Você está na página 1de 200

 

CORRIGENDUM‐IX 
 
[Tender ID No. 2018_AAI_6628_2] 
                                                 Date: 14.03.2018 
 

Sub:  Construction  of  New  Integrated  Passenger  Terminal  Building  at  C.C.S.  International  Airport, 
Lucknow. 
Tender Reference No. AAI/CHQ/ENGG (C)/LKO/NITB 
 
1. Reference may please be made to Tender Document for the above said work uploaded through CPP 
e‐tendering  portal  (URL:  https://etenders.gov.in/  eprocure/app)  vide  Tender  Reference  no. 
AAI/CHQ/ENGG(C)/LKO/NITB and Tender ID No. 2018_AAI_6628_2 published on 13.03.2018. 
 

2. The Soil Investigation Report is enclosed for reference (Annexure‐A). 
 

3. Refer List of Approved makes for Civil Works:‐ 
 

 Expansion Joint Cover –MIGUA make is added 
 

4. Following changes are made in BOQ. 
 
    ITEM Sl No. – 931   
 
“Supply  &  installation  of  following  rated  KVA  solar  inverter  input  three  phase  (415  V  ±10%) 
output three phase (415 V ± 10%) with sealed maintenance free batteries suitable for 30 minutes 
backup including providing suitable size of 14 gauge MS battery rack suitably painted.    
5 KVA described as above”  
 
shall be read as 
 
“Supply, Installation, Testing and Commissioning of following rated high performance IGBT based 
fully  microprocessor  controlled  (three  phase  Input  &  three  phase  output)  online  UPS  system 
suitable  for  input  and  output  parameters  as  per  specifications.  The  UPS  shall  be  provided  in 
powder coated fan cooled enclosure. The UPS shall be suitable for normal, emergency, recharge, 
by‐pass  and  maintenance  mode  including  bypass  arrangement.  UPS  shall  have  sealed 
maintenance free batteries with 30 minute battery back‐up having high Performance. The system 
must be provided as per specifications approved drawing and as per site requirement including 
inter  connecting  cables   from  battery  to  UPS,  UPS  to  panel  with  single  core  copper  cabling  etc 
complete as required.   
5 KVA UPS described as above” 
 
5. Replies  to  the  queries  no  17  and  18  for  some  queries  (MEP,  HVAC  system,  Airport  System, 
Information Technology) are amended. (Annexure‐B) 
 

Other terms & conditions remain unchanged. 
 

Note: ‐ 
 

This corrigendum‐ IX containing 200 pages shall become part of the Tender Document. 
 

 
BID MANAGER 
(Abhijit Jagannath)  (S.K. Kapahi)  (S. K. Sagar)  (M. N. N. Rao) 
AM (Engg ‐C)  Asst. G. M. (Engg ‐C)  D.G.M (Engg ‐C)  GM (Engg ‐C) 
   
Approved 
 
 
(Kaushik Bhattacharjee) 
ED (Engg), NR 
R . LTD. SOIL AND Annexure-A

e FOUNDATIO
p
GeotechnicaloInvestigation For Construction of New
Terminal rBuilding at Lucknow Airport , Uttar
t Pardesh

b
Report No. : LKO_IN_G_GEN_TR_0001_1_GEO

:
C
E
N
G
R
S

G
E
O
T
E
C
H
N
I
C
A

P
V
T
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Topic Summary of Results

Project Name Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport

Location Lucknow (U.P.)

Scope of W ork Drilling twenty (20) boreholes to 30 m depth.

Depth, m Field SPT


Soil Description
From To N- values

8-15 to 2.0 m
Site Stratigraphy 0.0 13.5-22.5 Sandy silt /clayey silt 12-33 to 9.0 m
20-51 to 15 m

13.5-22.5 24.0-28.5 Silty fine sand


> 40
24.0-28.5 30.0 clayey silt

Groundwater Groundwater was not met to the maximum explored depth of 30 m (June, 2017).

Liquefaction
Susceptibility The soils at the site are not likely to liquefy in the event of a design earthquake.
Assessment
Isolated foundations / raft foundations may be sufficient to carry the structural loads of the
terminal building. For individual foundations / isolated footings, we suggest that a RCC
beam interconnecting the column foundations be provided to give rigidity to the structure
Foundation and to limit differential settlement. Alternatively, pile foundations may also be provided at
Recommendations the site.

Our recommended bearing pressures for foundations at 2.0-3.0 m depth are presented in
Section 5.6. Our recommended safe pile capacities are presented in Section 5.7.
Foundation Please refer to Section 6.0 of this report for general foundation construction considerations
Construction on excavation, foundation level preparation, pile construction, pile load tests and chemical
Considerations degradation due to presence of sulphates and chlorides in soil.

Project No. 217054 i


TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Project Description 1
1.2 Purposes of Geotechnical Study 1
1.3 Scope of Geotechnical Investigation 1

2.0 FIELD INVESTIGATIONS 2


2.1 Utility Pits 2
2.2 Exploratory Boreholes 2
2.3 Groundwater 3

3.0 LABORATORY TESTS 3

4.0 GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS 4


4.1 Regional Geology 4
4.2 Site Description 4
4.3 Site Stratigraphy 4
4.4 Groundwater 5

5.0 FOUNDATION ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5


5.1 General 5
5.2 Liquefaction Susceptibility Assessment 5
5.3 Foundation Type and Depth 5
5.4 Concepts for Analysis 6
5.4.1 Open Foundations 6
5.4.2 Pile Foundations 6
5.5 Design Soil Parameters 7
5.6 Recommended Net Allowable Bearing Pressure 8
5.7 Recommended Pile Capacities 9
5.8 Definition of Net and Gross Bearing Pressure 10

6.0 FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 10


6.1 Excavation 10
6.2 Foundation Level Preparation 10
6.3 Pile Construction 11
6.4 Pile Load Tests and Integrity Tests 11
6.5 Chemical Attack 11

7.1 VARIABILITY IN SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 12

Project No. 217054 ii


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd.

Caption Plate No.


Layout Plan 1
Satellite Image 2
Engineering Description of Soil 3
Uncertainty in Laboratory Measurements 4
Borehole Profiles 5 to 44
Summary of Borehole Profiles 45 & 46
Standard Penetration Test 47 to 54
Plasticity Chart 55
Grain Size Analysis 56 to 95
Shear Test Results 96 to 122
Chemical Test Results 123

Typical Calculations : Appendix-A

Site Photographs : Appendix-B

-------------------------------------------------------

DEFINITION OF ACRONYMS

EGL Existing Ground Level


NGL Natural Ground Level
RL Reduced Level
SPT Standard Penetration Test
ISO International Standards Organization
IEC International Electro-Chemical Commission
NABL National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories
NCEER National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research
BIS Bureau of Indian Standards
UUT Unconsolidated undrained triaxial shear test
ERT Electrical Resistivity Test

LIST OF REFERENCES

 Compendium of Indian Standard on Soil Engineering (Part-2, Field Testing of Soils for Civil
Engineering Purposes) SP36 (Part-2:1988) RA 2006

 Compendium of Indian Standard on Soil Engineering (Part-1, Laboratory Testing of Soils for Civil
Engineering Purposes) SP36 (Part-1:1987) RA 2006

Project No. 217054 iii


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd.

1.1 INTRODUCTION

1.2 Project Description

M/s. Airport Authority of India is expanding the Chaudhary Charan Singh International Airport at
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh. The airport is situated in Amausi, in Lucknow City. A new terminal building is
being planned as part of the expansion project. M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd. (Egis) is
the preparing the DPR for the project.

M/s. Cengrs Geotechnica Pvt. Ltd. has carried out the geotechnical investigation at the
proposed project site. A layout plan showing the borehole locations is illustrated on Plate 1.

1.3 Purposes of Geotechnical Study

The overall purposes of this study are to investigate the stratigraphy at the site and to develop
geotechnical recommendations for design and construction of the terminal building foundation.

To accomplish these purposes, the study was conducted in the following phases:

(a) drilling twenty (20) boreholes of 150 mm diameter to 30 m depth in order to determine site
stratigraphy and collecting disturbed and undisturbed soil samples for laboratory testing;

(b) recording borehole top levels with reference to nearby bench mark;

(c) testing selected soil samples in the laboratory to determine pertinent index and engineering
properties; and

(d) analyzing all field and laboratory data in order to develop engineering recommendations for
foundation design and construction.

1.4 Scope of Geotechnical Investigation

Details of the boreholes drilled at the project site are tabulated below:

UTM Coordinates, m Ground Level Termination


Test Designation
Easting Northing (RL), m depth, m
BH-1 487801 9660432 120.1 30.45
BH-2 487801 2960432 120.1 30.30
BH-3 488001 2960432 120.3 30.30
BH-4 488101 2960432 120.3 30.30
BH-5 488201 9660432 120.3 30.30
BH-6 488301 2960432 120.1 30.30
BH-7 487801 9660337 120.1 30.30
BH-8 487901 9660337 120.2 30.30
BH-9 488001 9660337 120.3 30.30
BH-10 488101 2960337 120.5 30.30
BH-13 488241 2960388 120.1 30.30
BH-14 488142 2960389 120.4 30.30

Project No. 217054 Page 1 of 12


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd.

UTM Coordinates, m Ground Level Termination


Test Designation
Easting Northing (RL), m depth, m
BH-15 488049 2960388 120.3 30.30
BH-16 487953 2960386 120.0 30.30
BH-17 487859 2960385 120.2 30.30
BH-18 487850 9660459 120.3 30.30
BH-19 487941 2960459 120.3 30.30
BH-20 488034 2960495 120.2 30.30
BH-21 488133 2960459 120.2 30.45
BH-22 488225 2960459 120.4 30.30

 BH-11 and 12 were cancelled at site since there were too many cables / utility lines in the
vicinity and suitable point could not be identified for drilling the boreholes.
 A layout plan showing the borehole locations is illustrated on Plate 1.
 GPS coordinates of the test locations were recorded on site using a hand-held GPS device.
A satellite image indicating the borehole locations is presented on Plate 2.
 The reduced levels were taken at site with respect to the benchmark CP-2 (RL 120.654 m)

2.1 FIELD INVESTIGATIONS

2.2 Utility Pits

Prior to drilling the boreholes, a small pit was excavated to about 1.5 m depth at BH-6 & 13
given by Egis representative on site to check for utilities. When utility line(s) was encountered at that
point, the location was shifted by 1-2 m in consultation with Egis representative on site and another pit
was excavated. After identifying suitable location that is free of utility lines, the borehole was drilled. At
BH-6, four utility pits were dug whereas at BH-13, one utility pit was required.

2.3 Exploratory Boreholes

The boreholes were progressed using a mechanized shell and auger drilling rig to the
specified depth. The diameter of the borehole was 150 mm. Where caving of the borehole occurred,
casing was used to keep the borehole stable. The work was in general accordance with IS: 1892-1979
RA 2002.

Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) was conducted in the boreholes at specified depths. The
test was conducted by connecting a split spoon sampler to ‘A’ rods and driving it by 45 cm using a 63.5
kg hammer falling freely from a height of 75 cm. The tests were conducted in accordance with IS:
2131-1981 RA 2002. The SPT ‘N’-values are described as follows:-

1. The number of blows for each 15 cm of penetration of the split spoon sampler is recorded.

2. The blows required to penetrate the initial 15 cm of the split spoon for seating the sampler is
ignored due to the possible presence of loose materials or cuttings from the drilling operation.

3. The cumulative number of blows required to penetrate the balance 30 cm of the 45 cm split
spoon sampler is termed the SPT value or the ‘N’ value. For example, a SPT value reported
as “20” means that 20 blows were imparted to penetrate the split spoon sampler by the last
30 cm.

Project No. 217054 Page 2 of 12


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd.

4. Where the number of blows required to penetrate the balance 30 cm of the split spoon sampler
exceeds 100, the number of blows is presented along with the corresponding penetration. For
example, an SPT value reported as “101/5 cm” means that 101 blows were imparted to
penetrate the split spoon sampler by 5 cm after the first 15 cm initial (seating) penetration.

5. Where refusal (N>100) to further penetration of the split spoon smpler is encountered in the
first 15 cm of seating penetration itself, SPT test could not be completed and "Ref" is indicated
in the bore logs, along with the penetration achieved. For example, an SPT value reported as
“Ref / 5 cm” means that more than 100 blows were imparted to penetrate the split spoon
sampler by a total of 5 cm only, and the 15 cm seating penetration could not be achieved.

Disturbed samples were collected from the split spoon after conducting SPT. Undisturbed soil
samples were collected by attaching 75 mm diameter thin walled ‘Shelby’ tubes and driving the
sampler by light-hammering using a 63.5 kg hammer in accordance with IS: 2132-1986 RA 2002. The
tubes were sealed with wax at both ends. Where undisturbed samples slipped from the thin wall tube
during sampling, disturbed samples were collected. All samples were transported to our NABL-
accredited laboratory at Noida for further examination and testing.

2.4 Groundwater

Groundwater level is measured in the boreholes after drilling and sampling is completed. The
measured water levels are recorded on the individual soil profiles.

3.0 LABORATORY TESTS

The laboratory testing was carried out in our NABL accredited laboratory. The quality procedures
in our laboratory conform to ISO/IEC-17025-2005.

Laboratory tests were conducted on selected soil samples to determine their physical and
engineering properties. The testing procedures are in accordance with current applicable IS
specifications.

The following tests were conducted on soil samples recovered from the boreholes:

Laboratory Test IS Code Referred


Bulk Density By calculations
Natural moisture content IS : 2720 (Part-2)-1973, RA-2010
Specific Gravity IS : 2720 (Part-3)-1980, RA-2007
Grain size analysis IS : 2720 (Part-4)-1985, RA-2010
Liquid Limit and Plastic Limit IS : 2720 (Part-5)-1985, RA-2010
Unconfined compression test IS : 2720 (Part-10)-1991, RA-2010
Unconsolidated undrained triaxial shear test IS : 2720 (Part-11)-1993, RA-2007
Consolidated drained direct shear test IS : 2720 (Part-13)-1986, RA-2010
pH value IS : 2720 (Part 26)-1987, RA-2007
Chemical Analysis
of soil* Sulphates IS : 2720 (Part-27)-1977, RA-2010
Chlorides IS : 3025 (Part-32)-1988, RA-2009
*Outside NABL Scope

Engineering terms used to describe soils are explained on Plate 3. A note on our NABL
accreditation together with the uncertainty in laboratory measurements is presented on Plate 4.

Project No. 217054 Page 3 of 12


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd.

4.1 GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS

4.2 Regional Geology


(1)
The soils at the project site belong to the “Indo Gangetic Alluvium” and are river deposits of
the River Ganga, Gomti, Sai and its tributaries Lucknow city is part of the Ganga basin with flat alluvial
terrain.. The Pleistocene and Recent Deposits of the Indo-Gangetic Basin are composed of gravels, silts
and clays with remains of animal and plants.

The area is covered with thick cover of Quaternary sediments overlying the basement of
Bundelkhand Granitoids and sedimentary rocks of the Vindhyan Supergroup. The sediments consist of
clay, silt and sand. The thickness of alluvium is estimated between 250 to 400 m deep.

The alluvial tract is of the nature of a synclinal basin formed concomitantly with the elevation of
the Himalayas to its north in the mid-Eocene period. It is a “fore-deep” formed in front of the resistant
mass of the Indian Peninsula when the Tethyan sediments were thrust southward and compressed by
them.

The Indo-Gangetic Basin formed in the later stages of the Himalayan Orogeny when the Indian
Penisular Shield under-thrust the Asian Subcontinent. The well consolidated crust of the shield became
engulfed under the light soft, moist sediments. As the northern drift of India continued, the older strata
slid downward. The basement in the project area is quite deep, probably more than 1000-4000 m below
the ground.

The older alluvium is rather dark coloured (locally called “Bhanger”) and is generally rich in
concretions of nodules of impure calcium carbonate (kankars). The kankars are of all shapes and sizes,
varying from small sand sized grains to big lumps. Carbonate cementation is evident in the Bhanger
alluvium at many places. The age of the “Bhanger” alluvium is Middle to Upper Pleistocene.

The newer alluvium (locally “Khadar”) is light coloured and poor in concretions. It contains
lenticular beds of sand and gravel as well as peat beds. It is merged by insensible gradations into the
Recent or deltaic alluvia and its age is Upper Pleistocene to Recent.

4.3 Site Description

The airport is situated in Amausi in Lucknow City and lies at Latitude 26°45'53.26"N and
Longitude 80°52'46.90"E. Gomti River flows about 12 km northeast of the site. The site is at the west
side of the existing terminal building. The existing apron adjoins the south side of the plot.

The site for the terminal building is fairly level. The ground level across the site varies from RL
120.0 m to 120.5 m.

4.3 Site Stratigraphy

The boreholes drilled on the paved area had fill (road material) to 0.7-1.5 m depth. The natural
soils at the site are alluvial in nature and belong to the Indo-Gagnetic alluvium. The natural soil at the
site consist of sandy silt / clayey silt to about 13.5-22.5 m depth (RL 97.6-106.8 m) underlain by silty fine
sand to 24.0-28.5 m (RL 91.6-96.1m). Below this, clayey silt is encountered to the final explored depth of
30.0 m (RL89.7 m).

(1)
Krishnan, M.S. (1986), “Geology of India & Burma”, CBS Publishers, New Delhi.

Project No. 217054 Page 4 of 12


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd.

The field SPT N values encountered at the site ranges from 8-15 to about 2.0 m depth with
some higher values. Below this, field SPT N-values range from 12 to 33 to about 9.0 m depth and from
20 to 51 to about 15 m depth. Below this, the field SPT N values generally exceed 40 to the final
explored depth of 30 m (RL 89.7 m).

Detailed description of the soils encountered at the locations is presented on the individual soil
profile on Plates 5 to 44. A pictorial summary of the borehole profiles is presented in Plate 45 & 46. Plots
of field and corrected SPT values are presented on Plates 47 to 54, respectively.

4.4 Groundwater

Based on our measurements in the completed boreholes, groundwater was not met to the final
explored depth of 30.0 m (RL 89.7 m) during the period of our field investigation (June, 2017).

5.1 FOUNDATION ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.2 General

A suitable foundation for any structure should have an adequate factor of safety against
exceeding the bearing capacity of the supporting soils. Also the vertical movements due to compression
of the soils should be within tolerable limits for the structure. We consider that foundation designed in
accordance with the recommendations given herein will satisfy these criteria.

5.3 Liquefaction Susceptibility Assessment

Liquefaction is defined as the transformation of a granular material from a solid to a liquefied


state as a consequence of increased pore-water pressure and reduced effective stress (Marcuson,
2
1978 ). Increased pore pressure may be induced by the tendency of granular materials to compact when
subjected to cyclic shear deformation, such as in the event of an earthquake.

As per IS: 1893 (Part 1) - 2016, liquefaction is likely in loose fine sand (SP) below the water
table.

 As discussed in Section 4.3, sandy silt /clayey silt is encountered at the site to about 13.5-22.5
m depth.

 Groundwater was not met to the final explored depth of 30.0 m during the period of our field
investigation (June, 2017)

On review of all soil parameters, soil type, fine contents and SPT values and groundwater
conditions, we are of the opinion that the soils at site are not likely to liquefy in the event of an
earthquake.

According to Fig.1 of IS: 1893 (Part-1)-2016 showing seismic zones, the project site falls under
Zone-III. The design for seismic forces should be done considering the project site in Zone-III.

5.4 Foundation Type and Depth

Isolated foundations / raft foundations may be sufficient to carry the structural loads of the
terminal building. For individual foundations / isolated footings, we suggest that a RCC beam
interconnecting the column foundations be provided to give rigidity to the structure and to limit
differential settlement. Alternatively, pile foundations may also be provided at the site.

(2)
Marcuson, W.F. (III) (1978), “Definition of terms related to liquefaction”, J. Geotech Engg. Div,, ASCE, 104(9), 1197-
1200.

Project No. 217054 Page 5 of 12


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd.

Our recommended bearing pressures for foundations at 2.0-3.0 m depth are presented in
Section 5.6. Our recommended safe pile capacities are presented in Section 5.7.

5.5 Concepts for Analysis

5.4.1 Open Foundations

Bearing capacity analysis for open foundations has been done in general accordance with IS:
6403-1981 RA 2002. The bearing capacity equation used is as follows:

qnet safe = 1 [cNcc dc+ q(Nq-1) qdq+ 0.5 BN d Rw]
F
where:

qnet safe = safe net bearing capacity of soil based on the shear failure criterion.
q = overburden pressure
Rw = water table correction factor
F = Factor of safety, taken as equal to 2.5
c,q, = Shape factors. For Strip footings, c = q =  = 1
For Square footing, c = 1.3, q = 1.2,  = 0.6
dc ,dq, d= Depth factors
For 10, dc = 1 + 0.2 tan (45 + / 2) D / B, dq = d= 1
For > 10, dq = d = 1 + 0.1 tan (45 + / 2) D / B

Appropriate values have been substituted into the bearing capacity equation given above to
compute the safe net bearing capacity. The values have been checked to determine the settlement of
the foundation under the safe bearing pressure. The allowable bearing pressure has been taken as the
lower of the two values computed from the bearing capacity shear failure criterion as well as that
computed from the tolerable settlement criterion.

Settlement analysis has been performed based on the SPT values in accordance with Clause
9.1.4 of IS 8009 (Part 1)-1976 RA 2003 Fig.9. The values have been cross-checked with settlement
computed by the classical theory as sum of the immediate settlement and consolidation settlement.
Since groundwater was not met to the final explored depth and soil at the site is generally stiff to hard in
consistency condition, consolidation settlement is not likely to occur and the same has been ignored for
the purpose of analysis.

The immediate settlement has been computed using the following equation [Clause 9.2.3 of IS
(3)
8009 Part 1-1976] .
where:
Si = immediate (elastic) settlement
B = foundation width, B’ = B/2
 = Poisson’s ratio
q = applied bearing pressure
E = modulus of elasticity
df = depth factor
dr = rigidity factor
I = influence factor at corner of rectangular loaded area (B’x L’)

5.4.2 Pile Foundations

The axial capacity for bored piles have been computed based on static analysis using c-values
as interpreted from the site stratigraphy, SPT values and laboratory test results.

(3)
Bowles, J.E. (1996), “Foundation Analysis and Design”, International Edition, pp. 303-317.

Project No. 217054 Page 6 of 12


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd.

The ultimate pile compressive capacity has been computed using the following equation as
given in IS 2911, Part-I, Sections-1 & 2: 2010.

n 
Qult  fsAsLi quAp
i 1 
 
 n ( αc p k tan δ )A L  cpNc qpNq  1 γDN γ Ap
i1 i i


i s i
2
where:

Qult = ultimate pile capacity


fs = unit skin friction
 = adhesion factor, calculated as per IRC: 78-2014
th
ci = cohesion intercept in i layer
th
pi = overburden pressure at centre of i layer
k = coefficient of lateral earth pressure
i = angle of friction between soil and pile (taken as equal to i) for the i layer
th

As = surface area of pile per m length


th
Li = length of pile section in i layer
cp = cohesion intercept in bearing strata
qu = unit end bearing
qp = overburden pressure in bearing strata
Nc,Nq = bearing capacity factors, which are a function of in the bearing strata
Ap = pile cross sectional area

A factor of safety of 2.5 has been used on the ultimate pile capacity as per IRC: 78-2014 in
order to obtain the safe pile capacities. The overburden pressure is assumed to become constant
below depth of 20 times pile diameters as per IRC: 78-2014.

The uplift / pullout resistance has been computed from the static formula for compression by
ignoring the end bearing component and applying a reduction factor of 0.70. Also, the effective weight of
the pile which acts against uplift is added to the skin friction component. A factor of safety of 2.5 has
been applied to the ultimate pile pullout resistance to obtain the safe pullout capacity (As per IRC: 78-
2014).

The lateral load carrying capacity of fixed head pile has been computed based on IS: 2911
(Part-I) Section-2 2010 using the following equation:

Q 12 y E I
(L1 Lf )
3

where:

Q = lateral load
E = the Young’s modulus of pile material, taken from IRC: 112-2011 (Table A4.2)
I = moment of inertia of pile cross section.
Lf = depth of fixity
L1 = length of pile section below cut-off-level that may not contribute significantly to lateral
resistance (in loose/weak soils)
y = horizontal deflection, corresponding to 1% of pile diameter as per IRC: 78-2014

5.5 Design Soil Parameters

The following table presents the soil parameters used for bearing capacity analysis:

Project No. 217054 Page 7 of 12


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd.

Foundation c, Bearing Capacity Factors


2 ° ’ ’ ’ Failure Criterion Used for Analysis
Depth, m T/m Nc Nq N ’ Nc Nq N 

Average of General and Local


2.0-3.0 8.0 5 6.49 1.57 0.45 5.99 1.35 0.27 Shear Failure Criteria

4.0 8.0 5 6.49 1.57 0.45 - - - General Shear Failure Criterion

Reviewing the soil characteristics, the following soil parameters have been selected for
foundation analysis and pile capacity calculations:

Depth below
3 2 2
EGL, m Soil Classification , T/m N c, T/m degrees E, T/m
From To
0.0 1.5 Fill/Natural soil 1.65 11 - - 600

1.5 6.0 Sandy silt /clayey silt 1.73 19 8.0 5 1000

6.0 14.0 Sandy silt /clayey silt 1.79 28 11.0 5 1300

14.0 21.0 Sandy silt /clayey silt 1.88 47 15.0 5 2100

21.0 25.5 Fine sand 1.93 57 0.0 31 2800

25.5 30.0 Clayey silt 2.00 57 23.0 6 2900

where:

 = bulk density
E = modulus of elasticity4

5.6 Recommended Net Allowable Bearing Pressure

The following table presents our recommended values of net bearing pressures for individual /
raft foundations bearing at 2-4 m depth (RL 116.0-118.0 m):

Recommended Net
Planned Founding Depth Suggested Modulus of Subgrade
Allowable Bearing 3
below EGL 2 Reaction (k), kN/m
Pressure, T/m
2.0 m
16.5 3300
(RL 118.0 m)
3.0 m
20.0 4100
(RL 117.0 m)
4.0 m
23.6 4700
(RL 116.0 m)

The following points are highlighted with regard to the above recommended bearing pressures:

(4)
estimated based on empirical correlations with SPT N-values

Project No. 217054 Page 8 of 12


Additional SBC for foundations bearing at 6-14 m depth.

Recommended Net Allowable Bearing Pressure, T /m 2 Corresponding Gross Allowable Bearing Pressure, T /m 2 Suggested
Modulus of
Foundation Depth T otal T otal T otal
Structure Foundation T ype T otal Settlement = T otal Settlement = T otal Settlement = Subgrade
below EGL, m
Settlement = 40 Settlement = 50 Settlement = 75 40 mm 50 mm 75 mm Reaction (k),
mm mm mm kN/m 3
6m
18.8 23.5 - 29.1 33.8 - 6700
(RL 114m)
Isolated Footings 8m
(B ≤ 3m) 21.2 26.5 - 37.6 42.9 - 8500
(RL 112m)
10 m
Double 22.4 28.0 - 42.4 48.0 - 9600
(RL 110m)
Basement 6m
19.2 24.0 36.0 29.5 34.3 46.3 6800
(RL 114m)
Raft Foundations 8m
22.0 27.5 41.3 38.4 43.9 57.7 8700
(B ≥6m) (RL 112m)
10 m
23.2 29.0 43.5 43.2 49.0 63.5 9800
(RL 110m)
12 m
23.2 29.0 - 46.8 52.6 - 10500
Isolated Footings (RL 108m)
(B ≤ 3m) 14 m
T riple 24.8 31.0 - 52.0 58.2 - 11600
(RL 106m)
Basement 12 m
23.6 29.5 44.3 47.2 53.1 67.8 10600
Raft Foundations (RL 108m)
(B ≥6m) 14 m
26.0 32.5 48.8 53.2 59.7 75.9 11900
(RL 106m)

Recommend the values of net and corresponding gross allowable bearing allowable bearing pressures for individual / raft
foundations bearing at 6-14 m depth:
Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd.

1. The above value includes a bearing capacity safety factor of 2.5 and corresponds to a
permissible settlement of 50 mm.

2. Net bearing pressures for foundations at intermediate depths may be interpolated linearly
between the values given above.

3. For individual foundations a beam interconnecting the columns should be provided at plinth level
to limit the differential settlement.

4. In order to restrict the influence of adjacent footings on each other, the lateral edge-to-edge
spacing between the foundations should at least be equal to “0.8B” where ”B” is the width of the
larger footing. In case this criterion cannot be satisfied, combined footings/ strip footings or raft
foundations may be provided.

5. The suggested modulus of sub grade reaction (k) has been estimated as the ratio of the
computed gross bearing pressure and corresponding total settlement, and is applicable at the
5
centre of the loaded area .

5.7 Recommended Pile Capacities

Our recommended pile capacities for 500 mm & 600 mm diameter bored cast in-situ piles with
cut off level at 1.5 m are given below:

Safe Pile Capacities, Tonnes


Pile Diameter Length below COL
Compression Pullout Lateral*
14 55 17
500 mm 16 64 23 9.5
18 73 29
14 71 22
600 mm 16 82 29 13.7
18 93 37
14 105 31
800 mm 16 123 42 24.3
18 140 52
*Lateral capacity corresponds to a deflection of 1% diameter of the pile and is applicable at COL for fixed head condition.

The following points are highlighted with regard to the above recommended capacities:

1. The above values are based on IS: 2911(Part-1): Section- 2, RA-2010 subjected to the
stipulations given in IRC:78-2014 Clause 709.3 and Appendix 5 with a factor of safety equal to
2.5 in compression and a safety factor 2.5 under uplift.

2. Compression and pull-out capacities for piles of intermediate lengths may be linearly
interpolated between the values given above.

3. It should be ensured that the bottom of the pile bore is cleaned properly before casting the pile.
This is important because the sand particles tend to settle down at the bottom of the pile bore,
which can cause reduction in the actual pile capacities achieved on site.

5
Bowles, J.E. (1996), "Foundation Analysis and Design Fifth Edition", The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc., pp. 503

Project No. 217054 Page 9 of 12


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd.

4. The capacities given above may be taken as a guideline for initial design. Final pile capacities
should be confirmed by conducting initial pile load tests as per IS: 2911-Part-IV (2010). Also,
routine load tests should be conducted on sufficient working piles to ensure that the piles are
safe for the design loads.

5. We recommend that a quality assurance plan be developed to ensure that the actual pile
capacities and quality are within acceptable limits. This may include low strain pile integrity
tests, high strain dynamic load tests, cross-hole logging, etc.

5.8 Definition of Net and Gross Bearing Pressure

For the purposes of this report, the net allowable bearing pressure should be calculated as the
difference between total load on the foundation and the weight of the soil overlying the foundation
divided by the effective area of the foundation. The gross bearing pressure is the total pressure at the
foundation level including overburden pressure and surcharge load.

The following equations may be used –

qnet = [(Ps + Wf +Ws) / Af] - Sv


qgross = qnet + Sv = (Ps + Wf + Ws) / Af
where:
qnet = net allowable bearing pressure
qgross = gross bearing pressure
Ps = superimposed static load on foundation
Wf = weight of foundation
Ws = weight of soil overlying foundation
Af = effective area of foundation
Sv = overburden pressure at foundation level prior to excavation for foundation.

It may please be noted that safe bearing pressures recommended in this report refer to “net
values”. Where filling is done, it should be treated as a surcharge over the foundation. The advantage
of this gross bearing pressure may be taken while designing the basement and other underground
structures.

6.1 FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS

6.2 Excavation

Temporary excavations for foundation construction to about 1.5-2.5 m depth may be cut nearly
vertical (side slopes of 1 vertical on 0.1-0.2 horizontal). Such excavations slopes are expected to remain
stable except during rains. The engineer should monitor the slopes to ensure stability. If excessive
sloughing or caving occurs, the slopes may be flattened further to ensure stability.

6.3 Foundation Level Preparation

The area shall be excavated up to the foundation level. All loose soils should be removed and
the exposed foundation bearing surface should be watered and compacted properly using rammers /
rollers.

In case mechanical means like excavators are deployed for excavations, the excavations should
be carried out up to 0.5 m below the proposed level. The last 0.5 m depth of excavation should be
carried out manually, so that the founding soils are not disturbed / loosened.

The surface should be protected from disturbances due to construction activities so that the
foundations may bear on the natural undisturbed ground. W e recommend the placement of a 75 to 100
mm thick “blinding layer” of lean concrete to facilitate placement of reinforcing steel and to protect the
soils from disturbance.

Project No. 217054 Page 10 of 12


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd.

6.4 Pile Construction

For construction of piles, properly mixed drilling mud should be used to control the caving of the
borehole during drilling and concreting. The concrete used for the pile construction use of tremie
concreting is recommended so as to ensure that the groundwater does not mix with the fresh concrete.
3
It should be coherent, with a minimum cement content of 400 kg/m . It should have a slump of about 150
to 200 mm.

The piling activity should ensure minimum disturbance to the soil around the pile shaft. The pile
boring activity should not cause suction effect as this may tend to loosen the soils and reduce pile
capacity. The piling works should be executed by a specialist agency with sufficient experience in such
works.

6.5 Pile Load Tests and Integrity Tests

We recommend that load tests be conducted on piles in order to confirm the static capacities
and to ensure proper performance of the piles. A program of initial pile load tests and routine pile load
tests should be drawn up and sufficient number of piles should be tested in accordance with IS: 2911
(Part-IV)- 2013 in order to ensure that the safe load on the pile is either equal to or greater than the
working load on the piles.

In addition to static pile load tests, we recommend that high strain dynamic pile load tests
6
(HSDLT) (preferably using 8-channel PDA equipment) be carried out on some of the test
piles/production piles to quickly assess the safe pile capacity and pile integrity. HSDLT can effectively
supplement static load test and may result in substantial savings in the time and cost of foundation
testing. The results of the dynamic load tests should be compared with static load test results for
developing a site-specific correlation.
(7)
The production piles should be subject to low-strain pile integrity testing (PIT) to determine if
any unusual conditions, necking / bulging or voids in the shaft wall exist that could result in lower pile
capacity.

6.6 Chemical Attack

Results of chemical test on selected soil samples and water sample are presented on Plate 123.

The results indicate that the soils contain 0.07-0.09 percent sulphates and 0.005-0.01 percent
chlorides. The pH value of soil is 7.8-8.4.

IS: 456-2000 recommends that precautions should be taken against chemical degradation of
concrete if

 sulphates content of the soils exceeds 0.2 percent, or

 groundwater contains more than 300 mg /litre of sulphates (SO3).

Comparing the test results with these specified limits, the sulphate content of soil is less than the
specified limit and groundwater was not met. Therefore, the strata at the site may be treated in Class-1
category as described on IS: 456-2000.

6)
ASTM D4945 - 08 Standard Test Method for High-Strain Dynamic Testing of Piles
(7)
Sanjay Gupta, Ravi Sundaram and Sorabh Gupta (2008), “Pile Integrity Testing for Monitoring Pile Construction”,
Proceedings, National Symposium on Geoenvironment, Geohazards, Geosynthetics and Ground Improvement-
Experiences and Practices (4G) Indian Geotechnical Society (Delhi Chapter) pp 173-178.

Project No. 217054 Page 11 of 12


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd.

We recommend the following measures as a good practice to limit the potential for chemical
attack:
3
(1) Concrete for open foundations should contain at least 280 kg/m of cement. Ordinary Portland
cement may be used for concrete.

(2) Water cement ratio in foundation concrete should not exceed 0.55.

(3) A clear concrete cover over the reinforcement steel of at least 50 mm should be provided for all
foundations.

(4) Foundation concrete should be densified adequately, using a vibrator so as to form a dense
impervious mass.

7.0 VARIABILITY IN SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS

Subsurface conditions encountered during construction may vary somewhat from the conditions
encountered during the site investigation. In case significant variations are encountered during
construction, we request to be notified so that our engineers may review the recommendations in this
report in light of these variations.

Project No. 217054 Page 12 of 12


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

BH-18 BH-19 BH-20 BH-21 BH-22

BH-1 BH-2 BH-3 BH-4 BH-5 BH-6

BH-17 BH-16 BH-15 BH-14 BH-13

BH-7 BH-8 BH-9 BH-10

LEGEND
SYMBOL TYPE OF TEST

Borehole (BH)

Plan of Field Investigations

Project No. 217054 Plate 1 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow
Airport M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

®
 Satellite image taken from Google Earth
®
 Test Locations marked as per GPS coordinates taken on site using hand-held Garmin device
 Accuracy of hand-held GPS device generally ranges from 4-6m, and varies depending on the availability of satellite connection at the site
Satellite Image of Site and Test Locations

Project No. 217054 Plate 2 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Plasticity of Clay Plasticity Chart

Plasticity Liquid Limit

Low Plastic < 35

Medium Plastic 35 to 50

High Plastic > 50

Consistency of Cohesive Soils Density Condition of Granular Soils

Cohesion Static Cone Tip


SPT (N) Density SPT (N)
Consistency Intercept, Resistance
Value Descriptor Value
kg/sq.cm kg/sq.cm

Very Soft < 0.1 0 to 2


Very Loose 0 to 4 < 20
Soft 0.1 to 0.25 2 to 4
Loose 4 to 10 20 to 40
Firm/Medium 0.25 to 0.5 4 to 8
Medium Dense 10 to 30 40 to 120
Stiff 0.5 to 1.0 8 to 15
Dense 30 to 50 120 to 200
Very Stiff 1.0 to 2.0 15 to 30
Very dense > 50 > 200
Hard > 2.0 > 30

Degree of Expansion of Fine Grained Soils

Free Swell Degree of


Liquid Limit Plasticity Index Shrinkage Index Degree of Severity
Percent Expansion

20 - 35 < 12 < 15 < 50 Low Non-critical

35 - 50 12 - 23 15 -30 50 -100 Medium Marginal

50 - 70 23 - 32 30 - 60 100 - 200 High Critical

70 - 90 > 32 > 60 > 200 Very High Severe

Engineering Description of Soils

Project No. 217054 Plate 3 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

NABL Accredited Laboratory

Our laboratory is accredited to National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories
(NABL), New Delhi. The quality procedures in our laboratory conform to the International Standard ISO/IEC:
17025-2005.

The accreditation assures our clients of work quality in conformance with international norms and practices. It
authorizes us to use the NABL logo on test results.

To maintain the necessary level of quality and reliability in all measurements on a continual basis, we indulge in
the following:

 Use of calibrated equipment, regular maintenance and good housekeeping are a part of our work
culture.

 Inter-laboratory comparison, proficiency testing and replicate testing, continuing education - ensure
uniform quality of results.

 Internal Audit of quality procedures is done by our qualified ISO 17025 auditors to maintain the
requisite standards. NABL conducts external audit.

Uncertainty
Every measurement entails an uncertainty. It is well known that no measuring instrument can determine the
true value of any measurement. The cumulative effect of factors such as sensitivity of equipment, accuracy in
calibration, human factors and environmental conditions will determine the overall uncertainty in the parameter
determined from these measurements.
As a part of our commitment to our clients, we have worked out the uncertainty in the parameters reported by
our laboratory. Although this does not form a part of our contract agreement, we present below our statistical
estimate of uncertainty of various parameters based on our most recent evaluation (February, 2016).

