Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
I. PROTEST CASES:
BIR ACTION ON
PROTEST MAYBE:
ASSESSMENT: 1. GRANT PROTEST ( end of
1. LA (Letter of Authority to Investigate); proceedings); MOTION FOR
2. PAN (Preliminary Assessment Notice 2. DENY PROTEST; RECONSIDERATION APPEAL TO CTA EN PETITION FOR
RETURN PROTEST APPEAL TO CTA DIV
unless not required under Section 228, 3. PARTLY GRANT/DENY OR NEW TRIAL filed BANC REVIEW TO SC
NIRC); PROTEST; before CTA DIV
3. FAN ( Final Assessment Notice) 4. SIT ON IT W/IN 180
DAYS FROM FILING OF
PROTEST ( NON-ACTION)
1. Income Tax: Prescriptive Periods of Assessments: Period: Period: Period: Period: Period: Period:
Individual: One (1) return 3 yrs from due date if filed on or before due 30 days from NIRC does not provide for 30 days from receipt by TX 15 days from receipt of Fresh 15 days from 15 days from receipt of
on or before 15 April of the date; TX receipt of period requiring BIR to of actual BIR decision prejudicial decision of receipt of prejudicial prejudicial decision of
following yr; 3 yrs from actual date of filing if filed FAN decide; denying the protest; CTA Div decision of CTA Div CTA En Banc
Corporation: beyond due date;
10 yrs from DISCOVERY by BIR of filing
of fraduluent return (regardless of whether In case of BIR non-action or
the return is filed before , on, or beyond due BIR does not act on protest
date); within 180 day period from
10 yrs from DISCOVERY by BIR of non- filing, TX may file the
If BIR, however, does not
immediate remedy of appeal
CY: 1,2,3 QR within 60 days filing of return; act on the protest within
within agreed period bet. BIR & TX within 30 days from
from end of each Q plus one 180 days from the time TX
provided valid waiver is executed prior to expiration of 180 day
final consolidated R on or files protest, TX has the
expiration of the origianl period; period;If BIR requires TX to
before 15 Apr of the ff yr; immediate remedy of appeal
submit additional
to CTA Div;
documents, 30 days is
counted from date of
receipt by BIR of
documents;
2. ESTATE TAX
6 mos after death;
3. DONOR'S TAX
30 days after each gift;
4. VAT
monthly remittance w/in 10
dys from end of mo;
QR w/in 25 days fr close of
each Q;
AMENDED RETURN:
w/in 3 yrs from filing of
original return provided TX
has not received any notice
of investigation
SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE NIRC
PREJUDICED
PREJUDICED PARTY PREJUDICED PARTY
TX BIR TX PARTY (BIR
(BIR OR TX) (BIR OR TX)
OR TX)
•Without a decision or an “inaction xxx deemed a denial” of the CIR within the 120 day period, the CTA has no jurisdiction over a petition for
review.
•The 30-day period provided for under Section 112 (C) of the (NIRC within which to appeal the decision of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue
(CIR) to the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) need not necessarily fall within the two-year prescriptive period; (ibid)
CIR vs. San Roque Power Corporation;Taganito Mining Corporation vs. CIR; Philex Mining Corporation vs. CIR; G.R. No. 187485/G.R. No. 196113/G.R.
No. 197156. February 12, 2013;
III. REFUND OF ILLEGALLY ASSESSED, ILLEGALLY COLLECTED, EXCESSIVELY ASSESSED, AND EXCESSIVELY COLLECTED INTERNAL
REVENUE TAXES
PREJUDICED
PREJUDICED PARTY PREJUDICED PARTY
TX BIR TX PARTY (BIR
(BIR OR TX) (BIR OR TX)
OR TX)
1. GRANT REFUND; END OF PROCEEDINGS
2. DENY REFUND APPEAL TO CTA DIV MOTION FOR
CLAIM FOR REFUND
3. PARTLY RECONSIDERATION APPEAL TO CTA EN PETITION FOR
GRANT/DENY APPEAL TO CTA DIV OR NEW TRIAL filed BANC REVIEW TO SC
REFUND before CTA DIV
Period: Period: Period: Period: Period:
30 days from receipt by TX of
actual BIR decision denying the
refund PROVIDED THAT THE
APPEAL TO CTA DIV IS FILED
WITHIN THE SAME TWO (2) 15 days from receipt Fresh 15 days from 15 days from receipt
2 yrs from actual date
YEAR PERIOD FROM ACTUAL of prejudicial decision receipt of prejudicial of prejudicial decision
of payment of tax
PAYMENT OF TAX, otherwise, of CTA Div decision of CTA Div of CTA En Banc
appeal is filed out of time; 30
DAY period to appeal to CTA
DIV must be within the 2 yr
period;
Due Process in Issuance of Assessments: BIR RR 18-2013
•Step 1: BIR issues PAN (detailed facts, laws, rules) unless not required in Sec 228,
NIRC;
•Step 2:TX answers within 15 days from receipt of PAN;
•Step 3: If TX fails to respond, BIR issues FLD/FAN for payment of tax due; If TX
responds, BIR issues FLD/FAN within 15 days from receipt of response;
•FLD/FAN contains detailed facts, laws, rules, regulations, penalty, interest, tax due;
•If deficiency assessment tax is not paid by TX within the period provided in the
FLD/FAN, a deliquency interest of 20% based on the total amount due is imposed,
