Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
I. Overview
1. The basic purpose of remedies is to maintain equilibrium between the interest of the state and the
taxpayer.
2. Remedies can be either administrative or judicial.
3. Administrative remedies involve assessment and collection, protest and refund.
4. Judicial remedies may either be a civil suit or criminal suit, appeal to CTA, injunction/ temporary
restraining order, or criminal suit against erring BIR officials.
5. Summary of Remedies
REMEDIES TO THE STATE COMMON REMEDIES REMEDIES TO THE TAXPAYER
1
NOVEMBER 09, 2019 REPORTERS:
SERRANO, DANICA MAE DL. & TINGDIOCO, KRISTEL ANGELA
- If the government tries to assess a tax beyond the prescriptive periods, the taxpayer may
claim defense of prescription of the right of the government to assess. The defense of
prescription, however, is not jurisdictional and must be raised seasonably, otherwise it is
deemed waived.
- Place of Examination
• The primary place of examination is the taxpayer’s place of business.
• The secondary place of examination is at the Office of the BIR
• Only duly authorized Revenue Office can audit
- Submission of documents
• Use of best evidence available when:
i. The reports or records of the taxpayer are not available (i.e. lost or destroyed;
unreasonably refuses to submit records); or
ii. The reports and records submitted by the taxpayer are determined to be false,
incomplete or erroneous or cannot be understood. [Sec. 6(B), Tax Code]
- End of Audit/Investigation
• Preparation of report of investigation showing preliminary findings
• Notice of Informal Conference – RR No. 18 -2013 removed the requirement for the
issuance of a letter of informal conference before a Preliminary Assessment Notice
(PAN) is issued.
b. Collection
- Collection means enforcing the payment of tax. The following are the administrative
collection remedies of the government:
i. Summary proceedings
• Distraint (actual or constructive)
• Levy
• Tax lien
• Forfeiture
• Suspension of business operations in violation of VAT
• Enforcement of an administrative fine
ii. Judicial proceedings
- Any internal revenue tax, which has been assessed within the period agreed upon by the
taxpayer and the CIR, may be collected by distraint or levy or by a proceeding in court
within the period agreed upon in writing before the expiration of the 5 years prescriptive
period to collect. The period so agreed upon may be extended by subsequent written
agreement made before the expiration of the period previously agreed upon.
- If the government tries to collect by any of the above remedies beyond the prescriptive
periods, the taxpayer may claim defense of prescription of the right of the government to
collect. The defense of prescription, however, is not jurisdictional and must be raised
seasonably, otherwise it is deemed waived
a. Distraint
- It is the seizure (taking) by the government of personal property (tangible of intangible) to
enforce payment of taxes.
b. Levy:
- It is the seizure (taking) by the government of real property to enforce payment of taxes.
DISTRAINT LEVY
Levy Garnishment
1. As to subject matter Real property owned by Personal property owned
and in possession of the by the
taxpayer. taxpayer but in the
possession of a third
party.
2. As to disposition Forfeited in favor of the Purchased by the
for want of government then sold to government then resold
bidders or bids meet the deficiency. to meet the deficiency.
inadequate to satisfy
tax deficiency
3. As to advertisement for Advertisement once a week No advertisement is
sale for three required.
weeks.
3
NOVEMBER 09, 2019 REPORTERS:
SERRANO, DANICA MAE DL. & TINGDIOCO, KRISTEL ANGELA
a. Tax Lien:
- It is a legal claim or charge on property, either real or personal, established by law as
security in default of the payment of taxes. The extent of lien shall be the tax together
with the interests, penalties, and costs that may accrue. The lien attaches not only from
the service of warrant of distraint but from the time the tax become due and payable.
b. Forfeiture
If there is no bidder in the public sale or if the amount of the highest bid is insufficient to pay taxes,
penalties and costs, the real property shall be forfeited to the Government. The effect is to transfer
the title of the specific thing from the owner to the Government.
i. Background
• In March 2005, the BIR and the DOF launched the Run After Tax Evaders (RATE) Program.
• Since March 2005, 87 complaints of tax evasion have been submitted to the Department
of Justice (DOJ) for preliminary investigation under the RATE Program, including those filed
against actors, businessmen, public officials and other high-profile personalities.
• The BIR registered a record income tax collection in 15 April 2005 of P21.4 Billion or a 43.6%
increase from the P14.8 Billion collected compared to the previous year.
• But almost 5 years after the program’s launch, only 6 out of the 87 complaints for tax
evasion submitted to the DOJ progressed to the filing of criminal cases in court.