Test / Parameter Uncertainty* Test / Parameter Uncertainty*

Moisture Content ± 0.29% Free Swell Index, % ± 2.6%

2
Bulk & Dry Density ± 0.01 g/cc Swell Pressure ± 0.43 kg/cm

Specific Gravity ± 0.01 Pressure ± 0.03 kg/cm


2
Consolidation
Liquid Limit Void Ratio ±0.01
± 0.29%
Plastic Limit Density Index (relative
density) of cohesionless soils ±5%
Shrinkage Limit ± 0.61%
Unconfined 2 CD Direct Shear
c ± 0.054 kg/cm  ± 0.29 degrees
Compression Test
c ± 0.01 kg/cm
2
UU Triaxial Test Soil Gradation ± 0.5% of particle size
 ± 0.48 degree

MDD ± 0.14 g/cc Coefficient of Permeability -5


± 2.7 x 10 cm/s
Std/Mod Proctor
Compaction
Crushing 3.1
OMC ± 0.29% 2
Strength kg/cm
Rock
Point Load 8.89
Laboratory CBR ± 0.58% 2
Strength Index kg/cm
* at 95 percent confidence level for coverage factor of 2

Uncertainty in Laboratory Measurements

Project No. 217054 Plate 4 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-1)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.95 m (RL 89.1 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 487801 E, 2960432 N Ground Water Depth : Not met Casing Depth : 27.0 m

Surface Elevation : RL 120.093 m Boring Start : 11-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : m Boring Finish : 12-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

Very stiff to hard brown clayey silt,


0.00 0.75 DS1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
medium plastic (CI)

0.75 1.20 SPT1 17 17 - very stiff, 0.0 to 10.5 m 1 5 77 17 41.6 16.8 24.8 #N/A #N/A 2.67 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

1.50 1.80 UDS1 #N/A - with traces of gravel, 1.5 to 2.0 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.75 1.51 15.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

2.25 2.70 SPT2 25 25 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 35.2 21.8 13.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

3.00 3.30 UDS2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.75 1.57 11.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

4.50 4.95 SPT3 27 27 - with gravel, 4.5 to 6.0 m 5 1 78 16 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

6.00 6.30 UDS3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.78 1.55 14.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

7.50 7.95 SPT4 25 25 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 42.6 24.4 18.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

9.00 9.30 UDS4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.79 1.54 16.3 #N/A UC #N/A 1.2 #N/A

10.50 10.95 SPT5 41 41 - hard, 10.5 to 13.5 m 0 0 88 12 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

12.00 12.30 UDS5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.87 1.61 16.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

13.50 13.95 SPT6 27 27 - very stiff, 13.5 to 15.0 m 15.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 36.9 23.3 13.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 5 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-1)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.95 m (RL 89.1 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 487801 E, 2960432 N Ground Water Depth : Not met Casing Depth : 27.0 m

Surface Elevation : RL 120.093 m Boring Start : 11-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : m Boring Finish : 12-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

15.00 15.30 UDS6 #N/A Hard brown sandy silt, low plastic (CL) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.89 1.65 14.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

16.50 16.95 SPT7 56 36 18.00 0 18 73 9 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Very dense grey silty fine sand with
18.00 18.30 UDS7 #N/A 9 46 40 5 ### #N/A 1.93 1.74 10.8 #N/A DS 1 ,2, 3 0.0 32.1
gravel (SM)

19.50 19.95 SPT8 58 34 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

21.00 21.30 UDS8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.91 1.75 8.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

22.50 22.95 SPT9 63 34 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

24.00 24.30 UDS9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.93 1.73 11.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

25.50 25.95 SPT10 65 32 27.00 7 68 23 2 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Hard brown clayey silt, medium plastic
27.00 27.30 UDS10 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.95 1.67 16.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(CI)

28.50 28.95 SPT11 65 65 - with traces of gravel, 28.5 to 30.0 m 1 5 75 19 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

30.00 30.95 UDS11 #N/A 30.95 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.99 1.70 16.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 6 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-2)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 89.8 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 487901 E, 2960432 N Ground Water Depth : Not met Casing Depth : 27.0 m

Survey Coordinates : 487901 E, 2960432 N Surface Elevation : RL 120.05 m Boring Start : 16-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 17-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

Hard brown clayey silt, medium plastic


0.00 0.75 DS1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(CI)

0.75 1.20 SPT1 44 44 - with gravel, 0.7 to 2.5 m 20 5 65 10 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

1.50 1.80 UDS1 #N/A 2.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.71 1.46 16.5 2.67 UU 1 ,2, 3 1.6 8.7

2.25 2.70 SPT2 36 47 Hard brown sandy silt, low plastic (CL) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 28.0 19.9 8.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

3.00 3.30 UDS2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.75 1.57 11.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

4.50 4.95 SPT3 38 41 0 43 51 6 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

6.00 6.30 UDS3 #N/A 7.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.77 1.58 12.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Very stiff brown clayey silt, medium
7.50 7.95 SPT4 24 22 0 1 72 27 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
plastic (CI)

9.00 9.30 UDS4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.81 1.54 17.1 #N/A UC #N/A 1.3 #N/A

10.50 10.95 SPT5 27 27 12.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 35.0 23.7 11.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

12.00 12.30 UDS5 #N/A Hard brown sandy silt, low plastic (CL) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.82 1.58 15.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

13.50 13.95 SPT6 56 40 15.00 0 32 62 6 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 7 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-2)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 89.8 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 487901 E, 2960432 N Ground Water Depth : Not met Casing Depth : 27.0 m

Survey Coordinates : 487901 E, 2960432 N Surface Elevation : RL 120.05 m Boring Start : 16-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 17-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

15.00 15.30 UDS6 #N/A Very dense grey silty fine sand (SM) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.87 1.65 13.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

16.00 16.95 SPT7 61 40 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

18.00 18.30 UDS7 #N/A 0 85 15 0 ### #N/A 1.91 1.66 15.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

19.50 19.95 SPT8 62 36 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

21.00 21.30 UDS8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.91 1.68 13.3 #N/A DS 1 ,2, 3 0.0 32.6

22.50 22.95 SPT9 66 35 0 84 16 0 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

24.00 24.30 UDS9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.97 1.71 15.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

25.50 25.95 SPT10 69 34 27.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

27.00 27.30 UDS10 #N/A Hard brown sandy silt, low plastic (CL) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 23.9 16.4 7.5 1.98 1.70 17.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

28.50 28.95 SPT11 49 23 - with gravel, 28.5 to 30.0 m 14 13 60 13 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

30.00 30.30 UDS11 #N/A 30.30 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 2.01 1.69 19.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 8 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-3)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 90 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 488001 E, 2960432 N Ground Water Depth : Not met Casing Depth : 27.0 m

Survey Coordinates : Surface Elevation : RL 120.27 m Boring Start : 19-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 20-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

Very stiff to hard brown clayey silt,


0.00 0.75 DS1 #N/A 5 8 76 11 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
medium plastic (CI)

0.75 1.20 SPT1 13 13 - stiff, 0.0 to 2.2 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

1.50 1.80 UDS1 #N/A - with gravel, 0.0 to 1.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 35.7 22.8 12.8 1.70 1.50 13.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

2.25 2.70 SPT2 16 16 - very stiff, 2.2 to 7.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

3.00 3.30 UDS2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.76 1.53 15.1 2.69 UU 1 ,2, 3 0.9 6.7

4.50 4.95 SPT3 22 22 - with traces of gravel, 4.5 to 6.0 m 3 12 72 13 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

6.00 6.30 UDS3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.79 1.56 14.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

7.50 7.95 SPT4 32 32 - hard, 7.5 to 13.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 35.9 20.8 15.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

9.00 9.30 UDS4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.81 1.57 15.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

10.50 10.95 SPT5 34 34 0 2 78 20 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

12.00 12.30 UDS5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.82 1.59 14.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

13.50 13.95 SPT6 43 43 15.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 36.5 15.7 20.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 9 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-3)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 90 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 488001 E, 2960432 N Ground Water Depth : Not met Casing Depth : 27.0 m

Survey Coordinates : Surface Elevation : RL 120.27 m Boring Start : 19-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 20-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

Very stiff brown sandy silt, low plastic


15.00 15.30 UDS6 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.86 1.63 13.6 #N/A UC #N/A 2.3 #N/A
(CL)

16.50 16.95 SPT7 51 33 0 16 75 9 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

18.00 18.30 UDS7 #N/A 19.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.91 1.71 12.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

19.50 19.95 SPT8 58 34 Very dense brown silty fine sand (SM) 0 82 18 0 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

21.00 21.30 DS2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

22.50 22.95 SPT9 64 34 24.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Hard brown sandy silt with traces of
24.00 24.30 UDS8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 34.4 16.2 18.3 1.95 1.70 15.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
gravel, low plastic (CL)

25.50 25.95 SPT10 52 26 3 9 79 9 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

27.00 27.30 UDS9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.97 1.67 17.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

28.50 28.95 SPT11 51 23 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 33.5 20.7 12.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

30.00 30.30 UDS10 #N/A 30.30 2 33 61 4 ### #N/A 2.03 1.72 17.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 10 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-4)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 90 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 488101 E, 2960432 N Ground Water Depth : Not met Casing Depth : 26.0 m

Survey Coordinates : 488101 E, 2960432 N Surface Elevation : RL 120.258 m Boring Start : 07-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 07-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

0.00 0.75 DS1 #N/A Fill : Road material 1.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Stiff to hard brown clayey silt, medium
1.50 1.95 SPT1 8 8 2 7 76 15 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
plastic (CI)
- stiff, 1.5 to 2.2 m
2.25 2.70 SPT2 32 32 3.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
- hard, 2.2 to 3.0 m
Hard to very stiff brown sandy silt, low
3.00 3.30 UDS1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.72 1.56 10.3 #N/A DS 0.5 ,1, 1.5 0.0 31.9
plastic (CL)

4.50 4.95 SPT3 34 36 - hard, 3.0 to 7.5 m 0 42 52 6 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A 2.61 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

6.00 6.30 UDS2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 32.6 22.3 10.3 1.75 1.54 13.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

7.50 7.95 SPT4 27 24 - very stiff, 7.5 to 10.5 m 9.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Hard brown clayey silt, medium plastic
9.00 9.30 UDS3 #N/A 3 4 82 11 ### #N/A 1.80 1.57 14.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(CI)

10.50 10.95 SPT5 38 38 - with traces of gravel, 9.0 to 10.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

12.00 12.30 UDS4 #N/A 13.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 36.7 21.4 15.3 1.86 1.61 15.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

13.50 13.95 SPT6 41 29 Dense grey silty fine sand (SM) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

15.00 15.30 UDS5 #N/A 0 61 36 3 ### #N/A 1.89 1.67 12.8 #N/A DS 0.5 ,1, 1.5 0.0 32.0

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 11 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-4)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 90 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 488101 E, 2960432 N Ground Water Depth : Not met Casing Depth : 26.0 m

Survey Coordinates : 488101 E, 2960432 N Surface Elevation : RL 120.258 m Boring Start : 07-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 07-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

Dense to very dense grey silty fine sand


16.50 16.95 SPT7 46 30 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(SM)

18.00 18.30 UDS6 #N/A - dense, 16.5 tp 19.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.90 1.65 15.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

19.50 19.95 SPT8 51 30 - very dense, 18.0 to 22.5 m 0 75 23 2 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

21.00 21.30 UDS7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.89 1.72 9.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

22.50 22.95 SPT9 17 9 - medium dense, 22.5 to 25.0 m 3 82 15 0 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

24.00 24.30 UDS8 #N/A - with traces of gravel, 22.5 to 28.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.95 1.75 11.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

25.50 25.95 SPT10 48 24 - dense, 25.5 to 28.5 m 2 81 17 0 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

27.00 27.30 UDS9 #N/A 28.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 2.00 1.76 13.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Hard brown clayey silt, medium plastic
28.50 28.95 SPT11 49 49 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 35.5 21.8 13.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(CI)

30.00 30.30 UDS10 #N/A 30.30 0 1 90 9 ### #N/A 2.01 1.74 15.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 12 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-5)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 90 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 488201 E, 2960432 N Ground Water Depth : Not met Casing Depth : 26.0 m

Survey Coordinates : 488201 E, 2960432 N Surface Elevation : RL 120.302 m Boring Start : 08-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 09-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

0.00 0.75 DS1 #N/A Fill : Road material 0.75 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Stiff brown clayey silt, medium plastic
0.75 1.20 SPT1 13 13 0 5 66 29 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(CI)

1.50 1.80 UDS1 #N/A 2.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.73 1.50 15.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Stiff to very stiff brown sandy silt, low
2.25 2.70 SPT2 12 16 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 32.1 19.1 13.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
plastic (CL)

3.00 3.30 UDS2 #N/A - stiff, 2.2 to 4.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.72 1.49 15.3 #N/A UU 1 ,2, 3 0.6 5.5

4.50 4.95 SPT3 24 26 - very stiff, 4.5 to 6.0 m 6.00 0 46 48 6 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Hard brown clayey silt, medium plastic
6.00 6.30 UDS3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 42.3 23.2 19.1 1.77 1.54 14.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(CI)

7.50 7.95 SPT4 31 31 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A 2.66 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

9.00 9.30 UDS4 #N/A - with traces of gravel, 9.0 to 10.5 m 1 0 81 18 ### #N/A 1.77 1.54 15.5 #N/A UC #N/A 1.4 #N/A

10.50 10.95 SPT5 35 35 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

12.00 12.30 UDS5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.82 1.61 13.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

13.50 13.95 SPT6 37 37 15.00 0 2 66 32 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 13 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-5)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 90 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 488201 E, 2960432 N Ground Water Depth : Not met Casing Depth : 26.0 m

Survey Coordinates : 488201 E, 2960432 N Surface Elevation : RL 120.302 m Boring Start : 08-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 09-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

Dense to very dense grey silty fine sand


15.00 15.30 UDS6 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.85 1.65 12.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(SM)

16.50 16.95 SPT7 39 25 - dense, 15.0 to 22.5 m 0 57 36 7 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

18.00 18.30 UDS7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.87 1.70 10.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

19.50 19.95 SPT8 45 26 0 63 32 5 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

21.00 21.30 UDS8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.94 1.76 10.2 #N/A DS 1 ,2, 3 0.0 35.8

22.50 22.95 SPT9 61 33 - very dense, 22.5 to 30.3 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

24.00 24.30 DS2 #N/A 0 70 26 4 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

25.50 25.95 SPT10 65 32 27.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Very dense grey fine sand with gravel
27.00 27.30 DS3 #N/A 9 81 10 0 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(SP-SM)

28.50 28.95 SPT11 67 31 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

30.00 30.30 UDS9 #N/A 30.30 14 77 9 0 ### #N/A 2.00 1.75 14.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 14 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-6)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 89.8 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 488301 E, 2960432 N Ground Water Depth : Not met Casing Depth : 26.0 m

Survey Coordinates : 488301 E, 2960432 N Surface Elevation : RL 120.079 m Boring Start : 03-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 06-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

Very stiff brown clayey silt, medium


0.00 0.75 DS1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
plastic (CI)

1.50 1.95 SPT1 15 15 - with gravel, 0.0 to 1.5 m 5 6 64 25 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

2.25 2.70 SPT2 18 18 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 37.1 22.7 14.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

3.00 3.30 UDS1 #N/A 4.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.73 1.52 13.8 #N/A UC #N/A 0.8 #N/A
Very stiff to hard brown sandy silt, low
4.50 4.95 SPT3 27 29 0 18 73 9 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
plastic (CL)

6.00 6.30 UDS2 #N/A - very stiff, 4.5 to 13.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 33.3 20.3 13.0 1.74 1.52 14.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

7.50 7.95 SPT4 26 24 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

9.00 9.30 UDS3 #N/A - with gravel, 9.0 to 10.5 m 9 8 76 7 ### #N/A 1.78 1.55 15.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

10.50 10.95 SPT5 17 14 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

12.00 12.30 UDS4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.85 1.63 13.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

13.50 13.95 SPT6 36 26 - hard, 13.5 to 16.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

15.00 15.30 UDS5 #N/A 16.50 0 23 71 6 ### #N/A 1.87 1.63 14.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 15 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-6)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 89.8 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 488301 E, 2960432 N Ground Water Depth : Not met Casing Depth : 26.0 m

Survey Coordinates : 488301 E, 2960432 N Surface Elevation : RL 120.079 m Boring Start : 03-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 06-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

Dense to medium dense grey silty fine


16.50 16.95 SPT7 41 26 0 74 24 2 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
sand (SM)

18.00 18.30 UDS6 #N/A - dense, 16.5 to 19.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.88 1.68 12.0 #N/A DS 1 ,2, 3 0.0 31.9

19.50 19.95 SPT8 29 17 - medium dense, 19.5 to 21.0 m 21.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

21.00 21.30 DS2 #N/A Very dense grey fiine sand (SP-SM) 0 92 8 0 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

22.50 22.95 SPT9 65 35 24.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Hard brown clayey silt, medium plastic
24.00 24.30 UDS7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 38.9 20.4 18.5 1.93 1.65 17.1 2.68 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(CI)

25.50 25.95 SPT10 72 72 0 7 57 36 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

27.00 27.30 UDS8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.99 1.70 17.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

28.50 28.95 SPT11 52 52 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 39.3 23.6 15.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

30.00 30.30 UDS9 #N/A 30.30 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.94 1.70 14.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 16 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-7)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 89.8 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 487801 E, 2960337 N Ground Water Depth : Not met Casing Depth : 27.0 m

Survey Coordinates : 487801 E, 2960337 N Surface Elevation : RL 120.059 m Boring Start : 11-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 12-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

Very stiff to hard brown sandy silt, low


0.00 0.75 DS1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
plastic (CL)

0.75 1.20 SPT1 27 45 - very stiff, 0.0 to 4.5 m 1 17 68 14 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

1.50 1.80 UDS1 #N/A - with traces of gravel, 0.7 to 3.0 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.70 1.51 12.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

2.25 2.70 SPT2 26 34 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 30.2 22.5 7.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

3.00 3.30 UDS2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.72 1.51 14.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

4.50 4.95 SPT3 31 33 - hard, 4.5 to 7.5 m 0 16 76 8 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

6.00 6.30 UDS3 #N/A 7.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.75 1.52 14.8 #N/A UU 1 ,2, 3 1.3 3.3
Hard to very stiff brown clayey silt,
7.50 7.95 SPT4 33 33 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 44.7 24.7 19.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
medium plastic (CI)

9.00 9.30 UDS4 #N/A - hard, 7.5 to 10.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.79 1.55 15.8 2.68 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

10.50 10.95 SPT5 24 24 - very stiff, 10.5 to 15.0 m 0 0 70 30 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

12.00 12.30 UDS5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.85 1.61 14.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

13.50 13.95 SPT6 22 22 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 44.0 25.8 18.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 17 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-7)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 89.8 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 487801 E, 2960337 N Ground Water Depth : Not met Casing Depth : 27.0 m

Survey Coordinates : 487801 E, 2960337 N Surface Elevation : RL 120.059 m Boring Start : 11-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 12-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

Very stiff to hard brown clayey silt,


15.00 15.30 UDS6 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.84 1.58 16.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
medium plastic (CI)

16.50 16.95 SPT7 17 17 - very stiff, 15.0 to 19.5 m 3 1 73 23 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

18.00 18.30 UDS7 #N/A - with traces of gravel, 16.5 to 18.0 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.91 1.66 14.7 #N/A UC #N/A 1.8 #N/A

19.50 19.95 SPT8 53 53 - hard, 19.5 to 22.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 36.7 18.5 18.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

21.00 21.30 UDS8 #N/A 22.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.94 1.73 11.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

22.50 22.95 SPT9 60 32 Very dense grey fine sand (SP-SM) 0 90 10 0 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

24.00 24.30 DS2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

25.50 25.95 SPT10 64 31 27.00 0 89 11 0 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Hard bown clayey silt, medium plastic
27.00 27.30 UDS9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 35.6 19.1 16.5 1.98 1.72 15.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(CI)

28.50 28.95 SPT11 63 63 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

30.00 30.30 UDS10 #N/A 30.30 0 12 64 24 ### #N/A 1.99 1.71 16.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 18 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-8)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 89.9 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 487901 E, 2960337 N Ground Water Depth : Not met Casing Depth : 27.0 m

Survey Coordinates : 487901 E, 2960337 N Surface Elevation : RL 120.178 m Boring Start : 12-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 13-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

Very stiff brown clayey silt, medium


0.00 0.75 DS1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
plastic (CI)

0.75 1.20 SPT1 24 24 0 6 80 14 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

1.50 1.80 UDS1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.72 1.50 14.9 #N/A UC #N/A 0.9 #N/A

2.25 2.70 SPT2 25 25 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 36.7 22.8 13.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

3.00 3.30 UDS2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.74 1.53 13.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

4.50 4.95 SPT3 27 27 0 6 78 16 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

6.00 6.30 UDS3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.73 1.52 13.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

7.50 7.95 SPT4 17 17 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 36.9 21.9 15.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

9.00 9.30 UDS4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.77 1.56 13.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

10.50 10.95 SPT5 21 21 - with gravel, 10.5 to 12.0 m 9 4 65 22 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

12.00 12.30 UDS5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.84 1.57 17.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

13.50 13.95 SPT6 27 27 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 36.4 23.3 13.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 19 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-8)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 89.9 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 487901 E, 2960337 N Ground Water Depth : Not met Casing Depth : 27.0 m

Survey Coordinates : 487901 E, 2960337 N Surface Elevation : RL 120.178 m Boring Start : 12-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 13-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

Very stiff brown clayey silt, medium


15.00 15.30 UDS6 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.87 1.60 17.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
plastic (CI)

16.50 16.95 SPT7 30 30 0 1 74 25 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

18.00 18.30 UDS7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.90 1.61 17.6 #N/A UC #N/A 1.2 #N/A

19.50 19.95 SPT8 27 27 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 39.7 25.0 14.6 #N/A #N/A 2.68 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

21.00 21.30 UDS8 #N/A 22.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.93 1.75 10.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

22.50 22.95 SPT9 48 26 Dense grey silty fine sand (SM) 0 87 13 0 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

24.00 24.30 UDS9 #N/A 25.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.92 1.66 15.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Hard brown clayey silt, medium plastic
25.50 25.95 SPT10 36 36 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 36.2 19.8 16.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(CI)

27.00 27.30 UDS10 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.96 1.66 18.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

28.50 28.95 SPT11 40 40 0 3 80 17 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

30.00 30.30 UDS11 #N/A 30.30 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 2.00 1.70 17.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 20 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-9)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 90 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 488001 E, 2960337 N Ground Water Depth : Not met Casing Depth : 27.0 m

Survey Coordinates : 488001 E, 2960337 N Surface Elevation : RL 120.28 m Boring Start : 15-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 17-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

0.00 0.95 DS1 #N/A Stiff brown sandy silt, low plastic (CL) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

0.75 1.20 SPT1 12 20 - with traces of gravel, 0.7 to 2.2 m 2 10 80 8 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

1.50 1.80 UDS1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.73 1.55 11.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

2.25 2.70 SPT2 15 19 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 29.7 21.3 8.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

3.00 3.30 UDS2 #N/A 4.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.75 1.54 13.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Very stiff brown clayey silt, medium
4.50 4.95 SPT3 18 18 0 3 74 23 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
plastic (CI)

6.00 6.30 UDS3 #N/A 7.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.78 1.97 -9.8 #N/A UU 1 ,2, 3 0.9 6.3
Very stiff brown sandy silt, low plastic
7.50 7.95 SPT4 19 19 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 30.1 21.4 8.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(CL)

9.00 9.30 UDS4 #N/A 10.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.79 1.53 17.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Very stiff brown clayey silt, medium
10.50 10.95 SPT5 21 21 0 3 76 21 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
plastic (CI)

12.00 12.30 UDS5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.84 1.63 12.9 2.68 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

13.50 13.95 SPT6 28 28 15.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 36.7 22.9 13.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 21 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-9)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 90 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 488001 E, 2960337 N Ground Water Depth : Not met Casing Depth : 27.0 m

Survey Coordinates : 488001 E, 2960337 N Surface Elevation : RL 120.28 m Boring Start : 15-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 17-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

Dense to very dense grey silty fine sand


15.00 15.30 UDS6 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.90 1.68 13.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(SM)

16.50 16.95 SPT7 32 21 - dense, 15.0 to 25.5 m 0 55 41 4 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

18.00 18.30 UDS7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.91 1.66 14.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

19.50 19.95 SPT8 34 20 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

21.00 21.30 UDS8 #N/A 0 85 15 0 ### #N/A 1.93 1.70 13.8 #N/A DS 1 ,2, 3 0.0 32.7

22.50 22.95 SPT9 49 26 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

24.00 24.30 UDS9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.94 1.69 15.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

25.50 25.95 SPT10 58 29 - very dense, 25.5 to 27.0 m 27.00 0 84 16 0 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Hard brown clayey silt, medium plastic
27.00 27.30 UDS10 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 36.4 17.3 19.1 1.99 1.73 14.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(CI)

28.50 28.95 SPT11 49 49 - with gravel, 28.5 to 30.0 m 6 5 72 17 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

30.00 30.30 UDS11 #N/A 30.30 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 37.9 23.7 14.1 2.04 1.77 15.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 22 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-10)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 90.2 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 488101 E, 2960337 N Ground Water Depth : Not met Casing Depth : 27.0 m

Survey Coordinates : 488101 E, 2960337 N Surface Elevation : RL 120.50 m Boring Start : 17-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 18-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

Stiff to very stiff brown sandy silt, low


0.00 0.75 DS1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
plastic (CL)

0.75 1.20 SPT1 10 17 - stiff, 0.0 to 4.5 m 0 13 75 12 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

1.50 1.80 UDS1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.72 1.50 14.4 #N/A UU 1 ,2, 3 1.7 8.3

2.25 2.70 SPT2 12 16 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 32.0 20.8 11.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

3.00 3.30 UDS2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.74 1.53 13.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

4.50 4.95 SPT3 22 24 - very stiff, 4.5 to 10.5 m 4 19 70 7 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

6.00 6.30 UDS3 #N/A - with traces of gravel, 6.0 to 7.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.76 1.54 14.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

7.50 7.95 SPT4 27 24 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 29.9 22.3 7.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

9.00 9.30 UDS4 #N/A 10.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.80 1.57 14.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Hard brown clayey silt, medium plastic
10.50 10.95 SPT5 31 31 1 1 77 21 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(CI)

12.00 12.30 UDS5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.84 1.63 13.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

13.50 13.95 SPT6 40 40 15.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 37.5 22.9 14.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 23 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-10)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 90.2 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 488101 E, 2960337 N Ground Water Depth : Not met Casing Depth : 27.0 m

Survey Coordinates : 488101 E, 2960337 N Surface Elevation : RL 120.50 m Boring Start : 17-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 18-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

15.00 15.30 UDS6 #N/A Hard brown sandy silt, low plastic (CL) 0 43 51 6 ### #N/A 1.85 1.61 15.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

16.50 16.95 SPT7 44 28 18.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Dense to very dense grey fine sand (SP-
18.00 18.30 UDS7 #N/A 0 88 12 0 ### #N/A 1.90 1.66 15.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
SM)

19.50 19.95 SPT8 48 28 - dense, 18.0 to 22.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

21.00 21.30 UDS8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.93 1.71 12.6 #N/A DS 1 ,2, 3 0.0 34.5

22.50 22.95 SPT9 52 28 - very dense, 22.5 to 27.0 m 0 91 9 0 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

24.00 24.30 UDS9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.99 1.74 14.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

25.50 25.95 SPT10 56 28 27.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A 2.62 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Hard brown clayey silt with gravel,
27.00 27.30 UDS10 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 37.3 15.8 21.5 1.97 1.68 17.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
medium plastic (CI)

28.50 28.95 SPT11 49 49 30.00 7 4 81 8 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

30.00 30.30 UDS11 #N/A Hard brown sandy silt, low plastic (CL) 30.30 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 32.6 13.6 19.0 2.03 1.71 18.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 24 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-13)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 89.8 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 488241.17 E, 2960388.14 N Ground Water Depth : Not Met Casing Depth : 27.5 m

Survey Coordinates : Surface Elevation : RL 120.11 m Boring Start : 22-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 23-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

Very stiff brown clayey silt, medium


0.00 0.75 DS1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
plastic (CI)

1.50 1.80 UDS1 #N/A 0 7 84 9 ### #N/A 1.75 1.54 13.2 #N/A UC #N/A 1.3 #N/A

2.25 2.70 SPT1 27 27 3.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 43.3 23.8 19.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

3.00 3.30 UDS2 #N/A Hard brown sandy silt, low plastic (CL) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 31.1 20.8 10.3 1.74 1.52 14.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

4.50 4.95 SPT2 30 32 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

6.00 6.30 UDS3 #N/A 7.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 32.8 23.0 9.8 1.75 1.52 15.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Hard brown clayey silt with traces of
7.50 7.95 SPT3 33 33 0 13 63 24 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A 2.66 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
gravel, medium plastic (CI)

9.00 9.30 UDS4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.79 1.57 13.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

10.50 10.95 SPT4 44 44 1 2 74 23 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

12.00 12.30 UDS5 #N/A 13.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 37.5 24.3 13.2 1.82 1.57 15.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

13.50 13.95 SPT5 51 36 Hard brown sandy silt, low plastic (CL) 0 35 57 8 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

15.00 15.30 UDS6 #N/A 16.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.87 1.65 13.5 #N/A DS 0.5 ,1, 1.5 0.0 34.7

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 25 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-13)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 89.8 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 488241.17 E, 2960388.14 N Ground Water Depth : Not Met Casing Depth : 27.5 m

Survey Coordinates : Surface Elevation : RL 120.11 m Boring Start : 22-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 23-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

16.50 16.95 SPT6 53 34 Very dense grey silty fine sand (SM) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

18.00 18.30 UDS7 #N/A 0 81 19 0 ### #N/A 1.89 1.66 13.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

19.50 19.95 SPT7 57 33 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

21.00 21.30 DS2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

22.50 22.95 SPT8 63 34 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

24.00 24.30 DS3 #N/A 0 87 13 0 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

25.50 25.95 SPT9 68 33 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

27.00 27.30 DS4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

28.50 28.95 SPT10 75 35 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

30.00 30.30 DS5 #N/A 30.30 0 86 14 0 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 26 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-14)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 90.1 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 488142.17 E, 2960389.1 N Ground Water Depth : Not Met Casing Depth : 26.0 m

Survey Coordinates : 488142.17 E, 2960389.1 N Surface Elevation : RL 120.360 m Boring Start : 05-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 06-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

0.00 0.75 DS1 #N/A Fill : Road material 1.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Stiff brown clayey silt, medium plastic
1.50 1.95 SPT1 12 12 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 42.2 23.8 18.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(CI)

2.25 2.70 SPT2 13 13 - with traces of gravel, 2.2 to 4.5 1 3 69 27 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

3.00 3.30 UDS1 #N/A 4.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.76 1.53 14.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Very stiff brown sandy silt, low plastic
4.50 4.95 SPT3 19 20 0 34 59 7 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A 2.64 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(CL)

6.00 6.30 UDS2 #N/A 7.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.77 1.54 15.0 #N/A UU 1 ,2, 3 0.9 11.0
Very stiff brown clayey silt, medium
7.50 7.95 SPT4 29 29 0 5 84 11 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
plastic (CI)

9.00 9.30 UDS3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 35.5 22.2 13.3 1.79 1.55 15.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

10.50 10.95 SPT5 25 25 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

12.00 12.30 UDS4 #N/A 13.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.84 1.59 15.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

13.50 13.95 SPT6 49 35 Dense grey silty fine sand (SM) 0 55 41 4 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

15.00 15.30 UDS5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.86 1.68 10.9 #N/A DS 0.5 ,1, 1.5 0.0 35.2

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 27 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-14)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 90.1 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 488142.17 E, 2960389.1 N Ground Water Depth : Not Met Casing Depth : 26.0 m

Survey Coordinates : 488142.17 E, 2960389.1 N Surface Elevation : RL 120.360 m Boring Start : 05-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 06-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

Very dense to dense grey silty fine sand


16.50 16.95 SPT7 55 35 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(SM)

18.00 18.30 DS2 #N/A - very dense, 16.5 to 19.5 m 4 75 21 0 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

19.50 19.95 SPT8 45 26 - dense, 19.5 to 22.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

21.00 21.30 UDS6 #N/A - with traces of gravel, 18.0 to 19.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.90 1.70 11.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

22.50 22.95 SPT9 52 28 - very dense, 22.5 to 27.0 m 0 80 20 0 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

24.00 24.30 DS3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

25.50 25.95 SPT10 59 29 27.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Hard brown clayey silt, medium plastic
27.00 27.30 UDS7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 42.7 26.1 16.6 1.94 1.68 15.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(CI)

28.50 28.95 SPT11 43 43 0 7 73 20 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

30.00 30.30 UDS8 #N/A 30.30 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.97 1.71 14.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 28 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-15)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 90 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 488049.17 E, 2960387.82 N Ground Water Depth : Not Met Casing Depth : 27.0 m

Survey Coordinates : 488049.17 E, 2960387.82 N Surface Elevation : RL 120.32 m Boring Start : 13-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 15-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

Stiff to very stiff brown clayey silt,


0.00 0.75 DS1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
medium plastic (CI)

0.75 1.20 SPT1 13 13 - stiff, 0.0 to 2.2 m 3 7 81 9 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

1.50 1.80 UDS1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.72 1.50 14.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

2.25 2.70 SPT2 19 19 - very stiff, 2.2 to 4.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

3.00 3.30 UDS2 #N/A 4.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 37.8 24.0 13.8 1.75 1.57 11.2 #N/A UC #N/A 0.9 #N/A
Very stiff to hard brown sandy silt, low
4.50 4.95 SPT3 20 21 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
plastic (CL)

6.00 6.30 UDS3 #N/A - very stiff, 4.5 to 10.5 m 13 13 42 32 ### #N/A 1.76 1.52 15.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

7.50 7.95 SPT4 24 22 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

9.00 9.30 UDS4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.77 1.54 14.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

10.50 10.95 SPT5 39 31 - hard, 10.5 to 15.0 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

12.00 12.30 UDS5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 31.9 20.8 11.2 1.80 1.58 13.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

13.50 13.95 SPT6 46 33 15.00 0 47 51 2 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 29 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-15)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 90 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 488049.17 E, 2960387.82 N Ground Water Depth : Not Met Casing Depth : 27.0 m

Survey Coordinates : 488049.17 E, 2960387.82 N Surface Elevation : RL 120.32 m Boring Start : 13-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 15-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

15.00 15.30 UDS6 #N/A Very dense grey silty fine sand (SM) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.86 1.64 13.7 2.64 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

16.50 16.95 SPT7 52 33 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

18.00 18.30 UDS7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.93 1.73 11.4 #N/A DS 1 ,2, 3 0.0 32.8

19.50 19.95 SPT8 52 30 0 66 27 7 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

21.00 21.30 DS2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

22.50 22.95 SPT9 51 27 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

24.00 24.30 DS3 #N/A 0 78 22 0 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

25.50 25.95 SPT10 55 27 27.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Hard brown clayey silt, medium plastic
27.00 27.30 UDS8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 36.8 15.7 21.1 2.00 1.73 15.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(CI)

28.50 28.95 SPT11 50 50 0 8 72 20 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

30.00 30.30 UDS9 #N/A 30.30 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 39.6 21.0 18.6 2.05 1.74 17.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 30 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-16)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 89.7 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 487953.17 E, 2960386.24 N Ground Water Depth : Not Met Casing Depth : 27.0 m

Survey Coordinates : 487953.17 E, 2960386.24 N Surface Elevation : RL 120.03 m Boring Start : 15-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 17-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

Very stiff to hard brown sandy silt, low


0.00 0.75 DS1 #N/A 0 15 74 11 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
plastic (CL)

0.75 1.20 SPT1 16 26 - very stiff, 0.0 to 2.2 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 33.2 23.4 9.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

1.50 1.80 UDS1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.70 1.45 16.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

2.25 2.70 SPT2 14 18 - stiff, 2.2 to 4.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

3.00 3.30 UDS2 #N/A - with traces of gravel, 3.0 to 4.5 m 3 20 65 12 ### #N/A 1.73 1.53 13.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

4.50 4.95 SPT3 18 19 - very stiff, 4.5 to 13.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

6.00 6.30 UDS3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 31.9 21.4 10.4 1.80 1.56 15.1 #N/A UC #N/A 2.0 #N/A

7.50 7.95 SPT4 27 24 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

9.00 9.30 UDS4 #N/A 0 26 59 15 ### #N/A 1.80 1.59 12.6 2.69 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

10.50 10.95 SPT5 27 21 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

12.00 12.30 UDS5 #N/A - hard, 13.5 to 15.0 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 30.0 21.9 8.1 1.82 1.60 13.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

13.50 13.95 SPT6 39 28 15.00 0 13 79 8 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 31 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-16)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 89.7 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 487953.17 E, 2960386.24 N Ground Water Depth : Not Met Casing Depth : 27.0 m

Survey Coordinates : 487953.17 E, 2960386.24 N Surface Elevation : RL 120.03 m Boring Start : 15-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 17-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

Dense to very dense grey silty fine sand


15.00 15.30 UDS6 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.87 1.68 11.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(SM)

16.50 16.95 SPT7 42 27 - dense, 15.0 to 19.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

18.00 18.30 UDS7 #N/A 0 84 16 0 ### #N/A 1.89 1.66 13.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

19.50 19.95 SPT8 51 30 - very dense, 19.5 to 28.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

21.00 21.30 UDS8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.93 1.71 13.0 #N/A DS 1 ,2, 3 0.0 33.1

22.50 22.95 SPT9 55 29 0 75 25 0 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

24.00 24.30 UDS9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.96 1.72 13.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

25.50 25.95 SPT10 46 23 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

27.00 27.30 UDS10 #N/A 28.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 2.00 1.67 19.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Hard bown clayey silt with gravel,
28.50 28.95 SPT11 49 49 10 18 51 21 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
medium plastic (CI)

30.00 30.30 UDS11 #N/A 30.30 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 35.3 20.9 14.4 2.03 1.74 17.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 32 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-17)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 89.9 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 487859.17 E, 2960385.04 N Ground Water Depth : Not Met Casing Depth : 27.0 m

Survey Coordinates : 487859.17 E, 2960385.04 N Surface Elevation : RL 120.23 m Boring Start : 14-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 15-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

0.00 0.75 DS1 #N/A v Fill : Road material #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

0.75 1.20 SPT1 65 108 1.20 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Very stiff brown sandy silt, low plastic
1.50 1.80 UDS1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.71 1.51 13.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(CL)

2.25 2.70 SPT2 26 34 - with traces of gravel, 2.2 to 3.0 m 2 11 79 8 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

3.00 3.30 UDS2 #N/A 4.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.72 1.55 11.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Very stiff to hard brown clayey silt,
4.50 4.95 SPT3 24 24 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 37.9 24.5 13.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
medium plastic (CI)

6.00 6.30 UDS3 #N/A - very stiff, 4.5 to 10.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.78 1.55 14.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

7.50 7.95 SPT4 26 26 0 1 78 21 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

9.00 9.30 UDS4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.78 1.56 14.4 #N/A UC #N/A 2.0 #N/A

10.50 10.95 SPT5 32 32 - hard, 10.5 to 15.0 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 45.3 26.6 18.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

12.00 12.30 UDS5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.86 1.60 15.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

13.50 13.95 SPT6 34 34 - with traces of gravel, 13.5 to 15.0 m 15.00 3 5 70 22 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 33 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-17)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 89.9 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 487859.17 E, 2960385.04 N Ground Water Depth : Not Met Casing Depth : 27.0 m

