.1921 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.8831 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.1492 deg
Release Angle: 7.0599 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.9042 deg
Camber deflection: 18.9641 deg

Table 1802: Controlpoints


1 0
0.24746 0.0063749
0.14746 -0.03422
0.075 -0.03422
0.045235 -0.03422
0 -0.027718
0 0
0 0.083232
0.20014 0.1111
0.3 0.1111
0.38792 0.1111
0.54651 0.11
1 0

Table 1803: Base 64 representation:


vVTIuzZFFP-3PrA

Figure 1357: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

456
Profile: goe419 Table 1808: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.879 7.741 ects
Information: Gottingen 419 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 45.8 -1 dcts
Cm error 12 25 mcts
Upper transition point 3.16 3.23 %

Figure 1358: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1359: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1805: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 5.608 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 3.9462 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.1458e-005 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.17586 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.8862 deg
Release Angle: 7.2801 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.0323 deg
Camber deflection: 11.3124 deg

Table 1806: Controlpoints


1 0
0.11662 0.028333
0.10917 -0.0048749
0.025025 -0.0048749
0.0081427 -0.0048749
0 -0.0030898
0 0
0 0.00014114
0.072076 0.067499
0.39967 0.067499
0.60802 0.067499
0.90822 0.020722
1 0

Table 1807: Base 64 representation:


AzaWsoqCGCU-MrA

Figure 1360: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

457
Profile: goe420 Table 1812: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.695 7.115 ects
Information: Gottingen 420 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 4.6 4.8 dcts
Cm error 62 78 mcts
Upper transition point -11.83 -12.24 %

Figure 1361: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1362: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1809: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18.8 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 4.2452 % @0.5C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.2268 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.2536 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.0077 deg
Release Angle: 7.8854 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.3485 deg
Camber deflection: 13.2338 deg

Table 1810: Controlpoints


1 0
0.73561 -0.00054688
0.36884 -0.0604
0.2 -0.0604
0.13209 -0.0604
0 -0.053526
0 0
0 0.059333
0.16065 0.13115
0.3 0.13115
0.59637 0.13115
0.70436 0.084156
1 0

Table 1811: Base 64 representation:


seTb34WNOaubSsA

Figure 1363: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

458
Profile: goe423 Table 1816: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.67 7.207 ects
Information: Gottingen 423 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.3 -0.8 dcts
Cm error -52 -44 mcts
Upper transition point 0.55 -0.42 %

Figure 1364: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1365: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1813: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.9924 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 5.0724 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.5566 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.0794 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 23.1945 deg
Release Angle: 7.4099 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.8643 deg
Camber deflection: 13.2741 deg

Table 1814: Controlpoints


1 -0.0008
0.84323 -0.012277
0.43543 -0.03893
0.15095 -0.03893
0.057169 -0.03893
0 -0.034258
0 0
0 0.053942
0.17072 0.13534
0.39671 0.13534
0.46533 0.13534
0.69196 0.10691
1 0.0008

Table 1815: Base 64 representation:


ajZH53nKVRxTarE

Figure 1366: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

459
Profile: goe424 Table 1820: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.146 6.536 ects
Information: Gottingen 424 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.5 -3.4 dcts
Cm error 0 -12 mcts
Upper transition point -0.26 0.47 %

Figure 1367: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1368: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1817: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 20.0069 % @0.36C
Maximum Camber: 4.7639 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.76731 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.95124 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 25.5181 deg
Release Angle: 7.0652 deg
Nose Incidence: 19.4551 deg
Camber deflection: 26.5203 deg

Table 1818: Controlpoints


1 -0.00080002
0.65105 -0.035592
0.47039 -0.053511
0.30532 -0.053511
0.21266 -0.053511
0 -0.036723
0 0
0 0.012961
0.032842 0.14743
0.38538 0.14743
0.42345 0.14743
0.70635 0.10666
1 0.00080002

Table 1819: Base 64 representation:


G6ZE-rTUPXtpsrE

Figure 1369: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

460
Profile: goe425 Table 1824: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.964 7.1 ects
Information: Gottingen 425 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 3.2 3.1 dcts
Cm error -6 -18 mcts
Upper transition point -7.24 -7.09 %

Figure 1370: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1371: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1821: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.9602 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 4.4564 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.11 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.7728 %C
Lower nose radius: 6.9395 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.3378 deg
Release Angle: 5.586 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.8413 deg
Camber deflection: 18.4272 deg

Table 1822: Controlpoints


1 -0.00055
0.566 -0.012544
0.466 -0.03678
0.20197 -0.03678
0.0022275 -0.03678
0 -0.010519
0 0
0 0.059276
0.19008 0.12381
0.29337 0.12381
0.5314 0.12381
0.6314 0.083989
1 0.00055

Table 1823: Base 64 representation:


fXTW0S-NVQxzQoD

Figure 1372: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

461
Profile: goe426 Table 1828: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.196 6.004 ects
Information: Gottingen 426 airfoil RMS curvature error: 37.57 37.1 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.8 3.1 dcts
Cm error -10 -8 mcts
Upper transition point -3.96 -4.52 %

Figure 1373: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1374: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1825: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.6278 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 4.4709 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.425 %C
Lower nose radius: 4.9278 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.0943 deg
Release Angle: 7.818 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.6862 deg
Camber deflection: 12.5042 deg

Table 1826: Controlpoints


1 0
0.72362 0.013376
0.44154 -0.0265
0.2 -0.0265
0.01359 -0.0265
0 -0.02113
0 0
0 0.038391
0.15515 0.1115
0.3 0.1115
0.48573 0.1115
0.58573 0.094616
1 0

Table 1827: Base 64 representation:


WfTRvy7NTL1gLsA

Figure 1375: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

462
Profile: goe427 Table 1832: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.216 9.084 ects
Information: Gottingen 427 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.3 -0.1 dcts
Cm error 19 -29 mcts
Upper transition point -0.07 2.23 %

Figure 1376: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1377: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1829: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 4.5848 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 5.2875 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.36927 %C
Lower nose radius: 6.4613e-006 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.4311 deg
Release Angle: 9.3147 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.6696 deg
Camber deflection: 20.9844 deg

Table 1830: Controlpoints


1 0
0.13119 0.069891
0.13119 -0.0044437
0.01252 -0.0044437
0.011129 -0.0044437
0 -2.1895e-005
0 0
0 0.015527
0.097932 0.075799
0.39966 0.075799
0.42181 0.075799
0.72166 0.069554
1 0

Table 1831: Base 64 representation:


NvaCgAHBIC6 LuA

Figure 1378: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

463
Profile: goe428 Table 1836: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.016 6.394 ects
Information: Gottingen 428 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1 2.8 dcts
Cm error 4 -3 mcts
Upper transition point -2.9 -4.15 %

Figure 1379: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1380: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1833: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.9581 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 5.2091 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.63886 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.17985 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.4008 deg
Release Angle: 8.0777 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.5643 deg
Camber deflection: 21.642 deg

Table 1834: Controlpoints


1 0
0.30291 0.041137
0.15694 -0.0068
0.025 -0.0068
0.010674 -0.0068
0 -0.0035774
0 0
0 0.021747
0.11104 0.0904
0.3 0.0904
0.44772 0.0904
0.65318 0.078657
1 0

Table 1835: Base 64 representation:


PnTOmhkCJD30LsA

Figure 1381: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

464
Profile: goe430 Table 1840: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.871 5.724 ects
Information: Gottingen 430 airfoil RMS curvature error: 31 30.67 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -6.6 -6.8 dcts
Cm error -20 -8 mcts
Upper transition point 6 5.87 %

Figure 1382: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1383: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1837: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.3279 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 4.8778 % @0.53C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.22 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.43273 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.0588 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.666 deg
Release Angle: 12.2581 deg
Nose Incidence: 0.86185 deg
Camber deflection: 13.1199 deg

Table 1838: Controlpoints


1 -0.0011
0.65613 0.04677
0.37527 -0.03934
0.10172 -0.03934
0.076868 -0.03934
0 -0.032481
0 0
0 0.011467
0.045577 0.10751
0.39529 0.10751
0.448 0.10751
0.66553 0.10075
1 0.0011

Table 1839: Base 64 representation:


H4ZGt0QHTR7iKzG

Figure 1384: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

465
Profile: goe431 Table 1844: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.624 8.643 ects
Information: Gottingen 431 airfoil RMS curvature error: 46.36 45.07 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.8 -1.7 dcts
Cm error -28 -46 mcts
Upper transition point 3.83 4.28 %

Figure 1385: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1386: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1841: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.5696 % @0.2C
Maximum Camber: 7.2849 % @0.53C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.032883 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.32999 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.6936 deg
Release Angle: 15.9288 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.1582 deg
Camber deflection: 31.087 deg

Table 1842: Controlpoints


1 0
0.54469 0.093313
0.22809 -0.0243
0.1 -0.0243
0.055803 -0.0243
0 -0.01108
0 0
0 0.0023544
0.025287 0.1173
0.4 0.1173
0.55964 0.1173
0.70748 0.10806
1 0

Table 1843: Base 64 representation:


B7aRxscGJK6lK5A

Figure 1387: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

466
Profile: goe432 Table 1848: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.673 6.489 ects
Information: Gottingen 432 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2 -2.2 dcts
Cm error -44 -16 mcts
Upper transition point 4.64 3.44 %

Figure 1388: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1389: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1845: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.6998 % @0.22C
Maximum Camber: 4.3382 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2953 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.22162 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.3083 deg
Release Angle: 7.9562 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.4752 deg
Camber deflection: 25.4314 deg

Table 1846: Controlpoints


1 0
0.29832 0.028208
0.21287 -0.00877
0.025 -0.00877
0.020233 -0.00877
0 -0.0054674
0 0
0 0.023932
0.066329 0.0802
0.3 0.0802
0.42242 0.0802
0.75482 0.059363
1 0

Table 1847: Base 64 representation:


TxTLhnMCMEu4NsA

Figure 1390: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

467
Profile: goe433 Table 1852: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.434 8.148 ects
Information: Gottingen 433 airfoil RMS curvature error: 48.61 47.23 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 5.8 2 dcts
Cm error -11 -10 mcts
Upper transition point -10.67 -4.93 %

Figure 1391: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1392: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1849: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.6271 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 4.8521 % @0.52C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.3429 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.0567 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.3182 deg
Release Angle: 10.7795 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.8432 deg
Camber deflection: 20.6227 deg

Table 1850: Controlpoints


1 -0.0008
0.66117 0.035532
0.4094 -0.0548
0.15364 -0.0548
0.072211 -0.0548
0 -0.03836
0 0
0 0.072924
0.18368 0.12746
0.29154 0.12746
0.51341 0.12746
0.60633 0.10952
1 0.0008

Table 1851: Base 64 representation:


kYTU1shKTX2kKwE

Figure 1393: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

468
Profile: goe436 Table 1856: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.549 5.622 ects
Information: Gottingen 436 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.9 -0.9 dcts
Cm error -10 15 mcts
Upper transition point 4.13 3.29 %

Figure 1394: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1395: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1853: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.0315 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 3.7774 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4606 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.6546 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.4159 deg
Release Angle: 5.7826 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.1589 deg
Camber deflection: 12.9415 deg

Table 1854: Controlpoints


1 0
0.19742 -0.019969
0.09742 -0.02283
0.075 -0.02283
0.04725 -0.02283
0 -0.02283
0 0
0 0.031299
0.1006 0.0925
0.3 0.0925
0.43256 0.0925
0.66564 0.077136
1 0

Table 1855: Base 64 representation:


WqTMm YFCK04QoA

Figure 1396: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

469
Profile: goe437 Table 1860: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.913 4.188 ects
Information: Gottingen 437 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1 2 dcts
Cm error -18 0 mcts
Upper transition point -2.28 -3.36 %

Figure 1397: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1398: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1857: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.1094 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 4.7948 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.38449 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.0037659 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.0867 deg
Release Angle: 7.6751 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.3715 deg
Camber deflection: 19.0466 deg

Table 1858: Controlpoints


1 0
0.26139 0.040413
0.15547 -0.00683
0.025 -0.00683
0.0092825 -0.00683
0 -0.00048274
0 0
0 0.016612
0.10766 0.0821
0.3 0.0821
0.482 0.0821
0.69669 0.06568
1 0

Table 1859: Base 64 representation:


NoTRiFnCJDy3KrA

Figure 1399: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

470
Profile: goe438 Table 1864: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.627 5.88 ects
Information: Gottingen 438 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.4 -0.2 dcts
Cm error -3 7 mcts
Upper transition point -0.78 -1.13 %

Figure 1400: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1401: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1861: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.0369 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 3.7747 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6151 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.4848 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.2694 deg
Release Angle: 5.7245 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.158 deg
Camber deflection: 13.8826 deg

Table 1862: Controlpoints


1 0
0.225 -0.019078
0.125 -0.02274
0.05057 -0.02274
0.040456 -0.02274
0 -0.020011
0 0
0 0.033336
0.10321 0.09244
0.29769 0.09244
0.42529 0.09244
0.64365 0.081347
1 0

Table 1863: Base 64 representation:


XpTMm3NDFK34QoA

Figure 1402: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

471
Profile: goe439 Table 1868: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.773 7.612 ects
Information: Gottingen 439 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.3 3.7 dcts
Cm error 15 19 mcts
Upper transition point -3.28 -4.35 %

Figure 1403: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1404: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1865: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.9136 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 5.2367 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.5772 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.026077 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.4661 deg
Release Angle: 7.8249 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.4336 deg
Camber deflection: 21.2586 deg

Table 1866: Controlpoints


1 0
0.24318 0.04088
0.18588 -0.0073
0.025 -0.0073
0.0096113 -0.0073
0 -0.0012926
0 0
0 0.020435
0.10853 0.0904
0.3 0.0904
0.44825 0.0904
0.63886 0.080447
1 0

Table 1867: Base 64 representation:


OoTOmLmCLD46LsA

Figure 1405: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

472
Profile: goe442 Table 1872: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.832 4.802 ects
Information: Gottingen 442 airfoil RMS curvature error: 47.67 48.23 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 -0.7 dcts
Cm error 39 -43 mcts
Upper transition point 0.02 -0.2 %

Figure 1406: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1407: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1869: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.7015 % @0.22C
Maximum Camber: 4.3281 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5272 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.22053 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.0072 deg
Release Angle: 7.8282 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.9762 deg
Camber deflection: 25.8044 deg

Table 1870: Controlpoints


1 0
0.30055 0.028393
0.20846 -0.00877
0.02508 -0.00877
0.020358 -0.00877
0 -0.0054708
0 0
0 0.027851
0.08064 0.08019
0.29928 0.08019
0.40626 0.08019
0.73506 0.062784
1 0

Table 1871: Base 64 representation:


WuTKhnMCMEx4MsA

Figure 1408: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

473
Profile: goe445 Table 1876: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.555 4.201 ects
Information: Gottingen 445 airfoil RMS curvature error: 25.89 26.52 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.5 -1.3 dcts
Cm error -1 -2 mcts
Upper transition point 0.47 0.5 %

Figure 1409: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1410: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1873: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.4 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: -1.1189e-006 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.20219 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.20219 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.6656 deg
Release Angle: -1.4606e-005 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -1.4606e-005 deg

Table 1874: Controlpoints


1 0
0.76656 -0.02179
0.45132 -0.032
0.4 -0.032
0.104 -0.032
0 -0.01184
0 0
0 0.01184
0.104 0.032
0.4 0.032
0.45131 0.032
0.76655 0.021791
1 0

Table 1875: Base 64 representation:


YuaFOYuaFOrrMgA

Figure 1411: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

474
Profile: goe446 Table 1880: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.55 5.185 ects
Information: Gottingen 446 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.2 -0.9 dcts
Cm error 1 19 mcts
Upper transition point -0.49 -1.43 %

Figure 1412: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1413: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1877: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.8255 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 6.3749 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.32 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2127 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.0122 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 18.1647 deg
Release Angle: 11.0492 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.6961 deg
Camber deflection: 17.7453 deg

Table 1878: Controlpoints


1 -0.0016
0.3446 0.020907
0.13192 -0.02382
0.05056 -0.02382
0.031135 -0.02382
0 -0.020929
0 0
0 0.028788
0.10251 0.12689
0.39703 0.12689
0.61449 0.12689
0.86175 0.052277
1 0.0016

Table 1879: Base 64 representation:


PuZX13ZDFKavUxI

Figure 1414: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

475
Profile: goe447 Table 1884: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 7.006 9.765 ects
Information: Gottingen 447 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.9 4.4 dcts
Cm error -10 12 mcts
Upper transition point -1.05 -2.3 %

Figure 1415: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1416: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1881: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.6224 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 7.9444 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.32 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3659 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.114 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.9683 deg
Release Angle: 12.6037 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.5191 deg
Camber deflection: 23.1228 deg

Table 1882: Controlpoints


1 -0.0016
0.24548 0.052743
0.14548 -0.01981
0.05039 -0.01981
0.019044 -0.01981
0 -0.017433
0 0
0 0.031642
0.10995 0.14183
0.39721 0.14183
0.49416 0.14183
0.67999 0.125
1 0.0016

Table 1883: Base 64 representation:


OtZK83nDGI34TzI

Figure 1417: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

476
Profile: goe449 Table 1888: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.052 5.257 ects
Information: Gottingen 449 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.2 -0.6 dcts
Cm error 7 -4 mcts
Upper transition point 3.81 4.42 %

Figure 1418: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1419: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1885: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.0506 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 5.3879 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.7671 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.8432 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 21.5381 deg
Release Angle: 9.3317 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.0816 deg
Camber deflection: 24.4133 deg

Table 1886: Controlpoints


1 0
0.90754 -0.0023199
0.4616 -0.0366
0.15 -0.0366
0.084421 -0.0366
0 -0.032208
0 0
0 0.040343
0.088226 0.1384
0.4 0.1384
0.49875 0.1384
0.6701 0.12073
1 0

Table 1887: Base 64 representation:


TxaL63cKXQ3LYuA

Figure 1420: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

477
Profile: goe450 Table 1892: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.781 5.072 ects
Information: Gottingen 450 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.1 1.8 dcts
Cm error -18 -35 mcts
Upper transition point 2.63 3.25 %

Figure 1421: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1422: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1889: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.7531 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 5.2139 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.21 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0657 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0622 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.7471 deg
Release Angle: 9.0734 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.293 deg
Camber deflection: 19.3664 deg

Table 1890: Controlpoints


1 -0.00105
0.33125 0.030486
0.16759 -0.01124
0.02512 -0.01124
0.013816 -0.01124
0 -0.0098912
0 0
0 0.028932
0.11782 0.09527
0.399 0.09527
0.45193 0.09527
0.67952 0.089607
1 0.00105

Table 1891: Base 64 representation:


TsaGo3sCJF7yOuF

Figure 1423: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

478
Profile: goe456 Table 1896: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.046 3.919 ects
Information: Gottingen 456 airfoil RMS curvature error: 36.85 45.31 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.7 0 dcts
Cm error -13 -14 mcts
Upper transition point 1.3 1.89 %

Figure 1424: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1425: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1893: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.2615 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 5.2122 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.0052411 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.1414 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.8638 deg
Release Angle: 9.1033 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.4692 deg
Camber deflection: 17.5725 deg

Table 1894: Controlpoints


1 0
0.3538 0.04713
0.1701 -0.00794
0.07506 -0.00794
0.051791 -0.00794
0 -0.0069872
0 0
0 0.0014553
0.060617 0.087
0.39935 0.087
0.44016 0.087
0.66798 0.082999
1 0

Table 1895: Base 64 representation:


B1aEk3UFHD8xLuA

Figure 1426: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

479
Profile: goe457 Table 1900: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.564 4.433 ects
Information: Gottingen 457 airfoil RMS curvature error: 87.77 88.92 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.1 1.7 dcts
Cm error -13 -8 mcts
Upper transition point -2.72 -3.07 %

Figure 1427: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1428: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1897: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.8231 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 4.2234 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2019 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.67779 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.0727 deg
Release Angle: 8.296 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.873 deg
Camber deflection: 22.1691 deg

Table 1898: Controlpoints


1 0
0.33601 0.026201
0.16551 -0.01083
0.05012 -0.01083
0.019397 -0.01083
0 -0.009362
0 0
0 0.024859
0.077125 0.07991
0.29909 0.07991
0.36238 0.07991
0.73573 0.06752
1 0

Table 1899: Base 64 representation:


UuTGh2mDIF1yNsA

Figure 1429: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

480
Profile: goe458 Table 1904: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.027 4.065 ects
Information: Gottingen 458 airfoil RMS curvature error: 37.23 44.84 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.4 -51.1 dcts
Cm error -10 25 mcts
Upper transition point 1.01 0.05 %

Figure 1430: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1431: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1901: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.2615 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 5.2122 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.0052411 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.0071116 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.8638 deg
Release Angle: 9.1033 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.9843 deg
Camber deflection: 18.0877 deg

Table 1902: Controlpoints


1 0
0.3538 0.04713
0.1701 -0.00794
0.07506 -0.00794
0.0010649 -0.00794
0 -4.267e-005
0 0
0 0.0014553
0.060617 0.087
0.39935 0.087
0.44016 0.087
0.67143 0.082137
1 0

Table 1903: Base 64 representation:


B1aEkA-FHD7xLuA

Figure 1432: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

481
Profile: goe459 Table 1908: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.046 3.589 ects
Information: Gottingen 459 airfoil RMS curvature error: 28.96 28.83 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -5.8 -5.6 dcts
Cm error -21 -21 mcts
Upper transition point 7.74 7.55 %

Figure 1433: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1434: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1905: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.7 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.199e-005 % @0.89C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3727 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.3727 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 18.9222 deg
Release Angle: 0.0022627 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 0.0022627 deg

Table 1906: Controlpoints


1 0
0.98632 -0.0022799
0.64816 -0.0635
0.3 -0.0635
0.10323 -0.0635
0 -0.030736
0 0
0 0.030736
0.10323 0.0635
0.3 0.0635
0.64816 0.0635
0.98639 0.0022693
1 0

Table 1907: Base 64 representation:


fpTgbfpTgbCCVgA

Figure 1435: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

482
Profile: goe460 Table 1912: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.782 4.551 ects
Information: Gottingen 460 airfoil RMS curvature error: 39.38 40.08 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -6.4 -6.2 dcts
Cm error -26 -6 mcts
Upper transition point 7.66 7.4 %

Figure 1436: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1437: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1909: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 20.5 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: -7.1172e-006 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.8239 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.8239 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 27.4565 deg
Release Angle: -2.8766e-005 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -2.8766e-005 deg

Table 1910: Controlpoints


1 0
0.5872 -0.10085
0.39947 -0.1025
0.3 -0.1025
0.1059 -0.1025
0 -0.04465
0 0
0 0.04465
0.1059 0.1025
0.3 0.1025
0.3995 0.1025
0.58722 0.10084
1 0

Table 1911: Base 64 representation:


coTJrcoTJr–fgA

Figure 1438: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

483
Profile: goe464 Table 1916: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 12.542 11.851 ects
Information: Gottingen 464 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 29.5 NaN dcts
Cm error -6 NaN mcts
Upper transition point 0.73 NaN %

Figure 1439: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1440: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1913: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.0441 % @0.07C
Maximum Camber: 9.8669 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.5909 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.37633 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.0187 deg
Release Angle: 13.6193 deg
Nose Incidence: 32.2149 deg
Camber deflection: 45.8342 deg

Table 1914: Controlpoints


1 0
0.1404 0.17661
0.10605 -0.00632
0.02504 -0.00632
0.01592 -0.00632
0 -0.00632
0 0
0 0.056555
0.1045 0.12209
0.29915 0.12209
0.53513 0.12209
0.79126 0.058395
1 0

Table 1915: Base 64 representation:


epTWz XCFDf9E1A

Figure 1441: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

484
Profile: goe477 Table 1920: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.864 9.864 ects
Information: Gottingen 477 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.6 3.3 dcts
Cm error -14 -1 mcts
Upper transition point 6.88 -6.83 %

Figure 1442: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1443: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1917: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.8518 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 4.9035 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.6439 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.25607 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.4336 deg
Release Angle: 6.7365 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.0033 deg
Camber deflection: 18.7398 deg

Table 1918: Controlpoints


1 0
0.29472 0.012553
0.19472 -0.01518
0.05 -0.01518
0.015208 -0.01518
0 -0.0050953
0 0
0 0.016575
0.064 0.0975
0.4 0.0975
0.63519 0.0975
0.74957 0.055305
1 0

Table 1919: Base 64 representation:


L1aZpVsDKGr3NqA

Figure 1444: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

485
Profile: goe478 Table 1924: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.512 6.399 ects
Information: Gottingen 478 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 3.9 3.5 dcts
Cm error 28 14 mcts
Upper transition point -7.2 -6.65 %

Figure 1445: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1446: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1921: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.4047 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 4.2504 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.5244 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.718 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.3845 deg
Release Angle: 6.8221 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.7601 deg
Camber deflection: 14.5822 deg

Table 1922: Controlpoints


1 0
0.2613 -0.02412
0.1613 -0.0336
0.10129 -0.0336
0.026509 -0.0336
0 -0.025633
0 0
0 0.070903
0.21396 0.10789
0.29585 0.10789
0.5092 0.10789
0.65798 0.094943
1 0

Table 1923: Base 64 representation:


pSTTtwuGEO33TqA

Figure 1447: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

486
Profile: goe479 Table 1928: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.481 5.862 ects
Information: Gottingen 479 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 3.8 3.1 dcts
Cm error 0 -10 mcts
Upper transition point -5.79 -6.4 %

Figure 1448: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1449: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1925: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.6665 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 3.9638 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.6313 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1611 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.6944 deg
Release Angle: 6.517 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.6169 deg
Camber deflection: 20.1339 deg

Table 1926: Controlpoints


1 0
0.48541 -0.0074569
0.23489 -0.02505
0.1 -0.02505
0.058288 -0.02505
0 -0.021241
0 0
0 0.056319
0.18082 0.09685
0.3 0.09685
0.44391 0.09685
0.64691 0.087146
1 0

Table 1927: Base 64 representation:


kZTNo1bGKL5qQqA

Figure 1450: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

487
Profile: goe480 Table 1932: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.43 6.027 ects
Information: Gottingen 480 airfoil RMS curvature error: 55.95 54.51 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.8 0.3 dcts
Cm error -17 -11 mcts
Upper transition point -1.14 0.44 %

Figure 1451: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1452: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1929: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.3935 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 5.5227 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.014695 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.8476 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.4179 deg
Release Angle: 8.2503 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.8731 deg
Camber deflection: 16.1234 deg

Table 1930: Controlpoints


1 0
0.31014 0.018563
0.18176 -0.02372
0.05 -0.02372
0.045678 -0.02372
0 -0.02372
0 0
0 0.00095457
0.0093012 0.1107
0.4 0.1107
0.43315 0.1107
0.60753 0.10486
1 0

Table 1931: Base 64 representation:


B-aEu GDJK81PsA

Figure 1453: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

488
Profile: goe481a Table 1936: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.117 7.619 ects
Information: Gottingen 481A airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.1 -4.5 dcts
Cm error -115 -133 mcts
Upper transition point 3.38 3.15 %

Figure 1454: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1455: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1933: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.063 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 5.4983 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.1707 %C
Lower nose radius: 4.8043 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 34.1692 deg
Release Angle: 16.1771 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.0422 deg
Camber deflection: 21.2194 deg

Table 1934: Controlpoints


1 0
0.23653 -0.012093
0.13653 -0.04388
0.07706 -0.04388
0.060116 -0.04388
0 -0.04388
0 0
0 0.010392
0.007462 0.12852
0.39396 0.12852
0.4426 0.12852
0.85532 0.0949
1 0

Table 1935: Base 64 representation:


F-ZF2 OFETu4l5A

Figure 1456: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

489
Profile: goe483 Table 1940: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 7.431 9.543 ects
Information: Gottingen 483 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.3 -0.5 dcts
Cm error -65 -69 mcts
Upper transition point 4.14 3.55 %

Figure 1457: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1458: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1937: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 5.4595 % @0.21C
Maximum Camber: 5.6616 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.39771 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.1773 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.0825 deg
Release Angle: 8.091 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.394 deg
Camber deflection: 20.485 deg

Table 1938: Controlpoints


1 0
0.20916 0.076842
0.12771 -0.00488
0.025 -0.00488
0.0087049 -0.00488
0 -0.0032077
0 0
0 0.01658
0.10368 0.0815
0.3 0.0815
0.51585 0.0815
0.62562 0.070282
1 0

Table 1939: Base 64 representation:


NpTUippCHC25GsA

Figure 1459: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

490
Profile: goe484 Table 1944: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.663 5.104 ects
Information: Gottingen 484 airfoil RMS curvature error: 55.82 57.54 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.1 -4.2 dcts
Cm error -16 -28 mcts
Upper transition point -0.51 -1.26 %

Figure 1460: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1461: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1941: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.2361 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 5.0047 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.96156 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.96712 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.3193 deg
Release Angle: 10.9065 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.9595 deg
Camber deflection: 16.866 deg

Table 1942: Controlpoints


1 0
0.46516 0.058545
0.11813 -0.0122
0.025 -0.0122
0.014585 -0.0122
0 -0.0122
0 0
0 0.037354
0.21766 0.0793
0.4 0.0793
0.4692 0.0793
0.73594 0.073558
1 0

Table 1943: Base 64 representation:


esaHh bCGF6mKxA

Figure 1462: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

491
Profile: goe492 Table 1948: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.534 5.472 ects
Information: Gottingen 492 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.8 NaN dcts
Cm error 0 NaN mcts
Upper transition point -8.92 NaN %

Figure 1463: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1464: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1945: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.3765 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 3.4136 % @0.48C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.24426 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.33578 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.5069 deg
Release Angle: 6.9081 deg
Nose Incidence: 2.5294 deg
Camber deflection: 9.4375 deg

Table 1946: Controlpoints


1 0
0.51101 0.022673
0.25155 -0.01156
0.07514 -0.01156
0.018251 -0.01156
0 -0.0061231
0 0
0 0.017463
0.18727 0.06449
0.39919 0.06449
0.67918 0.06449
0.91125 0.017511
1 0

Table 1947: Base 64 representation:


RhaechvFMFSpKqA

Figure 1465: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

492
Profile: goe493 Table 1952: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.22 6.373 ects
Information: Gottingen 493 airfoil RMS curvature error: 27.13 25.94 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 -0.3 dcts
Cm error -9 -25 mcts
Upper transition point 2.78 2.75 %

Figure 1466: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1467: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1949: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.0037 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 3.3647 % @0.52C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6168 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.63881 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.4406 deg
Release Angle: 7.3991 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.6015 deg
Camber deflection: 16.0006 deg

Table 1950: Controlpoints


1 0
0.63438 -0.0084326
0.52062 -0.047661
0.20336 -0.047661
0.053349 -0.047661
0 -0.015073
0 0
0 0.042107
0.16449 0.10617
0.39251 0.10617
0.64788 0.10617
0.90264 0.028137
1 0

Table 1951: Base 64 representation:


ZkZbsUuNZUSwTrA

Figure 1468: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

493
Profile: goe494 Table 1956: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.197 5.388 ects
Information: Gottingen 494 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1469: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1470: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1953: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 5.0418 % @0.24C
Maximum Camber: 5.0647 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.41384 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.5087e-005 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.985 deg
Release Angle: 10.7964 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.5993 deg
Camber deflection: 16.3956 deg

Table 1954: Controlpoints


1 0
0.47044 0.077291
0.20266 -0.00741
0.01255 -0.00741
0.0094048 -0.00741
0 -3.966e-005
0 0
0 0.022629
0.1896 0.0713
0.3995 0.0713
0.51948 0.0713
0.71076 0.068315
1 0

Table 1955: Base 64 representation:


UhaNeAQBMD8qGwA

Figure 1471: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

494
Profile: goe495 Table 1960: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.309 5.002 ects
Information: Gottingen 495 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf 60.57 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.5 0.7 dcts
Cm error -1 1 mcts
Upper transition point -1.45 -1.27 %

Figure 1472: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1473: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1957: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.963 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 5.0142 % @0.48C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.95855 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.39724 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.3159 deg
Release Angle: 11.0725 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.7026 deg
Camber deflection: 21.7751 deg

Table 1958: Controlpoints


1 0
0.52739 0.061504
0.2202 -0.01092
0.05 -0.01092
0.039398 -0.01092
0 -0.010215
0 0
0 0.033014
0.17056 0.0806
0.4 0.0806
0.68439 0.0806
0.96395 0.0094773
1 0

Table 1959: Base 64 representation:


akaeh7ODLFHmIxA

Figure 1474: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

495
Profile: goe496 Table 1964: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.685 5.159 ects
Information: Gottingen 496 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.1 0.4 dcts
Cm error 15 4 mcts
Upper transition point -1.9 -1.09 %

Figure 1475: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1476: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1961: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.0015 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 5.0093 % @0.48C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.83845 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0624 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.2621 deg
Release Angle: 11.3473 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.6097 deg
Camber deflection: 17.957 deg

Table 1962: Controlpoints


1 0
0.58165 0.049265
0.26833 -0.02313
0.075 -0.02313
0.07107 -0.02313
0 -0.022436
0 0
0 0.020987
0.078797 0.0945
0.4 0.0945
0.53229 0.0945
0.79624 0.058344
1 0

Table 1963: Base 64 representation:


OyaOn9DFNKnkKxA

Figure 1477: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

496
Profile: goe497 Table 1968: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.267 7.345 ects
Information: Gottingen 497 airfoil RMS curvature error: 15.17 15.19 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.2 -1.6 dcts
Cm error 8 -12 mcts
Upper transition point 2.24 3.32 %

Figure 1478: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1479: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1965: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.5862 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 5.3095 % @0.5C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3695 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0747 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.8622 deg
Release Angle: 11.2296 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.1177 deg
Camber deflection: 21.3473 deg

Table 1966: Controlpoints


1 0
0.57559 0.043099
0.33857 -0.0318
0.1 -0.0318
0.040958 -0.0318
0 -0.01713
0 0
0 0.024692
0.066777 0.1088
0.4 0.1088
0.50112 0.1088
0.69366 0.091678
1 0

Table 1967: Base 64 representation:


P0aLthlGRO1oMxA

Figure 1480: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

497
Profile: goe498 Table 1972: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.625 7.348 ects
Information: Gottingen 498 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.9 2.4 dcts
Cm error 3 15 mcts
Upper transition point 0.35 -0.16 %

Figure 1481: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1482: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1969: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.7897 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 5.5312 % @0.48C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 5.9243 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.9432 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.1856 deg
Release Angle: 12.2578 deg
Nose Incidence: 21.4246 deg
Camber deflection: 33.6824 deg

Table 1970: Controlpoints


1 0
0.62668 0.033745
0.35019 -0.04097
0.15203 -0.04097
0.10034 -0.04097
0 -0.036054
0 0
0 0.067822
0.11647 0.12799
0.39367 0.12799
0.4509 0.12799
0.70265 0.10443
1 0

Table 1971: Base 64 representation:


hsZG23WKPRzkQzA

Figure 1483: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

498
Profile: goe499 Table 1976: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.069 3.961 ects
Information: Gottingen 499 airfoil RMS curvature error: 28.14 28.96 %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1484: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1485: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1973: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.8817 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 5.8822 % @0.52C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.24471 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.637 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.8213 deg
Release Angle: 13.3239 deg
Nose Incidence: 1.0355 deg
Camber deflection: 14.3594 deg

Table 1974: Controlpoints


1 0
0.55805 0.085211
0.1782 -0.01188
0.05 -0.01188
0.010015 -0.01188
0 -0.010454
0 0
0 0.015219
0.14198 0.087
0.4 0.087
0.60306 0.087
0.74565 0.071659
1 0

Table 1975: Base 64 representation:


LoaWk3yDJF0hF1A

Figure 1486: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

499
Profile: goe500 Table 1980: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.663 8.901 ects
Information: Gottingen 501 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.8 -1 dcts
Cm error -83 -97 mcts
Upper transition point 4.2 4.98 %

Figure 1487: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1488: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1977: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.0024 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 6.0345 % @0.51C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2684 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.91273 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.0411 deg
Release Angle: 12.2481 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.7698 deg
Camber deflection: 22.0179 deg

Table 1978: Controlpoints


1 0
0.63338 0.069456
0.23128 -0.01896
0.075 -0.01896
0.04575 -0.01896
0 -0.016685
0 0
0 0.034963
0.14456 0.1042
0.4 0.1042
0.68792 0.1042
0.90134 0.024176
1 0

Table 1979: Base 64 representation:


Voafr3ZFLIUfDzA

Figure 1489: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

500
Profile: goe501 Table 1984: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.941 8.196 ects
Information: Gottingen 501 airfoil RMS curvature error: 44.3 46.48 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.5 1.3 dcts
Cm error 19 -2 mcts
Upper transition point 1.49 2.23 %

Figure 1490: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1491: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1981: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.6763 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 6.405 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.3664 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.99543 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.251 deg
Release Angle: 12.4332 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.9795 deg
Camber deflection: 28.4127 deg

Table 1982: Controlpoints


1 0
0.57676 0.058035
0.27342 -0.02655
0.1 -0.02655
0.082257 -0.02655
0 -0.023364
0 0
0 0.042486
0.11442 0.1203
0.4 0.1203
0.63377 0.1203
0.85968 0.043058
1 0

Table 1983: Base 64 representation:


XtaZy3LGMLZkKzA

Figure 1492: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

501
Profile: goe502 Table 1988: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.976 6.584 ects
Information: Gottingen 502 airfoil RMS curvature error: 26.64 28.43 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.4 -2.6 dcts
Cm error 18 44 mcts
Upper transition point -1.49 -2.38 %

Figure 1493: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1494: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1985: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.8113 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 6.0923 % @0.48C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.287 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.9421 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.4106 deg
Release Angle: 12.9736 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.0953 deg
Camber deflection: 22.0688 deg

Table 1986: Controlpoints


1 0
0.56117 0.040464
0.32185 -0.04334
0.10219 -0.04334
0.089122 -0.04334
0 -0.04181
0 0
0 0.050293
0.11543 0.13286
0.39329 0.13286
0.44956 0.13286
0.69621 0.11467
1 0

Table 1987: Base 64 representation:


YsZG49IHQS2oR0A

Figure 1495: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

502
Profile: goe504 Table 1992: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.081 9 ects
Information: Gottingen 504 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -7.6 -7.5 dcts
Cm error 6 8 mcts
Upper transition point 0.42 0.14 %

Figure 1496: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1497: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1989: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.6971 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 5.4202 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.12961 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.70888 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 22.5557 deg
Release Angle: 8.149 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.7364 deg
Camber deflection: 23.8854 deg

Table 1990: Controlpoints


1 0
0.34472 -0.035819
0.24472 -0.04237
0.20233 -0.04237
0.094796 -0.04237
0 -0.021166
0 0
0 0.0038276
0.035741 0.14157
0.39222 0.14157
0.39486 0.14157
0.59989 0.14111
1 0

Table 1991: Base 64 representation:


C5ZA7ghNDS 3ZsA

Figure 1498: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

503
Profile: goe506 Table 1996: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.54 5.508 ects
Information: Gottingen 506 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -10.9 -11.4 dcts
Cm error -85 -69 mcts
Upper transition point 5.12 5.59 %

Figure 1499: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1500: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1993: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.535 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 4.6641 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0733 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.41006 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 20.2841 deg
Release Angle: 9.7686 deg
Nose Incidence: 16.2716 deg
Camber deflection: 26.0402 deg

Table 1994: Controlpoints


1 0
0.97466 -0.00016514
0.29866 -0.04128
0.20219 -0.04128
0.071595 -0.04128
0 -0.01399
0 0
0 0.024031
0.080708 0.12654
0.29329 0.12654
0.55403 0.12654
0.68846 0.11284
1 0

Table 1995: Base 64 representation:


MtTY1WoNIS4CXvA

Figure 1501: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

504
Profile: goe508 Table 2000: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.918 7.366 ects
Information: Gottingen 508 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.4 -1.5 dcts
Cm error -16 -48 mcts
Upper transition point 2.83 3.21 %

Figure 1502: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1503: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1997: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.3467 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 5.6531 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.12771 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.8569 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.6575 deg
Release Angle: 5.0173 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.1159 deg
Camber deflection: 17.1332 deg

Table 1998: Controlpoints


1 0
0.28422 -0.028892
0.18422 -0.0349
0.1 -0.0349
0.026343 -0.0349
0 -0.022399
0 0
0 0.0019273
0.0043628 0.1374
0.4 0.1374
0.57983 0.1374
0.95612 0.0096051
1 0

Table 1999: Base 64 representation:


B-aT6ouGGPH3QnA

Figure 1504: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

505
Profile: goe517 Table 2004: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 11.097 11.503 ects
Information: Gottingen 517 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.2 -1.4 dcts
Cm error -62 -74 mcts
Upper transition point 2.83 3.64 %

Figure 1505: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1506: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2001: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.0825 % @0.36C
Maximum Camber: 4.5653 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 16.0872 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.34038 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.903 deg
Release Angle: 6.8639 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.3247 deg
Camber deflection: 24.1886 deg

Table 2002: Controlpoints


1 0
0.18236 0.027301
0.082356 -0.00712
0.05 -0.00712
0.0185 -0.00712
0 -0.0064792
0 0
0 0.0030228
8.52e-005 0.081
0.4 0.081
0.42669 0.081
0.65926 0.07128
1 0

Table 2003: Base 64 representation:


C aDi5nDCD34LqA

Figure 1507: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

506
Profile: goe526 Table 2008: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.185 8.066 ects
Information: Gottingen 526 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.4 1.5 dcts
Cm error -4 -6 mcts
Upper transition point -2.03 -2.26 %

Figure 1508: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1509: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2005: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.6394 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 3.929 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.2883 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.9606 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 21.0606 deg
Release Angle: 2.9537 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.8645 deg
Camber deflection: 14.8182 deg

Table 2006: Controlpoints


1 0
0.96689 -0.0044036
0.14088 -0.03013
0.10086 -0.03013
0.053786 -0.03013
0 -0.026514
0 0
0 0.066311
0.20059 0.10147
0.29711 0.10147
0.51825 0.10147
0.62761 0.089294
1 0

Table 2007: Base 64 representation:


pVTUq3eGDN3JYkA

Figure 1510: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

507
Profile: goe527 Table 2012: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.954 4.667 ects
Information: Gottingen 527 airfoil RMS curvature error: 37.93 38.53 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 5.3 4.9 dcts
Cm error 19 15 mcts
Upper transition point -4.41 -3.75 %

Figure 1511: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1512: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2009: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.6101 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 5.7653 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 5.0074 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.6318 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.9261 deg
Release Angle: 8.0999 deg
Nose Incidence: 23.1923 deg
Camber deflection: 31.2923 deg

Table 2010: Controlpoints


1 0
0.54786 -0.006812
0.30712 -0.03041
0.15113 -0.03041
0.065831 -0.03041
0 -0.026761
0 0
0 0.069363
0.14412 0.13941
0.29484 0.13941
0.45 0.13941
0.5958 0.12406
1 0

Table 2011: Base 64 representation:


ggTO63jKMN4pUsA

Figure 1513: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

508
Profile: goe528 Table 2016: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.361 3.894 ects
Information: Gottingen 528 airfoil RMS curvature error: 42.85 42.95 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.4 1.6 dcts
Cm error 13 8 mcts
Upper transition point -3.47 -4.01 %

Figure 1514: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1515: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2013: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.5163 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 6.1503 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.46 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.81932 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.5891 deg
Release Angle: 9.0304 deg
Nose Incidence: 22.9772 deg
Camber deflection: 32.0077 deg

Table 2014: Controlpoints


1 0
0.40207 0.023345
0.22281 -0.01425
0.05021 -0.01425
0.034028 -0.01425
0 -0.013633
0 0
0 0.060906
0.16082 0.12247
0.29816 0.12247
0.45061 0.12247
0.61977 0.10777
1 0

Table 2015: Base 64 representation:


gsTOz8VDMG3wPuA

Figure 1516: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

509
Profile: goe529 Table 2020: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.462 8.145 ects
Information: Gottingen 529 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 5.4 5.9 dcts
Cm error 15 6 mcts
Upper transition point -7.86 -7.73 %

Figure 1517: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1518: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2017: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.7099 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 5.7202 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3626 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.93778 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.1157 deg
Release Angle: 7.7564 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.807 deg
Camber deflection: 21.5634 deg

Table 2018: Controlpoints


1 0
0.16896 0.031905
0.14554 -0.01192
0.05014 -0.01192
0.0176 -0.01192
0 -0.01049
0 0
0 0.035359
0.13763 0.10494
0.29879 0.10494
0.45093 0.10494
0.60978 0.092347
1 0

Table 2019: Base 64 representation:


WiTOs3pDGF39MsA

Figure 1519: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

510
Profile: goe532 Table 2024: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.436 3.809 ects
Information: Gottingen 532 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.6 -0.4 dcts
Cm error 4 6 mcts
Upper transition point 2.21 1.68 %

Figure 1520: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1521: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2021: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.6371 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 4.8395 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 5.2606 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.783 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.2972 deg
Release Angle: 8.1155 deg
Nose Incidence: 24.9651 deg
Camber deflection: 33.0806 deg

Table 2022: Controlpoints


1 0
0.60927 0.023671
0.35353 -0.02098
0.15 -0.02098
0.015694 -0.02098
0 -0.013658
0 0
0 0.087039
0.21602 0.11005
0.3 0.11005
0.5339 0.11005
0.97097 0.0065757
1 0

Table 2023: Base 64 representation:


ySTVup4KPJEmKsA

Figure 1522: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

511
Profile: goe533 Table 2028: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.357 4.974 ects
Information: Gottingen 533 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.9 0.9 dcts
Cm error 1 6 mcts
Upper transition point -1.2 -1.57 %

Figure 1523: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1524: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2025: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.7119 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 4.6818 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.9369 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.5084 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.348 deg
Release Angle: 8.7806 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.2046 deg
Camber deflection: 25.9851 deg

Table 2026: Controlpoints


1 0
0.64976 0.025146
0.54976 -0.0247
0.15 -0.0247
0.0088058 -0.0247
0 -0.012135
0 0
0 0.050741
0.1315 0.1146
0.3 0.1146
0.40868 0.1146
0.56898 0.10312
1 0

Table 2027: Base 64 representation:


cjTKwf7KeL5xKtA

Figure 1525: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

512
Profile: goe534 Table 2032: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.59 10.494 ects
Information: Gottingen 534 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.6 0.1 dcts
Cm error -57 -49 mcts
Upper transition point 3.11 3.6 %

Figure 1526: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1527: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2029: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.9698 % @0.21C
Maximum Camber: 5.2917 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 7.9379 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.4719 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.9801 deg
Release Angle: 6.5324 deg
Nose Incidence: 28.8842 deg
Camber deflection: 35.4166 deg

Table 2030: Controlpoints


1 0
0.41547 0.041308
0.35797 -0.03141
0.10112 -0.03141
0.077862 -0.03141
0 -0.027641
0 0
0 0.052356
0.051799 0.116
0.29588 0.116
0.48924 0.116
0.98742 0.001997
1 0

Table 2031: Base 64 representation:


s0TSw3PGSNC5GqA

Figure 1528: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

513
Profile: goe535 Table 2036: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.843 8.773 ects
Information: Gottingen 535 airfoil RMS curvature error: 25.62 25.67 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.8 3 dcts
Cm error -73 -77 mcts
Upper transition point 0.93 1 %

Figure 1529: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1530: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2033: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.3279 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 5.7638 % @0.48C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 7.0072 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.9551 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.8894 deg
Release Angle: 12.2529 deg
Nose Incidence: 22.7142 deg
Camber deflection: 34.9671 deg

Table 2034: Controlpoints


1 0
0.53508 0.051395
0.43508 -0.03628
0.15 -0.03628
0.044924 -0.03628
0 -0.02975
0 0
0 0.081642
0.14268 0.13245
0.3 0.13245
0.50254 0.13245
0.84787 0.050012
1 0

Table 2035: Base 64 representation:


mhTT4zsKVPY0NzA

Figure 1531: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

514
Profile: goe546 Table 2040: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.302 5.005 ects
Information: Gottingen 546 airfoil RMS curvature error: 34.91 35.01 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.6 0.2 dcts
Cm error 13 15 mcts
Upper transition point 0.75 1.39 %

Figure 1532: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1533: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2037: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.3117 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 3.583 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3964 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.99106 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.4682 deg
Release Angle: 7.5656 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.7541 deg
Camber deflection: 17.3197 deg

Table 2038: Controlpoints


1 0
0.63349 0.0085189
0.36135 -0.0232
0.2 -0.0232
0.030976 -0.0232
0 -0.014306
0 0
0 0.033817
0.12684 0.0851
0.4 0.0851
0.48328 0.0851
0.71043 0.071123
1 0

Table 2039: Base 64 representation:


ZraJjm1NNK0kOrA

Figure 1534: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

515
Profile: goe547 Table 2044: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.88 6.078 ects
Information: Gottingen 547 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.6 -2.7 dcts
Cm error -5 20 mcts
Upper transition point 5.31 4.69 %

Figure 1535: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1536: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2041: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.651 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 3.9894 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.91167 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.3505 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.4817 deg
Release Angle: 7.6477 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.5241 deg
Camber deflection: 11.1717 deg

Table 2042: Controlpoints


1 0
0.51497 0.0076772
0.32844 -0.02505
0.15074 -0.02505
0.008459 -0.02505
0 -0.011513
0 0
0 0.030038
0.14845 0.09022
0.39734 0.09022
0.71326 0.09022
0.98531 0.0037695
1 0

Table 2043: Base 64 representation:


VnZhls7KNLDtPrA

Figure 1537: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

516
Profile: goe548 Table 2048: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.971 4.193 ects
Information: Gottingen 548 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -7.2 -7.8 dcts
Cm error -29 -54 mcts
Upper transition point 11.67 13.49 %

Figure 1538: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1539: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2045: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.0079 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 2.3043 % @0.51C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.47894 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.40726 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 19.1946 deg
Release Angle: 5.6274 deg
Nose Incidence: 2.8622 deg
Camber deflection: 8.4896 deg

Table 2046: Controlpoints


1 0
0.71896 -0.019503
0.4425 -0.0398
0.3 -0.0398
0.014008 -0.0398
0 -0.0061671
0 0
0 0.018893
0.11179 0.0816
0.4 0.0816
0.57696 0.0816
0.79543 0.055674
1 0

Table 2047: Base 64 representation:


PtaTiK8TNRrgVoA

Figure 1540: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

517
Profile: goe549 Table 2052: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.298 6.025 ects
Information: Gottingen 549 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.4 0.5 dcts
Cm error 7 14 mcts
Upper transition point -4.34 -5.55 %

Figure 1541: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1542: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2049: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.951 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 4.6347 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5235 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2778 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.1206 deg
Release Angle: 6.8916 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.6745 deg
Camber deflection: 17.5661 deg

Table 2050: Controlpoints


1 0
0.59735 0.0023284
0.38642 -0.0271
0.2 -0.0271
0.049548 -0.0271
0 -0.020544
0 0
0 0.037341
0.13728 0.11435
0.3 0.11435
0.4666 0.11435
0.56186 0.1048
1 0

Table 2051: Base 64 representation:


ViTPwwvNPM6pPqA

Figure 1543: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

518
Profile: goe550 Table 2056: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.582 5.829 ects
Information: Gottingen 550 airfoil RMS curvature error: 37.96 39.91 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.3 -1.8 dcts
Cm error -6 -27 mcts
Upper transition point 2.48 3.55 %

Figure 1544: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1545: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2053: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.7252 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 4.3127 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.45895 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.0742 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.4315 deg
Release Angle: 9.6428 deg
Nose Incidence: 0.61801 deg
Camber deflection: 10.2608 deg

Table 2054: Controlpoints


1 0
0.52158 0.016097
0.22678 -0.04165
0.15 -0.04165
0.097151 -0.04165
0 -0.036652
0 0
0 0.010885
0.038725 0.1006
0.4 0.1006
0.55096 0.1006
0.8856 0.035759
1 0

Table 2055: Base 64 representation:


H5aQq3XKGSXnRvA

Figure 1546: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

519
Profile: goe553 Table 2060: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.396 5.21 ects
Information: Gottingen 553 airfoil RMS curvature error: 32.55 35.2 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.8 0.8 dcts
Cm error -3 -5 mcts
Upper transition point -0.09 -0.03 %

Figure 1547: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1548: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2057: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.7025 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 4.6835 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.2285 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.2375 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.3704 deg
Release Angle: 8.7108 deg
Nose Incidence: 18.4949 deg
Camber deflection: 27.2058 deg

Table 2058: Controlpoints


1 0
0.64332 0.025102
0.54332 -0.02467
0.15079 -0.02467
0.0097709 -0.02467
0 -0.012073
0 0
0 0.053469
0.13283 0.11448
0.29634 0.11448
0.40487 0.11448
0.55796 0.10528
1 0

Table 2059: Base 64 representation:


eiTKwf7KeL6xKtA

Figure 1549: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

520
Profile: goe559 Table 2064: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
Information: Gottingen 559 airfoil RMS position error: 2.542 4.513 ects
Reference: UIUC RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1550: Wing profile with camber and thickness


Figure 1551: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution.
curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2061: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.15 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 3.4253 % @0.31C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: NaN %C
Lower nose radius: NaN %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.5014 deg
Release Angle: 4.5254 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.223 deg
Camber deflection: 9.7484 deg

Table 2062: Controlpoints


1 0
0.98069 -0.00058165
0.53892 -0.0215
0.3 -0.0215
0.15831 -0.0215
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.17352 0.09
0.3 0.09
0.377 0.09
0.52713 0.09
1 0

Table 2063: Base 64 representation:


AbTHlAeTWJ DOmA

Figure 1552: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

521
Profile: goe563 Table 2068: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.902 3.384 ects
Information: Gottingen 563 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.2 -2.8 dcts
Cm error -23 -16 mcts
Upper transition point 5.56 3.69 %

Figure 1553: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1554: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2065: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.8253 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 2.251 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.4452 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.036 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.7512 deg
Release Angle: 4.3884 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.378 deg
Camber deflection: 7.7664 deg

Table 2066: Controlpoints


1 0
0.38375 -0.021382
0.35681 -0.02514
0.15089 -0.02514
0.085013 -0.02514
0 -0.024231
0 0
0 0.0048607
0.0079602 0.06562
0.39767 0.06562
0.65461 0.06562
0.9476 0.0099616
1 0

Table 2067: Base 64 representation:


F-Zbc9cKQLK8OmA

Figure 1555: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

522
Profile: goe564 Table 2072: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.333 5.331 ects
Information: Gottingen 564 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -7.8 -7.9 dcts
Cm error -21 -16 mcts
Upper transition point 18.43 19.23 %

Figure 1556: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1557: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2069: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.1922 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 2.6881 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.42033 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.72805 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.0631 deg
Release Angle: 5.7262 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.9427 deg
Camber deflection: 11.6688 deg

Table 2070: Controlpoints


1 0
0.21663 -0.017851
0.11663 -0.02078
0.075 -0.02078
0.056931 -0.02078
0 -0.016623
0 0
0 0.0051421
0.0071308 0.0672
0.4 0.0672
0.49203 0.0672
0.75449 0.055588
1 0

Table 2071: Base 64 representation:


F-aKsyPFDJ04QoA

Figure 1558: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

523
Profile: goe565 Table 2076: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.802 3.838 ects
Information: Gottingen 565 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -5.5 -4.5 dcts
Cm error -26 -44 mcts
Upper transition point 10.52 11.83 %

Figure 1559: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1560: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2073: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.3533 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 2.8363 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.3008 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.82423 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.9982 deg
Release Angle: 5.8661 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.6044 deg
Camber deflection: 11.4705 deg

Table 2074: Controlpoints


1 0
0.54393 0.0029218
0.32779 -0.02127
0.15 -0.02127
0.071727 -0.02127
0 -0.019853
0 0
0 0.0031812
0.0050464 0.06778
0.4 0.06778
0.44648 0.06778
0.67999 0.064323
1 0

Table 2075: Base 64 representation:


D-aFs7gKNJ8qMpA

Figure 1561: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

524
Profile: goe567 Table 2080: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.26 4.953 ects
Information: Gottingen 567 airfoil RMS curvature error: 30.43 29.39 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.2 -1 dcts
Cm error 9 34 mcts
Upper transition point 2.08 1.72 %

Figure 1562: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1563: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2077: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.6411 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 5.2856 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6935 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.8452 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.3003 deg
Release Angle: 11.7228 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.9141 deg
Camber deflection: 18.6369 deg

Table 2078: Controlpoints


1 0
0.5812 0.037175
0.39909 -0.03802
0.15175 -0.03802
0.086909 -0.03802
0 -0.032697
0 0
0 0.035606
0.11229 0.11965
0.3945 0.11965
0.57378 0.11965
0.92927 0.023492
1 0

Table 2079: Base 64 representation:


TtZTy2bKTQNsPyA

Figure 1564: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

525
Profile: goe575 Table 2084: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 10.887 13.646 ects
Information: Gottingen 575 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -5 -4.8 dcts
Cm error 96 111 mcts
Upper transition point -0.3 -0.58 %

Figure 1565: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1566: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2081: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.5929 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 3.449 % @0.31C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.507 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.7016 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 56.4143 deg
Release Angle: 4.8128 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.5648 deg
Camber deflection: 19.3777 deg

Table 2082: Controlpoints


1 0
0.93376 -0.028655
0.39844 -0.03402
0.15056 -0.03402
0.079008 -0.03402
0 -0.029938
0 0
0 0.054194
0.12562 0.10242
0.29831 0.10242
0.45684 0.10242
0.87456 0.081523
1 0

Table 2083: Base 64 representation:


hkTOr3eKTPy1-nA

Figure 1567: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

526
Profile: goe584 Table 2088: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.294 6.825 ects
Information: Gottingen 584 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.1 -0.4 dcts
Cm error -4 -23 mcts
Upper transition point 0.48 1.43 %

Figure 1568: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1569: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2085: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.465 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 4.9515 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1926 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.6905 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.1056 deg
Release Angle: 4.4555 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.6019 deg
Camber deflection: 16.0574 deg

Table 2086: Controlpoints


1 0
0.3095 -0.0071987
0.19252 -0.02475
0.1 -0.02475
0.042091 -0.02475
0 -0.02178
0 0
0 0.016919
0.036 0.111
0.4 0.111
0.5695 0.111
0.9707 0.0049082
1 0

Table 2087: Base 64 representation:


K5aSu3kGHLE2LmA

Figure 1570: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

527
Profile: goe591 Table 2092: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.759 3.537 ects
Information: Gottingen 591 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.4 3.7 dcts
Cm error -23 29 mcts
Upper transition point 7.98 -9.01 %

Figure 1571: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1572: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2089: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.2112 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 5.0131 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4909 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.76161 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.6143 deg
Release Angle: 7.5957 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.0771 deg
Camber deflection: 21.6728 deg

Table 2090: Controlpoints


1 0
0.22425 0.0039071
0.19841 -0.01619
0.075 -0.01619
0.039978 -0.01619
0 -0.014247
0 0
0 0.03518
0.12452 0.10525
0.3 0.10525
0.47137 0.10525
0.65198 0.09262
1 0

Table 2091: Base 64 representation:


VkTQs3eFJH39QrA

Figure 1573: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

528
Profile: goe592 Table 2096: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.943 6.544 ects
Information: Gottingen 592 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 5.3 5.8 dcts
Cm error -51 -36 mcts
Upper transition point 0.96 0.15 %

Figure 1574: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1575: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2093: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.2311 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 7.5287 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 5.6773 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.9485 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.8665 deg
Release Angle: 10.8289 deg
Nose Incidence: 24.1998 deg
Camber deflection: 35.0287 deg

Table 2094: Controlpoints


1 0
0.39777 0.030462
0.11604 -0.02136
0.05048 -0.02136
0.027199 -0.02136
0 -0.018797
0 0
0 0.082593
0.18023 0.14543
0.39673 0.14543
0.63647 0.14543
0.90805 0.031234
1 0

Table 2095: Base 64 representation:


jiZZ93eDEJQrSxA

Figure 1576: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

529
Profile: goe595 Table 2100: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.434 4.053 ects
Information: Gottingen 595 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.1 NaN dcts
Cm error 13 NaN mcts
Upper transition point -2.65 NaN %

Figure 1577: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1578: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2097: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.596 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 3.0018 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.86283 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.33205 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.8682 deg
Release Angle: 5.8918 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.3607 deg
Camber deflection: 16.2525 deg

Table 2098: Controlpoints


1 0
0.66036 -0.0091449
0.3613 -0.0194
0.2 -0.0194
0.053318 -0.0194
0 -0.010864
0 0
0 0.028307
0.1363 0.0774
0.3 0.0774
0.51104 0.0774
0.71245 0.068112
1 0

Table 2099: Base 64 representation:


XiTTgjuNNI3hRpA

Figure 1579: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

530
Profile: goe596 Table 2104: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.213 4.863 ects
Information: Gottingen 596 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 3.1 3.5 dcts
Cm error -6 1 mcts
Upper transition point -4.59 -5.23 %

Figure 1580: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1581: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2101: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.779 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 3.9798 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5321 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.7316 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.9831 deg
Release Angle: 5.7285 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.7444 deg
Camber deflection: 14.4729 deg

Table 2102: Controlpoints


1 0
0.28631 -0.003276
0.18631 -0.01572
0.075 -0.01572
0.0066667 -0.01572
0 -0.012878
0 0
0 0.03986
0.15555 0.0881
0.3 0.0881
0.44095 0.0881
0.62629 0.077528
1 0

Table 2103: Base 64 representation:


sfTNlz5FIH33NoA

Figure 1582: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

531
Profile: goe598 Table 2108: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.48 4.965 ects
Information: Gottingen 598 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 10.2 -9.5 dcts
Cm error 2 -14 mcts
Upper transition point -9.71 9.41 %

Figure 1583: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1584: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2105: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.5844 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 0.944 % @0.48C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.16906 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.44077 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.8762 deg
Release Angle: 1.7448 deg
Nose Incidence: -1.1447 deg
Camber deflection: 0.60005 deg

Table 2106: Controlpoints


1 -0.001
0.55502 -0.018043
0.45502 -0.02461
0.30097 -0.02461
0.15961 -0.02461
0 -0.021657
0 0
0 0.0092833
0.076464 0.04173
0.39835 0.04173
0.52623 0.04173
0.71681 0.029181
1 0.001

Table 2107: Base 64 representation:


OzZOS3eTOLrzJiF

Figure 1585: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

532
Profile: goe599 Table 2112: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.923 3.437 ects
Information: Gottingen 599 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -16.1 -16 dcts
Cm error -23 -10 mcts
Upper transition point 30.85 30.19 %

Figure 1586: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1587: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2109: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9962 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 1.5375 % @0.53C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.35 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.85769 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.66161 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.8798 deg
Release Angle: 5.6716 deg
Nose Incidence: 2.9409 deg
Camber deflection: 8.6125 deg

Table 2110: Controlpoints


1 -0.00175
0.60387 -0.02437
0.42467 -0.0374
0.30218 -0.0374
0.030917 -0.0374
0 -0.011678
0 0
0 0.030422
0.16582 0.06358
0.3963 0.06358
0.66301 0.06358
0.95624 0.013157
1 0.00175

Table 2111: Base 64 representation:


fkZcbU4TLQMrUoJ

Figure 1588: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

533
Profile: goe600 Table 2116: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.927 3.268 ects
Information: Gottingen 600 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -7 -6.6 dcts
Cm error -6 3 mcts
Upper transition point 10.86 10 %

Figure 1589: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1590: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2113: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.0974 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 1.8839 % @0.5C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.50001 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.44598 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.60506 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.3661 deg
Release Angle: 2.83 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.2678 deg
Camber deflection: 7.0978 deg

Table 2114: Controlpoints


1 -0.0025
0.59974 -0.032969
0.43151 -0.04945
0.30383 -0.04945
0.012905 -0.04945
0 -0.007215
0 0
0 0.0096932
0.031601 0.082501
0.3936 0.082501
0.58682 0.082501
0.78074 0.041213
1 0.0025

Table 2115: Base 64 representation:


I6ZUiJ8TMVhsQkN

Figure 1591: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

534
Profile: goe601 Table 2120: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.488 4.903 ects
Information: Gottingen 601 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -8.9 -9.1 dcts
Cm error -15 -19 mcts
Upper transition point 8.31 8.71 %

Figure 1592: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1593: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2117: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.1819 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 2.4672 % @0.53C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0805 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.4831 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 21.392 deg
Release Angle: 4.9908 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.4864 deg
Camber deflection: 8.4772 deg

Table 2118: Controlpoints


1 0
0.48327 -0.051624
0.40699 -0.060391
0.30605 -0.060391
0.042429 -0.060391
0 -0.020482
0 0
0 0.021054
0.06154 0.10247
0.38976 0.10247
0.48997 0.10247
0.66108 0.095182
1 0

Table 2119: Base 64 representation:


N1ZLrW2UJa63YnA

Figure 1594: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

535
Profile: goe602 Table 2124: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.516 6.945 ects
Information: Gottingen 602 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.1 3.5 dcts
Cm error -12 13 mcts
Upper transition point 6.81 -7.61 %

Figure 1595: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1596: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2121: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.8066 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 3.5012 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.014459 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.54295 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.7508 deg
Release Angle: 7.8519 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.7974 deg
Camber deflection: 14.6493 deg

Table 2122: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79537 0.0052744
0.27546 -0.02
0.2 -0.02
0.11029 -0.02
0 -0.01998
0 0
0 0.001577
0.0258 0.083
0.4 0.083
0.406 0.083
0.67592 0.08217
1 0

Table 2123: Base 64 representation:


B7aBi sNGJ-SOsA

Figure 1597: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

536
Profile: goe602m Table 2128: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.236 6.152 ects
Information: Gottingen 602 airfoil, modified. RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.7 -3.6 dcts
Cm error -8 -21 mcts
Upper transition point 4.1 5.7 %

Figure 1598: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1599: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2125: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.4909 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 3.8273 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.9258e-005 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.50541 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.7521 deg
Release Angle: 8.3513 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.1366 deg
Camber deflection: 15.4879 deg

Table 2126: Controlpoints


1 0
0.588 0.01781
0.33957 -0.01925
0.15 -0.01925
0.10976 -0.01925
0 -0.019231
0 0
0 8.3e-005
0.020978 0.083
0.4 0.083
0.40006 0.083
0.67297 0.082917
1 0

Table 2127: Base 64 representation:


A8aAi RKOI nNtA

Figure 1600: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

537
Profile: goe604 Table 2132: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.73 3.937 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.7 -1.2 dcts
Cm error -13 -12 mcts
Upper transition point 1.14 1.39 %

Figure 1601: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1602: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2129: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.9037 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 5.403 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.3832 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.872 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 18.3085 deg
Release Angle: 6.3346 deg
Nose Incidence: 24.1738 deg
Camber deflection: 30.5084 deg

Table 2130: Controlpoints


1 0
0.28263 -0.035332
0.28263 -0.03883
0.15196 -0.03883
0.061905 -0.03883
0 -0.01897
0 0
0 0.041647
0.076902 0.14279
0.29279 0.14279
0.34936 0.14279
0.48983 0.14138
1 0

Table 2131: Base 64 representation:


TuTF8flKKR- UpA

Figure 1603: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

538
Profile: goe610bm Table 2136: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.588 5.276 ects
Information: Gottingen 610-B MOD airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.1 -14.4 dcts
Cm error -50 -69 mcts
Upper transition point 5.49 4.75 %

Figure 1604: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1605: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2133: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.7887 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 5.504 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.80001 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1105 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.025139 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.1986 deg
Release Angle: 8.6599 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.0736 deg
Camber deflection: 23.7335 deg

Table 2134: Controlpoints


1 -0.004
0.40484 0.053943
0.11505 -0.0069599
0.012472 -0.0069599
0.011561 -0.0069599
0 -0.001392
0 0
0 0.033275
0.14956 0.091899
0.30037 0.091899
0.45415 0.091899
0.59079 0.089184
1 0.004

Table 2135: Base 64 representation:


XgTOmNFBHD9qHtU

Figure 1606: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

539
Profile: goe611 Table 2140: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.912 8.356 ects
Information: Gottingen 611 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.7 -3.2 dcts
Cm error 18 21 mcts
Upper transition point 0.02 -0.88 %

Figure 1607: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1608: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2137: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.9 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 5.7967 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.65 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.4238 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.507 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.3616 deg
Release Angle: 8.4137 deg
Nose Incidence: 23.4299 deg
Camber deflection: 31.8436 deg

Table 2138: Controlpoints


1 -0.00325
0.6009 -0.0051104
0.033368 -0.00788
0.02504 -0.00788
0.02504 -0.00788
0 -0.00788
0 0
0 0.046311
0.13273 0.12242
0.29942 0.12242
0.43171 0.12242
0.6125 0.12242
1 0.00325

Table 2139: Base 64 representation:


YjTMz ACBD aTtQ

Figure 1609: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

540
Profile: goe613 Table 2144: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.132 2.92 ects
Information: Gottingen 613 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 4.7 5.1 dcts
Cm error 8 14 mcts
Upper transition point -4.75 -5.73 %

Figure 1610: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1611: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2141: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.3127 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 4.0834 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.11338 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.5059 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.7613 deg
Release Angle: 7.0137 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.0939 deg
Camber deflection: 13.1076 deg

Table 2142: Controlpoints


1 0
0.98166 -0.00027749
0.075 -0.01434
0.075 -0.01434
0.00975 -0.01434
0 -0.012763
0 0
0 0.00593
0.046524 0.09215
0.3 0.09215
0.4617 0.09215
0.69511 0.081092
1 0

Table 2143: Base 64 representation:


E1TPm43FAG3BSqA

Figure 1612: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

541
Profile: goe615 Table 2148: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.444 4.759 ects
Information: Gottingen 615 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 3 3.3 dcts
Cm error 1 13 mcts
Upper transition point -3.86 -4.02 %

Figure 1613: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1614: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2145: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.8004 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 5.4901 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.7584 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.5274 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.2411 deg
Release Angle: 8.592 deg
Nose Incidence: 20.7371 deg
Camber deflection: 29.3292 deg

Table 2146: Controlpoints


1 0
0.40147 0.0049254
0.28221 -0.02283
0.10061 -0.02283
0.033522 -0.02283
0 -0.018475
0 0
0 0.052851
0.11148 0.12186
0.29677 0.12186
0.50774 0.12186
0.70713 0.087934
1 0

Table 2147: Base 64 representation:


cnTTzzqGNKt0StA

Figure 1615: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

542
Profile: goe617 Table 2152: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.535 3.774 ects
Information: Gottingen 617 airfoil RMS curvature error: 33.61 33.09 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.9 -3.9 dcts
Cm error 26 27 mcts
Upper transition point -1.07 -0.99 %

Figure 1616: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1617: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2149: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.85 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 2.175 % @0.31C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.5353 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.3376 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 21.7334 deg
Release Angle: 1.63 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.0605 deg
Camber deflection: 11.6905 deg

Table 2150: Controlpoints


1 0
0.74468 -0.041521
0.41199 -0.0475
0.3 -0.0475
0.19977 -0.0475
0 -0.042207
0 0
0 0.053964
0.17229 0.091
0.3 0.091
0.40676 0.091
0.58941 0.091
1 0

Table 2151: Base 64 representation:


lbTKm4VTKU 3YiA

Figure 1618: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

543
Profile: goe619 Table 2156: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.905 5.97 ects
Information: Gottingen 619 airfoil RMS curvature error: 37.32 35.48 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 5.4 4.5 dcts
Cm error 42 53 mcts
Upper transition point -11.09 -9.72 %

Figure 1619: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1620: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2153: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.0172 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 4.5141 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3023 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.6761 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.531 deg
Release Angle: 7.9394 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.0381 deg
Camber deflection: 15.9774 deg

Table 2154: Controlpoints


1 0
0.41365 0.0017793
0.27057 -0.03817
0.15172 -0.03817
0.069791 -0.03817
0 -0.030536
0 0
0 0.024909
0.071463 0.10878
0.29511 0.10878
0.43609 0.10878
0.62079 0.10663
1 0

Table 2155: Base 64 representation:


PwTNtyiKJQ-yRsA

Figure 1621: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

544
Profile: goe620 Table 2160: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.589 7.733 ects
Information: Gottingen 620 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.2 -1.7 dcts
Cm error -25 -51 mcts
Upper transition point 0.96 1.29 %

Figure 1622: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1623: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2157: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.3256 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 5.9987 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: NaN %C
Lower nose radius: 2.4341 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 20.112 deg
Release Angle: 10.5586 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.1872 deg
Camber deflection: 24.7458 deg

Table 2158: Controlpoints


1 0
0.4974 0.0044094
0.32798 -0.04278
0.15 -0.04278
0.071759 -0.04278
0 -0.034124
0 0
0 0
0 0.1421
0.4 0.1421
0.45712 0.1421
0.65239 0.13076
1 0

Table 2159: Base 64 representation:


A aG8ygKNS6vWwA

Figure 1624: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

545
Profile: goe621 Table 2164: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 7.449 8.588 ects
Information: Gottingen 621 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.3 -0.9 dcts
Cm error -52 -40 mcts
Upper transition point 1.26 0.66 %

Figure 1625: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1626: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2161: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.8467 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 5.0574 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.6559 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.2293 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.6158 deg
Release Angle: 7.8495 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.6601 deg
Camber deflection: 21.5096 deg

