Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Damaris Alvarado
Professor Batty
English 101
10 December 2019
When eating meat do you stop to think what has the animal possibly been through?
Although there is a very fast-growing population’s demand for food, on the other hand as
humans we should not be jeopardizing the life of animals by making them go through torture,
slaughtering them just to fill up our bellies; because for animals confined in factory farms food
has to be grown for them that the animals burn up that food’s energy which adds to the amount
of food available to us. When consuming an animal the consumer is also going to digest what it
was that the animal ate. Which is sometimes litter to ammonia droppings, and the way that
factory farms handle animals is horrifically unethical as farmers drag animals through pain and
suffering.
Raising animals for global meat consumption can most of the time lack of quality food
consumption for the animal to digest. As Singer mentions in The Ethics Of Eating “...Disease
was caused by feeding the cattle the brains and nerve tissue of sheep. People who naively
believed that cows ate grass discovered that beef cattle in feedlots may be anything from corn to
fishmeal, chicken litter (complete chicken droppings) and slaughterhouse waste”(1). The
majority of the time meat consumers have absolutely no idea what has been fed to the meat they
are eating. Even for the farmers that do grow food for animals, animals need and burn up
Alvarado 2
the energy from that food and human consumers end up with a very small fraction of the food
Meat is also known to be carcinogenic to humans. Full of parasites and leads to high risks
of diseases. Ray T. Pierrehumbert talks about in Meat Consumption, Health, and the
Environment “based mainly on evidence of links of colorectal cancer. LARC estimates that
34,000 deaths per year worldwide are attributable to diets high in processed meat, and if the
reported associations with red meat were proven to be casual, then diets high in red meat could
be responsible for 50,000 cancer deaths per year worldwide”(1). When consuming meat the
consumer is also eating away all the pain and suffering it has gone through. In the long run,
Newborn babies are separated from their mothers, made anemic and are kept in narrow stalls
they cannot even turn around in. Animals are not granted a minimally decent life, or even go
outdoors to see the day of light. Factory farms also are detrimental to the health of these animals
as the levels of harsh chemicals in the air such as ammonia stings and hurt the lungs of animals.
In The Ethics Of Eating Singer explains the suffering of animals by saying “Slaughtered at only
45 days old, their immature bones can hardly bear the weight of their bodies. Some collapse and
are unable to reach food or water, soon die… aggressive birds are likely to pick to death the
weaker hens in the cage. To prevent this, producers sear off all birds’ beaks with a hot blade. A
hen’s beak is full of nerve tissue… but no analgesic or anesthetic is used to relieve
Alvarado 3
pain”(1). No animal should go through that amount of unbearable pain just for the sake of filling
up our tummy.
Although it is true that there is a fast-growing demand for food and one cannot deny that
from a young age most humans have been taught that meat is necessary for our health, I argue
that consequently, the result will not only be animal suffering on an even greater scale, but
environmental damage and rise in diseases such as cancers and heart diseases will grow for in
humans.
Works Cited
Godfray, H. Charles J., et al. “Meat Consumption, Health, and the Environment.” Science,
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/361/6399/eaam5325.full.
Singer, Peter, et al. “The Ethics of Eating by Peter Singer.” ProjectSyndicate, 14 June 2006
https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-ethics-of-eating?barrier=accesspaylog