Survey Coordinates : 487859.17 E, 2960385.04 N Surface Elevation : RL 120.23 m Boring Start : 14-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 15-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

15.00 15.30 UDS6 #N/A Hard brown sandy silt, low plastic (CL) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.89 1.67 12.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

16.50 16.95 SPT7 57 37 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 29.7 21.4 8.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

18.00 18.30 UDS7 #N/A 19.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.91 1.69 13.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

19.50 19.95 SPT8 61 36 Very dense brown silty fine sand (SM) 0 65 28 7 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

21.00 21.30 UDS8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.92 1.70 13.1 #N/A DS 1 ,2, 3 0.0 34.6

22.50 22.95 SPT9 64 34 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

24.00 24.30 UDS9 #N/A 0 68 29 3 ### #N/A 1.98 1.73 14.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

25.50 25.95 SPT10 67 33 27.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Hard brown clayey silt with traces of
27.00 27.30 UDS10 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 36.0 20.8 15.2 2.01 1.73 16.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
gravel, medium plastic (CI)

28.50 28.95 SPT11 31 31 3 13 62 22 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A 2.67 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

30.00 30.30 UDS11 #N/A 30.30 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 36.7 17.5 19.2 2.04 1.69 20.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 34 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-18)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 90 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 487850.17 E, 2960459.14 N Ground Water Depth : Not Met Casing Depth : 27.0 m

Surface Elevation : RL 120.255 m Boring Start : 13-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 14-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

0.00 0.75 DS1 #N/A Stiff brown sandy silt, low plastic (CL) 1 38 56 5 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

0.75 1.20 SPT1 11 18 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 31.4 17.6 13.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

1.50 1.80 UDS1 #N/A 2.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.72 1.49 15.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Very stiff brown clayey silt, medium
2.25 2.70 SPT2 16 16 0 5 76 19 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
plastic (CI)

3.00 3.30 UDS2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.72 1.56 10.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

4.50 4.95 SPT3 19 19 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 35.2 23.4 11.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

6.00 6.30 UDS3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.75 1.52 14.8 #N/A UC #N/A 1.0 #N/A

7.50 7.95 SPT4 19 19 0 1 71 28 43.7 26.3 17.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

9.00 9.50 UDS4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.77 1.54 15.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

10.50 10.95 SPT5 21 21 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

12.00 12.30 UDS5 #N/A 13.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.85 1.61 14.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

13.50 13.95 SPT6 40 28 Hard brown sandy silt, low plastic (CL) 0 11 83 6 33.3 20.3 13.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 35 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-18)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 90 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 487850.17 E, 2960459.14 N Ground Water Depth : Not Met Casing Depth : 27.0 m

Surface Elevation : RL 120.255 m Boring Start : 13-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 14-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

15.00 15.30 UDS6 #N/A Hard brown sandy silt, low plastic (CL) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.86 1.61 15.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

16.50 16.95 SPT7 46 30 18.00 0 16 77 7 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A 2.60 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

18.00 18.30 UDS7 #N/A Very dense grey silty fine sand (SM) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.87 1.67 11.9 #N/A DS 1 ,2, 3 0.0 34.1

19.50 19.95 SPT8 51 30 3 63 31 3 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

21.00 21.30 UDS8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.97 1.75 12.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

22.50 22.95 SPT9 57 31 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

24.00 24.30 DS2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

25.50 25.95 SPT10 63 31 27.00 0 66 31 3 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Hard brown clayey silt, medium plastic
27.00 27.30 UDS9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.97 1.72 14.2 #N/A UC #N/A 2.5 #N/A
(CI)

28.50 28.95 SPT11 42 42 0 7 67 26 36.0 19.7 16.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

30.00 30.30 UDS10 #N/A 30.30 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.97 1.68 17.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 36 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-19)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 90 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 487941.17 E, 2960459.14 N Ground Water Depth : Not Met Casing Depth : 27.0 m

Survey Coordinates : Surface Elevation : RL 120.34 m Boring Start : 18-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 19-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

Stiff brown clayey silt, medium plastic


0.00 0.75 DS1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(CI)

0.75 1.20 SPT1 8 8 0 6 79 15 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

1.50 1.80 UDS1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.70 1.49 14.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

2.25 2.70 SPT2 12 12 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 36.0 21.7 14.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

3.00 3.30 UDS2 #N/A 4.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.74 1.50 15.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

4.50 4.95 SPT3 12 13 Medium dense grey silty fine sand (SM) 6.00 0 65 28 7 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Stiff to very stiff brown clayey silt,
6.00 6.30 UDS3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 36.5 21.8 14.7 1.81 1.63 11.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
medium plastic (CI)

7.50 7.95 SPT4 13 13 - stiff, 6.0 to 10.5 m 8 9 60 23 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

9.00 9.30 UDS4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.79 1.55 15.8 #N/A UC #N/A 0.8 #N/A

10.50 10.95 SPT5 15 15 - very stiff, 10.5 to 15.0 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 37.2 22.9 14.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

12.00 12.30 UDS5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.81 1.56 16.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

13.50 13.95 SPT6 16 16 15.00 0 8 65 27 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 37 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-19)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 90 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 487941.17 E, 2960459.14 N Ground Water Depth : Not Met Casing Depth : 27.0 m

Survey Coordinates : Surface Elevation : RL 120.34 m Boring Start : 18-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 19-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

15.00 15.30 UDS6 #N/A Hard brown sandy silt, low plastic (CL) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 28.3 20.3 8.0 1.88 1.63 15.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

16.50 16.95 SPT7 33 21 18.00 0 38 56 6 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

18.00 18.30 UDS7 #N/A Very dense grey silty fine sand (SM) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.92 1.64 16.8 2.65 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

19.50 19.95 SPT8 55 32 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

21.00 21.30 UDS8 #N/A 0 78 22 0 ### #N/A 1.90 1.66 15.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

22.50 22.95 SPT9 58 31 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

24.00 24.30 UDS9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 2.00 1.76 14.0 #N/A DS 1 ,2, 3 0.0 33.6

25.50 25.95 SPT10 60 30 27.00 0 84 16 0 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Hard brown clayey silt, medium plastic
27.00 27.30 UDS10 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 37.3 23.1 14.2 2.03 1.72 18.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(CI)

28.50 28.95 SPT11 46 46 0 9 78 13 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

30.00 30.30 DS2 #N/A 30.30 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 38 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-20)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 89.9 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 488034.17 E, 2960495.14 N Ground Water Depth : Not Met Casing Depth : 27.0 m

Survey Coordinates : Surface Elevation : RL 120.21 m Boring Start : 18-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 20-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

Stiff brown clayey silt, medium plastic


0.00 0.75 DS1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(CI)

0.75 1.20 SPT1 10 10 0 7 82 11 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

1.50 1.80 UDS1 #N/A 2.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.70 1.47 15.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

2.25 2.70 SPT2 13 17 Stiff brown sandy silt, low plastic (CL) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 28.5 20.8 7.6 #N/A #N/A 2.68 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

3.00 3.30 UDS2 #N/A 4.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.72 1.49 15.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

4.50 4.95 SPT3 23 25 Medium dense grey silty fine sand (SM) 7 47 46 0 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

6.00 6.30 UDS3 #N/A - with gravel, 6.0 to 7.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.76 1.56 12.2 #N/A DS 0.5 ,1, 1.5 0.0 31.4

7.50 7.95 SPT4 30 27 9.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Very stiff brown clayey silt, medium
9.00 9.30 UDS4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 35.8 21.4 14.4 1.81 1.55 16.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
plastic (CI)

10.50 10.95 SPT5 26 26 5 9 58 28 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

12.00 12.30 UDS5 #N/A - with gravel, 10.5 to 12.0 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.87 1.62 15.4 #N/A UU 1 ,2, 3 1.2 10.3

13.50 13.95 SPT6 28 28 15.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 39 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-20)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 89.9 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 488034.17 E, 2960495.14 N Ground Water Depth : Not Met Casing Depth : 27.0 m

Survey Coordinates : Surface Elevation : RL 120.21 m Boring Start : 18-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 20-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

15.00 15.30 UDS6 #N/A Hard brown sandy silt, low plastic (CL) 0 8 79 13 ### #N/A 1.86 1.60 16.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

16.50 16.95 SPT7 33 21 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

18.00 18.30 UDS7 #N/A 19.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 32.0 23.2 8.9 1.92 1.66 15.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

19.50 19.95 SPT8 64 37 Very dense grey silty fine sand (SM) 0 81 19 0 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

21.00 21.30 UDS8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.94 1.70 14.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

22.50 22.95 SPT9 70 37 0 87 13 0 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

24.00 24.30 UDS9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.98 1.72 15.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

25.50 25.95 SPT10 69 34 27.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Hard brown clayey silt, medium plastic
27.00 27.30 UDS10 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 36.9 22.9 14.0 1.96 1.64 19.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(CI)

28.50 28.95 SPT11 46 46 0 9 72 19 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

30.00 30.30 UDS11 #N/A 30.30 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 2.05 1.72 19.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 40 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-21)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.45 m (RL 89.8 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 488133.17 E, 2960459.14 N Ground Water Depth : Not Met Casing Depth : 26.0 m

Surface Elevation : RL 120.237 m Boring Start : 07-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 07-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

0.00 0.75 DS1 #N/A Fill : Road material 1.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Stiff to very stiff brown clayey silt,
1.50 1.95 SPT1 10 10 1 9 60 30 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
medium plastic (CI)

2.25 2.70 SPT2 12 12 - stiff, 1.5 to 7.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

3.00 3.30 UDS1 #N/A - with traces of gravel, 1.5 to 3.0 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 35.8 21.6 14.2 1.71 1.50 14.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

4.50 4.95 SPT3 12 12 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

6.00 6.30 UDS2 #N/A - with gravel, 6.0 to 7.5 m 8 5 79 8 ### #N/A 1.76 1.56 12.9 #N/A UU 1 ,2, 3 0.9 9.4

7.50 7.95 SPT4 23 23 - very stiff, 7.5 to 10.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 35.6 23.8 11.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

9.00 9.30 UDS3 #N/A 10.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.85 1.63 13.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Very stiff to hard brown sandy silt, low
10.50 10.95 SPT5 20 16 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 31.3 20.7 10.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
plastic (CL)
- very stiff, 10.5 to 13.5 m
12.00 12.30 UDS4 #N/A 3 28 53 16 ### #N/A 1.82 1.55 17.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
- with traces of gravel, 12.0 to 13.5 m

13.50 13.95 SPT6 34 24 - hard, 13.5 to 16.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

15.00 15.30 UDS5 #N/A 16.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 31.9 20.1 11.8 1.85 1.66 11.4 #N/A DS 0.5 ,1, 1.5 0.0 31.1

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 41 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-21)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.45 m (RL 89.8 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 488133.17 E, 2960459.14 N Ground Water Depth : Not Met Casing Depth : 26.0 m

Surface Elevation : RL 120.237 m Boring Start : 07-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 07-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

Dense to very dense grey silty fine sand


16.50 16.95 SPT7 45 29 0 72 20 8 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(SM)

18.00 18.30 UDS6 #N/A - dense, 16.5 to 19.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.91 1.73 10.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

19.50 19.95 SPT8 79 46 - very dense, 19.5 to 28.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

21.00 21.30 UDS7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.91 1.69 13.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

22.50 22.95 SPT9 69 37 0 82 18 0 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

24.00 24.30 UDS8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.89 1.68 12.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

25.50 25.95 SPT10 72 35 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

27.00 27.30 UDS9 #N/A 28.50 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.98 1.71 15.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Hard brown clayey silt with gravel,
28.50 28.95 SPT11 68 68 10 11 56 23 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A 2.69 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
medium plastic (CI)

30.00 30.45 UDS10 #N/A 30.45 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 35.6 19.0 16.6 1.99 1.69 17.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 42 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-22)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 90.1 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 488225.17 E, 2960459.14 N Ground Water Depth : Not Met Casing Depth : 26.0 m

Surface Elevation : RL 120.354 m Boring Start : 08-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 09-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

0.00 0.75 DS1 #N/A Fill : Road material 0.75 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Stiff to very stiff brown sandy silt, low
0.75 1.20 SPT1 9 15 0 14 80 6 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
plastic (CL)

1.50 1.80 UDS1 #N/A - stiff, 0.7 to 4.5 m #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.78 1.54 15.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

2.25 2.70 SPT2 12 16 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 32.5 19.6 12.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

3.00 3.30 UDS2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.70 1.51 12.1 #N/A UC #N/A 0.9 #N/A

4.50 4.95 SPT3 24 26 - very stiff, 4.5 to 9.0 m 0 13 77 10 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

6.00 6.30 UDS3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.77 1.56 13.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

7.50 7.95 SPT4 27 24 9.00 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Hard brown clayey silt, medium plastic
9.00 9.30 UDS4 #N/A 0 5 74 21 ### #N/A 1.78 1.56 14.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
(CI)

10.50 10.95 SPT5 39 39 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 43.1 24.1 19.0 #N/A #N/A 2.68 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

12.00 12.30 UDS5 #N/A 13.50 0 14 69 17 ### #N/A 1.81 1.59 13.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

13.50 13.95 SPT6 42 30 Hard brown sandy silt, low plastic (CL) 0 15 78 7 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 43 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Soil Profile (BH-22)


Location : Refer Plate-1 Termination Depth : 30.30 m (RL 90.1 m) Boring Method : Shell & Auger

Survey Coordinates : 488225.17 E, 2960459.14 N Ground Water Depth : Not Met Casing Depth : 26.0 m

Surface Elevation : RL 120.354 m Boring Start : 08-Jun-17

Chainage : Ground Water Level : Boring Finish : 09-Jun-17


(1)
Depth, m SPT Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Density and Moisture Shear Tests

Depth of Strata (m)

Moisture Content
Corrected Value,

Angle of Internal
Specific Gravity
Plasticity Index
Field Value, Nf

SOIL DESCRIPTION

Type of Test
Bulk Density

Intercept, 'c'
Sample No.

Dry Density
Plastic (%)
Gravel (%)

Liquid (%)

(gms/cm )

(gms/cm )
Sand (%)

Pressures

Friction, 
(degrees)
Cohesion
3

Confining
3
Clay (%)

(kg/cm )

(kg/cm )
Silt (%)
Symbol

2
From

(%)

(%)
To

N"

15.00 15.30 UDS6 #N/A Hard brown sandy silt, low plastic (CL) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.87 1.68 11.6 #N/A DS 0.5 ,1, 1.5 0.0 35.8

16.50 16.95 SPT7 45 29 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

18.00 18.30 DS2 #N/A 19.50 0 42 52 6 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

19.50 19.95 SPT8 58 34 Very dense grey silty fine sand (SM) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

21.00 21.30 UDS7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.95 1.75 11.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

22.50 22.95 SPT9 64 34 - with gravel, 22.5 to 25.5 m 8 73 18 1 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

24.00 24.30 UDS8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 1.93 1.74 10.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

25.50 25.95 SPT10 67 33 - with traces of gravel, 25.5 to 27.0 m 3 57 37 3 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

27.00 27.30 DS3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

28.50 28.95 SPT11 74 34 0 52 44 4 ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

30.00 30.30 UDS9 #N/A 30.30 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A 2.03 1.78 13.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A ### #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(1)
SPT is outside NABL scope.

Project No. 217054 Plate 44 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

BH-3 BH-4 BH-5 BH-8 BH-9 BH-10


122 BH-1 BH-2 BH-6 BH-7
RL:120.267m RL:120.258m RL:120.302m RL:120.284m RL:120.500m
RL:120.093m RL:120.053m RL:120.079m RL:120.059m RL:120.178m
N-Value N-Value N-Value N-Value N-Value N-Value N-Value
N-Value N-Value N-Value
17 13 0.7 13 24 12 10
44 8 27
1.5 15
2.0
118 25 16 32 12 18 25 15 12
2.5 36 26
3.0

27 22 34 24 27 4.5 18 22
4.5 38 4.5 27 31
6.0
114
32 19 27
24 27 31 17
25 7.5 26 7.5 33 7.5

9.0

110 34 35 21 10.5 21 10.5 31


41 27 38 17 24

12.0

56 43 13.5 37 27 28 40
27 41 36 22
Reduced Level, m

106
15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0
15.0 15.0
51 39 44
56 61 46 16.5 41 17 30 32
18.0
102 18.0

62 19.5 58 45 27 48
58 51 29 53 34

21.0
98 66 64 17 61 22.5 48 49 52
63 65 22.5 60
24.0 24.0
52 48 65 36 58 56
65 69 72 64 25.5
94
27.0 27.0
27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0

65 49 51 28.5 49 67 63 49 49
52 40
30.0
90
30.30m 30.30m 30.30m 30.30m 30.30m 30.30m 30.30m 30.30m 30.30m
30.95m

86
LEGEND
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
Fill : Road material
Clayey silt (CI)
Fine sand (SP-SM)
Silty fine sand (SM)
Sandy silt (CL)

Summary of Borehole Profiles

Project No. 217054 Plate 45 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

BH-13 BH-14 BH-15 BH-17 BH-18 BH-19 BH-20 BH-21 BH-22


122 BH-16
RL:120.360m RL:120.320m RL:120.230m RL:120.255m RL:120.335m RL:120.213m RL:120.237m RL:120.354m
RL:120.111m RL:120.026m
N-Value N-Value
N-Value N-Value N-Value N-Value N-Value N-Value N-Value N-Value
13 65 8 0.7 9
11 10
12 16 1.2 1.5 10
1.5
2.0 2.0
118 26 16 12 13 12 12
14
27 13 19
3.0 24 19 4.5 12 23 12 24
18 4.5 4.5
30 4.5 19 4.5 20
6.0
114
19
27 26 13 30 23 27

7.5 33 7.5 29 24 9.0


9.0

110 27 32 21 15 26 10.5 20 39
44 25 39

34 13.5 40 16 28 34 13.5 42
39
Reduced Level, m

106 46
13.5 51 13.5 49 15.0 15.0
15.0 15.0
15.0 57 46 33 33 16.5 45 45
42
16.5 53 55 52 18.0 18.0
102
19.5 61 51 55 19.5 64 79 19.5 58
51
57 45 52

98 64 57 58 70 69 64
55
63 52 51

68 59 55 46 67 63 60 69 72 67
94
27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0

75 43 50 31 42 46 46 28.5 68 74
28.5 49

90
30.30m 30.30m 30.30m 30.30m 30.30m 30.30m 30.30m 30.30m 30.30m
30.30m

86
LEGEND
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
Fill : Road material
Clayey silt (CI)
Silty fine sand (SM)
Sandy silt (CL)

Summary of Borehole Profiles

Project No. 217054 Plate 46 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Standard Penetration Test


IS : 2131-1981, RA-2007

Borehole Details
Symbol Borehole Number Reduced Level,m Location
BH-1 120.093
BH-2 120.053
BH-3 120.267 Refer Plate 1
BH-4 120.258
BH-5 120.302

Field SPT Value (N)


0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
122

118

114

110
Reduced level, m

106

102

98

94

90

Field SPT Values vs. Reduced level

Project No. 217054 Plate 47 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Standard Penetration Test


IS : 2131-1981, RA-2007

Borehole Details
Symbol Borehole Number Reduced Level,m Location
BH-1 120.093
BH-2 120.053
BH-3 120.267 Refer Plate 1
BH-4 120.258
BH-5 120.302

Corrected SPT Value (N")

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
122

118

114

110
Reduced level, m

106

102

98

94

90

Corrected SPT Values vs. Reduced level

Project No. 217054 Plate 48 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Standard Penetration Test


IS : 2131-1981, RA-2007

Borehole Details
Symbol Borehole Number Reduced Level,m Location
BH-6 120.079
BH-7 120.059
BH-8 120.178 Refer Plate 1
BH-9 120.284
BH-10 120.500

Field SPT Value (N)


0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
122

118

114

110
Reduced level, m

106

102

98

94

90

Field SPT Values vs. Reduced level

Project No. 217054 Plate 49 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Standard Penetration Test


IS : 2131-1981, RA-2007

Borehole Details
Symbol Borehole Number Reduced Level,m Location
BH-6 120.079
BH-7 120.059
BH-8 120.178 Refer Plate 1
BH-9 120.284
BH-10 120.500

Corrected SPT Value (N")

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
122

118

114

110
Reduced level, m

106

102

98

94

90

Corrected SPT Values vs. Reduced level

Project No. 217054 Plate 50 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Standard Penetration Test


IS : 2131-1981, RA-2007

Borehole Details
Symbol Borehole Number Reduced Level,m Location
BH-13 120.111
BH-14 120.360
BH-15 120.320 Refer Plate 1
BH-16 120.026
BH-17 120.230

Field SPT Value (N)


0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
122

118

114

110
Reduced level, m

106

102

98

94

90

Field SPT Values vs. Reduced level

Project No. 217054 Plate 51 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Standard Penetration Test


IS : 2131-1981, RA-2007

Borehole Details
Symbol Borehole Number Reduced Level,m Location
BH-13 120.111
BH-14 120.360
BH-15 120.320 Refer Plate 1
BH-16 120.026
BH-17 120.230

Corrected SPT Value (N")

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
122

65
118

114

110
Reduced level, m

106

102

98

94

90

Corrected SPT Values vs. Reduced level

Project No. 217054 Plate 52 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Standard Penetration Test


IS : 2131-1981, RA-2007

Borehole Details
Symbol Borehole Number Reduced Level,m Location
BH-18 120.255
BH-19 120.335
BH-20 120.213 Refer Plate 1
BH-21 120.237
BH-22 120.354

Field SPT Value (N)


0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
122

118

114

110
Reduced level, m

106

102

98

94

90

Field SPT Values vs. Reduced level

Project No. 217054 Plate 53 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Standard Penetration Test


IS : 2131-1981, RA-2007

Borehole Details
Symbol Borehole Number Reduced Level,m Location
BH-18 120.255
BH-19 120.335
BH-20 120.213 Refer Plate 1
BH-21 120.237
BH-22 120.354

Corrected SPT Value (N")

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
122

118

114

110
Reduced level, m

106

102

98

94

90

Corrected SPT Values vs. Reduced level

Project No. 217054 Plate 54 of 123


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow
Airport M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Atterberg Test
IS : 2720 (Part-5)-1985, RA-2010

60

A-Line : 0.73(LL-20)
50

CH
CI

40
L I Q U I D L I M I T, WL
Plasticity Index, Ip (%)

A Line BH-1
30 BH-2 BH-3
BH-4 BH-5
CL BH-6 BH-7
BH-8 BH-9
BH-10 BH-11
20
BH-14 BH-15
MH or OH BH-16 BH-17
BH-18 BH-19
BH-20 BH-21
10
BH-22
MI or OI
CL-ML ML
orOL
ML
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Liquid Limit, (%)

Plasticity Chart
Project No. 217054 Plate 55 of 123
Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

Clayey silt with traces of


BH-1 0.75 1 5 77 17 0.020 0.006
gravel (CI)

BH-1 4.50 Clayey silt with gravel (CI) 5 1 78 16 0.017 0.007

BH-1 10.50 Clayey silt (CI) 0 0 88 12 0.028 0.015

BH-1 16.50 Sandy silt (CL) 0 18 73 9 0.058 0.035 0.012 4.8 1.76

BH-1 18.00 Sandy silt with gravel (CL) 9 46 40 5 0.208 0.055 0.023 9.0 0.63

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND GRAVEL
CLAY SILT
FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE

100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30 Borehole No: 1 , Depth: 0.75 m

Borehole No: 1 , Depth: 4.5 m

20 Borehole No: 1 , Depth: 10.5 m

Borehole No: 1 , Depth: 16.5 m

10 Borehole No: 1 , Depth: 18 m

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 56 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

Silty fine sand with gravel


BH-1 25.50 7 68 23 2 0.262 0.151 0.034 7.7 2.56
(SM)
Clayey silt with traces of
BH-1 28.50 1 5 75 19 0.048 0.015
gravel (CI)

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND GRAVEL
CLAY SILT
FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE

100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30
Borehole No: 1 , Depth: 25.5 m

20
Borehole No: 1 , Depth: 28.5 m
10

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 57 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

BH-2 0.75 Clayey silt with gravel (CI) 20 5 65 10 0.037 0.012 0.002 18.5 1.95

BH-2 4.50 Sandy silt (CL) 0 43 51 6 0.088 0.033 0.005 17.6 2.48

BH-2 7.50 Clayey silt (CI) 0 1 72 27 0.008 0.002

BH-2 13.50 Sandy silt (CL) 0 32 62 6 0.065 0.026 0.005 13.0 2.08

BH-2 18.00 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 85 15 0 0.217 0.155

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND GRAVEL
CLAY SILT
FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE

100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30 Borehole No: 2 , Depth: 0.75 m

Borehole No: 2 , Depth: 4.5 m

20 Borehole No: 2 , Depth: 7.5 m

Borehole No: 2 , Depth: 13.5 m

10 Borehole No: 2 , Depth: 18 m

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 58 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

BH-2 22.50 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 84 16 0 0.213 0.145

BH-2 28.50 Sandy silt with gravel (CL) 14 13 60 13 0.040 0.007

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND GRAVEL
CLAY SILT
FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE

100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30
Borehole No: 2 , Depth: 22.5 m

20
Borehole No: 2 , Depth: 28.5 m
10

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 59 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

BH-3 0.00 Clayey silt with gravel (CI) 5 8 76 11 0.027 0.011


Clayey silt with traces of
BH-3 4.50 3 12 72 13 0.030 0.011
gravel (CI)

BH-3 10.50 Clayey silt (CI) 0 2 78 20 0.011 0.004

BH-3 16.50 Sandy silt (CL) 0 16 75 9 0.032 0.017 0.002 16.0 4.52

BH-3 19.50 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 82 18 0 0.142 0.095

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND GRAVEL
CLAY SILT
FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE

100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

Borehole No: 3 , Depth: 0 m


30
Borehole No: 3 , Depth: 4.5 m

20 Borehole No: 3 , Depth: 10.5 m

Borehole No: 3 , Depth: 16.5 m

10 Borehole No: 3 , Depth: 19.5 m

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 60 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

Clayey silt with traces of


BH-3 25.50 3 9 79 9 0.039 0.014 0.002 19.5 2.51
gravel (CI)
Sandy silt with traces of gravel
BH-3 30.00 2 33 61 4 0.066 0.015 0.004 16.5 0.85
(CL)

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND
CLAY SILT GRAVEL
FINE MEDIUM COARSE
100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30
Borehole No: 3 , Depth: 25.5 m

20
Borehole No: 3 , Depth: 30 m
10

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 61 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

Clayey silt with traces of


BH-4 1.50 2 7 76 15 0.042 0.009
gravel (CI)

BH-4 4.50 Sandy silt (CL) 0 42 52 6 0.082 0.048 0.019 4.3 1.48

Clayey silt with traces of


BH-4 9.00 3 4 82 11 0.022 0.010
gravel (CI)

BH-4 15.00 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 61 36 3 0.109 0.056 0.011 9.9 2.62

BH-4 19.50 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 75 23 2 0.176 0.091 0.040 4.4 1.18

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND
CLAY SILT GRAVEL
FINE MEDIUM COARSE
100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30 Borehole No: 4 , Depth: 1.5 m

Borehole No: 4 , Depth: 4.5 m

20 Borehole No: 4 , Depth: 9 m

Borehole No: 4 , Depth: 15 m

10 Borehole No: 4 , Depth: 19.5 m

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 62 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

Silty fine sand with traces of


BH-4 22.50 3 82 15 0 0.224 0.152
gravel (SM)
Silty fine sand with traces of
BH-4 25.50 2 81 17 0 0.192 0.109
gravel (SM)

BH-4 30.00 Clayey silt (CI) 0 1 90 9 0.020 0.008 0.002 10.0 1.60

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND
CLAY SILT GRAVEL
FINE MEDIUM COARSE
100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30
Borehole No: 4 , Depth: 22.5 m

20
Borehole No: 4 , Depth: 25.5 m

10
Borehole No: 4 , Depth: 30 m

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 63 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

BH-5 0.75 Clayey silt (CI) 0 5 66 29 0.009 0.002

BH-5 4.50 Sandy silt (CL) 0 46 48 6 0.094 0.026 0.008 11.8 0.90

Clayey silt with traces of


BH-5 9.00 1 0 81 18 0.010 0.004
gravel (CI)

BH-5 13.50 Clayey silt (CI) 0 2 66 32 0.006 0.002

BH-5 16.50 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 57 36 7 0.143 0.037 0.004 35.8 2.39

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND
CLAY SILT GRAVEL
FINE MEDIUM COARSE
100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30 Borehole No: 5 , Depth: 0.75 m

Borehole No: 5 , Depth: 4.5 m

20 Borehole No: 5 , Depth: 9 m

Borehole No: 5 , Depth: 13.5 m

10 Borehole No: 5 , Depth: 16.5 m

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 64 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

BH-5 19.50 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 63 32 5 0.152 0.052 0.008 19.0 2.22

BH-5 24.00 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 70 26 4 0.181 0.076 0.013 13.9 2.45

Fine sand with gravel (SP-


BH-5 27.00 9 81 10 0 0.286 0.182 0.080 3.6 1.45
SM)
Fine sand with gravel (SP-
BH-5 30.00 14 77 9 0 0.256 0.187 0.089 2.9 1.53
SM)

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND GRAVEL
CLAY SILT
FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE

100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30 Borehole No: 5 , Depth: 19.5 m

Borehole No: 5 , Depth: 24 m


20
Borehole No: 5 , Depth: 27 m

10 Borehole No: 5 , Depth: 30 m

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 65 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

BH-6 1.50 Clayey silt with gravel (CI) 5 6 64 25 0.015 0.003

BH-6 4.50 Sandy silt (CL) 0 18 73 9 0.045 0.017 0.003 15.0 2.14

BH-6 9.00 Sandy silt with gravel (CL) 9 8 76 7 0.022 0.010 0.003 7.3 1.52

BH-6 15.00 Sandy silt (CL) 0 23 71 6 0.056 0.023 0.005 11.2 1.89

BH-6 16.50 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 74 24 2 0.186 0.091 0.030 6.2 1.48
Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND GRAVEL
CLAY SILT
FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE

100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30 Borehole No: 6 , Depth: 1.5 m

Borehole No: 6 , Depth: 4.5 m

20 Borehole No: 6 , Depth: 9 m

Borehole No: 6 , Depth: 15 m

10 Borehole No: 6 , Depth: 16.5 m

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 66 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

BH-6 21.00 Fine sand (SP-SM) 0 92 8 0 0.229 0.173 0.091 2.5 1.44

BH-6 25.50 Clayey silt (CI) 0 7 57 36 0.014 0.002

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND
CLAY SILT GRAVEL
FINE MEDIUM COARSE
100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30 Borehole No: 6 , Depth: 21 m

20
Borehole No: 6 , Depth: 25.5 m

10

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 67 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

Sandy silt with traces of gravel


BH-7 0.75 1 17 68 14 0.048 0.014
(CL)

BH-7 4.50 Sandy silt (CL) 0 16 76 8 0.041 0.014 0.004 10.3 1.20

BH-7 10.50 Clayey silt (CI) 0 0 70 30 0.007 0.002

Clayey silt with traces of


BH-7 16.50 3 1 73 23 0.010 0.003
gravel (CI)

BH-7 22.50 Fine sand (SP-SM) 0 90 10 0 0.222 0.160 0.078 2.9 1.48

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND
CLAY SILT GRAVEL
FINE MEDIUM COARSE
100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30
Borehole No: 7 , Depth: 0.75 m

Borehole No: 7 , Depth: 4.5 m


20
Borehole No: 7 , Depth: 10.5 m

Borehole No: 7 , Depth: 16.5 m


10
Borehole No: 7 , Depth: 22.5 m

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 68 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

BH-7 25.50 Fine sand (SP-SM) 0 89 11 0 0.205 0.127

BH-7 30.00 Clayey silt (CI) 0 12 64 24 0.012 0.003

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND
CLAY SILT GRAVEL
FINE MEDIUM COARSE
100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30
Borehole No: 7 , Depth: 25.5 m

20

Borehole No: 7 , Depth: 30 m


10

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 69 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

BH-8 0.75 Clayey silt (CI) 0 6 80 14 0.020 0.008

BH-8 4.50 Clayey silt (CI) 0 6 78 16 0.022 0.009

BH-8 10.50 Clayey silt with gravel (CI) 9 4 65 22 0.012 0.004

BH-8 16.50 Clayey silt (CI) 0 1 74 25 0.010 0.003

BH-8 22.50 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 87 13 0 0.183 0.110


Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND GRAVEL
CLAY SILT
FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE

100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30 Borehole No: 8 , Depth: 0.75 m

Borehole No: 8 , Depth: 4.5 m

20 Borehole No: 8 , Depth: 10.5 m

Borehole No: 8 , Depth: 16.5 m

10 Borehole No: 8 , Depth: 22.5 m

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 70 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

BH-8 22.50 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 87 13 0 0.183 0.110

BH-8 28.50 Clayey silt (CI) 0 3 80 17 0.046 0.011

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND
CLAY SILT GRAVEL
FINE MEDIUM COARSE
100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30
Borehole No: 8 , Depth: 22.5 m

20

Borehole No: 8 , Depth: 28.5 m


10

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 71 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

Sandy silt with traces of gravel


BH-9 0.75 2 10 80 8 0.046 0.018 0.003 15.3 2.35
(CL)

BH-9 4.50 Clayey silt (CI) 0 3 74 23 0.012 0.003

BH-9 10.50 Clayey silt (CI) 0 3 76 21 0.014 0.003

BH-9 16.50 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 55 41 4 0.133 0.042 0.007 19.0 1.89

BH-9 21.00 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 85 15 0 0.208 0.132

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND
CLAY SILT GRAVEL
FINE MEDIUM COARSE
100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30 Borehole No: 9 , Depth: 0.75 m

Borehole No: 9 , Depth: 4.5 m


20
Borehole No: 9 , Depth: 10.5 m

Borehole No: 9 , Depth: 16.5 m


10
Borehole No: 9 , Depth: 21 m

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 72 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

BH-9 25.50 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 84 16 0 0.208 0.132

BH-9 28.50 Clayey silt with gravel (CI) 6 5 72 17 0.031 0.007

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND GRAVEL
CLAY SILT
FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE

100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30
Borehole No: 9 , Depth: 25.5 m

20

Borehole No: 9 , Depth: 28.5 m


10

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 73 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

BH-10 0.75 Sandy silt (CL) 0 13 75 12 0.038 0.015


Clayey silt with traces of
BH-10 4.50 4 19 70 7 0.053 0.018 0.003 17.7 2.04
gravel (CI)
Clayey silt with traces of
BH-10 10.50 1 1 77 21 0.010 0.003
gravel (CI)

BH-10 15.00 Sandy silt (CL) 0 43 51 6 0.090 0.034 0.006 15.0 2.14

BH-10 18.00 Fine sand (SP-SM) 0 88 12 0 0.238 0.178

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND
CLAY SILT GRAVEL
FINE MEDIUM COARSE
100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30
Borehole No: 10 , Depth: 0.75 m

Borehole No: 10 , Depth: 4.5 m


20
Borehole No: 10 , Depth: 10.5 m

Borehole No: 10 , Depth: 15 m


10
Borehole No: 10 , Depth: 18 m

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 74 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

BH-10 22.50 Fine sand (SP-SM) 0 91 9 0 0.220 0.161 0.082 2.7 1.44

BH-10 28.50 Clayey silt with gravel (CI) 7 4 81 8 0.044 0.018 0.003 14.7 2.45

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND GRAVEL
CLAY SILT
FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE

100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30

Borehole No: 10 , Depth: 22.5 m


20

10 Borehole No: 10 , Depth: 28.5 m

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 75 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

BH-13 1.50 Clayey silt (CI) 0 7 84 9 0.027 0.010 0.002 13.5 1.85

BH-13 7.50 Clayey silt (CI) 0 13 63 24 0.012 0.003

Clayey silt with traces of


BH-13 10.50 1 2 74 23 0.009 0.003
gravel (CI)

BH-13 13.50 Sandy silt (CL) 0 35 57 8 0.066 0.021 0.003 22.0 2.23

BH-13 18.00 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 81 19 0 0.231 0.165

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND
CLAY SILT GRAVEL
FINE MEDIUM COARSE
100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30 Borehole No: 13 , Depth: 1.5 m

Borehole No: 13 , Depth: 7.5 m

20 Borehole No: 13 , Depth: 10.5 m

Borehole No: 13 , Depth: 13.5 m


10 Borehole No: 13 , Depth: 18 m

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 76 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

BH-13 24.00 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 87 13 0 0.220 0.160

BH-13 30.00 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 86 14 0 0.212 0.143

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND
CLAY SILT GRAVEL
FINE MEDIUM COARSE
100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30

Borehole No: 13 , Depth: 24 m


20

10 Borehole No: 13 , Depth: 30 m

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 77 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

Clayey silt with traces of


BH-14 2.25 1 3 69 27 0.019 0.005
gravel (CI)

BH-14 4.50 Sandy silt (CL) 0 34 59 7 0.066 0.017 0.005 13.2 0.88

BH-14 7.50 Clayey silt (CI) 0 5 84 11 0.022 0.008

Silty fine sand with traces of


BH-14 13.50 0 55 41 4 0.113 0.035 0.010 11.3 1.08
gravel (SM)
Silty fine sand with traces of
BH-14 18.00 4 75 21 0 0.210
gravel (SM)
Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND GRAVEL
CLAY SILT
FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE

100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

Borehole No: 14 , Depth: 2.25 m


30
Borehole No: 14 , Depth: 4.5 m

20 Borehole No: 14 , Depth: 7.5 m

Borehole No: 14 , Depth: 13.5 m

10 Borehole No: 14 , Depth: 18 m

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 78 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

BH-14 22.50 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 80 20 0 0.186 0.102

BH-14 28.50 Clayey silt (CI) 0 7 73 20 0.023 0.004

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND
CLAY SILT GRAVEL
FINE MEDIUM COARSE
100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30
Borehole No: 14 , Depth: 22.5 m

20

Borehole No: 14 , Depth: 28.5 m


10

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 79 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

Clayey silt with traces of


BH-15 0.75 3 7 81 9 0.038 0.014 0.002 19.0 2.58
gravel (CI)

BH-15 6.00 Clayey silt with gravel (CI) 13 13 42 32 0.011 0.002

BH-15 13.50 Sandy silt (CL) 0 47 51 2 0.136 0.023 0.005 27.2 0.78

BH-15 19.50 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 66 27 7 0.180 0.022 0.003 60.0 0.90

BH-15 24.00 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 78 22 0 0.228 0.159

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND GRAVEL
CLAY SILT
FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE

100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30 Borehole No: 15 , Depth: 0.75 m

Borehole No: 15 , Depth: 6 m

20 Borehole No: 15 , Depth: 13.5 m

Borehole No: 15 , Depth: 19.5 m

10 Borehole No: 15 , Depth: 24 m

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 80 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

BH-15 24.00 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 78 22 0 0.228 0.159

BH-15 28.50 Clayey silt (CI) 0 8 72 20 0.032 0.004

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND
CLAY SILT GRAVEL
FINE MEDIUM COARSE
100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30
Borehole No: 15 , Depth: 24 m

20

Borehole No: 15 , Depth: 28.5 m


10

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 81 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

BH-16 0.00 Sandy silt (CL) 0 15 74 11 0.043 0.016


Sandy silt with traces of gravel
BH-16 3.00 3 20 65 12 0.045 0.016
(CL)