Table 2162: Controlpoints


1 0
0.4046 -0.0047634
0.3046 -0.0376
0.15171 -0.0376
0.091867 -0.0376
0 -0.03695
0 0
0 0.0083576
0.003945 0.12095
0.3945 0.12095
0.56341 0.12095
0.80605 0.056192
1 0

Table 2163: Base 64 representation:


E-ZSz-ZKMQc2TsA

Figure 1627: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

546
Profile: goe622 Table 2168: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.123 4.849 ects
Information: Gottingen 622 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.9 -1.2 dcts
Cm error 9 4 mcts
Upper transition point 6.22 6.8 %

Figure 1628: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1629: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2165: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.8896 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 2.4231 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.042416 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.55735 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.6651 deg
Release Angle: 4.0267 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.8562 deg
Camber deflection: 9.8828 deg

Table 2166: Controlpoints


1 -0.001
0.36193 -0.015545
0.22649 -0.01935
0.14998 -0.01935
0.064492 -0.01935
0 -0.01548
0 0
0 0.00045772
0.00074092 0.0632
0.40006 0.0632
0.44206 0.0632
0.68688 0.052607
1 0.001

Table 2167: Base 64 representation:


A aEbyjKGI00MmF

Figure 1630: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

547
Profile: goe623 Table 2172: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.781 8.238 ects
Information: Gottingen 623 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1631: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1632: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2169: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.8184 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 3.8391 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.2303 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.7993 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.7922 deg
Release Angle: 5.6723 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.9929 deg
Camber deflection: 17.6653 deg

Table 2170: Controlpoints


1 -0.0015
0.35953 -0.020774
0.25953 -0.0264
0.09996 -0.0264
0.097961 -0.0264
0 -0.022526
0 0
0 0.0035053
0.0080029 0.0969
0.40015 0.0969
0.44214 0.0969
0.65412 0.081789
1 0.0015

Table 2171: Base 64 representation:


C-aEo2BGLL12RoI

Figure 1633: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

548
Profile: goe624 Table 2176: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.862 3.921 ects
Information: Gttingen 624 profile RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 4.4 4.7 dcts
Cm error -5 -17 mcts
Upper transition point -3.53 -4.11 %

Figure 1634: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1635: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2173: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.0243 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 5.1922 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.5 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.9311 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.7777 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.1756 deg
Release Angle: 6.452 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.8655 deg
Camber deflection: 24.3175 deg

Table 2174: Controlpoints


1 -0.0025
0.31693 -0.027974
0.20692 -0.032875
0.14992 -0.032875
0.073868 -0.032875
0 -0.029587
0 0
0 0.063296
0.15287 0.13125
0.30033 0.13125
0.53144 0.13125
0.66206 0.093303
1 0.0025

Table 2175: Base 64 representation:


ffTV35gKEOt2TqN

Figure 1636: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

549
Profile: goe626 Table 2180: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.48 9.078 ects
Information: Gottingen 626 profile RMS curvature error: 25.19 26.44 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.1 -0.6 dcts
Cm error 25 42 mcts
Upper transition point -5.31 -4.7 %

Figure 1637: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1638: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2177: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.6655 % @0.22C
Maximum Camber: 5.0677 % @0.52C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.9859 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.0026 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.9051 deg
Release Angle: 11.6728 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.2096 deg
Camber deflection: 24.8824 deg

Table 2178: Controlpoints


1 0
0.53192 0.038649
0.30922 -0.055121
0.15372 -0.055121
0.098449 -0.055121
0 -0.036254
0 0
0 0.063218
0.1504 0.1207
0.29185 0.1207
0.62107 0.1207
0.92335 0.025834
1 0

Table 2179: Base 64 representation:


hfTeypXKMYNqQyA

Figure 1639: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

550
Profile: goe627 Table 2184: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.326 2.858 ects
Information: Gottingen 627 airfoil. RMS curvature error: 31.01 30.04 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -5.4 -4.9 dcts
Cm error -10 -5 mcts
Upper transition point 4.21 3.73 %

Figure 1640: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1641: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2181: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.75 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 4.075 % @0.3C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.3567 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.59427 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 24.7012 deg
Release Angle: 6.7348 deg
Nose Incidence: 26.9862 deg
Camber deflection: 33.721 deg

Table 2182: Controlpoints


1 0
0.92345 -0.0075276
0.63555 -0.038
0.3 -0.038
0.043836 -0.038
0 -0.013178
0 0
0 0.011193
0.0079746 0.1195
0.3 0.1195
0.42456 0.1195
0.72182 0.09625
1 0

Table 2183: Base 64 representation:


G9TLyW2TfQzNcqA

Figure 1642: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

551
Profile: goe628 Table 2188: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.231 7.061 ects
Information: Gottingen 628 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -5.5 -5.6 dcts
Cm error -11 -33 mcts
Upper transition point 0.2 1.29 %

Figure 1643: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1644: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2185: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.8909 % @0.24C
Maximum Camber: 5.6016 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.7296 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.92484 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.399 deg
Release Angle: 8.9365 deg
Nose Incidence: 23.5194 deg
Camber deflection: 32.4559 deg

Table 2186: Controlpoints


1 0
0.42264 0.012466
0.32264 -0.04097
0.15203 -0.04097
0.031852 -0.04097
0 -0.014014
0 0
0 0.056884
0.10263 0.13452
0.29334 0.13452
0.38089 0.13452
0.5498 0.13452
1 0

Table 2187: Base 64 representation:


bpTI4WyKNR 2RuA

Figure 1645: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

552
Profile: goe629 Table 2192: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.963 6.302 ects
Information: Gottingen 629 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.2 -1.8 dcts
Cm error 8 13 mcts
Upper transition point -1.25 0.48 %

Figure 1646: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1647: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2189: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.4989 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 2.8081 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.7125 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.0487 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 18.4406 deg
Release Angle: 5.3557 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.7759 deg
Camber deflection: 9.1316 deg

Table 2190: Controlpoints


1 0
0.30746 -0.046782
0.20746 -0.04783
0.15287 -0.04783
0.091722 -0.04783
0 -0.035394
0 0
0 0.025124
0.055289 0.09366
0.39438 0.09366
0.42466 0.09366
0.67191 0.085315
1 0

Table 2191: Base 64 representation:


R2ZDnuaKEU5-VoA

Figure 1648: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

553
Profile: goe630 Table 2196: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.378 6.993 ects
Information: Gottingen 630 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.4 -2.1 dcts
Cm error -35 -27 mcts
Upper transition point 1.1 1.02 %

Figure 1649: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1650: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2193: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.6338 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 7.6414 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.4127 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0454 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.6383 deg
Release Angle: 10.9817 deg
Nose Incidence: 18.653 deg
Camber deflection: 29.6347 deg

Table 2194: Controlpoints


1 0
0.30028 0.050923
0.13391 -0.01511
0.02523 -0.01511
0.018922 -0.01511
0 -0.011484
0 0
0 0.046771
0.136 0.13712
0.29787 0.13712
0.43823 0.13712
0.57294 0.13712
1 0

Table 2195: Base 64 representation:


WiTN6wQCHG zPxA

Figure 1651: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

554
Profile: goe645 Table 2200: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.097 3.495 ects
Information: Gottingen 645 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -5.5 -6.3 dcts
Cm error 2 -14 mcts
Upper transition point 3.86 5.06 %

Figure 1652: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1653: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2197: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.6249 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 4.8147 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.1827 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.80858 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.3761 deg
Release Angle: 7.1071 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.5123 deg
Camber deflection: 24.6194 deg

Table 2198: Controlpoints


1 0
0.39448 -0.000855
0.29447 -0.04013
0.15195 -0.04013
0.03747 -0.04013
0 -0.014212
0 0
0 0.030851
0.065409 0.12226
0.29407 0.12226
0.34505 0.12226
0.52019 0.12226
1 0

Table 2199: Base 64 representation:


QxTFzXvKLR 2QrA

Figure 1654: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

555
Profile: goe646 Table 2204: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.675 5.427 ects
Information: Gottingen 646 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.2 0 dcts
Cm error -16 -21 mcts
Upper transition point 0.16 0.51 %

Figure 1655: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1656: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2201: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18.3072 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 4.5139 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.0222 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.8636 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 18.2175 deg
Release Angle: 11.1111 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.0429 deg
Camber deflection: 22.1541 deg

Table 2202: Controlpoints


1 0
0.68669 0.010954
0.3518 -0.060531
0.20472 -0.060531
0.11669 -0.060531
0 -0.048424
0 0
0 0.029062
0.041921 0.13041
0.38982 0.13041
0.44636 0.13041
0.71479 0.10505
1 0

Table 2203: Base 64 representation:


O4ZG3ycNMazfUxA

Figure 1657: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

556
Profile: goe647 Table 2208: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.746 4.847 ects
Information: Gottingen 647 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.1 -2.3 dcts
Cm error -34 -22 mcts
Upper transition point 5.46 5.9 %

Figure 1658: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1659: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2205: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.4068 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 5.3607 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6395 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2996 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.7112 deg
Release Angle: 7.9165 deg
Nose Incidence: 19.8113 deg
Camber deflection: 27.7278 deg

Table 2206: Controlpoints


1 0
0.42028 -0.0044431
0.32028 -0.03548
0.15153 -0.03548
0.13891 -0.03548
0 -0.034692
0 0
0 0.021635
0.042827 0.13315
0.29428 0.13315
0.4829 0.13315
0.74281 0.07507
1 0

Table 2207: Base 64 representation:


K2TR4-FKNPj2TsA

Figure 1660: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

557
Profile: goe648 Table 2212: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.318 6.337 ects
Information: Gottingen 648 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -5.2 -5.4 dcts
Cm error -35 -40 mcts
Upper transition point 8.01 8.73 %

Figure 1661: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1662: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2209: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.2491 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 3.9212 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.1775 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1244 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.7617 deg
Release Angle: 7.5686 deg
Nose Incidence: 23.4967 deg
Camber deflection: 31.0653 deg

Table 2210: Controlpoints


1 0
0.66863 -0.007591
0.44201 -0.03888
0.20214 -0.03888
0.022856 -0.03888
0 -0.013089
0 0
0 0.032877
0.038811 0.11465
0.2937 0.11465
0.54274 0.11465
0.81738 0.05392
1 0

Table 2211: Base 64 representation:


S3TXwW4NTRelUrA

Figure 1663: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

558
Profile: goe650 Table 2216: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.833 6.125 ects
Information: Gottingen 650 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.4 0.3 dcts
Cm error -43 -29 mcts
Upper transition point 0.73 -0.72 %

Figure 1664: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1665: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2213: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.5372 % @0.24C
Maximum Camber: 4.4697 % @0.52C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.7204 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.006 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.6575 deg
Release Angle: 9.7611 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.6494 deg
Camber deflection: 18.4106 deg

Table 2214: Controlpoints


1 0
0.4829 0.021966
0.358 -0.04232
0.15214 -0.04232
0.08419 -0.04232
0 -0.033856
0 0
0 0.012151
0.012872 0.10294
0.3948 0.10294
0.43364 0.10294
0.67868 0.098788
1 0

Table 2215: Base 64 representation:


I9ZErysKQS8zQvA

Figure 1666: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

559
Profile: goe654 Table 2220: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.765 4.257 ects
Information: Gottingen 654 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.5 1.4 dcts
Cm error 18 31 mcts
Upper transition point -2.32 -2.73 %

Figure 1667: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1668: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2217: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.5631 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 5.2101 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.044596 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.9032 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.4757 deg
Release Angle: 7.2529 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.5667 deg
Camber deflection: 18.8196 deg

Table 2218: Controlpoints


1 0
0.50832 0.00012907
0.37001 -0.0245
0.15 -0.0245
0.012176 -0.0245
0 -0.015351
0 0
0 0.003036
0.031003 0.124
0.3 0.124
0.363 0.124
0.53446 0.12032
1 0

Table 2219: Base 64 representation:


C4TG0n6KRK9xQrA

Figure 1669: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

560
Profile: goe655 Table 2224: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.461 2.433 ects
Information: Gottingen 655 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.3 -1.9 dcts
Cm error -17 -16 mcts
Upper transition point 6.84 6.11 %

Figure 1670: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1671: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2221: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.0017 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 4.3998 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.049897 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0208 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.0995 deg
Release Angle: 7.1052 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.2551 deg
Camber deflection: 21.3604 deg

Table 2222: Controlpoints


1 0
0.4776 -0.0086123
0.33077 -0.03072
0.15 -0.03072
0.1267 -0.03072
0 -0.029364
0 0
0 0.0025152
0.019017 0.11255
0.3 0.11255
0.53312 0.11255
0.82782 0.046635
1 0

Table 2223: Base 64 representation:


B7TVv8KKONbxSrA

Figure 1672: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

561
Cover art wing profiles are, top to bottom:

Clark Y
Joukovski 11
Göttingen 628
Eppler 793
Naca 0012
RAE 104
SC 20406
NLF 015
Whitcomb

Parametric Airfoil Catalog, Part II


An Aerodynamic and Geometric Comparison Between Parametrized and Point Cloud Airfoils
Tomas Melin

Copyright 2013,
c Tomas Melin

Published by:
Fluid and Mechatronic Systems,
Department of Management and Engineering,
The Institute of Technology,
Linköping University,
Linköping, Sweden

Visit our website at www.iei.liu.se

Printed by:
Linköping University
LiU-Tryck
581 83 Linköping
SWEDEN

Typeset in LATEX

ISBN: 978-91-7519-656-5
First Edition, March 2013
Parametric Airfoil Catalog
Part II
Göttingen 673 to YS930

An Aerodynamic and Geometric Comparison Between Parametrized and Point Cloud Airfoils.

Tomas Melin

Research Associate
Fluid and Mechatronic Systems,
Department of Management and Engineering,
The Institute of Technology,
Linköping University,
Linköping, Sweden
Contents hq159b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
hq208 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
1 Acknowledgements 1 hq209 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
hq259b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
2 Introduction 1 hq309 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
hq358 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
3 Background 1
hq359 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
hq1010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
4 Method 2
hq1012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
4.1 Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
hq1510 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
4.2 Parameterization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
hq1511 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
4.3 Base change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
hq1512 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
4.4 Reproducing known airfoils . . . . . . . . 4
hq1585 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
5 Discussion 5 hq2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
hq2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
6 Software 6 hq2090sm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
hq2195 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
7 Airfoil Catalog 6 hq2510 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
goe673 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 hq2511 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
goe675 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 hq2590sm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
goe676 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 hq3010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
goe677 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 hq3011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
goe679 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 hq3012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
goe681 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 hq3013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
goe682 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 hq3014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
goe683 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 hq3015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
goe685 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 hq3510 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
goe692 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 hq3512 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
goe693 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 hq3513 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
goe703 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 hq3514 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
goe704 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 hq3518 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
goe711 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 hsnlf213 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
goe735 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 ht08 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
goe738 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 ht12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
goe758 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 ht22 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
goe766 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 ht23 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
goe767 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 isa571 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
goe769 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 isa960 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
goe770 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 isa961 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
goe775 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 isa962 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
goe776 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 joukovski11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
goe780 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 joukovski12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
goe795 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 k1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
goe795sm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 k2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
goe797 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 k3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
goe801 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 k3311 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
goe802 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 kc135a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
goe803h . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 kc135b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
goe804 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 kc135c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
gs1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 kc135d . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
hobie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 l188root . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
hobiesm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 l188tip . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
hor20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 l7769 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
hq07 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 la2573a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
hq09 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 la5055 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
hq010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 lds2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
hq108 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 lg10sc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
hq109 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 lnv109a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
hq158 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 ls013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
hq159 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 ls413mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108

3
ls417 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 mh114 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
ls421 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 mh115 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170
ls421mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 mh116 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171
lwk79100 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 mh117 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172
lwk80080 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 mh120 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173
lwk80100 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 mh121 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174
lwk80120k25 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 mh200 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175
lwk80150k25 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 mh201 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176
m3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 miley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177
m6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 mrc-16 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178
m11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 mrc-20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179
m12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 ms317 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180
m665 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 mue139 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181
ma409 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122 n5h10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182
ma409sm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 n5h15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183
marske1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 n5h20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184
marske2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 n6h15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185
marske3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 n8h12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186
marske4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 n9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187
marske5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 n10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188
marske7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129 n11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189
mb253515sm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 n0011sc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190
mh18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 n12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191
mh20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 n13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192
mh22 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 n14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193
mh23 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134 n22 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194
mh24 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 n24 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
mh25 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 n64215 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196
mh26 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137 naca0002mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
mh27 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 naca0004mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198
mh30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139 naca0006mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
mh32 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140 naca0008mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200
mh42 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141 naca0009sm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201
mh43 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142 naca0010mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202
mh44 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 naca0012mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203
mh45 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144 naca0014mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204
mh46 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145 naca0016mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205
mh49 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146 naca0018mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206
mh60 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147 naca0020mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207
mh61 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148 naca0022mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208
mh62 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 naca0024mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209
mh64 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150 naca0026mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210
mh70 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151 naca0028mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211
mh78 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152 naca0030mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212
mh80 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153 naca64a010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213
mh81 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 naca64a210 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214
mh82 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 naca66-018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215
mh83 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156 naca632a015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216
mh84 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 naca747a315 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217
mh91 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 naca747a415 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218
mh92 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 naca000834 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219
mh93 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 naca001034 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220
mh94 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 naca001034a08cli0.2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221
mh95 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162 naca001035 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222
mh102 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 naca001064 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223
mh104 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164 naca001065 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224
mh106 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165 naca001066 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225
mh108 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166 naca1108mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226
mh110 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167 naca1110mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227
mh113 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168 naca1112mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228
naca1114mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229 naca643218 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289
naca1116mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230 naca643418 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 290
naca1118mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231 naca643618 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291
naca1120-mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232 naca644221 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292
naca1122-mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233 naca644421 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 293
naca1124-mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234 naca651212 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294
naca001234 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235 naca651412 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 295
naca001264 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236 naca652215 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 296
naca001264a08cli0.2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237 naca652415 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297
naca2408mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238 naca652415a05 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 298
naca2415 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239 naca653218 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 299
naca6409mod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240 naca654221 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300
naca16006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241 naca654421 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301
naca16009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242 naca654421a05 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 302
naca16012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 243 naca661212 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 303
naca16015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244 naca662215 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 304
naca16018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245 naca662415 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 305
naca16021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246 naca663218 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 306
naca23012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247 naca663418 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 307
naca23015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 248 naca664221 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308
naca23018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249 naca671215 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 309
naca23021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250 nacacyh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310
naca63010a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251 nacam2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 311
naca63012a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252 nacam3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 312
naca63015a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253 nacam6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313
naca63206 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 254 nacam12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 314
naca63210a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255 nasasc2-0714 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315
naca63212 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256 ncambre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 316
naca63215 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257 nl722343 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317
naca63215b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258 nl722362 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 318
naca63412 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 259 nlf0115 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 319
naca63415 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 260 nlf0215f . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 320
naca64008a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 261 nlf414f . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321
naca64012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262 nlf415 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 322
naca64012a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263 nlf416 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323
naca64015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 264 nlr1t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 324
naca64015a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265 nlr7301 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325
naca64108 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 266 nn7mk20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 326
naca64110 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267 npl9510 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327
naca64206 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268 npl9615 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 328
naca64208 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269 npl9626 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 329
naca64209 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270 npl9627 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 330
naca64210 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271 nplx . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 331
naca64212 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272 oa206 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 332
naca64212mb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273 oa209 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 333
naca65209 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274 oa213 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 334
naca65210 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275 oaf095 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 335
naca65410 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 276 oaf102 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336
naca66206 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 277 oaf117 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 337
naca66209 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 278 oaf128 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 338
naca632615 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 279 oaf139 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339
naca633018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280 p51droot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 340
naca633218 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281 p51dtip . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341
naca633418 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282 p51hroot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 342
naca633618 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 283 p51htip . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 343
naca634221 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284 pfcm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 344
naca634421 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285 psu-90-125wl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 345
naca641112 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286 psu94097 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 346
naca642215 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 287 pt40 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 347
naca642415 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 288 r140 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 348
r140sm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 349 s1046 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 409
r1080 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 350 s1048 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 410
r1082 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 351 s2027 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 411
r1082t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352 s2046 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 412
rae69ck . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 353 s2048 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 413
rae100 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 354 s2050 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 414
rae101 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 355 s2055 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 415
rae102 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 356 s2060 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 416
rae103 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357 s2062 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 417
rae104 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 358 s2091 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 418
rae2822 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 359 s3002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 419
rae5212 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360 s3010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 420
rae5213 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 361 s3014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 421
rae5214 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 362 s3016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 422
rae5215 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 363 s3021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 423
raf6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364 s3024 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 424
raf25 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 365 s3025 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 425
raf27 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 366 s4022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 426
raf28 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 367 s4053 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 427
raf30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 368 s4061 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 428
raf30md . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 369 s4062 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 429
raf31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 370 s4083 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 430
raf32 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371 s4110 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 431
raf32md . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 372 s4158 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 432
raf34 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373 s4180 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 433
raf38 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 374 s4233 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 434
raf48 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 375 s4310 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 435
raf69 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 376 s4320 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 436
raf89 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 377 s5010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 437
rc08b3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 378 s5020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 438
rc10b3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 379 s6061 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 439
rc10n1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 380 s6062 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 440
rc12b3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 381 s6063 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 441
rc12n1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 382 s7012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 442
rc0864c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 383 s7055 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 443
rcsc2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 384 s7075 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 444
rg8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 385 s8025 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 445
rg12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 386 s8035 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 446
rg12a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 387 s8036 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 447
rg12a189 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 388 s8037 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 448
rg14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 389 s8038 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 449
rg14a147 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 390 s8052 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450
rg15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 391 s8055 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 451
rg15a111 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 392 s8064 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 452
rg15a213 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 393 s8065 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 453
rg149 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 394 s8066 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 454
rg1410 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 395 s9000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 455
rg1495 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 396 s9026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 456
rhodesg30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 397 s9027 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 457
rhodesg32 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 398 s9032 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 458
rhodesg34 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 399 s9033 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 459
rhodesg36 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 400 s9037 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 460
s3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 401 sa7035 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 461
s102b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 402 sa7036 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 462
s102s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 403 sa7038 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 463
s1010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 404 sc1095 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 464
s1012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 405 sc20010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 465
s1014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 406 sc20012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 466
s1016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 407 sc20402 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 467
s1020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 408 sc20403 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 468
sc20404 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 469 usa35b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 529
sc20406 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 470 usa40 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 530
sc20410 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 471 usa40b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 531
sc20412 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 472 usa41 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 532
sc20414 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 473 usa45 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 533
sc20518 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 474 usa45m . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 534
sc20606 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 475 usa46 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 535
sc20610 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 476 usa48 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 536
sc20612 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 477 usa49 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 537
sc20614 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 478 usa50 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 538
sc20706 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 479 usa51 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 539
sc20710 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 480 usa98 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 540
sc20712 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 481 usnps4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 541
sc20714 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 482 v13006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 542
sc21006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 483 v13009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 543
sc21010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 484 v23010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 544
sd2030 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 485 vr1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 545
sd2083 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 486 vr7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 546
sd5060 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 487 vr7b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 547
sd6060 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 488 vr8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 548
sd6080 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 489 vr9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 549
sd7003 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 490 vr11x . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 550
sd7032 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 491 vr12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 551
sd7034 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 492 vr13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 552
sd7037 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 493 vr14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 553
sd7043 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 494 vr15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 554
sd7062 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 495 wb13535sm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 555
sd7080 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 496 whitcomb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 556
sd7084 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 497 ys900 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 557
sd7090 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 498 ys915 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 558
sd8000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 499 ys930 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 559
sd8020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500
sd8040 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 501
sg6040 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 502
sg6041 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 503
sg6042 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 504
sg6043 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 505
sg6050 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 506
sg6051 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 507
sm701 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 508
sokolov . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 509
spicasm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 510
ssca07 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 511
ssca09 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 512
stcyr24 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 513
stcyr172 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 514
stcyr234 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 515
strand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 516
tempest1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 517
tsagi-r3a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 518
tsagi8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 519
tsagi12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 520
ua79sf18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 521
uag8814320 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 522
ui1720 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 523
ultimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 524
us1000root . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 525
usa22 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 526
usa35 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 527
usa35a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 528
1 Acknowledgements cating the trailing edge to make sure that the upper and
lower sides both ended at x=1.
This collection of parametrized airfoils would not have
been possible without the prior work of several indi-
viduals. Many thanks goes to Prof. Michael Selig at 3 Background
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign for supply-
ing the original point cloud airfoil database on which
this work is based. All my appreciation to Brenda Kul-A fundamental part of aircraft design involves wing air-
foil optimization, establishing an outer shape of the wing
fan from Boeing for her inspiring work on class function
/ shape function transformation technique. My warm which has good aerodynamic performance for the design
thanks tho the research team at Linköping University:mission, good internal volume distribution for fuel and
Anton Jonzén, Chetan Nangunoori, Jacob Bjärkmar, Jo-systems and which also serves as an efficient structural
han Karlén, Svante Löthgren and Vijaykumar Govin- member supporting the load of the weight of the air-
darajan. craft. The underlying idea with this parametrization is
to couple an appropriate number of parameters, balanc-
The author also wishes to thank the sponsors: VIN- ing the need of geometric accuracy with the necessity of
NOVA and the industrial partner Saab AB for their few airfoil parameters in order to facilitate en expedient
funding through Nationella Flygtekniska Frsksprogram- optimisation, with the intrinsic value of having param-
met, NFFP5. eters that makes sense for a human; such as thickness,
camber and trailing edge thickness. Several approaches
to parametrization of wing profiles can be found in the
literature.
2 Introduction
Airfoils can be described by point clouds as done in most
airfoil libraries [1]. The number of parameters is twice
This book is intended to serve as a reference for students, as large as the number of points used (x and y coordi-
engineers and researchers requiring a parametrized air- nates) and in the case of aerodynamic optimization this
foil that can model existing airfoils well as providing parametrization will most certainly be not well behaved,
a significant design space for optimisation. The pro- since no smoothing function is included and must there-
posed method covers at least one thousand of the known fore be employed. Other problems may arise for the fact
profiles used in aeronautics today, while enabling many that the airfoils sometimes are defined with too few co-
more. The method uses 15 parameters defining a wing ordinate points and/or too few decimals, a problem oc-
profile. This way many existing airfoils can be mod- curring especially with old airfoils. On the other hand,
elled with close tolerance. In the following volumes, the design space that this kind of parametrization allows
the parametrized airfoils are compared with the origi- representing is extremely large, as any and all shapes can
nal point cloud data. The comparison is made for ge- be reproduced, even degenerate ones.
ometrical and aerodynamic similarity, but is should be
noted that the point clouds used may in some instances Airfoils can also be represented by mathematical func-
not be representative for the original airfoil due to round tions. Among the most common representatives of this
off errors, discretisation error and other other unknown category are indeed the NACA 4-, 5- and 6-digits for-
errors. The parametrisation is intended for two dimen- mulations [2] [3]. Compared to point clouds, they could
sional airfoils but the method can easily be extended to be said to represent the opposite case: they are very
a three dimensional wing. well behaving parametrizations, but they cannot cover a
very large design space, since they only provide four to
The coordinate resolution becomes infinite and point dis- six parameters respectively to be tuned. The NACA 4
tribution becomes a non-issue by employing a functional digit series is particularly interesting as the parameters
parametric description with built-in smoothing and in- are a part of the name of the airfoil. In the case of the
terpolation. In order to facilitate this, some basic as- 5- and 6 digit series, the name is instead constructed
sumptions regarding the shape of an airfoil are made: from the airfoils aerodynamic characteristic and geome-
The airfoil is assumed to have one distinct top and bot- try. Another known set of theoretically defined airfoils
tom point, the chord line has a length of exactly one, are the Joukowski profiles [4]. Using the conformal map-
forming the x-axis of the profile, the trailing edge is as- ping method, airfoils with a round nose and sharp trail-
sumed to be either sharp, i.e. with a y-coordinate of zero ing edge can be represented. Sadly the method is not to
for both top and bottom sides, or blunt with the y coor- recommend for trying to match known airfoils and the
dinates of the top and bottom trailing edges being sym- design space it describes is quite confined to airfoils with
metric around the chord line. These assumptions means often poor performances.
that a lot of historical airfoils needed to be preprocessed
before they could be parametrized. Preprocessing usu- More recently a very interesting and powerful represen-
ally involved rotating the coordinate cloud to form an tation method, the class function/shape function’ trans-
x-axis from the nose to the trailing edge, scaling to set formation CST method was presented by Kulfan[5]. The
the length of the airfoil to exactly unity and finally trun- method is based on simple well behaved mathematical

1
functions that allow for increasing the number of pa-
rameters at will. Also the formulation is not restricted
to round nose and sharp trailing edge profiles, but can
describe almost any shape.
Figure 2: Parametrized transonic wing airfoil with
Beziér control points and control vectors, and the num-
bering of the control points.
4 Method

4.1 Model the curve, giving 26 variables when both x and y co-
ordinates are taken into account. However when some
The envelope of the airfoil is described by a set of para- symmetries and simplifications valid for wing profiles are
metric Beziér curves, which are closely related to Bern- taken into account the number of independent parame-
stein polynomials. The equation for an n-dimensional ters are reduced to 14. Control point 1 and 13 always
cubic Beziér curve is shown in equation 1. The cubic have the same x-coordinate, one, and the same absolute
Beziér curve requires the four control points, P0 to P3 value of their y-coordinate is also equal as their average,
in order to be defined. The points P0 to P2 span the the camber line, must be on the x-axis at the trailing
first control vector, and P2 to P3 span the second con- edge. Control points 3,4 and 5 on the bottom side have
trol vector, as shown in figure 1. The Beziér is tangential the same y-coordinate. The same goes for the top side
to the control vectors at the start and endpoints of the control points 9, 10 and 11. The leading edge points 6,7
curve. This behaviour will ensure that the leading edge and 8 all have an x-coordinate of zero. Table 1 show the
is tangential with the z-axis and that the curve at top dependent parameters for the control points.
point of the airfoil is tangential with the x-axis. The air-
Table 1: Coordinate dependency for the control points.
Some always take the value one or zero, while others
(a,b,c) always shares the same numerical while (xn yn )
are allowed any value.

Coordinate
Point nr. X Y
1 1 a
2 x2 y2
3 x3 b
4 x4 b
5 x5 b
6 0 y6
7 0 0
Figure 1: Generic cubic Beziér curve with the four con-
8 0 y8
trol points P0 to P3 marked. The Beziér is tangential
9 x9 c
to the control vectors at the start and endpoints of the
10 x10 c
curve.
11 x11 c
foil’s top and bottom curves are modelled individually 12 x12 y12
by two cubic Beziér curves in parametric form being C1 13 1 −a
continuous at the defined top and bottom points, as well
as the leading edge. C1 continuity was selected over C2
continuity in order to allow curve fitting with many older The control points for each of the investigated airfoils
airfoils which only exhibit C1 continuity. are available in this tabulated form in the results section
of this book.
B̄ = (1 − t)3 P̄0 + 3t(1 − t)2 P̄1 + 3t2 (1 − t)P̄2 + t3 P̄3 (1)
When modelling modern profiles, the proposed method
does allow C2 continuity as well. Figure 2 gives an ex- 4.2 Parameterization
ample of a transonic wing airfoil, the Lockheed C-5A
BL576, and show the outer envelope and the Beziér Handling the control point coordinates directly when
control points and control vectors. The control points specifying an airfoil is not user friendly. The coordi-
are numbered clockwise from the bottom side trailing nates themselves have no obvious relation to shape of
edge. The method of representing an airfoil is straight- the airfoil when reviewed alone and the possible range
forward. For a generic envelope built up by four cu- of the coordinate values exceed the allowed range for
bic Beziér curves, 13 control points are needed to define non-degenerate airfoils. To alleviate this concern, and

2
to reduce the number of free parameters, the following
parameter transformations are done:

The lengths of the control vectors are limited to prevent


degenerate cases. For example the upper leading edge Figure 4: Definition of the leading edge control vector
control vector needs to be shorter than the distance be- parameters.
tween the top point and the chord line to prevent leading
edge overshoot. Figure 3 shows the bounding box lim-
iting the range of the control vectors. None of the con- nr.10 to nr.9 has its length limited to a fraction, k2 , of the
trol points are allowed outside of this box, furthermore top point position in the same way in order to prevent
the trailing edge control vectors, governed by the two an overshoot of the profile into negative x-coordinates.
control points nr.2 and nr.12 may never reach further Likewise the control vector defined by points 10 to 11,
forward than points nr.3 and nr.11 respectively. -Shown the top to TE vector is a fraction k4 of the length be-
by the limit lines L1 and L2 in figure 3. Thickness: The tween the upper thickness position (nr.10) and the trail-
ing edge (x=1). The trailing edge is defined by five pa-

Figure 5: Definition of the top side control vector pa-


rameters.
Figure 3: Bounding box of the control vectors, together
with the trailing edge vectors forward limits L1 and L2 .
rameters, some shown in figure 6. The trailing edge gap
g, is the distance between the upper and lower side of
x and y coordinates of the top and bottom points (nr. the airfoil at the trailing edge. It is parametrized accord-
4 and nr.10) are kept as is and named upper thickness ing to equation 4, where Gmax is the maximum allowed
and upper thickness position and similarly for the lower trailing edge gap of 5% of the chord.
side. The upper height is parametrized as a factor k4
times the maximum allowed upper thickness, 0.15, ac- g = k15 · Gmax (4)
cording to equation 2. As the lower side is treated in the
The release angle α, which is the angle between the cam-
same way, this means that the maximum thickness al-
ber line tangent and the chord line at the trailing edge,
lowed with this parametrization is 30% of the chord. The
is parametrized similarly according to equation 5. The
difference between the upper and lower thickness then
release angle is a fraction k14 times the maximum al-
becomes the ram thickness. The ram thickness equals
lowed release angle αmax of 0.35 radians ( about 20◦ ).
the airfoil thickness in case the thickness positions are
Is should be noted that the release angle may take on
equals. If the upper and lower thickness positions are
both positive and negative values.
not equal, the ram thickness will be slightly larger than
the traditional airfoil thickness. α=k ·α (5)
14 max

y9,10,11 = hu = k5 · 0.15 (2) The boat tail angle β, which is the angle between tan-
gents of the upper and lower sides of the airfoil at the
Control vectors: The upper leading edge control vec-
trailing edge is defined in equation 6. It is treated in a
tor spanned by its start point, the leading edge at [0 0]
similar way to the release angle. The boat tail angle β is
which is point nr.7, and point nr.8. The length of this
a factor k13 times the maximum allowed boat tail angle
vector is defined as a fraction k1 of the upper thickness
βmax of 1 radian ( about 57◦ ).
hu , according to equation 3 The constant k1 is then only
allowed to be in the range [0..1], see figure 4. This en- β = k13 · βmax (6)
sures that the part of the profile going from the leading
edge to the top point does not overshoot the top points
y value.
y8 = k1 · hu (3)
The top side of the airfoil is controlled by three param-
eters, shown in figure 5. The top point position Pu is
in itself a fraction of the chord length and need not to
be parametrized further, is renamed k3 . The two frac- Figure 6: Definition of the top side control vector pa-
tions k2 and k4 control the lengths of the forward and rameters.
aft control vectors. The control vector going from the
top point towards the leading edge, i.e. between points

3
The length of the upper and lower side trailing edge con- from 10% to 1.6% for each parameter value. Some mod-
trol vectors together with the trailing edge gap, the boat ification to the new base numbering has to be made as
tail angle and the release angle determines the position both zero and one needs to be modelled, and any double
of control points nr. 2 and nr. 12. These lengths are are digit parameter is disallowed. The encoding follows the
also parametrized according to equation 7. The length RFC3548 [6]. The series [0, 1, 2, .., 25, 26, ..., 51, 52, ...63]
of the upper vector, V , is a fraction k11 of the maximum maps to [A, B, C, .., Z, a, ..., z, 0, ... ]. By rounding the
allowed length Vmax . The maximum allowed length is in base 10 multi-decimal parameter towards the closest
turn dependent on the bounding box of the airfoil and 63:rd as shown in table 3, a reasonable accurate value
the position of the forward limit L1 set by the x-position can be stored in a single digit. With this system an air-
of control point nr. 11.
Table 3: Base change example.
V = k11,12 · Vmax (7)

The parameters of the lower side of the airfoil are de- Parameter 63:rds base 64 error
fined in the same manner as the upper side parameters, k1 = 0 0 A 0%
numbering the parameters in the same way from 6 to 10. k2 = 0.3333 21 V 0%
k3 = 0.5 32 g 1.6 %
With the five parameters defining the trailing edge, the k4 = 0.7 44 s -0.3 %
number of parameters are now reduced to 15. See table k5 = 1 63 0%
2. By the limits of the fractions many degenerate airfoils
are now hard to impossible to generate. By using the
chord length as normalizing agent, the parameters are foil with know parameters k to k can be expressed as
1 15
also dimensionless and fully scalable. a single string. For example will the Naca747a415 profile
shown in figure 6 be represented as the string shown in
Table 2: Parameter names and order. table 4

Table 4: Base 64 representation:


Name Parameter Range
Upper side
Upper nose fraction k1 [0..1] ggaQszVsoTL8DeA
Upper forward fraction k2 [0..1]
Upper thickness position k3 [0..1]
Upper rearward fraction k4 [0..1]
Upper thickness k5 [0..1]
Lower side 4.4 Reproducing known airfoils
Lower nose fraction k6 [0..1]
Lower forward fraction k7 [0..1] In many design cases it will not be appropriate to start
Lower thickness position k8 [0..1] with a generic airfoil for design optimization. Instead,
Lower rearward fraction k8 [0..1] by employing a known airfoil, whether it is a Clark-Y,
Lower thickness k10 [0..1] NACA0012 or any other known airfoil there is a need
of having the traditional airfoil shape expressed in the
Trailing edge
proposed parameters. Modelling known airfoils require
Upper length fraction k11 [0..1]
slightly more work than creating new airfoils.
Lower length fraction k12 [0..1]
Boat tail angle fraction k13 [0..1] When fitting known wing profiles to the parametrization,
Release angle fraction k10 [0..1] the input data are sometimes in poor condition and in
Trailing edge gap fraction k10 [0..1] need of preprocessing. The point cloud must have its
leading edge at [0 0] and the trailing edge cord have to
end at [1 0], if the profile has a trailing edge gap, this
should be symmetrically distributed around the [1 0]. If
this is not the case som geometrical rotation, transla-
4.3 Base change tion and scaling will have to be employed. This means
that some aerodynamic properties such has zero lift an-
gle and stall angle of attack will shift when comparing
By listing the parameters k1 to k15 when rounded of the parametrized airfoil with external aero data.
to the nearest tenth, a 15 digit number could be used
to present a large set of airfoils. This approach would One example of a wing profile that needs preprocessing is
however introduce large round off errors which would the Clark-Y profile, an older propeller profile today used
make the process of modelling known airfoils trouble- frequently amongst model aircraft builders for its ease
some. This is alleviated by changing the base from base of manufacture rather than aerodynamic performance.
10 to base 64. With base 64 the resolution increases The coordinate data for the Clark-Y profile, as presented

4
in some databases [7] has the lower side flank parallel to scatter is found any offset bias or systematic error can
the x-axis, rather than letting the chord line define the be assumed to be small.
x-axis.
To further investigate the correlation between the orig-
A starting guess of parameters were created by evaluat- inal data point cloud and the parametric wing pro-
ing the profile radius at the leading edge, top and bot- file, an aerodynamic study was performed utilizing the
tom, at the upper maximum y- position and at the lower panel method XFOIL [8]. The original airfoil and the
minimum y-position. Together with the trailing edge parametrized airfoil were both subjected to a CL sweep
gap and the slope of the upper and lower sides of the ranging from −0.3 to 1 at a Reynolds number of 6 · 106 .
airfoil at the trailing edge. The radius at these points The drag and moment coefficients were evaluated, as well
are computed with a three point circle algorithm from as the boundary layer transition point for both profiles.
which the length of the control vectors can be computed
according to equation 8, where a is the outgoing control The proposed parametrization method was tested on a
vector length and h the perpendicular distance to the set of over 1100 different airfoils. Results for these pro-
next control point as shown in figure 7. files are presented in this report, in the catalog section.
For each of the investigated airfoils the reported curva-
1 2h ture distribution graph is truncated at the leading edge
= 3 (8) in order to give a better scale of the results for the rest of
r 3a
the profile. Each profile is reported on a separate page
consisting of the following sections

• Full name, if one is available

• Data source, usually the UIUC [1] database, but


also NACA or other sources.

• A geometry plot, showing both a scaled up y-axis


Figure 7: Definition radius parameters. with camber and thickness, as well as an axis equal
profile plot.

• A geometrical data table containing maximum


thickness, maximum thickness position etc...
With the obtained starting guess, a standard optimiza-
tion is run in MATLAB to fit the parameter curve to the • Coordinates of the Beziér curve control points.
corresponding point cloud. The mathematical method • Base 64 parametrized airfoil name
used is the built-in fsolve method, which in this case
utilizes the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. The run is • A table showing the average errors in position, cur-
set to minimize the root mean square error of the verti- vature as well as errors in drag- and pitching mo-
cal position of the coordinate points between parameter ment coefficient and transition point position for
points and point cloud. control point and parameter curves at a standard
CL of 0.3
The optimization is nested in two layers in order to treat
the parameter nature of the Beziér curve. The outer loop • A graph showing the position and curvature error
solves for the control parameters governing the curve over the entire profile.
segment in question and an inner loop solving for the
curvilinear position parameter vector t, with respect to • A figure showing the error in drag- and pitching
the x coordinate. As the original data points may have moment coefficient as well as the error in transition
any distribution along the x-axis, it cannot be assumed point position for a range of lift coefficients.
that the t vector in equation 1 is evenly distributed.

The optimization results is evaluated both from a geo-


metrical point of view, were the error of vertical position
5 Discussion
of each point is plotted for the profile. The average RMS
error for the profile is a general quality control. The av- The conducted aerodynamic study covers only some
erage RMS error was usually in the order of 10−4 , ne- aerodynamic phenomena in the linear domain of low
cessitating the use of the unit error counts (ects), where speed flight. For a more thorough comparison higer or-
1 ects = 10−4 . Similarly, the curvature and error in der effects needs to be modelled. Notably stall angle of
curvature between were evaluated Notably many of the attack and post-stall behaviour, which cannot be cap-
available airfoils had very noisy curvature distributions, tured well with XFOIL. Likewise High speed shock for-
making an error plot of curvature fitting interesting but mation similarities and drag rise needs to be assessed
not a good indicator to whether the parametric inter- before this parametric wing profile description can be
polation was good or bad. Instead, as long as a good said to model the point cloud airfoils in every aspect.

5
The method as described does not require C2 continuity [6] S. Josefsson, Ed., The Base16, Base32, and Base64
at the top and bottom points. Adding this constraint Data Encodings, Request for Comments: 3548, Net-
to the method will reduce the number of free parame- work Working Group, The Internet Society, 2003.
ters with two, and also give a more traditional curvature
continuity. However, the geometrical fitting of known [7] Louden, F A , Collection of wind-tunnel data
airfoils would suffer in having a higher geometrical er- on commonly used wing sections, NACA-TR-331,
ror. For most known airfoils tested, the optimized cur- 93R20691,1930
vature is indeed discontinuous, but with a very small [8] Drela, M, XFOIL - An analysis and design system
step. This discontinuity does not appear to have a sig- for low Reynolds number airfoils, Proceedings of the
nificant impact on the aerodynamic performance of the Conference, Notre Dame, Germany; 5-7 June 1989.
parametrized airfoil. pp. 1-12. 1989.
Some of the airfoils in the catalog have an improper set
of control points. In the numerical optimisation used
to compute the control points, some profiles got a zero 7 Airfoil Catalog
length control vector at the trailing edge. While the
geometric representation using the control points works,
as well as creating the base 64 string, creating control .
points from the BM64 string will not work. The zero-
length control vector destroys the information about its
orientation.

6 Software

MATLAB code needed for evaluating the airfoils in the


database, as well as an electronic version of the database
will be available at:

Linköping University:
http://www.iei.liu.se/flumes/aircraft-design/
software
and at Redhammer Consulting:
http://www.redhammer.se/software

References
[1] Michael Selig, UIUC Airfoil Coordinates
Database, University of Illinois at Urbana-
Champaign, Dept of Aerospace Engineering,
Urbana, Illinois, http://www.ae.illinois.edu/m-
selig/ads/coord database.html, webpage retrieved
2012-01-01

[2] E. N. Jacobs, K. E. Ward, & R. M. Pinkerton The


characteristics of 78 related airfoil sections from tests
in the variable-density wind tunnel, NACA Report
No. 460,1933

[3] P. Marzocca. The NACA airfoil series, Clarkson Uni-


versity, Retrieved 07-03-2009.

[4] R. Von Mises, Theory of Flight, Dover Publications


Inc., New York, 1959

[5] B. Kulfan, Universal Parametric Geometry Repre-


sentation Method, AIAA Journal of Aircraft, vol.45
no.1, pp.142-158, 2008

6
Profile: goe673 Table 8: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.2 4.457 ects
Information: Gottingen 673 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.4 -1.3 dcts
Cm error 2 -2 mcts
Upper transition point -2.48 1.73 %

Figure 8: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 9: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.

Table 5: Geometrical properties


Maximum Thickness: 10.7812 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 2.7651 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.4 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.18724 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.16614 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.5355 deg
Release Angle: 6.1497 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.2022 deg
Camber deflection: 11.3519 deg

Table 6: Controlpoints
1 -0.002
0.68741 -0.0053721
0.49986 -0.02985
0.20121 -0.02985
0.064908 -0.02985
0 -0.008479
0 0
0 0.010842
0.094169 0.08057
0.39674 0.08057
0.47118 0.08057
0.68855 0.073432
1 0.002

Table 7: Base 64 representation:


JwZIhSqNYN5nPpK

Figure 10: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

7
Profile: goe675 Table 12: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.429 6.389 ects
Information: Gottingen 675 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.4 1.8 dcts
Cm error -11 4 mcts
Upper transition point 1.11 0.31 %

Figure 11: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 12: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 9: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.6311 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 5.9429 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.35 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.4084 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.2406 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.7436 deg
Release Angle: 8.4689 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.2588 deg
Camber deflection: 20.7277 deg

Table 10: Controlpoints


1 -0.00175
0.37714 0.004741
0.21775 -0.03335
0.07616 -0.03335
0.056358 -0.03335
0 -0.029014
0 0
0 0.032398
0.065372 0.13024
0.39547 0.13024
0.65942 0.13024
0.93386 0.021142
1 0.00175

Table 11: Base 64 representation:


Q0Zc33RFKOMyStJ

Figure 13: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

8
Profile: goe676 Table 16: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.164 3.226 ects
Information: Gottingen 676 (= M 12) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.4 -2.9 dcts
Cm error 3 -1 mcts
Upper transition point 3.33 2.63 %

Figure 14: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 15: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 13: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.8712 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 2.024 % @0.29C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2313 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.7655 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.7088 deg
Release Angle: 1.1857 deg
Nose Incidence: 2.3603 deg
Camber deflection: 3.5459 deg

Table 14: Controlpoints


1 -0.0015
0.71216 -0.037703
0.44935 -0.0395
0.39994 -0.0395
0.061709 -0.0395
0 -0.02695
0 0
0 0.034413
0.14426 0.0795
0.30012 0.0795
0.47469 0.0795
0.57928 0.072206
1 0.0015

Table 15: Base 64 representation:


cgTQhr1aFR58ThI

Figure 16: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

9
Profile: goe677 Table 20: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.688 4.503 ects
Information: Gottingen 677 (= M 6) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.9 -2.7 dcts
Cm error 20 1 mcts
Upper transition point 3.67 3.01 %

Figure 17: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 18: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 17: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.0186 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 2.1969 % @0.29C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.4 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2483 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.4365 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.8695 deg
Release Angle: -0.46463 deg
Nose Incidence: 0.9031 deg
Camber deflection: 0.43847 deg

Table 18: Controlpoints


1 -0.002
0.81657 -0.030722
0.71657 -0.0385
0.39992 -0.0385
0.025042 -0.0385
0 -0.023952
0 0
0 0.034709
0.14476 0.082
0.30016 0.082
0.52017 0.082
0.58364 0.060294
1 0.002

Table 19: Base 64 representation:


bgTUin7ahQ3xTfK

Figure 19: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

10
Profile: goe679 Table 24: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.503 7.94 ects
Information: Gottingen 679 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.5 -0.6 dcts
Cm error -1 -42 mcts
Upper transition point -3.35 -1.67 %

Figure 20: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 21: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 21: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18.3818 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 4.4993 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.6372 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.7604 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 26.3561 deg
Release Angle: 9.6257 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.5989 deg
Camber deflection: 23.2246 deg

Table 22: Controlpoints


1 0
0.73876 -0.016218
0.25203 -0.054051
0.15367 -0.054051
0.12294 -0.054051
0 -0.047564
0 0
0 0.044012
0.079887 0.13478
0.29083 0.13478
0.53305 0.13478
0.82797 0.072329
1 0

Table 23: Base 64 representation:


VtTW53NKHXhWsvA

Figure 22: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

11
Profile: goe681 Table 28: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.029 5.277 ects
Information: Gottingen 681 airfoil RMS curvature error: 69.75 70.55 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.3 -4.6 dcts
Cm error 11 -3 mcts
Upper transition point 0.1 1.2 %

Figure 23: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 24: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 25: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.9523 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 4.3174 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.5577 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.6577 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 19.5605 deg
Release Angle: 6.2279 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.9021 deg
Camber deflection: 16.13 deg

Table 26: Controlpoints


1 0
0.25766 -0.046084
0.1813 -0.04893
0.15306 -0.04893
0.10616 -0.04893
0 -0.04337
0 0
0 0.035869
0.07545 0.12576
0.29214 0.12576
0.4571 0.12576
0.61426 0.11067
1 0

Table 27: Base 64 representation:


SuTP14UKCV37WpA

Figure 25: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

12
Profile: goe682 Table 32: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.513 6.221 ects
Information: Gottingen 682 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 4.7 5.2 dcts
Cm error 16 34 mcts
Upper transition point -7.56 -9.1 %

Figure 26: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 27: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 29: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.79 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 4.2621 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3079 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.3468 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.7255 deg
Release Angle: 7.048 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.7968 deg
Camber deflection: 14.8448 deg

Table 30: Controlpoints


1 0
0.45629 0.0065031
0.17259 -0.0225
0.1 -0.0225
0.052614 -0.0225
0 -0.021735
0 0
0 0.03137
0.11286 0.0945
0.3 0.0945
0.47546 0.0945
0.65122 0.08316
1 0

Table 31: Base 64 representation:


VnTQn9eGFK3pOqA

Figure 28: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

13
Profile: goe683 Table 36: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.341 4.087 ects
Information: Gottingen 683 airfoil RMS curvature error: 31.13 31.08 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4 -4 dcts
Cm error 32 45 mcts
Upper transition point 0.63 0.28 %

Figure 29: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 30: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 33: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 19.9 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 2.9504 % @0.31C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.0384 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.5181 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 38.7074 deg
Release Angle: -6.5984 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.6442 deg
Camber deflection: -1.9541 deg

Table 34: Controlpoints


1 0
0.89028 -0.053403
0.3842 -0.07
0.3 -0.07
0.16179 -0.07
0 -0.0616
0 0
0 0.048431
0.11579 0.129
0.3 0.129
0.48875 0.129
0.66268 0.07636
1 0

Table 35: Base 64 representation:


YmTR23sTIepwqVA

Figure 31: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

14
Profile: goe685 Table 40: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.772 3.95 ects
Information: Gottingen 685 airfoil RMS curvature error: 78.53 79.53 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.6 -3 dcts
Cm error 13 -20 mcts
Upper transition point -2.18 2.22 %

Figure 32: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 33: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 37: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.2529 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 4.2547 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.9047 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.8925 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.6695 deg
Release Angle: 7.1632 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.4905 deg
Camber deflection: 11.6536 deg

Table 38: Controlpoints


1 0
0.35174 0.0093735
0.27396 -0.04155
0.15204 -0.04155
0.094265 -0.04155
0 -0.034486
0 0
0 0.045976
0.16646 0.10096
0.29505 0.10096
0.42913 0.10096
0.59631 0.096902
1 0

Table 39: Base 64 representation:


scTMq0YKJS84OrA

Figure 34: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

15
Profile: goe692 Table 44: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.337 7.332 ects
Information: Gottingen 692 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.2 -0.1 dcts
Cm error 19 27 mcts
Upper transition point 0.03 0.73 %

Figure 35: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 36: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 41: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.0837 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 5.0253 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.5 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3587 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.62 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 22.9183 deg
Release Angle: 8.8411 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.2281 deg
Camber deflection: 16.0691 deg

Table 42: Controlpoints


1 -0.0025
0.27392 -0.035701
0.16941 -0.040245
0.1499 -0.040245
0.056415 -0.040245
0 -0.031391
0 0
0 0.022101
0.053925 0.1295
0.40032 0.1295
0.6248 0.1295
0.93473 0.026643
1 0.0025

Table 43: Base 64 representation:


L2aY2xnKBRM3atN

Figure 37: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

16
Profile: goe693 Table 48: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.266 3.903 ects
Information: Gottingen 693 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.1 -2.1 dcts
Cm error -31 -44 mcts
Upper transition point 3.78 4.69 %

Figure 38: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 39: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 45: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.9613 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 3.6218 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.5 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.30703 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.4902 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.4589 deg
Release Angle: 5.697 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.3786 deg
Camber deflection: 9.0756 deg

Table 46: Controlpoints


1 -0.0025
0.90193 -0.0072038
0.21593 -0.0308
0.099923 -0.0308
0.073943 -0.0308
0 -0.027104
0 0
0 0.0081769
0.032666 0.0953
0.40024 0.0953
0.57808 0.0953
0.83768 0.043393
1 0.0025

Table 47: Base 64 representation:


F6aTo3RGINcLToN

Figure 40: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

17
Profile: goe703 Table 52: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.755 4.541 ects
Information: Gottingen 703 airfoil RMS curvature error: 39.54 39.63 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.7 0.8 dcts
Cm error 92 64 mcts
Upper transition point -3.72 -3.99 %

Figure 41: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 42: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 49: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 19.4363 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 2.299 % @0.29C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.7787 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.6285 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 29.7938 deg
Release Angle: 0 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.81 deg
Camber deflection: 4.81 deg

Table 50: Controlpoints


1 0
0.99357 -0.00171
0.78573 -0.075
0.4 -0.075
0.17709 -0.075
0 -0.065451
0 0
0 0.06388
0.16199 0.12
0.3 0.12
0.43179 0.12
0.60304 0.1056
1 0

Table 51: Base 64 representation:


hsTMy3jaog3CggA

Figure 43: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

18
Profile: goe704 Table 56: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.699 6.27 ects
Information: Gottingen 704 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.8 -4.8 dcts
Cm error 26 25 mcts
Upper transition point 3.09 3.01 %

Figure 44: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 45: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 53: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.0008 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 2.0662 % @0.31C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.55 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.76654 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2672 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 18.3269 deg
Release Angle: -1.0126 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.5188 deg
Camber deflection: 2.5062 deg

Table 54: Controlpoints


1 -0.00275
0.86409 -0.027145
0.77246 -0.04454
0.20077 -0.04454
0.076293 -0.04454
0 -0.025388
0 0
0 0.017611
0.060689 0.08565
0.29852 0.08565
0.60527 0.08565
0.70527 0.044963
1 0.00275

Table 55: Base 64 representation:


NyTckjnNtTvlUeO

Figure 46: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

19
Profile: goe711 Table 60: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.279 7.405 ects
Information: Gottingen 711 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 6.2 0.5 dcts
Cm error -10 19 mcts
Upper transition point -5.94 -6.82 %

Figure 47: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 48: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 57: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.853 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 6.3051 % @0.31C
Trailing Edge Gap: 1.4 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.78451 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.92836 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 21.6687 deg
Release Angle: 10.4905 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.2185 deg
Camber deflection: 27.709 deg

Table 58: Controlpoints


1 -0.0070002
0.14092 -0.012156
0.044412 -0.012855
0.024911 -0.012855
0.020676 -0.012855
0 -0.011312
0 0
0 0.019404
0.071989 0.1373
0.30097 0.1373
0.57888 0.1373
0.81727 0.078336
1 0.0070002

Table 59: Base 64 representation:


JwTZ63LCBFi5Ywj

Figure 49: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

20
Profile: goe735 Table 64: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.003 6.737 ects
Information: Gottingen 735 airfoil RMS curvature error: 19.74 20.75 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.2 -4.2 dcts
Cm error -3 -12 mcts
Upper transition point 3.33 3.09 %

Figure 50: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 51: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 61: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 20.0582 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 4.4019 % @0.31C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.3472 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.7451 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.6387 deg
Release Angle: -3.5643 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.4973 deg
Camber deflection: 9.933 deg

Table 62: Controlpoints


1 0
0.88066 -0.024029
0.58481 -0.057
0.2 -0.057
0.162 -0.057
0 -0.05643
0 0
0 0.029126
0.054213 0.14425
0.3 0.14425
0.49188 0.14425
0.83099 0.012575
1 0

Table 63: Base 64 representation:


NzTS9-MNfYVbRaA

Figure 52: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

21
Profile: goe738 Table 68: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.001 3.15 ects
Information: Gottingen 738 airfoil RMS curvature error: 19.76 20.62 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.1 -1.1 dcts
Cm error -7 11 mcts
Upper transition point 1.27 0.93 %

Figure 53: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 54: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 65: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.44 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 2.125 % @0.3C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.5258 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.6688 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.7185 deg
Release Angle: -3.332 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.9499 deg
Camber deflection: 1.6179 deg

Table 66: Controlpoints


1 0
0.95936 -0.0069403
0.55382 -0.05595
0.3 -0.05595
0.13625 -0.05595
0 -0.049236
0 0
0 0.038677
0.088837 0.09845
0.3 0.09845
0.53506 0.09845
0.7593 0.012729
1 0

Table 67: Base 64 representation:


ZsTVp3iTXYgIOaA

Figure 55: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

22
Profile: goe758 Table 72: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.332 6.336 ects
Information: Gottingen 758 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.7 2 dcts
Cm error 4 10 mcts
Upper transition point -4.51 -5.33 %

Figure 56: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 57: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 69: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.9497 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 4.6394 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5202 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.8709 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.1212 deg
Release Angle: 6.892 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.1377 deg
Camber deflection: 17.0297 deg

Table 70: Controlpoints


1 0
0.59123 0.0023642
0.38641 -0.0271
0.2 -0.0271
0.020148 -0.0271
0 -0.015852
0 0
0 0.037276
0.13711 0.11435
0.3 0.11435
0.4665 0.11435
0.56177 0.10483
1 0

Table 71: Base 64 representation:


ViTPwk5NPM6qPqA

Figure 58: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

23
Profile: goe766 Table 76: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.357 3.852 ects
Information: Gottingen 766 airfoil RMS curvature error: 38.22 39.37 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.7 -2.3 dcts
Cm error -15 -26 mcts
Upper transition point 4.55 4.35 %

Figure 59: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 60: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 73: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.0471 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 1.4173 % @0.22C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.2587 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.4829 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.2973 deg
Release Angle: 0.1775 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.7416 deg
Camber deflection: 11.9191 deg

Table 74: Controlpoints


1 0
0.59732 -0.045674
0.38317 -0.0465
0.3 -0.0465
0.048024 -0.0465
0 -0.021789
0 0
0 0.050524
0.1175 0.0743
0.25 0.0743
0.35708 0.0743
0.73631 0.031565
1 0

Table 75: Base 64 representation:


rhQJge1TIUb-PgA

Figure 61: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

24
Profile: goe767 Table 80: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.509 5.261 ects
Information: Gottingen 767 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.5 -4.6 dcts
Cm error 18 -1 mcts
Upper transition point 1.53 1.83 %

Figure 62: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 63: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 77: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.007 % @0.21C
Maximum Camber: 1.5004 % @0.19C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.4262 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.0604 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.3152 deg
Release Angle: 0.2093 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.9566 deg
Camber deflection: 13.1659 deg

Table 78: Controlpoints


1 0
0.49884 -0.04339
0.28255 -0.0452
0.25 -0.0452
0.14874 -0.0452
0 -0.0452
0 0
0 0.06
0.122 0.075
0.2 0.075
0.31644 0.075
0.36907 0.059273
1 0

Table 79: Base 64 representation:


yZNJg aQDT68MgA

Figure 64: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

25
Profile: goe769 Table 84: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.379 4.984 ects
Information: Gottingen 769 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 65: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 66: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 81: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.7935 % @0.21C
Maximum Camber: 4.7991 % @0.31C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.35956 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.1215 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.7049 deg
Release Angle: 4.905 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.899 deg
Camber deflection: 19.804 deg

Table 82: Controlpoints


1 0
0.29498 -0.0055062
0.20295 -0.03042
0.05 -0.03042
0.040449 -0.03042
0 -0.029013
0 0
0 0.003462
0.005 0.1154
0.25 0.1154
0.42041 0.1154
0.60006 0.072374
1 0

Table 83: Base 64 representation:


C-QPw8MDKNr4MnA

Figure 67: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

26
Profile: goe770 Table 88: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.677 5.905 ects
Information: Gottingen 770 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.3 -2.8 dcts
Cm error -9 -25 mcts
Upper transition point 0.95 0.56 %

Figure 68: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 69: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 85: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 20.99 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 4.002 % @0.3C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.26 %C
Upper nose radius: 6.8175 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.326 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 19.3974 deg
Release Angle: 3.6187 deg
Nose Incidence: 26.4859 deg
Camber deflection: 30.1047 deg

Table 86: Controlpoints


1 -0.0013
0.61164 -0.042666
0.51164 -0.06493
0.29992 -0.06493
0.12422 -0.06493
0 -0.033137
0 0
0 0.084462
0.15696 0.14497
0.30019 0.14497
0.45279 0.14497
0.55279 0.10716
1 0.0013

Table 87: Base 64 representation:


kfTO9gkTTczyWlH

Figure 70: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

27
Profile: goe775 Table 92: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.795 3.879 ects
Information: Gottingen 775 airfoil RMS curvature error: 15.9 16.2 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.4 0.3 dcts
Cm error -2 -7 mcts
Upper transition point 0.64 0.22 %

Figure 71: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 72: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 89: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 20.9999 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: -0.0088208 % @0.02C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.44 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.7333 %C
Lower nose radius: 4.8183 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 27.8072 deg
Release Angle: 0.009479 deg
Nose Incidence: -0.23013 deg
Camber deflection: -0.22065 deg

Table 90: Controlpoints


1 -0.0022
0.77884 -0.056906
0.49067 -0.105
0.29977 -0.105
0.10587 -0.105
0 -0.058316
0 0
0 0.057171
0.10358 0.105
0.30023 0.105
0.49168 0.105
0.78011 0.056671
1 0.0022

Table 91: Base 64 representation:


ipTSsjoTRshhfgL

Figure 73: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

28
Profile: goe776 Table 96: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.389 3.565 ects
Information: Gottingen 776 airfoil RMS curvature error: 3.86 4.39 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.3 0.6 dcts
Cm error 0 6 mcts
Upper transition point 0.33 -0.64 %

Figure 74: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 75: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 93: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 24.9999 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: -0.014792 % @0.02C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.52 %C
Upper nose radius: 6.6315 %C
Lower nose radius: 6.802 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 33.0388 deg
Release Angle: 0.016196 deg
Nose Incidence: -0.38646 deg
Camber deflection: -0.37027 deg

Table 94: Controlpoints


1 -0.0026
0.86912 -0.041377
0.53746 -0.125
0.29968 -0.125
0.10341 -0.125
0 -0.068477
0 0
0 0.066607
0.10035 0.125
0.30033 0.125
0.53849 0.125
0.87028 0.041113
1 0.0026

Table 95: Base 64 representation:


hqTW0ipTW0UUkgN

Figure 76: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

29
Profile: goe780 Table 100: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.242 3.4 ects
Information: Gottingen 780 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.3 1.3 dcts
Cm error 20 -18 mcts
Upper transition point 0.03 -0.03 %

Figure 77: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 78: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 97: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12 % @0.5C
Maximum Camber: 1 % @0.5C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.14943 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.30486 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 23.5464 deg
Release Angle: -2.7028 deg
Nose Incidence: -1.4073 deg
Camber deflection: -4.1102 deg

Table 98: Controlpoints


1 0
0.82172 -0.046028
0.6235 -0.05
0.5 -0.05
0.28486 -0.05
0 -0.024061
0 0
0 0.015705
0.2476 0.07
0.5 0.07
0.64575 0.07
0.74575 0.040589
1 0

Table 99: Base 64 representation:


OggTefcgQVt6abA

Figure 79: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

30
Profile: goe795 Table 104: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.573 4.386 ects
Information: Gottingen 795 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -8.3 NaN dcts
Cm error -45 NaN mcts
Upper transition point 13.1 61.12 %

Figure 80: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 81: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 101: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.0457 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 2.4134 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.51053 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.71539 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.1887 deg
Release Angle: 4.3772 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.0533 deg
Camber deflection: 7.4305 deg

Table 102: Controlpoints


1 0
0.94354 -0.0041628
0.16352 -0.02065
0.14645 -0.02065
0.069239 -0.02065
0 -0.018172
0 0
0 0.017681
0.091856 0.06385
0.37059 0.06385
0.6068 0.06385
0.91712 0.019091
1 0

Table 103: Base 64 representation:


SvYYb3hJBJTNTmA

Figure 82: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

31
Profile: goe795sm Table 108: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.779 4.692 ects
Information: Gottingen 795 airfoil (smoothed) RMS curvature error: 61.36 63.47 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.4 0.4 dcts
Cm error -32 -32 mcts
Upper transition point -0.58 0.03 %

Figure 83: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 84: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 105: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.0861 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 2.4099 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.55628 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.65774 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 53.6737 deg
Release Angle: 13.2018 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.8096 deg
Camber deflection: 17.0114 deg

Table 106: Controlpoints


1 0
0.98591 -0.0034185
0.15574 -0.020633
0.14645 -0.020633
0.051575 -0.020633
0 -0.015038
0 0
0 0.019043
0.09778 0.064007
0.3706 0.064007
0.6642 0.064007
0.99658 0.0028774
1 0

Table 107: Base 64 representation:


TuYebuoJBJDL70A

Figure 85: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

32
Profile: goe797 Table 112: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.719 6.313 ects
Information: Gottingen 797 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.8 2.7 dcts
Cm error -4 -13 mcts
Upper transition point 0.18 1 %

Figure 86: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 87: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 109: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.9583 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 4.8974 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.80001 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.71277 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.8613 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 21.0949 deg
Release Angle: 8.045 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.5006 deg
Camber deflection: 13.5456 deg

Table 110: Controlpoints


1 -0.004
0.28233 -0.035365
0.18233 -0.0406
0.14984 -0.0406
0.030967 -0.0406
0 -0.027608
0 0
0 0.014323
0.035821 0.1276
0.40051 0.1276
0.56839 0.1276
0.80526 0.069508
1 0.004

Table 111: Base 64 representation:


H5aS1ryKCRh3YsU

Figure 88: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

33
Profile: goe801 Table 116: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.583 6.406 ects
Information: Gottingen 801 (MVA 301) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -7.3 -7.1 dcts
Cm error -28 -19 mcts
Upper transition point 1.63 -0.9 %

Figure 89: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 90: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 113: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.8948 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 6.0637 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.4 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.8749 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.6695 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.3251 deg
Release Angle: 8.7761 deg
Nose Incidence: 18.3122 deg
Camber deflection: 27.0883 deg

Table 114: Controlpoints


1 -0.002
0.22835 0.039974
0.12136 -0.011875
0.012476 -0.011875
0.0098563 -0.011875
0 -0.010474
0 0
0 0.05018
0.13138 0.109
0.30022 0.109
0.53291 0.109
0.68877 0.082133
1 0.002

Table 115: Base 64 representation:


sjTVu3NBHFv3NtK

Figure 91: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

34
Profile: goe802 Table 120: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.583 6.406 ects
Information: Gottingen 802 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -63 -7.1 dcts
Cm error 0 -19 mcts
Upper transition point 0.3 -0.9 %

Figure 92: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 93: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 117: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9292 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 6.0501 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.4 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.7514 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.6411 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.3251 deg
Release Angle: 8.7761 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.8457 deg
Camber deflection: 26.6218 deg

Table 118: Controlpoints


1 -0.002
0.22835 0.039974
0.12136 -0.011875
0.012476 -0.011875
0.009981 -0.011875
0 -0.01045
0 0
0 0.050181
0.13138 0.109
0.30022 0.109
0.53291 0.109
0.68877 0.082133
1 0.002

Table 119: Base 64 representation:


sjTVu3NBHFv3NtK

Figure 94: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

35
Profile: goe803h Table 124: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.776 10.493 ects
Information: Gottingen 803 (Hacklinger) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 59.7 -1 dcts
Cm error 117 74 mcts
Upper transition point 0.07 0.61 %

Figure 95: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 96: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 121: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 5.9516 % @0.16C
Maximum Camber: 6.6462 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.34561 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.5199 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.0685 deg
Release Angle: 12.68 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.67 deg
Camber deflection: 23.35 deg

Table 122: Controlpoints


1 -0.0015
0.40338 0.10527
0.031494 -0.012523
0.014981 -0.012523
0.013183 -0.012523
0 -0.01102
0 0
0 0.0039194
0.0066671 0.0916
0.40014 0.0916
0.57952 0.0916
0.93614 0.018868
1 0.0015

Table 123: Base 64 representation:


D-aTm3IBBFMmGzI

Figure 97: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

36
Profile: goe804 Table 128: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 7.497 8.665 ects
Information: Gottingen 804 (EA 8) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.7 -0.3 dcts
Cm error 55 35 mcts
Upper transition point 2.81 3.12 %

Figure 98: Wing profile with camber and thickness dis- Figure 99: Error distribution of vertical position and
tribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 125: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.1644 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 6.2798 % @0.53C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.56368 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.16706 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.9735 deg
Release Angle: 19.5969 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.474 deg
Camber deflection: 32.0708 deg

Table 126: Controlpoints


1 0
0.68606 0.084766
0.025975 -0.00582
0.025 -0.00582
0.023552 -0.00582
0 -0.0051216
0 0
0 0.022246
0.13169 0.0915
0.5 0.0915
0.53544 0.0915
0.80196 0.088518
1 0

Table 127: Base 64 representation:


QugFm3ECAC9VK A

Figure 100: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

37
Profile: gs1 Table 132: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.322 4.965 ects
Information: Gluharoff/Sikorsky GS-1 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 3.4 3 dcts
Cm error 22 34 mcts
Upper transition point -5.89 -6.41 %

Figure 101: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 102: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 129: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.0463 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 4.1371 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.35 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.5954 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.8138 deg
Release Angle: 7.5616 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.7202 deg
Camber deflection: 11.2818 deg

Table 130: Controlpoints


1 0
0.55078 0.0051334
0.2805 -0.0417
0.15 -0.0417
0.1005 -0.0417
0 -0.0417
0 0
0 0.052974
0.17913 0.1065
0.3 0.1065
0.41985 0.1065
0.58726 0.1065
1 0

Table 131: Base 64 representation:


gaTLs VKKS nPrA

Figure 103: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

38
Profile: hobie Table 136: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.18 5.307 ects
Information: Hobie Hawk airfoil (Hobie Hawk R/C sailplane) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -5.8 -2.8 dcts
Cm error -10 -25 mcts
Upper transition point 13.91 13.14 %

Figure 104: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 105: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 133: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.5154 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 3.9712 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.6273 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.4629 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.2059 deg
Release Angle: 7.4467 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.0276 deg
Camber deflection: 11.4743 deg

Table 134: Controlpoints


1 0
0.51653 0.028247
0.2401 -0.01778
0.1 -0.01778
0.013019 -0.01778
0 -0.011268
0 0
0 0.02154
0.11094 0.07911
0.35 0.07911
0.58935 0.07911
0.89088 0.022299
1 0

Table 135: Base 64 representation:


RrWYho3GKISoJrA

Figure 106: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

39
Profile: hobiesm Table 140: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.136 4.7 ects
Information: Hobie Hawk airfoil (Hobie Hawk R/C sailplane) RMS curvature error: 43.52 43.72 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.5 0 dcts
Cm error 5 22 mcts
Upper transition point 0.71 -1.14 %

Figure 107: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 108: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 137: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.5847 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 3.8453 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.28998 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.46873 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.6831 deg
Release Angle: 6.9335 deg
Nose Incidence: 2.7549 deg
Camber deflection: 9.6884 deg

Table 138: Controlpoints


1 0
0.50092 0.026959
0.25688 -0.020407
0.087552 -0.020407
0.034117 -0.020407
0 -0.010325
0 0
0 0.014408
0.10738 0.077671
0.34981 0.077671
0.49584 0.077671
0.66524 0.063709
1 0

Table 139: Base 64 representation:


MrWOggmGMJzqJqA

Figure 109: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

40
Profile: HOR20 Table 144: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.16 6.711 ects
Information: ONERA HOR20 - Onera propeller blade airfoils RMS curvature error: 52.18 51.79 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 3.3 3.5 dcts
Cm error -125 -96 mcts
Upper transition point 0.88 -0.69 %

