Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Residuals
Standard Residuals
-72482.7 -0.4318
-160131 -0.95394
30021.11 0.178844
-103724 -0.61791
-47408.9 -0.28243
224608.5 1.338052
36808.98 0.219281
-67344.6 -0.40119
-265375 -1.58091
-122743 -0.73121
65955.73 0.392916
615921.1 3.669205
156351.4 0.931427
266945.9 1.590268
-157579 -0.93874
-83978.7 -0.50028
-98327.4 -0.58576
-77475.2 -0.46154
-84217.3 -0.5017
-153915 -0.91691
102018 0.607748
-64448 -0.38393
302501.6 1.802082
-157721 -0.93959
168136.3 1.001633
-61789.9 -0.3681
-45665.6 -0.27204
-45058 -0.26842
-41720 -0.24854
-40107.5 -0.23893
-40076.5 -0.23875
101207.1 0.602918
-40313.5 -0.24016
-38874.6 -0.23159
States Poverty Rates Population in india Literacy Rate
UP 40.9 199812341 69.72
Maharashtra 38.1 120837347 82.91
Bihar 54.4 119461013 63.82
West Bengal 34.3 979694960 77.08
Madhya Pradesh 48.6 82342793 70.63
Rajasthan 34.4 78230816 67.06
Tamil Nadu 28.9 76481545 80.33
Karnataka 33.4 66165886 75.6 SUMMARY OUTPUT
Gujarat 31.8 63907200 79.31
Andhra Pradesh 29.9 52883163 67.35 Regression Statistics
Odisha 57.2 45429399 73.45 Multiple R
Jharkhand 45.3 37329128 67.63 R Square
Kerela 19.7 35330888 76.68 Adjusted R
Assam 20.9 34586234 73.18 Standard E
Punjab 20.9 26119350 76.68 Observatio
Haryana 24.1 27388008 76.64
Delhi 13.1 18345784 86.34 ANOVA
Jammu and Kashmir 13.2 13635784 68.74
Regression
Residual
Total
Coefficients
Intercept
2E+08
69.72
RESIDUAL OUTPUT
Observation
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
0.454591
0.206653
0.093318
12.64862
17
df SS MS F Significance F
2 583.4365 291.7183 1.823381 0.197807
14 2239.826 159.9876
16 2823.262
Coefficients
Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95%Upper 95%
Lower 95.0%
Upper 95.0%
101.2617 38.29985 2.643919 0.019256 19.11669 183.4067 19.11669 183.4067
1E-08 1.4E-08 0.714562 0.486624 -2E-08 4.01E-08 -2E-08 4.01E-08
-0.94354 0.515262 -1.83118 0.088436 -2.04866 0.161591 -2.04866 0.161591
RESIDUAL OUTPUT
Predicted 40.9
Residuals
Standard Residuals
24.24543 13.85457 1.17097
42.24374 12.15626 1.027431
38.36313 -4.06313 -0.34341
35.44585 13.15415 1.111772
38.77302 -4.37302 -0.3696
26.23474 2.665262 0.225265
30.59417 2.80583 0.237145
27.07099 4.729012 0.39969
38.24508 -8.34508 -0.70532
32.41473 24.78527 2.094819
37.82484 7.47516 0.631791
29.26578 -9.56578 -0.80849
32.56069 -11.6607 -0.98555
29.17337 -8.27337 -0.69925
29.22384 -5.12384 -0.43306
19.98081 -6.88081 -0.58156
36.5398 -23.3398 -1.97265
Paired T test
Category of Autmobiles Sales before declaration of EV Rules After Declaration of EV Rules
Passenger Cars 183885 139628
Utility Vehicles 73643 72917
Vans 16220 13187
Passenger Carriers-Commerci 3955 3913
Goods Carrriers-Commercial 26443 21512
Passenger Vehicles- LCVs 6157 5606
Goods Carriers- LCVs 44115 39740
Passenger Vehicles- Three W 46513 41442
Goods Carriers- Three Wheel 10371 10443
Scooters/ scooterettes 601761 512626
Motorcycles/stepthroughs 1199332 1084598
Mopeds 66791 52253
Since this is a one tailed Test we see that T stat>t Critical one tail, so we reject H0 that there is no
Automotive Sector before and after the declaration of EV Rules in India. We say that there is a sig
the declaration of the EV Rules.Alternatively when we compare P value and Alpha we see that P
Have the Sales in Automotive Sector decreased after the Declaration of EV Rules?