BH-16 9.00 Sandy silt (CL) 0 26 59 15 0.009 0.003

BH-16 13.50 Sandy silt (CL) 0 13 79 8 0.049 0.019 0.003 16.3 2.46

BH-16 18.00 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 84 16 0 0.193 0.114

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND
CLAY SILT GRAVEL
FINE MEDIUM COARSE
100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30
Borehole No: 16 , Depth: 0 m

Borehole No: 16 , Depth: 3 m


20
Borehole No: 16 , Depth: 9 m

Borehole No: 16 , Depth: 13.5 m


10
Borehole No: 16 , Depth: 18 m

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 82 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

BH-16 22.50 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 75 25 0 0.194 0.096

BH-16 28.50 Clayey silt with gravel (CI) 10 18 51 21 0.012 0.004

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND GRAVEL
CLAY SILT
FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE

100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30
Borehole No: 16 , Depth: 22.5 m

20

Borehole No: 16 , Depth: 28.5 m


10

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 83 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

Sandy silt with traces of gravel


BH-17 2.25 2 11 79 8 0.028 0.015 0.003 9.3 2.68
(CL)

BH-17 7.50 Clayey silt (CI) 0 1 78 21 0.009 0.003

Clayey silt with traces of


BH-17 13.50 3 5 70 22 0.028 0.003
gravel (CI)

BH-17 19.50 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 65 28 7 0.139 0.060 0.004 34.8 6.47

BH-17 24.00 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 68 29 3 0.215 0.069 0.010 21.5 2.21

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND
CLAY SILT GRAVEL
FINE MEDIUM COARSE
100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30
Borehole No: 17 , Depth: 2.25 m

Borehole No: 17 , Depth: 7.5 m


20
Borehole No: 17 , Depth: 13.5 m

Borehole No: 17 , Depth: 19.5 m


10
Borehole No: 17 , Depth: 24 m

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 84 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

BH-17 24.00 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 68 29 3 0.215 0.069 0.010 21.5 2.21
Clayey silt with traces of
BH-17 28.50 3 13 62 22 0.021 0.004
gravel (CI)

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND
CLAY SILT GRAVEL
FINE MEDIUM COARSE
100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30
Borehole No: 17 , Depth: 24 m

20

Borehole No: 17 , Depth: 28.5 m


10

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 85 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

Sandy silt with traces of gravel


BH-18 0.00 1 38 56 5 0.075 0.031 0.006 12.5 2.14
(CL)

BH-18 2.25 Clayey silt (CI) 0 5 79 16 0.037 0.016

BH-18 7.50 Clayey silt (CI) 0 1 71 28 0.006 0.002

BH-18 13.50 Sandy silt (CL) 0 11 83 6 0.040 0.018 0.003 13.3 2.70

BH-18 16.50 Sandy silt (CL) 0 16 77 7 0.055 0.029 0.006 9.2 2.55

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND
CLAY SILT GRAVEL
FINE MEDIUM COARSE
100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30 Borehole No: 18 , Depth: 0 m

Borehole No: 18 , Depth: 2.25 m

20 Borehole No: 18 , Depth: 7.5 m

Borehole No: 18 , Depth: 13.5 m

10 Borehole No: 18 , Depth: 16.5 m

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 86 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

Silty fine sand with traces of


BH-18 19.50 3 63 31 3 0.174 0.067 0.024 7.3 1.07
gravel (SM)

BH-18 25.50 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 66 31 3 0.187 0.067 0.023 8.1 1.04

BH-18 28.50 Clayey silt (CI) 0 7 67 26 0.023 0.004

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND
CLAY SILT GRAVEL
FINE MEDIUM COARSE
100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30 Borehole No: 18 , Depth: 19.5 m

20 Borehole No: 18 , Depth: 25.5 m

Borehole No: 18 , Depth: 28.5 m


10

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 87 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

BH-19 0.75 Clayey silt (CI) 0 6 79 15 0.020 0.007

BH-19 4.50 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 65 28 7 0.139 0.060 0.004 34.8 6.47

BH-19 7.50 Clayey silt with gravel (CI) 8 9 60 23 0.010 0.003

BH-19 13.50 Clayey silt (CI) 0 8 65 27 0.023 0.003

BH-19 16.50 Sandy silt (CL) 0 38 56 6 0.073 0.038 0.006 12.2 3.30

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND GRAVEL
CLAY SILT
FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE

100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30 Borehole No: 19 , Depth: 0.75 m

Borehole No: 19 , Depth: 4.5 m

20 Borehole No: 19 , Depth: 7.5 m

Borehole No: 19 , Depth: 13.5 m

10 Borehole No: 19 , Depth: 16.5 m

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 88 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

BH-19 21.00 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 78 22 0 0.228 0.159

BH-19 25.50 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 84 16 0 0.217 0.155

BH-19 28.50 Clayey silt (CI) 0 9 78 13 0.026 0.011

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND
CLAY SILT GRAVEL
FINE MEDIUM COARSE
100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30
Borehole No: 19 , Depth: 21 m

20
Borehole No: 19 , Depth: 25.5 m

10 Borehole No: 19 , Depth: 28.5 m

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 89 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

BH-20 0.75 Clayey silt (CI) 0 7 82 11 0.025 0.010


Silty fine sand with gravel
BH-20 4.50 7 53 32 8 0.176 0.026 0.003 58.7 1.28
(SM)

BH-20 10.50 Clayey silt with gravel (CI) 5 9 58 28 0.011 0.002

BH-20 15.00 Clayey silt (CI) 0 8 79 13 0.030 0.009

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND GRAVEL
CLAY SILT
FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE

100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30 Borehole No: 20 , Depth: 0.75 m

Borehole No: 20 , Depth: 4.5 m


20
Borehole No: 20 , Depth: 10.5 m

10 Borehole No: 20 , Depth: 15 m

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 90 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

BH-20 22.50 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 87 13 0 0.217 0.155

BH-20 28.50 Clayey silt (CI) 0 9 72 19 0.019 0.005

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND
CLAY SILT GRAVEL
FINE MEDIUM COARSE
100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30
Borehole No: 20 , Depth: 22.5 m

20

Borehole No: 20 , Depth: 28.5 m


10

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 91 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

Clayey silt with traces of


BH-21 1.50 1 9 60 30 0.014 0.002
gravel (CI)

BH-21 6.00 Clayey silt with gravel (CI) 8 5 79 8 0.042 0.016 0.003 14.0 2.03

Sandy silt with traces of gravel


BH-21 12.00 3 28 53 16 0.031 0.004
(CL)

BH-21 16.50 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 72 20 8 0.154 0.081 0.004 38.5 10.7

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND GRAVEL
CLAY SILT
FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE

100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30 Borehole No: 21 , Depth: 1.5 m

Borehole No: 21 , Depth: 6 m


20
Borehole No: 21 , Depth: 12 m

10 Borehole No: 21 , Depth: 16.5 m

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 92 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

BH-21 22.50 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 82 18 0 0.151 0.097

BH-21 28.50 Clayey silt with gravel (CI) 10 11 56 23 0.027 0.005

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND GRAVEL
CLAY SILT
FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE

100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30
Borehole No: 21 , Depth: 22.5 m

20

Borehole No: 21 , Depth: 28.5 m


10

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 93 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

BH-22 0.75 Sandy silt (CL) 0 14 80 6 0.056 0.034 0.003 18.7 6.88

BH-22 4.50 Sandy silt (CL) 0 13 77 10 0.050 0.025 0.002 25.0 6.25

BH-22 9.00 Clayey silt (CI) 0 5 74 21 0.025 0.005

BH-22 12.00 Clayey silt (CI) 0 14 69 17 0.035 0.007

BH-22 13.50 Sandy silt (CL) 0 15 78 7 0.047 0.018 0.006 7.8 1.15

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND
CLAY SILT GRAVEL
FINE MEDIUM COARSE
100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30 Borehole No: 22 , Depth: 0.75 m

Borehole No: 22 , Depth: 4.5 m

20 Borehole No: 22 , Depth: 9 m

Borehole No: 22 , Depth: 12 m

10 Borehole No: 22 , Depth: 13.5 m

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 94 of 123


Grain Size Analysis
IS : 2720 (Part 4) - 1985, RA-2010
Sample Details Test Results

Borehole Sample % % %
Sample Description % Silt D60 D30 D10 Cu Cc
Number Depth, m Gravel Sand Clay

BH-22 18.00 Sandy silt (CL) 0 42 52 6 0.083 0.044 0.013 6.4 1.79
Silty fine sand with gravel
BH-22 22.50 8 73 18 1 0.225 0.132 0.052 4.3 1.49
(SM)
Silty fine sand with traces of
BH-22 25.50 3 57 37 3 0.154 0.062 0.034 4.5 0.73
gravel (SM)

BH-22 28.50 Silty fine sand (SM) 0 52 44 4 0.144 0.050 0.011 13.1 1.58

Hydrometer Analysis Sieve Analysis

SAND GRAVEL
CLAY SILT
FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE

100

90

80

70
% Finer by Weight

60

50

40

30 Borehole No: 22 , Depth: 18 m

Borehole No: 22 , Depth: 22.5 m


20
Borehole No: 22 , Depth: 25.5 m

10 Borehole No: 22 , Depth: 28.5 m

0
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000

Particle Size, mm

Grain Size Distribution Curve

Project No. 217054 Plate 95 of 123


Drained Direct Shear Test
IS : 2720 (Part-13)-1986, RA-2010

Borehole No.: BH-1 Sample Depth: 18 m


Sample Details

Sample No.: UDS7 Sample Description: Silty fine sand


3
Dry Density of Soil (g/cm ): 1.65

Moisture Content (%): Saturated


Results

2
Cohesion Intercept, c : 0.00 kg/cm
Test

Angle of Internal Friction, : 32.1 degrees

5.0

4.
0 y = 0.6279x
2
R = 0.9997

3.0
2
Shear Stress ff, kg/cm

2.0

1.0

0.
0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
2
Normal Stress ff, kg/cm

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope

Project No. 217054 Plate 96 of 123


Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial Test
IS : 2720 (Part-11)-1993, RA-2007

Borehole No.: BH-2 Sample Depth: 1.5 m

Sample No.: UDS-1 Sample Description: Clayey silt


Sample Details

2
Confining Pressure, (kg/cm
0
): 1.0 2.0 3.0

Initial diameter (cm): 3.8 3.8 3.8


Initial Length (cm): 7.6 7.6 7.6
Bulk Density (g/cc): 1.72 1.72 1.71
Dry Density (g/cc): 1.49 1.48 1.49
Moisture Content (%): 15.3 15.6 15.1
Peak Deviator Stress, (-) (kg/cm2): 4.19 4.31 4.89
Test Results

3 1 f
Failure Strain, f (%): 23.7 23.7 23.7
2
Cohesion Intercept, c: 1.60 kg/cm
Angle of Internal Friction, : 8.7 degrees

10.0

8.0

6.0
2
Shear Stress ff, kg/cm

4.0

2.0

0.0
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0
2
Normal Stress ff, kg/cm

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope

Project No. 217054 Plate 97 of 123


Drained Direct Shear Test
IS : 2720 (Part-13)-1986, RA-2010

Borehole No.: BH-2 Sample Depth: 21 m


Sample Details

Sample No.: UDS-8 Sample Description: Silty fine sand


3
Dry Density of Soil (g/cm ): 1.68

Moisture Content (%): Saturated


Results

2
Cohesion Intercept, c : 0.00 kg/cm
Test

Angle of Internal Friction, : 32.6 degrees

5.0

4.0
y = 0.6383x
2
R = 0.9958

3.0
2
Shear Stress ff, kg/cm

2.0

1.0

0.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 2
4.0 5.0
Normal Stress ff, kg/cm

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope

Project No. 217054 Plate 98 of 123


Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial Test
IS : 2720 (Part-11)-1993, RA-2007

Borehole No.: BH-3 Sample Depth: 3 m

Sample No.: UDS-2 Sample Description: Clayey silt


Sample Details

2
Confining Pressure, (kg/cm
0
): 1.0 2.0 3.0

Initial diameter (cm): 3.8 3.8 3.8


Initial Length (cm): 7.6 7.6 7.6
Bulk Density (g/cc): 1.77 1.77 1.77
Dry Density (g/cc): 1.54 1.58 1.54
Moisture Content (%): 14.8 12.2 14.9
Peak Deviator Stress, (-) (kg/cm2): 2.28 2.60 2.81
Test Results

3 1 f
Failure Strain, f (%): 19.7 15.8 9.2
2
Cohesion Intercept, c: 0.90 kg/cm
Angle of Internal Friction, : 6.7 degrees

8.0

6.0
2
Shear Stress ff, kg/cm

4.0

2.0

0.0
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0
2
Normal Stress ff, kg/cm

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope

Project No. 217054 Plate 99 of 123


Drained Direct Shear Test
IS : 2720 (Part-13)-1986, RA-2010

Borehole No.: BH-4 Sample Depth: 3 m


Sample Details

Sample No.: UDS1 Sample Description: Sandy silt


3
Dry Density of Soil (g/cm ): 1.56

Moisture Content (%): Saturated


Results

2
Cohesion Intercept, c : 0.00 kg/cm
Test

Angle of Internal Friction, : 31.9 degrees

2.5

2.0
y = 0.6213x
2
R = 0.9974

1.5
2
Shear Stress ff, kg/cm

1.0

0.5

0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2
2.0 2.5
Normal Stress ff, kg/cm

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope

Project No. 217054 Plate 100 of 123


Drained Direct Shear Test
IS : 2720 (Part-13)-1986, RA-2010

Borehole No.: BH-4 Sample Depth: 15 m


Sample Details

Sample No.: UDS5 Sample Description: Silty fine sand


3
Dry Density of Soil (g/cm ): 1.65

Moisture Content (%): Saturated


Results

2
Cohesion Intercept, c : 0.00 kg/cm
Test

Angle of Internal Friction, : 32.0 degrees

2.5

2.
0 y = 0.6253x
2
R = 0.9973

1.5
2
Shear Stress ff, kg/cm

1.0

0.5

0.
0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
2
Normal Stress ff, kg/cm

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope

Project No. 217054 Plate 101 of 123


Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial Test
IS : 2720 (Part-11)-1993, RA-2007

Borehole No.: BH-5 Sample Depth: 3 m

Sample No.: UDS2 Sample Description: Sandy silt


Sample Details

2
Confining Pressure, (kg/cm
0
): 1.0 2.0 3.0

Initial diameter (cm): 3.8 3.8 3.8


Initial Length (cm): 7.6 7.6 7.6
Bulk Density (g/cc): 1.73 1.73 1.74
Dry Density (g/cc): 1.48 1.48 1.48
Moisture Content (%): 16.6 17.0 16.9
Peak Deviator Stress, (-) (kg/cm2): 1.64 1.84 2.07
Test Results

3 1 f
Failure Strain, f (%): 23.7 23.7 23.7
2
Cohesion Intercept, c: 0.60 kg/cm
Angle of Internal Friction, : 5.5 degrees

6.0

5.0

4.0
2
Shear Stress ff, kg/cm

3.0

2.0

1.0

0.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
2
Normal Stress ff, kg/cm

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope

Project No. 217054 Plate 102 of 123


Drained Direct Shear Test
IS : 2720 (Part-13)-1986, RA-2010

Borehole No.: BH-5 Sample Depth: 21 m


Sample Details

Sample No.: UDS8 Sample Description: Silty fine sand


3
Dry Density of Soil (g/cm ): 1.67

Moisture Content (%): Saturated


Results

2
Cohesion Intercept, c : 0.00 kg/cm
Test

Angle of Internal Friction, : 35.8 degrees

5.0

y = 0.721x
2
4.0 R = 0.9997

3.0
2
Shear Stress ff, kg/cm

2.0

1.0

0.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 2
4.0 5.0
Normal Stress ff, kg/cm

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope

Project No. 217054 Plate 103 of 123


Drained Direct Shear Test
IS : 2720 (Part-13)-1986, RA-2010

Borehole No.: BH-6 Sample Depth: 18 m


Sample Details

Sample No.: UDS6 Sample Description: Silty fine sand


3
Dry Density of Soil (g/cm ): 1.58

Moisture Content (%): Saturated


Results

2
Cohesion Intercept, c : 0.00 kg/cm
Test

Angle of Internal Friction, : 31.9 degrees

5.0

4.0
y = 0.6216x
2
R = 0.9999

3.0
2
Shear Stress ff, kg/cm

2.0

1.0

0.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 2
4.0 5.0
Normal Stress ff, kg/cm

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope

Project No. 217054 Plate 104 of 123


Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial Test
IS : 2720 (Part-11)-1993, RA-2007

Borehole No.: BH-7 Sample Depth: 6 m

Sample No.: UDS3 Sample Description: Sandy silt


Sample Details

2
Confining Pressure, (kg/cm
0
): 1.0 2.0 3.0

Initial diameter (cm): 3.8 3.8 3.8


Initial Length (cm): 7.6 7.6 7.6
Bulk Density (g/cc): 1.77 1.76 1.77
Dry Density (g/cc): 1.52 1.52 1.52
Moisture Content (%): 15.8 15.7 15.9
Peak Deviator Stress, (-) (kg/cm2): 2.80 2.96 3.04
Test Results

3 1 f
Failure Strain, f (%): 21.1 22.4 23.7
2
Cohesion Intercept, c: 1.30 kg/cm
Angle of Internal Friction, : 3.3 degrees

8.0

6.0
2
Shear Stress ff, kg/cm

4.0

2.0

0.0
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0
2
Normal Stress ff, kg/cm

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope

Project No. 217054 Plate 105 of 123


Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial Test
IS : 2720 (Part-11)-1993, RA-2007

Borehole No.: BH-9 Sample Depth: 6 m

Sample No.: UDS-3 Sample Description: Clayey silt


Sample Details

2
Confining Pressure, (kg/cm
0
): 1.0 2.0 3.0

Initial diameter (cm): 3.8 3.8 3.8


Initial Length (cm): 7.6 7.6 7.6
Bulk Density (g/cc): 1.76 1.76 1.76
Dry Density (g/cc): 1.58 1.58 1.59
Moisture Content (%): 11.3 11.4 11.1
Peak Deviator Stress, (-) (kg/cm2): 2.22 2.74 2.69
Test Results

3 1 f
Failure Strain, f (%): 15.8 17.1 17.1
2
Cohesion Intercept, c: 0.90 kg/cm
Angle of Internal Friction, : 6.3 degrees

8.0

6.0
2
Shear Stress ff, kg/cm

4.0

2.0

0.0
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0
2
Normal Stress ff, kg/cm

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope

Project No. 217054 Plate 106 of 123


Drained Direct Shear Test
IS : 2720 (Part-13)-1986, RA-2010

Borehole No.: BH-9 Sample Depth: 21 m


Sample Details

Sample No.: UDS-8 Sample Description: Silty fine sand


3
Dry Density of Soil (g/cm ): 1.70

Moisture Content (%): Saturated


Results

2
Cohesion Intercept, c : 0.00 kg/cm
Test

Angle of Internal Friction, : 32.7 degrees

5.0

4.0
y = 0.6417x
2
R = 0.9997

3.0
2
Shear Stress ff, kg/cm

2.0

1.0

0.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 2
4.0 5.0
Normal Stress ff, kg/cm

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope

Project No. 217054 Plate 107 of 123


Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial Test
IS : 2720 (Part-11)-1993, RA-2007

Borehole No.: BH-10 Sample Depth: 1.5 m

Sample No.: UDS-1 Sample Description: Sandy silt


Sample Details

2
Confining Pressure, (kg/cm
0
): 1.0 2.0 3.0

Initial diameter (cm): 3.8 3.8 3.8


Initial Length (cm): 7.6 7.6 7.6
Bulk Density (g/cc): 1.73 1.72 1.72
Dry Density (g/cc): 1.49 1.49 1.48
Moisture Content (%): 16.0 15.5 16.2
Peak Deviator Stress, (-) (kg/cm2): 4.43 4.43 5.07
Test Results

3 1 f
Failure Strain, f (%): 23.7 23.7 23.7
2
Cohesion Intercept, c: 1.70 kg/cm
Angle of Internal Friction, : 8.3 degrees

10.0

8.0

6.0
2
Shear Stress ff, kg/cm

4.0

2.0

0.0
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0
2
Normal Stress ff, kg/cm

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope

Project No. 217054 Plate 108 of 123


Drained Direct Shear Test
IS : 2720 (Part-13)-1986, RA-2010

Borehole No.: BH-10 Sample Depth: 21 m


Sample Details

Sample No.: UDS-8 Sample Description: Fine sand


3
Dry Density of Soil (g/cm ): 1.71

Moisture Content (%): Saturated


Results

2
Cohesion Intercept, c : 0.00 kg/cm
Test

Angle of Internal Friction, : 34.5 degrees

5.0

y = 0.6885x
4.0 2
R = 0.9937

3.0
2
Shear Stress ff, kg/cm

2.0

1.0

0.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 2
4.0 5.0
Normal Stress ff, kg/cm

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope

Project No. 217054 Plate 109 of 123


Drained Direct Shear Test
IS : 2720 (Part-13)-1986, RA-2010

Borehole No.: BH-13 Sample Depth: 15 m


Sample Details

Sample No.: UDS-6 Sample Description: Sandy silt


3
Dry Density of Soil (g/cm ): 1.65

Moisture Content (%): Saturated


Results

2
Cohesion Intercept, c : 0.00 kg/cm
Test

Angle of Internal Friction, : 34.7 degrees

2.5

y = 0.6917x
2. 2
0 R = 0.995

1.5
2
Shear Stress ff, kg/cm

1.0

0.5

0.
0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
2
Normal Stress ff, kg/cm

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope

Project No. 217054 Plate 110 of 123


Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial Test
IS : 2720 (Part-11)-1993, RA-2007

Borehole No.: BH-14 Sample Depth: 6 m

Sample No.: UDS2 Sample Description: Sandy silt


Sample Details

2
Confining Pressure, (kg/cm
0
): 1.0 2.0 3.0

Initial diameter (cm): 3.8 3.8 3.8


Initial Length (cm): 7.6 7.6 7.6
Bulk Density (g/cc): 1.78 1.78 1.77
Dry Density (g/cc): 1.53 1.53 1.53
Moisture Content (%): 15.9 16.0 15.8
Peak Deviator Stress, (-) (kg/cm2): 2.79 3.07 3.72
Test Results

3 1 f
Failure Strain, f (%): 23.7 23.7 23.7
2
Cohesion Intercept, c: 0.90 kg/cm
Angle of Internal Friction, : 11.0 degrees

8.0

6.0
2
Shear Stress ff, kg/cm

4.0

2.0

0.0
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0
2
Normal Stress ff, kg/cm

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope

Project No. 217054 Plate 111 of 123


Drained Direct Shear Test
IS : 2720 (Part-13)-1986, RA-2010

Borehole No.: BH-14 Sample Depth: 15 m


Sample Details

Sample No.: UDS5 Sample Description: Silty fine sand


3
Dry Density of Soil (g/cm ): 1.60

Moisture Content (%): Saturated


Results

2
Cohesion Intercept, c : 0.00 kg/cm
Test

Angle of Internal Friction, : 35.2 degrees

2.5

y = 0.706x
2.0 2
R = 0.9992

1.5
2
Shear Stress ff, kg/cm

1.0

0.5

0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2
2.0 2.5
Normal Stress ff, kg/cm

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope

Project No. 217054 Plate 112 of 123


Drained Direct Shear Test
IS : 2720 (Part-13)-1986, RA-2010

Borehole No.: BH-15 Sample Depth: 18 m


Sample Details

Sample No.: UDS-7 Sample Description: Silty fine sand


3
Dry Density of Soil (g/cm ): 1.73

Moisture Content (%): Saturated


Results

2
Cohesion Intercept, c : 0.00 kg/cm
Test

Angle of Internal Friction, : 32.8 degrees

5.0

4.
0 y = 0.6439x
2
R =1

3.0
2
Shear Stress ff, kg/cm

2.0

1.0

0.
0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
2
Normal Stress ff, kg/cm

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope

Project No. 217054 Plate 113 of 123


Drained Direct Shear Test
IS : 2720 (Part-13)-1986, RA-2010

Borehole No.: BH-16 Sample Depth: 21 m


Sample Details

Sample No.: UDS-8 Sample Description: Silty fine sand


3
Dry Density of Soil (g/cm ): 1.71

Moisture Content (%): Saturated


Results

2
Cohesion Intercept, c : 0.00 kg/cm
Test

Angle of Internal Friction, : 33.1 degrees

5.0

4.0
y = 0.6523x
2
R = 0.9993

3.0
2
Shear Stress ff, kg/cm

2.0

1.0

0.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 2
4.0 5.0
Normal Stress ff, kg/cm

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope

Project No. 217054 Plate 114 of 123


Drained Direct Shear Test
IS : 2720 (Part-13)-1986, RA-2010

Borehole No.: BH-17 Sample Depth: 21 m


Sample Details

Sample No.: UDS-8 Sample Description: Silty fine sand


3
Dry Density of Soil (g/cm ): 1.70

Moisture Content (%): Saturated


Results

2
Cohesion Intercept, c : 0.00 kg/cm
Test

Angle of Internal Friction, : 34.6 degrees

5.0

y = 0.6894x
4.0 2
R = 0.9999

3.0
2
Shear Stress ff, kg/cm

2.0

1.0

0.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 2
4.0 5.0
Normal Stress ff, kg/cm

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope

Project No. 217054 Plate 115 of 123


Drained Direct Shear Test
IS : 2720 (Part-13)-1986, RA-2010

Borehole No.: BH-18 Sample Depth: 18 m


Sample Details

Sample No.: UDS7 Sample Description: Silty fine sand


3
Dry Density of Soil (g/cm ): 1.48

Moisture Content (%): Saturated


Results

2
Cohesion Intercept, c : 0.00 kg/cm
Test

Angle of Internal Friction, : 34.1 degrees

5.0

4. y = 0.6777x
2
0 R =1

3.0
2
Shear Stress ff, kg/cm

2.0

1.0

0.
0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
2
Normal Stress ff, kg/cm

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope

Project No. 217054 Plate 116 of 123


Drained Direct Shear Test
IS : 2720 (Part-13)-1986, RA-2010

Borehole No.: BH-19 Sample Depth: 24 m


Sample Details

Sample No.: UDS-9 Sample Description: Silty fine sand


3
Dry Density of Soil (g/cm ): 1.76

Moisture Content (%): Saturated


Results

2
Cohesion Intercept, c : 0.00 kg/cm
Test

Angle of Internal Friction, : 33.6 degrees

5.0

4.0 y = 0.6632x
2
R = 0.9998

3.0
2
Shear Stress ff, kg/cm

2.0

1.0

0.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 2
4.0 5.0
Normal Stress ff, kg/cm

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope

Project No. 217054 Plate 117 of 123


Drained Direct Shear Test
IS : 2720 (Part-13)-1986, RA-2010

Borehole No.: BH-20 Sample Depth: 6 m


Sample Details

Sample No.: UDS-3 Sample Description: Silty fine sand


3
Dry Density of Soil (g/cm ): 1.56

Moisture Content (%): Saturated


Results

2
Cohesion Intercept, c : 0.00 kg/cm
Test

Angle of Internal Friction, : 31.4 degrees

2.5

2.0

y = 0.6098x
2
R = 0.9983

1.5
2
Shear Stress ff, kg/cm

1.0

0.5

0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2
2.0 2.5
Normal Stress ff, kg/cm

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope

Project No. 217054 Plate 118 of 123


Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial Test
IS : 2720 (Part-11)-1993, RA-2007

Borehole No.: BH-20 Sample Depth: 12 m

Sample No.: UDS-5 Sample Description: Clayey silt


Sample Details

2
Confining Pressure, (kg/cm
0
): 1.0 2.0 3.0

Initial diameter (cm): 3.8 3.8 3.8


Initial Length (cm): 7.6 7.6 7.6
Bulk Density (g/cc): 1.85 1.86 1.86
Dry Density (g/cc): 1.60 1.59 1.59
Moisture Content (%): 16.1 16.5 16.6
Peak Deviator Stress, (-) (kg/cm2): 3.35 4.01 4.21
Test Results

3 1 f
Failure Strain, f (%): 13.2 17.1 14.5
2
Cohesion Intercept, c: 1.20 kg/cm
Angle of Internal Friction, : 10.3 degrees

8.0

6.0
2
Shear Stress ff, kg/cm

4.0

2.0

0.0
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0
2
Normal Stress ff, kg/cm

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope

Project No. 217054 Plate 119 of 123


Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial Test
IS : 2720 (Part-11)-1993, RA-2007

Borehole No.: BH-21 Sample Depth: 6 m

Sample No.: UDS2 Sample Description: Clayey silt


Sample Details

2
Confining Pressure, (kg/cm
0
): 1.0 2.0 3.0

Initial diameter (cm): 3.8 3.8 3.8


Initial Length (cm): 7.6 7.6 7.6
Bulk Density (g/cc): 1.76 1.76 1.77
Dry Density (g/cc): 1.55 1.55 1.55
Moisture Content (%): 14.1 13.7 14.4
Peak Deviator Stress, (-) (kg/cm2): 2.42 2.89 3.20
Test Results

3 1 f
Failure Strain, f (%): 23.7 23.7 23.7
2
Cohesion Intercept, c: 0.90 kg/cm
Angle of Internal Friction, : 9.4 degrees

8.0

6.0
2
Shear Stress ff, kg/cm

4.0

2.0

0.0
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0
2
Normal Stress ff, kg/cm

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope

Project No. 217054 Plate 120 of 123


Drained Direct Shear Test
IS : 2720 (Part-13)-1986, RA-2010

Borehole No.: BH-21 Sample Depth: 15 m


Sample Details

Sample No.: UDS5 Sample Description: Silty fine sand


3
Dry Density of Soil (g/cm ):

Moisture Content (%): Saturated


Results

2
Cohesion Intercept, c : 0.00 kg/cm
Test

Angle of Internal Friction, : 31.1 degrees

2.5

2.0

y = 0.6033x
2
R = 0.9981

1.5
2
Shear Stress ff, kg/cm

1.0

0.5

0.
0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
2
Normal Stress ff, kg/cm

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope

Project No. 217054 Plate 121 of 123


Drained Direct Shear Test
IS : 2720 (Part-13)-1986, RA-2010

Borehole No.: BH-22 Sample Depth: 15 m


Sample Details

Sample No.: UDS6 Sample Description: Silty fine sand


3
Dry Density of Soil (g/cm ): 1.61

Moisture Content (%): Saturated


Results

2
Cohesion Intercept, c : 0.00 kg/cm
Test

Angle of Internal Friction, : 35.8 degrees

2.5

y = 0.7222x
2
2. R = 0.993
0

1.5
2
Shear Stress ff, kg/cm

1.0

0.5

0.
0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
2
Normal Stress ff, kg/cm

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope


Project No. 217054 Plate 122 of 123
TEST RESULTS

Soil-Water Extract Test Results

Sulphate Content (SO 3), Chloride Content (Cl),


Borehole No. Depth, (m) pH Value
% %

BH-1 0.75 0.07 below detectable limit 8.2

BH-2 2.25 0.09 below detectable limit 8.1

BH-4 2.25 0.09 below detectable limit 7.8

BH-5 2.25 0.09 0.01 8.4

BH-6 7.50 1.8 below detectable limit 8.2

BH-8 4.50 1.9 below detectable limit 7.8

BH-9 1.50 0.08 0.01 7.9

BH-15 4.50 1.10 below detectable limit 8.2

BH-17 3.00 0.09 0.01 7.8

BH-18 4.50 0.08 below detectable limit 8.2

BH-22 3.00 0.09 below detectable limit 8.2

IS : 456-2000, SPECIFICATIONS

Requirements for Concrete Exposed to Sulphate Attack as per IS : 456-2000, Clauses 8.2.2.4 and
9.1.2, Table 4, Page-19
Concentration of Sulphates, expressed as SO 3 In-
Class In Groundwater (mg/l)
Soil-Water Extract (Total) Percent
1 Traces (<0.2) Less than 300
2 0.2 to 0.5 300-1200
3 0.5 to 1.0 1200-2500
4 1.0 to 2.0 2500-5000
5 > 2.0 > 5000

Classification of Chloride Conditions in Groundwater*


Chloride Limits
Classification
Temperate Climate Tropical Climate
Negligible 0-2000 ppm Not Applicable
Moderate 2000-10,000 ppm 0-2000 ppm
High More than 10,000 ppm 2000-20,000 ppm
Only if considerably in excess of
Very High Generally not applicable
20,000 ppm
*Source : Institution of Civil Engineers, London (1979)

Chemical Test Results

Project No. 217054 Plate 123 of 123


APPENDIX-A
TYPICAL CALCULATIONS
Open Foundation
Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Bearing Capacity Analysis for Shallow Foundations


Analysis as per IS 6403-1981

Foundation at 2-3 m depth

The bearing capacity equation is as follows :


qnet safe = (1/FS){cNczcdc+q(Nq-1)zqdq+0.5BgNgzgdgRw}
where:
qnet safe = safe net bearing capacity c = cohesion intercept
q = overburden pressure B = Foundation width
γ = Bulk density of soil below founding level
Rw = W ater table correction factor FS = Factor of safety
Nc, Nq, Ng = bearing capacity factors, which are a function of f
dc, dq, dg = Depth factors
zc, zq, zg = Shape factors
Soil parameters : Bulk Density
c= 8.00 T/m 2 φ= 5.0 degrees GENERAL SHEAR FAILURE Profile
c' = 5.33 T/m 2 φ= 3.3 degrees LOCAL SHEAR FAILURE Depth, m γ
General Shear Failure : Nc = 6.49 Nq = 1.57 Ng = 0.45 From To T/m 3
' ' '
Local Shear Failure : Nc = 5.99 Nq = 1.35 Ng = 0.27 0.0 1.5 1.65
1.5 6.0 1.73
Factor of safety = 2.5 as per IS 1904-1986 6.0 14.0 1.79
14.0 21.0 1.88
Design W ater Table depth = Not Met 21.0 25.5 1.93
Rw factor: Constant value(V) for worst condition or Rw = 0.60
calculate(C) based on W T Depth ? : V
Depth factor to be considered ? Y
For computation of Depth Factor, depth below GL to be ignored to account for loose
soils,poorly compacted backfill above foundation, scour etc. = 1.0 m
FAILURE CRITERIA : AVERAG OF LOCAL & GENERAL SHEAR FAILURE
E

Foundation Depth factors Depth factors qnet safe , Gross


Shape Factors Safe Net
Dimensions (GSF) (LSF) Bearing
Depth,m

FOUN- T/m
2
Bearing
DATION Rw Capacity
Capacity
B, m L, m SHAPE zc zq zg dc dq dg dc
' dq' dg
'
GSF LSF 2 (Safe)
T/m 2
T/m
3.0 3.0 Square 2.0 0.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.07 1.00 1.00 1.07 1.00 1.00 30.1 18.5 24.3 27.6
6.0 6.0 Square 2.0 0.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 29.3 18.0 23.7 27.0
3.0 3.0 Square 3.0 0.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.15 1.00 1.00 1.14 1.00 1.00 32.5 20.0 26.2 31.3
6.0 6.0 Square 3.0 0.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.07 1.00 1.00 1.07 1.00 1.00 30.8 18.9 24.9 29.9

Project No. 217054 Appendix-A : A 1 of 19


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Bearing Capacity Analysis for Shallow Foundations


Analysis as per IS 6403-1981

Foundation at 4 m depth

The bearing capacity equation is as follows :


qnet safe = (1/FS){cNczcdc+q(Nq-1)zqdq+0.5BgNgzgdgRw}
where:
qnet safe = safe net bearing capacity c = cohesion intercept
q = overburden pressure B = Foundation width
γ = Bulk density of soil below founding level
Rw = W ater table correction factor FS = Factor of safety
Nc, Nq, Ng = bearing capacity factors, which are a function of f
dc, dq, dg = Depth factors
zc, zq, zg = Shape factors
Soil parameters : Bulk Density
c= 8.00 T/m 2 φ= 5.0 degrees GENERAL SHEAR FAILURE Profile
c' = 5.33 T/m 2 φ= 3.3 degrees LOCAL SHEAR FAILURE Depth, m γ
General Shear Failure : Nc = 6.49 Nq = 1.57 Ng = 0.45 From To T/m 3
' ' '
Local Shear Failure : Nc = 5.99 Nq = 1.35 Ng = 0.27 0.0 1.5 1.65
1.5 6.0 1.73
Factor of safety = 2.5 as per IS 1904-1986 6.0 14.0 1.79
14.0 21.0 1.88
Design W ater Table depth = Not Met 21.0 25.5 1.93
Rw factor: Constant value(V) for worst condition or Rw = 0.60
calculate(C) based on W T Depth ? : V
Depth factor to be considered ? Y
For computation of Depth Factor, depth below GL to be ignored to account for loose
soils,poorly compacted backfill above foundation, scour etc. = 1.0 m
FAILURE CRITERIA : GENERAL SHEAR FAILURE

Foundation Depth factors Depth factors qnet safe , Gross


Shape Factors Safe Net
Dimensions (GSF) (LSF) Bearing
Depth,m

FOUN- T/m
2
Bearing
DATION Rw Capacity
Capacity
B, m L, m SHAPE zc zq zg dc dq dg dc
' dq' dg
'
GSF LSF 2 (Safe)
T/m 2
T/m
3.0 3.0 Square 4.0 0.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.22 1.00 1.00 35.0 35.0 41.8
6.0 6.0 Square 4.0 0.60 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.11 1.00 1.00 32.2 32.2 39.0

Project No. 217054 Appendix-A : A 2 of 19


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Settlement Analysis for Shallow Foundation Based on N- Values


Analysis as per IS:8009 (Part 1)-1976, Clause 9.1.4

Foundation at 2-4 m depth

Design W ater Table Depth : Not Met


R w factor : Calculate (C) based on water table depth
or Fixed Value(V) for worst condition : V Rw factor for design : 0.6
Fox's Depth Factor to be considered ? Y
Depth to be ignored in Depth Factor Computation for
loose soils, poorly compacted backfill, scour, etc. 1.0 m

Settlemen
Design N-Value

Settlement, mm
2

Rigidity Factor,
Pressure, T/m

Fox's Depth

t@
Design Net

Computed
Foundation

Foundation

Foundation
Length,m

Factor, df
Depth,m
Width,m

Bearing

2
Shape 1kg/cm Rw
dr

(as read
off from
graph),
3.0 3.0 2.0 Square 15.0 16.5 19.9 0.60 0.91 1.0 49.8
6.0 6.0 2.0 Square 15.0 16.5 21.8 0.60 0.96 0.8 46.1
3.0 3.0 3.0 Square 16.0 20.0 18.4 0.60 0.80 1.0 49.0
6.0 6.0 3.0 Square 16.0 20.0 20.2 0.60 0.91 0.8 48.9
3.0 3.0 4.0 Square 17.0 23.5 17.0 0.60 0.73 1.0 48.7
6.0 6.0 4.0 Square 17.0 23.5 18.7 0.60 0.85 0.8 49.8

Project No. 217054 Appendix-A : A 3 of 19


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Settlement Analysis for Shallow Foundations


Elastic Settlement Computed From Theory of Elasticity
Analysis as per IS : 8009 Part 1 - 1976, Clause 9.2

Foundation at 2-4 m depth

Total settlement computed as equal to elastic/immediate settlement.