4
NOVEMBER 09, 2019 REPORTERS:
SERRANO, DANICA MAE DL. & TINGDIOCO, KRISTEL ANGELA
e. Oplan Kandado
i. On January 23, 2009, the BIR issued Revenue Memorandum Order No. 3 – 2009 to
implement a nationwide “Oplan Kandado” Program
ii. Under the program, business operations of non-compliant taxpayers will be
suspended, and their establishments will be temporarily closed if they will be found to
have violated certain tax laws.
iii. The programs aim to intensify the Bureau’s enforcement operations through strict
imposition of prescribed administrative sanctions for non-compliance with the basic
tax requirements.
iv. Grounds for suspension:
• Failure to issue receipts or invoices by a VAT-registered or registrable taxpayer;
• Failure to file a VAT return;
• Understatement of taxable sales or receipts by 30% or more of the correct amount
thereof in the case of a VAT-registered or registrable taxpayer;
• Failure to register
v. The closure of the business establishment shall last for a period of not less than five (5)
days and shall be in force until the violation is rectified by the concerned taxpayer.
vi. The suspension and temporary closure of business shall not preclude the BIR from filing
the appropriate charges under the RATE Program of the Bureau, if evidence so
warrants the taxpayer concerned or responsible office of the corporations.
vii. The closure order shall only be lifted by the BIR when there has been:
• A subsequent filing or amendment of returns with the payment of the tax inclusive
of statutory penalties;
• Subsequent registration with the payment of the corresponding compromise
penalties
• Payment of deficiency taxes inclusive of penalties corresponding to the sales
where no invoices/receipts have been issued; and
• Payment of deficiency taxes inclusive of penalties corresponding to the
understatement of taxable sales or receipts.
III. Remedies to the State: Judicial Remedies – Civil and Criminal Action
a. Civil action is resorted to when a tax liability becomes collectible, that is, the assessment
becomes final and unappealable, or the decision of the CIR has become final, executory, and
demandable.
b. Criminal action, like civil action, cannot be instituted without the approval of the CIR. It is
resorted to not only for collection of taxes but also for enforcement of statutory penalties of all
sorts. The judgment in the criminal case shall not only impose the penalty but shall also order the
payment of the taxes.
c. The extinction of a taxpayer’s criminal liability does not necessarily result in the extinguishment of
his civil liability. Conversely, the subsequent satisfaction of a tax liability will not operate to
extinguish the criminal liability.
6
NOVEMBER 09, 2019 REPORTERS:
SERRANO, DANICA MAE DL. & TINGDIOCO, KRISTEL ANGELA
2. Abatement
a. A tax may be cancelled or obliterated upon the authority of the BIR under certain
circumstances.
b. What are the grounds for abatement?
i. The tax or any portion thereof appears to be unjustly or excessively assessed;
ii. The administration and collection costs involved do not justify the collection of
the amount due; and
iii. The Commissioner may also, even without claim therefore, refund or credit any
tax where on the face of the return upon which payment was made such
payment appears clearly to have been erroneously paid.
Tax evasion and tax avoidance don’t mean the same thing. Tax evasion uses illegal or fraudulent methods to
reduce or avoid taxes, while tax avoidance uses lawful means to minimize tax payments.
Among the familiar examples of tax avoidance in the Philippines are the de minimis benefits that employers use
to lower withholding taxes and increase the take-home pay of their employees.
While both tax evasion and tax avoidance lead to reduced taxes, the former can land a person in jail because
of its criminal nature.
Tax Evasion Examples
According to the BIR, the following forms of tax evasion are considered criminal liabilities under the Tax Code:
• Failure to pay taxes
• Non-filing of appropriate tax returns
• Over-declaring expenses/deductions
• Under-declaring income
• Hiding or transferring income
• Claiming personal expenses as business expenses (for tax shield)
• Failure to remit withholding taxes
• Failure to register with the BIR
• Having more than one book of accounts
• Fake entries in financial books and records
• Using fake accountable forms
Even if you’re exempted from paying taxes, you’re still required to file an income tax return (ITR). Otherwise, this
is considered tax evasion.
A. For late filing of Tax Returns with Tax Due to be paid, the following penalties will be imposed upon filing, in
addition to the tax due:
a. Surcharges
1. Simple Neglect (25%)
i. Failure to file any return and pay the tax due thereon.
ii. If the return is not filed with the proper internal revenue officer.
iii. Failure to pay on time the deficiency tax shown in the notice of assessment.
iv. Failure to pay the full or part of the amount of tax shown on any return required to
be filed, or the full amount of tax due for which no return is required to be filed, on or
before the date prescribed for its payment.