computed from the due date stated in the FLD/Fan until fully paid;
SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE NIRC
III. REFUND OF ILLEGALLY ASSESSED, ILLEGALLY COLLECTED, ERRONEOUSLY ASSESSED, AND ERRONEOUSLY COLLECTED INTERNAL
REVENUE TAXES
NOTE: It appears that when the issue involved is validity of a local tax ordinance, the proper remedy from a prejudicial decision of the DOJ is to appeal to the Court
of Appeals then the Supreme Court following the Rules of Court. Section 7 of RA 9282 does not make any mention of appellate jurisdiction of CTA over decisions of
the DOJ. In the case, however, of NPC vs. Municipal Govt of Navotas, G.R. No. 192300 November 24, 2014: CTA has jurisdiction over decisions,
orders or resolutions of the RTC in local tax cases, to wit: Decisions, orders or resolutions of the Regional Trial Courts in local tax cases originally
decided or resolved by them in the exercise of their original or appellate jurisdiction;
If court of origin is
If without specified amount, the jurisdiction of courts in criminal cases is determined as follows:
MTC,METC,MCTC, prejudiced
MTC/METC/MCTC RTC CTA party appeals to RTC, then to
CTA EN BANC (30 days) , then
to SC (15 days); If
court of origin is RTC, prejudiced
within or outside of penalty is 6 yrs and penalty is more than 6 party appeals to CTA DIV (15
no jurisdiction
Metro Manila 1 day and below yrs and 1 day days) , then to CTA EN BANC
(30 days), then to SC (15
days);
SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE LGC OF 1991
IV. Appraisal and Assessment of Real Property Tax ( Valuation of Real Property by the ASSESSOR's Office)
Local Assessor PROPERTY OWNER Prejudiced Party Prejudiced Party Prejudiced Party
ASSESSMENT
( VALUATION BY GRANT GRANT
ASSESSOR's Office of APPEAL to LBAA
APPEAL TO CTA PETITION FOR
real property; This is (provincial or city APPEAL to CBAA
EN BANC REVIEW TO SC
different from only)
levy/imposition of real
DENY DENY
property tax)
ASSESSMENT
GRANT end of process
( annual ad valorem tax
on l, b, m, and
improvements at rate
PAYMENT UNDER GRANT
not exceeding 1% of DENY
PROTEST filed before
assessed value if APPEAL TO CTA PETITION FOR
the Local Treasurer APPEAL to CBAA
province, and not EN BANC REVIEW TO SC
exceeding 2% in city,
municipality within Metro NON-ACTION ( 60 days DENY
Manila) from filing of protest)
Period: Period: Period: Period:
5 yrs from due date of 30 days from payment 30 days from receipt 30 days from 15 days from receipt
Jan 20 of each yr or of tax ( Note: payment of decision of LBAA receipt of prejudicial of prejudicial decision
10 yrs from of RPT UNDER PROTEST decision
DISCOVERY of fraud is a requirement for
or intent to evade protest)
payment;
SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE LGC OF 1991 Period: Period:
REAL PROPERTY TAXATION Assessment Collection
VI. Collection of Real Property Tax (Treasurer's Office) 5 yrs from due date 5 yrs from receipt by TX of
10 yrs fr DISCOVERY of notice of assessment
TREASURER Property Owner PREJUDICED PARTY fraud or intent to evade (administrative or judicial)
payment
NOTE: LGC of 1991 does not prohibit injunction against local tax
MODES OF COLLECTION: collection cases. NIRC, however, explicitly provides that
injunction is not available againstinternal revenue tax collection
1. Administrative: (the assumption is TREASURER has issued a notice of assessment) cases;
I. PROTEST CASES
BOC Examiner Importer/Exporter BOC Examiner BOC COM SEC OF FINANCE Importer/Exporter
AFFIRM (decision
AFFIRM End of process
prejudicial to govt)
AUTOMATIC
or 30 DAYS expired
GRANT(decision AUTOMATIC REVIEW APPEAL TO CTA DIV,
without BOC
prejudicial to REVIEW BY BOC REVERSE THEN CTA EN BANC,
decision
govt) COMM THEN SC;
APPEAL TO CTA DIV,
PROTEST before
REVERSE THEN CTA EN BANC,
APPRAISAL/ASSESSMENT of Examiner (payment Order of
THEN SC;
TCD under protest is a Hearing
requirement) APPEAL TO CTA DIV,
AFFIRM THEN CTA EN BANC,
APPEAL by THEN SC;
DENY Importer/Exporter AFFIRM End of process
TO BOC COMM REVERSE(decision AUTOMATIC
APPEAL TO CTA DIV,
prejudicial to govt) REVIEW
REVERSE THEN CTA EN BANC,
THEN SC;
APPEAL TO CTA
AFFIRM DIV, THEN CTA EN
BANC, THEN SC;
APPEAL by
decision adverse to
Importer TO AFFIRM End of process
Importer
BOC COMM REVERSE(decisi
AUTOMATIC APPEAL TO CTA
on prejudicial
REVIEW REVERSE DIV, THEN CTA EN
to govt)
BANC, THEN SC;
actual seizure/forfeiture of AFFIRM
articles (decision AFFIRM End of process
prejudicial to
AUTOMATIC
govt) or 30
REVIEW APPEAL TO CTA
AUTOMATIC DAYS expired
decision adverse to REVERSE DIV, THEN CTA EN
REVIEW BY without BOC
Govt BANC, THEN SC;
BOC COMM decision
APPEAL TO CTA
REVERSE DIV, THEN CTA EN
BANC, THEN SC;
Note: Procedures follow the same periods of time as provided in the previous table;