No consolidation settlement - analysis valid for granular soils,weathered rocks,
hard clays & cohesive soils above water table

ELASTIC / IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT


2
Si = q B' (1 - µ ) I df dr
E
Reference : Foundation Analysis & Design by J.E.Bowles fifth edition (1996)
where B= Foundation width B' = B/2 L' = L/2 µ= Poisson's Ratio
q= Applied Bearing Pressure E= Modulus of Elasticity
df = Fox's Depth factor dr = Rigidity factor
I= Influence factor at corner of rectangular loaded area(B' x L'),
computed from theory of elasticity using Steinbrenner's factors
Settlement at centre of footing of size B x L = 4 x Settlement at corner of area B' x L'
Poisson's Ratio : 0.35
Is Rigid Layer met ? N
Layer Depth,m Modulus of
Soil Classification 2
No. From To Elasticity,T/m
1 0.0 1.5 Fill/Natural soil 600
2 1.5 6.0 Sandy silt /clayey silt 1000
3 6.0 14.0 Sandy silt /clayey silt 1300
4 14.0 21.0 Sandy silt /clayey silt 2100
5 21.0 25.5 Fine sand 2800
6 25.5 30.0 Clayey silt 2900

Fox's Depth Factor to be considered ? Y


Depth to be ignored in Depth Factor Computation for loose
soils, poorly compacted backfill, scour etc. = 1.5 m
Founda- Embed- Applied
Founda- Fox's E(weigh- Elastic
tion ment Bearing Rigidity Influence
tion Width Depth M = L'/B' N = H/B' ted ave.) Settle-
Length Depth (D), Press. Factor, dr Factor
(B), m Factor T/m 2 ment mm
(L), m m T/m2
3.0 3.0 2.0 16.5 1.00 0.96 1.00 10.00 0.505 1380 30.6
6.0 6.0 2.0 16.5 0.80 0.98 1.00 10.00 0.505 1955 35.3
3.0 3.0 3.0 20.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 10.00 0.505 1453 31.1
6.0 6.0 3.0 20.0 0.80 0.94 1.00 10.00 0.505 1991 40.0
3.0 3.0 4.0 23.5 1.00 0.76 1.00 10.00 0.505 1527 31.1
6.0 6.0 4.0 23.5 0.80 0.88 1.00 10.00 0.505 2029 43.3

Project No. 217054 Appendix-A : A 4 of 19


Pile Foundation
Lateral Load Carrying Capacity for Pile Foundations
Analysis in accordance with: IRC 78 - 2014

500 mm

Pile Type : Bored Cast in Situ RCC Pile


Pile cross-section : Circle
Pile Dia : 500 mm
Pile Cut-off-Level below GL 1.5 m Pile Length : 14 m
Pile Head : Fixed Head Condition
Grade of Concrete : M 25 Modulus of Elasticity : 30000 MPa
4
Moment of Inertia, I : 3.068E-03 m
Soil Classification: Cohesive Normally Consolidated or Preconsolidated Clays? P
Unconfined Compression Strength (qu) = 160.0 kPa
Saturation : Dry

T= (EI/ηh)1/5 for Granular Soils and NC Clays R= (EI/KB) 1/4 for Preconsolidated Clays
3
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction, k1 = 28.8 MN/m R= 2.00 m
Free Standing Length of Pile or Length of pile below cut-off-level not
contributing substantially to lateral capacity (e) : 0.0 m
e/R = 0.0 Reading off from graph, zf/R = 1.95
Depth of Fixity, zf = 3.90 m e + zf = 3.90 m
H (e + z f ) 3
Deflection, y = x10 3 …. for free-head pile
3EI
3
H (e + z f )
Deflection, y = x10 3 …. for fixed-head pile
12 EI
where : y = Lateral deflection at pile top e= Free-standing length of pile
H= Lateral load applied zf = Depth of fixity
Permissible Horizontal Deflection at top of pile, Y = 5.0 mm
Computed Lateral Capacity of Pile, H = 93 kN = 9.5 Tonnes
Computation of Safe Axial Compressive Pile Capacity
By Static Analysis
Analysis in accordance with IRC:78-2014, Appendix-5 (Clause 709.3.1)

500 mm

Pile Type : Bored Cast in Situ RCC Pile Loading : Axial Compression
The safe pile capacity is computed as :
Qsafe=(1/FS){a1 to n[(ac+pktana)AsL]+[(cNc+pNq+0.5D a' Na)Ap]}
where :
Qsafe = Safe axial pile capacity, kN FS = Factor of safety 2
a = Adhesion factor (function of C u ) p = Overburden pressure, kN/m
Angle of wall friction between soil and L = Pile segment length in selected
a =
pile, degrees layer
c = Cohesion intercept, kN/m2 k = Coefficient of earth pressure
3
a' = Effective density of soil, kN/m D Pile diameter
Nc, Nq, Na= Bearing capacity factors, which are a
Pile surface area per m length
function of a =
n = Number of layers As Pile end bearing area

=
Ap =
Pile Cross section : Circle Pile cut-off Level (COL) : 2.0 m
Pile Diameter ,D : 500 mm
2 2
Pile Surface Area, As = 1.571 m /m length Pile cross-section Area, Ap = 0.196 m
Overburden Pressure to be considered below : COL
Consider overburden pressure to 20 pile diameters, i.e. 10.0 m below 2.0 m
become constant below : i.e. 12.0 m below 0.0 m
Design Water Table Depth: Not Met
Factor of Safety : 2.5 as per IRC Specifications
degrees

N value
a, kN/m3

Depth,m
δ(=φ),
2
Layer

kN/m
No.

Soil Classification k a Nc Nq Na
c,

From To
1 0.0 1.5 Fill/Natural soil 16.5 11 1.5 0.0
2 1.5 6.0 Sandy silt /clayey silt 80 5 17.3 19 1.5 0.3
3 6.0 14.0 Sandy silt /clayey silt 110 5 17.9 28 1.5 0.3 9.0 1.57 0.45
4 14.0 21.0 Sandy silt /clayey silt 150 5 18.8 47 1.5 0.3 9.0 1.57 0.45
5 21.0 25.5 Fine sand 0 31 19.3 57 1.5 0.0 23.93 25.99
6 25.5 30.0 Clayey silt 230 6 20.0 57 1.5 0.3 9.0 1.72 0.57
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

Pile Capacity Calculation at following Pile 14.0 16.0 18.0


Length(s) below cut-off Level (m)
Computation of Safe Axial Compressive Pile Capacity
By Static Analysis
Analysis in accordance with IRC:78-2014, Appendix-5 (Clause 709.3.1)

500 mm

Pile Type : Bored Cast in Situ RCC Pile Loading : Axial Compression

Pile Dia = 500 mm

Skin Friction

Skin Friction
Cumulative
Overburden
below COL, m

Total End
Pressure

Unit Skin

Safe Pile

Safe Pile
Unit End

Capacity

Capacity

Capacity
Depth Below

Bearing

Bearing
in Layer

Ult. Pile
Friction
Soil Parameters
Pile Length
GL , m

Layer
No.
degrees
a (=a),
2

3
kN/m

kN/m
aeff,
c,

2 2 2
kN/m kN/m kN kN kN/m kN kN kN MT

0.0 -
1 0.0

1.5 -
2 80.0 5

2.0 0.0 0.0


2 80.0 5 17.3
25 19 19
2.5 0.5 8.7
2 80.0 5 17.3
29 160 179
6.0 4.0 69.2
3 110.0 5 17.9
43 68 247
7.0 5.0 87.1
3 110.0 5 17.9
50 395 642
12.0 10.0 176.6
3 110.0 5 17.9
56 176 819
14.0 12.0 176.6
4 150.0 5 18.8
68 107 926
15.0 13.0 176.6
4 150.0 5 18.8
68 107 1033 1629 320 1353 541 55
16.0 14.0 176.6
4 150.0 5 18.8
68 214 1247 1629 320 1567 627 64
18.0 16.0 176.6
4 150.0 5 18.8
68 214 1461 1629 320 1781 712 73
20.0 18.0 176.6
Computation of Safe Axial Pullout Capacity of Pile
By Static Analysis
Analysis in accordance with IRC:78-2014, Appendix-5 (Clause 709.3.1)

500 mm

Pile Type : Bored Cast in Situ RCC Pile


Loading : Axial Pullout (Uplift)
The safe uplift capacity of pile is calculated as :
Qsafe=(1/FS)[a1 to n[0.7*(ac+pktana)AsL] + W}
where
Qsafe = Safe axial pile capacity, kN FS = Factor of safety
a = Adhesion factor (function of C u ) p = Overburden pressure, kN/m2
Friction angle between soil and pile,
a = L = Pile segment length in selected layer
degrees ( = φ )
c = Cohesion intercept, kN/m2 k = Coefficient of earth pressure
a' = Effective density of soil, kN/m3 D = Pile diameter
n = Number of layers As = Pile surface area per m length
W = Weight of the pile
As per IRC : 78-2014, Safe Pile Capacity in uplift = 70% of shaft resistance in compression + Weight of Pile

Pile cross section shape : Circle Pile cut-off Level (COL) : 2.0 m
Pile Diameter ,D : 500 mm
Pile Surface Area, As = 1.571 m2/m length

Overburden Pressure to be considered below : COL


Consider overburden press. to
become constant below : 20 pile diameters, i.e. 10.0 m below 2.0 m
i.e. 12.0 m below 0.0 m
Design Water Table Depth : Not Met
Factor of Safety : 2.5 as per IRC:78, Clause 709.3.6.5
Percentage of Ultimate Shaft Resistance to be used for Ultimate Pullout Capacity: 0.7 as per IRC:78
c, kN/m2

Depth,m
N value
a, kN/m3
degrees
δ(=φ),
Layer
No.

Soil Classification k a
From To
1 0.0 1.5 Fill/Natural soil 16.5 11 1.5 0.00
2 1.5 6.0 Sandy silt /clayey silt 80 5 17.3 19 1.5 0.30
3 6.0 14.0 Sandy silt /clayey silt 110 5 17.9 28 1.5 0.30
4 14.0 21.0 Sandy silt /clayey silt 150 5 18.8 47 1.5 0.30
5 21.0 25.5 Fine sand 0 31 19.3 57 1.5 0.00
6 25.5 30.0 Clayey silt 230 6 20.0 57 1.5 0.30
0.00
#N/A 0.00
#N/A 0.00
#N/A 0.00
#N/A 0.00
#N/A 0.00

Pile Capacity Calculation at following 8.0 10.0 12.0


Pile Length(s) below cut-off Level (m)
Computation of Safe Axial Pullout Capacity of Pile
By Static Analysis
Analysis in accordance with IRC:78-2014, Appendix-5 (Clause 709.3.1)

500 mm

Pile Type : Bored Cast in Situ RCC Pile


Pile Dia = 500 mm Bored Cast in Situ RCC Pile

UltimatePullout
Skin Friction in
Pile Length below
Depth Below GL ,

Weight of Pile
Skin Friction

Safe Pullout

Safe Pullout
Overburden

Cumulative
Pressure

Unit Skin
Soil Parameters

Capacity

Capacity

Capacity
Friction

Layer
COL,m

Layer
m

No.
2

degrees
c, kN/m

a (=a),

3
kN/m
aeff,

2 2
kN/m kN/m kN kN kN kN kN MT

0.0 -
1 0.0 0

1.5 -
2 80.0 5

2.0 0.0 0.0


2 80.0 5 17.30
28.5 179 179
6.0 4.0 69.2
3 110.0 5 17.90
46.8 294 473 38 369 170 17
10.0 8.0 140.8
3 110.0 5 17.90
53.8 169 642 47 497 227 23
12.0 10.0 176.6
3 110.0 5 17.90
56.2 176 819 57 630 286 29
14.0 12.0 176.6
Lateral Load Carrying Capacity for Pile Foundations
Analysis in accordance with: IRC 78 - 2014

600 mm

Pile Type : Bored Cast in Situ RCC Pile


Pile cross-section : Circle
Pile Dia : 600 mm
Pile Cut-off-Level below GL 1.5 m Pile Length : 14 m
Pile Head : Fixed Head Condition
Grade of Concrete : M 25 Modulus of Elasticity : 30000 MPa
4
Moment of Inertia, I : 6.362E-03 m
Soil Classification: Cohesive Normally Consolidated or Preconsolidated Clays? P
Unconfined Compression Strength (qu) = 160.0 kPa
Saturation : Dry

T= (EI/ηh)1/5 for Granular Soils and NC Clays R= (EI/KB) 1/4 for Preconsolidated Clays
3
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction, k1 = 28.8 MN/m R= 2.40 m
Free Standing Length of Pile or Length of pile below cut-off-level not
contributing substantially to lateral capacity (e) : 0.0 m
e/R = 0.0 Reading off from graph, zf/R = 1.95
Depth of Fixity, zf = 4.68 m e + zf = 4.68 m
H (e + z f ) 3
Deflection, y = x10 3 …. for free-head pile
3EI
3
H (e + z f )
Deflection, y = x10 3 …. for fixed-head pile
12 EI
where : y = Lateral deflection at pile top e= Free-standing length of pile
H= Lateral load applied zf = Depth of fixity
Permissible Horizontal Deflection at top of pile, Y = 6.0 mm
Computed Lateral Capacity of Pile, H = 134 kN = 13.7 Tonnes
Computation of Safe Axial Compressive Pile Capacity
By Static Analysis
Analysis in accordance with IRC:78-2014, Appendix-5 (Clause 709.3.1)

600 mm

Pile Type : Bored Cast in Situ RCC Pile Loading : Axial Compression
The safe pile capacity is computed as :
Qsafe=(1/FS){a1 to n[(ac+pktana)AsL]+[(cNc+pNq+0.5D a' Na)Ap]}
where :
Qsafe = Safe axial pile capacity, kN FS = Factor of safety 2
a = Adhesion factor (function of C u ) p = Overburden pressure, kN/m
Angle of wall friction between soil and L = Pile segment length in selected
a =
pile, degrees layer
c = Cohesion intercept, kN/m2 k = Coefficient of earth pressure
3
a' = Effective density of soil, kN/m D Pile diameter
Nc, Nq, Na= Bearing capacity factors, which are a
Pile surface area per m length
function of a =
n = Number of layers As Pile end bearing area

=
Ap =
Pile Cross section : Circle Pile cut-off Level (COL) : 2.0 m
Pile Diameter ,D : 600 mm
2 2
Pile Surface Area, As = 1.885 m /m length Pile cross-section Area, Ap = 0.283 m
Overburden Pressure to be considered below : COL
Consider overburden pressure to 20 pile diameters, i.e. 12.0 m below 2.0 m
become constant below : i.e. 14.0 m below 0.0 m
Design Water Table Depth: Not Met
Factor of Safety : 2.5 as per IRC Specifications
degrees

N value
a, kN/m3

Depth,m
δ(=φ),
2
Layer

kN/m
No.

Soil Classification k a Nc Nq Na
c,

From To
1 0.0 1.5 Fill/Natural soil 16.5 11 1.5 0.0
2 1.5 6.0 Sandy silt /clayey silt 80 5 17.3 19 1.5 0.3
3 6.0 14.0 Sandy silt /clayey silt 110 5 17.9 28 1.5 0.3 9.0 1.57 0.45
4 14.0 21.0 Sandy silt /clayey silt 150 5 18.8 47 1.5 0.3 9.0 1.57 0.45
5 21.0 25.5 Fine sand 0 31 19.3 57 1.5 0.0 23.93 25.99
6 25.5 30.0 Clayey silt 230 6 20.0 57 1.5 0.3 9.0 1.72 0.57
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

Pile Capacity Calculation at following Pile 14.0 16.0 18.0


Length(s) below cut-off Level (m)
Computation of Safe Axial Compressive Pile Capacity
By Static Analysis
Analysis in accordance with IRC:78-2014, Appendix-5 (Clause 709.3.1)

600 mm

Pile Type : Bored Cast in Situ RCC Pile Loading : Axial Compression

Pile Dia = 600 mm

Skin Friction

Skin Friction
Cumulative
Overburden
below COL, m

Total End
Pressure

Unit Skin

Safe Pile

Safe Pile
Unit End

Capacity

Capacity

Capacity
Depth Below

Bearing

Bearing
in Layer

Ult. Pile
Friction
Soil Parameters
Pile Length
GL , m

Layer
No.
degrees
a (=a),
2

3
kN/m

kN/m
aeff,
c,

2 2 2
kN/m kN/m kN kN kN/m kN kN kN MT

0.0 -
1 0.0

1.5 -
2 80.0 5

2.0 0.0 0.0


2 80.0 5 17.3
25 33 33
2.7 0.7 12.1
2 80.0 5 17.3
29 182 215
6.0 4.0 69.2
3 110.0 5 17.9
43 98 314
7.2 5.2 90.7
3 110.0 5 17.9
53 678 991
14.0 12.0 212.4
4 150.0 5 18.8
73 165 1156
15.2 13.2 212.4
4 150.0 5 18.8
73 110 1266 1686 477 1743 697 71
16.0 14.0 212.4
4 150.0 5 18.8
73 275 1541 1686 477 2017 807 82
18.0 16.0 212.4
4 150.0 5 18.8
73 247 1788 1686 477 2265 906 92
19.8 17.8 212.4
4 150.0 5 18.8
73 27 1816 1686 477 2292 917 93
20.0 18.0 212.4
Computation of Safe Axial Pullout Capacity of Pile
By Static Analysis
Analysis in accordance with IRC:78-2014, Appendix-5 (Clause 709.3.1)

600 mm

Pile Type : Bored Cast in Situ RCC Pile


Loading : Axial Pullout (Uplift)
The safe uplift capacity of pile is calculated as :
Qsafe=(1/FS)[a1 to n[0.7*(ac+pktana)AsL] + W}
where
Qsafe = Safe axial pile capacity, kN FS = Factor of safety
a = Adhesion factor (function of C u ) p = Overburden pressure, kN/m2
Friction angle between soil and pile,
a = L = Pile segment length in selected layer
degrees ( = φ )
c = Cohesion intercept, kN/m2 k = Coefficient of earth pressure
a' = Effective density of soil, kN/m3 D = Pile diameter
n = Number of layers As = Pile surface area per m length
W = Weight of the pile
As per IRC : 78-2014, Safe Pile Capacity in uplift = 70% of shaft resistance in compression + Weight of Pile

Pile cross section shape : Circle Pile cut-off Level (COL) : 2.0 m
Pile Diameter ,D : 600 mm
Pile Surface Area, As = 1.885 m2/m length

Overburden Pressure to be considered below : COL


Consider overburden press. to
become constant below : 20 pile diameters, i.e. 12.0 m below 2.0 m
i.e. 14.0 m below 0.0 m
Design Water Table Depth : Not Met
Factor of Safety : 2.5 as per IRC:78, Clause 709.3.6.5
Percentage of Ultimate Shaft Resistance to be used for Ultimate Pullout Capacity: 0.7 as per IRC:78
c, kN/m2

Depth,m
N value
a, kN/m3
degrees
δ(=φ),
Layer
No.

Soil Classification k a
From To
1 0.0 1.5 Fill/Natural soil 16.5 11 1.5 0.00
2 1.5 6.0 Sandy silt /clayey silt 80 5 17.3 19 1.5 0.30
3 6.0 14.0 Sandy silt /clayey silt 110 5 17.9 28 1.5 0.30
4 14.0 21.0 Sandy silt /clayey silt 150 5 18.8 47 1.5 0.30
5 21.0 25.5 Fine sand 0 31 19.3 57 1.5 0.00
6 25.5 30.0 Clayey silt 230 6 20.0 57 1.5 0.30
0.00
#N/A 0.00
#N/A 0.00
#N/A 0.00
#N/A 0.00
#N/A 0.00

Pile Capacity Calculation at following 8.0 10.0 12.0


Pile Length(s) below cut-off Level (m)
Computation of Safe Axial Pullout Capacity of Pile
By Static Analysis
Analysis in accordance with IRC:78-2014, Appendix-5 (Clause 709.3.1)

600 mm

Pile Type : Bored Cast in Situ RCC Pile


Pile Dia = 600 mm Bored Cast in Situ RCC Pile

UltimatePullout
Skin Friction in
Pile Length below
Depth Below GL ,

Weight of Pile
Skin Friction

Safe Pullout

Safe Pullout
Overburden

Cumulative
Pressure

Unit Skin
Soil Parameters

Capacity

Capacity

Capacity
Friction

Layer
COL,m

Layer
m

No.
2

degrees
c, kN/m

a (=a),

3
kN/m
aeff,

2 2
kN/m kN/m kN kN kN kN kN MT

0.0 -
1 0.0 0

1.5 -
2 80.0 5

2.0 0.0 0.0


2 80.0 5 17.30
28.5 215 215
6.0 4.0 69.2
3 110.0 5 17.90
46.8 353 568 54 452 213 22
10.0 8.0 140.8
3 110.0 5 17.90
53.8 203 771 68 607 284 29
12.0 10.0 176.6
3 110.0 5 17.90
58.5 221 991 81 775 359 37
14.0 12.0 212.4
Lateral Load Carrying Capacity for Pile Foundations
Analysis in accordance with: IRC 78 - 2014

800 mm

Pile Type : Bored Cast in Situ RCC Pile


Pile cross-section : Circle
Pile Dia : 800 mm
Pile Cut-off-Level below GL 1.5 m Pile Length : 14 m
Pile Head : Fixed Head Condition
Grade of Concrete : M 25 Modulus of Elasticity : 30000 MPa
4
Moment of Inertia, I : 2.011E-02 m
Soil Classification: Cohesive Normally Consolidated or Preconsolidated Clays? P
Unconfined Compression Strength (qu) = 160.0 kPa
Saturation : Dry

T= (EI/ηh)1/5 for Granular Soils and NC Clays R= (EI/KB) 1/4 for Preconsolidated Clays
3
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction, k1 = 28.8 MN/m R= 3.20 m
Free Standing Length of Pile or Length of pile below cut-off-level not
contributing substantially to lateral capacity (e) : 0.0 m
e/R = 0.0 Reading off from graph, zf/R = 1.95
Depth of Fixity, zf = 6.24 m e + zf = 6.24 m
H (e + z f ) 3
Deflection, y = x10 3 …. for free-head pile
3EI
3
H (e + z f )
Deflection, y = x10 3 …. for fixed-head pile
12 EI
where : y = Lateral deflection at pile top e= Free-standing length of pile
H= Lateral load applied zf = Depth of fixity
Permissible Horizontal Deflection at top of pile, Y = 8.0 mm
Computed Lateral Capacity of Pile, H = 238 kN = 24.3 Tonnes
Computation of Safe Axial Compressive Pile Capacity
By Static Analysis
Analysis in accordance with IRC:78-2014, Appendix-5 (Clause 709.3.1)

800 mm

Pile Type : Bored Cast in Situ RCC Pile Loading : Axial Compression
The safe pile capacity is computed as :
Qsafe=(1/FS){a1 to n[(ac+pktana)AsL]+[(cNc+pNq+0.5D a' Na)Ap]}
where :
Qsafe = Safe axial pile capacity, kN FS = Factor of safety 2
a = Adhesion factor (function of C u ) p = Overburden pressure, kN/m
Angle of wall friction between soil and L = Pile segment length in selected
a =
pile, degrees layer
c = Cohesion intercept, kN/m2 k = Coefficient of earth pressure
3
a' = Effective density of soil, kN/m D Pile diameter
Nc, Nq, Na= Bearing capacity factors, which are a
Pile surface area per m length
function of a =
n = Number of layers As Pile end bearing area

=
Ap =
Pile Cross section : Circle Pile cut-off Level (COL) : 2.0 m
Pile Diameter ,D : 800 mm
2 2
Pile Surface Area, As = 2.513 m /m length Pile cross-section Area, Ap = 0.503 m
Overburden Pressure to be considered below : COL
Consider overburden pressure to 20 pile diameters, i.e. 16.0 m below 2.0 m
become constant below : i.e. 18.0 m below 0.0 m
Design Water Table Depth: Not Met
Factor of Safety : 2.5 as per IRC Specifications
degrees

N value
a, kN/m3

Depth,m
δ(=φ),
2
Layer

kN/m
No.

Soil Classification k a Nc Nq Na
c,

From To
1 0.0 1.5 Fill/Natural soil 16.5 11 1.5 0.0
2 1.5 6.0 Sandy silt /clayey silt 80 5 17.3 19 1.5 0.3
3 6.0 14.0 Sandy silt /clayey silt 110 5 17.9 28 1.5 0.3 9.0 1.57 0.45
4 14.0 21.0 Sandy silt /clayey silt 150 5 18.8 47 1.5 0.3 9.0 1.57 0.45
5 21.0 25.5 Fine sand 0 31 19.3 57 1.5 0.0 23.93 25.99
6 25.5 30.0 Clayey silt 230 6 20.0 57 1.5 0.3 9.0 1.72 0.57
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

Pile Capacity Calculation at following Pile 14.0 16.0 18.0


Length(s) below cut-off Level (m)
Computation of Safe Axial Compressive Pile Capacity
By Static Analysis
Analysis in accordance with IRC:78-2014, Appendix-5 (Clause 709.3.1)

800 mm

Pile Type : Bored Cast in Situ RCC Pile Loading : Axial Compression

Pile Dia = 800 mm

Skin Friction

Skin Friction
Cumulative
Overburden
below COL, m

Total End
Pressure

Unit Skin

Safe Pile

Safe Pile
Unit End

Capacity

Capacity

Capacity
Depth Below

Bearing

Bearing
in Layer

Ult. Pile
Friction
Soil Parameters
Pile Length
GL , m

Layer
No.
degrees
a (=a),
2

3
kN/m

kN/m
aeff,
c,

2 2 2
kN/m kN/m kN kN kN/m kN kN kN MT

0.0 -
1 0.0

1.5 -
2 80.0 5

2.0 0.0 0.0


2 80.0 5 17.3
25 70 70
3.1 1.1 19.0
2 80.0 5 17.3
30 217 287
6.0 4.0 69.2
3 110.0 5 17.9
44 177 464
7.6 5.6 97.8
3 110.0 5 17.9
53 858 1322
14.0 12.0 212.4
4 150.0 5 18.8
75 301 1623
15.6 13.6 242.5
4 150.0 5 18.8
77 78 1701 1745 877 2578 1031 105
16.0 14.0 250.0
4 150.0 5 18.8
80 404 2104 1804 907 3011 1204 123
18.0 16.0 287.6
4 150.0 5 18.8
83 291 2395 1804 907 3302 1321 135
19.4 17.4 287.6
4 150.0 5 18.8
83 125 2520 1804 907 3427 1371 140
20.0 18.0 287.6
Computation of Safe Axial Pullout Capacity of Pile
By Static Analysis
Analysis in accordance with IRC:78-2014, Appendix-5 (Clause 709.3.1)

800 mm

Pile Type : Bored Cast in Situ RCC Pile


Loading : Axial Pullout (Uplift)
The safe uplift capacity of pile is calculated as :
Qsafe=(1/FS)[a1 to n[0.7*(ac+pktana)AsL] + W}
where
Qsafe = Safe axial pile capacity, kN FS = Factor of safety
a = Adhesion factor (function of C u ) p = Overburden pressure, kN/m2
Friction angle between soil and pile,
a = L = Pile segment length in selected layer
degrees ( = φ )
c = Cohesion intercept, kN/m2 k = Coefficient of earth pressure
3
a' = Effective density of soil, kN/m D = Pile diameter
n = Number of layers As = Pile surface area per m length
W = Weight of the pile
As per IRC : 78-2014, Safe Pile Capacity in uplift = 70% of shaft resistance in compression + Weight of Pile

Pile cross section shape : Circle Pile cut-off Level (COL) : 2.0 m
Pile Diameter ,D : 800 mm
Pile Surface Area, As = 2.513 m2/m length

Overburden Pressure to be considered below : COL


Consider overburden press. to
become constant below : 20 pile diameters, i.e. 16.0 m below 2.0 m
i.e. 18.0 m below 0.0 m
Design Water Table Depth : Not Met
Factor of Safety : 2.5 as per IRC:78, Clause 709.3.6.5
Percentage of Ultimate Shaft Resistance to be used for Ultimate Pullout Capacity: 0.7 as per IRC:78
c, kN/m2

Depth,m
N value
a, kN/m3
degrees
δ(=φ),
Layer
No.

Soil Classification k a
From To
1 0.0 1.5 Fill/Natural soil 16.5 11 1.5 0.00
2 1.5 6.0 Sandy silt /clayey silt 80 5 17.3 19 1.5 0.30
3 6.0 14.0 Sandy silt /clayey silt 110 5 17.9 28 1.5 0.30
4 14.0 21.0 Sandy silt /clayey silt 150 5 18.8 47 1.5 0.30
5 21.0 25.5 Fine sand 0 31 19.3 57 1.5 0.00
6 25.5 30.0 Clayey silt 230 6 20.0 57 1.5 0.30
0.00
#N/A 0.00
#N/A 0.00
#N/A 0.00
#N/A 0.00
#N/A 0.00

Pile Capacity Calculation at following 8.0 10.0 12.0


Pile Length(s) below cut-off Level (m)
Computation of Safe Axial Pullout Capacity of Pile
By Static Analysis
Analysis in accordance with IRC:78-2014, Appendix-5 (Clause 709.3.1)

800 mm

Pile Type : Bored Cast in Situ RCC Pile


Pile Dia = 800 mm Bored Cast in Situ RCC Pile

UltimatePullout
Skin Friction in
Pile Length below
Depth Below GL ,

Weight of Pile
Skin Friction

Safe Pullout

Safe Pullout
Overburden

Cumulative
Pressure

Unit Skin
Soil Parameters

Capacity

Capacity

Capacity
Friction

Layer
COL,m

Layer
m

No.
2

degrees
c, kN/m

a (=a),

3
kN/m
aeff,

2 2
kN/m kN/m kN kN kN kN kN MT

0.0 -
1 0.0 0

1.5 -
2 80.0 5

2.0 0.0 0.0


2 80.0 5 17.30
28.5 287 287
6.0 4.0 69.2
3 110.0 5 17.90
46.8 470 757 97 627 309 31
10.0 8.0 140.8
3 110.0 5 17.90
53.8 271 1028 121 840 408 42
12.0 10.0 176.6
3 110.0 5 17.90
58.5 294 1322 145 1070 515 52
14.0 12.0 212.4
APPENDIX-B
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Borehole No. BH-1

Borehole No. BH-3

Site Photographs

Project No. 217054 Appendix-B : B 1 of 5


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Borehole No. BH-4

Borehole No. BH-6

Site Photographs

Project No. 217054 Appendix-B : B 2 of 5


eotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport M/s.
Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Borehole No. BH-8

Borehole No. BH-10

Site Photographs

Project No. 217054 Appendix-B : B 3 of 5


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Borehole No. BH-14

Borehole No. BH-16

Site Photographs

Project No. 217054 Appendix-B : B 4 of 5


Geotechnical Investigation for Construction of New Terminal Building at Lucknow Airport
M/s. Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd

Borehole No. BH-20

Borehole No. BH-22

Site Photographs

Project No. 217054 Appendix-B : B 5 of 5


Annexure-B
Reply to query No -17
AS PER TENDER DOCUMENT
Sr. No. Vol. Sec. Pg. Cl. Clause description CLARIFICATION SOUGHT AAI's Reply
No. No. No. No. Subject Clause description
SCHEDULE OF Complete Internal Light Fixture & Kindly provide the LED luminaire product codes for M/S Wipro 660 - LM29-451ADALI-40-LA
QUANTITIES lighting & External Roaad Lighting & Lighting also to enable a more competitive scenario. 661 - LM38-461-XXX-40-LA
(SOQ) lighting Landscape Light Fittings
662 - LM38-461XXX-40 DALA
control BOQ
as per 663 - LD56-251-XXX-40-LA
Tender BOQ 664 - LD56-251-XXX40DALA
Item No. 660 665 - LD56-501-XXX40DALA
To 688.01 666 - CRDL11R033HP40LA
& 667 - CRDL11RO33HP40DALA
Tender BOQ
668 - CRDL11R017HP40LA
Item No. 707
To 714.08
669 - CRDL11R013HP40LA
670 - LE10-491-XXX-57 HCSL
671 - LL20-281-XXX-65AL1
672 - LH17-132-XXX40DALA
673 - LH17-192-XXX40DALA
674 - LM34-501-XXX40SMLA
675 - LM34-501-XXX40SMLA
676 - LM34-251-XXX40SMLA
1
677 - LM34-251-XXX40SMLA
678 - LM34-502XXX-40DADL
679 - LM34-251XXX-40DADL
680 - 4 ft COVE LIGHT
681 - 1 ft COVE LIGHT
682 - CRCO13R038HP40G1LA

683 - LW03-850-XXX-57-XX
708 - LR02-132-XXX-57-LA
709 - LP05-711-XXX-57-LA
710 - LP05-711-XXX-57-LA
711 - LP06-351-XXX-57-LA
713 - LF20-442-060-57-LA
714 - CRLA11008HP27-08

Technical 1.3 Kindly include Osram, Bridgelux & Citizen in LED makes as Makes of LED shall be as under
Specifications these are technically equivalents to makes mentioned in Nichia/cree/philips/Osram/Sharp/Seoul.
Electrical Works The LED used should be of following tender documents & lot of luminaire manufacturers use LEDs
2
Section - 7 - B - makes Nichia/Cree/Philips of these makes in their products.
Light Fixtures

Technical 1.6 The housing of the indoor fixtures Most of the Indoor luminaires are made of CRCA hence kindly CRCA is accepted only where the Boq line item
Specifications should be extruded aluminum/standard include CRCA as approved material for Indoor luminaires. specifies it be CRCA.
Electrical Works alloy housing. CRCA has equal life as of extrusion aluminimum or PDC.
3
Section - 7 - B -
Light Fixtures

Technical 2.3.K As on date there is no by-law which demands LED luminaires Kindly follow the tender requirements.
Specifications to be BIS certified. Only LED luminaires for general purpose
Electrical Works are required to be BIS certified & no such luminaire forms a
Section - 7 - B - part of this tender BOQ. Hence it is requested to remove the
Luminaires an driver both shall be BIS
4 Light Fixtures clause of BIS certification for LED Luminaires. As on date BIS
certified individually.
has made it mandatory for all LED drivers to be BIS
certified/registered which all the luminaire manufacturers
comply to.

1
Technical 2.4 A good LED driver is supposed to have 3 stage Isolated Accepted.
Specifications protection for higher reliability, durability & longer life. When
Electrical Works more protections are added to driver to increase its durability
Section - 7 - B - & reliability it results in decrease of driver efficiency in tune of
5 Full load efficiency of driver ≥ 90%
Light Fixtures 85%. Drivers with 90% efficiency generally don't have 3 stage
isolated protection hence it is requested to allow drivers with
85% efficiency for higher durability & life.

SCHEDULE OF Tender BOQ These three line items call for UGR<16 whereas no other UGR is not required.
QUANTITIES Line Item No. indoor line items in the tender calls for UGR <16 hence it is
(SOQ) 660, 661 & requested to remove this parameter from these three line
662 items. Further, UGR is dependednt on lighting design,
6 architectural design, luminaire positioning & observer
positioning hence it is next to impossible to cross-check this
criteria at site. Kindly consider & remove this criteria to enable
a more competitive scenario.

SCHEDULE OF Tender BOQ Both these items fall under indoor lighting sub-head in tender For item no 672 & 673, IK is not required.
QUANTITIES Line Item No. BOQ. There is no such area/application in the termminal
(SOQ) 672 & 673. building which demands any luminaire to be IK08 complied &
no such criteria has been mentioned in any of the recent
tenders for indoor lighting in AAI hence it is requested to
remove this criteria or ammend the same to IK02 for these
two line items as most of the reputed manufacturers comply to
7 IK02 criteria for Indoor luminaires.
Further, this criteria has not been mentioned in any other
indoor lighting line items hence it is requested to remove this
parameter from these two line items . Kindly consider &
remove this criteria to enable a more competitive
scenario.

SCHEDULE OF SOQ-267 977 Variable Frequency Drive THiD - 10%, EMC Filter category - C1 Do we need THiD 10% at individual drive level or at PCC All VFD shall have inbuilt C1 compliant EMC filters.
QUANTITIES level because as per IEE519, THiD 10% should be at
(SOQ) common point of coupling i.e. at PCC end. Please confirm
8 10% at PCC End.
Please accept External C1 filter to meet the specifications as
some approved manufacturers are offering the same.

2 A.2 TS (E)-724 A2 1.01 (b) PAVA SYSTEM The proposed system shall be maximum 28 audio channels can be transmitted May be read as 28 channel instead of 123
16 COMPONENTS/DEVICES capable of broadcast of up to 123 channels.
AND digital audio channels concurrently
2 A.2 TS (E)-728 1.04 (2) PAVA SYSTEM There shall be no single point of failure As per the BOQ, there will be 1 main controller and 1 stand by As per tender, No Change
COMPONENTS/DEVICES with a one controller for the entire controller
17
AND ASSOCIATED system & hence a system topology
ACCESSORIES based on single controller for
2 A.2 TS (E)-729 1.04 (5) PAVA SYSTEM The system shall be Capable of maximum 28 audio channels can be transmitted May be read as 28 channel instead of 123
18 COMPONENTS/DEVICES delivering 123 Concurrent Audio channels.
AND ASSOCIATED Channels in a single data network with
2 A.2 TS (E)-735 2.7 (A) PAVA SYSTEM The DSP control unit must be equipped As per tender, No Change
COMPONENTS/DEVICES with non volatile audio message
19
AND ASSOCIATED memory on flash RAM with a capacity
ACCESSORIES of up to 16 messages in
2 A.2 TS (E)-736 2.7 A (viii) PAVA SYSTEM ‐ The DSP should have LCD Dispaly for for system monitoring Bidder may offer LCD/LED display for monitoring
COMPONENTS/DEVICES 4 LEDs for device operating state such and configuration and configuration.
AND ASSOCIATED as operation status,
20
ACCESSORIES warning/error, and emergency control
option, power saving mode, 8 LEDs for
indicating the control contacts status,
2 A.2 TS (E)-737 2.7 (B) PAVA SYSTEM The Audio Amplifiers shall be Four As per tender, No Change
COMPONENTS/DEVICES Channels with 300 watts per channel,
21
AND ASSOCIATED quad channels with 500 watts per
ACCESSORIES channel audio output power with 100
2 A.2 TS (E)-738 2.7 C (i) PAVA SYSTEM The unit shall store up to a minimum of Minimum 16 calls As per tender, No Change
COMPONENTS/DEVICES 60 calls in high quality format with
22 AND ASSOCIATED a maximum of three minutes for
ACCESSORIES each call, including chimes and
prerecorded

2
2 A.2 TS (E)-738 2.7 C (ii) PAVA SYSTEM The unit shall record and/or Minimum 16 calls As per tender, No Change
COMPONENTS/DEVICES playback up to 60 calls
AND ASSOCIATED simultaneously The
23 ACCESSORIES Unit can be connected to the data
network at any location in the
terminal building.