1. Deficiency Interest
Any deficiency in the tax due, as the term is defined in the Tax Code, shall be subject to the interest at the rate
of 20% per annum, which interest shall be assessed and collected from the date prescribed for its payment until
the full payment thereof.
Formula:
Deficiency Interest = Deficient tax x 20% x no. of days or months
Total No. of days or months in a year
2. Delinquency Interest
Delinquency interest in case of failure to pay:
i. The amount of the tax due on any return required to be filed, or
ii. The amount of the tax due for which no return is required, or
iii. A deficiency tax, or any surcharge or interest thereon on the due date appearing in
the notice and demand of the CIR, there shall be assessed and collected on the
unpaid amount interest at the rate of 20% per annum until the amount is fully paid,
which interest shall form part of the tax.
Formula:
Delinquency Interest = Deficient tax plus any deficiency interest or surcharges
times 20% times no. of days or months Total No. of days or months in a year
c. Compromise
NIRC SEC. 255. Failure to File Return, Supply Correct and Accurate Information, Pay Tax Withhold and Remit Tax
and Refund Excess Taxes Withheld on Compensation. - Any person required under this Code or by rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder to pay any tax make a return, keep any record, or supply correct the
accurate information, who willfully fails to pay such tax, make such return, keep such record, or supply correct
and accurate information, or withhold or remit taxes withheld, or refund excess taxes withheld on
compensation, at the time or times required by law or rules and regulations shall, in addition to other penalties
provided by law, upon conviction thereof, be punished by a fine of not less than Ten Thousand Pesos (P 10,000)
and suffer imprisonment of not less than one (1) year but not more than ten (10) years.
8
NOVEMBER 09, 2019 REPORTERS:
SERRANO, DANICA MAE DL. & TINGDIOCO, KRISTEL ANGELA
Any person who attempts to make it appear for any reason that he or another has in fact filed a return or
statement, or actually files a return or statement and subsequently withdraws the same return or statement after
securing the official receiving seal or stamp of receipt of internal revenue office wherein the same was actually
filed shall, upon conviction therefore, be punished by a fine of not less than Ten Thousand Pesos (P 10,000) but
not more than Twenty Thousand Pesos (P 20,000) and suffer imprisonment of not less than one (1) year but not
more than three (3) years.
In addition, Annex A of Revenue Memorandum Order (RMO) No. 7-2015 provides for the Revised Consolidated
Schedule of Compromise Penalties for Violations of the National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC).
TAX
CRIMINAL PENALTY
CODE NATURE OF VIOLATION AMOUNT OF COMPROMISE
IMPOSED
SEC
255 Failure to file and/or Fine of not less than If the amount of tax unpaid
pay P10,000 and
But does
any internal revenue imprisonment of not Compromise
Exceeds not
tax at the time or less than one (1) year is
exceed
times required by law but not more than 10
or regulation years P xxx P 5,000 P 1,000
5,000 10,000 3,000
10,000 20,000 5,000
20,000 50,000 10,000
50,000 100,000 15,000
100,000 500,000 20,000
500,000 1,000,000 30,000
1,000,000 5,000,000 40,000
5,000,000 x x x 50,000
B. For late filing of Tax Returns with NO Tax Due to be paid, the compromise penalty will be imposed upon filing
of the Tax Return based on the following:
1. For violations of the NIRC provisions which are subject to compromise, the reference is found in page 4
of Annex A of RMO No. 7-2015.
9
NOVEMBER 09, 2019 REPORTERS:
SERRANO, DANICA MAE DL. & TINGDIOCO, KRISTEL ANGELA
TAX
NATURE OF CRIMINAL PENALTY
CODE AMOUNT OF COMPROMISE
VIOLATION IMPOSED
SEC
255 Failure to Fine of not less than If gross sales, earnings or receipts;
make/file/submit any P10,000 and or gross estate or gift (based on the
return or supply imprisonment of not subject returns/information for
correct information less than one (1) year filing/submission)
at the time or times but not more than
But does
required by law or ten (10) years Compromise
Exceeds not
regulation is
exceed
P xxx P 50,000 P 1,000
50,000 100,000 3,000
100,000 500,000 5,000
500,000 5,000,000 10,000
5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000
10,000,000 25,000,000 20,000
25,000,000 x x x 25,000
2. For violations of the NIRC provisions which may be the subject of criminal actions, Section 250 of the
NIRC will apply as follows:
NIRC SEC. 250. Failure to File Certain Information Returns. - In the case of each failure to file an information
return, statement or list, or keep any record, or supply any information required by this Code or by the
Commissioner on the date prescribed therefor, unless it is shown that such failure is due to reasonable cause
and not to willful neglect, there shall, upon notice and demand by the Commissioner, be paid by the person
failing to file, keep or supply the same, One Thousand Pesos (P 1,000) for each failure: Provided, however, That
the aggregate amount to be imposed for all such failures during a calendar year shall not exceed Twenty-Five
Thousand Pesos (P 25,000).
