Você está na página 1de 10

Name : Nanda Dwi Anggraeni

NIM : 5213416055
0.2
Given.
Xa = 80% f(x) = 1.5314793327x + 0.5421434589 0
-1.1 -1 R²-0.9 -0.8 -0.7 -0.6 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2
= 0.9966844122
Fao = 1000 mol/hr
-0.2
Cao = 1.5 mol/L
-0.4

log (-ra)
Ask. Column D
-0.6
Volume PFR? Linear (Colum
-0.8
Answer.
-1
Ca (-ra) log Ca log (-ra)
-1.2
0.1 0.1 -1 -1
log Ca
0.2 0.3 -0.69897 -0.52288
0.3 0.6 -0.52288 -0.22185
0.4 0.8 -0.39794 -0.09691
0.5 1.2 -0.30103 0.079181

From the graph, we get k value and n value

k = 3.484175
n = 1.5315
(-ra) =
(-ra) =
Ca =
Ca = 0.158202
V = 248.2507 Liter
0.2

214345890
0.4 -0.3 -0.2
-0.2

-0.4

-0.6 Column D
Linear (Column D)
-0.8

-1

-1.2
Given.
Decomposition of A A->2.5R
T = 0 ◦C
= 273.15 K
P = 760 mmHg
= 1 atm
Fao = 60 mol A/hr
Xa = 50%

Ask.
Volume PFR?

Answer.

Time,min 0 2 4 6 8
Partial pressure of A, mmHg 760 600 475 390 320

As shown in the data above, after 14 minutes, the partial pressure of A remains at 150 mmHg.
This can possibly represent two things:
1. The overall fractional conversion of A is less than 1
2. The decomposition of A is at equilibrium

We can assume two kinds of reaction based on the two possible representation of the partial
pressure of A after 14 minutes :
1. First order irreversible reaction
A->R
2. First order reversible reaction
A<->R

First order irreversible reaction

Fir
1.4
1.2 f(x) = 0.090819484
Fir
1.4
1.2 f(x) = 0.090819484
R² = 0.9846856919
1

-ln(Pa/Pao)
0.8
0.6
Time (min) Pa (mmHg) Pao (mmHg) Pa/Pao (-lnPa/Pao) 0.4
0 760 760 1 0 0.2
2 600 760 0.7894736842 0.236388778
0
4 475 760 0.625 0.470003629 0 2 4
6 390 760 0.5131578947 0.667171694
8 320 760 0.4210526316 0.864997437
10 275 760 0.3618421053 1.016547336
12 240 760 0.3157894737 1.15267951 The R2 of the first assumptio
14 215 760 0.2828947368 1.262680405 conclude, lets try the second
ꝏ 150 760 0.1973684211 1.622683139

First order reversible reaction

Time (min) Pa (mmHg) Pao (mmHg) Pae (mmHg) Pa-Pae Pao-Pae


0 760 760 150 610 610
2 600 760 150 450 610
4 475 760 150 325 610
6 390 760 150 240 610
8 320 760 150 170 610
10 275 760 150 125 610
12 240 760 150 90 610
14 215 760 150 65 610
ꝏ 150 760 150 0 610

= 1.5
slope = 0.1603
k1 = 0.1286618421
k2 = 0.0316381579

(-ra) = 0.12866184Ca-0.03163816Cr
Cr = 0
(-ra) = 0.12866184Ca
Cao = 0.0446462455
Ca = 0.0223231227
k1*Cao = 0.0057442682

V = 10504.166845 Liter
10 12 14 ꝏ
275 240 215 150

First order irreversible reaction


1.4
1.2 f(x) = 0.0908194843x + 0.0730722088
First order irreversible reaction
1.4
1.2 f(x) = 0.0908194843x + 0.0730722088
R² = 0.9846856919
1
-ln(Pa/Pao)

0.8 Column E
0.6 Linear (Column E)

0.4
0.2
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
time (min)

The R2 of the first assumption is equal to 0.9847 which is close to 1. But, before we can
conclude, lets try the second assumption which is the first order reversible reaction

First order reversible reaction


2.5

2 f(x) = 0.1603099178x - 0.0118954376


-ln(Pa-Pae)/(Pao-Pae)

R² = 0.9998633829
1.5
Column G
Linear (Column G)
(-ln (Pa-Pae)/(Pao-Pae) 1
0
0.5
0.3042113744
0.6296337748 0
0.9328200338 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
1.2776605201 time (min)
1.5851452199
1.9136492868
2.2390716873 The R2 of the second assumption is equal to 0.9999 which is closer to 1 compared to R 2 of
the first assumption. Therefore the second assumption satisfactorily represent data.

G
olumn G)

o 1 compared to R 2 of
represent data.