2 A.2 TS (E)-738 2.7 (D)(iii) PAVA SYSTEM The following features shall be As per tender, No Change
COMPONENTS/DEVICES available in the Digital Call station
AND ASSOCIATED • Intercom function between digital
ACCESSORIES call stations.Digital call station to
24 digital call station.
• Digital call station to digital call station
and other loudspeaker circuits.
• Digital call station to several digital
call stations.Integrated broadband
2 A.2 PAVA SYSTEM lThed digital
k callf station isit connected
i d to As per tender, No Change
COMPONENTS/DEVICES the VA/PA system in starshaped
25 AND ASSOCIATED topology via CAT 5E cable (shielded)
ACCESSORIES and RJ45 socket (up to 300 meters
distance).
2 A.2 2.7 (D)(iv) PAVA SYSTEM As per tender, No Change
26 COMPONENTS/DEVICES Frequency range 100 15,000 Hz
AND ASSOCIATED
2 A.2 TS (E)-745 2.7 E.1 (iii) a PAVA SYSTEM The ceiling loudspeaker shall be Power (Watt): 6 watts As per tender, No Change
COMPONENTS/DEVICES equipped for the following performance Transformer Taps: 6/3/1.5 SPL P max./4m (dB): 98dB
AND ASSOCIATED criteria. SPL 1W/1m (dB): IEC 268-5, 90 dB
ACCESSORIES Power (Watt): 20 watts Frequency range (-10dB): IEC 268-5 110 - 18,000 Hz
Transformer Taps: 20/15/1‐0/5 Dispersion angle (-6dB) @ 1Khz 170°
27 SPL P max./4m (dB‐ ): 90 dB ‐


SPL 1W/1m (dB): ‐IEC 268 5, 89.0 dB
Frequency range ( 10dB): IEC 268 5
220 22,000 Hz
Dispersion angle ( 6dB) @ 1Khz 180°
2 A.2 TS (E)-746 2.7 E.2. a PAVA SYSTEM Wall/Surface Mount Cabinet speaker ‐ As per tender, No Change
COMPONENTS/DEVICES Surface mounted loudspeakers shall Surface mounted loudspeakers shall be provided for surface
AND ASSOCIATED be provided for surface mo‐unt in areas mount in areas without false ceiling. The surface mount
ACCESSORIES without false ceiling. The surface loudspeaker shall be Compact high quality music playback
mount loudspeaker shall be Compac‐t with adjustable positioning with torsion ball joint fixture. The
28 Two way monitor speaker with speaker shall be equipped with line matching transformer
woofer and mid range chassis suitable for 100 V line. The Loudspeaker shall be
for high quality music playback with weatherproof and suitable for outdoor use.
adjustable positioning with torsion ball
joint fixture. The speaker shall be
equipped with line matching
2 A.2 TS (E)-746 2.7 E.2. b PAVA SYSTEM Load capacity: 30 W Load capacity: 30 W Agreed
COMPONENTS/DEVICES Transformer tapping: 30 W/15 W/7.5 Transformer tapping: 30 W/15 W/7.5 W/2.5 W SPL Pmax/1
AND ASSOCIATED W/2.5 W SPL Pmax/1 m: 107.9 dB m: 105dB
ACCESSORIES SPL 1 W/1 m: 89.0 dB SPL 1 W/1 m: 90dB
29 Transmission range: 150 ... 20,000 Hz Transmission range: 100- 19kHz Opening angle: 166° (H),
Opening angle: 240° (H), 310° (V) 140 ° (V)
Weight: 2.9 kg Color: Black/ White
Dimensions (w x h x d): 260 x 160 x
2 A.2 TS (E)-748 2.7 E.5 PAVA SYSTEM ‐1 2 As per tender, No Change
30 COMPONENTS/DEVICES The Beam steering Column
AND Loudspeaker shall comply with the
2 A.2 TS (E)-748 2.7 E.5 (i) PAVA SYSTEM As per tender, No Change
Acoustic design electronically
31 COMPONENTS/DEVICES
steerable line array speaker
AND ASSOCIATED
2 A.2 TS (E)-748 2.7 E.5 a. PAVA SYSTEM components 8/16/24/ x 4“ speaker membranes As per tender, No Change
components 16/24/32 x 4“ speaker
32 COMPONENTS/DEVICES
membranes (fully neodymium)
AND
2 A.2 TS (E)-748 2.7 E.5 b. PAVA SYSTEM operating mode active, 8/16/24 channel DSP amplifier, class As per tender, No Change
operating mode active, 16/24/32
33 COMPONENTS/DEVICES D
channel DSP amplifier, class D
AND ASSOCIATED
2 A.2 TS (E)-748 2.7 E.5 c. PAVA SYSTEM sensitivity 85 dB As per tender, No Change
34 COMPONENTS/DEVICES sensitivity 112 dB
AND ASSOCIATED
3
2 A.2 TS (E)-748 2.7 E.5 d. PAVA SYSTEM power rating (peak) 90 dB As per tender, No Change
35 COMPONENTS/DEVICES power rating (peak) 130 dB
AND ASSOCIATED
2 A.2 TS (E)-748 2.7 E.5 e. PAVA SYSTEM frequency range 130 Hz 18kHz As per tender, No Change
36 COMPONENTS/DEVICES frequency range 60 Hz 17 kHz
AND ASSOCIATED
2 A.2 TS (E)-748 2.7 E.5 f. PAVA SYSTEM nominal dispersion horizontal 110° As per tender, No Change
37 COMPONENTS/DEVICES nominal dispersion horizontal 110°
AND ASSOCIATED
2 A.2 TS (E)-748 2.7 E.5 g. PAVA SYSTEM vertical dispersion, electronically steerable 0° 90° in 0.1° As per tender, No Change
vertical dispersion, electronically
38 COMPONENTS/DEVICES steps
steerable 0° 90° in 0.1° steps
AND ASSOCIATED
2 A.2 TS (E)-748 2.7 E.5 h. PAVA SYSTEM vertical sound inclination angle, vertical sound inclination angle, electronically steerable ±40° As per tender, No Change
39 COMPONENTS/DEVICES electronically steerable ±40° in 0.1° in 0.1° steps
AND ASSOCIATED steps
2 A.2 TS (E)-748 2.7 E.5 i. PAVA SYSTEM Optional colours: all RAL colours must Optional colours: all RAL 9007 and 9003 colours must be Agreed
40 COMPONENTS/DEVICES be available for the Architects approval available for the Architects approval
AND ASSOCIATED
2 A.2 TS (E)-748 2.7 E.6 PAVA SYSTEM The Beam steering Column As per tender, No Change
41 COMPONENTS/DEVICES Loudspeaker shall comply with the
AND following Electronic performance:
2 A.2 TS (E)-748 2.7 E.6 a. PAVA SYSTEM amplifier output 8/ 16/24/ x25 W As per OEM Solution or product offer
42 COMPONENTS/DEVICES amplifier output 16/24/32 x 100 W
AND
2 A.2 TS (E)-748 2.7 E.6 b. PAVA SYSTEM amplifier type Pure Path Digital PWM As per tender, No Change
43 COMPONENTS/DEVICES amplifier type Pure Path Digital PWM
AND ASSOCIATED
2 A.2 TS (E)-748 2.7 E.6 c. PAVA SYSTEM audio inputs 2 independent line inputs audio inputs 2 independent line inputs with automatic priority, As per tender, No Change
44 COMPONENTS/DEVICES with automatic priority, symmetrical symmetrical transformers
AND ASSOCIATED transformers
2 A.2 TS (E)-748 2.7 E.6 d. PAVA SYSTEM audio outputs 2x link As per tender, No Change
45 COMPONENTS/DEVICES audio outputs 2x link
AND
2 A.2 TS (E)-748 2.7 E.6 e. PAVA SYSTEM DSP channels, 8/16/24 As per tender, No Change
46 COMPONENTS/DEVICES DSP channels, 16/24/32
AND ASSOCIATED
2 A.2 TS (E)-748 2.7 E.6 f. PAVA SYSTEM As per tender, No Change
47 COMPONENTS/DEVICES amplification 25 dB
AND ASSOCIATED
2 A.2 TS (E)-748 2.7 E.6 g. PAVA SYSTEM As per tender, No Change
48 COMPONENTS/DEVICES input sensitivity 1,4 V
AND ASSOCIATED
2 A.2 TS (E)-748 2.7 E.6 h. PAVA SYSTEM frequency range130 Hz -18 kHz As per tender, No Change
49 COMPONENTS/DEVICES frequency response 20 Hz 20 kHz
AND ASSOCIATED
2 A.2 TS (E)-748 2.7 E.6 i. PAVA SYSTEM As per tender, No Change
50 COMPONENTS/DEVICES S/N Ratio >105 dB/A
AND
2 A.2 TS (E)-749 2.7 E.7 PAVA SYSTEM Loudspeaker Controller of the beam As per tender, No Change
51 COMPONENTS/DEVICES steering column loudspeaker shall
AND ASSOCIATED comply with the following:
2 A.2 TS (E)-749 2.7 E.7 a. PAVA SYSTEM Not Required Built in Speaker As per OEM Solution or product offer
52 COMPONENTS/DEVICES digital signal processors 2
AND ASSOCIATED
2 A.2 TS (E)-749 2.7 E.7 b. PAVA SYSTEM Not Required Built in Speaker As per OEM Solution or product offer
53 COMPONENTS/DEVICES independent limiters 4
AND ASSOCIATED
2 A.2 TS (E)-749 2.7 E.7 c. PAVA SYSTEM Not Required Built in Speaker As per OEM Solution or product offer
selective 3-band limiting bass/ mid/
54 COMPONENTS/DEVICES
high
AND ASSOCIATED
2 A.2 TS (E)-749 2.7 E.7 d. PAVA SYSTEM Not Required Built in Speaker As per OEM Solution or product offer
55 COMPONENTS/DEVICES band specific time constants
AND ASSOCIATED
2 A.2 TS (E)-749 2.7 E.7 e. PAVA SYSTEM Not Required Built in Speaker As per OEM Solution or product offer
56 COMPONENTS/DEVICES filter technology 56-bit double precision
AND ASSOCIATED
2 A.2 TS (E)-749 2.7 E.7 f. PAVA SYSTEM Not Required Built in Speaker As per OEM Solution or product offer
57 COMPONENTS/DEVICES AD 24 bit/ 96 kHz 4
AND ASSOCIATED
2 A.2 TS (E)-749 2.7 E.7 g. PAVA SYSTEM Not Required Built in Speaker As per OEM Solution or product offer
58 COMPONENTS/DEVICES FIR filters
AND ASSOCIATED
2 A.2 TS (E)-749 2.7 E.7 h. PAVA SYSTEM Not Required Built in Speaker As per OEM Solution or product offer
59 COMPONENTS/DEVICES gain -80 dB - +12 dB
AND ASSOCIATED
2 A.2 TS (E)-749 2.7 E.7 i. PAVA SYSTEM Not Required Built in Speaker As per OEM Solution or product offer
60 COMPONENTS/DEVICES volume -80 dB - +12 dB
AND ASSOCIATED
2 A.2 TS (E)-749 2.7 E.7 j. PAVA SYSTEM EQ 10-band parametric EQ, gain +/- Not Required Built in Speaker As per OEM Solution or product offer
61 COMPONENTS/DEVICES 12 dB, frequency range 10 - 20 kHz,
AND ASSOCIATED Q 0,1 - 100
2 A.2 TS (E)-749 2.7 E.7 k. PAVA SYSTEM Not Required Built in Speaker As per OEM Solution or product offer
62 COMPONENTS/DEVICES limiter compressor & noise gate
AND
2 A.2 TS (E)-749 2.7 E.7 l. PAVA SYSTEM Not Required Built in Speaker As per OEM Solution or product offer
X-Over Linkwitz-Riley 4. order, (24 dB/
63 COMPONENTS/DEVICES
octave),
AND
2 A.2 TS (E)-749 2.7 E.7 m. PAVA SYSTEM high pass: 10 Hz - 20 kHz, low pass: Not Required Built in Speaker As per OEM Solution or product offer
64 COMPONENTS/DEVICES 10 Hz - 20 kHz,delay 0,01 - 350 ms (or
AND ASSOCIATED 3,4 mm - 120 m)
2 A.2 TS (E)-750 2.7 E.9 PAVA SYSTEM The following beam steering As per tender, No Change
65 COMPONENTS/DEVICES loudspeaker types shall be proposed
AND ASSOCIATED as per the site requirements.
2 A.2 TS (E)-750 2.7 E.9 (i) PAVA SYSTEM Beam Steering Column Beam Steering Column Loudspeakers – Short Throw with 8 bidder should offer as per covrage distance and
66 COMPONENTS/DEVICES Loudspeakers – Short Throw with drivers for throw distances of 20 meters. site requirment.
AND ASSOCIATED 16 Channels
2 A.2 TS (E)-750 2.7 E.9 (ii) PAVA SYSTEM Beam Steering Column Loudspeakers Beam Steering Column Loudspeakers – Medium Throw with bidder should offer as per covrage distance and
67 COMPONENTS/DEVICES – Medium Throw with 24 Channels for 16 drivers for throw distances of 32 eters. site requirment.
AND ASSOCIATED throw distances of 35 to 75 meters.
2 A.2 TS (E)-750 2.7 E.9 (iii) PAVA SYSTEM Beam Steering Column Loudspeakers Beam Steering Column Loudspeakers – Long throw with 24 bidder should offer as per covrage distance and
68 COMPONENTS/DEVICES – Long throw with 32 Channels for drivers for throw distances upto 50 meters. site requirment.
AND ASSOCIATED throw distances of 50 to 100 meters.
2 A.1 TS (E)-720 11.5 l Technical Specification Preset Pan speed of 300 degree seems to specific OEM As per tender, No Change
Closed Circuit Television Preset Pan speed 0.5deg/Sec to 300 however practly upto 200 degree is ok enough for Proper
69
Cameras deg/Sec viewing
Please make the necesaary corrections to it.
2 A.1 TS (E)-661 8.7 Technical Specification DVMS Specification Complete DVMS Specification seems to be driven by Specific As per tender, No Change
Closed Circuit single OEM, as this is required for an airport project
70 Television Cameras hence request you to follow the BCAS guidelines for VMS and
Camera.

1 269/1144 Clause No. 9.2 The equipment shall be capable of There is conflict of statement among clause no. 9.2 , 13.1 & The DG set shall be prime power , suitable for 0.85
delivering continuously at the generator 14.1 & It has been noted from clause no. 13.1 that DG Set average load factor as specified in the Boq and
terminals, 100% output at 80% loading application will be prime power application as per IS 8528. specifications. It is also the design requirement of
(variable) for unlimited time duty Please Note that ISO 8528 specify that Prime power is the project.
operation with the 100 % rating defined as being the maximum power which a generating set
71 APPROVAL
available for any emergency/outage, is capable of delivering continuously whilst supplying a
when operating under the site and variable electrical load when operated for an unlimited number
ambient conditions described in this of hours per year under the agreed operating conditions with
specification as per relevant IS/BS the maintenance intervals and procedures being carried out
5514. Genset should have minimum as prescribed by the manufacturer.

5
2 271/1144 Clause No. The DG set shall be non acoustic As per ISO 8528 , the permissible average power output (Ppp)
13.1 prime duty suitable for continuous over 24 h of operation shall not exceed 70 % of the PRP
operations & shall be capable to unless otherwise agreed by the RIC engine manufacturer..
deliver the average load 85% , water (Copy of ISO 8528 enclosed as annexure - II for your kind
cooled with Heat exchanger, manually reference & perusal).
and automatically operated, designed In view of the above we would request you to kindly confirm
for continuous operation at 80% load at that DG Set rating shall be Prime Power rating as per ISO-
unlimited time duty operation except 8528. Kindly confirm.
the time required for periodic
maintenance as per relevant IS/ BS
72 GENERAL 5514. The DG set shall comprise of
diesel engine, cou‐pled to four pole
alternator on a single frame with
integrated microprocessor based
genset monitoring and control system
having self regulated, brushless/static
excitation system.

2 271/1144 Clause No. The equipment shall be capable of


14.1 delivering continuously at the generator
terminals, (100% output at 85% load at
unlimited time) as per BOQ except for
periodical maintenance when operating
under the site and ambient conditions
PERFORMANCE described in this specification as per
73
REQUIREMENT relevant IS/BS 5514. Genset should
have minimum 50% single step loading
capacity and it should be able to take
full load within 20 seconds from start.

2 272/1144 Clause No. The manufacturer shall furnish a 3 mm As per manufacturer standard, for higher rating generator set Noted & accepted.
16.1 thick mild steel day tank of 990 ltr. day tank are placed outside accoustic enclosure.
capacity. The day tank shall be suitably
located in the acoustic enclosure and
shall be complete with gauge glasses,
74 FUEL OIL SYSTEM
filling, draining and vent connection
with brass float valve and level switch
for low and high level alarm.

2 271/1144 Clause No. The DG set shall be non acoustic It is specified that DG set shall be non-acoustic . You are It is specified that DG sets are non-acoustic placed
13.1 prime duty suitable for continuous requested to kindly clarify that weather DG sets are required in acoustic treated room.
operations & shall be capable to with Acoustic enclosure or without Acoustic Enclosure.
deliver the average load 85% , water
cooled with Heat exchanger,

...............................................................
75 Acoustic Enclosure
..................................................
..based genset monitoring and control
system having self regulated,
brushless/static excitation system.

2 273/1144 Clause No. 21 Please note that Governor type nomenclature vary country to G2/G3 is not the class of governor but for transient
country . Like in the tender document specified class is A1 response. However Equivalent to class A1 is
which is US nomenclature & cummins is US company. Where accepted complying to the the AVR response time
as in UK Governor type nomenclature is G2/G3. And and accuracy.
Functionally both class are equivalent.
The Governor shall be electronic type
76 Governing System In view of the above, We would request that , The Governor
of class A1.
type may be please be considered as per respective engine
manufacturers complying to relevent applicable ISO / IS /BS
standards for the same . Kindly confirm

6
2 272/1144 Clause No. FUEL OIL SYSTEM The fuel oil system shall be provided The fuel injection system may be please be considered as per Noted & accepted, complying to the tender &
77 16.2 with full flow simplex oil cartridge filter. respective engine manufacturers complying to relevent design requirements.
applicable ISO / IS /BS standards for the same
2 273/1144 Clause No. 18 Advance fuel system “Electronic unit Fuel injection is the induction of fuel in an internal combustion
injection system” shall be used engine, most commonly by the means of fuel injector. All
complying the latest environment flue diesel engines use fuel injection by their own design.
gas data limitations amended upto The functional objectives for fuel injection systems remain
78 FUEL SYSTEM date. NOX, CO, PM etc. has to be same for all engine manufacturer but their design can vary
complied & shared by the
manufacturer with reports.

2 273/1144 Clause No. 19 This section comprises of the supply, Please clarify weather requirement is for HEX cooled system Water cooled with heat exchanger, cooling tower
erection, testing and commissioning of or radiator cooled system. system as specified in the Boq & Specifications..
the and Heat exchanger ,cooling
towers and associated pumps
79 COOLING SYSTEM conforming to the specifications and in
accordance with the requirements as
per equipment schedule.

2 281/1144 Clause No. COOLING SYSTEM Radiator cooling


80
4.07
2 273/1144 Clause No. 22 Engine exhaust system shall be fitted Silencer shall be residential type as per standard design of As per specifications.
with hospital or most critical grade manufacturer instead of hospital grade. Please confirm
silencer available as per manufacturer;
ducting, bends, thermally insulated
81 EXHAUST SYSTEM
aluminium clad exhaust piping etc.
shall be provided along with structural
support with stays for the engine.

2 275/1144 Clause No. The alternator shall be industrial type, There is contradiction in tender document, please clarify Class H for alternator with temprature rise class F ,
24.1 SPDP, IP23, Class H insulation, self insulation class of alternator. shall be provided as per boq & specifications. For
ventilated, air cooled, rotating field, BTD's , if engine manufacturer standards is single
salient pole, brushless, machine with no. BTD , then it should be Duplex type with two
82 ALTERNATOR
exciter and shall be rated continuous no. ports.
duty with temperature rise class H/F.

2 282/1144 Clause (b) Generator 11kV Insulation class H, temperature rise


83
class H
2 268/1144 Clause No. 3 INSPECTION AND The D.G. Set before dispatch shall be There is contradiction in tender, as per clause no. 3 five hours Clause 28.1 (a),(b),(c) deleted.
APPROVAL inspected and tested for four hours at factory testing is required, whereas as per clause no.
full load and thereafter at 10% 28.1 eight hour factory testing is required.
overload for one hour, by the owner's Please clear actual no. hours of factory test required.
84
representative at supplier's works and
only on his approval the same shall be
dispatched

2 277/1144 Clause No. Tests shall be performed.


28.1 a) One (1) hour at full load with fuel
consumption
b) One (1) hour at 3/4 load with fuel
consumption
c) One (1) hour at 50% load with fuel
TEST - DIESEL consumption
85
GENERATOR SET d) four (4) hour at full load followed by
a 1 hour continuous load at 110% and
with fuel
consumption.
Before each test, the engine shall be
brought to a steady state under the
conditions of the test.
2 277/1144 Clause No. TEST AT SITE Guarantee tests to prove guaranteed We are assuming 8 hours site testing is required and required Test at site shall be carried out as per clause 3.
28.4 (b) performance of the DG set shall also load and diesel will be provided by client. Kindly confirm your Total cost shall be quoted by the contractor shall
be carried out at site after proper acceptance. include arrangements for testing at site such as
90 installation. The load test with available loads. Nothing shall be paid extra for this & no
load at site will be given for about 8 arrangement of load shall be provided at site.
hours.

7
2 General Notes Kindly provided the DG location or nearest building height Drawings are attached with tender.
based on which Exhaust pipe will be terminated otherwise
91
exhaust pipe will terminated above canopy as per CPCB rule.

2 Kindly provide distance between DG & panel room for Drawings are attached with tender.
92
calucating Power & Control cable length.
Please also provide us the site layouts & P&I of fuel system to Drawings are attached with tender.
93
understand the scheme, if any.
Fuel piping between DG Set & day oil tank will be in scope of All the electrical requirements specified in the
94 DG vendor, any other fuel piping apart from this will be in tender shall be in the scope & responsibility of
scope of purchaser. Please confirm successful bidder.

8
NAME OF WORK: Construction of New Integrated Passenger Terminal Building at C.C.S. International Airport, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh

Reply to query No -18


Tender
S.no Clause No. Item Stipulation as per tender SPCL query description AAI Reply
PART A - TECHNICAL
Commercial (SCC - MEP)
Inspection and Testing Routine / type tests for the various items of equipment shall be Routine test shall be carried out for the items specifically indicated in Accepted
1 1 of SCC (E&M) performed at the contractor’s works and test certificates the list of makes, however type test certificates shall be provided as
furnished. required.
Guarantee and defect liability Any faulty component replaced or renewed under the The guarantee for the replaced or renewed part shall also expire at the Accepted
period clause shall also be guaranteed for a period of twelve months end of DLP period originally agreed i.e. 12 months from the date of
17.1 of SCC
2 from the date of such replacement or removal or until the end completion
(E&M)
of defect liability period whichever is later

3 Schedule F of Percentage to cover all 2(x) Percentage on cost materials & Labour to cover Specialised contractor for E&M works shall be paid 15% over the cost
GCC, Clause overhead and profits all overheads & Profits - 15% to Not Accepted
2(x) cover overhead and profits.
HVAC
1 Item 967-969 of HVAC - Pumps Efficiency of pumps shall be 80% We are not getting 80% efficiency for all the pumps. We request you
BoQ to accept Follow Tender Specification and BOQ.
efficiency of 75%
Each Chilling package shall be complete assembly of all As both type of VFD starters are acceptable i.e. free standing as well Acceptable.
components viz. electric motor driven semihermetic or open as Unit mounted. A freestanding Starter cannot be mounted on
Centrifugal compressor, insulated cooler, condenser, common structural frame as asked. So Please confirm that a free
2 TS (E) -276 Chiller - General Requirement refrigerant piping, oil cooler, protective devices, standing starter not mounted on common structural frame will also be
microprocessor control panel, unit mounted starter cum local acceptable.
electrical panel,etc. mounted on a common structural frame.

3 The entire water‐cooled Centrifugal liquid Chilling package shall We request you to approve some of reputed Indian make chillers like - Chillers manufactured in India are
TS (E) -277 Chiller - General Requirement be imported, as a fully assembled and factory tested unit. Daikin/Kirlokar. acceptable.

4 Motors shall be TEFC squirrel‐cage induction type/TEWC IP 42 The motor of chiller shall be SPDP/TERC/TEFC/TEWC type IP 42 /SPDP/TEFC/TEWC type open
rated, designed and guaranteed for continuous operation at protection as per manufacturer standard. drive motors and IP 42 TERC semi
TS (E) -277 Chiller's Motor Specs
name plate rating. hermetic Chillers are acceptable.

5 The Chiller shall be provided with liquid level sight glass and a The Chiller Manufacturers don’t manufacture evaporator with Liquid Accepted
TS (E) -280 Evaporator (Chiller) relief device (of the busing type) to prevent excess pressure in level sight glass. So evaporator should be as per manufacturer
the heat exchanger. standard.
6 X Ray NDT (Non Destructive Test) as per the The Chiller Manufacturers don’t have X-ray NDT testing facility. The Design and testing as per ASME
applicable NDT standard, for Shell welding of cooler & testing procedure of the shell welding shall be as per OEM standards. acceptable.
TS (E) -280 Condenser (Chiller)
condenser should be carried out by the manufacturer & test We requrest you to remove this clause.
reports to be submitted.
7 Chiller Specs Subhead - Variable Please note that chiller manufacturers don't have UL Listing on (UL/CE/GB/BIS/PED) listed VFD are
Speed Drive complete Chiller accepted as mentioned in VFD
package. However from this statement we understand that AAI is Specification.Refer page no. TS (E)‐280.
TS (E) -281 The entire chiller package shall be UL listed.
asking for UL Listing of VFD's only as it is mentioned under the
subheading of Variable speed Drive. Please Confirm.

8 Pump Specs Impeller & Shaft Sleeves Impeller shall be of bronze or gunmetal, double The BoQ specifies end suction pumps while the specs mention double BOQ. Supersedes Specifications.
TS (E) -305 & 306 suction, enclosed type. suction. We understand BoQ supercedes Specs and hence single
The pump shall be equipped with double mechanical seals. suction is required. Single suction shall be with single mechanical
seal
Each pump set including motors, flexible connection at inlet The Cost of Flexible connection need not be included alongwith Accepted.
and outlet, vibration isolators and accessories as specified in pumps as the same is appearing separate item under BOQ Sr. No.
9 TS (E)‐316 CENTRIFUGAL PUMPS
tender document shall be regarded as one unit for the purpose 1007
of measurement and payment.
10 LOAM (E)-10 Revised Revised list of approved Cooling Tower Makes above 200 TR Capacity. We request you to accept Bell and Flowtech make CTI Approved
makes for Cooling tower As per Revised list of approved makes.
Electrical works having capacity above than 200 TR.
11 TS (E)‐317 Cooling Tower Specs Sound performance shall be in accordance with CTI The cooling tower shall be CTI Certified and the sound performance
ATC‐128 / JCI / Eurovent. shall be as Follow Tender Specification.
manufacturer standard.

9
TS (E)‐319 Cooling Tower Specs The noise level from cooling tower shall around 70‐75 dBA from We request you to accept noise level rang between 70 to 78 dbA @ 3 Follow tender specification.
12 3 meter distance all around the meter.
cooling towers
TS (E)‐322 Hot Water Generator Specs Insulation and cladding. We have found discrepancies between specs and BOQ of HWG Follow BOQ.
BOQ Sr. No. -966 regarding the thickness of insulation and cladding. We request you to
13
clairify the order of
precedence.
14 TS (E)‐327 Air Handling Unit Specs Fresh Air Intakes (Exhaust/Fresh Air Louvers) We understand that these items shall not be costed along with AHU
as the same Yes.
is appearing separate in BOQ.
TS (E)‐324 Air Handling Unit Specs The coil shall be mounted on the rollers in order to facilitate AHU cooling coil shall be fixed type, cooling coil section shall be Follow Tender Specification.
15 easy removal of the coil from the drain pan provide with access door instead of roller facilites.
for cleaning.
16 Cabinets shall be constructed of 18 gauge die‐formed cold Follow Tender Specification.
We have considered 18G GI pre-coated skin in FCUs instead of
TS (E)‐333 Fan Coil Unit Specs rolled galvanized steel sheet bonderised and painted with
powder coated.
powder coating finish.
17 TS (E)‐334 Fan Coil Unit Specs Tubes shall be minimum 10 mm OD and wall We request you to accept the Outer Diameter of cooling coil tube as
thickness shall be minimum 0.5 mm. 9.5 mm
Follow Tender Specification.
instead 10 mm and and thickness 0.33 mm instead of 0.5 mm

18 TS (E)‐334 Fan Coil Unit Specs Motor shall be 230 V ± 6% V, 50 cycles single phase, FCU Motor pole shall be as per manufacturer standard.
Accepted.
six‐ pole, shaded pole type,
19 TS (E)‐336 Chilled Water Cassett Unit GENERAL REQUIREMENTS - Units shall be with Euro The unit ceertification of chilled water cassett unit shall be as per
vent Certified performance . manufacturer Accepted.
standard.
20 TS (E)‐336 Chilled Water Cassett Unit Motor shall be energy efficient, six pole Chilled Water Cassett Unit Motor pole shall be as per manufacturer
Accepted.
standard.
21 TS (E)‐339 Split Units Outdoor & Indoor Unit specification As the split units are mass production item, the construction features
of indoor Accepted.
and outdoor units shall be as per manufacturer standard.
TS (E)‐342 TS Axial Flow Fans Noise Level should not be more than 75db@3 distance when We request to accept maximum noise limit upto 80 db@3m Follow Tender Specification.
22 (E)‐343 Axial Flow Fans (for Fire, Smoke & measured in hemispherical
Heat Exhaust) reverberant romm condition.
All high temperature fans to be used for fire application shall Follow Tender Specifications however
bear the certification/listing of UL/CE (in addition of being Vane/Tube is acceptable.
Please note that there are only two manufacturers who have
AMCA certified for Sound and Air Performance) conforming to
Axial Flow Fans (for Fire, Smoke & certification/listing of UL/CE and only one of them is able to quote with
23 TS (E)‐344 UL‐705 “Power Ventilator for smoke exhaust” or
Heat Exhaust) Vane Axial. We don’t have any other choice. We request you to
EN12101‐3‐2002 smoke and heat control system specification
please remove this clause.
for powered smoke and heat exhaust ventilator.

24 TS (E)‐345 Inline Fans Specs Motor shall be energy efficient IE3 (as per IS 12615) Please note that Inline fans are not available with IE3 motor. We
request you to Accepted.
accept motor of fans as per manufacturer standard.
25 TS (E)‐347 Dry Scrubber Type - The unit shall be CE certified. The certification of Dry scrubber shall be as per manufacturer
Accepted.
standard.
26 TS (E)‐352 Airwasher Maximum velocity across the filters shall be 400 FPM. We request you to accept maximum velocity across the filter shall be
Accepted.
500 FPM.
TS (E)‐366 Air Distribution Third party Lab test of each lot is required and the cost of test Please clrarify what type of test to be required. We request you to Lab test is required to ensure the product
27 shall be borne by contractor. accpet the third party test of one random sample from all the lots meets the specification or not. Test of
instead of each lot each lot is required as per Tender
specification
28 TS (E)‐367 Air Distribution All exposed ducts within conditioned spaces shall We request you to quantify the qty of exposed duct separately as cost
All ducts shall be provided with flanged
have only slip joints and no flanged joints. of slip
joints.
joint and flange joint is different
Supply, Installation, Testing and commissioning of factory built Please note that most of the AHU manufacturers given in the BoQ are
floor mounted double skin type horizontal/vertical air handling not
units “EUROVENT CERTIFIED” having minimum efficiency Eurovent certified. The AHU used in India in most of the installations
grade "A" are not Eurovent certified. Moreover none of the Indian manufacturers
Item 971-974 of
29 HVAC - AHU specified in tender manufactures Eurovent certified AHUs. Having Not acceptable.
BoQ
Eurovent certified in the contract will ensure that only a handful of
foreign manufacturers will qualify and it will severely restrict
competitition. We request you to allow non Eurovent AHUs

10
Electronic Air Cleaner complete with washable pre‐filter, Your understanding is correct.
charging section and collector section capable of removing
Item 971 -974,978
particulates as small as 0.01 microns including microscopic As Electronic air cleaner is separately specified in the BoQ (Item 992),
30 of HVAC - AHU
haze particles, smoke, dust, mould spores and bacteria in we understand it need not be costed with AHUs
BoQ
supply air stream(wherever applicable scheduled separately),"

31 Item 972-974 of HVAC - AHU made of 50 ± 4 mm thick panels We request you to accept 43 mm thiick PUF panels as per
Follow Tender Specification.
BoQ manufacturer standard
Item 971 -974 of HVAC - AHU i) ‐ Supply air centrifugal fan with efficiency more We will not be able to achieve 75% efficiency especially for smaller Follow Tender Specification.
BoQ than 75%. fans in Ceiling
32
Suspended AHUs. We therefore request you to accept max. efficiency
as per fan selection for these AHUs
Item 975-976 of HVAC - FCU Same valves shall be provided for hot water coil of similar Please clarify whether you require a separate hot water coil with FCUs and Cassette Units shall be with 4-
33 BoQ pressure rating and specifications as FCUs/ Cassette units (4 pipe system) pipe system.
described above.
34 Item 977 of BoQ VFD i) ‐ THiD (IEEE519‐1992) ‐ 10% For achieving 10% THiD levels we will require separate harmonic
filters with 10% THiD level with or without filter.
VFDs. Please confirm requirement
Supplying, installation, testing and commissioning of AMCA Please note that only one manufacturer in the given list of make Follow Tender Specifications however
Certified (For Air and Sound Performance) ceiling hung / floor supplies AMCA certified (for Air and Sound Performance) vane axial Vane/Tube is acceptable.
Item 986-987 of
35 Axial fans mounted supply air vane fan. We request you to accept AMCA certified (for air performance
BoQ
axial flow fans only) vane axial fan so as to have some competition in the makes

36 Motor make shall be same as mentioned on the fire certificate We request you to accept any motor which meets the required Acceptable at no extra cost.
temperature
Item 986-987 of
Axial fans resistance. It may be difficult to arrange the same motor as mentioned
BoQ
on the fire certificate. The make of this motor may also be different
from the makes specified in tender
37 Item 986-987 of Axial fans All the fans shall be hot dip galvanized with minimum The fans may be hot dip galvanized/ pre-galvanized
Follow Tender Specification.
BoQ 220 GSM Zinc Coating,
38 Item 986-987 of Axial fans Static pressure shall be checked/verified by Static pressure shall be checked after order during detailed
Static pressure shall be checked prior to
BoQ contractor prior to order. engineering
order during detailed engineering.
Item 988 of BoQ Inline fans Supplying, installing, testing & commissioning of INLINE FANS Inline fans may not be AMCA certified Accepted.
39 AMCA Certified (For Air and Sound
Performance)
The acceptable design shall incorporate a separating element The design mentioned here is specific to a manufacturer. The design Temperature range of 5 deg C - 60 deg
to force water into tranquillity zones for dirt removal or a tube shall be generally as per manufacturer standards. However the C is acceptable.
mesh construction made of copper wire and the flow to be effectiveness shall be as desired in tender.
guided through an area with a greater cross‐section than the Dirt separator shall be manufactured and designed as per local
connection dimensions in order to reduce the flow standards prevalent in country of manufacturing or other
Item 1021-1022 of
40 Dirt Separator Dirt separator shall be manufactured and designed in internationally recognised standard.
BoQ
accordance with Pressure Equipment Directive PED 97/23/EC As glycol is not envisaged in the system therefore compatibility with
or 2014/68/EU glycol solution is not desired. Temperature range shall be 5 deg C - 50
It shall be suitable for glycol solution upto 50%, Temperature deg C
range ‐10 C to 110 C

Item 1023-1024 of Pressurisation unit with expansion The whole system duly tested from factory conforming to The system shall be tested as per local standards prevalent in country Accepted.
41 BoQ tank international standards PED‐97/23/EC. of manufacturing or other internationally recognised standard.

42 Item 1036 of BoQ Eye ball jet nozzle Jet nozzle - 400 mm dia Jet nozzle shall be 380 mm dia. as per manufacturer standard
Follow Tender Specification.
finally applying Class 0 (BS 3 layer compopsite film is a rarely used protection method. It is very Follow Tender Specification.
476) having a Flammability Index ≤ 5 (AS1530.2) Cladding of costly material. For mechanical protection, We request you to accept
350μm in thickness with a total weight factory laminated glass cloth with paint for UV protection (IC cladding)
Item 1050-1051 of
43 Thermal Insulation ≥500 g/m2 made from a 3‐layer composite film which is widely used or aluminium cladding over fibreglass insulation
BoQ
of metallic appearance with aluminium intermediate layer instead of 3 layer composite film.
tested for UV protection as per EN ISO 4892‐2 Method A and
having a permanent curl

11
Pipe supports to be used at each 1 m length shall be Insulated Pipe supports shall be non-insulated.However they shall be separated Follow Tender Specification.
pipe support with self‐adhesive closure, PUR/PIR load bearing from pipe using widely accepted PUF/PIR block instead of PUF block
Item 1050-1051 of Inserts, embedded in Elastomeric Nitrile Rubber insulation with embedded in nitrile with aluminium sheet cover.
44 Thermal Insulation
BoQ two outer metal shells made of aluminum sheet. Pipe support shall be at 2-3 m length as per good engineering
practices

Item 1050-1051 of Thermal Insulation PUR/PIR load bearing Inserts, embedded in Elastomeric Nitrile Widely accepted PUF/PIR block shall be used instead of PUF block Follow Tender Specification.
45 BoQ Rubber insulation with two outer embedded in nitrile with aluminium sheet cover
metal shells made of aluminum sheet.
46 The ducts are to be supported with duct supports The ducts shall be supported with wire rope hangers/GI slotted Accepted.
made from PET foam as load taking member embedded in channels. These need not be insulated as they do not come in contact
Item 1052 of BoQ Thermal Insulation
nitrile rubber foam sheet with outer metal face made of with bare metal duct
aluminium.
Item 1055-1057 of Electrical works All internal wiring and copper earthing of air handling unit Copper earthing shall be measured and paid separately as per Follow BOQ. Copper earthing shall not be
47 BoQ motors from the VFD & Panel shall be included separate items in BoQ quantified separately.

Please note that these chillers are Large tonnage chillers (1000 TR) Accepted.
and pressure drop of 5 M specially on evaportaor is not possible. The
approved pressure drop requirement for centrifugal chillers for both
48 TS (E) -267 Design Parameter Maximum permissible pressure drop in chiller - 5m evaporator and condenser as per latest CPWD (2017) general
specification for HVAC is 10 mtr. Request you to kindly accept 8 M
pressure drop in both evaporator & condenser.
Boq S No. 986 to
49 Efficiency of the Fans Fan total efficiency should not be less than 70%. 70% total efficiency is difficult to achieve in small capacities, we Follow tender specification.
988
50 Boq S No. 986 to Sound Level of the Fan Noise Level should not be more than 75db@3 distance when 75 db is very general criteria irrespective of different capacities. We Follow tender specification.
987 measured in hemispherical reverberant romm condition.
1. 4000 CFM to 24000 CFM - 75Db(A) as mention in tender

2. 24000 CFM to 40000 CFM - 78Db(A)


3. Above 40000 CFM - 80dB(A)
51 Boq S No. 986 to Sound Level of the Fan Noise Level should not be more than 75db@3 distance when In case above sound level ( mention in Sr. No 2) is not accepted then
987 measured in hemispherical reverberant romm condition. kindly confirm below point

A. To achieve the sound requirement , should attenuator to be used? A.)If required Fans shall be provided with
round 1D sound attenuator at inlet and
outlet to achieve the specified noise level.