Figure 110: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 111: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 141: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 20.4193 % @0.24C
Maximum Camber: 3.2632 % @0.5C
Trailing Edge Gap: 1.35 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.7924 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.6051 deg
Release Angle: 6.6228 deg
Nose Incidence: -7.8298 deg
Camber deflection: -1.207 deg

Table 142: Controlpoints


1 -0.00675
0.62385 0.0052042
0.37271 -0.082656
0.1797 -0.082656
0 -0.082656
0 -0.015151
0 0
0 0.037413
0.075192 0.12656
0.30405 0.12656
0.49202 0.12656
0.74362 0.058563
1 0.00675

Table 143: Base 64 representation:


TvTR1M MPiglLqi

Figure 112: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

41
Profile: hq07 Table 148: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.763 2.336 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 0/7 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 83.64 80.4 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.2 -1.2 dcts
Cm error -1 3 mcts
Upper transition point -1.15 1.17 %

Figure 113: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 114: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 145: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.998 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: -3.4994e-007 % @0.55C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.30327 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.30327 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.9355 deg
Release Angle: -9.0161e-007 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -9.0161e-007 deg

Table 146: Controlpoints


1 0
0.75837 -0.010413
0.59968 -0.03499
0.33933 -0.03499
0.086752 -0.03499
0 -0.013244
0 0
0 0.013244
0.086752 0.03499
0.33933 0.03499
0.59968 0.03499
0.75837 0.010413
1 0

Table 147: Base 64 representation:


YvWZPYvWZPmmGgA

Figure 115: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

42
Profile: hq09 Table 152: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.87 4.254 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 0/9 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.4 -1.1 dcts
Cm error 0 -1 mcts
Upper transition point 2.17 1.3 %

Figure 116: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 117: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 149: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.112 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 0.0066685 % @0.82C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.37183 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.37183 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.651 deg
Release Angle: 0.048879 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 0.048879 deg

Table 150: Controlpoints


1 0
0.75816 -0.012082
0.59977 -0.04056
0.33933 -0.04056
0.087062 -0.04056
0 -0.015398
0 0
0 0.015398
0.087062 0.04056
0.33933 0.04056
0.59977 0.04056
0.75816 0.012083
1 0

Table 151: Base 64 representation:


YvWZRYvWZRmmGgA

Figure 118: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

43
Profile: hq010 Table 156: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.088 3.47 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 0/10 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 0.2 dcts
Cm error 2 3 mcts
Upper transition point -0.52 -1.38 %

Figure 119: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 120: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 153: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 1.1056e-006 % @0.75C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.62037 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.62037 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.0477 deg
Release Angle: -1.398e-005 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -1.398e-005 deg

Table 154: Controlpoints


1 0
0.75848 -0.014873
0.59952 -0.05
0.33933 -0.05
0.087108 -0.05
0 -0.018981
0 0
0 0.018981
0.087108 0.05
0.33933 0.05
0.59952 0.05
0.75848 0.014873
1 0

Table 155: Base 64 representation:


YvWZVYvWZVmmIgA

Figure 121: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

44
Profile: hq108 Table 160: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.802 2.053 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 1.0/8 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 37.74 36.85 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.5 -1.9 dcts
Cm error -5 3 mcts
Upper transition point 6.25 4.56 %

Figure 122: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 123: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 157: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.9775 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 0.99442 % @0.51C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.36632 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.17986 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.9283 deg
Release Angle: 2.4987 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.837 deg
Camber deflection: 6.3357 deg

Table 158: Controlpoints


1 0
0.74357 -0.0020833
0.59291 -0.03037
0.325 -0.03037
0.012294 -0.03037
0 -0.0038395
0 0
0 0.01287
0.067827 0.04945
0.35 0.04945
0.59881 0.04945
0.74599 0.024292
1 0

Table 159: Base 64 representation:


RzWYVI9VZNonHjA

Figure 124: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

45
Profile: hq109 Table 164: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.159 2.919 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 1.0/9 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 39.54 45.36 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.6 1.1 dcts
Cm error -4 0 mcts
Upper transition point 4.12 -2.83 %

Figure 125: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 126: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 161: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.9859 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 0.99736 % @0.5C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.47055 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.33304 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.6141 deg
Release Angle: 2.4879 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.7895 deg
Camber deflection: 6.2773 deg

Table 162: Controlpoints


1 0
0.74711 -0.003616
0.59254 -0.03536
0.325 -0.03536
0.052318 -0.03536
0 -0.010778
0 0
0 0.014945
0.071198 0.05455
0.35 0.05455
0.5971 0.05455
0.75668 0.024694
1 0

Table 163: Base 64 representation:


SyWYXU1VZPmnHjA

Figure 127: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

46
Profile: hq158 Table 168: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.522 2.035 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 1.5/8 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 47.34 47.65 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -5.3 -4.8 dcts
Cm error -24 -34 mcts
Upper transition point 11.74 10.81 %

Figure 128: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 129: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 165: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.9651 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 1.4847 % @0.53C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.46804 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.35347 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.2435 deg
Release Angle: 3.6044 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.204 deg
Camber deflection: 8.8085 deg

Table 166: Controlpoints


1 0
0.72322 0.002332
0.5851 -0.02562
0.325 -0.02562
0.273 -0.02562
0 -0.025364
0 0
0 0.015734
0.079335 0.05408
0.35 0.05408
0.60065 0.05408
0.73408 0.031362
1 0

Table 167: Base 64 representation:


TwWZX-KVZLqqHlA

Figure 130: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

47
Profile: hq159 Table 172: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.136 3.05 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 1.5/9 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.8 1.1 dcts
Cm error -8 3 mcts
Upper transition point -1.03 -2.37 %

Figure 131: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 132: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 169: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.9784 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 1.4916 % @0.52C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.62349 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.29824 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.7414 deg
Release Angle: 3.7627 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.1624 deg
Camber deflection: 9.925 deg

Table 170: Controlpoints


1 0
0.74544 0.0017415
0.58353 -0.03063
0.325 -0.03063
0.023325 -0.03063
0 -0.0068101
0 0
0 0.018953
0.086421 0.05921
0.35 0.05921
0.59551 0.05921
0.73311 0.033401
1 0

Table 171: Base 64 representation:


UvWYZO6VZNpmIlA

Figure 133: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

48
Profile: hq159b Table 176: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.008 2.147 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 1.5/9 B R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 34.86 35.99 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 4.8 -4.3 dcts
Cm error 6 -7 mcts
Upper transition point -11.34 9.91 %

Figure 134: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 135: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 173: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.9605 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 1.5028 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.62446 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.30321 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.2738 deg
Release Angle: 3.6645 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.682 deg
Camber deflection: 10.3464 deg

Table 174: Controlpoints


1 0
0.742 0.0023757
0.60729 -0.0306
0.30866 -0.0306
0.055733 -0.0306
0 -0.010614
0 0
0 0.017263
0.071588 0.05928
0.37059 0.05928
0.6067 0.05928
0.79251 0.024747
1 0

Table 175: Base 64 representation:


TzYYZWzUcNhpHlA

Figure 136: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

49
Profile: hq208 Table 180: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.939 2.955 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 2.0/8 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.1 -0.3 dcts
Cm error -2 -14 mcts
Upper transition point -0.3 -0.51 %

Figure 137: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 138: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 177: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.9701 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 1.9933 % @0.5C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.45562 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.28104 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.7779 deg
Release Angle: 4.8612 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.6432 deg
Camber deflection: 12.5044 deg

Table 178: Controlpoints


1 0
0.73461 0.009139
0.59771 -0.02099
0.3 -0.02099
0.23047 -0.02099
0 -0.02078
0 0
0 0.01344
0.059472 0.05909
0.375 0.05909
0.6123 0.05909
0.79455 0.027962
1 0

Table 179: Base 64 representation:


P1YYZ-PTbJhpGnA

Figure 139: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

50
Profile: hq209 Table 184: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.001 3.097 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 2.0/9 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 48.12 47.29 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.3 -1.3 dcts
Cm error -3 10 mcts
Upper transition point 0.27 -0.42 %

Figure 140: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 141: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 181: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.9557 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 1.9952 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.53889 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.32391 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.4809 deg
Release Angle: 4.8072 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.8865 deg
Camber deflection: 12.6937 deg

Table 182: Controlpoints


1 0
0.73067 0.0073669
0.60447 -0.02591
0.3 -0.02591
0.027733 -0.02591
0 -0.0077386
0 0
0 0.014091
0.055268 0.06405
0.375 0.06405
0.61251 0.06405
0.80598 0.027433
1 0

Table 183: Base 64 representation:


O2YYbT5TcLgrHnA

Figure 142: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

51
Profile: hq259b Table 188: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.524 5.501 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 2.5/9 B R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 51.2 52.76 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 5 5.2 dcts
Cm error 2 23 mcts
Upper transition point -2.39 -6.52 %

Figure 143: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 144: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 185: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.0485 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 2.5247 % @0.56C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2272 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.77407 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.1646 deg
Release Angle: 7.3167 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.095 deg
Camber deflection: 18.4118 deg

Table 186: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79163 0.017257
0.57096 -0.0223
0.3 -0.0223
0.011491 -0.0223
0 -0.0077005
0 0
0 0.031553
0.12169 0.06844
0.35 0.06844
0.61548 0.06844
0.70406 0.051644
1 0

Table 187: Base 64 representation:


epWasW9TZKwfGrA

Figure 145: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

52
Profile: hq309 Table 192: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.061 5.803 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 3.0/9 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.1 0.3 dcts
Cm error -7 10 mcts
Upper transition point 1.31 0.74 %

Figure 146: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 147: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 189: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.9578 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 2.9899 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.74776 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.26163 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.6961 deg
Release Angle: 7.3467 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.8547 deg
Camber deflection: 19.2014 deg

Table 190: Controlpoints


1 0
0.72401 0.019292
0.62401 -0.01679
0.25 -0.01679
0.11517 -0.01679
0 -0.014173
0 0
0 0.0199
0.079438 0.07378
0.375 0.07378
0.61335 0.07378
0.78723 0.040183
1 0

Table 191: Base 64 representation:


RxYYf1iQgHiuHrA

Figure 148: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

53
Profile: hq358 Table 196: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.462 5.513 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 2.5/8 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 40.73 40.5 %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN 17.6 dcts
Cm error NaN -8 mcts
Upper transition point 34.17 3.02 %

Figure 149: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 150: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 193: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.9651 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 3.4921 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.47992 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.25489 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.5199 deg
Release Angle: 8.3847 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.8298 deg
Camber deflection: 21.2145 deg

Table 194: Controlpoints


1 0
0.69298 0.027534
0.66297 -0.00805
0.15 -0.00805
0.020322 -0.00805
0 -0.0058765
0 0
0 0.014524
0.065933 0.07368
0.375 0.07368
0.59522 0.07368
0.74843 0.051844
1 0

Table 195: Base 64 representation:


N0YXfu2KmDs5HtA

Figure 151: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

54
Profile: hq359 Table 200: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.495 7.016 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 3.5/9 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 41.5 39.61 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.5 0 dcts
Cm error -11 -30 mcts
Upper transition point 2.31 2.32 %

Figure 152: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 153: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 197: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.917 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 3.5129 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.98567 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.27297 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.3143 deg
Release Angle: 8.1514 deg
Nose Incidence: 16.0645 deg
Camber deflection: 24.2159 deg

Table 198: Controlpoints


1 0
0.72929 0.025217
0.62929 -0.01248
0.2 -0.01248
0.091389 -0.01248
0 -0.011795
0 0
0 0.01479
0.060572 0.07862
0.375 0.07862
0.61197 0.07862
0.7745 0.047623
1 0

Table 199: Base 64 representation:


M1YYh7iNhFmuHtA

Figure 154: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

55
Profile: hq1010 Table 204: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.003 3.942 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 1.0/10 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 27.37 28.2 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.7 -2 dcts
Cm error -4 -1 mcts
Upper transition point 3.98 3.97 %

Figure 155: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 156: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 201: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9627 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 0.99616 % @0.5C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.56718 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.4114 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.5123 deg
Release Angle: 2.4788 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.1597 deg
Camber deflection: 6.6385 deg

Table 202: Controlpoints


1 0
0.73754 -0.0058524
0.59687 -0.04028
0.325 -0.04028
0.052578 -0.04028
0 -0.012008
0 0
0 0.015065
0.063522 0.0594
0.35 0.0594
0.59586 0.0594
0.7453 0.027826
1 0

Table 203: Base 64 representation:


QzWYZT1VaRnpIjA

Figure 157: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

56
Profile: hq1012 Table 208: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.097 6.243 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 1.0/12 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 26.91 27.56 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.2 -0.3 dcts
Cm error -1 -1 mcts
Upper transition point 0.58 0.74 %

Figure 158: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 159: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 205: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.9568 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 1.0023 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0417 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.77025 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.0511 deg
Release Angle: 2.449 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.0355 deg
Camber deflection: 6.4844 deg

Table 206: Controlpoints


1 0
0.73275 -0.0095562
0.59875 -0.05026
0.325 -0.05026
0.064275 -0.05026
0 -0.016719
0 0
0 0.017865
0.062736 0.06939
0.35 0.06939
0.59225 0.06939
0.74011 0.03193
1 0

Table 207: Base 64 representation:


Q0WYeVyVaVoqKjA

Figure 160: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

57
Profile: hq1510 Table 212: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.103 3.877 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 1.5/10 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 32.02 31.98 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.9 1.4 dcts
Cm error -4 9 mcts
Upper transition point -1.34 -3.01 %

Figure 161: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 162: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 209: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.973 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 1.4926 % @0.52C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.77004 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.3395 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.4257 deg
Release Angle: 3.791 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.3349 deg
Camber deflection: 10.1259 deg

Table 210: Controlpoints


1 0
0.74724 0.00034487
0.58802 -0.03559
0.325 -0.03559
0.015786 -0.03559
0 -0.0059773
0 0
0 0.021166
0.087271 0.0642
0.35 0.0642
0.59519 0.0642
0.73275 0.035203
1 0

Table 211: Base 64 representation:


VvWYbL8VZPpmIlA

Figure 163: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

58
Profile: hq1511 Table 216: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.386 5.858 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 1.5/11 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 48.71 48.09 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.3 -1 dcts
Cm error -7 -31 mcts
Upper transition point 1.72 3.67 %

Figure 164: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 165: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 213: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 1.4915 % @0.54C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0859 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.49937 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.7143 deg
Release Angle: 3.9294 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.5702 deg
Camber deflection: 10.4996 deg

Table 214: Controlpoints


1 0
0.77052 0.00028944
0.57912 -0.04069
0.33928 -0.04069
0.020194 -0.04069
0 -0.0081993
0 0
0 0.028985
0.11605 0.06931
0.33928 0.06931
0.60371 0.06931
0.72092 0.038162
1 0

Table 215: Base 64 representation:


bpWaeN7WXRsiJmA

Figure 166: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

59
Profile: hq1512 Table 220: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.021 5.225 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 1.5/12 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 26.24 26.38 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.6 0.9 dcts
Cm error -2 -3 mcts
Upper transition point -1.13 -1.73 %

Figure 167: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 168: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 217: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.9622 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 1.493 % @0.51C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1421 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.43684 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.0468 deg
Release Angle: 3.7545 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.0839 deg
Camber deflection: 10.8385 deg

Table 218: Controlpoints


1 0
0.73689 -0.0035308
0.5938 -0.04551
0.325 -0.04551
0.027677 -0.04551
0 -0.0089779
0 0
0 0.026398
0.091526 0.07418
0.35 0.07418
0.59177 0.07418
0.73021 0.039252
1 0

Table 219: Base 64 representation:


XuWYgN6VZTpoKlA

Figure 169: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

60
Profile: hq1585 Table 224: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.903 4.077 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 1.5/8.5 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 37.26 36.87 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.5 -3.8 dcts
Cm error -4 17 mcts
Upper transition point 9.87 7.92 %

Figure 170: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 171: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 221: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.5824 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 1.4915 % @0.52C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.56386 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.44597 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.3919 deg
Release Angle: 3.5905 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.7548 deg
Camber deflection: 8.3453 deg

Table 222: Controlpoints


1 0
0.72597 0.0042787
0.62597 -0.0296
0.25 -0.0296
0.11203 -0.0296
0 -0.018251
0 0
0 0.016957
0.076496 0.0568
0.35 0.0568
0.62277 0.0568
0.73448 0.02925
1 0

Table 223: Base 64 representation:


TxWbYmiQgNsuGlA

Figure 172: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

61
Profile: hq2010 Table 228: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.308 4.259 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 2.0/10 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1 -0.8 dcts
Cm error -4 -15 mcts
Upper transition point 1.01 0.63 %

Figure 173: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 174: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 225: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9634 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 1.9953 % @0.51C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.60081 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.42905 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.0681 deg
Release Angle: 4.8775 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.8345 deg
Camber deflection: 12.7119 deg

Table 226: Controlpoints


1 0
0.74776 0.0059155
0.58317 -0.03085
0.325 -0.03085
0.031306 -0.03085
0 -0.009942
0 0
0 0.014051
0.04929 0.06901
0.375 0.06901
0.6075 0.06901
0.79317 0.030584
1 0

Table 227: Base 64 representation:


N3YYsV5VYNhmInA

Figure 175: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

62
Profile: hq2012 Table 232: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.514 6.237 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 2.0/12 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 30.25 31.26 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.2 0.3 dcts
Cm error -5 -12 mcts
Upper transition point -0.43 -1.49 %

Figure 176: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 177: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 229: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.9758 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 1.9857 % @0.52C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2021 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.54928 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.9856 deg
Release Angle: 4.8727 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.4096 deg
Camber deflection: 13.2823 deg

Table 230: Controlpoints


1 0
0.73195 0.0017774
0.59012 -0.04084
0.325 -0.04084
0.023325 -0.04084
0 -0.009242
0 0
0 0.027408
0.093733 0.07899
0.35 0.07899
0.59722 0.07899
0.72832 0.044809
1 0

Table 231: Base 64 representation:


WuWYhO6VZRqpKnA

Figure 178: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

63
Profile: hq2090sm Table 236: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.071 2.916 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 2.0/9 R/C sailplane airfoil (smoothed) RMS curvature error: 17.23 18.03 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2 3 dcts
Cm error -6 10 mcts
Upper transition point -0.58 -3.22 %

Figure 179: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 180: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 233: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.9792 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 1.9823 % @0.52C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.85306 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.37423 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.6055 deg
Release Angle: 5.0778 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.3995 deg
Camber deflection: 13.4772 deg

Table 234: Controlpoints


1 0
0.74213 0.0079914
0.60113 -0.0261
0.3 -0.0261
0.23732 -0.0261
0 -0.024333
0 0
0 0.025599
0.11523 0.0639
0.35 0.0639
0.59199 0.0639
0.714 0.042134
1 0

Table 235: Base 64 representation:


aqWYb7NTcLsoHnA

Figure 181: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

64
Profile: hq2195 Table 240: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.488 5.852 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 2.1/9.5 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 3.2 3.9 dcts
Cm error 0 18 mcts
Upper transition point -3.62 -5.95 %

Figure 182: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 183: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 237: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.5014 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 2.0888 % @0.56C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.001 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2433 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.4839 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.759 deg
Release Angle: 6.1026 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.7635 deg
Camber deflection: 15.866 deg

Table 238: Controlpoints


1 -5e-006
0.78793 0.011937
0.58878 -0.028472
0.3 -0.028472
0.19271 -0.028472
0 -0.025127
0 0
0 0.03178
0.12185 0.066778
0.35 0.066778
0.61351 0.066778
0.71351 0.045288
1 5e-006

Table 239: Base 64 representation:


epWac3XTaMugGpA

Figure 184: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

65
Profile: hq2510 Table 244: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.892 5.417 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 2.5/10 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 62.7 64.29 %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 185: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 186: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 241: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9616 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 2.4929 % @0.5C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.28092 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.43244 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.3909 deg
Release Angle: 6.1539 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.2692 deg
Camber deflection: 14.4231 deg

Table 242: Controlpoints


1 0
0.73513 0.011372
0.59572 -0.02622
0.3 -0.02622
0.18467 -0.02622
0 -0.023074
0 0
0 0.0080394
0.034511 0.07387
0.375 0.07387
0.60631 0.07387
0.7907 0.036339
1 0

Table 243: Base 64 representation:


H5YYg3ZTbLhpIpA

Figure 187: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

66
Profile: hq2511 Table 248: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.401 5.02 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 2.5/11 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.4 -3.8 dcts
Cm error -5 -22 mcts
Upper transition point -0.44 0.83 %

Figure 188: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 189: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 245: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.9871 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 2.4941 % @0.5C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.81852 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.57388 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.447 deg
Release Angle: 6.2002 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.9654 deg
Camber deflection: 15.1656 deg

Table 246: Controlpoints


1 0
0.75316 0.010677
0.59368 -0.03124
0.30866 -0.03124
0.19754 -0.03124
0 -0.027491
0 0
0 0.018986
0.066061 0.07901
0.37059 0.07901
0.61503 0.07901
0.79846 0.03526
1 0

Table 247: Base 64 representation:


P0YZh3XUaNhmIpA

Figure 190: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

67
Profile: hq2590sm Table 252: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.551 5.689 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 2.5/9 R/C sailplane airfoil (smoothed) RMS curvature error: 50.96 52.97 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 5.3 5.3 dcts
Cm error 4 25 mcts
Upper transition point -2.92 -6.89 %

Figure 191: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 192: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 249: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.0485 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 2.512 % @0.56C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2272 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.787 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.1646 deg
Release Angle: 7.3167 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.0935 deg
Camber deflection: 18.4103 deg

Table 250: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79163 0.017257
0.57096 -0.0223
0.3 -0.0223
0.011186 -0.0223
0 -0.0076608
0 0
0 0.031553
0.12169 0.06844
0.35 0.06844
0.61548 0.06844
0.71548 0.049652
1 0

Table 251: Base 64 representation:


epWasW9TZKufGrA

Figure 193: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

68
Profile: hq3010 Table 256: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.216 4.29 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 3.0/10 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 62.74 64.69 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.6 -1 dcts
Cm error 4 6 mcts
Upper transition point 0.66 0.41 %

Figure 194: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 195: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 253: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9609 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 2.9835 % @0.5C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.87391 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.35173 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.3337 deg
Release Angle: 6.9366 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.8651 deg
Camber deflection: 18.8016 deg

Table 254: Controlpoints


1 0
0.70295 0.01697
0.62543 -0.02162
0.275 -0.02162
0.18221 -0.02162
0 -0.02067
0 0
0 0.021124
0.076591 0.07873
0.375 0.07873
0.62972 0.07873
0.81257 0.035088
1 0

Table 255: Base 64 representation:


RyYah8WSfJgyIqA

Figure 196: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

69
Profile: hq3011 Table 260: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.553 5.797 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 3.0/11 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.3 -0.4 dcts
Cm error -8 -20 mcts
Upper transition point 0.38 0.23 %

Figure 197: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 198: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 257: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.9566 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 3.0026 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.98924 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.47062 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.3066 deg
Release Angle: 7.3853 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.7699 deg
Camber deflection: 19.1552 deg

Table 258: Controlpoints


1 0
0.78248 0.014188
0.5563 -0.02649
0.3 -0.02649
0.1642 -0.02649
0 -0.023311
0 0
0 0.021784
0.071955 0.08368
0.375 0.08368
0.62263 0.08368
0.80956 0.037151
1 0

Table 259: Base 64 representation:


RzYZj3sTXLgfIrA

Figure 199: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

70
Profile: hq3012 Table 264: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.268 4.758 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 3.0/12 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 37.74 37.24 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.9 0.5 dcts
Cm error -1 -6 mcts
Upper transition point 0.05 -0.13 %

Figure 200: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 201: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 261: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.9512 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 2.9801 % @0.5C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1469 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.62842 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.3587 deg
Release Angle: 7.1345 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.4653 deg
Camber deflection: 18.5998 deg

Table 262: Controlpoints


1 0
0.69703 0.01299
0.6227 -0.03141
0.3 -0.03141
0.18236 -0.03141
0 -0.027641
0 0
0 0.023305
0.071031 0.08864
0.375 0.08864
0.60133 0.08864
0.78074 0.045861
1 0

Table 263: Base 64 representation:


RzYXl3ZTeNiyKrA

Figure 202: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

71
Profile: hq3013 Table 268: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.365 4.923 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 3.0/13 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.8 -1.4 dcts
Cm error -8 -14 mcts
Upper transition point 0.03 0.42 %

Figure 203: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 204: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 265: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.9683 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 3.0013 % @0.51C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2858 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.80309 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.5826 deg
Release Angle: 7.5066 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.2223 deg
Camber deflection: 18.7289 deg

Table 266: Controlpoints


1 0
0.74676 0.01201
0.56802 -0.03641
0.325 -0.03641
0.19175 -0.03641
0 -0.032041
0 0
0 0.024122
0.067879 0.0936
0.375 0.0936
0.59481 0.0936
0.77255 0.049584
1 0

Table 267: Base 64 representation:


QzYXn3aVXQjlLrA

Figure 205: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

72
Profile: hq3014 Table 272: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.346 3.761 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 3.0/14 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 43.69 42.41 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2 -2.3 dcts
Cm error -6 13 mcts
Upper transition point -0.17 -0.86 %

Figure 206: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 207: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 269: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.9663 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 2.9816 % @0.5C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4477 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.83994 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.0794 deg
Release Angle: 7.3431 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.7475 deg
Camber deflection: 19.0907 deg

Table 270: Controlpoints


1 0
0.74326 0.010327
0.58269 -0.04139
0.325 -0.04139
0.037826 -0.04139
0 -0.015166
0 0
0 0.025335
0.066503 0.0986
0.375 0.0986
0.6044 0.0986
0.79672 0.04463
1 0

Table 271: Base 64 representation:


Q0YXpX4VYSgmLrA

Figure 208: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

73
Profile: hq3015 Table 276: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.333 3.581 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 3.0/15 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 36.5 37.22 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.9 -2.7 dcts
Cm error -1 6 mcts
Upper transition point -0.79 -0.7 %

Figure 209: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 210: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 273: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.9581 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 2.9813 % @0.5C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5814 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.93583 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.7361 deg
Release Angle: 7.2969 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.8085 deg
Camber deflection: 19.1054 deg

Table 274: Controlpoints


1 0
0.74181 0.0086954
0.58647 -0.04636
0.325 -0.04636
0.032353 -0.04636
0 -0.014207
0 0
0 0.025787
0.063077 0.10356
0.375 0.10356
0.60472 0.10356
0.8007 0.044786
1 0

Table 275: Base 64 representation:


Q0YYrU5VZUgnMrA

Figure 211: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

74
Profile: hq3510 Table 280: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.428 5.696 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 3.5/10 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 63.8 59.63 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.1 -1 dcts
Cm error 12 -12 mcts
Upper transition point -2.31 1.87 %

Figure 212: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 213: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 277: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9358 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 3.5013 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.62385 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.31009 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.4025 deg
Release Angle: 8.5597 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.929 deg
Camber deflection: 21.4887 deg

Table 278: Controlpoints


1 0
0.72429 0.023435
0.63057 -0.01721
0.225 -0.01721
0.092189 -0.01721
0 -0.013805
0 0
0 0.015479
0.057611 0.08359
0.375 0.08359
0.61117 0.08359
0.77538 0.048815
1 0

Table 279: Base 64 representation:


M1YYjylOgHkvItA

Figure 214: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

75
Profile: hq3512 Table 284: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.189 4.221 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 3.5/12 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.4 -1 dcts
Cm error -8 -6 mcts
Upper transition point 1.15 1.58 %

Figure 215: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 216: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 281: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.948 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 3.4878 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.78775 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.52747 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.9577 deg
Release Angle: 8.5385 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.7749 deg
Camber deflection: 21.3133 deg

Table 282: Controlpoints


1 0
0.72314 0.019649
0.61507 -0.02687
0.275 -0.02687
0.15305 -0.02687
0 -0.023199
0 0
0 0.016482
0.051726 0.09351
0.375 0.09351
0.6047 0.09351
0.78022 0.050809
1 0

Table 283: Base 64 representation:


L2YYn2cSeLjtKtA

Figure 217: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

76
Profile: hq3513 Table 288: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.301 4.722 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 3.5/13 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 48.31 47.86 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.3 -2.6 dcts
Cm error -10 15 mcts
Upper transition point 1.03 0.38 %

Figure 218: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 219: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 285: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.0071 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 3.4865 % @0.5C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.87068 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.70685 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.5078 deg
Release Angle: 8.6163 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.3772 deg
Camber deflection: 20.9935 deg

Table 286: Controlpoints


1 0
0.73648 0.017791
0.59318 -0.03201
0.3 -0.03201
0.16838 -0.03201
0 -0.028169
0 0
0 0.016793
0.048582 0.0987
0.375 0.0987
0.60396 0.0987
0.78352 0.051454
1 0

Table 287: Base 64 representation:


L3YXp3cTbOioLtA

Figure 220: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

77
Profile: hq3514 Table 292: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.178 4.912 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 3.5/14 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 68.82 70.27 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.1 -4.2 dcts
Cm error -16 -6 mcts
Upper transition point 5.4 4.63 %

Figure 221: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 222: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 289: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.9813 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 3.4731 % @0.51C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.182 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.87576 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.6778 deg
Release Angle: 8.4432 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.071 deg
Camber deflection: 22.5143 deg

Table 290: Controlpoints


1 0
0.70295 0.01611
0.62392 -0.03653
0.3 -0.03653
0.177 -0.03653
0 -0.032146
0 0
0 0.04312
0.13132 0.1036
0.35 0.1036
0.58382 0.1036
0.70228 0.073029
1 0

Table 291: Base 64 representation:


bnWXr3aTeQtyMtA

Figure 223: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

78
Profile: hq3518 Table 296: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.313 7.007 ects
Information: Quabeck HQ 3.5/18 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: 39.03 39.31 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -5.6 -4.4 dcts
Cm error 11 8 mcts
Upper transition point 5.44 4.28 %

Figure 224: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 225: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 293: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 3.4165 % @0.55C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.2484 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.7647 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.1997 deg
Release Angle: 7.9923 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.4955 deg
Camber deflection: 21.4878 deg

Table 294: Controlpoints


1 0
0.68667 0.0048808
0.60077 -0.0564
0.35 -0.0564
0.1645 -0.0564
0 -0.043992
0 0
0 0.051616
0.12302 0.1236
0.35 0.1236
0.59545 0.1236
0.72351 0.074562
1 0

Table 295: Base 64 representation:


bpWY0xhWZYrxQsA

Figure 226: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

79
Profile: hsnlf213 Table 300: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.395 4.875 ects
Information: NASA/Langley HSNLF(1)-0213 high speed natural RMS curvature error: 31.67 32.33 %
laminar flow airfoil CD error -6.9 -6.2 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -20 -17 mcts
Upper transition point 2.61 1.5 %

Figure 228: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 227: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 297: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.265 % @0.44C
Maximum Camber: 1.3536 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.13398 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.8029 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.60076 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.3469 deg
Release Angle: 0.86404 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.7109 deg
Camber deflection: 11.5749 deg

Table 298: Controlpoints


1 -0.0006699
0.79061 -0.0072848
0.76807 -0.053209
0.45073 -0.053209
0.29361 -0.053209
0 -0.034292
0 0
0 0.053082
0.23443 0.079554
0.42389 0.079554
0.68491 0.079554
0.78179 0.014159
1 0.0006699

Table 299: Base 64 representation:


qsbshoWskXr5GhD
Figure 229: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

80
Profile: ht08 Table 304: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.436 3.32 ects
Information: Drela HT08 airfoil RMS curvature error: 14.29 27.95 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.4 0.1 dcts
Cm error -2 9 mcts
Upper transition point -0.54 -1.17 %

Figure 230: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 231: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 301: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 5.0002 % @0.2C
Maximum Camber: -0.079218 % @0.03C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.34722 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.44391 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.73562 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.9711 deg
Release Angle: -0.024422 deg
Nose Incidence: -2.0095 deg
Camber deflection: -2.0339 deg

Table 302: Controlpoints


1 -0.0017361
0.80985 -0.0099902
0.38187 -0.025578
0.20163 -0.025578
0.028227 -0.025578
0 -0.011766
0 0
0 0.00977
0.032254 0.024425
0.20159 0.024425
0.40966 0.024425
0.87224 0.0072821
1 0.0017361

Table 303: Base 64 representation:


a1NRKs2NOLQWGgJ

Figure 232: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

81
Profile: ht12 Table 308: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.94 5.074 ects
Information: Drela HT12 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.2 0.2 dcts
Cm error 0 0 mcts
Upper transition point -0.34 0 %

Figure 233: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 234: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 305: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 5.0194 % @0.19C
Maximum Camber: 1.8102e-005 % @0.29C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.238 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.5079 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.5079 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.367 deg
Release Angle: -5.0506e-005 deg
Nose Incidence: -0.00010463 deg
Camber deflection: -0.00015514 deg

Table 306: Controlpoints


1 -0.00119
0.35904 -0.020029
0.25904 -0.025102
0.18609 -0.025102
0.1526 -0.025102
0 -0.025102
0 0
0 0.025102
0.1526 0.025102
0.18609 0.025102
0.25909 0.025102
0.3591 0.020026
1 0.00119

Table 307: Base 64 representation:


MMGL MMGL22EgG

Figure 235: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

82
Profile: ht22 Table 312: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.451 5.868 ects
Information: Drela HT22 airfoil RMS curvature error: 84.53 Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.6 0.1 dcts
Cm error 1 -12 mcts
Upper transition point -0.4 -0.52 %

Figure 236: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 237: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 309: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 5.0778 % @0.21C
Maximum Camber: 1.0735 % @0.23C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.163 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.93355 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.66245 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.8095 deg
Release Angle: 0.84197 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.8713 deg
Camber deflection: 6.7133 deg

Table 310: Controlpoints


1 -0.000815
0.43567 -0.011284
0.28331 -0.014895
0.15547 -0.014895
0.03199 -0.014895
0 -0.011886
0 0
0 0.036091
0.18837 0.036091
0.2093 0.036091
0.30744 0.036091
0.40744 0.029244
1 0.000815

Table 311: Base 64 representation:


GNIPyyKKG2xEhE

Figure 238: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

83
Profile: ht23 Table 316: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.258 6.643 ects
Information: Drela HT23 airfoil RMS curvature error: 71.44 86.97 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.7 -0.1 dcts
Cm error 1 13 mcts
Upper transition point -1.31 -1.86 %

Figure 239: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 240: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 313: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.5064 % @0.21C
Maximum Camber: 1.0772 % @0.22C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.2082 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3449 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.5878 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.7621 deg
Release Angle: 0.71387 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.5185 deg
Camber deflection: 9.2324 deg

Table 314: Controlpoints


1 -0.001041
0.66727 -0.010726
0.3735 -0.021811
0.19025 -0.021811
0.0010743 -0.021811
0 -0.0050692
0 0
0 0.041562
0.20695 0.043293
0.20904 0.043293
0.34271 0.043293
0.44271 0.031174
1 0.001041

Table 315: Base 64 representation:


8BNLSP MOJ1hFgF

Figure 241: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

84
Profile: isa571 Table 320: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.085 2.935 ects
Information: I.S.A.571 RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.4 -4.2 dcts
Cm error 12 18 mcts
Upper transition point 9.37 8.95 %

Figure 242: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 243: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 317: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.3855 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 3.616 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.29999 %C
Upper nose radius: -0.00055035 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.28348 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.1436 deg
Release Angle: 7.8269 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.7808 deg
Camber deflection: 18.6077 deg

Table 318: Controlpoints


1 -0.0014999
0.21692 0.0088209
0.11692 -0.0097871
0.025084 -0.0097871
0.024821 -0.0097871
0 -0.0068489
0 0
0 0
0.016712 0.072747
0.29939 0.072747
0.48374 0.072747
0.83673 0.044939
1 0.0014999

Table 319: Base 64 representation:


A7TRfsBCGEm4QsI

Figure 244: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

85
Profile: isa960 Table 324: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.339 8.215 ects
Information: I.S.A.960 RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -26.3 -27.1 dcts
Cm error -40 -60 mcts
Upper transition point 46.76 48.33 %

Figure 245: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 246: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 321: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.3337 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 4.5193 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.41993 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.45455 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.20513 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.1055 deg
Release Angle: 7.0535 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.5134 deg
Camber deflection: 22.5668 deg

Table 322: Controlpoints


1 -0.0020997
0.25267 0.010954
0.15267 -0.016805
0.075277 -0.016805
0.015055 -0.016805
0 -0.0045375
0 0
0 0.0056672
0.010598 0.091348
0.3986 0.091348
0.40673 0.091348
0.62044 0.090469
1 0.0020997

Table 323: Base 64 representation:


E9aBmRyFFH-3OrL

Figure 247: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

86
Profile: isa961 Table 328: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.356 6.805 ects
Information: I.S.A.961 RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -19.1 -17.7 dcts
Cm error -69 -53 mcts
Upper transition point 40.24 38.05 %

Figure 248: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 249: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 325: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.4567 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 4.5159 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.36995 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3617 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.10515 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.3534 deg
Release Angle: 7.327 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.528 deg
Camber deflection: 24.855 deg

Table 326: Controlpoints


1 -0.0018498
0.25584 0.013092
0.15584 -0.015481
0.050227 -0.015481
0.026615 -0.015481
0 -0.0043194
0 0
0 0.027666
0.084315 0.091096
0.29872 0.091096
0.41296 0.091096
0.62837 0.091096
1 0.0018498

Table 327: Base 64 representation:


TtTKmSeDHH 3OrJ

Figure 250: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

87
Profile: isa962 Table 332: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.031 6.213 ects
Information: I.S.A.962 RMS curvature error: 70.96 65.16 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.5 0.6 dcts
Cm error -52 -42 mcts
Upper transition point 3.58 2.18 %

Figure 251: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 252: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 329: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.6432 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 4.5228 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.41992 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.7308 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.3284 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.263 deg
Release Angle: 6.9224 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.5721 deg
Camber deflection: 16.4945 deg

Table 330: Controlpoints


1 -0.0020996
0.25024 0.014795
0.15024 -0.019102
0.05035 -0.019102
0.021492 -0.019102
0 -0.019102
0 0
0 0.027215
0.06419 0.091355
0.29841 0.091355
0.44213 0.091355
0.59918 0.091355
1 0.0020996

Table 331: Base 64 representation:


TxTNm kDHI 3NqL

Figure 253: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

88
Profile: Joukovski11 Table 336: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.514 5.152 ects
Information: Jukowski profile from equations. RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: LiU CD error 1.4 1.2 dcts
Cm error 10 10 mcts
Upper transition point -0.73 -0.57 %

Figure 254: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 255: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 333: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.6013 % @0.24C
Maximum Camber: 5.4052 % @0.51C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.98853 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.5181 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 1.3128 deg
Release Angle: 11.4568 deg
Nose Incidence: 0.7918 deg
Camber deflection: 12.2486 deg

Table 334: Controlpoints


1 0
0.67377 0.062234
0.26449 -0.0308
0.1017 -0.0308
0.026028 -0.0308
0 -0.020903
0 0
0 0.025025
0.09503 0.104
0.392 0.104
0.64646 0.104
0.93678 0.013568
1 0

Table 335: Base 64 representation:


PvZbrqvHMNLcByA

Figure 256: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

89
Profile: joukovski12 Table 340: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.123 4.119 ects
Information: 12 RMS curvature error: 16.16 13.14 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.4 1.4 dcts
Cm error 3 4 mcts
Upper transition point -3.17 -3.39 %

Figure 257: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 258: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 337: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.8 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: -4.6681e-007 % @0.73C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.0886 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.0886 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.4025 deg
Release Angle: 3.3848e-006 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 3.3848e-006 deg

Table 338: Controlpoints


1 0
0.81212 -0.0039397
0.48922 -0.059
0.25 -0.059
0.25 -0.059
0 -0.059
0 0
0 0.059
0.25 0.059
0.25 0.059
0.48922 0.059
0.81212 0.0039397
1 0

Table 339: Base 64 representation:


AQUZ AQUZYYDgA

Figure 259: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

90
Profile: k1 Table 344: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.599 5.979 ects
Information: NYU/Grumman K-1 transonic airfoil (GAC .75-.63- RMS curvature error: 63.11 64.02 %
11.6) CD error -7.7 -8.2 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -33 -55 mcts
Upper transition point 18.07 20.01 %

Figure 261: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 260: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 341: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.6307 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 1.9192 % @0.73C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.1 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6312 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.5684 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.8809 deg
Release Angle: 8.0448 deg
Nose Incidence: 0.76165 deg
Camber deflection: 8.8065 deg

Table 342: Controlpoints


1 -0.0005
0.74968 0.024063
0.60103 -0.053337
0.28342 -0.053337
0.27208 -0.053337
0 -0.053337
0 0
0 0.060991
0.34208 0.06484
0.42017 0.06484
0.6702 0.06484
0.7702 0.043029
1 0.0005

Table 343: Base 64 representation:


7Mbcc DScXsnFsD
Figure 262: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

91
Profile: k2 Table 348: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.196 7.294 ects
Information: Grumman K-2 transonic airfoil (GAC .80-.53-10.3) RMS curvature error: 49.93 50.86 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.3 0.9 dcts
Cm error 86 104 mcts
Upper transition point -1.11 -2.43 %

Figure 263: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 264: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 345: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.2833 % @0.41C
Maximum Camber: 1.2947 % @0.87C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.099992 %C
Upper nose radius: -Inf %C
Lower nose radius: 64.9933 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.242 deg
Release Angle: 11.9172 deg
Nose Incidence: -4.8618 deg
Camber deflection: 7.0554 deg

Table 346: Controlpoints


1 -0.00049996
0.80553 0.024399
0.80553 -0.05511
0.40743 -0.05511
0 -0.05511
0 -0.017576
0 0
0 0.013252
0 0.047726
0.41331 0.047726
0.65592 0.047726
0.88022 0.036067
1 0.00049996

Table 347: Base 64 representation:


S aaUU aqYv KyD

Figure 265: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

92
Profile: k3 Table 352: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.247 7.242 ects
Information: Grumman K-3 transonic airfoil (GAC .70-.83-17.5) RMS curvature error: 41.03 39.43 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.9 -1.4 dcts
Cm error 42 37 mcts
Upper transition point 1.44 -0.43 %

Figure 266: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 267: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 349: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.2952 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 2.6248 % @0.77C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.76398 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.7329 %C
Lower nose radius: 7.8898 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.7746 deg
Release Angle: 14.6122 deg
Nose Incidence: -14.3506 deg
Camber deflection: 0.26155 deg

Table 350: Controlpoints


1 -0.0038199
0.79758 0.029055
0.55996 -0.088324
0.27282 -0.088324
0.023274 -0.088324
0 -0.034989
0 0
0 0.086679
0.41237 0.089788
0.47128 0.089788
0.63774 0.089788
0.80376 0.075245
1 0.0038199

Table 351: Base 64 representation:


9IeUlZ6RZl0sM3T

Figure 268: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

93
Profile: k3311 Table 356: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.403 3.917 ects
Information: Leon Kincaid K3311 airfoil (original) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -5.2 -4.9 dcts
Cm error -3 -5 mcts
Upper transition point 1.53 0.14 %

Figure 269: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 270: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 353: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.0229 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 3.256 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.79438 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.51938 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.6791 deg
Release Angle: 5.8487 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.1106 deg
Camber deflection: 14.9593 deg

Table 354: Controlpoints


1 0
0.60579 6.2854e-005
0.50579 -0.02492
0.2 -0.02492
0.15719 -0.02492
0 -0.02333
0 0
0 0.02357
0.10491 0.08702
0.35 0.08702
0.51654 0.08702
0.74692 0.052356
1 0

Table 355: Base 64 representation:


RsWQk7ONYLmyNpA

Figure 271: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

94
Profile: kc135a Table 360: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.043 6.076 ects
Information: Boeing KC-135 transonic airfoils RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.1 0.9 dcts
Cm error -3 -3 mcts
Upper transition point -0.02 -1.4 %

Figure 272: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 273: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 357: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.4916 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 1.0753 % @0.26C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.73511 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.4469 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.9882 deg
Release Angle: 1.2024 deg
Nose Incidence: -0.25621 deg
Camber deflection: 0.94614 deg

Table 358: Controlpoints


1 0
0.59971 -0.047673
0.49971 -0.067558
0.35051 -0.067558
0.347 -0.067558
0 -0.057855
0 0
0 0.020559
0.086246 0.087368
0.34936 0.087368
0.50635 0.087368
0.60635 0.063732
1 0

Table 359: Base 64 representation:


PvWPk2BWPsyyShA

Figure 274: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

95
Profile: kc135b Table 364: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.761 6.846 ects
Information: continued RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1 -1.2 dcts
Cm error 1 2 mcts
Upper transition point 2.08 2.76 %

Figure 275: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 276: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 361: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.9798 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 1.1555 % @0.27C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.29056 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.67461 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.3802 deg
Release Angle: 1.3218 deg
Nose Incidence: 2.9864 deg
Camber deflection: 4.3081 deg

Table 362: Controlpoints


1 0
0.62654 -0.038384
0.52654 -0.053915
0.4003 -0.053915
0.30422 -0.053915
0 -0.036745
0 0
0 0.0099189
0.050791 0.075883
0.3996 0.075883
0.54599 0.075883
0.71898 0.042058
1 0

Table 363: Base 64 representation:


I3aQgrPaNXnxQhA

Figure 277: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

96
Profile: kc135c Table 368: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.666 5.737 ects
Information: continued RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.4 -1.8 dcts
Cm error 5 8 mcts
Upper transition point 1.25 2.07 %

Figure 278: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 279: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 365: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.54 % @0.43C
Maximum Camber: 1.4217 % @0.3C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.23496 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.35979 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.6393 deg
Release Angle: 1.642 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.7754 deg
Camber deflection: 6.4173 deg

Table 366: Controlpoints


1 0
0.65151 -0.028514
0.55151 -0.039877
0.45015 -0.039877
0.41347 -0.039877
0 -0.029839
0 0
0 0.0094015
0.056428 0.066046
0.39976 0.066046
0.57578 0.066046
0.70602 0.041116
1 0

Table 367: Base 64 representation:


J2aTcvFsMRrxOiA

Figure 280: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

97
Profile: kc135d Table 372: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.24 6.171 ects
Information: continued RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -15.7 -15.7 dcts
Cm error 24 10 mcts
Upper transition point 0.52 2.01 %

Figure 281: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 282: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 369: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.9531 % @0.43C
Maximum Camber: 1.8347 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.14016 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.16715 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.0838 deg
Release Angle: 2.4661 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.2479 deg
Camber deflection: 9.7141 deg

Table 370: Controlpoints


1 0
0.63239 -0.019753
0.53239 -0.027363
0.45009 -0.027363
0.45009 -0.027363
0 -0.022395
0 0
0 0.0067227
0.048366 0.062654
0.39981 0.062654
0.58563 0.062654
0.72719 0.03838
1 0

Table 371: Base 64 representation:


H3aUbzAsKMpxMjA

Figure 283: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

98
Profile: l188root Table 376: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.29 2.734 ects
Information: Lockheed L-188/P-3 root airfoil NACA 0014 -1.10 RMS curvature error: 80.48 76.36 %
40/1.051 Cli=.3 a=.8 CD error -0.6 -0.4 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -9 6 mcts
Upper transition point 0.47 -0.69 %

Figure 285: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 284: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 373: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.9877 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 2.0009 % @0.51C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.28 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.3271 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.2164 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.0644 deg
Release Angle: 3.4356 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.613 deg
Camber deflection: 8.0487 deg

Table 374: Controlpoints


1 -0.0014
0.68487 -0.02397
0.58487 -0.051127
0.34549 -0.051127
0.014446 -0.051127
0 -0.0176
0 0
0 0.064849
0.27107 0.089279
0.41318 0.089279
0.67314 0.089279
0.90479 0.019851
1 0.0014

Table 375: Base 64 representation:


tWaclW8WXWTwRlH
Figure 286: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

99
Profile: l188tip Table 380: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.378 3.865 ects
Information: Lockheed L-188/P-3 tip airfoil NACA 0012 -1.10 RMS curvature error: 59.26 60.4 %
40/1.051 Cli=.4 a=.8 CD error -1.2 -0.9 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -19 -18 mcts
Upper transition point 2.24 2.27 %

Figure 288: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 287: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 377: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.0131 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 2.6579 % @0.53C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.24 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.8326 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.5786 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.6872 deg
Release Angle: 5.0414 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.0494 deg
Camber deflection: 11.0908 deg

Table 378: Controlpoints


1 -0.0012
0.66504 -0.014666
0.56504 -0.035287
0.3127 -0.035287
0.057719 -0.035287
0 -0.024646
0 0
0 0.056577
0.262 0.085751
0.41318 0.085751
0.70915 0.085751
0.88865 0.025651
1 0.0012

Table 379: Base 64 representation:


pXagkszUXPZwQnG
Figure 289: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

100
Profile: l7769 Table 384: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.51 4.899 ects
Information: Lissaman 7769 human powered aircraft airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.9 -0.7 dcts
Cm error -6 11 mcts
Upper transition point 0.75 0.29 %

Figure 290: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 291: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 381: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.1661 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 4.3684 % @0.31C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4106 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.375 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.4478 deg
Release Angle: 1.676 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.9288 deg
Camber deflection: 10.6048 deg

Table 382: Controlpoints


1 0
0.17396 -0.0078989
0.075 -0.023
0.075 -0.023
0.041211 -0.023
0 -0.023
0 0
0 0.030495
0.098887 0.0992
0.3 0.0992
0.45149 0.0992
0.55149 0.030576
1 0

Table 383: Base 64 representation:


UqTOp sFAKz4FiA

Figure 292: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

101
Profile: la2573a Table 388: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.245 5.636 ects
Information: Liebeck LA2573A airfoil RMS curvature error: 43.22 45.01 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.2 -1.1 dcts
Cm error -12 -14 mcts
Upper transition point -3.22 -2.92 %

Figure 293: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 294: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 385: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.7064 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 3.1892 % @0.26C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.7657 %C
Lower nose radius: 5.901 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.3195 deg
Release Angle: -1.598 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.3431 deg
Camber deflection: 1.7451 deg

Table 386: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80631 -0.017824
0.80631 -0.036652
0.31509 -0.036652
0.030997 -0.036652
0 -0.036652
0 0
0 0.054013
0.15823 0.10043
0.26111 0.10043
0.43826 0.10043
0.63565 0.013116
1 0

Table 387: Base 64 representation:


hZRPq 5UtQp IsA

Figure 295: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

102
Profile: LA5055 Table 392: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.407 7.921 ects
Information: LIEBECK LA5055 AIRFOIL RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -7.7 -7.3 dcts
Cm error 5 5 mcts
Upper transition point 6.16 5.62 %

Figure 296: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 297: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 389: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.9745 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 5.9492 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.5883 %C
Lower nose radius: 4.7989 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.6998 deg
Release Angle: 3.0385 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.8379 deg
Camber deflection: 8.8764 deg

Table 390: Controlpoints


1 0
0.67675 -0.0017569
0.12805 -0.0324
0.05 -0.0324
0.018 -0.0324
0 -0.027216
0 0
0 0.070963
0.21401 0.1389
0.35 0.1389
0.53992 0.1389
0.63992 0.040316
1 0

Table 391: Base 64 representation:


gZWT61oDFOxYHkA

Figure 298: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

103
Profile: lds2 Table 396: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.26 3.179 ects
Information: LDS-2 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.2 2.7 dcts
Cm error 1 15 mcts
Upper transition point -2.82 -4.32 %

Figure 299: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 300: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 393: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.9819 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 2.1578 % @0.48C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.3924 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.72711 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.6902 deg
Release Angle: 3.2092 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.1873 deg
Camber deflection: 16.3965 deg

Table 394: Controlpoints


1 0
0.53055 -0.029831
0.43055 -0.0399
0.3 -0.0399
0.26193 -0.0399
0 -0.035632
0 0
0 0.067479
0.28549 0.08032
0.3488 0.08032
0.55207 0.08032
0.65207 0.061689
1 0

Table 395: Base 64 representation:


1MWUh4ITMRx0PkA

Figure 301: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

104
Profile: lg10sc Table 400: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.827 4.583 ects
Information: Lockheed-Georgia/NASA/Blackwell rotorcraft air- RMS curvature error: 11.32 12.4 %
foil CD error -0.9 -1.4 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 3 13 mcts
Upper transition point 2.96 3.18 %

Figure 303: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 302: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 397: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9788 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 1.4301 % @0.18C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.6288 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.52916 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.0567 deg
Release Angle: 1.0536 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.7982 deg
Camber deflection: 16.8519 deg

Table 398: Controlpoints


1 -0.0015
0.75759 -0.02901
0.55828 -0.03823
0.4 -0.03823
0.30298 -0.03823
0 -0.032693
0 0
0 0.06298
0.22633 0.06298
0.25148 0.06298
0.38251 0.06298
0.63105 0.05718
1 0.0015

Table 399: Base 64 representation:


GQLb2QaRQ5vRhI
Figure 304: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

105
Profile: lnv109a Table 404: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.995 7.577 ects
Information: Douglas/Liebeck LNV109A high lift airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1 1.4 dcts
Cm error -50 -24 mcts
Upper transition point -2.1 -3.07 %

Figure 305: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 306: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 401: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.8782 % @0.24C
Maximum Camber: 5.9775 % @0.31C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.227 %C
Lower nose radius: 4.7234 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.349 deg
Release Angle: 3.195 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.1069 deg
Camber deflection: 7.3019 deg

Table 402: Controlpoints


1 0
0.23697 0.026919
0.13697 -0.031544
0.031599 -0.031544
0.030967 -0.031544
0 -0.031544
0 0
0 0.054919
0.1402 0.12278
0.28772 0.12278
0.43326 0.12278
0.6069 0.030037
1 0

Table 403: Base 64 representation:


sgSNz BCHNr4DkA

Figure 307: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

106
Profile: ls013 Table 408: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.192 5.716 ects
Information: NASA/Langley LS(1)-0013 general aviation airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.7 -1.6 dcts
Cm error -3 -4 mcts
Upper transition point 2.54 1.9 %

Figure 308: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 309: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 405: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.864 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 2.6325e-007 % @0.59C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.604 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6084 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.6084 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.5117 deg
Release Angle: 6.4206e-006 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 6.4206e-006 deg

Table 406: Controlpoints


1 -0.00302
0.80901 -0.012214
0.67681 -0.06432
0.40004 -0.06432
0.20505 -0.06432
0 -0.046889
0 0
0 0.046889
0.20505 0.06432
0.40004 0.06432
0.67681 0.06432
0.80901 0.012214
1 0.00302

Table 407: Base 64 representation:


ufaebufaebllGgP

Figure 310: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

107
Profile: ls413mod Table 412: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.329 5.97 ects
Information: NASA/Langley LS(1)-0413MOD general aviation RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
airfoil CD error -6.7 -5.9 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 41 31 mcts
Upper transition point 0.96 -0.11 %

Figure 312: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 311: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 409: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.0212 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 2.2395 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.50998 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.8054 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.90445 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.2145 deg
Release Angle: 9.6301 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.3595 deg
Camber deflection: 23.9896 deg

Table 410: Controlpoints


1 -0.0025499
0.79155 0.023129
0.73067 -0.042873
0.3253 -0.042873
0.2523 -0.042873
0 -0.039003
0 0
0 0.054042
0.15616 0.087395
0.34941 0.087395
0.47525 0.087395
0.64667 0.079183
1 0.0025499

Table 411: Base 64 representation:


niWMk5OVlS5xGvN
Figure 313: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

108
Profile: ls417 Table 416: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.454 6.763 ects
Information: NASA/Langley/Whitcomb LS(1)-0417 (GA(W)-1) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
general aviation airfoil CD error -2.8 -2.3 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 51 15 mcts
Upper transition point 0.63 1.14 %

Figure 315: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 314: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 413: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.9949 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 2.4487 % @0.67C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.70898 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.2752 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.803 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.6583 deg
Release Angle: 10.6114 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.6832 deg
Camber deflection: 24.2946 deg

Table 414: Controlpoints


1 -0.0035449
0.79574 0.020747
0.71947 -0.06367
0.35028 -0.06367
0.31711 -0.06367
0 -0.061739
0 0
0 0.10565
0.39955 0.10671
0.39955 0.10671
0.65612 0.10671
0.75612 0.066348
1 0.0035449

Table 415: Base 64 representation:


-Aabt9GWjbsuJwS
Figure 316: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

109
Profile: ls421 Table 420: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.824 6.889 ects
Information: NASA/Langley LS(1)-0421 general aviation airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.1 0 dcts
Cm error 37 15 mcts
Upper transition point -0.65 0.63 %

Figure 317: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 318: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 417: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 20.8957 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 2.3809 % @0.63C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.90197 %C
Upper nose radius: 5.945 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.9976 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.349 deg
Release Angle: 10.5937 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.3649 deg
Camber deflection: 23.9586 deg

Table 418: Controlpoints


1 -0.0045099
0.79511 0.014927
0.71211 -0.083317
0.35037 -0.083317
0.30548 -0.083317
0 -0.078132
0 0
0 0.12023
0.36471 0.12613
0.39946 0.12613
0.6499 0.12613
0.7499 0.075131
1 0.0045099

Table 419: Base 64 representation:


8Gab17IWjjttMwX

Figure 319: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

110
Profile: ls421mod Table 424: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.145 7.274 ects
Information: NASA/Langley LS(1)-0421MOD general aviation RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
airfoil CD error -0.5 0 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 67 49 mcts
Upper transition point -0.31 0.56 %

Figure 321: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 320: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 421: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 20.9517 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 2.3294 % @0.28C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.89993 %C
Upper nose radius: 6.9884 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.015 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.8644 deg
Release Angle: 10.6362 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.6507 deg
Camber deflection: 28.2869 deg

Table 422: Controlpoints


1 -0.0044997
0.79598 0.021289
0.71305 -0.081852
0.35073 -0.081852
0.24524 -0.081852
0 -0.070209
0 0
0 0.077368
0.12848 0.12782
0.3239 0.12782
0.53074 0.12782
0.75506 0.06588
1 0.0044997

Table 423: Base 64 representation:


mmVU22TWjigtIwX
Figure 322: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

111
Profile: lwk79100 Table 428: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.986 4.472 ects
Information: LWK 79-100 symmetrical airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.4 -0.6 dcts
Cm error -5 -5 mcts
Upper transition point 1.4 0.97 %

Figure 323: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 324: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 425: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.994 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 3.6886e-007 % @0.53C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.95371 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.95371 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.1111 deg
Release Angle: -1.5402e-006 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -1.5402e-006 deg

Table 426: Controlpoints


1 0
0.59656 -0.021535
0.51122 -0.04997
0.27886 -0.04997
0.098947 -0.04997
0 -0.025082
0 0
0 0.025082
0.098947 0.04997
0.27886 0.04997
0.51123 0.04997
0.59656 0.021535
1 0

Table 427: Base 64 representation:


goSVVgoSVV00HgA

Figure 325: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

112
Profile: lwk80080 Table 432: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.72 4.986 ects
Information: LWK 80-080 symmetrical airfoil RMS curvature error: 37.13 38.09 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.4 -1.4 dcts
Cm error -30 -15 mcts
Upper transition point 0.58 0.22 %

Figure 326: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 327: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 429: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.0618 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: -0.078272 % @0.83C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.48676 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.48676 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.9279 deg
Release Angle: -0.4796 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -0.4796 deg

Table 430: Controlpoints


1 0
0.659 -0.032496
0.6125 -0.04031
0.40245 -0.04031
0.22851 -0.04031
0 -0.027231
0 0
0 0.027231
0.22851 0.04031
0.40245 0.04031
0.67226 0.04031
0.67226 0.025704
1 0

Table 431: Base 64 representation:


qcasRqcaWR 3LfA

Figure 328: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

113
Profile: lwk80100 Table 436: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.704 6.367 ects
Information: LWK 80-100 symmetrical airfoil RMS curvature error: 24.85 24.29 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.5 0.3 dcts
Cm error 72 68 mcts
Upper transition point -0.34 0.52 %

Figure 329: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 330: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 433: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.0618 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 0.025325 % @0.75C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.7566 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.76158 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.8279 deg
Release Angle: -0.14461 deg
Nose Incidence: -0.039973 deg
Camber deflection: -0.18458 deg

Table 434: Controlpoints


1 0
0.7283 -0.022853
0.69811 -0.050316
0.40245 -0.050316
0.22337 -0.050316
0 -0.033676
0 0
0 0.033382
0.22092 0.050304
0.40245 0.050304
0.6922 0.050304
0.73839 0.021999
1 0

Table 435: Base 64 representation:


psafVqcagV15LgA

Figure 331: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

114
Profile: lwk80120k25 Table 440: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.476 3.268 ects
Information: LWK 80-120/K25 symmetrical airfoil RMS curvature error: 31.13 32.41 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.5 -0.7 dcts
Cm error -36 -51 mcts
Upper transition point 1.34 2.11 %

Figure 332: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 333: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 437: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.0617 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: -0.038473 % @0.9C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.093 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.093 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.888 deg
Release Angle: -0.43302 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -0.43302 deg

Table 438: Controlpoints


1 0
0.70363 -0.033123
0.67264 -0.06031
0.40245 -0.06031
0.21924 -0.06031
0 -0.039969
0 0
0 0.039969
0.21924 0.06031
0.40245 0.06031
0.68449 0.06031
0.75452 0.023684
1 0

Table 439: Base 64 representation:


psaeapsasax5NfA

Figure 334: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

115
Profile: lwk80150k25 Table 444: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.664 5.217 ects
Information: LWK 80-150/K25 symmetrical airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.1 0 dcts
Cm error -21 -22 mcts
Upper transition point 0.06 0.23 %

Figure 335: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 336: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 441: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.0416 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: -0.076093 % @0.91C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.773 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.773 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.398 deg
Release Angle: -0.95364 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -0.95364 deg

Table 442: Controlpoints


1 0
0.69349 -0.041184
0.67219 -0.07521
0.40245 -0.07521
0.24998 -0.07521
0 -0.054357
0 0
0 0.054357
0.24998 0.07521
0.40245 0.07521
0.69087 0.07521
0.7798 0.022155
1 0

Table 443: Base 64 representation:


tYafgtYasgt7PeA

Figure 337: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

116
Profile: m3 Table 448: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.724 4.505 ects
Information: NACA/Munk M-3 airfoil RMS curvature error: 5.57 5.38 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.9 -2.2 dcts
Cm error -1 0 mcts
Upper transition point 2.81 2.55 %

Figure 338: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 339: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 445: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.9 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 2.3092e-006 % @0.18C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.4 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5498 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.5498 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.0238 deg
Release Angle: 1.1026e-007 deg
Nose Incidence: -1.7344e-005 deg
Camber deflection: -1.7233e-005 deg

Table 446: Controlpoints


1 -0.002
0.61965 -0.058925
0.41339 -0.0595
0.3 -0.0595
0.2156 -0.0595
0 -0.047197
0 0
0 0.047196
0.21559 0.0595
0.3 0.0595
0.41339 0.0595
0.61965 0.058925
1 0.002

Table 447: Base 64 representation:


ySTKZySTKZ–TgK

Figure 340: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

117
Profile: m6 Table 452: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.369 2.988 ects
Information: NACA/Munk M-6 airfoil RMS curvature error: 37.02 34.09 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.5 -1.9 dcts
Cm error -4 -5 mcts
Upper transition point -1.11 -1.96 %

Figure 341: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 342: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 449: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.0747 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 2.1922 % @0.29C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.52 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4151 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.9645 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.8984 deg
Release Angle: -1.3598 deg
Nose Incidence: 1.7603 deg
Camber deflection: 0.40047 deg

Table 450: Controlpoints


1 -0.0026
0.91386 -0.017493
0.76976 -0.0394
0.5 -0.0394
0.040895 -0.0394
0 -0.028429
0 0
0 0.037831
0.15171 0.0822
0.3 0.0822
0.54915 0.0822
0.67906 0.042515
1 0.0026

Table 451: Base 64 representation:


sgTXit6giRtaTeN

Figure 343: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

118
Profile: m11 Table 456: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.039 6.606 ects
Information: NACA/Munk M-11 airfoil RMS curvature error: 29.46 28.76 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.8 -1.1 dcts
Cm error -23 -18 mcts
Upper transition point -3.94 -4.45 %

Figure 344: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 345: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 453: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.1584 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 1.8733 % @0.3C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.83505 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.4434 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.751 deg
Release Angle: -4.0479e-007 deg
Nose Incidence: 2.9137 deg
Camber deflection: 2.9137 deg

Table 454: Controlpoints


1 0
0.95593 -0.0053136
0.81457 -0.02214
0.4 -0.02214
0.041258 -0.02214
0 -0.019925
0 0
0 0.029779
0.1593 0.05952
0.3 0.05952
0.49593 0.05952
0.59565 0.048756
1 0

Table 455: Base 64 representation:


geTSZ54arJzPPgA

Figure 346: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

119
Profile: m12 Table 460: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.743 2.137 ects
Information: NACA/Munk M-12 airfoil RMS curvature error: 20.79 21.14 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.3 -1.5 dcts
Cm error 0 1 mcts
Upper transition point -2.54 2.95 %

Figure 347: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 348: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 457: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.93 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.985 % @0.3C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.4 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6347 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.79 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.8878 deg
Release Angle: 1.2422 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.1779 deg
Camber deflection: 5.42 deg

Table 458: Controlpoints


1 -0.002
0.72049 -0.0398
0.4323 -0.0398
0.29992 -0.0398
0.0085181 -0.0398
0 -0.014671
0 0
0 0.042765
0.16781 0.0795
0.30016 0.0795
0.41201 0.0795
0.56867 0.0795
1 0.002

Table 459: Base 64 representation:


hcTKhY9TMR UhK

Figure 349: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

120
Profile: m665 Table 464: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.134 4.235 ects
Information: NACA/Munk M6 (65 RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -22.4 -22.3 dcts
Cm error 17 18 mcts
Upper transition point 6.91 6.86 %

Figure 350: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 351: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 461: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.8434 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 1.425 % @0.29C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.60999 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2091 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 57.2958 deg
Release Angle: -20.0535 deg
Nose Incidence: 1.3034 deg
Camber deflection: -18.7501 deg

Table 462: Controlpoints


1 0
0.99845 -0.0017671
0.8379 -0.02561
0.5 -0.02561
0.042532 -0.02561
0 -0.018516
0 0
0 0.025096
0.15487 0.05343
0.3 0.05343
0.47213 0.05343
0.88519 0.017351
1 0

Table 463: Base 64 representation:


efTQXt6gqLVE AA

Figure 352: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

121
Profile: ma409 Table 468: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.693 3.391 ects
Information: Michael Achterberg MA409 F1C class free flight air- RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
foil (original) CD error -5.9 -6.3 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -24 -31 mcts
Upper transition point 12.31 13.3 %

Figure 354: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 353: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 465: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.7049 % @0.24C
Maximum Camber: 3.3423 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.06999 %C
Upper nose radius: NaN %C
Lower nose radius: NaN %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.8134 deg
Release Angle: 8.4542 deg
Nose Incidence: 2.3949 deg
Camber deflection: 10.8491 deg

Table 466: Controlpoints


1 -0.00034995
0.48282 0.027184
0.25413 -0.015982
0.075285 -0.015982
0.00057104 -0.015982
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.027435 0.063267
0.39897 0.063267
0.39897 0.063267
0.74502 0.063267
1 0.00034995

Table 467: Base 64 representation:


A7aAbA FMH rMtC
Figure 355: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

122
Profile: ma409sm Table 472: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.966 2.621 ects
Information: Michael Achterberg MA409 F1C class free flight air- RMS curvature error: 20.98 20.76 %
foil (smoothed) CD error 0.4 0.5 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 14 18 mcts
Upper transition point 0.1 -0.71 %

Figure 357: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 356: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 469: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.6863 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 3.3202 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.07 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.39399 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.51037 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.9032 deg
Release Angle: 8.5666 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.4037 deg
Camber deflection: 11.9703 deg

Table 470: Controlpoints


1 -0.00035
0.49719 0.027014
0.25135 -0.015862
0.07395 -0.015862
0.07395 -0.015862
0 -0.015862
0 0
0 0.016712
0.10633 0.062939
0.37887 0.062939
0.65832 0.062939
0.89849 0.025693
1 0.00035

Table 471: Base 64 representation:


RtYsb AFMHaqMtC
Figure 358: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

123
Profile: marske1 Table 476: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.78 5.062 ects
Information: Marske XM-1D airfoil (F14-3.0) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -9.1 -7.7 dcts
Cm error 36 36 mcts
Upper transition point 3.15 2.73 %

Figure 359: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 360: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 473: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.0792 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 3.0165 % @0.23C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.3075 %C
Lower nose radius: 7.778 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.5232 deg
Release Angle: -2.7085 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.6609 deg
Camber deflection: 14.9524 deg

Table 474: Controlpoints


1 0
0.73128 -0.040017
0.54742 -0.042943
0.49944 -0.042943
0.0081998 -0.042943
0 -0.02062
0 0
0 0.055097
0.10571 0.10031
0.25131 0.10031
0.4451 0.10031
0.56583 0.023158
1 0

Table 475: Base 64 representation:


ikQRqf-gGSx7NbA

Figure 361: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

124
Profile: marske2 Table 480: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.159 6.902 ects
Information: Marske Pioneer IA airfoil (NACA 23112/43012A hy- RMS curvature error: 66.1 59.55 %
brid) CD error -3 -3.4 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 7 2 mcts
Upper transition point 3.84 3.93 %

Figure 363: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 362: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 477: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.101 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 2.5905 % @0.15C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 5.6835 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.37619 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.7985 deg
Release Angle: -0.96622 deg
Nose Incidence: 28.9978 deg
Camber deflection: 28.0315 deg

Table 478: Controlpoints


1 0
0.73376 -0.039151
0.63376 -0.0433
0.4 -0.0433
0.34998 -0.0433
0 -0.029795
0 0
0 0.0844
0.188 0.0844
0.2 0.0844
0.39884 0.0844
0.70716 0.033018
1 0

Table 479: Base 64 representation:


ENQjrIaZSf5ReA
Figure 364: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

125
Profile: marske3 Table 484: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.921 4.99 ects
Information: Marske Pioneer IID root airfoil (NACA RMS curvature error: 56.14 56.23 %
43012A/24112 hybrid) CD error -4 -3.9 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -9 -22 mcts
Upper transition point 3.85 4.13 %

Figure 366: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 365: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 481: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.1487 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 2.7063 % @0.17C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 5.4746 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.31493 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.2141 deg
Release Angle: -0.36258 deg
Nose Incidence: 29.1746 deg
Camber deflection: 28.812 deg

Table 482: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79173 -0.027307
0.71851 -0.0423
0.5 -0.0423
0.25276 -0.0423
0 -0.023037
0 0
0 0.085437
0.2 0.0863
0.2 0.0863
0.3833 0.0863
0.59679 0.047684
1 0

Table 483: Base 64 representation:


-ANPkiggcSpuQfA
Figure 367: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

126
Profile: marske4 Table 488: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.066 5.526 ects
Information: Marske Pioneer IID tip airfoil (NACA 43012A*.833 RMS curvature error: 52.32 50.69 %
hybrid) CD error -2.2 -2.9 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -7 -11 mcts
Upper transition point 2.81 3.41 %

Figure 369: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 368: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 485: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.2145 % @0.24C
Maximum Camber: 2.8129 % @0.14C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 5.564 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.16993 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.1958 deg
Release Angle: -0.86328 deg
Nose Incidence: 31.3936 deg
Camber deflection: 30.5304 deg

Table 486: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79129 -0.025483
0.71938 -0.0336
0.5 -0.0336
0.34908 -0.0336
0 -0.019886
0 0
0 0.073038
0.15 0.0777
0.15 0.0777
0.37577 0.0777
0.67096 0.030146
1 0

Table 487: Base 64 representation:


7AKRglTgcOhwOeA
Figure 370: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

127
Profile: marske5 Table 492: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.583 5.434 ects
Information: Marske Monarch airfoil (NACA 43012A) RMS curvature error: 54.1 55.71 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.3 -2.7 dcts
Cm error -2 -22 mcts
Upper transition point 2.24 2.8 %

Figure 371: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 372: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 489: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.8414 % @0.17C
Maximum Camber: 3.673 % @0.17C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 7.5863 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.24583 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.6138 deg
Release Angle: -1.0227 deg
Nose Incidence: 35.4647 deg
Camber deflection: 34.4419 deg

Table 490: Controlpoints


1 0
0.789 -0.030893
0.72098 -0.0403
0.5 -0.0403
0.34973 -0.0403
0 -0.023941
0 0
0 0.086769
0.1485 0.0933
0.15 0.0933
0.37364 0.0933
0.67643 0.035632
1 0

Table 491: Base 64 representation:


7BKRnlTgcRgvQeA

Figure 373: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

128
Profile: marske7 Table 496: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.168 4.122 ects
Information: Roncz/Marske-7 low drag flying wing airfoil RMS curvature error: 28.65 28.63 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.2 0.5 dcts
Cm error 23 30 mcts
Upper transition point -1.18 -1.64 %

Figure 374: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 375: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 493: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.0605 % @0.43C
Maximum Camber: 2.7931 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.40336 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0122 %C
Lower nose radius: 21.7485 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.1132 deg
Release Angle: -5.276 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.4245 deg
Camber deflection: 3.1485 deg

