Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Mallorie E. Hyatt
The role of technology in my career as a middle grades educator in the metro Atlanta area
is prominent, to say the least. I have been employed with Rockdale County Public Schools for
the past seven years, and last year, our district implemented a 1-to-1 technology initiative entitled
“Learning Reimagined” through which students in grades 3-12 are each issued a district provided
laptop to use both inside and outside of the classroom for educational purposes. While I had been
teaching students who are, according to Bates, digital natives for the entirety of my career, this
basis (Bates, 2016, p. 34). I found myself having to reevaluate my approach to teaching and
pedagogy. This kind of technology access completely changed the game as far as instruction,
assessment, strategies, classroom management, etc. A major part of this reevaluation involves
developing personal technology goals and a personal technology plan for meeting those goals.
Strengths
are honestly evolving and fluid in nature, especially with the technology developments we have
experienced in my own school district in rolling out “Learning Reimagined.” From my own
perspective, my greatest strength is perhaps my willingness and openness towards the changes
that integrating new technology in the classroom brings. In my limited experience of seven years,
it has been my observation that some teachers have a strong tendency to default to strategies and
ways of teaching that have worked in the past while new technology figuratively (or literally)
collects dust in some unused corner of the classroom. This reminds me of a statement made by
Grace Hopper, who worked extensively as a programmer with the Mark I, the first large-scale
SWOT ANALYSIS, GOALS, AND PLAN 3
digital computer (Schieber, 1987). Hopper posited that “humans are allergic to change. They
love to say, 'We've always done it this way.' I try to fight that” (Schieber, 1987). I cite this quote
because I feel that it relates a great deal to my philosophy of teaching, which is to embrace
change and stray often and frequently from comfort zones in teaching, particularly where
methods and strategies, we are choosing to remove ourselves and our students from the potential
of opportunities in teaching and learning that could take us farther and higher than we ever
imagined possible.
Weaknesses
technology, I would have to admit that I sometimes struggle with overcoming confidence issues
and making my voice heard, particularly with colleagues. Sometimes, this may mean that I do
not reach out for help or guidance when I struggle with a new technology, strategy, or resource,
even though doing so could improve outcomes in my lessons, methods, and implementation. I
end up making more exasperating work for myself trying to “fix” it on my own when reaching
In other situations, however, these occasional confidence issues mean that sometimes I do
not take a stand when I know that I should. An example that comes to mind occurred at the
beginning of this year in a content-level PLC meeting in which we were developing norms that
involved how we were going approach working collaboratively in an online setting on things
such as lesson plans and common assessment analyses. The teachers in the group decided that
the best course of action was to email our individual “parts” to one teacher, and that teacher
would compile them in order. I immediately realized that using OneDrive or Google Docs would
SWOT ANALYSIS, GOALS, AND PLAN 4
allow us to do this much more efficiently without placing the burden of piecing together our
work on any one teacher. However, I did not make it very far into suggesting this when another,
more seasoned teacher shot down this proposition as “too complicated” and said that we should
collaborate “smarter, not harder.” Instead of asserting myself and defending my (valid) point, I
allowed myself to be shut down and went along with my colleagues even though I knew that
collaborating on a single document as a team would be more effective. A few weeks later, our
Digital Learning Specialist was working with our PLC. When he realized how we were tackling
online collaboration, he immediately suggested to our team that we use OneDrive to collaborate,
and when the idea was again met with resistance, he pushed back and demonstrated how much
more easily and effectively we could collaborate by utilizing this tool. The PLC ultimately
agreed, and we have been collaborating (more effectively and efficiently) this way ever since.
This situation left me feeling a sense of frustration, not because I had been shot down
weeks prior when suggesting the same thing, but at myself for not asserting myself when I knew
that the solution I was defending was more beneficial to our process.
Opportunities
advance exponentially. With the game-changing introduction of 1-to-1 technology and the
ensuing plethora of digital resources (and challenges!), the learning environment I lead today
differs distinctly from the one I lead seven years ago in my first year of teaching.
DVD/VCR combo (that at its best, worked intermittently, and at its worst, annihilated one of my
personal VHS tapes in a hail of grinding squeals and pops that left me with the lingering aroma
of acrid burnt plastic) and one computer lab for the entire 7th grade wing (that I had to schedule
SWOT ANALYSIS, GOALS, AND PLAN 5
weeks in advance, and still wasn’t guaranteed use of.) Considering how much has changed in
less than a decade, one of the greatest opportunities I felt unquestionably necessary is extensive
degree is the pathway to meeting the demands and challenges of the ever-evolving 21st century
classrooms and the future learning environments that I will be entrusted to lead over the course
of my career.
Threats
Working in a school system that places devices in the hands of each student has certainly
created unique challenges. As the technology access increases, so have the threats to effective
use and implementation. Where the devices are concerned, appropriate student use and handling
are critical. Physical threats include destruction of devices due to student carelessness or outright
recklessness threatens future viability and sustainability of 1-to-1 due to the rising costs of
Another threat concerns the inappropriate use of the devices for gaming and/or illegal
downloads of software to bypass the district’s internet safety filter. Unfortunately, some students
often attempt to use their devices in ways other than educational purposes that were intended—
they are gaming in class on hidden desktops, deftly switching the screen with a couple of
keystrokes to avoid detection even under the most watchful eye. Not only are these students
frequently missing instruction, but some are walking a fine line between net-based distractions
Finally, a threat may lie in quantity versus quality where online resources are concerned.
In the two years of Learning Reimagined, teachers and students have been overwhelmed by an
abundance of programs for use with these devices. Oversaturation is a concern in that there may
SWOT ANALYSIS, GOALS, AND PLAN 6
be too many programs that teachers are being pressured by different entities from the district to
use to do so effectively. The choice between using many programs because we have them rather
than utilizing the few that are best suited well seems simple, but the outside pressure from the
county to “get our money’s worth” complicates and hinders effective instruction.
opportunities both inside and outside of the district, implementing more computer- and web-
My plan to achieve these goals starts with my enrollment in the Ed. S. program in Media-
Instructional Technology that I started in January of this year. In addition to this, I plan to take
this aspect of my technology plan is to then implement what I learn in my own classroom with
integrity and fidelity. I also plan to locate and actively participate in online Professional Learning
Communities focused on technology so that I may collaborate with other teachers outside of my
integral part of this plan will involve becoming more of a leader in technology in my school in a
way that allows me to not only continue to grow my own skills in teaching and technology, but
to be a benefit to other teachers as we all strive together to provide the highest quality of
education possible to the students we are entrusted to educate—both today and tomorrow.
SWOT ANALYSIS, GOALS, AND PLAN 7
References
Bates, T. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: guidelines for designing teaching and learning.
Schieber, P. (1987, March/April). The wit and wisdom of Grace Hopper. OCLC Newsletter, 167.