Determining The Value Of g Using Atmospheric Density

Ronnie Attema

Abstract: In this paper we demonstrate a new method to find the value of the
gravitational acceleration (g). This new value leads to a possible unification of
general relativity and quantum mechanics with use of the Yeet Theorem and The
Ababou Isomorphism Theorem.

1. Introduction

The determination of the gravitational acceleration has intrigued mankind for hundreds of years as everyone
knows. The physics of objects falling is often used as first introduction to the field of physics. During these
courses students often have to demonstrate that the following equation holds:

g ≈ 9.81 (1)

Serious doubts have already been raised by several scholars about these experimental methods.[1][2] Because of
these doubts we will determine the value of g with a new method. We will use the atmospheric density to find
the real value of g.

2. Methods

To determine the value of g we first need a theoretical framework. This is given to us by statistical mechanics.
Which is not only consistent with ’classical’ physics, but is also proven to be consistent with modern theories
build on the Yeet Theorem.[3][4] With this we remove any biases towards any of the two frameworks, giving us
a more complete picture. From this follows the barometric equation:
−g·M ·h
ρ = ρ0 · e R·T (2)

Most people will probably be familiar with the classic derivation of this formula, but this one is wrong in the
Ababou framework. The derivation in the Ababou framework is left as exercise for the reader but it’s trivial with
help of the Ababou Isomorphism Theorem and the Yeet Theorem.[3][6] To determine g we plot this formula
against the measured values for ρ. We then perform a curvefit to find the actual value of g. For the other
variables we use the following values:
M = 0.0289644 kg/mol
ρ0 = 1.225 kg/m3
R = 8.314 J/K · mol
T = 290 K These can all assumed to be considered constant, as the results show. For h we will look at
values from 0 to 100 km. For the density of the atmosphere we used the data from NASA.[7]

2.1. Results and Discussion

From the plot in figure 1 it can clearly be seen that from this data follows that g 6= 9.81. Instead it follows
clearly that g = 12. This is also in accordance with Nikola Tesla’s theory of the harmonics of the universe as
1 + 2 = 3 and 3 is one of the magnificent numbers.
This new result is also a conformation for the new physics that arises from the Big Donger Theorem.[8] This
gives mathematicians and physicists hope that they can finally proof the WTS Conjecture:

A∈
/ SP (3)

Next to this gives this new result us hope that using the Yeet Theorem GR and QM can finally be united. Before
this result was obtained GR was build on the assumption that g = 9.81, now that we have finally proven this
assumption wrong and with the fact that we have empirically proven many results from many other theorems,
 Figure 1: Plot of the predicted density with g = 12 and the measured values of the density

it gives us hope that without much effort a theory of everything can be constructed now.
One might ask why we did not report more significant figures, on this result. This is simply because the the
obtained g has a value of 12.0000... where the number of zero’s goes to the Ab limit. Of course it can easily be
seen that this is just equal to 12. Further research would therefore consist of finding more accurate experimental
methods, so the two lines would perfectly coincide.

3. Conclusion

As this paper has shown the common assumption that g = 9.81 is a wrong one and the true value is 12. This
result gives physical conformation of many (before) abstract mathematical theorems. This shows that soon GR
and QM can be unified without much effort, this should be the main goal for further research.

References
[1] Ked Taczynski. Industrial Society and its experimental methods. Jan. 1983
[2] Rebmo Banu. Doubts regarding modern academia. Dec. 2018
[3] Yellowcord Soc. T he Y eet T heorem http://vixra.org/abs/1909.0649 Sep. 2019
[4] Nena Slaats. Discrete Y eet Levels F rom Statistical M echanics Oct. 2019
[5] Z Nahi. Y eeting T he Barometric F ormula Jan. 2019
[6] Yellowcord Soc. T he Ababou Isomorphism T heorem http://vixra.org/abs/1806.0046 Jul. 2018
[7] https://ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov/modelweb/models/msis-vitmo.php
[8] The Big Donger Theorem and new physical derivations with it currently mainly exist out of unpublished notes by various
professors. But a small teaser has been given here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Onif1UmyiTQ

2
Appendix A.

The python code that has been used to come to these results can be found on the website of the author,
but I encourage you to try it for yourself. Nothing is as satisfying as deriving a revolutionary result in physics
yourself.

Appendix B.

One might have wondered by now, how does this influence the Fundamental Theorem of Engineering? For
those not familiar with it, the Fundamental Theorem is stated in the following way:

g = π2 (B.1)

But this is stated for the old result for g, currently I can only speculate about the the potential impact on the
Fundamental Theorem. I will leave this research topic to mathematicians to either prove if this relation still
holds for g = 12, this could for example mean that the value for π we always assumed to be true, could actually
be wrong. I will leave this to the mathematician.