Table 494: Controlpoints


1 -0.0020168
0.87677 -0.024484
0.7751 -0.03255
0.49781 -0.03255
0 -0.03255
0 -0.0087693
0 0
0 0.032369
0.15526 0.088217
0.42768 0.088217
0.66527 0.088217
0.76527 0.001118
1 0.0020168

Table 495: Base 64 representation:


XobblR giOsuLXK

Figure 376: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

129
Profile: mb253515sm Table 500: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.457 7.619 ects
Information: Mike Bame MB253515 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 34.35 32.94 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.3 -1.2 dcts
Cm error 5 2 mcts
Upper transition point 0.73 -0.96 %

Figure 377: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 378: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 497: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.958 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 2.4516 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.34656 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.50873 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.374 deg
Release Angle: 2.773 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.1756 deg
Camber deflection: 7.9486 deg

Table 498: Controlpoints


1 0
0.77395 -0.023415
0.57412 -0.050273
0.34998 -0.050273
0.12108 -0.050273
0 -0.019761
0 0
0 0.014622
0.092541 0.099306
0.35004 0.099306
0.54127 0.099306
0.65851 0.069228
1 0

Table 499: Base 64 representation:


JuWTpZpWWVvhTkA

Figure 379: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

130
Profile: mh18 Table 504: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.842 2.978 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 18 for F3D Pylon Racing RMS curvature error: 32.42 32.65 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.2 -0.5 dcts
Cm error 17 12 mcts
Upper transition point -1.66 -2.3 %

Figure 380: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 381: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 501: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.1325 % @0.36C
Maximum Camber: 2.8092 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.35982 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.46843 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.2044 deg
Release Angle: -5.4505 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.3053 deg
Camber deflection: 0.85481 deg

Table 502: Controlpoints


1 0
0.90782 -0.018006
0.44951 -0.028418
0.26864 -0.028418
0.035056 -0.028418
0 -0.0097699
0 0
0 0.013372
0.074546 0.083624
0.38001 0.083624
0.63485 0.083624
0.86336 0.00036172
1 0

Table 503: Base 64 representation:


KyYajW3RQMYoNXA

Figure 382: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

131
Profile: mh20 Table 508: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.591 3.389 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 20 for F3D Pylon Racing RMS curvature error: 57.14 63.54 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.1 -1.7 dcts
Cm error 15 6 mcts
Upper transition point -0.25 -0.67 %

Figure 383: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 384: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 505: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.0044 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 2.0142 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.26941 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.29472 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.3252 deg
Release Angle: -3.5388 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.3043 deg
Camber deflection: 0.76556 deg

Table 506: Controlpoints


1 0
0.91457 -0.013075
0.44937 -0.025566
0.22777 -0.025566
0.012779 -0.025566
0 -0.0050108
0 0
0 0.011562
0.074424 0.065036
0.32985 0.065036
0.61162 0.065036
0.7916 0.0059079
1 0

Table 507: Base 64 representation:


LxVbcN7PSLhgMaA

Figure 385: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

132
Profile: mh22 Table 512: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.454 3.353 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 22 for F3D Pylon Racing RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 31.2 -0.9 dcts
Cm error 11 29 mcts
Upper transition point -1.59 -3.36 %

Figure 386: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 387: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 509: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.2051 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 1.8196 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.36943 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.07525 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.2703 deg
Release Angle: -0.86239 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.0674 deg
Camber deflection: 5.205 deg

Table 510: Controlpoints


1 0
0.9484 -0.0049663
0.30806 -0.019147
0.1819 -0.019147
0.0049613 -0.019147
0 -0.0010641
0 0
0 0.01497
0.09099 0.053907
0.28888 0.053907
0.56246 0.053907
0.66246 0.022258
1 0

Table 511: Base 64 representation:


SrSZXE9MKIwRKeA

Figure 388: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

133
Profile: mh23 Table 516: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.189 5.051 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 23 for F3D Pylon Racing (ex- RMS curvature error: 37.63 36.87 %
tended laminar flow) CD error 1.6 2.3 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 36 49 mcts
Upper transition point -3.74 -5.47 %

Figure 390: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 389: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 513: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.9757 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 1.2755 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: NaN %C
Lower nose radius: 0.17534 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.8397 deg
Release Angle: -5.4472 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.8278 deg
Camber deflection: 0.38061 deg

Table 514: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79309 -0.024918
0.45003 -0.027347
0.32494 -0.027347
0.037475 -0.027347
0 -0.0066186
0 0
0 0
0 0.052554
0.38953 0.052554
0.76532 0.052554
0.96761 -0.0022804
1 0

Table 515: Base 64 representation:


A ZmWP4VMMJ5DXA
Figure 391: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

134
Profile: mh24 Table 520: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.07 4.744 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 24 for F3D Pylon Racing (ex- RMS curvature error: 42.53 41.86 %
tended laminar flow) CD error 1 1.6 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 49 54 mcts
Upper transition point -2.24 -3.06 %

Figure 393: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 392: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 517: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.9999 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 1.302 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.24327 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.2221 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.2497 deg
Release Angle: -2.5663 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.7129 deg
Camber deflection: 3.1466 deg

Table 518: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85896 -0.014056
0.77289 -0.031997
0.37263 -0.031997
0.061583 -0.031997
0 -0.0095489
0 0
0 0.0077576
0.037107 0.058014
0.39298 0.058014
0.78169 0.058014
0.95993 0.00039063
1 0

Table 519: Base 64 representation:


J5ZoZT0YoOMnHcA
Figure 394: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

135
Profile: mh25 Table 524: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.054 5.004 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 25 for F3D Pylon Racing (ex- RMS curvature error: 47.73 48.15 %
tended laminar flow) CD error 1.1 1.2 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 60 63 mcts
Upper transition point -2.16 -2.3 %

Figure 396: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 395: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 521: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9813 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 1.4586 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.44471 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.19865 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.7684 deg
Release Angle: -1.766 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.0584 deg
Camber deflection: 4.2925 deg

Table 522: Controlpoints


1 0
0.87892 -0.014117
0.77921 -0.035377
0.42248 -0.035377
0.021374 -0.035377
0 -0.0053204
0 0
0 0.014881
0.074697 0.06447
0.39567 0.06447
0.81124 0.06447
0.94927 0.0027634
1 0

Table 523: Base 64 representation:


PzZrcK8bnPRiLsA
Figure 397: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

136
Profile: mh26 Table 528: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.979 3.849 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 26 for F3D Pylon Racing (ex- RMS curvature error: 25.49 25.85 %
tended laminar flow) CD error 1.4 1.8 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 49 47 mcts
Upper transition point -2.02 -2.76 %

Figure 399: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 398: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 525: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.9821 % @0.41C
Maximum Camber: 1.5077 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.60318 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.27443 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 20.6447 deg
Release Angle: 1.7667 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.5708 deg
Camber deflection: 8.3375 deg

Table 526: Controlpoints


1 0
0.82806 -0.025868
0.72554 -0.039899
0.42307 -0.039899
0.080166 -0.039899
0 -0.012111
0 0
0 0.020647
0.10601 0.069954
0.39655 0.069954
0.7844 0.069954
0.89235 0.023056
1 0

Table 527: Base 64 representation:


TuZoeTzbhRgoXiA
Figure 400: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

137
Profile: mh27 Table 532: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.972 3.787 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 27 for F3D Pylon Racing (ex- RMS curvature error: 30.59 31.13 %
tended laminar flow) CD error 2.6 2.5 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 59 62 mcts
Upper transition point -4.19 -3.42 %

Figure 402: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 401: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 529: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.9831 % @0.44C
Maximum Camber: 1.4921 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.39336 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.3425 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.5795 deg
Release Angle: -5.6081 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.1791 deg
Camber deflection: 0.57107 deg

Table 530: Controlpoints


1 0
0.81852 -0.0333
0.72034 -0.045013
0.42408 -0.045013
0.1236 -0.045013
0 -0.0168
0 0
0 0.012225
0.056994 0.074833
0.44699 0.074833
0.83627 0.074833
0.9688 -0.00044561
1 0

Table 531: Base 64 representation:


K3ssgYsbgTMuLXA
Figure 403: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

138
Profile: mh30 Table 536: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.819 2.817 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 30 for F3E and F3B RMS curvature error: 38.59 36.04 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.1 -0.6 dcts
Cm error -1 4 mcts
Upper transition point 0.2 0.51 %

Figure 404: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 405: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 533: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.8461 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 1.7417 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.16429 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.21154 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.6849 deg
Release Angle: 1.401 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.1568 deg
Camber deflection: 6.5579 deg

Table 534: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79915 -0.0015473
0.43299 -0.024054
0.21749 -0.024054
0.0116 -0.024054
0 -0.0040447
0 0
0 0.0057373
0.030055 0.055619
0.34339 0.055619
0.66336 0.055619
0.94211 0.0032805
1 0

Table 535: Base 64 representation:


H5WfYL8OSKLXEhA

Figure 406: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

139
Profile: mh32 Table 540: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.048 4.394 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 32 for F3E and F3B RMS curvature error: 26.58 26.89 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.4 0.1 dcts
Cm error 2 15 mcts
Upper transition point 0.86 -0.54 %

Figure 407: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 408: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 537: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.7015 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 2.402 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.32565 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.29054 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.073 deg
Release Angle: 2.3495 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.4547 deg
Camber deflection: 9.8042 deg

Table 538: Controlpoints


1 0
0.81638 0.0026055
0.40035 -0.022306
0.20986 -0.022306
0.016423 -0.022306
0 -0.005417
0 0
0 0.010252
0.048409 0.066485
0.3474 0.066485
0.65331 0.066485
0.9469 0.0036072
1 0

Table 539: Base 64 representation:


K2WecQ6NPKKUDjA

Figure 409: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

140
Profile: mh42 Table 544: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.806 3.731 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 42 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 20.44 21.06 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.1 -0.5 dcts
Cm error -5 13 mcts
Upper transition point 1.47 0.28 %

Figure 410: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 411: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 541: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.9229 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.8834 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.34311 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.22605 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.2907 deg
Release Angle: 0.73572 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.8833 deg
Camber deflection: 6.6191 deg

Table 542: Controlpoints


1 0
0.76112 -0.0079646
0.45115 -0.027099
0.21976 -0.027099
0.011471 -0.027099
0 -0.0038867
0 0
0 0.01073
0.050335 0.063072
0.3345 0.063072
0.55541 0.063072
0.85561 0.0085303
1 0

Table 543: Base 64 representation:


L1VVbJ8OTMVcGgA

Figure 412: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

141
Profile: mh43 Table 548: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.878 3.374 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 43 for F3B and F3E RMS curvature error: 22.57 24.78 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.8 -0.3 dcts
Cm error 3 -1 mcts
Upper transition point -0.73 -0.94 %

Figure 413: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 414: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 545: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.4976 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.7587 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.30785 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.23691 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.2869 deg
Release Angle: 0.89679 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.6648 deg
Camber deflection: 5.5616 deg

Table 546: Controlpoints


1 0
0.81892 -0.0039407
0.45339 -0.02637
0.22102 -0.02637
0.011546 -0.02637
0 -0.0041036
0 0
0 0.010852
0.057382 0.059599
0.33494 0.059599
0.56917 0.059599
0.81099 0.010039
1 0

Table 547: Base 64 representation:


M0VXZK8OTLcVFhA

Figure 415: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

142
Profile: mh44 Table 552: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.672 3.094 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 44 for flying wings RMS curvature error: 32.64 32.39 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.3 0.2 dcts
Cm error -20 -23 mcts
Upper transition point -0.71 -0.26 %

Figure 416: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 417: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 549: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.6409 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 1.5684 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.90167 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.22056 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.1673 deg
Release Angle: -3.3628 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.0958 deg
Camber deflection: 5.733 deg

Table 550: Controlpoints


1 0
0.93197 -0.0094957
0.38351 -0.033369
0.22624 -0.033369
0.051082 -0.033369
0 -0.0086666
0 0
0 0.022792
0.086416 0.06344
0.27922 0.06344
0.60847 0.06344
0.86421 0.0028938
1 0

Table 551: Base 64 representation:


XrSsbRxONOWSKaA

Figure 418: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

143
Profile: mh45 Table 556: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.119 3.847 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 45 for flying wings RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.7 0.3 dcts
Cm error -21 -22 mcts
Upper transition point -0.43 -0.06 %

Figure 419: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 420: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 553: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.8356 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 1.7527 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1184 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.19236 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.4206 deg
Release Angle: -1.7896 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.8875 deg
Camber deflection: 9.0979 deg

Table 554: Controlpoints


1 0
0.61036 -0.023831
0.26805 -0.032646
0.22399 -0.032646
0.037978 -0.032646
0 -0.0069788
0 0
0 0.024655
0.081532 0.066253
0.27578 0.066253
0.58747 0.066253
0.80704 -0.00026716
1 0

Table 555: Base 64 representation:


YsSccO0OEOeuEsA

Figure 421: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

144
Profile: mh46 Table 560: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.936 4.507 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 46 for flying wings RMS curvature error: 81.75 79.82 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.5 0.5 dcts
Cm error -3 -15 mcts
Upper transition point -0.75 -0.25 %

Figure 422: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 423: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 557: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.056 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 1.5189 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.22525 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.25711 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.4592 deg
Release Angle: -4.4774 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.6829 deg
Camber deflection: 1.2055 deg

Table 558: Controlpoints


1 0
0.96361 -0.0065531
0.34214 -0.031289
0.22599 -0.031289
0.035621 -0.031289
0 -0.0078139
0 0
0 0.0064624
0.027811 0.060101
0.32688 0.060101
0.56333 0.060101
0.87175 0.0028032
1 0

Table 559: Base 64 representation:


H6VWaQ1OKNTNNZA

Figure 424: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

145
Profile: mh49 Table 564: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.229 5.21 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.5 -0.6 dcts
Cm error -19 -28 mcts
Upper transition point 0.56 1.07 %

Figure 425: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 426: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 561: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.4968 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: -0.93291 % @0.81C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.6744 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.00011985 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.6334 deg
Release Angle: -12.2005 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.7567 deg
Camber deflection: -7.4438 deg

Table 562: Controlpoints


1 0
0.97181 -0.01055
0.50481 -0.045015
0.28839 -0.045015
0.0058333 -0.045015
0 -6.8287e-005
0 0
0 0.017284
0.066445 0.059986
0.30256 0.059986
0.58213 0.059986
0.71085 -0.01963
1 0

Table 563: Base 64 representation:


SxTaaA-STTrPTMA

Figure 427: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

146
Profile: mh60 Table 568: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.803 2.76 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 60 for flying wings RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.6 0 dcts
Cm error -44 -46 mcts
Upper transition point -1.05 -0.04 %

Figure 428: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 429: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 565: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.0791 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 1.8328 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.80802 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.25328 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 1.7848 deg
Release Angle: -1.2147 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.2796 deg
Camber deflection: 8.0649 deg

Table 566: Controlpoints


1 0
1 0
0.42501 -0.032936
0.22391 -0.032936
0.044947 -0.032936
0 -0.0087118
0 0
0 0.019637
0.071586 0.068253
0.27686 0.068253
0.6101 0.068253
0.81574 -0.0010366
1 0

Table 567: Base 64 representation:


SuSssRyOROeACeA

Figure 430: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

147
Profile: mh61 Table 572: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.513 1.844 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 61 for flying wings RMS curvature error: 40.65 40.71 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 -0.5 dcts
Cm error 4 5 mcts
Upper transition point 0.19 1.28 %

Figure 431: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 432: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 569: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.262 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.4934 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.35 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.22529 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.0565 deg
Release Angle: -10.8289 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.2625 deg
Camber deflection: -6.5664 deg

Table 570: Controlpoints


1 0
0.98313 -0.0059262
0.40538 -0.03716
0.27626 -0.03716
0.039597 -0.03716
0 -0.0077118
0 0
0 0.013203
0.074713 0.065783
0.32171 0.065783
0.61163 0.065783
0.83976 -0.0064378
1 0

Table 571: Base 64 representation:


NwVbcN2SLQaKTOA

Figure 433: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

148
Profile: mh62 Table 576: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.495 4.585 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 62 for flying wings RMS curvature error: 40.13 38.23 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.4 0.4 dcts
Cm error -34 -39 mcts
Upper transition point -0.81 -0.13 %

Figure 434: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 435: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 573: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.3118 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 1.6302 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.54573 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.23131 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.9571 deg
Release Angle: -1.2352 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.2305 deg
Camber deflection: 5.9953 deg

Table 574: Controlpoints


1 0
0.39937 -0.02847
0.31253 -0.031189
0.22418 -0.031189
0.037823 -0.031189
0 -0.0076371
0 0
0 0.015012
0.061945 0.06227
0.2794 0.06227
0.60724 0.06227
0.8186 0.00077041
1 0

Table 575: Base 64 representation:


PxSsbQ0OHNe5DeA

Figure 436: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

149
Profile: mh64 Table 580: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.292 3.694 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 64 for flying wings RMS curvature error: 33.39 37.39 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.3 0.9 dcts
Cm error -22 -14 mcts
Upper transition point -0.51 -1.09 %

Figure 437: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 438: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 577: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.6168 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 1.466 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.3677 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.20949 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.8837 deg
Release Angle: -0.8202 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.5567 deg
Camber deflection: 4.7365 deg

Table 578: Controlpoints


1 0
0.468 -0.021014
0.35058 -0.029584
0.22448 -0.029584
0.030772 -0.029584
0 -0.0062597
0 0
0 0.011505
0.054 0.056953
0.28154 0.056953
0.60406 0.056953
0.82202 0.0019311
1 0

Table 579: Base 64 representation:


NzSsYO2OKNszDeA

Figure 439: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

150
Profile: mh70 Table 584: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.63 3.438 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 70 for fying wing (full size) RMS curvature error: 28.76 30.93 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.9 2.5 dcts
Cm error 3 4 mcts
Upper transition point -4.35 -3.2 %

Figure 440: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 441: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 581: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.1032 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 3.1195 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.9844 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.51743 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.3995 deg
Release Angle: 3.8762 deg
Nose Incidence: 16.1913 deg
Camber deflection: 20.0675 deg

Table 582: Controlpoints


1 0
0.86663 0.0015746
0.36301 -0.026388
0.20186 -0.026388
0.19378 -0.026388
0 -0.026388
0 0
0 0.036332
0.099779 0.085913
0.29332 0.085913
0.58763 0.085913
0.74356 0.031832
1 0

Table 583: Base 64 representation:


bpTbk DNNLnNHlA

Figure 442: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

151
Profile: mh78 Table 588: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.552 4.144 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 78 for flying wings (hang glider) RMS curvature error: 97.15 Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.6 -0.3 dcts
Cm error -15 -10 mcts
Upper transition point 2.45 2.38 %

Figure 443: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 444: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 585: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.5122 % @0.22C
Maximum Camber: 2.768 % @0.17C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.8476 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.2455 deg
Release Angle: -1.1626 deg
Nose Incidence: 21.7572 deg
Camber deflection: 20.5947 deg

Table 586: Controlpoints


1 0
0.94161 -0.0023302
0.78135 -0.046934
0.31507 -0.046934
0 -0.046934
0 -0.0092294
0 0
0 0.03258
0.041382 0.099815
0.20379 0.099815
0.37722 0.099815
0.75729 -0.00016863
1 0

Table 587: Base 64 representation:


VyNOqN UrUZRDeA

Figure 445: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

152
Profile: mh80 Table 592: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.495 4.063 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 80 for flying wings (hang glider) RMS curvature error: 28.15 26.2 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.4 0.1 dcts
Cm error 14 -7 mcts
Upper transition point -0.1 0.12 %

Figure 446: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 447: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 589: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.7233 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 2.9693 % @0.21C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.561 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0.32527 deg
Release Angle: 0.79567 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.8337 deg
Camber deflection: 16.6294 deg

Table 590: Controlpoints


1 0
0.95887 0.00045449
0.75031 -0.034199
0.26281 -0.034199
0 -0.034199
0 -0.0059139
0 0
0 0.024339
0.056925 0.093253
0.22012 0.093253
0.43257 0.093253
0.76207 0.0039799
1 0

Table 591: Base 64 representation:


RuORnL RpPbLAhA

Figure 448: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

153
Profile: mh81 Table 596: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.217 4.912 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 81 for flying wings (hang glider) RMS curvature error: 37.33 35.99 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.8 1.3 dcts
Cm error 36 39 mcts
Upper transition point -0.75 -1.47 %

Figure 449: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 450: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 593: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.9871 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 3.5331 % @0.22C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.1051 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.5372 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.5286 deg
Release Angle: -6.8631 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.971 deg
Camber deflection: 11.1079 deg

Table 594: Controlpoints


1 0
0.99423 -0.0016135
0.56068 -0.029704
0.25449 -0.029704
0.0056712 -0.029704
0 -0.0097941
0 0
0 0.03079
0.067554 0.10025
0.22493 0.10025
0.44572 0.10025
0.76382 0.0078398
1 0

Table 595: Base 64 representation:


UsOSqV-QaNbDUVA

Figure 451: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

154
Profile: mh82 Table 600: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.058 3.043 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 82 for flying wings (hang glider) RMS curvature error: 39.04 39.87 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.4 -0.8 dcts
Cm error 40 35 mcts
Upper transition point -0.91 -0.12 %

Figure 452: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 453: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 597: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.3132 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 4.0882 % @0.24C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.8054 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.5328 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.9465 deg
Release Angle: -1.1471 deg
Nose Incidence: 21.2748 deg
Camber deflection: 20.1277 deg

Table 598: Controlpoints


1 0
0.96676 -0.0029785
0.40421 -0.02583
0.20079 -0.02583
0.0087563 -0.02583
0 -0.0094594
0 0
0 0.038605
0.079684 0.10743
0.22954 0.10743
0.45764 0.10743
0.76519 0.011591
1 0

Table 599: Base 64 representation:


XpPTtX8NQLcHJeA

Figure 454: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

155
Profile: mh83 Table 604: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.724 3.873 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 83 for flying wings (hang glider) RMS curvature error: 14.55 16.32 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 -0.3 dcts
Cm error -8 -27 mcts
Upper transition point -1.26 -0.02 %

Figure 455: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 456: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 601: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.3162 % @0.22C
Maximum Camber: 5.1579 % @0.3C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.5207 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.5881 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0.85153 deg
Release Angle: 4.3364 deg
Nose Incidence: 20.2571 deg
Camber deflection: 24.5935 deg

Table 602: Controlpoints


1 0
0.64305 0.024401
0.26251 -0.021189
0.10178 -0.021189
0.0040125 -0.021189
0 -0.0083206
0 0
0 0.036276
0.078307 0.1169
0.24281 0.1169
0.4768 0.1169
0.78169 0.018186
1 0

Table 603: Base 64 representation:


UqQUxZ8HLJbfBmA

Figure 457: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

156
Profile: mh84 Table 608: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.927 3.084 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 84 for flying wings (hang RMS curvature error: 27.76 27.71 %
glider) CD error 0.4 1 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -13 -16 mcts
Upper transition point -2 -3.18 %

Figure 459: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 458: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 605: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.7246 % @0.2C
Maximum Camber: 4.835 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.8931 %C
Lower nose radius: 9.1399 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0.7217 deg
Release Angle: 4.9012 deg
Nose Incidence: 22.548 deg
Camber deflection: 27.4493 deg

Table 606: Controlpoints


1 0
0.6306 0.029334
0.27875 -0.027902
0.099229 -0.027902
0 -0.027902
0 -0.0069782
0 0
0 0.036366
0.050956 0.11452
0.23975 0.11452
0.49219 0.11452
0.78624 0.019687
1 0

Table 607: Base 64 representation:


UxPVwQ GNMbgBnA
Figure 460: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

157
Profile: mh91 Table 612: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.791 5.207 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 91 parafoil RMS curvature error: 44.94 53.27 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.3 -0.5 dcts
Cm error -9 -19 mcts
Upper transition point 1.41 1.81 %

Figure 461: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 462: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 609: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.9537 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 1.6526 % @0.17C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3441 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0458 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 1.5732 deg
Release Angle: -0.2926 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.6345 deg
Camber deflection: 12.3419 deg

Table 610: Controlpoints


1 0
0.94576 -0.0010217
0.66744 -0.061512
0.36784 -0.061512
0.13853 -0.061512
0 -0.031078
0 0
0 0.016242
0.029439 0.089792
0.25832 0.089792
0.48597 0.089792
0.84464 0.0013395
1 0

Table 611: Base 64 representation:


M4RUlgnYeaTKCfA

Figure 463: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

158
Profile: mh92 Table 616: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.479 5.74 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 92 parafoil RMS curvature error: 26.67 29.3 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.1 0.3 dcts
Cm error -8 23 mcts
Upper transition point 1.03 -0.15 %

Figure 464: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 465: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 613: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.468 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 1.6582 % @0.17C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5645 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0904 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.6887 deg
Release Angle: -0.88645 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.6875 deg
Camber deflection: 11.8011 deg

Table 614: Controlpoints


1 0
0.93592 -0.002496
0.68246 -0.064555
0.36914 -0.064555
0.14743 -0.064555
0 -0.032737
0 0
0 0.019536
0.036594 0.09213
0.25652 0.09213
0.48762 0.09213
0.83623 0.0013088
1 0

Table 615: Base 64 representation:


O2QUmglYgcUNDeA

Figure 466: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

159
Profile: mh93 Table 620: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.175 3.855 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 93 parafoil RMS curvature error: 17.04 16.8 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.2 0.1 dcts
Cm error -7 8 mcts
Upper transition point 0.99 0.38 %

Figure 467: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 468: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 617: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.9704 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 1.6477 % @0.16C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.7502 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1385 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.7155 deg
Release Angle: -1.4723 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.6262 deg
Camber deflection: 11.154 deg

Table 618: Controlpoints


1 0
0.92514 -0.0043559
0.69642 -0.067764
0.37065 -0.067764
0.15606 -0.067764
0 -0.034416
0 0
0 0.022468
0.043266 0.09421
0.25472 0.09421
0.49055 0.09421
0.82886 0.0011514
1 0

Table 619: Base 64 representation:


P0QUngkYgsVQEsA

Figure 469: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

160
Profile: mh94 Table 624: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.531 4.996 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 94 parafoil RMS curvature error: 20.3 20.88 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1 -0.4 dcts
Cm error -6 17 mcts
Upper transition point 1.67 -0.12 %

Figure 470: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 471: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 621: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.0248 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 1.3939 % @0.71C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 5.5257 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1216 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.3981 deg
Release Angle: 9.1908 deg
Nose Incidence: 20.1944 deg
Camber deflection: 29.3851 deg

Table 622: Controlpoints


1 0
0.87881 0.0052736
0.58482 -0.068724
0.34077 -0.068724
0.13046 -0.068724
0 -0.031232
0 0
0 0.082383
0.21103 0.091536
0.33491 0.091536
0.42129 0.091536
0.71634 0.080748
1 0

Table 623: Base 64 representation:


5YVImsmWYs3TPuA

Figure 472: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

161
Profile: mh95 Table 628: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.391 4.631 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 95 parafoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.5 -1.5 dcts
Cm error 27 11 mcts
Upper transition point 1.61 2.27 %

Figure 473: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 474: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 625: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.8598 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 1.4953 % @0.21C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.2702 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2522 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.0056 deg
Release Angle: 7.7525 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.9504 deg
Camber deflection: 22.703 deg

Table 626: Controlpoints


1 0
0.83943 -0.0021027
0.73658 -0.064818
0.34692 -0.064818
0.18074 -0.064818
0 -0.038844
0 0
0 0.025225
0.027056 0.093799
0.33638 0.093799
0.40077 0.093799
0.69584 0.088684
1 0

Table 627: Base 64 representation:


R6WGnlfWlc8mTsA

Figure 475: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

162
Profile: mh102 Table 632: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.861 2.813 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 102 for stall controlled wind RMS curvature error: 72.54 89.56 %
turbines (root) CD error 2.7 3.6 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 10 14 mcts
Upper transition point -3.27 -4.54 %

Figure 477: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 476: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 629: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.0119 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 3.0141 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.6991 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.98439 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.3587 deg
Release Angle: 5.0249 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.6393 deg
Camber deflection: 18.6642 deg

Table 630: Controlpoints


1 0
0.76472 -0.0067956
0.38708 -0.058953
0.19094 -0.058953
0.074994 -0.058953
0 -0.022185
0 0
0 0.043199
0.10371 0.1133
0.28493 0.1133
0.45353 0.1133
0.59412 0.084086
1 0

Table 631: Base 64 representation:


YoSPvYmMQZvZPnA
Figure 478: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

163
Profile: mh104 Table 636: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.356 3.582 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 104 for stall controlled wind RMS curvature error: 26.01 27.62 %
turbines CD error 1.9 1.5 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 0 22 mcts
Upper transition point -2.97 -3.33 %

Figure 480: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 479: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 633: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.2625 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 2.0299 % @0.27C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.7438 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.40133 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.8054 deg
Release Angle: -1.8422 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.5045 deg
Camber deflection: 10.6622 deg

Table 634: Controlpoints


1 0
0.93927 -0.009341
0.51335 -0.056022
0.2643 -0.056022
0.073422 -0.056022
0 -0.014016
0 0
0 0.036897
0.1171 0.096611
0.26921 0.096611
0.48853 0.096611
0.73048 0.023867
1 0

Table 635: Base 64 representation:


YjRToQtRWYhLPsA
Figure 481: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

164
Profile: mh106 Table 640: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.136 3.294 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 106 for stall controlled wind RMS curvature error: 30.52 31.27 %
turbines CD error 0 -0.3 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 1 18 mcts
Upper transition point -0.58 -0.72 %

Figure 483: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 482: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 637: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.0671 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 0.99313 % @0.25C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.94772 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.39972 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.3891 deg
Release Angle: -2.088 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.9567 deg
Camber deflection: 4.8688 deg

Table 638: Controlpoints


1 0
0.92936 -0.010283
0.52235 -0.055446
0.27357 -0.055446
0.078224 -0.055446
0 -0.014438
0 0
0 0.023431
0.086895 0.075241
0.26579 0.075241
0.43762 0.075241
0.71093 0.020754
1 0

Table 639: Base 64 representation:


UqRPgRtSWYgMOcA
Figure 484: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

165
Profile: mh108 Table 644: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.396 2.62 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 108 for stall controlled wind RMS curvature error: 31.76 28.94 %
turbines CD error 0.6 1.2 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 5 -5 mcts
Upper transition point -1.59 -1.91 %

Figure 486: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 485: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 641: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.9627 % @0.24C
Maximum Camber: 1.1041 % @0.19C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.77964 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.44996 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.4737 deg
Release Angle: -2.166 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.4934 deg
Camber deflection: 2.3274 deg

Table 642: Controlpoints


1 0
0.88286 -0.016261
0.50529 -0.049488
0.27298 -0.049488
0.026684 -0.049488
0 -0.0089468
0 0
0 0.01905
0.06982 0.070524
0.22072 0.070524
0.43781 0.070524
0.67112 0.020523
1 0

Table 643: Base 64 representation:


RrOSeM5RUVkVNcA
Figure 487: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

166
Profile: mh110 Table 648: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.159 4.022 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 110 for stall controlled wind RMS curvature error: 65.38 65.74 %
turbines (tip) CD error -1.5 -1.2 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 7 -6 mcts
Upper transition point 2.03 2.2 %

Figure 489: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 488: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 645: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.0147 % @0.24C
Maximum Camber: 1.083 % @0.17C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.26399 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.25588 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.5399 deg
Release Angle: -3.8074 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.3723 deg
Camber deflection: 1.5649 deg

Table 646: Controlpoints


1 0
0.87858 -0.019399
0.55616 -0.041477
0.33255 -0.041477
0.031729 -0.041477
0 -0.007357
0 0
0 0.0087381
0.043385 0.060188
0.21747 0.060188
0.38597 0.060188
0.69841 0.0077003
1 0

Table 647: Base 64 representation:


JyOOaL5VVSfeMaA
Figure 490: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

167
Profile: mh113 Table 652: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.904 5.944 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 113 for a propeller for ultra- RMS curvature error: 21.45 23.2 %
light CD error 0.2 -0.3 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 7 -1 mcts
Upper transition point -1.53 -1.22 %

Figure 492: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 491: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 649: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.5958 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 7.0016 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.3804 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2243 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.4551 deg
Release Angle: 18.718 deg
Nose Incidence: 22.2375 deg
Camber deflection: 40.9554 deg

Table 650: Controlpoints


1 0
0.77945 0.05291
0.27719 -0.021483
0.10532 -0.021483
0.038386 -0.021483
0 -0.017456
0 0
0 0.048062
0.1025 0.13935
0.38506 0.13935
0.66779 0.13935
0.99101 0.003992
1 0

Table 651: Base 64 representation:


WuZs6zoHMJCUM9A
Figure 493: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

168
Profile: mh114 Table 656: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.592 5.06 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 114 for a propeller for ultra- RMS curvature error: 23.64 25.72 %
light CD error -1.5 -1.9 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 5 8 mcts
Upper transition point -1.2 -1.09 %

Figure 495: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 494: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 653: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.03 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 6.5644 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.7735 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.5563 deg
Release Angle: 19.4462 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.0331 deg
Camber deflection: 36.4793 deg

Table 654: Controlpoints


1 0
0.77883 0.053784
0.28721 -0.017992
0.078205 -0.017992
0 -0.017992
0 -0.004994
0 0
0 0.033792
0.096582 0.12739
0.38883 0.12739
0.67601 0.12739
0.97633 0.011151
1 0

Table 655: Base 64 representation:


RvZe1S FPIGUN-A
Figure 496: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

169
Profile: mh115 Table 660: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.946 2.541 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 115 for a propeller for ultra- RMS curvature error: 23.15 22.8 %
light CD error 1.5 -1.4 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -2 6 mcts
Upper transition point 0.48 -0.88 %

Figure 498: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 497: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 657: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.0753 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 5.5749 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3705 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.6785 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.3915 deg
Release Angle: 16.2876 deg
Nose Incidence: 16.1337 deg
Camber deflection: 32.4213 deg

Table 658: Controlpoints


1 0
0.77659 0.045826
0.24869 -0.015959
0.089328 -0.015959
0.00081048 -0.015959
0 -0.0028519
0 0
0 0.029469
0.095052 0.10818
0.38109 0.10818
0.64804 0.10818
0.94976 0.01927
1 0

Table 659: Base 64 representation:


RvYctL-GLHLTK5A
Figure 499: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

170
Profile: mh116 Table 664: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.378 4.426 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 116 for a propeller for ultralight RMS curvature error: 22.59 22.39 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.3 -0.7 dcts
Cm error -9 7 mcts
Upper transition point 2.05 -0.97 %

Figure 500: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 501: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 661: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.7934 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 4.085 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.55431 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.25272 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.5683 deg
Release Angle: 9.9743 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.9643 deg
Camber deflection: 19.9387 deg

Table 662: Controlpoints


1 0
0.77811 0.02211
0.29315 -0.019592
0.1094 -0.019592
0.026603 -0.019592
0 -0.0066949
0 0
0 0.016518
0.073835 0.08779
0.41607 0.08779
0.62391 0.08779
0.908 0.023378
1 0

Table 663: Base 64 representation:


M0bXkWvHNIRUKvA

Figure 502: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

171
Profile: mh117 Table 668: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.953 3.723 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 117 for a propeller for ultralight RMS curvature error: 24.69 24.05 %
(tip) CD error -0.4 0.3 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 6 25 mcts
Upper transition point 0.2 -1.08 %

Figure 504: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 503: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 665: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.8207 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 2.7224 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.77835 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.65729 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.3766 deg
Release Angle: 5.7911 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.2126 deg
Camber deflection: 12.0037 deg

Table 666: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80155 0.0072867
0.34651 -0.028066
0.15984 -0.028066
0.083119 -0.028066
0 -0.019085
0 0
0 0.021161
0.086295 0.074316
0.34948 0.074316
0.48401 0.074316
0.61225 0.064744
1 0

Table 667: Base 64 representation:


SvWNgrfKOM3TIoA
Figure 505: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

172
Profile: mh120 Table 672: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.389 7.141 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 120 for tip section of a propeller RMS curvature error: 77 76.84 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -5.4 3.6 dcts
Cm error -5 14 mcts
Upper transition point -1.73 2.49 %

Figure 506: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 507: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 669: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.5507 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 2.5898 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.70651 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.42701 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.0963 deg
Release Angle: 2.3822 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.8923 deg
Camber deflection: 10.2745 deg

Table 670: Controlpoints


1 0
0.91397 -0.0092939
0.45551 -0.033135
0.25832 -0.033135
0.13376 -0.033135
0 -0.019513
0 0
0 0.023382
0.11608 0.083249
0.34724 0.083249
0.60835 0.083249
0.88172 0.022842
1 0

Table 671: Base 64 representation:


SqWajlfRROTSTjA

Figure 508: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

173
Profile: mh121 Table 676: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.32 4.863 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 121 for tip section of a propeller RMS curvature error: 30.16 29.79 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.6 0.3 dcts
Cm error -18 6 mcts
Upper transition point -1.34 2.16 %

Figure 509: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 510: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 673: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.7296 % @0.36C
Maximum Camber: 2.9926 % @0.63C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.45443 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.13812 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.794 deg
Release Angle: 10.9767 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.663 deg
Camber deflection: 17.6397 deg

Table 674: Controlpoints


1 0
0.78293 0.025039
0.50249 -0.023994
0.24092 -0.023994
0.069433 -0.023994
0 -0.007996
0 0
0 0.023032
0.1751 0.068601
0.47662 0.068601
0.63071 0.068601
0.81008 0.052219
1 0

Table 675: Base 64 representation:


VnfTsVtPWKwcKxA

Figure 511: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

174
Profile: mh200 Table 680: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.352 3.164 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 200 for a canard airplane (main RMS curvature error: 62.16 57.74 %
wing) CD error 0.7 1 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 18 15 mcts
Upper transition point -1.81 -1.98 %

Figure 513: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 512: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 677: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.9766 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 2.1291 % @0.5C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0088 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.22738 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.4251 deg
Release Angle: 8.1869 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.1078 deg
Camber deflection: 18.2946 deg

Table 678: Controlpoints


1 0
0.83384 0.011544
0.71484 -0.044479
0.34554 -0.044479
0.056351 -0.044479
0 -0.0092423
0 0
0 0.026651
0.10561 0.085574
0.40321 0.085574
0.57159 0.085574
0.67726 0.070956
1 0

Table 679: Base 64 representation:


UuaSkN1WjT0kJsA
Figure 514: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

175
Profile: mh201 Table 684: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.4 5.423 ects
Information: Martin Hepperle MH 201 for a canard airplane (ca- RMS curvature error: 27.39 27.11 %
nard) CD error 1.1 2.5 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 47 34 mcts
Upper transition point -2.18 -2.45 %

Figure 516: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 515: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 681: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.1032 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 2.5434 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5739 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.47541 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.2234 deg
Release Angle: 11.2388 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.1342 deg
Camber deflection: 23.373 deg

Table 682: Controlpoints


1 0
0.82033 0.022466
0.72033 -0.040496
0.33094 -0.040496
0.053926 -0.040496
0 -0.013073
0 0
0 0.03513
0.11762 0.090637
0.36257 0.090637
0.51112 0.090637
0.70618 0.080658
1 0

Table 683: Base 64 representation:


ZqXPmV1VkR4oJxA
Figure 517: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

176
Profile: miley Table 688: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.453 5.465 ects
Information: Miley MO6-13-128 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf 90.65 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.2 0.1 dcts
Cm error -38 -24 mcts
Upper transition point -2.92 -3.95 %

Figure 518: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 519: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 685: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.7917 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 5.1749 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.61689 %C
Lower nose radius: 866.026 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0 deg
Release Angle: 4.3501 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.6095 deg
Camber deflection: 18.9596 deg

Table 686: Controlpoints


1 0
1 0
0.52412 -0.014197
0.18793 -0.014197
7.1414e-006 -0.014197
0 -0.0064211
0 0
0 0.019291
0.090491 0.11561
0.35019 0.11561
0.52761 0.11561
0.62293 0.028684
1 0

Table 687: Base 64 representation:


LuWRws MaGyAAmA

Figure 520: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

177
Profile: mrc-16 Table 692: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.792 4.141 ects
Information: Drela MRC-16 RMS curvature error: 51.66 47.26 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.5 -0.1 dcts
Cm error 0 22 mcts
Upper transition point 0.62 -0.65 %

Figure 521: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 522: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 689: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.9021 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 3.1782 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.074502 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.26 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.88624 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.6504 deg
Release Angle: 4.4609 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.8097 deg
Camber deflection: 14.2706 deg

Table 690: Controlpoints


1 -0.00037251
0.8707 -0.01024
0.58001 -0.03817
0.30594 -0.03817
0.1751 -0.03817
0 -0.032164
0 0
0 0.028792
0.098691 0.10116
0.36491 0.10116
0.61684 0.10116
0.89551 0.025046
1 0.00037251

Table 691: Base 64 representation:


SuXZq1bUZQRUUmC

Figure 523: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

178
Profile: mrc-20 Table 696: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.697 6.777 ects
Information: Drela MRC-20 RMS curvature error: 57.86 90.84 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -13.8 -7 dcts
Cm error 2 -17 mcts
Upper transition point 1.6 1.34 %

Figure 524: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 525: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 693: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.585 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 3.0794 % @0.31C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.050004 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.0304 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.39276 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 24.3781 deg
Release Angle: 7.0872 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.919 deg
Camber deflection: 25.0062 deg

Table 694: Controlpoints


1 -0.00025002
0.65463 -0.031084
0.50098 -0.047739
0.38812 -0.047739
0.3391 -0.047739
0 -0.029798
0 0
0 0.041683
0.12836 0.10813
0.38229 0.10813
0.53245 0.10813
0.75044 0.087528
1 0.00025002

Table 695: Base 64 representation:


ZqYQtnIZMUzrbrB

Figure 526: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

179
Profile: ms317 Table 700: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.152 4.821 ects
Information: NASA/Langley MS(1)-0317 general aviation airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.8 -4.5 dcts
Cm error 28 42 mcts
Upper transition point 8.19 7.64 %

Figure 527: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 528: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 697: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.0067 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 1.6879 % @0.75C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.72199 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.5826 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.1849 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.048 deg
Release Angle: 8.9239 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.2343 deg
Camber deflection: 21.1582 deg

Table 698: Controlpoints


1 -0.0036099
0.79048 0.014351
0.69048 -0.070093
0.37524 -0.070093
0.29653 -0.070093
0 -0.065722
0 0
0 0.091708
0.27529 0.099986
0.37467 0.099986
0.56857 0.099986
0.66829 0.079874
1 0.0036099

Table 699: Base 64 representation:


6RYUq7NYgewqJtS

Figure 529: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

180
Profile: mue139 Table 704: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.473 7.257 ects
Information: MUE 139 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.9 -1 dcts
Cm error -28 -20 mcts
Upper transition point 0.04 0.47 %

Figure 530: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 531: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 701: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.7991 % @0.21C
Maximum Camber: 4.7206 % @0.3C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.0461 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.5485 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.9885 deg
Release Angle: 5.115 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.7362 deg
Camber deflection: 18.8512 deg

Table 702: Controlpoints


1 0
0.2447 -0.011592
0.1447 -0.03209
0.06699 -0.03209
0.046223 -0.03209
0 -0.028881
0 0
0 0.022944
0.038592 0.11495
0.25 0.11495
0.37272 0.11495
0.51945 0.094362
1 0

Table 703: Base 64 representation:


N1QKw5UEFO04NnA

Figure 532: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

181
Profile: n5h10 Table 708: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.146 5.091 ects
Information: NACA 5-H-10 rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -12.5 -12.9 dcts
Cm error -20 -41 mcts
Upper transition point 23.22 24.31 %

Figure 533: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 534: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 705: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9495 % @0.41C
Maximum Camber: 2.2364 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.748 %C
Lower nose radius: 100.5611 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.4007 deg
Release Angle: -1.9524 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.1267 deg
Camber deflection: 5.1742 deg

Table 706: Controlpoints


1 0
0.8031 -0.019489
0.8031 -0.029
0.7 -0.029
0.0001232 -0.029
0 -0.0090881
0 0
0 0.029223
0.17125 0.072
0.4 0.072
0.61782 0.072
0.77635 0.0068252
1 0

Table 707: Base 64 representation:


akaXfU sWMk IsA

Figure 535: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

182
Profile: n5h15 Table 712: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.915 7.012 ects
Information: NACA 5-H-15 rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 22.2 -22.2 dcts
Cm error -59 37 mcts
Upper transition point -11.56 12.08 %

Figure 536: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 537: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 709: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.4678 % @0.41C
Maximum Camber: 2.8339 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.37299 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.3755 deg
Release Angle: -3.852 deg
Nose Incidence: -0.17204 deg
Camber deflection: -4.0241 deg

Table 710: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80045 -0.035329
0.76641 -0.0496
0.5 -0.0496
0 -0.0496
0 -0.01134
0 0
0 0.016656
0.11156 0.1056
0.4 0.1056
0.60715 0.1056
0.77916 0.0090079
1 0

Table 711: Base 64 representation:


KtaWsP ghVj2OaA

Figure 538: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

183
Profile: n5h20 Table 716: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.416 7.492 ects
Information: NACA 5-H-20 rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -9.5 -10.2 dcts
Cm error 106 118 mcts
Upper transition point 3.54 4.04 %

Figure 539: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 540: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 713: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 19.9712 % @0.41C
Maximum Camber: 4.4396 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.2836 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.0248 deg
Release Angle: -3.7125 deg
Nose Incidence: 16.3757 deg
Camber deflection: 12.6632 deg

Table 714: Controlpoints


1 0
0.81433 -0.03182
0.81433 -0.059
0.7 -0.059
0 -0.059
0 -0.013071
0 0
0 0.064291
0.18882 0.144
0.4 0.144
0.6273 0.144
0.79153 0.0083729
1 0

Table 715: Base 64 representation:


shaY8O sYZj NaA

Figure 541: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

184
Profile: n6h15 Table 720: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 7.504 11.155 ects
Information: NACA 6-H-15 rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -10.4 -10.5 dcts
Cm error 30 8 mcts
Upper transition point 1.08 2.2 %

Figure 542: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 543: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 717: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.6475 % @0.41C
Maximum Camber: 4.5115 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.1711 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.19301 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.6702 deg
Release Angle: -3.7568 deg
Nose Incidence: 21.6524 deg
Camber deflection: 17.8956 deg

Table 718: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80337 -0.033229
0.80337 -0.0406
0.7 -0.0406
0.7 -0.0406
0 -0.030012
0 0
0 0.053421
0.19717 0.123
0.4 0.123
0.56555 0.123
0.78548 0.0077848
1 0

Table 719: Base 64 representation:


cgaSzuAsWRg NaA

Figure 544: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

185
Profile: n8h12 Table 724: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.557 6.539 ects
Information: NACA 8-H-12 rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: 30.94 30.92 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.2 1.9 dcts
Cm error 22 19 mcts
Upper transition point -0.89 -1.27 %

Figure 545: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 546: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 721: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.9936 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 3.5332 % @0.3C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.3385 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.58817 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.6656 deg
Release Angle: -5.7666 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.046 deg
Camber deflection: 11.2794 deg

Table 722: Controlpoints


1 0
0.91172 -0.01493
0.65088 -0.0249
0.3971 -0.0249
0.083188 -0.0249
0 -0.018061
0 0
0 0.057652
0.2132 0.0953
0.2997 0.0953
0.55308 0.0953
0.79837 -0.0068078
1 0

Table 723: Base 64 representation:


mSTXotyZbLslJXA

Figure 547: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

186
Profile: n9 Table 728: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.671 4.187 ects
Information: N-9 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.5 -4.8 dcts
Cm error 27 47 mcts
Upper transition point 8.74 8.09 %

Figure 548: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 549: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 725: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.4926 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 2.6836 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.27993 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3258 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.5715 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.7779 deg
Release Angle: 4.5235 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.3051 deg
Camber deflection: 14.8286 deg

Table 726: Controlpoints


1 -0.0013996
0.53107 -0.0084834
0.21317 -0.019331
0.15044 -0.019331
0.06693 -0.019331
0 -0.015969
0 0
0 0.035186
0.14007 0.068415
0.29862 0.068415
0.39682 0.068415
0.61651 0.068415
1 0.0013996

Table 727: Base 64 representation:


ghTJs0jKFI lMmH

Figure 550: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

187
Profile: n10 Table 732: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.273 5.08 ects
Information: N-10 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.6 -1.4 dcts
Cm error 49 38 mcts
Upper transition point 4.1 4.17 %

Figure 551: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 552: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 729: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.2759 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 3.5034 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.33985 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0634 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.4433 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.9021 deg
Release Angle: 6.1553 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.7052 deg
Camber deflection: 13.8605 deg

Table 730: Controlpoints


1 -0.0016992
0.50555 -0.012883
0.19209 -0.025745
0.15079 -0.025745
0.016462 -0.025745
0 -0.012586
0 0
0 0.02543
0.091223 0.090854
0.29755 0.090854
0.30457 0.090854
0.63166 0.090854
1 0.0016992

Table 731: Base 64 representation:


SrTBmf4KDL mRpJ

Figure 553: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

188
Profile: n11 Table 736: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.239 7.853 ects
Information: N-11 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.4 -1.7 dcts
Cm error -23 -20 mcts
Upper transition point 3.87 2.23 %

Figure 554: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 555: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 733: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.7386 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 4.3732 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.19995 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.035155 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.056 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.6621 deg
Release Angle: 7.8253 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.8521 deg
Camber deflection: 18.6774 deg

Table 734: Controlpoints


1 -0.00099974
0.38293 -0.0010621
0.19266 -0.020795
0.10048 -0.020795
0.061423 -0.020795
0 -0.020795
0 0
0 0.00096577
0.0039797 0.096577
0.39797 0.096577
0.49611 0.096577
0.77057 0.065302
1 0.00099974

Table 735: Base 64 representation:


B-ZKo ZGHJqwRsF

Figure 556: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

189
Profile: n0011sc Table 740: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.477 5.776 ects
Information: NASA/Langley 11 RMS curvature error: 6.03 5.45 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.8 -1.3 dcts
Cm error 8 -4 mcts
Upper transition point 1.09 1.1 %

Figure 557: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 558: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 737: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.9566 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 8.1694e-007 % @0.65C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 10.4858 %C
Lower nose radius: 10.4858 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 30.8836 deg
Release Angle: -1.7797e-005 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -1.7797e-005 deg

Table 738: Controlpoints


1 0
0.82529 -0.048262
0.54107 -0.054783
0.4 -0.054783
0.0040435 -0.054783
0 -0.016813
0 0
0 0.016813
0.0040435 0.054783
0.4 0.054783
0.54151 0.054783
0.82543 0.048221
1 0

Table 739: Base 64 representation:


U-aPXU-aPX33hgA

Figure 559: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

190
Profile: n12 Table 744: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.57 4.949 ects
Information: N-12 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -10.5 -11.1 dcts
Cm error -26 -28 mcts
Upper transition point 12.58 14.32 %

Figure 560: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 561: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 741: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.46 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 0.092809 % @0.14C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.84144 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.96003 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0 deg
Release Angle: -7.2652 deg
Nose Incidence: -0.09526 deg
Camber deflection: -7.3605 deg

Table 742: Controlpoints


1 0
0.9976 0.00034803
0.67547 -0.0518
0.3 -0.0518
0.16644 -0.0518
0 -0.032638
0 0
0 0.02339
0.097527 0.0528
0.3 0.0528
0.65295 0.0528
0.99653 0.00050331
1 0

Table 743: Base 64 representation:


cqTgXncThWBAAsA

Figure 562: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

191
Profile: n13 Table 748: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.552 5.396 ects
Information: N-13 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.4 -4.1 dcts
Cm error 46 39 mcts
Upper transition point -1.76 -0.45 %

Figure 563: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 564: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 745: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.8 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 0.074309 % @0.84C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2488 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0704 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 19.7481 deg
Release Angle: 0.36634 deg
Nose Incidence: 1.1423 deg
Camber deflection: 1.5087 deg

Table 746: Controlpoints


1 0
0.84368 -0.026181
0.5877 -0.0596
0.3 -0.0596
0.1488 -0.0596
0 -0.032585
0 0
0 0.03493
0.14656 0.0584
0.3 0.0584
0.70947 0.0584
0.97955 0.0036946
1 0

Table 747: Base 64 representation:


lgTkZigTaZFcWgA

Figure 565: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

192
Profile: n14 Table 752: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.563 4.469 ects
Information: N-14 airfoil RMS curvature error: 30.09 30.23 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -8.2 -8.7 dcts
Cm error 17 8 mcts
Upper transition point 4.99 6.04 %

Figure 566: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 567: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 749: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.48 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: -0.049537 % @0.02C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1937 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.4902 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 18.9466 deg
Release Angle: -0.0020088 deg
Nose Incidence: -1.4024 deg
Camber deflection: -1.4044 deg

Table 750: Controlpoints


1 0
0.65848 -0.057
0.44432 -0.057
0.3 -0.057
0.15978 -0.057
0 -0.039841
0 0
0 0.02964
0.11039 0.0578
0.3 0.0578
0.45372 0.0578
0.65353 0.0578
1 0

Table 751: Base 64 representation:


gnTOZseTNY VgA

Figure 568: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

193
Profile: n22 Table 756: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.899 4.089 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: 48.11 44.26 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.4 2.6 dcts
Cm error -11 -3 mcts
Upper transition point -5.29 -4.94 %

Figure 569: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 570: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 753: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.4519 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 3.9518 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.39977 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.7748 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.4535 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.5329 deg
Release Angle: 6.3514 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.1227 deg
Camber deflection: 15.4741 deg

Table 754: Controlpoints


1 -0.0019989
0.45466 -0.010709
0.2926 -0.028915
0.10097 -0.028915
0.069814 -0.028915
0 -0.02601
0 0
0 0.036002
0.10954 0.09996
0.29698 0.09996
0.43297 0.09996
0.60364 0.09802
1 0.0019989

Table 755: Base 64 representation:


XnTMq5UGOM-wQpK

Figure 571: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

194
Profile: n24 Table 760: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.41 7.441 ects
Information: N-24 airfoil RMS curvature error: 53.38 51.92 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.3 2.2 dcts
Cm error -102 -105 mcts
Upper transition point -7.07 -6.92 %

Figure 572: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 573: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 757: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.0802 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 5.2506 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.99909 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.4781 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.5335 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.3068 deg
Release Angle: 0.73937 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.9042 deg
Camber deflection: 15.6436 deg

Table 758: Controlpoints


1 -0.0049955
0.30815 -0.028116
0.21597 -0.039871
0.15162 -0.039871
0.094124 -0.039871
0 -0.039871
0 0
0 0.046831
0.094582 0.1365
0.29503 0.1365
0.65342 0.1365
0.89666 0.011122
1 0.0049955

Table 759: Base 64 representation:


WqTg5 YKFRT3GgZ

Figure 574: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

195
Profile: n64215 Table 764: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.197 6.64 ects
Information: NACA 64(2)-215 airfoil RMS curvature error: 17.3 18.47 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.9 -0.7 dcts
Cm error 10 -3 mcts
Upper transition point 0.8 1.29 %

Figure 575: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 576: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 761: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.9528 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 1.1377 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6225 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1323 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.639 deg
Release Angle: 3.4303 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.6734 deg
Camber deflection: 8.1037 deg

Table 762: Controlpoints


1 0
0.84631 0.0056646
0.59274 -0.06452
0.35074 -0.06452
0.2251 -0.06452
0 -0.041221
0 0
0 0.046919
0.20352 0.08544
0.39952 0.08544
0.57632 0.08544
0.89803 0.008473
1 0

Table 763: Base 64 representation:


ifaTjoXWYcPYDlA

Figure 577: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

196
Profile: naca0002mod Table 768: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.309 3.861 ects
Information: NACA 0002 from equations, 8 decimals, no TE gapno RMS curvature error: 10.36 6.63 %
TE gap CD error NaN NaN dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 579: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 578: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 765: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 2.0002 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 0.0012655 % @0.87C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.04762 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.04762 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.6516 deg
Release Angle: 0.012948 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 0.012948 deg

Table 766: Controlpoints


1 0
0.78497 -0.0049279
0.52183 -0.010001
0.3 -0.010001
0.15 -0.010001
0 -0.0069007
0 0
0 0.0069007
0.15 0.010001
0.3 0.010001
0.52137 0.010001
0.79601 0.0047671
1 0

Table 767: Base 64 representation:


rgTUErgTUEfgDgA
Figure 580: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

197
Profile: naca0004mod Table 772: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.386 6.739 ects
Information: Naca 0004 from equations, 8 decimals, no TE gap RMS curvature error: 9.64 17.53 %
Reference: NACA CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 581: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 582: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 769: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 4.0004 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: -0.0011218 % @0.81C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.10475 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.10475 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.4592 deg
Release Angle: -0.0087375 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -0.0087375 deg

Table 770: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80023 -0.0095549
0.51548 -0.020002
0.3 -0.020002
0.033 -0.020002
0 -0.0048005
0 0
0 0.0048005
0.033 0.020002
0.3 0.020002
0.51611 0.020002
0.80023 0.009494
1 0

Table 771: Base 64 representation:


P4TUJP4TUJefGgA

Figure 583: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

198
Profile: naca0006mod Table 776: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.322 2.629 ects
Information: NACA 0006, from equations, 16 decimals, no TE RMS curvature error: 6.2 8.49 %
gap. CD error -0.2 -0.8 dcts
Reference: NACA equations Cm error -3 2 mcts
Upper transition point 0.22 0.36 %

Figure 585: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 584: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 773: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.0008 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: -1.1527e-005 % @0.96C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.44112 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.44112 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.3944 deg
Release Angle: -0.00048138 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -0.00048138 deg

Table 774: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85322 -0.010773
0.53278 -0.030004
0.3 -0.030004
0.15 -0.030004
0 -0.021003
0 0
0 0.021003
0.15 0.030004
0.3 0.030004
0.53239 0.030004
0.85236 0.010834
1 0

Table 775: Base 64 representation:


sgTVNsgTVNXXJgA
Figure 586: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

199
Profile: naca0008mod Table 780: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.457 2.603 ects
Information: NACA 0008, from equations, 16 decimals, no TE gap RMS curvature error: 5.7 6.22 %
Reference: Naca equations CD error 1.2 1.2 dcts
Cm error 5 2 mcts
Upper transition point -2.41 -2.36 %

Figure 587: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 588: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.

Table 777: Geometrical properties


Maximum Thickness: 8.001 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: -1.4893e-005 % @0.96C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.76882 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.76882 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.1802 deg
Release Angle: -0.00062925 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -0.00062925 deg

Table 778: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85438 -0.014255
0.53332 -0.040005
0.3 -0.040005
0.153 -0.040005
0 -0.028004
0 0
0 0.028004
0.153 0.040005
0.3 0.040005
0.53293 0.040005
0.85352 0.014335
1 0

Table 779: Base 64 representation:


sfTVRsfTVRXXMgA

Figure 589: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

200
Profile: naca0009sm Table 784: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.77 3.513 ects
Information: NACA 0009 airfoil (smoothed) RMS curvature error: 9.65 11.04 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.2 -1.3 dcts
Cm error -3 0 mcts
Upper transition point 2.57 2.11 %

Figure 590: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 591: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 781: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.0179 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 8.0313e-009 % @0.55C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.58678 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.58678 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.8543 deg
Release Angle: -3.6946e-008 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -3.6946e-008 deg

Table 782: Controlpoints


1 0
0.91353 -0.012041
0.53671 -0.04509
0.30866 -0.04509
0.015503 -0.04509
0 -0.0077875
0 0
0 0.0077875
0.015503 0.04509
0.30866 0.04509
0.53671 0.04509
0.91353 0.012041
1 0

Table 783: Base 64 representation:


L8UVTL8UVTRRSgA

Figure 592: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

201
Profile: naca0010mod Table 788: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.64 5.368 ects
Information: NACA 0010, from equations, 16 decimals, no TE RMS curvature error: 5.91 10.13 %
gap. CD error 0.4 0.5 dcts
Reference: Naca equations Cm error 5 9 mcts
Upper transition point -1.89 -2.41 %

Figure 594: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 593: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 785: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.8434 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 0 % @1C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2071 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2071 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.3239 deg
Release Angle: 0 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 0 deg

Table 786: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85594 -0.017634
0.53405 -0.050006
0.3 -0.050006
0.165 -0.050006
0 -0.037004
0 0
0 0.037004
0.165 0.050006
0.3 0.050006
0.53416 0.050006
0.85616 0.017608
1 0

Table 787: Base 64 representation:


usTVVusTVVXXQgA
Figure 595: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

202
Profile: naca0012mod Table 792: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.645 5.884 ects
Information: NACA 0012, from equations, 16 decimals, no TE RMS curvature error: 5.08 5.84 %
gap. CD error 0.7 1.1 dcts
Reference: LiU Cm error 6 6 mcts
Upper transition point -1.89 -1.63 %

Figure 597: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 596: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 789: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.0014 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 3.6521e-005 % @0.51C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.7644 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.7644 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.7114 deg
Release Angle: 0.0011455 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 0.0011455 deg

Table 790: Controlpoints


1 0
0.8551 -0.021279
0.53367 -0.060007
0.3 -0.060007
0.15 -0.060007
0 -0.042005
0 0
0 0.042005
0.15 0.060007
0.3 0.060007
0.53418 0.060007
0.8562 0.021124
1 0

Table 791: Base 64 representation:


sgTVasgTVaXXTgA
Figure 598: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

203
Profile: naca0014mod Table 796: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.647 1.609 ects
Information: Naca 0014 from equations, 8 decimals. no TE gap RMS curvature error: 4.32 5.45 %
Reference: NACA CD error -0.7 0.5 dcts
Cm error -6 6 mcts
Upper transition point 1.74 -1.03 %

Figure 599: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 600: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 793: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.0016 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 0.00024319 % @0.64C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.3405 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.3405 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 19.4442 deg
Release Angle: 0 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 0 deg

Table 794: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85492 -0.024857
0.53359 -0.070008
0.3 -0.070008
0.141 -0.070008
0 -0.046905
0 0
0 0.046905
0.141 0.070008
0.3 0.070008
0.5337 0.070008
0.85492 0.024857
1 0

Table 795: Base 64 representation:


qhTVeqhTVeXXWgA

Figure 601: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

204
Profile: naca0016mod Table 800: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.279 2.776 ects
Information: Naca 0016 from equations, 8 decimals, no te gap. RMS curvature error: 3.33 5.08 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.3 0.6 dcts
Cm error 3 3 mcts
Upper transition point -0.5 -0.74 %

Figure 602: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 603: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 797: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.0018 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: -2.1547e-006 % @0.96C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.7438 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.7438 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 22.155 deg
Release Angle: -7.5607e-005 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -7.5607e-005 deg

Table 798: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85463 -0.028461
0.53346 -0.080009
0.3 -0.080009
0.095852 -0.080009
0 -0.041873
0 0
0 0.041873
0.095852 0.080009
0.3 0.080009
0.53344 0.080009
0.85458 0.02847
1 0

Table 799: Base 64 representation:


grTVhgrTVhXXZgA

Figure 604: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

205
Profile: naca0018mod Table 804: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.382 6.405 ects
Information: Naca 0018 from equations, 8 decimals, no TE gap. RMS curvature error: 3.4 5.97 %
Reference: NACA CD error 0.2 1.2 dcts
Cm error 2 7 mcts
Upper transition point -0.37 -1.86 %

Figure 605: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 606: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 801: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.8118 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 0 % @1C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.6196 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.6196 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 25.0669 deg
Release Angle: 0 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 0 deg

Table 802: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85413 -0.032126
0.53322 -0.090011
0.3 -0.090011
0.095532 -0.090011
0 -0.047138
0 0
0 0.047138
0.095532 0.090011
0.3 0.090011
0.53318 0.090011
0.85406 0.032141
1 0

Table 803: Base 64 representation:


hrTVlhrTVlXXcgA

Figure 607: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

206
Profile: naca0020mod Table 808: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.227 3.434 ects
Information: Naca 0020 from equations, 8 decimals, no TE gap RMS curvature error: 3.01 4.13 %
Reference: NACA equations CD error 0.2 0 dcts
Cm error 3 -6 mcts
Upper transition point -0.34 0.71 %

Figure 608: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 609: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.