H0: µ=0
H1: µ<0
Sex ratio
Sex(FemalesPer
Ratio(FemalesPer
1000)in
1000
ruralmales)
areasin Urban Areas
Mean 965.4667 929.8667
Variance 3017.41 1428.695
Observations 15 15
df 14 14
F 2.112004
P(F<=f) one-tail 0.087115
F Critical one-tail 2.483726
POPULATION BY MARITAL STATUS AND SEX: IND
#NUM!+A23:G40+A2+A23:F56+A23
One way ANOVA
SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
88.262822 16 969.2144 60.5759 220.2222497
1267834 16 12965701 810356.3 66177114821
1253856.875 16 14634132 914633.3 35553958428
1253856.875 16 14634132 914633.3 35553958428
ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 9.4E+12 3 3.13E+12 91.341366644 2.4328738E-22 2.758078
Within Groups 2.06E+12 60 3.43E+10
Total 1.15E+13 63
Normal Probability Plot
15
Infant Mortality rate
10
5
0 Pneumonia Line Fit Plot
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
100
Infant Mortality rate
80
Sample Percentile
60 Infant Mortality rate
40 Predicted Infant
20 Mortality rate
0 Diarrhoea
Malaria Line Fit
Line Fit Plot
500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 100
80
Total 1.15E+13
Hypothesis Testing
H0: There is no significant difference between the Child Mortality rates and incidenc
H1: There is a significant relationship between the Child Mortality Rates and inciden
df MS F P-value F crit
3 3.13E+12 91.34137 2.43E-22 2.758078
60 3.43E+10
63
Child Mortality rates and incidences of Malaria, Diarrohoea and Pneumonia in children
hild Mortality Rates and incidence of Malaria, Pneumonia, and Diarrohoea in children
27 729
14 196
-1 1
-11 121 Spearman Rank Correlation
31 961 0.984122
1 1
-3 9
0 0
-9 81
-7 49
2 4
9 81
1 1
-4 16
5 25
-1 1
-4 16
4 16
4 16
1 1
32 1024
-5 25
-29 841
0 0
1 1
5 25
0 0
-1 1
-6 36
-5 25
7 49
1 1
6 36
1 1
-1 1
-9 81
-5 25
-2 4
-2 4
-1 1
0 0
-2 4
0 0
11 121
-15 225
0 0
0 0
-5 25
17 289
-2 4
-15 225
-2 4
-5 25
4 16
-5 25
-1 1
10 100
-24 576
2 4
1 1
0 0
-1 1
-3 9
-7 49
-9 81
0 0
-3 9
-7 49
7 49
-1 1
-8 64
-5 25
-3 9
4 16
1 1
-6 36
-2 4
8 64
-3 9
-2 4
-3 9
-3 9
-8 64
0 0
-11 121
-25 625
-7 49
5 25
-3 9
4 16
-1 1
0 0
-2 4
-10 100
6 36
5 25
2 4
-10 100
0 0
5 25
1 1
-3 9
0 0
2 4
1 1
-18 324
0 0
2 4
-43 1849
9 81
1 1
7 49
-3 9
-35 1225
46 2116
38 1444
35 1225
40 1600
12 144
-4 16
-6 36
2 4
-3 9
-4 16
-5 25
-9 81
-3 9
-5 25
-2 4
-1 1
-2 4
2 4
-6 36
0 0
7 49
-3 9
2 4
14 196
0 0
0 0
4 16
-4 16
2 4
-2 4
11 121
-3 9
1 1
1 1
-1 1
1 1
-1 1
57 3249
1 1
-4 16
-45 2025
-1 1
-2 4
0 0
1 1
4 16
2 4
-4 16
1 1
-6 36
1 1
-2 4
-9 81
0 0
-1 1
-1 1
0 0
-1 1
-5 25
-2 4
-9 81
-14 196
3 9
5 25
2 4
0 0
-3 9
0 0
-10 100
-1 1
9 81
3 9
-6 36
12 144
-2 4
-5 25
2 4
2 4
0 0
-6 36
1 1
43 1849
0 0
3 9
-2 4
-2 4
-8 64
-2 4
-6 36
-1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
2 4
0 0
-6 36
0 0
-9 81
0 0
-6 36
2 4
-3 9