Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
‘PAKISTAN'SECONOMY:
CHALLENGES & SOLUTIONS’
Outline Of The Presentation
Why Economy Matters?
A strong economy would ensure strong defense and not the other
way round
EXAMPLE FROM SOVIET UNION
PERIOD REAL GDP GROWTH DEFENSE SPENDING
AS % OF GDP
1928-39 4.2 2.0*
1940-49 3.2 -
After a long battle India released a much smaller amount than the
legitimate share of Pakistan
The share of agriculture in GDP was 60% in 1947. Today,
it contributes 22% and 78% contribution comes from
industry and services
Production of wheat was 4.0 million tons in 1947. Today
we are producing over 23-24 million tons - almost 6
times more
Production of cotton was approximately 1.0 million bales
in 1947. Today we are producing close to 13.0 -14.0
million bales
Production of sugarcane was 10 million tons in 1947.
Today we are producing over 55-60 million tons
• Out of 14,569 industrial establishments in British India in 1947,
only 1406 units (less than 10%) were located in the areas that
comprised Pakistan.
10.00%
9.00%
GDP
8.00%
7.00%
6.00%
5.00%
4.00%
3.00%
2.00%
1.00%
0.00%
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS (POST-2008)
- Food & Fuel Crisis (Common Challenges faced by every
economy)
- Intensification of War on Terror
- Political Instability
- Less than satisfactory security environment
- Energy Crisis
- Economy Remained out of Radar of the Government
- Instability in economic team
- Weak economic team
- Fiscal Indiscipline
- Weak governance
- Break down of public–private sector relations
CONSEQUENTLY
- Economic growth slowed to an average of 3.0% per annum
over the last five years from an average of 7.0 per annum
during the previous five years
- Investment is down to 50 years low at 12.5% of GDP from as
high as 22.5% of GDP only five years ago
- Domestic Saving Rate at 5.8% of GDP is the lowest in the
country’s history from an average of 15% of GDP during the
previous five years
- Large – scale manufacturing growth averaged 0.7% per
annum over the last five years from an average of 12.4% per
annum during the previous five years
Real GDP Growth (percent)
Years China India Sri Lanka Bangladesh Pakistan
2006 12.7 12.7% 9.5 9.5% 7.7 6.9% 6.5 6.4% 5.8 7.2%
8 7.7
7.5
6.8
7 6.6
6 5.8
5.6
5.1
4.7
5
4.4
4.2
3.9 3.7
4 3.7
3.5
3.1 3.1
2.3 3.0
3
1.7
1.8
2 1.7
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
1990-91
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-96
1996-97
1997-98
1998-99
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
Source: Various Issues of Economic Survey
INVESTMENT PICKED UP DURING 2000-07 BUT
REACHED TO A 50 YEARS LOW LAST YEAR
25
24
23 22.5
22.1
22 21.1
21 20.7
20.1
20 19.4 19.1
19.0 18.8
19 18.4 18.2
18 17.7 17.4 17.2
17.3
15.6 16.8 16.9 16.6
17
16 15.4
15
14 13.4
13 12.5
12
11
10
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
1990-91
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-96
1996-97
1997-98
1998-99
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
Source: Various Issues of Economic Survey
SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN UNEMPLOYMENT
2000-07 BUT RISING THEREAFTER
Unemployment declined …
8.5 8.3
7.0
6.5 6.2
6
6.0
5.5 5.6
5.5 5.3 5.2
5.0
4.5
4.0
1999-00 2001-02 2003-04 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Inflation (%)
22 20.8
20
18
16
13.9
14
12 11.7
12 11
10 9.3
7.9 7.8
8
6 4.4 4.6
3.6 3.5
4 3.1
2
0
OVERALL FISCAL DEFICIT (% OF GDP)
CONTINUED TO REMAIN MANAGEABLE DURING
2000-07 BUT SURGED TO A NEW HEIGHT LAST
YEAR
2012-13*
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
1990-91
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-96
1996-97
1997-98
1998-99
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
Date
0.0
0.0
(1.0)
(2.0)
(2.4)
(3.0)
(3.3)
(4.0) (3.7)
(4.3) (4.3) (4.2) (4.3)
(5.0)
(5.2)