Table 805: Geometrical properties


Maximum Thickness: 20.002 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: -1.4404e-006 % @0.71C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.2376 %C
Lower nose radius: 4.2376 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 27.5031 deg
Release Angle: 6.1501e-006 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 6.1501e-006 deg

Table 806: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85471 -0.035557
0.53352 -0.10001
0.3 -0.10001
0.096837 -0.10001
0 -0.052304
0 0
0 0.052304
0.096837 0.10001
0.3 0.10001
0.53352 0.10001
0.85471 0.035556
1 0

Table 807: Base 64 representation:


gqTVqgqTVqXXfgA

Figure 610: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

207
Profile: naca0022mod Table 812: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.251 1.499 ects
Information: Naca 0022 from equations, 8 decimals, no TE gap. RMS curvature error: 4.38 5.64 %
Reference: NACA CD error 0.1 -0.1 dcts
Cm error 6 -3 mcts
Upper transition point -0.31 0.37 %

Figure 611: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 612: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 809: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 22.002 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 3.5932e-006 % @0.61C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 5.1269 %C
Lower nose radius: 5.1269 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 30.1274 deg
Release Angle: 3.8618e-005 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 3.8618e-005 deg

Table 810: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85413 -0.03926
0.53328 -0.11001
0.3 -0.11001
0.096783 -0.11001
0 -0.057515
0 0
0 0.057515
0.096783 0.11001
0.3 0.11001
0.53329 0.11001
0.85414 0.039256
1 0

Table 811: Base 64 representation:


gqTVugqTVuXXhgA

Figure 613: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

208
Profile: naca0024mod Table 816: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.404 4.121 ects
Information: Naca 0024 from equations, 8 decimals, no TE gap RMS curvature error: 5.9 7.45 %
Reference: NACA CD error 0 0.2 dcts
Cm error 1 -7 mcts
Upper transition point 0.07 -0.16 %

Figure 614: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 615: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 813: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 24.002 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: -0.26576 % @0.03C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 6.2239 %C
Lower nose radius: 8.6929 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 32.7363 deg
Release Angle: -6.407e-005 deg
Nose Incidence: -6.1967 deg
Camber deflection: -6.1967 deg

Table 814: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85533 -0.042491
0.53383 -0.12001
0.3 -0.12001
0.10503 -0.12001
0 -0.066006
0 0
0 0.066006
0.10503 0.12001
0.3 0.12001
0.53382 0.12001
0.85531 0.042498
1 0

Table 815: Base 64 representation:


ipTVyipTVyXXkgA

Figure 616: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

209
Profile: naca0026mod Table 820: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.41 9.078 ects
Information: Naca 0026 from equations, 8 decimals, no TE gap RMS curvature error: 6.98 7.55 %
Reference: NACA CD error 0 -0.5 dcts
Cm error -2 -22 mcts
Upper transition point 0.14 -0.1 %

Figure 617: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 618: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 817: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 26.004 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: -7.1171e-005 % @0.96C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 7.3055 %C
Lower nose radius: 7.3055 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 35.2926 deg
Release Angle: -0.0025667 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -0.0025667 deg

Table 818: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85436 -0.046337
0.53327 -0.13002
0.3 -0.13002
0.105 -0.13002
0 -0.071511
0 0
0 0.071511
0.105 0.13002
0.3 0.13002
0.53276 0.13002
0.85323 0.04668
1 0

Table 819: Base 64 representation:


ipTV2ipTV2XXmgA

Figure 619: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

210
Profile: naca0028mod Table 824: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.409 3.852 ects
Information: Naca 0028 from equations, 8 decimals, no TE gap RMS curvature error: 6.08 6.15 %
Reference: NACA CD error 0.2 0.4 dcts
Cm error -2 -2 mcts
Upper transition point -0.09 -0.21 %

Figure 620: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 621: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 821: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 28.004 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: -7.6581e-006 % @0.96C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 8.3756 %C
Lower nose radius: 8.3756 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 37.8122 deg
Release Angle: -0.00027197 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -0.00027197 deg

Table 822: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85299 -0.050352
0.5326 -0.14002
0.3 -0.14002
0.096281 -0.14002
0 -0.073322
0 0
0 0.073322
0.096281 0.14002
0.3 0.14002
0.5326 0.14002
0.85288 0.050388
1 0

Table 823: Base 64 representation:


hqTV7hqTV7XXpgA

Figure 622: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

211
Profile: naca0030mod Table 828: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.395 4.889 ects
Information: Naca 0030 from equations, 8 decimals, no TE gap RMS curvature error: 7.39 8.57 %
Reference: NACA CD error -0.2 -0.4 dcts
Cm error -5 -17 mcts
Upper transition point 0.13 -0.17 %

Figure 623: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 624: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 825: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 30 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 0 % @1C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 9.5345 %C
Lower nose radius: 9.5345 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 40.3255 deg
Release Angle: 0 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 0 deg

Table 826: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85704 -0.052492
0.53454 -0.15
0.3 -0.15
0.097167 -0.15
0 -0.078589
0 0
0 0.078589
0.097167 0.15
0.3 0.15
0.53454 0.15
0.85704 0.052492
1 0

Table 827: Base 64 representation:


hqTV hqTV WWsgA

Figure 625: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

212
Profile: naca64a010 Table 832: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.843 3.867 ects
Information: NACA 63A210 airfoil RMS curvature error: 61.44 53.18 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1 -1.1 dcts
Cm error -7 -8 mcts
Upper transition point 2.47 2.34 %

Figure 626: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 627: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 829: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9908 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: -0.0029577 % @0.83C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.72692 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.72692 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.0938 deg
Release Angle: -0.02257 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -0.02257 deg

Table 830: Controlpoints


1 0
0.77533 -0.023471
0.55182 -0.049954
0.4 -0.049954
0.243 -0.049954
0 -0.032976
0 0
0 0.032476
0.243 0.049954
0.4 0.049954
0.55179 0.049954
0.77522 0.023483
1 0

Table 831: Base 64 representation:


pZaQVpZaQVggNgA

Figure 628: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

213
Profile: naca64a210 Table 836: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.023 3.709 ects
Information: NACA 64A210 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.4 0.3 dcts
Cm error -5 -35 mcts
Upper transition point -1.19 0.11 %

Figure 629: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 630: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 833: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9912 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 1.327 % @0.52C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.042 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.70881 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.49239 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.8317 deg
Release Angle: 2.6856 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.7281 deg
Camber deflection: 6.4136 deg

Table 834: Controlpoints


1 -0.00021
0.66501 -0.016185
0.565 -0.03744
0.35065 -0.03744
0.27011 -0.03744
0 -0.029777
0 0
0 0.034514
0.2341 0.06274
0.39955 0.06274
0.63893 0.06274
0.90468 0.013779
1 0.00021

Table 835: Base 64 representation:


ibaabyPWVQRwMkB

Figure 631: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

214
Profile: naca66-018 Table 840: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.354 7.436 ects
Information: NACA 66-018 airfoil RMS curvature error: 40.36 40.87 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -8 -7.3 dcts
Cm error -15 -17 mcts
Upper transition point 11.3 9.89 %

Figure 632: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 633: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 837: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.996 % @0.45C
Maximum Camber: -0.012111 % @0.89C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4521 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.4521 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.8334 deg
Release Angle: -0.11235 deg
Nose Incidence: -8.4709e-006 deg
Camber deflection: -0.11236 deg

Table 838: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79547 -0.023408
0.73259 -0.08998
0.45 -0.08998
0.25143 -0.08998
0 -0.049775
0 0
0 0.049775
0.25593 0.08998
0.45 0.08998
0.73542 0.08998
0.79589 0.02255
1 0

Table 839: Base 64 representation:


icsglicsglwwOgA

Figure 634: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

215
Profile: naca632a015 Table 844: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.251 5.523 ects
Information: NACA 63(2)A-015 airfoil RMS curvature error: 86.85 86.93 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.3 -1.1 dcts
Cm error -2 -7 mcts
Upper transition point 1.38 3.31 %

Figure 635: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 636: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 841: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.9571 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 1.6394 % @0.18C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.0116 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.56443 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.9622 deg
Release Angle: 1.2679 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.5106 deg
Camber deflection: 16.7785 deg

Table 842: Controlpoints


1 0
0.72751 -0.034487
0.5437 -0.06211
0.40245 -0.06211
0.25637 -0.06211
0 -0.030815
0 0
0 0.02734
0.055736 0.08827
0.33928 0.08827
0.50105 0.08827
0.66813 0.057019
1 0

Table 843: Base 64 representation:


U0WQlgXaPbqlThA

Figure 637: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

216
Profile: naca747a315 Table 848: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.283 7.048 ects
Information: NACA 747A315 airfoil RMS curvature error: 51.51 50.44 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.5 1.2 dcts
Cm error 6 39 mcts
Upper transition point -1.71 -3.17 %

Figure 638: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 639: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 845: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.9201 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 2.5425 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.1859 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.74341 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.2219 deg
Release Angle: 0.1442 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.7171 deg
Camber deflection: 12.8613 deg

Table 846: Controlpoints


1 0
0.81198 -0.013038
0.79782 -0.0504
0.44625 -0.0504
0.28187 -0.0504
0 -0.037376
0 0
0 0.060968
0.25507 0.09982
0.35001 0.09982
0.59196 0.09982
0.81625 0.013671
1 0

Table 847: Base 64 representation:


mRWYquYsoWs7JgA

Figure 640: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

217
Profile: naca747a415 Table 852: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.15 6.124 ects
Information: NACA 747A415 airfoil RMS curvature error: 28.71 30.08 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.6 -1.7 dcts
Cm error 23 9 mcts
Upper transition point 1.6 2.1 %

Figure 641: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 642: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 849: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.9669 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 3.0184 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.1952 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.66857 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.7118 deg
Release Angle: -1.053 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.3001 deg
Camber deflection: 13.2471 deg

Table 850: Controlpoints


1 0
0.81359 -0.0078421
0.80377 -0.04493
0.44636 -0.04493
0.29882 -0.04493
0 -0.036495
0 0
0 0.054586
0.2036 0.10499
0.40176 0.10499
0.552 0.10499
0.92507 0.00039606
1 0

Table 851: Base 64 representation:


ggaQszVsoTL8DeA

Figure 643: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

218
Profile: naca000834 Table 856: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.286 1.925 ects
Information: NACA 0008-34 airfoil RMS curvature error: 3.98 4.34 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.1 0 dcts
Cm error 0 -2 mcts
Upper transition point -0.05 -0.09 %

Figure 644: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 645: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 853: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: -0.00014663 % @0.54C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.15022 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.15022 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.289 deg
Release Angle: -0.0024641 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -0.0024641 deg

Table 854: Controlpoints


1 -0.0008
0.77402 -0.029135
0.57806 -0.04
0.4 -0.04
0.13026 -0.04
0 -0.011422
0 0
0 0.011422
0.13026 0.04
0.4 0.04
0.60318 0.04
0.80068 0.025775
1 0.0008

Table 855: Base 64 representation:


SqaWRSqaTRotQgE

Figure 646: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

219
Profile: naca001034 Table 860: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.327 5.002 ects
Information: NACA 0010-34 airfoil RMS curvature error: 3.73 4.66 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.1 0.1 dcts
Cm error 1 2 mcts
Upper transition point -0.02 -0.83 %

Figure 647: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 648: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 857: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 3.486e-007 % @0.52C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.23511 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.23511 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.8496 deg
Release Angle: 4.4075e-006 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 4.4075e-006 deg

Table 858: Controlpoints


1 -0.001
0.75439 -0.039571
0.55635 -0.05
0.4 -0.05
0.13056 -0.05
0 -0.014305
0 0
0 0.014305
0.13056 0.05
0.4 0.05
0.55632 0.05
0.75436 0.039575
1 0.001

Table 859: Base 64 representation:


SqaRVSqaRVxxUgF

Figure 649: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

220
Profile: naca001034a08cli0.2 Table 864: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.635 2.241 ects
Information: NACA 0010-34 a=0.8 c(li)=0.2 airfoil RMS curvature error: 17.73 17.3 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.1 -2.2 dcts
Cm error -25 -15 mcts
Upper transition point 4.05 6.28 %

Figure 650: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 651: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 861: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 1.3277 % @0.56C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.34732 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.1372 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.0321 deg
Release Angle: 5.7296 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.114 deg
Camber deflection: 9.8436 deg

Table 862: Controlpoints


1 -0.001
0.99975 -0.0010012
0.62549 -0.03721
0.40045 -0.03721
0.075274 -0.03721
0 -0.0082977
0 0
0 0.01936
0.16187 0.06279
0.39955 0.06279
0.61715 0.06279
0.7714 0.04853
1 0.001

Table 863: Base 64 representation:


UlaXbOzaYQwANoF

Figure 652: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

221
Profile: naca001035 Table 868: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.269 4.566 ects
Information: NACA 0010-35 airfoil RMS curvature error: 3.99 4.25 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.4 0.2 dcts
Cm error 1 -2 mcts
Upper transition point -0.44 -0.68 %

Figure 653: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 654: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 865: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10 % @0.5C
Maximum Camber: 2.0428e-008 % @0.95C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.25722 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.25722 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 26.2469 deg
Release Angle: 4.8162e-007 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 4.8162e-007 deg

Table 866: Controlpoints


1 -0.001
0.82462 -0.041887
0.65085 -0.05
0.5 -0.05
0.2167 -0.05
0 -0.019277
0 0
0 0.019277
0.2167 0.05
0.5 0.05
0.65085 0.05
0.82462 0.041887
1 0.001

Table 867: Base 64 representation:


ZjgTVZjgTV00sgF

Figure 655: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

222
Profile: naca001064 Table 872: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.872 5.924 ects
Information: NACA 0010-64 airfoil RMS curvature error: 4.07 4.64 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1 -1.3 dcts
Cm error -2 -1 mcts
Upper transition point 1.37 1.37 %

Figure 656: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 657: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 869: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 6.3025e-006 % @0.52C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.006 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.006 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.8496 deg
Release Angle: 7.8686e-005 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 7.8686e-005 deg

Table 870: Controlpoints


1 -0.001
0.7546 -0.039537
0.55659 -0.05
0.4 -0.05
0.34818 -0.05
0 -0.048045
0 0
0 0.048045
0.34818 0.05
0.4 0.05
0.55608 0.05
0.75415 0.039608
1 0.001

Table 871: Base 64 representation:


8IaRV8IaRVxxUgF

Figure 658: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

223
Profile: naca001065 Table 876: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.693 5.91 ects
Information: NACA 0010-65 airfoil RMS curvature error: 11.68 11.97 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.1 -0.4 dcts
Cm error -3 -6 mcts
Upper transition point -0.01 0.04 %

Figure 659: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 660: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 873: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10 % @0.5C
Maximum Camber: -3.1616e-007 % @0.62C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.84241 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.84241 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 26.2469 deg
Release Angle: -5.6185e-006 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -5.6185e-006 deg

Table 874: Controlpoints


1 -0.001
0.82462 -0.041887
0.65085 -0.05
0.5 -0.05
0.39128 -0.05
0 -0.046577
0 0
0 0.046577
0.39128 0.05
0.5 0.05
0.65086 0.05
0.82463 0.041886
1 0.001

Table 875: Base 64 representation:


7OgTV7OgTV00sgF

Figure 661: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

224
Profile: naca001066 Table 880: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.658 4.608 ects
Information: NACA 0010-66 airfoil RMS curvature error: 12.4 11.88 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.7 1.5 dcts
Cm error -46 -51 mcts
Upper transition point -0.14 -0.12 %

Figure 662: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 663: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 877: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10 % @0.6C
Maximum Camber: 0.013853 % @0.97C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2937 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2937 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 33.6907 deg
Release Angle: 0.53214 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 0.53214 deg

Table 878: Controlpoints


1 -0.001
0.88877 -0.033554
0.84229 -0.05
0.6 -0.05
0.063536 -0.05
0 -0.023409
0 0
0 0.023409
0.063536 0.05
0.6 0.05
0.79945 0.05
0.87067 0.041475
1 0.001

Table 879: Base 64 representation:


e4lgVe4lmV0slgF

Figure 664: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

225
Profile: naca1108mod Table 884: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.26 2.777 ects
Information: Naca 1108 from eqation, 8 decimals, no TE gap. RMS curvature error: 19.18 17.73 %
Reference: NACA CD error -4.3 -4.4 dcts
Cm error 7 11 mcts
Upper transition point 2.8 2.67 %

Figure 665: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 666: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 881: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.9957 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.0049 % @0.18C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3306 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.27571 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.8103 deg
Release Angle: 1.3222 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.6318 deg
Camber deflection: 12.954 deg

Table 882: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80045 -0.014245
0.52665 -0.03054
0.31978 -0.03054
0.1535 -0.03054
0 -0.016797
0 0
0 0.022295
0.056036 0.049545
0.28018 0.049545
0.48812 0.049545
0.76322 0.02793
1 0

Table 883: Base 64 representation:


sySSVigUTNjeMhA

Figure 667: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

226
Profile: naca1110mod Table 888: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.233 5.275 ects
Information: Naca 1110 profile from equations, 8 decimals, no TE RMS curvature error: 21.7 21.82 %
gap CD error -1.9 -2.3 dcts
Reference: NACA Cm error 3 0 mcts
Upper transition point 2.64 2.49 %

Figure 669: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 668: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 885: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.0031 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 0.98184 % @0.19C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.1423 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.52312 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.5839 deg
Release Angle: 1.2337 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.5527 deg
Camber deflection: 13.7864 deg

Table 886: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80094 -0.019372
0.51396 -0.040529
0.30974 -0.040529
0.14558 -0.040529
0 -0.022291
0 0
0 0.056142
0.20908 0.059542
0.29024 0.059542
0.51481 0.059542
0.80196 0.027923
1 0

Table 887: Base 64 representation:


7STUZihUTRefPhA
Figure 670: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

227
Profile: naca1112mod Table 892: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.932 5.415 ects
Information: Naca 1112 from equations, 8 decimals, no TE gap. RMS curvature error: 98.89 Inf %
Reference: NACA CD error -2 -1.8 dcts
Cm error 2 -6 mcts
Upper transition point 2.93 3.43 %

Figure 671: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 672: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 889: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.0021 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 0.99949 % @0.16C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.0254 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.78453 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.2687 deg
Release Angle: 1.2294 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.9331 deg
Camber deflection: 15.1625 deg

Table 890: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80562 -0.023539
0.517 -0.050526
0.30969 -0.050526
0.11941 -0.050526
0 -0.02416
0 0
0 0.067887
0.2314 0.06954
0.29028 0.06954
0.51319 0.06954
0.80684 0.031852
1 0

Table 891: Base 64 representation:


9NTUefmUTWseShA

Figure 673: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

228
Profile: naca1114mod Table 896: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.591 3.257 ects
Information: Naca 1114 from equations, 8 decimals, no TE gap. RMS curvature error: 9.36 10.03 %
Reference: NACA CD error -2.3 -2.5 dcts
Cm error -4 -8 mcts
Upper transition point 3.54 4 %

Figure 674: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 675: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 893: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.0579 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 0.98792 % @0.15C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.7543 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.99248 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 19.6954 deg
Release Angle: 1.2533 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.8278 deg
Camber deflection: 16.0811 deg

Table 894: Controlpoints


1 0
0.88522 -0.017127
0.54758 -0.060523
0.30964 -0.060523
0.10528 -0.060523
0 -0.02663
0 0
0 0.078474
0.24008 0.079537
0.29033 0.079537
0.53278 0.079537
0.85295 0.028588
1 0

Table 895: Base 64 representation:


-LTWhcpUWaXSWhA

Figure 676: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

229
Profile: naca1116mod Table 900: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.946 2.786 ects
Information: Naca 1116 from equations, 8 decimals, no TE gap. RMS curvature error: 8.27 9.73 %
Reference: NACA CD error -1.8 -2.5 dcts
Cm error -8 -9 mcts
Upper transition point 2.6 3.22 %

Figure 677: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 678: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 897: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.9998 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.0134 % @0.14C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.871 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.339 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 21.5819 deg
Release Angle: 1.2211 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.981 deg
Camber deflection: 17.2022 deg

Table 898: Controlpoints


1 0
0.81951 -0.030429
0.52086 -0.07052
0.30959 -0.07052
0.089803 -0.07052
0 -0.028092
0 0
0 0.075889
0.17735 0.089535
0.29038 0.089535
0.51155 0.089535
0.80021 0.04251
1 0

Table 899: Base 64 representation:


1ZTUlZsUUeecYhA

Figure 679: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

230
Profile: naca1118mod
Table 904: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Information: NACA 1118 modified with sharp TE Control points Base64
Reference: NACA/LiU RMS position error: 1.843 7.11 ects
RMS curvature error: 8.82 9.06 %
CD error -2.7 -2.8 dcts
Cm error -10 -15 mcts
Upper transition point 2.93 2.57 %

Figure 681: Error distribution of vertical position and


curvature of the parameter curve.

Figure 680: Wing profile with camber and thickness


distribution.
Table 901: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.9982 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.0608 % @0.14C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 5.9109 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.2975 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 24.6007 deg
Release Angle: 1.1999 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.068 deg
Camber deflection: 16.2679 deg

Table 902: Controlpoints


1 0
0.83908 -0.031572
0.52511 -0.080517
0.30953 -0.080517
0.14239 -0.080517
0 -0.0467
0 0
0 0.075645
0.14521 0.099533
0.29042 0.099533
0.53741 0.099533
0.8483 0.036421
1 0

Table 903: Base 64 representation:


wgTWpkiUUhXZbhA
Figure 682: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

231
Profile: naca1120-mod Table 908: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.771 5.852 ects
Information: NACA 1120 modified with sharp TE RMS curvature error: 23.14 24.85 %
Reference: NACA/LiU CD error -3.3 -2.7 dcts
Cm error -23 -15 mcts
Upper transition point 3.93 3.33 %

Figure 683: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 684: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.

Table 905: Geometrical properties


Maximum Thickness: 19.9978 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.0375 % @0.1C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 7.0299 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.4474 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 26.9563 deg
Release Angle: 1.0758 deg
Nose Incidence: 19.1311 deg
Camber deflection: 20.207 deg

Table 906: Controlpoints


1 0
0.8267 -0.038111
0.51857 -0.090514
0.30948 -0.090514
0.061896 -0.090514
0 -0.024439
0 0
0 0.086529
0.15976 0.10953
0.29047 0.10953
0.54662 0.10953
0.85672 0.037198
1 0

Table 907: Base 64 representation:


ysTXuRyUTmWbehA

Figure 685: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

232
Profile: naca1122-mod Table 912: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.688 6.678 ects
Information: NACA 1122 modifies, sharp TE RMS curvature error: 13.26 14.48 %
Reference: NACA/LiU CD error -5.5 -5.8 dcts
Cm error -61 -55 mcts
Upper transition point 5.4 6.05 %

Figure 686: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 687: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.

Table 909: Geometrical properties


Maximum Thickness: 21.9958 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.0783 % @0.14C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 8.2521 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.8419 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 29.366 deg
Release Angle: 0.99172 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.1196 deg
Camber deflection: 16.1113 deg

Table 910: Controlpoints


1 0
0.81697 -0.044589
0.51331 -0.10051
0.30943 -0.10051
0.15162 -0.10051
0 -0.062317
0 0
0 0.092037
0.15397 0.11953
0.29052 0.11953
0.51783 0.11953
0.79164 0.058467
1 0

Table 911: Base 64 representation:


weTVyngUTqfcghA

Figure 688: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

233
Profile: naca1124-mod Table 916: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.235 6.82 ects
Information: NACA 1124 modified sharp TE RMS curvature error: 10.42 11.21 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -7.5 -8.4 dcts
Cm error -71 -85 mcts
Upper transition point 6.19 7.47 %

Figure 689: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 690: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 913: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 23.9951 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.0598 % @0.13C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 9.7772 %C
Lower nose radius: 4.6843 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 31.8513 deg
Release Angle: 0.96006 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.5605 deg
Camber deflection: 16.5205 deg

Table 914: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80906 -0.051041
0.50893 -0.11051
0.30938 -0.11051
0.13613 -0.11051
0 -0.0652
0 0
0 0.1101
0.18596 0.12953
0.29056 0.12953
0.51251 0.12953
0.7793 0.066994
1 0

Table 915: Base 64 representation:


1XTU2ljUSugejhA

Figure 691: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

234
Profile: naca001234 Table 920: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.408 4.071 ects
Information: NACA 0012-34 airfoil RMS curvature error: 3.8 4.39 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.2 0.1 dcts
Cm error 0 0 mcts
Upper transition point 0.35 0.5 %

Figure 692: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 693: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 917: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: -2.714e-006 % @0.53C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.24 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.33829 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.33829 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 21.3351 deg
Release Angle: -3.0878e-005 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -3.0878e-005 deg

Table 918: Controlpoints


1 -0.0012
0.75645 -0.047077
0.55892 -0.06
0.4 -0.06
0.1305 -0.06
0 -0.017155
0 0
0 0.017155
0.1305 0.06
0.4 0.06
0.55909 0.06
0.7566 0.047048
1 0.0012

Table 919: Base 64 representation:


SqaRaSqaRaxxYgG

Figure 694: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

235
Profile: naca001264 Table 924: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.051 5.476 ects
Information: NACA 0012-64 airfoil RMS curvature error: 4.21 4.69 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.2 -1.1 dcts
Cm error -2 -3 mcts
Upper transition point 2.01 2.76 %

Figure 695: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 696: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 921: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 1.9624e-007 % @0.53C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.24 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4487 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.4487 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 21.335 deg
Release Angle: 1.6444e-006 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 1.6444e-006 deg

Table 922: Controlpoints


1 -0.0012
0.75661 -0.047045
0.5591 -0.06
0.4 -0.06
0.34855 -0.06
0 -0.057685
0 0
0 0.057685
0.34855 0.06
0.4 0.06
0.55909 0.06
0.7566 0.047047
1 0.0012

Table 923: Base 64 representation:


9IaRa9IaRaxxYgG

Figure 697: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

236
Profile: naca001264a08cli0.2 Table 928: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.933 4.471 ects
Information: NACA 0012-64 a=0.8 c(li)=0.2 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 22.3 -22.7 dcts
Cm error -117 105 mcts
Upper transition point 1.66 -0.38 %

Figure 698: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 699: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 925: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.9578 % @0.44C
Maximum Camber: 1.8176 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.22 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.7792 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.031994 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 29.5449 deg
Release Angle: -1.0915 deg
Nose Incidence: 18.5242 deg
Camber deflection: 17.4327 deg

Table 926: Controlpoints


1 -0.0011
0.89495 -0.030953
0.53049 -0.03726
0.50007 -0.03726
0.10859 -0.03726
0 -0.0049222
0 0
0 0.066423
0.37196 0.07275
0.39947 0.07275
0.55453 0.07275
0.72888 0.067096
1 0.0011

Table 927: Base 64 representation:


5EaRfIxgEQ60geG

Figure 700: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

237
Profile: naca2408mod Table 932: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.041 6.166 ects
Information: NACA 2808 from equations, 16 decimals, no TE gap. RMS curvature error: 66.67 65.84 %
Reference: LiU CD error -0.2 -1.6 dcts
Cm error -54 -60 mcts
Upper transition point 2.37 5.35 %

Figure 701: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 702: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 929: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.0129 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 2.0262 % @0.72C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.87651 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.69133 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.9802 deg
Release Angle: 15.3036 deg
Nose Incidence: 2.8535 deg
Camber deflection: 18.1572 deg

Table 930: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85264 0.022849
0.53396 -0.029472
0.20143 -0.029472
0.086615 -0.029472
0 -0.019746
0 0
0 0.033265
0.19552 0.053653
0.39903 0.053653
0.43153 0.053653
0.86828 0.052668
1 0

Table 931: Base 64 representation:


ngaDXqjNbN-UO4A

Figure 703: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

238
Profile: naca2415 Table 936: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.058 4.034 ects
Information: NACA 2415 Modified RMS curvature error: 16.97 16.77 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1 -0.9 dcts
Cm error 0 10 mcts
Upper transition point 0.59 0.54 %

Figure 704: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 705: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 933: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.9908 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 2.0032 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.314 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.1315 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.3353 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 19.6378 deg
Release Angle: 3.8544 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.5442 deg
Camber deflection: 10.3987 deg

Table 934: Controlpoints


1 -0.00157
0.70528 -0.032362
0.41878 -0.05703
0.25278 -0.05703
0.16178 -0.05703
0 -0.050186
0 0
0 0.054152
0.14046 0.09409
0.34448 0.09409
0.43549 0.09409
0.68957 0.077092
1 0.00157

Table 935: Base 64 representation:


klWJn3XQOYzjWlI

Figure 706: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

239
Profile: naca6409mod Table 940: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.045 5.05 ects
Information: NACA 6409 Sharp TE RMS curvature error: 34.16 36.17 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.2 2.3 dcts
Cm error 5 8 mcts
Upper transition point -0.56 -0.48 %

Figure 707: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 708: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 937: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.9571 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 6.0081 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2727 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.59306 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.5553 deg
Release Angle: 11.2301 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.5685 deg
Camber deflection: 24.7986 deg

Table 938: Controlpoints


1 0
0.41397 0.050781
0.13864 -0.01192
0.0497 -0.01192
0.027832 -0.01192
0 -0.01049
0 0
0 0.035035
0.14467 0.1036
0.3959 0.1036
0.39787 0.1036
0.67218 0.10341
1 0

Table 939: Base 64 representation:


WoZAr3cDGF rOxA

Figure 709: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

240
Profile: naca16006 Table 944: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.142 2.612 ects
Information: NACA 16-006 airfoil RMS curvature error: 1.52 1.94 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 NaN dcts
Cm error 0 NaN mcts
Upper transition point -0.01 NaN %

Figure 710: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 711: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 941: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6 % @0.5C
Maximum Camber: 1.8811e-007 % @0.63C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.12 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.17018 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.17018 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.8791 deg
Release Angle: 3.7026e-006 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 3.7026e-006 deg

Table 942: Controlpoints


1 -0.0006
0.83515 -0.02359
0.6697 -0.03
0.5 -0.03
0.27902 -0.03
0 -0.017792
0 0
0 0.017792
0.27902 0.03
0.5 0.03
0.66969 0.03
0.83515 0.023591
1 0.0006

Table 943: Base 64 representation:


lcgWNlcgWNxxSgD

Figure 712: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

241
Profile: naca16009 Table 948: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.342 2.327 ects
Information: NACA 16-009 airfoil. RMS curvature error: 15.56 15.33 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.1 1.3 dcts
Cm error 0 2 mcts
Upper transition point -0.9 -0.92 %

Figure 713: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 714: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 945: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9 % @0.5C
Maximum Camber: 3.5647e-006 % @0.64C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.18 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.36519 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.36519 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 23.5286 deg
Release Angle: 8.9576e-005 deg
Nose Incidence: -6.8435e-007 deg
Camber deflection: 8.8891e-005 deg

Table 946: Controlpoints


1 -0.0009
0.84538 -0.033102
0.68716 -0.045
0.5 -0.045
0.26092 -0.045
0 -0.025204
0 0
0 0.025204
0.26092 0.045
0.5 0.045
0.68704 0.045
0.8453 0.033118
1 0.0009

Table 947: Base 64 representation:


jfgYTjfgYTuuagF

Figure 715: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

242
Profile: naca16012 Table 952: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.269 4.532 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: 1.28 1.98 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.3 -0.1 dcts
Cm error -1 1 mcts
Upper transition point 0.33 0.34 %

Figure 716: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 717: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 949: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12 % @0.5C
Maximum Camber: -3.234e-007 % @0.09C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.24 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.67999 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.67999 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 31.1826 deg
Release Angle: -3.6576e-007 deg
Nose Incidence: -5.1447e-006 deg
Camber deflection: -5.5105e-006 deg

Table 950: Controlpoints


1 -0.0012
0.83389 -0.047553
0.66749 -0.06
0.5 -0.06
0.27866 -0.06
0 -0.035542
0 0
0 0.035542
0.27866 0.06
0.5 0.06
0.66749 0.06
0.83388 0.047553
1 0.0012

Table 951: Base 64 representation:


lcgValcgVaxxigG

Figure 718: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

243
Profile: naca16015 Table 956: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.339 0.639 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: 1.32 1.28 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.4 -0.3 dcts
Cm error -2 2 mcts
Upper transition point 0.67 0.53 %

Figure 719: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 720: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 953: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15 % @0.5C
Maximum Camber: -1.1857e-006 % @0.81C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0632 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0632 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 38.4491 deg
Release Angle: 3.0174e-005 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 3.0174e-005 deg

Table 954: Controlpoints


1 -0.0015
0.83466 -0.059157
0.66884 -0.075
0.5 -0.075
0.27888 -0.075
0 -0.044459
0 0
0 0.044459
0.27888 0.075
0.5 0.075
0.66882 0.075
0.83465 0.059162
1 0.0015

Table 955: Base 64 representation:


lcgWglcgWgxxqgI

Figure 721: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

244
Profile: naca16018 Table 960: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.395 5.394 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: 1.2 1.99 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.4 -0.9 dcts
Cm error -2 1 mcts
Upper transition point 0.65 0.32 %

Figure 722: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 723: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 957: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18 % @0.5C
Maximum Camber: 7.5413e-007 % @0.13C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.36 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5305 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.5305 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 45.4192 deg
Release Angle: 8.7605e-006 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.7292e-006 deg
Camber deflection: 1.849e-005 deg

Table 958: Controlpoints


1 -0.0018
0.83431 -0.071141
0.66824 -0.09
0.5 -0.09
0.27878 -0.09
0 -0.053334
0 0
0 0.053334
0.27878 0.09
0.5 0.09
0.66823 0.09
0.83431 0.071143
1 0.0018

Table 959: Base 64 representation:


lcgWllcgWlxxygJ

Figure 724: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

245
Profile: naca16021 Table 964: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.465 1.876 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: 1.24 1.77 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.6 -1 dcts
Cm error -4 -12 mcts
Upper transition point 0.68 0.86 %

Figure 725: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 726: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 961: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 21 % @0.5C
Maximum Camber: 3.2419e-006 % @0.63C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.42 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.0828 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.0828 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 52.0517 deg
Release Angle: 6.1078e-005 deg
Nose Incidence: 1.7055e-005 deg
Camber deflection: 7.8132e-005 deg

Table 962: Controlpoints


1 -0.0021
0.8341 -0.083107
0.66787 -0.105
0.5 -0.105
0.27871 -0.105
0 -0.062209
0 0
0 0.062209
0.27871 0.105
0.5 0.105
0.66782 0.105
0.83408 0.083119
1 0.0021

Table 963: Base 64 representation:


lcgVslcgVsxx5gL

Figure 727: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

246
Profile: naca23012 Table 968: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.739 5.932 ects
Information: NACA 23012 airfoil RMS curvature error: 29.45 34.23 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4 -4.2 dcts
Cm error 1 -2 mcts
Upper transition point 2.31 2.37 %

Figure 728: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 729: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 965: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.9705 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 1.791 % @0.17C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.252 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.1032 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.62405 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.8927 deg
Release Angle: 1.2515 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.7871 deg
Camber deflection: 19.0386 deg

Table 966: Controlpoints


1 -0.00126
0.90663 -0.01222
0.60478 -0.045099
0.34417 -0.045099
0.27177 -0.045099
0 -0.033625
0 0
0 0.0082911
0.002513 0.075968
0.2513 0.075968
0.51798 0.075968
0.8909 0.018926
1 0.00126

Table 967: Base 64 representation:


H-QXgvNWZTPQShG

Figure 730: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

247
Profile: naca23015 Table 972: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.407 5.304 ects
Information: NACA 23015 airfoil RMS curvature error: 15.85 15.51 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.2 -3.9 dcts
Cm error -2 -9 mcts
Upper transition point 6.44 6.1 %

Figure 731: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 732: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 969: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.1031 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 1.8176 % @0.17C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.32 %C
Upper nose radius: 5.0605 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0708 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 20.025 deg
Release Angle: 1.2126 deg
Nose Incidence: 20.7899 deg
Camber deflection: 22.0025 deg

Table 970: Controlpoints


1 -0.0016
0.62909 -0.05902
0.384 -0.0596
0.3 -0.0596
0.23383 -0.0596
0 -0.040857
0 0
0 0.0923
0.2475 0.0923
0.25 0.0923
0.26833 0.0923
0.54755 0.091393
1 0.0016

Table 971: Base 64 representation:


BQCmrOTIZ–WhI

Figure 733: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

248
Profile: naca23018 Table 976: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.66 3.766 ects
Information: NACA 23018 airfoil RMS curvature error: 13.96 13.14 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.2 0.9 dcts
Cm error -1 -5 mcts
Upper transition point 1.55 1.28 %

Figure 734: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 735: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 973: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.979 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 1.8217 % @0.13C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.33 %C
Upper nose radius: 7.3499 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.4851 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 24.4098 deg
Release Angle: 1.2313 deg
Nose Incidence: 24.1255 deg
Camber deflection: 25.3568 deg

Table 974: Controlpoints


1 -0.00165
0.62326 -0.0747
0.356 -0.0747
0.3 -0.0747
0.17144 -0.0747
0 -0.0412
0 0
0 0.099117
0.2005 0.1056
0.25 0.1056
0.2946 0.1056
0.56493 0.10559
1 0.00165

Table 975: Base 64 representation:


7NQEsibTFg bhI

Figure 736: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

249
Profile: naca23021 Table 980: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.375 6.181 ects
Information: NACA 23021 airfoil RMS curvature error: 15.77 15.74 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.1 -0.8 dcts
Cm error -15 -16 mcts
Upper transition point 3.61 3.47 %

Figure 737: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 738: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 977: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 21.01 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.8621 % @0.08C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.44 %C
Upper nose radius: 26.1625 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.5911 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 27.0411 deg
Release Angle: 1.2786 deg
Nose Incidence: 31.9714 deg
Camber deflection: 33.25 deg

Table 978: Controlpoints


1 -0.0022
0.60167 -0.088627
0.377 -0.0895
0.3 -0.0895
0.12601 -0.0895
0 -0.03656
0 0
0 0.041786
0.0094416 0.1206
0.3 0.1206
0.36479 0.1206
0.61104 0.10496
1 0.0022

Table 979: Base 64 representation:


W9TGyakTHl3-ehL

Figure 739: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

250
Profile: naca63010a Table 984: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.536 2.86 ects
Information: NACA 63-010 A aifoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.4 -1.8 dcts
Cm error -2 1 mcts
Upper transition point 3.29 3.14 %

Figure 740: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 741: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 981: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.99 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: -2.1823e-007 % @0.9C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.042 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.64719 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.64719 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.3536 deg
Release Angle: -2.6497e-006 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -2.6497e-006 deg

Table 982: Controlpoints


1 -0.00021
0.66543 -0.033468
0.54399 -0.04995
0.35 -0.04995
0.20978 -0.04995
0 -0.030085
0 0
0 0.030085
0.20978 0.04995
0.35 0.04995
0.54399 0.04995
0.66543 0.033468
1 0.00021

Table 983: Base 64 representation:


maWTVmaWTVuuNgB

Figure 742: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

251
Profile: naca63012a Table 988: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.564 5.904 ects
Information: NACA 63-012 A RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.7 -2 dcts
Cm error -3 -4 mcts
Upper transition point 3.68 4.96 %

Figure 743: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 744: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 985: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.99 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 6.6652e-007 % @0.06C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.05 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.91816 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.91816 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.4899 deg
Release Angle: -1.2225e-006 deg
Nose Incidence: 1.2805e-005 deg
Camber deflection: 1.1583e-005 deg

Table 986: Controlpoints


1 -0.00025
0.6642 -0.039964
0.53843 -0.05995
0.35 -0.05995
0.20342 -0.05995
0 -0.035287
0 0
0 0.035287
0.20342 0.05995
0.35 0.05995
0.53843 0.05995
0.6642 0.039964
1 0.00025

Table 987: Base 64 representation:


lbWTalbWTauuPgB

Figure 745: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

252
Profile: naca63015a Table 992: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.63 3.118 ects
Information: NACA 63-015 A -MOD TE GAP RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.4 0 dcts
Cm error 0 -2 mcts
Upper transition point -0.31 0.31 %

Figure 746: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 747: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 989: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.992 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: -9.9462e-007 % @0.65C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.064 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3927 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.3927 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.5543 deg
Release Angle: 5.855e-006 deg
Nose Incidence: -7.1751e-006 deg
Camber deflection: -1.3201e-006 deg

Table 990: Controlpoints


1 -0.00032
0.66934 -0.048423
0.53265 -0.07496
0.35 -0.07496
0.19429 -0.07496
0 -0.042472
0 0
0 0.042472
0.19429 0.07496
0.35 0.07496
0.53265 0.07496
0.66934 0.048423
1 0.00032

Table 991: Base 64 representation:


jcWSgjcWSgssSgC

Figure 748: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

253
Profile: naca63206 Table 996: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6 · 106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.934 4.589 ects
Information: NACA 63-206 airfoil RMS curvature error: 30.46 28.98 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 3.7 -2.5 dcts
Cm error -6 10 mcts
Upper transition point -9.23 5.34 %

Figure 749: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 750: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 993: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 5.9667 % @0.36C
Maximum Camber: 1.1108 % @0.48C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.28406 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.18456 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 1.4576 deg
Release Angle: 4.1859 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.1666 deg
Camber deflection: 7.3525 deg

Table 994: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85131 0.0089825
0.60744 -0.01982
0.3004 -0.01982
0.3004 -0.01982
0 -0.019225
0 0
0 0.017665
0.16478 0.04042
0.39981 0.04042
0.59578 0.04042
0.8578 0.012227
1 0

Table 995: Base 64 representation:


claVR9ATcIXYCmA

Figure 751: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

254
Profile: naca63210a Table 1000: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.556 3.424 ects
Information: NACA 63-210 airfoil RMS curvature error: 31.12 31.32 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -22.9 -22.2 dcts
Cm error -22 -31 mcts
Upper transition point 41.98 40.96 %

Figure 752: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 753: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 997: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 1.1138 % @0.54C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.8271 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.54045 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0.99917 deg
Release Angle: 5.8677 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.9197 deg
Camber deflection: 9.7874 deg

Table 998: Controlpoints


1 0
0.89171 0.010176
0.55982 -0.0397
0.35049 -0.0397
0.15957 -0.0397
0 -0.023977
0 0
0 0.034658
0.21785 0.0603
0.34951 0.0603
0.58294 0.0603
0.71228 0.032106
1 0

Table 999: Base 64 representation:


kYWXamiWVRrQBpA

Figure 754: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

255
Profile: naca63212 Table 1004: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.298 3.456 ects
Information: NACA 63(1)-212 RMS curvature error: 23.25 26.23 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2 2.4 dcts
Cm error -2 -4 mcts
Upper transition point -4.03 -4.7 %

Figure 755: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 756: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1001: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 1.1021 % @0.54C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1508 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.75291 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 1.8328 deg
Release Angle: 5.1291 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.3082 deg
Camber deflection: 9.4373 deg

Table 1002: Controlpoints


1 0
0.87266 0.0093801
0.56594 -0.0497
0.35059 -0.0497
0.15044 -0.0497
0 -0.027479
0 0
0 0.040232
0.21097 0.0703
0.34941 0.0703
0.59932 0.0703
0.78203 0.023084
1 0

Table 1003: Base 64 representation:


kZWZeikWVViTCnA

Figure 757: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

256
Profile: naca63215 Table 1008: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.305 4.818 ects
Information: NACA 63(2)-215 airfoil RMS curvature error: 8.45 9.07 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.2 1.9 dcts
Cm error -2 4 mcts
Upper transition point -1.56 -2.88 %

Figure 758: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 759: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1005: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 1.1018 % @0.54C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.7449 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0687 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.3287 deg
Release Angle: 5.0364 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.2801 deg
Camber deflection: 10.3165 deg

Table 1006: Controlpoints


1 0
0.86445 0.0091745
0.56241 -0.0647
0.35074 -0.0647
0.13301 -0.0647
0 -0.030783
0 0
0 0.048664
0.20358 0.0853
0.34926 0.0853
0.5914 0.0853
0.80095 0.021626
1 0

Table 1007: Base 64 representation:


kbWYjenWVcfUDnA

Figure 760: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

257
Profile: naca63215b Table 1012: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.695 5.456 ects
Information: NACA-NASA/AMES/Hicks 63(2)-215 MOD B air- RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
foil CD error -1.9 -1.9 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 10 12 mcts
Upper transition point 2.42 2.61 %

Figure 762: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 761: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1009: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.0533 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 1.4628 % @0.1C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 5.8649 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0799 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.9099 deg
Release Angle: 4.6451 deg
Nose Incidence: 21.927 deg
Camber deflection: 26.5721 deg

Table 1010: Controlpoints


1 0
0.83802 0.0076106
0.58806 -0.0648
0.325 -0.0648
0.16089 -0.0648
0 -0.034035
0 0
0 0.086
0.18916 0.086
0.275 0.086
0.63183 0.086
0.72819 0.03145
1 0

Table 1011: Base 64 representation:


USfkhgVZcuZEnA
Figure 763: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

258
Profile: naca63412 Table 1016: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.944 4.19 ects
Information: NACA 63(1)-412 airfoil RMS curvature error: 31.62 32.09 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.5 0.1 dcts
Cm error 2 -2 mcts
Upper transition point -0.55 0.35 %

Figure 764: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 765: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1013: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.9265 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 2.2236 % @0.48C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3056 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.63442 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.933 deg
Release Angle: 7.9167 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.2469 deg
Camber deflection: 16.1636 deg

Table 1014: Controlpoints


1 0
0.83671 0.01846
0.58654 -0.03984
0.3016 -0.03984
0.18423 -0.03984
0 -0.027914
0 0
0 0.037475
0.16837 0.08062
0.39924 0.08062
0.5838 0.08062
0.86524 0.022269
1 0

Table 1015: Base 64 representation:


ekaUhsZTaRVZDsA

Figure 766: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

259
Profile: naca63415 Table 1020: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.152 5.952 ects
Information: NACA 63(2)-415 airfoil RMS curvature error: 15.96 17.14 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.3 0.3 dcts
Cm error 10 -5 mcts
Upper transition point 0.45 -0.35 %

Figure 767: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 768: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1017: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.985 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 2.211 % @0.51C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.1577 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.92537 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.9513 deg
Release Angle: 8.4465 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.1044 deg
Camber deflection: 18.5509 deg

Table 1018: Controlpoints


1 0
0.83466 0.018753
0.58944 -0.05474
0.302 -0.05474
0.16351 -0.05474
0 -0.03176
0 0
0 0.057215
0.22757 0.09559
0.34852 0.09559
0.57766 0.09559
0.71845 0.051786
1 0

Table 1019: Base 64 representation:


lWWXoksTaXqaEtA

Figure 769: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

260
Profile: naca64008a Table 1024: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.938 1.875 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.7 -1.6 dcts
Cm error -5 -6 mcts
Upper transition point 1.99 1.87 %

Figure 770: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 771: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1021: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.996 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: -4.4622e-007 % @0.08C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.036 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.39127 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.39127 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.2487 deg
Release Angle: 1.7975e-006 deg
Nose Incidence: -7.4926e-006 deg
Camber deflection: -5.6951e-006 deg

Table 1022: Controlpoints


1 -0.00018
0.80445 -0.015997
0.56603 -0.03998
0.4 -0.03998
0.21776 -0.03998
0 -0.023833
0 0
0 0.023833
0.21776 0.03998
0.4 0.03998
0.56603 0.03998
0.80445 0.015997
1 0.00018

Table 1023: Base 64 representation:


lsaSRlsaSRssKgB

Figure 772: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

261
Profile: naca64012 Table 1028: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.537 7.195 ects
Information: NACA 64(1)-012 airfoil RMS curvature error: 16.98 15.96 %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 773: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 774: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1025: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.962 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: -1.1541e-005 % @0.84C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.86638 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.86638 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0.57296 deg
Release Angle: -0.00014936 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -0.00014936 deg

Table 1026: Controlpoints


1 0
0.90038 -0.00049837
0.56563 -0.05981
0.4 -0.05981
0.18642 -0.05981
0 -0.032814
0 0
0 0.032814
0.18642 0.05981
0.4 0.05981
0.56563 0.05981
0.90038 0.00049785
1 0

Table 1027: Base 64 representation:


ihaSaihaSaPPBgA

Figure 775: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

262
Profile: naca64012a Table 1032: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.539 5.809 ects
Information: NACA 64(1)-012A airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 776: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 777: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1029: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.986 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 0.011111 % @0.8C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.05 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1735 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1735 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.9724 deg
Release Angle: 0.071099 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 0.071099 deg

Table 1030: Controlpoints


1 -0.00025
0.79705 -0.024464
0.55625 -0.05993
0.4 -0.05993
0.20536 -0.05993
0 -0.034243
0 0
0 0.034243
0.20536 0.05993
0.4 0.05993
0.55624 0.05993
0.79705 0.024464
1 0.00025

Table 1031: Base 64 representation:


kfaRakfaRassPgB

Figure 778: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

263
Profile: naca64015 Table 1036: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.952 3.869 ects
Information: NACA 64(2)-015 airfoil RMS curvature error: 16.02 17.93 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.4 2.7 dcts
Cm error -3 -4 mcts
Upper transition point -3 -3.54 %

Figure 779: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 780: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1033: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.964 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 1.7614e-006 % @0.58C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3921 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.3921 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.8592 deg
Release Angle: 1.5982e-005 deg
Nose Incidence: -2.1332e-005 deg
Camber deflection: -5.3498e-006 deg

Table 1034: Controlpoints


1 0
0.81269 -0.0095858
0.60783 -0.07482
0.35 -0.07482
0.24374 -0.07482
0 -0.047562
0 0
0 0.047562
0.24374 0.07482
0.35 0.07482
0.60783 0.07482
0.81269 0.009586
1 0

Table 1035: Base 64 representation:


oTWZgoTWZgffHgA

Figure 781: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

264
Profile: naca64015a Table 1040: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.021 3.777 ects
Information: NACA 64(2)-015A airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 782: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 783: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1037: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.974 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 0.014222 % @0.8C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.064 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6732 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.6732 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.1715 deg
Release Angle: 0.090668 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 0.090668 deg

Table 1038: Controlpoints


1 -0.00032
0.79558 -0.030353
0.54989 -0.07487
0.4 -0.07487
0.19617 -0.07487
0 -0.041309
0 0
0 0.041309
0.19617 0.07487
0.4 0.07487
0.54989 0.07487
0.79558 0.030354
1 0.00032

Table 1039: Base 64 representation:


igaQgigaQgssTgC

Figure 784: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

265
Profile: naca64108 Table 1044: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.208 3.455 ects
Information: NACA 64-108 airfoil RMS curvature error: 16.48 17.99 %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN -3 dcts
Cm error NaN 9 mcts
Upper transition point NaN 6.42 %

Figure 785: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 786: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1041: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.9699 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 0.57337 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.44475 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.36731 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.0681 deg
Release Angle: 1.636 deg
Nose Incidence: 1.6875 deg
Camber deflection: 3.3236 deg

Table 1042: Controlpoints


1 0
0.84396 0.0016396
0.61931 -0.03464
0.3502 -0.03464
0.27164 -0.03464
0 -0.025791
0 0
0 0.02512
0.21282 0.04528
0.39987 0.04528
0.59618 0.04528
0.8962 0.0048405
1 0

Table 1043: Base 64 representation:


jeaVTvOWbPQaCiA

Figure 787: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

266
Profile: naca64110 Table 1048: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.55 4.568 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: 32.75 40.77 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.7 -5 dcts
Cm error 7 -10 mcts
Upper transition point 9.78 10.74 %

Figure 788: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 789: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1045: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9615 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 0.58069 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.68033 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.57638 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.1962 deg
Release Angle: 1.3708 deg
Nose Incidence: 1.7929 deg
Camber deflection: 3.1637 deg

Table 1046: Controlpoints


1 0
0.83986 0.00076226
0.61424 -0.04465
0.35025 -0.04465
0.26064 -0.04465
0 -0.031647
0 0
0 0.030647
0.20708 0.05524
0.39984 0.05524
0.58776 0.05524
0.90078 0.0042781
1 0

Table 1047: Base 64 representation:


jfaUYsQWaTPbChA

Figure 790: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

267
Profile: naca64206 Table 1052: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.573 5.051 ects
Information: NACA 64-206 airfoil RMS curvature error: 69.88 80.39 %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 791: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 792: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1049: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.0003 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 1.0859 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.28998 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.16618 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.5334 deg
Release Angle: 2.9779 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.3798 deg
Camber deflection: 6.3577 deg

Table 1050: Controlpoints


1 0
0.73107 0.0033383
0.62907 -0.01951
0.35029 -0.01951
0.34007 -0.01951
0 -0.01931
0 0
0 0.020649
0.22056 0.04066
0.39981 0.04066
0.60228 0.04066
0.83311 0.015319
1 0

Table 1051: Base 64 representation:


gsaWR-CWbIbtFkA

Figure 793: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

268
Profile: naca64208 Table 1056: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.095 5.704 ects
Information: NACA 64-208 airfoil RMS curvature error: 24.19 24.01 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.5 -4 dcts
Cm error 4 -8 mcts
Upper transition point 5.35 9.62 %

Figure 794: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 795: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1053: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.986 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 1.1136 % @0.48C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.49629 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.32318 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 1.9973 deg
Release Angle: 4.3279 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.4911 deg
Camber deflection: 7.819 deg

Table 1054: Controlpoints


1 0
0.86631 0.0077769
0.60064 -0.02949
0.35039 -0.02949
0.29283 -0.02949
0 -0.025118
0 0
0 0.026911
0.21889 0.05063
0.39974 0.05063
0.60221 0.05063
0.8722 0.011915
1 0

Table 1055: Base 64 representation:


hsaWW2LWZNVVCmA

Figure 796: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

269
Profile: naca64209 Table 1060: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.442 3.367 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: 90.31 90.32 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -20.7 -21.1 dcts
Cm error -4 -6 mcts
Upper transition point 9.84 10.97 %

Figure 797: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 798: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1057: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.9814 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 1.1171 % @0.48C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.61863 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.41654 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.1552 deg
Release Angle: 4.2029 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.5978 deg
Camber deflection: 7.8007 deg

Table 1058: Controlpoints


1 0
0.86238 0.0075144
0.60121 -0.03449
0.35044 -0.03449
0.29748 -0.03449
0 -0.028742
0 0
0 0.029937
0.21731 0.05561
0.39971 0.05561
0.59918 0.05561
0.881 0.010999
1 0

Table 1059: Base 64 representation:


hsaVY0KWZPTWCmA

Figure 799: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

270
Profile: naca64210 Table 1064: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.601 4.347 ects
Information: NACA 64-210 airfoil RMS curvature error: 40.14 40.09 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1 -1.3 dcts
Cm error 67 58 mcts
Upper transition point 1.18 2.46 %

Figure 800: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 801: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1061: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9848 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 1.0899 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.75417 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.5164 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.0539 deg
Release Angle: 2.1809 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.7276 deg
Camber deflection: 5.9085 deg

Table 1062: Controlpoints


1 0
0.70542 -0.0043503
0.62507 -0.0395
0.35049 -0.0395
0.26389 -0.0395
0 -0.030141
0 0
0 0.032896
0.21523 0.06059
0.39968 0.06059
0.59536 0.06059
0.88762 0.010243
1 0

Table 1063: Base 64 representation:


ieaVawQWbRSxHjA

Figure 802: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

271
Profile: naca64212 Table 1068: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.712 3.505 ects
Information: NACA 64(1)-212 airfoil RMS curvature error: 14.64 13.99 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1 -1.1 dcts
Cm error 7 -3 mcts
Upper transition point 1.27 1.96 %

Figure 803: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 804: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1065: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.9634 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 1.1276 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0636 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.74326 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.4845 deg
Release Angle: 3.8097 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.0433 deg
Camber deflection: 7.8531 deg

Table 1066: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85289 0.0065966
0.59861 -0.04948
0.35059 -0.04948
0.24343 -0.04948
0 -0.034731
0 0
0 0.038577
0.20988 0.07052
0.39961 0.07052
0.58779 0.07052
0.89332 0.0094307
1 0

Table 1067: Base 64 representation:


ieaUesUWYVRXDlA

Figure 805: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

272
Profile: naca64212mb Table 1072: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.866 7.232 ects
Information: NACA-NASA/AMES/Hicks RMS curvature error: 31.74 30.72 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.1 -2.9 dcts
Cm error -2 -12 mcts
Upper transition point 4.88 4.65 %

Figure 806: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 807: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1069: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.0276 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 1.3738 % @0.13C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.9141 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.74326 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.722 deg
Release Angle: 4.9286 deg
Nose Incidence: 18.6022 deg
Camber deflection: 23.5308 deg

Table 1070: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85289 0.0065968
0.59861 -0.04948
0.35059 -0.04948
0.24343 -0.04948
0 -0.034731
0 0
0 0.071
0.19318 0.071
0.29921 0.071
0.59903 0.071
0.63116 0.047182
1 0

Table 1071: Base 64 representation:


XTbesUWYV6XFnA

Figure 808: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

273
Profile: naca65209 Table 1076: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.75 5.698 ects
Information: NACA 65-209 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -6.7 6.4 dcts
Cm error 45 -38 mcts
Upper transition point 15.03 -14.85 %

Figure 809: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 810: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1073: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.992 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 1.071 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.54057 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.33952 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.904 deg
Release Angle: 3.0723 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.6589 deg
Camber deflection: 6.7313 deg

Table 1074: Controlpoints


1 0
0.73131 -0.0041254
0.67303 -0.03425
0.40029 -0.03425
0.27484 -0.03425
0 -0.024941
0 0
0 0.03049
0.25795 0.05567
0.39971 0.05567
0.62474 0.05567
0.72647 0.033703
1 0

Table 1075: Base 64 representation:


iXaYYuUasPu0JkA

Figure 811: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

274
Profile: naca65210 Table 1080: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.801 3.513 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: 24.16 26.97 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.2 -1 dcts
Cm error -5 -5 mcts
Upper transition point 1.73 1.47 %

Figure 812: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 813: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1077: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.992 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 1.0892 % @0.53C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.6541 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.42043 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.6253 deg
Release Angle: 4.9246 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.776 deg
Camber deflection: 8.7006 deg

Table 1078: Controlpoints


1 0
0.87582 0.005665
0.64179 -0.03925
0.40032 -0.03925
0.26279 -0.03925
0 -0.02714
0 0
0 0.033492
0.25724 0.06067
0.39968 0.06067
0.63322 0.06067
0.76364 0.030015
1 0

Table 1079: Base 64 representation:


iXaZarWaaRoWFnA

Figure 814: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

275
Profile: naca65410 Table 1084: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.56 6.088 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: 24.11 24.26 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.5 -0.2 dcts
Cm error 15 -11 mcts
Upper transition point -1.13 -0.57 %

Figure 815: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 816: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1081: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9329 % @0.41C
Maximum Camber: 2.2435 % @0.5C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.72221 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.29444 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.5537 deg
Release Angle: 8.062 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.5956 deg
Camber deflection: 15.6577 deg

Table 1082: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85399 0.014793
0.67282 -0.02863
0.35097 -0.02863
0.28078 -0.02863
0 -0.023477
0 0
0 0.031077
0.20059 0.07153
0.44968 0.07153
0.63932 0.07153
0.9094 0.016528
1 0

Table 1083: Base 64 representation:


cisWfzNWgMQsFsA

Figure 817: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

276
Profile: naca66206 Table 1088: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.965 5.274 ects
Information: NACA 66-206 airfoil RMS curvature error: 53.55 45.66 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.7 -1.8 dcts
Cm error 22 36 mcts
Upper transition point 7.42 4.06 %

Figure 818: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 819: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1085: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6 % @0.45C
Maximum Camber: 1.095 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.23621 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.11853 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.4448 deg
Release Angle: 3.5478 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.5205 deg
Camber deflection: 7.0684 deg

Table 1086: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79002 0.0011926
0.7816 -0.01905
0.4501 -0.01905
0.4501 -0.01905
0 -0.01886
0 0
0 0.019933
0.25232 0.04095
0.4499 0.04095
0.68838 0.04095
0.78838 0.025123
1 0

Table 1087: Base 64 representation:


fcscR-AsmIq9HlA

Figure 820: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

277
Profile: naca66209 Table 1092: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.617 5.261 ects
Information: NACA 66-209 airfoil RMS curvature error: 27.79 28.97 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -11.4 -10.8 dcts
Cm error 22 27 mcts
Upper transition point 25.53 24.67 %

Figure 821: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 822: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1089: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.998 % @0.45C
Maximum Camber: 1.095 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.49626 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.30915 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.9176 deg
Release Angle: 3.1586 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.6247 deg
Camber deflection: 6.7833 deg

Table 1090: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79505 -0.0028625
0.76787 -0.03404
0.45014 -0.03404
0.31106 -0.03404
0 -0.02532
0 0
0 0.029358
0.26052 0.05594
0.44986 0.05594
0.72265 0.05594
0.8418 0.019753
1 0

Table 1091: Base 64 representation:


hbsgYvUskPk4JkA

Figure 823: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

278
Profile: naca632615 Table 1096: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.29 6.321 ects
Information: NACA 63(2)-615 airfoil RMS curvature error: 46.64 51.07 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.4 0 dcts
Cm error 12 -9 mcts
Upper transition point -0.89 -0.23 %

Figure 824: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 825: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1093: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.9254 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 3.3314 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.4129 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.68823 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 1.8209 deg
Release Angle: 12.7941 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.4476 deg
Camber deflection: 27.2417 deg

Table 1094: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85416 0.030689
0.55705 -0.04499
0.303 -0.04499
0.10271 -0.04499
0 -0.021709
0 0
0 0.055275
0.18994 0.10598
0.39857 0.10598
0.5724 0.10598
0.83475 0.040297
1 0

Table 1095: Base 64 representation:


ghaSsfpTXTZVC0A

Figure 826: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

279
Profile: naca633018 Table 1100: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.21 5.405 ects
Information: NACA 63(3)-018 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.1 -0.6 dcts
Cm error -1 -1 mcts
Upper transition point 0.04 0.69 %

Figure 827: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 828: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1097: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18.014 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 3.6859e-007 % @0.95C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.7772 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.7772 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.4041 deg
Release Angle: 1.0846e-005 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 1.0846e-005 deg

Table 1098: Controlpoints


1 0
0.8204 -0.0069061
0.58133 -0.09007
0.33928 -0.09007
0.15862 -0.09007
0 -0.04335
0 0
0 0.04335
0.15862 0.09007
0.33928 0.09007
0.58133 0.09007
0.8204 0.0069062
1 0

Table 1099: Base 64 representation:


fhWXlfhWXlbbFgA

Figure 829: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

280
Profile: naca633218 Table 1104: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.417 5.37 ects
Information: NACA 63(3)-218 airfoil RMS curvature error: 19.34 21.41 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -18.3 -17.7 dcts
Cm error -24 -43 mcts
Upper transition point 27.93 27.09 %

Figure 830: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 831: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1101: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 1.1038 % @0.54C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.2868 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.3773 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.7876 deg
Release Angle: 4.9507 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.9769 deg
Camber deflection: 10.9276 deg

Table 1102: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85728 0.0088716
0.55605 -0.0797
0.35089 -0.0797
0.12057 -0.0797
0 -0.033272
0 0
0 0.049983
0.17051 0.1003
0.34911 0.1003
0.58136 0.1003
0.80844 0.021299
1 0

Table 1103: Base 64 representation:


ggWXqbpWUhsVDnA

Figure 832: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

281
Profile: naca633418 Table 1108: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.09 4.25 ects
Information: NACA 63,3-418 airfoil RMS curvature error: 55.18 55.42 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 -0.3 dcts
Cm error 1 0 mcts
Upper transition point 0.59 0.96 %

Figure 833: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 834: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1105: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.9418 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 2.2281 % @0.48C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.9078 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1164 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.5978 deg
Release Angle: 8.1849 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.9873 deg
Camber deflection: 20.1722 deg

Table 1106: Controlpoints


1 0
0.82404 0.01814
0.58303 -0.069703
0.30866 -0.069703
0.13614 -0.069703
0 -0.031832
0 0
0 0.060585
0.18935 0.11056
0.37059 0.11056
0.56832 0.11056
0.79899 0.037197
1 0

Table 1107: Base 64 representation:


ifYUusjUZeebFsA

Figure 835: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

282
Profile: naca633618 Table 1112: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.699 6.181 ects
Information: NACA 63(3)-618 airfoil RMS curvature error: 60.45 52.7 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.8 0.4 dcts
Cm error 11 10 mcts
Upper transition point 0.43 -1.24 %

Figure 836: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 837: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1109: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18.012 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 3.3203 % @0.51C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.7555 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.84777 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.5831 deg
Release Angle: 12.6247 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.8384 deg
Camber deflection: 30.4631 deg

Table 1110: Controlpoints


1 0
0.83988 0.03064
0.56447 -0.0599
0.3036 -0.0599
0.1068 -0.0599
0 -0.024569
0 0
0 0.078234
0.2486 0.12086
0.34734 0.12086
0.54078 0.12086
0.65262 0.089297
1 0

Table 1111: Base 64 representation:


oSWTzaoTYavYEzA

Figure 838: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

283
Profile: naca634221 Table 1116: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.788 4.614 ects
Information: NACA 63(4)-221 airfoil RMS curvature error: 15.55 21.31 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.2 0.4 dcts
Cm error -1 -11 mcts
Upper transition point 0.45 -0.34 %

Figure 839: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 840: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1113: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 20.998 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 1.1058 % @0.54C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.1545 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.5993 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.1957 deg
Release Angle: 4.8725 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.6882 deg
Camber deflection: 12.5608 deg

Table 1114: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85091 0.0085306
0.55027 -0.09469
0.35103 -0.09469
0.10736 -0.09469
0 -0.033833
0 0
0 0.062019
0.1829 0.11529
0.34897 0.11529
0.57251 0.11529
0.81169 0.021357
1 0

Table 1115: Base 64 representation:


heWWwXrWUncVEnA

Figure 841: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

284
Profile: naca634421 Table 1120: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.63 7.815 ects
Information: NACA 63(4)-421 airfoil RMS curvature error: 13.46 13.24 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.8 1.9 dcts
Cm error 17 15 mcts
Upper transition point -0.62 -1.82 %

Figure 842: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 843: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1117: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 20.9622 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 2.2163 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.0717 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.3995 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.8175 deg
Release Angle: 7.9165 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.2594 deg
Camber deflection: 22.1759 deg

Table 1118: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80885 0.016749
0.58792 -0.08464
0.30281 -0.08464
0.13763 -0.08464
0 -0.035835
0 0
0 0.077145
0.21925 0.12558
0.34793 0.12558
0.57508 0.12558
0.77346 0.043318
1 0

Table 1119: Base 64 representation:


mYWW1biTajheGsA

Figure 844: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

285
Profile: naca641112 Table 1124: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.865 4.28 ects
Information: NACA 64(1)-112 airfoil RMS curvature error: 15.89 17.78 %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN -2 dcts
Cm error NaN -10 mcts
Upper transition point NaN 3.09 %

Figure 845: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 846: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1121: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.9481 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 0.5881 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.96042 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.8236 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.3573 deg
Release Angle: 1.1275 deg
Nose Incidence: 1.9347 deg
Camber deflection: 3.0622 deg

Table 1122: Controlpoints


1 0
0.83573 -0.00014672
0.60963 -0.05463
0.35029 -0.05463
0.2479 -0.05463
0 -0.036894
0 0
0 0.035734
0.19943 0.06517
0.39981 0.06517
0.58041 0.06517
0.90159 0.0039633
1 0

Table 1123: Base 64 representation:


igaTcqTWaXPbDhA

Figure 847: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

286
Profile: naca642215 Table 1128: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.197 6.64 ects
Information: NACA 64(2)-215 airfoil RMS curvature error: 17.3 18.47 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.8 -0.7 dcts
Cm error 10 -3 mcts
Upper transition point 0.79 1.29 %

Figure 848: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 849: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1125: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.9528 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 1.1377 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6225 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1323 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.639 deg
Release Angle: 3.4303 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.6734 deg
Camber deflection: 8.1037 deg

Table 1126: Controlpoints


1 0
0.84631 0.0056646
0.59274 -0.06452
0.35074 -0.06452
0.2251 -0.06452
0 -0.041221
0 0
0 0.046919
0.20352 0.08544
0.39952 0.08544
0.57632 0.08544
0.89803 0.008473
1 0

Table 1127: Base 64 representation:


ifaTjoXWYcPYDlA

Figure 850: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

287
Profile: naca642415 Table 1132: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.295 4.546 ects
Information: NACA 64(2)-415 airfoil RMS curvature error: 30.95 33.08 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.1 -0.3 dcts
Cm error 8 -15 mcts
Upper transition point 0.34 1.45 %

Figure 851: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 852: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1129: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.9822 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 2.2254 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.9561 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.9131 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.5702 deg
Release Angle: 8.6736 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.3831 deg
Camber deflection: 18.0568 deg

Table 1130: Controlpoints


1 0
0.86453 0.017567
0.57231 -0.05421
0.35147 -0.05421
0.19563 -0.05421
0 -0.034509
0 0
0 0.053825
0.22217 0.09614
0.39904 0.09614
0.58579 0.09614
0.87818 0.02139
1 0

Table 1131: Base 64 representation:


jcaUoocWWXTUDtA

Figure 853: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

288
Profile: naca643218 Table 1136: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.688 6.397 ects
Information: NACA 64(3)-218 airfoil RMS curvature error: 13.73 13.82 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.7 -0.8 dcts
Cm error 8 -21 mcts
Upper transition point 0.95 1.95 %

Figure 854: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 855: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1133: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.9222 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 1.147 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.2741 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.5532 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.7454 deg
Release Angle: 3.1097 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.4645 deg
Camber deflection: 8.5742 deg

Table 1134: Controlpoints


1 0
0.84138 0.0048102
0.58538 -0.07949
0.35088 -0.07949
0.21018 -0.07949
0 -0.046651
0 0
0 0.054487
0.19982 0.10023
0.39942 0.10023
0.56557 0.10023
0.89876 0.0079364
1 0

Table 1135: Base 64 representation:


igaSqlaWXhPYDkA

Figure 856: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

289
Profile: naca643418 Table 1140: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.184 7.01 ects
Information: NACA 64(3)-418 airfoil RMS curvature error: 19.48 20.06 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.9 -1.1 dcts
Cm error 5 1 mcts
Upper transition point 1.23 1.91 %

Figure 857: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 858: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1137: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.9503 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 2.2338 % @0.48C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.825 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2249 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.6363 deg
Release Angle: 8.3665 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.1689 deg
Camber deflection: 19.5354 deg

Table 1138: Controlpoints


1 0
0.8586 0.017483
0.5695 -0.06917
0.35177 -0.06917
0.1784 -0.06917
0 -0.038168
0 0
0 0.063882
0.22028 0.11093
0.39885 0.11093
0.57585 0.11093
0.88986 0.018797
1 0

Table 1139: Base 64 representation:


ksaTuigXVeRVDtA

Figure 859: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

290
Profile: naca643618 Table 1144: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.266 6.912 ects
Information: NACA 64(3)-618 airfoil RMS curvature error: 24.85 24.37 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 0.6 dcts
Cm error 7 44 mcts
Upper transition point -0.26 -1.54 %

Figure 860: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 861: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1141: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.9753 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 3.3284 % @0.5C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.3346 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.93421 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.5567 deg
Release Angle: 13.2255 deg
Nose Incidence: 16.183 deg
Camber deflection: 29.4085 deg

Table 1142: Controlpoints


1 0
0.86612 0.028329
0.55184 -0.05885
0.35265 -0.05885
0.13207 -0.05885
0 -0.02868
0 0
0 0.074418
0.24912 0.12163
0.39827 0.12163
0.57974 0.12163
0.8633 0.035363
1 0

Table 1143: Base 64 representation:


mYZTzfnXUZVTD0A

Figure 862: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

291
Profile: naca644221 Table 1148: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.484 7.578 ects
Information: NACA 64(4)-221 airfoil RMS curvature error: 12.74 15.46 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.4 1 dcts
Cm error 1 -6 mcts
Upper transition point -1.99 -3.11 %

Figure 863: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 864: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1145: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 20.96 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 1.1044 % @0.55C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.1731 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.0152 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.6422 deg
Release Angle: 4.7615 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.5365 deg
Camber deflection: 11.2981 deg

Table 1146: Controlpoints


1 0
0.8378 0.0040786
0.57792 -0.0945
0.35103 -0.0945
0.19821 -0.0945
0 -0.051603
0 0
0 0.073699
0.25676 0.1151
0.34897 0.1151
0.59456 0.1151
0.77995 0.03125
1 0

Table 1147: Base 64 representation:


oRWYwicWWniZHnA

Figure 865: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

292
Profile: naca644421 Table 1152: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.409 8.329 ects
Information: NACA 64(4)-421 airfoil RMS curvature error: 27.97 30.87 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1 -1.2 dcts
Cm error 7 -2 mcts
Upper transition point 1.64 2.37 %

Figure 866: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 867: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1149: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 20.9249 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 2.2417 % @0.48C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.8513 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.5425 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.8492 deg
Release Angle: 7.897 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.1149 deg
Camber deflection: 21.0119 deg

Table 1150: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85161 0.016835
0.56428 -0.08419
0.35206 -0.08419
0.16664 -0.08419
0 -0.041396
0 0
0 0.075703
0.2272 0.12572
0.39865 0.12572
0.5659 0.12572
0.89539 0.017172
1 0

Table 1151: Base 64 representation:


mcaS1fhXVjPWDsA

Figure 868: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

293
Profile: naca651212 Table 1156: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.058 3.308 ects
Information: NACA 65(1)-212 airfoil RMS curvature error: 40.37 37.62 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.8 0.7 dcts
Cm error 0 -14 mcts
Upper transition point -2.14 -1.61 %

Figure 869: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 870: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1153: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.994 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 1.0935 % @0.54C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.91578 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.6032 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.3096 deg
Release Angle: 4.9369 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.0676 deg
Camber deflection: 9.0045 deg

Table 1154: Controlpoints


1 0
0.87217 0.0050941
0.63785 -0.04926
0.40039 -0.04926
0.24837 -0.04926
0 -0.031603
0 0
0 0.039624
0.25717 0.07068
0.39961 0.07068
0.63913 0.07068
0.77941 0.0294
1 0

Table 1155: Base 64 representation:


jXaaeoYaZVmXGnA

Figure 871: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

294
Profile: naca651412 Table 1160: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.382 5.067 ects
Information: NACA 65(1) 412 RMS curvature error: 84.77 58.69 %
Reference: NACA Report No 824 CD error -1.9 -1.6 dcts
Cm error 1 1 mcts
Upper transition point 2.8 2.92 %

Figure 872: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 873: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.

