Introduction

Leadership is the action to lead a person, a group or an organization. There are different styles of

leadership. Organizational leadership is the management approach which works simultaneously

for the betterment of each individual of organization as well as the organization as a whole. While,

the interpersonal leadership is the ability to understand the other individuals and the source for

their motivation and to work with them obligingly. This paper states the relation between the

interpersonal and organizational leadership. This paper also aims at analyzing the effectiveness of

statesmanship model in key organizational communication practices.

Statesmanship and organizational communication best practices

For a person to be successful at present and in future both leadership and communication

are very crucial. Organizational leadership is a type of leadership but by a team or group. The

organization is defined as a group of individuals systematized for some goal or work. On the other

hand the leader of the organization is the person who is accountable for guiding or directing that

group (Bogle, S, 2018). Leadership is an important topic in the field of administration, you need

clear and significant work or tasks, objectives, and technology tools that help any organization's

course, this is to incorporate interpersonal and organizational leadership. Contracting for

representatives who can demonstrate the vision of any organization through their work can

sometimes substitute for cooperation with formal leaders. As a result of their communication lead

to some is something other than just interpersonal abilities (Griffith, T., 2013).

Communication strategies and patterns of an organization changes within different

circumstances. For example, on morning of September 11, 2001, two planes were hijacked by

terrorists and were crashed in New York City. This was the time where communication and

cooperation practices should have been more efficient than before. This event, though tragic,
helped to learn that the key to survive in a disaster is constant network connectivity without

suffering any failure. The hierarchical models of communication fail in disasters because if the top

node of such model is fail the rest of the networks is isolated (kapucu, N., 2018). Different

organizations have different communication patterns like in a specific case the child-welfare

employees are obliged to communicate through their organization for the required changes. Most

occupations have this sort of leadership when communicating. With child- welfare usage

achievement generously relies upon caseworkers’ inspiration and apparent satisfactoriness of

innovation (Cao, Y., Bunger, C., Hoffman, J., Robertson, H., 2016).

Statesmen's Organizational leadership

The leaders inside the organization assist things with running smoother during and process

or circumstances. The two main types of communication in an organization are bottom-up and top-

down communication. In top-down communication leaders choose to pass information to their

overseers, and it is advised to workers the desire or change that is going to occur in the

organization. A genuine case of that would be at employment in police department where the Chief

of Police will conclude that their needs should be changes inside this department so the information

will be told by the help of Chief of Police, which, thus, will make it down to the officials.

Programmatic policies envisioned to achieve stakeholder acquiescence or to rouse positive beliefs

about the intended change. There are different occasions when the Field Operations Bureau Chief

will spread a review to the whole police department to get out contribution on the changes that

Chief is considering about need to recognize what we think before doing so (Andersen & Jakobsen,

2016). Participatory change is acceptable in light of the fact that communication features the

inclusion of most or every one of the employees’ perspectives and points of view in the execution
procedure. There is one essential distinction between the two is the degree of stakeholder joint

effort, incorporating cutting edge representatives in the organization (Cao, Y et. al., 2016).

At the point when the Chief permits officials to take part in a questionnaire or review it

gives officials a feeling of authority over the effect of the change on their everyday jobs, reduces

worker opposition, and enhances workers’ gratification(Cao, Y et. al., 2016). Though taking part

or an interest is significant it doesn't generally serve for exploring the difficult nature associated

with realizing an carrying a change in an organization amalgamation and fitting various

methodologies are basic in meeting workers' differing needs and tending to different kinds of

vulnerabilities, particularly on the police division when there is an appeal and not every person

will agree. The Assistance Chiefs are entrusted with handling work related vulnerabilities for

which they are more likely to interact straight with frontline representatives, similar to a sergeant

of a corporal in the police division. Some organization heads are basic for mitigating tensions

emerging from key parts of the change exertion. A cascading methodology is energetically

suggested, assistance chief should communicate the key change information at the same time (Cao,

Y et. al., 2016). Police sergeants or direct administrators should connect with workers by

communicating job or job related change information this is a genuine case of organizational leader

of statesmen (Norfolk.gov, 2019).

Relationship between Organizational Leadership and Interpersonal Leadership

A best interpersonal leader can be a best leader only if he knows his limits, staff, stuff, and is aware

or what's coming. Research indicates that these regular characteristics make for an effective

manager and will enable the manager to become a great leader in extreme occasions (ICMA, 2017).

The majority of these characteristics are clear as crystal and are simple to accomplish, only by

being in an administration position. Realizing thyself is having a decent understanding and

consciousness of your soft abilities. Soft skills or also known as interpersonal leadership abilities

are a significant expertise for an administrator to have in his career. These abilities incorporate

however are not constrained to listening, negotiation, compassion, understanding, and

compromise, tolerance of changes and vulnerability as well as sympathy. Leadership comes in

various styles, and with the present stimulating environment with concurrent requests for control

and discharge, delicacy and force, the public administration professional must observe the

significance of what sound judgment is (ICMA, 2017).

Further, Organizational leadership is more on a bigger scale when contrasted with

interpersonal leadership. For public sector associations to keep turnover expectations low and

inspiration for efficient performances high leaders in associations must keep the public

representatives' inspiration high but also enhance devotees' inspiration to perform outside what is

written in the work contract (Ritz, A., Giauque, D., Varone, F., Anderfuhren-Biget, S., 2014). That

is the hardest job of leadership in an association as opposed to having an interpersonal leadership

with your workers. Workers feel like they can trust in their director and comprehend why that

choice was made as opposed to feeling like it's what's best for the organization.