C. For late filing of Statements/Reports required to be filed with NO Tax Due to be paid, the compromise penalty
will be imposed upon filing of the Tax Return based on the following:
NIRC SEC. 275. Violation of Other Provisions of this Code or Rules and Regulations in General.- Any person who
violates any provision of this Code or any rule or regulation promulgated by the Department of Finance, for
which no specific penalty is provided by law, shall, upon conviction for each act or omission, be punished by a
fine of not more than One Thousand Pesos (P 1,000) or suffer imprisonment of not more than six (6) months, or
both.
10
NOVEMBER 09, 2019 REPORTERS: Serrano, Danica Mae DL.
Tingdioco, Kristel Angela
Sample Problems:
1. Anita filed her annual income tax return on April 3, 2015 for her income last 2014. Until what day can the
Bureau of Internal Revenue make its assessment?
2. Anita filed her annual income tax return on May 3, 2015 for her income last 2014. Until what day can the
Bureau of Internal Revenue make a collection if there should be an assessment?
3. XYZ Corporation filed its annual income tax return on April 10, 2015. On October 3, 2016, it was found out
that the return filed was fraudulent. Until what day can the Bureau of Internal Revenue make a collection?
4. XYZ Corporation filed its annual income tax return on April 10, 2015. On October 3, 2016, it was found out
that the return filed was fraudulent. Until what day can the Bureau of Internal Revenue make a collection if
there should be an assessment?
5. Date assessment was received - February 8, 2009. Petition for reconsideration was filed with the Bureau of
Internal Revenue of February 18, 2009. Documents supporting the petition were filed with the Bureau of
Internal Revenue on February 28, 2009. Decision of denial of the petition was received on March 11, 2009.
Second request for reconsideration was filed with the Bureau of Internal Revenue on March 21, 2009. Date
revised assessment was received was April 2, 2009. Last day to appeal to the Court of Tax Appeals:
6. Assessment received - January 5, 2015. Petition for reconsideration filed with the Bureau of Internal
Revenue - February 1, 2015. Documents supporting the petition filed by the taxpayer - February 7, 2015.
Decision of the Bureau of Internal Revenue denying the petition was received
- March 22, 2015. Second request for reconsideration filed with the Bureau of Internal Revenue - March 30, 2015.
Decision of denial of second request for reconsideration was received - April 12, 2009. Last day to appeal to the
Court of Tax Appeals:
11
NOVEMBER 09, 2019 REPORTERS: Serrano, Danica Mae DL.
Tingdioco, Kristel Angela
7. Date assessment was received - January 2, 2009. Petition for reconsideration was filed with the Bureau of
Internal Revenue - January 12, 2009. Documents supporting the petition for reconsideration was filed with
the Bureau of Internal Revenue - January 22, 2009. No decision on the protest by July 12, 2009. Last day to
appeal to the Court of Tax Appeals:
8. On January 20, 2008, a taxpayer filed a protest on/request for reconsideration of an assessment of a tax.
He received a final decision of the Bureau of Internal Revenue on the protest on April 30, 2008. He failed to
appeal to the decision to the Court of Tax Appeals. The Bureau of Internal Revenue was collecting the tax
by summary proceedings on June 20, 2013. The taxpayer was opposing the collection of the tax on the
ground of prescription of the government to collect. When shall be the last day to collect?
10. Date the national internal revenue tax was erroneously paid - April 10, 2007. Claim for refund was filed with
the Bureau of Internal Revenue - March 10, 2008. Date decision of denial of refund was received – March
21, 2009. Last day to appeal to the Court of Tax Appeals.
12
NOVEMBER 09, 2019 REPORTERS: Serrano, Danica Mae DL.
Tingdioco, Kristel Angela
13