Table 1157: Geometrical properties


Maximum Thickness: 11.9524 % @0.41C
Maximum Camber: 2.2547 % @0.52C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1323 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.46676 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.581 deg
Release Angle: 9.4001 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.5228 deg
Camber deflection: 17.9229 deg

Table 1158: Controlpoints


1 0
0.88807 0.015207
0.621 -0.03855
0.40077 -0.03855
0.29256 -0.03855
0 -0.031226
0 0
0 0.044507
0.26267 0.08139
0.39923 0.08139
0.60772 0.08139
0.71663 0.056022
1 0

Table 1159: Base 64 representation:


iWaWizRaYQtTEuA

Figure 874: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

295
Profile: naca652215 Table 1164: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.18 6.013 ects
Information: NACA 65(2)-215 airfoil RMS curvature error: 18.11 21.66 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.6 -0.4 dcts
Cm error 0 -9 mcts
Upper transition point 1.17 0.26 %

Figure 875: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 876: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1161: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.996 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 1.0948 % @0.54C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3761 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.90885 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.3997 deg
Release Angle: 4.9056 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.6295 deg
Camber deflection: 9.5351 deg

Table 1162: Controlpoints


1 0
0.86585 0.0039949
0.6308 -0.06427
0.40048 -0.06427
0.2291 -0.06427
0 -0.037258
0 0
0 0.048245
0.25372 0.08569
0.39952 0.08569
0.63672 0.08569
0.79842 0.028709
1 0

Table 1163: Base 64 representation:


jXaZkkbaZbjXHnA

Figure 877: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

296
Profile: naca652415 Table 1168: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.559 4.269 ects
Information: NACA 65(2)-415 airfoil RMS curvature error: 19.33 19.49 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.3 -0.9 dcts
Cm error -4 -9 mcts
Upper transition point 1.31 2.44 %

Figure 878: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 879: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1165: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.994 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 2.1947 % @0.54C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6779 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.73409 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.3374 deg
Release Angle: 9.6389 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.1889 deg
Camber deflection: 18.8278 deg

Table 1166: Controlpoints


1 0
0.8796 0.01472
0.61851 -0.05355
0.40097 -0.05355
0.21039 -0.05355
0 -0.032088
0 0
0 0.05432
0.26378 0.09639
0.39903 0.09639
0.60324 0.09639
0.71296 0.062625
1 0

Table 1167: Base 64 representation:


jWaWoleaXXtUGvA

Figure 880: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

297
Profile: naca652415a05 Table 1172: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.056 5.881 ects
Information: NACA 65(2)-415 a=0.5 airfoil RMS curvature error: 57.45 66.61 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.1 -1.7 dcts
Cm error -11 -24 mcts
Upper transition point 0.15 1.26 %

Figure 881: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 882: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1169: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.996 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 2.972 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.9266 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.63886 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.7493 deg
Release Angle: 4.5301 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.5296 deg
Camber deflection: 17.0597 deg

Table 1170: Controlpoints


1 0
0.89915 0.0029147
0.60913 -0.04526
0.40084 -0.04526
0.22856 -0.04526
0 -0.0312
0 0
0 0.056768
0.25626 0.1047
0.39916 0.1047
0.65017 0.1047
0.80513 0.025326
1 0

Table 1171: Base 64 representation:


iXabsrcaWTjRGmA

Figure 883: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

298
Profile: naca653218 Table 1176: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.576 4.74 ects
Information: NACA 65(3)-218 airfoil RMS curvature error: 17.34 18.52 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.1 -0.3 dcts
Cm error 0 -15 mcts
Upper transition point 0.04 0.87 %

Figure 884: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 885: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1173: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.998 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 1.0955 % @0.54C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.9183 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2435 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.0397 deg
Release Angle: 4.8632 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.3296 deg
Camber deflection: 10.1927 deg

Table 1174: Controlpoints


1 0
0.86143 0.0032495
0.62367 -0.07928
0.40058 -0.07928
0.21498 -0.07928
0 -0.042216
0 0
0 0.056495
0.24958 0.1007
0.39942 0.1007
0.63177 0.1007
0.81209 0.027691
1 0

Table 1175: Base 64 representation:


jYaZqheaYhgYInA

Figure 886: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

299
Profile: naca654221 Table 1180: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.746 6.16 ects
Information: NACA 65(4)-221 airfoil RMS curvature error: 66.9 Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.6 0.1 dcts
Cm error 2 12 mcts
Upper transition point -0.67 0.12 %

Figure 887: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 888: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1177: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 20.998 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 1.0971 % @0.55C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.4199 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.5691 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.4272 deg
Release Angle: 4.8489 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.7077 deg
Camber deflection: 10.5566 deg

Table 1178: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85936 0.0027871
0.61587 -0.09428
0.40068 -0.09428
0.20208 -0.09428
0 -0.045977
0 0
0 0.063902
0.24404 0.1157
0.39932 0.1157
0.62514 0.1157
0.82181 0.026829
1 0

Table 1179: Base 64 representation:


iZaYwfgaXneXInA

Figure 889: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

300
Profile: naca654421 Table 1184: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.539 7.756 ects
Information: NACA 65(4)-421 airfoil RMS curvature error: 16.9 16.72 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.5 -0.3 dcts
Cm error 0 -11 mcts
Upper transition point -0.2 1.23 %

Figure 890: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 891: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1181: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 20.996 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 2.1968 % @0.54C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.0507 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2171 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.8337 deg
Release Angle: 9.5668 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.9126 deg
Camber deflection: 21.4794 deg

Table 1182: Controlpoints


1 0
0.86885 0.014131
0.60749 -0.08356
0.40135 -0.08356
0.17878 -0.08356
0 -0.038088
0 0
0 0.072679
0.25972 0.1264
0.39865 0.1264
0.62034 0.1264
0.78419 0.049759
1 0

Table 1183: Base 64 representation:


kWaY1siaWjjVIvA

Figure 892: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

301
Profile: naca654421a05 Table 1188: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.571 8.332 ects
Information: NACA 65(4)-421 a=0.5 airfoil RMS curvature error: 18.21 17.38 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.8 -0.1 dcts
Cm error -7 -29 mcts
Upper transition point -1.17 0.38 %

Figure 893: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 894: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1185: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 20.996 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 2.972 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.4953 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0296 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.2688 deg
Release Angle: 4.2466 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.9547 deg
Camber deflection: 20.2013 deg

Table 1186: Controlpoints


1 0
0.87665 0.001318
0.59277 -0.07526
0.40118 -0.07526
0.17388 -0.07526
0 -0.034547
0 0
0 0.079176
0.26903 0.1347
0.39882 0.1347
0.64 0.1347
0.81833 0.025147
1 0

Table 1187: Base 64 representation:


lVaa4sjaUggTImA

Figure 895: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

302
Profile: naca661212 Table 1192: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.079 4.865 ects
Information: NACA 66(1)-212 airfoil RMS curvature error: 28.23 29.28 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -5.8 -6.1 dcts
Cm error 22 36 mcts
Upper transition point 10.28 10.33 %

Figure 896: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 897: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1189: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12 % @0.45C
Maximum Camber: 1.095 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.84394 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.55752 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.1642 deg
Release Angle: 3.5627 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.9775 deg
Camber deflection: 7.5402 deg

Table 1190: Controlpoints


1 0
0.83253 -0.0029799
0.75022 -0.04905
0.45019 -0.04905
0.27811 -0.04905
0 -0.032151
0 0
0 0.038514
0.26364 0.07095
0.44981 0.07095
0.72677 0.07095
0.81036 0.027142
1 0

Table 1191: Base 64 representation:


iasgepYsiVrqKlA

Figure 898: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

303
Profile: naca662215 Table 1196: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.715 5.818 ects
Information: NACA 66(2)-215 airfoil RMS curvature error: 35.75 37.77 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.6 -1.3 dcts
Cm error 27 23 mcts
Upper transition point -0.58 0.41 %

Figure 899: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 900: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1193: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.99 % @0.45C
Maximum Camber: 1.095 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2758 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.85446 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.3993 deg
Release Angle: 3.5602 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.4607 deg
Camber deflection: 8.0208 deg

Table 1194: Controlpoints


1 0
0.81786 -0.0068044
0.74276 -0.064
0.45024 -0.064
0.25924 -0.064
0 -0.038428
0 0
0 0.047481
0.26507 0.0859
0.44976 0.0859
0.72547 0.0859
0.80144 0.032373
1 0

Table 1195: Base 64 representation:


iasgklbshbtsNlA

Figure 901: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

304
Profile: naca662415 Table 1200: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.284 7.604 ects
Information: NACA 66(2)-415 airfoil RMS curvature error: 28.03 29.37 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.3 -2.5 dcts
Cm error 38 65 mcts
Upper transition point 2.53 2.43 %

Figure 902: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 903: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1197: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.99 % @0.45C
Maximum Camber: 2.19 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5472 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.69476 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.5862 deg
Release Angle: 6.9901 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.8697 deg
Camber deflection: 15.8598 deg

Table 1198: Controlpoints


1 0
0.82977 0.0050436
0.74814 -0.05305
0.45048 -0.05305
0.26139 -0.05305
0 -0.034795
0 0
0 0.052772
0.26999 0.09685
0.44952 0.09685
0.71991 0.09685
0.80996 0.041376
1 0

Table 1199: Base 64 representation:


iasfopbsiXqqMqA

Figure 904: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

305
Profile: naca663218 Table 1204: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.213 5.031 ects
Information: NACA 66(3)-218 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.1 -1.1 dcts
Cm error 47 50 mcts
Upper transition point -0.64 -0.53 %

Figure 905: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 906: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1201: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.996 % @0.45C
Maximum Camber: 1.095 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.76 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1663 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.3952 deg
Release Angle: 2.8711 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.0551 deg
Camber deflection: 7.9263 deg

Table 1202: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79404 -0.013775
0.73549 -0.07903
0.45029 -0.07903
0.24283 -0.07903
0 -0.043451
0 0
0 0.055526
0.26276 0.10093
0.44971 0.10093
0.72382 0.10093
0.8096 0.032097
1 0

Table 1203: Base 64 representation:


ibsgqissghrxPkA

Figure 907: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

306
Profile: naca663418 Table 1208: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.911 5.487 ects
Information: NACA 66(3)-418 airfoil RMS curvature error: 25.32 26.31 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.9 -1.7 dcts
Cm error 46 54 mcts
Upper transition point 2.01 1.67 %

Figure 908: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 909: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1205: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.996 % @0.45C
Maximum Camber: 2.19 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.1448 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.94587 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.673 deg
Release Angle: 6.6169 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.0172 deg
Camber deflection: 16.6342 deg

Table 1206: Controlpoints


1 0
0.81624 0.00089947
0.7399 -0.06808
0.45057 -0.06808
0.23323 -0.06808
0 -0.03835
0 0
0 0.062497
0.27317 0.11188
0.44943 0.11188
0.71966 0.11188
0.81479 0.0426
1 0

Table 1207: Base 64 representation:


jZsfvjfshspsOqA

Figure 910: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

307
Profile: naca664221 Table 1212: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.233 7.633 ects
Information: NACA 66(4)-221 airfoil RMS curvature error: 25.41 28.75 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.8 -2.1 dcts
Cm error 24 26 mcts
Upper transition point 0.34 0.66 %

Figure 911: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 912: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1209: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 21 % @0.45C
Maximum Camber: 1.095 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.3228 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.5068 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.5257 deg
Release Angle: 3.3124 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.7583 deg
Camber deflection: 9.0707 deg

Table 1210: Controlpoints


1 0
0.81896 -0.0093308
0.7299 -0.09405
0.45033 -0.09405
0.23277 -0.09405
0 -0.048355
0 0
0 0.06371
0.26211 0.11595
0.44967 0.11595
0.72333 0.11595
0.82059 0.030265
1 0

Table 1211: Base 64 representation:


ibsgwgfsgnpqOlA

Figure 913: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

308
Profile: naca671215 Table 1216: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.999 5.519 ects
Information: NACA 67,1-215 airfoil RMS curvature error: 23.58 24.43 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.7 -3.8 dcts
Cm error -18 -35 mcts
Upper transition point 3.86 5.91 %

Figure 914: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 915: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1213: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.994 % @0.5C
Maximum Camber: 1.103 % @0.5C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4927 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0276 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.6016 deg
Release Angle: 4.8312 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.5351 deg
Camber deflection: 9.3663 deg

Table 1214: Controlpoints


1 0
0.87125 -0.0044275
0.81321 -0.06394
0.5 -0.06394
0.30033 -0.06394
0 -0.045359
0 0
0 0.052482
0.27679 0.086
0.5 0.086
0.77974 0.086
0.83191 0.034603
1 0

Table 1215: Base 64 representation:


msgjksagnbwrPnA

Figure 916: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

309
Profile: nacacyh Table 1220: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.863 4.65 ects
Information: NACA CYH airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.5 -0.1 dcts
Cm error 32 28 mcts
Upper transition point -0.15 -0.36 %

Figure 917: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 918: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1217: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.778 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 2.7822 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.19997 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0793 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.5949 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.5303 deg
Release Angle: 0.10668 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.6453 deg
Camber deflection: 5.752 deg

Table 1218: Controlpoints


1 -0.00099986
0.79908 -0.031596
0.20051 -0.031596
0.20051 -0.031596
0.029391 -0.031596
0 -0.017678
0 0
0 0.024361
0.082482 0.08664
0.29869 0.08664
0.54148 0.08664
0.6324 0.05838
1 0.00099986

Table 1219: Base 64 representation:


StTWkj2NANy UgF

Figure 919: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

310
Profile: nacam2 Table 1224: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.648 2.682 ects
Information: NACA M2 Airfoil. RMS curvature error: 7 7.58 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.9 -1.5 dcts
Cm error -1 0 mcts
Upper transition point 0.31 0.55 %

Figure 920: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 921: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1221: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.06 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 3.9875e-006 % @0.22C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.4 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.75948 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.75949 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.4508 deg
Release Angle: 0 deg
Nose Incidence: -4.566e-005 deg
Camber deflection: -4.566e-005 deg

Table 1222: Controlpoints


1 -0.002
0.618 -0.0403
0.40557 -0.0403
0.3 -0.0403
0.25599 -0.0403
0 -0.036002
0 0
0 0.036
0.25596 0.0403
0.3 0.0403
0.40557 0.0403
0.618 0.0403
1 0.002

Table 1223: Base 64 representation:


4JTKR4JTKR NgK

Figure 922: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

311
Profile: nacam3 Table 1228: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.666 4.106 ects
Information: NACA M3 airfoil RMS curvature error: 5.38 5.24 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.9 NaN dcts
Cm error -1 NaN mcts
Upper transition point 2.87 NaN %

Figure 923: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 924: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1225: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.9 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: -1.498e-009 % @0.75C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.4 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5498 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.5498 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.0238 deg
Release Angle: -7.2099e-009 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -7.2099e-009 deg

Table 1226: Controlpoints


1 -0.002
0.61581 -0.0595
0.40639 -0.0595
0.3 -0.0595
0.21559 -0.0595
0 -0.047196
0 0
0 0.047196
0.21559 0.0595
0.3 0.0595
0.40639 0.0595
0.61581 0.0595
1 0.002

Table 1227: Base 64 representation:


ySTKZySTKZ TgK

Figure 925: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

312
Profile: nacam6 Table 1232: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.284 4.317 ects
Information: NACA M6 airfoil RMS curvature error: 46.44 47.86 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.1 3.8 dcts
Cm error 23 -3 mcts
Upper transition point -2.21 -2.14 %

Figure 926: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 927: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1229: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.1055 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 2.1028 % @0.29C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4061 %C
Lower nose radius: 5.3207 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 26.6343 deg
Release Angle: -6.1337 deg
Nose Incidence: 1.358 deg
Camber deflection: -4.7757 deg

Table 1230: Controlpoints


1 0
0.88475 -0.0407
0.5199 -0.0407
0.4999 -0.0407
0.016733 -0.0407
0 -0.024362
0 0
0 0.03739
0.14913 0.08142
0.30021 0.08142
0.54525 0.08142
0.68274 0.039987
1 0

Table 1231: Base 64 representation:


sgTWil9gDRs eWA

Figure 928: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

313
Profile: nacam12 Table 1236: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.567 3.356 ects
Information: NACA M12 airfoil RMS curvature error: 16.98 16.24 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.5 0.9 dcts
Cm error 7 12 mcts
Upper transition point -1.41 -2.13 %

Figure 929: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 930: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1233: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.93 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.985 % @0.3C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.4 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.2734 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.714 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.902 deg
Release Angle: 1.9184 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.1946 deg
Camber deflection: 11.113 deg

Table 1234: Controlpoints


1 -0.002
0.70965 -0.0398
0.43935 -0.0398
0.3 -0.0398
0.011237 -0.0398
0 -0.014965
0 0
0 0.043248
0.17029 0.0795
0.3 0.0795
0.41191 0.0795
0.55575 0.0795
1 0.002

Table 1235: Base 64 representation:


icTKhY9TNR ThK

Figure 931: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

314
Profile: nasasc2-0714 Table 1240: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.077 7.496 ects
Information: NASA SC(2)-0714 airfoil (Ref. NASA TP-2890) RMS curvature error: 45.75 47.32 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -10.2 NaN dcts
Cm error -29 NaN mcts
Upper transition point 17.1 NaN %

Figure 932: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 933: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1237: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.9158 % @0.36C
Maximum Camber: 2.5747 % @0.82C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.58992 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.4231 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.3924 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.1895 deg
Release Angle: 16.3499 deg
Nose Incidence: 0.51136 deg
Camber deflection: 16.8613 deg

Table 1238: Controlpoints


1 -0.0029496
0.79911 0.051838
0.7199 -0.064922
0.3209 -0.064922
0.2012 -0.064922
0 -0.056194
0 0
0 0.064517
0.25767 0.075234
0.42903 0.075234
0.70028 0.075234
0.87079 0.043551
1 0.0029496

Table 1239: Base 64 representation:


2abeg2YVlcjtC5P

Figure 934: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

315
Profile: ncambre Table 1244: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.988 5.262 ects
Information: ONERA/Aerospatiale NACA-CAMBRE rotorcraft RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
airfoil CD error -5.3 -4.5 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 9 11 mcts
Upper transition point 2.23 1.87 %

Figure 936: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 935: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1241: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.4676 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 1.3378 % @0.19C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.23996 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.96983 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.7278 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.6105 deg
Release Angle: 1.0015 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.5692 deg
Camber deflection: 11.5708 deg

Table 1242: Controlpoints


1 -0.0011998
0.71328 -0.035408
0.47838 -0.046379
0.36522 -0.046379
0.35269 -0.046379
0 -0.040256
0 0
0 0.0074661
0.0086214 0.06939
0.28817 0.06939
0.48732 0.06939
0.79355 0.033185
1 0.0011998

Table 1243: Base 64 representation:


H9SSe3CXLUevRhG
Figure 937: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

316
Profile: nl722343 Table 1248: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.196 6.508 ects
Information: NLR NLR-7223-43 transonic rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.7 -3.3 dcts
Cm error -27 -22 mcts
Upper transition point 7.44 6.49 %

Figure 938: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 939: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1245: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.6058 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 1.2584 % @0.74C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.8441 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.35844 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.1064 deg
Release Angle: 5.6482 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.4323 deg
Camber deflection: 19.0805 deg

Table 1246: Controlpoints


1 0
0.77706 0.0062079
0.67706 -0.03187
0.41301 -0.03187
0.37202 -0.03187
0 -0.02965
0 0
0 0.053896
0.23628 0.05444
0.34826 0.05444
0.67031 0.05444
0.84089 0.027202
1 0

Table 1247: Base 64 representation:


-VWgX7GasOgrJoA

Figure 940: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

317
Profile: nl722362 Table 1252: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.085 8.216 ects
Information: NLR NLR-7223-62 transonic rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.9 -3.3 dcts
Cm error -6 -12 mcts
Upper transition point 3.37 4.39 %

Figure 941: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 942: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1249: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.6094 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 1.2831 % @0.23C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.8362 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.34972 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 19.7075 deg
Release Angle: -1.1418 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.5884 deg
Camber deflection: 12.4466 deg

Table 1250: Controlpoints


1 0
0.88029 -0.02326
0.5221 -0.03115
0.41307 -0.03115
0.3984 -0.03115
0 -0.030635
0 0
0 0.05516
0.24855 0.05516
0.34814 0.05516
0.67301 0.05516
0.77948 0.033791
1 0

Table 1251: Base 64 representation:


SWgY-CaMNqvWeA

Figure 943: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

318
Profile: nlf0115 Table 1256: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.249 8.61 ects
Information: NASA/Langley/Somers-Selig-Maughmer NLF(1)- RMS curvature error: 33.75 33.29 %
0115 natural laminar flow airfoil CD error 0.3 0.4 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 4 -9 mcts
Upper transition point -1.08 -0.71 %

Figure 945: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 944: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1253: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.951 % @0.42C
Maximum Camber: 1.8961 % @0.29C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.0932 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.71071 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.7271 deg
Release Angle: 5.8877 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.0286 deg
Camber deflection: 18.9162 deg

Table 1254: Controlpoints


1 0
0.75528 -0.0084425
0.6518 -0.057395
0.4554 -0.057395
0.32468 -0.057395
0 -0.038946
0 0
0 0.041739
0.12485 0.092617
0.39306 0.092617
0.45629 0.092617
0.62154 0.092617
1 0

Table 1255: Base 64 representation:


srZHnqSsXY sSpA
Figure 946: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

319
Profile: nlf0215f Table 1260: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.989 6.834 ects
Information: NASA/Langley/Somers NLF(1)-0215F natural lam- RMS curvature error: 83.27 85.45 %
inar flow airfoil CD error -1.2 -0.9 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 5 0 mcts
Upper transition point -0.9 -1.46 %

Figure 948: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 947: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1257: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.9785 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 3.9388 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.0855 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.66033 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.7067 deg
Release Angle: 20.0535 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.0038 deg
Camber deflection: 35.0573 deg

Table 1258: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79213 0.043049
0.76216 -0.03554
0.36468 -0.03554
0.18881 -0.03554
0 -0.02883
0 0
0 0.051945
0.19408 0.11428
0.37702 0.11428
0.63381 0.11428
0.97523 0.013397
1 0

Table 1259: Base 64 representation:


sfYawzfXnPI3T A
Figure 949: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

320
Profile: nlf414f Table 1264: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.016 7.574 ects
Information: NASA/Langley/Viken NLF(1)-0414F natural lami- RMS curvature error: 32.35 32.6 %
nar flow airfoil CD error 0.4 0 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -5 1 mcts
Upper transition point -1.66 -1.28 %

Figure 951: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 950: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1261: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.1878 % @0.46C
Maximum Camber: 2.4104 % @0.55C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.03918 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.8613 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.68778 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 1.9889 deg
Release Angle: 4.1289 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.9338 deg
Camber deflection: 15.0627 deg

Table 1262: Controlpoints


1 -0.0001959
0.78989 0.0092035
0.75815 -0.047222
0.43634 -0.047222
0.31279 -0.047222
0 -0.037871
0 0
0 0.060678
0.29671 0.094774
0.46586 0.094774
0.78212 0.094774
0.79793 0.020352
1 0.0001959

Table 1263: Base 64 representation:


oXelnySckU63EmB
Figure 952: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

321
Profile: nlf415 Table 1268: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.525 5.575 ects
Information: NASA/Langley-DFVLR/Somers(NASA)- RMS curvature error: 44.22 47.35 %
Horstmann(DFVLR) NLF(2)-0415 natural laminar flow airfoil CD error -2 -2.2 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 38 32 mcts
Upper transition point 1.18 1.24 %

Figure 954: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 953: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1265: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.9515 % @0.45C
Maximum Camber: 2.9454 % @0.73C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0646 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.46171 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.7677 deg
Release Angle: 9.9666 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.837 deg
Camber deflection: 16.8036 deg

Table 1266: Controlpoints


1 0
0.75675 0.0131
0.61358 -0.061689
0.41452 -0.061689
0.29218 -0.061689
0 -0.029989
0 0
0 0.048456
0.33081 0.090943
0.54381 0.090943
0.7545 0.090943
0.80245 0.059835
1 0

Table 1267: Base 64 representation:


hZiemfTbWaznPvA
Figure 955: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

322
Profile: nlf416 Table 1272: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.728 6.036 ects
Information: NASA/Langley/Somers NLF(1)-0416 natural lami- RMS curvature error: 73.69 74.11 %
nar flow airfoil CD error 1.2 1.1 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 2 21 mcts
Upper transition point -3.75 -5.24 %

Figure 957: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 956: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1269: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.9483 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 2.4533 % @0.29C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.9489 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.86603 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.0925 deg
Release Angle: 17.5809 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.5179 deg
Camber deflection: 29.0988 deg

Table 1270: Controlpoints


1 0
0.78616 0.035917
0.68616 -0.05529
0.32326 -0.05529
0.094475 -0.05529
0 -0.023355
0 0
0 0.039263
0.11865 0.10425
0.30422 0.10425
0.51774 0.10425
0.9624 0.018039
1 0

Table 1271: Base 64 representation:


YmTUrbsVhYLrS7A
Figure 958: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

323
Profile: nlr1t Table 1276: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.014 7.398 ects
Information: Bell/NASA/NLR NLR-1T rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: 55.41 54.28 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.7 -3.8 dcts
Cm error -14 -29 mcts
Upper transition point 7.13 7.3 %

Figure 959: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 960: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1273: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.687 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 1.273 % @0.25C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.208 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5656 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.36127 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 25.2671 deg
Release Angle: -3.5887 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.1962 deg
Camber deflection: 8.6075 deg

Table 1274: Controlpoints


1 -0.00104
0.9383 -0.018992
0.57494 -0.0315
0.42528 -0.0315
0.35892 -0.0315
0 -0.02926
0 0
0 0.023285
0.055352 0.05565
0.34064 0.05565
0.67233 0.05565
0.77233 0.037281
1 0.00104

Table 1275: Base 64 representation:


b1WgY6KbRNrlcaF

Figure 961: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

324
Profile: nlr7301 Table 1280: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.305 7.521 ects
Information: NLR NLR-7301 transonic airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -5.4 -5.2 dcts
Cm error -9 -41 mcts
Upper transition point 9.63 9.45 %

Figure 962: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 963: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1277: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.5085 % @0.36C
Maximum Camber: 1.6771 % @0.77C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.11 %C
Upper nose radius: 9.0694 %C
Lower nose radius: 318.7785 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.6434 deg
Release Angle: 8.6953 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.9826 deg
Camber deflection: 18.6779 deg

Table 1278: Controlpoints


1 -0.00055
0.79286 0.020759
0.64939 -0.07763
0.35 -0.07763
0 -0.07763
0 -0.020802
0 0
0 0.056104
0.05206 0.08764
0.4 0.08764
0.68089 0.08764
0.81933 0.037363
1 0.00055

Table 1279: Base 64 representation:


o3aekR WsgjlGtD

Figure 964: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

325
Profile: nn7mk20 Table 1284: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.911 6.226 ects
Information: NN7 MK20 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.5 0.1 dcts
Cm error -41 -23 mcts
Upper transition point 0.56 0.61 %

Figure 965: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 966: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1281: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.872 % @0.36C
Maximum Camber: 3.0873 % @0.57C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5178 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.71952 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.9659 deg
Release Angle: 9.4705 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.4095 deg
Camber deflection: 19.88 deg

Table 1282: Controlpoints


1 0
0.72401 0.024085
0.62774 -0.05546
0.33928 -0.05546
0.16526 -0.05546
0 -0.028156
0 0
0 0.040404
0.16134 0.11346
0.37059 0.11346
0.56114 0.11346
0.66114 0.084196
1 0

Table 1283: Base 64 representation:


XjYTvggWcYwuKuA

Figure 967: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

326
Profile: npl9510 Table 1288: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.401 6.564 ects
Information: NPL 9510 transonic airfoil RMS curvature error: 48.95 48.42 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -5.2 -4.9 dcts
Cm error -4 -1 mcts
Upper transition point 11.01 10.59 %

Figure 968: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 969: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1285: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.1898 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 1.6413 % @0.79C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.488 %C
Upper nose radius: -Inf %C
Lower nose radius: 1.8905 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.9622 deg
Release Angle: 8.7818 deg
Nose Incidence: -6.3396 deg
Camber deflection: 2.4422 deg

Table 1286: Controlpoints


1 -0.00244
0.73348 0.024635
0.57483 -0.065054
0.27984 -0.065054
0.20658 -0.065054
0 -0.051026
0 0
0 0.011961
0 0.049099
0.48012 0.049099
0.6658 0.049099
0.80353 0.043352
1 0.00244

Table 1287: Base 64 representation:


Q fXVxRSac3nHtM

Figure 970: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

327
Profile: npl9615 Table 1292: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.165 7.55 ects
Information: NPL 9615 rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: 51.2 50.84 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -27.3 -27.2 dcts
Cm error 8 3 mcts
Upper transition point 14.59 14.24 %

Figure 971: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 972: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1289: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.305 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 1.0014 % @0.22C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.026 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4232 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.82659 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0 deg
Release Angle: -10.6793 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.1595 deg
Camber deflection: -3.5198 deg

Table 1290: Controlpoints


1 -0.00013
1 -0.00013
0.63625 -0.04771
0.36355 -0.04771
0.32719 -0.04771
0 -0.042462
0 0
0 0.028404
0.085033 0.065716
0.3184 0.065716
0.59744 0.065716
1 0.00013
1 0.00013

Table 1291: Base 64 representation:


cuUac4GXbUAAAPB

Figure 973: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

328
Profile: npl9626 Table 1296: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.72 4.924 ects
Information: NPL 9626 rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -6.1 -5.6 dcts
Cm error -1 -2 mcts
Upper transition point 8.93 8.35 %

Figure 974: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 975: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1293: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.0651 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 0.72644 % @0.31C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.25198 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.9507 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2586 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.7864 deg
Release Angle: 0.59297 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.2416 deg
Camber deflection: 5.8346 deg

Table 1294: Controlpoints


1 -0.0012599
0.75266 -0.032945
0.48878 -0.053062
0.30808 -0.053062
0.22626 -0.053062
0 -0.043571
0 0
0 0.057848
0.25732 0.06759
0.3094 0.06759
0.3631 0.06759
0.611 0.0593
1 0.0012599

Table 1295: Base 64 representation:


2LUFs0RURX3mSgG

Figure 976: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

329
Profile: npl9627 Table 1300: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.621 3.857 ects
Information: NPL 9627 rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -9.8 -10.3 dcts
Cm error -4 -6 mcts
Upper transition point 11.17 12.08 %

Figure 977: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 978: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1297: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.1493 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 0.90551 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.25196 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.2224 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2926 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.1438 deg
Release Angle: 1.024 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.8143 deg
Camber deflection: 7.8383 deg

Table 1298: Controlpoints


1 -0.0012598
0.65579 -0.043816
0.36836 -0.052212
0.26346 -0.052212
0.18099 -0.052212
0 -0.039493
0 0
0 0.045456
0.13946 0.069542
0.30977 0.069542
0.53732 0.069542
0.90989 0.015687
1 0.0012598

Table 1299: Base 64 representation:


piUVevURJWO0ShG

Figure 979: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

330
Profile: nplx Table 1304: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.281 7.404 ects
Information: NPL transonic airfoil FROM ARC CP 1372 RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -8 -8 dcts
Cm error 13 12 mcts
Upper transition point 15.87 16.31 %

Figure 980: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 981: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1301: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.6653 % @0.36C
Maximum Camber: 1.153 % @0.76C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6089 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.77696 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.1803 deg
Release Angle: 6.0448 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.55 deg
Camber deflection: 12.5948 deg

Table 1302: Controlpoints


1 0
0.77882 0.0056167
0.57301 -0.051442
0.35756 -0.051442
0.30811 -0.051442
0 -0.038687
0 0
0 0.044734
0.1912 0.055213
0.35864 0.055213
0.51597 0.055213
0.73507 0.049747
1 0

Table 1303: Base 64 representation:


zeXQYvJXVW5gKpA

Figure 982: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

331
Profile: oa206 Table 1308: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.623 3.958 ects
Information: ONERA/Aerospatiale OA206 rotorcraft airfoil (Con- RMS curvature error: 42.73 42.59 %
structed from patent and smoothed) CD error 0.2 0 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 11 -1 mcts
Upper transition point 0.38 1.11 %

Figure 984: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 983: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1305: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.0723 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 0.79691 % @0.2C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.3348 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.42436 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.41407 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 1.1459 deg
Release Angle: -0.68314 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.1688 deg
Camber deflection: 3.4857 deg

Table 1306: Controlpoints


1 -0.001674
0.83879 -0.0052087
0.79943 -0.023693
0.44001 -0.023693
0.039601 -0.023693
0 -0.010456
0 0
0 0.012686
0.056885 0.037853
0.24446 0.037853
0.69029 0.037853
0.85405 0.0013933
1 0.001674

Table 1307: Base 64 representation:


VwQlQc5coKeyBfI
Figure 985: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

332
Profile: oa209 Table 1312: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 7.23 7.903 ects
Information: ONERA/Aerospatiale OA209 rotorcraft airfoil (Con- RMS curvature error: 67.82 67.53 %
structed from patent and smoothed) CD error -0.3 -0.7 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -6 -19 mcts
Upper transition point 0.48 1.5 %

Figure 987: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 986: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1309: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.0946 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 1.4802 % @0.18C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.5023 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1608 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.4049 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.1155 deg
Release Angle: 0.3085 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.6246 deg
Camber deflection: 12.9331 deg

Table 1310: Controlpoints


1 -0.0025115
0.83199 -0.0047087
0.79796 -0.033423
0.44002 -0.033423
0.38692 -0.033423
0 -0.032317
0 0
0 0.016048
0.03328 0.059058
0.24444 0.059058
0.72723 0.059058
0.81053 0.0070305
1 0.0025115

Table 1311: Base 64 representation:


R2QoZ9IcoOr0CgN
Figure 988: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

333
Profile: oa213 Table 1316: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 7.061 8.076 ects
Information: ONERA/Aerospatiale OA213 rotorcraft airfoil (Con- RMS curvature error: 44.91 45.37 %
structed from patent and smoothed) CD error -3.4 -2.7 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -68 -71 mcts
Upper transition point 7.54 7.18 %

Figure 990: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 989: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1313: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.5939 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 3.2907 % @0.28C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.4216 %C
Upper nose radius: NaN %C
Lower nose radius: 4.9576 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 1.7822e-007 deg
Release Angle: -1.5117 deg
Nose Incidence: 16.1659 deg
Camber deflection: 14.6541 deg

Table 1314: Controlpoints


1 -0.002108
0.89414 -0.0049016
0.76733 -0.031136
0.47515 -0.031136
0.0047515 -0.031136
0 -0.012532
0 0
0 0
0.0029952 0.095712
0.29952 0.095712
0.69293 0.095712
0.80739 -0.0029751
1 0.002108

Table 1315: Base 64 representation:


A-Tjoa-ejNnsAsL
Figure 991: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-
ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

334
Profile: oaf095 Table 1320: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.977 5.05 ects
Information: ONERA/Aerospatiale OAF095 Fenestron airfoil RMS curvature error: 32.83 32.26 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.2 -0.5 dcts
Cm error -35 -50 mcts
Upper transition point 1.65 1.75 %

Figure 992: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 993: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1317: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.4071 % @0.24C
Maximum Camber: 3.9461 % @0.53C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.5153 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2154 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0262 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0 deg
Release Angle: 7.3005 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.6323 deg
Camber deflection: 10.9328 deg

Table 1318: Controlpoints


1 -0.0025765
0.61932 0.046193
0.30199 -0.030125
0.11482 -0.030125
0.037205 -0.030125
0 -0.015954
0 0
0 0.036366
0.16321 0.078445
0.40612 0.078445
0.64763 0.078445
0.93962 0.010312
1 0.0025765

Table 1319: Base 64 representation:


elaaghqHONLiArN

Figure 994: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

335
Profile: oaf102 Table 1324: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.664 3.089 ects
Information: ONERA/Aerospatiale OAF102 Fenestron airfoil RMS curvature error: 22.44 21.93 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.8 -0.6 dcts
Cm error 25 35 mcts
Upper transition point -1.13 -1.29 %

Figure 995: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 996: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1321: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.0818 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 3.6171 % @0.52C
Trailing Edge Gap: 1.0018 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.89852 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.07 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0 deg
Release Angle: 7.1801 deg
Nose Incidence: 1.5008 deg
Camber deflection: 8.6809 deg

Table 1322: Controlpoints


1 -0.005009
0.66813 0.0368
0.3237 -0.032889
0.15773 -0.032889
0.089905 -0.032889
0 -0.025324
0 0
0 0.033365
0.18584 0.080126
0.4063 0.080126
0.62196 0.080126
0.88843 0.019065
1 0.005009

Table 1323: Base 64 representation:


biaXhwcKNOTfArZ

Figure 997: Error distribution of drag- and pitching mo-


ment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

336
Profile: oaf117 Table 1328: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.321 3.151 ects
Information: ONERA/Aerospatiale OAF117 Fenestron airfoil RMS curvature error: 22.68 23.37 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.1 0.4 dcts
Cm error 14 32 mcts
Upper transition point 1.13 0.38 %

Figure 998: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 999: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1325: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.3922 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 2.0143 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.9973 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.9619 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.5972 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0.74641 deg
Release Angle: 3.59 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.9799 deg
Camber deflection: 8.5699 deg

Table 1326: Controlpoints


1 -0.0049865
0.69412 0.012205
0.38668 -0.04254
0.15773 -0.04254
0.092283 -0.04254
0 -0.031347
0 0
0 0.035818
0.09809 0.074198
0.28711 0.074198
0.49019 0.074198
0.82554 0.017073
1 0.0049865

Table 1327: Base 64 representation:


fpSSgubKRSWgBlZ

Figure 1000: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

337
Profile: oaf128 Table 1332: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.806 3.499 ects
Information: ONERA/Aerospatiale OAF128 Fenestron airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.2 -1.4 dcts
Cm error 4 -5 mcts
Upper transition point 1.71 2.27 %

Figure 1001: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1002: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1329: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.8073 % @0.24C
Maximum Camber: 1.0029 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 1.0653 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.3267 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.3394 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0 deg
Release Angle: 2.4625 deg
Nose Incidence: 1.9029 deg
Camber deflection: 4.3654 deg

Table 1330: Controlpoints


1 -0.0053265
0.80765 0.0029457
0.38823 -0.055889
0.23211 -0.055889
0.075283 -0.055889
0 -0.034266
0 0
0 0.037566
0.090977 0.072383
0.25909 0.072383
0.4737 0.072383
0.798 0.014013
1 0.0053265

Table 1331: Base 64 representation:


gpRTfmqPNYZUAjb

Figure 1003: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

338
Profile: oaf139 Table 1336: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.513 3.83 ects
Information: ONERA/Aerospatiale OAF139 Fenestron airfoil RMS curvature error: 22.59 22.85 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.9 1.1 dcts
Cm error -5 0 mcts
Upper transition point -1.42 -1.67 %

Figure 1004: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1005: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1333: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.6805 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: -1.2963 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.9757 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.6576 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.0695 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 1.9248 deg
Release Angle: -2.8625 deg
Nose Incidence: -0.17526 deg
Camber deflection: -3.0377 deg

Table 1334: Controlpoints


1 -0.0048785
0.781 -0.01952
0.46844 -0.078572
0.25912 -0.078572
0.079346 -0.078572
0 -0.033086
0 0
0 0.044815
0.11336 0.058967
0.20611 0.058967
0.38924 0.058967
0.74009 -0.0037439
1 0.0048785

Table 1335: Base 64 representation:


wsNPZbrRShbaCbZ

Figure 1006: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

339
Profile: p51droot Table 1340: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.463 6.645 ects
Information: P-51D root (BL17.5) airfoil RMS curvature error: 98.15 97.52 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.2 -1.4 dcts
Cm error -49 -42 mcts
Upper transition point 2.95 3.28 %

Figure 1007: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1008: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1337: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.5146 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 1.2126 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.1633 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.7498 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.6051 deg
Release Angle: 4.1253 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.9448 deg
Camber deflection: 8.0701 deg

Table 1338: Controlpoints


1 0
0.7767 -0.0084893
0.55823 -0.070449
0.38874 -0.070449
0.18305 -0.070449
0 -0.04621
0 0
0 0.05311
0.19558 0.094701
0.38874 0.094701
0.54652 0.094701
0.9112 0.016342
1 0

Table 1339: Base 64 representation:


jgZRnphZSeNgOmA

Figure 1009: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

340
Profile: p51dtip Table 1344: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.409 3.837 ects
Information: P-51D tip (BL215) airfoil RMS curvature error: 63.05 68.53 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 3 3.1 dcts
Cm error -20 -23 mcts
Upper transition point -8.17 -8.16 %

Figure 1010: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1011: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1341: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.4179 % @0.46C
Maximum Camber: 1.3002 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.65626 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.48902 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.7769 deg
Release Angle: 2.1112 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.1843 deg
Camber deflection: 5.2955 deg

Table 1342: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79008 0.00081617
0.7024 -0.044088
0.46264 -0.044088
0.32252 -0.044088
0 -0.032426
0 0
0 0.034715
0.27545 0.070094
0.46264 0.070094
0.68779 0.070094
0.78779 0.014838
1 0

Table 1343: Base 64 representation:


gaebeuTesTrsEjA

Figure 1012: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

341
Profile: p51hroot Table 1348: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.725 6.786 ects
Information: NACA 66,2-(1.8)15.5 A=.6 P-51H root airfoil RMS curvature error: 62.06 61.16 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -37.1 -37.2 dcts
Cm error -80 -106 mcts
Upper transition point 64.17 64.91 %

Figure 1013: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1014: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1345: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.4982 % @0.45C
Maximum Camber: 1.3266 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.318 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.88714 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.7383 deg
Release Angle: 1.4558 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.8295 deg
Camber deflection: 6.2853 deg

Table 1346: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79014 -0.01804
0.73595 -0.064225
0.4502 -0.064225
0.25873 -0.064225
0 -0.039118
0 0
0 0.046687
0.24806 0.090757
0.4498 0.090757
0.73266 0.090757
0.7939 0.028323
1 0

Table 1347: Base 64 representation:


gssgmmbsgbwyOiA

Figure 1015: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

342
Profile: p51htip Table 1352: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.7 4.745 ects
Information: NACA 66,2-(1.8)12 A=.6 P-51H tip airfoil RMS curvature error: 57.64 58.29 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.1 0.6 dcts
Cm error -23 17 mcts
Upper transition point 1.28 -2.35 %

Figure 1016: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1017: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1349: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.9984 % @0.45C
Maximum Camber: 1.3266 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.88047 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.54699 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.6955 deg
Release Angle: 1.4624 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.6781 deg
Camber deflection: 6.1405 deg

Table 1350: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79007 -0.012418
0.74539 -0.046726
0.45015 -0.046726
0.28905 -0.046726
0 -0.032466
0 0
0 0.039148
0.2611 0.073258
0.44985 0.073258
0.73477 0.073258
0.79095 0.023117
1 0

Table 1351: Base 64 representation:


hbsgfrXshUx0LiA

Figure 1018: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

343
Profile: pfcm Table 1356: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.937 2.268 ects
Information: PROPFAN CRUISE MISSILE WING AIRFOIL RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.4 -3.9 dcts
Cm error -9 -5 mcts
Upper transition point 9.51 10.05 %

Figure 1019: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1020: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1353: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.2 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 1.3252 % @0.53C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.261 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.51917 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.32116 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.5117 deg
Release Angle: 2.8642 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.9575 deg
Camber deflection: 6.8217 deg

Table 1354: Controlpoints


1 -0.001305
0.66656 -0.0094058
0.56656 -0.028492
0.35 -0.028492
0.2938 -0.028492
0 -0.025081
0 0
0 0.028265
0.23082 0.053748
0.4 0.053748
0.63699 0.053748
0.88799 0.015297
1 0.001305

Table 1355: Base 64 representation:


hbaZX3KWVMUwKkH

Figure 1021: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

344
Profile: psu-90-125wl Table 1360: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.333 5.35 ects
Information: PSU-90-125WL sailplane winglet airfoil RMS curvature error: 30.51 31.68 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.9 0.3 dcts
Cm error 8 33 mcts
Upper transition point -0.61 -3.56 %

Figure 1022: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1023: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1357: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.5914 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 2.4145 % @0.51C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.84476 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.96084 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.4043 deg
Release Angle: 6.7162 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.461 deg
Camber deflection: 11.1772 deg

Table 1358: Controlpoints


1 0
0.81979 0.0047629
0.56199 -0.040816
0.2927 -0.040816
0.1542 -0.040816
0 -0.031429
0 0
0 0.023743
0.1001 0.085523
0.35057 0.085523
0.52543 0.085523
0.63668 0.076685
1 0

Table 1359: Base 64 representation:


StWRjweTYR4aMqA

Figure 1024: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

345
Profile: psu94097 Table 1364: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.382 5.443 ects
Information: Penn. State University Airfoil for gliders RMS curvature error: 38.72 36.25 %
Reference: LiU CD error -0.5 -43.5 dcts
Cm error -1 36 mcts
Upper transition point 0.79 0.49 %

Figure 1025: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1026: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1361: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.5566 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 4.0198 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.32813 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0833 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.18172 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.4762 deg
Release Angle: 8.7734 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.5584 deg
Camber deflection: 23.3318 deg

Table 1362: Controlpoints


1 -0.00164
0.82122 0.018911
0.37663 -0.015025
0.10986 -0.015025
0.028608 -0.015025
0 -0.0064197
0 0
0 0.03083
0.12385 0.087843
0.36893 0.087843
0.58429 0.087843
0.6843 0.064667
1 0.00164

Table 1363: Base 64 representation:


WqYWkbuHTGwSFtI

Figure 1027: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

346
Profile: pt40 Table 1368: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.707 7.237 ects
Information: Great Plane PT-40 trainer airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.1 -0.6 dcts
Cm error -4 -23 mcts
Upper transition point 0.89 1.22 %

Figure 1028: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1029: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1365: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.6219 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 2.9257 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.2704 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.2163 %C
Lower nose radius: 5.9732 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 19.2056 deg
Release Angle: 7.2414 deg
Nose Incidence: -0.90351 deg
Camber deflection: 6.3379 deg

Table 1366: Controlpoints


1 -0.001352
0.18547 -0.034942
0.05465 -0.040442
0.05465 -0.040442
0.031807 -0.040442
0 -0.035589
0 0
0 0.064981
0.15022 0.085735
0.3421 0.085735
0.59706 0.085735
0.95898 0.013772
1 0.001352

Table 1367: Base 64 representation:


wjWZk3bDARJ2VrH

Figure 1030: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

347
Profile: r140 Table 1372: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.751 4.65 ects
Information: R140 Quickee 500 airfoil (original) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 40.7 -40.7 dcts
Cm error 23 -23 mcts
Upper transition point -46.45 47.21 %

Figure 1031: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1032: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1369: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.0178 % @0.41C
Maximum Camber: 0.45497 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.29031 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.45041 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.4304 deg
Release Angle: 0.37509 deg
Nose Incidence: -0.30857 deg
Camber deflection: 0.066521 deg

Table 1370: Controlpoints


1 0
0.61035 -0.053654
0.45231 -0.05572
0.3931 -0.05572
0.20449 -0.05572
0 -0.024779
0 0
0 0.01584
0.12964 0.06456
0.42261 0.06456
0.42862 0.06456
0.5771 0.063884
1 0

Table 1371: Base 64 representation:


QrbBccfZGY-9SgA

Figure 1033: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

348
Profile: r140sm Table 1376: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.216 4.874 ects
Information: R140 Quickee 500 airfoil (smoothed) RMS curvature error: 89.6 93.27 %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN -4.6 dcts
Cm error NaN -14 mcts
Upper transition point NaN 6.48 %

Figure 1034: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1035: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1373: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.0404 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 0.43746 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.61338 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.6039 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.1028 deg
Release Angle: 0.046334 deg
Nose Incidence: 0.61932 deg
Camber deflection: 0.66565 deg

Table 1374: Controlpoints


1 0
0.60144 -0.055272
0.44257 -0.05583
0.3931 -0.05583
0.20151 -0.05583
0 -0.024257
0 0
0 0.021165
0.17133 0.06458
0.39304 0.06458
0.58245 0.06458
0.9143 0.011702
1 0

Table 1375: Base 64 representation:


VjZUccfZFYN-SgA

Figure 1036: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

349
Profile: r1080 Table 1380: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.62 7.259 ects
Information: Roncz 1080 Voyager inner aft wing airfoil RMS curvature error: 29.94 31.69 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1 -1.2 dcts
Cm error 42 42 mcts
Upper transition point 0.02 0.21 %

Figure 1037: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1038: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1377: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.9926 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 3.3037 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.1448 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0773 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.4926 deg
Release Angle: 5.777 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.6226 deg
Camber deflection: 17.3996 deg

Table 1378: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80208 -0.0050766
0.7585 -0.056995
0.41999 -0.056995
0.21882 -0.056995
0 -0.039643
0 0
0 0.049675
0.17257 0.12299
0.39998 0.12299
0.5709 0.12299
0.63692 0.08398
1 0

Table 1379: Base 64 representation:


ajaSzsfbkY1zQoA

Figure 1039: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

350
Profile: r1082 Table 1384: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.279 3.782 ects
Information: Roncz 1082 Voyager root outer aft wing airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.1 0.7 dcts
Cm error -49 -58 mcts
Upper transition point 0.96 0.17 %

Figure 1040: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1041: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1381: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18.0007 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 3.3803 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.7394 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1749 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.2139 deg
Release Angle: 6.9952 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.2709 deg
Camber deflection: 16.2661 deg

Table 1382: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80138 -0.0021209
0.77296 -0.0562
0.39999 -0.0562
0.246 -0.0562
0 -0.043895
0 0
0 0.042769
0.15774 0.12381
0.39993 0.12381
0.49833 0.12381
0.59363 0.10587
1 0

Table 1383: Base 64 representation:


WmaK0xZanY23RqA

Figure 1042: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

351
Profile: r1082t Table 1388: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.088 5.338 ects
Information: Roncz 1082T Voyager tip outer aft wing airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.4 -0.3 dcts
Cm error 49 39 mcts
Upper transition point -0.89 0.61 %

Figure 1043: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1044: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1385: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.9961 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 2.9968 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.353 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.94469 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.576 deg
Release Angle: 6.236 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.998 deg
Camber deflection: 14.2341 deg

Table 1386: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80139 -0.0019133
0.77257 -0.050012
0.39998 -0.050012
0.25662 -0.050012
0 -0.040202
0 0
0 0.037662
0.15726 0.10995
0.39992 0.10995
0.49867 0.10995
0.59396 0.09392
1 0

Table 1387: Base 64 representation:


WmaLuyXanV23PpA

Figure 1045: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

352
Profile: rae69ck Table 1392: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.655 3.141 ects
Information: RAE6-9CK transonic airfoil RMS curvature error: 10.12 11.51 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.3 2.1 dcts
Cm error -3 -17 mcts
Upper transition point -2.82 -3.71 %

Figure 1046: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1047: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1389: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.1188 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 1.2371 % @0.77C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.80236 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.84812 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.1955 deg
Release Angle: 7.3095 deg
Nose Incidence: -0.38737 deg
Camber deflection: 6.9221 deg

Table 1390: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80858 0.010741
0.565 -0.059236
0.35486 -0.059236
0.21653 -0.059236
0 -0.03499
0 0
0 0.03528
0.2327 0.062779
0.42663 0.062779
0.50173 0.062779
0.68885 0.062779
1 0

Table 1391: Base 64 representation:


jsbIblZXVZ cJrA

Figure 1048: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

353
Profile: rae100 Table 1396: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.327 3.614 ects
Information: RAE 100 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.2 NaN dcts
Cm error -1 NaN mcts
Upper transition point 0.54 NaN %

Figure 1049: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1050: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1393: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9956 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: -3.1853e-007 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.122 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.122 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.6939 deg
Release Angle: -2.6664e-006 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -2.6664e-006 deg

Table 1394: Controlpoints


1 0
0.60736 -0.033295
0.44614 -0.049978
0.26 -0.049978
0.093187 -0.049978
0 -0.026402
0 0
0 0.026402
0.093187 0.049978
0.26 0.049978
0.44614 0.049978
0.60737 0.033294
1 0

Table 1395: Base 64 representation:


hoRQVhoRQVssLgA

Figure 1051: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

354
Profile: rae101 Table 1400: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.466 3.83 ects
Information: RAE 101 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN 0.6 dcts
Cm error NaN -1 mcts
Upper transition point NaN -1.19 %

Figure 1052: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1053: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1397: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9938 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: -1.8033e-007 % @0.89C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.79272 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.79272 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.1199 deg
Release Angle: -1.9702e-006 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -1.9702e-006 deg

Table 1398: Controlpoints


1 0
0.63498 -0.03232
0.47054 -0.049969
0.3 -0.049969
0.17213 -0.049969
0 -0.03016
0 0
0 0.03016
0.17213 0.049969
0.3 0.049969
0.47054 0.049969
0.63498 0.03232
1 0

Table 1399: Base 64 representation:


mbTQVmbTQVrrLgA

Figure 1054: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

355
Profile: rae102 Table 1404: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.148 4.152 ects
Information: RAE 102 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN 0.1 dcts
Cm error NaN 0 mcts
Upper transition point NaN -0.73 %

Figure 1055: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1056: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1401: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9994 % @0.36C
Maximum Camber: 7.8347e-007 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.69139 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.69139 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.7803 deg
Release Angle: 9.3431e-006 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 9.3431e-006 deg

Table 1402: Controlpoints


1 0
0.68527 -0.029696
0.50371 -0.049997
0.36 -0.049997
0.1609 -0.049997
0 -0.027233
0 0
0 0.027233
0.1609 0.049997
0.36 0.049997
0.50371 0.049997
0.68526 0.029697
1 0

Table 1403: Base 64 representation:


iiXOViiXOVooMgA

Figure 1057: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

356
Profile: rae103 Table 1408: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.459 5.156 ects
Information: RAE 103 RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: LiU CD error -0.3 0.1 dcts
Cm error -1 -2 mcts
Upper transition point 0.44 -0.68 %

Figure 1058: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1059: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1405: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.997 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: -0.0014596 % @0.63C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.65086 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.65086 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.8864 deg
Release Angle: -0.0022011 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -0.0022011 deg

Table 1406: Controlpoints


1 0
0.64836 -0.03662
0.54836 -0.049985
0.4 -0.049985
0.15362 -0.049985
0 -0.024993
0 0
0 0.024993
0.15362 0.049985
0.4 0.049985
0.5478 0.049985
0.64834 0.036594
1 0

Table 1407: Base 64 representation:


gmaQVgmaQVxxNgA

Figure 1060: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

357
Profile: rae104 Table 1412: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.036 3.723 ects
Information: RAE 104 RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: LiU CD error -0.8 -1.1 dcts
Cm error -5 -1 mcts
Upper transition point -0.06 -0.27 %

Figure 1061: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1062: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1409: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10 % @0.42C
Maximum Camber: -5.5045e-005 % @0.76C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.60306 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.60306 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.3392 deg
Release Angle: -0.00015984 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -0.00015984 deg

Table 1410: Controlpoints


1 0
0.75656 -0.026316
0.6531 -0.05
0.42 -0.05
0.18569 -0.05
0 -0.027323
0 0
0 0.027323
0.18569 0.05
0.42 0.05
0.65309 0.05
0.75654 0.026317
1 0

Table 1411: Base 64 representation:


ijbaVijbaVssOgA

Figure 1063: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

358
Profile: rae2822 Table 1416: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.655 3.141 ects
Information: RAE 2822 transonic airfoil RMS curvature error: 10.12 11.51 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.8 2.1 dcts
Cm error -4 -17 mcts
Upper transition point -1.71 -3.71 %

Figure 1064: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1065: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1413: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.1188 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 1.2371 % @0.77C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.80237 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.84812 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.1955 deg
Release Angle: 7.3095 deg
Nose Incidence: -0.38735 deg
Camber deflection: 6.9222 deg

Table 1414: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80858 0.010741
0.565 -0.059236
0.35486 -0.059236
0.21653 -0.059236
0 -0.03499
0 0
0 0.035281
0.2327 0.062779
0.42663 0.062779
0.50171 0.062779
0.68885 0.062779
1 0

Table 1415: Base 64 representation:


jsbIblZXVZ cJrA

Figure 1066: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

359
Profile: rae5212 Table 1420: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.928 3.221 ects
Information: RAE(NPL) 5212 transonic airfoil RMS curvature error: 29.36 29.55 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -7.1 -7.8 dcts
Cm error -23 -34 mcts
Upper transition point 16.13 17.77 %

Figure 1067: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1068: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1417: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.9507 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 1.8295 % @0.69C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.2422 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.93972 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.7406 deg
Release Angle: 6.8943 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.8206 deg
Camber deflection: 16.715 deg

Table 1418: Controlpoints


1 0
0.69816 0.0027609
0.58628 -0.04715
0.35486 -0.04715
0.28744 -0.04715
0 -0.041964
0 0
0 0.066033
0.29815 0.07261
0.40245 0.07261
0.6698 0.07261
0.92638 0.017356
1 0

Table 1419: Base 64 representation:


5Rasf4MXXUPuOqA

Figure 1069: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

360
Profile: rae5213 Table 1424: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.439 5.773 ects
Information: RAE(NPL) 5213 transonic airfoil RMS curvature error: 28.95 28.95 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -5.1 -5.6 dcts
Cm error -7 -19 mcts
Upper transition point 10.69 11.66 %

Figure 1070: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1071: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1421: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9604 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 1.432 % @0.69C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 5.8549 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.86219 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.5068 deg
Release Angle: 5.2332 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.0024 deg
Camber deflection: 17.2355 deg

Table 1422: Controlpoints


1 0
0.71097 0.0099907
0.61097 -0.03915
0.30866 -0.03915
0.21992 -0.03915
0 -0.035163
0 0
0 0.020262
0.0098981 0.06061
0.35486 0.06061
0.51873 0.06061
0.67925 0.04786
1 0

Table 1423: Base 64 representation:


V9XQa4SUcRyvHoA

Figure 1072: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

361
Profile: rae5214 Table 1428: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.936 6.686 ects
Information: RAE 5214 transonic airfoil RMS curvature error: 28.18 28.33 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.2 -2.3 dcts
Cm error -6 -21 mcts
Upper transition point 4.79 5.18 %

Figure 1073: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1074: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1425: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.6786 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 1.421 % @0.7C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.8305 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.86219 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.4174 deg
Release Angle: 5.1884 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.4215 deg
Camber deflection: 17.61 deg

Table 1426: Controlpoints


1 0
0.71097 0.0099907
0.61097 -0.03915
0.30866 -0.03915
0.2261 -0.03915
0 -0.035554
0 0
0 0.028297
0.030088 0.05778
0.35486 0.05778
0.58763 0.05778
0.74801 0.037198
1 0

Table 1427: Base 64 representation:


f6XXZ5RUcRovHoA

Figure 1075: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

362
Profile: rae5215 Table 1432: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.957 5.274 ects
Information: RAE 5215 transonic airfoil RMS curvature error: 38.47 38.41 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.2 -3.4 dcts
Cm error -5 -2 mcts
Upper transition point 6.26 6.45 %

Figure 1076: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1077: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1429: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.6333 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 1.4729 % @0.7C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.38 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.4922 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.8539 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.4314 deg
Release Angle: 5.3446 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.5699 deg
Camber deflection: 17.9145 deg

Table 1430: Controlpoints


1 -0.0019
0.71453 0.0087119
0.61453 -0.039736
0.30859 -0.039736
0.24984 -0.039736
0 -0.037244
0 0
0 0.035673
0.05466 0.057025
0.40256 0.057025
0.61863 0.057025
0.75932 0.038129
1 0.0019

Table 1431: Base 64 representation:


n2aXY7MUcRpuHoK

Figure 1078: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

363
Profile: raf6 Table 1436: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.58 3.697 ects
Information: RAF-6 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.3 3.3 dcts
Cm error 20 21 mcts
Upper transition point -4.8 -6.63 %

Figure 1079: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1080: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1433: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9804 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 4.588 % @0.3C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.2296 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1761e-005 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 19.807 deg
Release Angle: 9.6972 deg
Nose Incidence: 28.6207 deg
Camber deflection: 38.3179 deg

Table 1434: Controlpoints


1 -0.0015
0.78999 -0.0022561
0.02502 -0.00501
0.02502 -0.00501
0.01299 -0.00501
0 -3.1915e-005
0 0
0 0.0049028
0.013033 0.09578
0.29966 0.09578
0.43164 0.09578
0.73524 0.09578
1 0.0015

Table 1435: Base 64 representation:


D8TMoAfCAC OWvI

Figure 1081: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

364
Profile: raf25 Table 1440: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.287 4.37 ects
Information: RAF-25 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -8.9 -9.3 dcts
Cm error -7 -14 mcts
Upper transition point 16.75 16.81 %

Figure 1082: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1083: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1437: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.3606 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 1.0739 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.28926 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.39748 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.7403 deg
Release Angle: 2.4893 deg
Nose Incidence: 0.37597 deg
Camber deflection: 2.8653 deg

Table 1438: Controlpoints


1 0
1 0
0.43445 -0.02403
0.20083 -0.02403
0.20083 -0.02403
0 -0.023069
0 0
0 0.014015
0.10186 0.04163
0.39856 0.04163
0.59975 0.04163
0.92843 0.0092443
1 0

Table 1439: Base 64 representation:


WvaVS8ANTKOALjA

Figure 1084: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

365
Profile: raf27 Table 1444: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.151 3.979 ects
Information: RAF-27 airfoil RMS curvature error: 24.79 26.94 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.7 -1.6 dcts
Cm error -7 -4 mcts
Upper transition point 0.98 0.96 %

Figure 1085: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1086: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1441: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.76 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 2.8222e-006 % @0.53C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.69222 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.69222 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.0699 deg
Release Angle: 2.1181e-006 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 2.1181e-006 deg

Table 1442: Controlpoints


1 0
0.574 -0.0488
0.37779 -0.0488
0.3 -0.0488
0.11345 -0.0488
0 -0.022882
0 0
0 0.022882
0.11345 0.0488
0.3 0.0488
0.37779 0.0488
0.574 0.0488
1 0

Table 1443: Base 64 representation:


enTHVenTHV PgA

Figure 1087: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

366
Profile: raf28 Table 1448: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.12 5.342 ects
Information: RAF-28 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -5.2 -5.8 dcts
Cm error 35 40 mcts
Upper transition point 8.26 9.06 %

Figure 1088: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1089: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1445: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.6707 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 1.9539 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.21801 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.768 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0 deg
Release Angle: -20.0028 deg
Nose Incidence: 1.3156 deg
Camber deflection: -18.6872 deg

Table 1446: Controlpoints


1 0
0.99822 -0.00064621
0.47702 -0.032
0.2 -0.032
0.2 -0.032
0 -0.03104
0 0
0 0.0071298
0.04188 0.0672
0.4 0.0672
0.59812 0.0672
0.99598 -0.0014629
1 0

Table 1447: Base 64 representation:


H4aVs9ANWOBBAAA

Figure 1090: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

367
Profile: raf30 Table 1452: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.327 2.642 ects
Information: RAF-30 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1091: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1092: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1449: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.64 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: -0.018578 % @0.82C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.921 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.921 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.5319 deg
Release Angle: -0.14095 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -0.14095 deg

Table 1450: Controlpoints


1 0
0.53084 -0.059418
0.46667 -0.0632
0.3 -0.0632
0.14162 -0.0632
0 -0.035361
0 0
0 0.035361
0.14162 0.0632
0.3 0.0632
0.46667 0.0632
0.53084 0.059418
1 0

Table 1451: Base 64 representation:


jhTPbjhTPb77QgA

Figure 1093: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

368
Profile: raf30md Table 1456: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.47 2.286 ects
Information: RAF-30 MOD airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.4 -0.8 dcts
Cm error -3 -1 mcts
Upper transition point 0.07 0.13 %

Figure 1094: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1095: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1453: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.6 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: -1.5061e-007 % @0.61C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.48573 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.48573 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.8027 deg
Release Angle: -2.8668e-007 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -2.8668e-007 deg

Table 1454: Controlpoints


1 0
0.57055 -0.033054
0.47055 -0.038
0.3 -0.038
0.14925 -0.038
0 -0.021984
0 0
0 0.021984
0.14925 0.038
0.3 0.038
0.47055 0.038
0.57055 0.033054
1 0

Table 1455: Base 64 representation:


kgTQQkgTQQ33KgA

Figure 1096: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

369
Profile: raf31 Table 1460: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.604 4.057 ects
Information: RAF-31 airfoil RMS curvature error: 45.33 43.23 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -9.2 -9.5 dcts
Cm error -20 -20 mcts
Upper transition point 14.16 15.27 %

Figure 1097: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1098: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1457: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.6031 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 2.0756 % @0.51C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.73934 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.4032 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.9879 deg
Release Angle: 4.4997 deg
Nose Incidence: 0.55245 deg
Camber deflection: 5.0521 deg

Table 1458: Controlpoints


1 0
0.66551 -0.017497
0.45819 -0.04715
0.25 -0.04715
0.17287 -0.04715
0 -0.040213
0 0
0 0.018028
0.06594 0.08124
0.4 0.08124
0.45176 0.08124
0.62137 0.080436
1 0

Table 1459: Base 64 representation:


O0aGi2UQSU-nRmA

Figure 1099: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

370
Profile: raf32 Table 1464: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.448 3.768 ects
Information: RAF-32 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.5 -0.6 dcts
Cm error -5 1 mcts
Upper transition point 1.57 1.46 %

Figure 1100: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1101: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1461: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.7332 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 4.9287 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6513 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.94295 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.0212 deg
Release Angle: 11.109 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.0132 deg
Camber deflection: 21.1221 deg

Table 1462: Controlpoints


1 0
0.60968 0.024545
0.422 -0.0279
0.1 -0.0279
0.074093 -0.0279
0 -0.021582
0 0
0 0.044469
0.17963 0.11
0.4 0.11
0.45776 0.11
0.67351 0.11
1 0

Table 1463: Base 64 representation:


aiaGuxRGXM qRxA

Figure 1102: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

371
Profile: raf32md Table 1468: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.251 4.622 ects
Information: RAF-32 MOD airfoil RMS curvature error: 24.21 25.79 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.7 -0.8 dcts
Cm error -11 -10 mcts
Upper transition point 0.14 0.78 %

Figure 1103: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1104: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1465: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.1889 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 4.0128 % @0.5C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0446 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.70542 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.5199 deg
Release Angle: 9.2256 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.3618 deg
Camber deflection: 16.5874 deg

Table 1466: Controlpoints


1 0
0.66871 0.020063
0.33232 -0.02284
0.15 -0.02284
0.10872 -0.02284
0 -0.022612
0 0
0 0.035363
0.17957 0.08816
0.4 0.08816
0.60382 0.08816
0.81314 0.050018
1 0

Table 1467: Base 64 representation:


aiaWl-SKOKjgNuA

Figure 1105: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

372
Profile: raf34 Table 1472: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.15 6.271 ects
Information: RAF-34 airfoil RMS curvature error: 35.25 33.05 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.9 -3 dcts
Cm error 9 2 mcts
Upper transition point 1.7 1.29 %

Figure 1106: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1107: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1469: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.6125 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 2.0194 % @0.29C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2756 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1384 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.9237 deg
Release Angle: -1.6852 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.2338 deg
Camber deflection: 3.5486 deg

Table 1470: Controlpoints


1 0
0.88563 -0.02047
0.5706 -0.0432
0.4 -0.0432
0.2099 -0.0432
0 -0.0432
0 0
0 0.032733
0.126 0.0832
0.3 0.0832
0.54252 0.0832
0.65286 0.041251
1 0

Table 1471: Base 64 representation:


ZkTWi eaSSweTsA

Figure 1108: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

373
Profile: raf38 Table 1476: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.011 4.547 ects
Information: RAF-38 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.8 2 dcts
Cm error 17 31 mcts
Upper transition point -4.42 -5.03 %

Figure 1109: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1110: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1473: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.65 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 2.4611 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.7618 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.85212 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.3516 deg
Release Angle: 2.5671 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.7395 deg
Camber deflection: 12.3066 deg

Table 1474: Controlpoints


1 0
0.6993 -0.02424
0.39781 -0.039
0.3 -0.039
0.19574 -0.039
0 -0.039
0 0
0 0.047569
0.19266 0.0875
0.3 0.0875
0.56617 0.0875
0.62322 0.064694
1 0

Table 1475: Base 64 representation:


iXTYk WTJR3nQjA

Figure 1111: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

374
Profile: raf48 Table 1480: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.197 5.698 ects
Information: RAF-48 airfoil RMS curvature error: 63.77 61.36 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.4 2.6 dcts
Cm error -29 -26 mcts
Upper transition point -1.16 -1.96 %

Figure 1112: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1113: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1477: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.8538 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 3.0219 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.625 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1408 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.7901 deg
Release Angle: 2.4593 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.6623 deg
Camber deflection: 14.1216 deg

Table 1478: Controlpoints


1 0
0.56389 -0.045342
0.31967 -0.0458
0.2 -0.0458
0.063048 -0.0458
0 -0.022356
0 0
0 0.05328
0.16222 0.104
0.3 0.104
0.55179 0.104
0.64735 0.067619
1 0

Table 1479: Base 64 representation:


gsTXrfrNKUx-TjA

Figure 1114: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

375
Profile: raf69 Table 1484: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.324 7.008 ects
Information: RAF-69 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.7 2.1 dcts
Cm error 25 29 mcts
Upper transition point -4.81 -5.23 %

Figure 1115: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1116: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1481: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 20.64 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.7126 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.0491 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.0803 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 21.1642 deg
Release Angle: 3.1546 deg
Nose Incidence: 2.8213 deg
Camber deflection: 5.9759 deg

Table 1482: Controlpoints


1 0
0.83061 -0.022083
0.50387 -0.08771
0.3 -0.08771
0.014053 -0.08771
0 -0.013961
0 0
0 0.05199
0.12697 0.11869
0.3 0.11869
0.53427 0.11869
0.63427 0.089403
1 0

Table 1483: Base 64 representation:


ckTVyK8TTkxWYkA

Figure 1117: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

376
Profile: raf89 Table 1488: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.632 5.326 ects
Information: RAF-89 airfoil RMS curvature error: 65.99 62.22 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1 -0.7 dcts
Cm error 34 45 mcts
Upper transition point -2.09 -2.79 %

Figure 1118: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1119: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1485: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 25 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.6956 % @0.52C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 5.6372 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.6255 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 25.8833 deg
Release Angle: 2.3657 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.6953 deg
Camber deflection: 6.061 deg

Table 1486: Controlpoints


1 0
0.67115 -0.0614
0.47735 -0.11063
0.3 -0.11063
0.01793 -0.11063
0 -0.020817
0 0
0 0.07675
0.15674 0.13937
0.3 0.13937
0.55556 0.13937
0.64396 0.097452
1 0

Table 1487: Base 64 representation:


ifTX6M7TQuynsjA

Figure 1120: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

377
Profile: rc08b3 Table 1492: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.98 6.551 ects
Information: NASA/Langley RC-08(B)3 rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: 25.22 25.16 %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1121: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1122: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1489: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.013 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 1.0713 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.18 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.68222 %C
Lower nose radius: 9.0867 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.6891 deg
Release Angle: 1.8219 deg
Nose Incidence: 2.6973 deg
Camber deflection: 4.5192 deg

Table 1490: Controlpoints


1 -0.0009
0.98225 -0.0015268
0.87881 -0.029572
0.45403 -0.029572
0 -0.029572
0 -0.010046
0 0
0 0.021671
0.10325 0.050719
0.37842 0.050719
0.65896 0.050719
0.88513 0.012297
1 0.0009

Table 1491: Base 64 representation:


buYsWW sxNWJJiF

Figure 1123: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

378
Profile: rc10b3 Table 1496: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.734 7.392 ects
Information: NASA/Langley RC-10(B)3 rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: 18.65 19.12 %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1124: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1125: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1493: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.0036 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 1.6496 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.2 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2347 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.3835 deg
Release Angle: -2.4641 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.0373 deg
Camber deflection: 3.5732 deg

Table 1494: Controlpoints


1 -0.001
0.94707 -0.011437
0.84707 -0.033993
0.49145 -0.033993
0 -0.033993
0 -0.0127
0 0
0 0.028921
0.10161 0.066418
0.37738 0.066418
0.65792 0.066418
0.89098 0.012897
1 0.001

Table 1495: Base 64 representation:


cuYscY fsPUWTcF

Figure 1126: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

379
Profile: rc10n1 Table 1500: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.311 6.804 ects
Information: NASA/Langley RC-10(N)1 rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: 48.87 48.72 %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1127: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1128: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1497: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9746 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 1.526 % @0.29C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.159 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.89922 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.30284 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.1147 deg
Release Angle: -2.8402 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.9738 deg
Camber deflection: 6.1336 deg

Table 1498: Controlpoints


1 -0.000795
0.90197 -0.017019
0.53669 -0.036214
0.424 -0.036214
0.38584 -0.036214
0 -0.027394
0 0
0 0.029888
0.14901 0.064374
0.35041 0.064374
0.61397 0.064374
0.71854 0.019081
1 0.000795

Table 1499: Base 64 representation:


ekWabvGbNPusPbE

Figure 1129: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

380
Profile: rc12b3 Table 1504: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.413 5.051 ects
Information: NASA/Langley RC-12(B)3 rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: 25.45 24.97 %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1130: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1131: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1501: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.0843 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 2.1525 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.25 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5451 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.3308 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 21.2166 deg
Release Angle: -1.166 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.4569 deg
Camber deflection: 4.2909 deg

Table 1502: Controlpoints


1 -0.00125
0.91833 -0.022408
0.81687 -0.039037
0.53209 -0.039037
0.036552 -0.039037
0 -0.024
0 0
0 0.022757
0.07486 0.081942
0.38005 0.081942
0.65477 0.081942
0.88857 0.01412
1 0.00125

Table 1503: Base 64 representation:


SyYcim7hmRVjYZG

Figure 1132: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

381
Profile: rc12n1 Table 1508: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.683 5.124 ects
Information: NASA/Langley RC-12(N)1 rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1133: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1134: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1505: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.0016 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 1.4056 % @0.29C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.18999 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0162 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.56636 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.5649 deg
Release Angle: -3.2646 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.0117 deg
Camber deflection: 3.7472 deg

Table 1506: Controlpoints


1 -0.00094995
0.91741 -0.017075
0.54273 -0.047139
0.42391 -0.047139
0.35686 -0.047139
0 -0.036707
0 0
0 0.029785
0.13095 0.073344
0.3756 0.073344
0.59463 0.073344
0.74319 0.021242
1 0.00094995

Table 1507: Base 64 representation:


apYWfxKbNUoWRbF

Figure 1135: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

382
Profile: rc0864c Table 1512: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.717 4.487 ects
Information: NASA/Langley 08-64C rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: 35.42 35.59 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -26.9 -26.4 dcts
Cm error 6 16 mcts
Upper transition point 21.61 20.46 %

Figure 1136: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1137: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1509: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.9926 % @0.41C
Maximum Camber: 0.99412 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.16 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.56535 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.473 deg
Release Angle: 1.0396 deg
Nose Incidence: 2.0794 deg
Camber deflection: 3.119 deg

Table 1510: Controlpoints


1 -0.0008
0.76562 -0.02625
0.56533 -0.03019
0.4638 -0.03019
0 -0.03019
0 -0.009954
0 0
0 0.016508
0.076004 0.04986
0.40002 0.04986
0.46596 0.04986
0.68881 0.046065
1 0.0008

Table 1511: Base 64 representation:


VzaHVV eMN62QhE

Figure 1138: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

383
Profile: rcsc2 Table 1516: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.899 4.463 ects
Information: NASA/Langley RC-SC2 rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1139: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1140: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1513: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9831 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 0.53821 % @0.62C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.21 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.1819 %C
Lower nose radius: 42.0807 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 19.8763 deg
Release Angle: 2.1052 deg
Nose Incidence: 0.48883 deg
Camber deflection: 2.5941 deg

Table 1514: Controlpoints


1 -0.00105
0.73563 -0.03742
0.51488 -0.045367
0.34995 -0.045367
0 -0.045367
0 -0.01613
0 0
0 0.017078
0.010462 0.05458
0.40006 0.05458
0.58752 0.05458
0.8055 0.042546
1 0.00105

Table 1515: Base 64 representation:


U9aUXX WQTx0WjF

Figure 1141: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

384
Profile: rg8 Table 1520: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.727 4.002 ects
Information: Rolf Girsberger RG 8 airfoil RMS curvature error: 53.33 53.01 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.1 1.1 dcts
Cm error 17 15 mcts
Upper transition point -0.9 -0.46 %

Figure 1142: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1143: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1517: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.7777 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 2.198 % @0.61C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.57237 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.77636 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.2173 deg
Release Angle: 10.6284 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.1157 deg
Camber deflection: 14.7441 deg

Table 1518: Controlpoints


1 0
0.7722 0.016009
0.5939 -0.03538
0.24185 -0.03538
0.2225 -0.03538
0 -0.035026
0 0
0 0.016123
0.068123 0.07359
0.3576 0.07359
0.60368 0.07359
0.91185 0.02735
1 0

Table 1519: Base 64 representation:


OzXZf-FPePYjPwA

Figure 1144: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

385
Profile: rg12 Table 1524: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.26 3.449 ects
Information: Rolf Girsberger RG 12 airfoil RMS curvature error: 26.15 26.73 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 34.9 0.2 dcts
Cm error 1 -3 mcts
Upper transition point 1.4 0.83 %

Figure 1145: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1146: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1521: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.2718 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 1.3803 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.36252 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.61901 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.0815 deg
Release Angle: 5.8244 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.0722 deg
Camber deflection: 8.8966 deg

Table 1522: Controlpoints


1 0
0.8238 0.0024101
0.70714 -0.03266
0.30876 -0.03266
0.24613 -0.03266
0 -0.032333
0 0
0 0.010934
0.049471 0.06013
0.34419 0.06013
0.57284 0.06013
0.89814 0.019551
1 0

Table 1523: Base 64 representation:


M2WWa-NUkOVmLpA

Figure 1147: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

386
Profile: rg12a Table 1528: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.919 4.18 ects
Information: Rolf Girsberger RG 12A airfoil RMS curvature error: 50.35 49.49 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.9 -0.9 dcts
Cm error 16 13 mcts
Upper transition point 0.49 0.63 %

Figure 1148: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1149: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1525: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.9957 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 1.798 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.86968 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.43039 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.73 deg
Release Angle: 6.8691 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.3737 deg
Camber deflection: 15.2428 deg

Table 1526: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79623 0.0053504
0.76142 -0.02711
0.29829 -0.02711
0.2168 -0.02711
0 -0.024941
0 0
0 0.022008
0.083538 0.06294
0.34413 0.06294
0.54911 0.06294
0.88604 0.02471
1 0

Table 1527: Base 64 representation:


WvWUb6RTpMZ2MqA

Figure 1150: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

387
Profile: rg12a189 Table 1532: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.917 4.237 ects
Information: Rolf Girsberger RG 12A-1.8/9.0 airfoil RMS curvature error: 50.11 49.17 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.8 -0.9 dcts
Cm error 17 12 mcts
Upper transition point 0.38 0.51 %

Figure 1151: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1152: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1529: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.9955 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 1.7983 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.86968 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.53039 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.7142 deg
Release Angle: 6.8612 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.2507 deg
Camber deflection: 14.1119 deg

Table 1530: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79623 0.0053504
0.76142 -0.02711
0.29829 -0.02711
0.20785 -0.02711
0 -0.024399
0 0
0 0.022008
0.083538 0.06294
0.34413 0.06294
0.54821 0.06294
0.88493 0.024918
1 0

Table 1531: Base 64 representation:


WvWUb5TTpMZ2MqA

Figure 1153: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

388
Profile: rg14 Table 1536: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.445 4.954 ects
Information: Rolf Girsberger RG 14 airfoil RMS curvature error: 27.61 28.19 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.2 -1.1 dcts
Cm error -7 1 mcts
Upper transition point 1.31 0.83 %

Figure 1154: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1155: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1533: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.4752 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 1.573 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.23524 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.4534 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.5108 deg
Release Angle: 5.7424 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.7645 deg
Camber deflection: 10.5069 deg

Table 1534: Controlpoints


1 0
0.9153 0.0029383
0.67299 -0.02705
0.26227 -0.02705
0.20011 -0.02705
0 -0.02678
0 0
0 0.0072011
0.033065 0.058
0.34343 0.058
0.55401 0.058
0.87354 0.021157
1 0

Table 1535: Base 64 representation:


I5WVZ-PRjMXRIoA

Figure 1156: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

389
Profile: rg14a147 Table 1540: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.277 1.704 ects
Information: Rolf Girsberger RG 14A-1.4/7.0 airfoil RMS curvature error: 30.96 31 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.3 0.1 dcts
Cm error -4 -7 mcts
Upper transition point 0.3 0.92 %

Figure 1157: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1158: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1537: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.9918 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 1.3962 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.3768 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.19058 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.7852 deg
Release Angle: 4.6947 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.2565 deg
Camber deflection: 10.9513 deg