B. In case of using attenuator, kindly confirm static given in BOQ


B.) Pressure drop across sound
included static
attenuator has been considered as 4mm
loss or should be added extra.?
WG and Static pressure specified is
inclusive of that.
C. Make of Attenuator ?? C.)Make of sound attenuator shall be as
make of Fan. Quoted price of Fan shall
be inclusive of sound attenuator wherevr
applicable.
52 Boq S No. 986 to Casing of the Fan Vane Axial flow fans of following capacity with GSS Kindly confirm casing shall be Long ( motor should completely Casing shall be Long ( motor should be
988 casing / standard MS construction accomodated in completely accomodated inside the
side the casing) or short casing).
53 Boq S No. 986, Axial Flow, Fan Centrifugal And Axial Flow, Fan Centrifugal And Inline Fans Request to Kindly incorporate the "AIRFLOW" make as they have UL
As per revised Revised Revised list of
987,988, 989 & Inline Fans Listed fans,
approved makes.
990 have AMCA Certification for Sound & Air Performance.
Plumbing
1 Boq S No. R.O. Plant capacity of 8,000 R.O. Plant capacity of 8,000 LPH Please provide the Item Detailed Description for the same. Detail BOQ item & technical
1147 LPH For details please tender BOQ S no. 1147 specifications for centralized RO drinking
water system is already provided in the
tender documents.
INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENTS INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION Details are provided in Technical
Boq S No. & INSTRUMENTATION DETAILS/ DETAILS/ LABORATORY APPARATUS specifications.
2 Please provide the Item Detailed Description for the same.
1175 LABORATORY APPARATUS For details please tender BOQ item no. 1175

12
4 LOAM Annexure - Make list STP & WTP Please provide make for STP & WTP system integrator
STP & WTP is not a singel manufacturing
1
item however it is a process orinented
involving many items of different make
which have been already specified in
tender document.
DG
1. In the tender documents, it is specified that KOEL/ASHOK As per revised list of approved makes.
LEYLAND/ GREAVES /CUMMINS / CATERPILLAR/ MTU/VOLVO
PENTA are the approved make of engine whereas reputed Engine
make “PERKINS” are not specified under approved make list of
engine.
2. Perkins have all required pre-qualification credentials & already
approved with almost all government departments like Indian
Railways, CPWD,PWD, Ministry of Labour (AIIMS Projects)
,PGCIL, ONGC, GAIL, RITES, COFMOW, NTPC, IOCL, BPCL etc.
including previous Tenders of AAI for other locations like DG
sets requirement for (i) Indian Aviation Academy, Vasant Kunj
Tender document Delhi (ii) Terminal Building Vadodara airport (iii) Terminal
KOEL / ASHOK LEYLAND / GREAVES / CUMMINS /
1 Vol I Clause C Approved Makes - Diesel Engine Building tender at CA Jammu. (iv) AAI ,Kolkata Tender etc.(AAI
CATERPILAR / MTU / VOLVO
(29) Page 265/306 Tender Perkins approval copies are enclosed as Annexure-1).
3. Further, we wish to bring to your kind notice that out of the above
approved makes except Cummins & Caterpillar all the other engine
manufactures do not have this rating DG sets (Engine).
4. In view of the above and in order to invite fair competition to
participate in the subject prestigious tender, we would request you to
kindly approve / accept “PERKINS” make of Engine and also include
the same in the tender list of approved make.

Tender document The equipment shall be capable of delivering continuously at The DG set shall be prime power ,
Vol II Clause No. the generator terminals, 100% output at 80% loading (variable) suitable for 0.85 average load factor as
9.2 Page for unlimited time duty operation with the 100 % rating available specified in the Boq and specifications. It
269/1144 for any emergency/outage, when operating under the site and is also the design requirement of the
ambient conditions described in this specification as per project.
relevant IS/BS 5514. Genset should have minimum 50% single
2 APPROVAL step loading capacity and it should be able to take full load
within 25 seconds from start

There is conflict of statement among clause no. 9.2 , 13.1 & 14.1 & It
has been noted from clause no. 13.1 that DG Set application will be
prime power application as per IS 8528.
The DG set shall be non‐acoustic prime duty suitable for Please Note that ISO 8528 specify that Prime power is defined as The DG set shall be prime power ,
continuous operations & shall be capable to deliver the average being the maximum power which a generating set is capable of suitable for 0.85 average load factor as
load 85% , water cooled with Heat exchanger, manually and delivering continuously whilst supplying a variable electrical load when specified in the Boq and specifications. It
automatically operated, designed for continuous operation at operated for an unlimited number of hours per year under the agreed is also the design requirement of the
Tender document 80% load at unlimited time duty operation except the time operating conditions with the maintenance intervals and procedures project.
Vol II Clause No. required for periodic maintenance as per relevant IS/ BS 5514. being carried out as prescribed by the manufacturer.
3 GENERAL
13.1 Page The DG set shall comprise of diesel engine, coupled to four As per ISO 8528 , the permissible average power output (Ppp) over
271/1144 pole alternator on a single frame with integrated 24 h of operation shall not exceed 70 % of the PRP unless otherwise
microprocessor based genset monitoring and control system agreed by the RIC engine manufacturer.. (Copy of ISO 8528 enclosed
having self‐regulated, brushless/static excitation system. as annexure - II for your kind reference & perusal).
In view of the above we would request you to kindly confirm that DG
Set rating shall be Prime Power rating as per ISO-8528. Kindly

13
g g p y
The equipment shall be capable of delivering continuously at confirm. The DG set shall be prime power ,
the generator terminals, (100% output at 85% load at unlimited suitable for 0.85 average load factor as
time) as per BOQ except for periodical maintenance when specified in the Boq and specifications. It
Tender document
operating under the site and ambient conditions described in is also the design requirement of the
Vol II Clause No.
4 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT this specification as per relevant IS/BS 5514. Genset should project.
14.1 Page
have minimum 50% single step loading capacity and it should
271/1144
be able to take full load within 20 seconds from start.

Tender document The manufacturer shall furnish a 3 mm thick mild steel day tank Noted & accepted.
Vol II Clause No. of 990 ltr. capacity. The day tank shall be suitably located in the
16.1 Page acoustic enclosure and shall be complete with gauge glasses, As per manufacturer standard, for higher rating generator set day tank
5 FUEL OIL SYSTEM
272/1144 filling, draining and vent connection with brass float valve and are placed outside accoustic enclosure.
level switch for low and high level alarm.

FUEL OIL SYSTEM We request you to kindly issue suitable amendment that the fuel Can be accepted as per manufacturer
system shall be as per respective manufacturers standard so that it standards, complying to the tender &
TS-(E )-58, clause does not favour to any particular engine. The fuel injection system design requirements.
The fuel oil system shall be provided with full flow simplex oil
6 16.2 & may be please be considered as per respective engine manufacturers
cartridge filter.
18 complying to relevant applicable ISO / IS /BS standards for the same

TS-(E )-59, FUEL OIL SYSTEM Inbuilt Provision of fuel leakage module
Clause 16.6 can be waived off as per manufacturer
As per manufacturer there is no provision of fuel leakage detection
Engine will be supplied with fuel leakage module to detect standards.However Outer arragement of
7 from engine. We shall not be able to provide this feature.Please
leakage… indicating the same shall be provided by
accept.
the succesful bidder.

Tender document The DG set shall be non‐acoustic prime duty suitable for DG sets are non-acoustic placed in
Vol II Clause No. continuous operations & shall be capable to deliver the average acoustic treated room as per boq &
13.1 Page load 85% , water cooled with Heat exchanger, specifications.
271/1144 .................................................................................................. It is specified that DG set shall be non-acoustic . You are requested to
8 Acoustic Enclosure ....... kindly clarify that weather DG sets are required with Acoustic
..........based genset monitoring and control system having enclosure or without Acoustic Enclosure.
self‐regulated, brushless/static excitation system.

Tender document Please note that Governor type nomenclature vary country to country . G2/G3 is not the class of governor but for
Vol II Clause No. Like in the tender document specified class is A1 which is US transient response. However Equivalent
21 Page 273/1144 nomenclature & cummins is US company. Where as in UK Governor to class A1 is accepted complying to the
type nomenclature is G2/G3. And Functionally both class are the AVR response time and accuracy.
9 Governing System The Governor shall be electronic type of class A1. equivalent.
In view of the above, We would request that , The Governor type may
be please be considered as per respective engine manufacturers
complying to relevent applicable ISO / IS /BS standards for the same .
Kindly confirm
10
S.no Clause No. Item Stipulation as per tender SPCL query description Client / PMC Response
11
12 Tender document This section comprises of the supply, erection, testing and Please clarify weather requirement is for HEX cooled system or Water cooled with heat exchanger,
Vol II Clause No. commissioning of the and Heat exchanger ,cooling towers and radiator cooled system. cooling tower system as specified in the
19 Page 273/1144 COOLING SYSTEM associated pumps conforming to the specifications and in Boq & Specifications..
accordance with the requirements as per equipment schedule.

Tender document COOLING SYSTEM Radiator cooling


Vol II Clause No.
13
4.07 Page
281/1144
14 Tender document Engine exhaust system shall be fitted with hospital or most Silencer shall be residential type as per standard design of As per specifications.
Vol II Clause No. critical grade silencer available as per manufacturer; ducting, manufacturer instead of hospital grade. Please confirm
22 Page 273/1144 bends, thermally insulated aluminium clad exhaust piping etc.
EXHAUST SYSTEM
shall be provided along with structural support with stays for the
engine.

14
TS-(E )-59, clause Engine indicator As per manufacturer there is no provision to measure exhaust gas Exhaust gas high temprature indicator is
23.1 temperature required at controller shall be provided by
and its indicator in engine controller. We shall not be able to provide the succesful bidder.
15 this feature. Pease accept.

Tender document The alternator shall be industrial type, SPDP, IP23, Class H There is contradiction in tender document, please clarify insulation
Vol II insulation, self ventilated, air cooled, rotating field, salient pole, class of alternator.
Clause No. 24.1 brushless, machine with exciter and shall be rated continuous
16 ALTERNATOR
Page 275/1144 duty with temperature rise class H/F.
Class H for alternator with temprature rise
class F , shall be provided as per boq &
Tender document specifications. For BTD's , if engine
Vol II Clause (b) manufacturer standards is single no. BTD
17 Generator 11kV Insulation class H, temperature rise class H
Page 282/1144 , then it should be Duplex type with two
no. ports.
TS ( E )- 61/62, Alternator/Excitation system For HT alternators class F insulation shall be provided with
Clause 24/25 temperature rise limited to class F. Also, as per manufacturer
18
standard design single bearing alternator shall be provide with one no.
BTD.
TS-(E )-63, clause Alternator We have not considered any kind of separate routine/type tests on Certificates shall be accomplished for the
28.2 engine & alternator. However certificates for the same shall be same model shall be accepted.
provided after award of contract.
19

TS ( E )- 66, Class of Insulation for Stator & Rotor : class H For HT alternators class F insulation shall be provided with Class H for alternator with temprature rise
Clause Annexure- temperature rise limited to class F. class F , shall be provided as per boq &
I, 3.2 specifications. For BTD's , if engine
20 manufacturer standards is single no. BTD
, then it should be Duplex type with two
no. ports.

21 Tender document The D.G. Set before dispatch shall be inspected and tested for There is contradiction in tender, as per clause no. 3 five hours factory Clause 28.1 (a), (b), (c ) stand deleted.
Vol II Clause No. 3 four hours at full load and thereafter at 10% overload for one testing is required, whereas as per clause no. 28.1 eight hour factory
Page 268/1144 INSPECTION AND APPROVAL hour, by the owner's representative at supplier's works and only testing is required.
on his approval the same shall be dispatched Please clear actual no. hours of factory test required.

Tender document Tests shall be performed.


Vol II Clause No. a) One (1) hour at full load with fuel consumption
28.1 Page b) One (1) hour at 3/4 load with fuel consumption
277/1144 c) One (1) hour at 50% load with fuel consumption
22 TEST - DIESEL GENERATOR SET d) four (4) hour at full load followed by a 1 hour continuous load
at 110% and with fuel
consumption.
Before each test, the engine shall be brought to a steady state
under the conditions of the test.
Tender document Guarantee tests to prove guaranteed performance of the DG We are assuming 8 hours site testing is required and required load Total cost shall be quoted by the
Vol II set shall also be carried out at site after proper installation. The and diesel will be provided by client. Kindly confirm your acceptance. contractor shall include arrangements for
Clause No. 28.4 load test with available load at site will be given for about 8 testing at site such as loads. Nothing
23 TEST AT SITE
(b) Page 277/1144 hours. shall be paid extra for this & no
arrangement of load shall be provided at
site.
24 General Notes Kindly provided the DG location or nearest building height based on Drawings are attached with tender.
which Exhaust pipe will be terminated otherwise exhaust pipe will
terminated above canopy as per CPCB rule.

25 Kindly provide distance between DG & panel room for calucating


Drawings are attached with tender.
Power & Control cable length.
26 Please also provide us the site layouts & P&I of fuel system to
Drawings are attached with tender.
understand the scheme, if any.

15
27 Fuel piping between DG Set & day oil tank will be in scope of DG All the requirements specified in the
vendor, any other fuel piping tender shall be in the scope &
apart from this will be in scope of purchaser. Please confirm responsibility of successful bidder.
ELV
Dismantling from existing terminal Refer Clause-8, General Guidelines for
building, reinstalling in new terminal bidders at pg NIT-1, Vol-I
building, connecting, testing &
FAS BOQ Details about the systems proposed In the exisiting
1 commissioning of existing fire alarm Please share us the detailed information about the existing systems.
S.No.29 buildings.
panel of existing terminal building

FAS BOQ It is added to provide 1 Isolator for every 20 Follow Tender documents.
S.No.18 dvices/detectors.
Please confirm whether we shall alter the BOQ based on the
2 Isolator Module As per devices/detectors qty the Isolators qty should be
requirement.
380. But the BOQ qty is only 294.

There is a mismatch in the speaker types as follows, Follow as per drawings. However Please
As per Drawings read :
(i) Ceiling speaker 20W As per Drawing-
(ii) Active Line Array - 1600W (iii) Active Line Array - 80W: To be read
(iii) Active Line Array - 80W as Passive column speaker 40 W
(iv) Horn speaker - 15W Max power 40W
(v) Cabinet Loudspeaker - 40W Rated power 40W(10W x 4)
(vi) Projection speaker - 20W Power taps @ 100V 80W / 40W / 20W /
As per BOQ 10W
PAS Drawings & (i) Ceiling speaker 20W SPL 107dB / 90dB
3 PAS BOQ PA system Layout (ii) Active Line Array - (with & without extension) (iii ) Passive Please confirm which speaker types has to be followed. Frequency response (-10dB) 300Hz -
Pg.No.DWG58 Line Array - 40W 15KHz
(iv) Horn speaker - 15W Dispersion angle (1KHz/-6dB) 180°
(v) Cabinet Loudspeaker - 30W Rated input voltage 100V
(vi) Projection speaker - 20W Rated impedance 125Ω / 250Ω / 500Ω /
(vii) Ceiing speaker - 6W 1kΩ
Connection fire-resistant cable
Speaker size 4"×8

# For rest of the speakers consider as


per the drawing

As per BOQ, the given Amplifier qty is as below, Please confirm whether the Amplifier qty is designed as per the As per the drawing and specification.
(i) 1x480W - 20 Nos speaker qty. Based on the number of speakers you
BOQ
4 PA Amplifier (ii) 2x240W - 15 Nos Because at maximum Wattage the Amplifier qty is not sufficient for can consider the amplifiers.
S.No.1188.00
The speaker qty is given as Lot in BOQ, anyhow we the speakers given. Please confirm on the Wattage tapping of
shall arrive the same from the drawings. speakers.
5 Boq S.No.1240.00 Distributed Antenna system Qty is mentioned as 1 Lot. Please provide us the detailed qty as per the requirement. bidder offer solution as per layout
drawing.
BOQ CCTV system As per BOQ, the Camera qty is 432 only. But the Software Please confirm whether we shall propose the Channel License for 500 System design based on future
S.No.1179.00 channel license is 700 which is almost 60% higher than the (with 15% spare) expansion. Hence no change
6
camera qty.

7 As per BOQ the Video Analyitcs requirement is as below, As per the mentioned qty the Video Analytics is only for 110 Cameras System design based on future
Object left VA -50 cameras, License plate recognition - 10 (50+10+50). expansion. Hence no change
BOQ
CCTV system cameras and Image Tracking (attribute search) -50 cameras But the description asks for 300 Video Analytics licenses. Please
S.No.1179.02
provide the necessity and detailed break up for type of Video Analytics
required.
8 BOQ Master Clock system Qty is mentioned as 1 Lot. Please provide us the detailed qty as per the requirement.
S.No.1271.00
GPS Synchronized Master clock (1+1)
redundant mode:1set
4” NTP slave clocks : 40 Nos
Passive -ICT and Accessories: 1 Lot

16
9 BOQ Trunk Mobile system Qty is mentioned as 1 Lot. Please provide us the detailed qty as per the requirement. OMNI Antenna 2 dBi : 1 Lot as per site
S.No.1243.00 requirement based on bidder design.
Panel Antenna, 10dBi: 1 Lot as per site
requirement based on bidder design.
Portable Handsets Radio:120Nos
Vehicle-Mount Mobiles Radio:20Nos
Desk-Top Mount Fixed Radios:10Nos
Expansion of Digital Voice Recording
system as necessary: 1 set
Splitter,Coupler,Connector,RF Cable,
Accessories :1 set as per site
requirement.

BOQ S.No.1205- As per mentioned BOQ line item LED Displays - 32" and 49" bidder offer as per BOQ
1206 As per tender spec
10 Tender FIDS LED Display sizes. LED Displays - 40"/42"/55" Please confirm which speaker types has to be followed.
spec.Pg.No.
TS(E)-764
11 Pg.Pg.LOAM(E)- PAS/CCTV/ACS/Networking List of Makes differening in two places. We shall follow approved makes as per Pg.21 & 22 for the mentioned
20 & systems. Refer TENDERDOCUMENTVOLUMEI
Pg.LOAM(E)-21 Page No LOAM (E)‐20 & LOAM (E)‐21

12 Pg.LOAM(E)- Access control system CEM/Solus/Lenel/Honeywell/HID Kindly approve Siemens.


Additional Make Addon- Siemens & DDS
21
13 Pg.LOAM(E)- Access door locks & accessories Abloy/ASSA/Locktronic Kindly approve Ebelco.
As Per Tender, No Change
21
14 Pg.LOAM(E)- Video Management Software Honeywell/Tyco/Infinova/Verint/Indigo Vision/ Kindly approve Siemens.
As Per Tender, No Change
20 Bosch/Pelco/Milestone/Qcognify/Genetec/Lenel
15 Pg.LOAM(E)- PAS Controller/Amplifer/Speakers Bosch/Bose/Harman/Tannoy/Biamp/QSC/Honeywell Kindly approve Heinrich.
As Per Tender, No Change
20
16 Pg.LOAM(E)- Wireleass Network Avaya/Cisco/Juniper/Extreme/HP Kindly approve Dlink.
As Per Tender, No Change
20
BMS BOQ Sno. Duct Temperature Sensor shall be with rigid stem and of Follow Tender Specification.
1066.05 averaging type. These shall be Platinum sensor suitable for
17 duct installation and accuracy shall be ± 0.06%, for Accuracy shall be ± 0.36 Deg. Celcius
measuring supply -air temperature of AHUs etc.

18 BMS BOQ Sno. Duct Temp & RH Sensor shall capable to measure relative Follow Tender Specification.
1066.06 humidity of 0 to 100%, suitable for duct installation and
accuracy shall be ± 34°F at 70°F & Resistance Change
±3% RH over 20–95% RH at 77°F (25°C).
approx 3ohms/°F, for Measuring return air Temprature &
Humidity of AHUs etc.

19 BMS BOQ Sno. Air Velocity Sensors Need size of probes Air Velocity Sensor's probe length shall
1066.11 be 6".
20 BMS BOQ Sno. Flame Proof Sensors Is it flame froof level tranmitter for bulk oil tank, please clarify?
Yes.
1066.12
TS (E)‐190 Power Supply The control panel shall drive from addressable 230 Volts from The addressable power supply is for 24 VDC supply or for 230 V AC. The power supply within the panel shall
21
4a. main power supply be addressable .
TS (E)‐191 Addressable main Fire Alarm Panel The panel shall have either an in ‐built or external printer Please share the minimum number of event logs to be considered in Can be accepted as per manufacturer
6.1.g coupled to the panel which shall log each panel for this project ( at least 4000 should be considered). standards, complying to the tender &
22
all events with time. design requirements.

TS (E)‐192 Intelligent Addressable Multi Criteria It shall be able to withstand temperature variations from 0° As per UL Listing the detector shall operate within the temperature For ul listed OEM's accepted with proper
6.1.o Detector Centigrade to 50° Centigrade. range of 0 to 49° Centigrade. And RH shall be 10% -93%, non certification
23
The acceptable Relative humidity (non condensing type) shall condensing.
be upto 95%.

17
TS (E)‐194 Intelligent Addressable Multi Criteria In “heat only” mode only temperature above The heat only mode the detector will work as a normal heat detector Noted & accepted.
24 6.3.b Detector certain fixed level & rate of rise in temp (i.e. both but not as multisensor detector hence please edit it to normal heat
– fixed & rate of rise) mode only.
TS (E)‐194 Intelligent Addressable Multi Criteria The multi criteria detector shall activate on Please provide the detail of the detector for smoke detection in terms Can be accepted as per manufacturer
6.3.e Detector receiving smoke particles in the 0.5 to 10 micro meter range or of obscuration per feet. standards, complying to the tender &
25
as specified. The detector shall be completely solid state with design requirements.
LED indication.
TS (E)-688 User Profiles A profile shall be used as a privileges template. Unlimited Kindly specify no. of profiles required.
26 up to 500 User accepted.
8.35.4.a number of profiles may be created.
TS (E)-667 Web Browser Viewing The DVMS web interface shall support media export to AVI and Please approve AVI/ WMV format Proprietary or Native Format file is
27 8.13-xxiii to a proprietary DVMS file format (i.e. w/o transcoding). mandatory.

TS (E)-508 Server software shall be able to browsed by Microsoft Internet Netscape navigator is obsolote now. Kindly remove it Alternative option accepted.
28
Explorer and Netscape Navigator
TS (E)-514 The temperature sensors may be of any of the following types : Controller supports PTC 100 and NTC 20k which are frequently not accepted
1) PT 100, PT 1000, PT 3000 available. Please accept.
29 2) NI 100, NI 1000
3) Balco 500.

TS (E)-708 Analog inputs/outputs of the following minimum types shall be Analogue inputs 4-20mA, 0-10 Vdc, 2-10 VDC shall be supported. not accepted
supported : We will use PTC 100 and NTC 20k which are frequently used.Please
4‐20 mA. accept. -
30
0‐1 volts. 0‐10 volts. 0‐5 volts, and 2‐10 volts.
Resistance Signals (either PTC or NTC) (PT 100, PT 1000, PT
3000, Balco 500, NI 1000)
TS (E)-711 Equip each router with a network transceiver on each network The BMS controller will not require a FTT or TP ports. Please accept Follow Tender Specification.
port (inbound and outbound) as it.
31 dictated by the network type (Type 1 ‐ FTT, Type 2
‐ TP). The Router/Interface Units shall be of same make as of
BMS System & shall be UL Listed.
32 Immersion temp sensor BOQ serial number 19 Please confrim pipe line size to select immersion temp sensor probe
Pipe sizes are as follows: 1.) evaporators
length.
300mm, 2.) condensers 350mm, 3.)
chilled water header 600mm, 4.)
condenser water header 700mm dia.
Outside air temperature , humidity RH BOQ serial number 20 Please confrim whether we can have temp, rh one sensor & wetbulb Acceptable.
33
& Wetbulb sensors temp sensor another sensor.
Differential pressure switches across BOQ serial number 22 There are two options of 0.2" to 2" (5 to 50mm) and 2" to 20" (50 to Consider 0- 100 mm WG pressure range
34 the blowers 254mm). Please confrim which one to consider. rating Differential pressure switches
across the blowers.
TS (E)‐500 Duct Temperature Sensor shall be The accuracy shall be at least ± 0.33 degrees F and sensitivity As per tender spec sensor accuracy mentioned as ±0.33°F but BOQ Follow BOQ.
with rigid stem and of averaging type of at least 2 ohm/F. description specified as ±0.06%. Please confirm which one to
35
consider.

Duct Temp & RH Sensor Tender spec not available for duct temp & Rh sensor, tender specified Yes.
for Temp & Rh seperately. Tender spec specified duct average for
36
temp sensor, is it applicable for temp/Rh sensor?

TS (E)‐502 Air Differential Pressure Sensor 1. Please confirm to consider CE approved sensor. 1.) UL/CE is acceptable. 2.)
2. Please confirmation to consider IP65 rating. IP 65 is required. 3.)
37 3. Please confirm pressure ranges to select required model. Consider 0- 100 mm WG pressure range
for Air Differential Pressure Sensor.

TS (E)‐501 PRESSURE The sensor must be pressure compensated for Please confirm to considered water pressure transmitter with 0-55°C Follow Tender Specification.
TRANSMITTER/DIFFERENTIAL a medium temperature of ‐10 oC to 60 oC with ambient compensated temp range.
38
PRESSURE SENSOR FOR WATER ranging between 0 oC to 50 oC.

39 BOQ UL Listed Current Relay BOQ serial number 27 Please confirm current rating to consider current switch. Rating shall be decided at detailed
engineering stage during execution.
40 BOQ Duct Static Pressure Sensor BOQ serial number 28 Please confirm pressure ranges to select required model. Consider 0- 100 mm WG pressure range
for AHU rating for Duct Static pressure Sensor.

18
41 BOQ Air Velocity Sensors BOQ serial number 29 1. Please confirm pressure ranges to select required model.
1.) Consider 0- 100 mm WG pressure
2. Please confirm duct size to select velocity probe length.
range rating for Air Velocity Sensor.
2.) Duct height varies from 300 mm thru
800 mm.
TS (E)-764 (xiii) DISPLAY DEVICES MINIMUM Display Monitor cabinet shall be designed for uniform heat New Display technology is coming with fan less technology and high Agreed
TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT. dissipation/removal and shall have mechanism to remove heat efficient heat resistive design. So this should be interchanged or
from the cabinet. Heat removal mechanism shall automatically incorporated as a optional.
42
start functioning when temperatures reach
certain threshold levels.

TS (E)-764 (xii) DISPLAY DEVICES MINIMUM Display monitor shall be provided with Aluminium cabinet Display monitor shall be provided with Aluminum / metal / Synthetic Agreed
TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT. suitable for industrial use with arrangement for Wall and Ceiling Metal cabinet suitable for industrial use with arrangement for Wall and
43 Mount installation with provision for Swivel movement. Ceiling Mount installation with provision for Swivel movement.
Declaration from OEM requires for performance for full usage period.

TS (E)-765 (v) FIDS LED DISPLAY MONITORS: Contrast (native) Ratio: 2400:1 Contrast Ration ( Native ) : 2400:1 with VA Panel and 1100:1 with IPS No Change
40/42/55” MINIMUM TECHNICAL Panel. ( All the recent 12-15 tenders of AAI has this terms for contrast
44
REQUIREMENT. ratio).

TS (E)-765 (viii) FIDS LED DISPLAY MONITORS: Video Input Ports : 1. Digital Ports: HDMI or DVI ‐D & 2. PC ‐ Video Input Ports : 1. Digital Ports: HDMI , DVI ‐D, DP & 2. PC ‐ Agreed
40/42/55” MINIMUM TECHNICAL VGA in: 1 x D-Sub: Optional VGA in: 1 x D ‐ Sub optional
45
REQUIREMENT.

46 TS (E)-913 Low End IP Phone Phonebook (100 entries), Call Logs (100 records) IP phone will use the call log feature of system.
As Per Tender, No Change
B.6.14.p
47 General IP phones Please clarify that whether the same should they be of the same make
as bidder may offer, 3rd party also
that of the OEM ? Please allow for third party phones
TS (E)-759 iv FIDS SYSTEM Web Server ‐WEB module for providing interface for Station FIDS through internet does not match as per AAI compliance due to Web Server -required for local intranet. if
COMPONENTS/DEVICES AND FID System Data to centralized system for providing Flight security reasons. Cloud Based server can be an option for the internet required in future expantion.Cloud based
48
ASSOCIATED ACCESSORIES. Information through Intranet/ Internet. or through VPN. not acceptable.

TS (E)-760 ix FIDS HARDWARE FIDS shall be provided with client ‐server Please confirm on LINUX OR WINDOWS. The FIDS software
architecture with latest version of UNIX or LINUX or Microsoft components changes accordingly.
49 Window Server as operating system of Server/Cluster server, UNIX/LINUX/ Microsoft acceptable.
and Windows or Linux as operating system of client terminals.

50 TS (E)-761 v FIDS HARDWARE OS: UNIX/LINUX/Microsoft Windows Server LINUX OR WINDOWS? The FIDS software components changes
licensed (Latest version). accordingly. UNIX/LINUX/ Microsoft acceptable.

TS (E)-848 3.1 MASTER CLOCK SYSTEM 3.1. System Architecture We request you to please include NDS & Techinfo as an approved As Per Tender, No Change
COMPONENTS/DEVICES AND (b) Time Servers shall be dual redundant and make
51
ASSOCIATED configured to be operating in an active/active manner;
ACCESSORIES.
TS (E)-848 3.1 MASTER CLOCK SYSTEM 3.1. System Architecture i) 1,000m of cable is very long distance between antenna and the Included in Passive-ICT work.
COMPONENTS/DEVICES AND vii) Antenna connected with up to 1,000m of cabling for each receiver, a fiber optic link is usually used in this case. If this distance
52 ASSOCIATED antenna, between antenna and the receiver panel, ensuring is actually required, shall the Fiber optical link be provided under the
ACCESSORIES. minimum antenna and signal loss. scope of master clock system or by other contractors?

TS (E)-852 Digital Format Clocks 3.10. Digital Format Clocks According to BoQ.xls file: S.No. 173:
3.10/3.11 3.11. Analogue Format Clocks Supply, Installation, Testing & Commissioning of 4” NTP slave clocks - Display format ( HH:MM:SS)
As Per technical Specification - 40 Nos. - Single sided
Normally, the above required 4" NTP slave clocks refer to digital - LED display as standard
format clocks with digit height of 4". If this understanding is correct, - Real time clock backup during power
53 shall we quote digital format clock only? failure
- Synchronization status with stable LED
and Unsynchronization status by means
of flashing LED as standard
- Ingress protection such as IP 54

19
TS (E)-852 3.11 Analogue Format Clocks 3.11. Analogue Format Clocks If analogue format clocks are indeed required, please clarify the
iv) Switchable clear/opaque front glass screen; requirement of switchable clear/opaque front glass screen: under - Display format ( H/M/S)
which circumstances shall front glass screen be clear? or opaque? - Single sided
54
- Dial Diameter as standard
- Ingress protection IP as standard
Quantity as per site requirement
TS (E)-848 3.1 3. Technical Specification The MTCS shall have the ability to connect to multiple NTP Please confirm our understanding as Agreed
(d) servers via IP and multiple GPS via antennae; The MTCS shall have ability to connect to multiple GPS satellites as
55
reference.
Further it shall synchronize multiple NTP clients via IP.
TS (E)-849 3.1 3. Technical Specification Configuration across a network via a secure browser interface; Please confirm our understanding as Agreed
56 (h) ii The MTCS Configuration across network can be done via secure GUI
interface as well.
TS (E)-849 3.1 3. Technical Specification https (RFC2616) support for configuration and monitoring; Please confirm our understanding as Agreed
(h) xii https (RFC2616) is limited to configure and moniter one device at a
time and digital/analogue clocks can’t be monitored over RFC2616
(web interface).
While NMS (Graphical user Interface) can be used for remote
57
configuration and monitoring of all devices at same time including
digital and analogue clocks monitoring & configuration.
Hence please amand the clause as https (RFC2616) or GUI support
for configuration and monitoring;

TS (E)-849 3.1 3. Technical Specification Antenna connected with up to 1,000m of cabling for each Please confirm our understanding as Vendor to supply antenna cable as per
(h) vii antenna, between antenna and the to support up to 1000 mtr, inline amplifiers or optical interface may be actual site requirement
58 receiver panel, ensuring minimum antenna and signal loss. used if required.
Vendor to supply antenna cable as per actual site requirement.

TS (E)-849 3.7 3.7 Synchronization Mechanism Time server shall continue to function when GPS- Please confirm our understanding as As Per Tender, No Change
(a) i synchronisation is lost; if this occurs the system will operate at Time server shall continue to function in Hold over mode without GPS
a higher stratum level and connect to a NTP server via the synchronization
Internet. Further Time server shall connect to LAN network and redundant link
59
through second NTP server to achieve full redundancy and lower
stratum.
Higher stratum may please be amended as lower stratum or high
accuracy.
LOAM (E) ‐20 Sr.No. 142 (Makes-1 Query.pdf) NTP server Please note under Revised Revised list of approved makes for As Per Tender, No Change
electrical works on Serial no. 142 Symmetricom, Galleon, Brandwine,
Timetools, Wharton whereas at Serial no. 167, (All system
60 components) Moser Baer AG, Gillam Feir, Mobatime, Microsemi,
Galleon. Please confirm this understanding all of these listed are for
NTP server & display clocks.

TS (E)-852 Digital Format Clocks Digital Format Clocks Please provide below information for 4 inch display digital clocks - Display format ( HH:MM:SS)
3.10/3.11 quantity 40 units: - Single sided
- Display format (HH:MM or HH:MM:SS) - LED display as standard
- Single or double sided - Real time clock backup during power
- LED display (RED) failure
61
- Real time clock backup during power failure - Synchronization status with stable LED
- Synchronization status with stable LED and Unsynchronization and Unsynchronization status by means
status by means of flashing LED. of flashing LED as standard
- Ingress protection such as IP 54. - Ingress protection such as IP 54

TS (E)-852 3.11 Analogue Format Clocks Analogue Format Clocks Please provide below information for analogue clocks: - Display format ( H/M/S)
- Display format (H/M or H/M/S) - Single sided
- Single or double sided - Dial Diameter as standard
62
- Dial Diameter - Ingress protection IP as standard
- Ingress protection IP 30 Quantity as per site requirement
- Quantity
TS (E)-856 3.1 CORE SWITCH MINIMUM The switch shall have shall have distributed Requesting to amend this clause "Switch should support non blocking,
As per Tender, As Per Tender, No Change ,
TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT. switching architecture on each interface module (any additional wire speed performance per line card"
63 Requirement given in tender as per site
hardware shall be proposed to achieve distributed switching)
requirement and future expansion.

20
TS (E)-856 3.1 CORE SWITCH MINIMUM 1 RJ‐45 (serial RS ‐232C) console port Requesting to amend this clause "1 RJ ‐45/serial RS ‐232C console
Modular Architecture is industry Standard
TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT. port"
64 and cannot be proprietary. As Per Tender, As
Per Tender, No Change
TS (E)-856 3.1 CORE SWITCH MINIMUM Packet buffer size of minimum 10 MB per module to support Switch should have a minimum buffer of 40 Mb. Bidder can offer higher configuration. RFP
65 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT. video/streaming traffic mentions minimum requirement as per site
requirement.
TS (E)-856 3.1 CORE SWITCH MINIMUM The Switch shoould support Redundant management module The Switch should support Redundant management module from Yes
66
TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT. Day1
TS (E)-856 3.1 CORE SWITCH MINIMUM The below Warranty shall be offered directly from the switch The below Warranty shall be offered directly from the switch OEM with As Per Tender, No Change
67 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT. OEM. NBD replacement, necessary contract copy need to provided by OEM

TS (E)-856 3.1 CORE SWITCH MINIMUM Lifetime warranty with advance replacement and next Clarification Lifetime warranty with advance
68 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT. ‐business ‐day delivery replacement and next ‐business ‐day
delivery
TS (E)-861 4 INTERNET ROUTER MINIMUM Router shall be based on RISC ‐based processors The Router should support modular architecture, multi-core As Per Tender, Requirement.
TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT Processor, internal redundant field replaceable power supply (from
69 Day1). The Router Should have capabilities to seamless field
upgrade/replacement (without interrupting running processes and
services ) for modular interfaces.
TS (E)-861 4 INTERNET ROUTER MINIMUM The router shall have USB Interface to support 3G Dongle The router shall have USB Interface. Should support 3G/4g/lte Agreed
70
TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT interface card
TS (E)-861 INTERNET ROUTER MINIMUM The router shall have an encryption performance of 1.9 Gbps The router shall have an encryption performance of 1.8 Gbps as an Agreed
71
TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT when required
TS (E)-861 INTERNET ROUTER MINIMUM The Router should provide 3G/4G LTE wireless access for The Router should provide 3G/4G LTE wireless access for primary or
TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT primary or backup backup connectivity via a 3G/4G LTE modules certified on various
72 connectivity via a 3G/4G LTE modules certified on various cellular networks Industry standard requirement. No Change
cellular networks;
optional carrier 3G/4G USB modems available
TS (E)-861 INTERNET ROUTER MINIMUM The Router should have VCCI V ‐4/2012.04; EN 55022 :2010 ; The Router should have VCCI V ‐3; EN 55022 Class A; CISPR 24 ;
73 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT CISPR 22 ; EN EN 55024. Industry standard requirement. No Change
55024; ICES‐003 issue 5;
TS (E)-869 24 PORT RACK SWITCH FOR 16 * 10G SFP+ ports , however 14 shall be populated with 10G Requesting to amend this clause "24 * 10G SFP+ ports , however 14
minimum requirement. Bidder can propose
SERVER MANAGEMENT MINIMUM SR Tranceiver from Day1 shall be populated with 10G SR Tranceiver from Day1"
74 higher configuration to meet or exceed the
TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT.
requirement.
TS (E)-869 24 PORT RACK SWITCH FOR The switch shall have Two expansion slots to support up to Requesting to amend this clause "The switch shall have one
minimum requirement. Bidder can propose
SERVER MANAGEMENT MINIMUM Two 40G QSFP+ port . Shall be populated with minimum 2 * expansion slots to support up to Two 40G QSFP+ port . Shall be
75 higher configuration to meet or exceed the
TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT. 40G Transceivers from day1 populated with minimum 2 * 40G Transceivers from day1"
requirement.
TS (E)-869 24 PORT RACK SWITCH FOR The Switch should support stacking up to 9 Switch and support Requesting to amend this clause "The Switch should support stacking
SERVER MANAGEMENT MINIMUM up to 336 Gb/s of stacking throughput. The Switch support up to 9 Switch and support up to 336 Gb/s of stacking throughput with minimum requirement. Bidder can propose
76 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT. Ring, chain, and mesh stacking topologies dedicated stacking port and cable. Port should be avalible from Day1 higher configuration to meet or exceed the
requirement.