Being a transformational administrator or leader is a decent instrument to be successful at

both interpersonal leadership and organizational leadership. Transformational administration is as

a leadership idea created by the political specialist Burns is described as a leadership practice that

stimulates followers to accomplish outstanding results by changing their attitudes and qualities

through providing both importance and understanding and through the arrangement of

authoritative strategic objective (Asencio, Mujkic, 2016). Four elements describe a

transformational leadership that can be utilized as both interpersonal leadership and organizational

leadership which are the admired impact, inspirational motivation, scholarly incitement, and
individualized consideration. Research has indicated that those four leadership practices impact

the adherents' appraisal of their workplace just as the actuation of intrinsic qualities (Ritz et. al.,

2014). Additionally being an entirely adaptable leader and powerful is dependent upon the

cooperation between a leader’s conduct and the circumstance itself makes an extraordinary leader

(Cherry, K., 2017).

Synthesis of Statesmanship, Leadership (Personal & Organizational) and Communication

Together administration and communication all go side by side. You can't have one without the

other. Leaders or administrators are not born, however, as expressed in lesson about leadership,

with appropriate training and empowering any individual can become a leader. Statesmanship has

been given to us from old to current times, however, it has an unfathomable relationship with the

forefront state (Denhardt, et. al., 2013). It is characterized as ethically great leadership at the

political level. Students of history, writers, and others for the most part credit it ex-post to

incredible political figures who have driven their detail through occasions of war and emergency

men like Lincoln, Churchill, or De Gaulle and, progressively, ladies like Thatcher or San Suu Kyi,

as well. By “state” meaning of a sort of legislator, namely, the classically contemporary regime

the national level, progressing through entwined forms of constitutionalizing, democratization, and

bureaucratization (Overeem, P., Bakker, F., 2016).

A great example of statesman, leader and communicator is the late Nelson Mandela (1918-2013).

He was born in a little town of Mvezo and his original name was Rolihlahla Mandela. He was a

social rights lobbyist, government official, and altruist who turned into the absolute first South

Africa's dark president. He turned into a statesman and extraordinary communicator for his
endeavors to destroy the nation's apart held framework for which he got the Novel Peace Prize.

His leadership said a lot, so much that he motivated the social rights activists around the world.

Mandela was viewed as a father figure, elder statesman and worldwide representative, when he

talked or showed up, he was the guarantee, practically like a protection policy, that South Africa's

young democracy and its administrators will persue the country's wellbeing (Karimi, F., 2013).

Since he was descent and good at communicating individuals cherished tuning in to him and

following what he believed. He was detained and later discharged on account of what he had faith

in. He stayed in jail on Robben Island for a long time before being moved to Pollsmoor Prison in

the territory in 1982 and later discharged in 1990 (BBC News, 2013). Nelson Mandela's message

of compromise, not retaliation, inspired the world after he negotiated a peaceful end to isolation

and encouraged pardoning for the white government that detained him. He is a saint to blacks and

whites and a great example of a statesman, leader as well as communicator. President Obama

stated, “we have lost one of the most powerful, gutsy and significantly great individual that any of

us will impart time to on this Earth and will never again have a place with us, yet has a place with

the ages (Karimi, F., 2013).

Conclusion

statesman, administration, communication, administration can be interwoven and used together. It

has been assessed why good communication matters to organizations. Communication can break

because of any obstruction that might be ascribed to the sender or recipient. Consequently,

powerful communication requires recognition with the boundaries. Picking the correct channel for

communication is also significant in light of the fact that picking an inappropriate medium

undermines the message. When communication happens in the multifaceted setting, additional

attention is required, given that various societies have various standards with respect to nonverbal
communication, and various words will be deciphered distinctively across societies.

Communication is the key to be a successful leader.

There are formal and informal channels that are utilized to communicate in an organization.

Formal is characterized as an official methods for communication while informal channels are

interpersonal, unofficial, and frequently, the most significant. Informal communication is the

communication among the individuals of an organization not founded on a conventional

relationship in the organizational structure however dependent on informal relations and

comprehension. (Sharma, P., 2019).

Andersen, S., & Jakobsen, M. (2016). Policy Positions of Bureaucrats at the Front Lines: Are They

Susceptible to Strategic Communication?. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 57-66. doi:

10.1111/puar.12584

Asencio, H., & Mujkic, E. (2016). Leadership behaviors and trust in leaders: Evidence from the

US federal government. Public Administration Quarterly, 156-179.

Cao, Y., Bunger, A. C., Hoffman, J., & Robertson, H. A. (2016). Change communication strategies

in public child welfare organizations: engaging the front line. Human Service Organizations:

Management, Leadership & Governance, 40(1), 37-50.

Cherry, K., (217). What is the contingency theory of leadership? Retrieved from
https://www.explorepsychology.com/contingency-theory-leadership/
Denhardt, R. B., Denhardt, J. V., & Blanc, T. A. (2013). Public administration: An action

orientation. Cengage Learning.

Kapucu, N. (2006). Interagency communication networks during emergencies: Boundary spanners

in multiagency coordination. The American Review of Public Administration, 36(2), 207-225.
Ritz, A., Giauque, D., Varone, F., & Anderfuhren-Biget, S. (2014). From leadership to citizenship
behavior in public organizations: When values matter. Review of Public Personnel
Administration, 34(2), 128-152.
Overeem, P., & Bakker, F. E. (2019). Statesmanship beyond the modern state. Perspectives on
Political Science, 48(1), 46-55.
Sharma, P., (2019). Informal communication: Meaning, purpose and importance. Retrieved from
www.yourarticlelibrary.com/business-communication/informal-communication/informal-
communication-meaning-purpose-and-importance/70204