(5.4)
(6.0) (5.6)
(5.9)
(6.1)
(6.3)
(7.0) (6.5) (6.4) (6.6)
(7.4)
(8.0) (7.7) (7.4)
(8.0)
(9.0) (8.5)
(8.7) (8.8)
(10.0)
3.8
4.0
2.0 1.4
0.1 0.2
0.0
-0.7
(2.0) -1.6 -1.6 -1.3
-2.0
-2.4
(4.0)
-4.1 -4.4
-4.8 -5.0
(6.0)
-5.7
-6.2
(8.0) -7.2
-8.3
(10.0)
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
1990-91
1995-96
1996-97
1998-99
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
Source: SBP
708 2011-12
1979 2010-11
DURING 2004-05 ONWARD BUT COLLAPSED IN THE
2086 2009-10
FOREIGN INVESTMENT (US $ MILLION) SURGED
2665 2008-09
5475 2007-08
8428 2006-07
3875 2005-06
1677 2004-05
922 2003-04
820 2002-03
475 2001-02
182 2000-01
543 1999-00
403 1998-99
823 1997-98
950 1996-97
Foreign Investment
1307 1995-96
LAST FIVE YEARS
1532 1994-95
643 1993-94
443 1992-93
554 1991-92
Source: SBP
237 1990-91
8500
8000
7500
7000
6500
6000
5500
5000
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
REMITTANCES ($ MILLION) CONTINUED TO RISE
16,000
13921
14,000
13186
12,000 11701
10,000
8906
7811
8,000
6450
6,000 5493
4600
4237 4169
3872
4,000 2389
1087
2,000
1060 984
0
1998-99
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
TRENDS IN EXTERNAL DEBT AND LIABILITIES
We added $2.6 billion in in 7 years (2000-07) but added $24 billion in 6 years (2007-12)
Source: Ministry of Finance
Why Have we Landed in Such a Difficult Situation?
Economy Never Received Due Attention by the Outgoing Government
Political Instability continued since March 2007
Intensification of War on Terror
Deteriorating Security Environment
Frequent Changes in Economic Team
Absence of Key Ministers for six months
Weak Economic Team
Food & Fuel Price Shocks
Fiscal Indiscipline
- New NFC Award
- Reckless Spending
Bleeding PSEs Consuming over Rs. 300 billion annually
Energy Mismanagement Resulting in “Crisis”
Weak Governance
Weakening of Key Economic Institutions
- Ministry of Finance
- State Bank of Pakistan
- Planning Commission
No Interaction of Government with Private Sector
Deliberate or Incompetence?
New Government has inherited
- A slowing economy
- Investment plummeting to the lowest rising unemployment and
poverty
- Large fiscal deficit
- Unsustainable Debt
- Foreign investment drying up
- Foreign Exchange reserves declining rapidly to a dangerously low
level
- Looming debt crisis
- Bleeding PSEs
- Persisting energy crisis
- Crumbling infrastructure
- A nervous private sector
- Dwindling state authority
• Debt Repayment Crisis forced the government to seek a new
IMF Program.
1947-48 0.0 -
1949-50 0.0 -
1959-60 145.0 -
1969-70 2959.0 -
1979-80 9458.0 155.4
1989-90 19207 801.2
1999-2000 37860 3018
2006-07 40500 4814
2009-10 57600 8911
2012 (Dec.) 61000 13904
Source: State Bank of Pakistan and Debt Office, Ministry of Finance
CHANGES IN DEBT PROFILE
Period External Debt & Public Debt (Billion) Rs)
Liabilities (million $)
1948-60 145 -
1960-70 2814 -
•
Undertake wide-ranging structural reforms
- Taxation side
- Expenditure side
- Accelerating Privatization
- Power Sector Reform
- Circular Debt Issues
- Correcting the Manufacturing defects of the NFC Award
- Strengthening of Infrastructure
- Strong Linkages with Private Sector
- Road show in major capital markets
Challenging Time Ahead but Surmountable
• New government appears to be the continuation of the previous
regime
• Weak Economic Team
• Same old Economic Team
• Why should we Expect Different Result?
• New Government has thus far borrowed from the SBP Rs. 15.3
billion per day as compared with Rs. 1.3 billion per day by the
previous regime
• Implementation of the IMF conditionalities will be extremely
painful for the people
• The new program of the IMF is not likely to be completed
• The general perception is that IMF wishes to keep Pakistani
economy hanging in balance during the US withdrawal out of
Afghanistan
CONCLUDING REMARKS