TS (E)-869 24 PORT RACK SWITCH FOR The switch should support IEEE 802.3ad Link Aggregation Requesting to amend this clause "The switch should support IEEE
minimum requirement. Bidder can propose
SERVER MANAGEMENT MINIMUM Protocol (LACP) and support up to 144 trunks, each with up to 802.3ad Link Aggregation Protocol (LACP) and support up to 128
77 higher configuration to meet or exceed the
TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT. 8 links (ports) per trunk trunks, each with up to 8 links (ports) per trunk
requirement.
TS (E)-869 24 PORT RACK SWITCH FOR Lifetime warranty with advance replacement and next Clarification Lifetime warranty with advance
SERVER MANAGEMENT MINIMUM ‐business ‐day delivery replacement and next ‐business ‐day
78
TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT. delivery

TS (E)-876 24 PORT PoE ACCESS SWITCH 24 RJ‐45 autosensing 10/100/1000 PoE+ports and 4 SFP+ 24 RJ‐45 autosensing 10/100/1000 PoE+ports and 2 SFP+ 1/10GbE As Per Tender, No Change
MINIMUM TECHNICAL 1/10GbE ports. Switch shall be populated with minimum 2 * ports. Switch shall be populated with minimum 2 * 10G SR
79 REQUIREMENT 10G SR Transceivers from day 1. Transceivers from day
1. 370 W POE POWER. Switch should support 2 nos of 80 gbps
dedicated stacking port with stacking cable.
TS (E)-874 7 24 PORT MPLS SWITCH Must support Layer2 Ping and Layer 2 Traceroute for Technology differs from OEM to OEM, Kindly amend the clause as
Please read the clause as "Must support
MINIMUM TECHNICAL connectivity and Fault Management "Must support Layer2 Ping and Layer 2 Traceroute or equivelant
Layer2 Ping and Layer 2 Traceroute or
REQUIREMENT. Must support multicast Traceroute for connectivity and Fault Management
80 equivalent for connectivity and Fault
.Must support multicast Traceroute or equivelant "
Management .Must snort multicast Traceroute
or equivalent"

21
TS (E)-874 7 24 PORT MPLS SWITCH Switch should be scalable to support minimum 3000 Hardware Product sizing varies from OEM to OEM. Kindly amend the clause as Please read the "Switch should be
81 MINIMUM TECHNICAL ACLs "Switch should be scalable to support minimum 2000 Hardware scalable to support minimum 2000
REQUIREMENT. ACLs" Hardware ACLs"
82 TS (E)-778 (i) Airport Operational Database (AODB) Integration doc/ API will be required Completely New System, Bidder to
provide integrated solution.
83 TS (E)-778 (ii) Departure Control System (DCS) Integration doc/ API will be required Completely New System, Bidder to
provide integrated solution.
84 TS (E)-778 (iii) Baggage Handling System (BHS) Integration doc/ API will be required Completely New System, Bidder to
provide integrated solution.
85 TS (E)-778 (iv) CUTE System Integration doc/ API will be required Completely New System, Bidder to
provide integrated solution.
Please note that makes such as Scheneider & Rittal does not Additional Add-On Make : Maser &
manufacture the said items to the best of our understanding. are not RSCAT
86 LOAM (E)-20 List of Makes Rodent Repellant System - Scheneider, Rittal
equivalent Makes. We request you to kindly approve Maser/RSCAT
make for the same.
Item 1090 of BoQ Rodent Repellant System BOQ for Rodent Repellant System Rodent Repellant System includes Satallites, Transducers, Master Bidder may offer complete system as per
Controller and data center area.
87 assciated cables.We request you to Kindly provide the Qty. for the
each Items mentioned here required for Rodent Repellant System.

88 LOAM (E)-21 Access Control System - EM door locks Approved Makes Kinldy confirm the approved makes for the same.
Refer to TENDERDOCUMENTVOLUMEI
Approved Makes
Page no-LOAM (E)‐21 S.No 164
Light Fixture
Complete lighting SCHEDULE OF QUANTITIES (SOQ) Internal Light Fixture & Kindly provide the LED luminaire product codes for M/S Wipro 660 - LM29-451ADALI-40-LA
& lighting control External Roaad Lighting & Lighting to enable a more competitive scenario. 661 - LM38-461-XXX-40-LA
BOQ as per Landscape Light Fittings 662 - LM38-461XXX-40 DALA
Tender BOQ Item 663 - LD56-251-XXX-40-LA
No. 660 To 688.01 664 - LD56-251-XXX40DALA
& 665 - LD56-501-XXX40DALA
Tender BOQ Item 666 - CRDL11R033HP40LA
No. 707 To 714.08 667 - CRDL11RO33HP40DALA
668 - CRDL11R017HP40LA
669 - CRDL11R013HP40LA
670 - LE10-491-XXX-57 HCSL
671 - LL20-281-XXX-65AL1
672 - LH17-132-XXX40DALA
673 - LH17-192-XXX40DALA
674 - LM34-501-XXX40SMLA
1 675 - LM34-501-XXX40SMLA
676 - LM34-251-XXX40SMLA
677 - LM34-251-XXX40SMLA
678 - LM34-502XXX-40DADL
679 - LM34-251XXX-40DADL
680 - 4 ft COVE LIGHT
681 - 1 ft COVE LIGHT
682 - CRCO13R038HP40G1LA
683 - LW03-850-XXX-57-XX
708 - LR02-132-XXX-57-LA
709 - LP05-711-XXX-57-LA
710 - LP05-711-XXX-57-LA
711 - LP06-351-XXX-57-LA
713 - LF20-442-060-57-LA
714 - CRLA11008HP27-08

TS-(E )-119, Technical Specifications Electrical The LED used should be of following makes Kindly include Osram, Bridgelux & Citizen in LED makes as these are Makes of LED shall be as under
clause 1.3 Works Nichia/Cree/Philips technically Nichia/cree/philips/Osram/Sharp/Seoul.
2 Section - 7 - B - Light Fixtures equivalents to makes mentioned in tender documents & lot of
luminaire manufacturers use LEDs of these makes in their products.

TS-(E )-119, Technical Specifications Electrical The housing of the indoor fixtures should be extruded Most of the Indoor luminaires are made of CRCA hence kindly include CRCA is accepted only where the Boq
clause 1.6 Works aluminum/standard alloy housing. CRCA as approved material for Indoor luminaires. CRCA has equal line item specifies it be CRCA.
3
Section - 7 - B - Light Fixtures life as of extrusion aluminimum or PDC.

22
4 Technical Specifications Electrical As on date there is no by-law which demands LED luminaires to be Kindly follow the tender requirements.
Works BIS certified. Only LED luminaires for general purpose are required to
Section - 7 - B - Light Fixtures be BIS certified & no such luminaire forms a part of this tender BOQ.
TS-(E )-120, Hence it is requested to remove the clause of BIS certification for LED
Luminaires an driver both shall be BIS certified individually.
clause 2.3k Luminaires. As per law all LED drivers are supposed to be BIS
certified which all the luminaire manufacturers comply to.

5 Technical Specifications Electrical A good LED driver is supposed to have 3 stage Isolated protection for Accepted.
Works higher reliability, durability & longer life. When more protections are
Section - 7 - B - Light Fixtures added to driver to increase its durability & reliability it results in
TS-(E )-121,
Full load efficiency of driver ≥ 90% decrease of driver efficiency in tune of 85%. Drivers with 90%
clause 2.4
efficiency don't have 3 stage isolated protection hence it is requested
to allow drivers with 85% efficiency for higher durability & life.

These three line items call for UGR<16 whereas no other indoor line UGR is not required.
items in the tender calls for UGR <16 which clearly indicates that there
is no uniformity in the criterias for indoor lighting application hence it is
requested to remove this parameter from these three line items. Also,
there is no such application area in the terminal building which
requires luminaires which can help in achieving UGR<16. Further,
Tender BOQ Line
Supply, Installation, testing and commissioning of Recess LED UGR is not dependent only on the luminaire rather it is a lighting
6 Item No. SCHEDULE OF QUANTITIES (SOQ)
.... CCT up to 4000, CRI >80, PF >0.95, UGR<16 application design parameters which is equally affected by or is
660, 661 & 662
dependent on lighting design, architectural design, luminaire
positioning & observer positioning hence it is next to impossible to
cross-check this criteria at site. Kindly consider & remove this criteria
to enable a more competitive scenario.

Supply, Installation, testing and commissioning of High Both these items fall under indoor lighting sub-head in tender BOQ. For item no 672 & 673, IK is not required.
Pressure Die Cast Aluminium Alloy ............. Protection of There is no such area/application in the termminal building which
Fixture:- IP65,IK08, demands any luminaire to be IK08 complied & no such criteria has
been mentioned in any of the recent tenders for indoor lighting in AAI
hence it is requested to remove this criteria or ammend the same to
IK02 for these two line items as most of the reputed manufacturers
Tender BOQ Line
comply to IK02 criteria for Indoor luminaires. Further, this criteria has
7 Item No. SCHEDULE OF QUANTITIES (SOQ)
not been mentioned in any other indoor lighting line items which
672 & 673.
clearly indicates that no uniformity has been maintained in the criterias
for indoor lighting application hence it is requested to remove this
parameter from these two line items . Kindly consider & remove this
criteria to enable a more competitive scenario.

8 BOQ item SITC of Passive Infrared(PIR) technology based As per recommendation of light fittings
reference 725 to occupancy sensor manufacturer.
Lighting sensors Please specify the approved makes for lighting sensor.
726 SITC High frequency dual technology based occupancy sensor

9 BOQ item Lighting Control System Dimming system Please specify the approved makes for lighting control system As per recommendation of light fittings
reference manufacturer.
727 to 737
S.no Clause No. Item Stipulation as per tender SPCL query description Client / PMC Response
10 Supply, assembly, erection, connecting, testing & Makes of poles are provided in the
BOQ item
GRP Poles commissioning of standard 10.0 metre high (above ground) Please specify the approved makes for GRP Poles tender.
reference 757
GRP Pole (Pressures as per IS 875 Part-3)
11 BOQ item Lighting fixture with poles Please specify the approved makes for poles, also please confirm Makes of poles are provided in the
reference 759 whether tender.
to 761 tubular or octagonal poles are required.
Chiller

23
1 BOQ S. No. 964, The unit shall be designed to unload upto 20% of its rated Unloading till 20% of Its rated capacity at constant Condenser Water Unloading till 20% of the Chiller's rated
Point No. - II, capacity at Constant Condenser Water Entering Temperature Entering temparature Should be without using Hot gas By pass capacity at constant Condenser Water
Page No. SOQ - & at AHRI conditions. system. Usage of hot gas bypass is inefficient way of unloading and Entering temparature should be without
253 The compressor shall have mechanism for stable operation at shall greatly impact the energy efficiency of the machine. Latest using Hot gas By pass system.
part loads. CPWD specification does not allow hot gas by pass. Hence hot gas by
pass should not be allowed.

Item 964 (i) of HVAC - Chillers Single / Multiple centrifugal type compressor semi‐hermetic Chiller compressor shall be semi-hermetic/open type SPDP/TEFC/TEWC type open drive
2 BoQ complete with automatic capacity motors and TERC semi hermetic Chillers
control, safety switches, speed increasing gear are acceptable.
Unit mounted factory fitted / Free standing(UL listed) with Please note that Unit mounted VFD shall be of suitable NEMA Free standing VFD shall be with IP 42
Item 964 (iv) of interconnection of power and control at site with copper cable, enclosure as per specification . We request you to accept freee enclosure.
3 HVAC - Chillers
BoQ air/liquid/refrigerant cooled with heat balancing Variable standing VFD of IP-42 enclosure instead of IP-55.
Frequency Drive (IP 55).
4 BOQ S. No. 964, The 3 references mentioned in Documents are Contradicting Please clarify which one to follow. Where as Per we suggest to go for VFD starter panel with IP42 or equivalent
Point No. - II, Each Other, In BOQ IP Rating Asked for Unit Mounted as well IP 42 and above rating for VFD. NEMA protection standard are
Page No. SOQ - as free standing starter VFD is asked as IP-55 and above. acceptable.
254/ TSE -278 Where as at other 2 Places it is asked as NEMA Enclosure and
/TSE - NEMA 1
281 Enclosure.
5 Sub Heading - The Chiller shall be provided with liquid level sight glass and a We wish to clarify that most of the Manufacturers don’t manufacture Accepted.
WATER relief device (of the busing type) to prevent evaporator with Liquid level sight glass. So evaporator should be as
–COOLED excess pressure in the heat exchanger. per manufacturer standard.
CONDENSER
AND
EVAPORATOR
(COOLER) TS (E)-
280
6 Sub Heading - X Ray NDT (Non Destructive Test) as per the applicable NDT We Wish to clarify that All the Manufacturers don’t Have this NDT Design and testing as per ASME
WATER standard, for Shell welding of cooler & condenser should be standard testing facility and tests the shell welding as OEM standards. acceptable.
–COOLED carried out by the manufacturer & test reports to be submitted. Kindly Allow us to go as per OEM standard by removing this X-ray
CONDENSER NDT testing clause.
AND
EVAPORATOR
(COOLER) TS (E)-
280
Semi‐hermetic system shall be suitable for 415 +/‐ 10% volts, 3 There is some confusion in Motor specification as semihermetic type IP 42 /SPDP/TEFC/TEWC type open
phase, 50 cycles AC supply. Motors shall be TEFC of motor is always TERC type and TEFC Squirrel Cage/TEWC type drive motors and IP 42 TERC semi
squirrel‐cage induction type/TEWC IP 42 rated, designed and motors with IP 42 rating are available with Open type compressors hermetic Chillers are acceptable.
guaranteed for continuous operation at name plate rating. only so the specification needs to get changed as " The compressor
Sub heading - Complete chiller shall comply with NEMA‐1 protection. The motor will be either TEFC / Totally enclosed Water cooled with IP 42
7 Motor TS (E) - motor shall be provided with a combination of ball and roller or Better protection or Semi hermetic (refrigerant cooled), squirrel
277 bearing, and shall be fitted at the free end with ample capacity cage, induction type operating at 3000 RPM max. The motor shall be
to deal with any axial thrust. Limit type lubricators shall be suitable for load characteristics and the operational duty of the driven
provided to enable the bearings to be correctly greased. equipment, and comply with these specifications and latest IEC
codes".

Sub heading - Each Chilling package shall be complete assembly of all As both type of VFD starters are acceptable i.e. free standing as well Acceptable.
General components viz. electric motor driven semihermetic or open as Unit mounted. A freestanding Starter cannot be mounted on
Requirements TS Centrifugal compressor, insulated cooler, condenser, common structural frame as asked. So Please confirm that a free
8 (E) - 276 refrigerant piping, oil cooler, protective devices, standing starter not mounted on common structural frame will also be
microprocessor control panel, unit mounted starter cum local acceptable.
electrical panel,etc. mounted on a common structural frame.

9 Sub heading - The entire chiller package shall be UL listed. We wish to clarify, Most of the manufacturersa don't have UL Listing (UL/CE/GB/BIS/PED) listed VFD are
Variable Speed on complete Chiller package. However from this statement we accepted as mentioned in VFD
Drive TS (E) - 281 understand that AAI is asking for UL Listing of VFD's only as it is Specification.Refer page no. TS (E)‐280.
mentioned under the subheading of Variable
speed Drive. Please Confirm.

24
Sub heading - An active harmonic filter that limits electrical power supply Active Harmonic Filter Should be of the same IP rating as of VFD.We Accepted.
Variable Speed distortion for the variable speed drive to comply with the suggest for IP 42 and Above for both the types of Active harmonic
Drive TS (E) - 281 guidelines of IEEE Std. 519‐1992 shall be provided. Total filters i.e Free Standing as well as Unit Mounted. ( At the same time
Harmonics distortion within 5% at the drive terminal should be even if AAI Doesn't Agree for IP 42 and above, than IP-49 rating of
10
provided. The filter shall be unit mounted within the same Both type of filters should be Same, As both type of filters have to
NEMA‐ 1 enclosure and shall be UL listed or field installed with face same atmospheric condition only).
IP 49
enclosure.
Distributed Antenna System
The power dividers shall operate within the frequency band of Please clarify the Frequency band of 400-500MHz whereas the The power dividers shall operate within
400 – 500MHz with the same bandwidth requirement. TETRA frequency band is given as 380-430MHz. the frequency band of 380-430MHz.
1 TS (E)-817 1.4.6 Power dividers
Two‐way, three‐way and four‐way even‐split power dividers
shall be utilized as required.
Leaky coaxial cables are used to distribute RF signals to Being the Airport terminal building we don't find usage of Leaky cable. Leaky coaxial cables not required
enclosed areas. All leaky coaxial cables used shall be Please clarify
2 TS (E)-817 1.4.7. Leaky Coaxial Cables
broadband and capable of handling a combined RF signal from
100 MHz to 2.4 GHz simultaneously
3 TS (E)-813 1.3.2. Radio Coverage Please provide the coverage probability details for IBMS Layout Drawing is uploaded.
Requirements EDS-CCSIA-LKO-L20-C201
EDS-CCSIA-LKO-L10-C202
EDS-CCSIA-LKO-L00-C203
EDS-CCSIA-LKO-B05-C204
EDS-CCSIA-LKO-B10-C205
(a) The TMR System comprises design, procurement, Please provide Master Campus layout drawings to asses the Layout Drawing is uploaded.
installation testing and commissioning for the new Integrated coverage requirement for associated landside areas. Need AutoCAD EDS-CCSIA-LKO-L20-C201
terminal building and associated landside areas as per below drawings for system design EDS-CCSIA-LKO-L10-C202
4 TS (E)-811 1.2 Scope of Work
specific scope of works EDS-CCSIA-LKO-L00-C203
EDS-CCSIA-LKO-B05-C204
EDS-CCSIA-LKO-B10-C205
Electrical
BOQ item Point Wiring Wiring for light point/ fan point/ exhaust fan point/ call bell With reference to BOQ item no. 629 to 631, we shall be considering No extra payment shall be done, quote
reference 629 to point…….. as required. - Group C the point length as per group-C mentioned in DAR 2016 for electrical, shall include inclunding the cost of point
1
631 any increase in wiring length complete.
length shall be paid in running meter.
2 TS-( E)-104, Metal Conduit Minimum wall thickness 1.6 mm thick…. We propose thickness of conduit shall be as per IS :9537 (Part-2 &3 ) Minimum requirement as specified in IS
Clause 3.6.2 & with and higher is acceptable to the perticular
3.6.3 tolerance. items.
3 BOQ item Point Wiring We presume steel conduit refers to painted MS conduit. Confirmed for these items.
reference 629 to
641, 646 to 649
4 BOQ item Supply and wiring for circuit/sub main wiring ….. complaining to As per item description unarmoured cable as per IS:7098 is As query is being quoted the Boq
reference 642 to IS - 7098 and relevant standards. mentioned, however descriptions with unarmored cable
645 as per BOQ description single run wires are mentioned , please already, wire should not be there. These
Submain Wiring
confirm whether 3CX2.5 sqmm/ 3CX4 sqmm/4CX6 smm+2CX6sqmm are cables in cable trays & raceways
cables are to be quoted or wires as per IS:694 are to be quoted. mentioned in the Boq. IS: 7098

5 BOQ item Supplying and fixing ….. Industrial type socket outlet (IP-66),
As per item description industrial socket fabricated from MS sheet Polycarbonate is accepted as per
reference 659 to .......SP, MCB, in sheet steel enclosure. with IP-66 manufacturer standards to maintain the
661 Industrial Switch socket protection is mentioned, however as per manufacturer standard IP level.
industrial socket with IP-66 is available in thermoplastic enclosure.
Please confirm the enclosure type.
6 Boq item 675 to The DB shall be metal clad …fabricated from 14/16 SWG thick Please clarify whether 14 or 16 SWG thickness DB required, as per 18 SWG is not accepted.
680 & high quality CRCA sheet manufacturers standard DB thickness is 18 SWG with IP-42 , we
Specification Construction propose to please approve the same.
Clause 4 (TS-113
(E ))
7 Boq item 692 & Flame retardant Distribution Board All Em. Lighting DB's shall be IP-55/66,UV resistant as per IEC The BOQ mentions flame retardant DB, the approved DB vendors are Approved makes shall be as under -;
698 61439,flame retardant, self extinguishing material for not into manufacturing of these DB's. Please provide the make for Hensel/GE power/ Rital/Siemens
outdoor/harsh environment like resistant to weather influences same.
8 Boq item 692 & Flame retardant Distribution (humidity, temperature, water sprays) Please clarify on the IP of DB whether require IP 55 or IP 66.
Accepted as per manufacturer standards.
698 Board

25
9 Boq item 692 & Flame retardant Distribution Board 6 way TPN DB (Flame retardant enclosure as per specs. & The BOQ detail mention only 4P incomer & SP outgoing, we propose As these Enclosures are for Emergency
695 report) to add DP RCCB/ELCB for phase segregation. operations, No ELCB is to be provided.
INCOMER-1 No. 40A 4 pole MCB (10 KA) OUTGOINGS-
18nos. 16A / 20A / 25A /32A SP MCB's
(10KA) as required DB as described above
10 Boq item 697 & Flame retardant Distribution VTPN DB's Please specify the rating & quantity of SP MCB & TP MCB required at
It shall be provided in the detailed
698 Board the
engineering stage post bid.
outgoing of VTPN DB.
11 BOQ item HT Panel 33 KV HT panel & 11 KV HT Panel Board Please provide the SLD & detailed BOQ for HT panels. SLD is provided with the tender uploaded
reference 788,789 Please confirm internal arc for HT panel required at 0.1 sec or 1 sec. on the AAI site.
,791 to Internal Arc at 1 sec.
795,799,800
12 BOQ item NIS & NGR Neutral Isolation panel & Neutral grounding resistor Please provide the approved makes for NIS & NGR, we propose All Makes complying to the design
reference 801 Ampcontrol,Resitech,RSI Switchgears. Please approve. requirement and complying IS/IEC
to 803 standards are accepted.
13 BOQ item Rated Current 590A & Neutral to earth current 60Amps As per BOQ 50A NGR for 11 KV DG sets is mentioned , however as It is 60A
reference 801 to per specifications 60A Neutral to earth current is mentioned. Please
803, TS-(E )-97, NGR Detail clarify.
clause 4.11 (viii &
x)
LOAM-( E)-2, sr. Power & Distribution transformers As per the approved makes Bharat Bijlee/Siemens/BHEL make As per revised Revised Revised list of
no.14 manufacture approved makes.
(b) & 15 transformers above 7.5 MVA, also Areva are not into manufacturing of
14 Dry type transformer and ABB is into manufacturing of oil type
transformers above 6.3 MVA, hence we request your to please
approve Essenar/Raychem/Talawane as additional make

15 General Construction feature of 1 no. transformer of each rating shall be type tested including We request to kindly accept type tested certificate of similar or higher Type test accepted for similar rating.
Transformer Short circuit test or short circuit test of exactly similar rating of
TS-4(E ), Clause transformer to be available transformers ( Power & distribution ) as per IS:2026/ IS 11171. Also
4.1 for 2 MVA transformer type test certificates not available as per
IS:1180, hence please accept the same as per IS:2026 only.

BOQ item Power & Distribution transformers The specifications and BOQ mentions tap changer rating of +/- 10% Kindly follow the tender requirements.
reference 805 & @2.5% steps, we request to please accept tap range of +5% to -10%
16
806 @ 2.5% as per
manufacturers standard.
Supplying, installing by suspension on ceiling/along the wall, The BOQ description mentions sandwiched type rising mains, Kindly follow the Boq for quantity and
testing and commissioning of following capacity Sandwich Type however tap-off box quantities not mentioned in BOQ, please confirm specifications for constructional features.
BOQ item
17 Rising Main Rising Mains……... provision of tapping at every meter whether bolted type or plugin type bus ducts required.We shall be Rising main word stand deleted.
reference 926
providing outdoor Bus duct of IP-65 rating with canopy.

TS-(E )-167, Short circuit rating & test. The whole bus bar shall be capable of withstanding the short Please specify the fault current rating of required bus ducts/rising It is 65kA for 4000A Bus duct, 50kA upto
18 clause 12.4 C circuit ( As per BOQ)… mains. We shall be considering 40kA for 800A & 50 kA for 1000A to 3200A Bus duct.
4000A bus duct.
19 TS-(E )-167, Housing The busbar trunking shall be constructed….RAL 7035 Paint shade and housing of Bus duct/Rising Main shall as per
clause 12.4 manufacturers Accepted.
D standard
TS-(E )- The whole bus bar shall be capable of withstanding the short Rising Mains shall be designed as per IEC 61439 part 1 &6 & IS 8623, Kindly follow the tender requirements for
168,clause 12.4 E circuit ( As per BOQ)… ambient Temprature & temprature rise, Drawings
(d) temp. 40 deg. C & rise above ambient 55 deg.C. Please confirm are shared with tender uploaded on AAI
20 Short circuit rating & test.
Please provide bus duct layout drawing and elevation of Service yard site.
for estimating accessories for same.

BOQ item Cable Trays The cable tray shall be supplied in standard length of 3000 mm We have considered cable trays with standard length 2500 mm as per Noted & accepted.
reference 1025 to …. manufacturers standard.
21 1038 & TS-( E)-
43 & 44

BOQ item Cable Trays For locally fabricated ….. Specification mentions 2.5 mm thickness up to 1.5 to 3 mtr span & 3 Noted,Minimum requirement is specified
reference 1025 to mm for 2.5 to 4 mtr span, however shall consider thickness of cable in the Boq.
22 1038 & TS-( E)- trays as mentioned in
44 BOQ.

26
BOQ item Cover for cable tray / ladder Cover for cable tray & ladder We have not considered covers with cable trays as the same is not Accepted.
reference 1025 to mentioned in BOQ.
23 1038 & TS-( E)-
44

BOQ item FRP Ladder Tray Fabricating, Supply and installing of following size of FRP Please provide the approved makes for FRP cable trays and Approved makes shall be as under -;
reference 1039 to Ladder type cable trays…... (For Tunnel) specifications. OBO/Sumip/Indiana/Schneider/Pilco
24
1042

BOQ item Under floor trunking Supply, assembly and laying of under floor trunking made out We shall be quoting cable trays and raceways as per make specified For raceways, raceways make shall be
reference 1025 to of 1.6mm thick GI sheet …… for pre- fabricated cable trays at LOAM-( E)-4, sr. no. 23 followed.
25 1038 & 1046 to
1057

26 TS-(E )-140, Specification Impulse Withstand 12kV Impulse Withstand as IEC 61439 1 & 2 for Voltage up to 600V for
ACB shall comply to 12kV Impulse
clause 3 MCCB's feeder
withstand and MCCB feeders sections
shall be of 8KV .Please Approve.
can be 8kV Impulse withstand
27 TS-(E )-140 & General from 3B for compartmentalized & from 1A for non- As per specifications at T-(E )-144 , form 4b construction is mentioned
All indoor panels are Form-3b as
144, compartmentalised and at T-(E
specified in the Boq.
clause 3.1 (ii) )-140 from 3b &1a mentioned. Please clarify.
TS-(E )-140 , General All major components like enclosure, switchgear….supplied by We presume all panel shall be TTTA type from authorised channel Noted & accepted.
28 clause 3.1 (iii) OEM manufacturer or partners of OEM.
franchise assembler.
29 TS-(E )-140, General Panel shall be tested for internal arc as per IEC 61641 As per approved manufacturers internal arc as per IEC 61641 65kA
clause 3.1 65kA for 0.35 seconds for 0.3 Noted and accepted.
(x) seconds. Please approve.
TS-(E )-140 & MCCB's shall be arranged in multi-tier formation whereas ACB As per specification page no TS(E)-141,MCCB’s are asked in Multitier ACB shall be provided in single tier
144, …in single tier formation formation whereas ACB’s are asked in single tier formation & same is formation. In case of multi tier formation,
clause 3.2 (ii) also asked in tender BOM general notes but as per specification page deration shall be considered.
30 Notes
no TS (E) -144 notes maximum 2Nos ACB’s shall be installed in one
enclosure. Please clarify.

31 TS-(E )-141 , Switchgear configuration 25% spare space to accommodate possible future Please confirm whether spare space is required.
clause 3.2 additional switchgear Panels shall be provided with 25% spare
(iii) space proportionate to O/G switch ratings.

32 TS-(E )-144, As per specification maximum 2 no's MCCB of 800A is asked in one Type tested assemblies as per standards
General Notes enclosure & shall be accepted.
5 Nos of MCCB of less than 250A shall to be installed in one
General Notes
enclosure. Please confirm the same for MCCB’s of 250A to 630A
rating or the same shall be as per panel builder standard.

33 TS-(E )-157, Metering Function ( only for Please confirm whether the same is required in meter with incomer or
Kindly follow the Boq for quantity and
clause q incomer section) in release
specifications.
of incomer breaker.
34 TS-(E )-157, Available Data & maintenance The requirement mentioned at these clause not clear, please clarify
Kindly follow the Boq for quantity and
clause s &t data the
specifications.
requirement.
35 MCCB shall have Earth Fault protection. In case of For Earth fault protection with microprocessor release neutral CT not Kindly follow the boq & specifications.
TS-(E )-159, TP+N MCCB , neutral CT and earth fault required. Please approve
Moulded Case circuit breaker
clause 9 c protection arrangement shall be made complete with
interconnections
The MCCB shall employ maintenance free minimum Total Discrimination upto
.........the manufacturer shall provide both the discrimination last level subpanel outgoing level as
tables and let‐through energy curves for all. It shall be specified have to be considered.
TS-(E )-159,
36 Moulded Case circuit breaker the responsibility of Panel builder & Please confirm discrimination required is partial or total
clause 9a
OEM to carry out the discrimination study at the time of
drawing approval.

LOAM-( E)-1, sr. Moulded Case circuit breaker Specific microprocessor release has to be provided… As per approved make list SCADA compatible MCCB’s are asked, Noted.
no.3 same is possible with Microprocessor based MCCB;s however with
37
TMD based MCCB’s same is
not possible. Please clarify.

27
LOAM-( E)-1, sr. Moulded Case circuit breaker Inside Ancillary building …. As per make list normal type MCCB's mentioned for Ancillary & List of makes is general,There is no
38 no.3 Residential building, please confirm which panels are required in these ancillary building.
buildings.
39 LOAM-( E)-1, sr. LT panels/Bus ducts Please approve Ambit/Sterling Generators/EAP as additional makes, Kindly follow the Revised Revised list of
no.1 as these are approved makes as per tender.
40 d h approved
Please provide l t makesf ABB
for&ATS/TVSS
Si ti l Provided in the Tender.
BOQ item FRONT OPERATED PANELS This is the general description of the
reference 1074 For details please tender BOQ item no. 832, item.
41 Front operated panels A. ALL LT PANELS SPECIFIC INCLUSIONS Please provide the qty of this item
B. BACK ACCESS PANELS WITH ACB's description also.

BOQ item External Lighting Feeder pillars This is the general description of the
reference 1153 For details please tender BOQ item no. 909, item.
42 External Lighting feeder pillar A. ALL LT PANELS SPECIFIC INCLUSIONS Please provide the qty of this item
B. BACK ACCESS PANELS WITH ACB's description also.

BOQ item Isolator Box Supplying and fixing enclosure with IP- 20/30 protection, We presume only box shall be quoted for this item, please confirm. Confirmed.MCCB's are provided in the
43 reference 1166 powder coated provision for housing Four Also please confirm the MCCB rating or size of box to be quoted. Boq.
pole (4P) MCCB/MCB, ……..
44 TS-( E)-214, Output frequency The output harmonic shall not be greater than 1% Generally for UPS system it is greater than 2% with linear load at
Can be accepted subject to complying all
Clause 4.2.5 with linear load 100% load.
the tender requirements.
Please approve.
45 TS-( E)-219, A TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS OF Input Circuit-Size pulse fully controlled thyristor bridge rectifier As per TS (E) -211 Clause 3.1 & BOQ refers, IGBT UPS requirement UPS shall be provided with IGBT
Clause A-8 , TS-( UPS SYSTEM is mentioned, however clause at TS-( E)-219 mentions thyristor based rectifiers as per Boq.
E)-211, clause 3.1 UPS. We presume that required technology is latest IGBT based.
Please confirm
46 TS-( E)-220, Transient recovery time Recovery to +/‐ 3 % in < 4 msec. As per manufacturers transit Recovery time shall be to +/‐ 7 % in < Recovery to +/‐ 1 % in < 50 msec shall be
Clause A-16 50 msec. accepted.
47 Snubber circuit is not applicable to IGBT Rectifier / IGBT Inverter Noted & accepted.
TS-( E)-221, Transformer less UPS.
Protection Snubber circuit for device dv/dt protection
Clause F Protection is provided against Overvoltage as per IEC 62040. Please
confirm.
Mechanical Dimension (Colour two) Structured ‐ White , Epoxy Polyester, code no. Noted & accepted.
6105/00046, Mfg. Polycoat Powders Structured ‐ Black , Epoxy
The UPS shall have provided with paint as per OEM standard. Please
48 TS-( E)-223 Polyester, code no. 6105/09900, Mfg. Polycoat
Confirm
Powders

Hot swappable User replaceable battery bank are provided by only a Accepted.
specific OEM , we request you to accept standard 12V double string
external battery bank with DC fuse / isolator with each 200KVA UPS
BOQ item Hot swappable/scalable, user replaceable ,internally fused
49 UPS System 30min backup , if any fault arises in one bank, particular bank can be
reference 1185 pluggable type Battery modules.
online hot swappable maintained by respective isolator/ fuse. Please
confirm

BOQ item Solar inverter UPS Supply & installation of following rated KVA solar inverter input Please specify the approved makes for solar inverter. Please provide Specifications are provided in the tender.
50 reference 1188 three phase (415 V ± 10%) …….... specification for same and confirm whether same is off grid or grid Delta/SMA/ABB/Fronius.
5 KVA described as above connected.
51 BOQ item Enclosure ELECTRICAL WORK:-CONTROL PANEL IN AHU ROOM We presume only space for VFD and MCCB's as per mentioned rating
reference (OPERATED THROUGH VFD) shall be It shall be followed as per HVAC boq.
1601 provided. Please confirm
T-(E )-637 clause General construction The angle of inclination of escalator shall be 35 deg…… As per BOQ 30 deg. Inclination is mentioned, however specification BOQ supersedes specification.
2& mentions 35
52
BOQ item 1887 & degree angle of inclination. We shall be considering 30 deg a sper
1888 BOQ, please confirm.
53 BOQ item LT panels Single Line Diagram Please provide Electrical SLD
SLD is provided with the tender uploaded
reference
on the AAI site.
1058 to 1160
54 Transformer Please recommand SGB Transformers India pvt ltd as approved make
Kindly follow the Revised Revised list of
approved makes as per tender.
55 BOQ Item No. Light Fixture Bega make Cata ref. given in BOQ whereas as per Please clarify
For LED fixtures, al makes meeting
714.03,714.04 & approved make Bega is not mentioned.
specification are approved.
.05

28
56 Queries related to HT & LT panels are based on specifications and
LOAM. Additional queries may be raised after receiving SLD &
detailed BOQ.
ELEVATOR & ESCALATORS

29
TS-( E)-615, Seismic Operation and Safety Device A counterweight derailment device or displacement switch shall The lifts shall be provided with earthquake return operations with Not Agreed. Provison of Bid Document
clause 5.8 be installed …… due to seismic movement earthquake sensors , however derailment or displacement switch is shall prevail
1
not considered, please
approve.
2 If the car has stopped due to some equipment malfunction…. As per manufacturer standard , if lift stops out of door zone , safety Clarification / defination provided by the
circuits / Bidder is OK
T-(E )-616, clause safety condition will be checked and if the same are intact, ARD will be
Safe landing feature
6.5 come into action and lift will go to nearest floor and open door to
evacuate passenger trapped in cabin. Please approve.

3 As per manufacturer standard, if doors are not opened at one landing Clarification / defination provided by the
T-(E )-616, clause it will check safety circuit / safety condition and if the same are intact Bidder is OK
Next Landing If the door do not open fully at destination…
6.7 and next car call is given, lift will go to the next landing and open the
door. Please approve.
4 T-(E )-624, clause Self levelling feature of +/- 3mm Self levelling accuracy shall be +/- 5 mm Not Agreed. Provison of Bid Document
12.3 shall prevail
T-(E )-637 clause General construction The angle of inclination of escalator shall be 35 deg…… As per BOQ 30 deg. Inclination is mentioned, however specification Kindly consider angle of Inclination for
2& mentions 35 Escalators as 30°
5
BOQ item 1887 & degree angle of inclination. We shall be considering 30 deg a sper
1888 BOQ, please confirm.
T-(E )-637 clause General construction Minimum transition radius shall be 1.5 mtr at the upper landing As per manufacturer standard minimum transition radius shall be 1 Not Agreed. Provison of Bid Document
2 and 1 mtr at lower landing mtr at upper & lower landing, however specifications mentions 1.5 mtr shall prevail
6
at upper landing & 1
mtr at the lower landing. Please clarify.
7 As per Specifications all cord, truss posts & diagonal shall be hollow
T-(E )-638, clause profile, we request to allow all cords, truss posts and diagonals in L
Truss All cord, truss posts and diagonals are hollow profile. As per manufacturer standard.
3.3 profile as hollow profile is specific to only single manufacturer. Please
approve
T-(E )-638, clause Oil tight welded sheet.. Oil tight welded sheet steel bottom plates of thickness is not As per Specifications oil tight welded sheet steel bottoms plate of Not Agreed. Provison of Bid Document
8 3.3 less than 4 mm thickness not less than 4mm, we shall provide same with 1mm shall prevail
thickness. Please approve.
9 T-(E )-638, clause Handrail Please specify the colour of handrail or same shall be as per
Kindly consider Handrail Colour for
3.5 manufacturers
Escalator as Black
standard.
10 T-(E )-639, clause Main & step chain The maximum pressure of step chain pin shall be We shall be provide supportive calculation & test certificate form pin
Supportive calculation and test
3.7 20N/mm2 with a design life ot at least 110000… pressure at
certificates are required as pre-requisite
the design stage.
of the tender however, maximum
pressure of step chain pin and operating
hours shall not be less than the
parameters in the tender.
T-(E )-641, clause Intersection Guard Please specify the adjoin floor intersection of escalators or criss-cross Kindly refer architectural drawings for the
11 3.19 alignment of escalators for working out requirement of intersection same.
guards.
12 T-(E )-642, clause Broken drive chain device Lifts using belt's as suspension/traction media shall Factor safety for suspension traction media shall be 8 Kindly refer relevant IS code which
4.5 confirm to factor of safety… requires factor of safety for Belts as 12
(minimum).
13 T-(E )-645, clause Monitoring & fire diagnostic An alpha-numeric play unit indication the fault code We shall provide fault code at only one of the landings, please Not Agreed. Provison of Bid Document
4.24 system or fault message…. approve. shall prevail
T-(E )-645, clause Sprinkler system All the escalators shall be equipped with sprinkler system in the A sprinkler tubing shall be fitted to the escalator, however the Coordination between Escalator System
4.26 top machinery space and bottom pit… installation of sprinkler heads and connection to sprinkler tubing shall Supplier and Sprinkler supplier to be in
14
be provided by fire bidder`s scope.
fighting agency. Please confirm.
15 T-(E )-646, clause BMS compatibility Potential free contacts shall be provided for BMS compatibility, please Not Agreed. Provison of Bid Document
7 confirm. shall prevail
Revised Revised list of approved makes

8 UPS Please add Riello-Power Ups (PCI) make aspproved make as it is


already Accepted.
approved & installed in some of Airport project.
9 NIS NGR PANELS Please proivde the approved make list for the same. As per OEM recommendation.
10 LT Panels Please add ADVANCE PANELS as approved make as it has all the
complience Not accepted
and approvals required.
30

Você também pode gostar