Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Chapter “1”
1]] Auditing: Is the process of accumulating and evaluating audit evidence about financial
information.
1) Done by accountants inside the company starting from journalizing until preparing the
financial statements.
1) External Auditors: working in certified public accounting firms they audit private
sector firms.
2) Internal Auditors: are selected by management to check day by day operations they
follow management and help in decision making.
3) Governmental Auditors: They audit governmental and public sector units and
follow a supreme Audit institution.
Page 2 of 9
Chapter “2”
1) The organizational hierarchy in a CPA firm includes the following positions:
1) Partners or shareholders 4) supervisors.
2) Managers 5) Seniors
3) Assistants.
3. Tax services.
Chapter: ‘3’
1) Report title: to tell users that the audit was unbiased in all aspects.
2) Audit report address: it’s addressed to the board of directors & stockholders.
3) Introductory paragraph includes 3 things:
1. The CPA firm has done an audit.
2. Listing the financial statements that were audited.
3. Stating that the statements are the responsibility of management and
auditor’s responsibility is to express an opinion on the statements based on
an audit.
4) Scope paragraph:
1. Statements that the audit is designed to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the statements are free of material misstatements.
2. About what the auditor did in the audit and that he followed GAAS or
PCAOB.
3. Financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP and audited in
accordance with GAAS.
5) Opinion paragraph: It’s just an opinion not a guarantee because there may be
information risk in spite of auditing the statements and the auditor states his
opinion about the financial statements as a whole and whether the company
followed.
6) Name of CPA firm: who is performed the audit & who is responsible for this audit
legally and professionally.
Page 4 of 9
a) The auditor is unable to satisfy himself that the overall financial statements
are fairly presented.
b) The auditor isn’t independent. C) Going concern problems.
Chapter ‘5’
1) The major factors creating legal liability for CPAs:
1) Auditors: believe that the conduct of the audit in accordance with auditing
standards is all that can be expected of auditors
2) Users: believe that auditors guarantee the accuracy of financial statements.
3) This expectation gab results in unwarranted lawsuits. So, the profession must
educate statement users about the role of auditors and the different among:
Business failure, Audit failure, Audit risk.
Page 6 of 9
4) The CPA is responsible for every aspect of his public accounting work including:
1) Auditing.
2) Taxes.
3) Management Advisory Services.
4) Accounting and Book keeping Services.
5) The main sources of auditor’s legal liability:
1) Liability to clients.
2) Liability to third parties.
3) Criminal liability.
4) Constitutional liability.
a) Liability to clients:
1) It is the common source of lawsuits against CPA, for failure to discover fraud.
2) CPA firms and clients sign engagement letters to formalize their agreements
about the services to be provided, fees and timing.
3) The CPA firms uses one or a combination of 4 defenses when there are legal
claims by client, like:
1) The client wants a review service, not an audit.
2) Non negligence performance in an audit.
3) Contributory negligence between auditor and client.
4) Absence of casual connection.
b) Liability to third parties:
1) Such as stockholders, bankers, creditors, employees and customer who make losses
because of misleading financial statements.
These are two types of users:
The foreseen: A member of a limited class of users whom the auditor is aware will rely on
the financial statements.
The Foreseeable: An unlimited class of users that the auditor should have reasonably been
able to foresee as being likely users of financial statements
There are 3 defenses available to auditors in suits by third parties:
a) The client wanted a review not an audit.
b) Non negligence performance.
c) Absence of casual connection.
Non negligence performance:
1) It is a preferred defense in 3rd party suits.
2) If the auditors conducted the audit in accordance with GAAS, the other defenses are
unnecessary.
Page 7 of 9
Civil liability:
1) To clients to 3rd parties
2) To compensate those on the losses they suffered because of the auditor’s failure in
his audit.
This liability requires 3 conditions:
a) Auditor’s mistakes.
b) Injury to the users.
c) A relationship between auditor’s mistakes and client injury.
c) Criminal liability:
CPA can be found guilty for criminal actions such as the destruction and alteration of
documents related to its audit.
d) Constitutional liability :
The auditor is responsible to the accounting association as a member of that association for
any illegal actions in the profession to be punished professionally.
6) RULE: Audit risk model:
PDR= AAR / IR * CR
After that you should make the result time hundred and make it as a %.
Chapter 7
1) Define evidence:
Any information used by the auditor to determine whether the information being
audited is stated in accordance with the established criteria evidence.
Evidence is not unique to auditors but it is also used by others such as scientist ,
lawyers and historians.
Page 8 of 9
*On evidence accumulation can be broken down into the following 4 sub
decisions:
1) Which audit procedures to use?
2) What sample size to select for a given procedure.
3) Which items to select from population?
4) When to perform the procedures.
1) Obtain the cash disbursements journal and compare the payee name, amount,
and date on the cancelled check with the cash disbursements journal.
2) Audit procedures are listed in an audit program which includes sample size,
items to select and the timing of the tests.
4) What are the conditions of audit evidence to support the opinion issued?
Competence of evidence:
Means the degree to which evidence can be considered believable or worthy of trust
reliability of evidence.
1) Relevance.
2) Independence of provider.
3) Effectiveness of client’s internal controls.
4) Auditor’s direct knowledge.
5) Qualifications of individuals providing the information.
6) Degree of objectivity.
7) Timelines.
Page 9 of 9
Sufficiency of evidence:
Means the quantity of evidence obtained. It is measured by the sample size selected
by the auditor to factors determine the appropriate sample size.