Table 1538: Controlpoints


1 0
0.90118 0.0022463
0.69471 -0.02133
0.25378 -0.02133
0.016059 -0.02133
0 -0.0047304
0 0
0 0.011012
0.048274 0.04885
0.3434 0.04885
0.55221 0.04885
0.88202 0.016765
1 0

Table 1539: Base 64 representation:


O2WUVO7QlJWVInA

Figure 1159: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

390
Profile: rg15 Table 1544: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.025 4.24 ects
Information: Rolf Girsberger RG 15 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 26.31 25.86 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.7 -0.4 dcts
Cm error 7 19 mcts
Upper transition point 0.69 -0.43 %

Figure 1160: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1161: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1541: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.9249 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 1.7571 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.3467 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.50712 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.3485 deg
Release Angle: 6.7114 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.781 deg
Camber deflection: 11.4924 deg

Table 1542: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80407 0.0069693
0.64077 -0.02785
0.25509 -0.02785
0.20901 -0.02785
0 -0.027571
0 0
0 0.010451
0.047258 0.0619
0.34902 0.0619
0.57529 0.0619
0.89477 0.021192
1 0

Table 1543: Base 64 representation:


L2WWa-MQgMWiKqA

Figure 1162: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

391
Profile: rg15a111 Table 1548: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.164 1.394 ects
Information: Rolf Girsberger RG 15A-1.8/11.0 airfoil RMS curvature error: 41.13 40.06 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1 -1 dcts
Cm error 11 16 mcts
Upper transition point 1.59 0.76 %

Figure 1163: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1164: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1545: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.9729 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 1.8064 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.86469 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.25055 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.5651 deg
Release Angle: 6.6324 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.0333 deg
Camber deflection: 14.6657 deg

Table 1546: Controlpoints


1 0
0.78539 0.0031836
0.64592 -0.03763
0.2601 -0.03763
0.0079648 -0.03763
0 -0.0036474
0 0
0 0.01756
0.053489 0.07262
0.34897 0.07262
0.57928 0.07262
0.90768 0.020323
1 0

Table 1547: Base 64 representation:


P1WXfG9RgQSmNqA

Figure 1165: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

392
Profile: rg15a213 Table 1552: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.237 5.526 ects
Information: Rolf Girsberger RG 15A 2.5/13.0 airfoil RMS curvature error: 28.69 29.31 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.6 -0.3 dcts
Cm error 6 19 mcts
Upper transition point 0.89 -0.1 %

Figure 1166: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1167: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1549: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.9879 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 2.5 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.8552 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.7975 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.4651 deg
Release Angle: 9.3158 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.071 deg
Camber deflection: 15.3868 deg

Table 1550: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80146 0.0089577
0.64178 -0.04096
0.26081 -0.04096
0.13479 -0.04096
0 -0.03031
0 0
0 0.031614
0.08081 0.08956
0.34877 0.08956
0.57402 0.08956
0.89577 0.029982
1 0

Table 1551: Base 64 representation:


XwWWlufRgRViPuA

Figure 1168: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

393
Profile: rg149 Table 1556: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.886 4.11 ects
Information: Rolf Girsberger RG 14 (9 RMS curvature error: 30.52 31.36 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.6 -0.8 dcts
Cm error 0 18 mcts
Upper transition point -0.44 -0.42 %

Figure 1169: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1170: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1553: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.0098 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.5574 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1321 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.56484 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.7291 deg
Release Angle: 5.4796 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.1905 deg
Camber deflection: 12.6701 deg

Table 1554: Controlpoints


1 0
0.91164 0.0024913
0.67338 -0.02965
0.26227 -0.02965
0.033435 -0.02965
0 -0.011221
0 0
0 0.031926
0.13504 0.06057
0.30998 0.06057
0.61454 0.06057
0.93499 0.010698
1 0

Table 1555: Base 64 representation:


hjUcaY3RjNLRJoA

Figure 1171: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

394
Profile: rg1410 Table 1560: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.922 3.068 ects
Information: Rolf Girsberger RG 14 (10 RMS curvature error: 30.57 31.02 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.5 -1 dcts
Cm error 2 7 mcts
Upper transition point -1.13 -0.49 %

Figure 1172: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1173: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1557: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.0045 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.5614 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3478 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.80376 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.7695 deg
Release Angle: 5.3315 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.7771 deg
Camber deflection: 12.1086 deg

Table 1558: Controlpoints


1 0
0.90529 0.0015651
0.67372 -0.03461
0.26227 -0.03461
0.2191 -0.03461
0 -0.034264
0 0
0 0.034317
0.13106 0.06557
0.30998 0.06557
0.57331 0.06557
0.85094 0.025522
1 0

Table 1559: Base 64 representation:


gkUYc-LRjPZTKoA

Figure 1174: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

395
Profile: rg1495 Table 1564: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.923 3.472 ects
Information: Rolf Girsberger RG 14 (9.5 RMS curvature error: 30.63 30.99 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.7 -0.8 dcts
Cm error 1 11 mcts
Upper transition point -0.67 -0.78 %

Figure 1175: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1176: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1561: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.5072 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.5595 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2377 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.66834 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.2224 deg
Release Angle: 5.3888 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.2177 deg
Camber deflection: 12.6065 deg

Table 1562: Controlpoints


1 0
0.90839 0.0020434
0.67364 -0.03213
0.26227 -0.03213
0.21334 -0.03213
0 -0.031809
0 0
0 0.033128
0.133 0.06307
0.30998 0.06307
0.59191 0.06307
0.88823 0.018705
1 0

Table 1563: Base 64 representation:


hkUab-MRjOTSJoA

Figure 1177: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

396
Profile: rhodesg30 Table 1568: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.792 5.309 ects
Information: Rhode St. Genese 30 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -9.6 -9.2 dcts
Cm error -2 1 mcts
Upper transition point 11.23 10.87 %

Figure 1178: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1179: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1565: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.7713 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 3.2207 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1595 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.11377 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.5618 deg
Release Angle: 4.4679 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.2042 deg
Camber deflection: 14.6721 deg

Table 1566: Controlpoints


1 0
0.98741 -0.00028858
0.10055 -0.021684
0.10055 -0.021684
0.001224 -0.021684
0 -0.00096352
0 0
0 0.029063
0.10927 0.080507
0.29815 0.080507
0.57054 0.080507
0.76732 0.042071
1 0

Table 1567: Base 64 representation:


XoTZhD-GAJiBNmA

Figure 1180: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

397
Profile: rhodesg32 Table 1572: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.229 3.588 ects
Information: Rhode St. Genese 32 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 6.4 -6.3 dcts
Cm error 17 -21 mcts
Upper transition point -12.24 12.13 %

Figure 1181: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1182: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1569: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.9408 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 3.9425 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6917 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.6828 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.0199 deg
Release Angle: 5.453 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.5423 deg
Camber deflection: 13.9952 deg

Table 1570: Controlpoints


1 0
0.9874 -0.00034262
0.10082 -0.026359
0.10082 -0.026359
0.034804 -0.026359
0 -0.01976
0 0
0 0.034259
0.10407 0.098448
0.29724 0.098448
0.56837 0.098448
0.76427 0.052099
1 0

Table 1571: Base 64 representation:


WpTZpvpGALiBQoA

Figure 1183: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

398
Profile: rhodesg34 Table 1576: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.916 5.533 ects
Information: Rhode St. Genese 34 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -5.7 -5.8 dcts
Cm error -19 -25 mcts
Upper transition point 10.98 11.28 %

Figure 1184: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1185: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1573: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.1197 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 4.6594 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.4342 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.9778 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.1703 deg
Release Angle: 6.2978 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.2023 deg
Camber deflection: 15.5 deg

Table 1574: Controlpoints


1 0
0.9873 -0.00039624
0.10114 -0.031211
0.10114 -0.031211
0.021518 -0.031211
0 -0.020668
0 0
0 0.04135
0.10536 0.11634
0.29614 0.11634
0.546 0.11634
0.70956 0.07448
1 0

Table 1575: Base 64 representation:


XoTXxpxGANoBSpA

Figure 1186: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

399
Profile: rhodesg36 Table 1580: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.272 5.853 ects
Information: Rhode St. Genese 36 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 4.7 -5.1 dcts
Cm error 54 -56 mcts
Upper transition point -8.39 9.16 %

Figure 1187: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1188: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1577: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.2842 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 5.3691 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.1235 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.7433 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.8969 deg
Release Angle: 5.2139 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.0993 deg
Camber deflection: 16.3132 deg

Table 1578: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79542 -0.0079828
0.1105 -0.035971
0.10152 -0.035971
0.021177 -0.035971
0 -0.022989
0 0
0 0.045097
0.097667 0.13419
0.29487 0.13419
0.63841 0.13419
0.89469 0.023661
1 0

Table 1579: Base 64 representation:


WqTf4oyGBPTPRoA

Figure 1189: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

400
Profile: s3 Table 1584: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.165 5.313 ects
Information: Republic S-3 airfoil (P-47 wing airfoil) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.5 -4.5 dcts
Cm error -7 0 mcts
Upper transition point 7.35 7.13 %

Figure 1190: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1191: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1581: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.9906 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.7744 % @0.17C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.060663 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.31961 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.1818 deg
Release Angle: 1.3433 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.7334 deg
Camber deflection: 16.0767 deg

Table 1582: Controlpoints


1 0
0.84226 -0.0061911
0.56466 -0.04
0.35 -0.04
0.19146 -0.04
0 -0.020198
0 0
0 0.001422
0.005 0.0711
0.25 0.0711
0.52224 0.0711
0.79442 0.017748
1 0

Table 1583: Base 64 representation:


B-QXegsWVRcXIhA

Figure 1192: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

401
Profile: S102B Table 1588: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.441 6.992 ects
Information: SOMERS S102 AIRFOIL (BLUNT) RMS curvature error: NaN NaN %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.7 -1.8 dcts
Cm error -72 -65 mcts
Upper transition point 3.4 3.72 %

Figure 1193: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1194: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1585: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.9881 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 2.0428 % @0.68C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.4 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.4429 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.55154 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.4513 deg
Release Angle: 9.5235 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.2912 deg
Camber deflection: 24.8147 deg

Table 1586: Controlpoints


1 -0.002
0.80414 0.021348
0.6176 -0.05776
0.39208 -0.05776
0.25111 -0.05776
0 -0.030386
0 0
0 0.052528
0.16942 0.09215
0.40037 0.09215
0.54766 0.09215
0.64766 0.078496
1 0.002

Table 1587: Base 64 representation:


jkaQmhXZYZ1gGuK

Figure 1195: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

402
Profile: S102S Table 1592: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.658 6.121 ects
Information: SOMERS S102 AIRFOIL(SHARP) RMS curvature error: 35.48 34.85 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.3 -1.2 dcts
Cm error 11 -11 mcts
Upper transition point 1.54 2.17 %

Figure 1196: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1197: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1589: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.9882 % @0.4C
Maximum Camber: 2.0692 % @0.7C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.4429 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.55234 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.0865 deg
Release Angle: 8.3324 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.2845 deg
Camber deflection: 23.6169 deg

Table 1590: Controlpoints


1 0
0.75259 0.014218
0.62475 -0.05776
0.39208 -0.05776
0.25142 -0.05776
0 -0.030427
0 0
0 0.052528
0.16942 0.09215
0.40037 0.09215
0.48401 0.09215
0.61246 0.09215
1 0

Table 1591: Base 64 representation:


jkaJmhXZYZ pLtA

Figure 1198: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

403
Profile: s1010 Table 1596: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.302 3.708 ects
Information: Selig S1010 HPV airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1199: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1200: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1593: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.022 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 6.7355e-006 % @0.72C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.82243 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.82243 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.1754 deg
Release Angle: 0.00018439 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 0.00018439 deg

Table 1594: Controlpoints


1 0
0.91258 -0.0031866
0.68346 -0.03011
0.23322 -0.03011
0.16535 -0.03011
0 -0.03011
0 0
0 0.03011
0.16535 0.03011
0.23322 0.03011
0.68346 0.03011
0.91257 0.0031875
1 0

Table 1595: Base 64 representation:


TPlN TPlNSSFgA

Figure 1201: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

404
Profile: s1012 Table 1600: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.549 5.661 ects
Information: Selig S1012 HPV airfoil RMS curvature error: 36.27 36.3 %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1202: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1203: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1597: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.0217 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: -0.0005049 % @0.84C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5521 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.5521 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.111 deg
Release Angle: -0.0032127 deg
Nose Incidence: -4.9696e-015 deg
Camber deflection: -0.0032127 deg

Table 1598: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79825 -0.014315
0.76667 -0.06011
0.37324 -0.06011
0.047931 -0.06011
0 -0.02227
0 0
0 0.02227
0.047931 0.06011
0.37324 0.06011
0.76667 0.06011
0.79825 0.014293
1 0

Table 1599: Base 64 representation:


Y3YnaY3Yna22JgA

Figure 1204: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

405
Profile: s1014 Table 1604: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.408 4.623 ects
Information: Selig S1014 HPV airfoil RMS curvature error: 32.37 32.76 %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1205: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1206: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1601: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.5078 % @0.42C
Maximum Camber: -0.0011467 % @0.84C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.0321 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.0321 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.4153 deg
Release Angle: -0.0071915 deg
Nose Incidence: -4.9696e-015 deg
Camber deflection: -0.0071915 deg

Table 1602: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79561 -0.016857
0.76425 -0.08254
0.42222 -0.08254
0.17825 -0.08254
0 -0.049141
0 0
0 0.049141
0.17825 0.08254
0.42222 0.08254
0.76425 0.08254
0.79094 0.01719
1 0

Table 1603: Base 64 representation:


lkblilkbli42LgA

Figure 1207: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

406
Profile: s1016 Table 1608: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.433 5.573 ects
Information: Selig S1016 HPV airfoil RMS curvature error: 68.91 66.94 %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1208: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1209: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1605: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.4839 % @0.42C
Maximum Camber: -0.0014433 % @0.84C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.8783 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.8783 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.8086 deg
Release Angle: -0.0094826 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: -0.0094826 deg

Table 1606: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80552 -0.018431
0.76658 -0.08742
0.41848 -0.08742
0.025064 -0.08742
0 -0.017716
0 0
0 0.017716
0.025064 0.08742
0.41848 0.08742
0.76658 0.08742
0.80552 0.018366
1 0

Table 1607: Base 64 representation:


N7blkN7blk00MgA

Figure 1210: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

407
Profile: s1020 Table 1612: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.395 4.321 ects
Information: Selig S1020 ornithopter airfoil RMS curvature error: 30.58 30.37 %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1211: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1212: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1609: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.1232 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 4.943 % @0.52C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2582 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.94646 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.8222 deg
Release Angle: 16.993 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.8846 deg
Camber deflection: 26.8776 deg

Table 1610: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79341 0.029335
0.47781 -0.03458
0.20942 -0.03458
0.16811 -0.03458
0 -0.032569
0 0
0 0.033514
0.14539 0.12164
0.38291 0.12164
0.68521 0.12164
0.96209 0.018414
1 0

Table 1611: Base 64 representation:


SnZfz7NNWPKZU6A

Figure 1213: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

408
Profile: s1046 Table 1616: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.8 6.137 ects
Information: Selig S1046 airfoil RMS curvature error: 87.77 90.06 %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1214: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1215: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1613: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.9895 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: -1.2951e-006 % @0.93C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.4472 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.4472 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.2115 deg
Release Angle: -2.6466e-005 deg
Nose Incidence: -1.4743e-005 deg
Camber deflection: -4.1208e-005 deg

Table 1614: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79195 -0.02042
0.49908 -0.08495
0.30811 -0.08495
0.031648 -0.08495
0 -0.0097135
0 0
0 0.0097135
0.031648 0.08495
0.30811 0.08495
0.49908 0.08495
0.79196 0.02042
1 0

Table 1615: Base 64 representation:


H4USjH4USjbbNgA

Figure 1216: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

409
Profile: s1048 Table 1620: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.516 3.312 ects
Information: Selig S1048 airfoil RMS curvature error: 60.22 48.81 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.5 1 dcts
Cm error 7 8 mcts
Upper transition point -1.25 -1.5 %

Figure 1217: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1218: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1617: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.97 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 0.056128 % @0.8C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0262 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0262 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.322 deg
Release Angle: 0.40403 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 0.40403 deg

Table 1618: Controlpoints


1 0
0.67056 -0.032381
0.5133 -0.06985
0.26988 -0.06985
0.095136 -0.06985
0 -0.022333
0 0
0 0.022333
0.095136 0.06985
0.26988 0.06985
0.5133 0.06985
0.67056 0.032381
1 0

Table 1619: Base 64 representation:


UoRVeUoRVeqqNgA

Figure 1219: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

410
Profile: s2027 Table 1624: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.245 6.437 ects
Information: Selig S2027 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 15.14 16.28 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.6 -0.9 dcts
Cm error 8 6 mcts
Upper transition point 1.06 1.99 %

Figure 1220: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1221: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1621: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.5237 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 2.7434 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0145 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.98275 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.8108 deg
Release Angle: 4.2221 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.1278 deg
Camber deflection: 11.3499 deg

Table 1622: Controlpoints


1 0
0.78847 0.0012652
0.53575 -0.04574
0.2935 -0.04574
0.083219 -0.04574
0 -0.02002
0 0
0 0.019664
0.074967 0.09978
0.33747 0.09978
0.57778 0.09978
0.89451 0.0097999
1 0

Table 1623: Base 64 representation:


NxWXqctTWUQsGkA

Figure 1222: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

411
Profile: s2046 Table 1628: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.997 2.918 ects
Information: Selig S2046 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 22.03 21.3 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.3 -0.7 dcts
Cm error -4 -9 mcts
Upper transition point -0.52 0.59 %

Figure 1223: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1224: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1625: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.9895 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 2.5812 % @0.57C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.94092 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.81534 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.0738 deg
Release Angle: 7.5692 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.9733 deg
Camber deflection: 13.5424 deg

Table 1626: Controlpoints


1 0
0.72449 0.026685
0.55654 -0.02542
0.15629 -0.02542
0.10801 -0.02542
0 -0.02423
0 0
0 0.021134
0.071202 0.06732
0.35374 0.06732
0.6063 0.06732
0.81898 0.030636
1 0

Table 1627: Base 64 representation:


UyXZs8UKeLsnFrA

Figure 1225: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

412
Profile: s2048 Table 1632: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.109 3.761 ects
Information: Selig S2048 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 42.93 41.58 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.5 -1.3 dcts
Cm error 7 -5 mcts
Upper transition point 0.35 1.4 %

Figure 1226: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1227: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1629: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.632 % @0.36C
Maximum Camber: 1.9197 % @0.59C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.097416 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.45404 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 38.9219 deg
Release Angle: 20.0535 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.8413 deg
Camber deflection: 25.8948 deg

Table 1630: Controlpoints


1 0
0.66296 0.0034859
0.61706 -0.025805
0.30224 -0.025805
0.21128 -0.025805
0 -0.025289
0 0
0 0.001616
0.0040213 0.061098
0.40213 0.061098
0.69336 0.061098
0.99853 0.0012159
1 0

Table 1631: Base 64 representation:


C-afa-TTsLB3q A

Figure 1228: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

413
Profile: s2050 Table 1636: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.494 5.362 ects
Information: Selig S2050 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 37.5 36.34 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 0.6 dcts
Cm error 11 -3 mcts
Upper transition point -2.48 -2.23 %

Figure 1229: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1230: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1633: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.9378 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 1.347 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.139 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.68519 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.3471 deg
Release Angle: 8.2804 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.9806 deg
Camber deflection: 14.261 deg

Table 1634: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80553 0.012258
0.6658 -0.03147
0.25508 -0.03147
0.21682 -0.03147
0 -0.03147
0 0
0 0.031983
0.13471 0.058037
0.29834 0.058037
0.60147 0.058037
0.95638 0.010034
1 0

Table 1635: Base 64 representation:


iiTcZ KQiNLkKsA

Figure 1231: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

414
Profile: s2055 Table 1640: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.266 2.817 ects
Information: Selig S2055 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 32.89 34.45 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2 0.7 dcts
Cm error -13 -3 mcts
Upper transition point -2.75 -3.78 %

Figure 1232: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1233: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1637: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.0029 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 1.6988 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 2e-006 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.67379 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.37777 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.7185 deg
Release Angle: 5.7543 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.2833 deg
Camber deflection: 13.0376 deg

Table 1638: Controlpoints


1 -1e-008
0.92367 0.0031927
0.71415 -0.023177
0.3115 -0.023177
0.2133 -0.023177
0 -0.023177
0 0
0 0.018263
0.074251 0.056906
0.34753 0.056906
0.50019 0.056906
0.66556 0.05365
1 1e-008

Table 1639: Base 64 representation:


VxWPY UUkK7RIoA

Figure 1234: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

415
Profile: s2060 Table 1644: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.06 3.955 ects
Information: Selig S2060 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 33.6 34.19 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.4 1.2 dcts
Cm error 0 13 mcts
Upper transition point -0.04 -0.3 %

Figure 1235: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1236: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1641: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.0068 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.8912 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.79782 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.58075 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.1634 deg
Release Angle: 5.0942 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.1854 deg
Camber deflection: 10.2795 deg

Table 1642: Controlpoints


1 0
0.83753 0.0071291
0.51543 -0.024117
0.16879 -0.024117
0.1536 -0.024117
0 -0.024117
0 0
0 0.023284
0.10193 0.057803
0.34861 0.057803
0.65788 0.057803
0.93536 0.0087118
1 0

Table 1643: Base 64 representation:


asWeZ GLbKMVGnA

Figure 1237: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

416
Profile: s2062 Table 1648: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.824 5.9 ects
Information: Selig S2062 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 29.01 30.1 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.9 0.1 dcts
Cm error -10 10 mcts
Upper transition point 0.3 -1.68 %

Figure 1238: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1239: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1645: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.0211 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.8033 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.74576 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.54364 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.8283 deg
Release Angle: 6.0568 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.1767 deg
Camber deflection: 11.2335 deg

Table 1646: Controlpoints


1 0
0.91755 0.0066959
0.47328 -0.02464
0.21205 -0.02464
0.16752 -0.02464
0 -0.02464
0 0
0 0.022074
0.098006 0.05698
0.34775 0.05698
0.65492 0.05698
0.9305 0.0091141
1 0

Table 1647: Base 64 representation:


ZtWeY NOVLNKDpA

Figure 1240: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

417
Profile: s2091 Table 1652: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.183 4.306 ects
Information: Selig S2091 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 23.61 22.16 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 3.3 4.2 dcts
Cm error -2 3 mcts
Upper transition point -1.78 -3.87 %

Figure 1241: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1242: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1649: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.1502 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 4.0804 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 4e-006 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.5243 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.51524 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.1606 deg
Release Angle: 5.2186 deg
Nose Incidence: 18.7372 deg
Camber deflection: 23.9558 deg

Table 1650: Controlpoints


1 -2e-008
0.69699 0.016614
0.27432 -0.016629
0.1118 -0.016629
0.080499 -0.016629
0 -0.016629
0 0
0 0.05065
0.15244 0.090157
0.30311 0.090157
0.60794 0.090157
0.81263 0.023999
1 2e-008

Table 1651: Base 64 representation:


jgTcl SHMHfbFoA

Figure 1243: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

418
Profile: s3002 Table 1656: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.028 5.764 ects
Information: Selig S3002 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 29.23 28.71 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.9 1.9 dcts
Cm error 7 2 mcts
Upper transition point -1.48 0.3 %

Figure 1244: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1245: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1653: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9567 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 2.774 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.050029 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.8415 deg
Release Angle: 7.6027 deg
Nose Incidence: 2.6861 deg
Camber deflection: 10.2888 deg

Table 1654: Controlpoints


1 0
0.78835 0.021058
0.68835 -0.024507
0.15417 -0.024507
0 -0.024507
0 -0.011847
0 0
0 0.0020941
0.013148 0.076852
0.35119 0.076852
0.6011 0.076852
0.82664 0.029083
1 0

Table 1655: Base 64 representation:


C9WZgf KnKcqErA

Figure 1246: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

419
Profile: s3010 Table 1660: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.246 4.759 ects
Information: Selig S3010 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 19.7 17.29 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.5 0.4 dcts
Cm error 1 -8 mcts
Upper transition point -2.88 -2.08 %

Figure 1247: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1248: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1657: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.3499 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 2.7511 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.97196 %C
Lower nose radius: 19.9556 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.4897 deg
Release Angle: 3.4669 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.4608 deg
Camber deflection: 10.9278 deg

Table 1658: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79469 0.0061725
0.40138 -0.02709
0.16118 -0.02709
0 -0.02709
0 -0.0052629
0 0
0 0.021909
0.074076 0.078316
0.29239 0.078316
0.5751 0.078316
0.83773 0.014801
1 0

Table 1659: Base 64 representation:


SvTagM KSMYWElA

Figure 1249: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

420
Profile: s3014 Table 1664: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.851 2.905 ects
Information: Selig S3014 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 89.06 95.38 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.9 -2 dcts
Cm error -9 -26 mcts
Upper transition point 0.97 2.49 %

Figure 1250: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1251: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1661: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.4532 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 2.5768 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.16302 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.4936 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.2412 deg
Release Angle: 0.79206 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.6172 deg
Camber deflection: 9.4092 deg

Table 1662: Controlpoints


1 0
0.42619 -0.018319
0.34581 -0.023835
0.17024 -0.023835
0.080712 -0.023835
0 -0.016297
0 0
0 0.0045898
0.019384 0.07237
0.33908 0.07237
0.63034 0.07237
0.88001 0.0071555
1 0

Table 1663: Base 64 representation:


E7WcfrhLOKV3GhA

Figure 1252: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

421
Profile: s3016 Table 1668: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.879 3.953 ects
Information: Selig S3016 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 45.79 41.26 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1 0.9 dcts
Cm error -10 6 mcts
Upper transition point 1.49 -0.11 %

Figure 1253: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1254: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1665: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.5048 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 2.1621 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.26736 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.53106 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.8895 deg
Release Angle: 0.11278 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.2458 deg
Camber deflection: 9.3586 deg

Table 1666: Controlpoints


1 0
0.49891 -0.020406
0.36284 -0.027647
0.2159 -0.027647
0.17488 -0.027647
0 -0.024882
0 0
0 0.0037346
0.007825 0.068466
0.33519 0.068466
0.61869 0.068466
0.89047 0.0048921
1 0

Table 1667: Base 64 representation:


D-Vbs5MOMMSxFgA

Figure 1255: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

422
Profile: s3021 Table 1672: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.886 5.1 ects
Information: Selig S3021 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 81.74 Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.5 -2.9 dcts
Cm error 4 2 mcts
Upper transition point -0.04 -0.3 %

Figure 1256: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1257: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1669: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.4578 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 2.9056 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.25471 %C
Lower nose radius: 3.0124 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.2095 deg
Release Angle: 3.7081 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.727 deg
Camber deflection: 9.4351 deg

Table 1670: Controlpoints


1 0
0.43535 -0.013766
0.29106 -0.021679
0.16459 -0.021679
0.0016917 -0.021679
0 -0.0058287
0 0
0 0.0090638
0.04838 0.075678
0.345 0.075678
0.50009 0.075678
0.68546 0.048765
1 0

Table 1671: Base 64 representation:


I2WPgR-LKJoyLlA

Figure 1258: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

423
Profile: s3024 Table 1676: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.914 3.407 ects
Information: Selig S3024 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 42.28 37.89 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.7 -1.9 dcts
Cm error 10 -14 mcts
Upper transition point -1.28 0.84 %

Figure 1259: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1260: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1673: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.8757 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 3.3811 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: -2e-006 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.87777 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.0848 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.7235 deg
Release Angle: 4.3517 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.0885 deg
Camber deflection: 10.4402 deg

Table 1674: Controlpoints


1 1e-008
0.61075 -0.0021098
0.30351 -0.02128
0.1207 -0.02128
0.0049095 -0.02128
0 -0.0077334
0 0
0 0.015403
0.081104 0.082125
0.3522 0.082125
0.67858 0.082125
0.85748 0.017232
1 -1e-008

Table 1675: Base 64 representation:


MwXgiX8INJcjIlA

Figure 1261: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

424
Profile: s3025 Table 1680: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.771 4.389 ects
Information: Selig S3025 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.9 -2.5 dcts
Cm error 13 27 mcts
Upper transition point -1.54 -1.11 %

Figure 1262: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1263: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1677: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.3928 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 3.4263 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.20747 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.0101 deg
Release Angle: 5.79 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.5732 deg
Camber deflection: 9.3632 deg

Table 1678: Controlpoints


1 0
0.67463 0.0044581
0.2579 -0.019258
0.11783 -0.019258
0 -0.019258
0 -0.0065489
0 0
0 0.0091223
0.060165 0.08021
0.35354 0.08021
0.40259 0.08021
0.57933 0.08021
1 0

Table 1679: Base 64 representation:


H0XFhW IKI cLoA

Figure 1264: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

425
Profile: s4022 Table 1684: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.285 5.246 ects
Information: Selig S4022 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 32.46 31.96 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.1 -1.4 dcts
Cm error 41 23 mcts
Upper transition point 0.49 1.75 %

Figure 1265: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1266: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1681: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.2433 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 4.3711 % @0.55C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0471 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.47368 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 19.1186 deg
Release Angle: 20.0535 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.0557 deg
Camber deflection: 31.1092 deg

Table 1682: Controlpoints


1 0
0.78304 0.040188
0.50727 -0.02152
0.17189 -0.02152
0.1148 -0.02152
0 -0.01904
0 0
0 0.031984
0.14654 0.09628
0.3866 0.09628
0.70768 0.09628
0.9757 0.013813
1 0

Table 1683: Base 64 representation:


VnZho4VLaJJcV A

Figure 1267: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

426
Profile: s4053 Table 1688: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.583 4.288 ects
Information: Selig S4053 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 43.56 43.54 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.8 -1 dcts
Cm error 10 9 mcts
Upper transition point -0.76 -0.53 %

Figure 1268: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1269: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1685: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.9589 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 2.9927 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.96605 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2309 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.7348 deg
Release Angle: 5.073 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.3453 deg
Camber deflection: 14.4182 deg

Table 1686: Controlpoints


1 0
0.65253 -0.0017855
0.37581 -0.0184
0.16249 -0.0184
0.0032152 -0.0184
0 -0.0051366
0 0
0 0.030054
0.14025 0.07383
0.35444 0.07383
0.44347 0.07383
0.59932 0.07383
1 0

Table 1687: Base 64 representation:


amXJgS-KQI jMnA

Figure 1270: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

427
Profile: s4061 Table 1692: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.881 6.096 ects
Information: Selig S4061 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 17.66 18.1 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.7 1.8 dcts
Cm error 2 -25 mcts
Upper transition point -0.15 1.36 %

Figure 1271: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1272: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1689: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.8307 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 3.64 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.91027 %C
Lower nose radius: 5.2564 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.9127 deg
Release Angle: 5.0884 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.7796 deg
Camber deflection: 10.8681 deg

Table 1690: Controlpoints


1 0
0.6708 0.015508
0.23407 -0.021836
0.11441 -0.021836
0 -0.021836
0 -0.0093876
0 0
0 0.018953
0.098404 0.083628
0.35295 0.083628
0.63424 0.083628
0.84063 0.018092
1 0

Table 1691: Base 64 representation:


PtXcjc HJJccEnA

Figure 1273: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

428
Profile: s4062 Table 1696: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.506 1.941 ects
Information: Selig S4062 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 14 14.14 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.5 -1.4 dcts
Cm error -8 -11 mcts
Upper transition point 0.4 0.51 %

Figure 1274: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1275: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1693: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.5292 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 4.2859 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6658 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.034998 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.5555 deg
Release Angle: 5.3905 deg
Nose Incidence: 16.7787 deg
Camber deflection: 22.1692 deg

Table 1694: Controlpoints


1 0
0.69241 0.019421
0.24319 -0.016362
0.11153 -0.016362
0 -0.016362
0 -1.6362e-006
0 0
0 0.038244
0.1317 0.088774
0.40874 0.088774
0.66587 0.088774
0.88474 0.014496
1 0

Table 1695: Base 64 representation:


cqaclA HJHWaEoA

Figure 1276: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

429
Profile: s4083 Table 1700: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.548 8.501 ects
Information: Selig S4083 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 52.93 52.83 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.4 2 dcts
Cm error 42 37 mcts
Upper transition point -7.22 -7.63 %

Figure 1277: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1278: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1697: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.9407 % @0.24C
Maximum Camber: 3.4029 % @0.31C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.66674 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.56349 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.4879 deg
Release Angle: 9.5675 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.1456 deg
Camber deflection: 19.7131 deg

Table 1698: Controlpoints


1 0
0.54701 0.01838
0.20174 -0.012798
0.074192 -0.012798
0.010733 -0.012798
0 -0.0064776
0 0
0 0.015961
0.074141 0.073106
0.28757 0.073106
0.32168 0.073106
0.86843 0.039751
1 0

Table 1699: Base 64 representation:


OuSDfg2FJFijQvA

Figure 1279: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

430
Profile: s4110 Table 1704: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.907 4.244 ects
Information: Selig S4110 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 19.53 19.72 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.2 0 dcts
Cm error 3 6 mcts
Upper transition point 0.19 0 %

Figure 1280: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1281: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1701: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.4025 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 3.1285 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.9784 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.57309 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.6269 deg
Release Angle: 7.5371 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.152 deg
Camber deflection: 16.6892 deg

Table 1702: Controlpoints


1 0
0.77313 0.016754
0.28099 -0.0192
0.11599 -0.0192
0.07097 -0.0192
0 -0.0192
0 0
0 0.022678
0.07885 0.07102
0.35714 0.07102
0.50033 0.07102
0.68486 0.060405
1 0

Table 1703: Base 64 representation:


UxXOe ZHMI1UHrA

Figure 1282: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

431
Profile: s4158 Table 1708: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.095 4.441 ects
Information: Selig S4158 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 39.37 43.06 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.3 0.4 dcts
Cm error -8 -10 mcts
Upper transition point -0.6 -0.54 %

Figure 1283: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1284: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1705: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.8692 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 3.7168 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0572 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.6226 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.8172 deg
Release Angle: 1.6738 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.3255 deg
Camber deflection: 10.9993 deg

Table 1706: Controlpoints


1 0
0.49576 -0.010868
0.38247 -0.0216
0.16075 -0.0216
0.0036394 -0.0216
0 -0.0062744
0 0
0 0.03066
0.13337 0.09057
0.39957 0.09057
0.73259 0.09057
0.8195 0.014467
1 0

Table 1707: Base 64 representation:


WqaimT-KRJqzGiA

Figure 1285: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

432
Profile: s4180 Table 1712: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.801 5.823 ects
Information: Selig S4180 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 34.84 37.71 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 0.2 dcts
Cm error 8 20 mcts
Upper transition point 0.14 -1.07 %

Figure 1286: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1287: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1709: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.7803 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 4.4897 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 2e-006 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.8065 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.70178 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 1.659 deg
Release Angle: 6.1606 deg
Nose Incidence: 19.1408 deg
Camber deflection: 25.3013 deg

Table 1710: Controlpoints


1 -1e-008
0.71934 0.02619
0.13768 -0.014949
0.073332 -0.014949
0.047766 -0.014949
0 -0.014949
0 0
0 0.051377
0.14108 0.092578
0.30361 0.092578
0.54699 0.092578
0.86047 0.017108
1 1e-008

Table 1711: Base 64 representation:


jhTWm WFEGUVCpA

Figure 1288: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

433
Profile: s4233 Table 1716: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.126 4.055 ects
Information: Selig S4233 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 24.3 24.52 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.1 0.1 dcts
Cm error 3 13 mcts
Upper transition point -1.99 -3.24 %

Figure 1289: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1290: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1713: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.6731 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 3.1354 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.76486 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.97516 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.0889 deg
Release Angle: 4.6322 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.2758 deg
Camber deflection: 8.9079 deg

Table 1714: Controlpoints


1 0
0.7738 0.0042947
0.5448 -0.039211
0.24332 -0.039211
0.20213 -0.039211
0 -0.03625
0 0
0 0.025175
0.12429 0.098834
0.34827 0.098834
0.62639 0.098834
0.82688 0.024875
1 0

Table 1715: Base 64 representation:


QoWbp6LQZRegInA

Figure 1291: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

434
Profile: s4310 Table 1720: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.391 4.947 ects
Information: Selig S4310 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 30.31 29.04 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.7 -1.1 dcts
Cm error 9 10 mcts
Upper transition point -0.87 -1.83 %

Figure 1292: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1293: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1717: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.8484 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 4.1558 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.91975 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.58115 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.8434 deg
Release Angle: 4.8858 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.0563 deg
Camber deflection: 17.942 deg

Table 1718: Controlpoints


1 0
0.78995 0.0072029
0.26375 -0.01869
0.11352 -0.01869
0.062287 -0.01869
0 -0.015392
0 0
0 0.020141
0.066161 0.09504
0.35154 0.09504
0.60432 0.09504
0.85918 0.019309
1 0

Table 1719: Base 64 representation:


OzWZo0sHLIXSHnA

Figure 1294: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

435
Profile: s4320 Table 1724: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.773 4.766 ects
Information: Selig S4320 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 13.01 12.78 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.1 -0.5 dcts
Cm error 1 -4 mcts
Upper transition point -1.24 -0.42 %

Figure 1295: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1296: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1721: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.4461 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 4.4242 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0884 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.75206 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.7489 deg
Release Angle: 6.7824 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.4815 deg
Camber deflection: 19.2639 deg

Table 1722: Controlpoints


1 0
0.6866 0.026718
0.20854 -0.01348
0.07648 -0.01348
0.0062265 -0.01348
0 -0.005754
0 0
0 0.011219
0.039114 0.09018
0.35549 0.09018
0.57356 0.09018
0.84391 0.022572
1 0

Table 1723: Base 64 representation:


I4XWlb6FJGXZEqA

Figure 1297: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

436
Profile: s5010 Table 1728: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.665 3.059 ects
Information: Selig S5010 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 24.13 27.48 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.1 -0.1 dcts
Cm error 10 -5 mcts
Upper transition point -0.89 0.37 %

Figure 1298: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1299: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1725: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.8275 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 2.3014 % @0.28C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5565 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.52346 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.6756 deg
Release Angle: -1.5461 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.2122 deg
Camber deflection: 11.6661 deg

Table 1726: Controlpoints


1 0
0.9291 -0.0069072
0.50029 -0.026132
0.26993 -0.026132
0.087122 -0.026132
0 -0.0143
0 0
0 0.025698
0.076765 0.072155
0.27559 0.072155
0.54279 0.072155
0.78069 -0.00043076
1 0

Table 1727: Base 64 representation:


XtSYfiqRULfRGbA

Figure 1300: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

437
Profile: s5020 Table 1732: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.603 4.165 ects
Information: Selig S5020 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 23.64 23.02 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.1 -0.1 dcts
Cm error 9 7 mcts
Upper transition point 0.06 0.45 %

Figure 1301: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1302: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1729: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.4034 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 2.6547 % @0.28C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1166 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.49613 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.9568 deg
Release Angle: -1.6477 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.7833 deg
Camber deflection: 13.1356 deg

Table 1730: Controlpoints


1 0
0.89947 -0.009045
0.49142 -0.015473
0.27148 -0.015473
0.007988 -0.015473
0 -0.0077188
0 0
0 0.015366
0.049008 0.068565
0.27805 0.068565
0.52772 0.068565
0.7893 -0.0027979
1 0

Table 1731: Base 64 representation:


O0SWsg9RTHskFbA

Figure 1303: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

438
Profile: s6061 Table 1736: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.316 3.945 ects
Information: Selig S6061 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 11.24 13.39 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.8 -0.3 dcts
Cm error 2 9 mcts
Upper transition point -0.03 0.06 %

Figure 1304: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1305: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1733: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.021 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 1.8472 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.80765 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.43808 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.3001 deg
Release Angle: 2.2896 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.5055 deg
Camber deflection: 9.7951 deg

Table 1734: Controlpoints


1 0
0.87228 0.0014258
0.59518 -0.027182
0.26348 -0.027182
0.16599 -0.027182
0 -0.022018
0 0
0 0.022957
0.097877 0.063392
0.3399 0.063392
0.61111 0.063392
0.88892 0.0076497
1 0

Table 1735: Base 64 representation:


XtWabzYRsMSUEjA

Figure 1306: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

439
Profile: s6062 Table 1740: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.899 1.918 ects
Information: Selig S6062 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 19.64 17.01 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.5 -3.1 dcts
Cm error -1 3 mcts
Upper transition point 5.73 6.78 %

Figure 1307: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1308: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1737: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.9362 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 1.7029 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.78483 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.007392 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.3671 deg
Release Angle: 2.0037 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.1357 deg
Camber deflection: 11.1394 deg

Table 1738: Controlpoints


1 0
0.88163 0.0016945
0.56695 -0.02367
0.22036 -0.02367
0.0044071 -0.02367
0 -0.00046603
0 0
0 0.023296
0.10373 0.05642
0.34018 0.05642
0.60883 0.05642
0.90516 0.0052812
1 0

Table 1739: Base 64 representation:


arWaYB-OcKQRDiA

Figure 1309: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

440
Profile: s6063 Table 1744: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.653 2.262 ects
Information: Selig S6063 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 25.39 27.17 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.5 -3.9 dcts
Cm error 0 -6 mcts
Upper transition point 9.75 8.68 %

Figure 1310: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1311: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1741: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.9512 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.5449 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.68816 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.074825 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0.84615 deg
Release Angle: 1.4996 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.4278 deg
Camber deflection: 9.9274 deg

Table 1742: Controlpoints


1 0
0.88565 0.0021488
0.46529 -0.020753
0.22152 -0.020753
0.0022152 -0.020753
0 -0.0014294
0 0
0 0.019397
0.08201 0.049663
0.34018 0.049663
0.60316 0.049663
0.93421 0.0022086
1 0

Table 1743: Base 64 representation:


ZwWaVE-OUJLOBiA

Figure 1312: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

441
Profile: s7012 Table 1748: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.607 2.394 ects
Information: Selig S7012 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 25.34 23.67 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.1 -0.1 dcts
Cm error 11 -3 mcts
Upper transition point -1.33 -0.9 %

Figure 1313: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1314: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1745: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.7906 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 1.933 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.2981 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.9934 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.8842 deg
Release Angle: 5.8176 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.1522 deg
Camber deflection: 8.9698 deg

Table 1746: Controlpoints


1 0
0.83098 0.01145
0.56098 -0.025411
0.23128 -0.025411
0.0023128 -0.025411
0 -0.005544
0 0
0 0.011857
0.070747 0.063005
0.31061 0.063005
0.49819 0.063005
0.78854 0.028815
1 0

Table 1747: Base 64 representation:


MwURbO-PbLsZEpA

Figure 1315: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

442
Profile: s7055 Table 1752: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.644 4.046 ects
Information: Selig S7055 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.7 -0.4 dcts
Cm error -2 2 mcts
Upper transition point 0.47 0.85 %

Figure 1316: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1317: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1749: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.4997 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 3.6042 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.74664 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.54665 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 9.4415 deg
Release Angle: 3.2999 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.1234 deg
Camber deflection: 13.4234 deg

Table 1750: Controlpoints


1 0
0.28385 -0.017763
0.28385 -0.019325
0.15776 -0.019325
0.076097 -0.019325
0 -0.016653
0 0
0 0.02069
0.085997 0.088086
0.35136 0.088086
0.6143 0.088086
0.87239 0.017981
1 0

Table 1751: Base 64 representation:


PvWal2gKKIV LlA

Figure 1318: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

443
Profile: s7075 Table 1756: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.911 3.692 ects
Information: Selig S7075 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -42.1 -1.1 dcts
Cm error 6 -17 mcts
Upper transition point 1.6 3.26 %

Figure 1319: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1320: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1753: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.0444 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 3.0937 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4254 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.47763 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 1.6812 deg
Release Angle: 7.517 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.1006 deg
Camber deflection: 19.6176 deg

Table 1754: Controlpoints


1 0
0.87663 0.014441
0.39553 -0.019419
0.15514 -0.019419
0.039793 -0.019419
0 -0.011257
0 0
0 0.035249
0.13075 0.074594
0.35855 0.074594
0.71026 0.074594
0.93629 0.0093595
1 0

Table 1755: Base 64 representation:


eoXigkvKSIONCrA

Figure 1321: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

444
Profile: s8025 Table 1760: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.981 3.835 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: 38.83 39.33 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.6 -0.2 dcts
Cm error 1 1 mcts
Upper transition point 0.69 -0.13 %

Figure 1322: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1323: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1757: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.9607 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 0.64864 % @0.13C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 6.6754 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.61601 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.4927 deg
Release Angle: 0.54483 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.3026 deg
Camber deflection: 5.8474 deg

Table 1758: Controlpoints


1 0
0.72109 -0.011293
0.4597 -0.034362
0.24983 -0.034362
0.0024983 -0.034362
0 -0.00068723
0 0
0 0.020922
0.059786 0.045547
0.20772 0.045547
0.40621 0.045547
0.61501 0.019549
1 0

Table 1759: Base 64 representation:


stNQTB-QSPogGgA

Figure 1324: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

445
Profile: s8035 Table 1764: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.002 3.908 ects
Information: Selig S8035 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 42.13 44.32 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.4 0.1 dcts
Cm error 3 4 mcts
Upper transition point -0.3 0.24 %

Figure 1325: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1326: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1761: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.0039 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 4.1249e-005 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0373 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0373 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.7015 deg
Release Angle: 0.00027881 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 0.00027881 deg

Table 1762: Controlpoints


1 0
0.62706 -0.051421
0.44691 -0.07002
0.29111 -0.07002
0.044575 -0.07002
0 -0.017557
0 0
0 0.017557
0.044575 0.07002
0.29111 0.07002
0.4462 0.07002
0.62641 0.051515
1 0

Table 1763: Base 64 representation:


Q1TOeQ1TOeuuSgA

Figure 1327: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

446
Profile: s8036 Table 1768: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.641 5.026 ects
Information: Selig S8036 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.3 -0.1 dcts
Cm error -6 -10 mcts
Upper transition point -0.58 0.06 %

Figure 1328: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1329: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1765: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.9939 % @0.36C
Maximum Camber: 1.8251 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.8211 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.3239 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 23.4214 deg
Release Angle: 4.4577 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.4041 deg
Camber deflection: 12.8618 deg

Table 1766: Controlpoints


1 0
0.62586 -0.047616
0.52586 -0.061816
0.34207 -0.061816
0.23297 -0.061816
0 -0.045345
0 0
0 0.031473
0.081587 0.09819
0.36842 0.09819
0.57053 0.09819
0.97852 0.0062279
1 0

Table 1767: Base 64 representation:


VxYUpuUWSaEyamA

Figure 1330: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

447
Profile: s8037 Table 1772: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.186 7.998 ects
Information: Selig S8037 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.5 -0.3 dcts
Cm error -12 -5 mcts
Upper transition point 1.04 1.88 %

Figure 1331: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1332: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1769: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.9963 % @0.36C
Maximum Camber: 2.4392 % @0.39C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.77545 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 21.8995 deg
Release Angle: 2.0147 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.6814 deg
Camber deflection: 8.6962 deg

Table 1770: Controlpoints


1 0
1 0
0.60907 -0.05584
0.33961 -0.05584
0 -0.05584
0 -0.0050312
0 0
0 0.01662
0.053429 0.10425
0.3685 0.10425
0.48549 0.10425
0.61144 0.08537
1 0

Table 1771: Base 64 representation:


K2YMrG WaYzAFvA

Figure 1333: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

448
Profile: s8038 Table 1776: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.495 7.742 ects
Information: Selig S8038 (13 RMS curvature error: 66.37 67.09 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.1 2.3 dcts
Cm error 92 91 mcts
Upper transition point -0.65 -1.19 %

Figure 1334: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1335: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1773: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.9998 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 1.0085 % @0.27C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.194 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.42021 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0 deg
Release Angle: -6.9688 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.2027 deg
Camber deflection: 5.2339 deg

Table 1774: Controlpoints


1 0
0.68171 -0.038906
0.42834 -0.055051
0.3464 -0.055051
0.053107 -0.055051
0 -0.012197
0 0
0 0.035178
0.084604 0.074993
0.3292 0.074993
0.58627 0.074993
0.99586 -0.00050571
1 0

Table 1775: Base 64 representation:


evVZgO1WIXBsAVA

Figure 1336: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

449
Profile: s8052 Table 1780: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.275 4.327 ects
Information: Selig S8052 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 70.85 83 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.8 1.4 dcts
Cm error 7 14 mcts
Upper transition point -1.94 -3.57 %

Figure 1337: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1338: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1777: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.8903 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 1.5954 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2532 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.7199 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.6697 deg
Release Angle: 2.0913 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.7545 deg
Camber deflection: 10.8458 deg

Table 1778: Controlpoints


1 0
0.73995 -0.010188
0.63995 -0.043595
0.30894 -0.043595
0.11847 -0.043595
0 -0.023845
0 0
0 0.023208
0.064468 0.075357
0.33346 0.075357
0.62364 0.075357
0.74437 0.028792
1 0

Table 1779: Base 64 representation:


UzVcgimUfTqtKjA

Figure 1339: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

450
Profile: s8055 Table 1784: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.493 3.001 ects
Information: Selig S8055 (12 RMS curvature error: 46.94 46.08 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.4 -0.6 dcts
Cm error 3 3 mcts
Upper transition point 0.97 1.11 %

Figure 1340: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1341: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1781: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.9985 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 1.9962 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.17051 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.5421 deg
Release Angle: 2.107 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.594 deg
Camber deflection: 9.701 deg

Table 1782: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80763 -0.0072689
0.65538 -0.040558
0.30571 -0.040558
0 -0.040558
0 -0.0051379
0 0
0 0.0013841
0.0016853 0.079725
0.3745 0.079725
0.67108 0.079725
0.84898 0.016881
1 0

Table 1783: Base 64 representation:


B YehI UgRsjKjA

Figure 1342: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

451
Profile: s8064 Table 1788: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.219 5.497 ects
Information: Selig airfoil for Q-500 (Q500) pylon racing (12.33 RMS curvature error: 82.66 84.05 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.5 1.1 dcts
Cm error -3 -5 mcts
Upper transition point -1.66 -1.03 %

Figure 1343: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1344: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1785: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.3293 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 1.2934 % @0.56C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2316 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.36755 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.0156 deg
Release Angle: 0.88984 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.1463 deg
Camber deflection: 9.0361 deg

Table 1786: Controlpoints


1 0
0.76587 -0.016856
0.66682 -0.049686
0.35365 -0.049686
0.10362 -0.049686
0 -0.015934
0 0
0 0.040611
0.20087 0.073899
0.41402 0.073899
0.75156 0.073899
0.83866 0.016666
1 0

Table 1787: Base 64 representation:


igakgVsXfVpsLhA

Figure 1345: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

452
Profile: s8065 Table 1792: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.592 7.057 ects
Information: Selig airfoil for Q-40 pylon racing (11 RMS curvature error: 40.62 39.91 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.2 0.7 dcts
Cm error -20 -28 mcts
Upper transition point -0.38 0.66 %

Figure 1346: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1347: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1789: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.9974 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 1.2863 % @0.54C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0901 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.18006 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.0924 deg
Release Angle: 1.7635 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.1606 deg
Camber deflection: 9.9241 deg

Table 1790: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80199 -0.011357
0.62904 -0.043216
0.35366 -0.043216
0.045537 -0.043216
0 -0.0073934
0 0
0 0.036206
0.18037 0.067055
0.41405 0.067055
0.71789 0.067055
0.80877 0.022835
1 0

Table 1791: Base 64 representation:


ijagsL3XbSqhLiA

Figure 1348: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

453
Profile: s8066 Table 1796: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.621 6.358 ects
Information: Selig airfoil for Q-40 pylon racing (10 RMS curvature error: 44.05 46.22 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 -0.1 dcts
Cm error 1 -8 mcts
Upper transition point 1.5 1.92 %

Figure 1349: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1350: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1793: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.0142 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 1.0186 % @0.54C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.86542 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.43758 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.0649 deg
Release Angle: 1.5265 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.4289 deg
Camber deflection: 6.9554 deg

Table 1794: Controlpoints


1 0
0.82624 -0.006086
0.62406 -0.040357
0.35408 -0.040357
0.10328 -0.040357
0 -0.017358
0 0
0 0.027583
0.13187 0.059832
0.37677 0.059832
0.70311 0.059832
0.87349 0.011199
1 0

Table 1795: Base 64 representation:


epYhacsXbRbeIiA

Figure 1351: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

454
Profile: s9000 Table 1800: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.459 5.214 ects
Information: Selig S9000 (9%) low Reynolds number airfoil used RMS curvature error: 33.73 34.11 %
on the Blackhawk R/C sailplane CD error 0.3 0.2 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -10 -15 mcts
Upper transition point -0.14 0.1 %

Figure 1353: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 1352: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1797: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.0297 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 2.2677 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.38233 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.5745 deg
Release Angle: 8.9812 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.1382 deg
Camber deflection: 15.1194 deg

Table 1798: Controlpoints


1 0
0.88935 0.012009
0.50656 -0.024895
0.18239 -0.024895
0 -0.024895
0 -0.0032519
0 0
0 0.010796
0.045728 0.066943
0.32691 0.066943
0.60125 0.066943
0.93296 0.013966
1 0

Table 1799: Base 64 representation:


K2VasI MZLNOGuA
Figure 1354: Error distribution of drag- and pitching
moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

455
Profile: s9026 Table 1804: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.191 3.204 ects
Information: elig S9026 (9.5%) symmetrical horizontal stab airfoil RMS curvature error: 75.41 79.66 %
used on the Opus R/C sailplane CD error 0.6 0.5 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 8 10 mcts
Upper transition point -1.1 -1.5 %

Figure 1356: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 1355: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1801: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.4997 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 0.038538 % @0.85C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.91503 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.91503 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.4336 deg
Release Angle: 0.35828 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 0.35828 deg

Table 1802: Controlpoints


1 0
0.86046 -0.0093913
0.50581 -0.0475
0.27273 -0.0475
0.013929 -0.0475
0 -0.0083733
0 0
0 0.0083733
0.013929 0.0475
0.27273 0.0475
0.50581 0.0475
0.86046 0.009392
1 0

Table 1803: Base 64 representation:


L8RVUL8RVUSSJgA
Figure 1357: Error distribution of drag- and pitching
moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

456
Profile: s9027 Table 1808: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.679 3.472 ects
Information: Selig S9027 (8%) symmetrical vertical stab airfoil RMS curvature error: 42.73 46.49 %
used on the Opus R/C sailplane CD error 0.3 0.4 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 12 10 mcts
Upper transition point -2.45 -2.61 %

Figure 1359: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 1358: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1805: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: -2.4005e-007 % @0.63C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0593 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0593 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.5481 deg
Release Angle: 2.9572e-006 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 2.9572e-006 deg

Table 1806: Controlpoints


1 0
0.66932 -0.021813
0.4323 -0.04
0.22885 -0.04
0.21283 -0.04
0 -0.04
0 0
0 0.04
0.21283 0.04
0.22885 0.04
0.4323 0.04
0.66932 0.021813
1 0

Table 1807: Base 64 representation:


EPRR EPRRkkIgA
Figure 1360: Error distribution of drag- and pitching
moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

457
Profile: s9032 Table 1812: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.5 3.359 ects
Information: Selig S9032 (9%) symmetrical horizontal stab airfoil RMS curvature error: 98.98 Inf %
used on the Blackhawk R/C sailplane CD error 0.2 -0.1 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 8 7 mcts
Upper transition point -0.5 -0.33 %

Figure 1362: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 1361: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1809: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 0.024428 % @0.9C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2266 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2266 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.4136 deg
Release Angle: 0.3261 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 0.3261 deg

Table 1810: Controlpoints


1 0
0.67509 -0.023439
0.44753 -0.045
0.25008 -0.045
0.0098675 -0.045
0 -0.006234
0 0
0 0.006234
0.0098675 0.045
0.25008 0.045
0.44753 0.045
0.67509 0.023439
1 0

Table 1811: Base 64 representation:


J8QRTJ8QRTllJgA
Figure 1363: Error distribution of drag- and pitching
moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

458
Profile: s9033 Table 1816: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.794 2.331 ects
Information: Selig S9033 (7.5%) symmetrical vertical stab airfoil RMS curvature error: 48.29 48.63 %
used on the Blackhawk R/C sailplane CD error 0.1 0.1 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 9 8 mcts
Upper transition point -1.67 -1.73 %

Figure 1365: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 1364: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1813: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.4979 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 4.1418e-006 % @0.67C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0856 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.0856 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.297 deg
Release Angle: 1.4157e-005 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 1.4157e-005 deg

Table 1814: Controlpoints


1 0
0.62397 -0.020684
0.39306 -0.03749
0.22847 -0.03749
0.1942 -0.03749
0 -0.03749
0 0
0 0.03749
0.1942 0.03749
0.22847 0.03749
0.39306 0.03749
0.62397 0.020684
1 0

Table 1815: Base 64 representation:


KPOQ KPOQnnHgA
Figure 1366: Error distribution of drag- and pitching
moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

459
Profile: s9037 Table 1820: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.176 3.709 ects
Information: Selig / Ashok Gopalarathnam SA7037 RMS curvature error: 30.76 30.98 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.1 -1 dcts
Cm error 10 13 mcts
Upper transition point -0.75 -1.23 %

Figure 1367: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1368: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1817: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.0077 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 3.493 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.87381 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.40156 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.2384 deg
Release Angle: 5.1302 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.84 deg
Camber deflection: 16.9702 deg

Table 1818: Controlpoints


1 0
0.73396 0.0093416
0.2479 -0.016006
0.11828 -0.016006
0.036322 -0.016006
0 -0.0098608
0 0
0 0.021721
0.080991 0.078922
0.33009 0.078922
0.62958 0.078922
0.88891 0.016106
1 0

Table 1819: Base 64 representation:


SvVshmrIJHTXHnA

Figure 1369: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

460
Profile: sa7035 Table 1824: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.488 3.604 ects
Information: Selig / Ashok Gopalarathnam SA7035 RMS curvature error: 25.52 24.43 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 3.4 3.8 dcts
Cm error 9 3 mcts
Upper transition point -1.33 -1 %

Figure 1370: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1371: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1821: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.2166 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 2.6552 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2229 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.3464 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 1.8455 deg
Release Angle: 2.8257 deg
Nose Incidence: 12.7518 deg
Camber deflection: 15.5776 deg

Table 1822: Controlpoints


1 0
0.82387 0.0058523
0.45299 -0.02135
0.19532 -0.02135
0.15988 -0.02135
0 -0.019215
0 0
0 0.028979
0.103 0.071996
0.31204 0.071996
0.64495 0.071996
0.95086 0.0032193
1 0

Table 1823: Base 64 representation:


aqUff5MNUJJVCkA

Figure 1372: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

461
Profile: sa7036 Table 1828: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.267 6.436 ects
Information: Selig / Ashok Gopalarathnam SA7036 RMS curvature error: 29.1 32.14 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2.3 1.9 dcts
Cm error 7 -4 mcts
Upper transition point -1.76 -2.52 %

Figure 1373: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1374: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1825: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.2341 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 2.8691 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1283 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.2907 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 1.7328 deg
Release Angle: 3.4712 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.4133 deg
Camber deflection: 16.8845 deg

Table 1826: Controlpoints


1 0
0.82881 0.0077879
0.39586 -0.020032
0.19223 -0.020032
0.10561 -0.020032
0 -0.016226
0 0
0 0.026759
0.095191 0.073927
0.31436 0.073927
0.65338 0.073927
0.94907 0.003863
1 0

Table 1827: Base 64 representation:


XsUggzsMQJJSClA

Figure 1375: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

462
Profile: sa7038 Table 1832: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.046 4.417 ects
Information: Selig / Ashok Gopalarathnam SA7038 RMS curvature error: 49.56 51.79 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.1 -5.3 dcts
Cm error -15 -9 mcts
Upper transition point 2.93 3.67 %

Figure 1376: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1377: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1829: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.1456 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 3.3227 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.49632 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.39538 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.1566 deg
Release Angle: 5.7869 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.8188 deg
Camber deflection: 17.6056 deg

Table 1830: Controlpoints


1 0
0.77584 0.012566
0.35767 -0.017988
0.12794 -0.017988
0.071786 -0.017988
0 -0.013756
0 0
0 0.010651
0.034285 0.077647
0.35313 0.077647
0.63505 0.077647
0.93778 0.0091499
1 0

Table 1831: Base 64 representation:


J5XcgwcIRILWGoA

Figure 1378: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

463
Profile: sc1095 Table 1836: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.918 4.644 ects
Information: Sikorsky/Balch SC1095 rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -5.9 -5.7 dcts
Cm error 4 8 mcts
Upper transition point 4.73 4.73 %

Figure 1379: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1380: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1833: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.4954 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 0.8063 % @0.27C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.3458 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2945 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.65193 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 1.1034 deg
Release Angle: 0.46386 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.0104 deg
Camber deflection: 7.4742 deg

Table 1834: Controlpoints


1 -0.001729
0.95132 -0.0018036
0.6128 -0.039414
0.26945 -0.039414
0.021191 -0.039414
0 -0.014878
0 0
0 0.012079
0.015802 0.05554
0.26945 0.05554
0.62198 0.05554
0.95374 0.0025491
1 0.001729

Table 1835: Base 64 representation:


O7RfYY6ReRIIBgJ

Figure 1381: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

464
Profile: sc20010 Table 1840: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.609 6.602 ects
Information: NASA SC(2)-0010 airfoil (NASA TP-2969) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.9 -3 dcts
Cm error 5 16 mcts
Upper transition point 4.13 3.7 %

Figure 1382: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1383: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1837: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9926 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: -0.053277 % @0.01C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.5 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1476 %C
Lower nose radius: 35.1217 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.9709 deg
Release Angle: -0.17198 deg
Nose Incidence: -1.5259 deg
Camber deflection: -1.6979 deg

Table 1838: Controlpoints


1 -0.0025
0.69722 -0.032495
0.61271 -0.05
0.41 -0.05
0.00164 -0.05
0 -0.011485
0 0
0 0.046292
0.2912 0.05
0.37 0.05
0.6489 0.05
0.65853 0.034259
1 0.0025

Table 1839: Base 64 representation:


6OYcVP aWV9xMfN

Figure 1384: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

465
Profile: sc20012 Table 1844: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.229 8.217 ects
Information: NASA SC(2)-0012 airfoil (NASA TP-2969) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.3 -3.4 dcts
Cm error 7 10 mcts
Upper transition point 5.23 5.51 %

Figure 1385: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1386: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1841: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.9927 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: -0.061339 % @0.01C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.6 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6244 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.093 deg
Release Angle: -0.23241 deg
Nose Incidence: -1.7567 deg
Camber deflection: -1.9891 deg

Table 1842: Controlpoints


1 -0.003
0.69724 -0.038989
0.61273 -0.06
0.41 -0.06
0 -0.06
0 -0.013201
0 0
0 0.056133
0.29097 0.06
0.37 0.06
0.65149 0.06
0.66178 0.040423
1 0.003

Table 1843: Base 64 representation:


7OYsaO aWa9xPfP

Figure 1387: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

466
Profile: sc20402 Table 1848: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.314 3.861 ects
Information: NASA SC(2)-0402 airfoil (NASA TP-2969) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1388: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1389: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1845: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 2.0079 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 0.5129 % @0.82C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.19 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.042413 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.038246 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 1.2015 deg
Release Angle: 5.2624 deg
Nose Incidence: 0.29915 deg
Camber deflection: 5.5616 deg

Table 1846: Controlpoints


1 -0.00094999
0.86219 0.010288
0.66393 -0.0084484
0.33004 -0.0084484
0.25023 -0.0084484
0 -0.0084484
0 0
0 0.010805
0.41289 0.012002
0.43995 0.012002
0.51986 0.012002
0.89238 0.012002
1 0.00094999

Table 1847: Base 64 representation:


5EcJF PVgE aBoF

Figure 1390: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

467
Profile: sc20403 Table 1852: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
Information: NASA SC(2)-0402 airfoil (NASA TP-2969) RMS position error: 1.299 2.418 ects
Reference: UIUC RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1391: Wing profile with camber and thickness


Figure 1392: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution.
curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1849: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 2.9914 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 0.5716 % @0.83C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.24 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.096743 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.093312 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0 deg
Release Angle: 5.2951 deg
Nose Incidence: 0.12646 deg
Camber deflection: 5.4215 deg

Table 1850: Controlpoints


1 -0.0012
0.86087 0.011695
0.66708 -0.01425
0.30004 -0.01425
0.2644 -0.01425
0 -0.012825
0 0
0 0.014467
0.32453 0.016075
0.42996 0.016075
0.48696 0.016075
0.8395 0.016075
1 0.0012

Table 1851: Base 64 representation:


5QcGH5IThG bAoG

Figure 1393: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

468
Profile: sc20404 Table 1856: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.005 2.179 ects
Information: NASA SC(2)-0404 airfoil (NASA TP-2969) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.8 -0.8 dcts
Cm error 10 13 mcts
Upper transition point 0.02 -0.1 %

Figure 1394: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1395: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1853: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 4.0047 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 0.71151 % @0.82C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.285 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.18112 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.17771 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0.65617 deg
Release Angle: 4.9759 deg
Nose Incidence: 0.11627 deg
Camber deflection: 5.0922 deg

Table 1854: Controlpoints


1 -0.001425
0.82281 0.01298
0.68761 -0.019093
0.31006 -0.019093
0.30521 -0.019093
0 -0.019016
0 0
0 0.019693
0.32117 0.021358
0.42994 0.021358
0.78976 0.021358
0.92337 0.0085392
1 0.001425

Table 1855: Base 64 representation:


6QcnJ BUiIXjBnH

Figure 1396: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

469
Profile: sc20406 Table 1860: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.001 7.008 ects
Information: NASA SC(2)-0406 airfoil (NASA TP-2969) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.9 -3.7 dcts
Cm error 7 -4 mcts
Upper transition point 5.57 5.04 %

Figure 1397: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1398: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1857: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.0197 % @0.36C
Maximum Camber: 0.63309 % @0.81C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.38999 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.42389 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.41522 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0.40883 deg
Release Angle: 5.1899 deg
Nose Incidence: 0.17848 deg
Camber deflection: 5.3683 deg

Table 1858: Controlpoints


1 -0.00195
0.85726 0.010501
0.64271 -0.028928
0.3301 -0.028928
0.27307 -0.028928
0 -0.027494
0 0
0 0.028554
0.28851 0.031555
0.40989 0.031555
0.56322 0.031555
0.74792 0.025753
1 0.00195

Table 1859: Base 64 representation:


5TaRN8LVeMyaAoK

Figure 1399: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

470
Profile: sc20410 Table 1864: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.81 6.549 ects
Information: NASA SC(2)-0410 airfoil (NASA TP-2969) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1400: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1401: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1861: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.97 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 1.1432 % @0.84C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.49 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1551 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.2005 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0.58529 deg
Release Angle: 8.9454 deg
Nose Incidence: -0.35332 deg
Camber deflection: 8.592 deg

Table 1862: Controlpoints


1 -0.00245
0.82244 0.02457
0.71296 -0.049985
0.37996 -0.049985
0.23267 -0.049985
0 -0.043153
0 0
0 0.043255
0.25427 0.049715
0.38004 0.049715
0.54541 0.049715
0.74715 0.043575
1 0.00245

Table 1863: Base 64 representation:


3VYRV2ZYhV3nBuM

Figure 1402: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

471
Profile: sc20412 Table 1868: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.244 8.104 ects
Information: NASA SC(2)-0412 airfoil (NASA TP-2969) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN 4.1 dcts
Cm error NaN -37 mcts
Upper transition point NaN -9.5 %

Figure 1403: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1404: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1865: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.0081 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 1.3296 % @0.84C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.55 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6805 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.7021 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0.80861 deg
Release Angle: 10.0729 deg
Nose Incidence: -0.16971 deg
Camber deflection: 9.9032 deg

Table 1866: Controlpoints


1 -0.00275
0.81847 0.028176
0.70076 -0.060204
0.36997 -0.060204
0.22899 -0.060204
0 -0.050975
0 0
0 0.048985
0.21419 0.059891
0.38003 0.059891
0.54359 0.059891
0.72809 0.053034
1 0.00275

Table 1867: Base 64 representation:


zcYRa1YYha3mBvO

Figure 1405: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

472
Profile: sc20414 Table 1872: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.763 5.071 ects
Information: NASA SC(2)-0414 airfoil (NASA TP-2969) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.7 -4.5 dcts
Cm error 20 33 mcts
Upper transition point 10.19 9.61 %

Figure 1406: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1407: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1869: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.015 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 1.5247 % @0.83C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.6 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.3895 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.5241 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 1.5606 deg
Release Angle: 10.9857 deg
Nose Incidence: -0.73875 deg
Camber deflection: 10.247 deg

Table 1870: Controlpoints


1 -0.003
0.80914 0.03136
0.69768 -0.070108
0.35998 -0.070108
0.19664 -0.070108
0 -0.055922
0 0
0 0.055904
0.19619 0.070086
0.38002 0.070086
0.54201 0.070086
0.71657 0.062036
1 0.003

Table 1871: Base 64 representation:


yfYReysXhe3nCxP

Figure 1408: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

473
Profile: sc20518 Table 1876: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.829 6.901 ects
Information: NASA SC(2)-0518 airfoil (NASA TP-2969) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.1 -3.2 dcts
Cm error 14 30 mcts
Upper transition point 8.06 5.68 %

Figure 1409: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1410: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1873: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 17.9946 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 1.8973 % @0.82C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.68998 %C
Upper nose radius: 59.3677 %C
Lower nose radius: 4.1098 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0.009035 deg
Release Angle: 14.7195 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.0947 deg
Camber deflection: 17.8143 deg

Table 1874: Controlpoints


1 -0.0034499
0.83485 0.039922
0.66006 -0.08805
0.34043 -0.08805
0.18036 -0.08805
0 -0.070297
0 0
0 0.021714
0.0011913 0.09219
0.38956 0.09219
0.50462 0.09219
0.70284 0.081542
1 0.0034499

Table 1875: Base 64 representation:


P ZMmyeWfl3fA3R

Figure 1411: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

474
Profile: sc20606 Table 1880: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.263 2.067 ects
Information: NASA SC(2)-0606 airfoil (NASA TP-2969) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.2 -2.5 dcts
Cm error 2 -2 mcts
Upper transition point 4.83 5.92 %

Figure 1412: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1413: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1877: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 5.9379 % @0.36C
Maximum Camber: 1.3083 % @0.81C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.40996 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.39054 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.39632 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0.1539 deg
Release Angle: 10.9052 deg
Nose Incidence: 0.18354 deg
Camber deflection: 11.0888 deg

Table 1878: Controlpoints


1 -0.0020498
0.8558 0.025532
0.68247 -0.02618
0.28033 -0.02618
0.23756 -0.02618
0 -0.025053
0 0
0 0.034617
0.42266 0.034967
0.46962 0.034967
0.5249 0.034967
0.83771 0.033543
1 0.0020498

Table 1879: Base 64 representation:


-GeHP8KSjL8sAxK

Figure 1414: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

475
Profile: sc20610 Table 1884: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.304 4.856 ects
Information: NASA SC(2)-0610 airfoil (NASA TP-2969) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -5 -4.5 dcts
Cm error 13 0 mcts
Upper transition point 10.77 10.62 %

Figure 1415: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1416: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1881: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.0039 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 1.7646 % @0.83C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.48997 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1375 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1903 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0.43964 deg
Release Angle: 12.531 deg
Nose Incidence: -0.10073 deg
Camber deflection: 12.4303 deg

Table 1882: Controlpoints


1 -0.0024498
0.81992 0.03685
0.71992 -0.046596
0.35044 -0.046596
0.1747 -0.046596
0 -0.037233
0 0
0 0.051006
0.34308 0.053841
0.41952 0.053841
0.55913 0.053841
0.78296 0.051564
1 0.0024498

Table 1883: Base 64 representation:


8MbPXygWjU8oAzM

Figure 1417: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

476
Profile: sc20612 Table 1888: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.419 5.345 ects
Information: NASA SC(2)-0612 airfoil (NASA TP-2969) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -8.4 -7.9 dcts
Cm error -3 -3 mcts
Upper transition point 14.49 13.74 %

Figure 1418: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1419: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1885: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.0241 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 1.9108 % @0.82C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.57996 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.7116 %C
Lower nose radius: 23.9338 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0.96016 deg
Release Angle: 13.0865 deg
Nose Incidence: -1.4213 deg
Camber deflection: 11.6653 deg

Table 1886: Controlpoints


1 -0.0028998
0.81322 0.038873
0.70248 -0.056437
0.35056 -0.056437
0.0010888 -0.056437
0 -0.012616
0 0
0 0.059229
0.31972 0.064133
0.4094 0.064133
0.51482 0.064133
0.74625 0.064133
1 0.0028998

Table 1887: Base 64 representation:


6OaLbO WiY nB0P

Figure 1420: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

477
Profile: sc20614 Table 1892: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.858 8.215 ects
Information: NASA SC(2)-0614 airfoil (NASA TP-2969) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -8.9 -10.6 dcts
Cm error -6 -26 mcts
Upper transition point 15 20.12 %

Figure 1421: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1422: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1889: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.0204 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 1.9953 % @0.81C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.65995 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.2934 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.1404 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0.19695 deg
Release Angle: 14.0947 deg
Nose Incidence: 1.1346 deg
Camber deflection: 15.2293 deg

Table 1890: Controlpoints


1 -0.0032997
0.80944 0.040698
0.68623 -0.066432
0.35068 -0.066432
0.0019014 -0.066432
0 -0.016092
0 0
0 0.06558
0.28569 0.074056
0.39929 0.074056
0.52295 0.074056
0.71902 0.074056
1 0.0032997

Table 1891: Base 64 representation:


4SaNgQ Wgc mB1R

Figure 1423: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

478
Profile: sc20706 Table 1896: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.995 5.315 ects
Information: NASA SC(2)-0706 airfoil (NASA TP-2969) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.6 -3.4 dcts
Cm error -15 -16 mcts
Upper transition point 9.27 8.76 %

Figure 1424: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1425: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1893: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.0041 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 1.5328 % @0.8C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.38994 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.4449 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.34653 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 1.2328 deg
Release Angle: 12.885 deg
Nose Incidence: 1.7076 deg
Camber deflection: 14.5926 deg

Table 1894: Controlpoints


1 -0.0019497
0.87254 0.032289
0.66052 -0.025029
0.29043 -0.025029
0.17473 -0.025029
0 -0.021476
0 0
0 0.028805
0.30872 0.036698
0.46948 0.036698
0.61829 0.036698
0.88887 0.032027
1 0.0019497

Table 1895: Base 64 representation:


xWeSQ2ZTgL2YA3K

Figure 1426: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

479
Profile: sc20710 Table 1900: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.592 3.787 ects
Information: NASA SC(2)-0710 airfoil (NASA TP-2969) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -11.5 -11.2 dcts
Cm error -10 1 mcts
Upper transition point 20.57 19.59 %

Figure 1427: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1428: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1897: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9711 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 2.1283 % @0.82C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.48993 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1594 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1543 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0.32747 deg
Release Angle: 14.6999 deg
Nose Incidence: 0.43619 deg
Camber deflection: 15.1361 deg

Table 1898: Controlpoints


1 -0.0024497
0.82025 0.044157
0.73261 -0.044903
0.32068 -0.044903
0.20253 -0.044903
0 -0.03853
0 0
0 0.051504
0.3507 0.056095
0.45924 0.056095
0.7031 0.056095
0.87027 0.03688
1 0.0024497

Table 1899: Base 64 representation:


6PssY2YVmToqA3M

Figure 1429: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

480
Profile: sc20712 Table 1904: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.09 6.297 ects
Information: NASA SC(2)-0712 airfoil (NASA TP-2969) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -10.3 -10.5 dcts
Cm error -3 -1 mcts
Upper transition point 16.48 16 %

Figure 1430: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1431: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1901: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.9904 % @0.36C
Maximum Camber: 2.2112 % @0.81C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.59991 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.7182 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.7381 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0.75054 deg
Release Angle: 14.6148 deg
Nose Incidence: 0.29962 deg
Camber deflection: 14.9145 deg

Table 1902: Controlpoints


1 -0.0029995
0.8119 0.044736
0.7119 -0.05479
0.32084 -0.05479
0.19455 -0.05479
0 -0.04629
0 0
0 0.060775
0.33563 0.066261
0.43907 0.066261
0.56688 0.066261
0.78216 0.061329
1 0.0029995

Table 1903: Base 64 representation:


6PcPc1ZVkX6pB3P

Figure 1432: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

481
Profile: sc20714 Table 1908: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.635 5.14 ects
Information: NASA SC(2)-0714 AIRFOIL RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -13.6 -12.4 dcts
Cm error -29 -23 mcts
Upper transition point 21.34 19.01 %

Figure 1433: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1434: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1905: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.9435 % @0.36C
Maximum Camber: 2.5178 % @0.82C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.69991 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.4011 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.3304 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0.49139 deg
Release Angle: 16.4132 deg
Nose Incidence: 0.7015 deg
Camber deflection: 17.1147 deg

Table 1906: Controlpoints


1 -0.0034996
0.80962 0.051694
0.70962 -0.065204
0.33088 -0.065204
0.20727 -0.065204
0 -0.056746
0 0
0 0.063262
0.25002 0.075214
0.43906 0.075214
0.76409 0.075214
0.93131 0.024054
1 0.0034996

Table 1907: Base 64 representation:


1cckg3YVjcTpB5S

Figure 1435: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

482
Profile: sc21006 Table 1912: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.463 5.511 ects
Information: NASA SC(2)-1006 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3 -2.6 dcts
Cm error -35 -39 mcts
Upper transition point 6.14 5.99 %

Figure 1436: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1437: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1909: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.0614 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 2.6579 % @0.72C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.38955 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.40392 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.41833 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.6128 deg
Release Angle: 16.6099 deg
Nose Incidence: 1.3628 deg
Camber deflection: 17.9727 deg

Table 1910: Controlpoints


1 -0.0019477
0.8298 0.041447
0.53029 -0.019017
0.17106 -0.019017
0.068746 -0.019017
0 -0.013846
0 0
0 0.025742
0.24609 0.048473
0.49829 0.048473
0.73682 0.048473
0.91347 0.031602
1 0.0019477

Table 1911: Base 64 representation:


hggeVulLcIoXF6K

Figure 1438: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

483
Profile: sc21010 Table 1916: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.313 3.813 ects
Information: NASA SC(2)-1010 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.8 -4 dcts
Cm error -25 -25 mcts
Upper transition point 5.94 5.9 %

Figure 1439: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1440: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1913: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.019 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 2.7729 % @0.72C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.6093 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2776 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.1423 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0.0057296 deg
Release Angle: 16.6224 deg
Nose Incidence: 1.113 deg
Camber deflection: 17.7354 deg

Table 1914: Controlpoints


1 -0.0030465
0.84194 0.044132
0.58147 -0.037401
0.23192 -0.037401
0.0096364 -0.037401
0 -0.011731
0 0
0 0.052155
0.31935 0.068104
0.46741 0.068104
0.53008 0.068104
0.78719 0.06659
1 0.0030465

Table 1915: Base 64 representation:


wUeIsU8PsQ-YA6P

Figure 1441: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

484
Profile: sd2030 Table 1920: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.2 6.061 ects
Information: Selig/Donovan SD2030 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 21.64 21.62 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.3 -1.2 dcts
Cm error 1 -22 mcts
Upper transition point 0.69 2.73 %

Figure 1442: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1443: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1917: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.5648 % @0.36C
Maximum Camber: 2.2348 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.41802 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.65695 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.0107 deg
Release Angle: 6.589 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.9327 deg
Camber deflection: 12.5217 deg

Table 1918: Controlpoints


1 0
0.93052 0.0055701
0.66412 -0.022265
0.20896 -0.022265
0.02805 -0.022265
0 -0.011084
0 0
0 0.0093836
0.031596 0.064679
0.40335 0.064679
0.71627 0.064679
0.92896 0.010736
1 0

Table 1919: Base 64 representation:


J6ahcg2NkJQNEqA

Figure 1444: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

485
Profile: sd2083 Table 1924: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.667 2.997 ects
Information: Selig/Donovan SD2083 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 33.61 42.54 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2 -2.7 dcts
Cm error 5 -10 mcts
Upper transition point 0.14 1.17 %

Figure 1445: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1446: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1921: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.9073 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 2.8344 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.77594 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.67674 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.9787 deg
Release Angle: 3.2974 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.906 deg
Camber deflection: 9.2034 deg

Table 1922: Controlpoints


1 0
0.59334 -0.0075816
0.38423 -0.020271
0.16648 -0.020271
0.004824 -0.020271
0 -0.0062042
0 0
0 0.0066725
0.037748 0.072152
0.39907 0.072152
0.67432 0.072152
0.90502 0.0088532
1 0

Table 1923: Base 64 representation:


G5asfU9LRJTpHjA

Figure 1447: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

486
Profile: sd5060 Table 1928: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.453 4.304 ects
Information: Selig/Donovan SD5060 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 16.72 20.15 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.1 -1.7 dcts
Cm error 4 4 mcts
Upper transition point 2.78 3.58 %

Figure 1448: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1449: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1925: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.4294 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 2.3488 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.51808 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.77543 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.4289 deg
Release Angle: 2.5164 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.5652 deg
Camber deflection: 10.0815 deg

Table 1926: Controlpoints


1 0
0.7698 0.0052319
0.33662 -0.02918
0.16471 -0.02918
0.16471 -0.02918
0 -0.02918
0 0
0 0.0045844
0.006085 0.068598
0.33885 0.068598
0.5937 0.068598
0.88581 0.0074457
1 0

Table 1927: Base 64 representation:


E-WZs ALNMSWDjA

Figure 1450: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

487
Profile: sd6060 Table 1932: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.308 3.879 ects
Information: Selig/Donovan SD6060 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 35.26 29.43 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.5 0.2 dcts
Cm error 3 7 mcts
Upper transition point -1.86 -1.54 %

Figure 1451: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1452: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1929: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.3682 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 1.9443 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.0025 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.049342 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.1013 deg
Release Angle: 1.9939 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.2843 deg
Camber deflection: 12.2782 deg

Table 1930: Controlpoints


1 0
0.86915 -0.0024136
0.67664 -0.032456
0.31325 -0.032456
0.0023139 -0.032456
0 -0.00087243
0 0
0 0.028569
0.12212 0.07127
0.33857 0.07127
0.6247 0.07127
0.84659 0.013542
1 0

Table 1931: Base 64 representation:


aoWceC UhOaaHiA

Figure 1453: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

488
Profile: sd6080 Table 1936: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.699 5.917 ects
Information: Selig/Donovan SD6080 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 24.34 24.27 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.8 1.3 dcts
Cm error 1 7 mcts
Upper transition point -0.91 0.02 %

Figure 1454: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1455: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1933: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.2192 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 3.5838 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: -2e-006 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.43237 %C
Lower nose radius: 46.3591 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 5.0085 deg
Release Angle: 4.732 deg
Nose Incidence: 2.5344 deg
Camber deflection: 7.2664 deg

Table 1934: Controlpoints


1 1e-008
0.71232 0.011191
0.23676 -0.018223
0.11736 -0.018223
0.00032275 -0.018223
0 -0.0099875
0 0
0 0.016211
0.091167 0.080694
0.35301 0.080694
0.60951 0.080694
0.83784 0.02059
1 -1e-008

Table 1935: Base 64 representation:


NuXZhi IJIbYGnA

Figure 1456: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

489
Profile: sd7003 Table 1940: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.892 3.525 ects
Information: Selig/Donovan SD7003 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 26.56 27.45 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.6 -1.4 dcts
Cm error -4 -4 mcts
Upper transition point 1.22 0.81 %

Figure 1457: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1458: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1937: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.4973 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 1.5762 % @0.33C
Trailing Edge Gap: 2e-006 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2629 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.62527 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.7856 deg
Release Angle: 4.5558 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.4292 deg
Camber deflection: 13.985 deg

Table 1938: Controlpoints


1 -1e-008
0.86922 0.0060828
0.48151 -0.027542
0.21243 -0.027542
0.072227 -0.027542
0 -0.017352
0 0
0 0.016688
0.033075 0.05792
0.28753 0.05792
0.45505 0.05792
0.77612 0.025304
1 1e-008

Table 1939: Base 64 representation:


S4SPZnpOWMcQEnA

Figure 1459: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

490
Profile: sd7032 Table 1944: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.476 3.126 ects
Information: Selig/Donovan SD7032 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 16.43 16.35 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.8 1.5 dcts
Cm error -3 -5 mcts
Upper transition point -2.67 -1.45 %

Figure 1460: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1461: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1941: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.0253 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 3.7679 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.9277 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.28645 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.3755 deg
Release Angle: 7.2603 deg
Nose Incidence: 18.1357 deg
Camber deflection: 25.396 deg

Table 1942: Controlpoints


1 0
0.82136 0.019004
0.37367 -0.01678
0.14938 -0.01678
0.017193 -0.01678
0 -0.00573
0 0
0 0.040059
0.12487 0.086503
0.30946 0.086503
0.65036 0.086503
0.90559 0.014022
1 0

Table 1943: Base 64 representation:


elUgkW4KRHRSDrA

Figure 1462: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

491
Profile: sd7034 Table 1948: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.854 6.472 ects
Information: Selig/Donovan SD7034 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 18.47 18.78 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 1.2 0.9 dcts
Cm error 7 23 mcts
Upper transition point 0.92 0.4 %

Figure 1463: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1464: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1945: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.4663 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 4.1135 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 4e-006 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1909 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.46058 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.4468 deg
Release Angle: 4.1192 deg
Nose Incidence: 17.5447 deg
Camber deflection: 21.6639 deg

Table 1946: Controlpoints


1 -2e-008
0.72442 0.01394
0.30831 -0.017846
0.11236 -0.017846
0.0033758 -0.017846
0 -0.0032195
0 0
0 0.01661
0.034749 0.092277
0.34749 0.092277
0.5886 0.092277
0.89834 0.009507
1 2e-008

Table 1947: Base 64 representation:


M5WYmM9HOIQZDmA

Figure 1465: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

492
Profile: sd7037 Table 1952: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.797 6.233 ects
Information: Selig/Donovan SD7037 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 23.8 24.48 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.9 -1 dcts
Cm error -8 -18 mcts
Upper transition point 3.05 2.24 %

Figure 1466: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1467: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1949: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.1958 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 2.9451 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.0014258 %C
Lower nose radius: 8.5516 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 1.7189 deg
Release Angle: 4.5719 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.6697 deg
Camber deflection: 8.2416 deg

Table 1950: Controlpoints


1 0
0.83578 0.010656
0.34396 -0.021883
0.15751 -0.021883
0.001445 -0.021883
0 -0.0090765
0 0
0 0.0003832
0.015448 0.073855
0.35074 0.073855
0.66028 0.073855
0.9493 0.0048202
1 0

Table 1951: Base 64 representation:


A8Wfgb-KOJKQCnA

Figure 1468: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

493
Profile: sd7043 Table 1956: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.518 3.756 ects
Information: Selig/Donovan SD7043 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 27.13 28.89 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.2 -0.6 dcts
Cm error 0 9 mcts
Upper transition point 1.23 1.46 %

Figure 1469: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1470: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1953: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.1155 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 3.6725 % @0.45C
Trailing Edge Gap: 2e-006 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.4719 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.24072 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 1.2661 deg
Release Angle: 6.7367 deg
Nose Incidence: 19.6983 deg
Camber deflection: 26.4349 deg

Table 1954: Controlpoints


1 -1e-008
0.77942 0.023588
0.36995 -0.016102
0.11294 -0.016102
0.030822 -0.016102
0 -0.0070329
0 0
0 0.04802
0.13993 0.080331
0.35654 0.080331
0.6573 0.080331
0.91892 0.010487
1 1e-008

Table 1955: Base 64 representation:


lmXehcuHTHPWBqA

Figure 1471: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

494
Profile: sd7062 Table 1960: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.317 3.909 ects
Information: Selig/Donovan SD7062 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 33.46 35.52 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.2 0.2 dcts
Cm error 0 -4 mcts
Upper transition point -0.32 -0.44 %

Figure 1472: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1473: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1957: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.996 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 4.1732 % @0.37C
Trailing Edge Gap: 4e-006 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.4155 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.88401 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.6569 deg
Release Angle: 7.4473 deg
Nose Incidence: 23.3865 deg
Camber deflection: 30.8337 deg

Table 1958: Controlpoints


1 -2e-008
0.78534 0.013576
0.44689 -0.031005
0.18233 -0.031005
0.12884 -0.031005
0 -0.027556
0 0
0 0.059214
0.11911 0.11079
0.29737 0.11079
0.53802 0.11079
0.77687 0.044487
1 2e-008

Table 1959: Base 64 representation:


hlTWu4TMVNfZJrA

Figure 1474: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

495
Profile: sd7080 Table 1964: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.704 4.802 ects
Information: Selig/Donovan SD7080 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 22.13 22.58 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.7 -3 dcts
Cm error -16 -31 mcts
Upper transition point 4.38 4.49 %

Figure 1475: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1476: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1961: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.0996 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 2.477 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.63958 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.62576 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.3025 deg
Release Angle: 4.9847 deg
Nose Incidence: 7.5214 deg
Camber deflection: 12.5062 deg

Table 1962: Controlpoints


1 0
0.81523 0.0059147
0.46901 -0.023881
0.16396 -0.023881
0.10524 -0.023881
0 -0.020714
0 0
0 0.013166
0.04158 0.069293
0.3465 0.069293
0.62862 0.069293
0.92875 0.010186
1 0

Table 1963: Base 64 representation:


M3Wce3XKXKMWHnA

Figure 1477: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

496
Profile: sd7084 Table 1968: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.805 5.805 ects
Information: Selig/Donovan SD7084 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 34.23 34.23 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.9 NaN dcts
Cm error 11 NaN mcts
Upper transition point 5.16 NaN %

Figure 1478: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1479: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1965: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.5958 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 2.3336 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.99354 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.54357 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.5944 deg
Release Angle: 2.2918 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.5383 deg
Camber deflection: 11.8302 deg

Table 1966: Controlpoints


1 0
0.55521 -0.017732
0.46289 -0.025781
0.21875 -0.025781
0.16064 -0.025781
0 -0.023767
0 0
0 0.019775
0.064453 0.070313
0.34375 0.070313
0.64111 0.070313
0.88785 0.013114
1 0

Table 1967: Base 64 representation:


SzWse6ROULU0KjA

Figure 1480: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

497
Profile: sd7090 Table 1972: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.396 5.688 ects
Information: Selig/Donovan SD7090 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 44.73 44.74 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.5 0.7 dcts
Cm error -8 3 mcts
Upper transition point 1.31 0.57 %

Figure 1481: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1482: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1969: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9944 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 1.9137 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3295 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.71758 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.267 deg
Release Angle: 5.5143 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.0119 deg
Camber deflection: 14.5262 deg

Table 1970: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80896 -0.0037322
0.51618 -0.031635
0.20919 -0.031635
0.17572 -0.031635
0 -0.030685
0 0
0 0.027088
0.082784 0.06883
0.29272 0.06883
0.58615 0.06883
0.96567 0.0073892
1 0

Table 1971: Base 64 representation:


ZtTbs9KNZNHZPoA

Figure 1483: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

498
Profile: sd8000 Table 1976: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.219 4.064 ects
Information: Selig/Donovan SD8000 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 23.46 24.07 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.3 -0.7 dcts
Cm error 9 3 mcts
Upper transition point 0.2 1.41 %

Figure 1484: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1485: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1973: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.8571 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 1.8216 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 2e-006 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.2396 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.59293 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.8648 deg
Release Angle: 2.2918 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.2135 deg
Camber deflection: 11.5053 deg

Table 1974: Controlpoints


1 -1e-008
0.81593 0.0027613
0.44914 -0.028824
0.21019 -0.028824
0.13242 -0.028824
0 -0.025942
0 0
0 0.018392
0.04093 0.061128
0.34058 0.061128
0.64861 0.061128
0.94584 0.0035255
1 1e-008

Table 1975: Base 64 representation:


T3Wea5YNTMKVDjA

Figure 1486: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

499
Profile: sd8020 Table 1980: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.143 4.421 ects
Information: Selig/Donovan SD8020 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 29.43 27.13 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.5 -0.3 dcts
Cm error 7 4 mcts
Upper transition point 0.95 1.64 %

Figure 1487: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1488: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1977: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.1012 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 0.00051729 % @0.48C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.63982 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.63849 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.7411 deg
Release Angle: -0.00013196 deg
Nose Incidence: 0.0053935 deg
Camber deflection: 0.0052616 deg

Table 1978: Controlpoints


1 0
0.55213 -0.050005
0.34689 -0.05051
0.27524 -0.05051
0.052695 -0.05051
0 -0.014977
0 0
0 0.015006
0.052792 0.05051
0.27523 0.05051
0.34745 0.05051
0.55206 0.05001
1 0

Table 1979: Base 64 representation:


TzSGWTzSGW–OgA

Figure 1489: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

500
Profile: sd8040 Table 1984: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.63 4.959 ects
Information: Selig/Donovan SD8040 low Reynolds number airfoil RMS curvature error: 26.16 25.6 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.7 -0.5 dcts
Cm error -16 -22 mcts
Upper transition point 3.61 4.1 %

Figure 1490: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1491: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1981: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9481 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 2.6123 % @0.42C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.35795 %C
Lower nose radius: 17.6207 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.0214 deg
Release Angle: 5.2887 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.8691 deg
Camber deflection: 12.1578 deg

Table 1982: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80418 0.0043686
0.45793 -0.026939
0.16022 -0.026939
0 -0.026939
0 -0.0073028
0 0
0 0.0034077
0.0048661 0.074859
0.3429 0.074859
0.55833 0.074859
0.79478 0.033603
1 0

Table 1983: Base 64 representation:


D-WVgR KXLeXJoA

Figure 1492: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

501
Profile: sg6040 Table 1988: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.11 4.865 ects
Information: Selig / Giguere SG6040 wind turbine airfoil RMS curvature error: 32.64 30.11 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.1 -0.7 dcts
Cm error 25 9 mcts
Upper transition point -0.83 0.83 %

Figure 1493: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1494: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 1985: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.9917 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 2.6201 % @0.48C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.7795 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.74643 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.9008 deg
Release Angle: 9.1972 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.3737 deg
Camber deflection: 23.5709 deg

Table 1986: Controlpoints


1 0
0.77586 0.010754
0.61991 -0.054508
0.3184 -0.054508
0.084514 -0.054508
0 -0.020508
0 0
0 0.060404
0.19691 0.10562
0.35297 0.10562
0.46968 0.10562
0.66816 0.092948
1 0

Table 1987: Base 64 representation:


kcXMsYuUcX3lOuA

Figure 1495: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

502
Profile: sg6041 Table 1992: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.444 4.548 ects
Information: Selig / Giguere SG6041 wind turbine airfoil (high RMS curvature error: 51.77 59.33 %
L/D) CD error -1.8 -2.4 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 8 11 mcts
Upper transition point 1.64 2.46 %

Figure 1497: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 1496: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1989: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9993 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 1.8856 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.1088 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.99491 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.9514 deg
Release Angle: 4.8126 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.8179 deg
Camber deflection: 9.6305 deg

Table 1990: Controlpoints


1 0
0.77972 -0.0025495
0.66663 -0.031378
0.34104 -0.031378
0.040925 -0.031378
0 -0.016476
0 0
0 0.0010624
0.001556 0.068728
0.38506 0.068728
0.67991 0.068728
0.90829 0.016646
1 0

Table 1991: Base 64 representation:


B Zfsh3WgNSpMnA
Figure 1498: Error distribution of drag- and pitching
moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

503
Profile: sg6042 Table 1996: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.792 5.395 ects
Information: Selig / Giguere SG6042 wind turbine airfoil (high RMS curvature error: 30.86 30.91 %
L/D) CD error 1.1 0.8 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 0 1 mcts
Upper transition point -2.19 -1.5 %

Figure 1500: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 1499: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1993: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.0452 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 3.6743 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.1122 %C
Lower nose radius: 102.8214 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.3362 deg
Release Angle: 11.5343 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.5398 deg
Camber deflection: 18.0742 deg

Table 1994: Controlpoints


1 0
0.83449 0.018467
0.49639 -0.019871
0.11605 -0.019871
0.00015725 -0.019871
0 -0.010382
0 0
0 0.026168
0.092349 0.085408
0.40575 0.085408
0.69885 0.085408
0.94732 0.015808
1 0

Table 1995: Base 64 representation:


Uwagjg HcIMVMyA
Figure 1501: Error distribution of drag- and pitching
moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

504
Profile: sg6043 Table 2000: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.85 5.678 ects
Information: Selig / Giguere SG6043 wind turbine airfoil (high RMS curvature error: 68.54 68.11 %
L/D) CD error -2.3 -1.5 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -12 -34 mcts
Upper transition point 0.14 0.1 %

Figure 1503: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 1502: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 1997: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.9927 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 5.4855 % @0.5C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5207 %C
Lower nose radius: 10.5861 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.1783 deg
Release Angle: 18.4675 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.1985 deg
Camber deflection: 28.6661 deg

Table 1998: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79858 0.046052
0.18205 -0.015493
0.050496 -0.015493
0.001131 -0.015493
0 -0.0089344
0 0
0 0.034398
0.11671 0.10215
0.42517 0.10215
0.67428 0.10215
0.92899 0.031698
1 0

Table 1999: Base 64 representation:


Wtbcrk-DJHUQM9A
Figure 1504: Error distribution of drag- and pitching
moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

505
Profile: sg6050 Table 2004: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.892 6.74 ects
Information: Selig / Giguere SG6050 wind turbine airfoil RMS curvature error: 68.77 71.41 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.5 -0.9 dcts
Cm error -7 12 mcts
Upper transition point 0.57 0.17 %

Figure 1505: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1506: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2001: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.8767 % @0.31C
Maximum Camber: 3.4352 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 1.0005 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.0835 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.5696 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.3221 deg
Release Angle: 7.4284 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.3553 deg
Camber deflection: 20.7836 deg

Table 2002: Controlpoints


1 -0.0050025
0.96124 -0.0041449
0.35392 -0.051462
0.24835 -0.051462
0.065306 -0.051462
0 -0.015748
0 0
0 0.041881
0.12628 0.1114
0.38239 0.1114
0.56479 0.1114
0.73633 0.068739
1 0.0050025

Table 2003: Base 64 representation:


YqYTvUuQJWmEOrZ

Figure 1507: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

506
Profile: sg6051 Table 2008: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.007 3.456 ects
Information: Selig / Giguere SG6051 wind turbine airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN -0.6 dcts
Cm error NaN 23 mcts
Upper transition point NaN -1.24 %

Figure 1508: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1509: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2005: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.9133 % @0.36C
Maximum Camber: 3.3608 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 1.0004 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3926 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.56258 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.4992 deg
Release Angle: 3.837 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.1375 deg
Camber deflection: 14.9745 deg

Table 2006: Controlpoints


1 -0.0050022
1 -0.0050022
0.3089 -0.030279
0.29371 -0.030279
0.1893 -0.030279
0 -0.026645
0 0
0 0.038235
0.15746 0.09218
0.42696 0.09218
0.64722 0.09218
0.85929 0.031301
1 0.0050022

Table 2007: Base 64 representation:


bnbZm3XTBNaAPlZ

Figure 1510: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

507
Profile: sm701 Table 2012: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.172 5.474 ects
Information: Somers / Maughmer SM701 airfoil RMS curvature error: 23.32 23.73 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 -0.2 dcts
Cm error -5 5 mcts
Upper transition point -1.72 -2.45 %

Figure 1511: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1512: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2009: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.9959 % @0.37C
Maximum Camber: 3.3869 % @0.59C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.2673 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.71272 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.3319 deg
Release Angle: 14.6199 deg
Nose Incidence: 18.7445 deg
Camber deflection: 33.3644 deg

Table 2010: Controlpoints


1 0
0.85244 0.027227
0.5774 -0.048047
0.36764 -0.048047
0.12693 -0.048047
0 -0.024558
0 0
0 0.028582
0.054046 0.11192
0.36282 0.11192
0.44015 0.11192
0.67097 0.11192
1 0

Table 2011: Base 64 representation:


Q1XIvgpYVV WJ3A

Figure 1513: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

508
Profile: sokolov Table 2016: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.644 9.7 ects
Information: Sokolov R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 7.4 9 dcts
Cm error 50 35 mcts
Upper transition point -4.67 -4.17 %

Figure 1514: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1515: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2013: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.9828 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 6.3291 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.7 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.3821 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.48641 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.2442 deg
Release Angle: 11.7495 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.1697 deg
Camber deflection: 20.9193 deg

Table 2014: Controlpoints


1 -0.0035
0.45788 0.08846
0.15674 -0.0088574
0.024969 -0.0088574
0.010884 -0.0088574
0 -0.005941
0 0
0 0.015365
0.092684 0.094199
0.40033 0.094199
0.49763 0.094199
0.73998 0.067711
1 0.0035

Table 2015: Base 64 representation:


KwaKnqjCJEsoFyS

Figure 1516: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

509
Profile: spicasm Table 2020: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.52 5.595 ects
Information: Anderson SPICA R/C sailplane airfoil (smoothed) RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.9 0.3 dcts
Cm error 27 15 mcts
Upper transition point -2.5 -2.62 %

Figure 1517: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1518: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2017: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.5476 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 4.7923 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.75843 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.5553 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.4287 deg
Release Angle: 5.9534 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.9834 deg
Camber deflection: 16.9368 deg

Table 2018: Controlpoints


1 0
0.13703 -0.014695
0.04 -0.01632
0.04 -0.01632
0.0098807 -0.01632
0 -0.01089
0 0
0 0.016317
0.052528 0.10583
0.35 0.10583
0.38692 0.10583
0.5285 0.10583
1 0

Table 2019: Base 64 representation:


K1WEsqvDAH 5PpA

Figure 1519: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

510
Profile: ssca07 Table 2024: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.158 7.129 ects
Information: Sikorsky/Flemming SSC-A07 transonic rotorcraft RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
airfoil CD error -0.2 0 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -43 -22 mcts
Upper transition point 0.2 -0.42 %

Figure 1521: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 1520: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 2021: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.9895 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 0.87645 % @0.22C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.24969 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.90055 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.2374 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 1.2412 deg
Release Angle: 1.6483 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.8421 deg
Camber deflection: 10.4905 deg

Table 2022: Controlpoints


1 -0.0012484
0.93766 -0.00013018
0.68906 -0.0272
0.41674 -0.0272
0.34965 -0.0272
0 -0.023524
0 0
0 0.016513
0.045419 0.043006
0.33702 0.043006
0.75591 0.043006
0.79314 0.0094446
1 0.0012484

Table 2023: Base 64 representation:


Z2WnS2KbeM1NBiG
Figure 1522: Error distribution of drag- and pitching
moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

511
Profile: ssca09 Table 2028: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.417 4.672 ects
Information: Sikorsky/Flemming SSC-A09 transonic rotorcraft RMS curvature error: 74.8 76.21 %
airfoil CD error -2.7 -2.1 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -28 -26 mcts
Upper transition point 6.05 4.9 %

Figure 1524: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 1523: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 2025: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.982 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 1.1268 % @0.22C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.32103 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.4876 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.39251 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0 deg
Release Angle: 0 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.3049 deg
Camber deflection: 11.3049 deg

Table 2026: Controlpoints


1 -0.0016052
0.91901 -0.0016052
0.68906 -0.034972
0.41673 -0.034972
0.34983 -0.034972
0 -0.030256
0 0
0 0.021252
0.045541 0.055294
0.33704 0.055294
0.75593 0.055294
0.87771 0.0016052
1 0.0016052

Table 2027: Base 64 representation:


Z2WnY2KbePgRAgI
Figure 1525: Error distribution of drag- and pitching
moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

512
Profile: stcyr24 Table 2032: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.769 4.382 ects
Information: St. CYR 24 (Bartel 35-IIIC) airfoil RMS curvature error: 50.25 49.3 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2 2.3 dcts
Cm error 18 29 mcts
Upper transition point -2.59 -3.61 %

Figure 1526: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1527: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2029: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.2929 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 5.903 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 3.7281 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.6107 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.3132 deg
Release Angle: 9.4581 deg
Nose Incidence: 20.1394 deg
Camber deflection: 29.5975 deg

Table 2030: Controlpoints


1 0
0.39319 0.019085
0.15489 -0.023312
0.050613 -0.023312
0.050613 -0.023312
0 -0.023312
0 0
0 0.02475
0.024646 0.1186
0.39709 0.1186
0.61569 0.1186
0.82264 0.054613
1 0

Table 2031: Base 64 representation:


N7ZXy ADHKetRuA

Figure 1528: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

513
Profile: stcyr172 Table 2036: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 6.361 6.679 ects
Information: St. CYR 172 (Royer) airfoil RMS curvature error: 44.07 44.07 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.3 -0.3 dcts
Cm error -8 -8 mcts
Upper transition point -1.03 -1.01 %

Figure 1529: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1530: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2033: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.56 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: -0.015053 % @0.06C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.8515 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.9094 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 17.6888 deg
Release Angle: 1.768e-005 deg
Nose Incidence: -0.27571 deg
Camber deflection: -0.27569 deg

Table 2034: Controlpoints


1 0
0.64306 -0.055541
0.307 -0.0678
0.3 -0.0678
0.24 -0.0678
0 -0.0678
0 0
0 0.067122
0.237 0.0678
0.3 0.0678
0.3 0.0678
0.63876 0.05621
1 0

Table 2035: Base 64 representation:


-NTAs NTBs0zUgA

Figure 1531: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

514
Profile: stcyr234 Table 2040: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.058 7.496 ects
Information: St. CYR 234 (Bartel 17-IC) airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -6.3 -6.5 dcts
Cm error -26 -8 mcts
Upper transition point 3.88 3.48 %

Figure 1532: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1533: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2037: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 16.1208 % @0.24C
Maximum Camber: 4.9416 % @0.49C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 5.4934 %C
Lower nose radius: 4.0173 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 19.9535 deg
Release Angle: 9.822 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.9054 deg
Camber deflection: 20.7274 deg

Table 2038: Controlpoints


1 0
0.40432 -0.0016085
0.31121 -0.052672
0.10359 -0.052672
0.10359 -0.052672
0 -0.048985
0 0
0 0.038651
0.040791 0.12223
0.39298 0.12223
0.46653 0.12223
0.66384 0.12102
1 0

Table 2039: Base 64 representation:


U4ZIz7AHPW-2WvA

Figure 1534: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

515
Profile: strand Table 2044: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
Information: Strand high lift airfoil - bad original data. RMS position error: 6.519 6.719 ects
Reference: UIUC RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN 2.21 %

Figure 1535: Wing profile with camber and thickness


Figure 1536: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution.
curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2041: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 15.4466 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 3.9869 % @0.28C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.9431 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 0.19531 deg
Release Angle: 3.9406 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.4276 deg
Camber deflection: 9.3682 deg

Table 2042: Controlpoints


1 0
0.69707 0.020348
0.42777 -0.0399
0.1652 -0.0399
0 -0.0399
0 -0.010508
0 0
0 0.044444
0.15248 0.1167
0.2607 0.1167
0.41408 0.1167
0.51015 0.034582
1 0

Table 2043: Base 64 representation:


YbRNxR LUR1hAmA

Figure 1537: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

516
Profile: tempest1 Table 2048: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.826 4.875 ects
Information: Hawker Tempest 37.5 RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.1 0.4 dcts
Cm error -1 -5 mcts
Upper transition point 0.7 0.64 %

Figure 1538: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1539: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2045: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.5004 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 1.0124 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.3822 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.92318 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 22.991 deg
Release Angle: 1.271 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.6458 deg
Camber deflection: 5.9169 deg

Table 2046: Controlpoints


1 0
0.69925 -0.0569
0.45799 -0.062396
0.37607 -0.062396
0.072306 -0.062396
0 -0.021117
0 0
0 0.030049
0.12188 0.082614
0.38328 0.082614
0.49731 0.082614
0.70391 0.069462
1 0

Table 2047: Base 64 representation:


XrZMiWzYIb15bhA

Figure 1540: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

517
Profile: TSAGI R3A Table 2052: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.294 4.171 ects
Information: TSAGI R3A RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -5.2 -5.6 dcts
Cm error 3 -5 mcts
Upper transition point 4.45 5.54 %

Figure 1541: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1542: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2049: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.0941 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 3.2145 % @0.23C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.24529 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.48888 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.0835 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.0214 deg
Release Angle: 3.377 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.8033 deg
Camber deflection: 15.1803 deg

Table 2050: Controlpoints


1 -0.0012265
0.94242 -0.0018634
0.53355 -0.028326
0.22892 -0.028326
0.036631 -0.028326
0 -0.022556
0 0
0 0.0086725
0.023077 0.092616
0.23077 0.092616
0.35071 0.092616
0.45071 0.072447
1 0.0012265

Table 2051: Base 64 representation:


G5PKny1PZM1IJlG

Figure 1543: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

518
Profile: tsagi8 Table 2056: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 0.911 4.219 ects
Information: TSAGI 8 RMS curvature error: 30.95 32.55 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.1 NaN dcts
Cm error 2 NaN mcts
Upper transition point 2.13 NaN %

Figure 1544: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1545: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2053: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.9959 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 1.3225 % @0.29C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.38471 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.37444 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.8573 deg
Release Angle: -1.4047 deg
Nose Incidence: 2.8781 deg
Camber deflection: 1.4734 deg

Table 2054: Controlpoints


1 0
0.81431 -0.0272
0.49153 -0.0272
0.4 -0.0272
0.15618 -0.0272
0 -0.019745
0 0
0 0.018654
0.13568 0.0531
0.3 0.0531
0.49771 0.0531
0.59771 0.038906
1 0

Table 2055: Base 64 representation:


WiTSXtmaKMy PeA

Figure 1546: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

519
Profile: tsagi12 Table 2060: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.508 4.883 ects
Information: TSAGI 12 RMS curvature error: 29.23 28.74 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.9 -5 dcts
Cm error 45 57 mcts
Upper transition point 0.12 -0.4 %

Figure 1547: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1548: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2057: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.9572 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 1.9759 % @0.29C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.8546 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.83761 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 20.5686 deg
Release Angle: -2.053 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.3134 deg
Camber deflection: 2.2604 deg

Table 2058: Controlpoints


1 0
0.81391 -0.0407
0.48347 -0.0407
0.4 -0.0407
0.1844 -0.0407
0 -0.032089
0 0
0 0.027535
0.13308 0.0794
0.3 0.0794
0.50276 0.0794
0.62741 0.053899
1 0

Table 2059: Base 64 representation:


WjTThxhaJRv XcA

Figure 1549: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

520
Profile: ua79sf18 Table 2064: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.874 6.99 ects
Information: University of Alberta/Marsden UA 79-SF-187 RMS curvature error: 80.05 78.14 %
FLAPPED sailplane airfoil CD error -4.5 -5.5 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error 79 94 mcts
Upper transition point -1.12 -1.32 %

Figure 1551: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 1550: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 2061: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18.7978 % @0.45C
Maximum Camber: 3.726 % @0.58C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.71262 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.27239 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.6225 deg
Release Angle: 7.5232 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.9837 deg
Camber deflection: 18.5069 deg

Table 2062: Controlpoints


1 0
0.80188 0.0059216
0.66874 -0.0584
0.4278 -0.0584
0.11812 -0.0584
0 -0.014646
0 0
0 0.024628
0.12767 0.1299
0.4715 0.1299
0.72855 0.1299
0.77285 0.05384
1 0

Table 2063: Base 64 representation:


Muef2QtbbZ1lNrA
Figure 1552: Error distribution of drag- and pitching
moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

521
Profile: uag8814320 Table 2068: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.429 6.074 ects
Information: UAG 88-143/20 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1553: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1554: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2065: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.3704 % @0.42C
Maximum Camber: 6.1688 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.8052 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.47446 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 20.7372 deg
Release Angle: 7.3332 deg
Nose Incidence: 18.1819 deg
Camber deflection: 25.5151 deg

Table 2066: Controlpoints


1 0
0.9792 -0.0011028
0.15754 -0.015182
0.10332 -0.015182
0.063158 -0.015182
0 -0.013664
0 0
0 0.045995
0.17579 0.13337
0.43474 0.13337
0.67663 0.13337
0.77663 0.071293
1 0

Table 2067: Base 64 representation:


Wlcb45ZHEGrFXrA

Figure 1555: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

522
Profile: ui1720 Table 2072: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.48 6.68 ects
Information: University of Illinois UI-1720 high lift airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.8 -0.6 dcts
Cm error 76 77 mcts
Upper transition point -0.46 -0.67 %

Figure 1556: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1557: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2069: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.8688 % @0.18C
Maximum Camber: 4.5884 % @0.21C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.061374 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.829 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.9671 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.4592 deg
Release Angle: 10.0268 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.1663 deg
Camber deflection: 24.1931 deg

Table 2070: Controlpoints


1 -0.00030687
0.6173 0.02845
0.22487 -0.028794
0.084295 -0.028794
0.063222 -0.028794
0 -0.028794
0 0
0 0.045173
0.1082 0.11474
0.19014 0.11474
0.25982 0.11474
0.93051 0.019913
1 0.00030687

Table 2071: Base 64 representation:


ZcMGw QFKMLgNvC

Figure 1558: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

523
Profile: ultimate Table 2076: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.763 6.943 ects
Information: Carl Goldberg R/C Ultimate Bipe airfoil RMS curvature error: 49.51 50.22 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.8 -4.4 dcts
Cm error -224 -207 mcts
Upper transition point 9.01 7.9 %

Figure 1559: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1560: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2073: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.847 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: -0.2337 % @0.74C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.5804 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.79584 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.80077 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 37.5204 deg
Release Angle: 0 deg
Nose Incidence: -0.72785 deg
Camber deflection: -0.72785 deg

Table 2074: Controlpoints


1 -0.002902
0.95797 -0.017179
0.57578 -0.065099
0.34208 -0.065099
0.10872 -0.065099
0 -0.024091
0 0
0 0.026823
0.13561 0.063373
0.34201 0.063373
0.54011 0.063373
0.98529 0.0079
1 0.002902

Table 2075: Base 64 representation:


bmWTbYrWXcFPpgP

Figure 1561: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

524
Profile: us1000root Table 2080: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.838 7.069 ects
Information: Great Planes R/C Ultra-Sport 1000 airfoil RMS curvature error: 50.72 50.72 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.7 -1.2 dcts
Cm error -106 -119 mcts
Upper transition point 0 0 %

Figure 1562: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1563: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2077: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18.5665 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: -0.14063 % @0.02C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.0096 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.0065444 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.33496 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 19.0456 deg
Release Angle: -0.078576 deg
Nose Incidence: -3.9678 deg
Camber deflection: -4.0463 deg

Table 2078: Controlpoints


1 -4.8e-005
0.621 -0.064153
0.43619 -0.093786
0.27132 -0.093786
0.054021 -0.093786
0 -0.010983
0 0
0 0.0013881
0.04417 0.091882
0.27108 0.091882
0.43766 0.091882
0.61866 0.06349
1 4.8e-005

Table 2079: Base 64 representation:


B1RPmHyROnrqVgA

Figure 1564: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

525
Profile: usa22 Table 2084: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.654 6.486 ects
Information: USA 22 RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.9 0.6 dcts
Cm error -29 -24 mcts
Upper transition point 2.08 1.9 %

Figure 1565: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1566: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2081: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.9673 % @0.22C
Maximum Camber: 4.3903 % @0.34C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.1 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.051496 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.41526 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.8568 deg
Release Angle: 5.9682 deg
Nose Incidence: 11.4008 deg
Camber deflection: 17.369 deg

Table 2082: Controlpoints


1 -0.0005
0.28967 0.018594
0.19077 -0.01355
0.1002 -0.01355
0.062313 -0.01355
0 -0.013414
0 0
0 0.0034409
0.034487 0.08733
0.29873 0.08733
0.41885 0.08733
0.69277 0.056869
1 0.0005

Table 2083: Base 64 representation:


D4TLk-YGGGp3KpD

Figure 1567: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

526
Profile: usa35 Table 2088: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.985 6.73 ects
Information: USA-35 airfoil RMS curvature error: 77.34 95.95 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.3 -0.5 dcts
Cm error -8 -9 mcts
Upper transition point 0.87 2.56 %

Figure 1568: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1569: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2085: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18.0056 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 6.2486 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.43 %C
Upper nose radius: 5.7354 %C
Lower nose radius: 4.776 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 19.8065 deg
Release Angle: 9.7399 deg
Nose Incidence: 16.3318 deg
Camber deflection: 26.0718 deg

Table 2086: Controlpoints


1 -0.00215
0.55401 -0.0034211
0.22745 -0.03812
0.10157 -0.03812
0.045638 -0.03812
0 -0.03812
0 0
0 0.063674
0.10604 0.15
0.2937 0.15
0.41024 0.15
0.58578 0.15
1 0.00215

Table 2087: Base 64 representation:


boTL iHJQ kWvL

Figure 1570: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

527
Profile: usa35a Table 2092: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.37 7.169 ects
Information: USA-35A airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.5 -0.3 dcts
Cm error -11 -10 mcts
Upper transition point 0.95 2.09 %

Figure 1571: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1572: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2089: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 18.005 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 6.2458 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.43 %C
Upper nose radius: 5.4675 %C
Lower nose radius: 5.0828 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 19.7832 deg
Release Angle: 9.7891 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.2408 deg
Camber deflection: 25.0299 deg

Table 2090: Controlpoints


1 -0.00215
0.56756 -0.0029236
0.228 -0.03802
0.10157 -0.03802
0.042659 -0.03802
0 -0.03802
0 0
0 0.061366
0.10331 0.15
0.2937 0.15
0.41024 0.15
0.58663 0.15
1 0.00215

Table 2091: Base 64 representation:


aoTL kHJQ jWvL

Figure 1573: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

528
Profile: usa35b Table 2096: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.764 4.726 ects
Information: USA-35B airfoil RMS curvature error: 52.13 45.88 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2 2.2 dcts
Cm error 0 18 mcts
Upper transition point -4.5 -4.74 %

Figure 1574: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1575: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2093: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.6712 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 4.1052 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.24991 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.2637 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.0327 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.0127 deg
Release Angle: 6.4161 deg
Nose Incidence: 9.323 deg
Camber deflection: 15.7391 deg

Table 2094: Controlpoints


1 -0.0012495
0.55539 -0.0019498
0.23138 -0.024257
0.10067 -0.024257
0.042412 -0.024257
0 -0.024257
0 0
0 0.045837
0.14219 0.097871
0.29752 0.097871
0.39171 0.097871
0.58306 0.096914
1 0.0012495

Table 2095: Base 64 representation:


egTJp kGJK-kPpG

Figure 1576: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

529
Profile: usa40 Table 2100: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.691 7.207 ects
Information: USA-40 airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.4 -2.7 dcts
Cm error 17 48 mcts
Upper transition point 4.82 3.62 %

Figure 1577: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1578: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2097: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.6029 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 4.1726 % @0.43C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.1 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.0436 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.9665 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.663 deg
Release Angle: 9.836 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.2254 deg
Camber deflection: 20.0614 deg

Table 2098: Controlpoints


1 -0.0005
0.72914 0.025602
0.41139 -0.03263
0.14999 -0.03263
0.073716 -0.03263
0 -0.03263
0 0
0 0.03031
0.077307 0.10714
0.30002 0.10714
0.53435 0.10714
0.82644 0.044313
1 0.0005

Table 2099: Base 64 representation:


SvTVt gKUOasKvD

Figure 1579: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

530
Profile: usa40b Table 2104: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 7.95 8.825 ects
Information: USA-40B airfoil RMS curvature error: 81.18 82.26 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -5.9 -5.8 dcts
Cm error -64 -49 mcts
Upper transition point 12.34 11.97 %

Figure 1580: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1581: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2101: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.4778 % @0.25C
Maximum Camber: 4.0222 % @0.38C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: -Inf %C
Lower nose radius: 2.6086 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.8692 deg
Release Angle: 10.6614 deg
Nose Incidence: 15.4526 deg
Camber deflection: 26.114 deg

Table 2102: Controlpoints


1 0
0.76677 0.025447
0.38501 -0.0327
0.14998 -0.0327
0.036466 -0.0327
0 -0.025183
0 0
0 0.0063474
0 0.10579
0.30007 0.10579
0.46183 0.10579
0.8414 0.04278
1 0

Table 2103: Base 64 representation:


E TPswvKSOaYKwA

Figure 1582: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

531
Profile: usa41 Table 2108: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.39 5.429 ects
Information: USA-41 airfoil RMS curvature error: 60.09 61.34 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.1 -1.3 dcts
Cm error -39 -42 mcts
Upper transition point -1.14 -2.76 %

Figure 1583: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1584: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2105: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.8012 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 4.5151 % @0.4C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.64253 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.1717 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.1105 deg
Release Angle: 7.7733 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.269 deg
Camber deflection: 16.0424 deg

Table 2106: Controlpoints


1 0
0.39315 0.044757
0.13955 -0.00948
0.04998 -0.00948
0.007494 -0.00948
0 -0.0081453
0 0
0 0.022886
0.12227 0.07652
0.30012 0.07652
0.37011 0.07652
0.61805 0.07652
1 0

Table 2107: Base 64 representation:


TlTGg21DGE sIsA

Figure 1585: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

532
Profile: usa45 Table 2112: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.482 7.116 ects
Information: USA-45M airfoil RMS curvature error: 33.43 33.88 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3.1 -2.4 dcts
Cm error -15 -8 mcts
Upper transition point 4.56 4.25 %

Figure 1586: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1587: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2109: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.5337 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 4.1469 % @0.3C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.75926 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.90974 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 16.9843 deg
Release Angle: 3.8344 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.6 deg
Camber deflection: 18.4344 deg

Table 2110: Controlpoints


1 0
0.63313 -0.02989
0.34766 -0.0312
0.30051 -0.0312
0.15149 -0.0312
0 -0.0312
0 0
0 0.015736
0.045941 0.11416
0.29814 0.11416
0.29814 0.11416
0.49827 0.10964
1 0

Table 2111: Base 64 representation:


J1TAw gTEN88TlA

Figure 1588: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

533
Profile: usa45m Table 2116: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.562 6.866 ects
Information: USA-45M airfoil RMS curvature error: 53.97 53.91 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -2.1 -1.9 dcts
Cm error -15 0 mcts
Upper transition point 4.23 3.71 %

Figure 1589: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1590: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2113: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.6398 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 3.3211 % @0.3C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.012145 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.4608 deg
Release Angle: 3.2182 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.2381 deg
Camber deflection: 8.4563 deg

Table 2114: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79839 -0.012374
0.57357 -0.0253
0.2 -0.0253
0 -0.0253
0 -0.011432
0 0
0 0.0015241
0.02869 0.0914
0.3 0.0914
0.314 0.0914
0.52018 0.084161
1 0

Table 2115: Base 64 representation:


B5TBms NeL6fPkA

Figure 1591: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

534
Profile: usa46 Table 2120: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.596 5.549 ects
Information: USA 46 RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0.1 -0.5 dcts
Cm error -19 -10 mcts
Upper transition point -2.31 -1.02 %

Figure 1592: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1593: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2117: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.7018 % @0.23C
Maximum Camber: 2.169 % @0.46C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.24003 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.078432 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 3.3146 deg
Release Angle: 5.7885 deg
Nose Incidence: 1.2057 deg
Camber deflection: 6.9943 deg

Table 2118: Controlpoints


1 0
0.77361 0.016352
0.22384 -0.01986
0.10003 -0.01986
0.0012958 -0.01986
0 -0.00082313
0 0
0 0.011232
0.078844 0.05242
0.28993 0.05242
0.41458 0.05242
0.62293 0.04928
1 0

Table 2119: Base 64 representation:


OuTLWD-GJI7TEoA

Figure 1594: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

535
Profile: usa48 Table 2124: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 7.096 9.664 ects
Information: USA 48 RMS curvature error: 86.35 86.05 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -24 -24.4 dcts
Cm error -44 -60 mcts
Upper transition point 23.31 24.28 %

Figure 1595: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1596: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2121: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 14.8323 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 2.8246 % @0.44C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.86925 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.36703 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 21.7639 deg
Release Angle: 8.7323 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.7148 deg
Camber deflection: 19.4472 deg

Table 2122: Controlpoints


1 0
0.69558 -0.011426
0.52635 -0.048
0.3 -0.048
0.0073467 -0.048
0 -0.0042399
0 0
0 0.013195
0.04 0.1015
0.4 0.1015
0.50495 0.1015
0.84524 0.055152
1 0

Table 2123: Base 64 representation:


I5aLqG9TVUioYtA

Figure 1597: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

536
Profile: usa49 Table 2128: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.557 7.273 ects
Information: USA 49 RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 5.9 -5.2 dcts
Cm error 1 -14 mcts
Upper transition point -25.91 26.05 %

Figure 1598: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1599: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2125: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.25 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 1.6545 % @0.3C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.23 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.70531 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.79497 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.7383 deg
Release Angle: 2.0699 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.8569 deg
Camber deflection: 8.9268 deg

Table 2126: Controlpoints


1 -0.00115
0.79682 -0.0093078
0.57323 -0.019705
0.29995 -0.019705
0.0093461 -0.019705
0 -0.007038
0 0
0 0.025027
0.13321 0.052795
0.30012 0.052795
0.56475 0.052795
0.80762 0.022861
1 0.00115

Table 2127: Base 64 representation:


ejTYXX9TZIceKjG

Figure 1600: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

537
Profile: usa50 Table 2132: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.287 6.074 ects
Information: USA 50 RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 2 2.3 dcts
Cm error -9 -14 mcts
Upper transition point -1.06 -1.74 %

Figure 1601: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1602: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2129: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 6.9514 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 1.9542 % @0.41C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.65065 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.38412 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.8439 deg
Release Angle: 4.4438 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.6409 deg
Camber deflection: 11.0847 deg

Table 2130: Controlpoints


1 0
0.91055 -0.0046536
0.33779 -0.0167
0.3 -0.0167
0.042 -0.0167
0 -0.010371
0 0
0 0.026711
0.17121 0.054
0.4 0.054
0.46318 0.054
0.84003 0.03361
1 0

Table 2131: Base 64 representation:


gkaHXn2TDHnSRmA

Figure 1603: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

538
Profile: usa51 Table 2136: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.372 3.685 ects
Information: USA 51 RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.1 1.1 dcts
Cm error -22 13 mcts
Upper transition point 6.02 -5.45 %

Figure 1604: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1605: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2133: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.33 % @0.3C
Maximum Camber: 2.565 % @0.3C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.15514 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.61181 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.4126 deg
Release Angle: 4.17 deg
Nose Incidence: 6.2592 deg
Camber deflection: 10.4293 deg

Table 2134: Controlpoints


1 0
0.75851 -0.010697
0.50628 -0.021
0.3 -0.021
0.087578 -0.021
0 -0.01806
0 0
0 0.0073183
0.042057 0.0723
0.3 0.0723
0.41611 0.0723
0.74484 0.049027
1 0

Table 2135: Base 64 representation:


G2TLf2sTTJqgPmA

Figure 1606: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

539
Profile: usa98 Table 2140: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 11.934 13.353 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: 59.91 61.26 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 0 -0.1 dcts
Cm error 118 99 mcts
Upper transition point -0.77 0.35 %

Figure 1607: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1608: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2137: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.8545 % @0.26C
Maximum Camber: 6.3762 % @0.48C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.90001 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.5198 %C
Lower nose radius: 5.2247 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.1666 deg
Release Angle: 12.8126 deg
Nose Incidence: 4.9527 deg
Camber deflection: 17.7653 deg

Table 2138: Controlpoints


1 -0.0045001
0.58129 0.052331
0.25472 -0.037725
0.049831 -0.037725
0.039865 -0.037725
0 -0.037263
0 0
0 0.079851
0.22763 0.1272
0.40058 0.1272
0.57439 0.1272
0.79978 0.069155
1 0.0045001

Table 2139: Base 64 representation:


ncaT1-NDOQhjL0X

Figure 1609: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

540
Profile: usnps4 Table 2144: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.27 3.144 ects
Information: Jacobs USNPS4 (smoothed) 17.5 kW wind turbine RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
airfoil CD error -0.5 -0.3 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -13 -23 mcts
Upper transition point 1.76 2.23 %

Figure 1611: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 1610: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 2141: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 11.9748 % @0.32C
Maximum Camber: 5.0008 % @0.36C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.7756 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.13549 %C
Lower nose radius: 1.3611 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 25.7728 deg
Release Angle: 12.4589 deg
Nose Incidence: 14.2684 deg
Camber deflection: 26.7273 deg

Table 2142: Controlpoints


1 -0.003878
0.15369 -0.010194
0.057679 -0.014564
0.038112 -0.014564
0.016779 -0.014564
0 -0.012339
0 0
0 0.0041821
0.019364 0.10978
0.34202 0.10978
0.58825 0.10978
0.88458 0.058547
1 0.003878

Table 2143: Base 64 representation:


C7WYu1jCBGg4szU
Figure 1612: Error distribution of drag- and pitching
moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

541
Profile: v13006 Table 2148: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.15 4.344 ects
Information: Boeing-Vertol V13006-.7 rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: 29.67 29.28 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -8.9 -8.7 dcts
Cm error -3 6 mcts
Upper transition point 17.3 16.22 %

Figure 1613: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1614: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2145: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 5.9613 % @0.28C
Maximum Camber: 0.87738 % @0.22C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.12 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.56711 %C
Lower nose radius: Inf %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 7.8973 deg
Release Angle: 0.64838 deg
Nose Incidence: 3.5584 deg
Camber deflection: 4.2068 deg

Table 2146: Controlpoints


1 -0.0006
0.71179 -0.017219
0.47194 -0.021769
0.40094 -0.021769
0 -0.021769
0 -0.0091087
0 0
0 0.016122
0.068748 0.038402
0.25196 0.038402
0.48432 0.038402
0.79329 0.017221
1 0.0006

Table 2147: Base 64 representation:


buQUQb aIJcxJgD

Figure 1615: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

542
Profile: v13009 Table 2152: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.809 5.397 ects
Information: Boeing-Vertol V(1.9)3006-1.25 rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: 36.79 36.78 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.1 -3.9 dcts
Cm error -10 -2 mcts
Upper transition point 5.99 6.5 %

Figure 1616: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1617: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2149: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.0349 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 1.2536 % @0.22C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.11 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.9609 %C
Lower nose radius: 8.6686 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.1101 deg
Release Angle: 1.0024 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.3379 deg
Camber deflection: 6.3402 deg

Table 2150: Controlpoints


1 -0.00055
0.58977 -0.033215
0.38388 -0.033215
0.34941 -0.033215
0.0035308 -0.033215
0 -0.014285
0 0
0 0.0079712
0.0099188 0.057464
0.25101 0.057464
0.348 0.057464
0.50931 0.056956
1 0.00055

Table 2151: Base 64 representation:


J8QIZc-WDO- MhD

Figure 1618: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

543
Profile: v23010 Table 2156: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.215 6.612 ects
Information: Boeing-Vertol V23010-1.58 rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -18.6 -19 dcts
Cm error 34 46 mcts
Upper transition point 0.7 0.87 %

Figure 1619: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1620: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2153: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.116 % @0.29C
Maximum Camber: 1.7223 % @0.16C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5418 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.49651 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 10.7125 deg
Release Angle: 1.0708 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.4413 deg
Camber deflection: 14.5121 deg

Table 2154: Controlpoints


1 0
0.66679 -0.024969
0.51551 -0.03709
0.35002 -0.03709
0.32569 -0.03709
0 -0.032639
0 0
0 0.026579
0.068728 0.06622
0.19996 0.06622
0.45218 0.06622
0.6272 0.041995
1 0

Table 2155: Base 64 representation:


apNUc3EWQQrrMhA

Figure 1621: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

544
Profile: vr1 Table 2160: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.206 5.698 ects
Information: Boeing-Vertol VR-1 rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: 89.16 77.27 %
Reference: UIUC CD error 7.5 -8.1 dcts
Cm error -6 -1 mcts
Upper transition point -5.8 7.46 %

Figure 1622: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1623: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2157: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.8963 % @0.38C
Maximum Camber: 1.5617 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.8876 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.81753 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.1993 deg
Release Angle: 2.5751 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.8769 deg
Camber deflection: 11.452 deg

Table 2158: Controlpoints


1 0
0.8711 -0.0079392
0.61061 -0.04045
0.3125 -0.04045
0.16555 -0.04045
0 -0.030038
0 0
0 0.064422
0.33413 0.06947
0.43331 0.06947
0.62017 0.06947
0.90348 0.014727
1 0

Table 2159: Base 64 representation:


6PcVeveUcRQVOjA

Figure 1624: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

545
Profile: vr7 Table 2164: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.857 4.071 ects
Information: Boeing-Vertol VR-7 rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.2 -3.4 dcts
Cm error 1 9 mcts
Upper transition point 2.72 2.4 %

Figure 1625: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1626: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2161: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.0275 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 3.1295 % @0.32C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.2161 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.36998 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.1049 deg
Release Angle: 3.188 deg
Nose Incidence: 18.1455 deg
Camber deflection: 21.3335 deg

Table 2162: Controlpoints


1 0
0.56522 -0.021755
0.46522 -0.029
0.37 -0.029
0.27618 -0.029
0 -0.0261
0 0
0 0.047482
0.1526 0.0914
0.33 0.0914
0.4883 0.0914
0.60498 0.064265
1 0

Table 2163: Base 64 representation:


ghVPm5QYKMwzOkA

Figure 1627: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

546
Profile: vr7b Table 2168: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.923 5.982 ects
Information: Boeing-Vertol VR-7 rotorcraft airfoil with tab RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -4.9 -5.1 dcts
Cm error -94 -83 mcts
Upper transition point 3.84 3.56 %

Figure 1628: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1629: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2165: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 12.0325 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 3.046 % @0.32C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.5 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.3431 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.36962 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 2.594 deg
Release Angle: 2.3437 deg
Nose Incidence: 18.384 deg
Camber deflection: 20.7276 deg

Table 2166: Controlpoints


1 -0.0025
0.88319 -0.00036593
0.58904 -0.029925
0.36993 -0.029925
0.32111 -0.029925
0 -0.028129
0 0
0 0.05209
0.1737 0.090575
0.33023 0.090575
0.56716 0.090575
0.79727 0.015399
1 0.0025

Table 2167: Base 64 representation:


keVXm7IYWNeSDjN

Figure 1630: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

547
Profile: vr8 Table 2172: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.443 2.514 ects
Information: Boeing-Vertol VR-8 rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error 48.8 NaN dcts
Cm error -34 NaN mcts
Upper transition point -39.58 NaN %

Figure 1631: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1632: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2169: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 8.15 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 1.275 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.54101 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.26745 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 8.141 deg
Release Angle: 1.2984 deg
Nose Incidence: 5.9901 deg
Camber deflection: 7.2885 deg

Table 2170: Controlpoints


1 0
0.58512 -0.020089
0.48512 -0.028
0.35 -0.028
0.23835 -0.028
0 -0.020615
0 0
0 0.021164
0.12418 0.0535
0.35 0.0535
0.46479 0.0535
0.57006 0.040406
1 0

Table 2171: Base 64 representation:


ZoWLXuUWNMyzJhA

Figure 1633: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

548
Profile: vr9 Table 2176: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.218 4.651 ects
Information: N/A RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1634: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1635: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.

Table 2173: Geometrical properties


Maximum Thickness: 6.06 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 0.33 % @0.35C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.24047 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.19764 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 6.2121 deg
Release Angle: 0.32405 deg
Nose Incidence: 1.3475 deg
Camber deflection: 1.6715 deg

Table 2174: Controlpoints


1 0
0.63639 -0.017669
0.495 -0.027
0.35 -0.027
0.13778 -0.027
0 -0.013474
0 0
0 0.014496
0.13107 0.0336
0.35 0.0336
0.48659 0.0336
0.62977 0.022191
1 0

Table 2175: Base 64 representation:


cnWNOgmWOMttHgA

Figure 1636: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

549
Profile: vr11x Table 2180: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.152 8.585 ects
Information: Boeing-Vertol/NASA/Dadone VR-11X transonic ro- RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
torcraft airfoil CD error -7.3 -12.8 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -11 53 mcts
Upper transition point 12.59 11.4 %

Figure 1638: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 1637: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 2177: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.9889 % @0.39C
Maximum Camber: 2.3843 % @0.28C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.4202 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.33971 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 30.2055 deg
Release Angle: -8.8655 deg
Nose Incidence: 24.1671 deg
Camber deflection: 15.3016 deg

Table 2178: Controlpoints


1 -0.0015
0.9671 -0.016126
0.62363 -0.0317
0.39995 -0.0317
0.3594 -0.0317
0 -0.02853
0 0
0 0.036891
0.06369 0.078375
0.35012 0.078375
0.79936 0.078375
0.79936 0.023428
1 0.0015

Table 2179: Base 64 representation:


ezWrg5GaYO fhSI
Figure 1639: Error distribution of drag- and pitching
moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

550
Profile: vr12 Table 2184: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.425 4.786 ects
Information: Boeing-Vertol/Dadone VR-12 rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -18.6 -18.6 dcts
Cm error 2 4 mcts
Upper transition point 7.35 6.89 %

Figure 1640: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1641: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2181: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.5805 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 2.2399 % @0.26C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.3 %C
Upper nose radius: 4.7626 %C
Lower nose radius: 8.1306 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 15.3108 deg
Release Angle: -3.4278 deg
Nose Incidence: 21.4099 deg
Camber deflection: 17.9821 deg

Table 2182: Controlpoints


1 -0.0015
0.864 -0.02814
0.49934 -0.0311
0.4 -0.0311
0.0011668 -0.0311
0 -0.0079527
0 0
0 0.023281
0.03376 0.0751
0.3 0.0751
0.6785 0.0751
0.86562 0.011433
1 0.0015

Table 2183: Base 64 representation:


U4TigQ aLNb5RaI

Figure 1642: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

551
Profile: vr13 Table 2188: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.465 5.549 ects
Information: Boeing-Vertol/Dadone VR-13 rotorcraft airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -17.2 -16.9 dcts
Cm error 10 13 mcts
Upper transition point 6.26 5.9 %

Figure 1643: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1644: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2185: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.4647 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 2.0011 % @0.27C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.2684 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.3991 %C
Lower nose radius: 6.5357 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 13.8764 deg
Release Angle: -3.0059 deg
Nose Incidence: 16.3292 deg
Camber deflection: 13.3234 deg

Table 2186: Controlpoints


1 -0.001342
0.86106 -0.025702
0.496 -0.02782
0.4 -0.02782
0.0011612 -0.02782
0 -0.007113
0 0
0 0.04098
0.105 0.06718
0.3 0.06718
0.67748 0.06718
0.86221 0.010814
1 0.001342

Table 2187: Base 64 representation:


mpTisQ aKMb6QbH

Figure 1645: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

552
Profile: vr14 Table 2192: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
Information: Boeing-Vertol/Dadone VR-14 rotorcraft airfoil RMS position error: 3.77 4.163 ects
Reference: UIUC RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
CD error NaN -9.5 dcts
Cm error NaN 4 mcts
Upper transition point NaN 5.17 %

Figure 1646: Wing profile with camber and thickness


Figure 1647: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution.
curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2189: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.9703 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 1.6851 % @0.27C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.226 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.6888 %C
Lower nose radius: 4.6313 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 11.5841 deg
Release Angle: -2.6067 deg
Nose Incidence: 13.7929 deg
Camber deflection: 11.1863 deg

Table 2190: Controlpoints


1 -0.00113
0.86408 -0.021197
0.51221 -0.023427
0.4 -0.023427
0.0011624 -0.023427
0 -0.0059908
0 0
0 0.03451
0.10577 0.056573
0.3 0.056573
0.6785 0.056573
0.86568 0.0086055
1 0.00113

Table 2191: Base 64 representation:


moTiYQ aMKb5NcG

Figure 1648: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

553
Profile: vr15 Table 2196: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 4.104 5.03 ects
Information: Boeing-Vertol/Dadone VR-15 transonic rotorcraft RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
airfoil CD error -0.1 0.1 dcts
Reference: UIUC Cm error -9 -3 mcts
Upper transition point 0.34 -0.13 %

Figure 1650: Error distribution of vertical position and


Figure 1649: Wing profile with camber and thickness curvature of the parameter curve.
distribution.
Table 2193: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 7.9659 % @0.33C
Maximum Camber: 1.2403 % @0.26C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.2389 %C
Upper nose radius: 1.5637 %C
Lower nose radius: 5.6043 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.9564 deg
Release Angle: -3.5375 deg
Nose Incidence: 10.513 deg
Camber deflection: 6.9755 deg

Table 2194: Controlpoints


1 -0.0011945
0.86372 -0.025263
0.50816 -0.027938
0.4 -0.027938
0.0014012 -0.027938
0 -0.0072355
0 0
0 0.046842
0.21048 0.052047
0.3 0.052047
0.67914 0.052047
0.86474 0.008143
1 0.0011945

Table 2195: Base 64 representation:


5TTiWR aMMb5OaG
Figure 1651: Error distribution of drag- and pitching
moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

554
Profile: wb13535sm Table 2200: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 3.609 5.967 ects
Information: Woody Blanchard WB135/35 R/C sailplane airfoil RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -1.2 -0.2 dcts
Cm error -53 -37 mcts
Upper transition point 1.71 0.53 %

Figure 1652: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1653: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2197: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 13.5387 % @0.27C
Maximum Camber: 3.7424 % @0.47C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.11994 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.18252 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.1252 deg
Release Angle: 6.2986 deg
Nose Incidence: 8.4514 deg
Camber deflection: 14.75 deg

Table 2198: Controlpoints


1 0
0.45443 -0.0072753
0.35443 -0.04085
0.175 -0.04085
0.042629 -0.04085
0 -0.0072022
0 0
0 0.0059709
0.044588 0.1
0.35 0.1
0.4556 0.1
0.57898 0.1
1 0

Table 2199: Base 64 representation:


E3WKqLvLOR 1QpA

Figure 1654: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

555
Profile: whitcomb Table 2204: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 5.488 8.672 ects
Information: Whitcomb supercritical profile RMS curvature error: Inf Inf %
Reference: UIUC CD error -3 -1.7 dcts
Cm error 23 -6 mcts
Upper transition point 2.25 3.46 %

Figure 1655: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1656: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2201: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 10.9811 % @0.36C
Maximum Camber: 2.3989 % @0.84C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0.05 %C
Upper nose radius: 2.3803 %C
Lower nose radius: 2.6331 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 4.5127 deg
Release Angle: 17.9413 deg
Nose Incidence: -1.0884 deg
Camber deflection: 16.8529 deg

Table 2202: Controlpoints


1 -0.00025
0.79785 0.056514
0.74962 -0.054532
0.35006 -0.054532
0.055578 -0.054532
0 -0.031235
0 0
0 0.031743
0.063498 0.05542
0.39994 0.05542
0.59304 0.05542
0.85884 0.052182
1 0.00025

Table 2203: Base 64 representation:


k1aVYk1WmX7zF8B

Figure 1657: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

556
Profile: ys900 Table 2208: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
Information: N/A RMS position error: 4.795 5.395 ects
Reference: UIUC RMS curvature error: 44.95 44.18 %
CD error NaN NaN dcts
Cm error NaN NaN mcts
Upper transition point NaN NaN %

Figure 1658: Wing profile with camber and thickness


Figure 1659: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution.
curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2205: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.006 % @0.53C
Maximum Camber: 0.0029543 % @0.79C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.12325 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.12325 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 24.3798 deg
Release Angle: 0 deg
Nose Incidence: 0 deg
Camber deflection: 0 deg

Table 2206: Controlpoints


1 0
0.79155 -0.04503
0.72256 -0.04503
0.52491 -0.04503
0.20857 -0.04503
0 -0.013091
0 0
0 0.013091
0.20857 0.04503
0.52491 0.04503
0.72432 0.04503
0.79155 0.04503
1 0

Table 2207: Base 64 representation:


TmhbTTmhbT bgA

Figure 1660: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

557
Profile: ys915 Table 2212: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 2.181 5.251 ects
Information: YS915 hydrofoil (Shen / Eppler) RMS curvature error: 48.92 48.26 %
Reference: UIUC CD error NaN -15.9 dcts
Cm error NaN -78 mcts
Upper transition point NaN 36.88 %

Figure 1661: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1662: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2209: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.0959 % @0.35C
Maximum Camber: 1.7724 % @0.66C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.24033 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.22462 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 14.4773 deg
Release Angle: 4.0005 deg
Nose Incidence: 0.57636 deg
Camber deflection: 4.5768 deg

Table 2210: Controlpoints


1 0
0.43265 -0.032099
0.33265 -0.038547
0.26367 -0.038547
0.11437 -0.038547
0 -0.013087
0 0
0 0.01688
0.17784 0.058295
0.50977 0.058295
0.74337 0.058295
0.79244 0.041245
1 0

Table 2211: Base 64 representation:


TpgeZWjRGQz1QmA

Figure 1663: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

558
Profile: ys930 Table 2216: Representation errors CL = 0.3, Re = 6·106
Control points Base64
RMS position error: 1.893 2.871 ects
Information: YS930 hydrofoil (Shen / Eppler) RMS curvature error: 48.38 47.44 %
Reference: UIUC CD error -0.9 -0.9 dcts
Cm error 43 49 mcts
Upper transition point 0.12 -0.15 %

Figure 1664: Wing profile with camber and thickness Figure 1665: Error distribution of vertical position and
distribution. curvature of the parameter curve.
Table 2213: Geometrical properties
Maximum Thickness: 9.0935 % @0.34C
Maximum Camber: 3.0369 % @0.58C
Trailing Edge Gap: 0 %C
Upper nose radius: 0.34479 %C
Lower nose radius: 0.23221 %C
Boat-Tail Angle: 12.6793 deg
Release Angle: 6.6851 deg
Nose Incidence: 2.1345 deg
Camber deflection: 8.8196 deg

Table 2214: Controlpoints


1 0
0.63875 0.0021781
0.27051 -0.03107
0.15871 -0.03107
0.060701 -0.03107
0 -0.0096937
0 0
0 0.020183
0.17722 0.072467
0.4948 0.072467
0.69485 0.072467
0.79485 0.047457
1 0

Table 2215: Base 64 representation:


SogZfUnKJNqgOqA

Figure 1666: Error distribution of drag- and pitching


moment, as well as the error of top and bottom transition
points.

559

Você também pode gostar